done.
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 11:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Excluding recipients from Dynamic Distribution Group?
With a traditional distribution group you could expand it and remove
individuals on a per-email basis.
I seem to remember an issue or "feature" where Account Operators (or some
similar priviledged group) can do this by default.
From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com]
Sent: 20 September 2012 10:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Users able to send mail as any user using "
IIRC when we migrated if you have a maximum message size it also refuses to
move those, we had to disable those during the move window - I think the issue
was that it uses SMTP as the transport.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 06 June 2012 15:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin
ut I think even
after increasing the cluster heartbeat timeout people were still having
occasional issues. I work for a Veeam partner so can probably find out more if
you need me to, though it sounds like you probably won’t gain much from doing
it anyway.
Steve
From: Paul Hutchings [mai
asily as I can. :)
Personally, I don’t like taking snapshots of entire VMs. For one thing, it’s
not a supported way to restore an Exchange server.
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Issues snapshotti
There are a lot of users on Spiceworks. Seems to get decent feedback compared
to many of the others.
I guess the biggest pro or con is the Dell takeover as nobody quite knows what
may change (if anything) yet.
Paul
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: 29 February 2012 21:04
To:
ect: RE: Renaming leavers mailbox to deal with meetings?
Ayup.
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Renaming leavers mailbox to deal with meetings
ood idea.
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 10:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Renaming leavers mailbox to deal with meetings?
We have a person, let's call them Joe, who works
a tool like this for Exchange so thought I'd get a bit of feedback
:) We are looking at an affordable option for DR in addition to general
backups.
Thanks!
Eric
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Paul Hutchings
mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk>> wrote:
FOr 100 to 200 users gut
FOr 100 to 200 users gut reaction is that's absolutely fine. The Mailbox
Sizing Spreadsheet will help but you're not likely be taxing any half-decent
RAID.
I'd probably increase the RAM because it's a cheap win.
Backup? I'm not sure if you're asking just for Exchange or in general. You
can
load balancer, or a single Windows VM acting
as the CAS?
____
From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 02 February 2012 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers?
So what is the pro of that approach over
/exchange/archive/2012/02/06/recovering-public-folders-after-accidental-deletion-part-1-recovery-process.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, Feb
change.com
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to recover Deleted Items using ExFolder?
I'm trying to recover some deleted items from a Public Folder using ExFold
I'm trying to recover some deleted items from a Public Folder using ExFolders.
I can see the items in ExFolder but when I right-click and do "Recover Items"
it throws an exception as per below.
Any ideas please?
When I browse to that folder using Outlook I don't have the Recover Deleted
Items
mber of TCP/IP ports for RPC. In essence to set static
ports it's just a couple of registry entries on each server that's part of the
array hosting the CAS role.
Steve
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: 02 F
load balance a large number of TCP/IP ports for RPC. In essence to set static
ports it's just a couple of registry entries on each server that's part of the
array hosting the CAS role.
Steve
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@m
C. In essence to set static
ports it's just a couple of registry entries on each server that's part of the
array hosting the CAS role.
Steve
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: 02 February 2012 11:10
To: MS-Excha
nce-9482517-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]<mailto:[mailto:bounce-9482517-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]>
On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings
Sent: 02 February 2012 09:46
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers?
This is clearly where I have a lot of
.@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]<mailto:[mailto:bounce-9482517-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]>
On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings
Sent: 02 February 2012 09:46
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers?
This is clearly where I have a lot of reading to d
panies, Kemp and
Coyote Point will work just fine.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:47 PM
To:
Coyote Point work just fine and you don't
have to do anything with RPC ports. I have both widely deployed with clients.
(I've also got expensive ones deployed - but for "most" companies, Kemp and
Coyote Point will work just fine.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and
If it helps any, I usually use this, probably not very elegant but seems to do
what I need:
$Mailboxes = Get-Mailbox
$Mailboxes | ForEach {Get-ActiveSyncDeviceStatistics -Mailbox:$_.Identity} |
Select
Identity,DeviceType,DeviceUserAgent,DeviceID,LastSyncAttemptTime,LastSuccessSync
| Export-CSV
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ActiveSync - block rule not working?
It probably is one specific app pool, but I don't know which one. I just
recycle all of those that have "Exchange" in their name.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssential
k rule not working?
IIS has a cache of stuff like this. Just recycle the app pools after making
changes for immediate effect.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailt
en with smart phones
when you disable them after the fact. Usually it takes a recycle of IIS to make
it stick.
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: A
We're using one. We have a good old mix of clients so I did my homework and
these have been flawless.
From: Ben Serebin [b...@reefsolutions.com]
Sent: 18 December 2011 9:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Cheap UC SSL CA?
Hello All,
Any
l B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Adding a second server and going to a DAG?
We
We currently have a single multi-role Exchange 2010 SP1 box running as a VM.
Early next year I'd like to add a second server to give us a two server DAG,
and a hardware load balancer.
Given I already have a working production server, just how much impact on my
users is this likely to cause?
We
we'll see, most odd if it is that though as it doesn't explain the
intermittent nature of it all.
____
From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 07 December 2011 8:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: Outlook is
sday, December 07, 2011 1:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: Outlook issues after changing domain
password?
And the password cache in the Users applet in the Control Panel has been
cleared?
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[m
only one mail account?
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: [Bulk] RE: Outlook issues after changing domain password?
Not sure about the full reboot as that is something I wanted to try and avoid
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook issues after changing domain password?
Not sure about the fu
e the situation?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook issues after changing domain password?
Has anyone
t let him. Turning cached mode off
"fixed" this anomaly.
Richard
From:
bounce-9464685-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com<mailto:bounce-9464685-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
[mailto:bounce-9464685-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]<mailto:[mailto:bounce-9464685-8066..
You know they just release SP2?
From: Sean Rector [sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
Sent: 05 December 2011 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 sp1 RU6 - has anyone experienced any issues
Basically wondering if anyone has experienced any problems af
I didn't find one single article, but as some start points for when I did ours:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exdeploy2010/default.aspx#DeploymentCheckList/ee721975/2003
http://msexchangegeek.com/2010/01/30/rapid-transition-guide-from-exchange-2003-to-exchange-2010/
http://blogs.technet.com/b
requirements?
Thanks,
Jamie Morales
Reliance Cloud Services
www.relianceCloud.com<http://www.relianceCloud.com>
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject
e MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 3:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disabling IMAP by default for new users?
We have an app that only works with IMAP access. I know I can run a cmdlet
that wi
ary.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Fo
riginal Message-----
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
So, back to this a little later, but does anyone have any ideas just wtf might
ing like:
Mail-Disable all public folders.
See what's left MESO folder and delete them (appreciate any tips on what to
look out for and NOT delete in this folder)
Mail-Enable the public folders that should be mail-enabled.
Thanks,
Paul
____
From: Paul Hu
Anyone used these? http://uk.loadbalancer.org/
From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 03 October 2011 3:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancers?
Sorry yes, “pair” being physical or virtual it’s still (ideally) two Windows
ons.com]>
Sent: 03 October 2011 13:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancers?
Kemp is a good choice, as is Coyote Point.
If you have lots of money, you can also consider Citrix, Cisco, and F5.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange
ultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 8:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Load Balancers?
I'm starting to think and plan for adding a
this issue with trying to add the email address.
From: Richard Sobey [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 27 September 2011 4:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
On 27/09/2011 16:30, Paul
;t mail-enabled...
Paul
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 27 September 2011 16:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
This is just a country name ourdomain.co.uk.
It's already in use as adfind s
ubject: RE: SMTP Address is un use by a non mail-enabled Public Folder?!
A couple of things come to mind.
You can try mail enabling it and see if that lets you remove the address, and
then mail-disable it.
Or take it straight to the source with ADSIEdit.
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:p
osoft@adname.local> comes to mind. Might you
have a special name?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Just came to setup a DL and the SMTP address we want to use is already in use.
I ran adfind and found it.
folderPathname is listed, as is proxyAddresses.
However, when I use the EMC Public Folders console to browse to that location,
the public folder is not mail enabled, so I have no idea how I
I don't think you shouldn't need a UCC cert for Exchange 2003 as usually all
the services usually go via a single URL.
On our Exchange 2003 box we used a RapidSSL cert which worked just fine.
On our 2010 box we use a Starfield (Godaddy without the Godaddy branding) one
from Certificatesforexcha
ts).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: "ObjectNotFound
We use 20mb with an Accellion for anything over that.
Whatever you set it to at some point it won't be enough so there is no right
answer.
From: John Hornbuckle [john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: 08 September 2011 5:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issue
atesforexchange - are all SAN certs equal?
Are you starting the certificates mmc from within an elevated command prompt?
(BTW: Lync 2010 Unleashed - go buy it. It's worth it.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[
I'm not sure there is one single guide, but in my environment, single BE & FE
2003 to single 2010, I found these useful, in no particular order:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exdeploy2010/default.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/jribeiro/archive/2009/11/26/transitioning-an-exchange-2003-envir
Honestly, set one up as soon as you can. They don't stop spam, but they do
help demonstrate that mail purporting to be from yourdomain.com really is.
The things to be aware of before you rush in is that SPF can break email
forwarding if you use it, and if you have people who submit mail with a
They aren't going over the wire in clear text because you're only allowing
Outlook Anywhere over SSL, aren't you...?
From: Harry Singh [hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 August 2011 5:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Anywhere and Checkpoint FW
All -
E
o: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving the Public Folder Hierarchy?
I'm forced to say that I've never seen either of those issues.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.
ched about
missing group metrics and sure enough my
\\server\groupmetrics share, which was there,
had mysteriously disappeared. Restarting the Exchange Host Service recreated
that though.
Are these little niggles normal/expected?! The old boxes are still switched
off.
From: Paul
s the
appropriate AD settings...just follow the the documentation...
Straight from MBS...
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2009/05/04/removing-the-last-exchange-2003-server.aspx
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Paul Hutchings
mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk>> wrote:
Thanks
e to recover if necessary...
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Paul Hutchings
mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk>> wrote:
Thanks Michael, already have. Right now in theory everything is done barring
uninstalling the two old Exchange boxes. They're switched off right now and I
plan on leaving t
ael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 6:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Moving the Public Folder Hierarchy?
I'd
I'd appreciate a bit of a sanity check please.
I've gone through all the steps that I know of to de-configure my Exchange 2003
servers prior to removing them.
I've not yet removed the mailbox databases and Public Folder database though
they are empty (no mailboxes, no PF instances).
I was plan
Are you using the same account? We're migrating and I didn't realise that
autodiscover only works with mailboxes on your 2010 servers, so my new test
mailbox checked out fine on the test website, but my own mailbox which was
still on 2003 wouldn't work without being manually setup.
arprocessing cmdlet.
You can end up with double bookings if you give users full access to the
calendar and they manually add the appointments to the calendar. The
AllowConflicts only applies to the behavior of the Booking Attendant. It
doesn’t apply a restriction to the calendar itself.
a wildcard cert? Is it just
price, or is there a technical advantage?
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings wrote:
>
> Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com,
> mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com.
>
>
>
>
Just done this, fun aint it :) We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com,
mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com.
We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our
reverse proxy for SSL inspection).
This is what I have in my notes for KB937031:
o not fix" for E14.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-----Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: [80004005-501-4B9-5
I've read pretty much all the threads on this, but I'm still unclear - with an
Exchange 2010 SP1 RU3v3 server and Outlook 2007 and 2010, whilst these Sync
Errors don't appear to be causing an issue, are they a bug, by design, or
something I can fix?
I've deleted and re-created OST's, no differe
Seems I have one problem area with Public Folders which is Organisation Forms.
Despite being listed on the Replication tab, our new 2010 SP1 RU3v3 simply
doesn't seem to have a replica of the Organisation Forms folder, and I don't
know why.
Clients are seeing this error in their Sync Issues fol
:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Social Connector
Did that and still have oddness. We've only tested with our IT department at
the moment.
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02,
ssues
Subject: RE: Outlook Social Connector
We've had "strangeness" with Outlook 2010 when it's in cached mode. Seems to
take days sometimes for the client to get the photo.
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
I wondered if anyone is using the Outlook Social Connector and if you can share
any problems/pitfalls/issues to be aware of?
I'm considering installing it simply so that Outlook 2007 will work with GAL
photos stored in Active Directory.
It looks like Microsoft make a GPO .adm file specifically
I've just moved our last mailbox from 2003 to 2010. On our 2003 server we were
using 410gb of disk space, on the new one we're using 440gb.
We did have quite a long deleted item retention on the old server which won't
yet have built up on the new box, so that's going to sway the numbers a bit,
I'm just about to move my last mailbox from 2003 to 2010 at which point I'll
want to start decommissioning my 2003 servers - the bit I'm not looking forward
to!
I have two 2003 boxes. One is the BE mailbox server, the other is a FE server.
The FE server is specified as the bridgehead server on
t an employee of Peterstow Aquapower
and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send
this e-mail.
[Description:
C:\Users\ptjohnson\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\environment2.jpg]
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 01 August 2011 17:22
To: M
n use it or not.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Receiv
data.
>
> Are you also seeing errors for the indexing and maintenance of the database?
>
> Good luck.
>
> Jim Rupprecht
> The University of Kansas
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Hutchings
>> [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk<mailto:pa
n extract-delete-recreate-import on the data.
>
> Are you also seeing errors for the indexing and maintenance of the database?
>
> Good luck.
>
> Jim Rupprecht
> The University of Kansas
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Hutchings
>>
he mailbox to another database
and ended up doing an extract-delete-recreate-import on the data.
Are you also seeing errors for the indexing and maintenance of the database?
Good luck.
Jim Rupprecht
The University of Kansas
> -Original Message-
> From
dicated by MSExchangeIS Event ID 1014) or 5 slow
RPC requests in your mailbox context.
Almost certainly a bad Outlook add-in or bad application.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:p
Just had a very odd repeat occurrence of the store crashing and a mailbox being
quarantined. It's happened twice in a fortnight and it's the same mailbox/user.
Thing is I have no idea how to troubleshoot what item/event in the mailbox may
have caused this?
I know the mailbox which has been qua
hnet.com/b/bill_long/archive/2010/04/22/fixing-public-folder-replication-errors-from-exchange-2003-to-exchange-2007-or-2010.aspx
I remember fiddling with this script and being pretty happy with the results.
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mi
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Category "Fixer"?
Have you taken a look at pfdavadmin and seen if it can help?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]<mailto:[mai
So, most of my public folder replication issues in going from 2003 to 2010 seem
to be caused by things like a folder showing two sets of items with a category
of "none".
I can fix it folder by folder by changing all these items to a random category
then clearing it, but that doesn't really scal
We use Accellion. Not the cheapest but it pays for itself as we no longer have
to mess about with FTP or posting CDs and DVDs.
We don't use the Outlook add-in, we've never found that to be a problem tbh.
Depending on user numbers, requirements, and budget, I would also suggest take
a look at A
I've asked this on a few forums and haven't really got a definitive answer,
which is a little odd as I can't believe I'm the only person to have run into
this.
Has anyone managed to configure a room mailbox via the EMC so that all meeting
requests from anyone go to a delegate for approval?
If
In the process of a migration now. Have to admit I don't recall ever reading
that though.
All our clients with mailboxes on the 2003 box still point to the 2003 box.
When they've been moved to the 2010 box their profile updates to point to the
2010 box, well to the CAS array object.
-Orig
There is a potential issue with Public Folders. Seems it's more a combo of
Outlook and SP1RU4 but still:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/06/22/released-update-rollup-4-for-exchange-2010-sp1.aspx
Bottom of the comments as of now.
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://l
I'm struggling terribly with getting in-policy and out-of-policy meeting
requests to work as the wording on the tabs on the room mailboxes would suggest.
I have a resource policy configured as per the following:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-CalendarProcessing "room 101" | fl *
PSComputerName
Do you have automatic replies to the internet enabled on your Exchange 2003
server?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 June 2011 20:24
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2010, Exchange 2003 and autoreplies
All,
I've been tasked with sett
u can check this via EMS using the
Get-CalendarProcessing command and checking the AutomateProcessing setting on
the mailbox. If it's set to 'AutoAccept' and 'DeleteNonCalendarItems' is set
to True, I believe you'll see the behavior you describe.
From: Paul Hutchin
Erm right.. so it looks like "AutomateProcessing" on "get-calendarprocessing"
was on AutoAccept for that mailbox rather than AutoUpdate.
I know I haven't changed it and nobody else around here would know how to so
WTF?!
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.
: True
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 22 June 2011 13:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: "User" mailboxes show as "Shared" when migrated?
Something screwy is going on.
If I switch on the resource attendant it accepts meetings automatical
tlook does show the delegate, but the Outlook checkbox
for them to receive a copy of meeting requests is not ticked.
Paul
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 22 June 2011 13:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: "User" mailboxes show as "Shared"
ons (I wouldn't), you've got
lots of options:
gcm *permission
To see the full list.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:51 AM
To:
en or so mailboxes so it's not a big deal to set this via Outlook - but
can it be done via EMS? I've not been able to find anything that suggests a
suitable commandlet.
Thanks,
Paul
From: Paul Hutchings
Sent: 22 June 2011 11:55
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Room
min Issues
Subject: RE: 4004 Exchange Availability Service Warning
My concern would be that when you shut off your 2003 PF server that PFs "just
stop working".
Right now - it's just less than optimal.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.
removing everything after and including the pipe and comparing
all the attributes to see if anything stands out.
But I'm outta ideas without actually spelunking myself.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.h
findstr -i "home"
any of those the old server?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 4004 Exchange
15:41
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 4004 Exchange Availability Service Warning
Does the server "nuneaton" still exist, with a PF DB in it?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@m
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
