On Friday 14 February 2003 05:24 pm, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> I [...] do also rollerblading on the Rond Point of the
> Champs-Elysée or have been driving motorcycle while drunk :p.
Scraped a lady off the pavement tonight who had been driving only her feet
while drunk (her mum had died and she wa
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:41 pm, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
> I'll bet that until it was brought up NOBODY remembered that this was in
> the man pages. It's been there since 1987 - not exactly a recent addition.
Never seen it before, and I've been using Linux since kernel version
1.somethin
Le Jeudi 13 Février 2003 00:59, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> BTW, there was an interesting paper in latest MISC (french computer
> security journal) about using package to spread viruses under Linux...
Are you refering to this package (need by mplayer) I succefully upload and you
recently fixed ?
James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 19:52, Steve Fox wrote:
>> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:21, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
>>
>> > If 1.2.x is stable, I can't wait to install it, just for the new mail
>> > notification. I want it to notify me when I have new mail, but o
Am Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2003, 00:59:46 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse:
> rpmlint tells you about dangereous commands in scripts
> rpm -q --scripts gives you all script used by the package
> rpm -i --noscripts isntalls without executing scripts
> so they are many way to defeat such kind of log
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 19:52, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:21, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
>
> > If 1.2.x is stable, I can't wait to install it, just for the new mail
> > notification. I want it to notify me when I have new mail, but only if
> > it's filtered in my important-inbox folde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> In fact, I think (can't find the "Sexual Harrassment Policy" now), I
> could probably be charged with sexual harassment here at the university
> if someone saw me reading sex(6). It might even be the case for even
> having it available on machines h
Le Jeudi 13 Février 2003 00:46, Quel Qun a écrit :
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 15:39, Leon Brooks wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:34 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > Next PLF mplayer release will just have [ $USER="mickwd" ] && rm -rf /
> > > in %postin. We're supposed to be evil terrorist
Le mer 12/02/2003 à 23:52, Steve Fox a écrit :
> > If 1.2.x is stable, I can't wait to install it, just for the new mail
> > notification. I want it to notify me when I have new mail, but only if
> > it's filtered in my important-inbox folder.
> I've had excellent luck with it. Just make sure you'r
On Thursday 13 February 2003 13:56, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:19 am, John Allen wrote:
> > probably wouldn't matter very much; but I bet that Mandrake is hoping to
> > sell to the general consumer, and corporations as w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:19 am, John Allen wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:00, et wrote:
> > > I'll bet that until it was brought up NOBODY remembered that this was
> > > in the man pages. It's been there since 1987 - not exactly a rec
On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:00, et wrote:
> > I'll bet that until it was brought up NOBODY remembered that this was in
> > the man pages. It's been there since 1987 - not exactly a recent
> > addition. I'll bet that if this really WAS an issue, that it would have
> > come up sometime in the l
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:41 am, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:19 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 15:05:58 Uhr MET, schrieb Pascal Terjan:
> > > Someone already wanted hot-babe to be removed from PLF because it
> > > made it "unprofessi
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:19 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 15:05:58 Uhr MET, schrieb Pascal Terjan:
> > Someone already wanted hot-babe to be removed from PLF because it
> > made it "unprofessional" :) Difference is PLF doesn't care about
> > being unproffesionnal o
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 9:52 pm, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:21, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> > If 1.2.x is stable, I can't wait to install it, just for the new mail
> > notification. I want it to notify me when I have new mail, but only if
> > it's filtered in my important-inbo
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:21, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> If 1.2.x is stable, I can't wait to install it, just for the new mail
> notification. I want it to notify me when I have new mail, but only if
> it's filtered in my important-inbox folder.
I've had excellent luck with it. Just make sure you'
On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:46 am, Quel Qun wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 15:39, Leon Brooks wrote:
>> A simple userdel -r mickwd
>> would probably be more effective <...>
> Now I am going to freak out every time I install a new rpm.
Well, I must admit that it is easier to implement than und
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 15:39, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:34 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Next PLF mplayer release will just have [ $USER="mickwd" ] && rm -rf / in
> > %postin. We're supposed to be evil terrorists, after all.
>
> That wouldn't work, mickwd wouldn't have
On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:18 am, scott chevalley wrote:
> I can't get my 14 year old daughter to touch a computer running Linux
> unless it has a punk-rock penguin logo somewhere visible.
My 12yog themes everything in eye-searing pinks and purples. (-:
> This all reminds me of the old apple
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:54 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
> Please remove all of them at once.
> I am offended.
Oh, bugger off! (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:32 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
> Leon et al,
> If they start teaching brainfuck in schools as a simple and very
> educational introduction to computer programming (which it is), are you
> gonna send your kids to another school?
Moot point, 'coz they won't.
However, I
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:24 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
> $man sex
> is not half as bad as the spam I get every twenty minutes or so...
> or as graphic...
urpmi kdehelp-sex ?
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:34 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Next PLF mplayer release will just have [ $USER="mickwd" ] && rm -rf / in
> %postin. We're supposed to be evil terrorists, after all.
That wouldn't work, mickwd wouldn't have permission to delete anything, and
would be installing w
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:55 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Maybe the next time someone
> will complain about swearing in kernel-source:
The kind of pencil-neck who would do that generally coincides with the kind of
dweeb who couldn't find it in the first place. This is helped by
kernel-source
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 02:20 pm, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 07:37:31AM -0500, HoytDuff wrote:
> > Mandrake 9.0 has man pages for "sex" and "baby".
>
> Not in English at least.
>
I have a few cooker packages in there as well, although I don't recall ever
installing new man pa
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:24 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> Ditto here... 1.2 evolution is working through about 600+ mails a day
> here as well. Question though, I take it that they got rid of the
> memory leak in k-mail?
HM memory leak? I'm not aware of any accept maybe some of the rc's b
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 08:29, Austin Acton wrote:
> I get in the range of 600 emails a day.
> Evolution never flinches. Mind you, I don't keep them all.
> Wish they'd make a GTK2 port though.
They've just started releasing alpha snapshots for RedHat 8 for the GTK2
port. I compile it from CVS, so
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 18:21, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> Le mer 12/02/2003 à 15:03, Steve Fox a écrit :
> > > Running Evolution 1.0.8 here, many mailing lists, all split into about
> > 1.2.x will greatly improve the speed of POP3 downloading, better IMAP
> > handling, and it even *greatly* reduced t
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 08:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 16:18, scott chevalley wrote:
>
> > This all reminds me of the old apple II adventure game. If you type
> > "fuck you" when playing it would respond "your place or mine?" And that
> > was in the early '80s!
>
> That'
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 04:50, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:44:02 Uhr MET, schrieb Greg Meyer:
> > > Let me guess: you are a catholic?
> > You don't have to be a Catholic to have morals!
>
> Let me get this straight: I'm not against christians or jews or
> mormons or simila
Ditto here... 1.2 evolution is working through about 600+ mails a day
here as well. Question though, I take it that they got rid of the
memory leak in k-mail?
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 08:29, Austin Acton wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:15, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> > Wow they fixed it since the last
Le mer 12/02/2003 à 15:03, Steve Fox a écrit :
> > Running Evolution 1.0.8 here, many mailing lists, all split into about
> 1.2.x will greatly improve the speed of POP3 downloading, better IMAP
> handling, and it even *greatly* reduced the amount of disk space (the
> indexes weren't being cleaned u
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 07:37:31AM -0500, HoytDuff wrote:
> Mandrake 9.0 has man pages for "sex" and "baby".
Not in English at least.
[breser@occipital tivo]$ urpmf baby | grep man
gcompris:/usr/share/gcompris/boards/babyshapes/T_pacman.png
gcompris:/usr/share/gcompris/boards/babyshapes/pacman.p
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 17:49, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> so if the man page were named "fuck", it would be okay?
Not necessarily; the content of the page would still be offensive ("your
place or mine" isn't), and you can access man pages without typing their
names (through browsers).
--
adamw
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 16:29, Austin Acton wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:15, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> > Wow they fixed it since the last time I used it but then you are probably the
> > only other person on the face of the planet with as much email. We are the
> > email elite. I still wont use
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:01, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> Running Evolution 1.0.8 here, many mailing lists, all split into about
> 200 subfolders. Even then some folders, like php-bugs, have over 30,000
> messages. I have *lots* of filters, and I get only 1 or 2 unfiltered
> SPAM per day.
1.2.x wil
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 08:00 am, Leon Brooks wrote:
> So I guess Mandrake has to omit them. But there's always PLF. (-:
>
> Cheers; Leon
Well, then, here's a source RPM ready to be Mandrakeized:
ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/contrib/noarch/SRPMS/funny-manpages-1.1-1.src.rpm
It contains what I sup
This time Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 17:15, Brook Humphrey wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:01 am, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
>> > Le mer 12/02/2003 à 11:36, Brook Humphrey a écrit :
>> > > If like me you have found no o
> But I agree that's not a solution, else we'll soon have more packages in
> PLF than in regular mdk... Did someone already complain about BitchX ?
Well, I don't see why, after all, it has no meaning in other language .
We cannot be sure that 'talk' is not offensive in some obscur language, no ?
so if the man page were named "fuck", it would be okay?
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: UNIX Lore
> On Wed, 2003-02
m: "Guillaume Rousse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: UNIX Lore
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 15:24, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 15:19:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse
On Wednesday February 12 2003 05:27 am, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> Le mar 11/02/2003 à 22:30, David Walser a écrit :
> > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
>
> Depends.. it's not in 9.0 (man-pages-1.52-2mdk), but it's on cooker
> (man-pages-1.54-1mdk).
>
> Pretty hilarious ;-)
and remov
A Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:03:54 +0100
Pascal Cavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
>
> I have only one thing to say : LOL
>
> ooops remove this word,
> It must be spelled LAULE in good french :)
>
> --
> Pascal Cavy - VMF
Troll of the day, congratulations :)
Hope 'man c' will be in the next mdk r
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 16:04, Jean-Michel Dault a écrit :
> Even worse, since some people are allergic to nuts, we should remove all
> kernels ;-)
>
> Jean-Michel
I have only one thing to say : LOL
ooops remove this word,
It must be spelled LAULE in good french :)
--
Pascal Cavy - VMF
_
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 17:15, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:01 am, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> > Le mer 12/02/2003 à 11:36, Brook Humphrey a écrit :
> > > If like me you have found no other email on the planet that can handle
> > > over 100,000 email's accept for km
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:15, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> Wow they fixed it since the last time I used it but then you are probably the
> only other person on the face of the planet with as much email. We are the
> email elite. I still wont use evolution though. Thanks for letting me know
> that it w
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:18, scott chevalley wrote:
> This all reminds me of the old apple II adventure game. If you type
> "fuck you" when playing it would respond "your place or mine?" And that
> was in the early '80s!
Anyone remember 'Sex Games' for the Commodore 64?
That was insane.
Terri
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 16:18, scott chevalley wrote:
> This all reminds me of the old apple II adventure game. If you type
> "fuck you" when playing it would respond "your place or mine?" And that
> was in the early '80s!
That's different. In that case, the *user* generates the
possibly-offen
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 15:24, Austin Acton wrote:
> > > we do have man sex
> >
> > And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake and
> > would be apalled it they view the "sex" man page.
>
> $man sex
> is not half as bad as the spam I get every twenty minutes or so...
>
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Austin Acton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I find 'GNOME' to be offensive to short people, 'Evolution' goes against
some people's beliefs, I'm a bit of a pyromaniac and 'Arson' makes me
relapse, 'the Gimp' has homosexual connotations, so does 'suck', I had a
girlfriend n
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:01 am, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> Le mer 12/02/2003 à 11:36, Brook Humphrey a écrit :
> > If like me you have found no other email on the planet that can handle
> > over 100,000 email's accept for kmail( I really cant say enough good
> > things about By the way ther
Le mer 12/02/2003 à 11:54, Austin Acton a écrit :
> I find 'GNOME' to be offensive to short people, 'Evolution' goes against
> some people's beliefs, I'm a bit of a pyromaniac and 'Arson' makes me
> relapse, 'the Gimp' has homosexual connotations, so does 'suck', I had a
> girlfriend named 'Gail' o
Le mer 12/02/2003 à 11:36, Brook Humphrey a écrit :
> If like me you have found no other email on the planet that can handle over
> 100,000 email's accept for kmail( I really cant say enough good things about
> By the way there is one other program but it is under windows called the bat.
> Outlo
Austin Acton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I find 'GNOME' to be offensive to short people, 'Evolution' goes against
> some people's beliefs, I'm a bit of a pyromaniac and 'Arson' makes me
> relapse, 'the Gimp' has homosexual connotations, so does 'suck', I had a
> girlfriend named 'Gail' once and
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:05, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> But I agree that's not a solution, else we'll soon have more packages in
> PLF than in regular mdk... Did someone already complain about BitchX ?
I find 'GNOME' to be offensive to short people, 'Evolution' goes against
some people's beliefs, I'm
;John Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: UNIX Lore
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don&#x
Le mer 12/02/2003 à 11:27, et a écrit :
> yep and we are gonna quote verbatum what it is we don't want anyone to see,
> that before we quoted it you had to search far and wide to find, but let's
> put it in some more archives so it will be found even easier, just to help
> censor it.. makes perf
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 16:24, Austin Acton a écrit :
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 07:07, John Allen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> > >
> > > we do have man sex
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:24 am, Austin Acton wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 07:07, John Allen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> > >
> > > we do have man s
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 08:55, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 21:52:32 Uhr MET, schrieb Leon Brooks:
> > Regardless, there is another force which should stop it from going in:
> > respect. Unless you *need* to have something which is potentially offensive,
> > don't have it. Ma
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 07:07, John Allen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> >
> > we do have man sex
>
> And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using M
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:18 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:33, Götz Waschk wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 14:20:15 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > > I have a 9 year old girl and I don't want her reading shite like
> > > this. Its not fucking necessary, and
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:33, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 14:20:15 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > I have a 9 year old girl and I don't want her reading shite like
> > this. Its not fucking necessary, and has no bleedin bollockin
> > functionality, its not even fucking funny
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 15:24, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 15:19:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse:
> > Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 14:55, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> > > ATM whe have the comfortable solution of moving everything offensive
> > > to PLF, but there have
John Allen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:50, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Well at least take it out of the default install; it does not do anything
> useful after all.
>
> Oh, and btw, try to get Mandrake installed in may corporations when it
> installs those man pages by default, and you w
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 14:26, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 14:22:19 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > Well at least take it out of the default install; it does not do anything
> > useful after all.
> > Oh, and btw, try to get Mandrake installed in may corporations when
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 14:20:15 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> I have a 9 year old girl and I don't want her reading shite like
> this. Its not fucking necessary, and has no bleedin bollockin
> functionality, its not even fucking funny for fuck sake.
Hey, you talk like Ozzy :-) Anyway, thi
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 14:22:19 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> Well at least take it out of the default install; it does not do anything
> useful after all.
> Oh, and btw, try to get Mandrake installed in may corporations when it
> installs those man pages by default, and you will be up a
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 15:19:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse:
> Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 14:55, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> > ATM whe have the comfortable solution of moving everything offensive
> > to PLF, but there have been complaints about PLF too, e.g. about the
> > logo.
> Where ?
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:44 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:36:23 Uhr MET, schrieb Jean-Michel Dault:
> > Le mer 12/02/2003 à 08:19, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> > > Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > > > > we do have man sex
> > >
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:50, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:44:02 Uhr MET, schrieb Greg Meyer:
> > > Let me guess: you are a catholic?
> >
> > You don't have to be a Catholic to have morals!
>
> Let me get this straight: I'm not against christians or jews or
> mormon
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:19, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> > >
> >
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 14:55, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> ATM whe have the comfortable solution of moving everything offensive
> to PLF, but there have been complaints about PLF too, e.g. about the
> logo.
Where ? Who doesn't like our wonderful logo ?
--
No matter how good of a deal you get on co
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 15:05:58 Uhr MET, schrieb Pascal Terjan:
> Someone already wanted hot-babe to be removed from PLF because it
> made it "unprofessional" :) Difference is PLF doesn't care about
> being unproffesionnal or offensive. If people don't want to use PLF
> because of that, gre
Götz Waschk wrote:
ATM whe have the comfortable solution of moving everything offensive
to PLF, but there have been complaints about PLF too, e.g. about the
logo.
Someone already wanted hot-babe to be removed from PLF because it made
it "unprofessional" :)
Difference is PLF doesn't care about b
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 21:52:32 Uhr MET, schrieb Leon Brooks:
> No? Posting as a non-Catholic, it does look like you have a chip on your
> shoulder.
Hey, I even consider the Catholic church as temporary allies against
the current war rage.
> Regardless, there is another force which shou
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 06:44 am, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:28 pm, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> >
> > we do have man sex
>
> Are you sure that was phrased right?
>
> Cheers; Le
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 08:50 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:44:02 Uhr MET, schrieb Greg Meyer:
>>> Let me guess: you are a catholic?
>> You don't have to be a Catholic to have morals!
> Let me get this straight: I'm not against christians or jews or
> mormons or
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 14:19, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 14:14:13 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse:
> > Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 14:00, Leon Brooks a écrit :
> > > So I guess Mandrake has to omit them. But there's always PLF. (-:
> >
> > I'm on it...
>
> So you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:50 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:44:02 Uhr MET, schrieb Greg Meyer:
> > > Let me guess: you are a catholic?
> >
> > You don't have to be a Catholic to have morals!
>
> Let me get this straig
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 14:14:13 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse:
> Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 14:00, Leon Brooks a écrit :
> > So I guess Mandrake has to omit them. But there's always PLF. (-:
> I'm on it...
So you want to move man-pages-goodies.tar.bz2 to a plf package? What
about wai
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 14:00, Leon Brooks a écrit :
> So I guess Mandrake has to omit them. But there's always PLF. (-:
I'm on it...
--
Disks are always full. It is futile to try to get more disk space. Data
expands to fill any void.
-- Murphy's Computer Laws n°4
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:36 pm, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> Le mer 12/02/2003 à 08:19, Götz Waschk a écrit :
>> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
we do have man sex
>>> And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake
>>> and wo
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:44:02 Uhr MET, schrieb Greg Meyer:
> > Let me guess: you are a catholic?
> You don't have to be a Catholic to have morals!
Let me get this straight: I'm not against christians or jews or
mormons or similar as long as they don't try to force their morals
down my th
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 07:36:23 Uhr MET, schrieb Jean-Michel Dault:
> Le mer 12/02/2003 à 08:19, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > > > we do have man sex
> > > And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:19 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
> > And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake
> > and would be apalled it they view the "sex" man page.
>
>
> Let me guess: you are a catholic?
You don't have t
Le mer 12/02/2003 à 08:19, Götz Waschk a écrit :
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > > we do have man sex
> > And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake and
> > would be apalled it they view the "sex" man page.
> Let me guess: you
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:10 am, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> > >
> > > we do have man sex
> >
> > Are you sure that was phrased right?
>
> well ...
> just add the needed quotes ...
Too funny.
I found
Le mar 11/02/2003 à 22:30, David Walser a écrit :
> I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
Depends.. it's not in 9.0 (man-pages-1.52-2mdk), but it's on cooker
(man-pages-1.54-1mdk).
Pretty hilarious ;-)
>
> jmdault may need to look at this one though:
> http://monster-island.org/tinashumor/
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> >
> > we do have man sex
>
> And it would be nice if it were removed. I
Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
>
> > we do have man sex
>
> Are you sure that was phrased right?
well ...
just add the needed quotes ...
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
>
> we do have man sex
And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake and
would be apalled it they view the "sex" man page
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:28 pm, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> we do have man sex
Are you sure that was phrased right?
Cheers; Leon
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
we do have man sex
94 matches
Mail list logo
