Re: Responding quickly as a WebService?
You are probably right about that. I am hoping to have to do that a bit later rather than sooner though. :) I figured out why my echoes wouldn't flush... It is typical really :) With autoRender = false I have tried a small test like this: echo 'Hi there'; flush(); @ob_flush(); sleep(3); // no more echoes. When I browsed this action (or curled it) I never saw anything before the 3 seconds were up. And like I said earlier, I have also added several other combinations of ob_* and flush calls to the mix with no change. Then it struck me that I probably needed to echo this instead: echo Hi there \n; // notice the newline added to the end of the string. Now I can see the reply before the 3 seconds begin. /Martin On May 7, 4:20 pm, Dardo Sordi Bogado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I think you can put $this-autoRender = false; an do echo but the real thing you should consider is implementing some batch processing and a queue system if you are planing to grow that big. On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will not know that. but once I know that the contents of the POST looks OK I want to reply... anything that happens after that (database problem or some other internal error) is my fault and not an issue relevant to the external server. I just need to sign for the package before opening and examining all the contents. If an item is missing the messenger can't do anything about that. I still need to call whoever send the package to get that corrected. (feeble analogy, I know) There is no way I can keep the external server hanging while I possible look through 300'000 of rows of data, call other external systems or some other time-expensive task. When logs and data grow I can see it becoming a real problem very quickly. On day one I know we will have to assign these incoming calls to one of 380'000 users stored in our MySQL database. On May 7, 2:28 pm, dr. Hannibal Lecter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand. How can you know it's All OK if your processing is not done yet?? On May 7, 12:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to improve the performance of an API I provide to other systems. Requests that post data to my application now have to wait for my processing to finish (parsing, saving model-data...) before they see a simple All OK response. Since the processing is governed by the controller I thought that I could echo the response and then flush the buffers and never render any final view for these actions. But... I can get it to work. I have tried many combinations of ob_* calls and flushes, following both old code I have used for outputting images and a few examples and hits found online and at php.net. Maybe flushing is not enough? I am a bit lost here. Has anyone got any example to share where they can let the browser (or other script) see the results before all processing is complete? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Database wont update fast enough
Since cake uses the MVC pattern which incorporates a Model which in
turn is an abstraction of your data source. So in order to do it by
the MVC pattern and getting closer to the cake way you need to
utilize your models instead.
I would write something like this:
foreach($file_list as $file) {
//read file contents
//search to see if record exists
$user = $this-User-find(*stuffs*);
$user_id = $user[User][id];
$tmpData = array(email = $user[User][email]);
$this-Modeltoinserto-create();
if(!$this-Modeltoinserto-save($tmpData)) {
echo QQ;
}
}
//Laeffe
On 7 Maj, 13:09, Unite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats not cakephp except the INSERT INTO. Yes i would use save but i
was trying everything to see if i can get it to work. And most of it
isnt the actual code just something i made up so i can illustrate the
problem.
How do you stop cake caching the queries?
On May 7, 1:05 pm, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
foreach($file_list as $file) {
//read file contents
//search to see if record exists
$user_id = $this-User-query(SELECT id FROM users WHERE
emailaddress = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]');
//if record does not exist write record to db
$this-User-query(INSERT INTO users (emailaddress) VALUES
('[EMAIL PROTECTED]'));
//get last record inserted
$temp = $this-User-query(SELECT last_insert_id());
}
Are you kidding ? this is not even close to cakephp i would be ashamed
to show such code on this group.
On the first loop everything works 100%.
On the second loop even though the email address has been inserted and
is in the DB (supposedly) $user_id still returns empty as if nothing
is there. I put in the sleep command to see if maybe php is running
faster than the database is updating but this has no effect. What can
I do to make sure that all query processes have been completed before
it starts the next loop?
maybe cake is caching the queries ?
--
Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Cake best practices for mobile browser development
Hey folks, I'm very new to Cake and couldn't find this satisfactorily addressed elsewhere: I'm developing an application for both mobile and desktop browsers. On the user end, I'd like this to be seamless, so no /mobile etc. Just curious as to be best practice for accomplishing this. First, I'm assuming I should use the the Request Handler's isMobile() function, and then use beforeRender() to set the layout to the mobile version. But what about the actual view? Should I use switches inside each view? Is it, perhaps, better practice to use render() to change the view altogether to a separate mobile version? In addition, just how unreliable is the isMobile() function? Is it really worthwhile to setup a WURFL-based browser checker as a vendor? Thanks in advance for your help! -David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: find('all') combine problem
$teams = $this-Team-find('all', array('fields' =
array('Team.id','Team.firstName','Team.lastName')));
$team_list = Set::combine($teams, '{n}.Team.id', array('%s %s',
'{n}.Team.firstName', '{n}.Team.lastName'));
On May 8, 3:48 pm, jwerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always follow the CakePHP standards and the way to utilize the
automagic part of CakePHP but sometimes I run into a problem where I
have an existing database and it's just not possible to change the
structure and thus I have to find a way around it, somehow.
Picture this:
3 Tables
projects
id
name
bla
bla1
bla2
projects_teams
project_id
team_id
teams
id
firstName
lastName
title
everything's ok until we get to the teams part, where cake likes to
automagically use the title column from the table. I however need it
to display firstName and lastName within the projects view.
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-make-findAll()-retrieve-just-some-fields...
I found this article here, which explains I have to use find('all)
instead of automagic find('list), and everything is fine with how
that's done, however, when i get to the point of gluing firstName and
lastName together I'm stuck for the value of the select I'm stuck.
Can someone help me?
$teams = $this-Team-find(all,array('fields' =
array('Team.id','Team.firstName', 'Team.lastName')));
$result = Set::combine($subdivisions,
'{n}.Team.id','{n}.Team.firstName');
Please help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: find('all') combine problem
Here ya go:
$teams = $this-Team-find('all', array(
'fields' = array('id', 'firstName', 'lastName'),
'recursive' = -1
));
$result = Set::combine(
$teams,
'{n}.Team.id',
array('%s %s', '{n}.Team.firstName', '{n}.Team.lastName')
);
See
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/77ce83191ecc7894
for more Set::combine() stuff
On May 8, 6:48 am, jwerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always follow the CakePHP standards and the way to utilize the
automagic part of CakePHP but sometimes I run into a problem where I
have an existing database and it's just not possible to change the
structure and thus I have to find a way around it, somehow.
Picture this:
3 Tables
projects
id
name
bla
bla1
bla2
projects_teams
project_id
team_id
teams
id
firstName
lastName
title
everything's ok until we get to the teams part, where cake likes to
automagically use the title column from the table. I however need it
to display firstName and lastName within the projects view.
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-make-findAll()-retrieve-just-some-fields...
I found this article here, which explains I have to use find('all)
instead of automagic find('list), and everything is fine with how
that's done, however, when i get to the point of gluing firstName and
lastName together I'm stuck for the value of the select I'm stuck.
Can someone help me?
$teams = $this-Team-find(all,array('fields' =
array('Team.id','Team.firstName', 'Team.lastName')));
$result = Set::combine($subdivisions,
'{n}.Team.id','{n}.Team.firstName');
Please help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake best practices for mobile browser development
Hey I'm developing an application for both mobile and desktop browsers. On the user end, I'd like this to be seamless, so no /mobile etc. Just curious as to be best practice for accomplishing this. thats always the best option although i see additionally many ppl using m.example.com , setting a cookie etc and not checking every request. imo its best to use both ways. First, I'm assuming I should use the the Request Handler's isMobile() function, and then use beforeRender() to set the layout to the mobile version. yes But what about the actual view? Should I use switches inside each view? Is it, perhaps, better practice to use render() to change the view altogether to a separate mobile version? Why do you want to switch things in the view ? It depends what mobile devices are we talking about - if you want to support the _old_ 160x160 then you would probably have to make a light version of everything. But if you're thinking about something more advanced (opera mini etc) then i would only use simpler css in the layout, no js most of the time etc. The problem with mobiles is that there are multiple resolutions, browsers are even worst than on the desktop (that's changing fortunately). I don't know what's you target but generally - lower specs - more work. I (most of the time) used only different layouts most of the time (different sidebar, navigation etc). Using different views would be a pain but sometimes it is a requirement so that's always an option - you could automate that (automatically adding _mobile to template name, or changing the view class ) In addition, just how unreliable is the isMobile() function? Is it really worthwhile to setup a WURFL-based browser checker as a vendor? isMobile checks the user agent you can look what UA it does support in the code. WURFL is way more advanced - depends if you need to check for specific functions. -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Open Flash Charts in Cake
i always used libchart [1] - quick, easy , nicely written [1] http://naku.dohcrew.com/libchart/pages/introduction/ On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Elmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also check out this blog entry about App::import(): http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/03/26/loading-vendor-files/ On Apr 21, 2:23 pm, ScottieBoy4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found a really slick library for generating flash charts and graphs w/a PHP wrapper. I can get it to work outside of cake, but not inside. Has any one used the Open Flash Charts code in Cake? -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake best practices for mobile browser development
Thanks for the response! The view in a desktop browser would be significantly more robust (i.e. complex), so it would not be able to display properly in most mobile browsers (except in the iphone's safari). By switching, I meant maintaing one .ctp file for everything and having an isMobile in each to determine how things are rendered. I guess using a different views class is the cleanest way to do this. Render() is the right function, is it not? On May 8, 4:11 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey I'm developing an application for both mobile and desktop browsers. On the user end, I'd like this to be seamless, so no /mobile etc. Just curious as to be best practice for accomplishing this. thats always the best option although i see additionally many ppl using m.example.com , setting a cookie etc and not checking every request. imo its best to use both ways. First, I'm assuming I should use the the Request Handler's isMobile() function, and then use beforeRender() to set the layout to the mobile version. yes But what about the actual view? Should I use switches inside each view? Is it, perhaps, better practice to use render() to change the view altogether to a separate mobile version? Why do you want to switch things in the view ? It depends what mobile devices are we talking about - if you want to support the _old_ 160x160 then you would probably have to make a light version of everything. But if you're thinking about something more advanced (opera mini etc) then i would only use simpler css in the layout, no js most of the time etc. The problem with mobiles is that there are multiple resolutions, browsers are even worst than on the desktop (that's changing fortunately). I don't know what's you target but generally - lower specs - more work. I (most of the time) used only different layouts most of the time (different sidebar, navigation etc). Using different views would be a pain but sometimes it is a requirement so that's always an option - you could automate that (automatically adding _mobile to template name, or changing the view class ) In addition, just how unreliable is the isMobile() function? Is it really worthwhile to setup a WURFL-based browser checker as a vendor? isMobile checks the user agent you can look what UA it does support in the code. WURFL is way more advanced - depends if you need to check for specific functions. -- Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake best practices for mobile browser development
I am actually of the opposite opinion regarding /mobile and m.example.com. I remember seeing sites use: m.example.com, wap.example.com, mob.example.com, mobile.example.com The result for me is that I hardly ever bother trying to guess which one is used and thuss do not use the mobile verson of the site. IMHO the site should automatically adapt to the smaller screen and less capable browser. And for most normal websites contain the same content (eg news, products, contact info...) formatted for smaller screens. David, you should look at viewPath and layoutPath. You can switch these in a similar way to what is done for json or xml requests. (no, I don't have any working code to paste, sorry) Check out this post for how it is setup for json. http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/3c5c74d233438c25/83ae4daddcaaccb5?lnk=gstq=viewpath#3a2068bddfc37cc5 You could possibly even use extension parsing once the mobile browser has been detected www.example.com/products.wap or something similar. Look for parseExtension in the manual for a start. On May 8, 10:11 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey I'm developing an application for both mobile and desktop browsers. On the user end, I'd like this to be seamless, so no /mobile etc. Just curious as to be best practice for accomplishing this. thats always the best option although i see additionally many ppl using m.example.com , setting a cookie etc and not checking every request. imo its best to use both ways. First, I'm assuming I should use the the Request Handler's isMobile() function, and then use beforeRender() to set the layout to the mobile version. yes But what about the actual view? Should I use switches inside each view? Is it, perhaps, better practice to use render() to change the view altogether to a separate mobile version? Why do you want to switch things in the view ? It depends what mobile devices are we talking about - if you want to support the _old_ 160x160 then you would probably have to make a light version of everything. But if you're thinking about something more advanced (opera mini etc) then i would only use simpler css in the layout, no js most of the time etc. The problem with mobiles is that there are multiple resolutions, browsers are even worst than on the desktop (that's changing fortunately). I don't know what's you target but generally - lower specs - more work. I (most of the time) used only different layouts most of the time (different sidebar, navigation etc). Using different views would be a pain but sometimes it is a requirement so that's always an option - you could automate that (automatically adding _mobile to template name, or changing the view class ) In addition, just how unreliable is the isMobile() function? Is it really worthwhile to setup a WURFL-based browser checker as a vendor? isMobile checks the user agent you can look what UA it does support in the code. WURFL is way more advanced - depends if you need to check for specific functions. -- Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Warning message infecting thumbnail images occasionally
Actually ignore that last one, I had the permissions set wrongly on this second server. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Max number of save()'s in a loop
I have a loop that I am running a $this-Word-save() in, and I need to be able to do the maximum of loops possible but it gets through about 4000 loops and then just stops. I've instructed the loop to go until it reaches 50,000 so I'm not sure why it's doing this. Any ideas ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Max number of save()'s in a loop
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Kyle Decot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a loop that I am running a $this-Word-save() in, and I need to be able to do the maximum of loops possible but it gets through about 4000 loops and then just stops. I've instructed the loop to go until it reaches 50,000 so I'm not sure why it's doing this. Any ideas ? Have you handled all the timeouts? Tarique -- = Cheesecake-Photoblog: http://cheesecake-photoblog.org PHP for E-Biz: http://sanisoft.com = --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Warning message infecting thumbnail images occasionally
I thought permissions had fixed it but it was actually due to me setting debug to 0. If debug is 0, I still get random warnings from the cache engine every so often which corrupt my thumbnails. They are always to do with that particular file: cache/persistent/cake_core_object_map I have tried deleting all cache files but it didn't help. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strange habtm problem - saving in other tables
If I comment out other habtm relationships, leaving only
var $hasAndBelongsToMany = array(
'HasAsFriend' = array(
'className' = 'User',
'joinTable' = 'friends',
'foreignKey' = 'user_id',
'associationForeignKey' = 'friend_id',
'uniq' = false,
'conditions' = '',
),
);
in my User model, then the save() will go flawlessly.
However, if I leave those relationships in User model, then the data
is inserted into
other tables even if I manually unbindModel() them before calling
$this-User-save().
I'm confused. Is there anyone who knows why this is happening? Or
maybe I should
just use a $this-User-query() to do the saving job and insert the
data in the right table? :(
On 5月8日, 上午6時13分, largon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm on a project that users can add other users as friends, families,
or block them.
So I've set up some habtm behaviors for that. The tables (friends,
families, blocks) look
very similar, all with (user_id, friend_id) or (user_id, family_id) as
keys.
But when I save a data, like calling:
$this-data['User']['id'] = 1;
$this-data['HasAsFriend']['HasAsFriend'] = 2;
$this-User-save($this-data);
I'll have not only user1 adding user2 as friend, but also user2 adding
user1 as friend.
What's more, they're each other's families and user1 is blocking user2
too.
(The data got inserted into families table and blocks table too.)
I posted my user model relationships athttp://bin.cakephp.org/view/241705085
I also tried the behavior
athttp://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/add-delete-habtm-behavior
,
but with the code:
$this-User-habtmAdd('HasAsFriend', 1, 2);
Also results the same as inserting into families table and blocks
table.
I'm troubled, I'm not sure why this is happening. Any clues is greatly
appreciated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake best practices for mobile browser development
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am actually of the opposite opinion regarding /mobile and m.example.com. I remember seeing sites use: m.example.com, wap.example.com, mob.example.com, mobile.example.com The result for me is that I hardly ever bother trying to guess which one is used and thuss do not use the mobile verson of the site. IMHO the site should automatically adapt to the smaller screen and less capable browser. And for most normal websites contain the same content (eg news, products, contact info...) formatted for smaller screens. Oh you misunderstood me :) i would also do the automatic checking - i just noticed some users do use m.example.com and in this way you *know* they want the mobile version. So by all means the automatic way is the way to go - just its good to assume that automatic doesnt work for everyone and it would be good to give people the alternative so they can force the mobile version. Btw the browser check isn't so resource intensive :) its one regexp. -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strange habtm problem - saving in other tables
I added some logging just to make sure the relationships are unbound:
$this-User-unbindAll(array('hasAndBelongsToMany' =
array('HasAsFriend')));
$this-log(current habtm: . print_r($this-User-
hasAndBelongsToMany, true));
The error log reads:
2008-05-08 17:03:49 Error: current habtm: Array
(
[HasAsFriend] = Array
(
[className] = User
[joinTable] = friends
[foreignKey] = user_id
[associationForeignKey] = friend_id
[uniq] =
[conditions] =
[with] = Friend
[fields] =
[order] =
[limit] =
[offset] =
[unique] = 1
[finderQuery] =
[deleteQuery] =
[insertQuery] =
)
)
Which indicates that those relationships are unbound successfully.
But the habtmAdd still inserts into other tables:
$this-User-habtmAdd('HasAsFriend', 1, 3);
will result with SQL queries:
28 INSERT INTO `friends` (`user_id`,`friend_id`) VALUES (1,3)
29 SELECT `Friend`.`id` FROM `friends` AS `Friend` WHERE `friend_id` =
1
30 INSERT INTO `friends` (`friend_id`,`user_id`) VALUES (1,3)
31 SELECT `Family`.`id` FROM `families` AS `Family` WHERE `user_id` =
1
32 INSERT INTO `families` (`user_id`,`family_id`) VALUES (1,3)
33 SELECT `Family`.`id` FROM `families` AS `Family` WHERE `family_id`
= 1
34 INSERT INTO `families` (`family_id`,`user_id`) VALUES (1,3)
35 SELECT `Block`.`id` FROM `blocks` AS `Block` WHERE `user_id` = 1
36 INSERT INTO `blocks` (`user_id`,`block_id`) VALUES (1,3)
This is wierd. Is this a bug in cake or is it my misconfiguration in
User model?
On 5月8日, 下午4時41分, largon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I comment out other habtm relationships, leaving only
var $hasAndBelongsToMany = array(
'HasAsFriend' = array(
'className' = 'User',
'joinTable' = 'friends',
'foreignKey' = 'user_id',
'associationForeignKey' = 'friend_id',
'uniq' = false,
'conditions' = '',
),
);
in my User model, then the save() will go flawlessly.
However, if I leave those relationships in User model, then the data
is inserted into
other tables even if I manually unbindModel() them before calling
$this-User-save().
I'm confused. Is there anyone who knows why this is happening? Or
maybe I should
just use a $this-User-query() to do the saving job and insert the
data in the right table? :(
On 5月8日, 上午6時13分, largon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm on a project that users can add other users as friends, families,
or block them.
So I've set up some habtm behaviors for that. The tables (friends,
families, blocks) look
very similar, all with (user_id, friend_id) or (user_id, family_id) as
keys.
But when I save a data, like calling:
$this-data['User']['id'] = 1;
$this-data['HasAsFriend']['HasAsFriend'] = 2;
$this-User-save($this-data);
I'll have not only user1 adding user2 as friend, but also user2 adding
user1 as friend.
What's more, they're each other's families and user1 is blocking user2
too.
(The data got inserted into families table and blocks table too.)
I posted my user model relationships athttp://bin.cakephp.org/view/241705085
I also tried the behavior
athttp://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/add-delete-habtm-behavior
,
but with the code:
$this-User-habtmAdd('HasAsFriend', 1, 2);
Also results the same as inserting into families table and blocks
table.
I'm troubled, I'm not sure why this is happening. Any clues is greatly
appreciated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake best practices for mobile browser development
Martin, would extension parsing be a way to avoid running the resource intensive browser check with every pageview? On May 8, 4:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am actually of the opposite opinion regarding /mobile and m.example.com. I remember seeing sites use: m.example.com, wap.example.com, mob.example.com, mobile.example.com The result for me is that I hardly ever bother trying to guess which one is used and thuss do not use the mobile verson of the site. IMHO the site should automatically adapt to the smaller screen and less capable browser. And for most normal websites contain the same content (eg news, products, contact info...) formatted for smaller screens. David, you should look at viewPath and layoutPath. You can switch these in a similar way to what is done for json or xml requests. (no, I don't have any working code to paste, sorry) Check out this post for how it is setup for json. http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/3c5c74d2... You could possibly even use extension parsing once the mobile browser has been detectedwww.example.com/products.wapor something similar. Look for parseExtension in the manual for a start. On May 8, 10:11 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey I'm developing an application for both mobile and desktop browsers. On the user end, I'd like this to be seamless, so no /mobile etc. Just curious as to be best practice for accomplishing this. thats always the best option although i see additionally many ppl using m.example.com , setting a cookie etc and not checking every request. imo its best to use both ways. First, I'm assuming I should use the the Request Handler's isMobile() function, and then use beforeRender() to set the layout to the mobile version. yes But what about the actual view? Should I use switches inside each view? Is it, perhaps, better practice to use render() to change the view altogether to a separate mobile version? Why do you want to switch things in the view ? It depends what mobile devices are we talking about - if you want to support the _old_ 160x160 then you would probably have to make a light version of everything. But if you're thinking about something more advanced (opera mini etc) then i would only use simpler css in the layout, no js most of the time etc. The problem with mobiles is that there are multiple resolutions, browsers are even worst than on the desktop (that's changing fortunately). I don't know what's you target but generally - lower specs - more work. I (most of the time) used only different layouts most of the time (different sidebar, navigation etc). Using different views would be a pain but sometimes it is a requirement so that's always an option - you could automate that (automatically adding _mobile to template name, or changing the view class ) In addition, just how unreliable is the isMobile() function? Is it really worthwhile to setup a WURFL-based browser checker as a vendor? isMobile checks the user agent you can look what UA it does support in the code. WURFL is way more advanced - depends if you need to check for specific functions. -- Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Warning message infecting thumbnail images occasionally
I've just moved the site to another server and I'm getting the same problem - one or two of the thumbnails are getting corrupted at random - but this time the warning message is slightly different: Warning (2): fopen(/home/sites/xx.com/public_html/app/tmp/ cache/persistent/cake_core_object_map) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory [CORE/cake/libs/file.php, line 144] Notice (8): unserialize() [function.unserialize]: Error at offset 0 of 865 bytes [CORE/cake/libs/cache/file.php, line 179] --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake best practices for mobile browser development
Absolutely, I agree with you on that note. You should always provide alternatives to detection. :) David: Yes it can. But like Marcin wrote, it is not a very expensive check (and extension parsing also cost execution-time). When checking each request you would gain the advantage that any deep links to the site till choose the mobile version automatically. Extension-parsing can be used as an alternative when the detection is not catching it correctly. But, looking at the source for isMobile() it looks solid. It should catch any mobile browser developed by competent developers. (a mobile browser should probably accept wap content and that is the fallback in isMobile) /Martin On May 8, 11:22 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am actually of the opposite opinion regarding /mobile and m.example.com. I remember seeing sites use: m.example.com, wap.example.com, mob.example.com, mobile.example.com The result for me is that I hardly ever bother trying to guess which one is used and thuss do not use the mobile verson of the site. IMHO the site should automatically adapt to the smaller screen and less capable browser. And for most normal websites contain the same content (eg news, products, contact info...) formatted for smaller screens. Oh you misunderstood me :) i would also do the automatic checking - i just noticed some users do use m.example.com and in this way you *know* they want the mobile version. So by all means the automatic way is the way to go - just its good to assume that automatic doesnt work for everyone and it would be good to give people the alternative so they can force the mobile version. Btw the browser check isn't so resource intensive :) its one regexp. -- Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Max number of save()'s in a loop
I'm not sure how to do that. Any suggestions? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
saveAll with three levels
Hi all, does anybody know if I can save a model with a hasMany relation and each of the related models has a hasMany relation? Hi have a model called Trivia with a 'hasMany' relation to model Pregunta and model Pregunta has a 'hasMany' relation to model Opcion. But when I call $this-Trivia-saveAll($this-data) in my controller, it only saves Trivia and their related Pregunta, but not Opcion Please help me! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strange habtm problem - saving in other tables
For anybody who's following this thread, or had the same problem, or
dived in during a google:
This seems like a bug mentioned at https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/4558
After adding a unset($newValues) as the ticket mentions the problem
goes away.
Thanks all!
On May 8, 5:08 pm, largon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added some logging just to make sure the relationships are unbound:
$this-User-unbindAll(array('hasAndBelongsToMany' =
array('HasAsFriend')));
$this-log(current habtm: . print_r($this-User-
hasAndBelongsToMany, true));
The error log reads:
2008-05-08 17:03:49 Error: current habtm: Array
(
[HasAsFriend] = Array
(
[className] = User
[joinTable] = friends
[foreignKey] = user_id
[associationForeignKey] = friend_id
[uniq] =
[conditions] =
[with] = Friend
[fields] =
[order] =
[limit] =
[offset] =
[unique] = 1
[finderQuery] =
[deleteQuery] =
[insertQuery] =
)
)
Which indicates that those relationships are unbound successfully.
But the habtmAdd still inserts into other tables:
$this-User-habtmAdd('HasAsFriend', 1, 3);
will result with SQL queries:
28 INSERT INTO `friends` (`user_id`,`friend_id`) VALUES (1,3)
29 SELECT `Friend`.`id` FROM `friends` AS `Friend` WHERE `friend_id` =
1
30 INSERT INTO `friends` (`friend_id`,`user_id`) VALUES (1,3)
31 SELECT `Family`.`id` FROM `families` AS `Family` WHERE `user_id` =
1
32 INSERT INTO `families` (`user_id`,`family_id`) VALUES (1,3)
33 SELECT `Family`.`id` FROM `families` AS `Family` WHERE `family_id`
= 1
34 INSERT INTO `families` (`family_id`,`user_id`) VALUES (1,3)
35 SELECT `Block`.`id` FROM `blocks` AS `Block` WHERE `user_id` = 1
36 INSERT INTO `blocks` (`user_id`,`block_id`) VALUES (1,3)
This is wierd. Is this a bug in cake or is it my misconfiguration in
User model?
On 5月8日, 下午4時41分, largon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I comment out other habtm relationships, leaving only
var $hasAndBelongsToMany = array(
'HasAsFriend' = array(
'className' = 'User',
'joinTable' = 'friends',
'foreignKey' = 'user_id',
'associationForeignKey' = 'friend_id',
'uniq' = false,
'conditions' = '',
),
);
in my User model, then the save() will go flawlessly.
However, if I leave those relationships in User model, then the data
is inserted into
other tables even if I manually unbindModel() them before calling
$this-User-save().
I'm confused. Is there anyone who knows why this is happening? Or
maybe I should
just use a $this-User-query() to do the saving job and insert the
data in the right table? :(
On 5月8日, 上午6時13分, largon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm on a project that users can add other users as friends, families,
or block them.
So I've set up some habtm behaviors for that. The tables (friends,
families, blocks) look
very similar, all with (user_id, friend_id) or (user_id, family_id) as
keys.
But when I save a data, like calling:
$this-data['User']['id'] = 1;
$this-data['HasAsFriend']['HasAsFriend'] = 2;
$this-User-save($this-data);
I'll have not only user1 adding user2 as friend, but also user2 adding
user1 as friend.
What's more, they're each other's families and user1 is blocking user2
too.
(The data got inserted into families table and blocks table too.)
I posted my user model relationships
athttp://bin.cakephp.org/view/241705085
I also tried the behavior
athttp://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/add-delete-habtm-behavior
,
but with the code:
$this-User-habtmAdd('HasAsFriend', 1, 2);
Also results the same as inserting into families table and blocks
table.
I'm troubled, I'm not sure why this is happening. Any clues is greatly
appreciated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: saveAll with three levels
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Jose Selesan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, does anybody know if I can save a model with a hasMany relation and each of the related models has a hasMany relation? Hi have a model called Trivia with a 'hasMany' relation to model Pregunta and model Pregunta has a 'hasMany' relation to model Opcion. But when I call $this-Trivia-saveAll($this-data) in my controller, it only saves Trivia and their related Pregunta, but not Opcion It should work - try with the latest SVN check out If does not work then take a look at the related test - modify it for one more level and submit as a bug report Tarique -- = Cheesecake-Photoblog: http://cheesecake-photoblog.org PHP for E-Biz: http://sanisoft.com = --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Something on the top of CakePHP
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:01 AM, b logica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure if you got that backward, but I'd think it'd always be easier if you know the other person has a better idea than yourself. *Knowing* and *accepting* are two different things. Computer programmers tend to be a passive-aggressive lot, so it's no surprise that there is lots of ranting and raving about how CakePHP doesn't do things they way they want but very little in the way of actively seeking to make those changes. They *know* CakePHP is better than what they could do but have not come around to *accepting* that there is the Cake way of doing things, rightly or wrongly. One person's key critical feature is another person's edge case. The trick is understanding that, and a lot of people fail at it. -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard: http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Open Flash Charts in Cake
@Marcin: Thanks for sharing that one, very nice! On May 8, 10:20 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i always used libchart [1] - quick, easy , nicely written [1]http://naku.dohcrew.com/libchart/pages/introduction/ On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Elmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also check out this blog entry about App::import(): http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/03/26/loading-vendor-files/ On Apr 21, 2:23 pm, ScottieBoy4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found a really slick library for generating flash charts and graphs w/a PHP wrapper. I can get it to work outside of cake, but not inside. Has any one used the Open Flash Charts code in Cake? -- Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake best practices for mobile browser development
I had the idea to handle this with an extra route to mobile actions in
config/routes.php:
$subdomain = substr(env(HTTP_HOST), 0, strpos(env(HTTP_HOST),
.));
if (strlen($subdomain) 0 ($subdomain == m || $subdomain ==
mobile)) {
Router::connect(':controller/:action/*', array('prefix' = 'm'));
Router::connect('/', array('controller' = 'pages', 'action' =
'index', 'prefix' = 'm'));
}
Instead of, or additionally to the subdomain check, you can put the
mobile check in the condition. This way your urls will look the same
like before but internally the mobile actions (and views) with prefix
m are used.
In the mobile action, in case you need the same data as the desktop
action, you can simply call it this way before the mobile view is
rendered:
function m_view() {
$this-view();
}
I don't know if this is best practice, but for me it's more clearly
arranged and you are more flexible if the mobile version differs alot
from the desktop version.
Regards,
Michael
David schrieb:
Hey folks,
I'm very new to Cake and couldn't find this satisfactorily addressed
elsewhere:
I'm developing an application for both mobile and desktop browsers. On
the user end, I'd like this to be seamless, so no /mobile etc. Just
curious as to be best practice for accomplishing this.
First, I'm assuming I should use the the Request Handler's isMobile()
function, and then use beforeRender() to set the layout to the mobile
version. But what about the actual view? Should I use switches inside
each view? Is it, perhaps, better practice to use render() to change
the view altogether to a separate mobile version?
In addition, just how unreliable is the isMobile() function? Is it
really worthwhile to setup a WURFL-based browser checker as a vendor?
Thanks in advance for your help!
-David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to access Cake Session Variables from a Stand Alone PHP script
Hi Sliv,
In Login controller i have set the user details using this line.
$this-Session-write('CURRENT_USER', $someone['User']);
and in the php script, which is oustside the cake directory, i am trying to
use the CURRENT_USER in the php script using $_SESSION. which i couldn
access
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Lakshmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sliv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 7, 2008 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: How to access Cake Session Variables from a Stand Alone
PHP script
To: CakePHP cake-php@googlegroups.com
What variables are you trying to access that are not available through
$_SESSION?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
hi guys
I have a Centos5.1 box, loaded with php-5.1.6 httpd-2.2.3(apache) mysql-5.0.22 following this video http://cakephp.org/screencasts/view/3 and this tutor: http://manual.cakephp.org/view/326/the-cake-blog-tutorial i have checked out from svn repo svn co https://svn.cakephp.org/repo/trunk/cake/1.1.x.x/ /var/www/html/ blog http://localhost/ points to /var/www/html/blog i have created database, entered test entries, modified database.php and all as shown in the video step by step, when i point the browser to, http://localhost/ it shows a page with: CakePHP Rapid Development Your database configuration file is present. Cake is able to connect to the database. but when i point the browser to; http://localhost/posts/ it shows: The requested URL /posts was not found on this server. any ideas what i could be doing wrong? thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Session Lost In IE
Hi All,
I have got a strange problem in IE-6.0. we have built a browser
plugin(Toolbar) for our application, which changes its contents dynamically
after loggin in to our application. we have used Best toolbar studio to
build a toolbar . what i am experiencing is, when i used the below java
script function to reload the toolbar, my session gets lost and i am kicked
back to the login page. Also we tried using a sample toolbar that uses
session_start(); to start session after login and change its contents
dynamically after logging in without the session being lost. In Mozilla,
everything works fine without session being lost.
?php
echo script
function ToolBarInit(tool)
{
tool.Reload(); // A java script function
}
/script ;
?
it would be very helpful if someone has experienced the same problem, or
have encountered the same problem in IE where session gets lost after reload
function, please share your views on this.
Thanks in Advance
Cheers
Bharath
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Cake integration with other app and session
Hi everyone,
I have an issue that I'd like people's comment(s) on. I am trying to
integrate an existing app with Cake. We are planning to move the
entire app over to Cake eventually but will have to do it in stages.
So we are planning to write new parts of the app in Cake and slowly
move old stuff over.
The problem that I was having was with sessions. It seems that Cake
closes any existing session before doing anything with sessions within
Cake. Session data from my other app is available in Cake. But session
data that I save in Cake is not available in the other app. I've got
around this by commenting out line 167 in cake/libs/session.php:
function start() {
if (function_exists('session_write_close')) {
// session_write_close(); -- this line
}
$this-__initSession();
return $this-__startSession();
}
This seems to work fine but I was wondering if any of the Cake experts
could point out any negative implications/side effects of doing this.
I would really appreciate any feedback from you guys.
Thanks in advance.
Ziad
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
filling model data in select tag
hi all. i m using cakephp 1.1, n firstly i want to know can we use form helper? if yes then how? secondlyi have a form which contains a select control,whose items should come from one table and when user select one item and click submit it should save on another table.pls solve my problem as even i don't know whether for different table will there be different model and controller files? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
blog tutor not working
hi guys; (sorry revised the title) I have a Centos5.1 box, loaded with php-5.1.6 httpd-2.2.3(apache) mysql-5.0.22 following this video http://cakephp.org/screencasts/view/3 and this tutor: http://manual.cakephp.org/view/326/the-cake-blog-tutorial i have checked out from svn repo svn co https://svn.cakephp.org/repo/trunk/cake/1.1.x.x/ /var/www/html/ blog http://localhost/ points to /var/www/html/blog i have created database, entered test entries, modified database.php and all as shown in the video step by step, when i point the browser to, http://localhost/ it shows a page with: CakePHP Rapid Development Your database configuration file is present. Cake is able to connect to the database. but when i point the browser to; http://localhost/posts/ it shows: The requested URL /posts was not found on this server. any ideas what i could be doing wrong? thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Storing sessions in mysql memory tables
Dear developers and users of great CakePHP! I'm new in this community, I've started to learn Cake about 1 week ago and very excited by this product :) I'm trying to make one optimization trick and have questions about it. I've modified my session table (in mysql 5.0.xx) like this: CREATE TABLE cake_sessions ( id varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', data varchar(255) default '', expires int(11) default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE=MEMORY; Note ENGINE=MEMORY, and 'data' field now not TEXT but VARCHAR (because memory tables don't support TEXT or BLOB). Now the questions: 1) Do you think it's safe for users to store their sessions in memory? In my opinion it's OK for small or medium number of visits. Now my sample app works OK with 5 people using it :) and length of session's 'data' as I see in log never been above 237 bytes. 2) Where I can patch a Cake (or maybe my app) to throw an error if session's 'data' is bigger than 255 bytes? Because mysql just truncates the field without a warning :( 3) If you're sure that 255 bytes isn't enough for session storing than how much bytes (according to your opinion) must take the 'data' field? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Open Flash Charts in Cake
Since I've found Open Flash Charts I was planning on using the simple App::import() method, but then I came across a bakery article specifically about a (somewhat unfinished but still very much working) Helper for the Open Flash Charts for use with CakePHP v1.2. http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/open-flash-chart-helper-draw-charts-the-cake-way On May 8, 9:55 am, S. William Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @Doc, I'm using OFC with Cake. Feel free to ping me if you're still looking for a solution down that route. S --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Label with checkbox formhelper and CakePHP 1.2
The form helper's `input()` and `inputs()` methods generate labels,
the individual control methods (`text()`, `checkbox()`) do not. This
is 100% by design.
So.. how do i manage to properly label the checkbox?
echo $form-input('dbDBName',array( 'label' = _('DB Database
Name', 'type' = 'checkbox')));
Btw.. its a tableless model, so no data connection.
You can (and should) create a schema for the model. This will allow
the form helper to automatically choose the correct field type.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Max number of save()'s in a loop
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.set-time-limit.php reset it every n times through a really long loop if you think that is your issue, each time you set it it rolls the timer back to 0 Sam D On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Kyle Decot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure how to do that. Any suggestions? -- -- (the old fart) the advice is free, the lack of crankiness will cost you - its a fine line between a real question and an idiot http://blog.samdevore.com/archives/2007/03/05/when-open-source-bugs-me/ http://blog.samdevore.com/cakephp-pages/my-cake-wont-bake/ http://blog.samdevore.com/cakephp-pages/i-cant-bake/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Label with checkbox formhelper and CakePHP 1.2
Hi!
To keep it short and simple
echo $form-input('dbDBName',array( 'label' = _('DB Database
Name')));
works flawless. It appears an input file with according label.
echo $form-checkbox('dbCreate', array( 'label' =_('Create database
if not exists'))); ?
does not work.
The label is not shown as label but as attribute (???).
So.. how do i manage to properly label the checkbox?
Btw.. its a tableless model, so no data connection.
Thank you for any help!
Carsten
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
using checkbox
hi all. i m using cakephp 1.1 and i have a form which contains 5 checkboxes. i want that corresponding value of the checkbox which is checked shuld enter in tha database table.it should be with the help of htmlhelper ,and at a time user should be able to check only on checkbox. pls solve my problem earliest. thnx. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Something on the top of CakePHP
An example further to Chris' point is a recent discussion I had with Nate - I ran into an issue where I passed an IP address through built- in IP validation then used ip2long to convert it so I could store it in a MySQL signed INT. I noticed that an IP written like 255.255.255.011 would pass validation, but if you convert it with ip2long, store it, retrieve it, convert it with long2ip, you end up with 255.255.255.9. Now, I could have posted a rant here saying OH NOES!! CAKE IS FAIL MY IP VERY BAD! and then talked about what I would change in the core to fix this. What did I do instead? I looked up popular regular expressions for validating IP addresses and saw that they would also validate 255.255.255.011 as acceptable. I then put some code in my beforeSave method to modify the submitted octets to their abs() values before using ip2long. Problem solved. As a final step, I politely contacted Nate, explained what I had discovered, and asked what his thoughts were on the situation. He told me (basically) that validation is not about changing data that's submitted, it's about ensuring the data is correct (not an exact quote). So, I learned something from my own research and sandbox work, I got input from a developer with far more skill than me, and I don't think I offended anyone or waste anyone's time. Above all, I think I walked away without looking like a moron. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Open Flash Charts in Cake
@Doc, I'm using OFC with Cake. Feel free to ping me if you're still looking for a solution down that route. S --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Session Lost In IE
Whats the session security in cake ? did you try to play with it ?
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:21 AM, bharath kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have got a strange problem in IE-6.0. we have built a browser
plugin(Toolbar) for our application, which changes its contents dynamically
after loggin in to our application. we have used Best toolbar studio to
build a toolbar . what i am experiencing is, when i used the below java
script function to reload the toolbar, my session gets lost and i am kicked
back to the login page. Also we tried using a sample toolbar that uses
session_start(); to start session after login and change its contents
dynamically after logging in without the session being lost. In Mozilla,
everything works fine without session being lost.
?php
echo script
function ToolBarInit(tool)
{
tool.Reload(); // A java script function
}
/script ;
?
it would be very helpful if someone has experienced the same problem, or
have encountered the same problem in IE where session gets lost after reload
function, please share your views on this.
Thanks in Advance
Cheers
Bharath
--
Marcin Domanski
http://kabturek.info
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Max number of save()'s in a loop
It's now getting anywhere from 2000-2400 loops into it and then I get: Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [CORE/cake/libs/ model/datasources/dbo_source.php, line 544] Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [CORE/cake/libs/ model/datasources/dbo_source.php, line 543] Notice (8): Undefined property: tablePrefix [CORE/cake/libs/model/ datasources/dbo_source.php, line 456] Notice (8): Undefined property: table [CORE/cake/libs/model/ datasources/dbo_source.php, line 456] Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /home/ content/a/f/f/affinit3/html/cake/libs/model/datasources/dbo_source.php on line 568 Warning (0rray = array()): Unknown(): Unable to call () - function does not exist [Unknown, line ??] on rare occasions it will get to the 16,000's and then just stop. I'm really confused by this. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
OT: Shitty Community
Seriously, why does everybody in the CakePHP community got their finger on the trigger to just rip any person that has a question a new one? I mean, I have seen some pretty stupid questions in my time, and the ones here are nowhere near as bad as the ones that I've seen elsewhere. The thing that makes it different here, is that as soon as those 'stupid' questions come in, the person asking the question gets treated like shit for 5-10 posts until their question is answered (if at all). So what if you created CakePHP, so what if you've used it for the entirety of it's life, some people haven't, and those people have perfectly valid questions for the simple fact that the documentation for CakePHP is horrendous and any documentation that is out there, is spread so thin on the internet that looking for an answer is like trying to find the proverbial needle. I've seen people get called names (seriously, are we in 4th grade?), been told to look things up themselves, been harped on to no end, and all without the courtesy of a decent answer. I feel that if someone comes to the group with a question, EVEN IF IT'S BEEN ASKED BEFORE, it deserves an answer, or at least a _polite_ point in the direction of the answer (in the form of a link to the post, or the page with the answer, NOT a begrudged 'Google It, dumbass'). If you can't answer the question in a polite and decent manner, don't answer the question. Let somebody else who has far better people skills answer it. That way, the person asking the question will feel like they are important to the community. Because nothing kills a project faster than a shitty community, no matter what the project is. So get your head out of your 'Holier than thou' asses and lighten up. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Session Lost In IE
Try changing your security setting to medium, see if that fixes your
problem.
-Erik
On May 8, 10:29 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats the session security in cake ? did you try to play with it ?
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:21 AM, bharath kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have got a strange problem in IE-6.0. we have built a browser
plugin(Toolbar) for our application, which changes its contents dynamically
after loggin in to our application. we have used Best toolbar studio to
build a toolbar . what i am experiencing is, when i used the below java
script function to reload the toolbar, my session gets lost and i am kicked
back to the login page. Also we tried using a sample toolbar that uses
session_start(); to start session after login and change its contents
dynamically after logging in without the session being lost. In Mozilla,
everything works fine without session being lost.
?php
echo script
function ToolBarInit(tool)
{
tool.Reload(); // A java script function
}
/script ;
?
it would be very helpful if someone has experienced the same problem, or
have encountered the same problem in IE where session gets lost after reload
function, please share your views on this.
Thanks in Advance
Cheers
Bharath
--
Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to access Cake Session Variables from a Stand Alone PHP script
Well providing your are starting your session and using the same
session id, then you should be able to access CURRENT_USER.
I am not sure if this will work with database sessions.
-Erik
On May 8, 2:11 am, bharath kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sliv,
In Login controller i have set the user details using this line.
$this-Session-write('CURRENT_USER', $someone['User']);
and in the php script, which is oustside the cake directory, i am trying to
use the CURRENT_USER in the php script using $_SESSION. which i couldn
access
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Lakshmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sliv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 7, 2008 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: How to access Cake Session Variables from a Stand Alone
PHP script
To: CakePHP cake-php@googlegroups.com
What variables are you trying to access that are not available through
$_SESSION?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
How is calling the documentation horrendous polite? You have any idea the amount of hours people take to write that, not to mention that is a community effort? I tell you, with the likes of you, I don't doubt anyone would call you names, disrespecting other's people valuable time like that. On May 8, 12:07 pm, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: perfectly valid questions for the simple fact that the documentation for CakePHP is horrendous and any documentation that is out there, is --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: blog tutor not working
http://localhost/ points to /var/www/html/blog http://localhost/posts/ And what about localhost/blog/posts ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:07 AM, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So get your head out of your 'Holier than thou' asses and lighten up. So...to sum up 1) there are no stupid questions, only stupid answers 2) every question, no matter how poorly researched or thought out, deserves a civilized answer 3) people asking questions have no responsibility, only those giving answers benjam, I agree with you that the go google it, asswipe response is not a good one. However, telling people to lighten up is just as insulting as telling them go google it, asswipe. People give answers for a variety of reasons. Most of the time it is to be helpful, but when you start criticizing parts of the code written by people who read the list, what do you think is going to happen? Not everyone is willing to have a touchy-feely response style. I have total respect for those who do their research before asking a question, and lots of people on the list do that. Those questions are worth answering. Other questions that give the impression that the poster hasn't thought about it at all before hitting send, well, again, what do you expect? -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard: http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
I think you're both right (except the part about horrendous documentation - it's actually pretty good at this point). Imho, the core team *and* the community has a lot to learn about being more polite. I think everyone is to the point where we feel justified in making each other mad. Some n00b asks a retarded question in a rude way? Bite his head off. Some jerk on the core team shut down my idea? Complain on the mailing list. Personally, I've been really ashamed of some of the core team responses as much as I have about complaints and requests on the list. How about we meet in the middle, and every work on being a little more polite? I'll try better to understand your frustration if you try harder to understand being overworked and underpaid. -- John On May 8, 2008, at 9:20 AM, mariano.iglesias wrote: How is calling the documentation horrendous polite? You have any idea the amount of hours people take to write that, not to mention that is a community effort? I tell you, with the likes of you, I don't doubt anyone would call you names, disrespecting other's people valuable time like that. On May 8, 12:07 pm, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: perfectly valid questions for the simple fact that the documentation for CakePHP is horrendous and any documentation that is out there, is --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
On May 8, 5:07 pm, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seriously, why does everybody in the CakePHP community got their finger on the trigger to just rip any person that has a question a new one? I mean, I have seen some pretty stupid questions in my time, and the ones here are nowhere near as bad as the ones that I've seen elsewhere. The thing that makes it different here, is that as soon as those 'stupid' questions come in, the person asking the question gets treated like shit for 5-10 posts until their question is answered (if at all). So what if you created CakePHP, so what if you've used it for the entirety of it's life, some people haven't, and those people have perfectly valid questions for the simple fact that the documentation for CakePHP is horrendous and any documentation that is out there, is spread so thin on the internet that looking for an answer is like trying to find the proverbial needle. I've seen people get called names (seriously, are we in 4th grade?), been told to look things up themselves, been harped on to no end, and all without the courtesy of a decent answer. I feel that if someone comes to the group with a question, EVEN IF IT'S BEEN ASKED BEFORE, it deserves an answer, or at least a _polite_ point in the direction of the answer (in the form of a link to the post, or the page with the answer, NOT a begrudged 'Google It, dumbass'). I'd like to build a forum. How can I do that with cake please? Andy --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
I feel that if someone comes to the group with a question, EVEN IF IT'S BEEN ASKED BEFORE, it deserves an answer, or at least a _polite_ point in the direction of the answer Well, IMHO, if the guys are not up to browse the list thru Google Groups to find the answer, I think they should stop coding anything. I try to help as much as I can here and elsewhere. And I can see that most of the people not just saying 'thanxx' for being helped are very oftenly guys or gals not having some *very basic* knowledge in programming. It's boring ! This place is intented to work like a community, not as a free helpdesk. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: blog tutor not working
seb wrote: http://localhost/ points to /var/www/html/blog http://localhost/posts/ And what about localhost/blog/posts ? Ouch. Made a mistake. Forget it. Do you have a posts_controller.php file in your controllers folder ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ARGHH - why is geneateList deprecated
In case you didn't pick up on it, I thinks that's a reference to the You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake quote that Nate has used before on this list when appropriate. Unfortunately, it's appropriate around here all too often. On May 7, 7:48 pm, MikeK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL, thanks fellas -- I only let my closest friends call me snowflake ;) Just curious -- does the find(list) and set::combine apis work on the 5875 code base too? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
Benjam, I am not sure where you derive your hostility. Do you have examples that will serve to backup your assertion, so we may teach the 4th graders how to behave? From what I have seen, the tone of the response often matches the tone of the original message. In general this is a community list and the developers of Cake are rarely involved. I generally try to stay out of the group until I see messages that may work to degrade the community. So, if the community is shitty then it is through no fault but your (the collective) own. Everyone must help to make it better, or else they are only being part of the problem. (In case you were wondering, the previous statement is not part of the communist manifesto;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: saveAll with three levels
On 8 Mag, 13:49, Dr. Tarique Sani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Jose Selesan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, does anybody know if I can save a model with a hasMany relation and each of the related models has a hasMany relation? Hi have a model called Trivia with a 'hasMany' relation to model Pregunta and model Pregunta has a 'hasMany' relation to model Opcion. But when I call $this-Trivia-saveAll($this-data) in my controller, it only saves Trivia and their related Pregunta, but not Opcion It should work - try with the latest SVN check out If does not work then take a look at the related test - modify it for one more level and submit as a bug report Tarique Using saveAll i create a new records in each table related to the one with the primary key linked as hasmany? am i right? But what if i just want to edit a field with a primary key? For example: http://blog.matsimitsu.nl/code/166/saveall-with-cakephp-part2 Let's take that models and relations. If i change the id of a todos record, how can i automatically modify all the records of task linked to id of todos? Is there a way? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
On May 8, 2008, at 9:34 AM, AD7six wrote: I'd like to build a forum. How can I do that with cake please? What needs to be said: - Don't ask vague questions - Try to work on a solution a bit before asking What they need: - Help getting started with CakePHP - Learn how to fish (use the API, Bakery, Docs, etc.) How to better ask: - I'm building Auth into my forum, and I had a question about this function in the API - Anyone else built a forum in CakePHP? I'd be interested to learn about gotchas - New to CakePHP here - found this list from a buddy... Where do I go to get started? - I googled up a blog post about forum creation using Cake... I had a question about this part.. How not to answer it: - Dude, @*(#$ing google it - I don't have time for this, etc. - How many times has this very topic been documented/covered on the list/, etc - Gonna pay me to write your stupid app for you? How to answer it: - If you're looking to get started with CakePHP, [insert link to bakery, manual, my blog here] - In order to help, we'd need more information about what you're doing... [insert link to bin here' - We can't answer a question that vague at this point - go ahead and dive in - maybe we can help later on. fwiw -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake integration with other app and session
I second this, I was about to post something here, when I saw this
one.
I am basically looking to integrate another applications session
system into my CakePHP application. The other application be
vbulletin. I haven't really began to see what the best way to do this
would be but comments from others would be nice at the same time,
since I believe our two questions are related. If not I will start my
own email.
Thanks,
-Erik
On May 8, 6:55 am, Ziad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have an issue that I'd like people's comment(s) on. I am trying to
integrate an existing app with Cake. We are planning to move the
entire app over to Cake eventually but will have to do it in stages.
So we are planning to write new parts of the app in Cake and slowly
move old stuff over.
The problem that I was having was with sessions. It seems that Cake
closes any existing session before doing anything with sessions within
Cake. Session data from my other app is available in Cake. But session
data that I save in Cake is not available in the other app. I've got
around this by commenting out line 167 in cake/libs/session.php:
function start() {
if (function_exists('session_write_close')) {
// session_write_close(); -- this line
}
$this-__initSession();
return $this-__startSession();
}
This seems to work fine but I was wondering if any of the Cake experts
could point out any negative implications/side effects of doing this.
I would really appreciate any feedback from you guys.
Thanks in advance.
Ziad
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake integration with other app and session
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Ziad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem that I was having was with sessions. It seems that Cake closes any existing session before doing anything with sessions within Cake. Session data from my other app is available in Cake. But session data that I save in Cake is not available in the other app. I've got around this by commenting out line 167 in cake/libs/session.php: Sometimes this happens depending on the security level in config/core.php. If you have it set to high, it recreates the session on every page load. Hope that helps. -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard: http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:24 PM, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 8, 2008, at 9:34 AM, AD7six wrote: I'd like to build a forum. How can I do that with cake please? What needs to be said: - Don't ask vague questions - Try to work on a solution a bit before asking http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - Sprinkle this URL in replies often enough and the rest will be automagical. Tarique P.S. try to include the disclaimer as well ;) -- = Cheesecake-Photoblog: http://cheesecake-photoblog.org PHP for E-Biz: http://sanisoft.com = --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
Benjam does have a point. People can be needlessly mean sometimes and that can probably make people think twice about if they are evaluating. But it is not that bad when compared to other communities. People are always being ripped on in forums and irc. The documentations is far from perfect, sure. But compared to (Adobe) Flash it is glorious. Macromedia (and now Adobe) have had 10 over years to write something useful, funded paying customers, backed by one of the larget software companies in the world. That manual does not tell you a single vital piece of information you need to develop Flash-applications. CakePHP has been around for only a few years and had for 1.1 a pretty good manual and API-docs. 1.2 version are still being worked on (a lot by the looks of it) for obvious reasons. To continue comparing to Flash... Trying to locate any medium to advanced tutorial, forum-thread or similar resource is a lot harder than finding answers for CakePHP. Plenty of stupid questions come from people that do not have the Cake-vocabulary to search effectively for answers to their questions. Not everyone is familiar with HABTM from their everyday life. I certainly wasn't before I started messing with RoR and CakePHP. /Martin On May 8, 5:34 pm, seb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I feel that if someone comes to the group with a question, EVEN IF IT'S BEEN ASKED BEFORE, it deserves an answer, or at least a _polite_ point in the direction of the answer Well, IMHO, if the guys are not up to browse the list thru Google Groups to find the answer, I think they should stop coding anything. I try to help as much as I can here and elsewhere. And I can see that most of the people not just saying 'thanxx' for being helped are very oftenly guys or gals not having some *very basic* knowledge in programming. It's boring ! This place is intented to work like a community, not as a free helpdesk. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
DB down, don't panic
I have a cake app on a server on which the database (mysql) has been going down every couple weeks or so. I think I fixed that problem with mysql, but here is the small problem I have with cake: with Config.debug=0 cake seems to silently ignore the fact there is no database. This makes for some strange behavior - pages aren't populated with content, menus are empty, searches return nothing. with Config.debug=1 then you get a lot of WARNING this and that and then a message about table not found either way, my poor client gets very anxious when they see this and sends me emails in ALL CAPS So is there a way, maybe just in my default layout view, to detect if there is no valid DB connection and then display an message along the lines of: http://www.damninteresting.net/content/tech_diff.jpg thanks guys. -Sam --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake integration with other app and session
Hi Chris, Thanks for your response, that certainly goes some way towards explaining why it happens. What about my question of do you see any issue/problem with commenting out this session recreation code? I guess there is the general issue of sharing session data between two applications, but if both applications are generally secure then are there any other issues that people can see? Sorry to be somewhat pedantic about this, its just that if anyone out there can see an issue then that would save me getting too deep into this before having to pull back. Thanks again. On May 8, 4:59 pm, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Ziad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem that I was having was with sessions. It seems that Cake closes any existing session before doing anything with sessions within Cake. Session data from my other app is available in Cake. But session data that I save in Cake is not available in the other app. I've got around this by commenting out line 167 in cake/libs/session.php: Sometimes this happens depending on the security level in config/core.php. If you have it set to high, it recreates the session on every page load. Hope that helps. -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard:http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
How is calling the documentation horrendous polite? You have any idea the amount of hours people take to write that, not to mention that is a community effort? I tell you, with the likes of you, I don't doubt anyone would call you names, disrespecting other's people valuable time like that. My apologies, I should have been more clear. The documentation that is there is very good, but there are holes in the documentation where pieces are missing. So the _lack_ of documentation is bad, not the documentation itself, and I truly am very grateful to the people who spend their time helping others out by writing documentation. If I knew anything about it, I would write some myself, but I've only been working with Cake for about a week now. So...to sum up 1) there are no stupid questions, only stupid answers 2) every question, no matter how poorly researched or thought out, deserves a civilized answer 3) people asking questions have no responsibility, only those giving answers . I actually do agree with 1 and 2, but I never said anything about 3. I feel that people should do some research before posting (to at least know the question they are trying to ask), but I also feel that posting is part of the research. But the people asking questions _do_ have responsibility. (If I'm reading your sarcasm correctly) And a 110% ditto to everything John David Anderson said, although he put it much better than I did. And to be clear, I think that CakePHP is an amazing piece of code (I wouldn't be here if I didn't). And this post has nothing to do with the actual code. So if you are a developer, please don't feel like I am attacking you or your code, because I'm not. And I admit, I am new to this community, so I may not have a broad enough picture to make generalized statements like this, but of the posts I've read, most (if not all) of them turned into bashing sessions. And there are people in this community who have a reputation for being quite rude, and that is just not right. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Hierarchical Tree Setup
Thanks for the reply, for some reason when I tried the 'empty' option
it didn't work, hence my question here.
And thanks for the beforeSave() hint.
On May 7, 8:44 pm, Adam Royle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't help you with the scaffolding - never used it, but it's
certainly possible to do what you want.
1) Do this in your view.
echo $form-input('Product.parent_id', array('options' = $categories,
'empty' = '-- Top Level --'));
You might need this in your model...
function beforeSave(){
if (isset($this-data[$this-alias]['parent_id'])
empty($this-data[$this-alias]['parent_id'])){
$this-data[$this-alias]['parent_id'] = null;
}
return true;
}
2) The Tree behaviour has generatetreelist() however it display likes
this:
Parent 1
_Child 1-1
_Child 1-2
Parent 2
_Child 2-1
_Child 2-2
__Subchild 2-2-1
I think you would need to create your own method to generate the data
in the format you wish.
Cheers,
Adam
On May 8, 4:32 am, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a location table with the following fields:
---
id
name
location_id -- this is a parent location id
---
I have a couple of questions about getting this to work the way I want
it to using scaffolding.
1- How can I set it up so the location_id select box on the form has a
default value of 0 - 'Top Level' without putting a 'Top Level' entry
in the table?
2- How can I get the select box to output in the following format?
-- Top Level --
Parent 1
Parent 1 :: Child 1-1
Parent 1 :: Child 1-2
Parent 2
Parent 2 :: Child 2-1
Parent 2 :: Child 2-2
Parent 2 :: Child 2-2 :: Subchild 2-2-1
etc.
where the tree is built in the order of the ids of the parents, then
the order of the idds of the children.
I can do this manually, but I'd like to know a 'Cake' way of doing it.
And if I must do this manually, how do I get it to play nice with the
$form-input method? If I need to at all?
Thanks for your help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
1.2 Documentation has made amazing progress
I think it's time to change the initial knee-jerk reaction when speaking about cake's documentation. If I remember correctly, only 3-4 months ago there was something like 190 pages. Most of the new 1.2 features were either totally undocumented, or sparse at best. I just had a look today using a pdf created version of the 1.2 cookbook. It currently weighs in at over 330 pages! We clearly have to recognize that the progress on these 1.2 docs over the last couple of months, has been nothing short of amazing. The 1.2 documentation is now, literally, light years better than it was just a few months ago. A couple of more months at this pace, with community members continuing to use the doc, post suggestions, amendments, fleshing out the stuff not yet documented, etc. and I believe we will have totally obliterated any lingering perception of the documentation being an issue. Much appreciation to John Anderson, AD7-Six et al., for the great work. Let's all pitch in and submit something to the cookbook to help them. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Model recursion
Hi. Sorry if this is obvious, but is it possible to set recursion to only go down (to things that belong to the model in question), and not up (to things that the model belongs to)? I've got a model that I've been recursing four levels deep, which has been working fine. Now, though, I've come to realise that I have to set it up to belong to another model that in turn has a *lot* of things belonging to it. Just putting in the $belongsTo makes the whole site time out. Thanks for your help, Zoe. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model recursion
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/bindable-behavior-control-your-model-bindings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1.2 Documentation has made amazing progress
I might disagree on the way the book is structured, but I'd have to agree that it has come a long way. I use it a lot now. Good job, guys. On May 8, 10:33 am, keymaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's time to change the initial knee-jerk reaction when speaking about cake's documentation. If I remember correctly, only 3-4 months ago there was something like 190 pages. Most of the new 1.2 features were either totally undocumented, or sparse at best. I just had a look today using a pdf created version of the 1.2 cookbook. It currently weighs in at over 330 pages! We clearly have to recognize that the progress on these 1.2 docs over the last couple of months, has been nothing short of amazing. The 1.2 documentation is now, literally, light years better than it was just a few months ago. A couple of more months at this pace, with community members continuing to use the doc, post suggestions, amendments, fleshing out the stuff not yet documented, etc. and I believe we will have totally obliterated any lingering perception of the documentation being an issue. Much appreciation to John Anderson, AD7-Six et al., for the great work. Let's all pitch in and submit something to the cookbook to help them. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1.2 Documentation has made amazing progress
Yes, indeed, I use it a lot too - maybe at some point there will be a way to mirror it to contributed servers so it doesn't get too slow due to the size and number of people using it :P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
I do find it interesting to compare Cake responses with, say, the JQuery group- where someone titles their post it's not working and still get loads of polite and helpful responses! I think that although the cook book is defnitely filling the gap in the documentation, the long period where Cake documentation was lacking is the root of the current situation, as it put a lot of stress on the developers to contribute to this group.This group was for a long time the most useful resource for Cake info. Learning Cake, especially 1.2, was not easy for a long time, and once you've had to learn everything the hard way, you're less inclined to help people who want a free ride! I think that once the cook book becomes more of a known one stop shop for cake info (especially with some more tutorials as opposed to just manual style content) then people wil be less likely to post dumb questions, and when they do, people will be a lot more inclined to give friendly, useful answers! Plug: I wrote a similar blog post to the one above about the best ways to reply to these kinds of posts (http://www.acumendevelopment.net/ archives/44). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Label with checkbox formhelper and CakePHP 1.2
What field type creates a checkbox? I was looking for this earlier
and was unable to find it.
On May 8, 10:25 am, grigri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The form helper's `input()` and `inputs()` methods generate labels,
the individual control methods (`text()`, `checkbox()`) do not. This
is 100% by design.
So.. how do i manage to properly label the checkbox?
echo $form-input('dbDBName',array( 'label' = _('DB Database
Name', 'type' = 'checkbox')));
Btw.. its a tableless model, so no data connection.
You can (and should) create a schema for the model. This will allow
the form helper to automatically choose the correct field type.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 1.2 Documentation has made amazing progress
It's been sporadically unresponsive today. Perhaps they're not caching? On May 8, 11:04 am, Sliv (Tim MacAleese) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, indeed, I use it a lot too - maybe at some point there will be a way to mirror it to contributed servers so it doesn't get too slow due to the size and number of people using it :P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
I have to agree with Gwoo, I haven't seen any replies that weren't appropriate to the post being replied to. If you write a post that shows you haven't read the welcome blurb posted on the group front page that tells you to search first before asking, and links to the wiki pages with a ton of information, then you will get an equivalent response (a link to google, a link to the cookbook, etc.). If you write a post with an subject that has all the politeness of a slap in the face like sh**y community or losing faith in cake, etc. then you will get an equally offensive reply like there's the door, troll. If you choose words/topics that can be taken as personally offensive to the people who work on this project, then you will get a personally offensive reply. Actually, I'd be surprised if you could show me even one post that received a reply that was not appropriate... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
On May 8, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Sliv (Tim MacAleese) wrote: I have to agree with Gwoo, I haven't seen any replies that weren't appropriate to the post being replied to. If you write a post that shows you haven't read the welcome blurb posted on the group front page that tells you to search first before asking, and links to the wiki pages with a ton of information, then you will get an equivalent response (a link to google, a link to the cookbook, etc.). If you write a post with an subject that has all the politeness of a slap in the face like sh**y community or losing faith in cake, etc. then you will get an equally offensive reply like there's the door, troll. If you choose words/topics that can be taken as personally offensive to the people who work on this project, then you will get a personally offensive reply. Actually, I'd be surprised if you could show me even one post that received a reply that was not appropriate... While I suppose it might be fair, I'm going to argue that it's actually not an appropriate response anymore. An eye for an eye, and soon the whole world is blind --- Ghandi How about we try to be polite even if the other person isn't? That goes for both sides. -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
What kind of authentication script?, tutorial? do you use?
I am looking for a authentication script?, tutorial for my new app that will work on 1.2 I search on the bakery and found this results: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search -- search string = auth Any suggestions? I got confused. -- Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.axishift.com Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: What kind of authentication script?, tutorial? do you use?
I'm switching from the default auth component to the DarthAuth component. Looks like it has everything you could need without the overhead of ACLs. - Original Message From: Louie Miranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cake-php@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 1:28:19 PM Subject: What kind of authentication script?, tutorial? do you use? I am looking for a authentication script?, tutorial for my new app that will work on 1.2 I search on the bakery and found this results: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search -- search string = auth Any suggestions? I got confused. -- Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.axishift.com Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :) Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
kumbayah. How about we try to be polite even if the other person isn't? That goes for both sides. -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ARGHH - why is geneateList deprecated
Trac has decided to be busted right now, so it's harder to figure that out. Anyway, seriously, your best bet is just to bite the bullet and update. There haven't been *that* many changes, and the deprecated stuff usually tells you exactly how to fix it. And a lot of annoying bugs have been fixed since then. On May 7, 7:48 pm, MikeK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL, thanks fellas -- I only let my closest friends call me snowflake ;) Just curious -- does the find(list) and set::combine apis work on the 5875 code base too? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Getting Cake build version?
I hope this isn't a stupid question, but how can I check what version of Cake 1.2. is installed? I also need to update my Cake 1.2 install with the latest version. When copying files over top my existing install which files should not get modified? are there any I should worry about, or is it safe to write overwrite everything. Also, how does the Cake team handle deleted files from the build updates? Is there a list of files that have been removed? Thanks guys, Mat. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Something on the top of CakePHP
On May 8, 11:03 am, Sliv (Tim MacAleese) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An example further to Chris' point is a recent discussion I had with Nate - I ran into an issue where I passed an IP address through built- in IP validation then used ip2long to convert it so I could store it in a MySQL signed INT. I noticed that an IP written like 255.255.255.011 would pass validation, but if you convert it with ip2long, store it, retrieve it, convert it with long2ip, you end up with 255.255.255.9. Now, I could have posted a rant here saying OH NOES!! CAKE IS FAIL MY IP VERY BAD! and then talked about what I would change in the core to fix this. What did I do instead? I looked up popular regular expressions for validating IP addresses and saw that they would also validate 255.255.255.011 as acceptable. I then put some code in my beforeSave method to modify the submitted octets to their abs() values before using ip2long. Problem solved. As a final step, I politely contacted Nate, explained what I had discovered, and asked what his thoughts were on the situation. He told me (basically) that validation is not about changing data that's submitted, it's about ensuring the data is correct (not an exact quote). So, I learned something from my own research and sandbox work, I got input from a developer with far more skill than me, and I don't think I offended anyone or waste anyone's time. Above all, I think I walked away without looking like a moron. Congratulations, you are a mature programmer. It´s a shame that there are only a few of them. Cheers, mbavio --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
I do find it interesting to compare Cake responses with, say, the JQuery group- where someone titles their post it's not working and still get loads of polite and helpful responses! Maybe I've just been around the jQuery group too long... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: OT: Shitty Community
I think this guy is just looking for 5 minutes of fame and fortune :P Cheers, mbavio --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: What kind of authentication script?, tutorial? do you use?
DarkAuth seems like a simpler solution to simple cases, but if you need the FULL power, you need to learn how to use Auth / ACL. Two months ago, I would tell you good luck with that, but nowadays there are plenty of docs, including the amazing CookBook. Cheers, mbavio On May 8, 2:31 pm, Mathew Nik Foscarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm switching from the default auth component to the DarthAuth component. Looks like it has everything you could need without the overhead of ACLs. - Original Message From: Louie Miranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cake-php@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 1:28:19 PM Subject: What kind of authentication script?, tutorial? do you use? I am looking for a authentication script?, tutorial for my new app that will work on 1.2 I search on the bakery and found this results:http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search-- search string = auth Any suggestions? I got confused. -- Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])http://www.axishift.com Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :) Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
OT: JQuery Group CakePHP Group
... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: What kind of authentication script?, tutorial? do you use?
i use and have been happy with othAuth; there's articles about it in (on?) the bakery; it works w/ 1.2 with a few modifications that can be found with a quick googling On May 8, 1:28 pm, Louie Miranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a authentication script?, tutorial for my new app that will work on 1.2 I search on the bakery and found this results:http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/search-- search string = auth Any suggestions? I got confused. -- Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])http://www.axishift.com Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: What kind of authentication script?, tutorial? do you use?
I started off a long time ago trying othAuth, obAuth, (can't remember all the different names, but I tried several). The problem I ran into is that you are then stuck if you upgrade your core and whatever script you chose happens to break because it used overrides or hacks or whatever. Or, the script simply didn't get updated to fix various bugs because the developer had moved on to other things. More recently I chose to just search all over the place, mainly hitting places like Chris Hartjes' blog, this Group, other blogs, etc. and also just read through the API. I'm still not what I would consider confident about working with Auth/ACL, but I am more comfortable upgrading my core without breaking my app because I'm trying to stick to the conventions of the framework (plus having more understanding of how the implementation works in my app). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Getting Cake build version?
My personal thought is you should keep your app and your cake core separate - then you can just delete the core and replace it with a fresh update without touching your app. The http://book.cakephp.org installation section explains how to keep them separate. I'm not aware of a simple way to check your specific revision from within your app. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
hasMany relationship simply not working
Hey, I have a hasMany relationship which when I bake the model, php picks up. I also have a corresponding belongsTo in teh other model. For some reason when I try to get this data, mysql throws an error saying that that table can't be found. To simplify, that hasMany relationship (in this case, School hasMany SchoolMajor) is not being added to the sql query which is built by cake. There can't be an error in the relationships because they were built using bake. I have double and triple checked them. if i wasn't sure of this I would post them. however, I will post the sql error along with the Joins and the Where clause which I have built: Thanks in advance to anyone. FROM `schools` AS `School` LEFT JOIN `campus_types` AS `CampusType` ON (`School`.`locale` = `CampusType`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `states` AS `State` ON (`School`.`stabbr` = `State`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `is_types` AS `IsType` ON (`School`.`sector` = `IsType`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `school_admissions` AS `SchoolAdmission` ON (`SchoolAdmission`.`school_id` = `School`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `school_aids` AS `SchoolAid` ON (`SchoolAid`.`school_id` = `School`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `school_arrests` AS `SchoolArrest` ON (`SchoolArrest`.`school_id` = `School`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `school_crimes` AS `SchoolCrime` ON (`SchoolCrime`.`school_id` = `School`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `school_missions` AS `SchoolMission` ON (`SchoolMission`.`school_id` = `School`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `school_tuitions` AS `SchoolTuition` ON (`SchoolTuition`.`school_id` = `School`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `vocational_tuitions` AS `VocationalTuition` ON (`VocationalTuition`.`school_id` = `School`.`id`) WHERE `SchoolMajor`.`awlevel` = 6 AND `School`.`id` =164465 ORDER BY `SchoolMajor`.`crace24` DESC LIMIT 1 Warning: SQL Error: 1054: Unknown column 'SchoolMajor.awlevel' in 'where clause' in C:\_projects\eclipse\NEW-MF\site\cake\libs\model \datasources\dbo_source.php on line 440 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Model filter possible
My question is simple, but I haven't been able to find the answer. I'm using Cakephp1.2 which I'm really liking, but I can't seem to figure this one out. Is there a way to hard code conditions in the model itself. I'm not talking about associations just the model itself. An example would be if I have a 'people' table. Can I create a model called 'members' that filters all people with a valid memberid? (there would be no good reason to do this, this is simply an example). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Getting Cake build version?
Mathew Nik Foscarini wrote: I hope this isn't a stupid question, but how can I check what version of Cake 1.2. is installed? There's a version.txt file located in cake core files folder. I also need to update my Cake 1.2 install with the latest version. When copying files over top my existing install which files should not get modified? are there any I should worry about, or is it safe to write overwrite everything. Well, you can overwrite all cake core files. This is harmless for your app. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How to catch errors / warnings from ConnectionManager::create
Hi!
I am just creating an installer for a cake application.
It uses a tableless model and after the user input his DB connection
details I test the connection to the new database using this code.
$db = ConnectionManager::create('test',array('driver'
= $postdata['installation']['dbType'],
'persistent' = false,
'host' =
$postdata['installation']['dbHost'],
'port' =
$postdata['installation']['dbPort'],
'login' =
$postdata['installation']['dbUsername'],
'password'
= $postdata['installation']['dbPassword'],
'database'
= $postdata['installation']['dbDBName'],
'schema'
= '',
'prefix'
= $postdata['installation']['dbPrefix'],
'encoding'
= 'UTF-8'));
if ($db-connected) {
It works fine except that i have no information why the connect
attempt fails. I just know it failed by checking if the DB is
connected or not. What i would like to show to the user is the warning
message the DBis giving back (and which is outputted when debug mode
is activated.
The $db-error property is empty btw, so that is not the solution.
Thank you for any help!
Carsten
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
IE7 Export XLS Problem
Hello wonderful group!
I have written some code that in essence, takes a date range and
serves up two different formats depending what button you click.
Firstly, is the View button. So, for example, I select a date range
and click view, I get a table on the same page with the information I
need. This works fine in IE7 and Firefox.
Secondly, I have another button called Export. Basically, it is the
same form with the date ranges except, when I click the button, it
calls a different function in my controller. The controller gets the
data from the model and packages it via a component as comma separated
values (CSV). It then just echos out the PHP headers and the CSV
data.
My problem is, it works fine in Firefox. When I click export, the
date range is submitted, and I get a download window for the xls
file. But, when I do the same thing in IE7 and IE6, I get an error
stating that:
Internet Explorer cannot download renewals_certificate_export from
subdomain.domain.com
Internet Explorer was not able to open this Internet site. The
requested site is either unavailable or cannot be found. Please try
again later.
So, while this error message is being displayed, I see the download
box in the background, like it is ready to download. So, that tells
me that the headers for php are correct but, I cannot figure out why
IE7 has a problem downloading variable data on the fly.
I have tried changing the headers to something else to no avail. I
have tried making the URL different by including the full URL, with an
ending slash (/) and also by including a file name on the end and
accepting it in my controller function (/text.xls).
I am at a loss here. So, I know it's a problem with IE7, not CakePHP
or with the PHP headers. Just wondering if anyone has had a similar
problem? If so, were you able to resolve the issue?
Here is my code:
Controller
-
function renewals_certificate_export($name = null) {
Configure::write('debug', 0);
if(!empty($this-data)) {
$from = date('Y-m-d', strtotime($this-data['Report']
['from_month']./.$this-data['Report']['from_day']./.$this-
data['Report']['from_year'])). 00:00:00;
$to = date('Y-m-d',
strtotime($this-data['Report']['to_month']./.
$this-data['Report']['to_day']./.$this-data['Report']
['to_year'])). 23:59:59;
$not = '';
if($this-data['Report']['stager'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Stager' ;
}
if($this-data['Report']['master'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Master' ;
}
if($this-data['Report']['realtor'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Realtor' ;
}
if($this-data['Report']['iahsp'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Iahsp';
}
$results = $this-Report-findAll(date = '$from' AND
date =
'$to' $not);
foreach($results as $key = $value) {
$user =
$this-Asp-findByUid($value['Report']['uid']);
$results[$key]['Report']['first_name'] =
$user['Asp']['fname'];
$results[$key]['Report']['last_name'] =
$user['Asp']['lname'];
$results[$key]['Report']['email'] =
$user['Asp']['email'];
$results[$key]['Report']['expiration_date'] =
$user['Asp']
['anniversary'];
}
$this-Excel-addRow(array(ID, First Name, Last
Name, Type,
Email, Expiration Date));
foreach($results as $key = $value) {
$this-Excel-addRow(array($value['Report']['uid'],
$value['Report']['first_name'], $value['Report']['last_name'],
$value['Report']['type'], $value['Report']['email'], date('Y-m-d',
strtotime($value['Report']['expiration_date'];
}
$this-Excel-download(date('Y-m-d',
strtotime($this-data['Report']
['from_month']./.$this-data['Report']['from_day']./.$this-
data['Report']['from_year']))._.date('Y-m-d', strtotime($this-
data['Report']['to_month']./.$this-data['Report']['to_day']./.
$this-data['Report']['to_year']))..xls);
}
}
Excel Component
--
class ExcelComponent extends Object {
var $lines;
function addRow($data) {
if(is_array($data)) {
foreach($data as $key = $value) {
$this-lines .= trim($value).\t;
}
$this-lines = str_replace(\r,,$this-lines);
$this-lines .= \n;
} else {
Re: OT: Shitty Community
I think this guy is just looking for 5 minutes of fame and fortune :P yes please. everybody who has posted a response please send me $5. mbavio gets to send me $10. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: IE7 Export XLS Problem
Okay, I got it thanks to some guidance from _psychic_ thank you!
So, the problem here was that the headers were all wrong.
They went from:
header(Content-type: application/vnd.ms-excel);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=
$file_name);
header(Pragma: no-cache);
header(Expires: 0);
To:
$mm_type=application/octet-stream;
header(Cache-Control: public, must-revalidate);
header(Pragma: hack);
header(Content-Type: . $mm_type);
//header(Content-Length: .(string)(filesize($fullpath)) );
//header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename='.
$filename.'');
header(Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary\n);
//header(Content-type: application/vnd.ms-excel);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$file_name);
// header(Pragma: no-cache);
header(Expires: 0);
I think what did it was the application.octet-stream and the
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary\n
Thanks again _psychic_
Here was where I found these headers:
http://us2.php.net/header
A post by : blinki bill
On May 8, 12:14 pm, Christopher E. Franklin, Sr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello wonderful group!
I have written some code that in essence, takes a date range and
serves up two different formats depending what button you click.
Firstly, is the View button. So, for example, I select a date range
and click view, I get a table on the same page with the information I
need. This works fine in IE7 and Firefox.
Secondly, I have another button called Export. Basically, it is the
same form with the date ranges except, when I click the button, it
calls a different function in my controller. The controller gets the
data from the model and packages it via a component as comma separated
values (CSV). It then just echos out the PHP headers and the CSV
data.
My problem is, it works fine in Firefox. When I click export, the
date range is submitted, and I get a download window for the xls
file. But, when I do the same thing in IE7 and IE6, I get an error
stating that:
Internet Explorer cannot download renewals_certificate_export from
subdomain.domain.com
Internet Explorer was not able to open this Internet site. The
requested site is either unavailable or cannot be found. Please try
again later.
So, while this error message is being displayed, I see the download
box in the background, like it is ready to download. So, that tells
me that the headers for php are correct but, I cannot figure out why
IE7 has a problem downloading variable data on the fly.
I have tried changing the headers to something else to no avail. I
have tried making the URL different by including the full URL, with an
ending slash (/) and also by including a file name on the end and
accepting it in my controller function (/text.xls).
I am at a loss here. So, I know it's a problem with IE7, not CakePHP
or with the PHP headers. Just wondering if anyone has had a similar
problem? If so, were you able to resolve the issue?
Here is my code:
Controller
-
function renewals_certificate_export($name = null) {
Configure::write('debug', 0);
if(!empty($this-data)) {
$from = date('Y-m-d', strtotime($this-data['Report']
['from_month']./.$this-data['Report']['from_day']./.$this-data['Report']['from_year'])).
00:00:00;
$to = date('Y-m-d',
strtotime($this-data['Report']['to_month']./.
$this-data['Report']['to_day']./.$this-data['Report']
['to_year'])). 23:59:59;
$not = '';
if($this-data['Report']['stager'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Stager' ;
}
if($this-data['Report']['master'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Master' ;
}
if($this-data['Report']['realtor'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Realtor' ;
}
if($this-data['Report']['iahsp'] == 0) {
$not .= AND type != 'Iahsp';
}
$results = $this-Report-findAll(date = '$from'
AND date =
'$to' $not);
foreach($results as $key = $value) {
$user =
$this-Asp-findByUid($value['Report']['uid']);
$results[$key]['Report']['first_name'] =
$user['Asp']['fname'];
$results[$key]['Report']['last_name'] =
$user['Asp']['lname'];
$results[$key]['Report']['email'] =
$user['Asp']['email'];
Re: OT: Shitty Community
And your post is a bit ironic... Your are asking for polite manners, and the title of the post is Shitty Community... Lol, I just think that you are bored and you have nothing better to do than fudd a little. Calm down, it will be worse if anybody answers any question. Cheers, mbavio On May 8, 4:29 pm, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this guy is just looking for 5 minutes of fame and fortune :P yes please. everybody who has posted a response please send me $5. mbavio gets to send me $10. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model filter possible
When you define the model associations, you can add a conditions key
to the array. Check the CookBook and you will understand what I mean.
Wait, let me give you an example:
var $hasMany = array('Book' = array('conditions' =
array('Book.price' = '!= 0')));
Hope this can help you.
Cheers,
mbavio
On May 8, 3:11 pm, jmmg77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is simple, but I haven't been able to find the answer.
I'm using Cakephp1.2 which I'm really liking, but I can't seem to
figure this one out.
Is there a way to hard code conditions in the model itself. I'm not
talking about associations just the model itself.
An example would be if I have a 'people' table. Can I create a model
called 'members' that filters all people with a valid memberid?
(there would be no good reason to do this, this is simply an example).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: DB down, don't panic
All you need is in the view file for the default home page that cake creates for you. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:13 PM, sbeam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a cake app on a server on which the database (mysql) has been going down every couple weeks or so. I think I fixed that problem with mysql, but here is the small problem I have with cake: with Config.debug=0 cake seems to silently ignore the fact there is no database. This makes for some strange behavior - pages aren't populated with content, menus are empty, searches return nothing. with Config.debug=1 then you get a lot of WARNING this and that and then a message about table not found either way, my poor client gets very anxious when they see this and sends me emails in ALL CAPS So is there a way, maybe just in my default layout view, to detect if there is no valid DB connection and then display an message along the lines of: http://www.damninteresting.net/content/tech_diff.jpg thanks guys. -Sam --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model filter possible
Thank you for your help. Is this example model something other than
book?
What I am trying to do is not typical associations between models.
It would be like this, I have a table called books. I would like to
create two different models that behave as if there are two completely
different tables, but they are both based on the 'books' table.
The first model would be called 'novel' where booktype = 1.
The second would be called 'studyguide' where booktype = 2.
Again, in this example, there are many reasons not to do this, but I
do have a specific need for something like this.
On May 8, 2:44 pm, mbavio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you define the model associations, you can add a conditions key
to the array. Check the CookBook and you will understand what I mean.
Wait, let me give you an example:
var $hasMany = array('Book' = array('conditions' =
array('Book.price' = '!= 0')));
Hope this can help you.
Cheers,
mbavio
On May 8, 3:11 pm, jmmg77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is simple, but I haven't been able to find the answer.
I'm using Cakephp1.2 which I'm really liking, but I can't seem to
figure this one out.
Is there a way to hard code conditions in the model itself. I'm not
talking about associations just the model itself.
An example would be if I have a 'people' table. Can I create a model
called 'members' that filters all people with a valid memberid?
(there would be no good reason to do this, this is simply an example).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model filter possible
Model Category on my app:
var $hasMany = array('Article', 'ChildCategory' = array(
'className' = 'Category',
'dependent' = false,
'foreignKey' = 'parent_id',
'order' = 'ChildCategory.order ASC',
)
);
So you can see that I can relate a model with itself.
Cheers,
mbavio
On May 8, 5:08 pm, jmmg77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your help. Is this example model something other than
book?
What I am trying to do is not typical associations between models.
It would be like this, I have a table called books. I would like to
create two different models that behave as if there are two completely
different tables, but they are both based on the 'books' table.
The first model would be called 'novel' where booktype = 1.
The second would be called 'studyguide' where booktype = 2.
Again, in this example, there are many reasons not to do this, but I
do have a specific need for something like this.
On May 8, 2:44 pm, mbavio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you define the model associations, you can add a conditions key
to the array. Check the CookBook and you will understand what I mean.
Wait, let me give you an example:
var $hasMany = array('Book' = array('conditions' =
array('Book.price' = '!= 0')));
Hope this can help you.
Cheers,
mbavio
On May 8, 3:11 pm, jmmg77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is simple, but I haven't been able to find the answer.
I'm using Cakephp1.2 which I'm really liking, but I can't seem to
figure this one out.
Is there a way to hard code conditions in the model itself. I'm not
talking about associations just the model itself.
An example would be if I have a 'people' table. Can I create a model
called 'members' that filters all people with a valid memberid?
(there would be no good reason to do this, this is simply an example).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: hi guys
Hi! but when i point the browser to;http://localhost/posts/ it shows: The requested URL /posts was not found on this server. any ideas what i could be doing wrong? It sounds like you have debugging set to 0 (off). If you edit app/ config/core.php, you can change it to 1 or 2 in order to get a more detailed error message. Most likely, you need to create a file called app/controllers/ posts_controller.php, and give it the right contents to have a function called index, plus create app/views/posts and put a file called index.ctp in it. There should be many guides on getting these things set up, although last I checked (which was a while ago now), Cake was kinda in between documentation... Hope that helps, Zoe. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
