%CURSOR (was: Re: [SPAM?] Re: v10 beta 8)

se one to upper case got rid of the weird font issue. > Maybe it was something else but here's my reply format, see if it works for > you it's all formatted as 12pt Arial HTML. >   >   > Hello %OFromFName, > %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, you wrote: > %QUOTES > %CURSOR &

5.3.8.4 (BETA) embedded address book groups

ns in foreign exchange markets, extreme deficits, inefficient bureaucracies, etc., are governments that are detrimental to an economy)." v 5.3.8.4 (BETA) on Windows 6.2 Build 9200 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: Change password on beta site

Hello Peter! On Wednesday, February 07, 2007, 4:21 PM, you wrote: > I logged in to download the new beta version - no problem - but had to use > a different ID and password. I would like to have just one ID and PW to > remember. I see. Then Roelof's advice is probably the best.

Re[2]: Change password on beta site

it. Mary> Peter, for me, my BT and my beta download accounts' user name and Mary> password are the same. Mary> You can change by logging in at BT on the Main page and then clicking Mary> on the My Account button. >> Can someone let me know where can I do this? Mary

Re[2]: Change password on beta site

stion? Thank you. -- Best regards, Peter The BAT 3.96.04 (BETA), Windows XP, Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Change password on beta site

Hello Peter! On Wednesday, February 07, 2007, 10:37 AM, you wrote: > I want to cange my ID and password on this site: > http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ > Cannot find any way to do it. Peter, for me, my BT and my beta download accounts' user name and password are the

Re: Change password on beta site

Can someone let me know where can I do this? http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/ Maybe you should drop somebody at Ritlabs a mail to drop your ol account... -- Groetjes, Roelof WINDOWS is to computing what Etch-a-Sketch is to art. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.96.04 (BETA) Wi

Change password on beta site

Hello, I want to cange my ID and password on this site: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ Cannot find any way to do it. Can someone let me know where can I do this? Thank you -- Best regards, Peter The BAT 3.95.6, Windows XP, Service Pack 2

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Peter! On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 6:07 PM, you wrote: > I am registered at the silverstones.. Website. But if I go to the > "proper page"to D/L I end up with the old beta. Ah, yes. For some reason, ever since the "ALPHA" beta series came in--at least--th

Re[2]: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Mary, Saturday, December 16, 2006, 5:40:37 PM, you wrote: Mary> Hello Peter! Mary> On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 4:10 PM, you wrote: >>>> I tried to get this beta version, but if I go to the website: >>>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ >>&

Re[2]: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Ron, Saturday, December 16, 2006, 5:20:13 PM, you wrote: Ron> On Saturday, December 16, 2006 Peter Kerekes, [PK] wrote: Ron> >> Where can I download it? Ron> 3.86.11 BETA is available at Ron> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb38611.rar Thank y

Re:Benefitting from beta testing

On Saturday, December 16, 2006 Peter Kerekes, [PK] wrote: > Where can I download it? 3.86.11 BETA is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb38611.rar -- Regards, Ron Secord Using TB! 3.86.11 beta Professional Under Windows XP 5.1 Service Pac

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Peter! On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 4:10 PM, you wrote: >>> I tried to get this beta version, but if I go to the website: >>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ >>> the latest version for download is 3.81.18 which is older than my >>> regular ver

Re[2]: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Mary, Saturday, December 16, 2006, 3:21:47 PM, you wrote: Mary> Hello Peter! Mary> On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 1:03 PM, you wrote: >> I tried to get this beta version, but if I go to the website: >> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ >> the latest version

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Peter! On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 1:03 PM, you wrote: > I tried to get this beta version, but if I go to the website: > http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ > the latest version for download is 3.81.18 which is older than my > regular version. Where did you find the 06/

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Chris! On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 1:22 PM, you wrote: >> It's tempting to me to close and re-launch The Bat! just for the >> pleasure of another look at the cheerful splash screen. But the >> biggest benefit, of course, is the collection of features and fixes

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Mary, Saturday, December 16, 2006, 7:56:08 AM, you wrote: Mary> Hello Fellow TBUDL Subscribers Who Might Consider Running a Beta! Mary> The splash screen on the current beta is as colorful as the Christmas Mary> season. Worth being a beta tester just to get an advance peek at

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Mary Bull @ 2006-12-16 6:56:08 AM "Benefitting from beta testing" > It's tempting to me to close and re-launch The Bat! just for the > pleasure of another look at the cheerful splash screen. But the > biggest benefit, of course, is the collection of features and fix

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

sk of running a beta, might find it of value. -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.86.11 beta on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Perry! On Saturday, December 16, 2006, 9:20 AM, you wrote: > There's nothing special about my system and others may have a better > one, but once I realized the process of switching versions was that > simple, I felt comfortable signing up for and participating in the >

Re: Benefitting from beta testing

Hi Mary, Saturday, December 16, 2006, 7:56:08 AM, you wrote: MB> Beta version 3.86.11 is running well, reliably, and stably, MB> according to everything I hear. Certainly it is for me. It's running well for me too, Mary. However, I'm replying to you to explain how I manage

Benefitting from beta testing

Hello Fellow TBUDL Subscribers Who Might Consider Running a Beta! The splash screen on the current beta is as colorful as the Christmas season. Worth being a beta tester just to get an advance peek at it. Beta version 3.86.11 is running well, reliably, and stably, according to everything I hear

Re: TB BETA Version information...

Hi WilWilWil, on Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:01:43 +0200GMT (06.09.2005, 22:01 +0200GMT here), you wrote: W> Is there a way (website or mailing list) to obtain list of bugs W> solved and new feature developped whenever a new BETA is available. W> Just for information. I don't want to risk m

Re[2]: TB BETA Version information...

DAC> There is usually a change log, which may or may not be as complete as DAC> some people want/expect, with new betas. Is there a Website where this log could be looked ? -- WilWilWil :flag-france: TB 3.60.07 BayesIt! 0.8.4 Windows XP Service Pack 2 _

Re: TB BETA Version information...

On Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 3:01:43 PM, WilWilWil wrote: > I see you use BETA 3.61.03 : can I expect copy/paste problem and > HTML answer are solved in it ? If you mean can you reply with quoted text, and copy and paste from HTML, the answer seems to be yes. > Is there a way (w

TB BETA Version information...

DAC> Using The Bat! 3.61.03 beta on Windows XP version 5,1 I see you use BETA 3.61.03 : can I expect copy/paste problem and HTML answer are solved in it ? Is there a way (website or mailing list) to obtain list of bugs solved and new feature developped whenever a new BETA is available. J

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello MAU, On 4 Sep 2004 at 16:52:30 +0200 GMT [16:52 CEST] you wrote: M> Traditionally on the net, asterisks mean *bold*, underscores mean M> _underlined_, slashes mean /italics/, etc. I know. :) And my text is either naked or underlined. -- Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on Andre

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Allie_M, [AM] wrote: > I'm a long time OS/2 user. I stopped using it in mid 1999. > How's it going now with that OS. Is it still viable in that apps are > being still actively developed for it? Shucks! My booboo. I guess it could have been worse, but this was intended as an off-list message. I j

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Lynn, [L] wrote: > I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *Team OS/2 I'm a long time OS/2 user. I stopped using it in mid 1999. How's it going now with that OS. Is it still viable in that apps are being still actively developed for it? -- -= Allie =- The Bat!™ v3.0 · Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2)

Re[2]: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Saturday, September 4, 2004, 11:32:31 AM, you wrote: MB> Thanks for answering. :) No problem .. had I not got so far behind with my email, due to being gone yesterday, I'd have seen the previous posts describing the situation. Lynn -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather b

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Lynn! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 1:20 PM, you wrote: MB>> Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll: MB>> 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : : MB>> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > L> Smileys in colons would probably be easier for me to implement .. Enclose

Re[2]: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Friday, September 3, 2004, 6:28:38 AM, you wrote: MB> Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll: MB> 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : : MB> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > Smileys in colons would probably be easier for me to implement .. TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Mary! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 11:46 AM, you wrote: ASK>> Dunno - I just created my own smiley theme, and it contains a ASK>> ":-)" handle, of course! ;-) MB> That explains why I don't see it--neither in the default.msl nor MB> in the pcwsmileys.msl as downloaded (default with TB!,

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Alexander! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 11:19 AM, you wrote: ASK>>> ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,, <> < ... > ASK> I mean - I placed "" as a handle there. Including the ASK> "chevrons" aka pointed brackets. Placing "*g*" is interpreted, ASK> however. Ah.

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Mary Bull, 04-Sep-2004 18:08, you wrote: MB>>> ASK>> ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,, <> > This is how it has always been. Take a look at the .msl files in The > Bat!/Images. TB! will only call the image as a text replacement for > the "handle," which you can

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Alexander! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 10:42 AM, you wrote: MB>> ASK> ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,, <> This is how it has always been. Take a look at the .msl files in The Bat!/Images. TB! will only call the image as a text replacement for the "handle,

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Andre Wichartz, 04-Sep-2004 15:29, you wrote: > Sorry to jump in here, I just tested a little bit - here (v2.12) the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in chevrons <> ... no no nothing, it just appears as-is... In addition, it only interprets smileys if they aren't following

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

mean /italics/, etc. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.123 Beta/Umpteen Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Andre! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 8:29 AM, you wrote: MB>> :grin: Okay. < > 4 * * 1 MB>> But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to indicate emphasis, AW> I don't. And for exactly for that reason. If I need to show AW> emphasis which is seldom enough i use underscores. Well, I think I had

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Mary, On 3 Sep 2004 at 10:57:06 -0500 GMT [17:57 CEST] you wrote: MB> :grin: Okay. < > 4 * * 1 MB> But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to indicate emphasis, I don't. And for exactly for that reason. If I need to show emphasis which is seldom enough i use underscores. I realize I'm not coming

Re[3]: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Friday, September 3, 2004, 12:35:55 AM, you wrote: ASK> Btw., is there a feature request open for an ASK> interpreter that turn ASK> *this* into bold and _that_ into underlined and ASK> /those/ into italics ASK> when using the RTV? I'd support that! (my old ASK> "ZConnect" point program ASK> Micr

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Eric! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 1:38 PM, you wrote: MB>>> Let's see how many would truly prefer a change from MB>>> colon enclosures, and I'll get back to you. ASK>> Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :) E> And me. So that's: 5 for pointed-brackets, or angle-brackets, < >

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:33:55 +0200 GMT(03/09/2004, 16:33 + GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> Hello Mary Bull, ASK> 03-Sep-2004 15:58, you wrote: >> Let's see how many would truly prefer a change from >> colon enclosures, and I'll get back to you. ASK> Count me in as a pointed-bracket-prefe

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello 9Val! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 12:48 PM, you wrote: MB>> Yes. But with the smiley interpreter on, the handles without MB>> colons in the default.msl can be startling, and I see that 9Val MB>> has still not had time to edit them. 9> Hmm, quite strange, I've deleted I am so glad to he

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Mary, MB> Yes. But with the smiley interpreter on, the handles without colons in MB> the default.msl can be startling, and I see that 9Val has still not MB> had time to edit them. Hmm, quite strange, I've deleted MB> " GRR ," " grr ," and " headshot " and other handles without colons f

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hæ! Friday, September 3, 2004, 17:49, Andre Wichartz wrote: > I vote for * * :p Me too. ;) -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media [The Bat! v2.12.03 without BayesIt on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4] > Listening to: DeutschlandRadio Berlin

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Andre! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:49 AM, you wrote: MB>> Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll: MB>> 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : : MB>> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > AW> I vote for * * :p :grin: Okay. < > 4 * * 1 But, Andre, I use *asteris

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Mary, On 3 Sep 2004 at 08:28:38 -0500 GMT [15:28 CEST] you wrote: MB> Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll: MB> 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : : MB> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > I vote for * * :p -- Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on And

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Alexander! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:33 AM, you wrote: ASK> Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :) Okay, that puts the count at 4. Thanks a bunch for your response. :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 __

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Mary Bull, 03-Sep-2004 15:58, you wrote: > Thank you so very much for your kind offer. Let's see how many would > truly prefer a change from colon enclosures, and I'll get back to you. Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - IC

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Allen! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:00 AM, you wrote: AD>>> As for :: v. <>, I really don't care either way. ... MB>> That was the impression I had in regard to many who are using MB>> Plain Text View, when the discussion took place on tbbeta. AD> Right--from plain-text side,

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:12:04 +0200 GMT(03/09/2004, 13:12 + GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK>>> Btw., is there a feature request open for an ASK>>> interpreter that turn *this* into bold and _that_ ASK>>> into underlined and /those/ into italics when using ASK>>> the RTV? >> Yes, there are: >

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Thomas! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 9:24 AM, you wrote: MB>> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > TF> I would like this better. Okay, including Roelof, this makes 2 openly expressing this preference so far. Thanks so much for responding. TF> I understand Allen's caveat abo

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Mary, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:28:38 -0500 GMT (03/09/2004, 20:28 +0700 GMT), Mary Bull wrote: MB> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > I would like this better. I understand Allen's caveat about HTML tags, I'm just uttering a wish as a (plain text) user. <> *are* quite common, p

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Mic! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 8:35 AM, you wrote: Mary>> I hope that 9Val will soon edit the default.msl file to enclose Mary>> all handles in colons there. MicCullen> No offence to anyone, but I'd prefer they fixed bugs rather MicCullen> than play with toys that aren't much use in t

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Allen! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 8:43 AM, you wrote: MB>> As "Keeper of the Smileys," I can easily edit every handle of the MB>> PCWize Smileys "Smileys" page to have a brackets (< >) enclosure MB>> rather than a colons enclosure. It would be a bit time-consuming, MB>> but I can do tha

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

On Friday, September 3, 2004 @ 8:31:32 PM, Mary Bull wrote: [snips] Mary> I hope that 9Val will soon edit the default.msl Mary> file to enclose all handles in colons there. No offence to anyone, but I'd prefer they fixed bugs rather than play with toys that aren't much use in the real world, wh

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello Roelof! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 7:48 AM, you wrote: MB>> This is the reason that all the handles on the Smileys page are MB>> enclosed in colons. I hope that 9Val will soon edit the MB>> default.msl file to enclose all handles in colons there. RO> Oh no, not colons, I'd prefer <> (d

No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hallo Mary, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:31:32 -0500GMT (3-9-2004, 14:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MB> This is the reason that all the handles on the Smileys page are MB> enclosed in colons. I hope that 9Val will soon edit the default.msl MB> file to enclose all handles in colons there. Oh no, n

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Alexander! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 2:35 AM, you wrote: ASK>>> I heard that characters like ":" and "-" and ")" (and their ASK>>> relatives) actually do like the freedom of imagination they ASK>>> leave on the user side, rather than being pressed into a ASK>>> graphical image. Stop th

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Peter Meyns, 03-Sep-2004 11:51, you wrote: ASK>> Btw., is there a feature request open for an interpreter that turn ASK>> *this* into bold and _that_ into underlined and /those/ into italics ASK>> when using the RTV? > Yes, there are: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=0001902 and > ht

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hi Alexander, on Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:35:55 +0200GMT, you wrote: ASK> Btw., is there a feature request open for an interpreter that turn ASK> *this* into bold and _that_ into underlined and /those/ into italics ASK> when using the RTV? Yes, there are: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=0001902

Re[2]: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 n'abend A.Translator, Friday, September 3, 2004, 9:56:12 AM: >> Btw., is there a feature request open for an interpreter that turn >> *this* into bold and _that_ into underlined and /those/ into italics >> when using the RTV? I'd support that! (my ol

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Op Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:35:55 +0200 schreef Alexander S. Kunz: > Btw., is there a feature request open for an interpreter that turn > *this* into bold and _that_ into underlined and /those/ into italics > when using the RTV? I'd support that! (my old "ZConnect" point program > MicroDot on the Amiga

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

quot;ZConnect" ASK> point program MicroDot on the Amiga did is - t'was most luvlee!) IMO, this is much more useful than smileys. If you make an entry in the BT, let me know and I'll support it. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 2.13 "Lu

Re[2]: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Mary, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 11:58:43 PM, you wrote: ASK>> I heard that characters like ":" and "-" and ")" (and their ASK>> relatives) actually do like the freedom of imagination they leave ASK>> on the user side, rather than being pressed into a graphical ASK>> image. Stop the suffe

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello 9Val, Thanks for your reply that I assume (I am pretty sure) it was intended to be PM. I will reply off-list. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.12.00 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' info

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Alexander! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 1:07 PM, you wrote: MAU>> I appreciate the beer, but please don't force me to make MAU>> comments about smileys ;-) ASK> I heard that characters like ":" and "-" and ")" (and their ASK> relatives) actually do like the freedom of imagination they

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

us would appreciate information on how things will evolve in the near future. Like a freeze for new features, concentrating on bugfixes... whatever information. > No new beta-cycles in near 1-2 weeks, as you understand, nothing depends > of programmers now I don't know how big a compan

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

t; I just and strongly believe the NFS is NOT mature enough for a M> release version. Agree with you, but see below M> So, unless Ritlabs opens a new beta cycle with a Beta version that, like M> 2.13 Beta6/7/8, No new beta-cycles in near 1-2 weeks, as you understand, nothin

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

n very fine support to me. M> As I have said somewhere before, I was one of the first to pay for the M> upgrade the very same night v3.0 was released, without waiting for the M> special discount announced for beta testers and refusing a free upgrade M> I was offered. ... I saw that.

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Stuart, > It was spot on as far as I can see. Thanks Stuart, I owe you a beer ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.12.00 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silver

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Mary, > And I do agree with you that v. 3.0 is a beta (to quote Shakespeare, > "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet"--or not, as the case > may be. ). In Spain we say: "A monkey dressed in silk is still a monkey". > It's marketing. The

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello MAU, 02-Sep-2004 19:21, you wrote: > I appreciate the beer, but please don't force me to make comments about > smileys ;-) I heard that characters like ":" and "-" and ")" (and their relatives) actually do like the freedom of imagination they leave on the user side, rather than being press

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello MAU, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 11:24:02 AM, you wrote: M> I don't know if my contribution to beta testing the NFS was good, bad, M> valuable or not. It certainly took quite a bit of my time, although I M> enjoyed it. But if RITLabs wants to count on me... new Beta cycle.

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

xt View selected. Up to now I haven't used any Virtual Folders. Sorry the New Filter System has been such a pain for you, Miguel. I use so few--just some Address Book simple templates--that it's not interfering with me, so far. And I do agree with you that v. 3.0 is a beta (to quote Sh

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Mary, > Let me offer you and Miguel both a :batbeer: ? > You can view it at > http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php > since I have no doubt that both of you are in PTV Mode. :) I appreciate the beer, but please don't force me to make comments about smileys ;-) -- Best regards, Migu

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Nick! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 11:57 AM, you wrote: ND> I wish that I could adopt Mary's positive approach (and I suspect ND> she's a much happier person than for it!), but I'm suffering a mild ND> form of cumulative disappointment with TB! Nothing terminal I suppose, ND> but sad al

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

Hello Miguel, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 5:24:02 PM, you wrote: M> One thing is finding a bug here and there... They could start with the installer! In a moment of weakness, during a lull in my afternoon, I was going to have a peek at v3. I backed everything up, God knows there have been enou

TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

the reports in TBBeta and TBUDL, I just and strongly believe the NFS is NOT mature enough for a release version. I think Ritlabs has made a big mistake here. I don't mind beta testing the NFS as I think I have proven in the last couple of weeks, but I refuse to do so with a release version.

Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

On Wed 11 August 2004, 4:57:49 +1000, Chris Weaven wrote: > As stated in the original mail, the reason I believe I need to use the > plug-in is because when using a TLS connection with my mail server, IMON > is unable to scan the message as it is encrypted. > > Is this the case? The transport lin

Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

Hello Chris, Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 2:59:36 PM, you wrote: PC>> I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could PC>> not send an email with an attachment. I never got an answer back from PC>> eset, so I went back to AVG. CW> Hmm, that's not

Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

Hi Paul, On Monday, August 9, 2004 17:05 your local time, which was 22:05 my local time, Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote; PC> I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could PC> not send an email with an attachment. I never got an answer back from PC> eset, so I went ba

Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

Hi Michael, On Monday, August 9, 2004 17:17 your local time, which was Tuesday, August 10, 2004 at 01:17 my local time, Michael Wilson [MLW] wrote; MLW> I have been using nod32 for several years, and have never used a BAT! MLW> plug-in. I do not need one. Nod32 will monitor any port you want an

Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

Michael- Ditto here. I run nod32 on the server and I also run Norton AV on my workstations just because I don't trust *anything* completely. But nod32 has _never_ let anything through for Norton to catch. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service P

Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

Hello Chris, On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Chris mused about "NOD32 Plug-In Beta." (at least in part): CW> NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB! CW> plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my CW> mail is received via

Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

uch as CW> IMON d are unable to scan these types of messages. Plus I like the way CW> plug-ins work. CW> The last I read was that it was at beta stage. Has it got any further CW> than this? I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could not send an email with an attac

NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

nd that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my mail is received via TLS and I am led to believe proxy scanners such as IMON d are unable to scan these types of messages. Plus I like the way plug-ins work. The last I read was that it was at beta stage. Has it got any further than th

Re: SMTP/POP3 issues (2.12 beta/7)

Hello Nestor, Monday, August 9, 2004, 1:57:29 PM, you wrote: NF> I'm using The Bat! version 2.12 beta/7 in evaluation mode and NF> discovered 2 issues that may be bugs: You are using a very old beta. Try getting the new one, or install the official 2.12 release (it's newe

SMTP/POP3 issues (2.12 beta/7)

Hi, I'm using The Bat! version 2.12 beta/7 in evaluation mode and discovered 2 issues that may be bugs: 1) if you create an account without saying during the creation steps that it will use authenticated SMTP, you won't be able to enable this feature afterwards. You can set the c

Beta downloads (was: Severe timeout bug)

ww.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/. You may have to >> register. but don't use the registering on that site. It is known to be broken. IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/ - -- Cheers Peter See headers for public key. -BEGI

Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?

Hello tbudl Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:31:08 PM, in which you wrote: M> In software development it is normal M> that in some special circumstances the software may fail. Ain't that the truth. And with some software the circumstances don't have to all that spec

Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?

Hello ken, on Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 1:26:48 AM, ken green wrote: > Come on, this isn't about my needs changing beyond what The Bat has to > offer. This is about The Bat promising on functionality and hitting > 90% - and I'm complaining about that 10% Yes, and that is good. If noone would

Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?

a pity and it MUST be fixed but this is not easily to find out by beta testers or the porgrammer before the error occurs. Look, one of a described problem was that the progress circle of connection center was displayed in another color than the rest of the box. In my eyes this is a pity because it

Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?

Tuesday, February 24, 2004, Doug Weller wrote: > I can't get it to kick in. Do you get any error message, such as the /very/ helpful "It seems like something is present in your registry, but it's not enough or corrupted" that it gives me at startup. Not a big problem to me, but it would be nice i

Re: Bayesit (was: Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?)

Hello Peter, On 24 Feb 2004 at 21:41:25 +0100 GMT [21:41 CET] you wrote: PO> Hello Andre Wichartz, PO> on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:44:26 +0100 (2004-02-24 18:44:26 in .nl) in the PO> message with reference PO> you PO> [AW] wrote (at least in part): DW>>> This is what I've bee

Re[2]: Bayesit (was: Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?)

Hello Peter, Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 3:41:25 PM, you wrote: PO> Up to the 2.04.04 release BayesIt 0.4gm worked quite fine here, with a PO> score level of 40. PO> Starting with 2.04.04, BayesIt 0.4gm SE hardly catches spam anymore. It PO> has been trained with something like 3000 spam message

Re: Bayesit (was: Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?)

Hello Andre Wichartz, on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:44:26 +0100 (2004-02-24 18:44:26 in .nl) in the message with reference you [AW] wrote (at least in part): DW>> This is what I've been doing, marking spam as Junk, but shouldn't DW>> Bayesit start to filter out spam by itself? Wh

Bayesit (was: Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?)

Hello Doug, On 24 Feb 2004 at 13:58:38 + GMT [14:58 CET] you wrote: DW> This is what I've been doing, marking spam as Junk, but shouldn't Bayesit start DW> to filter out spam by itself? When does it start doing that? Yes, but in my experience it needs a lot of spam before. At least a few hun

Re: Is 2.04.4 an official release or another beta?

Quoting dAniel hAhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Doug, > > on Tue, 24. Feb 2004 at 06:10:24 + you wrote: > > >> No, I can't confirm that. For me the 2.04.4 works very fine (also the > >> Spamfilter BayesIt which is included in that distribution. > D> I can't get it to kick in. I'm not sure

  1   2   3   4   5   >