ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:41 PM
> To: tom
> Subject: Re: Flash Stuff
>
>
> Tom,
>
> I'm doing it with AF360FGZ's, but I suspect that it is the same for
> the 5
Tom,
I'm doing it with AF360FGZ's, but I suspect that it is the same for
the 500FTZ. Basically, have one light attached to the camera via 5p
cord and the others on optical slaves or use the internal slave of the
flash. To fire each unit individually, turn the other slave flashes
off and use the
Check this out:
http://www.adoramaphoto.com/catalog.tpl?op=details&sid=101709784110084
467&sku=PXOCSAF
If that doesn't work, go to
www.adorama.com
and look at the Pentax Off Camera Shoe Adapter F #31046.
That's the wrong picture, isn't it?
Another question...if I set my Af500FTZ to 1/16 powe
Sorry, my mistake. It was my November 2000 PUG entry, Eagles, that showed some
of the architecture in the Village.
When I get my film scanner, hopefully soohn, I'll try to put up a page with
more typical Village scenes than that one. The mud flats are what impressed
me. They are every bit as ex
ery, and 2 wires. It was loads of fun.
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:30:02 +0100
From: Frantisek Vlcek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: flash stuff
But Mafud _always_ carries his old Graflex Strobe and a box of type F
blue flashbulbs... now he can fl
Dan, that picture was in Switzerland. I want to see the Village :-).
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash
esday, December 04, 2001 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash stuff
> That would be telling!
>
> Of course, it's the best TV series ever, envn though it only ran one
season. I
> have the entire series on Video Tape. I got my son hooke, and now he has
it on
>
mber, I'm a free man!
Be seeing you.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash stuff
> Tom C. w
Tom C. wrote:
> Totally OT... Who here likes my ALL TIME FAVORITE series, "The Prisoner"?
Oh man, Tom, don't get me started! I've found that I can get through just
about any workplace situation with a few choice lines from that show --
usually Patrick McGoohan's lines, but sometimes the other ch
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash stuff
>
> John,
>
> Mighty Mouse was a hero of sorts. When I was about six, I had a dream
> that
> I was Mighty
John,
Mighty Mouse was a hero of sorts. When I was about six, I had a dream that
I was Mighty Mouse. I was standing on a chimney top with my arms
outstretched yelling "Here I come to save the day!".
Then Mighty Mouse flew by and slapped me in the face for lying. I still
remember it like the n
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute"
Subject: Re: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash stuff
> Thanks Aaron. I'm sure my son will LOVE it.
>
> We have the Boomerang cartoon channel. My favorite was always
SPAACE
> GHHOSST!
I always liked (a
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: flash stuff
Outdoors, the distances are
> pre-measured, just as any artist measures and stretches their canvas.
Hmm... I wouldn't bother wi
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:40:59 -0700, you wrote:
>Thanks Aaron. I'm sure my son will LOVE it.
>
>We have the Boomerang cartoon channel. My favorite was always SPAACE
>GHHOSST!
Mighty Mouse.
The one and only.
He'll be on the PDML channel next Friday.
Hr he comes to save the day...
Thanks Aaron. I'm sure my son will LOVE it.
We have the Boomerang cartoon channel. My favorite was always SPAACE
GHHOSST!
Let's see...
Fantastic 4
Superfriends
Galaxy Trio
Birdman
Sky Commanders
Sealab 2020
Space Ghost
Johnny Quest
Not that I think cartoons are a healthy diet, but the ol
Rob Studdert wrote:
> , I only use TTL for macro stuff, or when I hand my
> camera/flash combo over to someone else to run off and shoot.
>
Hi Rob,
Although I use a flash meter with multiple units, I like using TTL when I have a
single flash firing into a reflector umbrella. The effect is nice f
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> I agree, if the flash is just put on the camera and left on full TTL
> auto. In the quote above, I was referring to using a flash meter as
> opposed to using a tape measure and math. I still maintain that the
> flash meter is the quickest, easiest and most accurate in
On 3 Dec 2001 at 14:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, but "tape measuring" is done ~before~ you shoot the subject, especially
> since ~you~ determine the time of day and where the subject will sit. In a
> studio, the distances are fairly well known. Outdoors, the distances are
> pre-measured, j
On Monday, December 3, 2001, at 02:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 12/3/01 12:09:34 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>
>> It is considerably quicker and more accurate than using the tape
>> measure and math method.
>>
>> -Aaron
>>
> Yes, but "tape m
er 03, 2001 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash stuff
> On Monday, December 3, 2001, at 10:19 AM, aimcompute wrote:
>
> > I would probably enjoy it!
> >
>
> Tom, you a Gamera fan?
>
> "It must be coated with some kind of...anti-electric
Which Sekonic do you use?
Otis
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> On Sunday, December 2, 2001, at 08:45 PM, Isaac Crawford wrote:
>
> > He was considerably nicer than
> > I would have been considering the tone of your last couple of posts was
> > basicly "Well what would you do without your fancy gear?
On Monday, December 3, 2001, at 10:19 AM, aimcompute wrote:
> I would probably enjoy it!
>
Tom, you a Gamera fan?
"It must be coated with some kind of...anti-electric wave paint, sir!"
"Okay."
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.
On Sunday, December 2, 2001, at 08:45 PM, Isaac Crawford wrote:
> He was considerably nicer than
> I would have been considering the tone of your last couple of posts was
> basicly "Well what would you do without your fancy gear? You'd be lost
> because you aren't a real photographer..." At lea
I would probably enjoy it!
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "aimcompute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re:
In a message dated 12/2/01 8:49:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> basicly "Well what would you do without your fancy gear? You'd be lost
> because you aren't a real photographer..." At least that's how it seemed to
> me, and apearently I'm not the only one...
>
> Isaac
>
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: flash stuff
> In a message dated 12/2/01 11:45:21 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>
> >
> > The form
In a message dated 12/2/01 11:45:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>
> The formula is "get out my Sekonic and check". I'd bet a dozen
> doughnuts that my exposure will be more accurate than yours, unless you
> remembered your tape measure.
>
> Seriously, you'd go to a
I WOULD go home. To take their picture of course,and make friends.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash stuff
&g
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Brogden"
> Subject: Re: flash stuff
>
>
> > On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> >
> > > But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your
>
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Brogden"
Subject: Re: flash stuff
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> > But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your
film was all
> > fogged by airport x-rays, and your car was stolen and there
was
On Sunday, December 2, 2001, at 12:24 PM, Chris Brogden wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
>> But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your film was all
>> fogged by airport x-rays, and your car was stolen and there was a
>> public transit strike? THEN what would y
On Sunday, December 2, 2001, at 12:09 PM, Len Paris wrote:
> I need to upgrade the flashmeter but haven't spent a
> lot of time doing research on the latest models.
I have a Sekonic L-308b which I quite like. It's small, the readout
makes sense, the controls are well-placed, and it hasn't le
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your film was all
> fogged by airport x-rays, and your car was stolen and there was a
> public transit strike? THEN what would you do with no background in
> manual flash exposure calculation, tough
> The formula is "get out my Sekonic and check". I'd bet a
dozen
> doughnuts that my exposure will be more accurate than yours,
unless you
> remembered your tape measure.
>
> Seriously, you'd go to a professional gig with no meter? Or
is that
> broken too?
>
> -Aaron
I carry a Wein flashmeter a
On Saturday, December 1, 2001, at 04:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> But I repeat the question: how would ~you~ handle the situation I
> proposed?
> What's the formula to get a properly exposed shot with a broken 283
> and a
> K1000, subject distance 11.5 feet?
The formula is "get out my S
On Saturday, December 1, 2001, at 01:54 AM, Chris Brogden wrote:
>
>> You forgot your camera and there is a function you could shoot but you
>> only have access to a 283 with a broken sensor and a K1000, meaning
>> raw manual flash shooting if you hope to get any photos at all. And
>> since the 2
In a message dated 12/2/01 12:02:39 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Well, I know all about guide numbers, but what happens if the battery in my
> calculator goes dead?
>
> --graywolf
>
It would be just your luck your pen ran out of ink right about then or your
pencil b
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Rittenhouse"
Subject: Re: flash stuff
> No, and I wear mittens, so I can only count to four.
If you put some mitten prints in the snow, you can count
higher.
Just a thought
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss M
No, and I wear mittens, so I can only count to four.
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 12:46 AM
Subject: Re:
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Rittenhouse"
Subject: Re: flash stuff
> Well, I know all about guide numbers, but what happens if the
battery in my
> calculator goes dead?
Really, Tom, you don't carry a slide rule?
WW
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
2001 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: flash stuff
> In a message dated 12/1/01 11:34:36 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > Well, now we have wireless P-TTL that can fire one or more flashes
> > strategically located and utilize TTL.
>
> The assumption b
In a message dated 12/1/01 11:34:36 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Well, now we have wireless P-TTL that can fire one or more flashes
> strategically located and utilize TTL.
The assumption being everyone (who can afford it) will own a P-TTL
camera/flash. I only enga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I carry all types of flashes with me. Since "assignments" won't be dragging
>me all over the place anymore, I get to choose. As noted, I shoot portraiture
>most times now and the strategically placed adjustable flash adding "pops" of
>manual flash will do when all the
In a message dated 12/1/01 1:55:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> This is pretty far-fetched. What if your much-vaunted K1000 breaks down,
> leaving you with access to only a pinhole camera and flashlight? Should
> you really have to be prepared for all possibilities?
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You forgot your camera and there is a function you could shoot but you
> only have access to a 283 with a broken sensor and a K1000, meaning
> raw manual flash shooting if you hope to get any photos at all. And
> since the 283 does not have a distanc
Mike didn't say he didn't know how to use a manual flash.
Doug
At 4:19 PM -050011/30/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, or at least typed:
>
>Hey Mike!
>You forgot your camera and there is a function you could shoot but you only
>have access to a 283 with a broken sensor and a K1000, meaning raw
In a message dated 11/30/01 2:00:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You guys should really try TTL flash, or better yet P-TTL if you have
> the new FA360FGZ and MZ-S. It really makes your approach redundant.
> Even with my AF280T and plain old TTL I find well balanced e
Mafud wrote:
> OK, besides me, how many PDML members shoot full manual flash (anytime)?
Me, I confess, Yes - I am guilty of such despicable acts :^)
I set the aperture by the distance scale, even if there is
an auto-thyrister function, because I want the flash level
48 matches
Mail list logo
