Re: Default Route set by BGP Local_Pref [7:40144]
You could use a route map along with the neighbour command to set the local preferance.The configuration should be similar to that below. RTD# router bgp 256 neighbor 3.3.3.4 remote-as 300 neighbor 3.3.3.4 route-map setlocalin in ... ip as-path access-list 7 permit ^300$ .. route-map setlocalin permit 10 match as-path 7 set local-preference 400 route-map setlocalin permit 20 set local-preference 150 Hunt Lee wrote: Can a default route (0/0) learned from another AS be assigned a BGP Local_Preference? My understanding is that a default route can be assigned an Admin Dist to setup a preference between multiple default routes, but not by Local_Pref. I tried to look on Internet Routing Arch (by Halabi) but Halabi seems to say that Local_Pref works also... Any ideas? From Halabi on p229:- The default route AS2 is learning from AS3 should not need to be set at a lower Local_Pref than the full routing AS2 learns from the provider Thanks, Hunt Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40154t=40144 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
multicast+qos [7:40155]
Hi, Can someone let me know the multicast+qos exam prep book for CCIP. Let me know the ISBN No. Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40155t=40155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
hey, today is not 1st of April !!! Wake up my friend From: B Rudy Reply-To: B Rudy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 12:27:28 -0500 JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40156t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]
Avi, Your not doing any type of nat translation for the inside network. If you are not doing any Nat translations then the hosts inside will never be able to get outside. -Original Message- From: Avi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, I am facing a problem on PIX 515 as described below. Firewall: Cisco PIX 515 Firewall Software Version: 4.4(7) PIX setup: - Host: 216.6.24.189 ---R---PIX-- -R--- 216.6.24.175172.16.10.1/30 172.16.10.2/30 192.168.2.6/30 192.166.2.5/30 Following is the config: -- PIX Version 4.4(7) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 hostname nungunungu fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 names pager lines 24 logging on no logging timestamp no logging console no logging monitor no logging buffered no logging trap logging facility 20 logging queue 512 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 ip address outside 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.252 ip address inside 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.252 no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 arp timeout 14400 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.177 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.186 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp any host 192.118.52.54 eq www conduit permit icmp any any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp-data conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.40 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.19 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.21 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.28 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.10 eq domain any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 8080 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 3180 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq www any no rip outside passive no rip outside default rip inside passive rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.5 1 PROBLEM Host 216.6.24.189 in the inside network can ping the internal interface of the PIX but can't ping the outside interface of the PIX nor any host in the outside network. Any host frm outside network can ping outside interface of the PIX, but can't ping the inside interface of the PIX or any host in the inside network. Sitting on PIX i am able to ping hosts in the inside as well as outside networks. Static routes have been defined on both the routers. Can someone pls help\guide me in solving this problem. Thanxs in advance. Rgds, Avtar. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40157t=40146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
802.3ab [7:40158]
I am working on a project and have a question I can't find the answer to, despite 4 hours searching. If you have Cat5E or Cat6 ieee standard cabling, properly tested... Is there a Max amount of cables you can run side by side before experiencing alien Crosstalk.. (Crosstalk between the cables, not between pairs, or NEXT, or FEXT) If you know of a link to a whitepaper or any thing solid... I sure would appreciate Lou Nelson Consulting System Engineer CCNP, CCDP, Campus ATM Specialized Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40158t=40158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question on PIX [7:40146]
Hi, All the inside addresses are valid internet IP addresses i.e. 216.6.24.189, so i need not do Nating. Thanxs Rgds, Avi. [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Avi, Your not doing any type of nat translation for the inside network. If you are not doing any Nat translations then the hosts inside will never be able to get outside. -Original Message- From: Avi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, I am facing a problem on PIX 515 as described below. Firewall: Cisco PIX 515 Firewall Software Version: 4.4(7) PIX setup: - Host: 216.6.24.189 ---R---PIX -- -R--- 216.6.24.175172.16.10.1/30 172.16.10.2/30 192.168.2.6/30 192.166.2.5/30 Following is the config: -- PIX Version 4.4(7) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 hostname nungunungu fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 names pager lines 24 logging on no logging timestamp no logging console no logging monitor no logging buffered no logging trap logging facility 20 logging queue 512 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 ip address outside 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.252 ip address inside 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.252 no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 arp timeout 14400 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.177 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.186 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp any host 192.118.52.54 eq www conduit permit icmp any any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp-data conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.40 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.19 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.21 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.28 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.10 eq domain any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 8080 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 3180 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq www any no rip outside passive no rip outside default rip inside passive rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.5 1 PROBLEM Host 216.6.24.189 in the inside network can ping the internal interface of the PIX but can't ping the outside interface of the PIX nor any host in the outside network. Any host frm outside network can ping outside interface of the PIX, but can't ping the inside interface of the PIX or any host in the inside network. Sitting on PIX i am able to ping hosts in the inside as well as outside networks. Static routes have been defined on both the routers. Can someone pls help\guide me in solving this problem. Thanxs in advance. Rgds, Avtar. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40159t=40146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]
Avi- By definition, the PIX is not a Router. Because of this, the PIX will not know a way to send traffic destined for a network other than what is defined on the PIX Inside or Outside Interfaces. Furthermore, you would have to still do NAT translation from the Outside Interface (192.168.2.x) to the Inside Interface (172.16.10.x) or an IP POOL that you define as 216.6.24.x/x. Your better bet though would be to put your Inside Router as one IP in the 216.6.24.x network, the Inside PIX interface as another IP in the same 216.6.24.x network, create a NAT pool with your remaining IPs from the same 216.6.24.x network, and then go from there. Either way, your going to have to do some NAT Translation from the 216.6.24.x network to the PIX Outside Interface network. -Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, All the inside addresses are valid internet IP addresses i.e. 216.6.24.189, so i need not do Nating. Thanxs Rgds, Avi. [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Avi, Your not doing any type of nat translation for the inside network. If you are not doing any Nat translations then the hosts inside will never be able to get outside. -Original Message- From: Avi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, I am facing a problem on PIX 515 as described below. Firewall: Cisco PIX 515 Firewall Software Version: 4.4(7) PIX setup: - Host: 216.6.24.189 ---R---PIX -- -R--- 216.6.24.175172.16.10.1/30 172.16.10.2/30 192.168.2.6/30 192.166.2.5/30 Following is the config: -- PIX Version 4.4(7) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 hostname nungunungu fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 names pager lines 24 logging on no logging timestamp no logging console no logging monitor no logging buffered no logging trap logging facility 20 logging queue 512 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 ip address outside 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.252 ip address inside 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.252 no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 arp timeout 14400 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.177 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.186 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp any host 192.118.52.54 eq www conduit permit icmp any any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp-data conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.40 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.19 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.21 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.28 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.10 eq domain any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 8080 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 3180 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq www any no rip outside passive no rip outside default rip inside passive rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.5 1 PROBLEM Host 216.6.24.189 in the inside network can ping the internal interface of the PIX but can't ping the outside interface of the PIX nor any host in the outside network. Any host frm outside network can ping outside interface of the PIX, but can't ping the inside interface of the PIX or any host in the inside network. Sitting on PIX i am able to ping hosts in the inside as well as outside networks. Static routes have been defined on both the routers. Can someone pls help\guide me in solving this problem. Thanxs in advance. Rgds, Avtar. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40160t=40146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]
Avi, It doesn't matter that the inside addresses are valid. They still need to be translated outside. You must either enter statics or create an access list specifying that these addresses should not be natted. Also since your inside network is the 172.16.10.x network, and the 216.6.24 network is on another router inside. You need to create default route to the 216.6.24.x network with the ip address of the router that is connected. Try this on the pix static (inside,outside) 216.6.24.0 216.6.24.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 ip route inside 216.6.24.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.10.1 You will also need to add a route to the 216.6.27.x network pointing to the pix's outside interface on the 192.166.2.5 router. Add this to the outside router Ip route 216.6.24.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.6 After that you should be able to ping. Jason -Original Message- From: Avi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, All the inside addresses are valid internet IP addresses i.e. 216.6.24.189, so i need not do Nating. Thanxs Rgds, Avi. [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Avi, Your not doing any type of nat translation for the inside network. If you are not doing any Nat translations then the hosts inside will never be able to get outside. -Original Message- From: Avi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, I am facing a problem on PIX 515 as described below. Firewall: Cisco PIX 515 Firewall Software Version: 4.4(7) PIX setup: - Host: 216.6.24.189 ---R---PIX -- -R--- 216.6.24.175172.16.10.1/30 172.16.10.2/30 192.168.2.6/30 192.166.2.5/30 Following is the config: -- PIX Version 4.4(7) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 hostname nungunungu fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 names pager lines 24 logging on no logging timestamp no logging console no logging monitor no logging buffered no logging trap logging facility 20 logging queue 512 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 ip address outside 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.252 ip address inside 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.252 no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 arp timeout 14400 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.177 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.186 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp any host 192.118.52.54 eq www conduit permit icmp any any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp-data conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.40 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.19 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.21 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.28 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.10 eq domain any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 8080 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 3180 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq www any no rip outside passive no rip outside default rip inside passive rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.5 1 PROBLEM Host 216.6.24.189 in the inside network can ping the internal interface of the PIX but can't ping the outside interface of the PIX nor any host in the outside network. Any host frm outside network can ping outside interface of the PIX, but can't ping the inside interface of the PIX or any host in the inside network. Sitting on PIX i am able to ping hosts in the inside as well as outside networks. Static routes have been defined on both the routers. Can someone pls help\guide me in solving this problem. Thanxs in advance. Rgds, Avtar. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40161t=40146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please help **location migration** [7:40162]
I work for a collocation and bandwidth provider and need help with an issue for a migration. We need to move about 30 servers from a offsite location to our data center. The move of the servers needs to be done over the period of a month. We need to do this without changing the ip addresses of the servers. so either through an internet connection or wan link (both possible) we need to share the ip block. It cannot be subnetted and must remain a single ip block. We have ruled out the use of bridge groups across a T1 circuit and would like a better option than using a VPN. If you have any ideas please help. thanks for the help and all the useful post. I have been in this group for about 6 months and have made very few posts but have benefited immensely from users in this group. I thank you for that. Kevin Campbell MCSE, MCT, CCNP [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40162t=40162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
How about - NICER CPU I JOS RICE CPU JOINS CONJURES PIC I or even SCOPIC INJURE? Dom Stocqueler Chuck cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056] nobody@groups tudy.com 01/04/2002 22:27 Please respond to Chuck perhaps a better name would be cissi-fer( sissy fur ) anyone any good at anagrams. maybe among the combined letter of cisco and juniper there is some good pun or other. B Rudy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40163t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS Firewall Feature Set -Blocking Attacks [7:40141]
If you know it's really him, send him RST-enabled TCP packets. Or use an IDS and that will shun him. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, You can configure a simple inbound access-list at your outside interface of your router to deny inbound connection from the specific host to web server. or the other way is to enable ip audit on the router and in the action specify it as reset. Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Clayton Dukes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: IOS Firewall Feature Set -Blocking Attacks [7:40141] nobody@groups tudy.com 02/04/2002 06:44 Please respond to Clayton Dukes Hi everyone, I have a specific IP address that constantly tries to attack my webserver. How can I block that IP address while allowing all others through? My config uses NAT extendable to translate the outside Ip to port 80 on an internal address. I want to allow the world to access that port EXCEPT for ip z.z.z.z, Can someone recommend a good way? TIA! Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE Micromuse, Inc. CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC (h) 904-292-1881 (c) 904-477-7825 ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40166t=40141 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]
I read that somewhere that the group did that. Another BBC article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1321000/1321176.stm -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... And speaking of my .sig, India has recently given up their Avian Carrier based system for e-mail. So, they are no longer RFC 1149 Compliant : ( It's a true story and not a joke. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1892000/1892085.st m I beg your pardon. They were not RFC 1149 compliant to begin with. Perhaps RFC 822 SMTP compliant--it was an application-layer message transfer system. Unfortunately, I can't find the citation, but a Norwegian group actually did implement not just RFC 1149, but TCP over RFC 1149 IP. Every pigeon carried one or more encoded IP packets. I suppose that if you could attach messages to burrowing creatures such as gophers, you could create Generic Rodent Encapsulation tunneling. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40165t=40046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]
You'll never be able to ping outside ip address of the PIX from the inside, but you should be able to ping outside router. I think the rest of the questions were already answered... -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Avi Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, I am facing a problem on PIX 515 as described below. Firewall: Cisco PIX 515 Firewall Software Version: 4.4(7) PIX setup: - Host: 216.6.24.189 ---R---PIX-- -R--- 216.6.24.175172.16.10.1/30 172.16.10.2/30 192.168.2.6/30 192.166.2.5/30 Following is the config: -- PIX Version 4.4(7) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 hostname nungunungu fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 names pager lines 24 logging on no logging timestamp no logging console no logging monitor no logging buffered no logging trap logging facility 20 logging queue 512 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 ip address outside 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.252 ip address inside 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.252 no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 arp timeout 14400 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.177 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.186 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp any host 192.118.52.54 eq www conduit permit icmp any any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp-data conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.40 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.19 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.21 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.28 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.10 eq domain any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 8080 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 3180 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq www any no rip outside passive no rip outside default rip inside passive rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.5 1 PROBLEM Host 216.6.24.189 in the inside network can ping the internal interface of the PIX but can't ping the outside interface of the PIX nor any host in the outside network. Any host frm outside network can ping outside interface of the PIX, but can't ping the inside interface of the PIX or any host in the inside network. Sitting on PIX i am able to ping hosts in the inside as well as outside networks. Static routes have been defined on both the routers. Can someone pls help\guide me in solving this problem. Thanxs in advance. Rgds, Avtar. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40168t=40146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please help **location migration** [7:40162]
See comments inline. Basically, I think you need to explain your restrictions. My experience working with clients is that sometimes perceived restrictions, i.e - We CAN'T do that!, really aren't restrictions at all, i.e. - We don't WANT to do that because we really don't understand how it works and we're not comfortable. Thanks, Craig P.S. - You appear to be in my area. Shoot me an e-mail off-list and maybe we can sit down to discuss your issue if you're close to me. At 05:49 AM 4/2/2002 -0500, you wrote: I work for a collocation and bandwidth provider and need help with an issue for a migration. We need to move about 30 servers from a offsite location to our data center. The move of the servers needs to be done over the period of a month. We need to do this without changing the ip addresses of the servers. Why can't you change the IP addresses? Are there hardcoded applications? Is time required for DNS cache expiration a problem? Is the same provider servicing the offsite and onsite locations? Is the IP block portable? so either through an internet connection or wan link (both possible) we need to share the ip block. It cannot be subnetted and must remain a single ip block. So you need a single, non-subnetted IP block to be at two physically remote locations, but one logical location. Why can't the IP block be subnetted? Can it be summarized? We have ruled out the use of bridge groups across a T1 circuit and would like a better option than using a VPN. If you have any ideas please help. thanks for the help and all the useful post. I have been in this group for about 6 months and have made very few posts but have benefited immensely from users in this group. I thank you for that. Kevin Campbell MCSE, MCT, CCNP [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40170t=40162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]
I have setup and managed both PIX and Checkpoint in a variety of environments. I think they are both solid options in different situations. Here is how I market these products. PIX - more cost effective - fast - you can have fail over - Can be more complicated to setup the CLI, but PIX has a nice feature of allowing all traffic out and none in by default. Who would I market this for? I would target this as an ideal candidate for small companies with rulesets that don't change much. They also need a Cisco savy person to manage it, usually a consultant. I am guessing you would fill this role. I have only made minor changes in the firewall I have managed for almost two years. Checkpoint - nice GUI for ruleset management - more expensive - required to know Unix or NT ( for the love of God don't use NT. Its security is very poor out of the box and requires a great deal of configuration to become mildly secure ) Who would I market this toward? I would target larger companies with Checkpoint. It is easier to manage the ruleset, but more setup time and more costly. I would also say this solution is slightly slower and more prone to security issues since you have to patch the OS and the firewall software. --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: Has anyone performed or seen an in depth study of PIX vs Checkpoint? I have a customer who is looking at both. Ive read various magazine articles, but nothing from real people such as this group! :) Thanks!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40171t=40136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]
Avi, Try to add this: route inside 216.6.24.255 255.255.255.0 172.16.10.1 Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: Avi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question on PIX [7:40146] Hi, I am facing a problem on PIX 515 as described below. Firewall: Cisco PIX 515 Firewall Software Version: 4.4(7) PIX setup: - Host: 216.6.24.189 ---R---PIX-- -R--- 216.6.24.175172.16.10.1/30 172.16.10.2/30 192.168.2.6/30 192.166.2.5/30 Following is the config: -- PIX Version 4.4(7) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 hostname nungunungu fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 names pager lines 24 logging on no logging timestamp no logging console no logging monitor no logging buffered no logging trap logging facility 20 logging queue 512 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 ip address outside 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.252 ip address inside 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.252 no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 arp timeout 14400 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.177 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.186 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp any host 192.118.52.54 eq www conduit permit icmp any any conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.189 host 216.6.24.5 eq ftp-data conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.40 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq smtp conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.19 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.10 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.185 host 216.6.24.5 eq 5001 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.21 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.184 host 216.6.24.28 eq 3306 conduit permit tcp host 216.6.24.10 eq domain any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 8080 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq 3180 any conduit permit tcp host 192.118.52.54 eq www any no rip outside passive no rip outside default rip inside passive rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.5 1 PROBLEM Host 216.6.24.189 in the inside network can ping the internal interface of the PIX but can't ping the outside interface of the PIX nor any host in the outside network. Any host frm outside network can ping outside interface of the PIX, but can't ping the inside interface of the PIX or any host in the inside network. Sitting on PIX i am able to ping hosts in the inside as well as outside networks. Static routes have been defined on both the routers. Can someone pls help\guide me in solving this problem. Thanxs in advance. Rgds, Avtar. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40172t=40146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wireless certification [7:40071]
What is CWNA? I am unaware of such a title. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of kvgb Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wireless certification [7:40071] Ashish, I am interested in CWNA, what study materials did you use? Thanks, kvgb Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40173t=40071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: please help **location migration** [7:40162]
I'm not sure if this will help but here goes: I used to work for a dotcom and we had to move our Datacenter from SiteA to SiteB with 2 different address blocks. The problem you might say is if you move the website what happens? Well we made a duplicate copy of the website (minus the database) at site B and then used IIS forwarding to point to the new site and put the Database under maintenance until we got it transferred to Site B. Then we changed our DNS entries for the website and left the IIS forwarding on for a few days. I now this doesn't actually answer your question but it could solve your problem. -Original Message- From: Kevin Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please help **location migration** [7:40162] I work for a collocation and bandwidth provider and need help with an issue for a migration. We need to move about 30 servers from a offsite location to our data center. The move of the servers needs to be done over the period of a month. We need to do this without changing the ip addresses of the servers. so either through an internet connection or wan link (both possible) we need to share the ip block. It cannot be subnetted and must remain a single ip block. We have ruled out the use of bridge groups across a T1 circuit and would like a better option than using a VPN. If you have any ideas please help. thanks for the help and all the useful post. I have been in this group for about 6 months and have made very few posts but have benefited immensely from users in this group. I thank you for that. Kevin Campbell MCSE, MCT, CCNP [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40174t=40162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please help **location migration** [7:40162]
You can do this two ways, either over a VPN or a WAN link over a tunnel interface. The tunnel interface will probably be a little less overhead nsince you don't need encryption. Kevin Campbell wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I work for a collocation and bandwidth provider and need help with an issue for a migration. We need to move about 30 servers from a offsite location to our data center. The move of the servers needs to be done over the period of a month. We need to do this without changing the ip addresses of the servers. so either through an internet connection or wan link (both possible) we need to share the ip block. It cannot be subnetted and must remain a single ip block. We have ruled out the use of bridge groups across a T1 circuit and would like a better option than using a VPN. If you have any ideas please help. thanks for the help and all the useful post. I have been in this group for about 6 months and have made very few posts but have benefited immensely from users in this group. I thank you for that. Kevin Campbell MCSE, MCT, CCNP [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40175t=40162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC's [7:40135]
First, a general comment on RFC's: when there is an Applicability Statement, Framework, or Roadmap associated with the protocol specification, read them first. Some of the more complex families such as MPLS, IPSec, etc., also have requirements and architecture documents worth reading. I would add to these: RFC 1812 Requirements for IPv4 routers RFC 1925 The Twelve Networking Truths. Some RFCs are in major revision, and the drafts may be more useful. I would recommend BGP students go to the IDR working group page at http://www.ietf.org and get the most recent draft (I think it's 18, but it may have gone to a yet newer round). Without false modesty, also go to the BMWG working group page and get the latest revision of the terminology for single-router BGP convergence, where we've cleaned up some of the more confusing BGP terminology. We should have an updated draft, about ready for RFC, up within a week or two. RFC 1517-1520 are the fundamental basis for CIDR/VLSM. RFC 1878, Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4, has excellent conversion tables and examples. My RFC 2072 also gives addressing strategies for renumbering routers. In fact, here's the timeline for RFCs for IP addressing: 760791 8501517-20 Fixed ClassfulSubnetting CIDR/VLSM NetworkAddressing Field All the April 1st RFCs notwithstanding, the following are classic RFCs that every network engineer should know about: And some of the April 1 RFCs are classics that have something to teach. 1194 is an excellent example of how IP is mapped onto a specific transmission system. RFC 760: DoD Standard Internet Protocol (IP), made obsolete by RFC 791, but still worth reading RFC 768: User Datagram Protocol (UDP) RFC 791: Internet Protocol (IP) RFC 792: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) RFC 793: Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) RFC 826: Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) RFC 854: Telnet Protocol Specification RFC 950: Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure RFC 959: File Transfer Protocol (FTP) RFC 1001: Protocol Standard for a NetBIOS Service on TCP/UDP Transport: Concepts and Facilities RFC 1002: Protocol Standard for a NetBIOS Service on a TCP/UDP Transport: Detailed Specifications RFC 1034: Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities RFC 1058. Routing Information Protocol (RIP) RFC 1122: Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers RFC 1661: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) RFC 1700: Assigned Numbers RFC 1752: The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation Protocol RFC 1757: Remote Network Monitoring (RMON) Management Information Base (MIB) RFC 1771: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP4) RFC 1812: Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers RFC 1905: Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2) RFC 1918: Address Allocation for Private Internets RFC 1939: Post Office Protocol (POP), Version 3 RFC 2021: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base Version 2 using SMIv2 (RMONv2) RFC 2060: Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP), Version 4rev1 RFC 2236: Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP), Version 2 RFC 2328: Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), Version 2 RFC 2390: Inverse Address Resolution Protocol (Inverse ARP) RFC 2453: Routing Information Protocol (RIP), Version 2 RFC 2460: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification RFC 2462: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration RFC 2474: Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers RFC 2475: An Architecture for Differentiated Service RFC 2516: A Method for Transmitting PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE) RFC 2608: Service Location Protocol (SLP), Version 2 RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), Version 1.1 RFC 2821: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) RFC 3022: Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT) HTH Priscilla At 10:43 PM 4/1/02, D'Wayne Saunders wrote: Hi, Can anyone recommend a few core rfc's that are wothwhile reading in regards to cisco study. tia Dwayne Saunders -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40176t=40135 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.3ab [7:40158]
nothing solid that I know of... I know in the production networks I have SEEN, nobody seems to care how many cables can be bundled. It's never been an issue in the networks I've experienced. Lou wrote: I am working on a project and have a question I can't find the answer to, despite 4 hours searching. If you have Cat5E or Cat6 ieee standard cabling, properly tested... Is there a Max amount of cables you can run side by side before experiencing alien Crosstalk.. (Crosstalk between the cables, not between pairs, or NEXT, or FEXT) If you know of a link to a whitepaper or any thing solid... I sure would appreciate Lou Nelson Consulting System Engineer CCNP, CCDP, Campus ATM Specialized Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40178t=40158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]
Dear x, I love your presentation. You spoke well. Nurudeen x wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have setup and managed both PIX and Checkpoint in a variety of environments. I think they are both solid options in different situations. Here is how I market these products. PIX - more cost effective - fast - you can have fail over - Can be more complicated to setup the CLI, but PIX has a nice feature of allowing all traffic out and none in by default. Who would I market this for? I would target this as an ideal candidate for small companies with rulesets that don't change much. They also need a Cisco savy person to manage it, usually a consultant. I am guessing you would fill this role. I have only made minor changes in the firewall I have managed for almost two years. Checkpoint - nice GUI for ruleset management - more expensive - required to know Unix or NT ( for the love of God don't use NT. Its security is very poor out of the box and requires a great deal of configuration to become mildly secure ) Who would I market this toward? I would target larger companies with Checkpoint. It is easier to manage the ruleset, but more setup time and more costly. I would also say this solution is slightly slower and more prone to security issues since you have to patch the OS and the firewall software. --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: Has anyone performed or seen an in depth study of PIX vs Checkpoint? I have a customer who is looking at both. Ive read various magazine articles, but nothing from real people such as this group! :) Thanks!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40177t=40136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Oh -- both David Wolsefer and Galina Pildush are CCIE's, and have been compensated by Certzone. Since David's posting was in support of an April Fool's joke An April fools joke to market your website... So you win either way... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40180t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SYBEX SIMULATORS [7:39505]
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone had an opinion on the following simulation/training programs from Sybex. Usefulness, worth the money spent, etc. Am considering purchasing. I appreciate your comments, and thanks in advance !! CCNP Complete Virtual Trainer CCNP: Remote Access Virtual Trainer CCNP: Routing Virtual Trainer CCNP: Support Virtual Trainer CCNP: Switching Virtual Trainer Jasper == Jasper Solt MCSE MCT CCNA Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == I've used the Complete Virtual Trainer for CCNA classes when I'm teaching out of the country and can't get my equipment shipped in. It good, but it is a sim, so it's not 100% the same. -- Wes Knight CCNP, MCT, MCSE, CNE, PSI, ASE, etc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40179t=39505 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.3ab [7:40158]
My wild guess would be that this actually depends on the surrounding, length, position, etc. The good literature for this would be some electrical engineering course on magnetic induction, etc. Advice how to avoid alien crosstalk would be to have those cable as less paralel as possible. Also, twisting them in a bundle might help, but I might be wrong on this. Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40182t=40158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
And to add to what William has written ... The current package we're looking at to manage our network is Computer Associates Unicenter. At it's core it's nothing more than another SNMP tool; however, it will integrate with about every company's software. With it we can drill through our network to the Cisco device we would like to work on, click it and CiscoWorks will open for that device. The same is true of Bay Networks, Cabletron and a host of other manufacturer's products (servers, etc.) as well. You might take a look at their product line and HP Openviwe to give you a direction to go in. Here is the URL to CA's product: http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/SubSolution.asp?ID=2846 That should be at leat a good 15 minutes worth of reading ;-) William Harrison wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Chris, Let me add to what David has said well. While Active Directory is Microsoft Directory service and is based on industry standard X.500 and LDAP and Kerboros. It is SNMP that is the only link between your Microsoft and Cisco devices. Therefore, management at best is monitoring the whole network. I think you will find that programs, such as Ciscoworks, are written because of the nature of business. Every manufacture wants his product to be unique. As far as SMS goes, it is capable of detection and monitor any snmp device. The key would be the response to the monitoring. SMS could only notify you at certain alert levels. This may be fine for your purposes. As final thought, consider your purposes and needs for management. I think that a combination of products is currently your best for full management! Bill Harrison MCSE, CCNP Instructor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Armstrong Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] Chris, We've been looking into several network management packages. The answers all seem to be the same. Network management software can find devices via a number of methods but all need the hardware vendor's specific management software to adequately work with each company's devices. In the case of Cisco that would of course be Cisco Works. I don't know yet whether MS's SMS software interfaces with CiscoWorks or not but it would certainly be able to manage it via Active Directory. There are several other companies that have similar software that would integrate with Active Directory as well. Hope that helps some, David Armstrong Mann, Chris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40181t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DTE DCE WAN Simulation [7:40183]
In setting up at home lab back to back 2501's with dte dce cable Is there anything special you need to do to pass traffic in a simulated WAN environment. Clocking host table Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40183t=40183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which switch [7:40184]
ok, I have a CAT5505. It uses the SET type OS. I have read that there is an IOS like OS for some of the switches. I can only imagine that we need to know both pretty well to score well on any exams. The question: which switch series have the other IOS type OS.. I guess I shold look into buying one to learn the interface. Thanks for any advice -Joe- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40184t=40184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Galina Pildush is CCIE # 3176 and currently is active. C.Q.Nguyen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Fowler Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I noticed a Galina Pildush was listed as CCIE # 5858, but using Cisco's on-line verification tool it shows a David Wolsefer as being CCIE # 5858. Does Cisco has a certification path for people with split personalities? :) -Original Message- From: David Wolsefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40185t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7206 disassembly [7:40186]
All, I have a problem in 7206 midplane can anyone help me in disassembling the chassis to reach the midplane? please advise Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40186t=40186 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Another example of useless comments and waste of bandwidth... just like the one I'm making now.. Patrick Ramsey wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Do you really want to trust the management of your core equipment to anything microsoft puts out? Mann, Chris 04/01/02 04:05PM Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40187t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]
Anyone have a good recommendation for an IOS on a 7206VXR with a PA2-T3+? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40188t=40188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RFC's [7:40135]
Here is my favorite download URL for RFCs: http://rfc.sunsite.dk/ Hth, Angel Leiva - MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN Lucent Technologies, ESS Irving, TX E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of D'Wayne Saunders Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFC's [7:40135] Hi, Can anyone recommend a few core rfc's that are wothwhile reading in regards to cisco study. tia Dwayne Saunders Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40190t=40135 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
I'm assuming that the use of spantree portfast is coupled with the use of this command: set spantree portfast bpdu-guard enable When this command is applied to the switch, and it will prevent a port configured as a end-station port from being used as an uplink port from another switch. Any BPDUs (Bridge Protocol Data Units) seen on a port where the macro command set port host (or in this case set spantree portfast) has been applied will cause the port to go into an errDisable state. The use of this command is intended to prevent unauthorized switching devices from being connected to the LAN via the user ports. We use it in our organization, and it is effective. Treece -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 5:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] At 01:50 AM 4/1/02, Larry Letterman wrote: For the most part here at Cisco, we have no guarrantee that setting a switch to root will stop another switch from coming up as root. However, we set all our roots/sec roots by issuing the set spantree root command. This should lower the prio. of the root/sec root switches to insure that they will always be the roots... We also use portfast to insure no unwanted switches are plugged into our network and allowed to become live Does that really work? A port in portfast mode still listens to BPDUs in case another switch instead of a workstation gets connected. If another switch gets connected, the port will do its normal blocking, listening, learning, and forwarding state transitions. I don't think just configuring portfast will stop an unwanted switch from becoming live?? Were you thinking of something else maybe? Thanks, Priscilla Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 10:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40189t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Yes this has been made clear to me by 5 different people including Galina herself. However there was a typo at the bottom of the page listing her with the incorrect CCIE # that is now fixed. -Original Message- From: Nguyen, Cuong Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is CCIE # 3176 and currently is active. C.Q.Nguyen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Fowler Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I noticed a Galina Pildush was listed as CCIE # 5858, but using Cisco's on-line verification tool it shows a David Wolsefer as being CCIE # 5858. Does Cisco has a certification path for people with split personalities? :) -Original Message- From: David Wolsefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40191t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
Priscilla, Maybe it's time to switch publishers like Howard's. Unless your upcoming book prevents Cisco from doing what they did to TDND's contract. BTW - when is the next book due for release? Elmer - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:12 AM Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] At 10:03 PM 4/1/02, Robert Padjen wrote: Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine ( ;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide. I'm sure you'll get flamed for advertising your own book, but I'm going to give you a hard time also for lack of accuracy. ;-) Top-Down Network Design is not a certification book, but it is based on the work I did on both the Designing Cisco Networks (DCN) and the Cisco Internetwork Design (CID) training classes when I worked for Cisco. I have heard that Cisco has made CID match my Top-Down Network Design book even more closely than before. I know for a fact that the description of the CID course is taken from my Top-Down Network Design book. I did a double-take when I read the following text from the description of the CID class here: http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/CELC/index.cgi?action=Cours eDescCOURSE_ID=321 Good internetwork design recognizes a customer's requirements embody many business and technical goals, including requirements for availability, scalability, affordability, security, and manageability. Difficult internetwork design choices and tradeoffs must be made when designing the internetwork before any physical devices or media are selected. CID covers typical internetwork design business and technical goals and constraints. CID details the top-down design process and the importance of using systematic methods for internetwork design. Using systematic methods helps you, the internetwork designer, to keep pace with changing technologies and customer requirements. I said to myself, Hey I wrote that. Oh yeah, I should have had a lawyer look at my book contract. Cisco can use anything I wrote in the book. Bummer. or maybe not?? ;-] Priscilla To save a buck, if you feel comfortable with the material, you may want to forgo the big book and use the Exam Notes (used books are out there too). The new test might focus on multicast more than the books reflect, and they may have less StrataCom and ATM, but its close enough. 640-025 (the exam the book was written to) is still the current version. Good luck. --- Andy Barkl wrote: The book is not that great. It has many errors and omissions. I recommend the Cisco Press Top-Down Network Design book for the new CID exam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of STRAND Scott Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] Has anyone who has taken the CID exam used the Cisco CID Exam Certification Guide. (Michael Crane, Reggie Terell). I was wanting to get some opinions on this book, especially the practice test on the CD. I intend to use BOSON as well. Thanks, Scott CCNP, CCDA [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Robert Padjen __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40192t=39669 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Beware of Unicenter! -Original Message- From: David Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] And to add to what William has written ... The current package we're looking at to manage our network is Computer Associates Unicenter. At it's core it's nothing more than another SNMP tool; however, it will integrate with about every company's software. With it we can drill through our network to the Cisco device we would like to work on, click it and CiscoWorks will open for that device. The same is true of Bay Networks, Cabletron and a host of other manufacturer's products (servers, etc.) as well. You might take a look at their product line and HP Openviwe to give you a direction to go in. Here is the URL to CA's product: http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/SubSolution.asp?ID=2846 That should be at leat a good 15 minutes worth of reading ;-) William Harrison wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Chris, Let me add to what David has said well. While Active Directory is Microsoft Directory service and is based on industry standard X.500 and LDAP and Kerboros. It is SNMP that is the only link between your Microsoft and Cisco devices. Therefore, management at best is monitoring the whole network. I think you will find that programs, such as Ciscoworks, are written because of the nature of business. Every manufacture wants his product to be unique. As far as SMS goes, it is capable of detection and monitor any snmp device. The key would be the response to the monitoring. SMS could only notify you at certain alert levels. This may be fine for your purposes. As final thought, consider your purposes and needs for management. I think that a combination of products is currently your best for full management! Bill Harrison MCSE, CCNP Instructor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Armstrong Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] Chris, We've been looking into several network management packages. The answers all seem to be the same. Network management software can find devices via a number of methods but all need the hardware vendor's specific management software to adequately work with each company's devices. In the case of Cisco that would of course be Cisco Works. I don't know yet whether MS's SMS software interfaces with CiscoWorks or not but it would certainly be able to manage it via Active Directory. There are several other companies that have similar software that would integrate with Active Directory as well. Hope that helps some, David Armstrong Mann, Chris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40194t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077]
You may find some help from RFC 2321, The Reliable Internetwork Troubleshooting Agent (RITA) I've been dying to use that one! Not that I don't take your problem seriously. ;-) Priscilla -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077] No matter how many times I subscribe, unsubscribe, and re-subscribe, I can't get the GroupStudy Listserve server to send me only 1 copy of all messages, it always sends me at least 2. Has anyone who has recently subscribed or re-subscribed having the same problem? I don't want to bother the list moderator or Paul until I can confirm the problem is not on my end. Thanks Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40164t=40077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Buy Vs. Virtual Rack Time for CCIE [7:40100]
Racktime - Pros: Far less expensive than buying; generally reliable equipment; ready made topology; very small footprint(!); available from any remote location; Racktime - Cons: Fixed timeslots mean lack of flexibility in practice; often a waiting list for access; Buying - Pros: Availabe 24/7; investment (can be sold on); physical access Buying - Cons: Expensive outlay; large footprint; On balance buying is better in my view. In the long run the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, and you can always sell the kit on to recover most of the expense. Regards, Ben Ben Lovegrove, CCNP Redspan Solutions Ltd Web: www.redspan.com www.bensbookmarks.com Tel: +44 (0)2392 492010 Fax: +44 (0)870 460 2156 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco hardware, software, accessories, and certification tips From: Mckenzie Bill Reply-To: Mckenzie Bill To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Buy Vs. Virtual Rack Time for CCIE [7:40100] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 16:46:10 -0500 I'm looking for comments about preparing for the CCIE Lab Exam. Do you NEED to buy the equipment to build a home lab, or is it possible to be enough prepared by practicing totally through renting rack time? (and in this dream world, money isn't an issue) I would really like to hear feedback about this. Thanks Bill Mckenzie, misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40145t=40100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http access not working anymore?? [7:40149]
Hello,I use http to get to my routers but after enabling 2 commands on the router it does not work anymoreI removed both the commands with just http access but it still does not workI cleared the cache in IE but that does not help either.I deleted the access-list and also changed the enable secret password but no luckWhat could have gone wrong?I had added: # ip http access-class 10 # ip http auth local Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40149t=40149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: #8960 [7:39144]
Congratulations Paul !! Thank you for sharing some tidbits as well. Angel Leiva - MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN Lucent Technologies, ESS Irving, TX E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Jin Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: #8960 [7:39144] Hello all, I guess it is my turn to make my announcement. I got my number this past weekend in RTP. #8960 This was my first attempt and thankfully, my last attempt for this track. I would especially like to thank Brian Dignan, CCIE #8248. He was a tremendous help in getting me ready to pass the first time. My company actually promised me 100% support for CCIE training when I got on board but the past 2 years, I ended up without any of the promised training. So I needed to prep with my own fund (meaning, I had to ask my wife for the money) :-) and I needed a lot of help on many subjects that I normally don't deal with every day. Especially on DLSW, TR and IPX. Brian took the time to explain these technologies and made the complex topics, easier to understand. I believe Stan earlier has already mentioned that Brian has started teaching his own Cisco and lab prep classes in the DC metro area. I also recommend Brian 100%. Anyone that would like to reach Brian can do so at - [EMAIL PROTECTED] As far as the books, I mainly used the same books as others, Bruce Caslow's book, Doyle 1 and 2 and CCIE practical studies. And Halabi book for BGP. I mainly used the free labs, labs from the books and also used lab 1 from Networkforce.com Thank you Paul for creating the list and all members on this list. - Paul Jin CCIE #8960 - Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40193t=39144 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
An April fools joke to market your website... So you win either way... Brian, You seem hostile about this. Could you tell me what subterfuge was involved? From the very beginning, it was identified with Certzone. Whether or not it was marketing -- I agree it is, and personally had nothing to do with the decision to do so -- it was also a j*o*k*e in the long tradition of IETF April 1 RFCs. RFC 1149, for example, is both funny but a good tutorial in how to map IP to a specific medium. The guy that wrote it worked, at the time, for BBN. Is that BBN marketing? My corporate affiliation shows on RFCs I write, as it does for every author. I suppose this, in some way, could be considered strategic marketing. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I do find it inappropriate for people to launch personal or product attacks on vendors, when they have a financial interest they do not disclose. I feel it equally inappropriate for non-disinterested people to write glowing reviews of products. Soon, I will be posting some general, vendor-independent notes on strategies for writing scenarios. I think it's in the general interest for these to be discussed in public, and get community input. I may, with proper disclaimers, post reviews of products. I will make the offer now that if a direct competitor wanted me to review their product, I would do so as objectively as possible--as a professional, not as a marketdroid. My reputation is too important to me to squander in shilling. -- What Problem are you trying to solve? ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40195t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
At 05:26 PM 4/1/02, Robert Fowler wrote: I wish I got paid for doing work for them. However even if I had the knowledge to write one of the papers they don't have, I would probably lack the technical writing skills. However if they want to start paying me I'd probably be a less obvious in my praise. I would agree that anything on their site is obtainable for free from anywhere else. Although I agree with your other statements, I can't agree that the text and figures at their site are obtainable for free from anywhere else. Howard and many of the other authors at www.certificationzone.com have an entirely unique way of explaining technologies. They make it fun to learn the material and they are dedicated to making sure the material is accurate and relevant. Not only that, but many of the www.certification.com authors have had unique experiences involving the development of some of the protocols covered. As just one example, there isn't another person on the planet who lived so intimately with the development of AppleTalk (at least I hope not! ;-) See my paper on AppleTalk at the Zone. Of course, not many people care about AppleTalk any more, but perhaps they should. A lot of AppleTalk themes (dynamic configuration, automated service location) are finally coming around to the IP world too. Many of the other authors have even more direct experience with the development and deployment of the technologies covered in the white papers. I do wish CertificationZone would fix the ARP paper though. An ARP packet does not have an IP header. I bugged and bugged them about this and they never fixed it. Hint, hint. ;-) Priscilla However reading the papers I find that they written in an easy to understand form, so you spend less time having to reread information and can spend more time thinking about it. Granted I don't think it's perfect, I'd like a better structure on the site, I think it's an excellent tool for someone who isn't pursuing their Masters degree but instead one of the Cisco Certifications. :) (that'd be me) Robert Fowler Unpaid, Unofficial site endorser of certificationzone.com who is merely stating his long winded opinion in pursuit of his 3rd major certification. :) -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I don't know, last time someone made a pitch like that. I found out they got paid for doing work for the site. My employer gives me 3500 a year for educational stuff, and that money is going for a Masters degree. All I need is an internet terminal and some free time to get those things you mentioned :-) Anyway, to each his own -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:00 PM To: Brian Zeitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Actually, the site provides much more than that. I subscribed over a month ago and it is full of information that is compiled so that it is easy to read etc. I have the PowerPoint slides also, but I've found the diagrams, tests etc are much more valuable and make things easier to learn. I think it's worth every dollar my employer spent. :) Robert -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag i=40070t=40035
RE: 802.3ab [7:40158]
If alien crosstalk is an issue in any cabling, it would come up in 802.3af before you ever saw it in 802.3ab. 48 volts will cause alot more noise than 5 volts (Is that the voltage for standard 802.3?). I've seen bundles of 20+ cat 5 ethernet running 802.3af without seeing problems. My guess would be that alien crosstalk will not be an issue with Cat 5 no matter how many cables are bundled. Of course, this assumes the are carrying pseudo-random data (as would be seen in a production network). If all the cables (or a large portion of them) were running the exact same data, a cumlutive effect might be seen. Like soldier marching in lock-step. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40196t=40158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Another added tidbit: we have been using CA TNG 3.0 and if you want to use Cisco, plan on writing custom agents, which translate to crummy support, (because now you are 'customized' )from CA,and we didn't even do the coding, and well, heck,, I shouldn't get started on them and product scope, reliability, support, blah blah. One extremely large customer of ours, just gave them the boot, as well as a couple of others. This is NOT intended to stir it up, just factual observations. The political structure of CA is unstable as well. IMHO, use HP OpenView. I think network folks overlook the amount of bandwidth that is needed for WAN enterprise agents, the more you monitor, the more you pay, one way or another. Serious attention must be given to total cost of ownership: labor, equipment, support, bandwidth (agents), training etc. All have a great day. Kevin McCarty CCNA CCNP Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector David ArmstrongTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] Sent by: nobody 04/02/2002 08:38 AM Please respond to David Armstrong And to add to what William has written ... The current package we're looking at to manage our network is Computer Associates Unicenter. At it's core it's nothing more than another SNMP tool; however, it will integrate with about every company's software. With it we can drill through our network to the Cisco device we would like to work on, click it and CiscoWorks will open for that device. The same is true of Bay Networks, Cabletron and a host of other manufacturer's products (servers, etc.) as well. You might take a look at their product line and HP Openviwe to give you a direction to go in. Here is the URL to CA's product: http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/SubSolution.asp?ID=2846 That should be at leat a good 15 minutes worth of reading ;-) William Harrison wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Chris, Let me add to what David has said well. While Active Directory is Microsoft Directory service and is based on industry standard X.500 and LDAP and Kerboros. It is SNMP that is the only link between your Microsoft and Cisco devices. Therefore, management at best is monitoring the whole network. I think you will find that programs, such as Ciscoworks, are written because of the nature of business. Every manufacture wants his product to be unique. As far as SMS goes, it is capable of detection and monitor any snmp device. The key would be the response to the monitoring. SMS could only notify you at certain alert levels. This may be fine for your purposes. As final thought, consider your purposes and needs for management. I think that a combination of products is currently your best for full management! Bill Harrison MCSE, CCNP Instructor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Armstrong Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] Chris, We've been looking into several network management packages. The answers all seem to be the same. Network management software can find devices via a number of methods but all need the hardware vendor's specific management software to adequately work with each company's devices. In the case of Cisco that would of course be Cisco Works. I don't know yet whether MS's SMS software interfaces with CiscoWorks or not but it would certainly be able to manage it via Active Directory. There are several other companies that have similar software that would integrate with Active Directory as well. Hope that helps some, David Armstrong Mann, Chris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40197t=40095
RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
Here is my list for the CID: DCN Padjen book Top Down -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] At 10:03 PM 4/1/02, Robert Padjen wrote: Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine ( ;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide. I'm sure you'll get flamed for advertising your own book, but I'm going to give you a hard time also for lack of accuracy. ;-) Top-Down Network Design is not a certification book, but it is based on the work I did on both the Designing Cisco Networks (DCN) and the Cisco Internetwork Design (CID) training classes when I worked for Cisco. I have heard that Cisco has made CID match my Top-Down Network Design book even more closely than before. I know for a fact that the description of the CID course is taken from my Top-Down Network Design book. I did a double-take when I read the following text from the description of the CID class here: http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/CELC/index.cgi?action=Cours eDescCOURSE_ID=321 Good internetwork design recognizes a customer's requirements embody many business and technical goals, including requirements for availability, scalability, affordability, security, and manageability. Difficult internetwork design choices and tradeoffs must be made when designing the internetwork before any physical devices or media are selected. CID covers typical internetwork design business and technical goals and constraints. CID details the top-down design process and the importance of using systematic methods for internetwork design. Using systematic methods helps you, the internetwork designer, to keep pace with changing technologies and customer requirements. I said to myself, Hey I wrote that. Oh yeah, I should have had a lawyer look at my book contract. Cisco can use anything I wrote in the book. Bummer. or maybe not?? ;-] Priscilla To save a buck, if you feel comfortable with the material, you may want to forgo the big book and use the Exam Notes (used books are out there too). The new test might focus on multicast more than the books reflect, and they may have less StrataCom and ATM, but its close enough. 640-025 (the exam the book was written to) is still the current version. Good luck. --- Andy Barkl wrote: The book is not that great. It has many errors and omissions. I recommend the Cisco Press Top-Down Network Design book for the new CID exam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of STRAND Scott Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] Has anyone who has taken the CID exam used the Cisco CID Exam Certification Guide. (Michael Crane, Reggie Terell). I was wanting to get some opinions on this book, especially the practice test on the CD. I intend to use BOSON as well. Thanks, Scott CCNP, CCDA [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Robert Padjen __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40199t=39669 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
I have that book, it is great! Robert does an excellent job outlining the intricacies of the CID. I am taking soon, (probably in May after the CISSP). Thanks for the great book Robert! Regards, Will -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Padjen Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine ( ;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide. To save a buck, if you feel comfortable with the material, you may want to forgo the big book and use the Exam Notes (used books are out there too). The new test might focus on multicast more than the books reflect, and they may have less StrataCom and ATM, but its close enough. 640-025 (the exam the book was written to) is still the current version. Good luck. --- Andy Barkl wrote: The book is not that great. It has many errors and omissions. I recommend the Cisco Press Top-Down Network Design book for the new CID exam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of STRAND Scott Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] Has anyone who has taken the CID exam used the Cisco CID Exam Certification Guide. (Michael Crane, Reggie Terell). I was wanting to get some opinions on this book, especially the practice test on the CD. I intend to use BOSON as well. Thanks, Scott CCNP, CCDA [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Robert Padjen __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40198t=39669 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IOS Firewall Feature Set -Blocking Attacks [7:40141]
Or as a simple solution, put a route for his IP address to Null0. His return traffic will never make it. This will not stop a denial of service, But it will stop any return traffic like port scans and such. This machine will effectively Disappear to him... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IOS Firewall Feature Set -Blocking Attacks [7:40141] Hi, You can configure a simple inbound access-list at your outside interface of your router to deny inbound connection from the specific host to web server. or the other way is to enable ip audit on the router and in the action specify it as reset. Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Clayton Dukes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax to: Sent by: Subject: IOS Firewall Feature Set -Blocking Attacks [7:40141] nobody@groups tudy.com 02/04/2002 06:44 Please respond to Clayton Dukes Hi everyone, I have a specific IP address that constantly tries to attack my webserver. How can I block that IP address while allowing all others through? My config uses NAT extendable to translate the outside Ip to port 80 on an internal address. I want to allow the world to access that port EXCEPT for ip z.z.z.z, Can someone recommend a good way? TIA! Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE Micromuse, Inc. CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC (h) 904-292-1881 (c) 904-477-7825 ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40200t=40141 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: DTE DCE WAN Simulation [7:40183]
set the clockrate on the serial interface that has the dce cable attached to 64000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of v s Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DTE DCE WAN Simulation [7:40183] In setting up at home lab back to back 2501's with dte dce cable Is there anything special you need to do to pass traffic in a simulated WAN environment. Clocking host table Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40202t=40183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: access-list problem [7:40092]
Shawn, (Unless I misunderstand what you need!!) The following line in your acl - !permit anyone to 172.16.1.0 port 80--web server access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq www Is saying 2 permit any source to get to 172.16.1.0 where the traffic is web traffic. As you would not be advertising 172.16.1.0 /24 on the internet you should really be permiting traffic from any source to the natted addresses of your web servers and not the inside address. No one will ever target the 172.16.1.0 from the outside. Hope that helps Regards Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40203t=40092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Its in english now http://www.certificationzone.com/studyguides/studyview/?Issue=51IssueDate=04-02-2002CP=1 Brian Zeitz @groupstudy.com on 04/01/2002 12:00:40 PM Please respond to Brian Zeitz Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I am not fluent in Russian, but I am fluent on how to translate stuff using Office XP. I have a plugin that translates any document language to any other language. Check out Worldlingo.com, you might be able to translate it there for free. There are some cool free plug ins for Office XP. I can do really cool stuff, not just the simple stuff like Spanish or French. I can translate my English documents to Japanese, or even Chinese, Viet etc. and vice versa. So the joke is not on me :) Thanks for the free guide :) -Original Message- From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40201t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
:) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... How about - NICER CPU I JOS RICE CPU JOINS CONJURES PIC I or even SCOPIC INJURE? Dom Stocqueler Chuck cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056] nobody@groups tudy.com 01/04/2002 22:27 Please respond to Chuck perhaps a better name would be cissi-fer( sissy fur ) anyone any good at anagrams. maybe among the combined letter of cisco and juniper there is some good pun or other. B Rudy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40204t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
that is correct. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EFIRD, TREECE (CONTRACTOR) Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] I'm assuming that the use of spantree portfast is coupled with the use of this command: set spantree portfast bpdu-guard enable When this command is applied to the switch, and it will prevent a port configured as a end-station port from being used as an uplink port from another switch. Any BPDUs (Bridge Protocol Data Units) seen on a port where the macro command set port host (or in this case set spantree portfast) has been applied will cause the port to go into an errDisable state. The use of this command is intended to prevent unauthorized switching devices from being connected to the LAN via the user ports. We use it in our organization, and it is effective. Treece -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 5:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] At 01:50 AM 4/1/02, Larry Letterman wrote: For the most part here at Cisco, we have no guarrantee that setting a switch to root will stop another switch from coming up as root. However, we set all our roots/sec roots by issuing the set spantree root command. This should lower the prio. of the root/sec root switches to insure that they will always be the roots... We also use portfast to insure no unwanted switches are plugged into our network and allowed to become live Does that really work? A port in portfast mode still listens to BPDUs in case another switch instead of a workstation gets connected. If another switch gets connected, the port will do its normal blocking, listening, learning, and forwarding state transitions. I don't think just configuring portfast will stop an unwanted switch from becoming live?? Were you thinking of something else maybe? Thanks, Priscilla Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 10:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40206t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40207]
Hi List, If you would read this study guide to it's end, you could find there nice ~10 lines perl script which explains what the guy actually did - he just shifted ascii of each english letter 128 chars. Have I mentioned that my mother tongue is Russian? -- Semion Lisyansky mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40207t=40207 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]
FWIW I have a couple customers running dual homed Internet connections with 7206VXRs, running 12.2.6 and so far so good. They have PA-A3-T3 and PA-T3. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: Anyone have a good recommendation for an IOS on a 7206VXR with a PA2-T3+? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40209t=40188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]
Hey smart guy, If you were a true Engineer you would have noticed that the post was dated April 1st. Good jobBen Liang Tan wrote: hey, today is not 1st of April !!! Wake up my friend From: B Rudy Reply-To: B Rudy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 12:27:28 -0500 JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS RUDY B _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40210t=40056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]
that module has a built in dsu right? MADMAN 04/02/02 12:16PM FWIW I have a couple customers running dual homed Internet connections with 7206VXRs, running 12.2.6 and so far so good. They have PA-A3-T3 and PA-T3. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: Anyone have a good recommendation for an IOS on a 7206VXR with a PA2-T3+? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40211t=40188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40207]
Interesting. Yesterday, I just copied the HTML and changed the charset to US-ASCII and voila - when I browsed it, I could read it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Semion Lisyansky Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40207] Hi List, If you would read this study guide to it's end, you could find there nice ~10 lines perl script which explains what the guy actually did - he just shifted ascii of each english letter 128 chars. Have I mentioned that my mother tongue is Russian? -- Semion Lisyansky mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40212t=40207 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213]
Has anyone ever tried to created a mullilink PPP bundle with DS-3's? A coworker was wondering and I never thought about it myself. I've only configured it for t-1's. I would assume the overhead might be bad for the router instead of using CEF or just letting the routing protocol load balance. Any thoughts? Woody CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40213t=40213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: please help **location migration** [7:40162]
Kevin, Check out local area mobility, it looks like it may fit your needs: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/lam/tech/lamso_wp.htm HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Campbell Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please help **location migration** [7:40162] I work for a collocation and bandwidth provider and need help with an issue for a migration. We need to move about 30 servers from a offsite location to our data center. The move of the servers needs to be done over the period of a month. We need to do this without changing the ip addresses of the servers. so either through an internet connection or wan link (both possible) we need to share the ip block. It cannot be subnetted and must remain a single ip block. We have ruled out the use of bridge groups across a T1 circuit and would like a better option than using a VPN. If you have any ideas please help. thanks for the help and all the useful post. I have been in this group for about 6 months and have made very few posts but have benefited immensely from users in this group. I thank you for that. Kevin Campbell MCSE, MCT, CCNP [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40214t=40162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wierd [7:40215]
anyone know what the heck this is...my 7206 is having difficulties booting: rommon 6 boot disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.bin loadprog: error - on load of image from file system with monlib boot: cannot load disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.bin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40215t=40215 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Gear for Sale [7:40216]
I am currently selling off some gear, below is what I currently have: PIX-520-UR w/ 4FE: $5200.00 (GREAT FOR CCIE SECURITY STUDIES) MC3810 w/ (2) FXO, (3) FXS, (1) EM, (1)T1MFT: $1550.00 (PERFECT SOLUTION FOR VOICE TRAINING) FS: PIX-515-UR w/ 4FE: $5500.00 (GREAT FOR CCIE SECURITY PRACTICE) FS: Lucent Portmaster 3 (PM3-2T) w/ 48 Modems: $2300.00 (PERFECT ACCESS SERVER) Thank you, Craig Crosby -- Your certified specialist for: Cisco Cerent 3Com Lucent Kentrox Adtran Paradyneand more. Craig Crosby, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maxis Technologies, Inc p: 1-800-79-MAXIS 433 W. Wilshire f: 405-841-7882 Oklahoma City, OK 73116 AOL IM: CRAIGatMAXIS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40216t=40216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]
I have a 7204VXR with both a PA-T3+ and what I believe is the PA-3-TA. We run 12.1.1 and have had no issues in over a year. Not exactly what your looking for, but fairly close. I have a 7206VXR with a PA-T3+ and PA-3-TA running 12.1.3a and it has had no issues either, but the PA-T3+ has only been in for 3-4 months. I suspect that any issues would have cropped up by now, but I wanted to at least put the disclaimer. For the record, each of them have one interface Riding the Light as well. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188] FWIW I have a couple customers running dual homed Internet connections with 7206VXRs, running 12.2.6 and so far so good. They have PA-A3-T3 and PA-T3. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: Anyone have a good recommendation for an IOS on a 7206VXR with a PA2-T3+? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40217t=40188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC's [7:40219]
At 11:48 AM 4/2/02, Hugo Taxa wrote: Sorry to bug you, but I'm looking for something and you being very knowledgeable in RFCs, are bvound to be a great help. Do you know which RFC has the definition of SNMPv2 Traps? I'm looking for information about where the SNMP community travels inside the PDU. Many thanks, Hugo Taxa PS-Do you know any list of Funny RFCs? I'm going to copy the group on this one in case they have more insight. I find the SNMP RFCs to be especially confusing. I think you'll find what you're looking for (the placement of the community string in PDUs) in RFC 1157. The placement is probably the same in Traps as it is in any PDU. I think it's the same for SNMPv1 versus v2, but I don't know for sure. You could try RFC 1905 also. There is a list of funny RFCs here: http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/~sburke/rfchumor.html Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40219t=40219 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
At 10:07 AM 4/2/02, Cebuano wrote: Priscilla, Maybe it's time to switch publishers like Howard's. Unless your upcoming book prevents Cisco from doing what they did to TDND's contract. BTW - when is the next book due for release? Hey, you guys keep giving me a chance to get in some free advertising! ;-) My next book is about troubleshooting. It is written (with Joseph Bardwell's help), but the publisher (Wiley) is still doing the production. Stay tuned. Thanks for asking. There's more info here: http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/ Hopefully the date that Amazon is reporting (July) is worst case! By the way, I approve of Robert Padjen's book on CID also. I wrote a good review of it for Amazon. My review is sincere and I'm not at all compensated for it (in fact, sort of the opposite! ;-) Priscilla Elmer - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:12 AM Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] At 10:03 PM 4/1/02, Robert Padjen wrote: Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine ( ;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide. I'm sure you'll get flamed for advertising your own book, but I'm going to give you a hard time also for lack of accuracy. ;-) Top-Down Network Design is not a certification book, but it is based on the work I did on both the Designing Cisco Networks (DCN) and the Cisco Internetwork Design (CID) training classes when I worked for Cisco. I have heard that Cisco has made CID match my Top-Down Network Design book even more closely than before. I know for a fact that the description of the CID course is taken from my Top-Down Network Design book. I did a double-take when I read the following text from the description of the CID class here: http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/CELC/index.cgi?action=Cours eDescCOURSE_ID=321 Good internetwork design recognizes a customer's requirements embody many business and technical goals, including requirements for availability, scalability, affordability, security, and manageability. Difficult internetwork design choices and tradeoffs must be made when designing the internetwork before any physical devices or media are selected. CID covers typical internetwork design business and technical goals and constraints. CID details the top-down design process and the importance of using systematic methods for internetwork design. Using systematic methods helps you, the internetwork designer, to keep pace with changing technologies and customer requirements. I said to myself, Hey I wrote that. Oh yeah, I should have had a lawyer look at my book contract. Cisco can use anything I wrote in the book. Bummer. or maybe not?? ;-] Priscilla To save a buck, if you feel comfortable with the material, you may want to forgo the big book and use the Exam Notes (used books are out there too). The new test might focus on multicast more than the books reflect, and they may have less StrataCom and ATM, but its close enough. 640-025 (the exam the book was written to) is still the current version. Good luck. --- Andy Barkl wrote: The book is not that great. It has many errors and omissions. I recommend the Cisco Press Top-Down Network Design book for the new CID exam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of STRAND Scott Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] Has anyone who has taken the CID exam used the Cisco CID Exam Certification Guide. (Michael Crane, Reggie Terell). I was wanting to get some opinions on this book, especially the practice test on the CD. I intend to use BOSON as well. Thanks, Scott CCNP, CCDA [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Robert Padjen __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40218t=39669 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]
Yes Dave Patrick Ramsey wrote: that module has a built in dsu right? MADMAN 04/02/02 12:16PM FWIW I have a couple customers running dual homed Internet connections with 7206VXRs, running 12.2.6 and so far so good. They have PA-A3-T3 and PA-T3. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: Anyone have a good recommendation for an IOS on a 7206VXR with a PA2-T3+? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Confidentiality DisclaimerThis email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40220t=40188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077]
Yea I have had it as well as several others on this list who were all using Outlook as a mail client. Do this: Delete all your rules. Still having trouble? Remove and Re-install Outlook. That should fix your dupes issue. It fixed mine. My rules were my problem. I deleted them all and re-created them and now I don't get the dupes anymore. Strange but true. I had changed PC's and moved my PST file to the new location. I am thinking that changing PC's may be partly to blame since my rules also followed me. But I have not verified this theory. -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 09:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077] You may find some help from RFC 2321, The Reliable Internetwork Troubleshooting Agent (RITA) I've been dying to use that one! Not that I don't take your problem seriously. ;-) Priscilla -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077] No matter how many times I subscribe, unsubscribe, and re-subscribe, I can't get the GroupStudy Listserve server to send me only 1 copy of all messages, it always sends me at least 2. Has anyone who has recently subscribed or re-subscribed having the same problem? I don't want to bother the list moderator or Paul until I can confirm the problem is not on my end. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40205t=40077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208]
Hi, all. This is just a short notice for people on this list that are subscribers of Cox Communications and have been denied the use of the Cisco uBR924 or newer models. I have battled the company's politics in the past when i wanted to connect my uBR924 to their network. I even escalated my request to their Tech. Engineering Dept. in San Diego, only to be told that they no longer support any Cisco cable modems in their database. Alas, after a few months of being quarantined by the likes of Doyle, Halabi and the gang, i was able to spare a few hours to configure my uBR for basic bridging operation (config is on CCO) and call up their local tech support and lied that I wanted to register a Toshiba modem. Gave the tech the MAC and Serial number (thank G~d she did not recognize these as Cisco numbers!!), and in two minutes my unit was provisioned. I hope this message helps one or more list subscribers. Albeit I still believe for most transactions that Honesty is the best policy (hey, I was honest in my quest :- ) Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40208t=40208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213]
As I haven ranted in the past, for parallel path load sharing just say no to PPP. CEF works great, is efficient and easy to configure. PPP has more overhead, interleaving, fragmentation (which yes can be disabled and should if you choose PPP) all for what?? You can save IP addresses but this is most often a moot point, use RFC1918 addresses. Dave Woods, Randall, SOLCM wrote: Has anyone ever tried to created a mullilink PPP bundle with DS-3's? A coworker was wondering and I never thought about it myself. I've only configured it for t-1's. I would assume the overhead might be bad for the router instead of using CEF or just letting the routing protocol load balance. Any thoughts? Woody CCNP -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40221t=40213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wierd [7:40215]
do a dir disk0: Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: anyone know what the heck this is...my 7206 is having difficulties booting: rommon 6 boot disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.bin loadprog: error - on load of image from file system with monlib boot: cannot load disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.bin -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40222t=40215 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]
Having issues running Cisco Works 2000 on an 2000 server. It was installed but it seems that nothing is working--can't use any functions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40223t=40223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MCNS Boson test [7:40224]
Does anyone know which test from BOSON is best for MCNS test ? There are three tests available at their site and am wondering which one should i buy ? MCNS #1 MCNS#2 MCNS #3 thanks in advance Sanjay Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40224t=40224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]
It is absolutely necessary to get a support contract for this software. You will probably be making at least two or three calls to TAC to get this working correctly. Save yourself a LOT of trouble by getting software support as soon as possible. If you can successfully get this running without a single call to TAC, I salute you. :-) John Danny 4/2/02 12:26:14 PM Having issues running Cisco Works 2000 on an 2000 server. It was installed but it seems that nothing is working--can't use any functions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40226t=40223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: voip em [7:40225]
I have two 2610 routers, one in new york and one in miami These two routers are connected to pbx via e/m cards. When a call is initiated from miami, a ring back tone is heard before the user picks up the phone. However, when the call is initiated from new york, no ring back tone is heard Any suggestions would be appreciated Joe R. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40225t=40225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: voip em [7:40225]
Need more info. -- RFC 1149 Compliant Joseph Rago wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have two 2610 routers, one in new york and one in miami These two routers are connected to pbx via e/m cards. When a call is initiated from miami, a ring back tone is heard before the user picks up the phone. However, when the call is initiated from new york, no ring back tone is heard Any suggestions would be appreciated Joe R. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40227t=40225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228]
I'm studying for the CCNA test. but should i wait to pick up the Sybex 607 book, or will the 507 book suffice? You guys mention Todd's book. You guys are reffering to the Sybex book right? Also, is the test the same as the 507 but with simulators or did they scrap the entire question list and start a new one? Please help me out... thanks, Jimmy. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40228t=40228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MCNS Boson test [7:40224]
This doesn't answer your question perfectly, but could be a good advise. What I do is to take all the tests, and the one I score the worst in I buy. I also look who wrote the test to see if I recognize a writer from a previous good test. I have not tried the MCNS tests yet, so I cannot give you any recommendations. Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: Sanjay Dalal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MCNS Boson test [7:40224] Does anyone know which test from BOSON is best for MCNS test ? There are three tests available at their site and am wondering which one should i buy ? MCNS #1 MCNS#2 MCNS #3 thanks in advance Sanjay Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40229t=40224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carrier Lost [7:40230]
If I have a setup: R1 (E3/3)-(E2/3) R2 I want to make R1 think that it has lost the carrier as if I were pulling the cable out at R1 and this message should come up: 1d02h: %AMDP2_FE-5-LOSTCARR: Ehernet3/3 cable/transceiver problem? A line flap by doing shut/no shut at R1 will not cause a carrier lost at R1. Also, administrative shutdown.is not the solution. I want to automate this because I need to do this repeatedly. Question: Is there any command or other way to cause this at R1 without jittering the cable? Nadeem == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40230t=40230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228]
For a more detailed answer on this I would recommend reading the article at TCPMAG.com . It has a great article from someone who has taken all 3 the 407, 507 and 607. Basically he says the material is the same just the way it's presented is different although he is careful not to break the NDA. Robert -Original Message- From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228] I'm studying for the CCNA test. but should i wait to pick up the Sybex 607 book, or will the 507 book suffice? You guys mention Todd's book. You guys are reffering to the Sybex book right? Also, is the test the same as the 507 but with simulators or did they scrap the entire question list and start a new one? Please help me out... thanks, Jimmy. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40231t=40228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]
What version of CiscoWorks 2000 ( RME 3.3 ...) I have CW2K under Windows 2K and have had no issues other than performance ones. ( performance dropped in comparison to NT4 ) When you say it isn't working, can you be more specific ? Does IE bring up a page not found? Does it bring up a login box ? Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223] Having issues running Cisco Works 2000 on an 2000 server. It was installed but it seems that nothing is working--can't use any functions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40232t=40223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]
I agree with John. The best advice I know to give you would be to put as much memory in the CW2000 station as possible and when accessing the console from the CW2000 station itself, use the IP address of the station in the URL instead of http://127.0.0.1 or http://localhost. Doing those two things resolved most of my issues. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223] It is absolutely necessary to get a support contract for this software. You will probably be making at least two or three calls to TAC to get this working correctly. Save yourself a LOT of trouble by getting software support as soon as possible. If you can successfully get this running without a single call to TAC, I salute you. :-) John Danny 4/2/02 12:26:14 PM Having issues running Cisco Works 2000 on an 2000 server. It was installed but it seems that nothing is working--can't use any functions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40233t=40223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MCNS Boson test [7:40224]
Hello, I used Bernard Omrani's test (#2, I think). I liked the questions, and Bernard replied promptly when I took issue with one of the questions. Alex Ole Drews Jensen wrote: This doesn't answer your question perfectly, but could be a good advise. What I do is to take all the tests, and the one I score the worst in I buy. I also look who wrote the test to see if I recognize a writer from a previous good test. I have not tried the MCNS tests yet, so I cannot give you any recommendations. Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: Sanjay Dalal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MCNS Boson test [7:40224] Does anyone know which test from BOSON is best for MCNS test ? There are three tests available at their site and am wondering which one should i buy ? MCNS #1 MCNS#2 MCNS #3 thanks in advance Sanjay Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40234t=40224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Carrier Lost [7:40230]
Is it an option to insert a device in between those two routers for testing purpses? If it is, I think it would be relatively simple to make a simple device that will act as an electrical switch, that could break the connection. Connect this with some timer (we're talking relatively simple electronics here + it could be computer controlled - see Linux Coffee-HOWTO for details on this). and you can have what you need. Of course, this most probably violates cable standards/recommendations, but this is what you want in the end - errors ;-) Marko. - Original Message - From: PING To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:41:23 -0500 Subject: Carrier Lost [7:40230] If I have a setup: R1 (E3/3)-(E2/3) R2 I want to make R1 think that it has lost the carrier as if I were pulling the cable out at R1 and this message should come up: 1d02h: %AMDP2_FE-5-LOSTCARR: Ehernet3/3 cable/transceiver problem? A line flap by doing shut/no shut at R1 will not cause a carrier lost at R1. Also, administrative shutdown.is not the solution. I want to automate this because I need to do this repeatedly. Question: Is there any command or other way to cause this at R1 without jittering the cable? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40236t=40230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: voip em [7:40225]
Could be echo problems?!? From: Joseph Rago Reply-To: Joseph Rago To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: re: voip em [7:40225] Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:01:51 -0500 I have two 2610 routers, one in new york and one in miami These two routers are connected to pbx via e/m cards. When a call is initiated from miami, a ring back tone is heard before the user picks up the phone. However, when the call is initiated from new york, no ring back tone is heard Any suggestions would be appreciated Joe R. _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40237t=40225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MCNS Boson test [7:40224]
Bernard Omrani is very helpful. I sent him a correction and a question and he answered both. --- Alex Lei wrote: Hello, I used Bernard Omrani's test (#2, I think). I liked the questions, and Bernard replied promptly when I took issue with one of the questions. Alex Ole Drews Jensen wrote: This doesn't answer your question perfectly, but could be a good advise. What I do is to take all the tests, and the one I score the worst in I buy. I also look who wrote the test to see if I recognize a writer from a previous good test. I have not tried the MCNS tests yet, so I cannot give you any recommendations. Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: Sanjay Dalal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MCNS Boson test [7:40224] Does anyone know which test from BOSON is best for MCNS test ? There are three tests available at their site and am wondering which one should i buy ? MCNS #1 MCNS#2 MCNS #3 thanks in advance Sanjay [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40239t=40224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay OSPF [7:40240]
Mocking up a partial mesh frame relay lab running OSPF. Hub router = multipoint subinterface (default OSPF network type = Nonbroadcast) Spoke router = point-to-point subinterface (default OSPF network type = point-to-point) I know that the point-to-point network type setting will cause adjacencies to form and no DR/BDR selection. But why is the adjacency forming between the hub router (OSPF network type = Nonbroadcast) and the spoke router (OSPF network type = pt-to-pt) when there are network type mismatches? 'debug ip ospf adj' shows the hello packets being exchanged with no comoplaints about mismatched parameters. I have searched the CCO website but am not able to find anything explaining this. Can some elaborate please or point me in the right direction. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40240t=40240 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Split horizon [7:40241]
Do RIP and IGRP disable split horizon in a frame relay hub and spoke topology? I have one source that says both do, one that says only RIP and one that says only IGRP. What is the real answer? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40241t=40241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Load-Balancing with 2 providers...Possible?? [7:40242]
Hello, Is it possible to load-balance BGP traffic with 2 service providers...I know it is possible to load balance with 2 circuits to the same provider using ebgp-multihop and update-source and cef but with 2 circuits to 2 different providers?? Thank you for your help. _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40242t=40242 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPSEC question scenario [7:40025]
CCIE (qual)? Is this a new CCIE track? CCIE Quality Control perhaps? Gaz Professor of Urinary Extraction (qual) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Rik, You can include a access-list on your router to permit esp,ahp and UDP port 500 for isakmp Ur access-list should like one given below, access-list acl-name permit esp src_ip dest_ip access-list acl-name permit ahp src_ip dest_ip access-list acl-name permit udp src_ip dest_ip eq isakmp Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Ricky Chan cc: Sent by: Fax to: nobody@groupsSubject: IPSEC question scenario [7:40025] tudy.com 01/04/2002 14:01 Please respond to Ricky Chan Hi all, I have another scenario question and would like to hear from your expertise opinion. machine A 10.10.10.1/24 machine B 10.10.10.2/24 machine c 10.10.100.1/24 I configured IPSEC for all these machines. Machine A can talk to Machine B, but Neither A and B can talk to Machine C. Obviously, Machine C belongs to diff network. If I put a router in between. I need to configure IPSEC in the router in order to let them talk to each other. Do you know how to complish this? Thanks alot. Ricky ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40243t=40025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Split horizon [7:40241]
Split horizon is disabled by default on a Frame point-to-point interfaces/sub-interfaces. There are a few books with huge errors saying that it is enabled on point-to-point interfaces by default. . S0/0 is Frame: Router#sh ip int s0/0 Serial0/0 is down, line protocol is down Internet address is 2.0.0.1/8 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by setup command MTU is 1500 bytes Helper address is not set Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled Multicast reserved groups joined: 224.0.0.9 Outgoing access list is not set Inbound access list is not set Proxy ARP is enabled Security level is default Split horizon is disabled hth -Russ x wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Do RIP and IGRP disable split horizon in a frame relay hub and spoke topology? I have one source that says both do, one that says only RIP and one that says only IGRP. What is the real answer? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40244t=40241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
riverstone [7:40245]
i was curious if anyone is familiar with riverstone and what your opinions are. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40245t=40245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Split horizon [7:40241]
You're not showing the subinterface. On a point-to-point subinterface, split horizon is enabled by default: RCORP#sho ip int s1/0.16 Serial1/0.16 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is 10.8.10.70/24 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by non-volatile memory MTU is 1500 bytes Helper address is not set Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled Multicast reserved groups joined: 224.0.0.10 Outgoing access list is not set Inbound access list is not set Proxy ARP is enabled Security level is default Split horizon is enabled John news.groupstudy.com 4/2/02 3:27:30 PM Split horizon is disabled by default on a Frame point-to-point interfaces/sub-interfaces. There are a few books with huge errors saying that it is enabled on point-to-point interfaces by default. . S0/0 is Frame: Router#sh ip int s0/0 Serial0/0 is down, line protocol is down Internet address is 2.0.0.1/8 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by setup command MTU is 1500 bytes Helper address is not set Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled Multicast reserved groups joined: 224.0.0.9 Outgoing access list is not set Inbound access list is not set Proxy ARP is enabled Security level is default Split horizon is disabled hth -Russ x wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Do RIP and IGRP disable split horizon in a frame relay hub and spoke topology? I have one source that says both do, one that says only RIP and one that says only IGRP. What is the real answer? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40246t=40241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208]
Nice workaround but isn't that a very expensive bridge you just created? Perhaps selling the UBR and getting something cheaper would be a better solution? Cebuano wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, all. This is just a short notice for people on this list that are subscribers of Cox Communications and have been denied the use of the Cisco uBR924 or newer models. I have battled the company's politics in the past when i wanted to connect my uBR924 to their network. I even escalated my request to their Tech. Engineering Dept. in San Diego, only to be told that they no longer support any Cisco cable modems in their database. Alas, after a few months of being quarantined by the likes of Doyle, Halabi and the gang, i was able to spare a few hours to configure my uBR for basic bridging operation (config is on CCO) and call up their local tech support and lied that I wanted to register a Toshiba modem. Gave the tech the MAC and Serial number (thank G~d she did not recognize these as Cisco numbers!!), and in two minutes my unit was provisioned. I hope this message helps one or more list subscribers. Albeit I still believe for most transactions that Honesty is the best policy (hey, I was honest in my quest :- ) Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40238t=40208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208]
Good Job. Sometimes you have to bend the truth to get around the politics. I've had a similar issue with TimeWarner Road Runner and my ubr924. They won't support it in docsis mode and the basic bridging config doesn't seem to work with their setup. For now I am using a 2611 that I bought for my lab. tm Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cebuano Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208] Hi, all. This is just a short notice for people on this list that are subscribers of Cox Communications and have been denied the use of the Cisco uBR924 or newer models. I have battled the company's politics in the past when i wanted to connect my uBR924 to their network. I even escalated my request to their Tech. Engineering Dept. in San Diego, only to be told that they no longer support any Cisco cable modems in their database. Alas, after a few months of being quarantined by the likes of Doyle, Halabi and the gang, i was able to spare a few hours to configure my uBR for basic bridging operation (config is on CCO) and call up their local tech support and lied that I wanted to register a Toshiba modem. Gave the tech the MAC and Serial number (thank G~d she did not recognize these as Cisco numbers!!), and in two minutes my unit was provisioned. I hope this message helps one or more list subscribers. Albeit I still believe for most transactions that Honesty is the best policy (hey, I was honest in my quest :- ) Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40235t=40208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228]
and yes, to those who study Cisco, there is only one Todd. -T Jimmy wrote: I'm studying for the CCNA test. but should i wait to pick up the Sybex 607 book, or will the 507 book suffice? You guys mention Todd's book. You guys are reffering to the Sybex book right? Also, is the test the same as the 507 but with simulators or did they scrap the entire question list and start a new one? Please help me out... thanks, Jimmy. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40247t=40228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: riverstone [7:40245]
I have used them an find them to be good routers. The configuration is a little difference and some basic tasks like modifying and interface can be unnecessarily difficult, but in terms of functionality, they provided what was promised. I had few problems. Review your requirements before you buy one. Unlike Cisco, they do not try to fill every niche. They also had some problems with their BGP code. That seems to be fixed though. Thomas Gainer Kevin Campbell wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... i was curious if anyone is familiar with riverstone and what your opinions are. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40248t=40245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AS-Path Filtering in Confederations? [7:40249]
Can you filter out certain confederations (in the main AS) using AS-Path access-lists? I don't think that it's possible since they are technically in one big main AS. I have also tried it to no avail, but the thing that makes me think it may be able to be done is if I do a show bgp regexp ^$ it shows just my routes local to my confederation, not anyone elses. I've looked on CCO without any luck. Can someone tell me if this is possible or not? Thanks. Example: (65001) - (65002) - (65003) I want to filter so that confederation 65003 does not see any routes that originated in confederation 65001 using AS-Path Access-Lists. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40249t=40249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virtual Lab Software - Opinions? [7:40250]
Has anyone used it. What do you think? Thomas Gainer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40250t=40250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco AS5300 For sale [7:40252]
Cisco AS5300, QUAD E1 Card, 2 x 60MICA modems, perfect condition, pulled from working enviroment, 100mbit and 10mbit ethernet ports, comes with rack kit and powercable. 64meg ram and 16meg Flash. Asking $10,000 AUD Can send worldwide at buyers shipping costs Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40252t=40252 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
Chris, Ignore the MS bashers. There is at least a statement of direction that they will work with MS active directory. I don't know how far along it is. The idea is that when a user logs in the switch will setup the vlan on the port from the users active directory profile. For companies with users on MS platforms (and there are a few out there) this will have some big advantages. Vlan setup will get much easier and vlans will be much more secure. Can any Cisco people out there give us an idea on how far away this is? From: Wow Reply-To: Wow To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:29:27 -0500 brilliant Patrick Ramsey wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Do you really want to trust the management of your core equipment to anything microsoft puts out? Mann, Chris 04/01/02 04:05PM Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from with Microsoft Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried looking on CCO and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them interact, if at all. Thanks, Chris _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40251t=40095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
