Re: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Please state your intentions for configuring it this way. Are you configuring inter-VLAN routing? EtherChannel? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66114&t=66072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network Management Software whats hot and whats not [7:66113]
For a network this size, check out Solarwinds for management and MRTG for trending. HTH Dom Stocqueler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Penrose Sent: 24 March 2003 23:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Management Software whats hot and whats not [7:66099] Does anyone have any good advice on choice of network management/monitoring software? I am looking to monitor roughly 25 servers 20 routers (mostly VPN to a 3000 Concentrator) 8 or so pix firewalls and various other switches and network devices. I have tried the Cisco works ver 6.0 eval and although it is a few thousand pounds cheaper than cisco works I have not been that impressed with the interface or functionality. Monitoring is going to be the main function but it would be nice to have some diagnostics tools and config delivery also. Considering the WAN is fairly small does anyone have any suggestions? Regards Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66113&t=66113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: This is even better - RIP / OSPF redistributio [7:66057]
I concur with Henry D. Sometimes, the CCIE lab would ask you to do fairly "stupid" or unconventional things just so they'll know that you master that particular subject. In the CCIE practice lab example you provided, the author was probably trying to test your ability to redistribute between OSPF and RIP (and probably solve some routing issues especially if it's RIPv1), and your ability to block the routes efficiently and with the least number of commands. When I took my lab, I keep muttering to myself "I can do this scenario much more efficiently than what it's asking me to do". But hey, it's their test questions and you have to comply to pass it. Can't argue with that fact. ;-) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66116&t=66057 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Juli, Turn off span-tree on the 3550 and see if the port goes into forwarding...if so the IBM is doing some type of bridging with spanning tree.. Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Juli Hato To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:06 PM Subject: Re: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072] Hi larry and all first I'd like to thank you for your quick response. Hm..the router we have is IBM 2210 series. How to know that the router is configured and running STP. What bout I turn off the STP from the Catalyst 3550. What is blade center. Sorry for my silly questions. Thanks in advance Best Regardss, HATO >From: "Larry Letterman" >Reply-To: "Larry Letterman" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072] >Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:49:47 GMT > >sounds like the router you have is a switch running spanning tree...if >thats >the case, then turn off span-tree on the IBM >device..is that device a Blade center server? > >Larry Letterman >Network Engineer >Cisco Systems > > > - Original Message - > From: Juli Hato > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:56 AM > Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072] > > > Hi all, > > I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to > Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect >to > the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the > Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet ports from >the > IBM router active. How to counteract with this. Thank you in advance. > > Best Regards, > HATO > > > > > > _ > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66118&t=66072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107]
I think someone changed the name to grouppolitics -Original Message- From: Biff Terrific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 04:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107] Is this on the new CCIE written? I don't remember this from CCNP. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66119&t=66107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
I dont think it supports the routing functions.. I believe the 3550 with EMI supports the routing... However I may be wrong... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Brian Carroll To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:55 PM Subject: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] S! ALL! I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work at the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS capabilities? I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. Prayers for me would not be refused either :) S! (Salute!) Brian Carroll CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66117&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127]
Hi all, i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected only and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please tell me the caveat of using ebgp multihop for ISP envy. Any comments would be appreciated. regards hendro mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66127&t=66127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Farm Site [7:66090]
Look ok to me, just a pity that there isnt a CIP card for the 6509 chassis :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This is a network requirement: > > It is a Farm Site, with Channel interfaces, connection to > Mainframe (OSA > FETCH and OSA ATM), > 215 other server (Windows 2000 and Unix) and 31 serial > interfaces. > > There will be one 10 Mbps ATM PVCs to each big site (5 PVCs > total) and > 1Mbps serial links to small sites (31 sites). > > The idea was using a 6509 with FlexWan and ATM interfaces to > provide high > access to the most high speed requirement corporate sites. The > 6509 would > also provide 215 FaEthernet interfaces to the servers. For > small office, > routers 7507 would be used. The 7507 would also provide > interfaces to the > Channels and to the OSA interfaces of a Mainframe. > > > Corporate Sites ATM Cloud-- 6509 com FlexWan e PA ATM > ---215 > FastEthernet interfaces > || > || > | > 7507 15 serial > interfaces > | | > |_channel > CX-CIP2-ECAP1 > | > |__to OSA > FETCH > | > | > > 7507---16 serial > interfaces > | > |_channel > CX-CIP2-ECAP1 > > |__to OSA ATM > > Redundancy is not a concernment. Its is a mirror site and will > be used > during the recovery time of the main Farm site > > Any Thought ? > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66124&t=66090 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call Manager [7:66120]
Hi Gurus, I have a callManager in my central office. I also Have a 2620 Router. I have a 256 kbps LL connecting to my branch office. There I got a 3600 box with FXO module. I need to implement VoIP using this infrastructure. What are the configurations required at both ends. Thanks Binoy ___ Odomos - the only mosquito protection outside 4 walls - Click here to know more! http://r.rediff.com/r?http://clients.rediff.com/odomos/Odomos.htm&&odomos&&wn Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66120&t=66120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 1720 crashing every week [7:66080]
Another thing that you may want to do is to condigure ftp crashdump. Basically with the router crashes, it will dump logs / error etc onto a ftp servr. I have found this quiet uesfull when trying to debug random router crashes neil K. wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I got two 1720's connected with a two bri's. I am running PPP > multilink on > them, it is basic ISDN setup with PPP Multilink,Also I have set > up a very > high idle-timer on the dialer interface just to keep them up > indefinitely, > but the routers crash every week and I have to manually reset > them and, then > they work fine for a week.Any help will be highly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > neil > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66122&t=66080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127]
One reason I can think of is that ebgp-multihop (in the lab) allows me to peer to a remote router's loopback interface. This can somewhat overcome situations wherein the main link can be down, but there still exists another link in which I can keep the neighborship up for whatever reason. As BGP runs on top of TCP, peering will still be up as long as there is another path to the remote router's loopback interface. ie. multi-homed BGP applications. I'm sure there are some more advantages and disadvantages of using such design in the real world. But I would guess that the guys from Cisco (or the geniuses who designed BGP), put ebgp-multihop in there as a feature not to be mandatorily used, but to overcome some unavoidable situations. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66128&t=66127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network Management Software whats hot and what [7:66099]
Depends on your budget, what growth and what reporting functionatily you want. From one extreme you have HP Openview, netcool etc, all the way down to something like Nagios / Big Brother etc? Chris Penrose wrote: > > Does anyone have any good advice on choice of network > management/monitoring software? I am looking to monitor > roughly 25 > servers 20 routers (mostly VPN to a 3000 Concentrator) 8 or so > pix > firewalls and various other switches and network devices. I > have tried > the Cisco works ver 6.0 eval and although it is a few thousand > pounds > cheaper than cisco works I have not been that impressed with the > interface or functionality. Monitoring is going to be the main > function > but it would be nice to have some diagnostics tools and config > delivery > also. Considering the WAN is fairly small does anyone have any > suggestions? > > Regards > > Chris > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66125&t=66099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any other listserver for discussing Cisco rela [7:66081]
There is another forumm, @!#$.com :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Listers: > > Are there any other listserver for Cisco related issues? > > Thanks > > YC > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66123&t=66081 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Natting problem...help!!! [7:66111]
You could get around this by doing a two way nat, or as cisco calls it, nating for overlapping networks .. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080093f30.shtml JP wrote: > > I have the following scenario > > 0---0--telnet > application > network3network 1 network 2 >lan wan link > > I need all hosts on network 3 to telnet to my "telnet > application" > Problem is network 3 and network 2 both have the same ip range. > > My question is the following: > Is there any way i can perform natting to allow network 3 hosts > to telnet to > the application and use an ip address other than the one > assigned to the > application as the destination address??? > > Any ideas appreciated > > Thanks > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66126&t=66111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log files [7:66070]
There are limited log files saved on the router. Since their is no hDD > On Cisco routers and switches are there log files? How do I > view them? > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66121&t=66070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PING PROBLEM [7:66132]
Hi all I am having one doubt regarding ping. I had configured two routers at two locations connected through SCPC PAMA VSATs. I had pinged to serial interface. It has given request timed out. but, the serial interface is up and line protocol is also up. I had pinged the other end serial ip. it is giving reply. what will be the reason. can any one explain me . Regards, K.Srinivas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66132&t=66132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107]
See the following URL for Cisco relevance http://www.cisco.com/en/US/about/ac48/ac104/about_cisco_partners_and_spo nsors.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symon Thurlow Sent: 25 March 2003 08:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107] I think someone changed the name to grouppolitics -Original Message- From: Biff Terrific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 04:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107] Is this on the new CCIE written? I don't remember this from CCNP. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66130&t=66107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]
Take a look at this document. Hope this helps Reza http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk826/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080 09405c.shtml#topic1 ""Tim Champion"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values) > which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest, > lowest or average value for the entire route? > > Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be > appreciated. > > > Many thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66129&t=66062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107]
maybe, war = wide area routing?? (I didn't read the ppt so can't be sure) -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 08:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107] I think someone changed the name to grouppolitics -Original Message- From: Biff Terrific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 04:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OOT War Analysis from Milan Technical University [7:66107] Is this on the new CCIE written? I don't remember this from CCNP. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66131&t=66107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Log files [7:66070]
On Cisco routers and switches are there log files? How do I view them? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66133&t=66070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137]
we are multihomed to 2 isp's on 1 router I only want to send the one network 62.154.91.0 and only want to recieve the default 0.0.0.0 addit9onally i want to prepend our as 23484 outbound to 1 neighbor does this work? is there a better way? router bgp 23484 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 62.154.91.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 146.223.74.37 remote-as 1239 neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 remote-as 6128 neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 route-map 6128 out no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip http access-class 1 ! access-list 10 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 20 permit 0.0.0.0 log access-list 30 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 route-map 6128 permit 30 match ip address 30 set as-path prepend 23484 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66137&t=66137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network Management Software whats hot and what [7:66099]
One I forgot to mention earlier is OpenNMS Well worth a look and it is free! HTH Dom Stocqueler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 09:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Management Software whats hot and what [7:66099] Depends on your budget, what growth and what reporting functionatily you want. From one extreme you have HP Openview, netcool etc, all the way down to something like Nagios / Big Brother etc? Chris Penrose wrote: > > Does anyone have any good advice on choice of network > management/monitoring software? I am looking to monitor roughly 25 > servers 20 routers (mostly VPN to a 3000 Concentrator) 8 or so > pix > firewalls and various other switches and network devices. I > have tried > the Cisco works ver 6.0 eval and although it is a few thousand > pounds > cheaper than cisco works I have not been that impressed with the > interface or functionality. Monitoring is going to be the main > function > but it would be nice to have some diagnostics tools and config > delivery > also. Considering the WAN is fairly small does anyone have any > suggestions? > > Regards > > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66135&t=66099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any other listserver for discussing Cisco rela [7:66081]
Try the groups - comp.dcom.sys.cisco and alt.certification.cisco I normally go to Google and then use their group tab to access these. HTH Dom Stocqueler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 08:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: any other listserver for discussing Cisco rela [7:66081] There is another forumm, @!#$.com :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Listers: > > Are there any other listserver for Cisco related issues? > > Thanks > > YC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66134&t=66081 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log files [7:66070]
That is why most sensible people use a syslog server to store the log files. See CCO for more details. Dom Stocqueler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 08:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Log files [7:66070] There are limited log files saved on the router. Since their is no hDD > On Cisco routers and switches are there log files? How do I view > them? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66136&t=66070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Call Manager [7:66120]
Uh, I don't wanna be rude, but it is not really the purpose of this NG to give you free consulting advice. If you have a specific technical question that you can't solve after proper research, then by all means come here and ask it. But if you just want somebody to do your job for you, hire one of us. ""Binoy K Lonappan"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Gurus, > > I have a callManager in my central office. I also Have a 2620 > Router. I have a 256 kbps LL connecting to my branch office. There > I got a 3600 box with FXO module. I need to implement VoIP using > this infrastructure. What are the configurations required at both > ends. > > Thanks > Binoy > ___ > Odomos - the only mosquito protection outside 4 walls - > Click here to know more! > http://r.rediff.com/r?http://clients.rediff.com/odomos/Odomos.htm&&odomos&&w n Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66138&t=66120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content Switch and Secure Content Accelerator management [7:66144]
Hi All long time since I've been at groupstudy, I need to do some serious study too and hopefully I can answer (or try too) some q's. First off I've this problem with a content switch CSS and ssl accelerator SCA. I want to be able to manage the SCA using the web interface, this works fine on port 80 but for added security I want to use https. I've enabled the port on the SCA and created a certificate too. My ssl server for web management is set up like this 1 _webManagement_ Server Type: Normal I.P. Address: 192.168.1.1 SSL Port: 443 Clear-Text Port: 449 Transparent Mode: off Status: Enabled Private Key: _webManagement_ Certificate: _webManagement_ Security Policy: default Certificate Chain: N/A On my CSS I've set up service for port 443 and 449. When I try to view the page I get the Security Alert for the private cert then nothing happens. If anyone would like to see the CSS config I can paste that too Cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66144&t=66144 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
sounds like the router you have is a switch running spanning tree...if thats the case, then turn off span-tree on the IBM device..is that device a Blade center server? Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Juli Hato To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:56 AM Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072] Hi all, I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet ports from the IBM router active. How to counteract with this. Thank you in advance. Best Regards, HATO _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66141&t=66072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any other listserver for discussing Cisco related issue [7: [7:66139]
Hi Listers: Are there any other listserver for Cisco related issues? Thanks YC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66139&t=66139 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1720 crashing every week [7:66080]
Hi Folks, I got two 1720's connected with a two bri's. I am running PPP multilink on them, it is basic ISDN setup with PPP Multilink,Also I have set up a very high idle-timer on the dialer interface just to keep them up indefinitely, but the routers crash every week and I have to manually reset them and, then they work fine for a week.Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66143&t=66080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]
Tim Champion wrote: > > When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default > 'K' values) > which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the > highest, > lowest or average value for the entire route? When calculating the composite metric, IGRP and EIGRP use the heaviest load on any segment in the route. The concern is any bottlenecks. You wouldn't want a router to select a path that on average has a reasonable load, but also has one link that is overloaded. This could happen if you used an average. And you definitely wouldn't want it to choose a path with the highest load. So they use the lowest load of any segment, which they pass to each other in Update packets. As you probably know, load isn't used at all unless you configure the metric weights command. Reliability is similar. It's the worst reliability of any segment in the path. You wouldn't want a router to select a path that on average had good reliability, but also had a link in the middle somewhere that was dropping packets like crazy. As you probably know, by default reliability is not used unelss you use the metric weights command. IGRP and EIGRP also use the lowest-bandwidth segment on the route to a network. The concern, again, is any bottlenecks. You wouldn't want a router to select a path that had some high-bandwidth links if there was still a dial-up modem connection somewhere in the path. Each router reports the bandwidth (which is configurable at router interfaces) in Update packets. The lowest is selected and passed on. Delay, on the other hand, is a sum of all the delays for outgoing interfaces in the path to the network. Did you already find this paper on IGRP by Rutgers: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/5.html It doesn't have all the details, but is still a good read. Priscilla > > Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it > would be > appreciated. > > > Many thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66140&t=66062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Juli, Make sure you don't have bridging turned up on the IBM, spanning tree may be shutting down one of the ports. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juli Hato Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072] Hi all, I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet ports from the IBM router active. How to counteract with this. Thank you in advance. Best Regards, HATO _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66142&t=66072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
Larry you are correct. From Cisco Product Bulletin 1855: The SI version is embedded in Cisco Catalyst 2950-12, 2950-24, and 2950SX-24 switches, and supports basic Cisco IOS(r) functionality, Fast Ethernet connectivity, and cluster management. The EI version supports all that and more. The EI version of software is embedded in Cisco Catalyst 2950T-24, 2950C-24, and 2950G-12, 2950G-24, 2950G-48 switches, and supports advanced intelligent services, gigabit connectivity, and a richer set of features. These include Cisco Spanning-Tree Protocol enhancements for high availability, access control parameters (ACPs) for enhanced security, and Differentiated Services Code Point (DCSP) and rate limiting for advanced quality of service. Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Letterman Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] I dont think it supports the routing functions.. I believe the 3550 with EMI supports the routing... However I may be wrong... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Brian Carroll To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:55 PM Subject: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] S! ALL! I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work at the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS capabilities? I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. Prayers for me would not be refused either :) S! (Salute!) Brian Carroll CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66145&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any other listserver for discussing Cisco rela [7:66081]
Do you know what newsserver hosts these? -Original Message- From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: any other listserver for discussing Cisco rela [7:66081] Try the groups - comp.dcom.sys.cisco and alt.certification.cisco I normally go to Google and then use their group tab to access these. HTH Dom Stocqueler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 08:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: any other listserver for discussing Cisco rela [7:66081] There is another forumm, @!#$.com :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Listers: > > Are there any other listserver for Cisco related issues? > > Thanks > > YC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66147&t=66081 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redistribution question [7:66071]
Try passive-interface default no passive-interface s0 (or whatever) Works for EIGRP. Not sure about RIP. > -Original Message- > From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Redistribution question [7:66071] > > > I have a network with approximately 20 VLANs, running EIGRP > as my routing > protocol. One of my VLANs, VLAN12, runs RIP for connectivity > to another > organization. The others do not need to receive RIP updates. So, the > solution I came up with is to make the other 19 VLANs passive > interfaces so > that RIP updates are not sent out interfaces that do not have any RIP > routers. I also have 3 VLANs where I only need a static > route, so I have > added those as passive interfaces for EIGRP too. My question > is: is this > the most efficient way to do it? > I imagine that in a very large network, adding every single > interface as a > passive interface would get old rather quickly. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66148&t=66071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Call Manager [7:66120]
Binoy, The following will give you some ideas of how to do this or least guide you to the appropiate direction.. Good Luck Juan Blanco Cisco IP Telephony by ciscopress - David Lovell A Cisco AVVID Solution Cisco CallManager Fundamentals by ciscopress - Alexander Pearce Cisco IP Telephony Network Design Guide http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/network Cisco IP Telephony Solution Guide http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/solution_guide/index.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Binoy K Lonappan Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Call Manager [7:66120] Hi Gurus, I have a callManager in my central office. I also Have a 2620 Router. I have a 256 kbps LL connecting to my branch office. There I got a 3600 box with FXO module. I need to implement VoIP using this infrastructure. What are the configurations required at both ends. Thanks Binoy ___ Odomos - the only mosquito protection outside 4 walls - Click here to know more! http://r.rediff.com/r?http://clients.rediff.com/odomos/Odomos.htm&&odomos&&w n Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66146&t=66120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Hi all, I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet ports from the IBM router active. How to counteract with this. Thank you in advance. Best Regards, HATO _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66150&t=66072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ebgp multihop in a NBMA medium?? [7:66149]
Hello, If RTA, RTB and RTC are in a FR multipoint config, with RTA in AS100 and RTB and RTC in AS200 with RTB peering with RTA and RTC, does the next-hop-self need to be set on RTB for BOTH RTA and RTC, IF BOTH RTA and RTC are advertising networks?? I definitely understand that if RTC were adverting 10.0.0.0/8, RTB would set itself as the next-hop-self for RTA to get to 10.0.0.0/8. Now if RTA also advertises netw. 20.0.0.0/8, would RTB need to be set as the next-hop-self for RTC to get to 20.0.0.0/8? Which basically means that RTB needs to be set as the next-hop-self for both RTA and RTC?? Now to add to this, if you are running an IGP for the networks that connect these 3 routers, if the next-hop-self even necessary? Please advise. Thank you. Sincerely, CN P.S. My Internet connection via Cox is down at this moment (thank you Cox..as usual) so I cannot get to my routers from work to try this out!! _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66149&t=66149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Self-Employment [7:62394]
I recently did some work in Wichita, Kansas. This tech at an Insurance company went and bought some gear from his buddy that works at a reseller. When he got the gear he asked his reseller buddy if he knew if anyone could install it for him. The reseller calls up Ingram Micro, from who he purchased, and asked them if they had anybody. Their reply was that you need a CCIE to do that. Reseller guy calls up WSU, which has a CCIE lab, and speaks to someone there that says they can do it. However, they never called him back. Reseller guy knows my brother and my brother told him that I could do it, but I was not a CCIE. Your probably wondering what was this mysterious work to be done? They had a 2620 with a fe int and a serial int. They wanted to add a third interface for a dmz, use the IOS firewall and setup a remote VPN. Of course he didn't have enough flash or memory or the right IOS. The moral of the story is that I charged him $125 an hour to get him setup. He was more than happy to pay it because they couldn't find anybody in the area that could do it. I live in Kansas City, so it's a 3 hour drive down there. I would think that in the larger cities your going to have that competition that is going to drive rates down. But a place like Wichita, you can still demand a decent rate$ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66152&t=62394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log files [7:66070]
The router can save logs into a memory buffer which of course gets cleared if you reboot. You would need to turn on logging and then you would be able to look at the log. logging buffered 16000 logging on logging monitor deb etc, etc type logg ? to see other options. Most people will configure logging x.x.x.x to point to a syslog server where the logs can be stored and managed. Thanks, Ian http://ccie4u.com Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios On 25 Mar 2003 at 8:50, Troy Leliard wrote: > There are limited log files saved on the router. Since their is no hDD > > On Cisco routers and switches are there log files? How do I > > view them? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66151&t=66070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop > comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected only > and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please > tell me the caveat of using ebgp multihop for ISP envy. While I don't know about the ISP environment, I've done several BGP labs with other folks in different parts of the country. EBGP Multihop is a necessary part of this, obviously. I suppose in real world the advantage is that you can peer loopbacks, rather than just the physical interfaces. Another thing that comes to mind, applicable to ISP and corporate environments, is that your iBGP routers can be located in different parts of your network, eliminating the need for physical adjaceny. > > Any comments would be appreciated. > > regards > hendro > > > > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66154&t=66127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log files [7:66070]
The best way to accomplish this is to setup your switches and routers to send all syslog messages to a designated syslog server. Check out this application... http://www.kiwisyslog.com Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66158&t=66070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM for Practice Lab [7:65981]
BTW - Does anyone have any NP-1A-MM they would like to part with ? If someone has 2 NP-1A-MM modules, I will connect them to my lab (already have an ATM switch) and provide unlimited access to a 9 router/ 3 switch lab. Mahalo! Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ATM for Practice Lab [7:65087] Hi, Just yesterday I was wondering the same thing. I checked into getting ATM for my home lab and the cheapest I came up with was $1,500.00 for all needed equipment. Check Horizondatacom.com - Cisco Lightstream 100 - $495.00 They have 2 available. Check Ebay - 2 4500M (165.00 each). One seller has six of these for sale. No modules, however 16/16 with 12.0 IOS. Do the following search from the Ebay main page - cisco 4500m. This auction will end in 19 hours from now (time now is 3:30 pm EST) Check Ebay - 1 seller has a np-1a-sm for an unbelievable $200.00 and another seller has a np-1a-sm for $425.00. Do the following search from the Ebay main page - cisco np-1a-sm. The first guy's auction ends 3/13. It depends on how your finances are. I mulled over whether to buy but decided to use an online rack rental for ATM. Best of luck. Danny [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of NSL-BGP.jpg] [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of NSL-OSPF.jpg] [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of NSL-Physical.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65981&t=65981 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ping things [7:66155]
I can ping from router A through various hops to router F. Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to find a path back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A. As the ping works in the first case - ie it knows the path back from F to A - how come it doesnt work in the 2nd ? The path is 'clean' ie no firewalls, access lists or any filtering. Puzzled. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66155&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 1720 crashing every week [7:66080]
Yesterday, Dave asked some questions of you that would help pinpoint your trouble. Best that you answer his questions. A wild guess is that there is a bug in your IOS version. Check Bug Navigator. > -Original Message- > From: neil K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 1720 crashing every week [7:66080] > > > Hi Folks, > > I got two 1720's connected with a two bri's. I am running PPP > multilink on > them, it is basic ISDN setup with PPP Multilink,Also I have > set up a very > high idle-timer on the dialer interface just to keep them up > indefinitely, > but the routers crash every week and I have to manually reset > them and, then > they work fine for a week.Any help will be highly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66156&t=66080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router ID? [7:66108]
OSPF uses a router ID in it's advertisements to other neighbors. The router id is simply the highest IP address of a loopback if you have them configured and if not then the highest IP of an active interface. I don't think it's a reachability type question - the neighbors certainly need to be able to talk to each other and learn about the topology - but the addresses they use to send traffic can be different than the IP used in the router id. Ian http://www.ccie4u.com Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios On 25 Mar 2003 at 4:24, XY HIEN LE wrote: > Hi all, > > Two routing protocols: OSPF and EIGRP DO need to have their own router > ID reachable by other routers to have proper network connectivity, or am > I incorrect? > > Any confirmation on this is much appreciated. > > Xy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66153&t=66108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help, Connecting external modem to 1600 ROUTER [7:66159]
Hello Group. Is it possible to connect an external modem to a Cisco 1600 series router? And if it is, then how is it done? Can I connect using the serial interface? Any link with step by step instructions? Thank you all! -- __ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66159&t=66159 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157]
Hello, Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ?? >From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always been set to a number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, is just uses the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop - with no value and it works!! Thus, I am assuming that the ebgp-multihop default value = 255?? Anyone?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66157&t=66157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping things [7:66155]
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote: > > You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables > thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks. > > The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using > different sets of source and destination IP addresses when > pinging from router A to router F, as compared to pinging from > router F to router A. The ping reply from router F uses the same addresses as the ping from router F to router A. Why would the reply work but not the ping? Or maybe the ping from router F to router A fails because the reply from router A doesn't get back. But that would be weird too. Why would router A be able to send a ping but not a reply? He needs to find out which fails and where, with debugs or sniffers. He could still have a routing problem, but it would have to be a weird one if these results are consistent. He says no firewalls or access lists, but it sure sounds like a firewall or access list to me. Priscilla > > Use the extended ping command to see what I mean. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66162&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
Here are a couple of good links. The Certif**zone has some excellent labs for the 3550 and "The long and Winding Road" had an excellent config email in jan or feb--if you cannot find it in the archives I may still have it somewhere. Good luck on the test stuart http://www.ipexpert.net/downloads/Catalyst_3550_Tutorial.zip http://www.netmasterclass.net/site/lib.php -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: Brian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:55 AM An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] S! ALL! I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work at the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS capabilities? I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. Prayers for me would not be refused either :) S! (Salute!) Brian Carroll CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66115&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping things [7:66155]
You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks. The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using different sets of source and destination IP addresses when pinging from router A to router F, as compared to pinging from router F to router A. Use the extended ping command to see what I mean. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66160&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN remote access via analog modem?? [7:65991]
to 1): PIX 515 can terminate 1000 tunnels (SW) or 2000 (HW)at max 10Mps VPN Performance. to 2): analog is no problem (same as ISDN). ISP gives you the "physical" address. If connecting to your VPN site you will be given a tunnel address from your central site. Both physical and tunnel IP's are activ. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66161&t=65991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written R&S [7:65972]
You can purchase it from our website, or from amazon.com, or your local barnes and noble bookstore. NLI's Study Guide for The CCIE R&S Written Exam ISBN# 1931881006 thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccbootcamp.com (cisco training) ""rbx10 Defcom"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks Thom, > What is the name of Dennis book so > I can buy it right now.. > > > rbx10Thomas Larus wrote: > > > > I think Dennis Laganiere's own CCIE prep book is very good. He > > is too > > polite to mention it here himself, but I think people should > > know about it. > > I like how it covers a vast array of topics in a summary > > fashion, but goes > > into considerable depth when it comes to especially difficult > > topics that > > cry out for in-depth coverage (like RIFs). It is a great way > > to cover the > > material for this particular exam. > > > > I bought it recently from Amazon for 30-some dollars to assess > > its > > usefulness for early stage CCIE preparation. It is worth more > > than it > > costs, in my opinion. > > > > > > Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014 > > > > > > > > Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014 > > > > > > ""Dennis Laganiere"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi rbx10... > > > > > > I would say that you need to read many of the same books > > you'll need to > > read > > > for the lab anyway. I put together a list of books I thought > > are > > important, > > > along with some preparation advice, at www.laganiere.net > > > > > > I hope you find it useful... > > > > > > Thanks... > > > > > > --- Dennis > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "rbx10 Defcom" > > > To: > > > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:03 PM > > > Subject: CCIE written R&S [7:65972] > > > > > > > > > > To All the CCIEs out there: > > > > > > > > I'm a newbie to CCIE...:-) > > > > I'm currently trying to prepare for my written Exam > > > > And honestly it's very puzzling and scary > > > > > > > > These are the books that I have read so far: > > > > > > > > LAN switching, Clarks > > > > Routing with TCP/IP I, Doyle > > > > Internet Routing Architecture, Sam Halabai > > > > > > > > I fear that the above books are not enough. I'm also going > > to read every > > > > last one of the Cisco recommended links. > > > > > > > > I was wondering if you could please tell me: > > > > > > > > 1) What book do I use to study for IP Multicast, QOS, and > > Multiservice. > > > > 2) What should I focus on the most (Especially For those > > of you who > > > > recently took the exam) > > > > 3) If I need to buy more books > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you all very much in advance for your response. > > > > > > > > rbx10, > > > > CCNA > > > > CCNP > > > > CCIE in training Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66044&t=65972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to create VLAN [7:66165]
Hi all, Can anyone please tell me how to create a vlan for a network range for ex 192.168.5.1 to 192.168.5.50 and 192.168.5.51 to 192.168.5.100 and establish communication between the 2.I don't have a router and I have a cisco 3548 XL switch. Is it possible .. Please help its extremely urgent guruprasad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66165&t=66165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127]
I do this every day for customers.They have 2 or more T-1's and would like to make sure that the circuit stays up if one of the T's go downAND they want to load balance their trafficUsing lo0 and ebgp multihop and using CEF with per-packet or per-destination achieves this. >From: "The Long and Winding Road" >Reply-To: "The Long and Winding Road" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127] >Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:48:53 GMT > >wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi all, > > > > i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop > > comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected >only > > and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please > > tell me the caveat of using ebgp multihop for ISP envy. > >While I don't know about the ISP environment, I've done several BGP labs >with other folks in different parts of the country. EBGP Multihop is a >necessary part of this, obviously. > >I suppose in real world the advantage is that you can peer loopbacks, >rather >than just the physical interfaces. > >Another thing that comes to mind, applicable to ISP and corporate >environments, is that your iBGP routers can be located in different parts >of >your network, eliminating the need for physical adjaceny. > > > > > > Any comments would be appreciated. > > > > regards > > hendro > > > > > > > > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > > http://mail2web.com/ . _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66164&t=66127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping things [7:66155]
Several thoughts: A standard ping uses as its source address the address of the exit interface. Extended ping can use the address of any interface on that router. Do a trace to see where it fails. Check the routing tables of the various routers. Somewhere a route is missing. For example - suppose routers A and F each have a LAN segment and a WAN interface. A standard ping from either would use its WAN interface address. Now on one end (say A)the LAN network isn't in the routing table. From A you can ping F (maybe both LAN and WAN); but F can only ping the WAN interface of A - not the LAN. Let us know your results. > -Original Message- > From: Peter P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ping things [7:66155] > > > I can ping from router A through various hops to router F. > Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to > find a path > back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A. > As the ping works in the first case - ie it knows the path > back from F to A > - how come it doesnt work in the 2nd ? The path is 'clean' ie > no firewalls, > access lists or any filtering. Puzzled. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66168&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157]
255 is the default. Daniel Ladrach CCNP, CCNA WorldCom -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157] Hello, Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ?? >From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always been set to a number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, is just uses the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop - with no value and it works!! Thus, I am assuming that the ebgp-multihop default value = 255?? Anyone?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66166&t=66157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HP OVNNM -Remote networks discovery [7:66167]
Hi all I am trying to setup OVNNM to discover a remote network. Could you please help me with a clue. I am using OVNNM 6.4 w2k version. I guess I am supposed to setup the network address and the network mask but I don't know where. I would mention that I know the remote gateway for this network. I added manually the device but the NNM refuses to manage the object (still blue) and of course no discovery for the network behind it. Thank you in advance Cristian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66167&t=66167 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157]
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello, > Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ?? > From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always been set to a > number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, is just uses > the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop - with no value and it works!! > Thus, I am assuming that the ebgp-multihop default value = 255?? trying to remember who it was who put a sniffer on the line and verified this, but yes the answer is 255 is the default. don't you just love what the documentation has to say about this? > Anyone?? > Thank you. > Sincerely, > CN > > > > > > > > _ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66169&t=66157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping things [7:66155]
At 02:55 PM 3/25/2003 +, Peter P wrote: >I can ping from router A through various hops to router F. >Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to find a path >back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A. >As the ping works in the first case - ie it knows the path back from F to A >- how come it doesnt work in the 2nd ? The path is 'clean' ie no firewalls, >access lists or any filtering. Puzzled. A cannot reach the interface from which the ping in sourced on F most likely. Try controlling your source addresses and see if that points you in the right direction. Pete Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66174&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157]
Cisco Nuts wrote: > > Hello, > Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ?? > From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always > been set to a > number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, > is just uses > the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop - with no value and > it works!! > Thus, I am assuming that the ebgp-multihop default value = 255?? > Anyone?? > Thank you. > Sincerely, > CN Notice if you configure ebgp-multihop with no parameter, that the "show ip bgp neighbors" output for that neighbor says: External BGP neighbor may be up to 255 hops away. If you specify a number, such as 2, you'll see: External BGP neighbor may be up to 2 hops away. Not putting a parameter on the command makes life easier, but then again, BGP network operators don't care about easiness. :-) However, if you are going to put a parameter, you need to know the number of hops, which can be a little confusing because just going to a loopback on another router instead of a directly-connected interface counts as a hop. I checked with a sniffer by the way. On the 3-way handshakes, the routers use 255 for the IP TTL regardless, at least on my routers which are running IOS 11.0. That surprised me. But after the 3-way handshake, they start setting the TTL to 1 (if no ebgp-multihop), 255 (if ebgp-multihop is configured with no parameter), and the correct number (if ebgp-multihop is configured with an exact number). That seems like a misbehavior to me (i.e. setting the TTL to 255 for the three-way handshake). You could establish a connection with a router even though you couldn't do anything. You could establish so many that you could cause a DOS. I'll have to do some more testing of this. Priscilla > > > > > > > > _ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66172&t=66157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping things [7:66155]
At 04:35 PM 3/25/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote: > > > > You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables > > thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks. > > > > The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using > > different sets of source and destination IP addresses when > > pinging from router A to router F, as compared to pinging from > > router F to router A. > >The ping reply from router F uses the same addresses as the ping from router >F to router A. Why would the reply work but not the ping? In many cases the ping is directed to a router loopback which I assumed and likely Orlando did as well. >Or maybe the ping from router F to router A fails because the reply from >router A doesn't get back. But that would be weird too. Why would router A >be able to send a ping but not a reply? He needs to find out which fails and >where, with debugs or sniffers. > >He could still have a routing problem, but it would have to be a weird one >if these results are consistent. > >He says no firewalls or access lists, but it sure sounds like a firewall or >access list to me. > >Priscilla > > > > > > Use the extended ping command to see what I mean. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66175&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HP OVNNM -Remote networks discovery [7:66167]
>Hi all > >I am trying to setup OVNNM to discover a remote network. Could you >please help me with a clue. I am using OVNNM 6.4 w2k version. I guess I >am supposed to setup the network address and the network mask but I >don't know where. >I would mention that I know the remote gateway for this network. I added >manually >the device but the NNM refuses to manage the object (still blue) and of >course no discovery for the network behind it. >Thank you in advance >Cristian Any HP OpenView issues would be more appropriate on the OpenView forum at www.ovforum.org. If you're an NNM user you really should be on that list, especially if you're running a brand new version of NNM (6.4) on the world's worst network management platform (anything running Windows) :-) There are so many potential problems here that you really should seek advice on a forum dedicated to that topic. Good luck, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66173&t=66167 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]
When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values) which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest, lowest or average value for the entire route? Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be appreciated. Many thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66181&t=66062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping things [7:66155]
do a traceroute from F to A and see what it says and email it to this list... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Peter P To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:55 AM Subject: ping things [7:66155] I can ping from router A through various hops to router F. Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to find a path back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A. As the ping works in the first case - ie it knows the path back from F to A - how come it doesnt work in the 2nd ? The path is 'clean' ie no firewalls, access lists or any filtering. Puzzled. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66183&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TCP SYNSENT Timeout [7:66178]
Did you check the host requirements RFC, RFC 1122? I think it's OS-dependent though and not specified Priscilla John Neiberger wrote: > > One of our programmers is asking me about this and I really > don't have an answer. I've checked RFC 793 and haven't spotted > the answer yet. > > Is there a default time specified in TCP to remain in the SYN > SENT state? If a device sends a SYN and doesn't receive a > response, is the timeout a built-in TCP parameter or is that a > function of the application or operating system? > > I'm starting to think that this is specific to the operating > system, but we have a need to make it specific to a certain > connection without affecting all TCP connections. To be > specific, they're writing something in Java 1.3.1 (I think) and > it doesn't have the capability to tweak TCP parameters. For a > particular set of connections they'd like the timeout to be 10 > seconds, but it seems to be defaulting to 45. > > They tell me that if we were using Java 1.4 they'd be able to > adjust these parameters, which makes me think this is an > application or OS-specific parameter and is only relevant to a > particular TCP implementation and could vary from platform to > platform. > > Any thoughts on this? > > Many thanks, > John > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66185&t=66178 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kansas City area Study Group? [7:66179]
Any KC metro study groups? Anyone want to form one? Jason. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66179&t=66179 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to create VLAN [7:66165]
without a router its not possible..The 35XX-XL switches dont support routing. If you had a 3550 with EMI IOS on it you could accomplish the task..and if you decide on a router, you'll need a fast ethernet interface to set up a trunk port. Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Can anyone please tell me how to create a vlan for a network range for ex 192.168.5.1 to 192.168.5.50 and 192.168.5.51 to 192.168.5.100 and establish communication between the 2.I don't have a router and I have a cisco 3548 XL switch. Is it possible .. Please help its extremely urgent guruprasad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66180&t=66165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP header [7:66060]
KW S wrote:
> I am reading RFC760 (IP protocol) and have the following questions.
>
> IHL : 4 bits
>
> Internet header length is the length of the internet header in 32 bits
words
>
> Question: what do u mean by the 4 bits and 32 bits words
The IHL is 4 bits long, and thus can have a maximum value of 2^4-1=15.
Which, in turn, means that the IP header could in theory be a maximum of
15 32-bit(=4 byte) units ('words') long, or 60 bytes.
> Total length :16 bits
>
> Total length is the length of the IP packets in octect including the
> internet headers and data. This field allows the length of a packet to be
up
> to 65,535 octets.
>
> Question: How do we arrive to the figure 65,535 octects
2^16-1.
> Such long packets are impractical for most host and networks.
Think MTU and fragmentation. An *IP packet* can be up to 64KB large, but
that does no mean that the underlying network must be able to transmit
or receive *frames* that long.
>
> All hosts must be prepared to accept datagram of up to 576 octects
>
> Question : 576 octects is the same as 576 bytes and how can it fit into the
> total length of 16 bits which is 2 bytes
See above. The length is a *16-bit value*, not 16 bits itself.
Regards,
Marco.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66182&t=66060
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
Oh brother! Now it's come to secretly coding company names so they don't get filtered! What's this world coming to?! :-) Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Stuart Laubstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] Here are a couple of good links. The Certif**zone has some excellent labs for the 3550 and "The long and Winding Road" had an excellent config email in jan or feb--if you cannot find it in the archives I may still have it somewhere. Good luck on the test stuart http://www.ipexpert.net/downloads/Catalyst_3550_Tutorial.zip http://www.netmasterclass.net/site/lib.php -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: Brian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:55 AM An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] S! ALL! I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work at the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS capabilities? I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. Prayers for me would not be refused either :) S! (Salute!) Brian Carroll CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66171&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP SYNSENT Timeout [7:66178]
One of our programmers is asking me about this and I really don't have an answer. I've checked RFC 793 and haven't spotted the answer yet. Is there a default time specified in TCP to remain in the SYN SENT state? If a device sends a SYN and doesn't receive a response, is the timeout a built-in TCP parameter or is that a function of the application or operating system? I'm starting to think that this is specific to the operating system, but we have a need to make it specific to a certain connection without affecting all TCP connections. To be specific, they're writing something in Java 1.3.1 (I think) and it doesn't have the capability to tweak TCP parameters. For a particular set of connections they'd like the timeout to be 10 seconds, but it seems to be defaulting to 45. They tell me that if we were using Java 1.4 they'd be able to adjust these parameters, which makes me think this is an application or OS-specific parameter and is only relevant to a particular TCP implementation and could vary from platform to platform. Any thoughts on this? Many thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66178&t=66178 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX VPN home access question [7:65666]
The 515 is actually at my home and from my office, I VPN to it. Yeah I know it is quirky, but I do have a legitimate excuse. You asked what the ip address outside DHCP setroute command does. I have DSL at home with no static IP address. That line in my PIX essentially lets the PIX know that I will be receiving my outside IP address via DHCP. The setroute argument merely transfers the gateway IP address to my inside PCs. Yes, I am also using DHCP to serve internal IP addresses to my internal PCs. Your other question about VPN access and Internet. Not sure if I understand your question, but while I am VPN'd into my PIX from home, yes users at home (my wife) can access the Internet. Is this what you are asking? YOu should be able to VPN from your home to your 515 at work and still allow INternet access for the employees at your work. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66186&t=65666 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
booting a 2900 switch.... [7:66190]
Hi I have a 2900 series switch that hasn4t ios in the memory. i want to load the Ios and the only way i know is by z-modem protocol but it is very slow(about 3 hours in this case). is there other way? thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66190&t=66190 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to create VLAN [7:66165]
Your going to need a router to get between VLANs and addresses that fall onto bit boundries like 192.168.5.1 to 192.168.5.62 and 65-126 Guruprasad Sanjeevi wrote: > Hi all, > > Can anyone please tell me how to create a vlan for a network range for > ex 192.168.5.1 to 192.168.5.50 and 192.168.5.51 to 192.168.5.100 and > establish communication between the 2.I don't have a router and I have a > cisco 3548 XL switch. > > Is it possible .. Please help its extremely urgent > > guruprasad -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me." --- General George S. Patton Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66188&t=66165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping things [7:66155]
At 04:35 PM 3/25/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote: > > > > You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables > > thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks. > > > > The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using > > different sets of source and destination IP addresses when > > pinging from router A to router F, as compared to pinging from > > router F to router A. > >The ping reply from router F uses the same addresses as the ping from router >F to router A. Why would the reply work but not the ping? In many cases the ping is directed to a router loopback which I assumed and likely Orlando did as well. >Or maybe the ping from router F to router A fails because the reply from >router A doesn't get back. But that would be weird too. Why would router A >be able to send a ping but not a reply? He needs to find out which fails and >where, with debugs or sniffers. > >He could still have a routing problem, but it would have to be a weird one >if these results are consistent. > >He says no firewalls or access lists, but it sure sounds like a firewall or >access list to me. > >Priscilla > > > > > > Use the extended ping command to see what I mean. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66204&t=66155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HP OVNNM -Remote networks discovery [7:66167]
>Hi all > >I am trying to setup OVNNM to discover a remote network. Could you >please help me with a clue. I am using OVNNM 6.4 w2k version. I guess I >am supposed to setup the network address and the network mask but I >don't know where. >I would mention that I know the remote gateway for this network. I added >manually >the device but the NNM refuses to manage the object (still blue) and of >course no discovery for the network behind it. >Thank you in advance >Cristian Any HP OpenView issues would be more appropriate on the OpenView forum at www.ovforum.org. If you're an NNM user you really should be on that list, especially if you're running a brand new version of NNM (6.4) on the world's worst network management platform (anything running Windows) :-) There are so many potential problems here that you really should seek advice on a forum dedicated to that topic. Good luck, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66203&t=66167 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]
Hi all. my cisco router keeps reporting this error when trying to bring up an adjacency accross a P2P link. OSPF: Rcv pkt from xxx.xxx.xxx.13, Serial0/0.1, area 0.0.0.1: src not on the same network I am presuming that the issue here is the subnet mask that I have specified the network statement as under OSPF. My serial interface (frame-relay subinterface) has a /30 mask. How should my network statement be configured if the IP address of the interface is xxx.xxx.xxx.14? I have tried the following: network xxx.xxx.xxx.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 as well as: network xxx.xxx.xxx.12 0.0.0.3 area 1 Neither one seemed to work. I still got the same error. The other side is also on the same subnet and it has an IP address of xxx.xxx.xxx.13/30 configured as a P2P as well. If the network statement is not the issue, please advise. Thanks. - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66206&t=66206 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
No Larry you are correct, I have a couple of each in my lab and the 2950 does not do the routing nor does it have as in depth QoS as the 3550, besides that is resembles it a lot. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Letterman Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] I dont think it supports the routing functions.. I believe the 3550 with EMI supports the routing... However I may be wrong... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Brian Carroll To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:55 PM Subject: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] S! ALL! I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work at the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS capabilities? I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. Prayers for me would not be refused either :) S! (Salute!) Brian Carroll CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66205&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157]
Cisco Nuts wrote: > > Hello, > Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ?? > From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always > been set to a > number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, > is just uses > the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop - with no value and > it works!! > Thus, I am assuming that the ebgp-multihop default value = 255?? > Anyone?? > Thank you. > Sincerely, > CN Notice if you configure ebgp-multihop with no parameter, that the "show ip bgp neighbors" output for that neighbor says: External BGP neighbor may be up to 255 hops away. If you specify a number, such as 2, you'll see: External BGP neighbor may be up to 2 hops away. Not putting a parameter on the command makes life easier, but then again, BGP network operators don't care about easiness. :-) However, if you are going to put a parameter, you need to know the number of hops, which can be a little confusing because just going to a loopback on another router instead of a directly-connected interface counts as a hop. I checked with a sniffer by the way. On the 3-way handshakes, the routers use 255 for the IP TTL regardless, at least on my routers which are running IOS 11.0. That surprised me. But after the 3-way handshake, they start setting the TTL to 1 (if no ebgp-multihop), 255 (if ebgp-multihop is configured with no parameter), and the correct number (if ebgp-multihop is configured with an exact number). That seems like a misbehavior to me (i.e. setting the TTL to 255 for the three-way handshake). You could establish a connection with a router even though you couldn't do anything. You could establish so many that you could cause a DOS. I'll have to do some more testing of this. Priscilla > > > > > > > > _ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66193&t=66157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3550s and L3 rate-limit [7:66209]
Hi. I have a few questions that I need clarification on: 1) Is this the correct method to do L3 rate-limiting on a 3550? access-list 101 permit ip any xxx.xxx.xxx.0 0.0.0.255 ! class-map match-any 768k_traffic match access-group 101 ! policy-map 768k-DSL class 768k_traffic police 768000 768000 exceed-action drop ! interface FastEthernet0/3 no switchport ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.1 255.255.255.252 service-policy output 768k-DSL 2) After playing with the ingress/egress filtering statements, f0/3 accepts the service-policy command but it does not show up in the config (the original tests did show up) interface FastEthernet0/3 no switchport ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.1 255.255.255.252 no cdp enable 3) Can I not do L3 rate-limiting on the 3550 for both ingress and egress rate-limiting (if "input" is specified and an "output" command is entered, it wipes the "input" statement). On the 2948G-L3s, I would use the rate-limit command and specify both input and output per interface. Thanks, Mario Puras SoluNet Technical Support Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66209&t=66209 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you [7:66208]
I had some problems with my account there at OVForum. I used this forum as a last resort. I apologize for that. Now the OVForum's admins have fixed the problem and I have posted my question there. Thank you Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66208&t=66208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Basic QOS Frame MPLS question [7:66210]
Hi, Quick question to everyone At work I have a Frame Cloud that links all our sites together in a hub and spoke manner. At some of the sites I would like to extend our IP Telephony and perhaps introduce Video Conferencing. Assume I have adequate bandwidth throughout for video and IP telephony. I would like to implement QOS. Am I correct in assuming that I can only prioritise voice/video over the frame circuit, and that if I want to implement QOS I would have to 'swap' Frame for MPLS/Layer 4 Switching ??? Kind regards Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66210&t=66210 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redistribution question [7:66071]
Thanks a lot Daniel. That was exactly the type of solution I was looking for. Robert ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Try > passive-interface default > no passive-interface s0 (or whatever) > Works for EIGRP. Not sure about RIP. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Redistribution question [7:66071] > > > > > > I have a network with approximately 20 VLANs, running EIGRP > > as my routing > > protocol. One of my VLANs, VLAN12, runs RIP for connectivity > > to another > > organization. The others do not need to receive RIP updates. So, the > > solution I came up with is to make the other 19 VLANs passive > > interfaces so > > that RIP updates are not sent out interfaces that do not have any RIP > > routers. I also have 3 VLANs where I only need a static > > route, so I have > > added those as passive interfaces for EIGRP too. My question > > is: is this > > the most efficient way to do it? > > I imagine that in a very large network, adding every single > > interface as a > > passive interface would get old rather quickly. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66207&t=66071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 1720 crashing every week [7:66080]
I had the same model and the same problem in 2001. I was doing prettyt much the same setup also, however I had PAT in use. For some reason (which was reoslved with an IOS upgrade), the box would die but luckily I would get a dump at that time of the memory etc. I got onto the TAC and they had a newer mid release IOS that solved my problem, however I did look stupid as my router would die in the middle of the day, right when net usage was at its highest. Possibly the router/IOS could not handle the PAT to well.. Hope this helps you. jb -Original Message- From: neil K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 1720 crashing every week [7:66080] Hi Folks, I got two 1720's connected with a two bri's. I am running PPP multilink on them, it is basic ISDN setup with PPP Multilink,Also I have set up a very high idle-timer on the dialer interface just to keep them up indefinitely, but the routers crash every week and I have to manually reset them and, then they work fine for a week.Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, neil ** This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66212&t=66080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137]
that would work, but I would get at least each providers internal routes rather than just a default. and unless it's for financial reasons (i.e. billed per usage) I wouldn't prepend your AS on either link... just let the internet do its thing and choose the best path. Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J M Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137] we are multihomed to 2 isp's on 1 router I only want to send the one network 62.154.91.0 and only want to recieve the default 0.0.0.0 addit9onally i want to prepend our as 23484 outbound to 1 neighbor does this work? is there a better way? router bgp 23484 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 62.154.91.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 146.223.74.37 remote-as 1239 neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 remote-as 6128 neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 route-map 6128 out no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip http access-class 1 ! access-list 10 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 20 permit 0.0.0.0 log access-list 30 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 route-map 6128 permit 30 match ip address 30 set as-path prepend 23484 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66213&t=66137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seek Lab Partner in Richmond, CA [7:66216]
Anyone looking to work with a lab in Richmond, CA (E. Bay, Nt. of Berkeley) area please e-mail me. I have 2 x RSP7000, a 7000, 2 x 4500, 4000M, 2 x 2501, 3662, 1601, PIX 501, TR Switch, ATM switch, ISDN switch, 5000, 2900XL, 1900, 2 x CSU, cables, computers. Looking for someone to bounce ideas off. If you have voice, better again. My regular partner has been pretty busy lately - just married. Write to my e-mail. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66216&t=66216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Networkers: is there a consistent link from CCO to [7:66217]
A couple weeks ago I put out an email with links to all of the general sessions from 1998 to 2002 as well as links to the power sessions from 2000 to 2002. The message subject line read "FYI: Cisco Networkers Links [7:64652]" Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 3/22/2003 at 7:58 PM Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: >I'll have to admit that I usually go to a specific presentation for >which I already have the URL, and then work backwards to find the >presentation index for a particular Networkers' event. > >Is there a better way? When I search on CCO for a root to >Networkers, all I seem to come up with is registration information >for upcoming ones or salesy stuff on why I should attend. > >Does anyone know if there is a consistent place to go and find the >starting point for the presentation archives for a given Networkers? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66217&t=66217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Hellos on ATM interface Disappear [7:66096]
I was running 12.1.3 EA, I think it was on one of the routers. When I switched it to 12.2.7 it seems to have come around. Has been holding routes for several hours now. Make sense? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66214&t=66096 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Natting problem...help!!! [7:66111]
from the below link: "...The inside device cannot use the IP address of the outside device because it is the same as the address assigned to itself (the inside device). Therefore, the inside device will send a DNS query for the outside device's domain name. The inside device's IP address will be the source of this query, and that address will be translated to an address from the "test-loop" pool because the ip nat inside source list command is configured. The DNS server replies to the address which came from the pool "test-loop" with the IP address associated with the outside device's domain name in the payload of the packet. The destination address of the reply packet is translated back to the inside device's address, and the address in the payload of the reply packet is then translated to an address from the pool "test-dns" because of the ip nat outside source list command. Therefore the inside device learns that the IP address for the outside device is one of the addresses from the "test-dns" pool, and it will use this address when communicating with the outside device. The router running NAT takes care of the translations at this point..." Is that accurate??? The "ip nat outside source" command will translate the IP in the PAYLOAD of the DNS reply packet even though it is not the source??? doesn't sound right and I am unable to test it rite now... Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Natting problem...help!!! [7:66111] You could get around this by doing a two way nat, or as cisco calls it, nating for overlapping networks .. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_examp le09186a0080093f30.shtml JP wrote: > > I have the following scenario > > 0---0--telnet > application > network3network 1 network 2 >lan wan link > > I need all hosts on network 3 to telnet to my "telnet > application" > Problem is network 3 and network 2 both have the same ip range. > > My question is the following: > Is there any way i can perform natting to allow network 3 hosts > to telnet to > the application and use an ip address other than the one > assigned to the > application as the destination address??? > > Any ideas appreciated > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66215&t=66111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137]
didn't even look at your config the first time 'round, but now that I do... if you're using distribute-lists, why match ip addr again in route-map 6128? remove the match clause and just set as-path prepend (if you must) since you only have the one route. then you can get rid of access-list 30 charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles D Hammonds Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137] that would work, but I would get at least each providers internal routes rather than just a default. and unless it's for financial reasons (i.e. billed per usage) I wouldn't prepend your AS on either link... just let the internet do its thing and choose the best path. Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J M Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137] we are multihomed to 2 isp's on 1 router I only want to send the one network 62.154.91.0 and only want to recieve the default 0.0.0.0 addit9onally i want to prepend our as 23484 outbound to 1 neighbor does this work? is there a better way? router bgp 23484 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 62.154.91.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 146.223.74.37 remote-as 1239 neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 remote-as 6128 neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 route-map 6128 out no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip http access-class 1 ! access-list 10 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 20 permit 0.0.0.0 log access-list 30 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 route-map 6128 permit 30 match ip address 30 set as-path prepend 23484 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66219&t=66137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
OK..now you guys are confusing me because I have ordered the 2950T-24 with EMI...and your blurb here SEEMS to state that it supports what I THINK I will need...am I missing something? Not that I can afford a 3550 with the EMI, I just wanted to know if there is anything really different between the 2950T with EMI and the 3550 as included in the lab. ..I feel so doomed :) I appreciate all the replies and especially the links! S! Brian ""Jeffrey Reed"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Larry you are correct. From Cisco Product Bulletin 1855: > > The SI version is embedded in Cisco Catalyst 2950-12, 2950-24, and 2950SX-24 > switches, > and supports basic Cisco IOS(r) functionality, Fast Ethernet connectivity, > and cluster > management. > > The EI version supports all that and more. The EI version of software is > embedded in Cisco > Catalyst 2950T-24, 2950C-24, and 2950G-12, 2950G-24, 2950G-48 switches, and > supports advanced intelligent services, gigabit connectivity, and a richer > set of features. These > include Cisco Spanning-Tree Protocol enhancements for high availability, > access control > parameters (ACPs) for enhanced security, and Differentiated Services Code > Point (DCSP) > and rate limiting for advanced quality of service. > > > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry > Letterman > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] > > I dont think it supports the routing functions.. > I believe the 3550 with EMI supports the routing... > > However I may be wrong... > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems > > > - Original Message - > From: Brian Carroll > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:55 PM > Subject: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] > > > S! ALL! > >I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work > at > the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS > capabilities? > I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab > on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. > > Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. > > Prayers for me would not be refused either :) > > S! (Salute!) > > Brian Carroll > CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66220&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
Check my earlier response, I use both the 2950T-24 and a couple of 3550-24-EMI's in my home lab and they are different. the 2950 does not do layer 3 nor does it have the qos granularity and queuing depth the 3550 does, but the look and feel is very similar. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Carroll Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 9:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] OK..now you guys are confusing me because I have ordered the 2950T-24 with EMI...and your blurb here SEEMS to state that it supports what I THINK I will need...am I missing something? Not that I can afford a 3550 with the EMI, I just wanted to know if there is anything really different between the 2950T with EMI and the 3550 as included in the lab. .I feel so doomed :) I appreciate all the replies and especially the links! S! Brian ""Jeffrey Reed"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Larry you are correct. From Cisco Product Bulletin 1855: > > The SI version is embedded in Cisco Catalyst 2950-12, 2950-24, and 2950SX-24 > switches, > and supports basic Cisco IOS(r) functionality, Fast Ethernet connectivity, > and cluster > management. > > The EI version supports all that and more. The EI version of software is > embedded in Cisco > Catalyst 2950T-24, 2950C-24, and 2950G-12, 2950G-24, 2950G-48 switches, and > supports advanced intelligent services, gigabit connectivity, and a richer > set of features. These > include Cisco Spanning-Tree Protocol enhancements for high availability, > access control > parameters (ACPs) for enhanced security, and Differentiated Services Code > Point (DCSP) > and rate limiting for advanced quality of service. > > > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry > Letterman > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] > > I dont think it supports the routing functions.. > I believe the 3550 with EMI supports the routing... > > However I may be wrong... > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems > > > - Original Message - > From: Brian Carroll > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:55 PM > Subject: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] > > > S! ALL! > >I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work > at > the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS > capabilities? > I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab > on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. > > Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. > > Prayers for me would not be refused either :) > > S! (Salute!) > > Brian Carroll > CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66223&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PING PROBLEM [7:66132]
Hi Larry, I did not understand what you are saying. I had pinged my local serial interface. it is giving request timed out. i had pinged the remote end serial ip. it is giving reply. Can you tell me why it happend. Thanks, K.Srinivas - Original Message - From: Larry Letterman To: srinivas kunthuri ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:09 AM Subject: Re: PING PROBLEM [7:66132] to ping the serial interface usually it has to go to the remote end and then back...make sure the path from end to end is working... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: srinivas kunthuri To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:11 AM Subject: PING PROBLEM [7:66132] Hi all I am having one doubt regarding ping. I had configured two routers at two locations connected through SCPC PAMA VSATs. I had pinged to serial interface. It has given request timed out. but, the serial interface is up and line protocol is also up. I had pinged the other end serial ip. it is giving reply. what will be the reason. can any one explain me . Regards, K.Srinivas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66221&t=66132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reload 3500XL switch [7:66222]
hi cisco buddy's, I hv 3500 series access switch's in my networ. In that i need shutdown for some access switches. and shutdown time is night time. so i can't do mannually. Can anyone suggest me is there any command so i can get switch shutdown at specific time and it will start automatically. if i mention particular time. Thanks & Regards, Milind Tare __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66222&t=66222 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Magazines [7:66225]
Hi all, Can any guide me what magazines to read to gain knowledge about latest technologies. news about networking companies. Regards, K.Srinivas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66225&t=66225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT IP in DNS reply payload? [7:66224]
from "Natting problem" thread... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080093f30.shtml "...The inside device cannot use the IP address of the outside device because it is the same as the address assigned to itself (the inside device). Therefore, the inside device will send a DNS query for the outside device's domain name. The inside device's IP address will be the source of this query, and that address will be translated to an address from the "test-loop" pool because the ip nat inside source list command is configured. The DNS server replies to the address which came from the pool "test-loop" with the IP address associated with the outside device's domain name in the payload of the packet. The destination address of the reply packet is translated back to the inside device's address, and the address in the payload of the reply packet is then translated to an address from the pool "test-dns" because of the ip nat outside source list command. Therefore the inside device learns that the IP address for the outside device is one of the addresses from the "test-dns" pool, and it will use this address when communicating with the outside device. The router running NAT takes care of the translations at this point..." Is that accurate??? The "ip nat outside source" command will translate the IP in the PAYLOAD of the DNS reply packet even though it is not the source??? doesn't sound right and I am unable to test it rite now... Charles Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66224&t=66224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106]
the 3550 in the lab has the ability to support routing as well as switching. That means the lab test may ask you to configure any routing/qos/switching configs on the 3550...the 2950 does not support the routing side of it... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Brian Carroll To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:20 PM Subject: Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] OK..now you guys are confusing me because I have ordered the 2950T-24 with EMI...and your blurb here SEEMS to state that it supports what I THINK I will need...am I missing something? Not that I can afford a 3550 with the EMI, I just wanted to know if there is anything really different between the 2950T with EMI and the 3550 as included in the lab. ..I feel so doomed :) I appreciate all the replies and especially the links! S! Brian ""Jeffrey Reed"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Larry you are correct. From Cisco Product Bulletin 1855: > > The SI version is embedded in Cisco Catalyst 2950-12, 2950-24, and 2950SX-24 > switches, > and supports basic Cisco IOS(r) functionality, Fast Ethernet connectivity, > and cluster > management. > > The EI version supports all that and more. The EI version of software is > embedded in Cisco > Catalyst 2950T-24, 2950C-24, and 2950G-12, 2950G-24, 2950G-48 switches, and > supports advanced intelligent services, gigabit connectivity, and a richer > set of features. These > include Cisco Spanning-Tree Protocol enhancements for high availability, > access control > parameters (ACPs) for enhanced security, and Differentiated Services Code > Point (DCSP) > and rate limiting for advanced quality of service. > > > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry > Letterman > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] > > I dont think it supports the routing functions.. > I believe the 3550 with EMI supports the routing... > > However I may be wrong... > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems > > > - Original Message - > From: Brian Carroll > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:55 PM > Subject: 2950 with EMI any good for studying? [7:66106] > > > S! ALL! > >I am recieving 2 2950's (WS-2950T-24 as I recall) with the EMI for work > at > the end of this week. Are they comparable to the 3550 vis MLS > capabilities? > I need to bone up on the uses of the 3550 vis the CCIE Lab (I take the lab > on 4/6 ) and I am hoping these 2950's will do the job. > > Also...any good links on configuring 3550 would be GREATLY appreciated. > > Prayers for me would not be refused either :) > > S! (Salute!) > > Brian Carroll > CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66226&t=66106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
