Re: serving javascript instead of html
SoCalCakeBaker wrote: > Hi Rodrego, > > It doesn't look like you called render() in your controller action... > Thanks SoCalCakeBaker, a simple $this->render() at the end of the action seems to have solved the problem! I'll try some more tests, but I think that solved it... Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: serving javascript instead of html
Hi Rodrego, It doesn't look like you called render() in your controller action... B. On Oct 17, 1:05 pm, "Rodrigo Tassinari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right Chris, here's my code, hope you guys spot something I'm > doing wrong. > > This is the regular PHP file, which works fine: > > links.php > header("Content-type: application/x-javascript" ); > echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; > echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; > echo "document.write(\" href='http://br-linux.org/linux/usando-o-google-adsense-para-gerar-recursos...>Usando > o Google Adsense para gerar recursos para o seu projeto livre | > BR-Linux.org\");\n"; > echo "document.write(\"Mais em href='http://links.pittlandia.net'>links\");\n"; > echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; > echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; > ?> > > These are the files I use in my cake app, which is not working: > > badge.thtml (layout) > header("Content-type: text/javascript"); > echo $content_for_layout; > ?> > > recent.thtml (view) > echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; > echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; > foreach ($links as $link): > echo "document.write(\" title='".utf8_decode($link['Link']['description'])."' > href='".$link['Link']['url']."'>".utf8_decode($link['Link']['title'])."\");\n"; > endforeach; > echo "document.write(\"Mais em title='".$siteConfig['nome_sistema']."' > href='".$siteConfig['link_sistema']."'>".$siteConfig['nome_sistema']."\");\n"; > echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; > echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; > ?> > > links_controller.php (controller, only showing the recent action) > function recent($quant = 5) > { > $this->layout = 'badge'; > if (!empty($this->params['url']['q'])) > { > $quant = $this->params['url']['q']; > } > $links = $this->Link->getLinks($quant); > $this->set('links', $links); > > }And finally, this is the page that tests the inclusion of the outputed > code in both methods: > > links.html > > > Teste de Links via Javascritp > > > Testando... > http://links.pittlandia.net/links/recent?q=5"; > type="text/javascript"> > Testando de novo... > http://www.pittlandia.net/links.php"; > type="text/javascript"> > Acabou o teste > > > > You can try out for yourself by going to:http://www.pittlandia.net/links.html > > Thanks in advance, > Rodrigo. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is Model::findCount supposed to work?!?!?!?!
Well - sounds like the CakePHP team has this under control. :) Where in the 1.2 branch can I see how you guys did this? B. On Oct 17, 12:10 pm, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You *can* do pagination (almost) completely in the model, but when you > see how it is implemented in 1.2, you'll realize why that's an > astoundingly bad idea. Also, "decorating" data is a task reserved for > the View, and putting View logic in the Model violates the most basic > principles of MVC and is generally considered to be Pure Evil. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Pagination not advancing results
You are probably not passing the var $page to your find list($order,$limit,$page) = $this->Pagination->init(); $this->data = $this->Course->findAll(null, null, $order, $limit, $page); HTH, AD7six --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Pagination not advancing results
I mean that the same five (or 20, 30, etc.) results are displayed whether you are on page one or page 101. So this is page 2: -- id vcourse_prefix course_title 1 CLA Classical Mythology 2 AST Descriptive Astronomy 3 ECN The World Economy 4 ECN London's Financial Markets 5 ANT Cultures of the Iberian Peninsula 1 | *2* | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ... | 140 --- and this is page 6: -- id vcourse_prefix course_title 1 CLA Classical Mythology 2 AST Descriptive Astronomy 3 ECN The World Economy 4 ECN London's Financial Markets 5 ANT Cultures of the Iberian Peninsula 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | *6* | 7 | 8 | ... | 140 --- If you sort on another column, the results change, but then that new set appears no matter what page you go to in the pagination links. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: serving javascript instead of html
You're right Chris, here's my code, hope you guys spot something I'm doing wrong. This is the regular PHP file, which works fine: links.php \");\n"; echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; echo "document.write(\"Usando o Google Adsense para gerar recursos para o seu projeto livre | BR-Linux.org\");\n"; echo "document.write(\"Mais em links\");\n"; echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; ?> These are the files I use in my cake app, which is not working: badge.thtml (layout) recent.thtml (view) \");\n"; echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; foreach ($links as $link): echo "document.write(\"".utf8_decode($link['Link']['title'])."\");\n"; endforeach; echo "document.write(\"Mais em ".$siteConfig['nome_sistema']."\");\n"; echo " document.write(\"\");\n"; echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; ?> links_controller.php (controller, only showing the recent action) function recent($quant = 5) { $this->layout = 'badge'; if (!empty($this->params['url']['q'])) { $quant = $this->params['url']['q']; } $links = $this->Link->getLinks($quant); $this->set('links', $links); } And finally, this is the page that tests the inclusion of the outputed code in both methods: links.html Teste de Links via Javascritp Testando... http://links.pittlandia.net/links/recent?q=5"; type="text/javascript"> Testando de novo... http://www.pittlandia.net/links.php"; type="text/javascript"> Acabou o teste You can try out for yourself by going to: http://www.pittlandia.net/links.html Thanks in advance, Rodrigo. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
drag id in dropRemote
I have a div with id="albumCover". I'm using $ajax->dropRemote() to turn it into a drop zone that calls a Controller method. It only responds when an image with the class="draggers" is dropped on it. I've got that part down just fine. My problem is that the method it is calling needs to know some information about the draggable image that is dropped on it. How can I pass that information on the the controller method? I'm using the class of the draggable images instead of individual id's because the images are generated dynamically and I don't know what the id's will be ahead of time. Specifically, I need to send along the dragged image's new x and y coordinates. I've been using top and left so far. Any assistance is greatly appreciated! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: serving javascript instead of html
On 10/17/06, Rodrigo Tassinari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tested both suggestions: using the ajax layout ($this->layout = > 'ajax' ) and changing the the header to header("Content-type: > text/javascript");. Both did not work. :( > > I know this is happening because of something to do with CakePHP, > because it works if I just use a regular php file to output the > javascript, and the code that outputs the javascript is identical in > both the regular file and in my action/view with cakephp... > Well, I've been able to output content NOT as HTML, so I'd be looking at my code before I blame CakePHP for the problem. I think showing the list your code will solve this problem quickly. -- Chris Hartjes "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." -- Rasmus Lerdorf @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: serving javascript instead of html
I tested both suggestions: using the ajax layout ($this->layout = 'ajax' ) and changing the the header to header("Content-type: text/javascript");. Both did not work. :( I know this is happening because of something to do with CakePHP, because it works if I just use a regular php file to output the javascript, and the code that outputs the javascript is identical in both the regular file and in my action/view with cakephp... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Re: Re: making controller methods private?
yea try it On 10/17/06, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/17/06, Samuel DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > no but it does make it private 'like' in cakephp in that it can not be > > called with the /controller/method from the browser. > > Hey Sam, > > Is this actually a feature in CakePHP that it won't let object methods > that start with an underscore be accessed directly? If so, that's a > neat bit of coding! > > -- > Chris Hartjes > > "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." > -- Rasmus Lerdorf > > @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark > @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard > > > > -- == S. DeVore (the old fart) the advice is free, the lack of crankiness will cost you --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Accessing variable in child class from app_controller's beforeFilter
Great! Thanks for your help. I'll continue to consider ACL. But since I want (non-techy) end-users to be able to manage permissions for those in their hierarchy, I don't want them to be confused with having to grant access to particlar controllers or function names (actions), etc. So in this system, I'm categorizing my controllers, and using some default actions (view,index,add,edit,delete), and mapping all other actions (the exceptions) to one of the defaults - to make it easy for the end user, and the programmer, to manage permissions. If ACL can do this well, I'm certainly open to it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Re: making controller methods private?
On 10/17/06, Samuel DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > no but it does make it private 'like' in cakephp in that it can not be > called with the /controller/method from the browser. Hey Sam, Is this actually a feature in CakePHP that it won't let object methods that start with an underscore be accessed directly? If so, that's a neat bit of coding! -- Chris Hartjes "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." -- Rasmus Lerdorf @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Re: making controller methods private?
no but it does make it private 'like' in cakephp in that it can not be called with the /controller/method from the browser. On 10/17/06, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just preceed the function name with a underscore. > > > > /me counts to five before replying to avoid getting labeled as angry or > uncaring > > Please note, the following rant is based on PHP, not Cake > > Adding an underscore to a function name DOES NOT MAKE A FUNCTION > PRIVATE. That is a commonly-used convention in PHP though, to make it > easier to figure out with functions SHOULD be private if your language > does not support making private methods of an object. > > Ahem. > > In PHP 5 you can declare a function private so that code that uses > your object cannot access that function directly. I take it from > Nate's comments that it has been done already for Cake 1.2. > > (There, that wasn't so bad...or angry) > > -- > Chris Hartjes > > "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." > -- Rasmus Lerdorf > > @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark > @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard > > > > -- == S. DeVore (the old fart) the advice is free, the lack of crankiness will cost you --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to distinguish empty recordset from error in findAll()
We're trying to get a dev version out in the next couple weeks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is Model::findCount supposed to work?!?!?!?!
You *can* do pagination (almost) completely in the model, but when you see how it is implemented in 1.2, you'll realize why that's an astoundingly bad idea. Also, "decorating" data is a task reserved for the View, and putting View logic in the Model violates the most basic principles of MVC and is generally considered to be Pure Evil. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: making controller methods private?
On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just preceed the function name with a underscore. > /me counts to five before replying to avoid getting labeled as angry or uncaring Please note, the following rant is based on PHP, not Cake Adding an underscore to a function name DOES NOT MAKE A FUNCTION PRIVATE. That is a commonly-used convention in PHP though, to make it easier to figure out with functions SHOULD be private if your language does not support making private methods of an object. Ahem. In PHP 5 you can declare a function private so that code that uses your object cannot access that function directly. I take it from Nate's comments that it has been done already for Cake 1.2. (There, that wasn't so bad...or angry) -- Chris Hartjes "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." -- Rasmus Lerdorf @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: making controller methods private?
The ability to call base class methods directly has already been removed. Just grab the latest Cake version. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1 of 3 input fields have to be filled - validate
hey again Felix, hard to say what it could be without seeing the code, but have you remembered to include your loadValidation() in your model? and to call it prior to validation? this could be the problem. also, looking at your code above, unless you had global variables turned on, i don't know how the function enterAddress will know what email1, email2 and email3 are. you need to pass any variables via your validation array for them to be available in your validation methods. HTH freedom On 18/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But now I get the error: "Warning: Delimiter must not be alphanumeric > or backslash in app/app_model.php on line 82". > In other topics I've read that maybe the function for the validation is > not recognized. But in my example there is no chance of spelling it > wrong (the example from my the post before). > > Does anyone have an idea what the problem could be? > > Thanks > > Felix > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: CakePHP.org and IE 7
Clearly the ideal solution would be to forgo the use of Internet Explorer altogether... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: serving javascript instead of html
It might be because your header is wrong. header("Content-type: application/x-javascript" ); should be header("Content-type: text/javascript"); to match the type of the requested content. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: serving javascript instead of html
On 10/17/06, Rodrigo Tassinari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I need to serve Javascript as the output of one action, instead of > regurlar HTML. The purpose is that i want to be able to call this > action from other pages outsite cake (in another domain) like so: > > http://mysite/controller/action"; > type="text/javascript"> > Hi Rodrigo, I think you may be able to do this by telling your controller that you wish to output things as Ajax instead of HTML. I do this in my Ajax-based controllers with the following line: $this->layout = 'ajax' I suppose you may be able to do different stuff like $this->layout = 'text' but I have not done anything like that. Hope that helps. -- Chris Hartjes "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." -- Rasmus Lerdorf @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
serving javascript instead of html
Hello all, I need to serve Javascript as the output of one action, instead of regurlar HTML. The purpose is that i want to be able to call this action from other pages outsite cake (in another domain) like so: http://mysite/controller/action"; type="text/javascript"> So the output of my action (a bunch of document.write()'s with HTML) is rendered in the page that called it. I can do this with a regular PHP file by sending a javascript header and then echo'ing the javascript, like: \");\n"; ... echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; ?> So, to use this strategy in Cake I created a new layout with: And set the action to use this layout via $this->layout. Then the view does all the echo'ing of the javascript. But this is not working. If I browse to http://mysite/controller/action, the output I see is exactly the same as if I browse to the regular PHP file in http://mysite/file.php. However, trying to include the code in another page with
Re: Accessing variable in child class from app_controller's beforeFilter
The only time an app controller instance is ever created is when you have an error ;). But is that really relavent, from yoru first message: you have code in your app controller referring to accessExceptions The error message doesn't refer to your users controller your pages controller (the on in the error message) doesn't have this variable If you want to follow that logic define an empty accessExceptions var in your app controller and override it in each controller as appropriate. However as I'm here, I would use the cake db-acl system and make use of the demo related to this blog: http://www.noswad.me.uk/MiBlog/ACLPart2 hth, AD7six --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Accessing variable in child class from app_controller's beforeFilter
Absolutely. But when does Cake ever create an Animal alone? Doesn't it always create a Dog, which is an animal? Or in Cake terms: When do we ever have just an App? Won't it always be a user? Does Cake ever create an AppController by itself? Isn't it instead creating a UserController which extends AppController? When I'm in the AppController::beforeFilter(), having accessed the function via /users/add, isn't the object really a User, rather than an App, thereby giving me access to the variables in the UserController? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
serving javascript instead of html
Hello all, I need to serve Javascript as the output of one action, instead of regurlar HTML. The purpose is that i want to be able to call this action from other pages outsite cake (in another domain) like so: http://mysite/controller/action"; type="text/javascript"> So the output of my action (a bunch of document.write()'s with HTML) is rendered in the page that called it. I can do this with a regular PHP file by sending a javascript header and then echo'ing the javascript, like: \");\n"; ... echo "document.write(\"\");\n"; ?> So, to use this strategy in Cake I created a new layout with: And set the action to use this layout via $this->layout. Then the view does all the echo'ing of the javascript. But this is not working. If I browse to http://mysite/controller/action, the output I see is exactly the same as if I browse to the regular PHP file in http://mysite/file.php. However, trying to include the code in another page with
Re: Accessing variable in child class from app_controller's beforeFilter
if the UserController extends AppController then (essentially) when you create an instance of the UserController class it contains all the members of the AppController Class as well as what's defined in UserController. They're created effectively as a single object. So, by putting something in UserController - you're giving it access to AppController's stuff, too.So something in UserController will be able to access AppController - and then it will be able to get stuff from UserController. But you won't be able to put something in AppController which asks for something that UserController owns and then expect an instance of AppController to be able to get it to work. If you have an Animal Class and your Dog Class extends Animal then your dog will have all the functionality of an Animal - but your Animal Class won't necessarily know how to bark!Does that make sense!? On 10/17/06, brandags <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alright. That makes sense.But since the Users controller extends the App controller, if I go to apage like:/users/addShouldn't that be creating a User object rather than an App object? Sothat when the beforeFilter runs, it's running through the User object? For example, if I put the beforeFilter in the userController, itunderstands it. And I can call a function in the App controller whichcan THEN reference variables in the User controller just fine. But itseems that the beforeFilter runs BEFORE the User controller is created, as if the App controller runs on its own before it's run as an"extension" of the Users controller. Am I making sense?When does the beforeFilter run when calling /users/add? And if I have abeforeFilter in both my Users and App controllers, in what order are they run? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
CakeBot on #cakephp
Quick FYI: You can ask her to point you to the pastebin using "~bin" or "~paste". If you want someone else to paste something you can "~tell nickName about bin", or "~tell nickName about paste". Doing this autofills your IRC nick in a form field for the paste. Instead of copying and pasting the URL for the paste in the IRC channel, you can just ask the bot to show someone your last paste by "~show nickName" (which works for saved and non saved posts). -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Accessing variable in child class from app_controller's beforeFilter
Alright. That makes sense. But since the Users controller extends the App controller, if I go to a page like: /users/add Shouldn't that be creating a User object rather than an App object? So that when the beforeFilter runs, it's running through the User object? For example, if I put the beforeFilter in the userController, it understands it. And I can call a function in the App controller which can THEN reference variables in the User controller just fine. But it seems that the beforeFilter runs BEFORE the User controller is created, as if the App controller runs on its own before it's run as an "extension" of the Users controller. Am I making sense? When does the beforeFilter run when calling /users/add? And if I have a beforeFilter in both my Users and App controllers, in what order are they run? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ajax to update form fields?
Well it's what I mean by "ajaxifying" the "select" trough the onChange ... Now just have to choose among solutions :-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Accessing variable in child class from app_controller's beforeFilter
hi. you can´t access the variables of the user controller in your app controller!! app controller is the base class of user controller, so you can access methods and variables of the app controller in your user controller, but the app controller don´t know the user controller!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Accessing variable in child class from app_controller's beforeFilter
I'm setting a few variables in my UserController that I want to access in my AppController (in the beforeFilter). But I'm getting this error: Notice: Undefined property: PagesController::$accessExceptions in C:\websites\klickfile.com\app\app_controller.php on line 67 I get the same error with the $this->category variable as well. In the app_controller's beforeFilter, are the variables in the child class not available yet? How can I access them? (If I can, this will be a really slick way to do user-managed ACL). class UsersController extends AppController { var $uses = array('User'); var $category = 'Users'; // The category this controller belongs to /** * Exceptions for access_rights other that view,index,add,edit,delete. Maps the exceptions to one of the default access_rights */ var $accessExceptions = array( 'dashboard'=>'view', 'login'=>'view', 'email'=>'add', ); } class AppController extends Controller { var $beforeFilter = array('_checkAccess'); var $uses = array('UsergroupRight', 'AccessCategory'); /** * Default actions (bit values) */ var $defaults = array( 'view'=>1, 'index'=>2, 'add'=>4, 'edit'=>8, 'delete'=>16 ); /** * Checks to see whether a usegroup has permission to perform the requested * action on the requested controller. */ function _checkAccess() { // Check for accessExceptions $checkAction = in_array($this->action, $this->defaults) ? $this->action : $this->accessExceptions[$this->action]; $hasAccess = $this->UsergroupRight->find(array('AccessCatetegory.name'=>$this->category, 'UsergroupRight.usergroup_id'=>$this->Session->read('usergroup_id'), 'UsergroupRight.access_rights_value & '.$checkAction.' > 0')); echo 'hasAccess?: '.$hasAccess; exit(); } } --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
Ok. I believe the IonCube tools allow for copyright notices to be left unencoded anyway, I'd have to check the documentation to be sure but I'm sure it mentioned something along those lines. On Oct 17, 3:51 pm, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll ask gwoo to weigh in here, since he's the IP attorney, but I'm > pretty sure the only stipulations with the MIT License are with regard > to the copyright notice. So if you wanted to go to the trouble, you > could remove the copyright from the files, encode them, then add the > copyright back at the top of the file. > > Also, with those auto-documentor tools, I would think they would let > you exclude certain files from being processed. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
I'll ask gwoo to weigh in here, since he's the IP attorney, but I'm pretty sure the only stipulations with the MIT License are with regard to the copyright notice. So if you wanted to go to the trouble, you could remove the copyright from the files, encode them, then add the copyright back at the top of the file. Also, with those auto-documentor tools, I would think they would let you exclude certain files from being processed. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Session and sessionid
So, now i figured out how to handle sessions. And it is extremely simple! For all those, who are also thinking about using sessions, here is what I did: In the core.php in the /app/config folder I've set the following line to tmp, because I want cake to store the data in the tmp folder define('CAKE_SESSION_SAVE', 'tmp'); In my Controller in the index function I save the value in the session: $myID="whatever you want"; $this->Session->write('ID', $myID); So, now you can access this ID on every page just by adding this code to your function in the controller: Here for example the function for the view page: echo $this->Session->read('ID'); And this will print out "whatever you want". Cheers Felix --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
IANAL, but I think that the no encryption/modification restrictions apply to an application that you're either selling or giving away. If you supply your client with an un-modified Cake Core, you've lived up to the license. Anything they do after that is for their own use. There's nothing stopping me or anyone else from making any changes I want to the Cake Core files for my own use. What I am restricted from doing is making changes (i.e., removing the copyright) and *re-distributing* them. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
You're telling me... I've been pushing the need since I started here to finish up a couple of other projects that are nearly ready to go online... trouble is this client takes up so much of our time, with us being only a small team, that we don't really get chance to tackle anything else. I'll be glad when we've polished this one off to be honest but our timescale at the minute suggests we'll be dealing with them until at least next May and probably beyond. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
On 10/17/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust > > them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be > > ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame us for even when > > it's their fault. [...] > > Why not checksum the files when you upload them and politely refuse to > support changed files? Of course, they need to agree to the limited > support terms when you work for them. If they dispute it, a diff should > show the changes done after it left you. I really like this idea, given that you can't just dump the client. They sound like a bunch of a$$hole$ anyway. No amount of money is worth a bad client. -- Chris Hartjes "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." -- Rasmus Lerdorf @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
Sadly, not my decision to make... although that checksum idea might not be a bad one for future reference, I'll put that forward to the directors. I don't think we'll be dumping them though, they really are our main client at the moment and their business is worth a huge amount. Plus they'd probably sue us if we did dump them, given the system is half-developed. This doesn't mean we can't use Cake for future projects where encoding is unnecessary :) I reckon this client might have issues with the use of code that we haven't developed in house in any case - they're a real nightmare for security, unwilling to allow any of our team to work on stuff for them from home, even via VPN. And yet their server went down the other day because 'someone' was on there deleting files :-S I would be very interested to know the opinion of the Cake developers as to the encoding issue though :-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust > them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be > ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame us for even when > it's their fault. [...] Why not checksum the files when you upload them and politely refuse to support changed files? Of course, they need to agree to the limited support terms when you work for them. If they dispute it, a diff should show the changes done after it left you. Like Chris Hartjes suggested, it might be best to dump that client, if they want more support than you want to offer. Regards, -- MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.ttllp.co.uk +44-870-4321-9-10 Web, localisation, koha, databases, GNU/Linux and statistics. Registered in England and Wales, partnership number OC303457 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
On 10/17/06, MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This might unfortunately be a sticking point. > > We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust > them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be > ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame us for even when > it's their fault. So, we use IonCube Encoder on all the work we do for > them before it gets uploaded to their server. Then I suggest your company dump the client. ;) I am one of those people strongly opposed to encoding anything, so perhaps my opinion should be discounted when it comes to this thread. I was able to use Cake for a project at my work because the company doesn't care what technologies we use because we're responsible for maintaining them as well. Probably a unique situation. -- Chris Hartjes "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." -- Rasmus Lerdorf @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ajax to update form fields?
This wouldn't strictly speaking be Ajax, at least not the way I would do it. I'd trap the onchange event in the select tag: Then have some javascript code to automatically select the other options. You COULD do it with Ajax (and this just occurred to me while writing this post) by putting your sub-elements in their own DIV. Then, you again use the onchange event, tie it up with an Ajax.Updater() - and let your Cake application generate the HTML for the other form elements before passing it back for display. Anyway, there's bound to be alternatives --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ajax to update form fields?
You have to attach a remote_url to the onSelect event. There was a tuto about Ajax with check boxes, basically it's the same approach. When selecting a value, you would call an action using Ajax and will update the div's that contains the fields. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
This might unfortunately be a sticking point. We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame us for even when it's their fault. So, we use IonCube Encoder on all the work we do for them before it gets uploaded to their server. If we're not allowed to do that under the license, then I reckon the directors will be saying no to Cake (and all other open-source frameworks, for that matter). We're happy to respect copyright and leave those messages in place, but the code itself needs to be protected from tampering. It's a bit of a bugger really! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > you can sell your cake-based apps for money, but you are not allowed to > encrypt/remove copyright/... from the cake files. ...even from files from 'app' directory, which is quite annoying as it (besides other things) little bit complicate auto generated documentation for company projects etc, as some procedural files (especially app/webroot/index.php and app/config/*) are in project documentation mentioned/linked/with source code. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
Luckily, I've been using Cake myself for the past couple of months - so I'm about as much as we're likely to need for the moment :) The other options are: keep doing things the same way they've always been done here (we have a function library, but the functions it includes are pretty specific to certain projects and thus useless on a general level), or to write our own framework - which from an ownership point of view makes sense, but less so from the point of view of "hey, this is a huge job, and it still might have security issues I've missed". I've also encountered the problem with having trouble going back to basic PHP code after a few months of baking. Really, I had to relearn a lot of my old techniques. Although I think being exposed to Cake has helped, my code is far more organised now just as a matter of course. I guess we'll have to see which way we wind up going. I personally wouldn't mind the challenge of writing our own framework from scratch, but I have no illusions about the size of the job and the fact that I'd effectively be responsible for all of it, good or bad. Luckily there's only one other developer in the company at the moment so training wouldn't be that hard to manage. I'm also trying to push for source control, I know it probably seems a bit backwards to some of you but I don't think the company has ever felt this sort of thing was worth developing in the past - I'm working towards bringing them up to modern techniques, so that we can embrace new developments instead of ignoring them. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
You can use Cake, AND Smarty! What are your other options to be honest? Write it all from scratch? Use another framework? Don't forget open source means community, and the Cake community is growing rapidly, so most problems you'll encounter others have encountered. Cake is also growing rapidly, I must say I'm nothing short of impressed at the rate of new versions, updates and of course tutorials and components being added by the users themselves. Disadvantages? Well, if your after a Cake expert to walk in and help you on a project, perhaps someone who is a PHP programmer who has not used MVC before, that might cause some delays while he learns the ins and outs. I can't think of any more to be honest. You write code, you finish an application. Inbetween that, the team gets a kick out of using a moden, excellent and efficient framework, and probably gets to go home on time. Oh wait I know another disadvantage, once you start using cake you begin to forget everything else. It's like the brain getting used to wearing glasses. The picture is better, it just makes sense ;-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1 of 3 input fields have to be filled - validate
But now I get the error: "Warning: Delimiter must not be alphanumeric or backslash in app/app_model.php on line 82". In other topics I've read that maybe the function for the validation is not recognized. But in my example there is no chance of spelling it wrong (the example from my the post before). Does anyone have an idea what the problem could be? Thanks Felix --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Convincing my company to use Cake
you can sell your cake-based apps for money, but you are not allowed to encrypt/remove copyright/... from the cake files. if your company doesnt know what the benefits of a framework are, i wonder what kind of management is leading that company. I can't imagine any software company *not* using a framework (many of them write their own) obviously a framework takes away the "stupid,annoying, repetitive" tasks so the developer can focus on the real problem. Cakephp does a pretty good job at providing help for making many things very easy, and still not standing in the way if you want to do it the other way. it makes things more manageable, more abstract. On the other hand, there is a learning curve you must go through, and the performance isn't always optimal, but these points are easily outweighted by the improved workflow when using the framework. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Session and sessionid
Hi Dieter, 30 Minutes is more than enough. It only needs to be saved in the session. So, then I will try to figure out, how $session->write works. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Session and sessionid
how long does that data need to stay in the database? only during the session? (like 30, 45 minutes, whatever?) then you could just save it all save it in the session ($session->write()) if longer then that, i would just create a user_id field in the datatable to store the user_id. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Convincing my company to use Cake
Hi guys, I'm working as a web developer now, and I've been trying to convince the directors of the company that using some open-source libraries to build our sites would be a good move. I've almost managed to convince them that having a template engine is a good idea - with demonstrations of what I've managed to build myself. From that, I've extended the idea of using Smarty for future projects... ...but that led me to thinking, the primary benefits of Smarty are to separate content from presentation - why not go the whole hog and use Cake? I've been here for a while myself, I think Cake is fantastic and so far I've been frustrated that I couldn't just use it for work-related projects. What they're asking for though is what the advantages and disadvantages are of adopting this sort of system. I can probably come up with most of them by myself anyway, but if anyone can suggest any, I'd be very pleased to hear them :) As an aside, the MIT license Cake uses - am I right in thinking it allows use in commercial software (specifically the sort of large websites we'll be building with it, which of course we're charging for)? We'll probably have to encode the files as well if only to prevent our clients from breaking the system... Thanks in advance for any advice :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to distinguish empty recordset from error in findAll()
YEah ! This will be cool feature in cake 1.2 Nate, can you tell us when we can expect 1.2 to be published? tnx in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1 of 3 input fields have to be filled - validate
OK, I figured that one out. I simply forgot to write the "" tags in the error.php file. Stupid mistake... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1 of 3 input fields have to be filled - validate
Thanks for the links. I have followed this tutorial step by step, but somehow there is a error in my validation rules: My model: var $validate = array( 'email1' => array('enteredAdress','Enter at least one contact'), 'email2' => array('enteredAdress','Enter at least one contact'), 'email3' => array('enteredAdress','Enter at least one contact'), ); function enteredAdress() { if (($this->email1 != NULL ) OR ( $this->email2 != NULL ) OR ( $this->email3 != NULL )) {return true;} else {return false;} } When I go that page, I get the error: "Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /app/app_model.php on line 72" What could be my problem? Thanks Felix --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 2 forms and 1 submit button
Thanks, I will give it a try! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Session and sessionid
Thanks so far for the answers! I have an index-page with a form. The user enters data and saves it to the database (data-table). The data-table has a "data_id" as key. Now I would like to save this actual data_id for the user. So the user can go to different pages and when he comes back to the index-page, he is still known as the one who entered the data. How do I start a session, save the var for the user and so on? Thanks for the help! Felix --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Session and sessionid
sessions are given an id automatically by the php engine, you don't need to do anything manually for that. same about the handling, it's all automatically. you can basically just use the session without doing any checking on your own, you can trust php for that. (it's not perfectly secure, but it does the job very well) (correct me if i'm wrong) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ajax observeField on a select
Not yet, thank you Léo, I will. Have a nice day Sten --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---