password recovery on a Marconi/FORE ASX-200WG switch [7:52912]
9/9/2002 2:22amMonday Has anyone ever done this ? I was able to break in to it @ bootup it looks amazingly like a cisco router but I cannot figure out how to do it. Marconi's web site is actually more usless than Nortel's !!! Thanks, Richard // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52912t=52912 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
password recovery on a Marconi/FORE ASX-200WG switch [7:52913]
9/9/2002 2:22amMonday Has anyone ever done this ? I was able to break in to it @ bootup it looks amazingly like a cisco router but I cannot figure out how to do it. Marconi's web site is actually more usless than Nortel's !!! Thanks, Richard // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52913t=52913 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unicast flooding on switch ports [7:52907]
Well I had an early Cat6k with Sup1 and a software bug which caused the L2 CAM not to populate. Simple software upgrade resolved the problem, been too long for me to recall which CatOS version that would have been. I doubt that's what you're facing, but since you asked for examples :-) First I would suggest you verify the packets you are seeing have unicast MAC destination addresses. Some protocols do use broadcast MAC addresses with Layer3 unicast addresses and this traffic you're observing may well be normal. It's best to understand what you are seeing before jumping to conclusions. Also double check that you aren't SPAN'ing that VLAN to your sniffer... That being said and there is still something to chase. The next thing to do is verify the cam is populated correctly for those endhosts. The cam--content addressable memory is the storage for the layer 2 forwarding tables in these boxes. Without knowing where to forward frames to the switch is forced to flood the frame out each port that is a part of that VLAN, which may be what your sniffer is seeing. For CatOS based use sh cam to view it, issue for the other NT server as well. If a definite dest port isn't listed then you need to look into why. Issue the commands a few times in short succession to see if a destination port is ever learned. It may be that the switch you're attached to isn't keeping a stable cam due to interfaces flapping, STP topology changes(from network design flaw), software bugs, some other device sending frames from those host's MAC addresses, use your imagination. If you need to hook the sniffer up to one of the other switches which carry that VLAN, that may help you narrow the scope of the problem. If you can't see what's wrong provide us the following: -Where are the two NT hosts in question attached to in the diagram you're giving. -What are the specific src/dst mac, ip, and if applicable port numbers of the traffic that you see leaking. -What is the state of the cam's for each of these hosts' mac addresses. It'd be nice for each switch between these hosts. And what device do each of these destinations port represent -Output of sh spant stat Good Luck, Darrell Newcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consultant, Netswitch--Turning your Needs into Results http://www.netswitch.net BTW, Netswitch has been Serving Indonesia since 2000 Hitesh Pathak R wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear Group, I am having a setup like this :- cat6k -- cat6k | | | | | Cat5k| | Cat5k| I am connecting the sniffer on one of my core switches (cat6ks) and without doing port mirroring (SPAN) able to see the unicast packets flow between 2 Windows NT servers. Does this indicate unicast port flooding ??? or is this the default behavior of my Sniffer s/w. I am using Network associates Sniffer s/w. The port where the PC is connected is also in the same vlan in which the Windows NT servers are connected. Both the Servers are connected on the same switch. The servers are Win2k. Has anybody faced a similar problem like this ??? many thanks in advance Hitesh DISCLAIMER: Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52914t=52907 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unicast flooding on switch ports [7:52907]
Hi Hitesh, I feel this traffic could be the replication traffic between the two Win2K server. What are the nature of the two servers? Also if possible edit and paste the output of the sniffer. This would help us decipher what is actually happening. Do you get any such statistics in traffic from A to B server if you put the sniffer on promiscuous mode? Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac Hitesh Pathak R wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear Group, I am having a setup like this :- cat6k -- cat6k | | | | | Cat5k| | Cat5k| I am connecting the sniffer on one of my core switches (cat6ks) and without doing port mirroring (SPAN) able to see the unicast packets flow between 2 Windows NT servers. Does this indicate unicast port flooding ??? or is this the default behavior of my Sniffer s/w. I am using Network associates Sniffer s/w. The port where the PC is connected is also in the same vlan in which the Windows NT servers are connected. Both the Servers are connected on the same switch. The servers are Win2k. Has anybody faced a similar problem like this ??? many thanks in advance Hitesh DISCLAIMER: Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52915t=52907 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help! 65xx L3 switch? [7:52916]
Is this worth it tobe a core L3 Switch?? what else you guys could recommend?..i got 50meg local traffic(internet)! many thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52916t=52916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why my interface keep going up and down?? [7:52917]
Hi... I was checking my syslog server and found that one of the switch's port keep changing states to up and down as shown below?? May I know what is the cause for this? I am sure we didn't plug out the cable at all. By the way, what is 27W5d?? Sep 9 16:11:59 50.100.165.248 12051: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12052: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12053: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12054: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12055: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:26 50.100.165.248 12056: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12057: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12058: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12059: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12060: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52917t=52917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why my interface keep going up and down?? [7:52917]
Hi Sim, Port flapping can occur due to duplex, speed mismatch or some other reason. Check the duplex, speed of the port and the settings on the machine connected to the port Fa0/18 Check if there is an STP loop i your network When did this link flapping start? Show port will show a lot of information and also check for any error on this port. 27W5d is the switch uptime which is 27 weeks and 5 days. Hope this helps. Vamsi Wipro Technologies - Original Message - From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) To: Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: why my interface keep going up and down?? [7:52917] Hi... I was checking my syslog server and found that one of the switch's port keep changing states to up and down as shown below?? May I know what is the cause for this? I am sure we didn't plug out the cable at all. By the way, what is 27W5d?? Sep 9 16:11:59 50.100.165.248 12051: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12052: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12053: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12054: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12055: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:26 50.100.165.248 12056: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12057: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12058: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12059: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12060: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52918t=52917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why my interface keep going up and down?? [7:52917]
Hi Chee Tong 27W5d means that the switch is up 27Weeks and 5 Days. I had a problem similar to this and what I did to resolve it was to make sure that the Switch was hard coded to a port speed instead of Auto. regards Derek - Original Message - From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) To: Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: why my interface keep going up and down?? [7:52917] Hi... I was checking my syslog server and found that one of the switch's port keep changing states to up and down as shown below?? May I know what is the cause for this? I am sure we didn't plug out the cable at all. By the way, what is 27W5d?? Sep 9 16:11:59 50.100.165.248 12051: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12052: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12053: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12054: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12055: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:26 50.100.165.248 12056: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12057: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12058: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12059: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12060: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52919t=52917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE and voice. [7:52860]
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: At 8:56 PM + 9/8/02, Chuck's Long Road wrote: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#45 ) it would be possible for there to be IP phones. However, and again checking CCO ( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/voice_faqs.html#2 ) at present the only phones are analogue. Cisco tends to make announcements as to content changes several months in advance. Until it apears on CCO, all one has is speculation. That information should pretty much tell you how to prepare. Am I reading the info at the URLs correctly: If analog phones are or might be used in the CCIE labs, how would that work? The only thing I can think of is a switch that has an analog DSP with an analog phone plugged into it, or a router that has an FXS or FXO module. Is that right? Who knows, they might even change the name of CCIE R/S to CCAE (Cisco Certified AVVID Expert). Not really, but it sure looks like that cert requires more AVVID at each rev. -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52920t=52860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
Hi all.. Thanks a lot for your great information you provide me..Wish me a luck Kind regards.. Marwa Ismail -Original Message- From: Marwa Ismail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878] Hi all.. I am now trying to take CCIP Certificate, I already took BSCI exam, and I want after that to take the multicast and QOS exam then MPLS specialization.. Can anyone please recommend for me a Cisco Press books for these exams as I am not able to take courses in them,, Thanks a lot.. Kind regards.. Marwa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52921t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dhcp client cisco 2500 [7:52922]
How would I setup my ethernet interface, on my cisco 2500 running IOS 12.06, to grab it's ip info from a dhcp server, or is this impossible? -Jason Yates Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52922t=52922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unicast flooding on switch ports [7:52907]
Have a look here. The quickest fix is to change the ARP timers to 180 seconds. This will be less then the 5 minute CAM timers. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/62.shtml#casestudy8 -- David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: Hitesh Pathak R Dear Group, I am having a setup like this :- cat6k -- cat6k | | | | | Cat5k| | Cat5k| I am connecting the sniffer on one of my core switches (cat6ks) and without doing port mirroring (SPAN) able to see the unicast packets flow between 2 Windows NT servers. Does this indicate unicast port flooding ??? or is this the default behavior of my Sniffer s/w. I am using Network associates Sniffer s/w. The port where the PC is connected is also in the same vlan in which the Windows NT servers are connected. Both the Servers are connected on the same switch. The servers are Win2k. Has anybody faced a similar problem like this ??? many thanks in advance Hitesh DISCLAIMER: Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52923t=52907 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help! 65xx L3 switch? [7:52916]
I'm not clear on what you're asking: Is a $100,000-$500,000 switch worth it for 50MBps of Internet traffic? Retail price on a single Sup-II + MSFC2 + PFC2 is just about $40,000. Add in power supplies, fabric modules, chassis and blades - price goes up quickly. Do you need the redundancy or would a 7200 series router or 3550 switch work? sisco 09/09/02 01:32AM Is this worth it tobe a core L3 Switch?? what else you guys could recommend?..i got 50meg local traffic(internet)! many thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52924t=52916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dhcp client cisco 2500 [7:52922]
Yes it is possible.. I think you are talking about autoinstall. You need at least 12.1(5)T for this. hth, Mark -Original Message- From: Jason Yates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 9 September 2002 22:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dhcp client cisco 2500 [7:52922] How would I setup my ethernet interface, on my cisco 2500 running IOS 12.06, to grab it's ip info from a dhcp server, or is this impossible? -Jason Yates Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52925t=52922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dhcp client cisco 2500 [7:52922]
I don't know about autoinstall, but version 12.2.x will support DHCP... I'm using it to grab my IP from my Cable Provider. Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52926t=52922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help! 65xx L3 switch? [7:52916]
We have many customers doing just that, what is your question, it's hard to ascertain from your post?!? Dave sisco wrote: Is this worth it tobe a core L3 Switch?? what else you guys could recommend?..i got 50meg local traffic(internet)! many thanks! -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52927t=52916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Undeliverable mail--Web. True or False [7:52928]
The following mail can't be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Web. True or False The file is the original mail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52928t=52928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDA Exam [7:52929]
Hi Passed the CCDA exam today. Passed with the highest mark I ever received for a cisco exam. All I can say for prospective exam-takers ... is don't take anything for granted. I didn't and felt sorta relieved with myself that I actually didn't bother to really follow the new exam Guideline List. As always it pays to know more than just the required things. Some questions were absolute classics in my mind. Well that's as much as I can say without violating the NDA. Thanks Manish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52929t=52929 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network Management Sofware [7:52886]
I like the event notifications of Network Performance Monitor better. It allows you to get them by interfaces going up/down as opposed to the entire router. However, the What's Up network mapping feature is nice. In any case, Network Performance Monitor is one of a suite of tools that are all pretty useful. http://www.solarwinds.net/Tools/Engineer/index.htm Albert Lu wrote: Hi, You might want to check out What's Up Gold by IPSwitch. http://www.ipswitch.com/ Regards, Albert Lu CCIE #8705 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Linda Vaughan Beckerling Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Management Sofware [7:52886] Anyone know of some great shareware/freeware or low cost Network management software. To run on win 2000 server/desktop and analyse traffic flows and report link state. We host multiple small business WAN's providing remote office connectivity soutions. HP Open View is prohibitively expensive and Cisco Works will cost the company upwards of $2200 and at this price, my CIO would rather purchase another 1700 router. We are having bandwidth problems (limited bandwidth via 256k leased line). Our ISP is implementing a Lucent AP450 QOS box as a managed solution and it is just compounding the problem. Also, my CIO is concerned that if I implement an IOS based SNMP solution it will add to the protocol overhead. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52930t=52886 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
Hi, Just a small comment: The passing score for MPLS is 867 Do you think IP Quality of Service is enough for the QoS portion? Does it contain really good stuff for the real world or further reading is needed to master QoS? Regards, Yasser From: Lars Bucher hi to prepare i used the following: - MPLS and VPN architectures covers all you need (read all chapters up to and inclusive the ospf chapter). but you really need to understand the content. the passing score is quite high (818) and the exam really tough. i'm quite experienced and found it one of the hardest cisco exams! a colleague of mine, who is ccie and mpls experienced as well, needed 2 attempts... - IP Quality of Service - Developing IP Multicast Networks compare with the cisco exam blueprint to decide which chapters to read. i managed the exam with just these 2 books plus the boson test. take care: it's really a lot of stuff in this exam. also quite tough. but passing score 'only' 720. both exams will be much harder than the bsci... i hope you're not too scared now. good luck and cheers larsMarwa Ismail schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all.. I am now trying to take CCIP Certificate, I already took BSCI exam, and I want after that to take the multicast and QOS exam then MPLS specialization.. Can anyone please recommend for me a Cisco Press books for these exams as I am not able to take courses in them,, Thanks a lot.. Kind regards.. Marwa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52882t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52911t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UDP packets [7:52931]
Hi, Since I didn't get reply for the earlier one, Sorry to resend it again: I am using a router 7500 with ATM interface to manage an ATM device.The management s/w is run from a Sun solaris 2.8 .Each of the packet size is on an average 160 bytes.The device can be configured for managing on LAN as well as on ATM.When the device is configured for managing in the LAN,everything goes fine and none of the UDP packets gets lost.But when the device is configured for managing in ATM I see lot of ICMP redirects come from 7500.The UDP packets doesn't even reach the device.Also I noticed that the maximum packet send to the device when managed on the LAN is 2.7KBytes/sec and when configured for managing on the ATM, the maximum packet send to the device is 2.1KBytes/sec. I am so confused after looking at the sniffer output. When Managed for ATM (The device configured for ATM): 1)why ICMP redirects occurs from the router 7500 which is one reason for the UDP loss. 2)I see sometimes BAD UDP checksum on the sniffer o/p from the device. 3)Why the maximum packets send from the management station is 2.1 KBytes/sec only which is less than when the device is configured for management on the LAN side? 4)Is there a way to avoid this on the router end?Some configuration changes??? 5)For the management application which is running on the solaris does it matter LAN management and ATM management?If not, why the difference in Maximumm packets send differs in both?If yes, anybody can explain how?? I appreciate if anybody can throw some light into this.Spending considerable amount of time to troubleshoot this . Thanks, GP __ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52931t=52931 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
YASSER ALY wrote: Do you think IP Quality of Service is enough for the QoS portion? Take a look at the Q Book: http://cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/index.htm http://cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/qcfbook.pdf Comparing the TOC of the Q Book to the QoS part of the MCAST+QOS exam blueprint, there's a close correspondence, even better than the book by Vegesna. -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52932t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Swap [7:52933]
Hi, I need an SJ date between 10/28 and 11/3. If you have a date available, and don't quite feel comfortable with Token Ring, IPX, and IGRP, then I have a 11/18 date in SJ to offer you (these topics, among others, will be dropped on 11/4). Please email me directly. Thanks! Eddie __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52933t=52933 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reserving Bandwidth for a subnet [7:52935]
Hi, I would like to ask everybody what mechanism you suggest in order to reserve a fixed amount of bandwidth within a serial interface? I was checking class and policy maps and I also notice de bandwidth and priority commands but I would like to ask anyone who has done this configuration before. The scenario is, we have a customer with subnet x.x.x.x/24 and I need to reserve a fixed bandwidth to this customer and have it available even in times of severe congestion, and if there's availablity give them certain burst. In advanced, I wanna thank anybody who shares ideas, best regards ... Silvio from Nicaragua Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52935t=52935 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice suggestion needed [7:52936]
hi group To a person that does not have much voice background, which is a better course to take, the CIPT or CVoice? I need to write the several Voice Specialization test eventually. And how about the unity course? is that any good? _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52936t=52936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Support exam [7:52727]
I had a similer experience, I showed up to the exam and was suprised by the vagueness by the first 10 or 15 questions. I reset my brain to using the test as a study preperation to come back the next day and focused on picking answers that felt good subconciously. There was way too much Token Ring on mine. Test was done and it surprised me that I passed by more than a bit. I guess the change in focus and mentality calmed me down and reassured me that I knew most of the answers at hand. Good luck dude. If at first you dont succeed, you will get a lot of advice afterwards. From: John McCartney Reply-To: John McCartney To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Support exam [7:52727] Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 21:07:22 GMT Well I just got back from taking the test and failed by six points!! What a bummer, now its time to regroup and study some more and re-take the exam in a month. The questions were very different from what I expected, ie very vague as to what they were asking. Oh well, know Appletalk - that's what got me. HTH's _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52939t=52727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
Hi Ok, then the mpls passing score must have changed ;-) (817 was in March, 2002) Actually, the IP Quality of Service book is one of the weaker ciscopress books (I would describe it as chaotic) and doesn't cover all topics from the blueprint. However, I managed the exam with just this book plus some cisco webpages about NBAR (just to get the idea). On the other side, the Multicast book is well structured and written in a 'user-friendly' style (one of the best cisco books). You'll definitely enjoy this book. In my opinion, the QoS book is a good start for the real world. If you want to know more about a topic, then the cisco homepage is a good source. Unfortunately, I don't know whether there are better books out there. A colleague of mine, who took the QoS course described the course books as very valuable at least for exam preparation. hope this helps lars YASSER ALY schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Just a small comment: The passing score for MPLS is 867 Do you think IP Quality of Service is enough for the QoS portion? Does it contain really good stuff for the real world or further reading is needed to master QoS? Regards, Yasser From: Lars Bucher hi to prepare i used the following: - MPLS and VPN architectures covers all you need (read all chapters up to and inclusive the ospf chapter). but you really need to understand the content. the passing score is quite high (818) and the exam really tough. i'm quite experienced and found it one of the hardest cisco exams! a colleague of mine, who is ccie and mpls experienced as well, needed 2 attempts... - IP Quality of Service - Developing IP Multicast Networks compare with the cisco exam blueprint to decide which chapters to read. i managed the exam with just these 2 books plus the boson test. take care: it's really a lot of stuff in this exam. also quite tough. but passing score 'only' 720. both exams will be much harder than the bsci... i hope you're not too scared now. good luck and cheers larsMarwa Ismail schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all.. I am now trying to take CCIP Certificate, I already took BSCI exam, and I want after that to take the multicast and QOS exam then MPLS specialization.. Can anyone please recommend for me a Cisco Press books for these exams as I am not able to take courses in them,, Thanks a lot.. Kind regards.. Marwa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52882t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52934t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why my interface keep going up and down?? [7:52917]
hard code the port speed and duplex on your switch thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi... I was checking my syslog server and found that one of the switch's port keep changing states to up and down as shown below?? May I know what is the cause for this? I am sure we didn't plug out the cable at all. By the way, what is 27W5d?? Sep 9 16:11:59 50.100.165.248 12051: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12052: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:02 50.100.165.248 12053: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12054: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:20 50.100.165.248 12055: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:26 50.100.165.248 12056: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12057: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to down Sep 9 16:12:30 50.100.165.248 12058: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12059: 27w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/18, c hanged state to up Sep 9 16:12:34 50.100.165.248 12060: 27w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interfa ce FastEthernet0/18, changed state to up == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52937t=52917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
Thats the book I used when I passed. I also had lots of hands on with QoS, and that always helps. I would buy both available cisco press books regarding MPLS if you choose to go that path. I also did the Optical Elective. That was very very hard, good luck on that road. --- Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net (217) 557-6555 -Original Message- From: YASSER ALY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878] Hi, Just a small comment: The passing score for MPLS is 867 Do you think IP Quality of Service is enough for the QoS portion? Does it contain really good stuff for the real world or further reading is needed to master QoS? Regards, Yasser From: Lars Bucher hi to prepare i used the following: - MPLS and VPN architectures covers all you need (read all chapters up to and inclusive the ospf chapter). but you really need to understand the content. the passing score is quite high (818) and the exam really tough. i'm quite experienced and found it one of the hardest cisco exams! a colleague of mine, who is ccie and mpls experienced as well, needed 2 attempts... - IP Quality of Service - Developing IP Multicast Networks compare with the cisco exam blueprint to decide which chapters to read. i managed the exam with just these 2 books plus the boson test. take care: it's really a lot of stuff in this exam. also quite tough. but passing score 'only' 720. both exams will be much harder than the bsci... i hope you're not too scared now. good luck and cheers larsMarwa Ismail schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all.. I am now trying to take CCIP Certificate, I already took BSCI exam, and I want after that to take the multicast and QOS exam then MPLS specialization.. Can anyone please recommend for me a Cisco Press books for these exams as I am not able to take courses in them,, Thanks a lot.. Kind regards.. Marwa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52882t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52938t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
A search on Amazon for Cisco and QoS turned up two books that will be published in Dec '02 and Jan '03. Most likely they will be closer to the course material. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52940t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: password recovery on a Marconi/FORE ASX-200WG switch [7:52941]
Richard, Once the switch boots up you should be able to use the AMI account to get in without a password. It's a whole lot like the C5k on bootup and password recovery. You just need to use the account AMI on login. Nigel From: nettable_walker Reply-To: nettable_walker To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: password recovery on a Marconi/FORE ASX-200WG switch [7:52912] Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:31:43 GMT 9/9/2002 2:22am Monday Has anyone ever done this ? I was able to break in to it @ bootup it looks amazingly like a cisco router but I cannot figure out how to do it. Marconi's web site is actually more usless than Nortel's !!! Thanks, Richard // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52912t=52912 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52941t=52941 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 4507 [7:52942]
I was playing around on the Configurator this morning pricing out a design I am doing and saw Cisco is now offering the 4507R. Its a 7 Slot 4006 set for Redundant Supe's. Looked wild but I am going to wait on sticking it in my designs until they work out the bugs... Any thoughts? ---Michael _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52942t=52942 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Router Simulation [7:52944]
Has anyone used the router simulation software from RouterSim? Just wanted some feedback. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52944t=52944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Swapping Procedures?? [7:52945]
Hey List, If I was to swap lab dates with someone, how would we go about it in a secure way? That is, a more reliable way than just timing it to do it via the online interface. I was looking on Cisco's site, and I could only find email correspondence for any CCIE-related questions. Is there a live operator I can speak to? If so, does anyone know the number? Please email me directly, if you can. Thanks! Eddie __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52945t=52945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Callmanager installation [7:52946]
I tried to install Callmanager 2.4.5 on a Windows 2000 Server with SQL Server 7 (upgraded to SP4). And when I launch setup, it says that I need Service Pack 4 at least for Y2k updates. What does it mean ? Service Pack for what ? thanks for help. -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52946t=52946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 4507 [7:52942]
It kinda seems like a little 6500. I don't know that it will be too bug riddled though, nothing radically new here just some of the features of it's big brother. Question is how do I justify getting one in the lab!! Dave Michael Greenbaum wrote: I was playing around on the Configurator this morning pricing out a design I am doing and saw Cisco is now offering the 4507R. Its a 7 Slot 4006 set for Redundant Supe's. Looked wild but I am going to wait on sticking it in my designs until they work out the bugs... Any thoughts? ---Michael _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52947t=52942 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Callmanager installation [7:52946]
Look on the Windows/Microsoft Web site for Windows NT4 Updates Service Pack 6A (its a lot of updates for Windows NT). Install the service pack re-boot the machine, install Callmanager and Voila! Karl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephane LITKOWSKI Sent: 09 September 2002 20:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Callmanager installation [7:52946] I tried to install Callmanager 2.4.5 on a Windows 2000 Server with SQL Server 7 (upgraded to SP4). And when I launch setup, it says that I need Service Pack 4 at least for Y2k updates. What does it mean ? Service Pack for what ? thanks for help. -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52948t=52946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice suggestion needed [7:52936]
1) CIPT is very product specific, relates almost entirely to Cisco Call Manager 2) CVOICE is Cisco VoX; dial-peers, VoIP, VoATM, VoFR, some QoS, some minor VoIP hardware product knowledge. 3) IPTT is all about troubleshooting CIsco IPT products (CCM, Unity, VoIP) 4) DQoS is all QoS, inside and out 5) CuSE and CuSA exams are similar to CIPT, but relate to Unity, also covers MS Exchange, and AD I would start with the exam that covers information you are most familiar with. Most of the Cisco Voice relate exams assume hands on product knowledge, without that hands on knowledge, the exams are 3 or 4 times harder. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: . . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice suggestion needed [7:52936] hi group To a person that does not have much voice background, which is a better course to take, the CIPT or CVoice? I need to write the several Voice Specialization test eventually. And how about the unity course? is that any good? _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52951t=52936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Callmanager installation [7:52946]
Stephane, CCM 2.4 was designed for Windows NT 4, and so you may be getting a bogus error. I believe it is asking for Win2k sp4, but I don't think there is a Win2k sp4 yet, they just released sp3 a few weeks ago. If you are attempting to learn Call Manager, I wouldn't waste my time with CCM 2.4 it is entirely different that CCM 3.x tim Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Stephane LITKOWSKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Callmanager installation [7:52946] I tried to install Callmanager 2.4.5 on a Windows 2000 Server with SQL Server 7 (upgraded to SP4). And when I launch setup, it says that I need Service Pack 4 at least for Y2k updates. What does it mean ? Service Pack for what ? thanks for help. -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52952t=52946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network design question [7:52762]
Intermediate Distribution Facility. Usually where your Access Layer switches reside. Jeff - Original Message - From: Tunji Suleiman To: ; Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:02 AM Subject: Re: network design question [7:52762] Hi Jeff Duchin, pls what's IDF? Regards From: Jeff D Reply-To: Jeff D To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: network design question [7:52762] Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:11:16 GMT How many users per IDF? Jeff John Brandis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports. Hoever, like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and to plan for VOIP in a few months time. My topology looked like [Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006] / \ / \ / \/ \ / \ / \ [Cat2950][Cat2950] [Cat2950][cat2950] and would extend out another level That kind of worked for 460 ports: Would this design work: [---Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006-] Floor Closet-Level 3 (core room) / \ / \ / \/ \ / \ / \ [Cat2950]--[Cat2950]---[Cat2950] [Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950] Floor Closet-Level 1 Floor Closet-Level 2 All links back to the core, are fibre connecting to a GBIC on the core 4006. The link between each cat 2950, is also fibre connecting to a GBIC port. Would this design work as my core-distribution model, or would it be better just to have the just 2 switchs at my dist layer ? Thanks for your time. John Sydney Australia ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52953t=52762 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reserving bandwidth [7:52954]
Hi everybody!!! I have a simple question, what techniques can I use in order to configure bandwidth reservation in serial interfaces? I want to match an extended access list, representing the interesting traffic. What I want to do is to reserve a minimun bandwidth for this customer, even if the serial interface is experiencing severe congestion problems ... thanks to everybody in advanced ... SM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52954t=52954 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Partitioned areas [7:52955]
Greetings guys, Is it possible to find out if an area is partitioned by using OSPF commands? Thanks...Nabil I have never let my schooling interfere with my education. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52955t=52955 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPX and Timers [7:52850]
hy here are the cisco statement. Regards Philipp ipx hold-time eigrp To specify the length of time a neighbor should consider IPX enhanced IGRP hello packets valid, use the ipx hold-time eigrp interface configuration command. To restore the default time, use the no form of this command. ipx hold-time eigrp autonomous-system-number seconds no ipx hold-time eigrp autonomous-system-number seconds Syntax Description autonomous-system-numberIPX enhanced IGRP autonomous system number. It can be a decimal integer from 1 to 65535. seconds Hold time, in seconds. The hold time is advertised in hello packets and indicates to neighbors the length of time they should consider the sender valid. The default hold time is 15 seconds, which is three times the hello interval. Default 15 seconds Command Mode Interface configuration Usage Guidelines If the current value for the hold time is less than two times the interval between hello packets, the hold time will be reset to three times the hello interval. If a router does not receive a hello packet within the specified hold time, routes through the router are considered available. Increasing the hold time delays route convergence across the network. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hello Goodbye Sent: Montag, 9. September 2002 06:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IPX and Timers [7:52850] I tried to update just one of the ipx eigrp timers and found the other did not update as well. I'm not thinking that this can be done in eigrp. I just dont see how they would ever synchronize in eigrp. With IPX RIP you can change the update interval and the time it takes the route to be marked invalid will update with this. You can change the ratio with the ipx rip-multiplier command. I have been unable to figure anything like this out for eigrp. Where did you read or hear otherwise? Ben --- hagedorn wrote: Hy I also know on my Lab , and i already tryed out to have the same timers on al interfaces within the AS, but no success. I created a very small AS. Router---Et0Et1---Router the whole is ipx router eig 200 , ipx network 100 ipx rip is off But it still do not synchronize the ipx timers. What I do wrong?? Regards philipp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hello Goodbye Sent: Samstag, 7. September 2002 20:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPX and Timers [7:52850] First, have you made sure that all the hello and hold times are the same on all interfaces on all routers in the AS. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1908.htm#xtocid15 The default hold time is 3 times the hello time. Is there any reason to not keep this relationship? I'm going to play with this in my lab this weekend to verify that all the timers need to be set the same but I have a feeling that DUAL will get messed up if they are not. Ben --- hagedorn wrote: Hy guys I have a problem with the IPX timers, if I would change the IPX eigrp hold-time , I can do this with ipx hold-time inteval ... command, other possibility is to change the ipx hello interval , that should work but in all the possibility that I tryed out it will not work. Ciscos statement is if the hold time is smaller then twice a hello interval , the timers should be synchronize. ( will not work ) any ideas are VERY welcome. Other if i change the Hold time of 60 seconds on a ethernet , the ipx hello interval will stay on 5 seconds , no synch?? now if someone cxan help me to get this question answered , that would be super. Regards Philipp PS: Already tryed several IOS version. Not work [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52956t=52850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple ISDN dialups - 256k channel - advise need [7:52719]
I haven't actually done this in production, but at various times when testing, I have noticed that if you have multiple dialer strings on the one dialer interface, the first string will be dialled, and then if that fails, the second string will be dialled, and so on. I suspect that what you want to do would work, although I doubt it would load balance between the two numbers - I think it would normally dial the first number, and only dial the second number if the first one failed (or is engaged?) Hope that helps, JMcL Andrew Larkins wrote: Hi all, I am just testing the theory here to see if this is possible. I have a remote site with 2x ISDN BRI and a central site with 2x ISDN BRI. These BRI's are backing up a dedicated 256k point to point link. I have dialer interfaces created on both sites with the physical BRI's being members of dialer pools. ISDN backup works great. Question: I need to add a second BRI to this group. I assign the interface to the dialer pool. Each of these BRI's on the central site have different ISDN telephone numbers. In order to get ALL these channels (4x 64k) dialed up in the event of a failure, can I add another dialer string to the remote site dialer interface?? If so will it load balance ???. The other alternative I have is that the Telco can assign both numbers to a hunt group, but I do not really want to have this right now. I have left out the ppp multilink and dialer load threshold commands on purpose. Current confis below. Central site: interface BRI3/0 no ip address dialer pool-member 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI3/1 no ip address dialer pool-member 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Dialer1 description ISDN Backup bandwidth 56 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer remote-name xx dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap end Remote site: interface BRI0/0 no ip address dialer pool-member 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 New isdn still to be added but the concept remains the same as above interface Dialer1 description ISDN Backup bandwidth 56 ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer remote-name y dialer string 222 (not the real one) dialer string 333 (is this correct???) dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap Thanks in advance Andrew Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52957t=52719 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home lab [7:52958]
i'm planning to build my home lab, does any one know how can i have a comm-server : from which i will be able to access to all lab devices? thx in advance Mounir CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52958t=52958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN load-interval [7:52851]
It's not specific to ISDN. By default, when you do a show int, you will see a 5 minute input rate and 5 minute output rate. The load figures are calculated over five minutes (I believe it's an exponentially decaying algorithm or something similar, not a straight average). These load figures are used in conjunction with dialer load-threshold to determine when to bring up (or drop) another ISDN channel. Now, you might want your ISDN channels to react more quickly to changes in load. In that case, you can set the load-interval to something shorter (e.g. 30 seconds). When you do a show int you will now see that a 30 second input rate. The load figure will react more quickly if the load suddenly increases, and your ISDN channel will be brought up more quickly. There's a good explanation in the command reference - http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/fun_r/frprt3/frd3003.htm#xtocid2298117 (watch the wrap). JMcL hagedorn wrote: Hy can someone exlpain me for what the load-interval in isdn is. any comments are welcome. Regards Philipp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52959t=52851 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: home lab [7:52958]
Hey, All you need is a 2511 with 2 octal cables and you are on your way... gnaoui wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... i'm planning to build my home lab, does any one know how can i have a comm-server : from which i will be able to access to all lab devices? thx in advance Mounir CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52960t=52958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QOS ?? help needed [7:52961]
Hi Group, i am having problems to solve the following scenario. kabelmodem-(E0)router2501(E1) - witch - win2k-pro (private address range) ( internetaddress )( using - win2k-server (private address range) i want to prefer udp-packets with port xxx over all other traffic (specially http) (leaving the win2k-pro in direction to kabel-modem, with all other traffic i mean traffic from win2k-pro and win2k-server, specially http) is this possible? i tried priority-queueing: priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 120 priority-list 1 protocol ip normal priority-list 1 protocol ip low tcp www access-list 120 permit udp host 10.0.0.2 any range int e 0 priority-group 1 but the result wasn' t efficient. also i tried route-maps with precedence flash-override as high and routine as low, but i dont know whether it is the right way solving the prob nor the configuration works. i was searching on the cco and trying to solve the problem for many hours. i need your help. any suggestions? in advanced, i wanna thank anybody who shares ideas and helps me out best regards andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52961t=52961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internal Users ping through a PIX [7:52962]
Ok guys I am on my last leg with this one I seen a ton of examples but can't seem to get it working what am I doing wrong here. All I want is my internal users to be able to ping through the firewall to the net, but external users not be able to ping. Here is the last example I used that does not work. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/single-net.shtml !--- Create an access-list to allow pings out and the return packets back in. access-list 100 permit icmp any any echo-reply access-list 100 permit icmp any any time-exceeded access-list 100 permit icmp any any unreachable !--- Apply access-list 100 to the outside interface. access-group 100 in interface outside pixfirewall# sh version Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.1(3) I appreciate your help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52962t=52962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Callmanager installation [7:52946]
Tim, Stephane, We had the same problem when installing CCM 2.4.5 on our Win2k server in the Academy lab. It appeared that the installation aborted when it gave us the message about the Service Pack, although it may only have been a warning / bogus message, not an abort. In any case, we're going to start again tomorrow and we'll see where it takes us. The reason we had to start with 2.4.5 was simply that all the later versions were updates. The only full installation, not an update, was 2.4.5. If there is a later version that we can begin with, please specify what it is. We have access to all versions through our site license. -- TIA, TT Original Message Subject: RE: Callmanager installation [7:52946] Date: 9 Sep 2002 22:07:45 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Medley) Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Stephane, CCM 2.4 was designed for Windows NT 4, and so you may be getting a bogus error. I believe it is asking for Win2k sp4, but I don't think there is a Win2k sp4 yet, they just released sp3 a few weeks ago. If you are attempting to learn Call Manager, I wouldn't waste my time with CCM 2.4 it is entirely different that CCM 3.x tim Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Stephane LITKOWSKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Callmanager installation [7:52946] I tried to install Callmanager 2.4.5 on a Windows 2000 Server with SQL Server 7 (upgraded to SP4). And when I launch setup, it says that I need Service Pack 4 at least for Y2k updates. What does it mean ? Service Pack for what ? thanks for help. -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52963t=52946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tr: QOS ?? help needed [7:52961]
Andy, This is a problem for Q Man! (whoever and wherever he is) But seriously, maybe we could work this one out on the list. May I suggest that you use the modular QoS CLI. This involves three steps: First, classify the packets using ACLs and the class-map command. Second, apply actions to the class using the policy-map command. Third, attach the policy to an interface (input or output). Fourth, enjoy your network. Anyone else want to take it from there? -- TT Original Message Subject: QOS ?? help needed [7:52961] Date: 10 Sep 2002 00:17:37 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (crow) Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Hi Group, i am having problems to solve the following scenario. kabelmodem-(E0)router2501(E1) - witch - win2k-pro (private address range) ( internetaddress )( using - win2k-server (private address range) i want to prefer udp-packets with port xxx over all other traffic (specially http) (leaving the win2k-pro in direction to kabel-modem, with all other traffic i mean traffic from win2k-pro and win2k-server, specially http) is this possible? i tried priority-queueing: priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 120 priority-list 1 protocol ip normal priority-list 1 protocol ip low tcp www access-list 120 permit udp host 10.0.0.2 any range int e 0 priority-group 1 but the result wasn' t efficient. also i tried route-maps with precedence flash-override as high and routine as low, but i dont know whether it is the right way solving the prob nor the configuration works. i was searching on the cco and trying to solve the problem for many hours. i need your help. any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52964t=52961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internal Users ping through a PIX [7:52962]
Are you applying it to the incoming traffic or outbound traffic? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Elijah Savage III Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Internal Users ping through a PIX [7:52962] Ok guys I am on my last leg with this one I seen a ton of examples but can't seem to get it working what am I doing wrong here. All I want is my internal users to be able to ping through the firewall to the net, but external users not be able to ping. Here is the last example I used that does not work. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/single-net.shtml !--- Create an access-list to allow pings out and the return packets back in. access-list 100 permit icmp any any echo-reply access-list 100 permit icmp any any time-exceeded access-list 100 permit icmp any any unreachable !--- Apply access-list 100 to the outside interface. access-group 100 in interface outside pixfirewall# sh version Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.1(3) I appreciate your help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52965t=52962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internal Users ping through a PIX [7:52962]
What is on your internal interface access-list wise ? Do you have an access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo ? You must permit the ICMP echo through the inside, and the echo-reply through the outside... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Internal Users ping through a PIX [7:52962] Ok guys I am on my last leg with this one I seen a ton of examples but can't seem to get it working what am I doing wrong here. All I want is my internal users to be able to ping through the firewall to the net, but external users not be able to ping. Here is the last example I used that does not work. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/single-net.shtml !--- Create an access-list to allow pings out and the return packets back in. access-list 100 permit icmp any any echo-reply access-list 100 permit icmp any any time-exceeded access-list 100 permit icmp any any unreachable !--- Apply access-list 100 to the outside interface. access-group 100 in interface outside pixfirewall# sh version Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.1(3) I appreciate your help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52966t=52962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice suggestion needed [7:52936]
My opinion is that if you have to choice only one between CIPT y CVOICE , could be more conveniente to take CIPT due to IP Telephony (CallManager,IP Telephones, Gateways ,etc )is a field with more perspectives of future expecially thinking that is cheaper than PBX , more ductile and largely deployable . And otherwise its logica could be harder to study by yourself. Christian Narvaez [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCNP Voice Specialized -- Mensaje Original -- hi group To a person that does not have much voice background, which is a better course to take, the CIPT or CVoice? I need to write the several Voice Specialization test eventually. And how about the unity course? is that any good? _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52967t=52936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internal Users ping through a PIX [7:52962]
The access-list is correct. There is something else that is going on. Use debug icmp trace to troubleshoot... How do you test this access-list? What are you trying to ping? -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elijah Savage III Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Internal Users ping through a PIX [7:52962] Ok guys I am on my last leg with this one I seen a ton of examples but can't seem to get it working what am I doing wrong here. All I want is my internal users to be able to ping through the firewall to the net, but external users not be able to ping. Here is the last example I used that does not work. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/single-net.shtml !--- Create an access-list to allow pings out and the return packets back in. access-list 100 permit icmp any any echo-reply access-list 100 permit icmp any any time-exceeded access-list 100 permit icmp any any unreachable !--- Apply access-list 100 to the outside interface. access-group 100 in interface outside pixfirewall# sh version Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.1(3) I appreciate your help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52968t=52962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why my 5505 switch doesn't log to syslog?? [7:52969]
Hi.. I have a catalyst 5505 switch and I had type in the following command set logging server 100.100.100.10 set logging server enable set logging server facility LOCAL4 set logging server severity 7 But it end up with the following config. I don't know why it has so many entries. Besides, there is no config showing the command set logging severity 7 that I have typed. And I can't clear those extra by the command i.e. clear logging level cdp 4 default #syslog set logging console enable set logging server enable set logging server 100.100.100.10 set logging level cdp 4 default set logging level mcast 2 default set logging level dtp 5 default set logging level dvlan 2 default set logging level earl 2 default set logging level fddi 2 default set logging level ip 2 default set logging level pruning 2 default set logging level snmp 2 default set logging level spantree 2 default set logging level sys 5 default set logging level tac 2 default set logging level tcp 2 default set logging level telnet 2 default set logging level tftp 2 default set logging level vtp 2 default set logging level vmps 2 default set logging level kernel 2 default set logging level filesys 2 default set logging level drip 2 default set logging level pagp 5 default set logging level mgmt 5 default set logging level mls 5 default set logging level protfilt 2 default set logging level security 2 default set logging level radius 2 default set logging level udld 4 default set logging level gvrp 2 default set logging server facility LOCAL4 ! But for the other switch , it is working. Why they are different ?? #syslog set logging server enable set logging server 100.100.100.10 set logging server facility LOCAL4 set logging server severity 7 ! Thanks in advanced == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52969t=52969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why my 5505 switch doesn't log to syslog?? [7:52970]
Hi.. sorry me again, I found I can log to my syslog server now, but I want to know when I change a port from speed 100 to auto, the syslog server only record part of the log as shown below, it doesn't record port2/8 speed set to auto ?? why ??? Cat55-L7-1 (enable) set port speed 2/8 auto 2002 Sep 10 14:02:00 Singapore +08:00 %SYS-6-CFG_CHG:Module 2 block changed by telnet/100.1 00.100.9/ Port(s) 2/8 speed set to auto detect. [root@syslog rabo]# Sep 10 12:48:11 cat557.sin.ap.rabobank.com 2002 Sep 10 14:02:00 Singapore +08:00 %SYS-6-CFG_CHG:Module 2 block changed by teln et/100.100.100.9/ [root@syslog rabo]# -Original Message- From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:36 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: why my 5505 switch doesn't log to syslog?? Hi.. I have a catalyst 5505 switch and I had type in the following command set logging server 100.100.100.10 set logging server enable set logging server facility LOCAL4 set logging server severity 7 But it end up with the following config. I don't know why it has so many entries. Besides, there is no config showing the command set logging severity 7 that I have typed. And I can't clear those extra by the command i.e. clear logging level cdp 4 default #syslog set logging console enable set logging server enable set logging server 100.100.100.10 set logging level cdp 4 default set logging level mcast 2 default set logging level dtp 5 default set logging level dvlan 2 default set logging level earl 2 default set logging level fddi 2 default set logging level ip 2 default set logging level pruning 2 default set logging level snmp 2 default set logging level spantree 2 default set logging level sys 5 default set logging level tac 2 default set logging level tcp 2 default set logging level telnet 2 default set logging level tftp 2 default set logging level vtp 2 default set logging level vmps 2 default set logging level kernel 2 default set logging level filesys 2 default set logging level drip 2 default set logging level pagp 5 default set logging level mgmt 5 default set logging level mls 5 default set logging level protfilt 2 default set logging level security 2 default set logging level radius 2 default set logging level udld 4 default set logging level gvrp 2 default set logging server facility LOCAL4 ! But for the other switch , it is working. Why they are different ?? #syslog set logging server enable set logging server 100.100.100.10 set logging server facility LOCAL4 set logging server severity 7 ! Thanks in advanced == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52970t=52970 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
