Chuck
I recall for that for Declude to move the message to a "spam" folder for
the user based on weight,
You need to use the declude MAILBOX action. So something like
"WEIGHT20 MAILBOX Spam", as you have
below. (this may only work for Imail?)
However, I think you need to, for each domain, check
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:17 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BadHeaders?
David,
Thank you for the explanation. I actually wrote the code that generates the
Message-ID. Do you happen to have a link to documentation that would show
the proper format for the Messa
ED] On Behalf Of David
> Barker
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 11:55 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BadHeaders?
>
> The E-mail failed the BADHEADERS test. This means the email failed with a
> violation of the RFC. This specific code in
The answer to your question is yes, the mailbox is created automatically.
We use it all the time.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Schick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox actio
The E-mail failed the BADHEADERS test. This means the email failed with a
violation of the RFC. This specific code indicates a incorrect Message-ID:
in the header.
David B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Wednesday, Apr
30, 2008 10:47 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox action...
I am not trying to re route the messages. What I want to do is place the
email in a spam folder for each user if the message exceeds a certain
weight. The mailbox action in declude
it does not already exist.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:32 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
It the mail box is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And you say ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] THEN THE FOLDER SPAM GETS CREATED
AUTOMATICLY
Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] Undeliverable mails
Glen, this is an ongoing problem lately. Backscatter is at an all time high.
I have a filter that will stop this. Could you please send me a copy of your
global.cfg file?
_
From: "Cybercorp Computers -- Glen Spidal" <[EM
Hi Linda,
Yes, I will mail the file later today.
Thnaks,
-Glen Spidal
503-648-1133
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Linda
Pagillo
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 10:48 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Undeliverable mails
Glen,
This is fairly normal. When spammers send out campaigns they pretty
much use spoofed addresses. Unfortunately your address as well as
others in your domain have been used thus you are receiving the back
scatter. On some of the servers I
Glen,
This is fairly normal. When spammers send out campaigns they pretty
much use spoofed addresses. Unfortunately your address as well as
others in your domain have been used thus you are receiving the back
scatter. On some of the servers I maintain for clients we have seen
waves of unde
Glen, this is an ongoing problem lately. Backscatter is at an all time high. I
have a filter that will stop this. Could you please send me a copy of your
global.cfg file?
From: "Cybercorp Computers -- Glen Spidal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April
1. Dunno cause I have never operated a mail server without proper
reverse DNS (nor any server for that matter).
2. Yes I do. Proper standard should include proper reverse. As a
general rule mail servers without reverse I have encountered are sending
spam OR improperly configured and candi
> 1) If a mail server is configured without a reverse DNS pointer, is >
>enough to prevent email from reaching AOL, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc?
AOL indicates they will do this, on occasion I have seen this, but not
all the time.
> 2) Do you block email coming from mail servers with no reverse DNS?
N
Point your mx record to your new serverlike MX 10
gateway.123marbella.net.
Then point gateway.123marbella.net. to the IP address of your new alligate
server.
Imail should not need any changes.
To really tighten things up have your users authenticate on port 587 and
block all IPs to port 2
Hi Harry,
Thanks for that. I will try it!
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.net
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: 22 April 2008 21:12
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
Your MX record should be changed to the new Alligate IP address.
Alligate will send mail to imail server
No change needed in Imail as far as I recall
Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222
From:
12:52 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMMERS using "postmaster@" in
their FROM email
David,
I never added your backscatter, should I do it.
What does it do exactly.
Stephan
_
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
David,
I never added your backscatter, should I do it.
What does it do exactly.
Stephan
_
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de David
Barker
Envoyé : 22 avril, 2008 11:32
À : declude.junkmail@declude.com
Objet : RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMMERS using
Hi,
I score it at 25% of my hold weight. A mail may contain a "bad link" for what
ever reason.
I might increase this in the near future but never more then 50%. I would never
hold on any one test, that's the power of Declude.
Having said that, I do hold on certain Sniffer results alone like por
David, I have Junkmail Pro... can I use the NOSENDER filter? If so, where
can I find it? Thanks, E.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:32 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
8 17:22
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMMERS using "postmaster@" in
their FROM email
Importance: High
Don't know if Declude (or anyone) can help, but we are seeing
a L O T of bounce-backs that show that the SPAMMERS are
using valid postmaster@
AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMMERS using "postmaster@" in
their FROM email
Importance: High
Don't know if Declude (or anyone) can help, but we are seeing
a L O T of bounce-backs that show that the SPAMMERS are
using valid postmaster@
Don't know if Declude (or anyone) can help, but we are seeing
a L O T of bounce-backs that show that the SPAMMERS are
using valid postmaster@ (that we host) as their FROM address
and send the SPAM out thru Post Offices other than ours.
When the SPAM goes to a non-existant address, it bounces ba
1. Yes - per AOL SMTP header.
2. Yes. But if it the sending host has any pointer (match or not) then pass.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:23 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sub
I hold on invURIBL alone.
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:56 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] INVURIBL WEIGHT?
Hi everyone,
I would appreciate hearing some opinions. How heavy are y
ail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Mike,
Your service agreement expired in 31 Aug 2007, so I don’t know if the issue you
are having is recent, but from our records it seems you are 7 months behind on
releases. There could certainly have been a fix for your speci
Yes that is correct... changes to declude.cfg require a restart.
David B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 8:52 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
active service agreement.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hardrick
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 10:13 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
How many pairs of eyes does it take.
I gave remote
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell
Ard
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 7:55 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
David
Thanks very much.
I added to the Declude.cfgBANCHARSETkoi8-r
after I upgraded to
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
<mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:12 AM
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need help in setting up filter please
You can use the settings in Declude.cfg to stop certain character sets.
David B
-IMail-SPAM =?koi8-r?B?58/S0d3JxSDQ1dTF18vJIQ==?=
Thanks very much
Ferrell Ard
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need help in setting up filter please
You can use t
: Saturday, April 19, 2008 6:31 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Michael, in cases such as yours, it may be a good idea to get an outside pair
of eyes on the server.
Many of us are running multiple servers with no problems what so ever
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent 4/18/2008 8:44:05 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
Greetings All,I hate t
On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: 19 April 2008 15:33
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Michael,
Judging by that screen cap you are having a rough time to say the least.
I am sure you have exhausted a ton of options, but have you turned
] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 11:17 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Hi Michael,
I am sorry to hear you are having a struggle, but I am running mine on HP
servers also and have had no real problems at all in fact I have
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: 19 April 2008 15:33
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Michael
PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Craig Edmonds
*Sent:* Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:37 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
I second that.
I am not trying to brown nose or anything here but without declude we
would be completely screwed.
In 3
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:37 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
I second that.
I am not trying to brown nose or anything here but without declude
ds.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:04 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Hi Matt,
Parsing CAPTCHA essentially means OCR. OCR in general would be
CPU-intensive. Spammers a
This is from memory, but I think this would work.
ALLRECIPS END NOTCONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS SPAMCANNIBAL
MAILFROM10 IS xyx.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
G
Sorry I am not thinking very well today.
Zipping them up worked
Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Friday, Ap
f implementing CAPTCHA and its overall effectiveness, I
still believe CAPTCHA is the single best method to secure a public form.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filte
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 4.4.0 leaving some trash?
>
> We have been made aware of this and are currently looking into the cause, it
> seems to be AVG that is the source, if used in combination with a 3rd party
> scanner. We a
tion page is
CAPTCHA.
Darin.
- Original Message -
*From:* Marc Catuogno <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com <mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:22 PM
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
One th
page is CAPTCHA.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Marc Catuogno
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
One thing we did on our domain is to ban "pasting" so that the scripts couldn
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:54 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Matt,
I did understand. What I'm saying is that it doesn't always work. To
clarify, in addition to less sophisticated automated form fillers that would
fill
ril 09, 2008 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
No, I understood completely. I've seen forms with fields hidden by DIVs
still filled out. Some of the less sophisticated spam form fillers I've seen
used simply filled out every field. They were not looking
No, I understood completely. I've seen forms with fields hidden by
DIVs still filled out. Some of the less sophisticated spam form
fillers I've seen used simply filled out every field. They were not
looking to see what was "visible" and what wasn't.
Actually this is the part that you misund
The PCRE for yahoo.co.uk might just be the ticket.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:58 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score
e to implement it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Gufler Markus | Limitis
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Matt, Darin
would it possible that you both forget, that 99,9+% of all incomming fo
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:24 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Darin,
I think you missed what I was saying exactly. If the form spammer fills out
the fields that are
ude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Darin,
I think you missed what I was saying exactly. If the form spammer fills out
the fields that are hidden by DIV's, the E-mail wouldn't be sent by the mailer
script and it would prete
st people filling
out the forms, and works well.
Darin.
- Original Message -
*From:* Matt <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com <mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:55 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
ude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Hi Craig,
There's really nothing Declude can currently do with this. The headers will
all be different, and the format and content of the messages are all
different, based on what the web form handler does.
That only leaves th
Here's a filter I use:
# attack Yahoo spammers
SKIPIFWEIGHT315
MAXWEIGHT 150
#
# exclude the big emails and those with good attachments
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINSMPPT-SIZE-L
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINSMPPT-SIZE-XL
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINSMPPT-S
com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:22 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Thanks people for the comments.
I will stick with captchas for now but it would be great if declude could
figure a nice filter to deal with it, at the end of the day its still incoming
spam.
K
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: 09 April 2008 15:09
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
Hi Matt,
Some do, some don't. I've seen both methods used on some customer sites.
Setting session variab
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] form spam filter
The form spammers are smarter than to go directly to the mail script. They
will hit for the form submission page with what appears to be IE and sub
The form spammers are smarter than to go directly to the mail script.
They will hit for the form submission page with what appears to be IE
and submit the form. They even handle cookies correctly.
The trick for form spam is to take fields like your Name and E-mail and
rename the variables to
Since forms all use different emailers, and the form content is different as
well, your only hope is content filtering based on what the spammer
submitted... like SURBL filtering or REGEX on the spammer submission.
These days, web-based form processing pages should minimally check that the
refe
om
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score.
"We're almost always Bcc'd "
Consider using BCC
This test will catch E-mail that has a lot of local recipients that are not
listed in the E-mail headers. This test is normally only used in advanced
setups, as mos
"We're almost always Bcc'd "
Consider using BCC
This test will catch E-mail that has a lot of local recipients that are not
listed in the E-mail headers. This test is normally only used in advanced
setups, as most mailing list E-mail has many recipients not listed in the
headers.
BCC
wasn't a stupid user error. :)
Thanks,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
> Barker
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:48 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters n
08, 2008 11:32 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering - David Barker
Hi David,
The filter is not triggering. That IS the issue I am reporting! I provided
log snippets showing that the filter does run, but is not triggering. This
is the problem
OTECTED] On Behalf Of David
> Barker
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:11 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering - David Barker
>
> The expression I gave you does match on (discount. Coupon) in 85%
discount.
> Coupon #zH5d
PCRE (?i:google.{3,10}pagead/iclk)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:58 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering - David Barker
David
You can use the settings in Declude.cfg to stop certain character sets.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell
Ard
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 7:41 AM
To: Declude
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Need help in setting up filter please
We are getting a
t; Barker
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:14 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering
>
> Spaces before the phrase are not used as the line is normalized. Also the
> regular CONTAINS is not case sensitive.
>
> It would be b
ECTED] On Behalf Of
Darrell
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 3:40 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering
>
> Dave,
>
> From my experience I have had number of problems with spaces that would
> ca
eclude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering
Dave,
I noticed with the relevant lines from the filter posted below some of
the lines were indented more than the one line. Is it possible you have
extraneous whitespaces between contains and the text you want to filter
on
PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
I have posted the backscatter filters we use under the download section of
Declude, any feedback is welcome.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent:
From: "Kevin Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
I'm looking for a little help creating SPF records. I'm trying to use
the tools at openspf.org.
We only have one server that
; ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:42 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filters not triggering
>
> Dave,
>
> I noticed with the relevant lines from the filter posted below some of
> the lines were indented more
Dave,
I noticed with the relevant lines from the filter posted below some of
the lines were indented more than the one line. Is it possible you have
extraneous whitespaces between contains and the text you want to filter on?
Dsrrell
--
Check out http://www.inv
Spaces before the phrase are not used as the line is normalized. Also the
regular CONTAINS is not case sensitive.
It would be better to use
SUBJECT 0 PCRE(?i:(discount|off).{0,2}Co(upon|de))
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:09 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.4.00 Released
Andre -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name, Weight and Tests
failed
to the BLKLST log
I thinks its the
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:13 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.4.00 Released
Has anyone tried this option yet?
DEC ADD Can use for 4 digit yea
> Well, actually the MOST sense would be mmdd, since it
> would result in SORT order.
I agree, and hope that 4.5.00 or 5.0.01 would finaly support MMDDHH
It would be a great innovation (at least comparable to the 4.4 enhancements)
Markus
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Jun
We have been made aware of this and are currently looking into the cause, it
seems to be AVG that is the source, if used in combination with a 3rd party
scanner. We are trying to replicate the issue to have it resolved.
David B
From: "Adolfo Justiniano"
CTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 4:33 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 4.4.0 leaving some trash?
>
> I just checked and I am seeing this as well.
>
> Darrell
>
> --
> Check out htt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 4.4.0 leaving some trash?
I just checked and I am seeing this as well.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude
t of the world).
It would be like trying to impose the weird multipliers of the imperial UOM
on the rest of the world. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:13 PM
To: declude.junkmail@dec
PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.4.00 Released
Andre -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name,
Weight and Tests
failed
I just checked and I am seeing this as well.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Adolfo Ju
Has anyone tried this option yet?
DEC ADD Can use for 4 digit year on log file names in the
format ddmm
IS the format really "ddmm" - it seems like it would make more sense
if the format was actually "mmdd"?
Especially since the regular format of "dec#
Andre -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name, Weight and Tests
failed
to the BLKLST log
I thinks its the recording to the blklst.txt file that lives in the
\spool dir.
I have forgotten the files purpose...
-Nick
Da
David Barker said:
DEC ADD Added date, Time, Email, Spool name, Weight and Tests
failed
to the BLKLST log
Dave, the what log?
Andrew.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Barker
> Sent: Thursday, March
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:43 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
Jim -
I'm running the exact same set up as you are. We had the same problem about
two weeks ago. I don'
I'm looking for a little help creating SPF records. I'm trying to use
the tools at openspf.org.
We only have one server that sends out mail for our domain. We have a
secondary server that accepts email sent to our domain if our primary
server is down (myriadnetwork.com). After going through t
PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Todd Richards
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:43 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged-Spam Backscatter
Jim -
I'm running the exact same set up as you are. We had the same
pr
] On Behalf Of Stephan
Chayer
Sent: 03 April 2008 22:21
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Dan, Todd,
I feel a little like you.
We are using, selling and supporting Declude for the past 4 years. It works
great for us. Especially since they
... but I noticed the domains that we were seeing this with did not have any
SPF records in place. So when I saw this sudden increase come through, I
added a strict SPF policy for that domain. The backscatter for that domain
all but stopped. ...
Good thing to check... the latest domain to g
c.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Linda
Pagillo
Envoyé : 3 avril, 2008 14:35
À : declude.junkmail@declude.com
Objet : Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
Thank you Todd. It's my pleasure!
If you have any further questions
The filter deals with Backscatter. Jon is the issue you are talking about is
your mail server bouncing messages?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Lucas
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
Will the filter keep spoofed email senders from getting into the queue
manager in IMail? the format I am seeing is like
bipweks@mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:25 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forged
Jim -
I'm running the exact same set up as you are. We had the same problem about
two weeks ago. I don't know if this made much difference or not, but I
noticed the domains that we were seeing this with did not have any SPF
records in place. So when I saw this sudden increase come through, I
Same here, we normally run 100 or so messages a min @ 70% spam, now
seeing peaks of 400-500 @ 97% Seems much worse in the last 2 weeks or
so. I think that we all have lots of company.
Herb
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Jim,
While others may cringe regarding this, but some of the backs
We use 2 filters to address the issue which work well for us. I will make
them available on our website this week.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Comerford
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:46 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Jun
901 - 1000 of 25088 matches
Mail list logo
