Problems with corrupt? NVRAM. [7:75221]

2003-09-10 Thread Degracia, Alex
Hi,

Has anybody ran into this problem?

This is the version and the device:

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-I-L), Version 12.0(10), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 20-Mar-00 21:43 by phanguye
Image text-base: 0x0302F35C, data-base: 0x1000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(9.1), SOFTWARE

uptime is 4 weeks, 5 days, 2 hours, 14 minutes
System restarted by power-on at 13:51:20 NZST Sat Aug 9 2003
System image file is flash:c2500-i-l_120-10.bin

cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision D) with 16384K/2048K bytes of
memory.
Processor board ID 01534863, with hardware revision 
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
2 Serial network interface(s)
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)

Configuration register is 0x2102

#sh start
Using 1258048252 out of 32762 bytes
%Error opening nvram:/startup-config (Permission denied)
#erase start
Erasing the nvram filesystem will remove all files! Continue? [confirm]
[Failed]
%Error erasing nvram: (Permission denied)
#sh file syste
File Systems:

 Size(b) Free(b)  Type  Flags  Prefixes
   -   -opaque rw   null:
   -   -opaque rw   system:
   -   -   network rw   tftp:
*8388608 2660108 flash ro   flash:
   12288   0opaque ro   flh:
   32762   32762 nvram rw   nvram:
   -   -opaque wo   lex:
   -   -   network rw   rcp:
   -   -   network rw   ftp:


Problem is though the NVRAM seems corrupted. Anyone know of any CISCO
bugs that relate to this issue? Can I also safely reload this router and
safely boot back into its original config?

Cheers




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75221t=75221
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


Cisco PVST plus [7:75158]

2003-09-09 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I am wondering what is the implication if I have a network whereby Cisco
Per Vlan Spanning Tree is implemented with PVST plus and I plug in a
external switch such as the Hwa Wei switch that doesn't seem to support
PVST. does it mean that I could only have one vlan on the hwa wei switches
itself. thank


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75158t=75158
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


RE: router CPU utilization on access lists? [7:75002]

2003-09-08 Thread Degracia, Alex
Aren't interfaces with access-lists process switched?

So I would imagine it would be IP Input but this is rather vague as
well.

Correct me if im wrong.

-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: router CPU utilization on access lists? [7:75002]

Maybe a dumb question, but I know you guys can help me. :-)

How would I know if a router is using excessive CPU on IP access lists?

What am I looking for when I do a show processes cpu?

Thanks,

Priscilla
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75008t=75002
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


Re: Cisco Secure VPN 642-511 [7:73919]

2003-08-19 Thread Alex Lee
Just received e-mail from Cisco that they would send me the INFOSEC letter
of recognition after I signed the Cisco Certification Agreement.

I am spending time on other interesting stuffs which is not Cisco and not
sure if I would sit for recert.



Kevin Wigle  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 on the same page is an INFOSEC Professional link.  Cisco has been granted
 rights to award this cert.  It is NOT a Cisco cert.  Which is cool because
 once it is awarded there is no need to recertify, it is permanent.

 Which is opposite to everything Cisco does - especially CCSP - to recert
 CCSP you have to take all 5 exams again.  Hopefully by the time people get
3
 years in CCSP Cisco will have a single recert exam like they do for
 CCIE/CCDP/CCNP

 I might do the security exams once to get the INFOSEC cert and then forget
 the recert on the Cisco stuff.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74180t=73919
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


Re:Information Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professional [7:73514]

2003-08-09 Thread Alex Lee
I received a e-mail from Cisco on July 1, 2003 about a new cert. :

On July 1, 2003, candidates in the Cisco Career Certifications Tracking
System who meet the above requirements will be recognized as an Information
Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professional and will receive a letter of
recognition from Cisco.
++

Has anyone received this said letter of recognition from Cisco yet ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73514t=73514
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


Re: Re:Information Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professi [7:73606]

2003-08-06 Thread Alex Lee
Alan Ho  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 No. What are the above requirements?

 Thanks

 Alan


Content of e-mail from Cisco:-
+
Cisco Security Training Leads to Information Systems Security (INFOSEC)
Professional Certificate
In April 2003, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Committee on
National Security Systems (CNSS) awarded Cisco formal certification
recognizing that Cisco security courseware meets the 4011 training standard.
This standard is intended for Information Systems Security (INFOSEC)
Professionals responsible for the security oversight or management of
critical networks. This formal NSA and CNSS certification gives Cisco the
authority to recognize those candidates who have demonstrated that they have
met this training standard.

To be eligible for the INFOSEC Professional certificate, candidates must be
CCNA certified and pass these security exams:

  a.. SECUR-Securing Cisco IOS Networks (or MCNS)
  b.. CSPFA-Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced
  c.. CSVPN-Cisco Secure Virtual Private Networks
  d.. CSIDS-Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection System (or IDSPM)
This certificate indicates confidence in the competency of your skills. The
4011 standard for INFOSEC Professionals applies to all U.S. Government
departments and agencies, as well as to its contractors. Therefore, this
certificate will help you meet current or future Federal employment
requirements. In environments where these requirements do not apply, you can
use this certificate to demonstrate that you possess the knowledge and
skills needed to oversee and protect critical information infrastructures
and networks.

On July 1, 2003, candidates in the Cisco Career Certifications Tracking
System who meet the above requirements will be recognized as an Information
Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professional and will receive a letter of
recognition from Cisco. Candidates who partially meet these requirements can
track their progress using the online tracking system as with all Cisco
certifications at www.cisco.com/go/certifications/login. To learn more about
this and other training standards set forth by the CNSS, go to
www.nstissc.gov. Additional information about this INFOSEC certificate can
be found on the Certifications Online Support page at
www.cisco.com/go/certsupport.

+++

Alex Lee




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73606t=73606
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


CCIE Lab experience! [7:73263]

2003-07-30 Thread Alex Cosic
Hi there,

I have finished my CCNP exam.

Well, I live in Sydney, Australia and I still could not find job. I wish to
carry on with CCIE. I do not have problem with passing writing CCIE exam, but
what about practical exam of 2 days duration. I have found some programs on
the net. But is it enough to pass without practice. I have passed my CCNP by
only reading books and downloading simulation programs.

Can somebody give me advice whether I could carry on without real hand on
experince?

Is there some way to volonteer to work for free?

Is there some way to get free CCIE Lab experience?


Thanks in advance


Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73263t=73263
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bandwidth Utilization [7:73086]

2003-07-27 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, just wondering about this question, while are running in a ethernet
enviroment, we usually try to do capacity planning when the overall average
utilization exceed 70% of the available bandwidth, how about when we are
doing capacity planning in a Wan enviroment, I realised that data transfer
should be bursting , what should the threshold be for average utilization
before we considered busy, anybody who could shed some light


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73086t=73086
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]

2003-07-23 Thread Degracia, Alex
Make sure lmi is being exchanged.

Turn on keepalives for the pvc.



-Original Message-
From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]


Per these instructions, I am able to bring my frame connection online:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/frbacktoback.html

However when I intentionally break the connection (Pull the Cable) 
the PVC doesn't automatically come back up.  Is it because its static to
begin with?  I know I'm probably missing something very obvious but could
you explain why the interface does not come back online after being
reconnected?  So far, the only way I can get the connection back online is
by using a hard/software configured loopback and  removing it at which point
I'm up, up.

Thanks.

BTW Using IOS versions 12.1(20) and 11.2(26)P4. Configs are identical to the
instructions.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72872t=72869
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: route commands [7:72406]

2003-07-18 Thread Alex Muhin
The URL is for partners only. Where are the tech notes for us lowly
non-partner users?

Priscilla 

it is here
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk80/technologies_tech_note09186a00800ef7b2.shtml


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72568t=72406
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: do you know why? [7:72352]

2003-07-15 Thread Degracia, Alex
Sounds like arp requests arent being allowed through.

Once its the arp cache is maintained, it knows where to forward the packets.

Just my theory.

-Original Message-
From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: do you know why? [7:72352]


I have a pix firewall and i have a strange problem.
If any one of you have come across this pls let me know the solution.

I have few servers at both sides of the PIX.
eg. Server-A at Outside zone and Server-B at Inside zone.

1. When I ping from Server-B to Server-A, I get request timeout.
2. Now I go to Server-A and start a ping to Server-B. It works fine.
3. Then again I go back to Server-B to ping to Server-A, and now it 
starts pinging!!!

Can anyone of you explain this???
I need to get this thing resloved and straight away ping from B to A.
Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72359t=72352
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CCIE Program will be migrating to IOS 12.2 From July 7 2003 [7:71539]

2003-06-27 Thread Alex
Yes they will, you can download them from Cisco's web site but you need to
have a CCO account.

Alex
Ashok C Braganza  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can someone tell me, if the following Routers will support Cisco IOS 12.2?
 and where i can find these IOS.

 2501 (16D/16F)(2S,1E)
  2503 (16D/16F)(2S,1E,1ISDN)
  2511 (16D/16F)(2S,1E,16Asyn)
  2522 (16D/16F)(10S,1E,1ISDN)

 Thanks

 A. Braganza




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71539t=71539
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Teltone ILS-1000 ISDN Simulator [7:70798]

2003-06-17 Thread Alex
Hi
Does anyone know where i can get new ILS image for this unit.

Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70798t=70798
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


IOS upload error on 25xx [7:70453]

2003-06-10 Thread Alex
Hi

I was trying to upgrade IOS on 2501 router with 16MB flash and 16MB RAM, new
IOS image requires 16/16 according to Cisco web site.  Image size is 15,376
when I upload the image it fails with memory buffer overflow error.  I
tried this on different 25xx models same error on all of them.  If anyone
has any ideas please advice.

Thanks

Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70453t=70453
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Cisco 2000 problems [7:65837]

2003-03-20 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I used to be able to see the Hardware Mac address column while doing the
Topology Service on the VTP domain on the Cisco Work 2000, however , I am
unable to see it now ever since I reinstall and migrate Cisco work 2000 to
another pc, hopefully some body has encounterd the same problems before and
is able to shed some light thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65837t=65837
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Question on Traffic on the internet [7:65148]

2003-03-12 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
I am wondering about this question, if my vendor told me that their server
are resided locally and I assumed that traffic out through my ATM with 2Mb
local and 256Kb International will off course travelled through the 2Mb
local leased line nad considered local traffic,

I check the IP assign from Arin whois and found that it was indeed locally
assign, however, when I did a tracert or pathping in Win2K, I found out that
it actually route through a router with ip which is assign in the US from
Arin whois then to the vendor server, does it mean traffic is actually
travelling through the international pipe from my ATM or consider local,

My question is how will ISP determine your traffic whether it is local or
international traffic , is it base on the Destination IP or base on the
Router IP it is directed to. hope someone is able to understand my question
and shed some light. thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65148t=65148
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Microsoft MOM [7:63701]

2003-02-25 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I am trying evaluating the Microsoft MOM Microsoft Operation Manager,
wonder if anybody has got advice or feedback on the software. would
appreciate if someone using it is able to shed some light on site or book
that cover great detail on the usage and administrating of the MOM


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63701t=63701
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Layer 3 switching [7:63304]

2003-02-18 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I am trying to have a clearer picture of the layer 3 switching 

concept. 

Assuming that I have a Core Catalyst 6 series switch with layer 3 

switching capabilities, I have a Access layer switch connected to the 

core with two port label Vlan 1 subnet 1 and Vlan 2 subnet 2,

when frames is sent from from Vlan 1 to Vlan 2 on the same Access 

switch, my understanding is that for layer 3 switching , it will 

evoke a route one and switch the rest concept , my question is that,

after the first route , if no Access list has been created, will the 

the Access switch be smart enough to perform internal 

switching, that is , frame direct from Vlan 1 to Vlan 2 internally 

within the Access switch. If the answer is no, Are there switches on 

the market that is routing by this concept, please advice , 

thanks to all the guys who have tried to entertain all my questions






Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63304t=63304
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DNS query [7:63140]

2003-02-16 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I am kind of confuse right now, is it possible to have a domain that is
resolvable and yet I couldn't find any information on the internic or apnic
etc, what did I miss, any body to shed some light


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63140t=63140
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DR Planning capacity [7:62492]

2003-02-05 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I am trying to plan for disaster recovery and the data that are to be
backup will be transfer between a 3548 switch via a gigabit link to Core
6006 as well as to a backup server via gigabit link, therefore , data will
be passing through a Fast Ethernet and 1 gigabits pipe line with back plane
of 10.8 Gbps for 3548 and 6006 with 32 Gbps. Wonder if any body there who
could shed some light as to any website or way to go about doing this
capacity planning.What are the factor to take note and how do we
calculate.thank


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62492t=62492
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: History of the PIX Firewall [7:62512]

2003-02-05 Thread Alex Lee
Cool.

Richard Deal  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62540t=62512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Finding out of MAC address in Multilayer switch [7:61554]

2003-01-22 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I am trying to find out the MAC Address of certian IP in a multilayer
switch , it seem that the only way is to go to that Valn and do a sniffing
to discover , any other quick way from the console or from Cisco Work 2000,
please advice , thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61554t=61554
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Voice Over Internet [7:61467]

2003-01-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Hi Neil,

I am doing voice over IP over the Interet with one remote location
with a 512k ADSL connection and VPN with PPTP. The voice quality is
extremely good, with no echos, delays etc...  I am using netmeeting for the
voice over ip application and Windows 2000 server on both location as the
VPN servers. Clients are Windows 2000 Professional workstations.

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61469t=61467
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



QOS on IOS 12.1.10 2610 Router [7:61269]

2003-01-17 Thread alex
I can only apply service-policy out name to the main interface but not to
sub interfaces.  Can some one tell me if it automatically applyes to sub
interfaces.

Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61269t=61269
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Netbios on Wan [7:61249]

2003-01-16 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, wondering if it is possible to configure more than 1 ip for IP helper
address



Author: Amazing ()
Date:   01-17-03 01:18

ip helper address on the ethernet interface of the remote router. 

this will change the nbns broadcast to a unicast directed at the remote lan 


Frederico Madeira  wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 
 Hellow, 
 
 how i configure an 2600 router to permit acess for network neighborhood to 
 computers on the lan, in other words, how i make to see all computers of 
 my WAN in network neighborhood of windows explore ? 
 



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61249t=61249
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP load balancing questions [7:61095]

2003-01-15 Thread Alex Muhin
ISP1 should advertise 1.1.1.x/16 AND 1.1.1.x/24 ?

alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61096t=61095
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Please check my logic: ospf / frame-relay / broadcast [7:60715]

2003-01-09 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
On a non broadcast network, using the keyword neighbour will allow the DR
to start the adjacency with the indicated neighbours. Once the adjacency is
completed, all ospf traffic between neighbours will be unicast. Therefore on
such networks,  you do not need to add the keyword broadcast on the
frame-relay map statement for OSPF to work.

[ However not having the keyword broadcast may affect other network
functions that depend on the broadcast traffic, therefore it is a good idea
to put the keyword broadcast in the frame-map statement].


Any flaw in my logic?

Evidence: (you can see here that r1 is sending to r2 (10.10.1.2 ) , r3
(10.10.1.3) and r5 (10.10.10.5) via unicast. You can see that r2 is
responded with unicast.

r1#debug ip pac
08:26:51: IP: s=10.10.1.1 (local), d=10.10.1.3 (Serial0/0.1), len 76,
sending
08:26:51: IP: s=10.10.1.1 (local), d=10.10.1.5 (Serial0/0.1), len 76,
sending
08:26:51: IP: s=10.10.1.1 (local), d=10.10.1.2 (Serial0/0.1), len 76,
sending
08:26:51: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (local), d=224.0.0.5 (Ethernet0/0), len 64, sending
broad/multica

r1#debug frame pack int ser 0/0.1

08:32:51: Serial0/0.1(o): dlci 103(0x1871), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 80
08:32:51: Serial0/0.1(o): dlci 105(0x1891), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 80
08:32:51: Serial0/0.1(o): dlci 102(0x1861), NLPID 0x3CC(IP), datagramsize 80
---

on R2#

08:43:16: IP: s=10.10.1.1 (Serial0/0), d=10.10.1.2, len 76, rcvd 0
08:43:25: IP: s=10.10.1.2 (local), d=10.10.1.1 (Serial0/0), len 68, sending
08:43:25: IP: s=137.20.20.1 (local), d=224.0.0.5 (Ethernet0/0), len 64,
sending broad/mult
icast

- router configuration 

r1#show run int ser 0/0.1
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 198 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
 ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.0.0
 ip ospf priority 200
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.2 102
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.3 103
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.5 105
end


r2#show run int ser 0/0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 216 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 10.10.1.2 255.255.0.0
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 ip ospf priority 0
 ip policy route-map 10
 clockrate 128000
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.1 201
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi

r3#show run int ser 0/1
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 216 bytes
!
interface Serial0/1
 ip address 10.10.1.3 255.255.0.0
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 ip ospf priority 0
 ip policy route-map 10
 clockrate 128000
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.1 301
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi

r5#show run int ser 6/0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 222 bytes
!
interface Serial6/0
 ip address 10.10.1.5 255.255.0.0
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 ip ospf priority 0
 ip policy route-map 10
 serial restart-delay 0
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.1 501
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
end

Thank you,

Pierre-Alex Guanel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60715t=60715
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: CCIE LAB Study partner - UK [7:60116]

2003-01-02 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Happy New Year group study members ...

Is anyone currently studying for the CCIE Lab in the UK?

I have 9 Cisco routers / ISDN simulator / most of the CCIE Preparation
library and plenty of hands-on experience under my belt and 12 PC to
generate plenty of traffic.

I am looking for a study partner with ATM, Catalyst 3550 switches and Voice
Equipment or someone willing to share the expense of buying those gears.

Please contact me off-line if you are interested.

My lab is scheduled for October 29 2003.

Thank you,

Pierre-Alex Guanel

tel +44 (0)1695 725408

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60116t=60116
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco 2000 Problems [7:59338]

2002-12-16 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
I have some problems with the Cisco 2000,

here is the scenario, I have add in all the necessary Cisco device and
checked their attributes to be correct

however , when I try a topology services in Campus Manager , I am only able
to see the cisco 6006 and cisco 3548 switches , not a single 3524 and 3512
switches that are supposed to be detected , any patches need to done ? and
how do I go about doing it . thank





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59338t=59338
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco Work 2000 Manual user guide [7:58959]

2002-12-10 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, Anybody have ideas on book or site that reveal good information on how
to install, configure and use Cisco Work 2000,  thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58959t=58959
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Dumb question [7:58783]

2002-12-09 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
I am wondering if Hub could be subjected to loop problems , if not, what
will happen if there is a loop within a Hub enviroment


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58783t=58783
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco 2000 problems [7:58782]

2002-12-09 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I have been running Cisco Work 2000 smoothly until recently , upon
accessing the default page, I got a ? on the cookies column and my java just
won't run and I am not able to see the logon screen. I have tried removing
my java applet as well as clear all my cookies to no avail. Any one
encountered this problems before and is able to help. thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58782t=58782
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Catalyst 1600 Token Ring Report - [7:56671]

2002-11-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
After a very long trial and error procedure and a bit of luck, I finally
figured this switch out!

There are no commands to setup VLANS from the command-line on this switch.

You must use the TrueView Manager software which is available for free
download

at: http://www.madge.com/downloads-software-archived.asp

Once on the page above, you want to download from the link: Smart
Ringswitch Software R4.3 - Dec 00 (for RS Plus and RS Express only)

When you open the download, the software will install automatically. The
rest is obvious 

Pierre-Alex

NB. This switch run the same code as the SmartRing Switch from Madge. If
want a full documentation of the Cisco 1600 Token Ring Switch (since Cisco
Documentation on this Switch is very slim), you should go to the Madge Web
site.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56671t=56671
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Duplicating Address on HSRP [7:56431]

2002-10-28 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, I have been having this problems recently, Wonder if anyone could 

help me out on this one 

I am running a Collapsed Core Model with two Catalyst 6000 running on 

HSRP for redundancy , all link connect to the Access switches are 

Catalyst 3500 series with redundancy link and PVST Plus implemented

(The two Catalyst 6000 are defined as primary and secondary Root for 

all vlan except for VLAN 25. 

However, one direct link from the Core Bridge's port is connected 

without redundancy link)VLAN25 to 7206 Router interface(Root Bridge). 

Recently , the Router interface seem to be faulty and the whole 

network was town (affecting other Vlan) my understanding is that it 

should not affect other VLAN.

Error message as follow was given 

Oct 12 13:15:41: %STANDBY-3-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 10.25.0.1 
  on Vlan25, sourced by .0c07.ac19 
Oct 13 16:25:41: %STANDBY-3-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 10.25.0.1 
  on Vlan25, sourced by .0c07.ac19 
Oct 15 22:31:02: %STANDBY-3-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 10.25.0.1 
  on Vlan25, sourced by .0c07.ac19 
Oct 15 22:41:01: %STANDBY-3-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 10.25.0.1 
  on Vlan25, sourced by .0c07.ac19 
 

A reload on the Gigabit module was needed in order to solve the 

problems. I am not quite sure what could have cause this problems , 

anyone care to enlighten me , thank


My guess is that the faulty interface cause a recalculation for STP as the
Root is gone and that cause the link to be lost between the two catalyst and
thus resulting in a loop



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56431t=56431
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



O.T: CCIE Lab Partner - England. [7:56378]

2002-10-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Anyone studying for their CCIE LAB in the Manchester / Liverpool area?

I have gears  books. Let's talk offline: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks,

Pierre-Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56378t=56378
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



BGP Best Path Algorithm -- Trick [7:56356]

2002-10-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
OK, from Cisco http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/25.shtml

Step 3: Prefer the path that was locally originated via a network or
aggregate BGP subcommand, or through redistribution from an IGP. Local paths
sourced by network/redistribute commands are preferred over local aggregates
sourced by the aggregate-address command.


Step 4: Prefer the path with the shortest AS_PATH


Step 5: Prefer the path with the lowest origin type: IGP is lower than EGP,
and EGP is lower than INCOMPLETE

My question:  In step 3 if a path is locally originated within a AS, it's
path will always be shorter than any path learned through over means.

So what is the rational for this step? I bet it is used in some trick
configuration and I admit I have run out of imagination...

Any hint would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Pierre-Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56356t=56356
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP Best Path Algorithm -- Trick [7:56356]

2002-10-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Sorry about the bad grammar. I must have been tired. Here is the same
message again hopefully without typos.

OK, from Cisco http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/25.shtml 

Step 3: Prefer the path that was locally originated via a network or 
aggregate BGP subcommand, or through redistribution from an IGP. Local paths 
sourced by network/redistribute commands are preferred over local aggregates 
sourced by the aggregate-address command. 

Step 4: Prefer the path with the shortest AS_PATH 

Step 5: Prefer the path with the lowest origin type: IGP is lower than EGP,
and EGP is lower than INCOMPLETE

-
My question: In step 3, if a path is locally originated within a AS, its
path will always be shorter than any path learned through other means.

So what is the rational for this step? I bet it is used in some trick 
configuration, and I admit I have run out of imagination... 

Any hint would be greatly appreciated. 

Thanks, 

Pierre-Alex 


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56361t=56356
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Catalyst 1600 - Token Ring VLAN [7:56185]

2002-10-23 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am trying to do this on a Catalyst 1600:


port 1, port 2, port 3: in vlan 1

port 4, port 5, port 6: in vlan 2

port 7 and port 8: in vlan 3

If you know how to do this would you please give me a hand?

(Yes, I have read the (rather slim) documentation ...)
 
Thank you,

Pierre-Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56185t=56185
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218]

2002-10-09 Thread Alex Lee

I guess you suddenly remembered that this company must be the one which has
filed bankruptcy and has let all their BGP gurus to greener pastures.

The Long and Winding Road  wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a
 moment, until I remembered something.

 Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, and what was
it
 I remembered?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55221t=55218
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-10-08 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Great Britain Wiring 


I got to England after a long 15-hour trip ...

On my arrival I immediately went to a Electric shop to buy British Power
Cord.

Those are relatively cheap about 2 pounds something each, but I needed 12 of
those for my equipment.

The lad other there was very kind, he told me that I could make my own cord
from my American Power cord

using a socket that only cost half a pound. Here how it goes in England:

Green or Yellow is grown
Blue or Blank is neutral
Brown or Red is live

The process is pretty simple but quite time consumming: with a sharp knife
to strip the wires, a flat screw driver
and a Philips screw driver I made a plug every 10 minutes)

I also bought surge protectors at the store.  They are not cheap out there
(about 8 pounds for a 4-plugs surge protector
and 12 pounds for 6-plugs). 

Basically my total cost of conversion was: 6 pounds for the plugs + 48
pounds for the surge protectors (less than $100) ...

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55087t=53864
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Vlan Port Security feature [7:54772]

2002-10-02 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang

hi, wonder if anyone has used the port security or port protected before, I
am trying to implement the port security feature with 1-2 max mac address
for security reason, is there any implication on  overhead traffic that will
be created with this feature, Also, with the port interface shut down when
more than 2 mac address has been learned, will it turn back to on when the
original mac address learn is plug back in. thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54772t=54772
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco work 2000 [7:54773]

2002-10-02 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang

I have been trying to set up my Cisco work 2000, under resource manager
essential , inventory , check device attribute , I am able to check that all
device are correctly configured. However , when I try extract the topology
service network view on the layer 2 view, I find that some of my switch
discover by the resource manager are missing, anyone has any advice on that
, thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54773t=54773
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: slightly OT: Pingflood [7:54334]

2002-09-27 Thread Alex Lee

This is man ping under OBSD 3.2 -stable, i386 arch

+++
 -f  Flood ping.  Outputs packets as fast as they come back or one
 hundred times per second, whichever is more.  For every
 ECHO_REQUEST sent a period ``.'' is printed, while for every
 ECHO_REPLY received a backspace is printed.  This provides a
 rapid display of how many packets are being dropped.  Only the
 superuser may use this option.  This can be very hard on a net-
 work and should be used with caution.


OBSD can be downloaded from www.openbsd.org


sam sneed  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does anyone know where I can get a copy of this or something similiar for
 Linux. I found a windoze version but I need linux or UNIX.
 My ping versions of linux and SunOS do not have the -f option. The only
 version of pingflood I found on google is crap, the source code reads:




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54348t=54334
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PPPoE on Cisco 2500 [7:54139]

2002-09-26 Thread Alex Lee

Rahul,

I looked at the features listed for this ios image at the feature navigator
also but could not find anything which says 'pppoe client'. Have I missed
anything ? Thanks.

Alex Lee


Rahul Kachalia  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Yes it does.

 thanks,
 rahul.
 lab#
 lab#s ver
 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
 IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 12.2(8)T,  RELEASE SOFTWARE
 (fc2)
 TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
 Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
 Compiled Wed 13-Feb-02 21:11 by ccai
 Image text-base: 0x0306DA78, data-base: 0x1000

 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c)XB1, PLATFORM SPECIFIC RELEASE
 SOFTWARE
 (fc1)
 BOOTLDR: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c)XB1,
 PLATFORM SP
 ECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

 lab uptime is 18 weeks, 5 days, 4 hours, 50 minutes
 System returned to ROM by reload
 System image file is flash:c2500-is-l.122-8.T

 cisco AS2511-RJ (68030) processor (revision K) with 14336K/2048K bytes of
 memory
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54250t=54139
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-09-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I was hoping to find an UPS or surge protector that would work with both US
and UK, but after thinking, might be easier to find something when I get
there. Thanks anyway.

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53939t=53864
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-09-22 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I am moving to England next week (with my Cisco rack).

Are the outlets in England the same shape as the US?

Thanks,

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53864t=53864
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-09-22 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Thanks!

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53868t=53864
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Certificatiom [7:53666]

2002-09-19 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang

hi, everyone , is there any way to verify if it is true if a person claimed
he has a CCNP or CCIE certification ?


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53666t=53666
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCNP exam [7:53668]

2002-09-19 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang

hi, I am currently preparing for my CCNP module , however , the course that
I took which is Building Cisco Multilayer Switched Networks (BCMSN) was
quote as 640-504 and the exam I am taking now is
640-604, can any body tell me if there is any significant different between
the two. thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53668t=53668
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCNP BCMSN [7:52904]

2002-09-08 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang

hi, everyone , I am currently preparing for my CCNP BCMSN module exam which
will be in two month time , womder if any body has got any recommendation to
good simulation software orwebsite or any reading material, thanks.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52904t=52904
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: configuring catalyst 1200 [7:52319]

2002-08-29 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Tim, I have a Catalyst 1600 and I had the same problem. Here is the work
around I used:

1) I attached a modem to the console

2  I dialed in

3) I assigning an IP address

3) I disconnected and connected to the switch via telnet

Try this with your 1200 ...

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52330t=52319
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Responding to my second questions: Is this to prevent loops?

Well, there is no loop here because neither R2 nor R0 would have received
their local AS in the AS_PATH!

Pierre-Alex



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51183t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Everything I have read seems to indicate that R0 and R2 should have received
2 paths to the 172.16.0.0 network. I did a clear ip bgp * on R0. And I got
the expected result:

   Network  Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
*  172.16.0.0   10.10.4.1  0 103 102 101 i
*  10.10.5.10 0 101 i

Then I cleared R2. R2 did not get the extra route. Here is R2

   Network  Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
* 172.16.0.0   10.10.1.20 0 101 i




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51184t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

When I cleared R2, not only did I NOT get the extra path but I lost the
second path on R0. Here is R0 (after clearing R2)

   Network  Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
* 172.16.0.0   10.10.5.10 0 101




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51185t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Still thinking aloud: it seems that the problem is located at R3. When I do
a show bgp summary on R2 it apppears that it did not receive any prefix
from R3

NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down 
State/PfxRcd
10.10.1.2   4   10112771269200 00:04:321
10.10.2.2   4   10312661277200 00:01:330




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51186t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

On my previous post I said that the problem was on R3. It could also have
been on R2, if R2 rejected the update

I used a debug on R2 to locate the problem. R3 did send the update but R2
rejected it. Please note the keyword withdrawn at the end of the output
below:

R2#
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.1.2 Down User reset
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.2 Down User reset
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.1.2 Up
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.1.2 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 0, table
version
1, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.1.2 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 0ms, neighbor
version 0
, start version 1, throttled to 1
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.1.2 rcvd UPDATE w/ attr: nexthop 10.10.1.2, origin i,
metric 0,
path 101
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.1.2 rcvd 172.16.0.0/16
1d11h: BGP(0): Revise route installing 172.16.0.0/16 - 10.10.1.2 to main IP
table
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.2 Up
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.2 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 0, table
version
2, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.2 send UPDATE (format) 172.16.0.0/16, next 10.10.2.1,
metric 0
, path 101
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.2 1 updates enqueued (average=46, maximum=46)
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.2 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 12ms, neighbor
version
0, start version 2, throttled to 2
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.2 rcvd UPDATE w/ attr: nexthop 10.10.2.2, origin i,
path 103 1
00 101
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.2 rcvd 172.16.0.0/16
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.1.2 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 1, table
version
2, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.1.2 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 0ms, neighbor
version 1
, start version 2, throttled to 2
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.2 rcv UPDATE about 172.16.0.0/16 -- withdrawn


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51188t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

More supsense 

R3 sent an update but the message was that 172.16.0.0/16 is unreacheable.
That should explain why R2 did not accept the update!


R3#
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.1 Down User reset
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.3.1 Down User reset
1d12h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.2 Down Peer closed the session
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.3.1 Up
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 0, table
version
1, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 0ms, neighbor
version 0
, start version 1, throttled to 1
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 rcvd UPDATE w/ attr: nexthop 10.10.4.2, origin i,
localpref
50, path 100 101
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 rcvd 172.16.0.0/16
1d11h: BGP(0): Revise route installing 172.16.0.0/16 - 10.10.4.2 to main IP
table
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 1, table
version
2, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 0ms, neighbor
version 1
, start version 2, throttled to 2
1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.1 Up
1d12h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.2 Up
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 0, table
version
2, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 send UPDATE (format) 172.16.0.0/16, next 10.10.2.2,
metric 0
, path 100 101
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 1 updates enqueued (average=48, maximum=48)
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 12ms, neighbor
version
0, start version 2, throttled to 2
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 rcvd UPDATE w/ attr: nexthop 10.10.2.1, origin i,
path 102 1
01
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 rcvd 172.16.0.0/16
1d11h: BGP(0): Revise route installing 172.16.0.0/16 - 10.10.2.1 to main IP
table
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 2, table
version
3, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 NEXT_HOP part 1 net 172.16.0.0/16, next 10.10.2.1
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 send UPDATE (format) 172.16.0.0/16, next 10.10.2.1,
metric 0
, path 102 101
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 1 updates enqueued (average=53, maximum=53)
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.3.1 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 16ms, neighbor
version
2, start version 3, throttled to 3
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 computing updates, afi 0, neighbor version 2, table
version
3, starting at 0.0.0.0
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 send unreachable 172.16.0.0/16
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 send UPDATE 172.16.0.0/16 -- unreachable
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 1 updates enqueued (average=26, maximum=26)
1d11h: BGP(0): 10.10.2.1 update run completed, afi 0, ran for 8ms, neighbor
version 2
, start version 3, throttled to 3
[Resuming connection 1 to r4 ... ] 

On my next post, I will attempt to explain why the network was unreacheable!
Any one wants to guess? Gheese, am I playing alone? :)


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51189t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Stuck!


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51190t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Hey Pete,

Thanks for the explaination. It does make sense now!

There were two things I was not aware of:

1) Routers prefers the EBGP routes due to E vs I preference 
2) You are only allowed to advertise your best path for a particular NLRI

I went back to my books and tried to find references on the first point.
This is what I found: (Doyle, TCP IP vol2 : page 115)

1) Prefer path with the highest administrative weight
2) Prefer path with highest Local_Pref value
3) Prefer path originated locally i.e. from an IGP
4) Prefer path with shortest AS_Path
5) Prefer path with lowerst origin code
6) Prefer path with lowest multi_exit_disc value
7) Prefer EBGP paths over IBGP path
8) Prefer path with shortest path to bgp next_hop
9  install equal-cost routes in the Loc-RIB (maximum-path enabled)
10)prefer path with lowest BGP router ID (maximum-path not enabled)

There is no mention of EBGP path versus IBGP. Worse, if I was to go by the
rules above I would have to conclude that R4 should have chosen the path via
AS102 because of the highest LocPref. (see below)



R4sib
BGP table version is 3, local router ID is 192.168.250.4
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid,  best, i -
internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network  Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path
* 172.16.0.0   10.10.4.2  0 100 101 i
* i 10.10.2.1 100  0 102 101 i

There must be a set of rules out there that precede the rules above ...
Where did you learn about those? Are they published some place?


Thanks,

Pierre-Alex



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51202t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Hi Pete,

Here is the reference for rule 2: You are only allowed to advertise your
best path for a particular NLRI


Internet Routing Architecture (Second Edition), Sam Halabi page 155

The best routes, as identified by the decision process, are placed in the
Loc-RIB. These routes become candidates that can be advertised to other
peers or placed in the IP routing table. If a route is not placed int he
Loc-RIB, it cannot be placed in the Adj-RIB-Out for advertisement to peers

Still looking for a reference to Rule 1  

Pierre-Alex 


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51203t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Thanks Pete!!!

I will spend more time reading the rfcs.

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51215t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: break via reverse telnet [7:51192]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

That's correct... If you want to use a different escape character use the
command escape-character followed by the ASCII number
Example:

config t
line vty 0 4
escape-character 1

where: 

1=A
2=B
3=C 

etc...

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51216t=51192
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

This is the network:

AS101(R1) --- AS102 (R2) --- AS103 (R3)--- (R4)-AS100(R0) to AS101
(R1)

(R3 and R4 are IBGP neighbors)

I have route 172.16.0.0 on AS101 (R1) that is advertised via BGP.
When i do a show ip bgp, the only routers that have two paths to
172.16.0.0 are R3 and R4. R0 and and R2 only have on path

Given that I have a loop, I would have expected R0 to also have a path to
172.16.0.0 via As103 and R2 to also have a path to 172.16.0.0 via AS103.

Do I have a configuration problem or is this the default behavior of BGP
that it won't accept another path if it already has the information from a
directly connected neighbor? Is this to prevent loops?





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51169t=51169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CSIDS, self-study CD ROM [7:50287]

2002-07-31 Thread Alex Lee

Has anyone used this self-study tool (TRNG-800237, CSIDS 2.1) ?

Does it help in getting familiar with the CSPM's GUI interfaces if one does
not have hand-on experience in config 4200 series sensors and CSPM ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50287t=50287
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Kind suggestion is Needed! [7:50317]

2002-07-31 Thread Alex Lei

Mr. Ahmad,

I have found Tanenbaum's Computer Networks, 2nd edition to be a very good
book. Radia Perlman's Bridges and Switches is also a classic.

Alex

a. ahmad wrote:
 
 Dear All,
 
 I just want to work on my basic concepts of networking and for
 that I need the name of some valuable books. I am no more
 interested in studying CCNA,CCNP books as I have already
 studied those books. I hope you can understand my point. I
 just want my base as strong as possible and then gradually move
 towards advance networking stuff. My ultimate aim is to be a
 Voice Engineer.
 
 Thanks in advance!
 AA




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50329t=50317
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: Priscilla [7:50077]

2002-07-30 Thread Alex Lee

I bought a copy a minute ago.

Alex Lee

Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

 My new book has a troubleshooting focus. It will help people pass the
 Support Exam. It's called Troubleshooting Campus Networks. It's shipping
 finally! There's more info here:

 http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/

 Thanks for asking! ;-)

 Priscilla




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50106t=50077
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay NNI -- [7:49849]

2002-07-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I was not aware of this requirement. Thank you!!!

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49890t=49849
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Huawei routers - a.k.a. futurewei.com [7:49778]

2002-07-26 Thread Alex Lei

Groupstudy,

I'd be very very surprised if Huawei violated Cisco's rights, simply because
Huawei is the largest networking gear company in China, if they did anything
suspicious, Cisco would surely find them. From what I know, Huawei is a
pretty ethical company for a multi national corporation, and they sponsor a
lot of research projects in Chinese universities.

For the question in an earlier thread, Hua means China, Wei is effort or
achievement.

Alex

Ron Tan wrote:
 
 Hi group,
 
 Huawei routers were introduced into the local market sometime
 in the past 2
 months in an asian networking exhibition called Communicasia.
 
 That's where I met the Huawei distributor whom had volunteered
 to provide a
 demo set for me to play with (myself from an international mnc,
 has current
 projects to revamp our LAN/WAN structure) and guess what, my
 boss is
 requesting me to have a look at their routers !
 
 The day the router came into the office, I noticed that there
 were no
 manuals provided. After meddling with the router, I believed
 that there was
 no need to request for one in the first place ! There will be no
 requirements to load the box with IOS, it is IOS (with a bit of
 differences). The whole thing was CLONED !
 
 I'm not too sure about reversed-engineering but more on how
 Cisco  is going
 to protect their market dominance. With boxes selling for
 30-40% cheaper, I
 guess lots of ppl will be rushing off to buy it.
 
 Guess might as well I pack my bags for China to get a new set of
 certifications.
 
 Ron Tan
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49804t=49778
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Frame-Relay NNI -- [7:49849]

2002-07-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

My frame-relay switch died, so I put 2 1700 routers back-to-back to get
enough interfaces.

I made sure to use the interface type nni between the two 1700, yet it
looks like the two frame-relay switches are not talking to each other.

Anyone try this trick before. This is what I get:

frame2#show ro

frame2#show frame route
Input Intf  Input Dlci  Output Intf Output Dlci Status
Serial0 501 Serial1 301 inactive
Serial0 502 Serial1 302 inactive
Serial0 503 Serial1 303 inactive
Serial1 301 Serial0 501 active
Serial1 302 Serial0 502 active
Serial1 303 Serial0 503 active
frame2#
frame1#show frame
% Incomplete command.

frame1#show frame ro
Input Intf  Input Dlci  Output Intf Output Dlci Status
Serial0 101 Serial3 501 inactive
Serial1 102 Serial3 502 inactive
Serial2 103 Serial3 503 inactive
Serial3 501 Serial0 101 active
Serial3 502 Serial1 102 active
Serial3 503 Serial2 103 active
frame1#
[Resuming connection 2 to frame2 ... ]

frame2#show frame ro
Input Intf  Input Dlci  Output Intf Output Dlci Status
Serial0 501 Serial1 301 inactive
Serial0 502 Serial1 302 inactive
Serial0 503 Serial1 303 inactive
Serial1 301 Serial0 501 active
Serial1 302 Serial0 502 active
Serial1 303 Serial0 503 active
frame2#


-- and here are my configs ---
frame1#show run
Building configuration...

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname frame1
!
enable secret 5 $1$8trQ$MA9cUOeNwYnOmOPZsav8D0
!
!
!
!
!
memory-size iomem 25
ip subnet-zero
ip host frame2 2005 192.168.250.8
!
frame-relay switching
!
!
process-max-time 200
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 192.168.250.8 255.255.255.255
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Serial0
 description CHI
 bandwidth 1544
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 no ip mroute-cache
 keepalive 1
 fair-queue 64 32 0
 cdp enable
 frame-relay lmi-type cisco
 frame-relay intf-type dce
 frame-relay route 101 interface Serial3 501
!
interface Serial1
 description SJ
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay intf-type dce
 frame-relay route 102 interface Serial3 502
!
interface Serial2
 description ROCH
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 clockrate 128000
 frame-relay intf-type dce
 frame-relay route 103 interface Serial3 503
!
interface Serial3
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 clockrate 128000
 frame-relay intf-type nni
 frame-relay route 501 interface Serial0 101
 frame-relay route 502 interface Serial1 102
 frame-relay route 503 interface Serial2 103
!
interface FastEthernet0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
ip classless
no ip http server
!
!
line con 0
 transport input none
 escape-character 9
line aux 0
 no exec
 transport input all
line vty 0 4
 password cisco
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end

frame1#

---


frame2#
frame2#
frame2#show run
Building configuration...

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname frame2
!
enable secret 5 $1$Obxi$tJ7NyXAUQyrCbx6hvtcBr1
!
!
!
!
!
memory-size iomem 25
ip subnet-zero
ip host switch 2005 192.168.250.10
!
frame-relay switching
!
!
process-max-time 200
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 192.168.250.10 255.255.255.255
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Serial0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 no ip mroute-cache
 no fair-queue
 cdp enable
 frame-relay intf-type nni
 frame-relay route 501 interface Serial1 301
 frame-relay route 502 interface Serial1 302
 frame-relay route 503 interface Serial1 303
!
interface Serial1
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay lmi-type cisco
 frame-relay intf-type dce
 frame-relay route 301 interface Serial0 501
 frame-relay route 302 interface Serial0 502
 frame-relay route 303 interface Serial0 503
!
interface Serial2
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
interface Serial3
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0
 no ip 

Bus Error [7:49592]

2002-07-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router. 

I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004 
to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location, 
boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard
ressources and system IO

( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/112/appB.html#4000 ) 

The result of the test seems to indicate that my DRAM (lower location) is OK
but that the main board of the router is defective?

Is my interpretation correct? 


t m 
Memory/Bus diagnostic 

Starting Address [0x1000]? 0x0004 
Ending Address [0x100]? 0x067F 
Hex argument for variable tests [0x]? 
Select Tests [all]? 
Number of passes to run [2]? 
Trigger word for hardare debugging [0]? 
Message Level (0=silence, 1=summary, 2=normal)[2]? 

Testing addresses between 0x4 and 0x67f 

Begin pass 0, test 0 
Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x202 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x202 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020002 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020002 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020004 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020004 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020006 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020006 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020008 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020008 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x202000a in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x202000a 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x202000c in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x202000c 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x202000e in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x202000e 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020010 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020010 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020012 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020012 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020014 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020014 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020016 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020016 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x2020018 in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x2020018 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x202001a in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x202001a 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 0x202001c in test number 0 
while attempting short read at add 
ress: 0x202001c 
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 
non-local memory transaction timeout 
system overtemp 
local memory transaction timeout 
at address 

Hardware Diagnostic - How to interpret [7:49431]

2002-07-23 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router. 

I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004
to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location,
boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard
ressources and system IO

( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/112/appB.html#4000 ) 

The result of the test seems to indicate that my DRAM (lower location) is OK
but that the main board of the router is defective?

Is my interpretation correct?


t m
Memory/Bus diagnostic

Starting Address [0x1000]? 0x0004
Ending Address [0x100]? 0x067F
Hex argument for variable tests [0x]?
Select Tests [all]?
Number of passes to run [2]?
Trigger word for hardare debugging [0]?
Message Level (0=silence, 1=summary, 2=normal)[2]?

Testing addresses between 0x4 and 0x67f

Begin pass 0, test 0
Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x202 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x202
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020002 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020002
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020004 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020004
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020006 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020006
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020008 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020008
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x202000a in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x202000a
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x202000c in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x202000c
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x202000e in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x202000e
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020010 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020010
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020012 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020012
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020014 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020014
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020016 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020016
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x2020018 in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x2020018
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x202001a in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x202001a
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x202001c in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 0x202001c
SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491

Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0
non-local memory transaction timeout
system overtemp
local memory transaction timeout
at address 0x202001e in test number 0
 while attempting short read at add
ress: 

RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-17 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Manish, I think you have solved my problem ...Thanks also to Steven,
Priscilla, Tangled up in Blue, Brad and Bernard; I will try your suggestions
to.

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49031t=48947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-16 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I am about to start studying Voice topics for the CCIE lab 

How does one test that a call has actually been placed succesffuly when
doing remote-labs? Or maybe this is not possible and you actually have to
buy the gears to see the stuff working ...

I bet you would neeed some type of robot to pickup the phone  (just
kidding).

Thanks,

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48947t=48947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-16 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

That is good ... but does the fact that the modem ring and indication that I
have a proper voice link? Could it be that if picked up the phones that I
would not be able to hear anything from the other side?
And could a simple debug demonstrate that I have a crystal clear voice
connection on the other side with no echos, etc  Seems to me that I
would be missing quite a lot in doing a voice lab other the Internet. Are my
assumptions correct? Or am I just paranoid ...

Thank you,

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48961t=48947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX 520 Motherboard repair replace [7:48959]

2002-07-16 Thread Alex Lei

I don't know the details, but I would imagine that the boot roms are
different. I can't really see Cisco using a Phoenix bios... Finesse is the
original OS used in PIXes, the boot roms probably have the Finesse kernel
inside. Larry Letterman would probably know for sure.

Alex


Calorifer Gogu wrote:
 
 A couple of weeks back I bought for about $100 a defective
 CISCO PIX 520.
 The box came complete with one 16 MB Flash card and one NIC.
 The box was sold to me as Motherboard defective it is the
 Intell Al440LX moteherboard. I took apart PIX boxes before at
 work and noticed that they were actuall PC Mobos. That is why I
 reasoned that repairing the PIX 520 should be only a matter of
 replacing the board with an identicall one that retails for no
 more than $60.
 I also noticed that the newer boards on the PIX 520's are Intel
 SE440BX2 without sound modules.
 I went ahead and bought the new board and installed all cards
 but when I power up I get no console output. I reasoned that
 the Flash card might be bad and I installed one with 2 MB,
 still same results...No console output. I went to CCO and
 downloaded the Boothelper utilities to boot the PIX from the
 Floppy but that does not help either.
 I have read multiple discussions about Clone PIX and
 FrankenPIX where people stated that you can build one if you
 just have the Flash card... Aparently there is more to that.
 Any Ideeas? CISCO TAC told me that there is special drivers
 for the console port onboard the original Motherboards on a
 chip. I have some doubts about that considering that in all the
 times I contacted TAC with different issues I got vague answers
 and they allways missed the point regardless of the fact that I
 have a Partner contract.
 Meantime I acuired a local director with a working
 motherboard inside but without flash. I took that out and
 swapped out the PIX Mobo but I still get no console output.
 Meantime If I use the board as a PC board everithing is fine.
 Is there a certain BIOS that needs to be loaded on the
 Motherboard prior to installing the cards ?
 On the sho ver of some PIX 520 with 2 MB Flash there is a
 line:
 Finesse Bios V3.3 is this line refering to the bios on the
 board or on the Flash card ?
 
 
 Any insight in this issue will be appreciated




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48967t=48959
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX 520 Motherboard repair replace [7:48959]

2002-07-16 Thread Alex Lei

Facts have spoken. I retract my prior statements. 

By extension, could you have used a differenet MB / CPU? 

Alex

Mike Sweeney wrote:
 
 Special drivers? bunk-
 
 http://www.packetattack.com/frankenpix.html
 
 
 It can be replaced with a normal, garden varity Intel SE440BX
 motherboard. I happen to use a recycled PII 300Mhz slot1
 processor which had been used as a paperweight for the last
 year ;)
 
 MikeS
 
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48969t=48959
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CA , FQDN [7:48032]

2002-07-03 Thread Alex Lee

If an entity does not have a registered domain name and has no desire to get
one, how would one configure a router's FQDN for CA support assuming using
in-house CA server.

Can I do this :-

hostname  whatever_host_name
ip domain-name whatever_domain_name.foo




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48032t=48032
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Networkers Power Slides [7:47900]

2002-07-02 Thread Alex Lei

Thanks Steve. The slides are very helpful.

Alex


Steven A. Ridder wrote:
 
 Oops, wrong link.
 
 pad
 pad
 pad
 
 http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html
 
 
 --
 RFC 1149 Compliant
 
 
 
 
 Clayton Dukes  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  I didn't see the power slides there, where are they?
 
 
  Clayton Dukes
  CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Steven A. Ridder
  To:
  Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:09 AM
  Subject: Re: Networkers Power Slides [7:47900]
 
 
   Found the link finally.
  
   pad
   pad
  
   http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/update/index.html
  
  
  
   Steven A. Ridder  wrote in message
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What are the power slides?  But they are publically
 available, I just
  have
to find the link
   
--
   
RFC 1149 Compliant.
   
   
   
JohnZ  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does any one have the link to the Power Slides from San
 Diego
  Networkers
02.
 Are these even available yet.
 Thanks
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47965t=47900
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco VPN client and NAT [7:47430]

2002-06-26 Thread Alex Lee

So how does the Linksys or cisco 800 handles the IPSec thru PAT then ?
Thanks.

 Alex Lee

Lidiya White  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 PIX doesn't support IPSec transparency/IPSec over TCP. Concentrators do.
 It all depends on the device that is between your client and PIX, that
 is doing PAT.
 IPSec uses ESP protocol, that doesn't have ports, so how can you perform
 PAT (port address translation) for a protocol that doesn't understand
 port concept?
 Some routers can pass IPSec through the PAT (like Linksys, Cisco 800).
 So if the router/device that is doing PAT is IPSec aware, then you
 should be able to pass IPSec through. If not, then you have to make sure
 that one-to-one address translation happens for your VPN clients, not
 one-to-many (PAT)...
 Hope this helps...




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47476t=47430
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ISDN Gurus HElp! [7:47353]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Please send us the output of show isdn status on that router.

Thanks,

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47378t=47353
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Thanks for the landmark...

With an extra more focus, today I was able to do a new case scenario:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/bri_isdn_11048.html

in exactly 15 minutes. That was pretty stressfull!

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47379t=47320
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Thank you for the Tips Bernard. I will change my bad habits :)

Just curious... When you configure your routers do you enter all the
commands in global config mode, then interface mode, then router mode
? Or do you configure the routers according to the sequence in which the
router operates (for example: Layer 1, Layer 2, Layer 3)?

I have found that when I configure my routers the second way, I feel much
more in control of what is going on (because the config is logical). The
down side is that I take much more time because I am some how thinking about
the process while I am doing it.

On the other hand, when I configure from memory (i.e. all commands in global
mode, then interface mode ...) there is no internal dialog but things are
going much faster and I can keep within the timeline.

I would like to know how the folks who took the CCIE and those who are close
to taking it configure routers under time presure: memorization of configs
or sequence in which the router operates

Thanks,

Pierre-Alex






Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47384t=47320
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Understood ...

THANKS Chuck!!!

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47395t=47320
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Don, I did not understand your post.  Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47401t=47320
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CSS1 exams [7:47308]

2002-06-25 Thread Alex Lee

It is still there. Make sure you select 'show all topics'.


John Kaberna  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 It used to be up on securityie.com but it got taken down.  I would rather
 not post it here.  Email me off list.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47428t=47308
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: remote router IOS upgrade best practice [7:47283]

2002-06-24 Thread Alex Lee

Hi group,

I am trying to get info from the Groupstudy mail list archive as I remember
this was posted several times before. It seems that the archive is having
problem, gives me error message 'Glimpse Index Not found'. Can anyone offer
some insight ?

I have two 1720, each in a different subnet. One router had two 'memory
allocation error' problem in two months. Both times required power-cycle the
router. Opened a TAC case but could not find any memory hardware issue.  The
two 1720 are linked by a fractional frame-relay with an ISDN BRI dial
backup. TAC said there could be IOS bug related to ISDN BRI, recommended us
to upgrade from 12.1.1 to 12.1.15.
Anyone has similar problem ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47283t=47283
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ISDN DDR and Routing Protocols [7:47301]

2002-06-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I don't know which IGP protocols you run on your network (if any)... so this
is just a wild guess.

If you were running RIP it could trigger the link ...

(I would add: access-list 101 deny udp any any eq 520)

If you were running  OSPF 

(I would add: access-list 101 deny ospf any any)


Pierre-Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47321t=47301
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lab comming Frakin' out here [7:47055]

2002-06-20 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

I know the feelling ...

You said:  But what is really scaring me is the 
Old Stuff like Bridging, Token, IPX. 

Then why not postpon your lab and take the lab after November.

Apparently they are removing ipx and token ring?


Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47086t=47055
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

From router B, I pinged a boggus destination. This triggered the bri
interface on router B. Here is the output of the debug dialer events from
Router A. You can see that router A (for no apparent reason) is trying to
call router B (even though it is router B who initiated the call.) Of course
the result of this is that the isdn timers will time out because the only
channel available is busy with the call initiated by  router B.

Why would router A attempt to call the next hop? (172.16.1.2)


Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.2.3.6, timeout is 2 seconds:

00:17:27: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.16.1.1, d=172.16.1.2)
00:17:27: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 5554000
00:17:27: BRI0/0: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8006.
00:17:29: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.16.1.1, d=172.16.1.2)
00:17:29: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 5554000
00:17:29: BRI0/0: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8007.
00:17:31: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.16.1.1, d=172.16.1.2)
00:17:31: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 5554000
00:17:31: BRI0/0: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8008.
00:17:33: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.16.1.1, d=172.16.1.2)
00:17:33: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 5554000
00:17:33: BRI0/0: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8009.
00:17:35: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.16.1.1, d=172.16.1.2)
00:17:35: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 5554000
00:17:35: BRI0/0: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x800A.
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46607t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

No I am not running any routing protocol!

Here are my configs:

isdn1 (router A)

isdn1#show run
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 1166 bytes
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname isdn1
!
enable secret 5 $1$9PdI$e3RshbiT8O9CiQxW317VQ0
!
username isdn2 password 0 cisco
username isdn3 password 0 cisco
ip subnet-zero
!
!
no ip domain-lookup
ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1
!
isdn switch-type basic-ni
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0
 no ip address
 shutdown
 no fair-queue
!
interface BRI0/0
 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer map ip 172.16.1.2 broadcast 5554000
 dialer-group 1
 isdn switch-type basic-ni
 isdn spid1 51055512340001
 isdn spid2 51055512350001
 ppp authentication chap
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface Serial0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.2
ip http server
ip pim bidir-enable
!
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
!
line con 0
 escape-character 19
line aux 0
 no exec
 transport input all
line vty 0 4
 password san-fran
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end



isdn 2 (Router B)

isdn2#show run
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 1115 bytes
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname isdn2
!
logging rate-limit console 1
enable secret 5 $1$8Z95$B21CJMn0N8R9EqeGB8olj1
!
username isdn1 password 0 cisco
ip subnet-zero
!
!
no ip domain-lookup
ip host switch 2065 1.1.1.1
!
isdn switch-type basic-ni
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface BRI0/0
 ip address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer map ip 172.16.1.1 broadcast 5551234
 dialer-group 1
 isdn switch-type basic-ni
 isdn spid1 5105554001
 isdn spid2 51055540010001
 ppp authentication chap
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.1
no ip http server
ip pim bidir-enable
!
access-list 1 permit any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1
!
line con 0
 escape-character 18
line aux 0
 no exec
 transport input all
line vty 0 4
 password san-fran
 login
!
no scheduler allocate
end




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46608t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

You have default routes pointed towards one another. You ping an address
that doesn't exist on either router. The first sends it off to the second.
The second doesn't know what to do with it so sends it on to its default
which is the first.

I do agree with your statements ... However, what is the need to open a
second channel when there is one already opened? Shouldn't Router A use the
already existing channel?

Pierre-Alex



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46630t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Gaz, you are going to have to educate me on cultural issues ...

What is wrong with those numbers ? 

(ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1)

Pierre-Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46631t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Sorry Gaz, I did not mean to spoil to the suspense.  I thought you meant the
humbers 2065 1.1.1.1 were unlucky numbers. Something like  :) That is
why I asked you to explain if there was any cultural issues with my numbers
...

Anyway,I am redoing the exercise right now with Fast Ethenernet Interfaces
up and I am renumbering the loopbacks  I will let you  know.

Thanks!

Pierre-Alex


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46649t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Ok, here are the result of my tests (cummulative)

1) I gave the loopbacks unique IP addresses and tested 

result: no change

2) I  assigned isdn1 f0/0 to vlan11 and isdn f0/0 to vlan12
on isdn1 f0/0 ip address was 192.168.10.1/24 
on isdn2 f0/0 ip address was 192.168.20.1/24

I left the default route unchanged on both routers and tested

result: no change


3) I remove the default route and created specific routes instead

on isdn1: ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.2
on isdn2: ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1

result: no change. When the first bri channel was up, I was able to ping nor
the two fast ethernet interfaces nor the two bri interface. Strange!!!


4) I added the keyword name to each map statement (as suggested by Gaz)

on isnd1:dialer map ip 172.16.1.2 name isdn2 broadcast 5554000 
on isdn2:dialer map ip 172.16.1.1 name isdn1 broadcast 5551234

result: double success. RouterA (isdn1) did not try to initiate another
connection AND I was able to ping the fast ethernet interfaces and the bri
interfaces.

See below:

isdn2#ping 192.168.10.1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.10.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

01:12:30: ISDN BR0/0: RX  on B1 at 64 Kb/s
01:12:30: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0x10
01:12:131009057551: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up
01:12:30: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x94
01:12:30: Channel ID i = 0x89
01:12:30: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x94
01:12:30: Channel ID i = 0x89
01:12:30: ISDN BR0/0: RX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8  callref = 0x14
03:55:06: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up.
01:12:32: BR0/0:1 DDR: dialer protocol up.!!!
Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 32/32/32 ms
isdn2#
01:12:33: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1, changed
state to
up
03:55:09: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1, changed
state to
up

Now that the problem is solved (thanks Gaz, Daniel, Ahoang and Thomas), we
need to understand the reasons for the behavior of router A . To summarize:

1) Without the name keyword, routerA attempts to initiate a connection on
receiving a connection initiated by router B.

2) Once the channel setup from B is up, data traffic does not flow even with
proper routes.

My gut feeling is that name keyword is preventing data traffic to flow
between the two routers , even when the channel is up! This would explain
why routeA is attempting to open a new connection even though there is a
channel already up. routerA must be thinking that it is not allowed to use
the already existing channel to reply to router B ... but then it would mean
that something must have leaked from A to B to prone routerA to initiate a
connection ...
but what if not ip data?

I will do some more research on this and post my findingsremaksquestions
in a next post.


Pierre-Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46663t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 5-4-3 rule segment definition for 10BaseT [7:46439]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Well here is a start: the 5-4-3 rule reffers to 

5 segments

4 repeaters

3 populated segments

Pierre-Alex






Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46667t=46439
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces

Router A  ATLAS --- ROUTER B

Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call
router B or vice-versa (basic stuff).

When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link
goes up, but then (surprisingly), Router A attempts to initiate a connection
to Router B . This connection fails because I only configured the phone
number for one channel (Isdn error 17: User is busy).

Is this calling of Router A a normal behavior? (I don't think so!)

I fixed the problem by simpling removing the phone number from the map
statement of Router A. I am posting here the debug before and after I
removed the phone number on A. The debug where captured on Router A.

I have spent the day on the apparently trivial question: why is Router A
calling Router B when I have no call back of any sort.
Still no light ...  Want to step up to the challenge? :)

Before:

00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX  on B1 at 64 Kb/s
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0xD
00:32:193273528320: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up
01:51:113824615516: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x84
00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x84
00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x09
00:32:47: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:47: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:47: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x09
00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x0A
00:32:49: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:49: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:49: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x0A
00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x0B
00:32:51: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:51: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:51: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:51: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to  isdn3
00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x0B
00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x0C
00:32:53: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:53: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:53: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x0C
00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX  on B1 at 64 Kb/s
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0x10
00:41:227633266688: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up
02:00:14602128: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to
5551234
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x85
00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x85
00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8  callref = 0x05..
02:00:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed
state to up
00:41:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1, changed
state to
up.
02:00:40: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 isdn1
00:41:59: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to  isdn3..





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46496t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ISDN ....Challenging Problem! [7:46500]

2002-06-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Posted to Cisco Newsgroup at 3:30 on June 13, 2002

Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces

Router A  ATLAS --- ROUTER B

Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call
router B or vice-versa (basic stuff).

When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link
goes up, but then (surprisingly), Router A attempts to initiate a connection
to Router B . This connection fails because I only configured the phone
number for one channel (Isdn error 17: User is busy).

Is this calling of Router A a normal behavior? (I don't think so!)

I fixed the problem by simpling removing the phone number from the map
statement of Router A. I am posting here the debug before and after I
removed the phone number on A. The debug where captured on Router A.

I have spent the day on the apparently trivial question: why is Router A
calling Router B when I have no call back of any sort.
Still no light ...  Want to step up to the challenge? :)

Before:

00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX  on B1 at 64 Kb/s
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0xD
00:32:193273528320: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up
01:51:113824615516: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x84
00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x84
00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x09
00:32:47: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:47: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:47: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x09
00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x0A
00:32:49: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:49: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:49: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x0A
00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x0B
00:32:51: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:51: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:51: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:51: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to  isdn3
00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x0B
00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX  SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x0C
00:32:53: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
00:32:53: Channel ID i = 0x83
00:32:53: Keypad Facility i = '555'
00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX  RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x0C
00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX  on B1 at 64 Kb/s
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0x10
00:41:227633266688: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up
02:00:14602128: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to
5551234
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x85
00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x85
00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89
00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8  callref = 0x05..
02:00:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed
state to up
00:41:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1, changed
state to
up.
02:00:40: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 isdn1
00:41:59: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to  isdn3..





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46500t=46500
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pix don't route [7:46356]

2002-06-12 Thread Alex Lei

Wayne,

Why not use the router to terminate the links, and put the PIX behind the
router? The PIX will inspect the traffic, and the router can send traffic to
different links depending on where it originated from. Usually a 515 may be
a better solution because it has a DMZ interface where the server can sit
on, but I guess there is a cost concern.

Alex

Wayne Jang wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 The Pix don't route, but can I do this?
 
 I have a 2 server 20 user small office.
 
 I have a Pix 506 sitting in front of a 2621 with a T1 and a DSL
 link to the
 Internet.  I'm not looking to load balance or even do
 redundancy.  I just
 want traffic from the servers to use the T1 and I want traffic
 from the
 users to use DSL.  I could use access-lists on the 2621 to
 direct the
 traffic based on source address, but how will the 2621 know
 where the
 traffic came from?  Won't all traffic have a source address of
 the Pix
 outside interface?  What if I Nat the servers(on PIx) so that
 they will
 appear to have a different source IP than the users who will be
 behind the
 global outside address?  I'll need more public addresses, but
 that would be
 fine.
 
 I can't get any help from Cisco Pre-Sales because they aren't
 sure.  I can't
 get an engineer that knows more than me (not much).
 
 My fall back plan is to only use the 2621 and have a firewall
 IOS.  But I
 would rather use the Pix, especially because we have already
 quoted the
 above solution and are working to save face.
 
 Thanks
 
 --
 Wayne Jang
 Advanced Computer Technologies, Inc.
 108 Main Street
 Norwalk, CT 06851
 Wk 203-847-9433
 Cell 203-943-6603
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46358t=46356
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SNMP Management Using a Switch [7:46196]

2002-06-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Switches can do Layer 3 switching (hardware base routing) if they have a
router module or a router switch feature card. Pierre-Alex

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SNMP Management Using a Switch [7:46196]


I have a question regarding switches. Can I connect multiple hosts together
on a single switch?
I though switches can only perform layer 2 switching and not layer 3
routing. Am I right?

Scott




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46292t=46196
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

2002-06-09 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel

Steven, thanks for the answer. I am still have questions ...
Where do I find original documents on Frame-Relay?
Thanks

Pierre-Alex



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46172t=46076
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   4   5   >