Anthony,

I don't think the analysis is that faulty, but whatever.
In Chicago, public transit works for 100,000-200,000 people
who work in the city center (2 square miles) and travel in and out daily.
Suburbanites fill heavy rail trains for a 20+ minute ride into the city.

The rest of the system is sad & expensive.  A last resort for those
without autos.
Short trips with stops every 1/2 mile trying to attract customers.
Travel speeds are low and travel times long, and safety is a concern,
especially when waiting at transfer points in off hours.

It doesn't work for a reason.  The folks from the Federal Reserve are
just trying to point out the absurdity of it all.

Regards,  Bob S.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob,
>
> That quoted argument is so faulty in its conclusion as to be laughable.  The
> 7,700 "poor riders" (lack of a car being the factor defining the riders'
> impoverishment)do not necessarily number the entire ridership of the light
> rail, yet 7,700 is the number of extra vehicles that the author suggests
> would hit the road if the light rail service ceased.  That is clearly wrong.
> And what of the car owners who choose not to commute by car, because of
> either the running costs or a lack of desire to drive in peak traffic, among
> many reasons?  Shouldn't they be subsidised for their extra costs, and that
> figure added to the equation?  If not , why not?
>
> IOW the St Louis Federal Reserve is attempting to promote a point of view by
> the use of deception.  It's rubbish.
>
> Regards, Anthony
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Bob Sullivan
>> Sent: Friday, 5 December 2008 6:04 AM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: PESO: Union Station Grand Hall
>>
>> Scott,
>> Good article from the Federal Reserve of St.Louis.
>> I especially like the part that says,
>> "Based solely on dollar costs, the annual light-
>> rail subsidies could instead be used to buy an
>> environmentally friendly hybrid Toyota Prius
>> every five years for each poor rider and even
>> to pay annual maintenance costs of $6,000.
>> Increases in polution would be minimal with the
>> hybrid vehicle, and 7,700 new vehicles on the
>> roadway would result in only 0.5 percent increase
>> in traffic congestion. And there would still be funds
>> left over - about $49 million per year.  These funds
>> could be given to all other MetroLink riders
>> (amounting to roughly $1,045 per person per year)
>> and be used for cab fare, bus fare, etc."
>>
>> PJ, it's the public's choice NOT to support mass transit.
>> Always has been.  Taxes never killed it, cars and suburbia did.
>>
>> Regards, Bob S.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> > On 12/4/08, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Oh well, I guess a couple of A's and a B+ ourtank my Masters Thesis in
>> >>  urban transportation planning, and work experience in Cost and
>> >>  Economic Analysis for the railroad plus 24 years at Mickey D's doing
>> >>  Real Estate Market planning.  Oh well...   Regards,  Bob S.
>> >
>> > This is an interesting read.
>> >
> <http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional/04/07/light_rail.pdf>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Scott Loveless
>> > New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, USA
>> > http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
>> >
>> > --
>> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> > PDML@pdml.net
>> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow
>> the directions.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow
>> the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to