Eric Gaither, Gaithman's E-Gold Exchange wrote:
If we can overcome that stigma by utilizing the
> alternate forms of identity verification, we may all be on to something
> bigger that most of us have conceptualized even to this point.
Eric,
Signed PGP messages. Webs of trust. PKI? Reputation
You may subscribe to my e-group also. for
updates and news.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind regards,
Michael Moore[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.gold-today.comSign up with
e-gold today and get grams of e-gold here.https://www.e-gold.com/newacct/newaccount.asp?cid=129542
- Original Message
CCS wrote:
> Thirty years ago you could walk into a Savings and Loan in the US
> and open a passbook account. They might have asked for a name but
> that was just for convenience and it didn't matter. No ID was
> requested or needed. Possession of the passbook was ownership of
> the account; t
Loryn,
>But we do hope that most financial criminals will
> avoid doing business with us.]
>
> This is the least we can do for our Agents. For it is our Agents who
> absorb the risk that enables all of us to move from non-trusted,
> non-trustable, always-reversible transactions systems to a non-r
> >I also suggest that SR would be better served by firing their
> >verification service and devising a real way to accomplish their
> >actual objective that is compatible with the interests of their
> >potential customers.
>
> Any suggestions? We have been searching for a service that would
>
At 07:45 PM 12/29/2000 -0500, CCS wrote:
>I also suggest that SR would be better served by firing their
>verification service and devising a real way to accomplish their
>actual objective that is compatible with the interests of their
>potential customers.
Any suggestions? We have been searchin
Contrary to the comments of Matyjewicz and Jenkins, Standard Reserve
has no legitimate business concern with establishing anyone's
identity. Their actual business interest is only in establishing that
their accounts are controled by the true owners of the funds therein.
These are two different
> 1. WE did some checking on our customer and do not believe that they
> are involved in anything illegal.
Not to pick nits but the issue which concerned me is not whether they
are involved with anything illegal (after all taxation is legal) but
with anything dishonest. I think this is what yo
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 09:55:58 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Vinnie Moscaritolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Reminder... Mac Crypto Jan 29th - Feb 1st
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all;
Below is a preliminary list of talks scheduled for the Millennium
Edition of the
"Loryn E. Jenkins" wrote:
> I personally have always been more comfortable providing my
> details over a 128-bit encrypted SSL session than providing them
> over-the-counter or through-the-mail. But perhaps that's just me ...
Interesting. Providing personal information to ANY person should alway
The issue of identifying people is not the issue. The real issue is with
mishonoring created credit on or to a stolen credit card.
E-gold started out in the right direction in dealing exclusively with funded
accounts. Can't spend what you don't have. Like cash in the pocket.
Credit cards are a l
>I personally am VERY skeptical about giving mine
>over the Internet no matter WHO is asking and
>HOW secure they claim to be. I prefer to mail it
>by snail mail.
Interesting. I personally have always been more comfortable providing my
details over a 128-bit encrypted SSL session than providing
Destiny Worldwide,
and all others interested in doing business with Standard Reserve.
Our application form currently demands a SSN because the US-based identity
verification service requires it. We use this service because it quickly
and cost effectively ascertains the consistency of the identit
George,
Please let me be one of the first SR Agents and e-gold Market Makers to
publicly thank you for your efforts:
>Ours is not an anonymous service, never has been,
> and was never touted as such. Rather, we actually verify that
> the applicant is who they say they are. We owe that to
I just logged into my egroups page for that
group and this is what it says is the address to subscribe to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the opposite order I had it on the list and in my
newsletter template. I am certian that when I set up the template, I cut
and pasted this address direct
> The SS# requirement also stopped my application for their debit account.
I'm also curious why SR want this number.
I can see the need for a passport number or driver's license number for
identification purposes (even though it is pretty useless without
verification). But AFAIK a social secur
At 01:06 PM 12/29/2000 -0600, Destiny Worldwide wrote:
>
>I have noted several things about Standard Reserve, all of which
>I do not like. We were going to use Standeard Reserve and even
>introduce clients to it, but it is obvious that Standard reserve
>intends to play by the rules of Big Brot
WE have noted the comments about our egold sale
and want to add our 2 cents worth.
1. WE did some checking on our customer and do not
believe that they are involved in anything illegal.
2. we do not believe in the current know your customer rules
and support the old fashioned values of
Subject: Re: e-gold / SR ??From: Dale Pond
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 10:59:34
-0700X-Message-Number: 5B Ray wrote:> You are asked to
give quite a bit of personal information in order to open an [SR] acct including
a SS# all this makes me very suspicious and starts my mind as
At 09:02 AM 12/29/2000 -0800, Khurram Khan wrote:
> >Volume has nothing to do with it. The discount >should be
> based on the savings possible because of >our process. Any retailer
> >should be able to offer that - whether they be pure play
> (online only) or clicks and mortar.
> >
> I mus
>Volume has nothing to do with it. The discount >should be based on the savings
>possible because of >our process. Any retailer
>should be able to offer that - whether they be pure play (online only) or clicks and
>mortar.
>
I must disagree with you here George. Higher volume means h
At 11:41 PM 12/29/2000 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>It would not take mauch to provide e-gold users with a substantial
>>benefit in their online purchasing. Say, a 5% discount and 3% from the
>>better security and speed of settlement and lower fees would add up to
>>enough to cover in-exchang
>Bearerinstruments.com intends to provide a rotating banner
>ad at the bottom of it's home page. There's an example there
>now:
>http://www.bearerinstruments.com/
>Info is at:
>http://www.bearerinstruments.com/html/advertising.html
>
>If anybody has a suggestion before programing begins,
>please s
>It would not take mauch to provide e-gold users with a substantial
>benefit in their online purchasing. Say, a 5% discount and 3% from the
>better security and speed of settlement and lower fees would add up to
>enough to cover in-exchange costs and make it more efficient. Factor in
>falling ine-
>On 11-29-00 I wired a sizeable amount of money to Flat Rate Gold for deposit
>into my E-Gold acct. The next day there was a service message on their site
>stating there had been money orders totaling over $250k returned as
>fraudulent, resulting in a mandatory 30 day hold on all incoming wires,
Sidd wrote:
>
> EJ has stated in the past:
>
> "there is not always the necessity to back Standard Gold 100% with
> E-Gold" and
>
> "there is a market where those individuals and businesses may need
> capital to grow. Standard Reserve will be in that market providing
> capital from its asset
26 matches
Mail list logo