Re: [Asterisk-Users] An anniversary and a lament for FXOs

2004-11-05 Thread Ryan Thrash
On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
As for the Interrupt issues and PCI issues, Digium isn't really
responsible for broken PCI busses. You need to be complaining to the
manufacturer of the $35 motherboard for that. I do agree, however, 
that a
community developed Hardware Compatibility List would be a good thing.
What about an expensive Supermicro dual Xeon PCI-X system with 1GB ECC 
RAM and a hardware RAID controller (it was SATA, though)?

Echo was noticeable even on SIP-to-SIP calls internally with the 
system, with all sorts fo tweaks to tx/rx gain. Supermicro, too. Oh 
yeah, and we were on a T1 PRI, which is not *supposed* to have echo. 
Unfortunately when I left the company, they finally replaced the phone 
system to get rid of the echo and customer complaints.

A motherboard list would be REALLY great, indeed.
Best regards,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Echo SIP-T100P-PRI

2004-08-27 Thread Ryan Thrash
On Aug 19, 2004, at 5:33 PM, Rich Adamson wrote:
Mike Schwartz wrote:
I'm experience echo on outgoing calls:
 Snom 200  Asterisk  T100P  PRI  called party
I am getting echo on the Snom 200 phone. The called party does not
hear the echo.
snip
When that discussion was going on a few weeks ago, the echo issue
seemed to have been narrowed down to two possibiliites; 1) interrupt
service latency, or, 2) PCI bus latencies. Processor speed does not
seem to be a driving factor as noted above.
I've not heard anyone (as yet) come up with the tools or process for
actually identifying the root-cause. Would be nice for those of us
that aren't programmers.
Some more echo food for thought. It's most noticeable on very short, 
hard sounds (like CH), so as someone mentioned, reverb might be the 
right description. I've spent the better part of several hours 
experimenting with various combinations of adjusting taps from 32 to 
256, echowhenbridged on and off and txgain adjustments. I just flat 
can't get it to go away...

I'm also one of those luck ones with a Supermicro box (dual Xeons and 
plenty of RAM). How in the heck would/should I go about figuring out 
what the interrupt service latency or the PCI bus latency is doing. Any 
other thoughts on the front? I'm using GS phones so maybe their echo 
can algorithms are to blame... hmmm...

Here's to hoping,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?

2004-07-24 Thread Ryan Thrash
On Jul 23, 2004, at 1:22 AM, Andres Junge wrote:
What is a RMA?
Return Merchandise/Materials(something like that) Authorization.
It's  a number from the mfr, that when the product arrives with it on 
the box, tells them to expect some dead hardware.

rt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?

2004-07-22 Thread Ryan Thrash
I just received in the mail my TDM04B card and put it in the computer, 
now the computer won't even show the video card bios or the post 
screen. From the digium website I could not find any specific 
requirements for the pci card, like 32 or 64 bit slot. The motherboard 
for the computer I put it in is an Asus A7V333 with PCI 2.2 compliant 
slots. I am thinking that maybe I just got a dud card. Is there 
anything I need to change or I can test to see why it is not letting 
the computer boot?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
This may be a stupid question, but did you plug in the power on the 
molex connector on the card?

-- Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo on a PRI

2004-07-20 Thread Ryan Thrash

I recently set up the following in a production system (2.8 GHZ Xeon, 
1 Gig
Memory, Dell 2650).

Telco - PRI - Asterisk - T1 - PBX
I am getting an occasional noticeable echo on some of the phone lines
(random inbound and outbound).  Everyone I ask keeps telling me that I 
can't
be having echo since I am on a PRI, which is a digital circuit.  Ok, 
so I
can't be having echo, but I am!  Does anyone have any ideas of what 
might be
causing the echo in this situation?
Welcome to the club. ;) You have the same exact problem I've got. The 
only difference is I'm using dual Xeon 2.4s and a Supermicro 
SuperWorkstation 7033A-T (X5DAL-TG2 motherboard 
http://supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/E7505/X5DAL-TG2.cfm ). 
Echo training=800 on a recent CVS helped, but did not totally resolve 
the issue.

Best regards,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo on a PRI

2004-07-20 Thread Ryan Thrash
I recently set up the following in a production system (2.8 GHZ Xeon, 
1 Gig
Memory, Dell 2650).

Telco - PRI - Asterisk - T1 - PBX
I am getting an occasional noticeable echo on some of the phone lines
(random inbound and outbound).  Everyone I ask keeps telling me that I 
can't
be having echo since I am on a PRI, which is a digital circuit.  Ok, 
so I
can't be having echo, but I am!  Does anyone have any ideas of what 
might be
causing the echo in this situation?
Oops. I need to correct my last post: I don't have the PBX in the mix. 
My config is dual Xeon 2.4s, 1GB RAM, HW SATA RAID, SuperMicro 
X5DAL-TG2 motherboard connected to:

Telco - PRI (T100P) - Asterisk - SIP Phones (Budgetones 102s/Snom 200)
The premise is still the same though: echo present despite our digital  
PRI that *should* make this impossible. It's usually only echo on our 
side when calling out as has been discussed here previously ad nauseum 
with no one being able to really figure out its source. I wish I knew 
where to really start poking around to try to help get to the bottom of 
this.

Best regards,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] strange echo problem

2004-07-10 Thread Ryan Thrash

We have a strange echo problem.  Maybe echo isn't the correct term. 
When we make a call f/ a SIP phone (we have several 7960's, some 
3coms, and I've even tried a softphone, all on the same 100BaseTX 
network) to the pstn, if the person I'm calling has a PRI or 
channelized T1 f/ Bell, then the sound is perfect, couldn't be better. 
If I make a call to a person with a plain POTS line, I hear everything 
I say in my earpiece about 1/4 second after I say it.  It's very 
irritating.We have tried 2 different * boxes, using 2 different 
T1/PRI cards f/ digium.

After calling digium about it, we set echotraining to 800 in 
zapata.conf.  It got better but was still there, if I turn the volume 
down on the phone, it does almost go away, but it's still 
detectable. No where near as clear as calling a person that has a PRI 
or channelized T1 for phone service.  The POTS persons we call that we 
do have the echo issue with all say the call sounds perfecto to them.

Am I missing something obvious?
We experience the exact same issue, and like Rich said in a subsequent 
post, I'm thinking there's a gremlin hiding somewhere in the * code. 
Everyone said you shouldn't have to even use echo canceling on a T1 
PRI, but we do or we get serious complaints, instead of consistent 
minor complaints. FWIW, it still was around in the 6/29 CVS and we just 
updated again last night.

For us the echo is a slight faint echo now that we implemented the 
echotraining=800, but it's still there. We haven't touched TX/RX gain.

We can also give anyone access and a SIP account if that would be 
helpful.

Best regards,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BudgeTone hold?

2004-06-12 Thread Ryan Thrash
On Jun 11, 2004, at 8:04 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I can't seem to make the Hold button function on the GS 
BudgeTone-100. I'm trying a procedure like this:

1) On a call
2) Press Hold button
3) Hang up phone
You can sorta do this by pressing the speakerphone button prior to 
placing the receiver on the hookswitch. When you pick up the receiver, 
just press the hold button again to resume your call. I too found out 
the hard way.

HTH,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] voicemail notify to external number

2004-05-26 Thread Ryan Thrash
I'm not aware of any way of doing this currently, but this has made it 
to the planning board of Voicemail3... the timing for which is 
unfortunately undetermined at the moment.

HTH,
Ryan Thrash
On May 25, 2004, at 11:14 AM, Bruce Komito wrote:
When a user has voicemail, I would like * to call the user at a
pre-determined number (internal or external) and play a message that 
the
user has voicemail, and then give the user the option to login to
voicemail and pick up the message.  I know about the externnotify 
feature,
but I don't see a way to use it to accomplish what I want.  I've 
checked
the archives, etc., but I don't see that anyone has ever done this.

If you have, please respond.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] grandstream transfer, park and conference

2004-05-03 Thread Ryan Thrash
Your English is just fine. :)

What's your extensions.conf and sip.conf for your Grandstreams look 
like?

What are your options in the GS config webpage for:
1) NAT transversal (and are you behind a NAT firewall)
2) Send Flash event 
3) Send DTMF
Best regards,
Ryan Thrash
On May 3, 2004, at 8:51 PM, Ing Isianto Istiadi wrote:

I have 2 grandstream budgetone 100 series. I can call allright, but I 
cant do call transfer, park and call conference. (all features 
works with tdm devices) the

 The budgetone using 1.0.4.55.
	1.  	If I called using sip to sip (from phone a to phone b), I cant 
transfer it at all or parking it or dial to conference.
	2.  	if  the call come from pstn, then the first phone who answer can 
park the call, and be picked up by the second phone, but after that 
the parking stuff wont work anymore. (it seems asterisk doesnt 
recognize #)
	3.  	Ive already set dtmf to info
	4.  	It seems on case 2 above, that even the # works for the first 
call from pstn to sip, but asterisk only recognize at most 2 digit 
after # being pressed (for example, I have ext 700 to park the call, 
when I look at * console, it only receive 70)

Thanks and forgive my English
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo Cancellation Feature

2004-04-22 Thread Ryan Thrash
I would also offer feedback that we too have random calls with echo on 
our end, that can't be traced to a reproducible event. It's very odd 
and can be frustrating, as it's a big distraction for those that don't 
know better. Like a bad cell phone connection when you hear yourself 
talk. For us, this happens in a pure SIP environment on a network 
switch dedicated to Asterisk, a T1 PRI and 18 SIP handsets.

HTH,
Ryan
On Apr 22, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Brent Franks wrote:

I do feel the echo cancellation does need some work.

Currently, other than listening to users, there is no way to benchmark 
or
trouble shoot echo problems.

We find that 2 to 3 out of every 20 calls will experience echo.  While
echo is a problem that naturally occurs from SIP - PSTN and vice 
versa, I
am still baffled by the fact that the cancellation works randomly.

snip
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Extension buttons

2004-04-22 Thread Ryan Thrash
I can verify that snom 200s will support up to 5 line appearances and 
you can happily change back-and-forth between them.

Now actually successfully transferring those calls when more than one 
call is in those line appearances is another thing entirely, when using 
the soft keys or the transfer button. Quite frustrating, actually. Like 
building a sure to win race car and forgetting to put the lug nuts on 
the wheels...

HTH,
Ryan
On Apr 22, 2004, at 11:22 PM, John Todd wrote:

At 7:33 PM -0500 on 4/22/04, David Krider wrote:
I've downloaded the entire archive of articles and searched through 
them
for an answer on this, but I haven't come across one yet. I'm looking 
to
replace a small phone system in my church with Asterisk, and I'm stuck
looking for phones. I know that the staff are going to want a button 
for
their commonly-called extensions, but I'm having trouble finding 
phones
that have, say, 10 programmable buttons for this sort of thing. I'm 
left
to conclude that most phones can do this sort of thing by clicking
through some combination of buttons. However, it would seem that the
average price for a nice SIP phone eliminates the possibility of just
ordering some to find out. Can someone please tell me how this is
handled in general? For instance, the Polycom 600 doesn't seem to have
ANY buttons that can be programmed for particular extensions, but I 
have
to think it can do so fairly easily. Perhaps these phones are being 
sold
primarily for very large business (like my Fortune 500 company) where
you use a directory for numbers, and have only a few buttons for
programming. I guess the follow-on question is just to ask: what phone
would be good for a 12-18 extension office, where people want to 
quickly
ring up others because of long walks between the offices?

Thanks,
dk
--
David Dunkirk Krider, http://www.davidkrider.com
Acts 17:28, For in Him we live, and move, and have our being.
Open Source: Will you use the power for good... or for AWESOME?


(I'll assume you're asking for line appareances, and not 
single-button push-dial.  If you're looking for single-button 
push-dial, something even as simple as the 7960 can work for you)

What you're looking for are line appearances, and no, they're not 
common with SIP phones since the methods to support the presence 
activity on those buttons is a bit of a pain, and still fairly fresh 
off the presses (if off the presses at all.)

The phones that are rumored to support these new methods (I haven't 
any of them in my hands at the moment, so I can't say if they do or 
don't):
  - SNOM 220
  - Sayson 480i
  - Inter-Tel 8620 and 8662
  - not sure about the Polycomm 500 and 600
  - others?

Now, even though some of these phones might actually be shipping, that 
doesn't mean that Asterisk supports line appearances.   There is no 
SUBSCRIBE or NOTIFY method that currently exists for SIP phones with 
Asterisk to handle line appearances (though that might not be too 
difficult.)

JT
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] grandstream and stun

2004-04-18 Thread Ryan Thrash
FYI, with 1.0.4.55 and NAT set to off (but with the * config set as 
nat=yes), I'm able to bypass stun servers completely with a GS phone as 
well.

HTH,
Ryan
On Apr 18, 2004, at 5:08 AM, Brancaleoni Matteo wrote:

you don't need stun to make GS work under NAT
with *
Just set NAT=yes into the GS, and leave the stun server addr
entry empty.
And set nat=yes into the sip.conf entry.
Il dom, 2004-04-18 alle 11:26, Richard ha scritto:
Hi,

I noticed some issues with how grandstream handles
stun test. GS is running version 1.0.4.50. First I
reset the NAT router. Then reboot GS, get results of
restricted cone. Immediately reboot GS, get results
full cone. I tried quite a few public and commercial
stun servers. Also tried different model/version of
linksys routers. I always got the same issue. Winstun
on the PC doesn't have this issue. Some ngrep on the
stund 0.91 on Fedora linux revealed winstun had about
20 UDP packets back and forward. However GS only had
less than 10.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 Admin Password

2004-04-17 Thread Ryan Thrash
I *think* the default password is  (all zeros).

HTH,
Ryan
On Apr 17, 2004, at 10:38 AM, WipeOut wrote:

Pertti Pikkarainen wrote:

There is a way.
Right after reboot, and when you see the first text,  hit any key
and you will get a 'boot menu'.  Give the phone an ip-address and 
define a tftp-server.
The bootfile must be named snom200.bin ( e.g rename the latest snom 
sw ).

After you have succesfully got it to download the code,
the phone is also resetted to factory defaults.   You will see 
erasing flash etc.
If the download fails the phone will use the sw it has got and there 
will be no change
in the config either.

--Pertti

Hmm.. That would mean I would have to setup a TFTP server which is a 
hassle.. :) I was hoping that there was some key combination or a 
reset busson hidden somewhere..

snip
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Strange T1 Problem - FIXED plus new question

2004-04-16 Thread Ryan Thrash
First, check zapata.conf to see what is in there. Next, I've not heard 
of any luck with the name portion on T1s, but the number can be changed 
for us.

HTH,
Ryan
On Apr 16, 2004, at 10:30 AM, Mike Machado wrote:



You can usually get CLI on an EM robbed bit T1 by configuring it 
right.
Instead of just sending you the DNIS as a string of DTMF they usually
send *cli*dnis*. The DNIS and CLI may be swapped, and there may be
less than 3 *s in the string - wonderful consistency, eh? :-\
I am getting CallerID and DNIS on the inbound calls. What I really need
is to be able to set callerID on outbound calls. I am trying to set the
callerid using SetCIDNum just before using Dial on a zap channel, but 
it
looks like the switch guys have it set to always stamp the same 
callerID
on the my outbound calls no matter what I put in SetCIDNum or what
channel on the T1 I use. Is this a misconfiguration of the switch or a
limitation of the signaling protocol? If its the switch, can you give 
me
any pointers as to what I could ask them to look for, or if its the
protocol, do you know any other signaling protocol that lets me set
outbound callerID (besides PRI)?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATA 188 and fax

2004-04-15 Thread Ryan Thrash
On a Grandstream ATA and CVS HEAD from last night, and with echo off, 
I'm able to receive faxes. With echo on, no go.

HTH,
Ryan
On Apr 15, 2004, at 1:58 PM, Ariel Batista wrote:

Osvaldo Mundim wrote:
Hi,

Does anybody have ATA 188 working with any kind of fax machine? I've
tried many different configuration following the Cisco Online Manual
and I couldn't get this working with Asterisk.
I don't know what the difference is between the 186 and 188 other then 
the
extra nic port.  But we gave up on the 186 for doing any fax or data 
calls.
We switched to Sipura-2000 and using Ulaw faxing works.  Data calls 
well we
can get them working but only at 28,800 bps.

Good luck


I were trying do change the ATA Connect Mode and Audio Mode reading
the (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps514/
products_configuration_example09186a00800d698e.shtml) and allowing all
codecs on Asterisk and did not work either.
best regards
Oz
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 update - timestamp issue within iax pkts

2004-04-14 Thread Ryan Thrash
Would this fix also help random quality issues both on a LAN and also 
with a remote SIP based installation running CVS from 3/22.

We're having too frequent complaints in conjunction with Grandstream 
phones and very stuttery/choppy sound, usually outgoing to land lines, 
to the point of being unintelligible, but also on internal voicemail 
messages. Our voice LAN is a dedicated 100Mb ethernet switch for voice, 
and no general network traffic.

Thanks,
Ryan
On Apr 14, 2004, at 4:26 PM, Rich Adamson wrote:

For those that might be using Cisco 7940/7960 sip phones and placing
calls across an iax2 link, we think the voice quality problem has been
identified and corrected. The dev cvs should be updated as of about
3:30pm CDT today (April 14).
snip

If you use iax2 and Cisco sip phones, please update from cvs and give 
it a
try. I am not aware of any other sip phone vendor that is sensitive to
these timestamps, but there could be others.

Keep in mind the fix addresses iax2 timestamp problems at the distant
end, therefore iax updates will be required at both ends of an iax 
link
to address the end-to-end audio quality problem.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] small question 3 way calling

2004-04-13 Thread Ryan Thrash
The GS phones do not currently support conferencing on the phones using 
the conference button. You'll probably have better luck setting up a 
conference room, help with which I'm absolutely worthless... The 
on-phone conferencing should be addressed in a future GS firmware 
revision.

HTH,
Ryan
On Apr 13, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Anthony Law wrote:

According to voip-info.org,

3 way calling: Normally implemented by the phone

I am using a Grand Stream 100 and not able to make this work. I can 
dial out
to 1st number then with the flash button I am able to dial out again 
to a
2nd number. I am not able to bind them together into 1 conversation. Is
there something I have to set on the phone config or in sip.conf??

Anyone knows?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TAPI driver

2004-04-13 Thread Ryan Thrash
Could you post a link?

Thanks!

On Apr 13, 2004, at 2:59 PM, Nick Knight wrote:

Just a quick note, I have been putting together a TAPI driver for
Asterisk, this enables the user to perform things like click to dial
from any TAPI enabled app (such as outlook or ACT etc). At the moment 
it
is very basic and can only perform click to dial but further
functionality will be coming. It uses the Asterisk manager to place
calls.

Please feel free to use it - not much documentation as yet but will be
coming, can be found on sourceforge project name asttapi.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] application Directory (Modified by Ryan Thrash)

2004-04-09 Thread Ryan Thrash
Sent 12 hours ago and it never showed up (slightly reworded here). 
Sorry if this is a duplicate:

-

Scenario: a person selects an Auto Attendant option that fires off the 
Directory application (CVS circa 3/22). Three questions:

1) How do they escape if they didn't mean to go there in the first 
place (without having to hang up...)? Config of entry into the vertex 
directory below:

exten = 1,1,Directory(vertex)
exten = 1,2,Goto(s,200)
2) Why is there a five second pause before the directory instructions 
start?

3) Why no option for first name (without recording your own custom 
message and reversing names in voicemail.conf)?

Thanks,
Ryan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] application Directory

2004-04-09 Thread Ryan Thrash
Let's say an unsuspecting soul accidently selects the Directory option 
from an Auto Attendant (CVS circa 3/22). Three questions:

1) How do they escape if they didn't mean to go there in the first 
place (without having to hang up...)?

exten = 1,1,Directory(vertex)
exten = 1,2,Goto(s,200)
2) Why is there a five second pause before the directory instructions 
start?

3) Why no option for first name (without recording your own custom 
message and reversing names in voicemail.conf)?

Thanks,
Ryan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] application Directory (Modified by Ryan Thrash)

2004-04-09 Thread Ryan Thrash
On Apr 9, 2004, at 9:52 AM, Tilghman Lesher wrote:

On Thursday 08 April 2004 22:41, Ryan Thrash wrote:
Scenario: a person selects an Auto Attendant option that fires off
the Directory application (CVS circa 3/22). Three questions:
1) How do they escape if they didn't mean to go there in the first
place (without having to hang up...)? Config of entry into the
vertex directory below:
If you just wait, Directory will exit if there is no entry.
Ah! So it does in fact. Thanks! Many people get impatient and start 
getting button-happy, often hanging up in frustration. Time to record a 
new message with instructions for the escape hatch!

2) Why is there a five second pause before the directory instructions 
start?
Probably because you have another extension that begins with 1.
Since Asterisk has no other way to know if the extension is complete,
it waits DigitTimeout seconds (defaults to 5).
And again, you are correct, sir. Internal extensions start at 100. 
Thanks. Time to re-record  the message and assign new extensions for 
the prompts.

3) Why no option for first name (without recording your own custom
message and reversing names in voicemail.conf)?
Just wasn't written that way.  You're welcome to submit a patch to add
first name matching on the bugtracker (bugs.digium.com).
Just signed up on Mantis today. Not being a coder, I'll see if I can 
poke around and get something to work with some help of some local 
friends that do have a clue.

Again, thanks for your helpful response. : )

rt

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Restart Asterisk

2004-04-08 Thread Ryan Thrash
You should be able to do a reload, not having to restart (and bringing 
the system down).

On Apr 8, 2004, at 8:48 AM, Jain, Sonal wrote:

Is it true that every time we make a change in the configuration file 
we need to restart the asterisk server. This will not be practical in 
the production environment.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Caller ID and Voicemail ?s

2004-04-07 Thread Ryan Thrash
Wow... talk about a detailed response; thanks!

In our situation, we've got a T-1 voice PRI from Allegiance Telcom. For 
the benefit of those of us who aren't as in the know as you are (and 
who have no affiliation with a CLEC), is there a way to be able to 
control what gets sent out as our name portion of the Caller ID (even 
if it means changing what's recorded at Allegiance)? We somehow manage 
to do so with the number part.

In other words, type real slow and mention specific conf files if 
possible. This is pretty new stuff for me...  Thanks again!

--
Ryan
On Apr 6, 2004, at 7:59 PM, Kyle Thomas wrote:

SCP=Service control point (database that houses name to number)
SCP DIP = Query to an SCP via the SS7 network
ISUP = SS7 signaling for call setup and teardown (equivalent of
invite,ringing,ok,bye)
IAM = Initial address message (equal to the SIP invite )
LNP= Local number portability (uses the SS7 network as a backbone). 
This
let's people keep thier phone number and switch service providers.

There is nothing quick about quick caller id. The far end Telco will
override the name infomration sent to the PSTN and perform thier dips
regardless, overwriting the info you are trying sending out. We are a 
CLEC so,
therefore we store, therefore it works..

On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

The terminating telco is doing an SCP dip to thier local SCP's and 
the
database probably does not have that name mapped to this number.

First thing to do is make sure the generic name ISUP optional 
paramter is
set in the outgoing IAM / ISDN setup from your GW.

You could also store with an SS7 provider , if these are ported 
numbers
you are sending out make sure that the CNAM field in the LNP line 
record
is set to the point code alias of the provider you are storing with. 
The
terminating switch will first do an LNP dip to see what CNAM alias to
launch the CNAM dip to. If that is not found , will default to the 
local
SCP thus not finding your record.
Ok, and now for the rest of us...

SCP? SCP dip? ISUP?  IAM?  LNP?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] MySQL CDR

2004-04-07 Thread Ryan Thrash
Remove the semi-colon in front of [global]

HTH,
Ryan Thrash
On Apr 7, 2004, at 8:15 PM, Jeremy Bogan wrote:

Sounds like an error in your config file.  Want to paste the contents
in?  Thanks...
Sorry:

;[global]
;hostname=localhost
dbname=asterisk
password=password
user=asterisk
;port=3306
sock=/tmp/mysql.sock
userfield=1
--
jeremy bogan[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
segment publishing - design.develop.host
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] softphone (SIP) with multiple profiles

2004-04-06 Thread Ryan Thrash
I think Xten is included in Lindows, but I could be totally wrong. 
Probably tweaked to work out of the box with that Distro...

Xten is really pretty good.

The one I know of is X-Pro/X-Lite from http://www.xten.com/

I doubt that there is a Linux version available...

Markus

 I contacted X-Ten and they told me they are working on a Linux 
version of X-Lite... let's see...
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Quick Caller ID and Voicemail ?s

2004-04-06 Thread Ryan Thrash
I'm trying to config a couple of things on Asterisk 
CVS-03/22/04-16:41:51.

The number shows up, but I can't get the words to show on a local 
bell line. The text always comes up as unavailable. In sip.conf for 
each extension, I've tried:

callerid=VERTEX 2142618000
callerid=VERTEX 2142618000
Neither one works. Suggestions?

On the Voicemail front, I'm trying to set an extension to dial into a 
specific voicemail box that has (or in fact may have) nothing with the 
exact extension I'm dialing. For example, from extension 122, I want it 
to check 107 without having to enter the voicemail box. In 
extensions.conf, I've got the following for that extension:

exten = 122,1,Macro(extVertex,SIP/122)
exten = 122,2,VoiceMailMain(107)
In watching asterisk -rc, I see the following when dialing the 
voicemail extension:

  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/sip.conf':   == Parsing 
'/etc/asterisk/sip.conf':   == Parsing 
'/etc/asterisk/indications.conf': -- Executing 
Answer(SIP/122-7161, ) in new stack
-- Executing Wait(SIP/122-7161, 1) in new stack
-- Executing VoiceMailMain(SIP/122-7161, 2142618000) in new 
stack
-- Playing 'vm-login' (language 'en')

Ideas?

Thanks,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Redhat 9 OVER, Fidora Support, comments please.

2004-04-05 Thread Ryan Thrash
We had an issues with an Intel Zero Channel hardware RAID controller 
that wouldn't allow us to install either Fedora Core 1 or 2, so we 
couldn't test with *. Given that we didn't try to convert our 9 to 
Fedora, either. We got it running great under RH 9.

HTH,
Ryan Thrash
On Apr 5, 2004, at 7:50 AM, James Gardiner wrote:

Hi *ers,
I recently got an Email from Redhat about the dropping of support for 
Redhat
9 on the 30 of April and that Fedora Project is the recommended future,
otherwise, RedHat enterprise ($$$).

Considering this, I would like some feed back on the Fedora Project 
from
users who may be using it, and how its going with Asterisk?  Are there 
any
problems?
Is the Asterisk development team got Fedora Project in mind and fully
supported?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Auto connect to voicemail

2004-04-05 Thread Ryan Thrash
I'm running into a similar situation. We have 3-digit extensions and a 
4-digit DID numbers that get used for for outbound CID. Therefore, no 
$CALLERIDNUM direct access to voicemail. Suggestions?

What do you do when $CALLERIDNUM of the caller isnt the 4-digit 
extension? I set all of my users Caller ID entries to their 
10-digit phone # so that Caller ID appears correctly when I send their 
call out the PRI to the public network. The side effect of this is 
breaking convenient access to voicemail using this method, and I 
havent found a way to fix it yet.

I think this is what you are looking for

Exten = 1000,1,Answer,1
 Exten = 1000,2,Wait,1
 Exten = 1000,3,Voicemailmain([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Options

2004-03-31 Thread Ryan Thrash
How do I set configure my voicemail notification so that when I'm left 
a voicemail message it:

1) sends an e-mail to my inbox with the voicemail message attached
2) sends a message to my cellphone without the message attached
I get notifications when I've got attachments turned off, but my cell 
doesn't like attachments in the messages and doesn't send them.

An even better option would be for the * voicemail system function like 
a Telekol system:

1) * calls your cell after receiving a new message. On our system 888 
puts you to voicemail of the extension you're dialing from, 887 prompts 
for your extension. It would in essence place an outbound call from 888 
using your extension to your cell phone.
2) The voicemail system keeps trying every X of minutes until you 
answer your cell (a separate caller ID would be good for this), or it 
can time-out after Y attempts.
3) If you don't want to be notified any longer of the new message, 
answer your cell and press *# (star-pound), and it turns off 
notification until another new message comes in.
4) The remote notification number to call can be set through the 
voicemail options prompts. If you were going to be somewhere without 
cell service, you could change the number over the voicemail line.

Thanks,
Ryan Thrash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VON Update - Pingtel Creates new SIP Open Source Group

2004-03-30 Thread Ryan Thrash
How did the launch meeting go?

rt

On Mar 29, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Steven M. Sokol wrote:

The VON show has started off with a number of interesting 
announcements.
First among these is a big announcement from Pingtel that they have 
created
a not-for-profit corporation called SIPFoundry.  This new company 
includes
Pingtel (which has recently open sourced their SIPExchange PBX), 
Vovida and
somebody else.
snip
More on-the-scene reports to come.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VON Update - Pingtel Creates new SIP Open Source Group

2004-03-30 Thread Ryan Thrash
Actually, ignore that... forgot to take the check the calendar pill 
this AM. Doh!

rt

On Mar 30, 2004, at 11:46 AM, Ryan Thrash wrote:

How did the launch meeting go?

rt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Graphical Interface to display Asterisk CDR / php

2004-03-24 Thread Ryan Thrash
Does register_globals need to be on to work with this? And if so, any 
chance that will be turned off in the (hopefully near) future?

Thanks, Ryan

On Mar 24, 2004, at 9:09 AM, Areski wrote:

I just finished an other version, all my apologies, cause I made it for
mysql then I ve done the change to support postgresql and forget to
re-test again... not really professional at all ;)
snip
http://www.areski.net/asterisk-stat-v1/about.php
Download :
http://www.areski.net/asterisk-stat-v1/asterisk-stat-v1_1.tar.gz
If you have still some problems, share them with me !
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Incoming Fax Call to File

2004-03-23 Thread Ryan Thrash
I can't seem to find an answer in the archives covering this (or maybe 
I just missed it)... Setting up * and hope to accomplish the following:

1) Use 5 of our DID numbers from our PRI for inbound fax reception
2) When * receives a call on one of these lines, it digitizes the 
incoming fax to a multi-page .tif file (ala eFax.com) rather than 
transferring it to an analog fax machine.
3) Based on the DID number, e-mail the resulting fax to a specific inbox

The end result--when coupled with doing the same for voice mail 
messages--would be a unified inbox, which we really are hoping to have 
soon.

To accomplish Part 2, do we need a fax board or some such piece of 
external hardware, or is the processing power of a dual Xeon server 
coupled with some as-yet-to-be-identified-DSP-esque software capable of 
translating fax-static into an image?

Thanks for any ideas or pointers.

--
Best regards,
Ryan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users