[sympy] GSOC Idea and Query

I was planning to be a part of GSOC this summer with SymPy to learn more and implement something big. *For this,I was planning to work on improving SymPy's stats module;* I checked there are many good things already implemented in the stats module. And, I found issue(https://github.com/sympy/s

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, By review I mean please provide feedback so that I can improve my proposal before submitting final proposal. I think I should share it in fresh thread so that more people can give feedback along with your feedback. Sudeep Sidhu On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:45 PM Jason Moore wrote: > Sudeep

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Sudeep, I do not plan to review any GSoC proposals until we are in the actual review process. If you have specific questions you can ask on the mailing list and we all well answer as we have time. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:56 AM Sudeep Sidhu wrote: > Jaso

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I had submitted my GSoC draft proposal a few days back on official GSoC page, since I'm left with just 12 days to submit the final proposal's pdf I was really hoping you could review my proposal so that I can submit the final proposal comfortably before the deadline. Sudeep Sidhu GSoC Propo

[sympy] GSOC Idea Discussion

Hi developers, I am Sundara Srinivasan pursuing second year in Computer Science department from National Institute of Technology - Trichy (NIT-T). I have good knowledge on web development (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, ReactJs, NodeJs). I have keen interest on mathematics and conducted various contest

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

> The exact details of what you would do if your proposal was accepted > are less important than showing that you can make substantial > improvements in general. It's very likely that if any proposal based > on DomainMatrix is accepted then the details of what would get > implemented would end up d

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 10:51, Kartik Sethi wrote: > > There is already a PR #21120 which is trying to implement DomainScalar class > which is why I deleted that message. Personally I read these messages as an email mailing list so deleting a message is unnoticeable to me (you can't delete an emai

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

There is already a PR #21120 which is trying to implement DomainScalar class which is why I deleted that message. Should I add Jordan Normal Form to my Proposal instead assuming that DomainScalar would be implemented by then or should I add improveme

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 07:48, Kartik Sethi wrote: > > S.Y. Lee, in #20987 It is outlined that there is a need to implement a > DomainScalar class, which would help speed up eigenvector computation. > I think that would be a more fruitful endeavour instead of working on these > decompositions.

[sympy] Gsoc idea discussion

Hello, I found an open issue https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/20391 and I'm planning to implement simplex method as a liner optimization method as a part of Gsoc and fix this. Simplex method - http://web.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/mcasquilho/acad/or/ftp/FergusonUCLA_LP.pdf (page 20) Issue #20391

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

S.Y. Lee, in #20987 It is outlined that there is a need to implement a DomainScalar class, which would help speed up eigenvector computation. I think that would be a more fruitful endeavour instead of working on these decompositions. What do you

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

> Mind me jumping in the discussion for this, but I have some comments Not at all. S.Y. Lee what do you suggest I work on instead of these decompositions. I have added some fraction-free algorithms which were listed on #20987 . I could not find any p

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Mind me jumping in the discussion for this, but I have some comments The important aspect of DomainMatrix is that the computations should be 'rational' (which can be generalized up to 'multivariate rational function field') So I don't think that you can implement cholesky or hessenberg or house

[sympy] GSoc Idea Discussion

hello everyone, I'd like to know if #20391 Linear Programming with simplex method can be a valid GSoC idea for this year. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/20391 Regards, Mayank Raj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe f

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

hello everyone, I'd like to know if #20391 Linear Programming with simplex method can be a valid GSoC idea for this year. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/20391 Regards, Mayank Raj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe f

[sympy] GSOC IDEA DISCUSSION

Hello there, I want to contribute to this project named as "IMPROVE SYMPY INTEGRATION". Looking forward to work on this under your guidance! Best, Chaitanya. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop re

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Oscar Benjamin, Have you had a chance to review my GSoC application draft? I've posted it here https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2021-Current-Applications On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 11:44:49 am UTC+5:30 Kartik Sethi wrote: > Oscar Benjamin, could you review this first draft of my propos

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

I have shared my draft proposal at the specified wiki page. Please review so that I can improve it as much as I can. Sudeep Sidhu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Thanks Naman Sudeep Sidhu On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, 21:42 Naman Nimmo, wrote: > > *So shall I create a new wiki page for 2021 proposals on sympy repository >> and share my google docs link there as done in previous years?* >> > > GSoC 2021 current applications can be added here: > https://github.com

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

> *So shall I create a new wiki page for 2021 proposals on sympy repository > and share my google docs link there as done in previous years?* > GSoC 2021 current applications can be added here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2021-Current-Applications Regards, -- On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, 1

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, So shall I create a new wiki page for 2021 proposals on sympy repositoryand share my google docs link there as done in previous years? Sudeep Sidhu On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, 16:58 Jason Moore, wrote: > Sudeep, > > Please see the GSoC instructions: > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-S

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Sudeep, Please see the GSoC instructions: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Student-Instructions. We recommend the wiki. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 1:39 PM Sudeep Sidhu wrote: > Jason, > > I have prepared my draft proposal for GSoC'21. Where shall I

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I have prepared my draft proposal for GSoC'21. Where shall I share it so that you and others can review it. Sudeep Sidhu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

If not, I know there happen to be a number of problems with respect to the 2/3 arg mul. I would also like to try and attempt to fix that from all the possible angles - fixing all the dependent code after considering the effects on downstream projects. On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 2:27:45 PM UTC

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

No, this isn't listed on the ideas page. I just thought it would be an interesting idea that could be implemented on a larger range of functions. If this isn't a good enough idea, I'd love to work on calculus-related projects such as Risch algorithm or other ODE related projects. Could you gui

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Oscar Benjamin, could you review this first draft of my proposal. Please let me know if you feel that I should focus on some other topics/ algorithms in DomainMatrix instead of the ones chosen by me. GSoC 2021 Proposal On Tuesday, 9 M

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hello everyone, After reading through project ideas, I think i can help in *Classical Mechanics: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python*, because i have prior knowledge in this field, i think it would be good topic for me to contribute better in this project. Thanks and regards,

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 18:54, Rohan Gupta wrote: > > I'm interested in working on numerical integration techniques for functions. Is this listed on the ideas page somewhere? In general numerical techniques are out of scope for sympy and should be implemented in mpmath or numpy/scipy etc. The ide

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hello everyone, I am Sayantan Dhara, an undergraduate student from India. I would love to contribute to the project name - "*Classical Mechanics: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python*" Could you elaborate on the project and give me few suggestions on how to begin. Thanks in advanc

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hello Everyone, I'm interested in working on numerical integration techniques for functions. I've worked on Sympy before and am familiar with the code. Can anyone please guide me on how to pursue this? I have multiple years of coding experience and am really looking to learn. Sincerely, Rohan

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hello Everyone, I would to take P*roject as Solvers.* As i have a knowledge in *Algebraic and differential equations* .I think it would be a good topic for me and i can contribute better in this project. Warm Regards, Aditya Kumar Gupta -- You received this message because you are subscribe

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

On 3/11/21 8:45 AM, Aryan Goyal wrote: Hey there, I'd like to contribute to the Project name- *Improve the plotting module.* As I have a good piece of knowledge in matplotlib, Python, HTML, CSS Javascript. Thank You Aryan Goyal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hey there, I'd like to contribute to the Project name- *Improve the plotting module.* As I have a good piece of knowledge in matplotlib, Python, HTML, CSS Javascript. Thank You Aryan Goyal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubsc

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 11:33, Shreyas Sai wrote: > > I'd like to know if Risch algorithm for symbolic integration would be a valid > topic for this year in GSoC, if yes, I'd love to help contribution it. Hi Shreyas, That would be a valid topic but not an easy one. Given the amount of time avail

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hello everyone, I'd like to know if Risch algorithm for symbolic integration would be a valid topic for this year in GSoC, if yes, I'd love to help contribution it. Regards, Shreyas Sai -- You received t

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I have gone through Sahil's work multiple times and I think it has some really good work and needs polishing, updations and some good test cases. In Sahil's JointsMethod implementation , the use of root_body is only to achieve the frame about which equations shall be generated so instead c

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 16:00, Kartik Sethi wrote: > > Oscar Benjamin, what if someone else also puts up this same proposal to > improve the DomainMatrix module for Gsoc. How does sympy decide which person > will work on it. There is plenty more work to do on DomainMatrix than one person could do

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Oscar Benjamin, what if someone else also puts up this same proposal to improve the DomainMatrix module for Gsoc. How does sympy decide which person will work on it. On Monday, 1 March 2021 at 12:16:35 pm UTC+5:30 Kartik Sethi wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion. I'll start looking into methods

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll start looking into methods that can be made faster and also look into making DomainMatrix more complete. On Sunday, 28 February 2021 at 8:08:15 pm UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote: > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 14:26, Oscar Benjamin > wrote: > > > > The most useful thing that a

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 14:26, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > The most useful thing that a GSOC project could do is really just to > make the whole DomainMatrix class a bit more complete, usable and > documented so that it's easier for users and future contributors to > make use of it and also make impr

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 10:38, Kartik Sethi wrote: > > I was wondering if completing the tasks listed on > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/20987 could be a Gsoc proposal. Some of the things in that list are fairly trivial like "make Matrix use DomainMatrix for charpoly". The DomainMatrix ch

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Oscar Benjamin, I was wondering if completing the tasks listed on https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/20987 could be a Gsoc proposal. There's a lot to do in that list and I can even add some other functions like QR decomposition, Hessenberg Decomposition, SVD, Polar Decomposition etc. to that

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Thanks for listing out the issues. I'll start looking into them On Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 4:00:01 am UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 11:33, Oscar Benjamin > wrote: > > This is not listed anywhere on the ideas page or really documented > > anywhere yet but there is a new most

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Thanks for listing out some of the issues. I'll start looking into them. On Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 4:00:01 am UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 11:33, Oscar Benjamin > wrote: > > This is not listed anywhere on the ideas page or really documented > > anywhere yet but there is a

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 11:33, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > This is not listed anywhere on the ideas page or really documented > anywhere yet but there is a new mostly internal implementation of > matrices in the sympy.polys.matrices module. This new implementation > is called DomainMatrix and is based

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 14:28, Kartik Sethi wrote: > > Thanks Oscar Benjamin for the wonderful suggestions. I will start looking > into algorithms and methods that have not been implemented for the domain > Matrix class yet. > I would be happy to help in building Domain Matrix class. > > Do you t

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Thanks Oscar Benjamin for the wonderful suggestions. I will start looking into algorithms and methods that have not been implemented for the domain Matrix class yet. I would be happy to help in building Domain Matrix class. Do you think improving and implementing algorithms in Domain Matrix clas

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 07:40, Kartik Sethi wrote: > > Hey, my name is Kartik Sethi. I am interested in taking part in Gsoc this > year. I have been contributing to sympy for the past couple of months. Hi Kartik, > I have come up with a few ideas for Gsoc. I am focusing primarily on the > sympy

[sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Hey, my name is Kartik Sethi. I am interested in taking part in Gsoc this year. I have been contributing to sympy for the past couple of months. I have come up with a few ideas for Gsoc. I am focusing primarily on the sympy matrices module. 1. Implementing complete Singular Value decomposit

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:24 PM Sidharth wrote: > > Hello SymPy Community! > > I was interested in a few ideas in the GSoC Ideas page, and wanted to know a > bit more about their usefulness to the community and expected time required > to finish - > > sympy.logic - It seems like sympy.logic has

[sympy] Gsoc Idea Discussion

Hello Developers , I have read the ideas page and found the idea for probability and statistics in the Mathematics Project Section and would like to work on it if it is being considered for Gsoc this year , A brief description and a Start

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hello SymPy Community! I was interested in a few ideas in the GSoC Ideas page, and wanted to know a bit more about their usefulness to the community and expected time required to finish - 1. sympy.logic - It seems like sympy.logic has a lot

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Thank you Oscar, I'll keep in mind to put the reference next time. Also, I went through the issue you just shared, it looks like a good idea for gsoc, could someone guide me on it? I have fairly good understanding of the algorithm and would start working on it right away, though some supervision wo

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 13:13, cheshta babbar wrote: > > While going through ideas , I found this idea , Multivariate polynomials and > factorization, using Gao's partial differential equations approach, very > appealing . I wanted to know if this idea is outdated or is being considered > for th

[sympy] GSoC Idea Discussion

Hi, While going through ideas , I found this idea , *Multivariate polynomials and factorization*, using Gao's partial differential equations approach, very appealing . I wanted to know if this idea is outdated or is being considered for this year's GSoC . Also, it'd be great to have someone g

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, Thanks for clarifying things for me , I actually got confused because your name wasn't in potential mentors list so I thought about that "good to go". Other than looking in other dynamics packages I wanted to learn a bit theory about Joints and JointsMethod , searching google is showing Tr

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Sudeep, We don't tell you what is "good to go". Every applicant can propose whatever they want. The applications are judged on the scope, the likelihood of success, the writer's communication, alignment with sympy's roadmap, and their applicant's interaction with the community. Jason moorepants.i

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I'll surely look into it. So is JointsMethod good to go as GSoC project? On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 19:15 Jason Moore, wrote: > Sudeep, > > The only thing I can think of to look it is how people do this in other > dynamics software. Many of them let the user define a system based on > descrip

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Sudeep, The only thing I can think of to look it is how people do this in other dynamics software. Many of them let the user define a system based on descriptions of rigid bodies and different joint types. That description is the used to define the mathematics of the kinematics. The software Simbo

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I went through the previous JointsMethod work, I think it would be wise to complete the previous 2 PRs of Joint Methods because it contains some good work and completing them would take less time rather than starting from scratch. Please refer a source to read more about Joints and JointsMe

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I'm comfortable in implementing JointsMethod and it has some previous work done too (unmerged GSoC work). All I would need is some guidance with concepts if I get stuck somewhere and a good source to read about JointsMethod. I have some knowledge of dynamics too so I think I can implement i

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

I personally think completing the JointsMethod is of higher priority than the FeatherStone method. The JointsMethod would open up the use of the library to a much wider set of users because they will be able to construct models with less knowledge of the underlying mathematics. For example, a doubl

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021, 19:00 Jason Moore, wrote: > James worked with Featherstone's book "Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms". > But I think that the spatial vector implementation used in simbody may be a > good thing to copy. > > I also think that focusing on improving end-user use of the software is >

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

James worked with Featherstone's book "Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms". But I think that the spatial vector implementation used in simbody may be a good thing to copy. I also think that focusing on improving end-user use of the software is more bang for the buck and adding the Featherstone algorit

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021, 18:24 Sudeep Sidhu, wrote: > Jason, > > I would definitely like to work on physics mechanics/vectors project in > this summer as physics has been my favourite subject and I'm really eager > to learn more physics to code it and I think I can learn it myself while > coding plus

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I would definitely like to work on physics mechanics/vectors project in this summer as physics has been my favourite subject and I'm really eager to learn more physics to code it and I think I can learn it myself while coding plus you could help me if I get stuck somewhere. So which would

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Please someone should help me, doesn't some need to really know physics to take on those projects relating to physics stuff On Mon, Feb 8, 2021, 12:50 Jason Moore wrote: > Sudeep, > > FeatherstoneMethod should not require any implementation of joints, I > think it should work with knowledge of t

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Sudeep, FeatherstoneMethod should not require any implementation of joints, I think it should work with knowledge of the rigid bodies and particles in a system and their relative kinematics. That would keep things general. I do think that a nice implementation of a spatial vector would provide the

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

We've had students succeed that don't know physics well but are fast learners. It really depends on your motivation, ability to self learn new physics topics, and the project you plan to implement. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 9:47 PM Mhd Ali wrote: > Hello, >

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

For: I would like to know if the idea, *Continuum Mechanics: Create a Rich 2D > Beam Solving System*, will be considered this time or not. > I would also like to know if it is better to > - implement more features in the existing beam module - Or expand the continuum mechanics module to imp

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Jason, I would like to work in this realm in this year's GSoC. I went through Sahil Shekhewat's and James Milam's (jbm950) previous unmerged GSoC work and found out that(I may be wrong) *FeatherStoneMethod *can't be added until we add fully working *JointsMethod* class and implement *spatia

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Hello, Does someone have to be really conversant with physics to handle a project like that? On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 2:24 PM Jason Moore wrote: > Sudeep, > > The topics related to sympy.physics.vector/mechanics are still > possibilities. I will have time to mentor this summer if someone wants to

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Hi, I would like to know if the idea, *Continuum Mechanics: Create a Rich 2D Beam Solving System*, will be considered this time or not. I would also like to know if it is better to - implement more features in the existing beam module - Or expand the continuum mechanics module to impleme

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Sudeep, The topics related to sympy.physics.vector/mechanics are still possibilities. I will have time to mentor this summer if someone wants to do projects in this realm. We have not updated the ideas page yet for this year so those could be adjusted. Off the top of my head here are some things

[sympy] GSoC Idea discussion

Hi, While going through ideas , I found this idea , *Classical Mechanics: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with Python*, very appealing . I wanted to know if this idea is outdated or is being considered for this year's GSoC . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sympy] GSoC Idea

I'm not sure if this idea would be in scope for SymPy. It definitely isn't in scope for the library itself, but even as a GSoC project, I don't think we have any mentors who could mentor such a project. If you are interested in doing something related to machine learning, I would suggest finding a

[sympy] GSoC Idea

I have idea of making application using flutter that take the picture of problem and convert image into text by using image processing and solve the problem by using SymPy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscrib

Re: [sympy] Gsoc idea

Umarpreet, It is relevant, but it may be best to focus on higher priority items on SymPy's roadmap. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 1:46 AM, Umarpreet Singh wrote: > Hello, > I am student currently studying Software Engineering. I want to > participate in Gsoc 2

[sympy] Gsoc idea

Hello, I am student currently studying Software Engineering. I want to participate in Gsoc 2018.I was having a look at sympy documentation and i found that there is not thermodynamic module here. as thermodynamics is the major part of physics and it is used in almost every area. There are lots o

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: Rewriting the Matrices module to make matrices in Sympy faster and more usable.

Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for your advice. Actually that's the reason I dropped my idea. If something like that can be done through few pull requests (and someone has already done so much work on it), there was no point in me working on it as a GSoC project. But I am definitely intereste

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: Rewriting the Matrices module to make matrices in Sympy faster and more usable.

You should connect with Jason Siefkin who is currently in the midst of rewriting and organization the matrix code. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 <(530)%20601-9791> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Vedarth Sharma wrote: > I saw it as an idea prompt in Sympy ideas. It basically said tha

[sympy] GSoC idea: Rewriting the Matrices module to make matrices in Sympy faster and more usable.

I saw it as an idea prompt in Sympy ideas. It basically said that we need to rewrite the Matrices module to be more like polys module etc. Rewrite Matrices module . Well for past few days I have been analyzing Matrices module and

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: robust cse

Seems reasonable to me, but I haven't reviewed a lot of GSOC proposals. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017, 15:09 Arif Ahmed wrote: > Here is my proposal : > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2017-Application-Arif-Ahmed:-Improve-Code-Generation-in-SymPy > Some implementation details are left. Can anyon

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: robust cse

Here is my proposal : https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2017-Application-Arif-Ahmed:-Improve-Code-Generation-in-SymPy Some implementation details are left. Can anyone in this thread review what I've written so far. On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 1:00:38 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > >

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: robust cse

CSE is usually tied to code generation. If you wanted to make a project about code generation there are plenty of things that could be done to fill a summer. Aaron Meurer On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:16 PM Arif Ahmed wrote: > I have carefully gone through the paper, and have completed a good part

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: robust cse

I have carefully gone through the paper, and have completed a good part of my rough proposal, but I have one major concern. A robust CSE is no doubt important but would it be enough work to qualify as a GSoC project (usually 11 - 13 weeks long)? If there are other stuff in SymPy which uses CSE o

[sympy] GSOC IDEA: Fourier Optics

I would like to propose an idea to add Fourier optics functionality to the already existing physics.optics package. The current package is based on Newtonian Optics and Par-axially Approximated Optics which work only for specific usecases. Adding Fourier analysis to the package would help in so

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: robust cse

+1 for improvements to CSE On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:49 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > This is interesting. Could you add it to the ideas page (perhaps on the > codegen section)? > > Aaron Meurer > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:00 AM Chris Smith wrote: > > I did some searching for a more robust method

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea: robust cse

This is interesting. Could you add it to the ideas page (perhaps on the codegen section)? Aaron Meurer On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:00 AM Chris Smith wrote: > I did some searching for a more robust method for common substring > extraction (the `cse` function in SymPy) and came across [this paper](

[sympy] GSoC idea: robust cse

I did some searching for a more robust method for common substring extraction (the `cse` function in SymPy) and came across [this paper](http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~kastner/papers/tech-alg_opt.pdf). Perhaps this and others could direct a good project toward improving cse. -- You received this mess

[sympy] GSoC Idea: Rubi integrator

Hi, Here is a project that I would love to see happen: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/12233 I am available to mentor it, and I think quite a few people are excited about it and such a system/framework (i.e. set of rules for patter matching + compiler to generate a fast if/then/else decisi

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea 2016 Series Expansion

A good place to start would be to look through the issues labeled "series" on the issue tracker. That should give you an idea of what sorts of things don't work. Aaron Meurer On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > Hello everyone , I am abhishek Verma and series expansion will b

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea 2016 Series Expansion

On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 4:18:29 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote: > > I would try using the series expansion modules in SymPy and see if you can > discover some of the things it can't do. You can search the mailing list > and github issues to find out problems or suggestions for series ex

Re: [sympy] Gsoc Idea 2016 Series Expansion

I would try using the series expansion modules in SymPy and see if you can discover some of the things it can't do. You can search the mailing list and github issues to find out problems or suggestions for series expansions. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM,

[sympy] Gsoc Idea 2016 Series Expansion

Hello everyone , I am abhishek Verma and series expansion will be idea for gsoc 2016. What is my present status 1. I have read the book On Computing Limits in a Symbolic Manipulation System by gruntz. and have probably understood code of gruntz.py and limits.py 2.I have read Power Series in Co

[sympy] GSoC idea for a project: Number Theory

Hi I've added a project idea here: *Number Theory* *Idea* I want to Implement more functions in number theory Finding solutions to system Diophantine equations, Prime factorization of factorials in less time, Finding n consecutive composite numbers , Checking Perfect Number or not

[sympy] GSoC idea for a project: holonomic functions

Hi, I've added a project idea here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2016-Ideas#implement-holonomic-functions I would really like to have this capability in SymPy. I think it should allow a robust symbolic integration of a large class of functions, as well as analytic series expansion (

[sympy] GSOC Idea : Sympy live android app

Hi, I would like to suggest a very interesting gsoc idea : A web based sympy-live android application. It will send the post requests to sympy web server and the response will be printed as result of the query. The layout of the app will be exactly like a python console (like we have on sympy web a

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea : implement similarity measure between expression trees

implementing similarity measures we can check if sinx + siny is a sub tree of the given expr tree..and sometimes when users pose similar questions like trigsimp(some similar exprs not exactly same) we can incorporate AI to the trigsimp function for ex. trigsimp by fu algo rule list 2 is a long proc

Re: [sympy] GSoC idea : implement similarity measure between expression trees

How does the similarity measure help in either of these cases? Aaron Meurer On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:22 PM, manoj babu wrote: > in many cases we are just using term.match(pattern) but applying the > similarity between these two trees expr tree and pattern tree it would > become useful in some ca

  1   2   >