Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P Wildcard does not work with Ubuntu 12.04 server
Michel Verbraak michel at verbraak.org writes: Op 22-08-12 12:09, Shitian Long schreef: I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04 server edition. I followed the procedure from http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step. During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete I got following warnings: root at ubuntu:/usr/local/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1# make perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = en_US:en, LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = UTF-8, LANG = en_US.UTF-8 are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). Frist of, I am wondering if this error matters? Second question, after installation process complete, and reboot the machine I got the following error, when machine boot up: Loading DAHDI hardware modules: wcte11xp: error I think the TE110P card is no properly loaded. I try to confirm my thought by using root at ubuntu:~# dahdi_tool There is no interface listed on the table. I am wondering if anyone got idea about this issue. Thanks. longst -- _ Having the same problems: /# dmesg -c /dev/null /# /etc/init.d/dahdi stop Unloading DAHDI hardware modules: done /# modprobe wte11xp FATAL: Module wte11xp not found. /# dmesg [ 2775.316252] dahdi: Telephony Interface Unloaded /# lspci | grep Dig /# however: # make config install -D dahdi.init /etc/init.d/dahdi /usr/sbin/update-rc.d dahdi defaults 15 30 System start/stop links for /etc/init.d/dahdi already exist. DAHDI has been configured. List of detected DAHDI devices: pci::03:02.0 wcte11xp-e159:0001 Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Board run 'dahdi_genconf modules' to load support for only the DAHDI hardware installed in this system. By default support for all DAHDI hardware is loaded at DAHDI start. any ideas? doesnt look like my system recognized the card at all. no lights on the card. card was working perfectly. i simply moved it from one box (gentoo) to another (ubuntu 12.04) -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P Wildcard does not work with Ubuntu 12.04 server
Hi, On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:18:46PM +, ted wrote: Michel Verbraak michel at verbraak.org writes: Op 22-08-12 12:09, Shitian Long I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04 server edition. I followed the procedure from http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step. During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete I got following warnings: root at ubuntu:/usr/local/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1# make perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = en_US:en, LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = UTF-8, LANG = en_US.UTF-8 are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). Frist of, I am wondering if this error matters? I do not think this error matters. You probably should still make sure your locale is set properly. Second question, after installation process complete, and reboot the machine I got the following error, when machine boot up: Loading DAHDI hardware modules: wcte11xp: error There should be some output in dmesg that indicates what the problem is when you get an error here. I think the TE110P card is no properly loaded. I try to confirm my thought by using root at ubuntu:~# dahdi_tool There is no interface listed on the table. I am wondering if anyone got idea about this issue. Thanks. Having the same problems: /# dmesg -c /dev/null /# /etc/init.d/dahdi stop Unloading DAHDI hardware modules: done /# modprobe wte11xp FATAL: Module wte11xp not found. The above is a differnt error than what Shitian reported. It doesn't look like the driver was installed properly for the current kernel. /# dmesg [ 2775.316252] dahdi: Telephony Interface Unloaded /# lspci | grep Dig /# however: # make config install -D dahdi.init /etc/init.d/dahdi /usr/sbin/update-rc.d dahdi defaults 15 30 System start/stop links for /etc/init.d/dahdi already exist. DAHDI has been configured. List of detected DAHDI devices: pci::03:02.0 wcte11xp-e159:0001 Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Board run 'dahdi_genconf modules' to load support for only the DAHDI hardware installed in this system. By default support for all DAHDI hardware is loaded at DAHDI start. any ideas? doesnt look like my system recognized the card at all. no lights on the card. card was working perfectly. i simply moved it from one box (gentoo) to another (ubuntu 12.04) Best guess based on what you said that the driver really isn't installed for the current kernel. Cheers, Shaun -- Shaun Ruffell Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P Wildcard does not work with Ubuntu 12.04 server
Shaun Ruffell sruffell at digium.com writes: Best guess based on what you said that the driver really isn't installed for the current kernel. Cheers, Shaun thanks much! this lead me to find this: http://totalticketsystem.com/blog/technical-articles/how-to-install-asterisk-on-ubuntu-from-scratch/ which i followed and things are working now. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P Wildcard does not work with Ubuntu 12.04 server
Op 22-08-12 12:09, Shitian Long schreef: I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04 server edition. I followed the procedure from http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step. During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete I got following warnings: root@ubuntu:/usr/local/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1# make perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = en_US:en, LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = UTF-8, LANG = en_US.UTF-8 are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). Frist of, I am wondering if this error matters? Second question, after installation process complete, and reboot the machine I got the following error, when machine boot up: Loading DAHDI hardware modules: wcte11xp: error I think the TE110P card is no properly loaded. I try to confirm my thought by using root@ubuntu:~# dahdi_tool There is no interface listed on the table. I am wondering if anyone got idea about this issue. Thanks. longst -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Please try the command lspci and see if the card is mentioned in the results. Regards. Michel. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P Wildcard does not work with Ubuntu 12.04 server
I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04 server edition. I followed the procedure from http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step. During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete I got following warnings: root@ubuntu:/usr/local/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1# make perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = en_US:en, LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = UTF-8, LANG = en_US.UTF-8 are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). Frist of, I am wondering if this error matters? Second question, after installation process complete, and reboot the machine I got the following error, when machine boot up: Loading DAHDI hardware modules: wcte11xp: error I think the TE110P card is no properly loaded. I try to confirm my thought by using root@ubuntu:~# dahdi_tool There is no interface listed on the table. I am wondering if anyone got idea about this issue. Thanks. longst -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P Wildcard does not work with Ubuntu 12.04 server
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:09:54PM +0200, Shitian Long wrote: I am trying to setup TE110P wildcard on a PBX running ubuntu 12.04 server edition. I followed the procedure from http://docs.digium.com/misc/ADL_quickstart.pdf step by step. During the process of installing dahdi-linux-complete I got following warnings: root@ubuntu:/usr/local/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1# make perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = en_US:en, LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = UTF-8, LANG = en_US.UTF-8 are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). Frist of, I am wondering if this error matters? I think you can safely ignore these warnings. You might need to make sure those locales are properly setup on your server to get rid of the warnings. See http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1346581 Second question, after installation process complete, and reboot the machine I got the following error, when machine boot up: Loading DAHDI hardware modules: wcte11xp: error I think the TE110P card is no properly loaded. You will want to runt he dmesg command after trying to load the driver to see if there are any errors listed. Run these commands as root and send the output: # dmesg -c /dev/null # /etc/init.d/dahdi stop # modprobe wte11xp # dmesg I try to confirm my thought by using root@ubuntu:~# dahdi_tool There is no interface listed on the table. I am wondering if anyone got idea about this issue. Thanks. dahdi_tool will not be able to see the interface since the driver failed to load in the previous step. -- Shaun Ruffell Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P or TE120P
Can someone tell me in simple words what the difference between these 2 cards are, and why I should buy a TE120P (more expensive) than a TE110P. I've bought TE120P's recently just because my supplier was out of stock on the TE110P's, but for a single board in a server, what's the difference? Thanks, Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P or TE120P
Gordon, the TE110P is disco'd. I don't believe there is any more product in the channel on that model. Digium has replaced the TE110P with the TE120P/TE122P(w/echo can). Cory J. Andrews Director New Market Initiatives Sayers Media Group VoIP Supply, LLC 454 Sonwil Drive Buffalo, NY 14225 716-250-3402 OFFICE 716-630-1548 FAX 716-601-4474 MOBILE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have I exceeded your expectations? Please share your experience with my boss, Benjamin P. Sayers, CEO NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any document attached hereto is intended only for the named recipient(s). It is the property of the VoIP Supply, LLC and shall not be used, disclosed or reproduced without the express written consent of VoIP Supply, LLC. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message in confidence to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify me immediately by reply e-mail or telephone and then delete this message, including any attachments. Our mailing address is 454 Sonwil Drive, Buffalo, NY 14225 USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Henderson Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P or TE120P Can someone tell me in simple words what the difference between these 2 cards are, and why I should buy a TE120P (more expensive) than a TE110P. I've bought TE120P's recently just because my supplier was out of stock on the TE110P's, but for a single board in a server, what's the difference? Thanks, Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P or TE120P
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Cory Andrews wrote: Gordon, the TE110P is disco'd. I don't believe there is any more product in the channel on that model. Digium has replaced the TE110P with the TE120P/TE122P(w/echo can). OK, but I can still get the TE110P as my supplier now has stock of them, so why should I buy the TE120P instead? Gordon Cory J. Andrews Director New Market Initiatives Sayers Media Group VoIP Supply, LLC 454 Sonwil Drive Buffalo, NY 14225 716-250-3402 OFFICE 716-630-1548 FAX 716-601-4474 MOBILE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have I exceeded your expectations? Please share your experience with my boss, Benjamin P. Sayers, CEO NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any document attached hereto is intended only for the named recipient(s). It is the property of the VoIP Supply, LLC and shall not be used, disclosed or reproduced without the express written consent of VoIP Supply, LLC. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message in confidence to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify me immediately by reply e-mail or telephone and then delete this message, including any attachments. Our mailing address is 454 Sonwil Drive, Buffalo, NY 14225 USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Henderson Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P or TE120P Can someone tell me in simple words what the difference between these 2 cards are, and why I should buy a TE120P (more expensive) than a TE110P. I've bought TE120P's recently just because my supplier was out of stock on the TE110P's, but for a single board in a server, what's the difference? Thanks, Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess
I am not sure if Digum has a lifetime warranty like Sangoma (did a quick google search and only saw Sangoma) but if they do, maybe you could arrange a cross ship. Thanks, Steve T On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Alexander Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you don't have a spare card, try resetting the PCI bus in the Bios, it may have become corrupt with the power failure. At least try a different slot. You can also try flashing the BIOS. That is the only thing that comes to mind at this time and not knowing if you have a spare card. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Chavez Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:31 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess I have an Asterisk server that was running fine until Sunday. Monday there was a power outage and the server was off most of the day. This server has a TE110P, two TDM04B and an Astribank 32. Today I noticed that the TE110P started having IRQ missess. Before today it only had about two or three per month. Today, this is the miss count after ten minutes on: IRQ Misses: 1443 I can see the number climbing when using zttool. Users are reporting noise and echo on the analog channels. Obviously faxes are not going through anymore which has the client up in arms. I think thet maybe the card got damaged? I can send and receive calls on the E1 link and users with SIP phones do not seem affected (at least they are not the ones complaining). The TE110P is not sharing and IRQ with anything else. Any ideas on where to look for the problem? -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnología Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V. Tel: +52-55-91169161 Ext 2001 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 00:30 -0500, Carlos Chavez wrote: I have an Asterisk server that was running fine until Sunday. Monday there was a power outage and the server was off most of the day. This server has a TE110P, two TDM04B and an Astribank 32. Today I noticed that the TE110P started having IRQ missess. Before today it only had about two or three per month. Today, this is the miss count after ten minutes on: IRQ Misses: 1443 This definitely sounds unusual... Your TE110P card comes with support from Digium, so I would suggest you contact Digium support and have them help you diagnose the problem. -- Jared Smith Training Manager Digium, Inc. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess
I have an Asterisk server that was running fine until Sunday. Monday there was a power outage and the server was off most of the day. This server has a TE110P, two TDM04B and an Astribank 32. Today I noticed that the TE110P started having IRQ missess. Before today it only had about two or three per month. Today, this is the miss count after ten minutes on: IRQ Misses: 1443 I can see the number climbing when using zttool. Users are reporting noise and echo on the analog channels. Obviously faxes are not going through anymore which has the client up in arms. I think thet maybe the card got damaged? I can send and receive calls on the E1 link and users with SIP phones do not seem affected (at least they are not the ones complaining). The TE110P is not sharing and IRQ with anything else. Any ideas on where to look for the problem? -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnología Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V. Tel: +52-55-91169161 Ext 2001 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess
If you don't have a spare card, try resetting the PCI bus in the Bios, it may have become corrupt with the power failure. At least try a different slot. You can also try flashing the BIOS. That is the only thing that comes to mind at this time and not knowing if you have a spare card. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Chavez Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:31 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P with 40,000 IRQ missess I have an Asterisk server that was running fine until Sunday. Monday there was a power outage and the server was off most of the day. This server has a TE110P, two TDM04B and an Astribank 32. Today I noticed that the TE110P started having IRQ missess. Before today it only had about two or three per month. Today, this is the miss count after ten minutes on: IRQ Misses: 1443 I can see the number climbing when using zttool. Users are reporting noise and echo on the analog channels. Obviously faxes are not going through anymore which has the client up in arms. I think thet maybe the card got damaged? I can send and receive calls on the E1 link and users with SIP phones do not seem affected (at least they are not the ones complaining). The TE110P is not sharing and IRQ with anything else. Any ideas on where to look for the problem? -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnología Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V. Tel: +52-55-91169161 Ext 2001 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] te110p stays in red alarm
Folks, I installed a te110p to connect to an E-1. Ensured the jumper is on for E-1, installed the card, and got the following from the phone company: hdb3 encoding (verbally confirmed ccs) euroisdn switchtype pri signalling So I set up zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15 unused=17-31 dchan=16 loadzone=us defaultzone=us Card tries to come up but goes into RED alarm. Occasionally cycles YELLOW/RED and or RED/RECOVERING or YELLOW/RED/RECOVERING, but always returns to RED. Insert the wcte11xp module with a debug=9 option and get the following in my kernel log: kernel: Expecting top ca1e, got CW Panama says the switch I'm connecting to is an Erickson AXE 10. Thoughts? Thanx, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. - Nemesis Air Racing Team motto ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
The revision on this card was new and my version of zaptel (1.2.11) did not support my pri signaling for that card. I upgraded zaptel through svn and all was good. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:01 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1. On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote: Thank you all. Was a signaling issue. And for the benefit of those who will read the archive: how have you debugged it? how have you resolved it? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
Thank you all. Was a signaling issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:55 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1. On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:01:41PM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote: Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm getting the following error when trying to start asterisk: Asterisk died with code 1. Automatically restarting Asterisk. Does anyone have any idea what is wrong with this configuration?? Thanks in advance!!! What is the output of: cat /proc/zaptel/* -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote: Thank you all. Was a signaling issue. And for the benefit of those who will read the archive: how have you debugged it? how have you resolved it? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm getting the following error when trying to start asterisk: Asterisk died with code 1. Automatically restarting Asterisk. Does anyone have any idea what is wrong with this configuration?? Thanks in advance!!! Here's my config files: zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 dchan=24 loadzone=us defaultzone=us Zapata.conf [channels] context=from-pstn switchtype=national signalling=pri_cpe rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes echocancel=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 immediate=yes group=0 signalling=pri_cpe context = from-pstn channel =1-23 == Jeronimo Romero EUS Networks Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 917-332-7238 Office: 212-624-5943 Web: www.euscorp.com == ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
Jeronimo Romero wrote: Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm getting the following error when trying to start asterisk: Asterisk died with code 1. Automatically restarting Asterisk. Does anyone have any idea what is wrong with this configuration?? Thanks in advance!!! Here's my config files: zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 dchan=24 loadzone=us defaultzone=us Zapata.conf [channels] context=from-pstn switchtype=national signalling=pri_cpe rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes echocancel=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 immediate=yes group=0 signalling=pri_cpe context = from-pstn channel =1-23 == Jeronimo Romero EUS Networks Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 917-332-7238 Office: 212-624-5943 Web: www.euscorp.com == tail /var/log/asterisk/full will give you good insight. Thanks, Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
I see that you have signaling listed twice. That might be causing a problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:54 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1. Jeronimo Romero wrote: Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm getting the following error when trying to start asterisk: Asterisk died with code 1. Automatically restarting Asterisk. Does anyone have any idea what is wrong with this configuration?? Thanks in advance!!! Here's my config files: zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 dchan=24 loadzone=us defaultzone=us Zapata.conf [channels] context=from-pstn switchtype=national signalling=pri_cpe rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes echocancel=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 immediate=yes group=0 signalling=pri_cpe context = from-pstn channel =1-23 == Jeronimo Romero EUS Networks Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 917-332-7238 Office: 212-624-5943 Web: www.euscorp.com == tail /var/log/asterisk/full will give you good insight. Thanks, Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P: Error == Asterisk died with code 1.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:01:41PM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote: Running Asterisk 1.2.9. I just installed a TE110P card and configured zaptel.conf zapata.conf. The config files look right to me but I'm getting the following error when trying to start asterisk: Asterisk died with code 1. Automatically restarting Asterisk. Does anyone have any idea what is wrong with this configuration?? Thanks in advance!!! What is the output of: cat /proc/zaptel/* -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P working hardware configurations
Helo, I have a troubles getting to stable work of Digium TE110P card (mailed some time earlier in the list) - I can't get 100% pseudo zap interface accuracy (zttest), so getting HDLC aborts and call drops. I tried number motherboards, hardware and software configs according to info in wiki, thisl list and number of websites - no luck. So I ask everyboby who successfully use Digium TE110P card and get stable 100% pseudo zap interface accuracy with zttest to put exact hardware (motherboard model, NIC, CPU, RAM, HDD) and software (kernel and zaptel versions, maybe zaptel.conf and zapata.conf) configuration here. I think this info could be very useful for many people and we can make detail compatibility list in wiki. There is some hw examples list in wiki already but I think not enough detailed. Thank you! -- Sincerely, Elman Efendiyev PROTECH INC. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and HDLC problems
I had this problem and in the end it appeared to be slot timing on the mobo. I had to put the TE110P in the 1st slot - which happened to be a PCI-X slot. That was using a Supermicro motherboard too. Regards Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Fredrickson Sent: 25 January 2007 20:58 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and HDLC problems There was a recent driver fix that *might* help you. It's not in an official 1.x.x release yet, but if you check out 1.2 from svn, you should get the latest version of the driver with the fix. Matthew Fredrickson On Jan 25, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Marc Patino Gómez wrote: Hi!, this issue makes me crazy. I read a lot of docs, also * mailling list and I try a lot of things without success. Any help will be appreciated. Here is the info: Hardware: Supermicro Server with motherboard X7DB8, chipset Intel 5000P, Xeon 5050 Digium TE110P Software - Asterisk version 1.2.12.1 Zaptel version 1.2.8 /etc/zaptel.conf loadzone=es defaultzone=es span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 The dammed errors: Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 ... I tried the following without success: - Disable Hyper Threading. - Disable NIC's, RAID controller, usb, serial... to avoid shared IRQ, so TE110P has his own IRQ as shows lspci -vb. - Also I tried with APIC and without APIC. .. These HDLC errors appear when I physically loop the E1 interface in the Card and also appear, and more frequently, when I connect the E1 circuit (from the Telco) to the interface of the Card. Thanks a lot -- --- - Marc Patino Gómez Dpto. Sistemas Claranet España. Servicios Internet C/General Almirante 2-28, Torres Cerdá 08014 Barcelona Tel. Información General: 902 884 633 Tel. Soporte Técnico: 902 884 622 Fax: +34 93 445 19 20 www.claranet.es Claranet Group: United Kingdom - Spain - France - Germany - Portugal - Netherlands - USA --- - ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and HDLC problems
Thanks for your answers :) I use another server to test digium board and my config, and it works well, so... I think the problem is between chipset, Intel 5000P and digium card. I will try to put the digium board in other PCI-X slots, and change some timing PCI parameters in the BIOS. Regards Marc Patino Gómez wrote: Hi!, this issue makes me crazy. I read a lot of docs, also * mailling list and I try a lot of things without success. Any help will be appreciated. Here is the info: Hardware: Supermicro Server with motherboard X7DB8, chipset Intel 5000P, Xeon 5050 Digium TE110P Software - Asterisk version 1.2.12.1 Zaptel version 1.2.8 /etc/zaptel.conf loadzone=es defaultzone=es span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 The dammed errors: Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 ... I tried the following without success: - Disable Hyper Threading. - Disable NIC's, RAID controller, usb, serial... to avoid shared IRQ, so TE110P has his own IRQ as shows lspci -vb. - Also I tried with APIC and without APIC. .. These HDLC errors appear when I physically loop the E1 interface in the Card and also appear, and more frequently, when I connect the E1 circuit (from the Telco) to the interface of the Card. Thanks a lot -- Marc Patino Gómez Dpto. Sistemas Claranet España. Servicios Internet C/General Almirante 2-28, Torres Cerdá 08014 Barcelona Tel. Información General: 902 884 633 Tel. Soporte Técnico: 902 884 622 Fax: +34 93 445 19 20 www.claranet.es Claranet Group: United Kingdom - Spain - France - Germany - Portugal - Netherlands - USA ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and HDLC problems
Problem solved :) :) I change the OS, I install a Debian Etch x86_32bits and it works perfectly with the following software versions: asterisk 1.2.13 zaptel 1.2.12 so... I don't understand where was the problem. TE110P driver version The previus OS was a Ubuntu 6.10 (codename Edgy) 64bits version. Marc Patino Gómez wrote: Thanks for your answers :) I use another server to test digium board and my config, and it works well, so... I think the problem is between chipset, Intel 5000P and digium card. I will try to put the digium board in other PCI-X slots, and change some timing PCI parameters in the BIOS. Regards Marc Patino Gómez wrote: Hi!, this issue makes me crazy. I read a lot of docs, also * mailling list and I try a lot of things without success. Any help will be appreciated. Here is the info: Hardware: Supermicro Server with motherboard X7DB8, chipset Intel 5000P, Xeon 5050 Digium TE110P Software - Asterisk version 1.2.12.1 Zaptel version 1.2.8 /etc/zaptel.conf loadzone=es defaultzone=es span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 The dammed errors: Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 ... I tried the following without success: - Disable Hyper Threading. - Disable NIC's, RAID controller, usb, serial... to avoid shared IRQ, so TE110P has his own IRQ as shows lspci -vb. - Also I tried with APIC and without APIC. .. These HDLC errors appear when I physically loop the E1 interface in the Card and also appear, and more frequently, when I connect the E1 circuit (from the Telco) to the interface of the Card. Thanks a lot -- Marc Patino Gómez Dpto. Sistemas Claranet España. Servicios Internet C/General Almirante 2-28, Torres Cerdá 08014 Barcelona Tel. Información General: 902 884 633 Tel. Soporte Técnico: 902 884 622 Fax: +34 93 445 19 20 www.claranet.es Claranet Group: United Kingdom - Spain - France - Germany - Portugal - Netherlands - USA ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P and HDLC problems
Hi!, this issue makes me crazy. I read a lot of docs, also * mailling list and I try a lot of things without success. Any help will be appreciated. Here is the info: Hardware: Supermicro Server with motherboard X7DB8, chipset Intel 5000P, Xeon 5050 Digium TE110P Software - Asterisk version 1.2.12.1 Zaptel version 1.2.8 /etc/zaptel.conf loadzone=es defaultzone=es span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 The dammed errors: Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 ... I tried the following without success: - Disable Hyper Threading. - Disable NIC's, RAID controller, usb, serial... to avoid shared IRQ, so TE110P has his own IRQ as shows lspci -vb. - Also I tried with APIC and without APIC. .. These HDLC errors appear when I physically loop the E1 interface in the Card and also appear, and more frequently, when I connect the E1 circuit (from the Telco) to the interface of the Card. Thanks a lot -- Marc Patino Gómez Dpto. Sistemas Claranet España. Servicios Internet C/General Almirante 2-28, Torres Cerdá 08014 Barcelona Tel. Información General: 902 884 633 Tel. Soporte Técnico: 902 884 622 Fax: +34 93 445 19 20 www.claranet.es Claranet Group: United Kingdom - Spain - France - Germany - Portugal - Netherlands - USA ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and HDLC problems
There was a recent driver fix that *might* help you. It's not in an official 1.x.x release yet, but if you check out 1.2 from svn, you should get the latest version of the driver with the fix. Matthew Fredrickson On Jan 25, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Marc Patino Gómez wrote: Hi!, this issue makes me crazy. I read a lot of docs, also * mailling list and I try a lot of things without success. Any help will be appreciated. Here is the info: Hardware: Supermicro Server with motherboard X7DB8, chipset Intel 5000P, Xeon 5050 Digium TE110P Software - Asterisk version 1.2.12.1 Zaptel version 1.2.8 /etc/zaptel.conf loadzone=es defaultzone=es span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 The dammed errors: Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 25 14:11:52 NOTICE[4934]: chan_zap.c:8316 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 ... I tried the following without success: - Disable Hyper Threading. - Disable NIC's, RAID controller, usb, serial... to avoid shared IRQ, so TE110P has his own IRQ as shows lspci -vb. - Also I tried with APIC and without APIC. .. These HDLC errors appear when I physically loop the E1 interface in the Card and also appear, and more frequently, when I connect the E1 circuit (from the Telco) to the interface of the Card. Thanks a lot -- --- - Marc Patino Gómez Dpto. Sistemas Claranet España. Servicios Internet C/General Almirante 2-28, Torres Cerdá 08014 Barcelona Tel. Información General: 902 884 633 Tel. Soporte Técnico: 902 884 622 Fax: +34 93 445 19 20 www.claranet.es Claranet Group: United Kingdom - Spain - France - Germany - Portugal - Netherlands - USA --- - ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: RE : [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
Hi All, as good? But to tell the resolution of this problem: I change board TE110P and is all good now,is functioning almost perfectly. :) When I occupy channel 17 of the board and the call is without audio is as if it did not exist TX and RX. I find that this is problem in the Siemens HiPath 4000.Somebody already passed previously therefore? Thank's to all Best Regards Josué 2006/12/30, Josué Conti [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Francoise, thanks will be this attention. I verified to jumper of the TE110P, That´s closed (indicating link E1), in the tests without crc4, the error is the same, I of not intervene with nothing. Stranger is that I obtain you effect normally called and received too. In the ztcfg - vv to appear the 30 channels in isdn. Thank´s in advance Best Regards Josué 2006/12/29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Josué, Have you checked the strap on the TE110P board ? You must have it on the E1 position, not T1 (open ?, I don't remember at this hour, sorry). Check also without crc4. And recheck ztcfg -vvv. Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Josué Conti Envoyé : vendredi 29 décembre 2006 23:27 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig Hi Matthew thank's will be attention. I believe that the configurations are correct, I changed of server, one another hardware and the problem remains the same. :( Changing of protocol, for euroisdn the problem remains. Stranger, does not find? Best Regards Josue zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] language=us context=default switchtype=qsig nsf=none pridialplan=unknown prilocaldialplan=unknown facilityenable = yes signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes restrictcid=no callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 callgroup=1 immediate=no callerid=asreceived musiconhold=default group=1 channel=1-15 channel=17-31 2006/12/29, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It sounds like it isn't configured correctly. Are you sure that your cabling is ok and that your span= line is correct? Matthew Fredrickson On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Josué Conti wrote: Hi all, as good? I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the following errors: Server1:~ # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. === == Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
It sounds like it isn't configured correctly. Are you sure that your cabling is ok and that your span= line is correct? Matthew Fredrickson On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Josué Conti wrote: Hi all, as good? I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the following errors: Server1:~ # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. === == Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: Alarm (4) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5484]: chan_zap.c:2289 pri_find_dchan: No D-channels available! Using Primary channel 16 as D-channel anyway! Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 1: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 2: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 2 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 3: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 3 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
Hi Matthew thank's will be attention. I believe that the configurations are correct, I changed of server, one another hardware and the problem remains the same. :( Changing of protocol, for euroisdn the problem remains. Stranger, does not find? Best Regards Josue zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] language=us context=default switchtype=qsig nsf=none pridialplan=unknown prilocaldialplan=unknown facilityenable = yes signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes restrictcid=no callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 callgroup=1 immediate=no callerid=asreceived musiconhold=default group=1 channel=1-15 channel=17-31 2006/12/29, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It sounds like it isn't configured correctly. Are you sure that your cabling is ok and that your span= line is correct? Matthew Fredrickson On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Josué Conti wrote: Hi all, as good? I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the following errors: Server1:~ # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. === == Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28
RE : [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
Hi Josué, Have you checked the strap on the TE110P board ? You must have it on the E1 position, not T1 (open ?, I don't remember at this hour, sorry). Check also without crc4. And recheck ztcfg -vvv. Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Josué Conti Envoyé : vendredi 29 décembre 2006 23:27 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig Hi Matthew thank's will be attention. I believe that the configurations are correct, I changed of server, one another hardware and the problem remains the same. :( Changing of protocol, for euroisdn the problem remains. Stranger, does not find? Best Regards Josue zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] language=us context=default switchtype=qsig nsf=none pridialplan=unknown prilocaldialplan=unknown facilityenable = yes signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes restrictcid=no callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 callgroup=1 immediate=no callerid=asreceived musiconhold=default group=1 channel=1-15 channel=17-31 2006/12/29, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It sounds like it isn't configured correctly. Are you sure that your cabling is ok and that your span= line is correct? Matthew Fredrickson On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Josué Conti wrote: Hi all, as good? I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the following errors: Server1:~ # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. === == Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel
Re: RE : [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
Hi Francoise, thanks will be this attention. I verified to jumper of the TE110P, That´s closed (indicating link E1), in the tests without crc4, the error is the same, I of not intervene with nothing. Stranger is that I obtain you effect normally called and received too. In the ztcfg - vv to appear the 30 channels in isdn. Thank´s in advance Best Regards Josué 2006/12/29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Josué, Have you checked the strap on the TE110P board ? You must have it on the E1 position, not T1 (open ?, I don't remember at this hour, sorry). Check also without crc4. And recheck ztcfg -vvv. Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Josué Conti Envoyé : vendredi 29 décembre 2006 23:27 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig Hi Matthew thank's will be attention. I believe that the configurations are correct, I changed of server, one another hardware and the problem remains the same. :( Changing of protocol, for euroisdn the problem remains. Stranger, does not find? Best Regards Josue zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] language=us context=default switchtype=qsig nsf=none pridialplan=unknown prilocaldialplan=unknown facilityenable = yes signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes restrictcid=no callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 callgroup=1 immediate=no callerid=asreceived musiconhold=default group=1 channel=1-15 channel=17-31 2006/12/29, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It sounds like it isn't configured correctly. Are you sure that your cabling is ok and that your span= line is correct? Matthew Fredrickson On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Josué Conti wrote: Hi all, as good? I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the following errors: Server1:~ # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. === == Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8
[asterisk-users] TE110P with Qsig
Hi all, as good? I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the following errors: Server1:~ # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. = Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:54 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:55 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:56 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 NOTICE[5484]: chan_zap.c:8176 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: Alarm (4) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5484]: chan_zap.c:2289 pri_find_dchan: No D-channels available! Using Primary channel 16 as D-channel anyway! Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 1: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 1 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 2: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 2 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 3: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 3 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 4: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435 zt_disable_ec: Unable to disable echo cancellation on channel 4 Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:6337 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 5: Red Alarm Dec 28 21:31:57 WARNING[5485]: chan_zap.c:1435
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P Out fine / In Fail
On 12/6/06, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just installed Asterisk wit a TE110P card. I have configured 30 channels which seems to be recognised by staff and zap show channels. I can make outbound calls with exceptional call quality but inbound (receiving) calls the caller get a message saying Your call could not be connected, please check the number and try again. Nothing is displayed in the CLI. Is this a configuration problem with Asterisk or a problem with Verizon? Hi post your output errors from cli so its easy to identify the problem ram ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P Out fine / In Fail
I have just installed Asterisk wit a TE110P card. I have configured 30 channels which seems to be recognised by staff and zap show channels. I can make outbound calls with exceptional call quality but inbound (receiving) calls the caller get a message saying Your call could not be connected, please check the number and try again. Nothing is displayed in the CLI. Is this a configuration problem with Asterisk or a problem with Verizon? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P Out fine / In Fail
30 Channels on Verizon? Is this in the US? T1 (24 channels) or E1(30 channels)? Are you dialing from the top (g1) of the group or bottom (G1)? On 12/5/06, Klaverstyn, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just installed Asterisk wit a TE110P card. I have configured 30 channels which seems to be recognised by staff and zap show channels. I can make outbound calls with exceptional call quality but inbound (receiving) calls the caller get a message saying Your call could not be connected, please check the number and try again. Nothing is displayed in the CLI. Is this a configuration problem with Asterisk or a problem with Verizon? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
try this, pls give some feedback ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 fxsks=1-4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### On 11/22/06, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the scenarios: 1 - ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### modprobe wcte11xp ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 32: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcte11xp 2 - ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### modprobe wctdm ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 5: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wctdm 3 - ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 fxsks=32-35 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### modprobe wcte11xpok modprobe wctdmok modprobe wcfxook modprobe wct4xxpok modprobe zaptelok ### /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [channels] context=corsidian overlapdial=yes immediate=no callprogress=yes busydetect=no switchtype=euroisdn signalling=pri_net channel = 1-15,17-31 group=2 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 signalling=fxs_ks channel = 32-35 ### tail -f /var/log/asterisk/messages Nov 22 15:11:43 ERROR[5524] chan_zap.c: Channel 16 is reserved for D-channel. Nov 22 15:11:43 ERROR[5524] chan_zap.c: Unable to register channel '1-15' Nov 22 15:11:43 WARNING[5524] loader.c: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 Nov 22 15:11:43 WARNING[5524] loader.c: Loading module chan_zap.so failed! - Original Message - *From:* Henk Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* 'Lincoln Zuljewic Silva' [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Sent:* Wednesday, November 22, 2006 4:08 PM *Subject:* RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P I think that you are loading the drivers in the wrong order. You can change the order of loading are first define the E1 followed by the TDM400 Hope this helps, Henk -- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Lincoln Zuljewic Silva *Sent:* woensdag 22 november 2006 20:51 *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed above: :08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b1d9:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 169 I/O ports at e800 [size=256] Memory at febff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 :08:01.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device 79fe:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 193 I/O ports at e400 [size=256] Memory at febfe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 The problem is that I cant make the both cards to work together in the same server. Here is my /etc/zaptel.conf: ### fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 ### When I load the wctdm module, I get this error: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 5: No such device or address (6). Its sounds like the FXS module its tring to configure the channels 5 to 35 (E1 - ISDN Channels - TE110P card). Anybody already saw this ? Its possible to use this two cards in the same computer ? There is any separator that I can use in zaptel.conf to make the load of the modules dont mistakes itself ? Here is my versions: Debian kernel - 2.6.8 asterisk-1.2.12.1 libpri-1.2.4 zaptel-1.2.11 Thanks Lincoln ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Best regards, Marco Mouta ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 11:49:50AM +, Marco Mouta wrote: try this, pls give some feedback This one is evidently false: ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 It claims that the T1 span is the first one. However: fxsks=1-4 The analog span is the first one. Which is generally a bad idea, as it makes the analog card the master sync source for Zaptel (right?) bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
Ok, now it works: ideiafix:~# modprobe zaptel ideiafix:~# modprobe wcte11xp ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 32: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcte11xp ideiafix:~# modprobe wctdm ideiafix:~# modprobe wcte11xp Order to load: zaptel, wctdm, wcte11xp Thanks a lot Henk ! - Original Message - From: Henk Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Lincoln Zuljewic Silva' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:03 PM Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P I would suggest the following - remove the drivers - load them manually (zaptel, wcte11xp, wctdm) Run: Zttools - should show unconfigured cards. Take: /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 fxsks=32-35 loadzone = us defaultzone=us run: ztcfg -vv See what it is saying Hope this helps ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:47:27PM -0300, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote: Ok, now it works: ideiafix:~# modprobe zaptel ideiafix:~# modprobe wcte11xp ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 32: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcte11xp ideiafix:~# modprobe wctdm ideiafix:~# modprobe wcte11xp Order to load: zaptel, wctdm, wcte11xp No. This just goes to show that you should not run ztcfg automatically. An alternative experiment: sed -i -e 's/^install /#remmed out by Tzafrir# /' /etc/modprobe.d/zaptel wget http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/team/tzafrir/zaphelper/zaptel-helper . zaptel-helper # let's get asterisk out of our way, so we could unload modules: /etc/init.d/asterisk stop # start afresh: let's make sure we have no modules loaded unload_modules # now we're ready. Feel free to add a long sleep here. # let's load the modules: modprobe wctdm modprobe wcte11xp wait_for_zap_ctl # udev may take its time generating /dev/zap/ctl ztcfg # End of experiment. However, I would still recommend that you load the wctdm driver last. This takes slight editing of zaptel.conf (and zapata.conf), or using xpp/genaptelconf . To force that load order: cat EOF /etc/modules wcte11xp wctdm EOF (or use, surprise-surprise, genzaptelconf -dM). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed above: :08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b1d9:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 169 I/O ports at e800 [size=256] Memory at febff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 :08:01.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device 79fe:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 193 I/O ports at e400 [size=256] Memory at febfe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 The problem is that I cant make the both cards to work together in the same server. Here is my /etc/zaptel.conf: ### fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 ### When I load the wctdm module, I get this error: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 5: No such device or address (6). Its sounds like the FXS module its tring to configure the channels 5 to 35 (E1 - ISDN Channels - TE110P card). Anybody already saw this ? Its possible to use this two cards in the same computer ? There is any separator that I can use in zaptel.conf to make the load of the modules dont mistakes itself ? Here is my versions: Debian kernel - 2.6.8 asterisk-1.2.12.1 libpri-1.2.4 zaptel-1.2.11 Thanks Lincoln___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
I think that you are loading the drivers in the wrong order. You can change the order of loading are first define the E1 followed by the TDM400 Hope this helps, Henk _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lincoln Zuljewic Silva Sent: woensdag 22 november 2006 20:51 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed above: :08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b1d9:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 169 I/O ports at e800 [size=256] Memory at febff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 :08:01.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device 79fe:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 193 I/O ports at e400 [size=256] Memory at febfe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 The problem is that I cant make the both cards to work together in the same server. Here is my /etc/zaptel.conf: ### fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 ### When I load the wctdm module, I get this error: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 5: No such device or address (6). Its sounds like the FXS module its tring to configure the channels 5 to 35 (E1 - ISDN Channels - TE110P card). Anybody already saw this ? Its possible to use this two cards in the same computer ? There is any separator that I can use in zaptel.conf to make the load of the modules dont mistakes itself ? Here is my versions: Debian kernel - 2.6.8 asterisk-1.2.12.1 libpri-1.2.4 zaptel-1.2.11 Thanks Lincoln ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
This is the scenarios: 1 - ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### modprobe wcte11xp ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 32: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcte11xp 2 - ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### modprobe wctdm ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 5: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wctdm 3 - ### /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 fxsks=32-35 loadzone = us defaultzone=us ### modprobe wcte11xpok modprobe wctdmok modprobe wcfxook modprobe wct4xxpok modprobe zaptelok ### /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [channels] context=corsidian overlapdial=yes immediate=no callprogress=yes busydetect=no switchtype=euroisdn signalling=pri_net channel = 1-15,17-31 group=2 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 signalling=fxs_ks channel = 32-35 ### tail -f /var/log/asterisk/messages Nov 22 15:11:43 ERROR[5524] chan_zap.c: Channel 16 is reserved for D-channel. Nov 22 15:11:43 ERROR[5524] chan_zap.c: Unable to register channel '1-15' Nov 22 15:11:43 WARNING[5524] loader.c: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 Nov 22 15:11:43 WARNING[5524] loader.c: Loading module chan_zap.so failed! - Original Message - From: Henk Dick To: 'Lincoln Zuljewic Silva' ; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 4:08 PM Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P I think that you are loading the drivers in the wrong order. You can change the order of loading are first define the E1 followed by the TDM400 Hope this helps, Henk -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lincoln Zuljewic Silva Sent: woensdag 22 november 2006 20:51 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed above: :08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b1d9:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 169 I/O ports at e800 [size=256] Memory at febff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 :08:01.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device 79fe:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 193 I/O ports at e400 [size=256] Memory at febfe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 The problem is that I cant make the both cards to work together in the same server. Here is my /etc/zaptel.conf: ### fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 ### When I load the wctdm module, I get this error: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 5: No such device or address (6). Its sounds like the FXS module its tring to configure the channels 5 to 35 (E1 - ISDN Channels - TE110P card). Anybody already saw this ? Its possible to use this two cards in the same computer ? There is any separator that I can use in zaptel.conf to make the load of the modules dont mistakes itself ? Here is my versions: Debian kernel - 2.6.8 asterisk-1.2.12.1 libpri-1.2.4 zaptel-1.2.11 Thanks Lincoln ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
I would suggest the following - remove the drivers - load them manually (zaptel, wcte11xp, wctdm) Run: Zttools - should show unconfigured cards. Take: /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 fxsks=32-35 loadzone = us defaultzone=us run: ztcfg -vv See what it is saying Hope this helps ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE110P and TDM400P
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:51:24PM -0300, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote: Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed above: :08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b1d9:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 169 I/O ports at e800 [size=256] Memory at febff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 :08:01.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device 79fe:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 193 I/O ports at e400 [size=256] Memory at febfe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 The problem is that I cant make the both cards to work together in the same server. Here is my /etc/zaptel.conf: ### fxsks=1-4 loadzone = us defaultzone=us span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=5-19,21-35 dchan=20 ### When I load the wctdm module, I get this error: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 5: No such device or address (6). Its sounds like the FXS module its tring to configure the channels 5 to 35 (E1 - ISDN Channels - TE110P card). Anybody already saw this ? Its possible to use this two cards in the same computer ? There is any separator that I can use in zaptel.conf to make the load of the modules dont mistakes itself ? Here is my versions: Debian kernel - 2.6.8 As you use Debian, you should expect the drivers to be loaded by hotplug before you run you zaptel init stuff. So simply load them before that. Add the following two lines to /etc/modules : wcte11xp wctdm Use the init.d script from the Debian zaptel package, as the sample one from the package will only break your setup. Also, be sure to remove the install ... lines from /etc/modprobe.d/zaptel if there are any, and run ztcfg only in the zaptel init.d script. asterisk-1.2.12.1 libpri-1.2.4 zaptel-1.2.11 -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] TE110P Card Little help
Hi, I really need some assistance in installing and configuring this card. I have already physically installed it into the computer which is running Mandriva 2006. I have compiled and installed asterisk 1.2.13 along with zaptel-1.2.10 and libpri-1.2.4. However I do not know what the next step is. Better yet several sites that list some kind of walk through are completely different from each other. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Julian From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comDate: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:45:50 +Subject: [asterisk-users] TE110P Card Hi Groupies,I am sort of new to the whole asterisk thing, especially when it comes to the Digium TE110P card. Does anyone have experience setting this up? If so can you help me out? The provider for the PRI is going to be ATT/SBC.ThanksJulian ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P Card
Hi Groupies,I am sort of new to the whole asterisk thing, especially when it comes to the Digium TE110P card. Does anyone have experience setting this up? If so can you help me out? The provider for the PRI is going to be ATT/SBC.ThanksJulian ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] te110p and te205p behavioural differences
I'm running both these cards in different boxes. MB chipset is the
same. I see consistently zero IRQ misses on the 205p and 9/10 timing
samples at 100%.
the te110p is a different story. No amount of optimisation can get the
timing up to 100% consistently. 1 out of 15 zttest samples will come
back at 100%. I also get the odd IRQ miss trickling in. We're up to 6
at present.
Is this normal behaviour for the te110p?
Also, lspci -vb displays the te110p as a network controller and the
te205p as a communications controller. Does this have something to
do with it?
Also, doing a zap show channel {n} on the 205p shows the dsp
parameter as yes. for the 110p, this comes back as no. Can someone
help me understand what this parameter describes?
This activity is an attempt to debug some voice quality issues that I
am seeing at one particular site. We don't have these issues at the
site running the 205p although the other hardware and client solution
are substantially the same.
thanks,
Mark .
--
regards,
Mark P. Edwards
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE110P configuration problem
Read my post in this last April [Asterisk-Users] R2 protocol error you can find some guide from the Unicall creator. Goodluck! Also I think the subject wont attract Asterisk-MFC-R2 user, since its a kind of zaptel configuration issue. Dennis __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P on E1
Hi, I wonder if anyone is using Digium's TE110P card on an E1 connection. I have been try to, but so far it wasn't much of a success. It only works more or less in EuroISDN as PRI CPE. And even that config gives me some trouble with channel negotiation. My current config: zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 loadzone=be defaultzone=be zapata.conf: [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1,1 [channels] context=incoming-pri switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=national prilocaldialplan=national signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channels = 1-15,17-31 I have tried EuroISDN and QSIG in both NET and CPE, without much success. From traces of D-channel messaging, I think there's a problem with channel negotiation. The information element (IE) involved only shows 5 bytes coming from our PBX. But Asterisk (Zaptel) uses 6 bytes. From pri debug messages on Asterisk, I see that it adds a DS1 Identifier. I haven't seen that in other d-channel traces between other systems. Anyone with experience on this matter??? Regards, Koen ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P on E1
For BT in the UK I use :- zaptel.conf loadzone = uk defaultzone=uk span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] language=en context=did priindication = outofband usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=v23 usecallingpres=yes sendcalleridafter=1 switchtype = euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling = pri_cpe group = 1 channel = 1-15 channel = 17-31 overlap=yes On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:34, Koen Van Impe wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone is using Digium's TE110P card on an E1 connection. I have been try to, but so far it wasn't much of a success. It only works more or less in EuroISDN as PRI CPE. And even that config gives me some trouble with channel negotiation. My current config: zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 loadzone=be defaultzone=be zapata.conf: [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1,1 [channels] context=incoming-pri switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=national prilocaldialplan=national signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channels = 1-15,17-31 I have tried EuroISDN and QSIG in both NET and CPE, without much success. From traces of D-channel messaging, I think there's a problem with channel negotiation. The information element (IE) involved only shows 5 bytes coming from our PBX. But Asterisk (Zaptel) uses 6 bytes. From pri debug messages on Asterisk, I see that it adds a DS1 Identifier. I haven't seen that in other d-channel traces between other systems. Anyone with experience on this matter??? Regards, Koen __ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Hi Paul, Thanks for the message! On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote: [...] I am curious.. Have you tried disabling CPU1 by setting isolcpus=1 on the kernel command line ? This will make the kernel ignore the second CPU - you can then run asterisk on it by using the taskset command (from schedutils) taskset 0x0001 asterisk -p and asterisk wlll run on a CPU all on its own. I was about to try this and wondered if you might give it a try and report back. I haven't done this yet. Once we have physical access to the machine, I'll make sure we try this out and see what difference it makes. Cheers! Gerald. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
I don't know if this only works with multiple cpus but I have HT enabled and it shows cpu0 and cpu1 .. I tried the first part of this email and still the kernel boots and shows 2 cpus.. Will this only work with 2 real cpus? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Begumisa Gerald M |Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |Hi Paul, | |Thanks for the message! | | On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote: | [...] | I am curious.. | | Have you tried disabling CPU1 by setting isolcpus=1 on |the kernel | command line ? | | This will make the kernel ignore the second CPU - you |can then run | asterisk on it by using the taskset command (from schedutils) | | taskset 0x0001 asterisk -p | | and asterisk wlll run on a CPU all on its own. I was about to try | this and wondered if you might give it a try and report back. | |I haven't done this yet. Once we have physical access to the |machine, I'll make sure we try this out and see what |difference it makes. | | |Cheers! |Gerald. |___ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | | ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
On 4/11/06, Begumisa Gerald M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own IRQ, it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The reason that it is suggested to disable the IO-APIC is that on many low-end systems, Allow me to comment that Digium actually recommends turning off APIC and using lspci -vb to troubleshoot this kind of shared-interrupt problem. Interesting. Now 'why' do they suggest it, is it because older IO-APIC are 'broken' on some boards? I'm very curious as to 'why', because that would give everyone a better idea on what to look for when having this kind of problems. cheers ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, stoffell wrote: Interesting. Now 'why' do they suggest it, is it because older IO-APIC are 'broken' on some boards? I'm very curious as to 'why', [...] Most likely this is why. Regards, Gerald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
On Monday 17 April 2006 12:39, Anton Krall wrote: I don't know if this only works with multiple cpus but I have HT enabled and it shows cpu0 and cpu1 .. I tried the first part of this email and still the kernel boots and shows 2 cpus.. Will this only work with 2 real cpus? I believe so. Hyperthreading is not really SMP. Additionally I think that HT should not be used if asterisk is doing a lot of transcoding - whilst HT gives u 2 'pipes' there is still only one FPU and heavy transcoding will simply bottleneck at the FPU(NB SSE/MMX count as FP since they use the FP registers.). If u turn HT on, a 1% penalty is incurred fir the mutexes required so heavy use of the FPU will actually show a decrease in speed compared to no HT. In theory at least. :-) Paul Hewlett |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Begumisa Gerald M |Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |Hi Paul, | |Thanks for the message! | | On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote: | [...] | | I am curious.. | | Have you tried disabling CPU1 by setting isolcpus=1 on | |the kernel | | command line ? | | This will make the kernel ignore the second CPU - you | |can then run | | asterisk on it by using the taskset command (from schedutils) | | taskset 0x0001 asterisk -p | | and asterisk wlll run on a CPU all on its own. I was about to try | this and wondered if you might give it a try and report back. | |I haven't done this yet. Once we have physical access to the |machine, I'll make sure we try this out and see what |difference it makes. | | |Cheers! |Gerald. |___ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
What you say makes a lot of sense... Well.. I disabled HT and Im still having irqmisses :( I stil have to try the latency idea.. Hope that helps.. |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Paul Hewlett |Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 12:19 PM |To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |On Monday 17 April 2006 12:39, Anton Krall wrote: | I don't know if this only works with multiple cpus but I have HT | enabled and it shows cpu0 and cpu1 .. I tried the first part of this | email and still the kernel boots and shows 2 cpus.. Will this only | work with 2 real cpus? | | I believe so. Hyperthreading is not really SMP. | | Additionally I think that HT should not be used if asterisk |is doing a lot of transcoding - whilst HT gives u 2 'pipes' |there is still only one FPU and heavy transcoding will simply |bottleneck at the FPU(NB SSE/MMX count as FP since they use |the FP registers.). If u turn HT on, a 1% penalty is incurred |fir the mutexes required so heavy use of the FPU will actually |show a decrease in speed compared to no HT. In theory at least. :-) | |Paul Hewlett | | |-Original Message- | |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of | |Begumisa Gerald M | |Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM | |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion | |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | | | |Hi Paul, | | | |Thanks for the message! | | | | On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote: | | [...] | | | | I am curious.. | | | | Have you tried disabling CPU1 by setting isolcpus=1 on | | | |the kernel | | | | command line ? | | | | This will make the kernel ignore the second CPU - you | | | |can then run | | | | asterisk on it by using the taskset command (from schedutils) | | | | taskset 0x0001 asterisk -p | | | | and asterisk wlll run on a CPU all on its own. I was |about to try | | this and wondered if you might give it a try and report back. | | | |I haven't done this yet. Once we have physical access to |the machine, | |I'll make sure we try this out and see what difference it makes. | | | | | |Cheers! | |Gerald. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 21:45, Begumisa Gerald M wrote: Hi, I've been battling with a similar issue: a) I wrote a script to periodically run the command cat /proc/interrupts and figure out the interrupts per second. I run this script for over 24 hours and never once did the difference between the preceeding and succeeding interrupt counts go below 1005 (wierd result because of (b) below); b) zttest was reporting very bad results; c) lspci -vb was reporting that the TE110P shared an IRQ with the Gigabit Ethernet Card (IRQ 11) d) lspci -vv was reporting that the TE110P was on an IRQ of its own (IRQ 24) probably because of APIC (wierd because of (c) above); e) Users reported intermittent bad audio; Below are the [experimental] steps I took: a) I'm running a Dual 3.2 GHz machine - the network card is services by CPU0 - I set the smp_affinity value for the Digium card to be CPU1 I am curious.. Have you tried disabling CPU1 by setting isolcpus=1 on the kernel command line ? This will make the kernel ignore the second CPU - you can then run asterisk on it by using the taskset command (from schedutils) taskset 0x0001 asterisk -p and asterisk wlll run on a CPU all on its own. I was about to try this and wondered if you might give it a try and report back. b) I disabled the userland 'irqbalance' process which keeps switching the Digium card between the CPUs c) I increased the PCI LATENCY_TIMER value for the TE110P to a value higher than the Gigabit Card. So far, things are looking quite good - zttest is reporting very encouraging worst-case figures when run over a period of over an hour (it reports 99.98% worst case at off peak time and 99.77% when run during the busy hour). Ultimately when I have physical access to the machine, I will change the PCI slots to see if getting lspci -vb to report that the card is on its own IRQ will improve performance further. There is a lot of rubbish said about interrupts - if possible use the APIC - it is the new beast that solves interrupt starvation problems. Seeing if the card has an IRQ 5 as reported by lspci is misleading - this is the IRQ that would be used if operating in old mode and in old mode you will have to disable all kinds of things to make it work. In APIC mode, new hardware comes into play and each device can have its own interrupt - it is the way to go. The only problem is that uniprocessor APIC implementations are known to be badly done - recent motherboards should be OK. For elucidation see http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/IO-APIC.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/apic.mspx http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Programmable_Interrupt_Controller http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_APIC_Architecture Paul Hewlett ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
On Monday 10 April 2006 19:20, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote: Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel option. Notice this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. Then get your boards on different REAL irqs. Please do not open your mouth to spout nonsense if you do not know what you're talking about. APIC interrupts are far more real than emulated XT-PIC interrupts. If the IO-APIC can put each device on its own high interrupt it means that that INT# signal on the PCI slot *is* on a totally separate, physical IRQ line which is routed into that APIC. When you disable native APIC mode you force it into compatibility mode, where it essentially performs a logical OR on the real, separate IRQ lines and gives you a single, edge-triggered i8259-style low IRQ. (In reality it's not a logical OR since the XT (i8259-style) interrupts are edge-triggered, not level triggered, but that's neither here nor there for this particular discussion.) Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own IRQ, it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The reason that it is suggested to disable the IO-APIC is that on many low-end systems, the IO-APIC is plain old broken and causing other issues. I don't think I've run across a system board in the last year or two with that issue, though. It's always been on older P3 and early P4 systems. Anton, your problem is very likely simple interrupt load. You have three Digium cards in there, and they're all generating their own 1000Hz interrupt. If you did the newbie thing and compiled your kernel with a HZ value of '1000' because you felt it would be better, you have that overhead as well. Your system is very likely just having trouble coping with so many interrupts. My personal opinion is that you should sell the three Digium cards and buy a single dualspan card and a cheap channel bank. Your interrupt load will drop by 2/3 and your system will be FAR happier. So check the kernel HZ value first; I set *all* my Asterisk systems to the old style HZ of 100; there is simply no need for anything more on a server, *especially* if you've already got hardware providing a real 1000Hz interrupt instead of ztdummy trying to emulate such a thing. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 19:25 -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote: Anton Krall wrote: I will try that and see what happens... This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues like this on supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them? If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you assign irq to certain pci ports right? Will that help? Also, is there a way/is it recommended to increase the latency for these devices? We tried to use a supermicro board once. We could not make it work with Asterisk and a Digium TE card if there was any usage of the IDE controller. We made the system a new file server and went with an Intel branded board. I'm running a Supermicro system with a te110p and a tdm40b. I have HT turned off in the bios and I have acpi=off noapic added as boot options in grub. The cards work just fine. FYI, Kenny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Hi Andrew... Thank you very much for the info. I didn't recompile the kernel, Im using a generic 2.6 kernel but its worth taking a look at what you said.. Where can I find (which file) the Hz the kernel was precompiled to? Also, Im running 1 te110p and 2 tdm cards, probably I'll disable 1 card later but I will need at least 1 tdm and the te110p for my E1. So you suggest not disabling any apic/acpi stuff then.. How about HT? should I disable that on the bios? Im using supermicro servers and eventhough I get voice calls without problems, Im getting a few IRQ Misses from time to time which makes faxing on the E1 very difficult (the original problem). What do you think? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Andrew Kohlsmith |Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:37 AM |To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |On Monday 10 April 2006 19:20, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote: | Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel |option. Notice | this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. Then get your | boards on different REAL irqs. | |Please do not open your mouth to spout nonsense if you do not |know what you're talking about. | |APIC interrupts are far more real than emulated XT-PIC |interrupts. If the IO-APIC can put each device on its own |high interrupt it means that that INT# signal on the PCI |slot *is* on a totally separate, physical IRQ line which is |routed into that APIC. When you disable native APIC mode you |force it into compatibility mode, where it essentially |performs a logical OR on the real, separate IRQ lines and |gives you a single, edge-triggered i8259-style low IRQ. | |(In reality it's not a logical OR since the XT (i8259-style) |interrupts are edge-triggered, not level triggered, but that's |neither here nor there for this particular discussion.) | |Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own |IRQ, it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The |reason that it is suggested to disable the IO-APIC is that on |many low-end systems, the IO-APIC is plain old broken and |causing other issues. I don't think I've run across a system |board in the last year or two with that issue, though. It's |always been on older P3 and early P4 systems. | |Anton, your problem is very likely simple interrupt load. You |have three Digium cards in there, and they're all generating |their own 1000Hz interrupt. |If you did the newbie thing and compiled your kernel with a HZ |value of '1000' because you felt it would be better, you have |that overhead as well. | |Your system is very likely just having trouble coping with so |many interrupts. |My personal opinion is that you should sell the three Digium |cards and buy a single dualspan card and a cheap channel bank. | Your interrupt load will drop by 2/3 and your system will be |FAR happier. | |So check the kernel HZ value first; I set *all* my Asterisk |systems to the old style HZ of 100; there is simply no need |for anything more on a server, |*especially* if you've already got hardware providing a real |1000Hz interrupt instead of ztdummy trying to emulate such a thing. | |-A. |___ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | | ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Zttool shows no irqmisses on the te110p card? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Kenneth Lussier |Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:05 AM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 19:25 -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote: | Anton Krall wrote: | I will try that and see what happens... | This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues |like this | on supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them? | | If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you |assign irq to | certain pci ports right? Will that help? | | Also, is there a way/is it recommended to increase the latency for | these devices? | | We tried to use a supermicro board once. We could not make it work | with Asterisk and a Digium TE card if there was any usage of the IDE | controller. We made the system a new file server and went with an | Intel branded board. | |I'm running a Supermicro system with a te110p and a tdm40b. I |have HT turned off in the bios and I have acpi=off noapic |added as boot options in grub. The cards work just fine. | |FYI, |Kenny | | ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
R: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Hi Anton, I'm using a supermicro P4 3GHz P8SCT (Intel E7221 chipset) with TE205P and a TDM04 and I've similar problem. I was using linux 2.6.9smp that seams to have problem with APCI so Hyperthreading, even if enabled, was not working (I sow 1 cpu). Today I've disable hypertrading and start using mono processor kernel, disabled both serial and parallel interfaces (via bios setup), prevent loading of kernel module for second gigabit interface card and zaptel tdm module (I not using tdm04 interface at the moment). These bios changes also seams to have disabled APIC (is it related to hyperthreading ?). However, after all this I've a 4 busy hours of no chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 2 error. I'll make you know for news. Take also a look at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+hardware , chrisre seams to had our same problem with TE110 and supermicro. Simone -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Anton Krall Inviato: martedì 11 aprile 2006 5.28 A: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts Damn :) any others? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric |ManxPower Wieling |Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:25 PM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |Anton Krall wrote: | I will try that and see what happens... | This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues |like this on | supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them? | | If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you assign irq to | certain pci ports right? Will that help? | | Also, is there a way/is it recommended to increase the latency for | these devices? | |We tried to use a supermicro board once. We could not make it work |with Asterisk and a Digium TE card if there was any usage of the IDE |controller. We made the system a new file server and went with an |Intel branded board. |___ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | | ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: Please do not open your mouth to spout nonsense if you do not know what you're talking about. [...] Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own IRQ, it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The reason that it is suggested to disable the IO-APIC is that on many low-end systems, the IO-APIC is plain old broken and causing other issues. I don't think I've run across a system board in the last year or two with that issue, though. It's always been on older P3 and early P4 systems. Allow me to comment that Digium actually recommends turning off APIC and using lspci -vb to troubleshoot this kind of shared-interrupt problem. Cheers, Gerald. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Hi, I've been battling with a similar issue: a) I wrote a script to periodically run the command cat /proc/interrupts and figure out the interrupts per second. I run this script for over 24 hours and never once did the difference between the preceeding and succeeding interrupt counts go below 1005 (wierd result because of (b) below); b) zttest was reporting very bad results; c) lspci -vb was reporting that the TE110P shared an IRQ with the Gigabit Ethernet Card (IRQ 11) d) lspci -vv was reporting that the TE110P was on an IRQ of its own (IRQ 24) probably because of APIC (wierd because of (c) above); e) Users reported intermittent bad audio; Below are the [experimental] steps I took: a) I'm running a Dual 3.2 GHz machine - the network card is services by CPU0 - I set the smp_affinity value for the Digium card to be CPU1 b) I disabled the userland 'irqbalance' process which keeps switching the Digium card between the CPUs c) I increased the PCI LATENCY_TIMER value for the TE110P to a value higher than the Gigabit Card. So far, things are looking quite good - zttest is reporting very encouraging worst-case figures when run over a period of over an hour (it reports 99.98% worst case at off peak time and 99.77% when run during the busy hour). Ultimately when I have physical access to the machine, I will change the PCI slots to see if getting lspci -vb to report that the card is on its own IRQ will improve performance further. Cheers, Gerald. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8223 sample intervals 99.621582% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8400 sample intervals 97.460938% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8438 sample intervals 96.997070% --- Results after 15 passes --- Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 96.997070 -- Average: 99.601237 And for the te110p: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 1 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8239 sample intervals 99.426270% 8192 samples in 8200 sample intervals 99.902344% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8384 sample intervals 97.656250% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% --- Results after 20 passes --- Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 97.656250 -- Average: 99.843140 Im getting problems receiving faxes which can be caused by this. As you can see, the cards are not sharing IRQs as far as I cant tell CPU0 CPU1 0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer 7: 2 2IO-APIC-edge parport0 8: 1 0IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 1 IO-APIC-level acpi 14: 103455 112606IO-APIC-edge ide0 15: 0 0IO-APIC-edge libata 169: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb2 185:2793868 12 IO-APIC-level eth0 201: 0 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd:usb1 209: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb3 217: 19672684 15531101 IO-APIC-level wcte11xp 225: 17824822 17371238 IO-APIC-level wctdm 233: 15323598 19896224 IO-APIC-level wctdm So, can anybody point me in the right direction in order to debug the problem with zttest and quality of sound? How can I change prioritiess for the cards or maybe adjust or see if they get their right number of interrupts, etc? Thx for the help guys! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts..On 4/10/06, Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system:Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -vOpened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8223 sample intervals 99.621582%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8400 sample intervals 97.460938%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8438 sample intervals 96.997070%--- Results after 15 passes ---Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 96.997070 -- Average: 99.601237And for the te110p:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 1 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...8192 samples in 8239 sample intervals 99.426270%8192 samples in 8200 sample intervals 99.902344%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8384 sample intervals 97.656250%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793%--- Results after 20 passes ---Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 97.656250 -- Average: 99.843140Im getting problems receiving faxes which can be caused by this.As you can see, the cards are not sharing IRQs as far as I cant tell CPU0 CPU10: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edgetimer 7:22IO-APIC-edgeparport08:10IO-APIC-edgertc9:01 IO-APIC-levelacpi 14: 103455 112606IO-APIC-edgeide0 15:00IO-APIC-edgelibata169:00 IO-APIC-leveluhci_hcd:usb2185:2793868 12 IO-APIC-leveleth0201:00 IO-APIC-levelehci_hcd:usb1209:00 IO-APIC-leveluhci_hcd:usb3217: 19672684 15531101 IO-APIC-levelwcte11xp225: 17824822 17371238 IO-APIC-levelwctdm233: 15323598 19896224 IO-APIC-levelwctdmSo, can anybody point me in the right direction in order to debug the problem with zttest and quality of sound?How can I change prioritiess for the cards or maybe adjust or see if theyget their right number of interrupts, etc?Thx for the help guys!___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
This system has acpi enabled. This is how the cards looks like: 217: 22201132 17764597 IO-APIC-level wcte11xp225: 20253291 19707036 IO-APIC-level wctdm233: 17510466 22474179 IO-APIC-level wctdm but if you run lspci .vb to see how the system sees the cards: 02:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device 795e:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at 2000 Memory at dd20 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 02:08.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at 2800 Memory at dd201000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 03:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at 3000 Memory at dd40 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 I dont get it, the system sees everything on IRQ5 eventhough the kernel sees everything in diff. IRQ: 02:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface02:08.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface03:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Also, latency for the cards is 32... i enabled the watchdog on zttool and I do see Missed IRQ/interrupts on zttooll for the te110p card... how can I fix this? Ive read some stuff around but so far.. nothing makes sense to me... :( From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Infobox PeruSent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:47 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts.. On 4/10/06, Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system:Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -vOpened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8223 sample intervals 99.621582%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8400 sample intervals 97.460938%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8438 sample intervals 96.997070%--- Results after 15 passes ---Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 96.997070 -- Average: 99.601237And for the te110p:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 1 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...8192 samples in 8239 sample intervals 99.426270%8192 samples in 8200 sample intervals 99.902344%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8384 sample intervals 97.656250%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00%8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793%--- Results after 20 passes ---Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 97.656250 -- Average: 99.843140Im getting problems receiving faxes which can be caused by this.As you can see, the cards are not sharing IRQs as far as I cant tell CPU0 CPU10: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edgetimer 7:22IO-APIC-edgeparport08:10IO-APIC-edgertc9:01 IO-APIC-levelacpi14: 103455 112606IO-APIC-edgeide015:00IO-APIC-edgelibata169:00 IO-APIC-leveluhci_hcd:usb2185:2793868 12 IO-APIC-leveleth0201:00 IO-APIC-levelehci_hcd:usb1209:00 IO-APIC-leveluhci_hcd:usb3217
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel option. Notice this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. Then get your boards on different REAL irqs. Moj Anton Krall wrote: This system has acpi enabled. This is how the cards looks like: 217: 22201132 17764597 IO-APIC-level wcte11xp 225: 20253291 19707036 IO-APIC-level wctdm 233: 17510466 22474179 IO-APIC-level wctdm but if you run lspci .vb to see how the system sees the cards: 02:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device 795e:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at 2000 Memory at dd20 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 02:08.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at 2800 Memory at dd201000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 03:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at 3000 Memory at dd40 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 I dont get it, the system sees everything on IRQ5 eventhough the kernel sees everything in diff. IRQ: 02:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface 02:08.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface 03:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Also, latency for the cards is 32... i enabled the watchdog on zttool and I do see Missed IRQ/interrupts on zttooll for the te110p card... how can I fix this? Ive read some stuff around but so far.. nothing makes sense to me... :( *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Infobox Peru *Sent:* Monday, April 10, 2006 5:47 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts.. On 4/10/06, *Anton Krall* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8223 sample intervals 99.621582% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8400 sample intervals 97.460938% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8438 sample intervals 96.997070% --- Results after 15 passes --- Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 96.997070 -- Average: 99.601237 And for the te110p: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 1 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8239 sample intervals 99.426270% 8192 samples in 8200 sample intervals 99.902344% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8384 sample intervals 97.656250% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled? If it is P4, I would recommend to disable HT. Try changing PCI slots for one of the cards (if you have spare PCI slots). CPU0 CPU1 0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
I will try that and see what happens... This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues like this on supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them? If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you assign irq to certain pci ports right? Will that help? Also, is there a way/is it recommended to increase the latency for these devices? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Mojo with Horan Company, LLC |Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 6:20 PM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel option. |Notice this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. |Then get your boards on different REAL irqs. | |Moj | |Anton Krall wrote: | This system has acpi enabled. This is how the cards looks like: | | 217: 22201132 17764597 IO-APIC-level wcte11xp | 225: 20253291 19707036 IO-APIC-level wctdm | 233: 17510466 22474179 IO-APIC-level wctdm | | but if you run lspci .vb to see how the system sees the cards: | | 02:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX |Modem/ISDN | interface | Subsystem: Unknown device 795e:0001 | Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 | I/O ports at 2000 | Memory at dd20 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) | Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 |02:08.0 Network | controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface | Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 | Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 | I/O ports at 2800 | Memory at dd201000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) | Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 | | 03:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX |Modem/ISDN | interface | Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 | Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 | I/O ports at 3000 | Memory at dd40 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) | Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 | | I dont get it, the system sees everything on IRQ5 eventhough the | kernel sees everything in diff. IRQ: | | 02:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX |Modem/ISDN | interface 02:08.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. |Tiger3XX | Modem/ISDN interface 03:02.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network | Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Also, latency for the cards is | 32... | | i enabled the watchdog on zttool and I do see Missed |IRQ/interrupts on | zttooll for the te110p card... how can I fix this? | | Ive read some stuff around but so far.. nothing makes sense to me... | :( | | | |--- |- | *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of | *Infobox Peru | *Sent:* Monday, April 10, 2006 5:47 PM | *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion | *Subject:* Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | | use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts.. | | On 4/10/06, *Anton Krall* [EMAIL PROTECTED] | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b | cards on the | same system: | | Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v | Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... | | 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% | 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% | 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% | 8192 samples in 8223 sample intervals 99.621582% | 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% | 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% | 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% | 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% | 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% | 8192 samples in 8400 sample intervals 97.460938% | 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% | 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% | 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.00% | 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% | 8192 samples in 8438 sample intervals 96.997070% | --- Results after 15 passes --- | Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 96.997070 -- Average: 99.601237 | | And for the te110p: | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 1 -v | Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... | | 8192 samples in 8239 sample intervals 99.426270% | 8192 samples in 8200 sample intervals 99.902344% | 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% | 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
This is a Xeon with HT... I remember I disabled HT on supermicros bios but then again, maybe somebody enabled it again.. Thats why its showing 2 cpus? Ill disable it too.. Thx for the hint.. BTW why did you commented the timer line? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Boris Bakchiev |Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 6:26 PM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled? |If it is P4, I would recommend to disable HT. | |Try changing PCI slots for one of the cards (if you have spare |PCI slots). | | CPU0 CPU1 | 0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer |___ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | | ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Because it was what showed you had two CPUs: CPU0, CPU1 (Hyperthreading is kinda dual-coreish) Anton Krall wrote: This is a Xeon with HT... I remember I disabled HT on supermicros bios but then again, maybe somebody enabled it again.. That’s why its showing 2 cpus? Ill disable it too.. Thx for the hint.. BTW why did you commented the timer line? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Boris Bakchiev |Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 6:26 PM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled? |If it is P4, I would recommend to disable HT. | |Try changing PCI slots for one of the cards (if you have spare |PCI slots). | | CPU0 CPU1 | 0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer |___ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | | ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office Manger, Horan Company, LLC (907) 747- x112 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Anton Krall wrote: I will try that and see what happens... This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues like this on supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them? If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you assign irq to certain pci ports right? Will that help? Also, is there a way/is it recommended to increase the latency for these devices? We tried to use a supermicro board once. We could not make it work with Asterisk and a Digium TE card if there was any usage of the IDE controller. We made the system a new file server and went with an Intel branded board. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
Damn :) any others? |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Eric ManxPower Wieling |Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:25 PM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts | |Anton Krall wrote: | I will try that and see what happens... | This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues |like this on | supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them? | | If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you assign irq to | certain pci ports right? Will that help? | | Also, is there a way/is it recommended to increase the latency for | these devices? | |We tried to use a supermicro board once. We could not make it |work with Asterisk and a Digium TE card if there was any usage |of the IDE controller. We made the system a new file server |and went with an Intel branded board. |___ |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | | ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P errors
Hi All I have a TE110P card connected to a PRI line. In my zaptel.conf I have: span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 dchan=24 loadzone = us defaultzone=us and my zapata.conf is: [channels] context=inbound-pri switchtype = national pridialplan=unknown ;pridialplan=international signalling = pri_cpe callerid=asreceived busydetect=no usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no callwaitingcallerid=no threewaycalling=no echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=no echotraining=yes group = 1 channel = 1-23 When I load the wcte11xp module, I get the following: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: KB1 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:00.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 169 Controller version: 24 Wrote '10' but read '0' Wrote '11' but read '1' Wrote '12' but read '2' Wrote '13' but read '3' Wrote '14' but read '4' Wrote '15' but read '5' Wrote '16' but read '6' Wrote '17' but read '7' Wrote '18' but read '8' Wrote '19' but read '9' Wrote '1a' but read 'a' Wrote '1b' but read 'b' Wrote '1c' but read 'c' Wrote '1d' but read 'd' Wrote '1e' but read 'e' Wrote '1f' but read 'f' Wrote '30' but read '20' Wrote '31' but read '21' Wrote '32' but read '22' Wrote '33' but read '23' Wrote '34' but read '24' Wrote '35' but read '25' Wrote '36' but read '26' Wrote '37' but read '27' Wrote '38' but read '28' Wrote '39' but read '29' Wrote '3a' but read '2a' Wrote '3b' but read '2b' Wrote '3c' but read '2c' Wrote '3d' but read '2d' Wrote '3e' but read '2e' Wrote '3f' but read '2f' Wrote '40' but read '0' Wrote '41' but read '1' Wrote '42' but read '2' Wrote '43' but read '3' Wrote '44' but read '4' Wrote '45' but read '5' Wrote '46' but read '6' Wrote '47' but read '7' Wrote '48' but read '8' Wrote '49' but read '9' Wrote '4a' but read 'a' Wrote '4b' but read 'b' Wrote '4c' but read 'c' Wrote '4d' but read 'd' Wrote '4e' but read 'e' Wrote '4f' but read 'f' Wrote '60' but read '20' Wrote '61' but read '21' Wrote '62' but read '22' Wrote '63' but read '23' Wrote '64' but read '24' Wrote '65' but read '25' Wrote '66' but read '26' Wrote '67' but read '27' Wrote '68' but read '28' Wrote '69' but read '29' Wrote '6a' but read '2a' Wrote '6b' but read '2b' Wrote '6c' but read '2c' Wrote '6d' but read '2d' Wrote '6e' but read '2e' Wrote '6f' but read '2f' Wrote '90' but read '80' Wrote '91' but read '81' Wrote '92' but read '82' Wrote '93' but read '83' Wrote '94' but read '84' Wrote '95' but read '85' Wrote '96' but read '86' Wrote '97' but read '87' Wrote '98' but read '88' Wrote '99' but read '89' Wrote '9a' but read '8a' Wrote '9b' but read '8b' Wrote '9c' but read '8c' Wrote '9d' but read '8d' Wrote '9e' but read '8e' Wrote '9f' but read '8f' Wrote 'b0' but read 'a0' Wrote 'b1' but read 'a1' Wrote 'b2' but read 'a2' Wrote 'b3' but read 'a3' Wrote 'b4' but read 'a4' Wrote 'b5' but read 'a5' Wrote 'b6' but read 'a6' Wrote 'b7' but read 'a7' Wrote 'b8' but read 'a8' Wrote 'b9' but read 'a9' Wrote 'ba' but read 'aa' Wrote 'bb' but read 'ab' Wrote 'bc' but read 'ac' Wrote 'bd' but read 'ad' Wrote 'be' but read 'ae' Wrote 'bf' but read 'af' Wrote 'c0' but read '80' Wrote 'c1' but read '81' Wrote 'c2' but read '82' Wrote 'c3' but read '83' Wrote 'c4' but read '84' Wrote 'c5' but read '85' Wrote 'c6' but read '86' Wrote 'c7' but read '87' Wrote 'c8' but read '88' Wrote 'c9' but read '89' Wrote 'ca' but read '8a' Wrote 'cb' but read '8b' Wrote 'cc' but read '8c' Wrote 'cd' but read '8d' Wrote 'ce' but read '8e' Wrote 'cf' but read '8f' Wrote 'e0' but read 'a0' Wrote 'e1' but read 'a1' Wrote 'e2' but read 'a2' Wrote 'e3' but read 'a3' Wrote 'e4' but read 'a4' Wrote 'e5' but read 'a5' Wrote 'e6' but read 'a6' Wrote 'e7' but read 'a7' Wrote 'e8' but read 'a8' Wrote 'e9' but read 'a9' Wrote 'ea' but read 'aa' Wrote 'eb' but read 'ab' Wrote 'ec' but read 'ac' Wrote 'ed' but read 'ad' Wrote 'ee' but read 'ae' Wrote 'ef' but read 'af' FALC version: TE110P: Setting up global serial parameters for T1 FALC V1.2 TE110P: Successfully initialized serial bus for card Found a Wildcard: Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) TE110P: Span configured for ESF/B8ZS Calling startup (flags is 4099) wcte1xxp: Setting yellow alarm I have tried compiling zaptel and libpri from the download source on asterisk.org, I have pulled them from svn, and I even tried [EMAIL PROTECTED], all had the same effect. I have also tried the card in three different systems. Is this a config issue that I am missing, or can I assume a bad card? Thanks, Kenny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensions question
You need to have an extension defined for each number comig in. They may be 4 digit if that is how your circuit is ordered. You then need to create a dialplan to tell the call what to do. Yes you could create a group in zapata to use for outdial The pri will automatically allow up to 23 calls for one number as long as channels are available On Jan 21, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Dan Sully wrote: * Doug Lytle shaped the electrons to say... exten = 1153,1,Answer I can get the incoming call. If I try and do: exten = s,1,Answer Why would an incoming call have a destination of 1153? My incoming don't have a destination until the end user selects something from and IVR or and operator sends them on to an extension. The destination is the last 4 digits of the number I dial. It sounds like something isn't configured quite correctly at XO then. I wasn't able to find much useful information on the Wiki. You really didn't look that hard then, took me all but 10 seconds doing a search on zapata.conf That really was addressing my first question, not the second - which was easy to find - I just needed some confirmation. Thanks -D -- Ya gotta love UNIX, where else do you wonder whether you can kill a zombie spawned by a daemon's fork? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensions question
Dan Sully wrote: We've been given a block of 23 numbers for the PRI. If I explictly set the incoming extension in extensions.conf like: exten = 1153,1,Answer or: exten = _,1,Answer I can get the incoming call. If I try and do: exten = s,1,Answer Why would an incoming call have a destination of 1153? My incoming don't have a destination until the end user selects something from and IVR or and operator sends them on to an extension. A slightly reversed question for outgoing calls - do I assign a group of channels (in zapata.conf) to available for outgoing calls? Yes I wasn't able to find much useful information on the Wiki. You really didn't look that hard then, took me all but 10 seconds doing a search on zapata.conf http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+zapata.conf And here is a bit from it: *group*: Allows you to group together a number of channels so that the Dial http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+Dial command will treat the group as a single channel. When Dial tries to make a call on a Zap group, the Zap channel module will use the first available (i.e. non-busy) channel in the group for the call. Multiple group memberships may be specified with commas, and to signify no group membership, the portion after the equals sign may be omitted. Group numbers can range from 0 to 31. The default value is an empty string, i.e. no groups. group=1 group=2,3 group= -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensions question
* Doug Lytle shaped the electrons to say... exten = 1153,1,Answer I can get the incoming call. If I try and do: exten = s,1,Answer Why would an incoming call have a destination of 1153? My incoming don't have a destination until the end user selects something from and IVR or and operator sends them on to an extension. The destination is the last 4 digits of the number I dial. It sounds like something isn't configured quite correctly at XO then. I wasn't able to find much useful information on the Wiki. You really didn't look that hard then, took me all but 10 seconds doing a search on zapata.conf That really was addressing my first question, not the second - which was easy to find - I just needed some confirmation. Thanks -D -- Ya gotta love UNIX, where else do you wonder whether you can kill a zombie spawned by a daemon's fork? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensionsquestion
Relax your PRI is fine. What Xo is sending you is 4 digits os DID. If for example you have 1130-1153 as the last 4 digits of your Number you can use this to rout your calls. exten = 1130,1,Goto(ivr,s,1) Exten = 1140,1,Goto(extensionss,100,1) Exten = _X.,1,Zapateller Is the above config. XXX-XXX-1130 with go to the s extensions' first priority in the ivr context. XXX-XXX-1140 will go to extension 100 in the extensions context XXX-XXX- Will get a Zapateller tone. Any questions? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Sully Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 10:53 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensionsquestion * Doug Lytle shaped the electrons to say... exten = 1153,1,Answer I can get the incoming call. If I try and do: exten = s,1,Answer Why would an incoming call have a destination of 1153? My incoming don't have a destination until the end user selects something from and IVR or and operator sends them on to an extension. The destination is the last 4 digits of the number I dial. It sounds like something isn't configured quite correctly at XO then. I wasn't able to find much useful information on the Wiki. You really didn't look that hard then, took me all but 10 seconds doing a search on zapata.conf That really was addressing my first question, not the second - which was easy to find - I just needed some confirmation. Thanks -D -- Ya gotta love UNIX, where else do you wonder whether you can kill a zombie spawned by a daemon's fork? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensions question
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:32:26 -0500 Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why would an incoming call have a destination of 1153? On my asterisk, when a call comes from E1 the default destination is the last 4 digits. -- Iuri Gomes Diniz adm.iuri (at) digi.com.br Network Admin and Programmer [http://clx.digi.com.br] DIGINET [http://www.digi.com.br] Natal - RN - Brazil. -- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de anti-virus e acredita-se estar livre de perigo. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensionsquestion
* Alexander Lopez shaped the electrons to say... Relax your PRI is fine. What Xo is sending you is 4 digits os DID. If for example you have 1130-1153 as the last 4 digits of your Number you can use this to rout your calls. exten = 1130,1,Goto(ivr,s,1) Exten = 1140,1,Goto(extensionss,100,1) Exten = _X.,1,Zapateller Is the above config. XXX-XXX-1130 with go to the s extensions' first priority in the ivr context. XXX-XXX-1140 will go to extension 100 in the extensions context XXX-XXX- Will get a Zapateller tone. Any questions? Thanks - I got it sorted. Need more phones to test with. :) -D -- This knob controls the thing that changes when you turn it. - noah ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P + PRI incoming + outgoing extensions question
I just got a TE110P up on an XO PRI - everything looks good so far. We've been given a block of 23 numbers for the PRI. If I explictly set the incoming extension in extensions.conf like: exten = 1153,1,Answer or: exten = _,1,Answer I can get the incoming call. If I try and do: exten = s,1,Answer I'll see something like this: -- Extension '1153' in context 'default' from 'N' does not exist. Rejecting call on channel 0/1, span 1 Is using the _ method the prefered way of doing this? How am I able to have one main number that customers call into, use multiple channels on the PRI? A slightly reversed question for outgoing calls - do I assign a group of channels (in zapata.conf) to available for outgoing calls? I wasn't able to find much useful information on the Wiki. If anyone can point me in the right direction.. Thanks -D -- dr.pie 31336.5: the neighbor of the l33t ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 Why are you excluding channel 6? jvb ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
Hi guys, I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs. zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready. But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get the following Unable to load module chan_zap.so Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10546 setup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe' Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10171 setup_zap: Signalling must be specified before any channels are. Jan 5 21:43:33 WARNING[6808]: loader.c:414 __load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 My config is here below. TIA Arnar Gestsson /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = nl loadzone=de defaultzone=nl bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1 [channels] language=en context=default switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=5.0 txgain=1.0 echotraining=yes group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1-15,17-31 -- Arnar Gestsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
Hi, I think you didn't install the libpri. On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:48 +0100, Arnar Gestsson wrote: Hi guys, I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs. zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready. But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get the following Unable to load module chan_zap.so Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10546 setup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe' Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10171 setup_zap: Signalling must be specified before any channels are. Jan 5 21:43:33 WARNING[6808]: loader.c:414 __load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 My config is here below. TIA Arnar Gestsson /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = nl loadzone=de defaultzone=nl bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1 [channels] language=en context=default switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=5.0 txgain=1.0 echotraining=yes group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1-15,17-31 -- Domjan Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
Hi there, well supposedly I've compiled and installed libpri and it actually resides in /usr/lib. I've installed /usr/lib in the /etc/ld.so.conf explicitly but without a luck. But I'll check this path anyhow more thoroughly. Thanks for the advice. BR. Arnar On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:01 +0100, Domjan Attila wrote: Hi, I think you didn't install the libpri. On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:48 +0100, Arnar Gestsson wrote: Hi guys, I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs. zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready. But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get the following Unable to load module chan_zap.so Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10546 setup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe' Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10171 setup_zap: Signalling must be specified before any channels are. Jan 5 21:43:33 WARNING[6808]: loader.c:414 __load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 My config is here below. TIA Arnar Gestsson /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = nl loadzone=de defaultzone=nl bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1 [channels] language=en context=default switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=5.0 txgain=1.0 echotraining=yes group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1-15,17-31 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
Hi, did you compile the asterisk after the libpri install? check it! [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so libpri.so.1 = /usr/lib/libpri.so.1 (0x2ac3) libtonezone.so.1 = /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.1 (0x2ad58000) libc.so.6 = /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (0x2ae7f000) libm.so.6 = /lib64/tls/libm.so.6 (0x2b0b2000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x4000) On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:07 +0100, Arnar Gestsson wrote: Hi there, well supposedly I've compiled and installed libpri and it actually resides in /usr/lib. I've installed /usr/lib in the /etc/ld.so.conf explicitly but without a luck. But I'll check this path anyhow more thoroughly. Thanks for the advice. BR. Arnar On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:01 +0100, Domjan Attila wrote: Hi, I think you didn't install the libpri. On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:48 +0100, Arnar Gestsson wrote: Hi guys, I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs. zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready. But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get the following Unable to load module chan_zap.so Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10546 setup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe' Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10171 setup_zap: Signalling must be specified before any channels are. Jan 5 21:43:33 WARNING[6808]: loader.c:414 __load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 My config is here below. TIA Arnar Gestsson /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = nl loadzone=de defaultzone=nl bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1 [channels] language=en context=default switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=5.0 txgain=1.0 echotraining=yes group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1-15,17-31 -- Domjan Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
I had this problem and while not 100% sure. I think the solution was whitespace at the end of the lines in the conf file. Opened the file with vi, went to each line and hit end to make sure there were no extra spaces, there were, removed them, rebooted and issue went away. Hi guys, I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs. zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready. But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get the following Unable to load module chan_zap.so Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10546 setup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe' Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10171 setup_zap: Signalling must be specified before any channels are. Jan 5 21:43:33 WARNING[6808]: loader.c:414 __load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 My config is here below. TIA Arnar Gestsson /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = nl loadzone=de defaultzone=nl bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1 [channels] language=en context=default switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=5.0 txgain=1.0 echotraining=yes group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1-15,17-31 -- Arnar Gestsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.13/221 - Release Date: 1/4/2006 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
Good guess, I recompiled asterisk and now things are falling in place. Thanks for the pointers. BR. Arnar On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:12 +0100, Domjan Attila wrote: Hi, did you compile the asterisk after the libpri install? check it! [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so libpri.so.1 = /usr/lib/libpri.so.1 (0x2ac3) libtonezone.so.1 = /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.1 (0x2ad58000) libc.so.6 = /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (0x2ae7f000) libm.so.6 = /lib64/tls/libm.so.6 (0x2b0b2000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x4000) On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:07 +0100, Arnar Gestsson wrote: Hi there, well supposedly I've compiled and installed libpri and it actually resides in /usr/lib. I've installed /usr/lib in the /etc/ld.so.conf explicitly but without a luck. But I'll check this path anyhow more thoroughly. Thanks for the advice. BR. Arnar On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:01 +0100, Domjan Attila wrote: Hi, I think you didn't install the libpri. On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:48 +0100, Arnar Gestsson wrote: Hi guys, I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs. zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready. But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get the following Unable to load module chan_zap.so Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10546 setup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe' Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10171 setup_zap: Signalling must be specified before any channels are. Jan 5 21:43:33 WARNING[6808]: loader.c:414 __load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 My config is here below. TIA Arnar Gestsson /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = nl loadzone=de defaultzone=nl bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1 [channels] language=en context=default switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=5.0 txgain=1.0 echotraining=yes group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1-15,17-31 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized
I have seen issues where people had edited the files in windows. The hint is that Asterisk was complaining about having ^M in the config files PaulH - Original Message - From: stotaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:17 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110p and pri_cpe signalling not recognized I had this problem and while not 100% sure. I think the solution was whitespace at the end of the lines in the conf file. Opened the file with vi, went to each line and hit end to make sure there were no extra spaces, there were, removed them, rebooted and issue went away. Hi guys, I've been installing and configuring a TE110p card. The compile and install went very well. I'm using this on FC4 and I compile with linux26 as well checked I on the udev configs. zttool and ztcfg both indicate that the card is ready. But when I try to load chan_zap.so then I get the following Unable to load module chan_zap.so Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10546 setup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe' Jan 5 21:43:33 ERROR[6808]: chan_zap.c:10171 setup_zap: Signalling must be specified before any channels are. Jan 5 21:43:33 WARNING[6808]: loader.c:414 __load_resource: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1 My config is here below. TIA Arnar Gestsson /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = nl loadzone=de defaultzone=nl bchan=1-5,7-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] trunkgroup = 1,16 spanmap = 1,1 [channels] language=en context=default switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown signalling=pri_cpe ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=5.0 txgain=1.0 echotraining=yes group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1-15,17-31 -- Arnar Gestsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.13/221 - Release Date: 1/4/2006 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P Zaptel config questions
I have a TE110P that I will be connecting to a T1 PRI. This seems pretty standard, but I am only using 7 channels for voice. Its a shared voice/data T1; 7 channels voice, 16 channels data and 1 D-chan, it comes into a telco router and is split into a voice PRI and an Ethernet connection. The 7 voice channels and one D chan are the only things on the backside PRI. Does zaptel need any special configuration for this sort of setup, or would the telco router handle the conversion and restriction? Would I still define the bchan as 1-23 and dchan as 24? Or would it be bchan=1-7 dchan=8? This seems like a pretty common product for most telco/ISPs to deliver to small businesses. I am a system/network admin by trade, not a telecom engineer, so please excuse my ignorance! I have not tried connecting it yet, as we need these phone lines during the course of the business day, but I will be testing it tonight so I am trying to ask any pertinent questions before Im up to my neck in it. :) -Ryan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P Hanging up sometimes not picking up on EM T1
I'm getting unstable behavior with my newly installed TE110P T1 card. It hangs up any incoming call anywhere from 20 seconds to 6 minutes. Frequently, when you call back on our incoming T1 there'll be an automated announcement (maybe from the telco?) stating we are unable to complete your call at this time. I simultaeously get a yellow alarm on the system and shortly after the yellow alarm is cleared (appears the T1 card is reconnecting). Here's what I've tried: * I'm using EM signalling (not PRI), and have toyed with rxwink times of 250ms to 450ms. * I have also changed: busydetect=no, callprogress=no There is also one other odd behavior that I'm noticing... within the Asterisk CLI I'm seeing that when a call comes in the system appears to be spawning several extensions at a time. For example, a single call comes in and I see: == Spawn extension (aa_2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'Zap/19-1' -- Executing Hangup(Zap/19-1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (aa_2, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/19-1' == Spawn extension (aa_2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'Zap/17-1' == Spawn extension (aa_2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'Zap/24-1' == Spawn extension (aa_2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'Zap/13-1' == Spawn extension (aa_2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'Zap/18-1' == Spawn extension (aa_2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'Zap/6-1' To my untrained eye, it seems that Asterisk is over-reacting and presenting the single incoming call with hoard of available channels. Makes me think it has something to do with timing. Any ideas on what's going on and suggestions on how to fix this? thanks, Sasch -- The Alternative Energy Store Making Renewable Energy Affordable (tm) http://www.AltEnergyStore.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P hybrid configuration for data and voice
Hello hopefully someone can answer this :) We currently have an asterisk pbx connected to a FXO channel bank to 10 pots lines. Works great. But due to increasing costs and business load, we have ordered a dedicated T1. We plan on transfering the service to the T1 and cancelling the POTlines. My questions are: 1. Can/should I use the existing TE110P card to split between data and voice? If so, would I just plug the T1 pri into the TE110P and route my data out from that? 2. Since the line is a dedicated data T1, should I just run the phones through the ETH network? and use ztdummy for my channels? Thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install Problems - Televantage 3 T1
Title: TE110P - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install Problems
I
figured it out. The old system (Televantage 3 and 4 I think) has limited
specifications on the T1. After setting up the system, I was able to send
and recieve calls. I still have some work to do like figuring out faxing
and a floating receptionist, but this is a nice start.
Televantage
T1 Requirements:
Framing: D4 Superframe or Extended
Superframd
Interface: DSX-1
Supervisory Signal: 2- or 4-wire
EM
Wink: Wink and double wink
CSU or
NTU equipment: Robbed bit: CSU, ISDN: NTU
Line
coding/Framing: For D4 Superframe: AMI; for Extended Superframe:
B8ZS
Digit
signaling: Robbed Bit: DTMF or MF; ISDN: DTMF
--
Working Config for Televantage 3 T1
---zaptel.conf
span=1,1,0,d4,ami
#This will vary depending on your T1. Look at your Adtran or CSU and set
accordingly.em=1-24
# Span 1: WCT1/0 "Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0"# channel 1,
WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 2, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 3,
WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 4, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 5,
WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 6, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 7,
WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 8, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 9,
WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 10, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel
11, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 12, WCT1, unhandled for now#
channel 13, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 14, WCT1, unhandled for
now# channel 15, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 16, WCT1, unhandled
for now# channel 17, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 18, WCT1,
unhandled for now# channel 19, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 20,
WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 21, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel
22, WCT1, unhandled for now# channel 23, WCT1, unhandled for now#
channel 24, WCT1, unhandled for now
# Global data
loadzone =
usdefaultzone=usend
zaptel.conf
---zapata.conf
;; Zapata telephony interface;;
Configuration file
[trunkgroups]
[channels]
language=ensignalling=em_wgroup=0context=from-pstnchannel=1-24echocancelwhenbridged=yesechotraining=400busydetect=nofaxdetect=incoming---end
zapata.conf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Robert
WagnerSent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:46 AMTo:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Install Problems
I am having problems sending and receiving calls
over the T1. They never seem to connect - outbound keeps ringing,
inbound gets busy. The T1 looks ok - no errors on the line. Any
ideas on what is wrong? I have tried a
variety of fxsks and fxoks configurations without avail. This is a
single [EMAIL PROTECTED] system with a single T1 card. Robbed Bit T1 ami,
d4.
--inbound call --
Starting simple switch on 'Zap/7-1' -- Starting simple switch on
'Zap/14-1' -- Executing
Playback("Zap/7-1", "vm-goodbye") in new stack -- Playing 'vm-goodbye' (language 'en')
-- Executing Macro("Zap/7-1",
"hangupcall") in new stack -- Executing ResetCDR("Zap/7-1", "w") in new
stack -- Executing
NoCDR("Zap/7-1", "") in new stack -- Executing Wait("Zap/7-1", "5") in new
stack -- Executing
Playback("Zap/14-1", "vm-goodbye") in new stack -- Playing 'vm-goodbye' (language 'en')
-- Executing Hangup("Zap/7-1",
"") in new stack == Spawn extension
(macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'Zap/7-1' in macro
'hangupcall' == Spawn extension
(default, s, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/7-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/7-1' -- Executing Macro("Zap/14-1", "hangupcall") in new
stack -- Executing
ResetCDR("Zap/14-1", "w") in new stack -- Executing NoCDR("Zap/14-1", "") in new
stack -- Executing
Wait("Zap/14-1", "5") in new stack -- Executing Hangup("Zap/14-1", "") in new
stack == Spawn extension
(macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'Zap/14-1' in macro
'hangupcall' == Spawn extension
(default, s, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/14-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/14-1'
--outbound call -- Executing SetVar("SIP/4901-cd04",
"OUTNUM=mynum") in new stack -- Executing Cut("SIP/4901-cd04",
"custom=OUT_1|:|1") in new stack -- Executing GotoIf("SIP/4901-cd04", "0?19") in new
stack -- Executing
Dial("SIP/4901-cd04"
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install Problems
Title: TE110P - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install Problems I am having problems sending and receiving calls over the T1. They never seem to connect - outbound keeps ringing, inbound gets busy. The T1 looks ok - no errors on the line. Any ideas on what is wrong? I have tried a variety of fxsks and fxoks configurations without avail. This is a single [EMAIL PROTECTED] system with a single T1 card. Robbed Bit T1 ami, d4. --inbound call -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/7-1' -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/14-1' -- Executing Playback(Zap/7-1, vm-goodbye) in new stack -- Playing 'vm-goodbye' (language 'en') -- Executing Macro(Zap/7-1, hangupcall) in new stack -- Executing ResetCDR(Zap/7-1, w) in new stack -- Executing NoCDR(Zap/7-1, ) in new stack -- Executing Wait(Zap/7-1, 5) in new stack -- Executing Playback(Zap/14-1, vm-goodbye) in new stack -- Playing 'vm-goodbye' (language 'en') -- Executing Hangup(Zap/7-1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'Zap/7-1' in macro 'hangupcall' == Spawn extension (default, s, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/7-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/7-1' -- Executing Macro(Zap/14-1, hangupcall) in new stack -- Executing ResetCDR(Zap/14-1, w) in new stack -- Executing NoCDR(Zap/14-1, ) in new stack -- Executing Wait(Zap/14-1, 5) in new stack -- Executing Hangup(Zap/14-1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'Zap/14-1' in macro 'hangupcall' == Spawn extension (default, s, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/14-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/14-1' --outbound call -- Executing SetVar(SIP/4901-cd04, OUTNUM=mynum) in new stack -- Executing Cut(SIP/4901-cd04, custom=OUT_1|:|1) in new stack -- Executing GotoIf(SIP/4901-cd04, 0?19) in new stack -- Executing Dial(SIP/4901-cd04, ZAP/g0/mynum) in new stack -- Called g0/mynum -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/4901-cd04 -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' --- [zaptel.conf] span=1,1,0,d4,ami # have tried with 1,0,0 - same problem fxsks=1-24 loadzone = us defaultzone=us [zapata.conf] [channels] signalling=fxs_ks group=0 ;context=incoming channel=1-24 echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=400 context=default faxdetect=incoming ;Include genzaptelconf configs #include zapata-auto.conf ;Include AMP configs #include zapata_additional.conf ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset
Thank you for all Sorry my English Jmoura - Original Message - From: Jason Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 21:40 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset You are correct. I did not expand completely and stand corrected. An additional note...we have some Dialogic cards (not associated with *) that do the same thing on PRI. Question - is it somewhat standard to have b chans restart on PRI circuits when not explicitly configured to NOT reset? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 5:00 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:40, Jason Walker wrote: PRI channels will reset when not in use throughout the day. A reset on a channel should not happen when that channel is in use. This happens all the time on my PRI circuits (TE110P and TE410P). From what I gather, it's somewhat like a handshake for the D chan between the cpe and net sides. Not exactly. Digium's replicating the B channel resets someone noted in a particular situation. It's not required, but it shouldn't hurt. If it's causing trouble you can turn it off with resetinterval=0 in your zapata.conf. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset
Is there a situtation where it could hurt to turn off the reset? I have never had a problem with it cutting off a call or anything but it is somewhat concerning to see it in the console all the time. Thanks, Steve - Original Message - From: JOAO CARLOS MOURA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 2:05 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset Thank you for all Sorry my English Jmoura - Original Message - From: Jason Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 21:40 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset You are correct. I did not expand completely and stand corrected. An additional note...we have some Dialogic cards (not associated with *) that do the same thing on PRI. Question - is it somewhat standard to have b chans restart on PRI circuits when not explicitly configured to NOT reset? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 5:00 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:40, Jason Walker wrote: PRI channels will reset when not in use throughout the day. A reset on a channel should not happen when that channel is in use. This happens all the time on my PRI circuits (TE110P and TE410P). From what I gather, it's somewhat like a handshake for the D chan between the cpe and net sides. Not exactly. Digium's replicating the B channel resets someone noted in a particular situation. It's not required, but it shouldn't hurt. If it's causing trouble you can turn it off with resetinterval=0 in your zapata.conf. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset
My TE110P reset some times in the day. E this cause an interruption in the service. How I decide this problem? my zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 # set this to 1-15,17-31 for E1 dchan=24 # set this to 16 for E1 defaultzone=us loadzone=us my zapata.conf [channels] language=en signalling=pri_cpe switchtype=national echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=200 ; Asterisk trains to the beginning of the call, number is in milliseconds callerid=000 busydetect=yes busycount=5 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 callreturn=yes context=pstn channel = 1-23 -- B-channel 0/1 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/2 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/3 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/4 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/5 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/6 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/7 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/8 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/9 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/10 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/11 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/12 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/13 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/14 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/15 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/16 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/17 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/18 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/19 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/20 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/21 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/22 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/23 successfully restarted on span 1 Thank you João Carlos Moura ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset
PRI channels will reset when not in use throughout the day. A reset on a channel should not happen when that channel is in use. This happens all the time on my PRI circuits (TE110P and TE410P). From what I gather, it's somewhat like a handshake for the D chan between the cpe and net sides. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOAO CARLOS MOURA Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 3:14 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P reset My TE110P reset some times in the day. E this cause an interruption in the service. How I decide this problem? my zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 # set this to 1-15,17-31 for E1 dchan=24 # set this to 16 for E1 defaultzone=us loadzone=us my zapata.conf [channels] language=en signalling=pri_cpe switchtype=national echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=200 ; Asterisk trains to the beginning of the call, number is in milliseconds callerid=000 busydetect=yes busycount=5 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 callreturn=yes context=pstn channel = 1-23 -- B-channel 0/1 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/2 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/3 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/4 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/5 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/6 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/7 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/8 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/9 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/10 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/11 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/12 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/13 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/14 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/15 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/16 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/17 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/18 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/19 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/20 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/21 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/22 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/23 successfully restarted on span 1 Thank you João Carlos Moura ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
