"Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been selling WD (only the BB and JB models mind you - 7200RPM) with my
> systems since their WD400BB came out and was voted fastest 40Gb HDD at the
> time. That was a while ago, so you can see how long I've been dealing with
> them.
I'm guessin
> IIRC, one was maybe a year old. The other was bad out of the box I
> think. It never died completely, it just collected errors out the
> wazoo. It took me a while to realize it was the drive, and not some
> other component. By then, I was glad to see it go.
Wow, do we get different drives to yo
it should be 2.4.9-34 :)
sorry.
--- loophole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> that is the latest kernel version for 7.2 - 2.4.9-31
>
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2002-104.html
>
> What kernel version to you expect to be the latest?
> Unless you have an S390 which has version 2.4.9-37.
>
that is the latest kernel version for 7.2 - 2.4.9-31
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2002-104.html
What kernel version to you expect to be the latest?
Unless you have an S390 which has version 2.4.9-37. :)
cheers,
lh
--- Josepablo Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gretings,
>
> Iam on Red
I am using Redhat 7.2 and I have configured Samba 2.2.5-1.
I my Network Places, I am able to view my Linux Server and access my
shared directories, here I get the option of Printers and Faxes, when
I try to Add Printer I get the following error message.
" You dont have sufficient privileges a ad
Hi
Tony,
Thanks! That was definitely the answer I was
looking for.Originally I wanted to use sendmail for this but I couldn't seem
to get the encoding right on the PDF file. It would send through ok but when it
came to opening it, Acrobat would throw it out as a corrupted file, so I gave u
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:07:30PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I had 2 WD drives die very prematurely not long ago. Then, I had to
> > ask myself why would I want replacements? I don't trust them, at least
> > the low end ones. I have another that se
Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had 2 WD drives die very prematurely not long ago. Then, I had to
> ask myself why would I want replacements? I don't trust them, at least
> the low end ones. I have another that seems fine though. I also try to
> keep this in mind:
Hal, what are you u
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:36:16PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> It would be interesting to hear of other experiences.
I had 2 WD drives die very prematurely not long ago. Then, I had to
ask myself why would I want replacements? I don't trust them, at least
the low end ones. I have another that
Julian Opificius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been following a thread on the Mandrake newbie list about hard
> drives, and "learned" that my Western Digital HDs are about as welcome
> in the Linux world as a hole in the head.
>
> I haven't had any problems with my RH7.2 installations to dat
At 8:39 AM +0800 7/11/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Josepablo Pérez wrote:
>
>> Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that
>> the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the
>> updates were made, however the kernel was update
I've been following a thread on the Mandrake newbie list about hard drives,
and "learned" that my Western Digital HDs are about as welcome in the Linux
world as a hole in the head.
I haven't had any problems with my RH7.2 installations to date, even after
I added a WD 80Gig drive on one of the
Check the "/proc/sys/kernel/msgmax" file. Put a new value into this
file (e.g. by "echo 16384 > /proc/sys/kernel/msgmax") can change the
maximum allowable size immediately (NO NEED to recompile kernel and NOT
even reboot the system). If you want to keep the setting even after
reboot, try editing "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-Jul-2002/10:52 +0800, Kevin - KD Micro Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is probably a dumb question but I've looked everywhere and can't
>find the answer to this. I'm using Mutt to send out an email with a PDF
>attachment using the com
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> I don't think so. He can receive mail from other servers in his domain.
The transport mechanism is not described -- fetchmail could be
pulling local copies, for all we know. A trace of
/var/log/messages would demonstrate external connectivity, and
"Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 08-Jul-2002/20:39 -0500, "Parhami, Faraz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there
>>a method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross
>>'timeofday'. Is this the right me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/22:52 -0400, Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wednesday 10 July 2002 10:30 pm, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>> There is no point to adding sendmail to hosts.allow because it is not
>> called by inetd/xinetd. It is a standalone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/21:28 -0500, Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a HOWTO somewhere on a relatively easy way to get user information
>(username, password, expiration, etc.) into an ldap database? The docs for
>ldap seem fairly indepth - massi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 10:32 pm, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 10-Jul-2002/20:31 -0400, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> >> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 10:30 pm, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:24 pm, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> > I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
> > from servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from
Hello,
This is probably a dumb question but I've looked
everywhere and can't find the answer to this.I'm using Mutt to send out an
email with a PDF attachment using the command:echo "" >/dev/null | mutt -a $pdf -H
$elog
with $pdf being set by my script as the PDF file
and $elog is the ac
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 04:46 pm, Dale Scott's voice rose above the
ones in my head and declared:
[snip]
>
> I guess I've now got two choices: How can I undo the errata that
> seems to have messed me up, or back to my original question as to
> where I can find a more current apache package.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/20:31 -0400, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Donnie Grimes wrote:
>
>> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
>> servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other ser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:24 pm, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
> from servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on
> my domain). I am building the linux server to r
Is there a HOWTO somewhere on a relatively easy way to get user information
(username, password, expiration, etc.) into an ldap database? The docs for
ldap seem fairly indepth - massive overkill for what should be a relatively
easy problem. For example, what's the equivalent to useradd?
Thanks,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/19:53 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[about managing user accts for multiple machines in one place]
>Is it possible to have the users use NT authentication?
Yes, using pam_smb_auth. See the docs in
on a RH7x machine.
Tony
It is not out yet.
There is a beta out.
> Sergio Pantoja H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Where can i doenload redhat 8
>
> In the ftp site i can't found it
>
> Sergio Pantoja H.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Engineer
> System, Network and Security Administrator
> #user 245264 cou
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:12:30PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> >I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there
> >a method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross
> >'timeofday'. Is this the right method to use? 'gethrtime' guarantees 1
> >microsecond p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/15:00 -0700, Apolinaras Sinkevicius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What do I have to enter in via command line to ban all
>the traffic on ethernet adapter eth0 coming or leaving
>255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0. I am tired of bootp
>traffic my
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Sergio Pantoja H. wrote:
> Where can i doenload redhat 8
>
> In the ftp site i can't found it
You can't download SW that doesn't exist. There is a new beta called
limbo if that interests you. That beta *may* be a indication of what "Red
Hat 8" will look likeif
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:10:03PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08-Jul-2002/12:16 -0600, Alan Kirton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What is the maximum allowable size for messages put onto System V message
> >queues and how is the maximum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/14:24 -0400, Donnie Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
>servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on my
>domain). I am building the linux se
Where can i doenload redhat 8
In the ftp site i can't found it
Sergio Pantoja H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Engineer
System, Network and Security Administrator
#user 245264 counter.li.org
msg83138/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-Jul-2002/20:39 -0500, "Parhami, Faraz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there
>a method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross
>'timeofday'. Is this the right method to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-Jul-2002/12:16 -0600, Alan Kirton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What is the maximum allowable size for messages put onto System V message
>queues and how is the maximum size controlled?
If you're talking about sendmail, see "MaxMessageSize" in se
It's working THANKS THANKS.Installing FreeS/Wan Redhat 7.3
1.) Download the RPM's
ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/pub/crypto/freeswan/RedHat-RPMs
2.) Intstall the RPM's
a.)FreeS/Wan Module
b.)FreeS/Wan
3.)
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
iptables -t nat -A POSTROU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 04:46 pm, Dale Scott wrote:
I'm sure someone answered this question several days ago, but here goes:
> First off, understand I'm a total newbie. I saw a posting the other
> day where someone mentioned that they were runni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:24 pm, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
> from servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on
> my domain). I am building the linux server to r
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Josepablo Pérez wrote:
> Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that
> the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the
> updates were made, however the kernel was updated but up tp version:
> 2.4.9-34 which is not the latest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 08:28 pm, Josepablo Pérez wrote:
> Gretings,
>
> Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that
> the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the
> updates were made, however the k
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
> servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on my
> domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing Windows 2000
> Do you have any suggestion
Gretings,
Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that
the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the
updates were made, however the kernel was updated but up tp version:
2.4.9-34 which is not the latest kernel. The question is why does
up2date
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 02:00, Sam Sgro wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>
>
> We have produced FreeS/WAN 1.98b RPMs for RedHat kernel versions 2.4.7-10,
> 2.4.9-34, 2.4.18-3, 18-4 and 18-5. They don't require any kernel recompilation,
> as this results in a module-based install.
Is it possible to have the users use NT authentication?
david
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10-Jul-2002/14:16 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am in need of some guidance. I am trying to set-up a few worksta
Hi David,
> How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
> may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
> computers?
NIS(+). See the NIS-HOWTO. (Why the faq has the howto rpm dissappeared from
the distro? The docs cd is almost empty. Should
Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I could be terribly wrong here, but my thinking is that the GW
> statement in eth1 on m6 is being ignored (maybe check dmesg). I have
> never assigned a static route in linux that did not show up in netstat
It turns out your suggested experiment sho
I not blamming Redhat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Lee
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Users] FreeS/Wan on Redhat 7.3
it is not free redhat that is the problem, bu
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:15:29 -0400
"Norm Yates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 3 packages that are reported by RHN to be out of date.
>
> They won't update because they need - libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so - the trouble
> is I can't find that package anywhere. What am I doing wrong? The
> packages t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/14:16 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am in need of some guidance. I am trying to set-up a few workstations
>in a proof of concept for management.
>
>How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Jul-2002/17:31 -0300, Marcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 18:31, Marcelo wrote:
>> > Hi, I'm getting a problem using fetchmail with linuxconf in Red Hat 7.2.
>The system hangs while configuring fetchmail in linuxconf an
Dale,
I use red hat's up2date. It was free for the first system and works
quite well from a gui or cl interface. You can sign up to use it at
the red hat network.
sighup is used to kill and restart a service.
Cheers,
Thomas
>First off, understand I'm a total newbie. I saw a posting t
I tryed to use kmymoney2 to manage my finances,
It works very well using it as root but with simple user it issued this message :
kmymoney2: error while loading shared libraries: libkfile.so.3: cannot open shared
object file: Permission denied
Is anyone bring me a solution !!!
_
Hello
I have static IP and domain.
Sousing RH7.2
I need to set up a server with sendmail using imap
the clients must be able to send mails between them and to any e-mail in the
internet.
What's the best way to do it?
Anyone knows where to find a HOW-TO/documentation/tutorial for this?
I h
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:00:45PM -0300, Shaw, Marco wrote:
> Anyone know where I can find tcpdchk for RedHat 7.2 (from
> tcp_wrappers)? The RedHat RPM files don't seem to contain it.
>
> I'll at least ask here before I try to compile one.
It is not included because it does not work with xinet
I have just connected my Dell powervolt 110T tape backup to my server which
is running RH 7.3. How do I make this thing work? This is the first time i
have ever tried to install a new piece of hardware on a linux system. Can
someone point me in the right direction? Also, what kind of software
Try..
man ifconfig
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] cana rich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is some one know what is the command line to
> change the IP address, the netmask ?
>
> THanks for your help.
>
> Canarich
>
> ___
> Do You Yahoo!? -- Une
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
We have produced FreeS/WAN 1.98b RPMs for RedHat kernel versions 2.4.7-10,
2.4.9-34, 2.4.18-3, 18-4 and 18-5. They don't require any kernel recompilation,
as this results in a module-based install.
These RPMs greatly speed up the installation process: you
Has anybody the iptables solution to ARP Problem as suggested in 'LVS HOWTO
- ARP Problem'. I am asking becasue I tried the other approaches and they are
not working when I put the qmail server live on to the LVS.
Any comments/suggestions will be appreciated.
Qesad Ednor
I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on my
domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing Windows 2000
server. So far, from reading manuals I have
1) commented out the DAEMON_OPTION
You Can Lock Numlock
key from the setup of the BIOS of Your Machine.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: numlock
For some reason, I cannot to a reverse lookup on my IP address on my RH7.2
system. When I do a 'dig -x 12.x.x.x', I get the following error: ';;
connection timed out; no servers could be reached'
Here are my DNS files:
named.conf
options {
directory "/var/named";
};
key "rndckey"{
On 9 Jul 2002 12:55:21 -, "O.U ramu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>hyderabad.i have one problem to load Redhat linux on that machine
>because in that cdrom drive support is not there.only boot
>sequence is from floppy or from Hard Disk only.on this issue
>please kindely help me how to load w
I went successfuly through upgrade. Unless you use triggers etc. the only
thing you need is to restore the data in PSQL 7.2 after you init your
dataspace and create the database. See user manual for details.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be
I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there a
method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross 'timeofday'. Is
this the right method to use? 'gethrtime' guarantees 1 microsecond
precision.
Thanks
___
Redhat-lis
Anyone know where I can find tcpdchk for RedHat 7.2 (from tcp_wrappers)? The RedHat
RPM files don't seem to contain it.
I'll at least ask here before I try to compile one.
Marco
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat
What is the maximum allowable size for messages put onto System V message
queues and how is the maximum size controlled?
Thanks,
Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redha
I have APS HyperDAT tape drive which is not that
young, it does take though DDS2 tapes, also it is on
SCSI II interface. I think it has Python 28388 drive
in it.
How do I install this tape drive on my system?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo!
What do I have to enter in via command line to ban all
the traffic on ethernet adapter eth0 coming or leaving
255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0. I am tired of bootp
traffic my server gets hit cause provider does not
force other users to check their configurations, so I
would like to ban all bootp traffi
Hi all,
I have set up a new dual boot system for my son with RH7.3 and W2k. W2K has
the 1st 15 MB of a 30 MB drive hd0 [hda] with 20 MB of a 2nd HD for win data
and the remaining 40 MB for linux.
Grub was installed on hda6 which is the "/" directory on the
extended "partition" and "system
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:18:18PM -, Binyon Steve Contr Det 4 AFC2TIG/ASRCC wrote:
> John,
> You will have problems with identical cards, where upon reboot there
> is a chance that the assignment between eth1 and eth2 (or in your case eth1,
> eth2, eth3, eth4...) will switch on you. It
Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There was no particular good reason for the setup below but this is
>> where I am running into what I described:
>>
>
> I'm dying to ask anyway! What are you achieving/trying to do with M6
> that it cohabitates both networks?
I knew you wouldn't b
> I'm confusing things here, but not on purpose. I mean that I have
> assigned a gateway to both eth0 and eth1 in this way:
easy to get confused in all this :)
>
> These files are on machine6 in diagram below:
> cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:
> USERCTL='no'
> NETMASK='255.2
Hi,
I am trying to stress test a proxy filter for concurrent connections. I
am looking for GPL software that can do this...
Can wget be run to do this somehow?
--
Matthew Chapman .~.
Network Engineer/V\
Orange County Public Schools // \\
[EMAIL PRO
First off, understand I'm a total newbie. I saw a posting the other day
where someone mentioned that they were running Apache 1.3.23. One of the
responders commented on how insecure that was and that the original poster
should upgrade to a newer release. This bothered me as I'm running Apach
Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not entirely sure what you are asking.
>
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
>> irtt Iface
>> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0 eth1
>> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.2
John,
You will have problems with identical cards, where upon reboot there
is a chance that the assignment between eth1 and eth2 (or in your case eth1,
eth2, eth3, eth4...) will switch on you. It appears that eth(n) is a
logical assignment to the first card that is detected at boot time,
Hi,
This is my fetchmail file.
set logfile "/var/log/fetchmail.log"
set syslog
set postmaster "informatica"
set daemon 120
poll pop.visywork.com.br with protocol POP3, with options
localdomains domain.br
user "marcelo_informatica" there with password "ofni" is marcelo here
with options rewri
i was using ns4.79 on my old system then went to
ns7.0. and i did like the 7.0. does anyone know
if the 7.0 has something like the 6.22 for the wheel mouse?
thank you.
eric
- Original Message -
From: "loophole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002
thank you. duh on my part.
that was a nice simple fix.
thanks again. i guess with a little
rtfm'ing i would have found that.
thank you again.
eric
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "clover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Ju
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ximo Llacer wrote:
> Jim.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> All this is to try another thing.
>
> I'm beginning with this and I don´t know how get help.
>
> My true problem is the next :
>
> I've got 3 lans:
>
> Lan A: 192.168.200.0 = all my clients computers are coneccted.
> Lan
I'm not entirely sure what you are asking.
>
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0 eth1
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.
Hi all,
On a Redhat 6.2 I "--rebuilt" a bind-9.2.1-0.7x.src.rpm: so far
everything went well:
rpm --rebuild bind-9.2.1-0.7x.src.rpm
I have now this:
ls /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bind*
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bind-9.2.1-0.7x.i386.rpm
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bind-utils-9.2.1-0.7x.i386.rpm
/usr/
I am in need of some guidance. I am trying to set-up a few workstations
in a proof of concept for management.
How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
computers?
david
_
What do I have to enter in via command line to ban all
the traffic on ethernet adapter eth0 coming or leaving
255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0. I am tired of bootp
traffic my server gets hit cause provider does not
force other users to check their configurations, so I
would like to ban all bootp traffi
it is not free redhat that is the problem, but you not being
able to compile the kernel correctly. don't bash redhat
for that. i have been able to get it working without a problem.
plus i found a rpm package somewhere on the net for the kernel
with ipsec for redhat.
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Brian
Jim.
Thanks for your help.
All this is to try another thing.
I'm beginning with this and I don´t know how get help.
My true problem is the next :
I've got 3 lans:
Lan A: 192.168.200.0 = all my clients computers are coneccted.
Lan B: 192.168.2.0 = there are 3 hosts where the clients A must
I assume you are showing data for a router. It looks ok. Packets destined for
192.168.2.0/24 will go out eth1, packets for 192.168.200.0/24 will go out
eth0 and everything else will be sent to 192.168.200.17, which is out eth0.
Fine.
The problem is on host A. Look at the route table on host
Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the best answer is 'man route'
>
> route add -net 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
> route add -net 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
>
Matthew, I posted a similar answer in this thread. Although I think
yours is clearer.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ximo Llacer wrote:
> I have 2 if :
>
> eth0=192.168.200.11
> eth1=192.168.2.189
>
> I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.
>
> My route table is:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
> Lan A
> 192.168
HI.
Please Could anyone help about this matter ¿
I have 2 if :
eth0=192.168.200.11
eth1=192.168.2.189
I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.
My route table is:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
Lan A
192.168.2.0 19
HI.
Please Could anyone help about this matter ¿
I have 2 if :
eth0=192.168.200.11
eth1=192.168.2.189
I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.
My route table is:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
Lan A
192.168.2.0 19
Could some folks make some suggestions? Experiences?
Greatly appreciated!
j
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hello.
The first partition that You must create is /boot ,these must be allocated in the
first 1024 cilynders,after You can
create in order as You wish .
Josep
Begin of Quote shyam :
>hi friends
>
>I am trying to install RH7.2 on my home pc ,i have 18GB hard disk(scsi).i have one
>win95 part
hi friends
I am trying to install RH7.2 on my home pc ,i have 18GB hard
disk(scsi).i have one win95 partition of 9GB and in rest of 9GB i
need to install RH7.2 . while installing iam able create only
/,swap,/var each of around 250MB and iam not able to proceed
further it is giving error sayin
I have 3 packages that are reported by RHN to be out of date.
They won't update because they need - libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so - the trouble is I
can't find that package anywhere. What am I doing wrong? The packages that
won't update are below.
Ethereal-base
Ethereal-gtk+
Snort-snmp
Thank you,
Norm
Try setting the "Password & account policies" in userconf
steve
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 July 2002 13:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: How do you set default user characteristics?
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I'm using Redhat
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Mark Gillingham wrote:
> Suddenly I lost all privileges while in a user account through ssh.
> After loggin out, I could not log back in. I was using sudo at the time
> to edit a config file. Is this a know bug, or something else?
Depending on which config file you were edit
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Stamper, Steve wrote:
> Does anyone know of a source for character based tn3270?
> We have this function on our AIX boxes and am trying to
> eliminate
ummm ... c3270 in the x3270 package comes to mind ...
c3270: Curses-Based 3270 Emulation
c3270 is the curses-based
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think or I am going crazy or I am too stupid too understand this one. Check
> it out: After my computer is restarted I connect to the Internet, but I don't
> establish any connection yet to any site. Now, I do a netstat -pan and see 4
> external ip-address
I think the best answer is 'man route'
route add -net 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
route add -net 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
A good friend once described the best way to understand routing: "be the
packet". If your .1.x clients are trying to get to .2.1, and their
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
