On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Sean Corfield <[email protected]>wrote:
> I don't know whether he attended any sessions - as an > attendee, he was clearly welcome and entitled to do so. There was no > "fight" involved. > It's getting reeeeal thick in here at this point. You either have selective amnesia or you weren't on the same call I was on about that issue. There was a very heated discussion about this. I hate airing the laundry of another organization this way, but I can't let this pass without comment because it's simply not true. Ancient history, dead horses, and all that. Moving on ... > > As I've said several times to several people, I really do hope that we > see some CFML on GAE talks at conferences. I think it's a very > interesting subject and I know a lot of CFers are interesting in the > cloud in general and GAE in particular. > Great! So if OpenBD on GAE is a worthy topic (while you're right about *who* pulled the topic submission your spin on the *why* is rather interesting ...), and you really do hope we see it at a conference, we certainly have people willing and able to speak on that topic at cf.Objective(). Yea or nay? I suspect we're free to submit the topic, but I'd be stunned if it gets accepted. -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://mpwoodward.posterous.com identi.ca/Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!
