If i set my camera for long exposure, say 30 with the 12 timer on,
and set multi exposure to 2 or 3 will the camera stay in multi until
all 3 shots are taken or will it reset to 1 shot with all of the
delays.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
on 2012-02-02 11:56 Larry Colen wrote
He said something very interesting in the video, a detail that has been overlooked in
every comment I've read so far, but when you get down to it almost the only thing that
matters: It should out perform the K-5.
yeah, i noticed that; the other video i
I love it.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:35 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
Dave showed his, it's only fair I show mine.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7019/6725546807_d951e25dc3_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:49 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Keeping in mind that it was named by Japanese, the K-01 (Kay-Zero-Wun
in english) would probably be pronounced Kay-Ray-eeCHEE in Japanese.
(Rei being the japanese word for Zero and ichi being the japanese word
On 2/1/2012 11:46 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Darren Addypixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Fkrxy2FAku4/TylI7rKtXYI/Ahk/KEJd0EPjCrg/w812-h609-k/K-5_SE_40xs_silver3_front-top.jpg
This is clearly NOT the K-01. It has a
Those were my thoughts. If the standard is 50mm, then that's FF or Pentax have
redefined the term standard.
Peter
On 2 Feb 2012, at 18:50, Paul Stenquist wrote:.
Good news then in regard to long glass. No DFAs to be seen, but I'm not sure
that's a designation that Pentax would use, even
On 02/02/2012 12:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Really, are you going to look at the camera? Or look at the pictures you take
with the camera?
With this one, neither.
They could put a sensor and a view screen onto a paper shredder and have
a perfectly functional camera, but it wouldn't
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
If i set my camera for long exposure, say 30 with the 12 timer on,
and set multi exposure to 2 or 3 will the camera stay in multi until
all 3 shots are taken or will it reset to 1 shot with all of the
delays.
I dunno, but I bet you could
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Peter Jordan wrote:
Those were my thoughts. If the standard is 50mm, then that's FF or Pentax
have redefined the term standard.
Not really, a lot of people just didn't redefine standard with APS, and just
use 50 as normal 30 and shorter as wide, and 75 and
2012/2/2 William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com:
On 02/02/2012 11:49 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Keeping in mind that it was named by Japanese, the K-01 (Kay-Zero-Wun
in english) would probably be pronounced Kay-Ray-eeCHEE in Japanese.
(Rei being the japanese word for Zero and ichi being the
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:05 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Enough about the K-01, though there is something in common here
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20classic.html
Equipment:: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
.. He said something very interesting in the video, a detail that has been
overlooked in every comment I've read so far, but when you get down to it
almost the only thing that matters: It should out perform the K-5.
+1
I
On 2/2/12, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just watched a small portion of an interview of the designer of the
K-01. He mentioned very early on that he had never designed a camera
before. At that point, I decided that my initial suspicions had been
confirmed and watched no further.
If
On 1 February 2012 02:37, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
Mark,
I can't do a K-5 photo at full resolution 100% JPEG quality and fit the
maximum file size for submitting to the annual.
That means I need to either
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Miserere wrote:
When I first started using Photoshop in 2005 I took one of my photos
with plenty of detail and colours and saved it as a JPEG in all
quality settings up to 12. I then pixel-peeped the hell out of them
and came to the conclusion that the
Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
When I first started using Photoshop in 2005 I took one of my photos
with plenty of detail and colours and saved it as a JPEG in all
quality settings up to 12. I then pixel-peeped the hell out of them
and came to the conclusion that the differences between 10
Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses?
There's this thing called a tripod.
:-P
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses?
There's this thing called a tripod.
Most people just call me Larry.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
Yes it is a classic. For one thing it doesn't look like a Toyota.
Cool!
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:05:27 -0500
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO -- Classic
Message-ID: 4f2ade77.3030...@gmail.com
Content-Type:
Finally, someone more deluded than Pentax ;-)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses?
There's
Composing on the rear screen is just dandy with a tripod or monopod.
I use a monopod at the races and it works fine. Handholding a big
lens without an eye-level VF is just nuts.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally, someone more deluded than Pentax
On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:42 AM, steve harley wrote:
i read the press release and watch the linked video interview
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/02/Pentax_K-01_announcement#press
alas the hype about visual aspects of the design and
On Feb 2, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses?
There's this thing called a tripod.
:-P
I see the grin, but to address this in practical terms (or at least in my
On 2/2/2012 1:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:42 AM, steve harley wrote:
i read the press release and watch the linked video interview
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/02/Pentax_K-01_announcement#press
alas the hype about visual aspects of the design and the reputation of
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Does it offer significant advantages over your K-5 in that regard? Some
additional frame rates is all I recall, but I didn't study the specs.
Yep. 24 fps is a biggie.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Lens road map
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Miserere wrote:
Focal lengths are approximate and garnered from reading the tea leaves
in the
On 2/1/2012 6:26 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Jaume Lahuertajlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
...and it is indeed ugly (IMHO):
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-01-forum/173674-k-01-leaked-photos.html
I think it looks fine, but what do i know... I like the looks
On 2/1/2012 6:45 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been afraid to chime in lest I be the lone philistine in the group (as
though my photography hadn't long ago pegged me as such), but I agree. It's
not so bad to my eye. I would
Quoting P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
If I had a stable of DA Limiteds or old primes, I'd be pretty
interested (pending price and specs). But all of my lenses are on the
larger size, and I don't have an overwhelming urge to get a smaller
camera body for the DA* 300/4.
Maybe it
Thanks Don, Bulent, knarf, Dave and Jack :-)
I don't need a release for this guy, but I think it gets less personal when the
face is less visible. More of a general association to the situation.
DagT
Den 31. jan. 2012 kl. 18:29 skrev Don Guthrie:
Eye catching photo - the kind that would
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Does it offer significant advantages over your K-5 in that regard? Some
additional frame rates is all I recall, but I
On 2/2/2012 1:28 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cottycotty...@mac.com wrote:
how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses?
There's this thing called a tripod.
:-P
I see the grin, but to address this in
Well how about focusing in bright light - if all you have is the rear LCD.
I also wonder about the issue in trying to capture action - the delay, if
any, between shutter button depression and image capture.
So all users of the K01 will be chimping !
Kenneth Waller
On Feb 2, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 2/2/2012 1:28 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cottycotty...@mac.com wrote:
how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses?
There's this thing
Here we are on February 2 and I wish it was still two days until the
K-01 announcement. And I'll feel the same way tomorrow.
Anyone for Groundhog Day?
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Whatever.
It's ugly.
I can put up with ugly if the ugliness makes it more usable, but I can't see
that to be the case here.
It's just ugly.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: steve harley
I agree with those who are reading the tea leaves of the lens road map
and seeing full frame (even though they are using the DA placeholder
(how could they really do anything else without tipping their hand?).
Calling the 50 a standard lens is the most obvious tip off. I think
it would be easiest
Paul Stenquist wrote:
True enough. But since the 60-250 is my most used lens, the fact that it will
undoubtedly be awkward with that lens is reason enough to make it a
non-starter for me. That's not to say it's a bad camera. It should prove to
be a good choice for some folks.
The target
On 2/2/2012 2:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
All the bitching about this camera that we're seeing here, on DP
Review and Pentax Forums is irrelevant because this camera is aimed at
people who, by definition, aren't in these discussions. This doesn't
mean the camera will be a success, but it sure
It seems that most everyone that complains about some feature or other
are looking at the camera bodies and complaining that they don't do
everything, rather than there are situations where a particular body
works better than other ones.
I like the Q, but the sensor is too small, and it
imo it's very rare that a so-called designer ever produces anything
other
than hideous crap. There are few exceptions - the Porsche-designed
Contax
RTS being what. What they do is not design, but styling. Since form
follows
function it requires a real designer to design the camera in the
On Feb 2, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I agree with those who are reading the tea leaves of the lens road map
and seeing full frame (even though they are using the DA placeholder
(how could they really do anything else without tipping their hand?).
I would expect that the DA prefix
On 2/2/12, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some web souces I looked at say that 25p achieves virtually the same
cine look as 24p. I doubt that the difference is noticeable. But I'm
no expert. When I was making a lot of commercials, the directors
frequently shot film at 30 and
On 2/2/12, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
You're taking a trip, and
you want to have a spare body, but space is pretty limited. Besides, the
K-5 is just a little too big to conveniently fit in a jacket pocket, or
a fannypack, when you're walking around a strange city and don't want to
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
We've all been looking it this backwards: The K-01 isn't a camera for
all of us who already own Pentax lenses, it's a camera for newcomers
to buy so they'll start acquiring Pentax lenses.
It's a gateway drug. Nice.
Nice paint job :-)
ann
On 2/2/2012 14:05, P. J. Alling wrote:
Enough about the K-01, though there is something in common here
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20classic.html
Equipment:: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally
On 2/2/2012 17:09, DagT wrote:
Thanks Don, Bulent, knarf, Dave and Jack :-)
I don't need a release for this guy,
Son? brother? buddy?
whoever, I like it.. fun shot
ann
but I think it gets less personal when the face is less visible. More
of a general association to the situation.
DagT
On 2/2/2012 3:06 PM, Tom C wrote:
I understand the point you're making and in generally agree, BUT,
would you rather have a bunch of fanboys who worship Pentax and
therefore think they can do no wrong? I can buy a lot of 8 crescent
wrenches or other hand tools for the price of a K-01, K-5,
I have this nifty new receiver, which sounds great--a huge improvement over my
38-year-old Pioneer.
What puzzles me is the volume control: Minimum volume is -90dB (mute), and
maximum is +15dB.
Huh?
What is zero dB? Is it an arbitrary point? Is it linked to some undisclosed
property of the
If I'm not mistaken, the 0 db point is the maximum rated output power.
But that's a big if.
-- Walt
On 2/2/2012 5:41 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I have this nifty new receiver, which sounds great--a huge improvement over my
38-year-old Pioneer.
What puzzles me is the volume control: Minimum
Kind of hard for that to be the case when the dial goes to +15.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, the 0 db point is the maximum rated output power.
But that's a big if.
-- Walt
On 2/2/2012 5:41 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I have this
On 02/02/2012 5:30 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
All they
need is a shoe mount optical viewfinder and a lot of the objections to
the K-01 go away, or are greatly alleviated.
No reason why the Q-Finder can't go on. They already have the 31mm more
or less covered. As much as I detest electronic
On 2/2/2012 3:41 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I have this nifty new receiver, which sounds great--a huge improvement over my
38-year-old Pioneer.
What puzzles me is the volume control: Minimum volume is -90dB (mute), and
maximum is +15dB.
Huh?
What is zero dB? Is it an arbitrary point? Is it
I'm pretty sure they don't rate receivers and amplifiers at absolute
maximum output. Beyond 0 db there's considerable degradation in the
signal-to-noise ratio, so they rate them at some point below that.
On 2/2/2012 5:47 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Kind of hard for that to be the case when the
The poor bird who made it to Hawaii this year (their first ever) was
shot dead as a hazard to aircraft.
http://hawaii.land.blogs.civilbeat.com/post/16450956889/details-emerge-about-snowy-owl-holiday-death
Idiots!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Rick Womer wrote:
I have this nifty new receiver, which sounds great--a huge improvement over my
38-year-old Pioneer.
What puzzles me is the volume control: Minimum volume is -90dB (mute), and
maximum is +15dB.
Huh?
What is zero dB? Is it an arbitrary point? Is it linked to some
From: David J Brooks
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:15 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Bill Owens
http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/01/30/sexual-chocolate-beer?hpt=hp_bn13
Bill
I am so happy to see good news coming out of North Carolina for a change.
What do you mean.? I
From: William Robb
On 02/02/2012 8:57 AM, p. j. alling wrote:
and look at what you're missing, you could have Obama as your President too...
Better him than Harper (BTW, we have Prime Ministers).
Be glad you don't live somewhere like Russia or France where they have both.
--
PDML
This seems to be the direction I expected DSLR video to take, a box with
no view finder holding the sensor with a lens mount on the front.
From: David Savage
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual focus.
DS
On 2 February 2012 23:41, Paul Stenquist
From: William Robb
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Miserere wrote:
Focal lengths are approximate and garnered from reading the tea leaves
in the images of the roadmap shown by Photographyblog. I'm sure Pentax
is being vague on purpose, most likely because many of them are
probably not even on the
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
True enough. But since the 60-250 is my most used lens, the fact
that it will
undoubtedly be awkward with that lens is reason enough to make it a
non-starter for me. That's not to say it's a bad camera. It should prove
From: William Robb
On 02/02/2012 11:49 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Keeping in mind that it was named by Japanese, the K-01 (Kay-Zero-Wun
in english) would probably be pronounced Kay-Ray-eeCHEE in Japanese.
(Rei being the japanese word for Zero and ichi being the japanese word
for one)
Why not be
Have a great day, Bill.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
Sent: February 2, 2012 2/2/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I was sure that Knarf was
Thanks to your wife. And you. And everyone else who commented on this one. And
to everyone who just looked.
They were a cute young couple.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Don Guthrie
How about butt ugly?
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Sent: February 2, 2012 2/2/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: What to call the new
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
True enough. But since the 60-250 is my most used lens, the fact that it will
undoubtedly be awkward with that lens is reason enough to make it a
non-starter for me. That's not to say it's a bad
Well done indeed. Original and effective.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Eye catching photo - the kind that would make make you stop and look if you
were picking one out from a group. I
On 02/02/2012 7:12 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Interesting to note that in the school I teach, it gets more attention
from the industrial design students than the photography majors.
I suspect that it as far as industrial design students go, it could be a
toaster and it would get attention
I really like this one. The sublime light makes it, of course.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Sent: February 2, 2012 2/2/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
A fine and impressive collection of images.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
I do find these pictures continually interesting. Like snow flakes or
fireworks they are repetitive but not
She may be too young for an old lodger like me but that doesn't mean I can't
appreciate her beauty.
Lovely photo!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com
Sent:
Wonderful image.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:25 PM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2012/02/snow-crystal.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Wow, I'd forgotten how ugly some cars were in the seventies. The Nova really
hasn't stood the test of time, has it?
And to think I used to think it a good looking car. What was I thinking?
Nice pic.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Agreed. Lovely, Jostein!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Sent: February 2, 2012 2/2/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO -
On 2/2/2012 5:23 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
A fine and impressive collection of images.
Thank you Dan.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Don Guthrieshark50...@gmail.com wrote:
I do find these pictures continually
The State Of The Mania - A Moment's Reflection
The new Pentax K-01 is announced.
Ricoh has also announced the A16 zoom camera unit for the GXR too.
Both are interesting new cameras. It's always fun to speculate on what might
be better in the land of equipment. But ... what I read on all the
This is true, larry, but these complaints typically come from
different people. Most of the PDMLers are just fine with the K5, and
OK with the Kr. The 645D is REALLY expensive, and the Q is a bit
nichey for the price.
This camera directly competes with the NEX 5N, which is about $700
with a kit
Very interesting choice of framing. The sliver of a figure on the right of the
frame is most unusual and intriguing.
I like it!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Quite interesting, and you caught great expressions ob the faces of
mother and baby. I might like to see a bit more of the other child.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
The State Of The Mania
On Feb 2, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
This is true, larry, but these complaints typically come from
different people. Most of the PDMLers are just fine with the K5, and
OK with the Kr. The 645D is REALLY expensive, and the Q is a bit
nichey for the price.
This camera
Yup, I knew that. The sound energy changes by a factor of 10 for every 10 dB,
and the ear perceives that as a doubling of loudness. The smallest change in
sound intensity the ear can reliably discern is about 3 dB.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From:
From: Rick Womer
I have this nifty new receiver, which sounds great--a huge improvement over my
38-year-old Pioneer.
What puzzles me is the volume control: ?Minimum volume is -90dB (mute), and
maximum is +15dB.
Huh?
What is zero dB? ?Is it an arbitrary point? ?Is it linked to some
Thanks, all. I suspect that Walt may have the answer, that 0dB is the point at
which further power brings an increase in noise or distortion.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Look, Stan, if you're just going to be reasonable I'm going to have to
go over to the Pentax Forums for entertainment.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
This is true, larry, but these complaints
MARK!!!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
Sent: February 2, 2012 2/2/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K-01 is here...
snip
On 2/2/2012 6:49 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Size: I don't really care if it fits in my pocket. I have never taken any
pictures with a camera in my pocket - I find it much better to have the camera
in hand without all of the clothing in the way.
Of course not. It works a lot better with the
Yeah, well I have an amp that goes up to 11. That's louder than 10.
One louder.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
Sent: February 2, 2012 2/2/12
To:
Maybe it's just me, but I think she has a doll-like quality in this
shot. As a matter of fact, I would have believed it was a doll if you
had told me that. Maybe it's just bedtime.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:47 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 February 2012 04:49, Larry Colen
That explains the quality of some of your photos then...
;-)
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Sent: February 2, 2012 2/2/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
on 2012-02-02 19:49 Stan Halpin wrote
Good news: it is clearly a variation on the K-5,
it has 16 Mp like the K-5, but from at least one source, it is not the same
sensor, and it's a different (new? upgraded?) processing engine; i assume that
is why it is said to outperform the K-5; we shall
I believe it's the same sensor but a different processing engine. \
Paul
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:32 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-02 19:49 Stan Halpin wrote
Good news: it is clearly a variation on the K-5,
it has 16 Mp like the K-5, but from at least one source, it is not the same
That was my sense as well Paul. In any case, it reminds me of the K-X which was
clearly a lower-niche product but did some things (high ISO w/ low noise)
better than its then-current more expensive big brother. The K-01 is a
lower-niche product which apparently incorporates some
on 2012-02-02 20:55 Paul Stenquist wrote
I believe it's the same sensor but a different processing engine.
i'm mostly content to wait until people actually shoot with it to see whether
it's better; but as to whether the sensor is different, i see many casual
comments that assume it's the
On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:18 PM, William Robb wrote:
I suspect that it as far as industrial design students go, it could be a
toaster and it would get attention because of who designed it.
Designer toasters have already been done.
http://www.bugatticoffeemachines.com/store/bugatti-toasters
On
The link is to a small gallery (4 shots) taken in Bologna, last year. The
first image is
good enough as a shot of a bunch of university students on a big (graduation)
day for
them, but on processing the image I thought there might be three images
contained in it
that could stand-alone.
Was I
101 - 195 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
