Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility

2003-08-01 Thread Patrick Spence
derek keller said:

> granted, i am probably missing the picture of what you need.  if you
> have an existing set of permissions and url rewrites on your apache
> installation in a big bunch of scattered htaccess files, it wouldn't be
> hard to translate those into aolserver's url registeration and
> permissions stuff.  make a tcl script that translates your htaccess
> files to tcl configs.  then post that script and the method you used so
> that someone else could do the same thing into a "how to migrate url
> rewrites and permissions from apache to aolserver without the headache"
> doc.

The rewrite stuff is only half of the problems I am dealing with.. I need
to put AS4.0 on a system and try out it's virtual hosting to see if it
eliminates the other problems I was having with the virtual hosting
package I was using...

> that way, you can solve the same problem as apache in the
> aolserver-approved way without having to duplicate apache code in a
> runtime environment.
>
> again, i may be missing something...  and none of this helps you to do
> it in the meantime anyway.

it is a cascading effect of wanting/needing to use certain tools that make
it easier to do things a certain way.. but make it a LOT easier to do
them...


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility

2003-08-01 Thread derek keller
i didn't mean any personal criticism.

what i do mean is that it's not easy to move between systems,
especially when you don't have the time or money to spend doing it.

in these situations, if docs existed it might make the transition
easier as there probably are elements of apache functionality that
already do exist in aolserver.

granted, i am probably missing the picture of what you need.  if you
have an existing set of permissions and url rewrites on your apache
installation in a big bunch of scattered htaccess files, it wouldn't be
hard to translate those into aolserver's url registeration and
permissions stuff.  make a tcl script that translates your htaccess
files to tcl configs.  then post that script and the method you used so
that someone else could do the same thing into a "how to migrate url
rewrites and permissions from apache to aolserver without the headache"
doc.

that way, you can solve the same problem as apache in the
aolserver-approved way without having to duplicate apache code in a
runtime environment.

again, i may be missing something...  and none of this helps you to do
it in the meantime anyway.

> This is an extract of what is in one of the .htaccess files... Mostly
> I
> think it is just the mod_rewrite and the access control stuff that is
> used
> for a lot of what is out there..
>
> 
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteBase /gallery/
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([0-9]+)$
> /gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&index=$2   [QSA]
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([A-Za-z_0-9\-]+)$
> /gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&id=$2  [QSA]
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/$  /gallery/$1 [R]
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)$
> /gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=$1
>  [QSA]
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility (was: Are the weekly chats officially dead?)

2003-08-01 Thread Jean-Fabrice RABAUTE
Using a TCL filter and then computing the url with some tcl regexp should do
the trick as well.
For some "Rewrite module" compatibility, you can write a tcl file that will
be read at AS startup, parse the apache file and create the filters.

Is that right, or am I missing something ?

Regards.

Jean-Fabrice RABAUTE
Core Services - Enjoy the future today
http://www.core-services.fr
Mob: +33 (0)6 13 82 67 67

-Message d'origine-
De : AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part
de tammy
Envoye : vendredi 1 aout 2003 20:51
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility (was: Are the weekly chats
officially dead?)


This seems really close to what .vuh files do in OpenACS... unless I'm
mistaken. Maybe a simple/quick fix is to write a quick script to just
parse all the .htaccess rewrite commands into simple .vuh files? Or is
there more to this I'm missing? Probably so huh?!

t

On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 11:01  AM, Patrick Spence wrote:

> Peter M. Jansson said:
> This is an extract of what is in one of the .htaccess files... Mostly I
> think it is just the mod_rewrite and the access control stuff that is
> used
> for a lot of what is out there..
>
> 
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteBase /gallery/
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([0-9]+)$
> /gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&index=$2   [QSA]
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([A-Za-z_0-9\-]+)$
> /gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&id=$2  [QSA]
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/$  /gallery/$1 [R]
> RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)$
> /gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=$1
>  [QSA]
> 
>

--

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject:
field of your email blank.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility (was: Are the weekly chats officially dead?)

2003-08-01 Thread tammy
This seems really close to what .vuh files do in OpenACS... unless I'm
mistaken. Maybe a simple/quick fix is to write a quick script to just
parse all the .htaccess rewrite commands into simple .vuh files? Or is
there more to this I'm missing? Probably so huh?!
   t

On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 11:01  AM, Patrick Spence wrote:

Peter M. Jansson said:
This is an extract of what is in one of the .htaccess files... Mostly I
think it is just the mod_rewrite and the access control stuff that is
used
for a lot of what is out there..

RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /gallery/
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([0-9]+)$
/gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&index=$2   [QSA]
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([A-Za-z_0-9\-]+)$
/gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&id=$2  [QSA]
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/$  /gallery/$1 [R]
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)$
/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=$1
 [QSA]

--

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Patrick Spence
Peter M. Jansson said:
>> Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
>> towards wider adoption of AS
>
> Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.

I don't see how it would speed the migration..  in fact it would have kept
me from moving my stuff away...by adding functionality, especially as an
add on module, it increases the likelyhood that someone will not migrate
away to -get- that functionality...  I love aolserver, I think it is a
very stable (for me), fast, powerful server.. I love the tcl being built
in.. I love how stuff works with it...  but it isn't a "fit" any more... I
have grown in my needs to other directions...  I still help maintain it at
work, most of our work servers run it..  but for some things it doesn't
work out.. which is depressing to be honest.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility (was: Are the weekly chats officially dead?)

2003-08-01 Thread Patrick Spence
Peter M. Jansson said:
>> the problem isn't
>> that the functionality is missing, its not knowning syntax.
>
> Patrick's case is that he wants to use a 3rd-party package that requires
> Apache semantics, and it's not a matter of his knowing the syntax,
> (which he probably does anyway), but it's that the 3rd-party packages do
> automated things with the .htaccess files and expect them to work.
>
> What would be helpful would be to collect a list of .htaccess directives
> that such packages use, so we could figure out how to support them.

This is an extract of what is in one of the .htaccess files... Mostly I
think it is just the mod_rewrite and the access control stuff that is used
for a lot of what is out there..


RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /gallery/
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([0-9]+)$
/gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&index=$2   [QSA]
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/([A-Za-z_0-9\-]+)$
/gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=$1&id=$2  [QSA]
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)/$  /gallery/$1 [R]
RewriteRule ^([^\.\?/]+)$   /gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=$1
 [QSA]



--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility (was: Are the weekly chats officially dead?)

2003-08-01 Thread Patrick Spence
derek keller said:
> apache compatibility in aolserver?  band-aid.

But if it keeps blood from spurting, a band-aid can indeed be a useful thing.

> make some docs for apache users:  "how to do apache-specific tasks in
> aolserver" with some examples.  the problem isn't that the
> functionality is missing, its not knowning syntax.

No, for me the problem is that there are some wheels that I do not want to
spend the months to re-invent.. that should not HAVE to be reinvented...

> if someone wants to go as far as to build modules that emulate apache
> from within aolserver, there should be a better reason than lack of
> time or motivation to learn aolserver on the part of the developer.

Such a nice way to be called lazy...  Ever hear of the concept of not
reinventing the wheel?  Why would I write my own html editor, my own
gallery software scripts, my own user signup scripts when they already
exist and can be leveraged?  To replicate the software that I am using
would take more than a couple years since I do not have the
manpower/resources/money/etc to do so.. when a compatibility layer would
be easier to write, help MORE people, and help promote the server
software.

But I guess I am just a lazy, unmotivated developer.. :)


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility (was: Are the weekly chats officially dead?)

2003-08-01 Thread Peter M. Jansson
> the problem isn't
> that the functionality is missing, its not knowning syntax.

Patrick's case is that he wants to use a 3rd-party package that requires
Apache semantics, and it's not a matter of his knowing the syntax,
(which he probably does anyway), but it's that the 3rd-party packages do
automated things with the .htaccess files and expect them to work.

What would be helpful would be to collect a list of .htaccess directives
that such packages use, so we could figure out how to support them.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] IM'ed URLs not being logged

2003-08-01 Thread Rob Mayoff
+-- On Aug 1, Daniel P. Stasinski said:
| In the tcpdump thats I posted in the last hour, the first hit
| returned the image (and response 200) but it was never logged .
| The second hit was when I clicked the refresh button and it
| returned 304 and WAS logged.  It works the same way with text
| files.

Sounds like you need to put AOLserver under the debugger and step
through a request.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility, are docs the answer?

2003-08-01 Thread Dave Bauer
I really like this idea. Compiling a how to do this apache thing using
AOLserver tools would go a long way. AOLserver users would see what cool
things Apache can do, and we can learn areas where AOLserver can't do
what Apache can do. From there we would need to decide if we want
AOLserver to do those things at all.

I really doubt an apache compatability layer would be extremely complex
due to the complete different way of handling requests,

Dave

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:02:43AM -0700, derek keller wrote:
> apache compatibility in aolserver?  band-aid.
>
> keep the products separate but functionally similar, which they are.
>
> make some docs for apache users:  "how to do apache-specific tasks in
> aolserver" with some examples.  the problem isn't that the
> functionality is missing, its not knowning syntax.
>
> if someone wants to go as far as to build modules that emulate apache
> from within aolserver, there should be a better reason than lack of
> time or motivation to learn aolserver on the part of the developer.
>
> again...  to me, as a random lowly aolserver user, this seems to be a
> matter of comprehensive documentation rather than development needs.
>
> --- "Peter M. Jansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
> > > towards wider adoption of AS
> >
> > Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.
>
>
> =
> "Are you going to spend the rest of your life selling sugar water, or are you going 
> to come with me and change the world?"
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
>
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
>
> To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with 
> the
> body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field 
> of your email blank.
>

--
Dave Bauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thedesignexperience.org


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] apache compatibility (was: Are the weekly chats officially dead?)

2003-08-01 Thread derek keller
apache compatibility in aolserver?  band-aid.

keep the products separate but functionally similar, which they are.

make some docs for apache users:  "how to do apache-specific tasks in
aolserver" with some examples.  the problem isn't that the
functionality is missing, its not knowning syntax.

if someone wants to go as far as to build modules that emulate apache
from within aolserver, there should be a better reason than lack of
time or motivation to learn aolserver on the part of the developer.

again...  to me, as a random lowly aolserver user, this seems to be a
matter of comprehensive documentation rather than development needs.

--- "Peter M. Jansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
> > towards wider adoption of AS
>
> Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.


=
"Are you going to spend the rest of your life selling sugar water, or are you going to 
come with me and change the world?"

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Roberto Mello
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
>
> Funny that your putting this out :)
>
> Some years (1, 2?) ago, I was tinkering with the idea of how
> to bring DAV (faster) to AS and one of the considerations
> was to snap-in Apache-layer and use mod_dav as-is.

Musea Technologies has been working on a port of mod_dav to AOLserver.

> The fact that Apache is now also going MT would mean
> that many mod_x modules will have to be made MT-safe
> which could simplify the work.
> I'm afraid that we'd need to make some internal changes
> in AS C-API, but it would be worth the effort.

It would be a good selling point, no doubt.

-Roberto

--
+|Roberto Mello   -http://www.brasileiro.net/  |--+
+   Computer Science Graduate Student, Utah State University  +
+   USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club - http://fslc.usu.edu/ +
"Please return stewardess to original upright position"


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] IM'ed URLs not being logged

2003-08-01 Thread Daniel P. Stasinski
 > I don't see anything weird about the HTTP request.  Try
 > creating a dummy file, like /foo.txt, containing just a
 > few ASCII characters, and see if you can reproduce the
 > problem with that URL.  If so, post a tcpdump of that.

In the tcpdump thats I posted in the last hour, the first hit
returned the image (and response 200) but it was never logged .
The second hit was when I clicked the refresh button and it
returned 304 and WAS logged.  It works the same way with text
files.

This is the only log entry:

66.62.93.30 - - [01/Aug/2003:08:51:08 -0700] "GET /desertdawn.jpg
HTTP/1.1" 304 0 "" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows
98; Q312461)"

Also, no log entry of you downloading the tcpdump file (just the
incorrect url you tried)

24.153.164.125 - - [01/Aug/2003:09:19:53 -0700] "GET /tcpdump.ou
HTTP/1.0" 404 531 "" "Wget/1.8.2"

url: http://www.avenues.org/desertdawn.jpg
tcpdump: http://www.avenues.org/tcpdump.out
nsd.tcl: http://www.avenues.org/nsd.tcl (snippet of nslog
section)

Daniel P. Stasinski
Software Engineer
Mayor Pharmaceutical Laboratories
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] IM'ed URLs not being logged

2003-08-01 Thread Rob Mayoff
I don't see anything weird about the HTTP request.  Try creating a dummy
file, like /foo.txt, containing just a few ASCII characters, and see if
you can reproduce the problem with that URL.  If so, post a tcpdump of
that.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Peter M. Jansson
> Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way
> towards wider adoption of AS

Unless it would speed migration away from AOLserver.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] IM'ed URLs not being logged

2003-08-01 Thread Daniel P. Stasinski
 > Is this file supposed to be 269 bytes?  It looks like it
 > just contains a HTTP request.  Where's the tcpdump data
 > itself?

Sorry, try again.

Daniel P. Stasinski
Software Engineer
Mayor Pharmaceutical Laboratories
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] forcing headers on aolserver 3.4.2

2003-08-01 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:05:27AM -0400, Jason Cook wrote:

> [01/Aug/2003:10:37:47][1169.1][-main-] Error:
> no current connection
> while executing
> "ns_conn outputheaders"
> invoked from within
> "ns_set put [ns_conn outputheaders] "AUTHOR" "Internet Services"
> "
> (file
> "/servers/test/modules/tcl/test.tcl" line 1)
>
> host# cat test.tcl
> ns_set put [ns_conn outputheaders] "AUTHOR" "Internet Services"

You've put your "test.tcl" file in the wrong place.  Above, it looks
like it's in a tcl library directory, which means it is getting
sourced at AOLserver startup time by thread "main", which is NOT a
connection thread, thus the "no current connection" error.  You need
to put test.tcl in your www/ directory instead, then hit
"http://mysite.com/test.tc.l"; to test it.

--
Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.piskorski.com


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] forcing headers on aolserver 3.4.2

2003-08-01 Thread Jason Cook
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Jason Cook wrote:

> I'm having a problem trying to force a header on aolserver 3.4.2.
>
> I found some docs on http://webmaster.info.aol.com/aolserver.html, but
> when I try even that specific example, it returns the following error:
>
> [01/Aug/2003:10:37:47][1169.1][-main-] Error:
> no current connection
> while executing
> "ns_conn outputheaders"
> invoked from within
> "ns_set put [ns_conn outputheaders] "AUTHOR" "Internet Services"
> "
> (file
> "/servers/test/modules/tcl/test.tcl" line 1)
>
> host# cat test.tcl
> ns_set put [ns_conn outputheaders] "AUTHOR" "Internet Services"
> host#
>
> Can anyone let me know what I may be doing wrong?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>


n/m .. tcl module programming 101, I fixed it :)


thanks!
-j


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Tim Moss
not that I remember - but most of it (if not all of it is Tcl based so it'd
fairly easy to add that)

> -Original Message-
> From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Patrick Spence
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
>
>
> Does it work using instructions in a .htaccess file?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
>
>
> > >
> > > > 2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
> > >
> > > I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
> > > then run Apache.  :-)
> > >
> >
> > And the nsrewrite module worked last time I tried!
> >
> >
> > Tim Moss
> > SiteSpeed Ltd
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Website:http://www.site-speed.co.uk
> >
> > This email contains information from SiteSpeed Ltd, which may be
> privileged
> > or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be
> aware that any
> > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information
> > is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error,
> please
> > notify us immediately.
> >
> >
> > --
> > AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
> >
> > To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
> > body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the
> Subject: field of your email blank.
>
>
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
>
> To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
> body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave
> the Subject: field of your email blank.
>


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


[AOLSERVER] forcing headers on aolserver 3.4.2

2003-08-01 Thread Jason Cook
I'm having a problem trying to force a header on aolserver 3.4.2.

I found some docs on http://webmaster.info.aol.com/aolserver.html, but
when I try even that specific example, it returns the following error:

[01/Aug/2003:10:37:47][1169.1][-main-] Error:
no current connection
while executing
"ns_conn outputheaders"
invoked from within
"ns_set put [ns_conn outputheaders] "AUTHOR" "Internet Services"
"
(file
"/servers/test/modules/tcl/test.tcl" line 1)

host# cat test.tcl
ns_set put [ns_conn outputheaders] "AUTHOR" "Internet Services"
host#

Can anyone let me know what I may be doing wrong?

Thanks for your help.

-j


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Patrick Spence
I am familiar with the concept, I use one Daniel Stasinski wrote.. though
when I used AS for my personal site I used the functionality of AS to do the
same... but for this particular use (the gallery software), and for similar
functionality in other third party software I really need something that is
compatible with how Apache does it...rather than having to manually go in
and create the URLs each time something changes, or write a filter that
processes it all first using Regexp (not my strong suit of programming to
say the least)...

Compatibility with common apache features would go a long way towards wider
adoption of AS

- Original Message -
From: "Mat Kovach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?


> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:01PM -0700, Patrick Spence wrote:
> } the main one I am concerned with is a script for subscriptions that
> } handles via .htaccess entries.. the next most used set is the rewrite
> } stuff done by Gallery (gallery.menalto.com) which is primarily just
> } rewrite commands to make friendly URLs out of url encoded ones..
>
> I have a tinyurl.com clone written using AOLserver and Postgres
> (shouldn't be very hard to port to use about any DB) which does
> make "nice" urls (http://myturl.com/software/dist/).  I'm working
> it into OpenACS ( to provide nice 'Email This Link' for pages).
>
> The basic functionlity is fairly generic and should be easy to move
> into other projects.
>
> Mat Kovach
>
>
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
>
> To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
> body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the
Subject: field of your email blank.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Patrick Spence
Does it work using instructions in a .htaccess file?

- Original Message -
From: "Tim Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?


> >
> > > 2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
> >
> > I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
> > then run Apache.  :-)
> >
>
> And the nsrewrite module worked last time I tried!
>
>
> Tim Moss
> SiteSpeed Ltd
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Website:http://www.site-speed.co.uk
>
> This email contains information from SiteSpeed Ltd, which may be
privileged
> or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information
> is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error,
please
> notify us immediately.
>
>
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
>
> To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
> body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the
Subject: field of your email blank.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] IM'ed URLs not being logged

2003-08-01 Thread Dossy
On 2003.08.01, Daniel P. Stasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Capture the entire HTTP request that isn't logged,
>  > using "tcpdump -s 2000 -w tcpdump.out port 80" or
>  > similar. Give us a URL to download tcpdump.out
>  > so we can examine it.
>
> http://www.avenues.org/tcpdump.out

Is this file supposed to be 269 bytes?  It looks like it just contains a
HTTP request.  Where's the tcpdump data itself?

-- Dossy

--
Dossy Shiobara   mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/
  "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Daniel P. Stasinski
 > I have a tinyurl.com clone written using AOLserver and
 > Postgres (shouldn't be very hard to port to use about
 > any DB) which does make "nice" urls

Spiffy, I did the same at http://oneweek.org a while back.  Never
advertised it though, just gave it friends and people here on the
list.

Daniel P. Stasinski
Software Engineer
Mayor Pharmaceutical Laboratories
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Mat Kovach
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:01PM -0700, Patrick Spence wrote:
} the main one I am concerned with is a script for subscriptions that
} handles via .htaccess entries.. the next most used set is the rewrite
} stuff done by Gallery (gallery.menalto.com) which is primarily just
} rewrite commands to make friendly URLs out of url encoded ones..

I have a tinyurl.com clone written using AOLserver and Postgres
(shouldn't be very hard to port to use about any DB) which does
make "nice" urls (http://myturl.com/software/dist/).  I'm working
it into OpenACS ( to provide nice 'Email This Link' for pages).

The basic functionlity is fairly generic and should be easy to move
into other projects.

Mat Kovach


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Scott Goodwin
Yes, I am able and willing to do this. I was also taking over as
moderator for the core team meetings starting next week, but it appears
you and/or Mark now have the time to devote to that role and you have a
set of agenda items so I'll step back from that role.
/s.

On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 09:36 AM, Nathan Folkman wrote:

we need an owners for the webdav module and the rest of the modules as
well. scott, are you still able and willing to coordinate this effort?
it would be nice to have one point person for each module who would
coordinate feature requests, track bugs, review code, ect.
Dossy wrote:

Yes, yes yes!  I was thinking of using tDOM as well, that's awesome.
That, and David Walker (grax) has also done some work on the nsdav
code
as well.  Perhaps at some point I'll merge everything together, and
we'll have something decent.
Hey, someone else also announced a WebDAV module on the AOLserver
mailing list -- I wonder how far they got with theirs ...


--
Nathan Folkman
Technical Mgr., AOLserver/NPE/NES
Web Services and Publishing
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the
Subject: field of your email blank.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] IM'ed URLs not being logged

2003-08-01 Thread Daniel P. Stasinski
 > Capture the entire HTTP request that isn't logged,
 > using "tcpdump -s 2000 -w tcpdump.out port 80" or
 > similar. Give us a URL to download tcpdump.out
 > so we can examine it.

http://www.avenues.org/tcpdump.out

I typed in a url directly into IE and simply pressed ENTER.
Nothing in the access log and I had not previously viewed this
image.  When doing a forced refresh, the entry appeared.

I've had other users who there is no way possible they had viewed
an image prior to the moment, when the go to a URL it does not
appear in the access log.

I am in AIM as DanielStasinski if you want to do a live test.

Daniel P. Stasinski
Software Engineer
Mayor Pharmaceutical Laboratories
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Nathan Folkman
we need an owners for the webdav module and the rest of the modules as
well. scott, are you still able and willing to coordinate this effort?
it would be nice to have one point person for each module who would
coordinate feature requests, track bugs, review code, ect.

Dossy wrote:

 >
 > Yes, yes yes!  I was thinking of using tDOM as well, that's awesome.
 > That, and David Walker (grax) has also done some work on the nsdav code
 > as well.  Perhaps at some point I'll merge everything together, and
 > we'll have something decent.
 >
 > Hey, someone else also announced a WebDAV module on the AOLserver
 > mailing list -- I wonder how far they got with theirs ...


--
Nathan Folkman
Technical Mgr., AOLserver/NPE/NES
Web Services and Publishing


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Jim Davidson



In a message dated 8/1/2003 1:55:22 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roberto Mello wrote:> - Readline support for nscp.That would be quite hard, since readline also has to guess the terminaltype and so on.Wouldn't it be much better to write nscp client in Tcl+readline or evenTk. I have a pretty generic ztelnet module, which I use to connect.It's pretty old and nasty, but proved that writing a quite simplesocket/ssl connecting tool is pretty easy. Then adding command history... and things would start working pretty well.Tk could also allow editing multiline commands - using [info complete].I often do nested foreach loops so checking completeness helps me a lot.
 
 
Yes -- direct readline would be too hard.  In fact, it was in there once long ago and was very messy and hard to maintain.
 
A separate app, perhaps a Tk thingy, which communicates with nscp makes a lot of sense.
 
-Jim
 


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.



Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Dossy
On 2003.08.01, Nathan Folkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 8/1/03 6:08:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I was tinkering with the idea of how
> > to bring DAV (faster) to AS
> >
> which reminds me... ;-) jay and i took dossy's orginal nsdav code and
> modified it to use tdom for xml creation and parsing. we'll be
> releasing it as soon as we find a few minutes to check the code in. it
> doesn't have everything, locking for example, but is very simple and
> fast.

Yes, yes yes!  I was thinking of using tDOM as well, that's awesome.
That, and David Walker (grax) has also done some work on the nsdav code
as well.  Perhaps at some point I'll merge everything together, and
we'll have something decent.

Hey, someone else also announced a WebDAV module on the AOLserver
mailing list -- I wonder how far they got with theirs ...

-- Dossy

--
Dossy Shiobara   mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/
  "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Friday 01 August 2003 13:19, you wrote:
> In a message dated 8/1/03 6:08:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I was tinkering with the idea of how
> > to bring DAV (faster) to AS
>
> which reminds me... ;-) jay and i took dossy's orginal nsdav code and
> modified it to use tdom for xml creation and parsing. we'll be releasing it
> as soon as we find a few minutes to check the code in. it doesn't have
> everything, locking for example, but is very simple and fast.

Heh,  this news is good news :) Many roads lead to Rome!
Zoran


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Nathan Folkman

In a message dated 8/1/03 6:08:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


I was tinkering with the idea of how
to bring DAV (faster) to AS

which reminds me... ;-) jay and i took dossy's orginal nsdav code and modified it to use tdom for xml creation and parsing. we'll be releasing it as soon as we find a few minutes to check the code in. it doesn't have everything, locking for example, but is very simple and fast.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.



Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Friday 01 August 2003 07:19, you wrote:
> Nathan Folkman said:
> > perhaps its time to look at what it would take to provide a simple apache
> > compatibility layer that would allow apache modules to be used
> > (unmodified)
> > within aolserver. i've not had time to fully investigate, so this could
> > be the
> > wrong approach, and maybe wouldn't even be possible or feasible.
>

Funny that your putting this out :)

Some years (1, 2?) ago, I was tinkering with the idea of how
to bring DAV (faster) to AS and one of the considerations
was to snap-in Apache-layer and use mod_dav as-is.
The fact that Apache is now also going MT would mean
that many mod_x modules will have to be made MT-safe
which could simplify the work.
I'm afraid that we'd need to make some internal changes
in AS C-API, but it would be worth the effort.

Cheers
Zoran


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.


Re: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?

2003-08-01 Thread Tim Moss
>
> > 2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
>
> I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
> then run Apache.  :-)
>

And the nsrewrite module worked last time I tried!


Tim Moss
SiteSpeed Ltd
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:http://www.site-speed.co.uk

This email contains information from SiteSpeed Ltd, which may be privileged
or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please
notify us immediately.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.