did you train the filter by flagging all those slipped messages as junk?
iF you just delete them, the filter would not be improved!
I've been using Moz Firebird as my only email for quite some time now.
And have been somewhat disappointed in the filters. It catches alot of
the junk right
M.W. Chang wrote:
did you train the filter by flagging all those slipped messages as junk?
iF you just delete them, the filter would not be improved!
Yes. I always hit the 'Junk' button which promptly gets them out of my
sight and into the Junk folder. This seemed to work great on Mozilla but
I
I had that problem with spam-assassin' Bayesian filter. I actually tried
using the Junk folder of mozilla to train SA (sa-learn --mbox --spam
Junk). Until now, there are still some Chinese junk messages passing
through the sanity check of SA.
Michael Hipp wrote:
Yes. I always hit the 'Junk'
It seems that mozilla's built-in bayesian filter works better than
SpamAssassin. Until now, SA failed to identify many Chinese spam while
mozilla can correctly move them into the Junk folder on reception.
It's not *really* Bayesian - I don't think any of them are. They all ignore the
M.W. Chang wrote:
It seems that mozilla's built-in bayesian filter works better than
SpamAssassin. Until now, SA failed to identify many Chinese spam while
mozilla can correctly move them into the Junk folder on reception.
I've been using Moz Firebird as my only email for quite some time now.
And
On 11/14/2003 8:34 AM, I believe that Michael Hipp wrote:
M.W. Chang wrote:
It seems that mozilla's built-in bayesian filter works better than
SpamAssassin. Until now, SA failed to identify many Chinese spam while
mozilla can correctly move them into the Junk folder on reception.
I've been
On Friday 14 November 2003 9:09 am, Collins Richey wrote:
Agrred. Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the
once-and-future-browser, it would seem that improvements are to be
expected. I've been using Firebird since it's early days, and it's
quite good. Nevertheless, 0.7 has more of a
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:34:36 -0600 Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M.W. Chang wrote:
It seems that mozilla's built-in bayesian filter works better than
SpamAssassin. Until now, SA failed to identify many Chinese spam while
mozilla can correctly move them into the Junk folder on
Tim Wunder wrote:
I've been using Moz Firebird as my only email for quite some time now.
You have? How did you get the stand alone browser product to do e-mail?
Perhaps you mean Thunderbird. ;-)
Hehe. I still think of them as one.
FWIW, Mozilla's intergrated MUA is still better than the
Collins Richey wrote:
Agrred. Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the
once-and-future-browser, it would seem that improvements are to be expected.
I've been using Firebird since it's early days, and it's quite good.
Nevertheless, 0.7 has more of a propensity to just go poof (TM)
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:19:45AM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2003 9:09 am, Collins Richey wrote:
Agrred. Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the
once-and-future-browser, it would seem that improvements are to be
expected. I've been using Firebird since
On Friday 14 November 2003 10:13 am, Myles Green wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:19:45AM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2003 9:09 am, Collins Richey wrote:
Agrred. Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the
once-and-future-browser, it would seem that
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:23:16AM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Hmmm I don't think I've ever seen .7 go poof Perhaps it's
your . naw I won't go there... :-)
But it's been rock solid here.
I've been getting the same problem as Collins myself (on Slackware
9.1).
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Myles Green wrote:
My hardware:
Athlon 1800+
1.5GB PC2700 DDR RAM (Samsung)
nVidia Geforce2 MX 400 (using nvidia drivers)
PS/2 keyboard
USB wheel mouse (Logitech) using IMPS/2 protocol
I've run Memtest86 on the RAM, one stick at a time and all three
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:51:20 -0700 Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:23:16AM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Hmmm I don't think I've ever seen .7 go poof Perhaps it's
your . naw I won't go there... :-)
But it's been rock solid here.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:20:41PM -0700, Collins Richey wrote:
In your case, Myles, I would suspect nvidia drivers, USB mouse, combination of
all of the above with acpi, or ???, probably nothing to do with Firebird.
I thought about the drivers too but this has been happening with the nv driver
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:08:00PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Myles Green wrote:
My hardware:
Athlon 1800+
1.5GB PC2700 DDR RAM (Samsung)
nVidia Geforce2 MX 400 (using nvidia drivers)
PS/2 keyboard
USB wheel mouse (Logitech) using IMPS/2 protocol
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:47:21 -0600
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:09:16 +0800
M.W. Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you ever toyed with the Bayesian learner?
I wonder where SA stores her rules.
It's not *really* Bayesian - I don't think any of
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:09:16 +0800
M.W. Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you ever toyed with the Bayesian learner?
I wonder where SA stores her rules.
It's not *really* Bayesian - I don't think any of them are. They all ignore the
cross-correlation. That is, they don't correct for the
have you ever toyed with the Bayesian learner?
I wonder where SA stores her rules.
--
.~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
/ v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.22-xfs
^ ^6:06pm up 1 day, 6:59, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 1.04, 1.01
sorry, I found it in the doc. it's in users' home directories or be
specified by bayes_path in site config file local.cf.
M.W. Chang wrote:
have you ever toyed with the Bayesian learner?
I wonder where SA stores her rules.
--
.~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
/ v \
21 matches
Mail list logo
