Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access permission to relax mixed content

LGTM2 On 2/15/24 4:55 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 9:51 AM 'Yifan Luo' via blink-dev wrote: OT findings: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15b2kCikEqw6P0xZFXQKMiKk_WnqnIZpT5p8nmLgc93Y/edit?usp=sharing There are 7 OT users and most of them

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebSocketStream

Thank you - LGTM1 On 2/15/24 7:16 AM, Adam Rice wrote: Thanks Mike, I have requested the approvals. Sorry for the delay, I didn't understand the interface. Adam On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 01:39, Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Adam, Would you mind requesting approvals in the chromestatus

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: allow Window's focus() API to focus opener

LGTM3 On 2/15/24 1:06 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:28 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: Thanks! LGTM1 On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:07 AM 'Tommy Steimel' via blink-dev wrote: Landed the PR and added a comment to the TAG thread. Thanks!

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support in Chrome for the VoiceIsolation getUserMedia constraint

LGTM3 On 2/14/24 11:49 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:46 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, some comments inline. On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 6:15 AM Per Åhgren wrote: >> >> >> TAG review status >> >> Issues addressed >> This is

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebSocketStream

Hi Adam, Would you mind requesting approvals in the chromestatus entry for the various review gates? On 2/8/24 1:30 AM, Adam Rice wrote: Unfortunately, no partners were ready when we did the OT, so there was no feedback at all. However, we have subsequently received private feedback that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: jitterBufferTarget

Thanks! I had intended to reply that it's very simple to add a runtime enabled feature to IDL, but it's been a busy day. :) On 2/13/24 3:57 PM, Eldar Rello wrote: >Can we add a flag? https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/flag_guarding_guidelines.md >(Or someone can

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement

pect we'll eventually add support). On 2/8/24 11:59 PM, Nan Lin wrote: Hi Yoav, On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:09 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:58 PM Nan Lin wrote: Thanks Mike. On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:50 AM Mike Taylor wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: jitterBufferTarget

We also need to flip the various review gates on the chromestatus entry (privacy, security, enterprise... etc.). If you're working with someone at Google on this feature, perhaps they could assist? On 2/12/24 9:53 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 2/12/24 6:36 AM, Eldar Rello wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: jitterBufferTarget

On 2/12/24 6:36 AM, Eldar Rello wrote: Contact emails eldar.re...@gmail.com Explainer None Specification https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#dom-rtcrtpreceiver-jitterbuffertarget Summary JitterBufferTarget attribute allows applications to specify

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove "window-placement" alias for permission and permission policy "window-management"

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 1:59 PM Brad Triebwasser wrote: +blink-dev@chromium.org <mailto:blink-dev@chromium.org> / Reply All Thanks for your feedback, Mike! Recipes inline: On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:36 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Brad,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Private network access checks for navigation requests: warning-only mode

: LGTM2 On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:10 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Correction: LGTM1, conditioned on requesting Enterprise, Debuggability, and Testing bits in chromestatus. :) On 2/2/24 5:09 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 On 2/2/24

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement

On 2/6/24 3:59 AM, Nan Lin wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for reviewing. Please see responses inline. Nan On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:33 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Nan, On 2/2/24 5:00 AM, Nan Lin wrote: Contact emails lin...@chromium.org <mailto:lin...@chromium.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove "window-placement" alias for permission and permission policy "window-management"

Hi Brad, On 2/6/24 3:49 PM, Brad Triebwasser wrote: Contact emails btri...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/window-management/blob/main/EXPLAINER_spec_and_permission_rename.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement

Hi Nan, On 2/2/24 5:00 AM, Nan Lin wrote: Contact emails lin...@chromium.org , johni...@chromium.org Explainer Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Private network access checks for navigation requests: warning-only mode

Correction: LGTM1, conditioned on requesting Enterprise, Debuggability, and Testing bits in chromestatus. :) On 2/2/24 5:09 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 On 2/2/24 11:17 AM, Jonathan Hao wrote: Contact emails p...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/private

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Private network access checks for navigation requests: warning-only mode

LGTM1 On 2/2/24 11:17 AM, Jonathan Hao wrote: Contact emails p...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/private-network-access/blob/main/explainer.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/private-network-access Design docs

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: 'pagereveal' event

LGMT2 - no concerns about lack of a response from TAG. On 2/2/24 1:18 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1 On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 6:53 AM David Bokan wrote: Contact emails bo...@chromium.org, khushalsa...@chromium.org, nrosent...@chromium.org, vmp...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial : HTMLVideoElement-specific Prefixed Fullscreen API

: Thanks for marking it for review! I submitted a request to review this change to the chromium enterprise mailing list. Thanks, Thomas On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 1:08 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Yep - seems

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial : HTMLVideoElement-specific Prefixed Fullscreen API

ed to take some extra action, and a "Feature deprecation" entry is the only way we can flag that. On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:44 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Gentle reminder to follow up on requesting privacy/security/debuggability approvals in chromestatus

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial : HTMLVideoElement-specific Prefixed Fullscreen API

Gentle reminder to follow up on requesting privacy/security/debuggability approvals in chromestatus (which is currently blocking LGTMs). On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 7:23:28 AM UTC-5 Mike Taylor wrote: > Would you mind requesting reviews for the various gates (privacy, > se

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS light-dark() Color Function

LGTM2 On 1/30/24 1:11 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:08 AM Rune Lillesveen wrote: Contact emails futh...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#light-dark

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: NavigationActivation

On 1/29/24 2:44 AM, 'Noam Rosenthal' via blink-dev wrote: On Friday, January 26, 2024 at 5:15:28 PM UTC Vladimir Levin wrote: On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 4:27 AM Noam Rosenthal wrote: Finch feature nameNone Non-finch justification It's a web-API, exposing it

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Protected Audience k-Anonymity Enforcement

then that auction will return without a winner. Protected Audience auctions already return with no winner in some cases, such as when there are no bids, so this does not introduce a new behavior. On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 4:24 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Russ, Can you say more about

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access permission to relax mixed content

Hi! Could you please request the various approval bits for the review gates in your chromestatus entry? On 1/26/24 11:07 AM, 'Yifan Luo' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails l...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support in Chrome for the VoiceIsolation getUserMedia constraint

Hi Per, On 1/26/24 8:27 AM, Per Åhgren wrote: Contact emails p...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-extensions/#voiceisolation-constraint Summary This is about adding support in Chrome for the VoiceIsolation

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Protected Audience k-Anonymity Enforcement

Hi Russ, Can you say more about the compatibility implications for such a change? AFAIU, things shouldn't "break" for users or throw errors behind the scenes, correct? thanks, Mike On 1/26/24 12:59 AM, 'Russ Hamilton' via blink-dev wrote: We plan to start enabling the k-anonymity

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to experiment - WebAssembly JavaScript Promise Integration (update)

Yep - that is an official positive signal, thanks! On 1/24/24 7:40 PM, Francis McCabe wrote: Does this: https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#wasm-js-promise-integration count as an official positive signal? Francis On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:09 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience Ad slot size in real-time bidding signals fetch and update more interest group fields

LGTM2 On 1/24/24 4:10 PM, Rick Byers wrote: Great, thank you! Yep, looks like the PR is about to land to me, I'm satisfied. LGTM1 On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:02 AM Paul Jensen wrote: That spec PR has now been reviewed and approved by the Protected Audience team and our spec mentor. 

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Long Animation Frame Timing

LGTM1 On 1/17/24 9:32 AM, 'Noam Rosenthal' via blink-dev wrote: Updating that Mozilla gave an official positive signal: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/pull/962 Updated the corresponding chromestatus field. On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 10:34:19 AM UTC Noam Rosenthal wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial : HTMLVideoElement-specific Prefixed Fullscreen API

Would you mind requesting reviews for the various gates (privacy, security, debuggability) for an OT/DT in your chromestatus entry? On 1/19/24 10:43 PM, Thomas Guilbert wrote: Contact emails tguilb...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Allow for WebAuthn credential creation in a cross-origin iframe

f we get any reply :) On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 10:25, Mike Taylor wrote: I think erring on the side of requesting a signal here is a good idea. :) On 1/17/24 8:33 AM, Stephen Mcgruer wrote: API owners: It wasn't clear

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Soft Navigation Heuristics

LGTM to extend to 123 inclusive. On 1/22/24 10:00 PM, Ian Clelland wrote: Contact emails iclell...@chromium.org Explainer https://bit.ly/soft-navigation https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eUyQg3YLEmYjrTMC3p-F1MilECwCynhM6WIbIo05SPU/edit Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow Cross-Origin Subframes to Send Automatic Beacons

Thanks Liam. This seems fine to me given that both parties need to opt in. LGTM1 On 1/22/24 6:10 PM, Liam Brady wrote: Hi Mike, "crossOrigin=true" is just a typo. "crossOrigin" was the original naming convention for "crossOriginExposed". It was renamed during code review, but I forgot to

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Domenic Denicola

+1 - congrats! I look forward to Domenic bringing his decade plus of web and standards experience to the group. (I think it was somewhere between 2010-2012 that I first saw Domenic give a talk at the NYC.js meetup and have been a fan since). On 1/21/24 4:24 AM, Yuki Shiino wrote:

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: New ALPS code point

In our OWNERS meeting this week, there was some confusion on what's being proposed here (which is understandable, this isn't quite a typical intent for web exposed feature). Here's a summary of what we're trying to accomplish: 1) We shipped support for the ACCEPT_CH frame over h2 and h3 back

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow Cross-Origin Subframes to Send Automatic Beacons

Hi Liam, On 1/16/24 3:49 PM, 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails lbr...@google.com , shivani...@chromium.org , jkar...@chromium.org Explainer(s)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RTCRtpSender setParameters() extensions for requesting the generation of a key frame

LGTM2 On 1/19/24 12:41 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 7:36 AM 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev wrote: Thank you for the detailed explanation. It's hard to decipher from meeting notes whether a discussion is bikeshedding or serious objections :)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:42 AM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 On 10/15/23 11:07 AM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't aware they

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

If you believe you've found a bug, please file a new issue at crbug.com/new. This is not a support forum. thanks, Mike On 1/17/24 7:30 PM, Adam Semenenko wrote: Unfortunately the opt-out feature no longer seems to work, and now Chrome is randomly highlighting text and scrolling halfway

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Captured Surface Control

Oops, missed Chris' email on this. But you're double approved now. :) On 1/17/24 8:32 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM to experiment from M122 to M127 inclusive. On 1/17/24 9:09 AM, 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev wrote: A quick clarification, btw, that we have a partner in mind that's eager to start

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Captured Surface Control

LGTM to experiment from M122 to M127 inclusive. On 1/17/24 9:09 AM, 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev wrote: A quick clarification, btw, that we have a partner in mind that's eager to start origin trial as soon as m122. We also heard interest from other parties during Screen Capture CG meetings. On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: separate Read-only depth-stencil

LGTM2 On 1/17/24 7:45 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't blocking approval on them in this case) On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:02 AM Corentin Wallez wrote: Hey Rick, The spec PRs for all of these intents are landed but

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WGSL: pointer composite access

LGTM2 On 1/17/24 7:46 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't blocking approval on them in this case) On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:17 AM 'Corentin Wallez' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails cwal...@google.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: render to slice of 3D texture

LGTM2 On 1/17/24 7:50 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't blocking approval on them in this case) On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:18 AM Corentin Wallez wrote: Contact emails cwal...@google.com Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: read-write storage textures

LGTM2 On 1/17/24 7:49 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't blocking approval on them in this case) On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:04 AM 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:01 AM Yoav Weiss

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WGSL: packed 4x8 integer dot product (DP4)

LGTM3 On 1/17/24 7:49 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't blocking approval on them in this case) On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 7:39 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: Oops! For this intent as well, can you tick the other review boxes in

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WGSL: unrestricted pointer parameters

LGTM3 On 1/17/24 3:40 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:04 PM Corentin Wallez wrote: Thanks a lot! On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:11 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: Got it, thanks for clarifying and the quick response! The API owners reviewed today

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: MessagePort.onclose

:31 AM UTC+9 Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks Rakina - right now the biggest blocker is the unlanded spec PR. Things should move pretty quickly once that's resolved. On 1/10/24 11:15 PM, Rakina Zata Amni wrote: > Hoping that the design doc can become an GH

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Allow for WebAuthn credential creation in a cross-origin iframe

I think erring on the side of requesting a signal here is a good idea. :) On 1/17/24 8:33 AM, Stephen Mcgruer wrote: API owners: It wasn't clear to me if I should still be formally requesting signals from WebKit and Gecko in the case of a change to an API (WebAuthn) where the change has been

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: MessagePort.onclose

sual format, as the design doc doesn't answer questions in the strucutre we like to see: https://w3ctag.org/explainers/ Best, Alex On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 8:46:20 AM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote: Gentle reminder to request approvals for the other review gates in chromes

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audiences Negative Targeting

On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 % landing https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/796.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS custom state new :state() syntax

(but please remember to request reviews for the other review gates in chromestatus) On 1/3/24 1:10 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 1/3/24 12:54 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:44 AM Joey Arhar wrote: Contact emails jar...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS custom state new :state() syntax

LGTM2 On 1/3/24 12:54 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:44 AM Joey Arhar wrote: Contact emails jar...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Set methods

It seems like Firefox hasn't actually shipped this yet (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1868423), but LGTM3. On 1/3/24 11:52 AM, Alex Russell wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 8:49:57 AM UTC-8 Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 12:57 PM

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FedCM: domain hint and disconnect

LGTM1 On 1/2/24 11:42 AM, Nicolás Peña wrote: Brief update: both spec PRs are now merged. Hoping to ship in M122. On Friday, December 15, 2023 at 2:29:58 PM UTC-5 Nicolás Peña wrote: Contact emails n...@chromium.org Explainer Domain Hint (formerly hosted domain):

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebSocket: Allow http(s) scheme and relative URLs

On 12/27/23 4:01 AM, snek wrote: *Explainer* None *Specification* https://websockets.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-websocket-websocket *Summary* Implement changes to WebSocket constructor to accept http(s) schemes, and by extension relative URLs as well. Unmerged change is here:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Highlight Inheritance

forgotten it. /Daniel On 2023-11-06 16:43, Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks for the detailed explanation of compat and for filing a TAG review. The risk of breakage seems low (and I suppose we'll learn how true that is as the change rides the trains), and breakage in this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGL drawingBufferStorage

Given that Kelsey gave you a private positive signal and the spec is merged, that works for me. LGTM1 to ship. On 12/20/23 4:44 PM, Ken Russell wrote: The PR has been merged into the WebGL spec, viewable at https://registry.khronos.org/webgl/specs/latest/1.0/ . Are OWNERS here comfortable

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

don't think this debate changes anything from a blink API owner's perspective so I'm OK treating it as non-blocking. A subset of API owners met today (Daniel, Mike Taylor, Philip and I), and agreed with this stance. WDYT?

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Compute Pressure API

Yep - all good to go. On 12/19/23 4:18 AM, Arnaud Mandy wrote: @chris @rick, I think we have, now, all the approvals in order. https://chromestatus.com/feature/5597608644968448?context=myfeatures=6581325103890432 Can we consider our "Intent to Extend Experiment" approved? Arnaud. On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: field-sizing CSS property

LGTM1 Very happy to see this addition. On 12/15/23 2:23 AM, TAMURA, Kent wrote: Contact emails tk...@chromium.org, ikilpatr...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tkent-google/explainers/blob/main/form-sizing.md Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: fetchLater API

What milestones are you proposing for the Origin Trial? On 12/13/23 1:48 AM, 'Ming-Ying Chung' via blink-dev wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 6:29 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:54 AM Daisuke Enomoto wrote: Yoav, What milestones do you want to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: MessagePort.onclose

Gentle reminder to request approvals for the other review gates in chromestatus, thanks. On 12/1/23 1:05 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 11/30/23 10:56 PM, Fergal Daly wrote: On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 2:23:12 PM UTC+9 Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 12:31, Nonoka

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Storage Buckets API

LGTM3 On 12/13/23 11:04 AM, Rick Byers wrote: LGTM2 +1 to raising the bar on test automation, but only in the cases where there aren't unreasonable burdens and there is clear significant test coverage value (i.e., not this specific case). Thanks for the analysis Evan and Philip! On Wed,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Navigational prefetch: follow redirects

LGTM2 On 12/12/23 5:34 PM, Rick Byers wrote: Personally I'd consider this prefetch behavior change to be more of a UA impl detail than a "web exposed API". I'm really glad you're covering this in a spec and WPT in the hopes of moving prefetch towards more interoperability long-term (as

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSSKeyframesRule.length

This seems like a fairly trivial and useful addition, but can we put this behind a feature flag? It's not hard to imagine some code looking at `CSSKeyframesRule.length` as a proxy for "is not Chrome" and something going wrong (though, I imagine this is a very small risk).

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience directFromSellerSignals via HTTP response headers

13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks for the heads up. It would be nice to write WPTs for these changes (to the extent that it's possible), rather than just Chromium unit tests. On 11/10/23 4:17 PM, Caleb Raitto wrote: FYI: I merged crrev.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto Sizes for Lazy Loaded Images with Srcset

LGTM2 On 12/5/23 2:33 PM, Rick Byers wrote: Nice! LGTM1 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:08 AM Traian Captan wrote: Contact emails tcap...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4654 Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Features (Reduced Aggregate Delays, Event-Level Report Epsilon Field, Reserved Keys)

LGTM2 On 12/5/23 2:29 PM, Rick Byers wrote: LGTM1 On the interoperability risks front I see there's still no official position on the API from Mozilla or WebKit . On Thu,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: URLPattern: hasRegExpGroups

LGTM2 On 12/5/23 2:23 PM, Rick Byers wrote: Yeah looks pretty trivial, thanks for the improvement! LGTM1 On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:34 PM Jeremy Roman wrote: Contact emails jbro...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Async Clipboard API: Read unsanitized HTML format

LGTM3 On 12/5/23 1:57 PM, 'Rick Byers' via blink-dev wrote: By the way, for others trying to follow the history, the correct link to the original thread on this is https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/oiPCXHy9kRE/m/YS2sxbIQAAAJ On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:56 PM Rick Byers

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Third-party cookie deprecation exemption heuristics

I see this as a critical web compatibility intervention, so LGTM1. It seems like there is some disagreement about spec venue (compat vs fetch/html), but I don't think we need to block on landing given the other browsers shipped their heuristics without specifying in any standards venue.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Extension of WebDriver command for clicking on FedCM dialogs

LGTM1 On 12/5/23 3:44 AM, 'Zachary Tan' via blink-dev wrote: My mistake - it is indeed without the "k", thanks for double checking. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:34 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:42 PM 'Zachary Tan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Features (Reduced Aggregate Delays, Event-Level Report Epsilon Field, Reserved Keys)

Hi Akash, Can you request reviews for the various review gates on your chromestatus entry? thanks, Mike On 11/30/23 12:37 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails akashna...@google.com , lin...@chromium.org ,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fenced Frames - Enable Leaving IGs, and Ads Report at Top Level Navigation Start (Chrome - 120)

LGTM2 On 11/30/23 6:10 PM, Rick Byers wrote: LGTM1 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:55 AM 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails shivani...@chromium.org , jkar...@chromium.org , lbr...@google.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: MessagePort.onclose

On 11/30/23 10:56 PM, Fergal Daly wrote: On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 2:23:12 PM UTC+9 Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 12:31, Nonoka Muraki wrote: TAG review Not needed because This is a small feature where we just dispatch a new event.

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Multiple Readers and Writers in File System Access API

Seems like a useful addition to the API. LGTM1 On 11/29/23 11:17 AM, 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev wrote: +ajayrahate...@google.com On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 8:18:04 AM UTC-8 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: Can you please tick all the review boxes in the Chrome status entry?

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Lazy load scroll margin

LGTM2 On 11/30/23 9:33 AM, Traian Captan wrote: You're welcome Rick! On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:33 AM Rick Byers wrote: Thank you Traian! On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 7:27 PM Traian Captan wrote: Hi Rick, Yes. I uploaded a CL that increases the spacer size by 30px:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: VideoEncoderConfig.contentHint

8 05:04, 'Eugene Zemtsov' via blink-dev wrote: Done for Privacy, Security, Enterprise, Debuggability and Testing. On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 7:19 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Eugene, Could you please request reviews for all the other review

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-palette property animation

LGTM2 On 11/23/23 8:39 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 assuming there aren't any surprises on that front. Thanks!! On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 2:33 PM Dominik Röttsches wrote: Hi Yoav, On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 6:46 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU default entry points to shader modules

LGTM2 On 11/24/23 8:53 AM, Rick Byers wrote: Thanks, good enough for me! LGTM1 On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:32 AM François Beaufort wrote: On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 1:46 AM Rick Byers wrote: Seems trivial to me, just one little question: On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at

Re: [blink-dev] Re: High Contrast Black mode in Chrome under Linux

Hi Jakub (moving blink-dev to bcc), Let me reach out off-list to see if I can help connect the dots. thanks, Mike On 11/22/23 11:59 AM, 'Jakub Pawlik' via blink-dev wrote: Hi, I'm hoping to get in touch with someone who can provide some guidance on the issue. I'm still locked out and would

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: transition types

LGTM2 On 11/22/23 11:15 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 7:05:57 PM UTC+1 Vladimir Levin wrote: On Thu, Nov 9, 2023, 12:54 Mike Taylor wrote: On 11/8/23 3:53 PM, Vladimir Levin wrote: Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org, nrosent

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience - Do Not Disable Cookie Setting in ReportEvent until 3PCD (Chrome - 120)

eiss wrote: On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:23 PM 'Garrett Tanzer' via blink-dev wrote: They should all be requested now. Thanks On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Garrett,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Element Capture

Thanks, LGTM to experiment from 121 to 126 inclusive. On 11/20/23 11:35 AM, Elad Alon wrote: Hi Mike. I'm asking for m121 to m126 (inclusive). On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 5:29:31 PM UTC+1 mike...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Elad, Can you clarify which milestones you intend to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Element Capture

Hi Elad, Can you clarify which milestones you intend to experiment in? thanks, Mike On 11/20/23 6:40 AM, 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails elada...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/screen-share/element-capture/blob/main/README.md

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Third-Party Cookies

LGTM for a deprecation trial from M120 to M132. For those of you who have followed my career (all 2 of you), it shouldn't come as a surprise that I appreciate the desire and efforts to minimize the compat implications for sites that are earnestly moving towards this brave new post-3rd-party

Re: [blink-dev] Intend to extend experiment: Long Animation Frame Timing

Thanks. LGTM to extend 3 more milestones (I believe M121 to M123 inclusive). On 11/17/23 4:17 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:28 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Noam, Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any substantial progress

Re: [blink-dev] Intend to extend experiment: Long Animation Frame Timing

Hi Noam, Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any substantial progress in the following areas: * Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated with the appropriate standardization venue, or WICG) * TAG review (see exceptions) *

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: URLPattern: RegExp v flag instead of u

esn't and the author must write /[\-a-z]/v. (I'll leave it to Shunya to comment on the pros/cons of waiting for stable data.) On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:04 AM Mike Taylor wrote: This feels like something th

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

+1, thank you. LGTM2 w/ same condition. On 11/15/23 12:39 PM, Daniel Bratell wrote: Thanks for getting the security people to weigh in on this because that was really the main question for me. And it will still be controllable by a finch flag. LGTM1 dependent on there being a published

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: Interoperable Pointer and Mouse boundary events after DOM changes

ssed anything. Mustaq On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:39 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Mustaq, Please take a moment to request the other rev

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: URLPattern: RegExp v flag instead of u

This feels like something that has the potential to be rather thorny... I would expect 0.001% on Beta to be higher on Stable. Given that your UMA landed in M120, could we wait a few weeks to look at the stable

Re: [blink-dev] The `Expect-CT` header is deprecated and will be removed

(blink-dev to bcc) Hi there, This is not a support forum, but a technical discussion list related to changes in Blink and Chromium. You may have better luck at a site like stackoverflow.com or similar web developer-focused sites. That said, the error is recommending you remove the Expect-CT

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience directFromSellerSignals via HTTP response headers

e approved) -- I understand your LGTM is contingent on those landing. Thanks, -Caleb On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 3:07:11 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: And gentle reminder to please land the spec PRs :) On 9/20/23 12:54 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience - Do Not Disable Cookie Setting in ReportEvent until 3PCD (Chrome - 120)

Hi Garrett, Would you mind requesting each of the review gates in the chromestatus entry? thanks, Mike On 11/7/23 12:24 PM, Garrett Tanzer wrote: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience - Do Not Disable Cookie Setting in ReportEvent until 3PCD (Chrome - 120) Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: transition types

On 11/8/23 3:53 PM, Vladimir Levin wrote: Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org, nrosent...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/vmpstr/web-proposals/blob/main/explainers/view-transition-types.md Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: EditContext API

LGTM3 On 11/8/23 12:13 PM, Alex Russell wrote: +1 to the evidence from OT being persuasive. LGTM2 On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 8:56:24 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote: It certainly sounds to me that there's additional work to be done here, but I agree with Daniel that changing event

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: checkVisibility: contentVisibilityAuto, opacityProperty, and visibilityProperty

LGTM2 On 11/8/23 11:58 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 9:21:34 PM UTC+1 Vladimir Levin wrote: Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience clearOriginJoinedAdInterestGroups() & interest group limit changes & kAnonStatus

LGTM2 On 11/8/23 11:33 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 8:11:02 PM UTC+1 or...@google.com wrote: Sorry for the delay in response. All of the PRs have since landed. Regarding your question on the interest group limit changes, these limits are intended

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >