On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005, Alon Altman wrote about "Re: Assembly-related
discussions":
shows that almost all of the people are not interested in these issues. Only
25 addresses are subscribed to the meta list, even though it was announced
Alon, if anything, this proves that the meta list is NOT the place for
discussions about assembly issues.
The last assembly proved that if we don't reach a concensus before an
assembly, we won't reach it DURING the assembly. So discussion among all
voting members is very important. This is why I believed assembly@ IS the
right mailing list to discuss assembly things is not. But discussions@
is also ok - better than the "ghost town" you call [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We need concensus between the people who actually intend to be present at
the assembly. These people (less than 15% of the subscribers of discussions)
should subscribe to meta. There is no reason to spam members in a way they
cannot unsubscribe, or to spam 200 people that will get irritated, and
simply not renew their membership.
I think that most of the people who will arrive to the assembly are
registered to meta.
Alon
--
This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
GPG public key at http://8ln.org/pubkey.txt
Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627 DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-=[ Random Fortune ]=-
Type louder, please.
