Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter output question

Brian L. Lightfoot wrote I was wondering about this a little bit also. I realize that the "ADDRESS FOR PRIVATE USE" is hard coded into the program and I have not printed out all possible report permutations, but does the address ever appear in any kind of report? So far I have never seen it app

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter output question

which begs the question, why is it even bothered to be input in the first place? Brian in CA Just wondering... -Original Message- From: Jenny M Benson [mailto:ge...@cedarbank.me.uk] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:31 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] So

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter output question

Charles Apple wrote On some of the SourceWriter templates (for example the Family Group Sheet) the address is displayed as [ADDRESS FOR PRIVATE USE,] in formatting the output for Footnote/Endnotes and Bibliography. What controls this display, and where is it located? I have searched, and sear

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter output question

On some of the SourceWriter templates (for example the Family Group Sheet) the address is displayed as [ADDRESS FOR PRIVATE USE,] in formatting the output for Footnote/Endnotes and Bibliography. What controls this display, and where is it located? I have searched, and searched and can't find it.

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter - IRC - which template... PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE

Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Harbaugh Hopkins Hughes Jones Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sullivan Williams - Original Message From: Jenny M Benson To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:16:32 AM Subject: Re: [L

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter - IRC - which template and how to use it specifically?

Dan Bateham wrote Has anyone any suggestions, with specifics, for using a SourceWriter template for documenting an online chat (IRC) more or less in accordance with _EE_ standards? I would use the template for Interviews>Transcripts>Privately held. I think the word "transcript" only appears i

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter - IRC - which template and how to use it specifically?

I am still using basic, but for those I have at present, I treat it as if an e-mail, or letter. Rich in LA CA - Original Message From: Dan Bateham To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:51:08 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter - IRC - which

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter - IRC - which template and how to use it specifically?

Has anyone any suggestions, with specifics, for using a SourceWriter template for documenting an online chat (IRC) more or less in accordance with _EE_ standards? Thanks, Dan Bateham Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter for marriage and divorce indexes?

Thank you for the excellent advice (Jennie Benson & Connie Sheets)on using the basic source system for citing these marriage and divorce indexes. I created the source and it is working great. Thank you for your help. Vicki Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamil

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: Artifacts>Privately held; Author's name in citation

I have checked Evidence Explained and agree the Author should be included. I have submitted a problem report on this issue. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation br...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this messa

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter for marriage and divorce indexes?

Vicki, If you are working with indexes you find online, I would probably use the Internet > Database template. If actual divorce records, I would start with the Court records templates. I always experiment with how each  template "prints" to get the best results:  you can leave fields blank o

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter for marriage and divorce indexes?

v pedersen wrote Also, there is no Sourcewriter template at all for any type of divorce record. I could use a generic Source template, but am wondering if there is a template that I am overlooking in Sourcewriter that could be used. What you could do is us use the Basic System and write the

[LegacyUG] Sourcewriter for marriage and divorce indexes?

I like using Sourcewriter and find the templates useful, however, I cannot find a Sourcewriter template for marriage indexes or divorce indexes. My state is putting a marriage index online and will soon be putting a divorce index online as well. As a workaround for the marriage index, I have

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter: Artifacts>Privately held; Author's name in citation

In _SourceWriter_ template (Artifacts>Privately held), I've entered author's names. Output preview reports name in the bibliography, but not in the either the full or short footnote. I can edit in override, but is this the way the template is supposed to work? Thank you for any assistance y

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem

rom: vik...@rvi.net > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:12:44 -0800 > > Sherry: > > Thanks for checking. It may be a quirk with .76 that was fixed in .86. I > tried two from scratch usin

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem

- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of S. Fry Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:31 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem Apologies for sending this third e-mail, if the first e-mail makes it to the

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem

italics. I have Legacy 7.0.0.86. Sherry - Original Message - From: "Kirsten Bowman" To: "LegacyUserGroup" Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 12:24 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem I'm having a problem with a master source created using

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem

- Original Message - From: "Kirsten Bowman" To: "LegacyUserGroup" Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 12:24 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem I'm having a problem with a master source created using the SourceWriter template Book > book, auth

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem

I should add that I copied the book sources to the Source Clipboard then to another event, and again no italics. Sherry - Original Message - From: "Kirsten Bowman" To: "LegacyUserGroup" Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 12:24 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWri

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter Template Problem

I'm having a problem with a master source created using the SourceWriter template Book > book, authored > author known > online book. When brought onto the Source Clipboard, everything typed into either of the Text Comments boxes appears in italics. The text doesn't show as italicized when typed,

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

t see the source the way you want it, you can fix it! Elizabeth researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: "Ward Walker" To: Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 6:40 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

I like the sourcewriter. There is room for improvement of course, and I am looking forward to the converter thingie so that the rest of my basic sources can be switched over easier, but overall I like it a lot. I am VERY obsessive compulsive about having everything in my file consistent and u

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

Arnold, I wold use the authored books basic format template and add the word "compiler" on the author suffix line. That avoids any need for an override (overrides may not print properly in reports until bugs such as those associated with subsequent citations are fixed) and results in a citati

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

e Writer a big help. (That includes me. I had a lot of trouble achieving consistency when using the basic source method.) Please respect differences of opinion. Ward - Original Message - From: "Elizabeth Richardson" To: Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 6:21 PM Su

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

Have been using LEGACY since late in V.5. Had my sources all set up - then Source Writer showed up. Tried it several times - but result in REPORTS (especially the Book and Other Reports) was 4-6 lines long. I can give enough detail for anyone to go back to my sources in less that 2 lines in the

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

Source Writer is terrific I think, but I personally have a lot to do to clean mine up, so maybe I shouldn't talk! BUT, I play the CD's that came with DELUXE 7 over and over, until it sinks in. I even went back and played the 12-step using Legacy disk and found a lot I'd missed . Just a sug

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

I disagree with Elizabeth about the SourceWriter. I find it to be the speediest way to get a source that's up to my standards, particularly in the case of census and a couple of others that we all used frequently. I would encourage those of you who are new to Legacy (or new to genealogy) to use th

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 2:12 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY Elizabeth, If you go to SourceWriter and choose Books, your first choice is "Was the book authored or edited?" If you choose one of the Edited options, the word EDITOR will then appe

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

d I just add the word, compiler, or compiled by. I have yet to use the sentence override for anything. Elizabeth - Original Message - From: "Arnold Sprague" To: Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 11:46 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY I have come across a

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

ginal Message - From: "Arnold Sprague" To: Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 11:46 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY I have come across a goodly number of books which are Compiled By, not Authored By nor Edited by as are the current options. I end up using A

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter / Book COMPILED BY

I have come across a goodly number of books which are Compiled By, not Authored By nor Edited by as are the current options. I end up using Authored or Edited by, but then have to click on "Click here to go to the overrides tab" to change the text from editor or author to compiler. Does anyo

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

Bruce, Thanks. I think I get it now. --- On Wed, 12/10/08, Bruce Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Bruce Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Date

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

n Tue, 12/9/08, Bruce Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Bruce Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template > > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > > Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 8:42 PM > > If you have 5 e-m

RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

Everyone, Thanks for the help. --- On Tue, 12/9/08, music-line <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: music-line <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Date: Tuesday, December 9, 20

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

e Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Bruce Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 8:42 PM > If you have 5 e-mails from the same person, group by > corres

RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

& Choirmaster, Polesworth Abbey www.polesworthabbey.co.uk * -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melanie Armstrong Sent: 10 December 2008 01:52 To: Legacy user group Subject: [Legac

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

If you have 5 e-mails from the same person, group by corresponded provides you one Master Source to be used 5 times (with different Detail Source). Group by e-mail provides 5 Master Sources. Hope that heps. On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Melanie Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Can anyone t

RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com > > Can anyone tell me the difference between the E-mail template for group by > individual e-mails and group by correspondant? I just tried using group by > correspondant an

[LegacyUG] Sourcewriter Template

Can anyone tell me the difference between the E-mail template for group by individual e-mails and group by correspondant? I just tried using group by correspondant and it just didn't seem to work correctly. I looked in the help files but didn't find anything. I'm using the latest build of Legacy

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / NEHGS

nealogy! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arnold Sprague Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:09 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / NEHGS The New England Historical Genealogical Society

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / NEHGS

]> To: Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:09 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter / NEHGS The New England Historical Genealogical Society (NEHGS) publishes a quarterly mailing for its membership called the "Register" <http://www.newenglandancestors.org/publications/register.asp>.

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter / NEHGS

The New England Historical Genealogical Society (NEHGS) publishes a quarterly mailing for its membership called the "Register" . I have looked and looked at the SourceWriter and cannot find an appropriate category for this type publi

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter vs BASIC

Thanks Robert and Ron -- I just tried putting a new source (Ohio Deaths) using source writer. The resulting source on an Individual report was nearly 12 lines! With a BASIC source - it is 2 and makes much more sense. I continue to be unconvinced about the necessity for all of that data. I belie

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter

lytree.com<mailto:legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:23 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Kelly, The announcement of it's birth was somewhat premature, and it is now long ove

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter

Kelly Horst wrote: Good Morning, I have just upgraded to Legacy 7.0 (Deluxe) and am trying to convert my Basic Sources. According to the User Manual the Source Template Conversion Tool is reached from the Master Source List by clicking the Options Button and then choosing Source Template Co

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter

sweb.com/%7Ewendyh65/> - Original Message - *From:* "Kelly Horst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com *Sent:* 09/27/2008 6:12:08 AM +1200 *Subject:* [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Good Morning, I have just upgraded to Legacy 7.0 (Deluxe) and am

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly Horst Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:12 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Good Morning,   I have just upgraded to Legacy 7.0 (Deluxe) and am trying to convert my Basic Sources.  According to the User Manual

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter

http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [Leg

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter

The Conversion Tool has yet to be made available to the paying customers. Stay tuned. Tom Herson Ithaca, NY - Original Message - From: "Kelly Horst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:12 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter Good Morni

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter

Good Morning, I have just upgraded to Legacy 7.0 (Deluxe) and am trying to convert my Basic Sources. According to the User Manual the Source Template Conversion Tool is reached from the Master Source List by clicking the Options Button and then choosing Source Template Conversion Tool from the

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter

co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter > Date: Mon, 18 Aug 20

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter

With the SourceWriter, is there a way to eliminate n.p., n.d. etc that appear in source output for footnote/endnote and bibliography (preview and report) when you have elected to not fill in some of the fields in the source input screen, particularly with the generic ones. I presume n.p. = no p

RE: [LegacyUG] sourcewriter with dutch sources

rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard Doddema Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11:22 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] sourcewriter with dutch sources I use Genlias for much of my Dutch ancestors. It has birth, marriage, and death reco

[LegacyUG] sourcewriter with dutch sources

I use Genlias for much of my Dutch ancestors. It has birth, marriage, and death records online. The text below is an example of a search. How would I use sourcewriter to do this? I'm changing over all my previous sources to sourcewriter so I can get everything standardized (Hopefully I'm going

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

Pat and Rita Molloy wrote: I think the straight answer to the question is that if your certificate comes from the GRO then the GRO is the Source, and the Repository; if it comes from your Local Register Office then that is the Source, and that is the Repository. I record the Source and Rep

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

Jack Earnshaw wrote Incidentally, is the GRO interested in being told about errors in the index? If it is an error in the Index, I don't know! If it is an error in the transcription of the Index then FreeBMD are happy to be informed and will correct it on confirmation, Ancestry may or may no

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

I think the straight answer to the question is that if your certificate comes from the GRO then the GRO is the Source, and the Repository; if it comes from your Local Register Office then that is the Source, and that is the Repository. I record the Source and Repository simply as a reminder

RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

Jenny wrote : Incidentally, on a related point, I often use the Birth, Marriage and Death Indexes as Sources, until such time as I can obtain Certificates. When I get the Certificate and use this as a Source, I leave the relevant Index citation in place so that anyone wishing to follow-up my re

RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

A copy certificate obtained from the GRO is a facsimile of the original certificate issued by the local Register Office. - No it is, at best, a facsimile of a transcribed copy. The GRO holds its own “originals” that were sent to it by the Local Register Office. There weren’t facsimile facilities

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

wrote A copy certificate obtained from the GRO is a facsimile of the original certificate issued by the local Register Office. That is not quite true. The local Register Offices send copies of their data to the GRO (so there is always a small possibility of inaccuracy creeping in).   The a

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

One small point is that the reference for the GRO version is different from the reference for the Local Register Office. I found this out when I asked a Local Office for a certificate and gave the GRO reference. They had to look through over 50 Local Registers (lots of churches in the area) before

[LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - English BMD certificates

I returned from the Baltic cruise all enthused to begin entering my source data into Legacy 7, as I have never done this before, and am now persuaded it is important! I have masses of certificate copies filed away, but have never previously done more than enter the details into the Individu

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter- Book, authored, basic - field selection

Warning!! If you do not attach a source to a person, they can be typed over and/or lost. If needed, create a person named dummy to attach them to until you are ready to attach to people. Rich in LA CA --- Jessica Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am populating my master source list with some >

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter- Book, authored, basic - field selection

58-59). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jessica Morgan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:00 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter- Book, authored, basic - field selection > Also, I've added seven sources, all using t

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter- Book, authored, basic - field selection

t out lists and reports of what and where their information came from, so when I get to the point of actual research I will have a starting point. Thanks so much, Jessica > > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:43:41 -0500 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacy

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter- Book, authored, basic - field selection

: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:43:41 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter- Book, authored, basic - field sel

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter- Book, authored, basic - field selection

I am populating my master source list with some sources I will be using in the very near future. I am specifically using the Book, Authored > Author Known > Basic Format. When I move to Step 2, which is entering the data in the fields, I'm having trouble tabbing from field to field properly. I wou

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter options

Thanks for the reminder nudge! Penny - Original Message - From: John S. Adams To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:42 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter options I see a lot of questions to this group which indicate to me that many users are hung up on the

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter options

Oh, John, I wasn't trying to do that. I figured there was something I didn't understand or I was missing. Patti On Jun 29, 2008, at 5:16 PM, John S. Adams wrote: Patti, I certainly agree that it is much easier to use a template designed for the particular source at hand. But my point is,

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter options

John S. Adams wrote My point is that SourceWriter is flexible.  If you experiment, you can probably find a template that will work for that unique or unusual source you want to cite.  The title of the template usually doesn't show up in the printed citation.   I'd like to hear others' opinion

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter options

;wish list." John S. Adams Hermosa Beach, CA From: Patti Hobbs Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 2:26 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter options John, I think I realized that I probably could make other things work, but I also figured that

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter options

John, I think I realized that I probably could make other things work, but I also figured that if there was a template specifically designed for the particular information and format, I'd rather use that. Also, it usually helps to understand the thinking behind how certain options are cho

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter options

I see a lot of questions to this group which indicate to me that many users are hung up on the literal titles of the various source templates. After experimenting with SourceWriter for a while, it seems to me that it is quite flexible and that many templates can be adapted for sources other tha

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - INTERVIEWS

Elizabeth Richardson wrote No, first of all, the option is audio/video (not visual), It must be getting towards time for me to get new glasses! -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - INTERVIEWS

of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: "Jenny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - INTERVIEWS Michele Lewis wrote When you select the interview option in the Sourcewr

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - INTERVIEWS

(Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: "Jenny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - INTERVIEWS Michele Lewis wrote When you select the interview option in the Sourcewriter there are only

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - INTERVIEWS

Michele Lewis wrote When you select the interview option in the Sourcewriter there are only two options, audio/visual and transcripts. What about face to face interviews, telephone interviews and email? How do you enter those? Face-to-face *is* Visual, isn't it?! And Audio just means over

[LegacyUG] Sourcewriter - INTERVIEWS

When you select the interview option in the Sourcewriter there are only two options, audio/visual and transcripts. What about face to face interviews, telephone interviews and email? How do you enter those? michele Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquet

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail

This is how I do it, too. The master source is the person and the details indicate phone, email, etc. > Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:19:35 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail > > I agree with

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail

Type at the Master Source level. Kirsten -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bruce Jones Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:20 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail I agree with Jenny. I have a M

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail

> Geoff Rasmussen > Millennia Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny M > Benson > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 11:24 AM > To: LegacyUserGro

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail

y, June 20, 2008 11:24 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail When using the SourceWriter to create a citation for an e-mail there are fields for entering the details of the sender, the recipient and the e-mail itself. When you move to the Source Deta

[LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail

When using the SourceWriter to create a citation for an e-mail there are fields for entering the details of the sender, the recipient and the e-mail itself. When you move to the Source Details screen, there are NO fields for Detail Information, other than Surety Level, Recorded Date and Fil