TO ALL OPEN-MINDED FOLKS

2001-12-01 Thread 12

Dear Hollywood Sex Toys Patrons,
 
  http://www.Hollywood-Sex-Toys.com
 
 
  Come to http://www.hollywood-sex-toys.com for adult
  toys and more.
 
  We offer extremely affordable adult erotic
  novelties, videos, lingerie and
  more. As well as a FREE GIFT WITH EVERY SINGLE
  ORDER!
 
  We carry all the top brands in the adult novelty
  industry such as:
 
  Swedish Erotica, Doc Johnson, Hustler, TLC and more!
 
  No min. order amount required!
  All Major Credit Cards Accepted!
 
  We await you at http://www.hollywood-sex-toys.com,
  the place where your
  inhibitions and imagination can run free!
 
 
 
  You are receiving this e-mail message because you or
  someone you know has
  submitted your e-mail address to one of our
  websites. If you do not wish to
  receive and further mailings from us please reply
  with Remove in the
  subject line to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we
  will promptly remove
  your e-mail address from our list. Please accept our
  apologies if we have
  inconvenienced you in any way.





Re: Simple things (visual, usability bugs) ?

2001-12-01 Thread Gavin Long

 2.  In the list boxes inside preferences (those with 2 colums), the 
 grid seperating the data cells does not match up with the header 
 cells.  The column divider is offset to the left by a few pixels.

 I find this annoying as well. I think the problem is that the table code 
 doesn't make allowances for the vertical scroll bar.


Sounds like http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101482


[follow-ups set to n.p.m.general]

-- 
gav





Password on Profile

2001-12-01 Thread Patrick Chkaiban

Hello I was wondering if there is a way to have a password on each 
profile? Like on Outlook Express to protect the emails. If this option 
is not available right now would it be supported in the futur releases?





Re: How can I change Cache location?

2001-12-01 Thread Steve

You can setup individual user profiles, specifying the location of user's
profiles. This would place personal settings, bookmarks and cache
information wherever you want to store it.

Start Mozilla with -profilemanager command line switch.

HTH

Steve


Al Rider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I've looked all over and can't find what determines the cache location.

 Would someone point me to it?

 Thanks...







Font smoothing under linux/kde?

2001-12-01 Thread Jens Kohl

I've installed xFree 4.x, I know it brought me the long-awaited font
smoothing. In KDE it works fine. But when I'm surfing the web with moz 0.9.6
I notice that the smoothing isn't active in the browser, is there any way to
turn font smoothing on?

thanks, jens






Re: Password on Profile

2001-12-01 Thread Christian Biesinger

Patrick Chkaiban wrote:

 Hello I was wondering if there is a way to have a password on each 
 profile?


http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16489





Re: New Feature List

2001-12-01 Thread Christian Biesinger

Moritz Meinesz wrote:

 The various Mozilla Programms (Mail, Browser) should have different 
 Icons to be recognizable in the ALT-TAB menue. Best would be s.th like a 
 thumbnail of the webpage they show.


You can install the NS 4 icons for Mozilla at this URL:

http://www.consultanddesign.com/mozilla/





Re: installing plugin in Mozilla

2001-12-01 Thread Philippe

Hi,

Thanks for your answers!

I will give a go. This seems complicated to me.

I understand that Netscape is using the code of Mozilla for its own release.
Why can't the program then  recognise Mozilla as a pure Netscape and also
look for mozilla?

Thanks anyway

--
Philippe

Travis Crump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Philippe wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Hopefully this is the place to ask that kind of question :)
 
 I am using Mozilla 0.9.2 (soon 0.9.6) and I am very happy with it for one
 problem I have
 
 I can't install any plugin. When I go on a page that requires a plugin
and
 click the link then all I end up with is a page telling mw that it
couldn't
 find a plugin for my browser!
 
 What am I doing wrong? Can someone guide me?
 
 Thank you
 
 --
 Philippe
 
 
 Try downloading the plugin for Netscape 6.x, and then manually show it
 your Mozilla folder.  Sometimes mozilla.exe needs to be renamed to
 netscape.exe during installation of the plugin(and then changed back to
 mozilla.exe)







strange behaviour

2001-12-01 Thread Hilkiah Lavinier

Hi I've been using mozilla 0.9.6 with RH72 for the past 2 weeks (or so) 
and I've just noticed something.  I've just installed flash plugin 
(Shockwave Flash 5.0 r47) and Java(TM) Plug-in 1.3.1_01.  Anyway, when a 
page loads, whatever fits on the screen appears ok.  But when I scroll 
down, I get a blank page.  I have to highlight (mouse) the rest of the 
text for it to display (and when I scroll up or down again, it 
disappears).  I tried uninstalling the plugins (rm Sock*; rm 
libf*; rm libjav* from /usr/local/mozilla/plugins) but that still doens't 
make a dif.  I'm not sure why this is happening.  Has anyone xperienced 
this odd behaviour?

Thanks.
Hilkiah L






Re: Font smoothing under linux/kde?

2001-12-01 Thread Joni K.

Jens Kohl wrote:

 I've installed xFree 4.x, I know it brought me the long-awaited font
 smoothing. In KDE it works fine. But when I'm surfing the web with moz
 0.9.6 I notice that the smoothing isn't active in the browser, is there
 any way to turn font smoothing on?

KDE has anti-aliased (smooth) fonts because it's based on the QT toolkit 
which supports anti-aliasing. Mozilla doesn't use QT.

I don't know about the exact status of Mozilla anti-aliasing, but I think 
(or hope) it will eventually be there... 

Maybe this gives more information:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31296

-- 
  Joni




odd behaviour

2001-12-01 Thread Hilkiah Lavinier

Hi, I got this problem with 0.9.6/RH72.  When I use my mouse wheel
to scroll down a page, it's blank!!!  If I use pgup/dn or arrow keys
it's okay.  When I use the mouse wheel, I have to highlight all the
'hidden' stuff for them to appear or hit the refresh button.

Anyone else have seen this problem?

Thanks
Hilkiah

-- 
Sigh.  I like to think it's just the Linux people who want to be on
the leading edge so bad they walk right off the precipice.
(Craig E. Groeschel)


..\  /.. HILKIAH G. LAVINIER, [aka ¥eL10WwU]
...\/... 9 Earls Court SQ., SW5 9BY, London
.._||_.. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
./ ||... [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.\_||_.. Tel : 0796 807 8247  Fax: 603 697 8299
...||... ICQ # 8978201, Yahoo: hilkiah, MSN: hilkiahlavinier





.tiff image fails to download

2001-12-01 Thread WDA

If you go to the following page - 
http://weather.noaa.gov/fax/surface.shtml#sfconus and download Plot No. 
1, under North America, you will find the file name on your hard drive 
but with zero bytes - the file will be empty.  I went over and used IE 
to see if perhaps there was something wrong with the file itself and it 
downloaded with no problems.  Can someone check this and confirm.

I'm using Mozilla (windows XP) build ID:  2001112803.  This is a .tiff 
image.  I use my computer extensively for meteorological purposes and 
downloading files of this type is a norm for me.

Thanks

-- 
Wayne Alligood/Amelia Island, Florida
Compaq Computer running Windows XP
Words rightly spoken are like apples of gold in pictures of silver.





Re: Password on Profile

2001-12-01 Thread Fulvio Perini

I do not think that a password for a Profile is needed,but there should
be one for Mail.Even more necessary now that there are multiple e-mails.
 I cannot get anyone in the family to use Messenger because of this.

Patrick Chkaiban wrote:
 
 Hello I was wondering if there is a way to have a password on each
 profile? Like on Outlook Express to protect the emails. If this option
 is not available right now would it be supported in the futur releases?




Re: .tiff image fails to download

2001-12-01 Thread neil . marshall

WDA wrote:

 If you go to the following page - 
 http://weather.noaa.gov/fax/surface.shtml#sfconus and download Plot No. 
 1, under North America, you will find the file name on your hard drive 
 but with zero bytes - the file will be empty.  I went over and used IE 
 to see if perhaps there was something wrong with the file itself and it 
 downloaded with no problems.  Can someone check this and confirm.
 
 I'm using Mozilla (windows XP) build ID:  2001112803.  This is a .tiff 
 image.  I use my computer extensively for meteorological purposes and 
 downloading files of this type is a norm for me.


If I click on it, quicktime tries to load it and it breaks.  If I 
shift-click on it I can save it to my hard drive and then view it fine. 
  I'm using build 2001113003 under Win2k.





Pill to Increase Your Ejaculation by 581%

2001-12-01 Thread brbbbgburqqnc
Title: What makes Packer







  

  


  


SIMPLE PILL CAN INCREASE YOUR EJACULATION By 581%!!!



  
  

  
  NO GimmickREAL SCIENCE!
  
  

  

  


  

  
  

  

  


  
  Increase
  Ejaculation by almost 600%!
  Increase Sex drive
  Stronger Erections
  Longer Lasting orgasms!
  More Intense Orgasms
  Shoot up to 13 feet!


  

  

  
  

  
  
  New Medical break through
  has now created a revolutionary herbal pill that is guaranteed
  to increase your Semen and EJACULATION by almost 600% in just
  a few short weeks!
  This amazing new product
  works by simply taking 2 pills every day...


  

  
  
  Order
  Now!





Order
  Now!



  
  Simply try these Amazing
  pills for 30-days and if after 30-days you do not experience
  both a huge increase in the amount of semen you ejaculate
  along with longer lasting more intense orgasms, simply send
  the empty bottle back to us and we'll refund you 100% of the
  cost including shipping. With this guarantee, our product must
  work for you... or we'll lose money on every sale!
  
  To order go to
  here or call
  626-440-1747 M to F 8:00am to 6:00pm Pacific standard time
  
  
  

  
  

  

  


  
  -Winner of the
  BURDETT RESEARCH GOLDEN STAR AWARD-
  ALL NATURAL HERBAL
  COMPLEX CAPSULE


  

  

  
  

  



  
  
RESULTS MAY
VARY. 
NOTE: Go to here to be removed.
  

  

  










Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


Asa Dotzler wrote:
 
 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
 
 snip
  As I've been chided here often. Don't make broad brush assumptions.
  while on 'nix and windows you can do this Netscape 6 and Communicator up
  to 4.7.8 do conflict with each other.
 
 Please stop stating that is if it was the case for everyone. You have a usage 
pattern which differs from most other users that causes you some problem that no one 
else can reproduce. I test Mozilla on Mac OS 8.5 (currently busted, no keyboard 
input) 8.6, 9.1, 9.2.1, 10.0 and 10.1. I also use Communicator 4.x on those machines 
for compatability testing and bug confirming. There are no problems with running 4.x 
and Mozilla/6.x on the same machine.
 
 --Asa
 
 

Look you better frequent some of the netscape newsgroups.

I can not believe that I am the only one having the problem if the
Netscape Champions program recommends not puting both on the same
partition on the same hard drive.

Its recommended by the Netscape Champions program. NOT to have N6 and
Communicator installed on the same Hard drive if using one partition (as
i do)  or on the same Partition if the drive is paritioned.

The netscape Champions program was setup using certain programers and or
users with special priviges such as acces to factory Beta software also
have access to inside info from Netscape. They even maintain a ufaq.

Supposedly they were to change something in Communicator 4.7.9 to
prevent the interference howevr; it hasn't changed things.

Again if netscape would just change the creator code from MOSS on
Netscape 6, to MOSZ or MOZS the problem would be cleared up as currently
both N6 and Communicator use MOSS. 

I don't have any problem with MOZZILLA as far as that goes because Mozz
creator code is MOZZ.

I can't believe anyone can't see it. 

And don't say the Type and creator codes are outdated there 4 to the
fourth power possible combinations for Type Codes and Creators as well.
-- 
---
Phillip M. Jones, CET  |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---

If it's fixed, don't break it!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm




Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


Asa Dotzler wrote:
 
 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
 
 
 snip
  The reason why the the browser works but not necessarily mail and news.
  Is because all emphasis is being placed in the Browser. The Mail and
  news is considered an after thought.
 
 
 
 What gives you any authority to make statements like that? Are you involved in any 
way in the planning that goes into this project. 

No.

Are you being intentionally insulting to the people that work long
hours trying to make _all_ of the product better? Are you just bitter
or mean?

No I am not biter or mean but I am fast getting that way. Its been
stated in these newsgroups that emphasis is being placed on the browser
first and then its prefected then you will work on Mail and news.

I've posted suggestions, I've answered questions (yes some maybe wrong).
I've posted bugs. Still no difference.

Look get real. I might possibly be the only Mac person on this
newsgroup and wishlist. I even subscribe to the Mozilla Mac group sadly
it gets posted to once or twice a week and then only one or two post.

Mozilla group don't give a Damn about the Mac side of research. They
would just as soon see Apple and Mac crash and burn.

People have to wake up suppose one day that Apple and Mac is no longer
around. That means Mr Gates at microsoft can screw everyone around any
way he wants. He will then set his sites on UNIX. 

He already making noise about open source. (Mozilla and others). 

So research should be done on the Mac platform not just for the sake of
Mac but to keep Mr Gates in line so that you can freely ddesign
sofware as you desire.

So yes in a way i guess I am downright upset, bitter. And I might be
begining to get mean.


Go ahead and laugh. But wait 5 - 10 years see how hard you laugh, when
every piece of software you get on the planet has to be cleared through
Mr gates and his bunch. imagine what the prices will be like even for UNIX.

 
 --Asa



-- 
---
Phillip M. Jones, CET  |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---

If it's fixed, don't break it!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm




Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


DeMoN LaG wrote:
 
 Asa Dotzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 30 Nov 2001:
  What gives you any authority to make statements like that? Are you
  involved in any way in the planning that goes into this project.
  Are you being intentionally insulting to the people that work long
  hours trying to make _all_ of the product better? Are you just
  bitter or mean?
 
 He's just an asshole.  He doesn't bother to read anything, doesn't try
 to learn anything, does not contribute with bugs or real feedback, and
 just constantly bitches and mouths off that Mozilla sucks, plugins don't
 work on the mac (despite other people having no problems), etc.  It's
 quite amusing most of the time
 
 --
 ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
 AIM: FlyersR1 9
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _ = m


Actually I have posted several bugs, and voted on others.

(Also take one to know one :-)   )
-- 
---
Phillip M. Jones, CET  |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---

If it's fixed, don't break it!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm




Re: installing plugin in Mozilla

2001-12-01 Thread Travis Crump

Philippe wrote:

Hi,

Thanks for your answers!

I will give a go. This seems complicated to me.

I understand that Netscape is using the code of Mozilla for its own release.
Why can't the program then  recognise Mozilla as a pure Netscape and also
look for mozilla?

Thanks anyway

--
Philippe


That is a good question, why don't you ask the plugin makers?  Some 
people have reported this as happening, but for one plugin I don't 
remember it as being my experience(I think Flash, but I am not sure), 
and went through my procedure...







no !!!!!!

2001-12-01 Thread Juan Perez

hey, what the hell have you done to my beloved netscape/mozilla little 
hand pointer, i want it back !!  :(

besides, if youre gonna leave this, maybe yous hould also replace the 
lizard with some blueish rotating m or something, got the point ?





Re: .tiff image fails to download

2001-12-01 Thread Travis Crump

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 WDA wrote:

 If you go to the following page - 
 http://weather.noaa.gov/fax/surface.shtml#sfconus and download Plot 
 No. 1, under North America, you will find the file name on your hard 
 drive but with zero bytes - the file will be empty.  I went over and 
 used IE to see if perhaps there was something wrong with the file 
 itself and it downloaded with no problems.  Can someone check this 
 and confirm.

 I'm using Mozilla (windows XP) build ID:  2001112803.  This is a 
 .tiff image.  I use my computer extensively for meteorological 
 purposes and downloading files of this type is a norm for me.



 If I click on it, quicktime tries to load it and it breaks.  If I 
 shift-click on it I can save it to my hard drive and then view it 
 fine.  I'm using build 2001113003 under Win2k.

Their is a notice on their website *NOTICE---* for error-free downloads 
use the FTP Server ftp://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/fax which sort of implies 
that their http downloads are error-filled and it is not Mozilla's 
fault.  If I go to the FTP Server it works(a randomly chosen tif loads 
in Quicktime when I left click).  Though if I locate the specific tif 
link to for North America Plot 1(QYAA00.tif), it also opens broken just 
like it does when clicking on the link on the main page.





Re: no !!!!!!

2001-12-01 Thread Juan Perez

Juan Perez wrote:

 hey, what the hell have you done to my beloved netscape/mozilla little 
 hand pointer, i want it back !!  :(
 
 besides, if youre gonna leave this, maybe yous hould also replace the 
 lizard with some blueish rotating m or something, got the point ?
 

hmm, on a second thought, could you please give us the option to us the 
advanced users to choose our pointer, ive been thinking, ie users will 
find it friendly to have a similar ui when switching, maybe you should 
make an IE skin in the installer?? perhaps when installing ask something 
like:

please select the profile that best describes how mozilla will be used 
or that best describes you
1.- migrating from IE (all the friendly stuff)
2.- public computer (disable auto fill for web forms and passwords, 
expire history / cache immediatley, etc..)
3.- personal and only personal (completely opposed to public computer)
4.- mozilla classic/default
5.- i dont remember, but there was another one i thought of before

of course all of this goes imho..
please comment about it ! :)





Re: no !!!!!!

2001-12-01 Thread R.K.Aa.

Juan Perez wrote:

 hey, what the hell have you done to my beloved netscape/mozilla little 
 hand pointer, i want it back !!  :(

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112916





Re: no !!!!!!

2001-12-01 Thread yatsu

On Sat, 01 Dec 2001 20:53:10 +0100, Juan Perez wrote:

 Juan Perez wrote:
 
 hey, what the hell have you done to my beloved netscape/mozilla little
 hand pointer, i want it back !!  :(

Could you be more specific to what has changed and which build you're using?

 besides, if youre gonna leave this, maybe yous hould also replace the
 lizard with some blueish rotating m or something, got the point ?
 
 
 hmm, on a second thought, could you please give us the option to us the
 advanced users to choose our pointer, ive been thinking, ie users will
 find it friendly to have a similar ui when switching, maybe you should
 make an IE skin in the installer?? perhaps when installing ask something
 like:
 
 please select the profile that best describes how mozilla will be used
 or that best describes you
 1.- migrating from IE (all the friendly stuff) 

 2.- public computer
 (disable auto fill for web forms and passwords, expire history / cache
 immediatley, etc..) 

 3.- personal and only personal (completely
 opposed to public computer) 

 4.- mozilla classic/default 

 5.- i dont
 remember, but there was another one i thought of before

4. Netscape 4.x
5. Mozilla/Netscape 6.x

 of course all of this goes imho..
 please comment about it ! :)
 

I think it's a nice idea. Something for the installer or the profile
managers new profile wizard.

Not much chance of this being picked up till 1.0 though :)

- yatsu




Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread DeMoN LaG

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Dec 2001: 
Are you being intentionally insulting to the people that work long
 hours trying to make _all_ of the product better? Are you just
 bitter or mean?
 
 No I am not biter or mean but I am fast getting that way. Its been
 stated in these newsgroups that emphasis is being placed on the
 browser first and then its prefected then you will work on Mail and
 news. 

That was never stated by anyone working on or in any way involved with 
Mozilla.

 
 I've posted suggestions, I've answered questions (yes some maybe
 wrong). I've posted bugs. Still no difference.
 
 Look get real. I might possibly be the only Mac person on this
 newsgroup and wishlist. I even subscribe to the Mozilla Mac group
 sadly it gets posted to once or twice a week and then only one or
 two post. 

Asa just said he runs mozilla on like 4 different Mac OSs.  Can you not 
read?

 
 Mozilla group don't give a Damn about the Mac side of research.
 They would just as soon see Apple and Mac crash and burn.

You have no basis of this information.  You are just an ignorant dick 
head that isn't getting his own way.

 
 People have to wake up suppose one day that Apple and Mac is no
 longer around. That means Mr Gates at microsoft can screw everyone
 around any way he wants. He will then set his sites on UNIX. 

He's been trying, yet strangely it has accomplished nothing.

 
 He already making noise about open source. (Mozilla and others). 

Let him.  Noise about open source is free publicity.

 
 So research should be done on the Mac platform not just for the
 sake of Mac but to keep Mr Gates in line so that you can freely
 ddesign sofware as you desire.

The constitution of the US of A says I can freely design anything, 
software included.  

 
 So yes in a way i guess I am downright upset, bitter. And I might
 be begining to get mean.

You have been this way as long as I can remember.
 
 
 Go ahead and laugh. But wait 5 - 10 years see how hard you laugh,
 when every piece of software you get on the planet has to be
 cleared through Mr gates and his bunch. imagine what the prices
 will be like even for UNIX. 

Yeah...  Sure.  You seem to imply that the Mac going bye bye would 
affect Unix somehow?  The Mac does not compete in the same market as 
Unix.  The Mac has no bearing on Unix at all.

-- 
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m




Builds won't load

2001-12-01 Thread Gord McFee

I am having a problem with the 20011129 build similar to one I had with
the 0.9.6 release, serious enough that I can't use them at all.

After downloading, when I try to start Mozilla and load a 4.79 profile,
the Mozilla homepage starts to load and then freezes with the progress
bar at about the halfway point.  The system (Win98) freezes solid -
mouse, keyboard, everything dead - and a cold reboot is required.  I
have tried this importing an existing profile or creating a new one. 
The only difference is that a new profile loads the first time, and
freezes the second, and importing an existing profile freezes the first
time.  This happens every time and makes even using the program
impossible.

-- 
Gord McFee
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'll write no line before its time




Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Chuck Simmons

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
 
 Asa Dotzler wrote:
 
  Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
 
  snip
   As I've been chided here often. Don't make broad brush assumptions.
   while on 'nix and windows you can do this Netscape 6 and Communicator up
   to 4.7.8 do conflict with each other.
  
  Please stop stating that is if it was the case for everyone. You have a usage 
pattern which differs from most other users that causes you some problem that no one 
else can reproduce. I test Mozilla on Mac OS 8.5 (currently busted, no keyboard 
input) 8.6, 9.1, 9.2.1, 10.0 and 10.1. I also use Communicator 4.x on those machines 
for compatability testing and bug confirming. There are no problems with running 4.x 
and Mozilla/6.x on the same machine.
 
  --Asa
 
 
 
 Look you better frequent some of the netscape newsgroups.
 
 I can not believe that I am the only one having the problem if the
 Netscape Champions program recommends not puting both on the same
 partition on the same hard drive.
 
 Its recommended by the Netscape Champions program. NOT to have N6 and
 Communicator installed on the same Hard drive if using one partition (as
 i do)  or on the same Partition if the drive is paritioned.

I'm sorry but Asa can find out all about the Netscape Champions from
some other folks who he works with. Dan Vedits (sorry if I misspelled
that) for one. How we came about is history. That we still help with
Netscape problems is habit or whatever though we still get some good
help from some very good Netscape engineers.

The actual recommendation is not to share profiles because of some
changes in preferences that can cause surprises and worse. There is
nothing special about having Netscape and Mozilla in the same partition.
They don't do battle with thermonuclear weapons on you disk drive
leaving craters and land mines. It is just that there are occasional
problems with preferences when profiles are shared.

Asa is right. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill. The
exageration is insulting to developers. Dragging in the Netscape
Champions is not fair to us because we are always working with the
balance that fits the user who asks a question. I am not going to tell a
completely green user to fix his problem by writing a Perl script. I
will give him guidelines that I consider safe for his level of
expertise.

Don't be so confrontational. I know Asa's tone is very different when he
thinks he can say words that will help. Look for other posts from
Netscape and Mozilla developers when they are confronted with a real
problem with a real solution or even no solution. They tell you a lot.
After all, this is an open source project. We can all know as much or as
little as we wish.

Chuck
-- 
... The times have been, 
 That, when the brains were out, 
  the man would die. ... Macbeth 
   Chuck Simmons  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Common adress book on network

2001-12-01 Thread Jadzia

Hi!

I'm installing mozilla on my network at work.
We used a shared adressbook with outlook and a private one.
I now want to do the same with mozilla.
1 adress book that everyone has and a private one.

Can this be done with mozilla? (without LDAP)





nsString status?

2001-12-01 Thread Chuck Messenger

Help!  (please...!)

I've just started delving into the Mozilla framework -- a treasure!

Anyway, I'm striving to make sense of the string classes.  The only existing
docs consist largely of old email messages, which themselves refer to things
which are planned (and presumably implemented by now??)

The LXR browser is great, but leaves me a bit puzzled.  Searching for
nsString (as an identifier) in lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey, I find the class
definition in mozilla/string/obsolete/nsString2.h.  Doing a diff on my
/src/mozilla/dist/include/string/nsString.h, I see that is, indeed, the
current nsString.h file.

So, why is it referred to as obsolete?  What's the status on strings?

Thanks.

- Chuck






Re: no !!!!!!

2001-12-01 Thread Travis Crump

Juan Perez wrote:

 , maybe you should make an IE skin in the installer?? 

At first I thought this was a sarcastic response until I realized that 
it was posted by the same person,  it is very very unlikely that there 
would be any support for this from any of the people in the Mozilla 
heirarchy who matter(note: I am not one of the people who matter), which 
means it is never going to be done.  Some people might even oppose it's 
addition to the tree if someone actually did implement it since it would 
make Mozilla look like it is trying to clone IE which would make it look 
inferior.  Someone could post it for download elsewhere, but theme 
capatability as I understand it from other newsgroup posts isn't going 
to stabilize til 1.0 so it would have to be heavily mantained.

As for the other points, the only problem I see with it is that it would 
encourage people not to look over and customize their preferences which 
would leave them open to surprises down the road since 4 or 5 options 
are unlikely to suit everyone.





Solution: Re: dumping in-memory RDF datasource

2001-12-01 Thread Jan Peter Hecking

On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Jan Peter Hecking wrote:
 is there an easy way to dump an in-memory RDF datasource to either a
 file or stdout from within a javascript xpcom component?

Answer: there is. This thread in n.p.m.rdf explains how:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=dethreadm=3AF256D9.503%40netscape.comrnum=2prev=/groups%3Fq%3Drdf%2Bserialize%2Bmozilla%2Bdump%26hl%3Dde%26btnG%3DGoogle-Suche

Note: There's one mistake in the post. The nsIOutputStream should be
created like this:

var out = {
write: function(buf, cound){ dump(buf); return cound; }
};

bye,
Jan

-- 
Jan Peter Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of RostockDepartment of Computer Science
Web: http://jhecking.netgaroo.com, http://news.netgaroo.com




Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


Chuck Simmons wrote:
 
 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
 
  Asa Dotzler wrote:
  
   Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
  
   snip
As I've been chided here often. Don't make broad brush assumptions.
while on 'nix and windows you can do this Netscape 6 and Communicator up
to 4.7.8 do conflict with each other.
   
   Please stop stating that is if it was the case for everyone. You have a usage 
pattern which differs from most other users that causes you some problem that no one 
else can reproduce. I test Mozilla on Mac OS 8.5 (currently busted, no keyboard 
input) 8.6, 9.1, 9.2.1, 10.0 and 10.1. I also use Communicator 4.x on those machines 
for compatability testing and bug confirming. There are no problems with running 4.x 
and Mozilla/6.x on the same machine.
  
   --Asa
  
  
 
  Look you better frequent some of the netscape newsgroups.
 
  I can not believe that I am the only one having the problem if the
  Netscape Champions program recommends not puting both on the same
  partition on the same hard drive.
 
  Its recommended by the Netscape Champions program. NOT to have N6 and
  Communicator installed on the same Hard drive if using one partition (as
  i do)  or on the same Partition if the drive is paritioned.
 
 I'm sorry but Asa can find out all about the Netscape Champions from
 some other folks who he works with. Dan Vedits (sorry if I misspelled
 that) for one. How we came about is history. That we still help with
 Netscape problems is habit or whatever though we still get some good
 help from some very good Netscape engineers.
 
 The actual recommendation is not to share profiles because of some
 changes in preferences that can cause surprises and worse. There is
 nothing special about having Netscape and Mozilla in the same partition.
 They don't do battle with thermonuclear weapons on you disk drive
 leaving craters and land mines. It is just that there are occasional
 problems with preferences when profiles are shared.
 
 Asa is right. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill. The
 exageration is insulting to developers. Dragging in the Netscape
 Champions is not fair to us because we are always working with the
 balance that fits the user who asks a question. I am not going to tell a
 completely green user to fix his problem by writing a Perl script. I
 will give him guidelines that I consider safe for his level of
 expertise.
 
 Don't be so confrontational. I know Asa's tone is very different when he
 thinks he can say words that will help. Look for other posts from
 Netscape and Mozilla developers when they are confronted with a real
 problem with a real solution or even no solution. They tell you a lot.
 After all, this is an open source project. We can all know as much or as
 little as we wish.
 
 Chuck
 --
 ... The times have been,
  That, when the brains were out,
   the man would die. ... Macbeth
Chuck Simmons  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Okay please explain for admonition by the Champs Not to place
Communicator and netscape 6 on the same partion on your hard Drive. 

I realize that Mozilla and netscape 6 can actaully use one anothers
preferences because the path to preferences is Name (name of Hard Drive)
 Documents  Mozilla  User Profile.

But i am refering to Communicator and netscape 6.

Communicator's preferences are located in System File  preferences File
 Netscape User Folder, Profile Folder. There is no way they can share Preferences.

However, The Mac uses both Internet Config and and File Exchange. Both
depend upon Type and creator codes. 

If for example say I want to update Interarchy from with Interarchy and
and both Netscape 6 and Communicator are present on same Partition
Internet Config /Internet Contol panel will call up netscape 6 instead
Communicator as i have set. Throwing away Internet Control panel's
preferences make no difference becaus it does a poll of all the
applications it finds Communicator with Type APPL Creator MOSS, and it
finds Netscape 6 with Type APPL,  and Creator MOSS.

So guess what happens. Both try to open. But Netscape 6 has code to kill
off any other application with the same Type and Creator. SO even though
I plainly have set Communicator as the browser to use to go to website
to update application (I used Interarchy in this example but it could be
anything) netscape 6 comes up.  I can repeat this for a thousand years
if necessary. It will come up the same.

So please explain why I get this problem is its not a conflict between
the type and creator code.


And Finally I was not trying to Drag the Champions program in to this,
other than to state that memebers of the Champs program on the
Communicator Mac groups have suggested Not to place N6 and Communicator
either on same partition if your drive is partitioned or on the same
hard drive because of this problem. No other reason was intended. The
Champs program has helped out me a lot 

Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Henri Sivonen

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I can not believe that I am the only one having the problem if the
 Netscape Champions program recommends not puting both on the same
 partition on the same hard drive.

replay
Installing them on the same disk might mix up icons and the 
double-clicking associations. Other than that, there is no risk.

The icon mix-up does not imply corruption of the contents of the files. 
The contents are OK. It is only a Finder-level thing.

If you don't like the icon mix-up, you can use disk images. You don't 
need another hard drive.
/replay

-- 
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/




Re: Builds won't load

2001-12-01 Thread dman84

Gord McFee wrote:

 I am having a problem with the 20011129 build similar to one I had with
 the 0.9.6 release, serious enough that I can't use them at all.
 
 After downloading, when I try to start Mozilla and load a 4.79 profile,
 the Mozilla homepage starts to load and then freezes with the progress
 bar at about the halfway point.  The system (Win98) freezes solid -
 mouse, keyboard, everything dead - and a cold reboot is required.  I
 have tried this importing an existing profile or creating a new one. 
 The only difference is that a new profile loads the first time, and
 freezes the second, and importing an existing profile freezes the first
 time.  This happens every time and makes even using the program
 impossible.
 
 

could just be an issue with the importing utility.. you have to get it 
fully converted over first, then it should create a new profile.





full customizable toolbars

2001-12-01 Thread yatsu

Originally posted to the ui newsgroup but i suppose this isn't all about
mozilla's looks.

i'm sure there's a bug on this, and never being very sucessful with
bugzilla i thought i might ask if anyone knew which bug(s) cover this?

Also just a few comments on mozilla's gui.

1) Why doesn't the Go button have an icon?
2) How about a clear urlbar icon on the toolbar?
3) Why has there been decided not to show the urlbar seperately from the
navbar like N4.x?
4) It'd be nice to have a simple option to turnoff menubar grippies like
IE's lock toolbars.
5) When using the block images feature shouldn't mozilla show the
server's url in the context menu?
6) Any plans on copying the fontsizing feature to the navbar?
7) Will fontsizing eventually be stored on a page to page basis?

- yatsu




Re: Pre-alpha: Privacy Manager dialog

2001-12-01 Thread Dan Mosedale

Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Hey ho,
 
 I've created a dialog designed for deleting all the stuff collated in 
 various places throughout Mozilla as you surf the web.  By stuff, I mean 
 cookies, history, permissions, etc.   This probably sounds quiet vague.. 
 take a look at http://www.pncl.co.uk/~mhardy/privacymanager/ for info 
 and download a very early release.  Feedback welcome!  Requires moz 0.9.6.

A fine idea; looks nice!

Dan






Re: Common adress book on network

2001-12-01 Thread Dan Mosedale

Jadzia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Hi!
 
 I'm installing mozilla on my network at work.
 We used a shared adressbook with outlook and a private one.
 I now want to do the same with mozilla.
 1 adress book that everyone has and a private one.
 
 Can this be done with mozilla? (without LDAP)
 

Yes; see http://abzilla.mozdev.org/

Dan





Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


DeMoN LaG wrote:
-snip-
 
 You have been this way as long as I can remember.

Actually, when i first started on these groups I wasn't. But the more i
saw things deteriate  (inthe program) and the more I asked what was
going on or reported bugs, or voted on bugs, or offerred comments then
was promptly shot down. The more things deteriated even more. 

I can remember several versions ago I could look at pages on 

snews://secnews.netscape.com/test.multimedia

And in some cases I could hear sounds or see images. Actions such as
drifter, Marquee and such wouldn't work because the layer comand was
used in code. And I understood that. 

Now for several versions I get no sound at all and the images flash on
and off so fast you can't tell what's what and the only way to get out
of the page is to do a force quit. The only response I get get lost, it
ain't happening, your imagining things. So instead of any offerring to
help figure out what is happening I get blown off as a crackpot

Heck I'd be willing to send a copy of my about plugins, and my system
profiler File to anyone seriously interested in figuring out what the
problem is. I'm open to suggestions. But; since I've never had anyone
say can you send me information so I can look into it. I must assume
then it does happen no one has a solution.

 
 
  Go ahead and laugh. But wait 5 - 10 years see how hard you laugh,
  when every piece of software you get on the planet has to be
  cleared through Mr gates and his bunch. imagine what the prices
  will be like even for UNIX.
 
 Yeah...  Sure.  You seem to imply that the Mac going bye bye would
 affect Unix somehow?  The Mac does not compete in the same market as
 Unix.  The Mac has no bearing on Unix at all.

Yes, I am  - because  if Apple was gone, Gates could consentrate all his
efforts at buying up or killing open source for UNIX and other products.
You better thank your lucky stars tha Mac is around. Its a deversion for
Mr Gates to not place 100% of his efforts against UNIX and Open Source.

 
 --
 ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
 AIM: FlyersR1 9
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _ = m

-- 
---
Phillip M. Jones, CET  |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---

If it's fixed, don't break it!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm




Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread DeMoN LaG

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Dec 2001: 
 
 Yeah...  Sure.  You seem to imply that the Mac going bye bye would
 affect Unix somehow?  The Mac does not compete in the same market
 as Unix.  The Mac has no bearing on Unix at all.
 
 Yes, I am  - because  if Apple was gone, Gates could consentrate
 all his efforts at buying up or killing open source for UNIX and
 other products. You better thank your lucky stars tha Mac is
 around. Its a deversion for Mr Gates to not place 100% of his
 efforts against UNIX and Open Source. 

You can't buy up Unix.  Hell, let Bill Gates try to take on Unix in 
the server market.  Never happen.  Unix is too powerful.  And since it's 
open source, you can take plain vanilla unix and craft it to anything to 
suit your needs.  Can't do that with any MS product.  Bring it on, Mr. 
Gates, Open Source is here to stay and there is no way Microsoft could 
eliminate *nix (MS has been trying to eliminate Linux for years, still 
not happening.  In fact, Linux has *gained* market share)

-- 
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m




Autoscroll/Panning

2001-12-01 Thread Brian Bober

We need more input on Bug 63712. Bug 22775
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775 talks about
autoscroll/panning. If you want to help, please skim that bug and then read
63712 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63712 and give your
opinion on how to activate autoscroll/panning on oses besides Windows. Thank
you.






Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Chuck Simmons

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
 
 
 Okay please explain for admonition by the Champs Not to place
 Communicator and netscape 6 on the same partion on your hard Drive.
 
 I realize that Mozilla and netscape 6 can actaully use one anothers
 preferences because the path to preferences is Name (name of Hard Drive)
  Documents  Mozilla  User Profile.
 
 But i am refering to Communicator and netscape 6.
 
 Communicator's preferences are located in System File  preferences File
  Netscape User Folder, Profile Folder. There is no way they can share Preferences.
 
 However, The Mac uses both Internet Config and and File Exchange. Both
 depend upon Type and creator codes.
 
 If for example say I want to update Interarchy from with Interarchy and
 and both Netscape 6 and Communicator are present on same Partition
 Internet Config /Internet Contol panel will call up netscape 6 instead
 Communicator as i have set. Throwing away Internet Control panel's
 preferences make no difference becaus it does a poll of all the
 applications it finds Communicator with Type APPL Creator MOSS, and it
 finds Netscape 6 with Type APPL,  and Creator MOSS.
 
 So guess what happens. Both try to open. But Netscape 6 has code to kill
 off any other application with the same Type and Creator. SO even though
 I plainly have set Communicator as the browser to use to go to website
 to update application (I used Interarchy in this example but it could be
 anything) netscape 6 comes up.  I can repeat this for a thousand years
 if necessary. It will come up the same.
 
 So please explain why I get this problem is its not a conflict between
 the type and creator code.
 
 And Finally I was not trying to Drag the Champions program in to this,
 other than to state that memebers of the Champs program on the
 Communicator Mac groups have suggested Not to place N6 and Communicator
 either on same partition if your drive is partitioned or on the same
 hard drive because of this problem. No other reason was intended. The
 Champs program has helped out me a lot with Communicator. And I suppose
 will continue to do as long as Communicator is Viable.

Never mind. I have had my ration of talking to fence posts this week.

Chuck
-- 
... The times have been, 
 That, when the brains were out, 
  the man would die. ... Macbeth 
   Chuck Simmons  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: full customizable toolbars

2001-12-01 Thread Luke

bug 15144 Ability to add/remove toolbar buttons (customize toolbars)

  3) Why has there been decided not to show the urlbar seperately from 
the navbar like N4.x?

bug 49543 Separate Toolbar from Address Bar [urlbar]

  6) Any plans on copying the fontsizing feature to the navbar?
  7) Will fontsizing eventually be stored on a page to page basis?

etc.  These have bugs too.  Please spend your own time searching 
bugzilla, not others'.

  2) How about a clear urlbar icon on the toolbar?

?!

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Redhat and Mozilla thru MS ISA server

2001-12-01 Thread Luke

Until that bug's fixed, your ISA server config might allow you to use 
the ISA / MS proxy client.  Try running MS_FWC.MSI on 
\\yourISAserver\mspclnt.

Cheers,

 Thanks Will,
 
 That is exactly the issue. It works if I don't require authentication
 internally for Internet access.  I should've check bugzilla myself.  I'll
 know next time.


Maybe check:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35159

I have a situation where I am using several Red Hat 7.2 boxes on Windows
2000 network.
These boxes cannot get out through the MS ISA (Internet Security and
Acceleration)  server.  I have used this same
type of setup with MS Proxy 2.0 and had no problems.  Here is the setup:


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Redhat and Mozilla thru MS ISA server

2001-12-01 Thread Luke

Um...just read the subject again.  RedHat.

Ignore me.

Luke wrote:

 Until that bug's fixed, your ISA server config might allow you to use 
 the ISA / MS proxy client.  Try running MS_FWC.MSI on 
 \\yourISAserver\mspclnt.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Thanks Will,

 That is exactly the issue. It works if I don't require authentication
 internally for Internet access.  I should've check bugzilla myself.  I'll
 know next time.
 
 
 
 Maybe check:
 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35159

 
 I have a situation where I am using several Red Hat 7.2 boxes on 
 Windows
 2000 network.
 These boxes cannot get out through the MS ISA (Internet Security and
 Acceleration)  server.  I have used this same
 type of setup with MS Proxy 2.0 and had no problems.  Here is the 
 setup:

 
 



-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





key chain type Alcohol tester

2001-12-01 Thread SCL

Dear sir,

This is one time email.  Sorry for any inconvenience.
We got your email from internet that you are dealing with wine
 relative products.

So, we would like to introduce you our new items:
Key Chain, LED type alcohol tester.

Which is suitable for the gift and promoting items with your wine products.

Quickly delivery with reasonable price will be let you satisfy.

If any interesting, please advise.

Regards
J.Lee
Tel:+886-937029101
Fax:+996-9-43882640



Re: Worth it?

2001-12-01 Thread Jay Garcia

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:

 
 I can not believe that I am the only one having the problem if the
 Netscape Champions program recommends not puting both on the same
 partition on the same hard drive.


Where did you come up with this bit of info ??? The Champions Program
has never made this recommendation.

 Its recommended by the Netscape Champions program. NOT to have N6 and
 Communicator installed on the same Hard drive if using one partition (as
 i do)  or on the same Partition if the drive is paritioned.


See above reply

I run NS 6, Mozilla AND Communicator on the same drive on 8 different
workstations here with no noticeable conflicts whatsoever.

My brother does the same on 4 different Macs including a G4 with no
noticeable problems.

-- 
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org





Re: nsString status?

2001-12-01 Thread John Morrison

You might try posting in netscape.public.mozilla.xpcom 

Chuck Messenger wrote:
 
 Help!  (please...!)
 
 I've just started delving into the Mozilla framework -- a treasure!
 
 Anyway, I'm striving to make sense of the string classes.  The only existing
 docs consist largely of old email messages, which themselves refer to things
 which are planned (and presumably implemented by now??)
 
 The LXR browser is great, but leaves me a bit puzzled.  Searching for
 nsString (as an identifier) in lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey, I find the class
 definition in mozilla/string/obsolete/nsString2.h.  Doing a diff on my
 /src/mozilla/dist/include/string/nsString.h, I see that is, indeed, the
 current nsString.h file.
 
 So, why is it referred to as obsolete?  What's the status on strings?
 
 Thanks.
 
 - Chuck




second post how make mozilla the default

2001-12-01 Thread John Fabiani

Hi,
I have KDE 2.2 RH 7.2 I want to make mozilla the default browers.  How do I 
do that?
TIA
John