Re: Subject: Re: Dead console port [7:9621]
Comments within and below.
> Subject: Dead console port [7:9621]
>
>
> > Okay gang, here's a challenge that I'm trying to overcome
(warning:
> it
> may
> > not be solvable)
> >
> > I just got a 2514 where I couldn't get any response from
the console
> port.
Can you be very specific here? Does this mean that you saw
absolutely *zero* characters go by on the screen, or that any
amount of input on your part did not cause any reaction on the
part of the router?
> > Of course, I tried changing baud rates, etc,
When you say you tried changing "baud rates, etc" How exactly
did you do this? I have found that a lot of folks never
complete *all* the necessary steps to fully change over to a
different speed setting in hyperterm. To be precise, did you
do the following for each console speed (1200bps, 2400bps,
4800bps) change listed in the paragraphs below?
I'll assume you are using hyperterm. If you are, you will need
to disconnect the connection(phone off hook button). Once
disconnected, go into the properties button (hand with a piece
of paper?) and select the configure button. Change the console
speed to 1200bps. Press okay twice. **Close hyperterm** and
reopen it. Hyperterm is now set to read/operate at 1200bps.
At this point, you would want to reload the router. Hopefully,
within the first 15-20 seconds you should see something you
recognize. If not, redo the procedures in the paragraph above
for both 2400bps and 4800bps respectively. Once you do get
recognizable text, send a regular break to the router. Use the
rommon procedures to reset the config register to 0x2142:
>o/r 0x2142
but when I finally
> connected
> to
> > the AUX port, I was able to get in.
I assume this was the first time you tried the AUX port? also,
what speed was Hyperterm's console set to when you accessed the
AUX port? Remember, the AUX port speed is set with the values
specified in the startup config. Since there is nothing set to
interrupt that startup config, it can be any of the following
possible values: 1200bps, 2400bps, 4800bps, or 9600bps. Also
don't forget that somebody who was messing with the config
could have set other parameters, such as stopbits, etc.
The enable password was cisco, so
> I
> > gleefully got into the config and changed the config
register, hoping
> that
> > would solve the problem.
You have not mentioned what value you had and what value you
changed it to. Can I presume that the config register was set
to something other than 0x2102? If so, what value did it
have? When you changed it back presumably to 0x2102, did you
remember to reset hyperterm's console speed to use 9600bps
using the procedure above?
It didn't, so I did the next (very stupid)
> thing -
> > I erased the config (I'm beating my head against the desk
as I type).
Well, if you mean to say you erased the config, I assume you
meant "erase startup"? if so, the default settings should have
allowed access to the AUX port once the router was fully
booted. The big assumption here is that your hyperterm
settings were set to 9600, 8, N, 1 and no flow control. If
not, the AUX port may not work.
> Now,
> > of course, the problem is when I go to the AUX port and try
to get
> into
> > enable mode, I can't ("no password set").
So you are able to access the AUX port, but it will not permit
you to set a privileged level password via the AUX port. That
is not good. The AUX port cannot be used for password
recovery, but I am sure you have already figured that out.
Even if you could send a break to the router somehow without
using the keyboard (electrically), you would still not be able
to access the AUX port to change the config register.
> > Is there any way for me to "bypass" the console port by
using the AUX
> port,
Not for password recovery purposes.
> > or have I just rendered this device useless until I find a
way to fix
> the
> > console port?
To my knowledge, it is not repairable. The best you can do is
get a Smartnet Contract for it and send it to the great router
heaven in the sky (a.k.a Cisco's dumpsters :-)
I don't think I can get into ROMMON mode from the AUX
> port,
Correct.
> > and I can't get into priveleged EXEC mode, either.
Make 100% sure you cannot access the router from each of the
console speeds mentioned. A router without a fully functioning
console port is a disaster waiting to happen. If the console
port really and truly is dead, you need to get rid of the router
(hopefully viia replacement from Smartnet).
HTH,
Paul Werner
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9671&t=9621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
RE: configuring Hyperterminal Private edition w/Wi [7:9590]
You may want to go the step further and get SecureCRT from vandyke, which allows SSH v1 and v2 connections. It's a $100, but worth the extra functionality if you want to use secure communications. Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: Jon Thomasberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 1:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: configuring Hyperterminal Private edition w/Wi [7:9590] Basically, Hyperterm for WinME and Win2000 are horible and rarely work properly. Get CRT. Here's the link to download it. ftp://ftp.vandyke.com/pub/CRT/ntcrt331.exe 30day shareware. 35 bucks to reg. Worth every penny IMHO. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9670&t=9590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I can't use dialer 1 int to connect internet [7:9662]
Try using "dialer pool 1" under the dialer interface and "dialer pool-member 1" under the BRI interface(s). Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > hwen > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 8:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: I can't use dialer 1 int to connect internet [7:9662] > > > Hi, > when I only config the bri int , I can ping any ip in route. > Now, I use the dialer 1 int, I can't ping any ip in route > > my config > > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname 2600 > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip domain-lookup > ! > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > isdn voice-call-failure 0 > ! > ! > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 192.168.1.250 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat inside > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface BRI1/0 > ip address negotiated > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat outside > encapsulation ppp > dialer rotary-group 1 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface BRI1/1 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat outside > encapsulation ppp > shutdown > dialer rotary-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface BRI1/2 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface BRI1/3 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface Dialer1 > ip address negotiated > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat outside > encapsulation ppp > dialer in-band > dialer idle-timeout 1800 > dialer string 169 > dialer load-threshold 1 either > dialer-group 1 > ppp authentication pap callin > ppp pap sent-username 169 password 7 055A5056 > ppp multilink > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 > no ip http server > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > no scheduler allocate > end > > > when I ping somewhere in route , the message is > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 166.111.8.28, timeout is 2 seconds: > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9669&t=9662 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ccie dump trading [7:9668]
anybody wants ccie written dump trading? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9668&t=9668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: configuring Hyperterminal Private edition w/Wi [7:9590]
Basically, Hyperterm for WinME and Win2000 are horible and rarely work properly. Get CRT. Here's the link to download it. ftp://ftp.vandyke.com/pub/CRT/ntcrt331.exe 30day shareware. 35 bucks to reg. Worth every penny IMHO. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9667&t=9590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: configuring Hyperterminal Private edition w/Wi [7:9590]
Hypeterm for Win ME and 2000 has issues. Goto download.cnet.com and download CRT. Its a much better program. Hope this helps. I will never use hypeterm again. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9666&t=9590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #1388 (Out of office) [7:9665]
I will be out of the office until Monday, July 2. If you need further assistance, please contact the East Jefferson Information Systems Help Desk at (504) 454-4847. Thanks Brad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9665&t=9665 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Netcool [7:9152]
I have yet to personally work on a Netcool system and have only seen it at an ISP that a friend was working at. I understand it to be an excellent product, but I have also heard that it is very expensive. Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: CCB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Netcool [7:9152] Can anyone recommend some good links to documentation on and give some opinions on Netcool. Thank You Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9664&t=9152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nokia Firewall vs PIX? [7:9371]
Having worked on both platforms, they each have their strength's and weaknesses. I tend to use Nokia Checkpoint firewalls when guarding office type environments to the internet and then use PIX firewalls for guarding production networks. Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: Keyboard_Cowboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Nokia Firewall vs PIX? [7:9371] Anyone have any have a Nokia firewall that they have played with and how does it rate against the PIX? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9663&t=9371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't use dialer 1 int to connect internet [7:9662]
Hi, when I only config the bri int , I can ping any ip in route. Now, I use the dialer 1 int, I can't ping any ip in route my config version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname 2600 ! ! ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.1.250 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface BRI1/0 ip address negotiated no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer rotary-group 1 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI1/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp shutdown dialer rotary-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI1/2 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI1/3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 1800 dialer string 169 dialer load-threshold 1 either dialer-group 1 ppp authentication pap callin ppp pap sent-username 169 password 7 055A5056 ppp multilink ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! no scheduler allocate end when I ping somewhere in route , the message is Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 166.111.8.28, timeout is 2 seconds: FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Load balancing [7:9627]
I think ip load-sharing per-packet command only work on serial port. Since it is "IP" load sharing, it should only work on layer 3 interface. You can implement Ethernet load sharing by " FastEther Channel ( FEC). How does FEC choose a way to go? It calculate the XOR between the destination MAC address and port MAC address. Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 9:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Load balancing [7:9627] I am trying to configure load balancing across two FT1s that connect into a 3620's Ethernet ports. I have enabled IP load-sharing per-packet on each interface but it doesn't seem to help. I have also removed the 512K link and nothing changes regardless of the load-sharing statement. But when I pull the 128K link, all connectivity is lost. I am thinking there is a problem with the 512K link and I have asked the client to contact the provider. My question is, will the IP load-sharing per-packet command work across the Ethernet ports, or does it only apply to Serial ports? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9661&t=9627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multicast on the Internet - what is the status [7:9655]
Actually, I think you've already partially answered your own question. Recently, I moved to a new location and didn't bother getting any television hook up (obviously being either cable or dish). While I feel the "jones" once in a while to watch TV, it doesn't bother me much. Back to the original point: The problem exists in the companies. In the companies minds, they ask the questions: what hardware do I have (as opposed to what I need)? What software do I have (as opposed to what I need)? And, most importantly: "Am I going to make a profit on my investment?". I personally believe that Internet TV will be a reality in around five years. I will qualify this by saying that I think it will have some consumer expense tagged onto it - in other words, it's not going to be as simple as clicking on "Happy Days" or "Family Ties". Business is business. If advertisers can't foot the bill, we're talking pay-per-view. The upside is that we will (hopefully) be able to see what we want, when we want. In other words, while you may have to watch commercials during your favorite show, you won't have to wait unitl a specific day/hour to see it. ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hello gang: > > I hope some experts like Howard Berkowitz can respond: > > question - what is the status of multicasting on the Internet today? Both > technically, and non-technically? > > I understand that the first iteration involved some version of PIM (probably > sparse-dense) in an internal network, connected to the MBONE vie DVMRP > tunnels . Many experts disliked this method due to the inherent lack of > scalability of DVMRP and, I believe, there was also no standard way to > allocate group addresses (only via SDR/SAP, I believe) > > So, the second iteration consisted of, once again, PIM (almost certainly > sparse-dense) used in an internal network, but with MBGP to connect to the > Internet and MSDP to locate other sources while still providing RP placement > flexibility. And I also thought MASC/MADCAP was an attempt to solve the > whole address allocation problem (but it still leaves several problems > unresolved, like how to allocate addresses fairly). > > But now I've noticed yet another group of technologies emerging - BGMP > (which I am told is supposed to be better than MSDP/MBGP, but I don't yet > understand how it is better), bidirectional PIM (which seems to be another > name for CBT), and SSM with IGMP V3 (which still leaves open the question > that how would you know who to block and who not to block?). Plus, I seem > to see less emphasis on CGMP, and more emphasis on RGMP and IGMP snooping. > > > But the bottom line is that I still don't see too many widespread > consumer-uses of multicasting. I only see real-world uses of multicasting > within companies (financial information in investment companies), or, across > the Internet, meetings of standards bodies. > But, for example, I don't see anything like the Superbowl or the World > Series being delivered via multicast. OK, OK, that's because of corporate > licensing restrictions, but I think you see my point, I don't see a whole > lot of multicasting that delivers information of interest to the average > user. > > > So, are these new multicasting technologies becoming very popular, and if > so, why (and if not, why not)? And will these technologies make Internet > multicasting more wide-spread, or does that have to do with things like > politics, money, and that kind of thing (layer 8 of the OSI model)? > Exactly what is happening with Internet multicasting? > > Thanx > > NRF Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9660&t=9655 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access-list /TCP & UDP ! [7:9638]
First I'll give you links to port assignments and documents that will help, then I'll give you my understanding of the workings of TCP and UDP (if you don't mind doing a little reading). The first link is to a listing of UDP/TCP ports: http://www.networkice.com/advice/Exploits/Ports/ Additionally, I would advise you to go to the Cisco Web site www.cisco.com, and investigate the details concerning TCP/IP. I'm sure you've already checked there, and I don't mean to offend you by indicating this, however the issue concerning ports and transport protocols is vague and needs to be investigated at length in order for someone to gain a clear understanding. That being said, here is what I personally know (once again, this is not gospel, this is one persons understanding). We first have to agree that TCP/IP does not directly correlate to the OSI Reference Model. If we can agree on that, then we can discuss how an application or service talks to the TCP/IP protocol, and how TCP and UDP relate to port assignments. If you looked at the first link I indicated, you will see that there are no specific listings for TCP or UDP ports, only listings for services that operate over certain ports. There are two kinds of port assignments: those that are well known and used to provide specific services using the TCP/IP suite as an application level service, and those ports that are negotiated for a particular application that exists outside of TCP/IP. An analogy would be: If you choose to Telnet into another computer, you are using an application which is part of the TCP/IP suite. The innerworkings of Telnet are included in the TCP/IP specification. If, however, you are going to connect to a server to play Quake III or something of that nature, you are using TCP/IP only as a transport. Quake III is an application, but is not an application that is contained in the TCP/IP suite. To that end, you are not using TCP/IP on the Application, Presentation, or Session layers of the OSI, but rather the Quake III application uses TCP or UDP as a transport for communication. In the case of Quake III, it provides it's own application, presentation, and session layer information, and then communicates with the TCP/IP protocol, telling it whether it needs connection-oriented or connectionless transmission. And now the discussion turns to which ports are TCP (connection-oriented) ports and which ports are UDP (connectionless) ports. Regarding the issue of which ports are UDP and which are TCP; I've never seen a document which explains this to my satisfaction. This is where my logic (and or the failure there of) comes into play. My understanding is that TCP and UDP do not have port assignments. If you are using an application that is outside of the services of the TCP/IP protocol suite, the application must request either a connection-oriented (TCP), or connectionless (UDP) transport. If this train of thought is correct, then it doesn't matter what port an application requests, it will be able to request either TCP or UDP based on whether the application needs a connection-oriented or connectionless transport. There are (by RFC specification I believe) 1024 well known ports. The first 1024 have been reserved (so to speak)for the TCP/IP protocol. This logic might indicate that these ports (for the purposes of security and convenience) have been designated as either UDP or TCP, however I'm not sure this is the case. I will give you an example, however, to clarify this point. FTP is known as a TCP/IP suite protocol known to be a File Transfer Protocol. It is also known to use the Transport Control Protocol (TCP) as its transport (end to end connection)and actually uses two ports: 20 and 21. If you look at those ports, one controls data flow and the other actually transmits data. This is important in that when we use FTP we are declaring that the information being sent is critical and we need confirmation that it is being received correctly. Conversly, TFTP uses port 69. The Trivial File Transport Protocol uses UDP, a connectionless protocol, which assumes that the data is not critical. In the case of UDP, we're saying that we'd like to send information, but It's not neccessary to acknowledge it. Both these protocols are part of the TCP/IP suite, and both use a different transport method. My question would be in regards to the 1024 well known ports and whether there are assignments specifically designated to the TCP/IP suite, or is rather just a matter that applications developed using these ports use this standard for the sake of continuity? If you wish to extend this discussion, we could consider why anyone would consider using a connectionless protocol at all, considering it's unreliable nature. The answer lies (lays?) in its history. At a certain point in time, applications didn't provide any error correction, they merely provided information. As technology evolved, programs were capable of providing this servi
Re: Rack Time Available. [7:9628]
I forget to mention ISDN is on the 3620 routers with a switch. ""Scott O'Donnell"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > To All, > > I'm currently gearing up for a second CCIE Cert (hopefully) and have a > pretty good rack to pratice on. > It's the rack I used to studying and pass the R/S exam. > I'm offering access to the rack as a way of recovering some of the expensive > of buying it from my previous employer. > > I will charge a very low cost or barter for access. > > The current cabling configuration will allow for you to do ccbootcamp labs > 1-8, (I don't have the others, but if you > send me the cable info, I'll try to work it out.) > > Please contact me directly if anyone is interested. > > The rack is made up of the following > > 1 x 2511 access server > 2 x 2514 dual e /dual wan > 2 x 2513 1 eth/1 tok/ 2 wan > 2 x 3810 eth / 2 wan / voice t1 / MFT ATM t1 > 2 x 3620 eth /wan /voice FXS > 1 x 1750 > 1 x 1605 > 1 x AGS frame switch > 1 x pix 506 > 1 x Cat 2901 > 1 x Cat 2900 XL Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9658&t=9628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX 525 Password Recovery? / Need Help!!! [7:9549]
Try again; this time really follow the directionsit works every time. ""Justin Lofton"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm trying to erase the PIX password. I used the instructions on CCO but > after I tftp it never asks me if I want to erase the passwords, then it > continues and reboots like nothing happened. Is there another way that will > just blow out the whole config? Please let me know if you have any ideas. > > Thanks for all your help! > > > Justin Lofton > Account Executive/CCNA > Tredent Data Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > V: (818) 222-3770 > F: (818) 222-3778 > http://www.tredent.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9657&t=9549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #1387 (Out of office) [7:9656]
Brad; I had a few problems I needed help with. I called the number, but no one could help me. WHASUP!? ""Brad Cameron"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I will be out of the office until Monday, July 2. If you need further > assistance, please contact the East Jefferson Information Systems Help Desk > at (504) 454-4847. > > Thanks > Brad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9656&t=9656 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast on the Internet - what is the status [7:9655]
hello gang: I hope some experts like Howard Berkowitz can respond: question - what is the status of multicasting on the Internet today? Both technically, and non-technically? I understand that the first iteration involved some version of PIM (probably sparse-dense) in an internal network, connected to the MBONE vie DVMRP tunnels . Many experts disliked this method due to the inherent lack of scalability of DVMRP and, I believe, there was also no standard way to allocate group addresses (only via SDR/SAP, I believe) So, the second iteration consisted of, once again, PIM (almost certainly sparse-dense) used in an internal network, but with MBGP to connect to the Internet and MSDP to locate other sources while still providing RP placement flexibility. And I also thought MASC/MADCAP was an attempt to solve the whole address allocation problem (but it still leaves several problems unresolved, like how to allocate addresses fairly). But now I've noticed yet another group of technologies emerging - BGMP (which I am told is supposed to be better than MSDP/MBGP, but I don't yet understand how it is better), bidirectional PIM (which seems to be another name for CBT), and SSM with IGMP V3 (which still leaves open the question that how would you know who to block and who not to block?). Plus, I seem to see less emphasis on CGMP, and more emphasis on RGMP and IGMP snooping. But the bottom line is that I still don't see too many widespread consumer-uses of multicasting. I only see real-world uses of multicasting within companies (financial information in investment companies), or, across the Internet, meetings of standards bodies. But, for example, I don't see anything like the Superbowl or the World Series being delivered via multicast. OK, OK, that's because of corporate licensing restrictions, but I think you see my point, I don't see a whole lot of multicasting that delivers information of interest to the average user. So, are these new multicasting technologies becoming very popular, and if so, why (and if not, why not)? And will these technologies make Internet multicasting more wide-spread, or does that have to do with things like politics, money, and that kind of thing (layer 8 of the OSI model)? Exactly what is happening with Internet multicasting? Thanx NRF Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9655&t=9655 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7000 memory upgrade - memory spec [7:9647]
>From the CCO Open Forum Q&A #1996 List of Supprted Vendors for Memory and Flash. Cut the RP64 from a long list of other routers. RP-64 PCA,SUB,ROUTE PROCESSOR,64MB4 15-1352-01 IC,DRAM , 16Mx 9, 70ns,SIM30 Part Number ManufacturerManufacturer # Status Approved --- -- -- 15-1352-01 SAMSUNG KMM5916000/AT-7 QualApproved* 15-1352-01 MITSUBISHI MH16M09ATJ-7QualApproved BTW Saw another reply suggesting RSP1. The RSP1 is for the 7505 box. The 7000 series replaces the RP and (S)SP with the RSP7000 and CI7000 set. In theory they will run any code that the RSPs in 7500s will run. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Whittle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 6:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 7000 memory upgrade - memory spec [7:9647] > > > I have an old 7000 router with RP & SP in my home lab. The RP only has > 16Mb ram fitted (4 x 4Mb), it is Hardware 1.2 rev D0 (pn 73-0877-06). > Which according to CCO should upgrade to 64 MB (4 of 16Mb x 9 SIMMS). > > Does anyone know the spec for the SIMMS? Are they the same > as any other > router or PC platform? > > I am after a source of an inexpensive set for my home lab. > > Many thanks for the help > > Peter > > -- > Peter Whittle > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9654&t=9647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wan technology [7:9475]
You know, I couldn't agree more with this. I sat down one day to read Pepelnjak's MPLS novella from Cisco Press, but by page 100 I said to myself, "Am I missing something here??" ;-) Can anyone else recommend an easy-to-read tutorial on MPLS? Or is that an oxymoron? ;-) BJ - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 8:49 PM Subject: RE: Wan technology [7:9475] Unfortunately, most vendor marketeers and course writers focus on part 3 above -- the forwarding part. At best, they tend to wave their hands and say some magic set up the paths. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9653&t=9475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: duplex for WAN connection ? [7:9462]
>Yes, WAN connections are almost always full duplex. I say "almost" >because there are probably some that I'm not aware of that are half >duplex. > >John Before frame relay and ISDN were widely available, IBM terminal networks commonly used polled multidrop analog lines, which are inherently half-duplex. You still may see this sort of thing on automatic teller machines, credit authorization terminals, and various remote monitoring (e.g., utility meter reading), but it's largely obsolete. What is worth mentioning, especially to someone in Australia where intercontinental bandwidth is expensive, is that you can have full duplex circuits with asymmetrical bandwidth -- say 1 Mbps in one direction and 128 Kbps in the other. This is entirely appropriate for applications where you primarily are transferring data in one direction and just sending acknowledgements in the other. Indeed, the "fast" path can go over a long-delay satellite facility, the "slow" path can go over low-latency terrestrial, and you may get the best of both worlds. This is sometimes called unidirectional link routing, but that is rarely true simplex -- there needs to be a control channel opposite the directin of the main data flow. > "Justin Vo" 6/21/01 7:49:29 PM >>> >Hi all, > >I need to verify to see if the WAN connection is somewhat "full-duplex" >? >another word, for a 64kbps WAN connection, do I have 64K incoming and >another 64 K outgoing or the total of incoming and outgoing is 64 Kbps >? > >Much thanks >Justin Vo >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Network Adminsitrator Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9652&t=9462 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wan technology [7:9475]
Both the Cisco/Stratacom and Nortel/Passport WAN switches have well-established industry positions. I've worked with both. Historically, WAN switches -- including other major vendors such as Ascend/Lucent -- use proprietary provisioning and layer 2 routing technology. This, however, is changing significantly with MPLS and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS). Now, you need to understand that MPLS is not a replacement for IP routing protocols. I like to think of it as an "overdrive" to them. 1. The IP routing protocols, perhaps with traffic engineering extensions, figure out the network topology. 2. MPLS path setup protocols such as RSVP-TE, LDP, and CR-LDP, set up label switched paths. 3. MPLS forwarding actually moves labeled data units to the next hop. GMPLS generalizes these concepts beyond the idea of frames and packets. Typically with additional path setup mechanisms including GSMP, it can set up paths that are not aware of packets/frames -- but work on multiplex time slots (e.g., SONET), wavelengths (DWDM), or physical ports (arbitrary cross-connects). So I would argue that a good knowledge of MPLS and its extensions may be even more important than a specific WAN switch vendor technology. Unfortunately, most vendor marketeers and course writers focus on part 3 above -- the forwarding part. At best, they tend to wave their hands and say some magic set up the paths. When I taught some internal Cisco SE courses on the Stratacoms, I remember turning off the projector -- with slides totally focused on forwarding -- and spending 45 minutes introducing the ways in which label switched paths are created. IMNSHO, knowing that parts 1 and 2 precede part 3, and understanding all 3 parts, is the real competitive advantage. >Cisco ofcourse. > >StrataCom and the MGX range of switches ROCK. Seriously -- what about them do you especially like? I don't think there's a WAN switch in the industry that has as friendly an interface as router IOS -- scary, isn't it? > >M > > >--- Rico Ortiz wrote: >> diversity is key. know them all and don't pigeon >> hole your self. >> >> Rico >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> Ronnie Poon >> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:33 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Wan technology [7:9475] >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> Which vendor's WAN technology is more valuable in >> the market. >> Nortel passport , juniper or Cisco. >> >> Thanks >> Ronnie Poon >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9651&t=9475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7000 memory upgrade - memory spec [7:9647]
Peter- from what experience I've had with the 7000's, 11.2 is the best you can do with that combination. You need an RSP1 to upgrade this router. Ebay usually has a large assortment of the RSP's ($150 being a fair price) Phil - Original Message - From: "Peter Whittle" To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 10:26 PM Subject: 7000 memory upgrade - memory spec [7:9647] > I have an old 7000 router with RP & SP in my home lab. The RP only has > 16Mb ram fitted (4 x 4Mb), it is Hardware 1.2 rev D0 (pn 73-0877-06). > Which according to CCO should upgrade to 64 MB (4 of 16Mb x 9 SIMMS). > > Does anyone know the spec for the SIMMS? Are they the same as any other > router or PC platform? > > I am after a source of an inexpensive set for my home lab. > > Many thanks for the help > > Peter > > -- > Peter Whittle Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9650&t=9647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco STS problem Please Help [7:9603]
I knew someday my knowledge of STS-10 cabling would come in handy. :-) I have one of these in my lab, and it took a while to get the cabling right, but here you go: sts-10 side router console --- -- Green-white Blue-white Orange-whiteBlue Brown-white Orange-white Blue-white Orange BlueGreen-white Orange Green Green Brown-white Brown Brown This cable will also work for the PC to console port on the sts-10. If you have any non-router hardware that you want a console for like a sparc workstation, you need to cross-over the "router console" end. Other combinations of signals may work, but I know these work. HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Curtis Newman Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco STS problem Please Help [7:9603] Hello Everybody, I just brought a Cisco STS 10x terminal server and I have tried to access it via rolled cable using hyperterminal but nothing happens, I have checked the cable and it works on my other routers, Am I connecting to this terminal server incorrectly? If anyone has any experience with one of these can you please send me a reply on how to access this device. Thank You Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9649&t=9603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: network security issue [7:9556]
Jim, First, physical site security is always your first line of defense. It is a rule of thumb that if your site security is so bad that you cannot at least have some assurance that unauthorized people are not coming into your site, there's always going to be a way for someone to create a security breach. There are lots of things you can do from a network security perspective, but a skilled person can bypass almost anything if they have physical access to your network. For example, you could create access based on MAC addresses and have acl's, but if someone can simply walk up to an authorized station when a person leaves for lunch, what good does any of that do you? Answer, very little. So, here is my advice, in order of priority: 1) Create security policies that users must sign that include describing what users should and should not do with regard to computer _and_ site security. These policies will include physical access to network equipment/closets and user education programs. If users don't know what they are supposed to do, how can they do the "right" thing? Unfortunately, this is usually the last thing an organization implements, if at all and when policies are created they are usually not adequate or not kept up to date. 2) You client should have a facilities organization that coordinates all physical site security around the globe. Every site needs to have oversight and management control. 3) IMHO, trying to manage this by MAC address will be so problematic, that it will eventually be abandoned. My suggestion would be to use the authentication proxy feature on all remote site routers. This feature is available in 12.0.5T and requires users to authenticate before being allowed access to the network. (based on acl's you create). This will require an AAA server. Here's a link: Make the idle timeouts fairly low, like 15-20 minutes. 4) Require all user workstation to have a password protected screen saver that enables after no more than 10 minutes of inactivity. This will be part of the policies you create in #1. 5) Partner with a security organization that has global presence to conduct regular site reviews to ensure compliance with all policies. These reviews should be conducted on at least a annual basis for all large sites and a semi-annual basis for smaller sites. There are more things you could do, but if you did only these things you would be in decent shape. HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 12:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: network security issue [7:9556] Hello, My client is a Cisco shop and they have many offices all over the world. They want to make sure that only authorized person can connect to their network. Their concern is that someone may just walk into one of their offices and plug in a laptop and then is on their network. How can we prevent this? The only thing I can think of is create a MAC database and implement security on the 6509 switches. But to create and manage tens of thousands of MAC addresses is a pain. Is there any other way? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9648&t=9556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7000 memory upgrade - memory spec [7:9647]
I have an old 7000 router with RP & SP in my home lab. The RP only has 16Mb ram fitted (4 x 4Mb), it is Hardware 1.2 rev D0 (pn 73-0877-06). Which according to CCO should upgrade to 64 MB (4 of 16Mb x 9 SIMMS). Does anyone know the spec for the SIMMS? Are they the same as any other router or PC platform? I am after a source of an inexpensive set for my home lab. Many thanks for the help Peter -- Peter Whittle Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9647&t=9647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:strange problem in voice [7:9093]
Use command " no supervisory " on voice ports at FXS router. >Hi, >i configured voice on two routers, on one router i ?>hav a phone set attached with Fxs and on the other >router Pbx is connected with fxo. I can recieve >and make calls from both ends, but i m having this >problem that the phone keeps on ringing even when i > onhook the phone. > >Regards, >Dar -- ___ Make PC-to-Phone calls with Net2Phone. Sign-up today at: http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?121 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9646&t=9093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client...... [7:9612]
Do it by the layers. 1. Check nic, cable, and other physical layer (1) issues. 2. Check layer 2 ( arp, mac, etc) 3. Check layer 3 (ping IP address , not host name, start with self, then local workstation, then server, etc). Ping local router, than ISP router. Once that is done, then try ping a local server by its DNS name, then WINS name, etc. If that is successful, ping a remote server by its DNS server. If unsuccessful, you,needless to say, have a DNS problem of some sort. Check what DNS server you are pointing to, and see if it has any weird*** reqs or settings. Your biggest problem right now may be a lack of structure to your troubleshooting. Design a plan of attack similar to what I just described, and them implent it. It's a pain in the *** but better than guessimating. HTH, and let us know what the final problem is... Charles ""George Murphy CCNP"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > =0D > Hey Folks... I just wanted to get your opinions on this:=0D > =0D > I snagged a side job (pays great) and am wondering about a situation. Ok.= > =2E. here goes. One PC out of about 15 that work great can see Server res= > ources but cannot browse the web or ping outside. They are using an NT 2k= > Server, 2900XL switch and CELLPipe router to the web via ADSL. I have t= > ried sitching drives, copycatting configs from other clients, reinstallin= > g stack and client (no domain just a workgroup) and even a different NIC,= > still no web for this node. I have checked th router and switch and ther= > are no filters and no access lists yada yada yada... The only clue i= > s the last group they had in did not resolve the server backup issues and= > left things unresolvd so they let them go this makes me think there = > may be some trickery in her since these folks left the router exposed to = > the web with no password (which I have fixed) and were able to access unt= > il yesterday. I guess my question in retrospect is there some way to bloc= > k the bosses PC from TCP/IP via MAC address that I am rusty or unknowledg= > able of? What arer your thoughts The client is DHCP and the serve= > r is no domain but providing DHCP and workgroup..? > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type Image/jpeg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9645&t=9612 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dead console port [7:9621]
Just a thought - if you have access to another router with same capabilities
- install that routers operational flash - i.e. swapping flash and
preprogramming it.
Just a thought - might work?
Okay gang, here's a challenge that I'm trying to overcome (warning: it may
not be solvable)
I just got a 2514 where I couldn't get any response from the console port.
Of course, I tried changing baud rates, etc., but when I finally connected to
the AUX port, I was able to get in. The enable password was cisco, so I
gleefully got into the config and changed the config register, hoping that
would solve the problem. It didn't, so I did the next (very stupid) thing -
I erased the config (I'm beating my head against the desk as I type). Now,
of course, the problem is when I go to the AUX port and try to get into
enable mode, I can't ("no password set").
Is there any way for me to "bypass" the console port by using the AUX port,
or have I just rendered this device useless until I find a way to fix the
console port? I don't think I can get into ROMMON mode from the AUX port,
and I can't get into priveleged EXEC mode, either.
TIA,
-e-
Ray
CCNP, CADA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9644&t=9621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Community queries [7:9616]
It seems to me that you are trying to force traffic from AS 300 destined to 10.1.1.0/24 through AS 200, rather then directly to AS 100. If this is correct you really don't need to do anything on R5. The following will accomplish this: //Assume R3 is neighor 3.3.3.3 for R1:// route-map pre-pend permit 10 match ip address prefix-list pre-pend set community 100:10 ! ! route-map pre-pend permit 20 match ip address ! ! ip prefix-list pre-pend seq 10 permit 10.1.1.0/24 access-list 1 permit any ! ! //In your router bgp section// neighbor 3.3.3.3 route-map pre-pend out ! Assume R4 is neighbor IP address 4.4.4.4 for R3 Assume R3 is neighbor IP address 33.33.33.33 for R4 route-map pre-pend permit 10 match community 10:100 set as-path prepend 1000 2000 3000 ! ! route-map pre-pend permit 20 match ip address ! ! ip prefix-list pre-pend seq 10 permit 10.1.1.0/24 access-list 1 permit any //In your router bgp section// neighbor 33.33.33.33 route-map pre-pend in ""Grad Alfons Kanon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear All, need help: > > Given: > == > As 100 = R1, R2, R3 > AS 200 = R5 > AS 300 = R4 > > Physical connection: > > R3 has three connection: R1, R2 and R4 > R2 has two : R5 and R3 > R4 has two: R3 and R5 > > > > R1 to R2 with IBGP > R3 to R4 with EBGP > R3 to R2 with IBGP > R2 to R5 with EBGP > R4 and R5 with EBGP > R3 is route reflector > R1 will advertise 10.1.1.0 > > Question: > How can Iconfigure R1 and R5 so, > AS300 will prepend with 1000 2000 3000 for network 10.1.1.0 with community > 100:10 that coming from AS100..? > > > tx, > > Grad > > > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9643&t=9616 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Console vs access server ! [7:9636]
that depends, how is the access server connected to the router? or do you mean via a modem connected to the router on an async line other than the console? I just want to clear up your methods of reaching the router now. If the router is dead or hung, all it might need is to be power cycled. If it is hung the console port might be dead also until a reset is performed. Need more info. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "shella kevin" To: Sent: Saturday, 23 June, 2001 12:38 Subject: Console vs access server ! [7:9636] > Hi, > I have a remote site to logon in the router via Access server in case if we > are unable to logon via telnet etc. I had a router freeze and I was not been > able to telnet to it which is a usual practice. Then I tried via Access > server but could not. > > My Q is if I go use the console port via console cable will I be able to log > in ? or should I assume if I am not able to logon via access server I will > not be able to log in via console port ? > > Thanks > S. Kevin > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9642&t=9636 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX v5.25 logging [7:9640]
I usually log to a syslog server (*NIX), and then use tail and/or grep to get the traffic I'm interested in. I haven't found a way to filter on the PIX itself for specific traffic other than using debug levels ( 1-7) which usually don't give you exactly what you are looking for. Allen. At 11:14 AM 6/23/2001, Mike wrote: >Is there anyway to view logs on a PIX and filter by a specific property, >such as IP address or TCP Port? >thanks, >Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9641&t=9640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX v5.25 logging [7:9640]
Is there anyway to view logs on a PIX and filter by a specific property, such as IP address or TCP Port? thanks, Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9640&t=9640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access-list /TCP & UDP ! [7:9638]
I am confusing little about the UDP and TCP ports in the access list statement. Can any one tell me any document explaining it ? Also any document showing the ports information like port 5001 or 2918 ? what are they for and what is the function ? Thanks S. Kevin _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9638&t=9638 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access-list /TCP & UDP ! [7:9639]
I am confusing little about the UDP and TCP ports in the access list statement. Can any one tell me any document explaining it ? Also any document showing the ports information like port 5001 or 2918 ? what are they for and what is the function ? Thanks S. Kevin _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9639&t=9639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dead console port [7:9621]
I was looking for Louie's link, and it didn't come up. Considering the fact
that 99% of problems are physical, plus the fact that you just bought this
piece of hardware, I would look at replacement as an issue. I know that
it's a pain in the ass to do this, but the reality is you could knock
yourself out for two or three weeks trying to figure it out when it's simply
a hardware problem. Simple analogy: I was (at one time in my young life)
trying to learn about Windows NT. In order to load NT you have to create
three boot disks. I had many floppy disks laying around, so I used a couple
of them to create my boot disks. I ran into all these indescrimate problems
along the way - no matter which disks I used, NT never worked. Feeling
like a failure, I finally looked at the last hope: all new disks. Wouldn't
you know when I did this everything worked like a charm. Before beating
your brains out, make sure the hardware is good to go.
I defer to anyone with superior knowledge
P01NT
""Tony Medeiros"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think the only way to get in to puppy is to set it up for autoinstall.
> See link:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios112/112cg_cr/1cb
> ook/1cclkstr.htm
>
> Tony M.
> #6172
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: EA Louie
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 2:11 AM
> Subject: Dead console port [7:9621]
>
>
> > Okay gang, here's a challenge that I'm trying to overcome (warning: it
> may
> > not be solvable)
> >
> > I just got a 2514 where I couldn't get any response from the console
port.
> > Of course, I tried changing baud rates, etc, but when I finally
connected
> to
> > the AUX port, I was able to get in. The enable password was cisco, so I
> > gleefully got into the config and changed the config register, hoping
that
> > would solve the problem. It didn't, so I did the next (very stupid)
> thing -
> > I erased the config (I'm beating my head against the desk as I type).
> Now,
> > of course, the problem is when I go to the AUX port and try to get into
> > enable mode, I can't ("no password set").
> >
> > Is there any way for me to "bypass" the console port by using the AUX
> port,
> > or have I just rendered this device useless until I find a way to fix
the
> > console port? I don't think I can get into ROMMON mode from the AUX
port,
> > and I can't get into priveleged EXEC mode, either.
> >
> > TIA,
> > -e-
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9637&t=9621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Console vs access server ! [7:9636]
Hi, I have a remote site to logon in the router via Access server in case if we are unable to logon via telnet etc. I had a router freeze and I was not been able to telnet to it which is a usual practice. Then I tried via Access server but could not. My Q is if I go use the console port via console cable will I be able to log in ? or should I assume if I am not able to logon via access server I will not be able to log in via console port ? Thanks S. Kevin _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9636&t=9636 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wan technology [7:9475]
Cisco ofcourse. StrataCom and the MGX range of switches ROCK. M --- Rico Ortiz wrote: > diversity is key. know them all and don't pigeon > hole your self. > > Rico > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Ronnie Poon > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Wan technology [7:9475] > > > Dear all, > > Which vendor's WAN technology is more valuable in > the market. > Nortel passport , juniper or Cisco. > > Thanks > Ronnie Poon [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9635&t=9475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to set my 2611 router to enable vpn on win2k? [7:9622]
I'm assuming the WAN IP address is a valid Internet IP address. In that case the next question is: how many other devices use this router to forward traffic? If your Windows 2000 server is the only host attached to this router, I would suggest an access list that permits hosts to connect, however this is a broad interpretation and I would prefer to defer to more experienced people in this area. If this puts you in the right direction, kewl - glad I helped. p01nt ""Derric Gu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > My vpn server uses win2k routing and remote access method, and it is behind > the router, but it has a static wan ip address. How to set the router to > enable the remote user to access our intranet using PPTP protocol through > dial-up. > thanx a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9634&t=9622 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring stuff for sale [7:9633]
Anyone interested in these? Thank you. 2 IBM 8228 MAUs $10 ea. 1 HP 600N (model# j3112A) internal Token-Ring print server card $30 13 IBM Auto 16/4 Token Ring ISA card $2.50/ea. 1 Olicom (model# OC-3118) 16/4 Token Ring ISA card $2.50 1 HP JetDirect Ex Plus 3 (model#2594A) print server $30 4 ~16ft IBM-type (brand Black Box) Type-1 to DB-9 Token-Ring cable $6/ea. 9 8ft IBM-type (brand Black Box) Type-1 to DB-9 Token-Ring cable $6/ea. 6 8ft IBM Type-1 to DB-9 Token-Ring cable $6/ea. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9633&t=9633 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions please... [7:9624]
I know there is a CCIP specialty that I've been told deals with ISP/Broadband technologies, however I don't know that it addresses your need specifically. There is a new test that's in beta right now called CCIP. While I'm personally not investigating this, my brother-in-law is. He's taking the beta test either this Sunday or next Sunday. His indications on the curriculum for this test indicated that not only does it involve the ISP and the home user market, but that it's very similar to the routing test with the exception of IS-IS, which he found documentation for in the Routing TCP/IP book from Cisco Press. Hope this helps. p01nt ""Mark Z."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group, > I decided that I want to go for more Cisco training (self study for > certs). I haven't been to the site in a while and I just went back and was > amazed as to how many things on the cert side have changed. There are so many > new ones now. I already have my NP and DA and want to go onto one of the > Cisco > Qualified Specialist programs. I'm trying to decide between the security > track > or the internet solutions one. I am more interested in the Internet solutions > one because it seems to deal with business and e-commerce and I like that > type > of stuff. The only thing stopping me from going for that without a doubt is > that I don't see where there are any training materials on it yet. If there > aren't I'll just go ahead with the security track. Anybody know if there are > books out for the internet specialization or should I just go the security > route? Thanks all, > > Mark Z. ~ CCNP, CCDA > > "I feel like technology's interpretation of a starving artist." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9632&t=9624 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client...... [7:9612]
I had a similar problem with my home network lab. I have both NT4 /W2k servers. (as well as NT4, W2K, W9* workstations) The first big problem was that I could log in from one machine but not another. It turned out that W2K played with the auto duplex on the card. It seemed that after every boot, I could log in, then I couldn't. It was strange because I could see packets going in and leaving the W2K server (properties on the card) but it wasn't reacting. Nailing the duplex speed on the W2K fixed that one. Then, as you say surfing the net became a problem. It seemed the NT4(W9*) family could and the W2K family could not although they had the exact same IP config. It turned out that the W2K family wasn't playing with DNS properly as configured on the ADSL router. I can't explain it further. I installed a W2K DNS and pointed it to the ISP DNS. The W2K machines point to the W2K DNS and everything works. The NT4 (W9*) machines point to the ADSL and everything works. You have not said if you can get to a web site using their IP address or if the problem machines can ping anywhere (local or remote) via IP. Have a look at a DNS issue and try again. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "George Murphy CCNP" To: Sent: Saturday, 23 June, 2001 02:30 Subject: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client.. [7:9612] > =0D > Hey Folks... I just wanted to get your opinions on this:=0D > =0D > I snagged a side job (pays great) and am wondering about a situation. Ok.= > =2E. here goes. One PC out of about 15 that work great can see Server res= > ources but cannot browse the web or ping outside. They are using an NT 2k= > Server, 2900XL switch and CELLPipe router to the web via ADSL. I have t= > ried sitching drives, copycatting configs from other clients, reinstallin= > g stack and client (no domain just a workgroup) and even a different NIC,= > still no web for this node. I have checked th router and switch and ther= > are no filters and no access lists yada yada yada... The only clue i= > s the last group they had in did not resolve the server backup issues and= > left things unresolvd so they let them go this makes me think there = > may be some trickery in her since these folks left the router exposed to = > the web with no password (which I have fixed) and were able to access unt= > il yesterday. I guess my question in retrospect is there some way to bloc= > k the bosses PC from TCP/IP via MAC address that I am rusty or unknowledg= > able of? What arer your thoughts The client is DHCP and the serve= > r is no domain but providing DHCP and workgroup..? > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type Image/jpeg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9631&t=9612 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dead console port [7:9621]
I think the only way to get in to puppy is to set it up for autoinstall.
See link:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios112/112cg_cr/1cb
ook/1cclkstr.htm
Tony M.
#6172
- Original Message -
From: EA Louie
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 2:11 AM
Subject: Dead console port [7:9621]
> Okay gang, here's a challenge that I'm trying to overcome (warning: it
may
> not be solvable)
>
> I just got a 2514 where I couldn't get any response from the console port.
> Of course, I tried changing baud rates, etc, but when I finally connected
to
> the AUX port, I was able to get in. The enable password was cisco, so I
> gleefully got into the config and changed the config register, hoping that
> would solve the problem. It didn't, so I did the next (very stupid)
thing -
> I erased the config (I'm beating my head against the desk as I type).
Now,
> of course, the problem is when I go to the AUX port and try to get into
> enable mode, I can't ("no password set").
>
> Is there any way for me to "bypass" the console port by using the AUX
port,
> or have I just rendered this device useless until I find a way to fix the
> console port? I don't think I can get into ROMMON mode from the AUX port,
> and I can't get into priveleged EXEC mode, either.
>
> TIA,
> -e-
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9630&t=9621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client...... [7:9612]
have you tried changing the hostname whilst the pc is in a workgroup and then rejoin the domain with a new hostname ? - Original Message - From: "George Murphy CCNP" To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 7:30 AM Subject: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client.. [7:9612] > =0D > Hey Folks... I just wanted to get your opinions on this:=0D > =0D > I snagged a side job (pays great) and am wondering about a situation. Ok.= > =2E. here goes. One PC out of about 15 that work great can see Server res= > ources but cannot browse the web or ping outside. They are using an NT 2k= > Server, 2900XL switch and CELLPipe router to the web via ADSL. I have t= > ried sitching drives, copycatting configs from other clients, reinstallin= > g stack and client (no domain just a workgroup) and even a different NIC,= > still no web for this node. I have checked th router and switch and ther= > are no filters and no access lists yada yada yada... The only clue i= > s the last group they had in did not resolve the server backup issues and= > left things unresolvd so they let them go this makes me think there = > may be some trickery in her since these folks left the router exposed to = > the web with no password (which I have fixed) and were able to access unt= > il yesterday. I guess my question in retrospect is there some way to bloc= > k the bosses PC from TCP/IP via MAC address that I am rusty or unknowledg= > able of? What arer your thoughts The client is DHCP and the serve= > r is no domain but providing DHCP and workgroup..? > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type Image/jpeg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9629&t=9612 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rack Time Available. [7:9628]
To All, I'm currently gearing up for a second CCIE Cert (hopefully) and have a pretty good rack to pratice on. It's the rack I used to studying and pass the R/S exam. I'm offering access to the rack as a way of recovering some of the expensive of buying it from my previous employer. I will charge a very low cost or barter for access. The current cabling configuration will allow for you to do ccbootcamp labs 1-8, (I don't have the others, but if you send me the cable info, I'll try to work it out.) Please contact me directly if anyone is interested. The rack is made up of the following 1 x 2511 access server 2 x 2514 dual e /dual wan 2 x 2513 1 eth/1 tok/ 2 wan 2 x 3810 eth / 2 wan / voice t1 / MFT ATM t1 2 x 3620 eth /wan /voice FXS 1 x 1750 1 x 1605 1 x AGS frame switch 1 x pix 506 1 x Cat 2901 1 x Cat 2900 XL Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9628&t=9628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Load balancing [7:9627]
I am trying to configure load balancing across two FT1s that connect into a 3620's Ethernet ports. I have enabled IP load-sharing per-packet on each interface but it doesn't seem to help. I have also removed the 512K link and nothing changes regardless of the load-sharing statement. But when I pull the 128K link, all connectivity is lost. I am thinking there is a problem with the 512K link and I have asked the client to contact the provider. My question is, will the IP load-sharing per-packet command work across the Ethernet ports, or does it only apply to Serial ports? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9627&t=9627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client...... [7:9612]
George, I think you just answered your own question. IMHO, if the other PC's have the sameconfig and are able to get an address, it is most likely a SID that is gotten corrupt on the box in question. I would back up data, rebuild, and readd it to the workgroup. My .02c, BTW, if you want to block by MAC address, use an access list # 700 - 799. Robert Hugo CCNP, CCDA, MCSE Network Engineer Ameritech / SBC Bloomington, IL. W: 309-530-2456 H: 217-424-2425 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9626&t=9612 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Community queries [7:9616]
I'm not quite clear on what you're trying to accomplish here. Since R1 doesn't have any external neighbors, I don't think you'd configure it to set any community strings. R5 is not in AS300, and therefore can't force the routers in AS300 to prepend anything. It looks like you're trying to force the traffic to 10.1.1.0 (/24?) through either AS200 or AS300, but again I'm not clear. Are you trying to set a community string, or prepend an as-path? - Original Message - From: Grad Alfons Kanon To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 3:04 AM Subject: BGP Community queries [7:9616] Dear All, need help: Given: == As 100 = R1, R2, R3 AS 200 = R5 AS 300 = R4 Physical connection: R3 has three connection: R1, R2 and R4 R2 has two : R5 and R3 R4 has two: R3 and R5 R1 to R2 with IBGP R3 to R4 with EBGP R3 to R2 with IBGP R2 to R5 with EBGP R4 and R5 with EBGP R3 is route reflector R1 will advertise 10.1.1.0 Question: How can Iconfigure R1 and R5 so, AS300 will prepend with 1000 2000 3000 for network 10.1.1.0 with community 100:10 that coming from AS100..? tx, Grad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9625&t=9616 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions please... [7:9624]
Hi Group, I decided that I want to go for more Cisco training (self study for certs). I haven't been to the site in a while and I just went back and was amazed as to how many things on the cert side have changed. There are so many new ones now. I already have my NP and DA and want to go onto one of the Cisco Qualified Specialist programs. I'm trying to decide between the security track or the internet solutions one. I am more interested in the Internet solutions one because it seems to deal with business and e-commerce and I like that type of stuff. The only thing stopping me from going for that without a doubt is that I don't see where there are any training materials on it yet. If there aren't I'll just go ahead with the security track. Anybody know if there are books out for the internet specialization or should I just go the security route? Thanks all, Mark Z. ~ CCNP, CCDA "I feel like technology's interpretation of a starving artist." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9624&t=9624 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error when Booting up [7:9614]
nope, ... flash is there, just there is no image on flash, indicated by the > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c), RELEASE > SOFTWARE (fc1) and the > 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Based on the prompt, it probably has no config either, so from the prompt, type enable to enter priveleged EXEC mode, give it an IP address, set up a TFTP server, copy tftp flash, and download an image. If not, then look up the password recovery for the 2500. (exercise left to the reader ;-) -e- - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 1:40 AM Subject: RE: Error when Booting up [7:9614] > On the other hand, it may well be that you have no flash chips in the > router. I see no evidence of an IOS. 2 meg DRAM? You didn't buy this on a > street corner from a guy wearing asbestos gloves, did you? ;-> > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Steiven Poh - Jaring Mailbox > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Error when Booting up [7:9614] > > Folks, > > I'm having below error when booting up my router, any advice? > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems > 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory > > %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 11.1 may not be correctly > understood. > No usable interfaces > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems > 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory > > Restricted Rights Legend > > Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is > subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph > (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted > Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph > (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer > Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. > >cisco Systems, Inc. >170 West Tasman Drive >San Jose, California 95134-1706 > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c), RELEASE > SOFTWARE (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Fri 27-Dec-96 17:33 by loreilly > Image text-base: 0x0101, data-base: 0x1000 > > cisco 2511 (68030) processor (revision M) with 2048K/2048K bytes of memory. > Processor board ID 10297453, with hardware revision > X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. > 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. > 2 Serial network interfaces. > 16 terminal lines. > 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) > > Press RETURN to get started! > > Router(boot)> Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9623&t=9614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to set my 2611 router to enable vpn on win2k? [7:9622]
My vpn server uses win2k routing and remote access method, and it is behind the router, but it has a static wan ip address. How to set the router to enable the remote user to access our intranet using PPTP protocol through dial-up. thanx a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9622&t=9622 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dead console port [7:9621]
Okay gang, here's a challenge that I'm trying to overcome (warning: it may
not be solvable)
I just got a 2514 where I couldn't get any response from the console port.
Of course, I tried changing baud rates, etc, but when I finally connected to
the AUX port, I was able to get in. The enable password was cisco, so I
gleefully got into the config and changed the config register, hoping that
would solve the problem. It didn't, so I did the next (very stupid) thing -
I erased the config (I'm beating my head against the desk as I type). Now,
of course, the problem is when I go to the AUX port and try to get into
enable mode, I can't ("no password set").
Is there any way for me to "bypass" the console port by using the AUX port,
or have I just rendered this device useless until I find a way to fix the
console port? I don't think I can get into ROMMON mode from the AUX port,
and I can't get into priveleged EXEC mode, either.
TIA,
-e-
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9621&t=9621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error when Booting up [7:9614]
On the other hand, it may well be that you have no flash chips in the router. I see no evidence of an IOS. 2 meg DRAM? You didn't buy this on a street corner from a guy wearing asbestos gloves, did you? ;-> Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steiven Poh - Jaring Mailbox Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Error when Booting up [7:9614] Folks, I'm having below error when booting up my router, any advice? System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 11.1 may not be correctly understood. No usable interfaces System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Dec-96 17:33 by loreilly Image text-base: 0x0101, data-base: 0x1000 cisco 2511 (68030) processor (revision M) with 2048K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 10297453, with hardware revision X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. 2 Serial network interfaces. 16 terminal lines. 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Press RETURN to get started! Router(boot)> Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9620&t=9614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client...... [7:9612]
>>(not that this has anything at all to do with cisco..but anyway.) my first thought was a NAT / NAT overload issue. Depending upon how the DSL router in question works, is there one more PC than outside nattable addresses available? My other thought was improper machine configuration, as you suggested. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 12:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client.. [7:9612] On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, George Murphy CCNP wrote: > I snagged a side job (pays great) and am wondering about a situation. Ok.= > =2E. here goes. One PC out of about 15 that work great can see Server res= > ources but cannot browse the web or ping outside. They are using an NT 2k= > Server, 2900XL switch and CELLPipe router to the web via ADSL. I have t= Have you checked to see that the machine has a valid default gateway assigned? Have you tried a tracert to see where the machine thinks it is going? > able of? What arer your thoughts The client is DHCP and the serve= > r is no domain but providing DHCP and workgroup..? So we have verified the machine HAS recieved a valid IP address from the DHCP server? That it is even making the request? winipcfg or similar would be a good place to look david (not that this has anything at all to do with cisco..but anyway.) --- david raistrick (deep in the south georgia woods) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9618&t=9612 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error when Booting up [7:9614]
This may or may not be an error. It is possible that some prankster has renamed your router to Router(boot)> Hostname Router If you type a question mark ( help ) ? do you get the boot menu, or do you get a full set of commands? Have you tried to enter an enable to see if you can get to privilege level? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steiven Poh - Jaring Mailbox Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Error when Booting up [7:9614] Folks, I'm having below error when booting up my router, any advice? System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 11.1 may not be correctly understood. No usable interfaces System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Dec-96 17:33 by loreilly Image text-base: 0x0101, data-base: 0x1000 cisco 2511 (68030) processor (revision M) with 2048K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 10297453, with hardware revision X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. 2 Serial network interfaces. 16 terminal lines. 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Press RETURN to get started! Router(boot)> Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9619&t=9614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
