I am thinking of buying a Gigabyte GN-WI01GS to replace my Wistron
CM9. It's listed as supported under the man file. I was curious if
anyone has any experience with this card and can confirm that it's
FULLY supported under OpenBSD-4.3 (i386).
Thank you.
Kevin
"Hope in reality is the worst o
Yay!
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:50:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
...
So the problems I see are the following:
1) the "(inet|inet6)" parameter either doesn't work, doesn't work
consistently, or at the very least doesn't work as described in the man
page for bgpd.
I have set up an aggressive mode VPN between a cisco 877 and OpenBSD server.
The SA seems to have set up correctly however the connection only
appears to pass traffic from the cisco to the server.
The private IPs on the cisco have a nat exemption to keep it from
natting when going through the tunne
Hi folks. I'm trying to get my Nintendo DS to use my OpenBSD 4.3 router to
access the internet, but it's sort of inconsistent. Everything works on
unencrypted wifi, but only some games work when I turn WEP on. After some
research, the most likely culprit appears to be that some NDS games don't
I am running 4.3 (june 4 snapshot) and I'm using spamd in the default
greylisting mode. Works fine. Now I would like to know what is the
best way to immediately turn off greylisting mode and enter
blacklisting mode only. Stopping spamd and then starting it with the
'-b' switch? Or do I need to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Ted.
I'd be willing to test patches if OBSD needs it. Otherwise it looks
like I have enough disk space in my hot spare to move the system over.
When reformatting what block size should be used to reduce the fsck
overhead. Per 14.7:
"Larger fr
I'm trying to set up a virtualised qemu OpenBSD kernel debug
environment, with a reasonable amount of success, but am running into
the following problem on bootup :
com1: at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3panic: com_isa_attach: mapping failed
The operating system has halted
Presumably because the kern
Leader europien de la mise en relation B to B
DOSSIER SPECIAL : INFORMATIQUE ET SECURITE INFORMATIQUE.
Connaissez vous les risques de ne pas avoir de sauvegarde ? Savez quand cas de
perte de vos donnies sans sauvegarde votre assurance ne vous prend pas en
charge ?
Il existe aujourd'hui des solut
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Dan Harnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's under the keyboard on the X31 and relatively easy to get to. The
> hardware maintenance manual has full instructions.
Thanks everyone for the replies.
I found the mini pci and mail you all noe from a wi(4), it w
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:59 AM, alemus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to compile a simple program written in C with -fno-stack-protector
> option and i have some troubles...
>
> this is my simple file main.c:
>
> int main()
> {
> int i;
> short int *screen = (short int *) 0xB8000;
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Jason Sidabras
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Increasing MAXDSIZ from (1*1024*1024*1024) to (2*1024*1024*1024),
> which is well within my RAM limits and larger than the number the
> error says it is having trouble allocating (183MB).
> And this is where my expertise
It was just a quick test. I did not install it.
Thanks,
Carl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:47 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Does OpenBSD only allow 19 Interfaces
On 2008
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Used bsd.rd -current and increased my RAM to 3.1GB. No luck.
Looked into changing MAXDSIZ in
/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/include/vmparam.h and compiling a bsd.rd from
- -STABLE just so I can run fsck_ffs.
Increasing MAXDSIZ from (1*1024*1024*1024) to (2*
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Pierre Riteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This could be the same problem than Linux users are seeing:
> > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/21/3358724
> >
>
> This is not good esp
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-09-24, wolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Support for d-link dfe-550tx(st201) in amd64 arch is broken or only disable?
>> i386 works fine in GENERIC 4.3 kernel.
>
> This gives a good clue:
>
> $ fgrep ste* /sys/a
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:52:05PM -0600, Carl Horne wrote:
> Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
> and built it. It gives the following error:
this will likey not work. openbsd tcpdump is heavily modified from
the upstream. there are parts of this you w
On 2008-09-24, wolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Support for d-link dfe-550tx(st201) in amd64 arch is broken or only disable?
> i386 works fine in GENERIC 4.3 kernel.
This gives a good clue:
$ fgrep ste* /sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
#ste* at pci? # Sundance ST201 etherne
On 2008-09-24, Carl Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
> and built it. It gives the following error:
Take care with non-OpenBSD versions of tcpdump, most (all?) still don't
jail the protocol dissectors into an unprivilege
On 2008/09/24 14:12, Carl Horne wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> Thanks so much. I am using urlsnarf to log url requests and there
> is one instance running for each gre tunnel. I have a script that
> auto starts or stop one as soon as I added or removed a tunnel. So
> when I added a tunnel it would fire u
Carl Horne wrote:
Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
and built it. It gives the following error:
Carl,
I think you are going down a more dangerous path then you might need to
do here.
You are mixing many things now.
I would start first by running 4
Some more info. I downloaded version 3.9.8 of tcpdump from www.tcpdump.org
and built it. It gives the following error:
# /usr/local/tcpdump/sbin/tcpdump -nttt -i bge0
tcpdump: /dev/bpf10: No such file or directory
When I look in /dev I see bpf0 through bpf9.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Carl
Stuart,
Thanks so much. I am using urlsnarf to log url requests and there is one
instance running for each gre tunnel. I have a script that auto starts or
stop one as soon as I added or removed a tunnel. So when I added a tunnel it
would fire up a new instance breaking tcpdump. Removing the tu
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 13:39:54 Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Pierre Riteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > This could be the same problem than Linux users are seeing:
> > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/21/3358724
>
> This is not good especiall
On 2008-09-24, Carl Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have put all my eggs in this basket so I am desperate to get this fixed.
> This may only be a tcpdump issue. If I have 19 interfaces tcpdump works as
> expected. If I have 20 or more it fails.
>
> First I try with 20 interfaces setup and I
That's me some 3 weeks ago:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122099826019882&w=2
In short, it's the exact same situation (X31, IPW2100 etc.).
As detailed in my original message, there's a sort of workaround:
ifconfig ipw0 up first and them try rescanning. Usually works for me,
but still need to r
Support for d-link dfe-550tx(st201) in amd64 arch is broken or only disable?
i386 works fine in GENERIC 4.3 kernel.
Jacek
--
System poczty na jablko.one.pl
I also told him to get a -current amd64 with >3.5GB. i've got a few
things running on my amd64 at home w/ 4.1GB working set.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:53PM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ted and Chris,
>>
>>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:50:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
...
> > So the problems I see are the following:
> > 1) the "(inet|inet6)" parameter either doesn't work, doesn't work
> > consistently, or at the very least doesn't work as described in the man
> > page for bgpd.conf(5) IMHO.
> >
Hi,
I have put all my eggs in this basket so I am desperate to get this fixed.
This may only be a tcpdump issue. If I have 19 interfaces tcpdump works as
expected. If I have 20 or more it fails.
First I try with 20 interfaces setup and I get:
# tcpdump -nttt -i bge0
tcpdump: Failed to open bp
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:28:01PM -0500, tico wrote:
>> On 2008-09-24, tico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lead me to believe that
>> > simply adding "allow from any inet6 prefixlen 12 - 48" would allow
>> > the IPv6 prefixes that my neighbor was announci
On 2008-09-24, tico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lead me to believe that
> simply adding "allow from any inet6 prefixlen 12 - 48" would allow
> the IPv6 prefixes that my neighbor was announcing to me be added
> from the RIB into the FIB, however this was n
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Brian Keefer wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I booted a Sunfire V120 off a 4.4 snapshot CD and dd if=/dev/zero
of=/rsd0
was humming along quite nicely when I left
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:53PM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
> Thanks Ted and Chris,
>
> I have to go pick up some more RAM, i don't have a system I can take down to
> shift this over.
That won't help. You are running into MAXDSIZE, which is not increased
by adding RAM.
-Otto
>
> J
Adding more RAM won't change anything with your current software
configuration.
You are running 4.3 which limits dynamic memory allocation to 1 GB per
process.
You could boot off a snapshot where the limit is bigger (and fsck uses
less memory as Chris said).
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:53PM -050
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:34:36AM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
> /etc/fstab (line of interest):
> /dev/sd0a /pub_raid ffs rw,noexec,softdep 0 2
>
> I can't seem to edit my fstab in single user mode because everything
> is ro. System has 2GB of real memory and is running bsd.mp GENERIC. I
You ca
Thanks Ted and Chris,
I have to go pick up some more RAM, i don't have a system I can take down to
shift this over.
Jason
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Jason Sidabras
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thanks Chris,
>
> I am a little worried abou
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Pierre Riteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This could be the same problem than Linux users are seeing:
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/21/3358724
>
This is not good especially as I have opened the back plate on my X31
to find no mini-pci slo
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Afaik, erasing a disk 7x7 times using a truly random source of
> entrophy, using the proton decay multiplexed with the frequency of
> solar flares on alpha centauri, and just dd'ing /dev/zero to the drive
> *ONE* time makes no diff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Chris,
I am a little worried about running `fsck -p` in case of loss of data
but I did it and edited my fstab.
once booted I still have no luck running fsck_ffs:
error is now:
cannot alloc NNN bytes for statemap
dmesg follows:
OpenBSD 4.3 (
On 24.09-09:48, Maximo Pech wrote:
> Well I guess I will have to resolve this by coding something. What do you
> think about this:
[ ... ]
would you not be better to use ALTQ to limit the bandwidth available
to each user? then if they share their password their only sharing
their own use?
if not
Chris McGee escreveu:
> Giancarlo, thank you for your ideas.
>
>
>
>
>
>
2) Regarding hfsc, what is the old "bandwidth" statement used for? It
>> seems
>>
like it would be obsolete. Changing it doesn't seem to affect
>> anything,
>>
either
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Jason Sidabras
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, it is also important to note that this is a 3TB single
> partition with ffs2
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#LargeDrive
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:51:00PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an X31 which I have installed -current on. It has an ipw card:
> ipw0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 2100" rev 0x04: irq 11
>
> Its function seems to work for a while, then I get:
> Sep 24 15:22:35 x31 /bs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, it is also important to note that this is a 3TB single
partition with ffs2
thanks again
Jason
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFI2nEe2ZVbbZM1O8gRAoO1AKCGudcFAzNG+heHSvkH1f3Ql04cEACeNhaj
3eshHXLM8CGSSp2sZO3pWXo=
=vPPP
-END PGP SIGNATUR
Hi,
I have an X31 which I have installed -current on. It has an ipw card:
ipw0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 2100" rev 0x04: irq 11
Its function seems to work for a while, then I get:
Sep 24 15:22:35 x31 /bsd: ipw0: fatal firmware error
Sep 24 15:22:36 x31 /bsd: ipw0: timeout waiti
@brnhnahk|: KIA CERATO
Vber: Wepm{i
Dbhc`rek|: 2.03 QVVT
Jnpnaj`: LR
Jnlokejr`vh: EU
Opnaec: 28 000
Cnd: 2007
Dno. nanpsdnb`mhe: G`yhr` dbhc`rek, jnf`m{i psk|, l`cmhrntnm - Kenwood(1 CD,
USB, MP3), o`pjrpnmhj - SteelMate p`gcnbnpwhb{i, qhcm`kj` - Pantera q
dbsuqrnpnmmei qbg|~|, weuk{ m` bqe qh
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Maximo Pech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/22 Maximo Pech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> This will be a ssh tunnel, I want to share it with a few friends, but I
>> don't want them sharing it with someone else because if a lot of people
>> start using it my upload ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I just had a massive power failure and my raid drive is failing with a:
cannot alloc NNN bytes for blockmap
cannot alloc NNN bytes for lncntp
searching the archives and man pages for both OpenBSD and FreeBSD reveals:
fsck_ffs(3) freebsd
"Fsc
Giancarlo, thank you for your ideas.
> >> 2) Regarding hfsc, what is the old "bandwidth" statement used for? It
> seems
> >> like it would be obsolete. Changing it doesn't seem to affect
> anything,
> >> either. The manpage doesn't say. :)
> >>
> >What do you mean by "old" bandwidth?
>
> Also, if your subnets mask
> are wrong, it could explain this behavior.
You've got it!
Such a blindness! ...
I found a wrong broadcast address in an alias. Damn...
Ok, thank you guys for this "flash of inspiration", the flu is stunning me.
Cya
Well I guess I will have to resolve this by coding something. What do you
think about this:
There will be a daemon that has a list of logged users. When a user logs in
a small program is launched that tell the daemon the user has logged in. The
daemon looks for the user in the list of users, If th
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:07:22PM +0200, Federico wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a routing problem that I can't understand.
>
> I have firewall equipped with OpenBSD 4.3.
> On this machine i have 3 nic:
>
> nic A: 89.96.AA.xx/28
> nic B: 89.96.BB.xx/29
> nic C: 10.1.1.0/24
>
> As you can read, ni
Federico escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a routing problem that I can't understand.
>
> I have firewall equipped with OpenBSD 4.3.
> On this machine i have 3 nic:
>
> nic A: 89.96.AA.xx/28
> nic B: 89.96.BB.xx/29
> nic C: 10.1.1.0/24
>
> As you can read, nic A and nic B are on different and separate
Hi all,
I have a routing problem that I can't understand.
I have firewall equipped with OpenBSD 4.3.
On this machine i have 3 nic:
nic A: 89.96.AA.xx/28
nic B: 89.96.BB.xx/29
nic C: 10.1.1.0/24
As you can read, nic A and nic B are on different and separate subnets.
I've put on /etc/mygate the
Hi,
I tried to compile a simple program written in C with -fno-stack-protector
option and i have some troubles...
this is my simple file main.c:
int main()
{
int i;
short int *screen = (short int *) 0xB8000;
char msg[]="Hello World";
for(i=0; msg[i] != '\0'; *(screen++) = 0x1F00 | msg[i
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:16:24 +0200 (CEST), Ernst Terhardt wrote
> Hello,
Hi. bugs@ is probably the wrong mailing list to use for informal problem
discussions and diagnostics -- misc@ is a better choice for this discussion,
so I am routing my response there.
> installed obsd-4.3 from iso image. I
# FLAVOR="ldap" make install
test -z "/usr/local/bin" || mkdir -p --
"/usr/ports/www/squid/w-squid-2.7.STABLE3-ldap/fake-i386-ldap/usr/local/bin"
install -c -s -o root -g bin -m 555 'squidclient'
'/usr/ports/www/squid/w-squid-2.7.STABLE3-ldap/fake-i386-ldap/usr/local/bin/s
quidclient'
test -
On 2008-09-24, tico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lead me to believe that simply
> adding
> "allow from any inet6 prefixlen 12 - 48"
> would allow the IPv6 prefixes that my neighbor was announcing to me be
> added from the RIB into the FIB, however this was
Hi all,
sorry for the noise.Now I know,that Theo is somewhere out.But still one
thing.I was thought abou translation on oficial page,but there is no
answer for about month on my offer (from Saad Kadhi)?
On Wed, wrote:
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
we have prepared czech site abou
Pete Vickers wrote:
well i think you could insert your dual NIC openbsd host into the switch
'ring' physically, then bridging between the 2 NICs and firing up STP,
but be aware that every time you up/down an interface or reboot your
openbsd box, you'll trigger an STP recalc - which is around 45se
Good evening all,
Forgive me if this is common knowledge, but my reading of bgpd.conf(5)
on OpenBSD 4.3 did not make the following clear to me:
When running BGP with only IPv4 prefixes, the examples given in the
sample bgpd.conf work splendidly.
Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lea
well i think you could insert your dual NIC openbsd host into the
switch 'ring' physically, then bridging between the 2 NICs and firing
up STP, but be aware that every time you up/down an interface or
reboot your openbsd box, you'll trigger an STP recalc - which is
around 45sec outage acros
Hello,
we have prepared czech site about OpenBSD and we are ready to start(email
system up,ftp system up,translate is done,only FAQ 4 and up is in
progress),but we still don't know if we can use html code from original
site or make own.It's about 14 days,when we were ask for the first time
63 matches
Mail list logo
