On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:30:25PM -0400, Drew Northup wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > 3. I am assuming that "ownership" is under the GPL or equivalent, as > > > Plex86 is *NOT* a for-profit venture (unlike VMWare). > > > > It's under the LGPL. I don't care about plex86 being for profit, as > > long as the code is under the (L)GPL. > > > > Well I don't think that it needs to be for profit. But that isn't a big > issue here.
I'm just saying that being for profit doesn't have to be a problem, as long as it is free sfotware. > > > 4. Any innovative algorithms would be presented, along with implementations. > > > > Those are not allowed to get patented. We need a clear written > > statement about that. > > Good point. Copyright is good enough for most things anyhow. Patenting > will only drive plex86 out of the USA entirely. I don't think patents will be a problem for plex86, but we already discussed that. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
