RE: Exchange dilemma
Change the rule to mark items read. Then delete -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Have this user install: http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm Then your redheaded stepchildren (whatever that means) won't know they are being neglected. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
It sounds like maybe you are using an Outlook rule to forward his email. How about instead created a "Special Recipient" of his external address on your exchange server, and then in the exchange server administrator entry for this guy, on the "Delivery Options" tag, make the Special Recipient the Alternate Recipient. That's how we do off-campus forwarding. >-Original Message- >From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:34 >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >Subject: Exchange dilemma > > >Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is >locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox >outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to >his deleted >items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted >items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt >gets a message >back that their mail was deleted without being read. These >users are feeling >neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best >resolve this >issue? > >This is exchange 5.5 > >List Charter and FAQ at: >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma They will not get this if this user is the alternate recipient and do not have it go to the mailbox. I am curious as to why you would have all mail go off-domain. That sounds dangerous - Original Message - From: Abercrombie, Sherry To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Why not just create a Custom Recipient? No mailbox, no e-mail to delete. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Exchange dilemma > > > Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is > locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to > another mailbox > outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to > his deleted > items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging > his deleted > items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt > gets a message > back that their mail was deleted without being read. These > users are feeling > neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best > resolve this > issue? > > This is exchange 5.5 > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the floor" scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding story is too long to type here. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 1. Why is it forwarded? 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange dilemma Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve this issue? This is exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
I'm with Ken here. If they don't need to access mail internally, then give them a CR and you're done. I do this all the time (something like 1000 CR's here). Otherwise you can create a CR and assign it as the alternative recipient for this persons mailbox. That way the message would get delivered in both places. Be aware that there may some legal issues regarding automatically forwarding mail in clear text to the internet. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Why not just create a Custom Recipient? No mailbox, no e-mail to delete. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Exchange dilemma > > > Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is > locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to > another mailbox > outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to > his deleted > items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging > his deleted > items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt > gets a message > back that their mail was deleted without being read. These > users are feeling > neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best > resolve this > issue? > > This is exchange 5.5 > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding
mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the
proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the floor" scenario
before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through Exchange Admin, or
mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient?
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I
can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The
forwarding story is too long to type here.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
1. Why is it forwarded?
2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox.
3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they
have more fun than blonds...
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange dilemma
Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but
my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another
mailbox outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his
deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his
deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read receipt gets a
message back that their mail was deleted without being read. These users are
feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can I best resolve
this issue?
This is exchange 5.5
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>
< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> >
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. > > -Original Message- > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate > forwarding > mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and > then it's the > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the > floor" scenario > before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through > Exchange Admin, or > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? > > Sherry Abercrombie > Data Center Administration Team > Information Technology > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the > rules where I > can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The > forwarding story is too long to type here. > > -Original Message- > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > 1. Why is it forwarded? > 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. > 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally > think they > have more fun than blonds... > > Sherry Abercrombie > Data Center Administration Team > Information Technology > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Exchange dilemma > > > Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be > obvious but > my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being > forwarded to another > mailbox outside of our network. His messages then > automatically go to his > deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when > purging his > deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read > receipt gets a > message back that their mail was deleted without being read. > These users are > feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can > I best resolve > this issue? > > This is exchange 5.5 > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > < http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
No OWA? -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom Recipient. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. > > -Original Message- > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate > forwarding > mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and > then it's the > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the > floor" scenario > before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through > Exchange Admin, or > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? > > Sherry Abercrombie > Data Center Administration Team > Information Technology > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the > rules where I > can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The > forwarding story is too long to type here. > > -Original Message- > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > 1. Why is it forwarded? > 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. > 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally > think they > have more fun than blonds... > > Sherry Abercrombie > Data Center Administration Team > Information Technology > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Exchange dilemma > > > Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be > obvious but > my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being > forwarded to another > mailbox outside of our network. His messages then > automatically go to his > deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when > purging his > deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read > receipt gets a > message back that their mail was deleted without being read. > These users are > feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can > I best resolve > this issue? > > This is exchange 5.5 > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > < http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's
calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and
deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the
person(clerical) here can make appts, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone
goes on
sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their
office. If
their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a
Custom
Recipient.
Ken
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
>
>
> A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
>
> Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate
> forwarding
> mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and
> then it's the
> proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the
> floor" scenario
> before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through
> Exchange Admin, or
> mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient?
>
> Sherry Abercrombie
> Data Center Administration Team
> Information Technology
> "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
>
>
> Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the
> rules where I
> can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution.
The
> forwarding story is too long to type here.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
>
> 1. Why is it forwarded?
> 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox.
> 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally
> think they
> have more fun than blonds...
>
> Sherry Abercrombie
> Data Center Administration Team
> Information Technology
> "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange dilemma
>
>
> Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be
> obvious but
> my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being
> forwarded to another
> mailbox outside of our network. His messages then
> automatically go to his
> deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when
> purging his
> deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read
> receipt gets a
> message back that their mail was deleted without being read.
> These users are
> feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can
> I best resolve
RE: Exchange dilemma
Yea, that too but a lot of people don't like OWA on Exchange 5.5. I'm hoping OWA on Exchange 2000 will take care of that. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:29 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > No OWA? > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when > someone goes > on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their > office. If their primary e-mail account is on another server then I > just use a Custom Recipient. > > Ken > > --- > Ken Leyba > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate > > forwarding > > mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and > > then it's the > > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the > > floor" scenario > > before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through > > Exchange Admin, or > > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > Data Center Administration Team > > Information Technology > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the > > rules where I > > can change the mail to mark as read or that would be my > solution. The > > forwarding story is too long to type here. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > 1. Why is it forwarded? > > 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. > > 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally > > think they > > have more fun than blonds... > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > Data Center Administration Team > > Information Technology > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be > > obvious but > > my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being > > forwarded to another > > mailbox outside of our network. His messages then > > automatically go to his > > deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when > > purging his > > deleted items, everyone who has their mail set up for a read > > receipt gets a > > message back that their mail was deleted without being read. > > These users are > > feeling neglected and like red headed step children. How can > > I best resolve > > this issue? > > > > This is exchange 5.5 > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://
RE: Exchange dilemma
OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor > this person's > calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and > deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the > person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example > when someone > goes on > sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their > office. If > their primary e-mail account is on another server then > I just use a > Custom > Recipient. > > Ken > > --- > Ken Leyba > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate > > forwarding > > mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and > > then it's the > > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the > > floor" scenario > > before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through > > Exchange Admin, or > > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > Data Center Administration Team > > Information Technology > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the > > rules where I > > can change the mail to mark as read or that would be > my solution. > The > > forwarding story is too long to type here. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > 1. Why is it forwarded? > > 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. > > 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally > > think they > > have more fun than blonds... > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > Data Center Administration Team > > Information Technology > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Exchange dilemma >
Re: Exchange dilemma
Exactly, you big fat* weirdo Bill! * this in no way related to the physical state of being "fat" or "gordo". I have no way of knowing whether you are actually obese, nor do I care. - Original Message - From: "Ken Leyba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:34 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal Calendar? Too weird. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor > this person's > calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and > deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the > person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example > when someone > goes on > sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their > office. If > their primary e-mail account is on another server then > I just use a > Custom > Recipient. > > Ken > > --- > Ken Leyba > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate > > forwarding > > mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and > > then it's the > > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the > > floor" scenario > > before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through > > Exchange Admin, or > > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > Data Center Administration Team > > Information Technology > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the > > rules where I > > can change the mail to mark as read or that would be > my solution. > The > > forwarding story is too long to type here. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > 1. Why is it forwarded? > > 2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox. > > 3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally > > think they > > have more fun than blonds... > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > Data Center Administration Team > > Information Technology > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:34 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Exchange dilemma > > > Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be > obvious but > my brain is locked. We have a user who's mail is being > forwarded to another > mailbox outside of our network. His messages then > automatically go to his > deleted items folder. Since these messages are unread, when > purging his > deleted items, everyone who has their mail set u
RE: Exchange dilemma
Long story
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using
internal
Calendar? Too weird.
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
>
>
> Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor
> this person's
> calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded
and
> deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the
> person(clerical) here can make appts, etc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
>
> Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example
> when someone
> goes on
> sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to
their
> office. If
> their primary e-mail account is on another server then
> I just use a
> Custom
> Recipient.
>
> Ken
>
> ---
> Ken Leyba
> Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> California State University Dominguez Hills
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
> >
> >
> > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
> >
> > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I
hate
> > forwarding
> > mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to
and
> > then it's the
> > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into
the
> > floor" scenario
> > before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding through
> > Exchange Admin, or
> > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient?
> >
> > Sherry Abercrombie
> > Data Center Administration Team
> > Information Technology
> > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bill Beckett [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
> >
> >
> > Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the
> > rules where I
> > can change the mail to mark as read or that would be
> my solution.
> The
> > forwarding story is too long to type here.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Abercrombie, Sherry
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:46 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
> >
> > 1. Why is it f
RE: Exchange dilemma
You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins* this job wouldn't be half bad. *I'm talking about here not anyone on this list. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Long story > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using > internal > Calendar? Too weird. > > --- > Ken Leyba > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor > > this person's > > calendar so all messages other than calendar items > get forwarded > and > > deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox > here so that the > > person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example > > when someone > > goes on > > sabbatical or off campus for a while but will > come back to > their > > office. If > > their primary e-mail account is on another server then > > I just use a > > Custom > > Recipient. > > > > Ken > > > > --- > > Ken Leyba > > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at > times:) I > hate > > > forwarding > > > mail to another domain. I only do it when > I'm forced to > and > > > then it's the > > > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my > heels into > the > > > floor" scenario > > > before I'll do it. Are you doing the > forwarding through > > > Exchange Admin, or > > > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? > > > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > > Data Center Administration Team > > > Information Technology > > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bill Beckett [ > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > >
RE: Exchange dilemma
Not a sysadmin*
* Just in case that was a reference
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins*
this job
wouldn't be half bad.
*I'm talking about here not anyone on this list.
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
>
>
> Long story
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
>
> OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but
using
> internal
> Calendar? Too weird.
>
> ---
> Ken Leyba
> Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> California State University Dominguez Hills
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
> >
> >
> > Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to
monitor
> > this person's
> > calendar so all messages other than calendar items
> get forwarded
> and
> > deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox
> here so that the
> > person(clerical) here can make appts, etc.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
> >
> > Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For
example
> > when someone
> > goes on
> > sabbatical or off campus for a while but will
> come back to
> their
> > office. If
> > their primary e-mail account is on another server
then
> > I just use a
> > Custom
> > Recipient.
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > ---
> > Ken Leyba
> > Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> > California State University Dominguez Hills
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bill Beckett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
> > >
> > >
> > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
> > >
> > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at
> times:) I
> hate
> > > forwarding
> > > mail to another domain. I only do it when
> I'm forced to
> and
> > > then it's the
> > > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my
Re: Exchange dilemma
me either* * Just in case that was a reference - Original Message - From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:51 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Not a sysadmin* * Just in case that was a reference -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins* this job wouldn't be half bad. *I'm talking about here not anyone on this list. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Long story > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using > internal > Calendar? Too weird. > > --- > Ken Leyba > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor > > this person's > > calendar so all messages other than calendar items > get forwarded > and > > deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox > here so that the > > person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example > > when someone > > goes on > > sabbatical or off campus for a while but will > come back to > their > > office. If > > their primary e-mail account is on another server then > > I just use a > > Custom > > Recipient. > > > > Ken > > > > --- > > Ken Leyba > > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at > times:) I > hate > > > forwarding > > > mail to another domain. I only do it when > I'm forced to > and > > > then it's the > > > proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my > heels into > the > > > floor" scenario > > > before I'll do it. Are you doing the > forwarding through > > > Exchange Admin, or > > > mailbox rules? Is it a custom recipient? > > > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > > Data Center Administration Team > > > Information Technology > > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message- > > > From: Bill Beckett [ > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:48 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > > > > Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I > cannot find in the > > > > rules where I > > > can change the mail to mark as read or that would be > > my solution. > > The > > > forwarding story is too long to type here. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry > > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent:
RE: Exchange dilemma
Nope, talking about where I'm at. --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills > -Original Message- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:52 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > Not a sysadmin* > > * Just in case that was a reference > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo > sysadmins* > this job > wouldn't be half bad. > > *I'm talking about here not anyone on this list. > > --- > Ken Leyba > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:47 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Long story > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but > using > > internal > > Calendar? Too weird. > > > > --- > > Ken Leyba > > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > > > > Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to > monitor > > > this person's > > > calendar so all messages other than calendar items > > get forwarded > > and > > > deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox > > here so that the > > > person(clerical) here can make appts, etc. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For > example > > > when someone > > > goes on > > > sabbatical or off campus for a while but will > > come back to > > their > > > office. If > > > their primary e-mail account is on > another server > then > > > I just use a > > > Custom > > > Recipient. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > --- > > > Ken Leyba > > > Windows/Exchange System Administrator > > > California State University Dominguez Hills > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Bill Beckett > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:20 AM > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma > > > > > > > > > > > > A mailbox rule and it is also a > custom recipient. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Abercrombie, Sherry > > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
I personally prefer Ball Peen - Original Message - From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Yeah I like ball peen as well. Ok actually I just like saying Ball peen.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Re: Exchange dilemma
I personally prefer Ball Peen
- Original Message -
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer
has
greater effectiveness...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
How about using a hammer for the sinking in part?
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to
forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this
persons
mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on
Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings
get
delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded
step-children can
take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give
them a
little education and maybe some of it will sink in.
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
Heh, yeah that is a cool word...heh heh - Original Message - From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Yeah I like ball peen as well. Ok actually I just like saying Ball peen. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma I personally prefer Ball Peen - Original Message - From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma Plan for sysamdin/exchadmin stress relief after dealing with HMUs to comply with official OSHA stress relief standards: 1. Take piece of foam that is approx 6x5 and at least 3 inches thick (Note, the thicker the foam the better the results will be) 2. Take 4 pieces of velcro/duct tape/scotch tape, any kind of "adhesive" will do 3. Tape foam from #1 and adhesive from #2 and attach foam to wall at forehead height level. (Note, may need to have multiple pieces of foam a various heights for the range in height of admins who will be using stress relief ) 4. Stand stressed admin in front of foam and have him/her beat head against wall. 5. No need for psychiatrist bill 6. Make management happy by saving on HMO medical costs 7. Make stressed admin a little happier 8. This stress relief method replaces the afore mentioned hammer/sledge hammer vs HMU's method of stress relief 9. Have a nice day! Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader".
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
10 pound tweaking tool.
The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with
sand
that was their tweaking tool.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer
has
greater effectiveness...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
How about using a hammer for the sinking in part?
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule
to
forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this
persons
mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on
Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings
get
delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded
step-children can
take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give
them a
little education and maybe some of it will sink in.
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange dilemma
Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader". -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader". -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Lucky for you there is only one of them. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader". -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Hmm, egos can weight that much?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds...
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma
Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader".
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
10 pound tweaking tool.
The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with
sand
that was their tweaking tool.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer
has
greater effectiveness...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
How about using a hammer for the sinking in part?
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule
to
forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this
persons
mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on
Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings
get
delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded
step-children can
take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give
them a
little education and maybe some of it will sink in.
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma I concur, this is exactly what I do, and I don't think I've seen it so just so you don't irritate anyone with outside addresses coming up in your Global Address List, in the Advanced Tab of the Mailbox Properties Hide the Custom Recipient you create from the Address List. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Only when they have absorbed alcohol. And I'd tell you that my ego is much
larger than that, but modesty is one of my best qualities.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Hmm, egos can weight that much?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds...
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma
Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader".
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
10 pound tweaking tool.
The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with
sand
that was their tweaking tool.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer
has
greater effectiveness...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
How about using a hammer for the sinking in part?
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule
to
forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this
persons
mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on
Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings
get
delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded
step-children can
take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give
them a
little education and maybe some of it will sink in.
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Use the Schwartz, Luke. Spaceballs - 1987 - Mel Brooks -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired - Original Message - From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader". -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma 10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has greater effectiveness... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma How about using a hammer for the sinking in part? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: Message Oh yeah, I always hide the custom recipient. Thanks for bringing that point up Desiree. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma I concur, this is exactly what I do, and I don't think I've seen it so just so you don't irritate anyone with outside addresses coming up in your Global Address List, in the Advanced Tab of the Mailbox Properties Hide the Custom Recipient you create from the Address List. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange dilemma
Title: Message Hey, just want to apologize for calling it "Special Recipient" a few zillion posts ago, hope I didn't confuse anyone, and yes, it is good to hide it. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 15:26To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Oh yeah, I always hide the custom recipient. Thanks for bringing that point up Desiree. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma I concur, this is exactly what I do, and I don't think I've seen it so just so you don't irritate anyone with outside addresses coming up in your Global Address List, in the Advanced Tab of the Mailbox Properties Hide the Custom Recipient you create from the Address List. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange dilemma Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, meetings get delivered to where they want them and the whiney redheaded step-children can take a hike if they get deletes w/o reading on their messages. Give them a little education and maybe some of it will sink in. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
