On 10/24/2012 06:56 PM, sysad...@tricubemedia.com wrote:
Hi all
Fresh install of QMT using Jakes ISO.
All updates from yum and qtp-menu. So now at Centos 5.8
Trying to add Horde for webmail using the wiki guide
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Adding_Horde_Webmail_to_Toaster
keeps faili
On 11/18/2012 02:16 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
Good morning to all,
I read a lot of documentation on spamdyke and spamassassin but I did
not understand a few things:
I'll post my understanding which is by no means gospel.
1) I have installed on my system (qnmailtoaster up date ) spamdyke
from
On 11/13/2012 06:04 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 11/12/2012 06:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I would seem to me that the php53 package/spec would have a
"Provides: php" line in it. Does it not?
It does not.
While I don't think that rpm can handle a "Requires: A or B" type thing,
I should think t
Have you done any DNS testing to see if comcast.net resolves?
On 12/13/2012 04:53 AM, Rvaught wrote:
My resolv.conf has :
Search libertycasting.com
Nameserver 192.168.120.20 ( this local a network dns forwarder)
I still have bind installed . I thin
Greetings,
I have Qmailtoaster set up on two machines. I use Fail2ban to thwart
unwanted FTP and SSH intruders. It works perfectly. I want to stop the
brute force e mail attacks that I am seeing in my logwatch reports like
this.
No Such User Found:
1...@area510.net - 1 Time(s)
I have two qmailtoaster installations that exhibit the same behavior. I
am wondering if this is normal or can be fixed.
I have my outgoing SMTP/POP3 mail server (using Thunderbird) on my
office desktop set to use my toaster as a relay
(http://mail.example.com) which works fine, but if I try t
nd it authenticated and sent the
mail properly.
I guess the real question is does Thunderbird have a cache for passwords
and a password file? Can the password file be edited to clear passwords?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I have two qmailtoaster installations that ex
Thanks. In Linux it's not in that location. It is under edit >
preferences > privacy > passwords
It looks like that will do that trick.
CJ
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersco
Firewall related question.
If I execute
r...@myconsole# iptables -A INPUT -s 10.10.10.10 -j DROP
Does this amend the existing table? Does it add the entry to the top or
bottom of the file?
CJ
-
Qmailtoaster is
Eric,
OK, that's exactly how I do it on all counts. I was just wondering if
there was an easier way. :)
What's the diff between service iptables restart and iptables-restore <
/etc/sysconfig/iptables?
CJ
-
Qm
Check to see that the IP address your sending mail from hasn't been
blacklisted.
Glen Vickers wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I’m having an issue I have yet to figure out. About a week or so ago my
> server stopped accepting incoming connections to send mail. I checked
> my router/firewall/port
You need to check the tick if you want the mail filtered. If you do not
check the tick the mail will go un filtered. Once you check the tick
there will be a SPAM folder created in your squirrelmail interface(once
SPAM is found) that houses the SPAM that is filtered out. It cannot be
checked via
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not "ticked" that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> spambox doesn't have anything to do with scanning messages, it only
> takes effect during delivery after a message has been scanned and acc
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not "ticked" that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
All mail is scanned unless you create
I think just the clarification that it goes /dev/null whether it's
checked or not. The pertinent information for me is it's not going to
make it to the POP3 client regardless if it's ticked or not.
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell S
So, if I am understanding this correctly. There is no way to filter it
and have it make it to the POP3 Inbox marked as SPAM?
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Jake Vickers wrote:
>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>> So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
>>>
>>
>&g
it to my
POP3 client.
I understand the scoring and it currently works very well. I don't plan
on modifying anything. I just want to know how it works. It is
currently correct 98% of the time and that's pretty good IMHO.
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> So, if I am u
ger see it.
>
> If you need to filter POP3 email, that has to be done by the client.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> So, if I am understanding this correctly. There is no way to filter it
>> and have it make it to the POP3 Inbox marked as SPAM?
>>
>> Eric Shubert
Got it.
I was able to set up Thunderbird as an IMAP client and it works
perfectly including the Sent and SPAM folders. Are there advantages to
one over the other?
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Yes, but it gets moved to a "Spambox" that can only be accessed
ith any IMAP-capable client from virtually anywhere. Do you need to
> share your email account between your desktop and notebook? No problem.
> Would you like to pull up your email on your blackberry? Again, not a
> problem (and pretty slick if you ask me).
>
> Get the picture?
>
&g
Hey thanks for all your help. I have a much better understanding of the
setup and the difference between IMAP and POP3.
Using Thunderbird for IMAP was a snap and I can now view all folders on
the server in my client including the SPAM folder.
--
x27;t even know it exists.
I personally don't use any MS product and only suggest Firefox, Opera,
or Thunderbird. I had been old school up until today. I check it from
my home and leave the mail on the server and my office client removes it
from the server.
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxw
Great news.
Glen Vickers wrote:
Problem solved.
And yes, I bought yet another Tee shirt. My fricken router blew!!!
So it happened to be something rather simple. Got the RMA today and
all is fine.
Glen
Yea, there's only so much you can do remotely. At this point a local
visi
Pardon my ignorance. What exactly does the softlimit do?
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
You said this started a couple weeks after you did a newmodel. I
think I smell a softlimit problem. Are you running x64 OS? You
might need to bump the SMTP softlimit back up. You should
I am having authentication problems that I cannot seem to figure out.
It always seems to happen with Thunderbird on Windows systems. I
cannot get the outgoing SMTP server to authenticate. It always comes up
with an error, cannot connect to server. I am sure it's a problem with
Thunderbird
ugust 2009 08:04:37 schrieb Maxwell Smart:
I am having authentication problems that I cannot seem to figure out.
It always seems to happen with Thunderbird on Windows systems. I
cannot get the outgoing SMTP server to authenticate. It always comes up
with an error, cannot connect to server.
I know how to use telnet, but I don't activate it on my servers because
it's insecure. I'll take a look at it later. It's not that pressing
since it's only on my wifes machine! :)
Jake Vickers wrote:
Philip wrote:
Maxwell
try testing the authentification with a telnet session
from your wind
t's a client app. You can
# telnet 25
to any email transport server, so long as there is connectivity.
(Perhaps you're thinking of ssh??)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I know how to use telnet, but I don't activate it on my servers
because it's insecure. I'll take a look at it lat
OK, that did it. It answers to port 587 but not 25. My guess is that
SBC is blocking port 25. I will change the port on my wifes system and
see what happens. I just checked, and see that my desktop is set to use
port 587.
Many thanks,
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Doh! I don't know
AUTH first (#5.5.1)
What goes here?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
You don't have to have telnet on the server. It's a client app. You can
# telnet 25
to any email transport server, so long as there is connectivity.
(Perhaps you're thinking of ssh??)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I know how to us
auth with telnet. If
we don't have it on the wiki yet, google for it, learn it, then add it
to the wiki. TLS is particularly tricky because you need to encode
what you send. There's a web site that'll do the encoding for you
though, and you can simply cut'n'paste it.
Or you have been blacklisted because of excessively high unusual traffic?
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Is it possible your provider is blocking port 25?
>
> > Ok, having serious problems...
> >
> > This morning I discovered that our email server was pegging out our
> T1. I
> > have no idea why. After
Ole,
The default QMT ISO install should already have this feature implemented.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Is there any possibilities to make spamassassin/qmail to automatical
> move all incoming emails who is tagged as SPAM to ”spam folder” in
> Squirrelmail/Horde?
>
>
>
> T
Eric,
While were on the subject. Does SpamDyke use an IP blacklist?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> amit IKF wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Whenever i go qtp-install-spamdyke from qtp-menu, I use to see below
>> message. Is this mean spamdyke is not installed on my server or not
>> getting update. How d
the answer
to most all of my spam issues.
Spamdyke can use an ip blacklist by adding ips to the blacklist_ip
file in /etc/spamdyke.
Read the spamdyke documentation on configuring the list the way you
need it.
here is the link to the docs
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html
Max
Although while it works great when it works after the second update I
performed qtp-newmodel broke and I had to upgrade manually. I haven't
played with it since.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Thanks guys.
But i still have a hard time to actual get the QMT u
I can try it again and give you the error message. It failed after the
sandbox was created. I don't recall the error, it's been a while since
I used it.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the problem? Has it been fixed?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Although while it works great when it w
g updating.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the problem? Has it been fixed?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Although while it works great when it works after the second update I
performed qtp-newmodel broke and I had to upgrade manually. I
haven't played with it since.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jak
ked/copied sandboxes have always worked for the
lastest releases though.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I can try it again and give you the error message. It failed after
the sandbox was created. I don't recall the error, it's been a while
since I used it.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the
Eric,
OK, it worked.
How do I upgrade the qtp to the latest version?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Just say no. (that will let you select a new list)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I just tried, but it thinks that there are updates that need to be
done that have been done manually. It says &quo
or my needs.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
# yum update qmailtoaster-plus
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
OK, it worked.
How do I upgrade the qtp to the latest version?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Just say no. (that will let you select a new list)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I just tried, but it thinks
3.el5)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 ro root=LABEL=/
initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.img
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Perfect.
If I use the qmailtoaster-plus to install Spamdyke, do the default
config settings work for sta
kernel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Everything worked as expected.
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
>> However, I h
grub in the mbr, but only after I thought
> there was some reason it might fix something. This definitely sounds
> like a grub misconfiguration issue. (duh)
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> The /boot/grub/grub.conf file reads the same. The other 2 are both
>> symlinks as expecte
urrent on all fronts including Spamdyke.
I will likely set up this server as a back up or retire it as I have
enough hardware (primary and backup) up and running with my new config
to suit my current needs.
Thanks for all you help.
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
> Clean install on formatted drive.
I didn't partition it that way. It's a default QMT install with a
mirrored drive.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> I wonder if there isn't a separate boot partition that's not being
> mounted.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Strange indeed.
>>
>> Tried remotely
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban, but
must not have it set up correctly to block the harvesters after 3
attempts. If anyone can shed some light on how to set this up it would
be greatly appreciated.
Here is my vpopmail logwatch
Anyway to drop their connection after 3 tries?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
These look like script kiddies (lame crackers) to me, not harvesters.
They're simply a nuisance.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban,
max.
>
> If you look a the logs in more detail, I expect you'd find that these
> attempts are coming from limited IP address ranges. You could block
> them with iptables.
>
> I don't think these are worth being concerned about though.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrot
I do use OSSEC. Do you have a particular page that discusses this and
how to set it up for blocking? or at least where I can read up on it?
CJ
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Greetings fellow Qmailers,
>>
>> I am trying to find a way to block harvesters.
I found out what was happening. My notifications were being blocked by
my SpamDyke. :(
CJ
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I do use OSSEC. Do you have a particular page that discusses this and
>> how to set it up for blocking? or at least where I can read up
-
>>
>> *From:* Constantin IOAJA [mailto:io...@cartel-alfa.ro]
>> *Sent:* 28. august 2009 21:40
>> *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] re: harvesting
>>
>>
Great work Ole.
I have fail2ban installed and I will test the vpopmail, since I am only
using it for ssh and ftp right now.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
*Install fail2ban:*
wget
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fail2ban/files/fail2ban-stable/fail2ban-0.8.3/fail2ban-0.8.3.tar.bz2/download
tar
Have you done a dig to find out what the DNS is reporting?
# dig mail.example.com
or
# dig example.com ANY @your dns server address.
CJ
Sean Humphries wrote:
Hi
Moved a server using qtp-backup and restore. Server moved to a new ip
address and domain. I am having an issue with one domain sen
ord for 'mailhost' needs to be
a type A record (not a cname).
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Have you done a dig to find out what the DNS is reporting?
# dig mail.example.com
or
# dig example.com ANY @your dns server address.
CJ
Sean Humphries wrote:
Hi
Moved a server using qtp-backup and re
Ole,
I set mine up the way you suggested and had one attempt today also. It
ended on the 4th try, but I didn't receive my notification. Everything
appears to be working correctly except the notification.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Hello friends,
Just let you know.
My previous email about u
Ole,
That would be great. You can just send it directly to me if you like.
c...@yother.com
I did compare the syntax to the other jail entries and it looked
correct. I'll check it again.
CJ
ole.johan...@cryonix.no wrote:
> It notified me, perhaps you typed in wrong email adress/typo error?
>
CBL usually means you have a spammer in your midst, have been hacked or
victim of malware, or are an open relay.
Gary Bowling wrote:
>
> I keep getting listed on the CBL list. I have been through all the
> recommendations for checking my server, but can't seem to find
> anything wrong. I'm sure it
The RFC actually requires abuse, postmaster, and webmaster if memory
serves me correctly.
PakOgah wrote:
> Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
>> Jake Vickers wrote:
>>>
>>> [...] Most admins no longer set up "abuse@" addresses (since they
>>> get spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - lik
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someone on this
list can help me.
I am trying to update my toasters and I have updated all of the packages
except one on one server. I cannot get the python to update. Here is
the error message. I am not really sure what the dealio is.
Eric,
I am running the QMT ISO CentOS 5.0. That worked perfectly, all
updated now :)
What exactly was the cause?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Which distro/version?
Have you tried "yum clean all"?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someon
Rajesh,
Why don't you try it like this.
206.53.144.0/20:allow,CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR3"/"
CJ
Rajesh M wrote:
sir,
i understood what you say, but if i use it in the last line then it would
mean the whole server and i did not want that.
on the safe side i just applied it to only the blackbe
This is more an Apache question, but I know that most everyone on this
list with the exception of me knows the answer.
How do I setup my webserver not to answer to requests to my ip? I have
been reading that this can be very dangerous and mine currently answers
to my default page served up by Apa
could
> just stop apache. Or... if you wanna view pages locally, but block
> outsiders:
>
> In httpd.conf :
>
>
>Order Deny,Allow
>Deny from all
>Allow from 127.0.0.1
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
>
et is to use .htaccess
Deny from All
Allow from 192.168.1.0/24
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 6:14 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache ?
This is more an Apache question
f you have a decent firewall you
should be ok. We use shorewall and they have a lot of good protection and
features. Taking good security practices in the httpd.conf and php.ini
should keep you fairly safe.
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Sunday, Septemb
>
> Richard
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Domnick,
>>
>> The IP address already default to my home page, which is OK. I use
>> iptables, fail2ban and OSSEC. They seem to cover the issues I have
>> faced. If anyone has any additional tips or tricks based on my
>
I am building a test machine using QMT ISO 5.1. I did a default
install, but no qtp-menu.
How do I resolve this?
CJ
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Co
atedb, then locate qtp-menu.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:27 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] re: qtp-menu
>
> I am building a test machine using QMT ISO 5.1.
I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
delivery. I am now experiencing delays of several minutes and sometimes
15 or so. What is the cause of this and how can it be resolved. Is
this traffic on the s
64.168.70.132
nameserver 127.0.0.1
; generated by /sbin/dhclient-script
no caching nameserver
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
>> server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
>
;s not the one you mean, but I can't seem to
find the log your talking about. In the maillog nothing unusual. In
the /var/log/qmail/smtp there are quite a few entries. Is this normal.
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Not that your supposed to
3d50634e21bdc.s
@40004ab54c802f171784.s @40004ab6dc910d26c494.s
Those are the DNS servers. The 64.168.70.132 is my autoritative DNS server.
The qtp-check-rbls is
[r...@laetitia smtp]# qtp-check-rbls
0.194
2.021
Sending HUP signal to qmail-send.
[r...@laetitia smtp]#
Thanks,
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
ks,
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Not that your supposed to know. Knowing the level of insight in the
members of this list, I knew someone has had, is having or can offer
info on where to look.
No on the Spamdyke.
[r...@laetitia tmp]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 206.13.3
sassin seems to work very well.
I only have spamhaus in my blacklist file.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Anyone get this yesterday?
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I wil
I have bind installed and it's running. It is mainly a slave server for
my main DNS server. It turns out there was no 127 address like there
should be. I fixed that and put my 127.0.0.1 in the first position.
I'll report back.
Thanks for all your help guys.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
12:14:19 laetitia named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'85.194.39.201.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN':
64.168.70.132#53
Sep 22 12:14:20 laetitia named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'ns.embratel.net.br/A/IN':
64.168.70.132#53
p and restart qmail I get
all the mail.
Ideas on how to begin to troubleshoot? I remember someone on the list a
few days ago experiencing the same issue, but paid little attention then.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Only if they're there. ;)
> Your named has a problem.
>
> Maxwell Sm
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first position of
>> my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
>
> It's not really ok. It's just th
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>>> Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
>>>> position of
>>>>
Eric,
I think I found part of my problem. It was an entry in the forwards of
my DNS server. This should really improve performance. I am not sure
how it even worked.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>>
C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
;; Query time: 34 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Tue Sep 22 17:18:09 2009
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 287
[r...@laetitia ~]#
I am guessing this is what you were looking for.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>>> Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>>>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>>>>> Eric,
>>>>>>
&g
Webmin actually has the features you are wanting. They are in modules
like Usermin and Virtualmin. It is very robust and offers a great deal
of flexibility on what you want your customers to have access to. It
also supports, bandwidth monitoring, webalizer, etc.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Michael
206.13.30.12;
};
};
zone "." {
type hint;
file "/etc/db.cache";
};
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Eric Shubert wrote:
>> I don't know off hand.
>>
>> Hey Jake, what do you know about this? (I'm guessing quite a bit!)
>>
>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>> I think I am getting it sorted. Here i
from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=253 time=7.99 ms
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Thanks Jake,
That's what I was able to glean from the info I read. I am not sure how
I am going to ultimately set this up yet. This is all making me rethink
my entire rack configuration. I have been trying to simplify
Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my
toaster the mail is delivered immediately.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be
delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to
the same mail server. These
Peter,
Anyway to confirm BIND has been compromised?
CJ
Peter Tan wrote:
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to
djbdns. Works for me so far...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart <mailto:c...@yother.com>> wrote:
Some additional informa
Eric Shubert wrote:
> I don't see any highlighting.
> Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f
>> /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anyt
e:
> Those are 2 different messages.
>
> Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing
> that's leading you to conclude that there are delays.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> I don't
: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.86?) (c...@yother.com@192.168.0.2)
by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Message-ID: <4abc0132.3010...@yother.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:58 -0700
From: Maxwell Smart
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version:
Telnet so I cannot complete the transaction.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Jake Vickers wrote:
>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>> Here is the header.
>>> Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
>>> Return-Path:
>>> Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
>>>
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's
l
look.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
Eric Shubert wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2009 14:28, Constantin IOAJA pisze:
*No need f
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what
I mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and
how to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely
helpful.
I can get you all of the
x27;d like. Please include as much
detail (and links) as you can about them.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
Eric Shu
0197s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com
09-25 10:59:07 tcpserver: end 27234 status 0
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Eric Shubert wrote:
>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>> This would be monitoring the /var/log/qm
Sounds good.
FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
delays.
It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck from
Win95 days. :)
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Hey Max,
>
> I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the sa
1 - 100 of 428 matches
Mail list logo