Is this the devl mailing list for Hyphanet/Freenet_Classic?

-- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin

Re: Important Announcement: Freenet naming change

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, 1:54 PM Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:11 AM Juiceman wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, 12:08 PM David Dernoncourt >> wrote: >> >>> As "just a regular user" and node runner who just poked around a few >>>

Re: Important Announcement: Freenet naming change

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, 12:08 PM David Dernoncourt wrote: > As "just a regular user" and node runner who just poked around a few PRs, > the main issues I have with this are 1) "what the Hell is Locutus" and 2) > wow that's confusing. > > Sure, 1) is just (mostly) a rhetorical question. But it seems

[freenet-dev] paddDataPackets defaults to false??

I recently installed a new node and noticed this config setting defaults to false? The description field recommended that it could improve local node performance but would be detrimental if a large number of the network did this. This was on a linux machine and I chose low security settings if tha

Re: [freenet-dev] PSK keys

On Feb 2, 2016 3:14 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On 02/02/16 17:24, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm the maintainer of Web of Trust [2] and Freetalk [3], which are the first > > systems which will likely be deployed as installed by default for purposes > > subject to what yo

[freenet-dev] Fwd: Promiscuous opennet

I originally sent this email 3 and a half years ago. Would it help to limit seednodes acceptance of announcement attempts to once per hour? Would slow harvesting down and encourage uptime from users... -- Forwarded message -- From: "Juiceman" Date: Apr 10, 2012 2:32

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

On Nov 8, 2015 2:48 PM, "Ian" wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > > > Bikeshed discussions is where most people don't feel qualified to weigh in > > on designing a nuclear reactor but everyone feels like they are entitled to >

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

On Nov 8, 2015 12:27 PM, "Ian" wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide > wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 8. November 2015, 08:55:50 schrieb Ian: > > > Light on dark or dark on light is a minor point. > > > I disagree, it is the single most obvious aspect of the design, the very

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet website & optimization

On Nov 4, 2015 9:54 AM, wrote: > > First of all, very good how the donation money bar on the website currently is - https://freenetproject.org/index.html > Clear improvement to the vague donation time bar, which wasn't really motivating to donate as such and by it's boring small design. > > Sugges

Re: [freenet-dev] Behind the times

On Oct 22, 2015 11:09 PM, "Steve Dougherty" wrote: > > On 10/22/2015 10:58 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Steve Dougherty > > wrote: > ... > >> I don't understand what you mean by this exactly. Reduce padding between > >> sections and put the download button where? Up

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on removing native acceleration? [cross-post FMS]

On Sep 19, 2015 3:26 PM, "Steve Dougherty" wrote: > > Does anyone have benchmarks that demonstrate native acceleration having > significant performance improvements? Keeping it around makes for > maintenance, and anecdotes suggest native Java performance is > sufficient. If it's no longer a clear

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple SourceForge issues

On Sep 11, 2015 6:14 PM, "Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2015, 18:30:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > I did that once. Ian got really angry. Granted it's not really his > > decision any more. But he's right, isn't he? Versions are for marketing, > > not for change t

Re: [freenet-dev] [RFC] Update channels

On Aug 18, 2015 11:17 AM, "xor" wrote: > > On Friday, September 19, 2014 10:03:29 PM Steve Dougherty wrote: > > > Also, is this usable for plugins, too? > > > > It seems desirable to have it generic enough to do so, but I'm not sure > > it's in the initial scope. > > We've had 2 continuous WOT bui

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1468-pre4

It is fixed now but the update-new.cmd file still has wrong line endings On Jul 18, 2015 1:51 PM, "Florent Daigniere" wrote: > Weird. I re-ran the script for testing-build-1469-pre2; let me know if > it's still a problem. > > Florent > > On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 1

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1468-pre4

I don't know the answer to that. I do know that https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/update/ has the wrong line endings. I'm confused how it could have broken again. Is a .gitattribute file with eol=clrf not sufficient? On Fri, Jul 17, 2015, 11:35 AM Juiceman wrote: > .

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1468-pre4

.cmd file line endings are still broken on website. Needs to have CR-LF endings. On Jun 27, 2015 8:47 PM, "Steve Dougherty" wrote: > On 06/27/2015 04:35 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > > Freenet unstable testing prerelease 1468-pre4 is now available. Inserts > > are pending and I will reply with key

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1468-pre4

It works now. Thanks! No further issues upgrading from -pre3 On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 06/27/2015 07:36 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> The windows update script on the website still has Unix style line endings >> that break the batch script. My instal

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1468-pre4

The windows update script on the website still has Unix style line endings that break the batch script. My install detects a new script on the website, downloads and launches it then fails with "the system cannot find the batch label specified - extjardownloadend. I tracked this down to the line en

Re: [freenet-dev] Donation page on website

, numbers would be included. Just my 2 cents. 😃 > > > Greetings, > Torben Lechner > > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Juiceman > Datum: 02.06.2015 17:45:25 > An: Discussion of development issues > Betreff: Re: [freenet-dev] Donation page on website >

Re: [freenet-dev] Donation page on website

for month 6. You give yourself mini goals 5 lbs a week or 10 pounds a month or whatever works so you feel like progress is being made. If you don't make your mini goal you know to work harder for the next check-in. If you want to put a year progress bar next to it that is fine. > On Tue, J

[freenet-dev] Donation page on website

I have been meaning to bring this for a while. The donate page shows our balance $10K+ or whatever. In my mind this actually discourages donations. "eh. The project has enough money for now... my $10 isn't gonna make a difference." People respond to goals. We figure out what monthly amounts we ne

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1468-pre3

On Jun 1, 2015 8:12 AM, "Steve Dougherty" wrote: > > On 05/31/2015 11:16 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > the Windows update script is borked. it needs to be resaved with windows > > line endings instead of unix. otherwise the goto jumps fail... > > That sounds

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1468-pre3

the Windows update script is borked. it needs to be resaved with windows line endings instead of unix. otherwise the goto jumps fail... ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] New Freenet website (almost finished)

Nice! I am browsing on a mobile device and see a few overlapping texts but looks good so far! On May 31, 2015 4:49 PM, "Gerard Krol" wrote: > Hello everyone! > > It has been a busy weekend and now the new Freenet website is almost > finished! > Take a look: http://realitysink.com/freenet/en/ > T

Re: [freenet-dev] Incoming bugfix release 2014-11-22 or 2014-11-23

On Nov 21, 2014 10:19 AM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On 21/11/14 09:52, Steve Dougherty wrote: > > Bug #6411 [0] got into build 1466. > > > > When Fred writes the configuration file on startup > > `pluginmanager.loadplugins` is blank due to a race condition introduced > > by 869f62559a06b2f72c9

Re: [freenet-dev] Coding Standard

On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 20:50 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> On 11/01/2014 07:00 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: >> ... >> > I’m not a big fan of these single large commits that reformat all >> > source code at once. As Google’s style guide

Re: [freenet-dev] Coding Standard

It also looks like Google and Sun are mostly the same but designating 'Google' does give us one standard to reference which I like. That said, Google calls out 2 space indents. Makes it easier to format the code, but harder to read. Thoughts? On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Juice

Re: [freenet-dev] Coding Standard

The tool I am using to convert all the source in a repository is Jindent which also has the option to sort classes and interfaces, etc. On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 7:00 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > Hi there, > > initiated by a change in a pull request[1] the issue of coding style (or > coding sta

Re: [freenet-dev] 1464 prerelease testing snapshot

So far so good. An hour into it and nothing seems broken :) On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 07/05/2014 12:40 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> There's a snapshot of something like what will become 1464 on the >> webserver (update.sh testing or update.cmd testing) and inse

Re: [freenet-dev] database

On Jul 7, 2014 2:28 AM, "Volker Fervers" wrote: > > Hi all, > > I remember posts about the search for an alternative to db4o. Are there > any candidates? > > Thank you! > GV > I believe Toad (Matthew Toseland) is re-writing the client layer to not use a database. _

[freenet-dev] Fwd: [freenet-support] www not working

Who broke the website? 😜 Freenetproject.org works but www.freenetproject.org does not. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Narcis Garcia" Date: Jun 29, 2014 1:41 PM Subject: [freenet-support] www not working To: Cc: Hello, this URL is linked from diverse websites: > http://www.freen

[freenet-dev] Strange client activity

On my seed node I am seeing a few IP addresses connecting ridiculously often With almost 6 days of uptime these are the three worst IP Connected Announced Accepted Completed Sent refs Version 184.52.99.110 1473 373 373 373 836 1462 99.60.162.70 1720 422 422 422 944 1462 208.91

Re: [freenet-dev] Pretty sure 1462 is broken by commit 6d0321c1bbf96c593681719c8d4d0a63555d2e32

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 06/03/2014 10:17 AM, Juiceman wrote: >> On Jun 2, 2014 2:06 PM, "David Roden" wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> you’re right. I pushed a fix to next. >>> >>> >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Pretty sure 1462 is broken by commit 6d0321c1bbf96c593681719c8d4d0a63555d2e32

the remaining seednodes get updated and opennet falls apart. Thanks. > Greetings, > -- > * David ‘Bombe’ Roden > > On 02.06.2014, at 06:22, Juiceman wrote: > > > My seednode came online right before 1462 was released and was > > seeding. Since 1462 I have not s

[freenet-dev] Pretty sure 1462 is broken by commit 6d0321c1bbf96c593681719c8d4d0a63555d2e32

My seednode came online right before 1462 was released and was seeding. Since 1462 I have not seen a single seed client connect. My logs are full of: Jun 02, 2014 02:22:12:164 (freenet.support.SerialExecutor$2, FNP incoming auth packet handler thread(0), ERROR): Caught java.lang.NullPointerExcep

Re: [freenet-dev] What do nodes cost in bulk?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 29/03/14 15:26, > adilson_lanpo@8AEGotJKXJ4ABJy1gKjls4SrrzpshQNoEMAbu0IFA94 wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:59:34 - >> toad-notrust@h2RzPS4fEzP0zU43GAfEgxqK2Y55~kEUNR01cWvYApI wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash

[freenet-dev] index format

Fyi, Freenet is using an ancient version of SnakeYAML. Current version is 1.12 http://code.google.com/p/snakeyaml/wiki/changes It might be worth looking into upgrading. Sent from my wireless phone. On Jul 20, 2013 6:51 AM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > On Saturday 20 Jul 2013 09:47:06 Veronica E

[freenet-dev] Thoughts about Freenet deployment on Windows platforms.

Sent from my wireless phone. On Jul 23, 2013 6:20 AM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 11:01:16 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Monday 22 Jul 2013 11:47:17 Rom. wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to expose some thoughts about the current move for the > > > deployment o

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet wish list

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Madhawa Chandrasena wrote: > Hi, > I'm computer science and Engineering student and I would like to contribute > in Freenet developments. Can any one direct me where can I find Freenet wish > list and any thing useful for my purpose. > Thanks in advance. > > -- > D

Re: [freenet-dev] coding in Freenet

On Nov 23, 2012 4:09 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Friday 23 Nov 2012 20:47:24 Simon Vocella wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i have more questions after one my little refactoring: > > > > - Why you don't user a log4j or similar project to log? > > There's a lot we could move to third party code,

Re: [freenet-dev] Nextgens' invite idea

On Dec 18, 2012 8:26 AM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 Dec 2012 02:49:36 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012, 19:32:18 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > > - HTTPS ensures that the executable hasn't been tampered with. However, the > > > friend providing it may

Re: [freenet-dev] Automated seednode collection was: Depth-first announcement

On Nov 26, 2012 6:05 AM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Monday 26 Nov 2012 01:00:43 Juiceman wrote: > > We need more seednodes. It would be nice if this could be more > > automated and best if it could be done within Freenet itself. > > > > Assumption:

[freenet-dev] Automated seednode collection was: Depth-first announcement

We need more seednodes. It would be nice if this could be more automated and best if it could be done within Freenet itself. Assumption: The official Freenet website will be shutdown or blocked someplaces\everywhere Toad (or other project maintainer\s) live someday in the future. Development wil

Re: [freenet-dev] Depth-first announcement

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 22 Nov 2012 00:22:25 Juiceman wrote: >> Sent from my wireless phone. >> On Nov 21, 2012 6:55 PM, "Matthew Toseland" >> wrote: >> > >> > On Monday 19 Nov 2012 16:09:02 J

Re: [freenet-dev] Depth-first announcement

Sent from my wireless phone. On Nov 21, 2012 6:55 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Monday 19 Nov 2012 16:09:02 Juiceman wrote: > > Sent from my wireless phone. > > On Nov 19, 2012 10:24 AM, "Juiceman" wrote: > > > > > > Idea for a

Re: [freenet-dev] Depth-first announcement

Sent from my wireless phone. On Nov 19, 2012 10:24 AM, "Juiceman" wrote: > > Idea for automated seednode collection: > > Could official seednodes pass a list of second tier seednodes that newbies can try to connect to when official nodes are overloaded? > > Implemen

Re: [freenet-dev] Depth-first announcement

Idea for automated seednode collection: Could official seednodes pass a list of second tier seednodes that newbies can try to connect to when official nodes are overloaded? Implementation: When an official seednode accepts a newbie node for announcement it checks if that node has its "be a seedn

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we move to 128-bit link encryption?

I tend to think seednodes are more likely bound by bandwidth constraints than CPU, at least the one I run. However I agree that the packet size going over the MTU is a dealbreaker. Sent from my wireless phone. On Nov 16, 2012 7:04 AM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > Nextgens is making some largish

[freenet-dev] [website-official] Add a link to gun.io (#1)

Forwarding to devl list On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > As far as I'm aware, the gun.io tasks are unofficial. I could see a link > going on the wiki, but not the website menu. Thoughts? > > Pull requests should go to website-staging; deploys are made from > website-off

Re: [freenet-dev] [website-official] Add a link to gun.io (#1)

Forwarding to devl list On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > As far as I'm aware, the gun.io tasks are unofficial. I could see a link > going on the wiki, but not the website menu. Thoughts? > > Pull requests should go to website-staging; deploys are made from > website-off

[freenet-dev] Promiscuous opennet

Should we do something about the amount of announcements/refs handed out?? Seems a good way to harvest opennet (known problem, but perhaps we could slow it down...) or perhaps monopolize/monitor the key-space somehow? opennetSizeEstimateSession:?18985?nodes opennetSizeEstimate24h: ?12435?nod

[freenet-dev] Promiscuous opennet

Should we do something about the amount of announcements/refs handed out?  Seems a good way to harvest opennet (known problem, but perhaps we could slow it down...) or perhaps monopolize/monitor the key-space somehow? opennetSizeEstimateSession: 18985 nodes opennetSizeEstimate24h:  12435 nod

[freenet-dev] Coding standards

On Mar 30, 2012 1:12 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Sunday 25 Mar 2012 19:33:45 Juiceman wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Marco Schulze > > wrote: > > > May I add a vote to standardise indentation? This mess of spaces with tabs > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Coding standards

On Mar 30, 2012 1:12 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Sunday 25 Mar 2012 19:33:45 Juiceman wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Marco Schulze > > wrote: > > > May I add a vote to standardise indentation? This mess of spaces with tabs > > >

[freenet-dev] Coding standards

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Marco Schulze wrote: > May I add a vote to standardise indentation? This mess of spaces with tabs > really bugs me. > Assuming tabs 8 spaces wide the current code yields 9,187 lines with warnings about being longer than 120 chars.

Re: [freenet-dev] Coding standards

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Marco Schulze wrote: > May I add a vote to standardise indentation? This mess of spaces with tabs > really bugs me. > Assuming tabs 8 spaces wide the current code yields 9,187 lines with warnings about being longer than 120 chars. _

[freenet-dev] GSoC: is experience with security a necessity?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Kieran Donegan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a second year BSc Computer Science student in University College Cork, > Ireland. Freenet's development goals really resonate with me and I'd love > to help enhance Freenet for GSoC this year. My Java skills are excellent > and I

Re: [freenet-dev] GSoC: is experience with security a necessity?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Kieran Donegan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a second year BSc Computer Science student in University College Cork, > Ireland. Freenet's development goals really resonate with me and I'd love > to help enhance Freenet for GSoC this year. My Java skills are excellent > and I

[freenet-dev] Gun.io

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ian Clarke > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > >>> > >>> Dumb question time: how would I go about searching for hypoth

Re: [freenet-dev] Gun.io

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ian Clarke > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > >>> > >>> Dumb question time: how would I go about searching for hypoth

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Michael Grube wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Robert Hailey > wrote: > >> >> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote: >> >> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that. >> > we should thank the FBI for p

Re: [freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Michael Grube wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Robert Hailey > wrote: > >> >> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote: >> >> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that. >> > we should thank the FBI for p

[freenet-dev] Internet SOPA blackout

Anyway we can get something on our webpage? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[freenet-dev] Internet SOPA blackout

Anyway we can get something on our webpage? ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] [RFC] Allow more people to release a Freenet build

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > ** > > Hi Matthew, > > > Also we could have many "streams" of test builds, by different > developers, > > > and thus let them release whatever they want to without it being > > > officially endorsed, but the users still be able to use t

Re: [freenet-dev] [RFC] Allow more people to release a Freenet build

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > ** > > Hi Matthew, > > > Also we could have many "streams" of test builds, by different > developers, > > > and thus let them release whatever they want to without it being > > > officially endorsed, but the users still be able to use t

[freenet-dev] Website text

On Jul 9, 2011 12:39 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > Please look at what I've put up at the moment: > > "Share files, chat on forums, browse and publish, anonymously and without fear of blocking or censorship! Then connect to your friends for even better security!" > I like this. Informative,

Re: [freenet-dev] Website text

On Jul 9, 2011 12:39 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > Please look at what I've put up at the moment: > > "Share files, chat on forums, browse and publish, anonymously and without fear of blocking or censorship! Then connect to your friends for even better security!" > I like this. Informative,

[freenet-dev] China effectively blocking opennet

Do we even know that Chinese users are using 0.7.5 and not 0.5 or earlier? On May 13, 2011 7:09 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > Our old friend sdiz came up with some interesting, if depressing, news from China: > just some news from china -- no english media have reported this yet... china gfw ha

Re: [freenet-dev] China effectively blocking opennet

Do we even know that Chinese users are using 0.7.5 and not 0.5 or earlier? On May 13, 2011 7:09 PM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > Our old friend sdiz came up with some interesting, if depressing, news from China: > just some news from china -- no english media have reported this yet... china gfw ha

[freenet-dev] Should we include JNA in freenet-ext.jar?

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > This is a very small and very promising patch, but we would need to include > the JNA library. The JNA library allows us to conveniently call native APIs > without JNI code. We could use this for not only what this patch does - set > ba

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we include JNA in freenet-ext.jar?

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > This is a very small and very promising patch, but we would need to include > the JNA library. The JNA library allows us to conveniently call native APIs > without JNI code. We could use this for not only what this patch does - set > ba

[freenet-dev] Initiating a bugfix

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Ashan Fernando wrote: > Hi, > Im a final year student from the Department of Computer Science and > Engineering and interested in Freenet for GSoC 2011. To get started I have > cloned the source of Freenet from the git and would like to start working on > fixing a

Re: [freenet-dev] Initiating a bugfix

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Ashan Fernando wrote: > Hi, > Im a final year student from the Department of Computer Science and > Engineering and interested in Freenet for GSoC 2011. To get started I have > cloned the source of Freenet from the git and would like to start working on > fixing a

[freenet-dev] Kaspersky working on whitelisting Freenet

I forgot to mention that it was free... I am willing to be an official tester/contact if you need one. On Mar 16, 2011 10:19 AM, "Juiceman" wrote: > I got an answer back from Kaspersky. Basically we will need to whitelist > each release for now. I asked if they could give

[freenet-dev] Kaspersky working on whitelisting Freenet

ue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Juiceman wrote: > >> I have been in contact with Kaspersky regarding the false positive >> detections. They have been quite helpful. I still need to find out >> what they are whitelisting, just the FreenetInstaller-1355.exe or the >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Kaspersky working on whitelisting Freenet

I forgot to mention that it was free... I am willing to be an official tester/contact if you need one. On Mar 16, 2011 10:19 AM, "Juiceman" wrote: > I got an answer back from Kaspersky. Basically we will need to whitelist > each release for now. I asked if they could give

Re: [freenet-dev] Kaspersky working on whitelisting Freenet

ue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Juiceman wrote: > >> I have been in contact with Kaspersky regarding the false positive >> detections. They have been quite helpful. I still need to find out >> what they are whitelisting, just the FreenetInstaller-1355.exe or the >>

[freenet-dev] Kaspersky working on whitelisting Freenet

I have been in contact with Kaspersky regarding the false positive detections. They have been quite helpful. I still need to find out what they are whitelisting, just the FreenetInstaller-1355.exe or the underlying files. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Mon, Mar 14, 2011 a

[freenet-dev] Kaspersky working on whitelisting Freenet

I have been in contact with Kaspersky regarding the false positive detections. They have been quite helpful. I still need to find out what they are whitelisting, just the FreenetInstaller-1355.exe or the underlying files. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Mon, Mar 14, 2011 a

[freenet-dev] New freenet-ext.jar, please test!

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We want to deploy this soon. Please test it. > http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-ext-v27pre8.jar > > You can build this from the tag. So far so good...

Re: [freenet-dev] New freenet-ext.jar, please test!

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We want to deploy this soon. Please test it. > http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-ext-v27pre8.jar > > You can build this from the tag. So far so good... ___ Devl mailing list Devl@

[freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 05 Feb 2011 19:26:46 Juiceman wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toselan

[freenet-dev] Wonder why bootstrapping is slow

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 Feb 2011 04:16:25 Juiceman wrote: > > Bootstrapping from seednodes is really slow right now. ?I run one of > > those seednodes. ?Here are my stats, they have been horrible for about > > 2 weeks

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 05 Feb 2011 19:26:46 Juiceman wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toselan

Re: [freenet-dev] Wonder why bootstrapping is slow

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 Feb 2011 04:16:25 Juiceman wrote: > > Bootstrapping from seednodes is really slow right now.  I run one of > > those seednodes.  Here are my stats, they have been horrible for about > > 2 weeks

[freenet-dev] Wonder why bootstrapping is slow

Bootstrapping from seednodes is really slow right now.? I run one of those seednodes.? Here are my stats, they have been horrible for about 2 weeks now.? I don't suppose my node is serving many announcements, huh? Are other seednodes in similarly bad shape? Node status overview bwlimitDelayTime:

[freenet-dev] Wonder why bootstrapping is slow

Bootstrapping from seednodes is really slow right now.  I run one of those seednodes.  Here are my stats, they have been horrible for about 2 weeks now.  I don't suppose my node is serving many announcements, huh? Are other seednodes in similarly bad shape? Node status overview bwlimitDelayTime:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you >> can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably >> stat

[freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland >> wrote: >>> We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you >>> can run a

[freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you >> can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably >> stat

[freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you > can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably > static IP address (or dyndns name), and a reasonable amount of bandwidth > (especiall

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you >> can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably >> stat

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland >> wrote: >>> We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you >>> can run a

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you >> can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably >> stat

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-support] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you > can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably > static IP address (or dyndns name), and a reasonable amount of bandwidth > (especiall

[freenet-dev] Please test the new load management branch

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Please get the snapshot (update.cmd testing / update.sh testing), and test > it. I want to know if it causes serious problems, and also any other bugs you > run into. I know there will be various errors, but I am still interested in >

Re: [freenet-dev] Please test the new load management branch

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Please get the snapshot (update.cmd testing / update.sh testing), and test > it. I want to know if it causes serious problems, and also any other bugs you > run into. I know there will be various errors, but I am still interested in >

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1314 (and 1313)

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1314 is now available, please upgrade! It will be > mandatory on Tuesday. > > This build's main new feature is a new packet format. This should give > significant improvements in several areas: > - Fewer small packets.

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1314 (and 1313)

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1314 is now available, please upgrade! It will be > mandatory on Tuesday. > > This build's main new feature is a new packet format. This should give > significant improvements in several areas: > - Fewer small packets.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >