Following the steps in the issue made me realize that there is an RC3.
By guessing that couldn't be too old, that it ought to be named
similar to RC2, and using google, I located
OOo_2.0.0rc3_051014_Win32Intel_install_sv.exe
Well I definitely think it is hard to find the Swedish versions. I've
had
I have a similar problem. I'd like to be able to switch between
Swedish and English GUI on an XP Home Edition. Is this possible? Do I
need two complete installations of OOo? I assume file extensions will
be associated with just one of the language versions in this case.
Or is there a way to switch
2005/10/29, Timothy Stockdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Greetings,
> Thanks for your product. I was just wondering whether or not this is
> completely legal. Even using it to open certain Microsoft files? (Word,
> Powerpoint, Excel)
I'm also uncertain. Is the reversed engineering ,used to construct
problems with using common sense on how laws work)
/Henrik
2005/10/30, Wesley Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:51, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
> > 2005/10/29, Timothy Stockdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Greetings,
> > > Thanks for your product. I
lotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sunday, October 30, 2005 Henrik Sundberg wrote:
>
> > But if this reversed engineering is completely legal, why should the
> > license attached to MS Open XML format make it GPL incompatible?
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/office/xml/licenseoverv
Aah, got it! Thanks!
No worries then. I just don't trust MS that much. I wanted to get
convinced that there are no doc format litigations around the corner.
I think it's time for me to sign that open document petition.
/$
2005/10/30, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> He
I've read this thread with interest. I had no opinion at all from the beginning.
I think the arguments of Giuseppe are more convincing than those of Nicolas.
I don't think the presentation gets mixed with the contents by adding
language as a cascading style. And I don't think any attributes added
Why not sending the document as the message text, instead of using attachments?
This is like Copy & Paste, but more convenient. And I prefer not to
receive to many attachments anyway. OTOH I like plain text better
anyway.
/$
2005/11/10, Bill Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Cut & Paste anyone?
>
> j
> 2005/11/12, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For Pete's sake - OpenOffice.org (the program who's list were on) - opens the
> bloody formats! It reads them, edits them, saves them, creates them. OOo is
> crossplatfrom, so with *JUST* OOo and other OSes, anyone in the world can
> open, read, edit,
2005/11/12, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> What would be more reasonable would be a plug-in interface to a CM tool,
> such as CVS, or Subversion.
I agree. I don't want my documents to grow indefinitely, And I don't
want to export all versions of my documents.
But can Subversion handle OpenDocument
Thanks for all this info Mathias!
I think "File-Compare Documents" and binary files in my VCS will suit me best.
I just tested "File-Compare Documents". It didn't notice differences
in tables. Is it just meant for bread text?
/$
2005/11/13, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PR
SPAM warning. Potency pills or such.
Moderators, Please remove these posts.
/$
2005/11/13, Pool Jake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> Before, I've never tried this, but I have hearted only good
> things from my friends. And this month, I tried it, and you
> know I'am happy! It changed my life.
>
How about the anti spam Haiku?
http://www.oblomovka.com/writing/habeas:_the_antispam_haiku.php3
/$
2005/11/20, Randomthots <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>
> >
> > If you call carpet-bombing effective, it is. Retail paper flyers are the
> > true spam ancestors.
> >
>
> It's cost e
2005/11/26, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Of course it "can" be abreviated. What I'm saying is that abreviating it
> is not going to give you the benefit that you think it will. It will not
> speed up parsin, it will not make the file load faster. It will save
> disk space, but I doubt that
2005/11/27, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Irrelevant comparison. Document files are not programs. OOo is a 60 MB
> program, not a 192kb document. OOo does rendering, memmory allocation,
> loads external libraries, runs threads, and does a zillion other things
> that documents don't do.
I w
This is only testing the behaviour of ZIP and has, in my opinion, no
bearing to the discussion.
I am surprised by the difference in file size though. I though the ZIP
files should differ by ~49 bytes.
/$
2005/12/6, John W. Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just for the heck of it, I decided to provid
Great info!
What happens at SAVE? Isn't the complete unzipped file needed to do
the ZIP-analysis? Is there a way to ZIP on the fly? Does OOo implement
the ZIP algorithm itself, using the fact that it knows about the tags
it'll use from the beginning?
(I expect that auto save will be very expensive
I don't think you need to be working for MS just to dislike false
accusations. I think Chad was very precise in his question. And
genuinely interested in finding the truth too.
This discussion has been escalating until the question was lost.
This was the statement:
> If a vendor failed to adhere t
Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 09:38 +0100, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
>
> > This was the statement:
> > > If a vendor failed to adhere to that, then the vendor was shut down,
> > > and all assets went to Microsoft.
> >
> > And th
2005/11/9, Andrew Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think it's obvious to anyone
> that such ideas as "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" is
> something between wildly misleading and utter crap. It certainly doesn't
> apply to OOo. Assume, for the sake of argument, that OOo's Marketing
> pro
2005/12/11, Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Dim 11 décembre 2005 11:55, M. Fioretti wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 11:11:00 AM +0100, Gianluca Turconi
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> >> Same thing for Mozilla or Gnome, I think.
> >
> > Yes, of course the same problems in any big pro
2005/12/11, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 12/11/05, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > To me this sounds like:
> > Just a few volunteers have contributed to OOo.
> > That is not many eyeballs.
> > Therefore "with en
2005/12/11, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 18:38:34 PM +0100, Gianluca Turconi
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > There's is no evidence the open source model can scale for desktop
> > applications. At the same time, there's no evidence it cannot.
> > We're talking about as
ar that is)?
/$
2005/12/11, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 19:52:46 PM +0100, Henrik Sundberg
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 2005/12/11, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > 90% or more of the current users of: web browsers, email c
2005/12/11, techwrite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am wondering if there is any current way to set up a "Dual Save" feature in
> Open Office. It seems like such an easy, vital feature which (thus far
> anyway) I've been unable to find. It would be great to simply click on the
> "Save" button and know
2005/12/2, Olivier Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
> >
> > Yes, there is definitely a simple way to do this. You can download the
> > language-file from the place, you've already found.
>
> I noticed there is no "en_US" package there. Well, there are two with
> close names,
2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:55:34 -, Jacqueline McNally
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Is anyone using CosmoPOD.com ?
> >
> > I have heard it is back with improvements to the site (including a
> > support forum), and they have u
2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:51:13 -0000, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > 2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:55:34 -, Jacquel
2005/12/12, Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:12:12 -0000, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > No I have not. Would that make the security warnings less valid?
> > /$
>
> No but then is not about
2005/12/13, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Randomthots wrote:
> > Mathias Bauer wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> So possibly the size of the Calc document created from the file (the
> >> memory consumption of Calc itself) caused the swapping you experienced
> >> but not the xml content itself that (as ou
2006/1/14, Markus Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This, however, makes it necessary that a server can generate PS or PDF files
> from the ODT templates on a scripting (commandline) base.
>
> Thus my question: Is there a tool or a method which allows me to render ODT on
> the commandline? The tool sho
2006/1/15, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Enrique Castro wrote:
> > What about the -headless mode?
>
> It still requires X.
>
> > By invoking OOo from commandline with -headless will be possible to run a
> > macro _without_ X being up and running? (but perhaps installed)
>
> It certainly has
> >> make it my mission to personally visit Mr. Gates to say that excel
> >> does not have all components a good spreadsheet should have... it
> >> lacks arcade gaming... or did they take it to the X-box?
> >
> >
> > No need, to visit Mr. Gates, his software is already full of easter-eggs.
>
> So t
I use gmail in Firefox and Thunderbird (windows XP). All text is black
with white background.
Is this some kind of SPAM?
/$
2006/2/12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Reverse type? Is that to make your email even harder to read? May I suggest
> you Google "typography" and read some of t
Perhaps something is happening already:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060319121128416
/$
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006/3/20, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Simon Hogg wrote:
>
> > Actually this is not a bug, any number[1] raised to the power zero is 1.
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Exponents_one_and_zero
>
> Wikipedia is not an authority on mathematics :)
> I thin
2006/3/21, Bob Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As the value of 0^0 seems to depend on context to some extent (either 1 or
> undefined), perhaps it should be an option in Tools|Options|OpenOffice.org
> Calc.|Calculate. Something like a checkbox saying "Define 0^0=1, else
> undefined".
I consider this t
2006/3/21, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henrik Sundberg wrote:
> > I think it is strange to be this pedantic about 0^0, and not care
> > about math at all when it comes to normal cases like this. Are we
> > looking for compatibility with Microsoft or math?
&q
2006/3/21, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is the third time I give this example. Aren't people listening? It
> is *NOT* true that x^y approaches 1, it DOESN'T. It only approaches 1 in
> a special case i.e. if you approach along the a curve y = f(x) where
> f(x) is analytic.
Listening.
* /= ^
/$
2006/3/21, Jonathon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Liberty wrote:
>
> > Every Calculator, Spreadsheet, Compiler, and Interperter, that I've seen
> > defines 0^0 as 1.
>
> My Texas Instruments BAII Plus calculator says that 0 * 0 = 0.
> MY PDA says 0 * 0 = 0.
> My cell phone says 0 * 0 = 0
2006/3/21, Rod Engelsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Excel 2000 gives an error.
My bet is that this makes the circle full, considering the mail that
started this thread looked like this:
On 3/18/06, Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear sirs,
> we would like to inform you that we have found a bug
I think this thread fits better in the discuss list than in the dev list.
2006/7/7, Dave Calkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henrik Sundberg wrote:
>> > > If I were doing this, to avoid trying to produce a binary file in a
>> > > format that is not documented o
2006/7/14, James Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
I know I'm probably doing something very stupid, but after scanning
quite a few messages on "SQL errors" I can't figure it out.
I installed OpenOffice 2.0.3 and Writer and Calc work fine as usual.
However, I can't get any SQL queries to work in
2006/7/16, Code Monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
To Whom It May Concern:
Your so-called "feature", the delete dialog box, is a violation of the common
functionality principle of application design. Even Microsoft follows this principle
most of the time. It was one of the first things I learned wh
Which document format do you use?
/$
2007/1/18, A N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I use OO 2.1 on Windows XP Pro. I saved a Writer
document with a password and turned on versioning
(Under File->Versions...), and created a new version.
Close and reopen the document and the saved versions
dissapear.
Bug is
2007/6/10, Roger Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What's your angle Johnny? You need to learn to connect the dots!
Open your eyes and see the truth! Or... is some of Microsoft's dirty
money in your pockets too?
Calm down.
Did you actually read the informative link Johnny provided?
I'll repeat it f
2008/8/24 Twayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You started a new thread; was that supposed to be in reference to some
> previous thread?
But he correctly labeled the message as "Pointless Thread", so all is fine :-)
/$
-
To unsubscribe
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:31 AM, András Kovács <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've a problem, I atteched Fault.ods file.
> Look at the red cell! It's not egual.
> Why?
K16 contains 33 166 Ft.
Why?
/$
-
To unsubscribe, e
48 matches
Mail list logo
