On Wed, Nov 30, 2005, Orna Agmon wrote about "Re: Assembly-related discussions": > Any discussion about Hamakor itself is meta, but it does not mean it is > not important to some people.
Apparently, your (and Alon's) interpretation of what "meta" means continues to drift. From being a list "to discuss how to discuss" it turned to a list "to discuss anything about Hamakor as an Amuta". This last meaning, was *exactly* the original meaning of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Originally, discussions of Linux-specific stuff, Free-software questions, and so on, went to other non-hamakor-run lists and forums (linux-il, whatsup, and so on), and discussions@ was specifically for Amuta-specific discussion. I understand that as the Amuta grew people started moving their free-software discussions also to discussions@, but I didn't notice the point where Amuta discussions were no longer welcome on [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nadav Har'El | Wednesday, Nov 30 2005, 28 Heshvan 5766 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |We could wipe out world hunger if we knew http://nadav.harel.org.il |how to make AOL's Free CD's edible!
