RE: Reverse Telnet [7:74469]

2003-08-29 Thread Joe Gagznos
I had a similar issue with my 2511.  In chapter 2 of Caslow's book, Caslow
recommends using the modem host command under the line configuration.  The
command worked for me - I can now reverse telnet to all the devices.  Hope
that helps!


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74507t=74469
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


RE: CCIE Written Reading List ? [7:74317]

2003-08-25 Thread Joe Gagznos
Sounds like your on the right track with reading material.  I would pick up
a copy of Caslow's book - some of the material is a little dated, but the
frame relay section is one of the best I've read anywhere.  In addition, if
you can find a good buy on TCP/IP vol II buy it.  There is some good BGP 
multicasting examples and a decent introduction to IPv6.  CCIE practical
studies will be a good book for the lab, but if you see a good buy on it -
don't pass it up.

I think most importantly you will want to familiarize yourself with all of
the URL's at the bottom of the blueprint.  Many of the obscure technologies
on the blueprint can only be found in those URL's.  I think that if I had
spent more time reading those the first time, I would have saved myself $300.
  
Here are a couple great web resources for this exam:

www.writtenexam.com - Excellent site by Dennis Laganiere
www.ccprep.com - Check out the Token Ring document under Resources

Good luck!


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74350t=74317
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html


Re: IOS AUTH-PROXY problem [7:71956]

2003-07-06 Thread Joe Deleonardo
It could just be that in version of 12.2.15(T) it is finally fully
implemented.  12.1.5T(9) is just an earlier version.  I ran into this last
night while working on blocking Nimda and Code Red.  The feature required to
do the blocking was released in 12.1E (not exactly sure which version, I
can't find my notes).  I couldn't find the feature anywhere in the
documentation for 12.1, but as soon as I looked in 12.2, it was there. Hope
that helps.

Cheers,

Joe

- Original Message - 
From: d tran 
To: ; 
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:18 AM
Subject: IOS AUTH-PROXY problem


 All,
 Below is the configuration I have with AUTH-PROXY.  I don't understand why
 the configuration works with IOS version 12.2.15(T) but doesn't work with
IOS version
 12.1.5T(9).  With version 12.1.5T(9), I am not getting a authentication
failed.  Instead
 I am getting bad request.

 Any ideas?

 C2610#sh run
 Building configuration...
 Current configuration : 4248 bytes
 !
 version 12.1
 no service single-slot-reload-enable
 service timestamps debug uptime
 service timestamps log uptime
 no service password-encryption
 !
 hostname C2610
 !
 logging buffered 8192 notifications
 logging rate-limit 1
 no logging console
 aaa new-model
 aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ local
 aaa authentication login NONE none
 aaa authentication login TACACS group tacacs+ local enable
 aaa authentication login LOCAL local enable
 aaa authorization auth-proxy default group tacacs+
 enable secret 5 $1$Bj2H$ad4Dn5rkgKvwPZzJDKAgZ1
 !
 memory-size iomem 10
 ip subnet-zero
 no ip source-route
 !
 !
 no ip finger
 ip tcp intercept list 100
 ip tcp intercept connection-timeout 3600
 ip tcp intercept watch-timeout 5
 ip tcp intercept max-incomplete low 300
 ip tcp intercept max-incomplete high 1000
 ip tcp intercept one-minute low 100
 ip tcp intercept one-minute high 500
 ip domain-name micronetsolution.com
 ip host tac 2065 10.10.10.10
 ip name-server 172.17.1.2
 ip name-server 129.174.1.8
 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.100.0.71
 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.100.0.72
 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.100.0.254
 ip dhcp ping packets 5
 !
 ip dhcp pool DHCP
network 10.100.0.0 255.255.255.0
netbios-name-server 172.17.1.2 129.174.1.8
dns-server 172.17.1.2 129.174.1.8
default-router 10.100.0.254
domain-name micronetsolution.com
lease 3
 !
 ip inspect audit-trail
 ip inspect dns-timeout 15
 ip inspect name CBAC tcp timeout 3600
 ip inspect name CBAC udp timeout 3600
 ip auth-proxy auth-proxy-banner
 ip auth-proxy auth-proxy-audit
 ip auth-proxy auth-cache-time 1
 ip auth-proxy name AUTH-PROXY http
 ip audit info action alarm drop reset
 ip audit attack action alarm drop reset
 ip audit notify log
 ip audit po max-events 100
 ip audit name ATTACK attack action alarm drop reset
 ip audit name INFO info action alarm
 !
 !
 call rsvp-sync
 cns event-service server
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255
 !
 interface Ethernet0/0
  ip address 172.18.1.1 255.255.0.0
  ip nat outside
  half-duplex
 !
 interface FastEthernet1/0
  ip address 10.100.0.254 255.255.255.0
  ip nat inside
  ip auth-proxy AUTH-PROXY
  speed 100
  full-duplex
 !
 ip kerberos source-interface any
 ip nat pool natpool 172.18.1.1 172.18.1.1 netmask 255.255.0.0
 ip nat inside source list 130 interface Ethernet0/0 overload
 ip nat inside source static 10.100.0.71 172.18.0.71
 ip classless
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.18.1.254
 ip http server
 ip http authentication aaa
 !
 !
 ip access-list extended NAMEDACL
  permit tcp any any
  permit udp any any
  permit ip any any
 ip access-list extended in2out
  permit udp 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 any eq domain reflect traffic
  permit tcp 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 any eq www reflect traffic
  permit tcp 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 any eq telnet reflect traffic
  deny   ip any any
 ip access-list extended out2in
  permit icmp any any
  evaluate traffic
  deny   ip any any
 logging trap notifications
 logging facility local5
 logging source-interface Ethernet0/0
 logging 172.17.1.2
 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.100.0.71 eq www
 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.100.0.71 eq 443
 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.100.0.71 eq 22
 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.100.0.71 eq telnet
 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.100.0.71 eq ftp
 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.100.0.71 eq ftp-data
 access-list 110 permit tcp 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.100.0.254 eq
telnet
 access-list 110 dynamic lock-and-key permit ip 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
 access-list 110 deny   ip any any
 access-list 120 permit udp 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 any eq domain
 access-list 120 permit tcp 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.100.0.254 eq www
 access-list 120 deny   ip any any
 access-list 130 permit ip 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
 access-list 140 permit ip host 172.18.1.2 host 172.18.1.1
 access-list 140 permit icmp any 10.100.0.0 0.0.0.255
 access-list 140 permit icmp any host 172.18.0.71
 access-list 140

Re: GRE with IPsec [7:71964]

2003-07-06 Thread Joe Deleonardo
I don't have a source.  But, it's really very simple all you do is apply the
crypto map to the tunnel interface AND the physical interface between the
two devices.

Then add an ACL:

access-l 100 permit gre host  host 

You do that on each device of course.

And then the rest of it is just a standard VPN config.

Cheers,

Joseph


- Original Message - 
From: Michael Jia 
To: ; 
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 2:56 PM
Subject: GRE with IPsec


 Hi,

 Anyone has good reference doc about GRE with Ipsec .

 I am a little confused about 2 flavors of crypto ACL used:
 A) permit ip  
 B) permit gre any any

 It seems option A is encry first then GRE encap, while option B is encap
 first then encrypt.

 Is there a good ref about these setups?


 Thanks
 Michael




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71964t=71964
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: GRE with IPsec [7:71966]

2003-07-06 Thread Joe Deleonardo
Hmm, not sure what you mean but.

Really all you do is create your regular VPN.

Then you create your GRE tunnel.  then the ACL here is an abbreviated
example.

R1#
Int Lo0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

Int Tu0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
tun source loop0
tun dest 2.2.2.2
crypto map VPN

Int s0
ip address 101.101.101.101 255.255.255.0
crypto map VPN

access-l 100 permit gre host 1.1.1.1 host 2.2.2.2

That's it, then just take the same actions the other side.

It really is just the regular VPN, then extra crypto map on the GRE tunnel
and acl.

Better?


- Original Message - 
From: Michael Jia 
To: 'Joe Deleonardo' ; ;

Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: RE: GRE with IPsec


 Hi, Joe

 There is a sligt difference between A and B.
 Could you share some insights as well?

 Thanks
 Michael

 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Deleonardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 5:17 PM
 To: Michael Jia; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: GRE with IPsec


 I don't have a source.  But, it's really very simple all you do is apply
 the crypto map to the tunnel interface AND the physical interface
 between the two devices.

 Then add an ACL:

 access-l 100 permit gre host  host  destination

 You do that on each device of course.

 And then the rest of it is just a standard VPN config.

 Cheers,

 Joseph


 - Original Message - 
 From: Michael Jia 
 To: ; 
 Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 2:56 PM
 Subject: GRE with IPsec


  Hi,
 
  Anyone has good reference doc about GRE with Ipsec .
 
  I am a little confused about 2 flavors of crypto ACL used:
  A) permit ip  
  B) permit gre any any
 
  It seems option A is encry first then GRE encap, while option B is
  encap first then encrypt.
 
  Is there a good ref about these setups?
 
 
  Thanks
  Michael




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71966t=71966
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: GRE with IPsec [7:71967]

2003-07-06 Thread Joe Deleonardo
From your original email.

by permitting ip you're allowing everything over the IPSec tunnel.  If you
just permit gre you're just allowing the gre tunnel over the ipsec tunnel.
You might want to do this to transport something that ipsec can't handle by
itself, like AppleTalk or IPX.

You're thinking of it as a flavor.  That's the wrong mind set for this
concept.  Just think of it as a regular ipsec tunnel and all your acl does,
is just what any other acl does... controls granularity.

- Original Message - 
From: Michael Jia 
To: ; 
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 2:56 PM
Subject: GRE with IPsec


 Hi,

 Anyone has good reference doc about GRE with Ipsec .

 I am a little confused about 2 flavors of crypto ACL used:
 A) permit ip  
 B) permit gre any any

 It seems option A is encry first then GRE encap, while option B is encap
 first then encrypt.

 Is there a good ref about these setups?


 Thanks
 Michael




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71967t=71967
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]

2003-03-26 Thread Joe Earhart \(jearhart\)
It depends on what are you wanting to do with the (2) Ethernets coming from
the IBM router?  Trunk to the Cat?  Route (2) networks? Bridge?  I was just
saying that Spanning Tree is on by default on a catalyst and if by chance
the IBM router happened to be bridging then that is why one of the ports is
being shut down.

-Original Message-
From: Juli Hato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]

Hi Earhart,

May turn off the STP on the Catalyst? What mostly will happen then. Thank
YOu

Best Regards,
HATO


From: Joe Earhart (jearhart) 
Reply-To: Joe Earhart (jearhart) 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:19:25 GMT

Juli,
Make sure you don't have bridging turned up on the IBM, spanning tree may
be
shutting down one of the ports.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juli
Hato
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]

Hi all,

I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to
Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to
the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the
Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet ports from
the
IBM router active. How to counteract with this. Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,
HATO





_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66243t=66072
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]

2003-03-25 Thread Joe Earhart (jearhart)
Juli,
Make sure you don't have bridging turned up on the IBM, spanning tree may be
shutting down one of the ports.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juli
Hato
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]

Hi all,

I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to
Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to
the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the
Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet ports from the
IBM router active. How to counteract with this. Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,
HATO





_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66142t=66072
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]

2003-03-24 Thread Joe Earhart \(jearhart\)
Juli,
Make sure you don't have bridging turned up on the IBM, spanning tree may be
shutting down one of the ports.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juli
Hato
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]

Hi all,

I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to
Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to
the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the
Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet ports from the
IBM router active. How to counteract with this. Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,
HATO





_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66079t=66072
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Debug atm ilmi [7:64855]

2003-03-08 Thread Joe Chang
- Original Message -
From: John Tafasi 
To: Cisco Group Study ; ccielab

Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:13 PM
Subject: Debug atm ilmi


 Hi group,


 I am receiving ilmi errored responses from the Lightstream 100 switch that
I
 am using. Does any body know what could be wrong ?

 Here is the output from r6.


 r9#debug atm ilmi
  Setting ILMI debug for all interfaces.
 r9#
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Trying keepalive objects one at a time
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):SystemId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):PortMyIfId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):peerSysUpTime being queried for keepalive
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 108
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 109
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 110
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 108
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 109
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 110
 01:55:18: ILMI(ATM0):Verifying response to SysUpTime query
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Trying keepalive objects one at a time
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):SystemId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):PortMyIfId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):peerSysUpTime being queried for keepalive
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 111
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 112
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 113
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 111
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 112
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 113
 01:55:23: ILMI(ATM0):Verifying response to SysUpTime query
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Trying keepalive objects one at a time
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):SystemId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):PortMyIfId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):peerSysUpTime being queried for keepalive
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 114
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 115
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 116
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 114
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 115
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 116
 01:55:28: ILMI(ATM0):Verifying response to SysUpTime query
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Trying keepalive objects one at a time
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):SystemId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):PortMyIfId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):peerSysUpTime being queried for keepalive
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 117
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 118
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 119
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 117
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 118
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 119
 01:55:33: ILMI(ATM0):Verifying response to SysUpTime query
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Trying keepalive objects one at a time
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):SystemId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):PortMyIfId being queried for keepalive
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):peerSysUpTime being queried for keepalive
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 120
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 121
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Sending out Request 122
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 120
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAliveSysIdQuery
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 121
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response  Function Type =
 ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0): Errored response to ilmiKeepAlivePortIfQuery
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Response received for request 122
 01:55:38: ILMI(ATM0):Verifying response to SysUpTime query
 01:55:43: ILMI(ATM0):Trying keepalive objects one at a 

RE: CCIE Written Training [7:64107]

2003-02-28 Thread Joe Gagznos
Ben,

I am not aware of any formalized training programs in the Denver area for
the written exam.  However, I am organizing a study group with another
gentleman here in the Denver area specifically to tackle the CCIE written. 
You are more than welcome to contact me offline if you are interested in
joining us.

Joe



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64115t=64107
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Cisco ExecNet [7:55569]

2002-10-14 Thread Joe

Technology isn't necessarily heading in that direction - Cisco is
driving it there.  Bottom line is this: Cisco is traditionally a router
and switch manufacturer, and no one buys routers and switches these
days, at least not enough to provide continued growth for Cisco.
Company infrastructures are already built, have been for years, and are
running for the most part nowhere near capacity.  These technology
applications, besides generating hardware sales directly, will also
increase bandwidth consumption, thereby causing indirect hardware sales
when customers upgrade their routers and switches to support the new
bandwidth-hungry apps like VoIP.  If Cisco can drive the customers'
purchases in that direction, they win.

My two cents.

Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Albert Lu
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Cisco ExecNet


Hello Group,

Has anyone checked out the Cisco ExecNet, which is basically thoughts
about where technology is heading in the future from the VPs at Cisco.

http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/tln/execnet/

From what they are saying (specifically Mike Volpi), the direction for
technology is heading towards: CDN, Security, Wireless, IP Telephony,
VPN. Reegineering business processes to best utilise these technologies
in order to improve productivity and reduce cost for enterprises.

Does anyone have any comments about this, and where money will be spent
in the future for technologies?

Regards,

Albert Lu
CCIE #8705




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55569t=55569
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Please confirm (conf#99c2dc97cc6fe1343691b05392e865ac) [7:55570]

2002-10-14 Thread Joe A

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please confirm (conf#99c2dc97cc6fe1343691b05392e865ac)


Hi,

You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you
will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail
address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify
that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).  

PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN!  BY CONFIRMING THIS
EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE
POSTED.


By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:

1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.

2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.

3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com

4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.

5. The message is NOT inflammatory.

6. The message is NOT a test message.

To confirm, simply reply to this message.  No editing is necessary.
Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional
confirmations.


Welcome to GroupStudy.com!


--ORIGINAL MESSAGE-

From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Oct 11 03:42:39 2002
Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2])
by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA32229;
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 03:42:39 GMT
Received: from mickey (pcp01503282pcs.coatsv01.pa.comcast.net
[68.82.170.6])  by mtaout03.icomcast.net  (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1
HotFix 1.4 (built Aug  5 2002))  with ESMTP id
; Thu,  10 Oct 2002 23:42:08 -0400
(EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:42:04 -0400
From: Joe 
Subject: RE: Cisco ExecNet
In-reply-to: 
To: 'Albert Lu' , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: 
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal

Technology isn't necessarily heading in that direction - Cisco is
driving it there.  Bottom line is this: Cisco is traditionally a router
and switch manufacturer, and no one buys routers and switches these
days, at least not enough to provide continued growth for Cisco. Company
infrastructures are already built, have been for years, and are running
for the most part nowhere near capacity.  These technology applications,
besides generating hardware sales directly, will also increase bandwidth
consumption, thereby causing indirect hardware sales when customers
upgrade their routers and switches to support the new bandwidth-hungry
apps like VoIP.  If Cisco can drive the customers' purchases in that
direction, they win.

My two cents.

Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Albert Lu
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Cisco ExecNet


Hello Group,

Has anyone checked out the Cisco ExecNet, which is basically thoughts
about where technology is heading in the future from the VPs at Cisco.

http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/tln/execnet/

From what they are saying (specifically Mike Volpi), the direction for
technology is heading towards: CDN, Security, Wireless, IP Telephony,
VPN. Reegineering business processes to best utilise these technologies
in order to improve productivity and reduce cost for enterprises.

Does anyone have any comments about this, and where money will be spent
in the future for technologies?

Regards,

Albert Lu
CCIE #8705




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55570t=55570
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco ExecNet [7:55571]

2002-10-14 Thread Joe A

Maybe I should say IP Telephony, not VoIP.  How many uncompressed,
toll-quality calls can you push out simultaneously over a T1???  Have
you done the math? 24?   Maybe 23 on a good day.  Sure, if you use
compression you can squeeze in quite a bit more, but you can't deny that
IPT is bandwidth-hungry, with streaming MOH, voicemail audio streams,
the calls themselves.  Believe me, VoIP is absolutely a bandwidth-hungry
app.  No one who understands the technology would deny that.

Joe

-Original Message-
From: Nathan Chessin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:56 AM
To: 'Joe'; 'Albert Lu'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco ExecNet


1) Since when is VoIP a bandwidth-hungry app

Nate

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

 Joe
 Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:42 PM
 To: 'Albert Lu'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco ExecNet
 
 
 Technology isn't necessarily heading in that direction - Cisco is 
 driving it there.  Bottom line is this: Cisco is traditionally a 
 router and switch manufacturer, and no one buys routers and switches 
 these days, at least not enough to provide continued growth for Cisco.
 Company infrastructures are already built, have been for 
 years, and are
 running for the most part nowhere near capacity.  These technology
 applications, besides generating hardware sales directly, will also
 increase bandwidth consumption, thereby causing indirect 
 hardware sales
 when customers upgrade their routers and switches to support the new
 bandwidth-hungry apps like VoIP.  If Cisco can drive the customers'
 purchases in that direction, they win.
 
 My two cents.
 
 Joe
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
 Behalf Of
 Albert Lu
 Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:16 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: OT: Cisco ExecNet
 
 
 Hello Group,
 
 Has anyone checked out the Cisco ExecNet, which is basically thoughts 
 about where technology is heading in the future from the VPs at Cisco.
 
 http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/tln/execnet/
 
 From what they are saying (specifically Mike Volpi), the
 direction for
 technology is heading towards: CDN, Security, Wireless, IP Telephony, 
 VPN. Reegineering business processes to best utilise these 
 technologies in order to improve productivity and reduce cost for 
 enterprises.
 
 Does anyone have any comments about this, and where money
 will be spent
 in the future for technologies?
 
 Regards,
 
 Albert Lu
 CCIE #8705




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55571t=55571
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CSS Content Switch questions [7:55452]

2002-10-12 Thread Joe McCormack

Is anyone familiar with CSS11506 content switches?  I have some general
concept questions and am on an extremely short timeline (management
strikes again).  We can take this offline and not bore everyone else.

 

I will have two firewalls attached to the Internet with an IP address on
each (DNS round robin access) for every web server in the DMZ.  In a
shared DMZ I have two content switches, one per Pix firewall and
connected to each other.  It has been decided that we need three
subnets.  Can the CSS do routing between the subnets (as opposed to
going back to the firewall and having a cable to each subnet)?  I have
not found the answer on CCO yet but I am still looking.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Joe




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55452t=55452
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NAT [7:54838]

2002-10-03 Thread Joe Middleton

Hi All,

I am trying to set up NAT on a cisco 2600 router.  Everything seems to be
working except that I can not access resources on the inside using there
public IP address from the inside.  From the internet the router translates
the public addresses to private addresses, but from the inside I have to use
the private address to access any resource.  How can I get the router to
translate requests that originate from the inside?  Any help would be
greatly appreciated.

Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54838t=54838
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



channel partner benefits? [7:51334]

2002-08-13 Thread Joe Morabito

I was just wonderingOur company is close to becoming a Premier Partner. 
I
know there are benefits like you get listed on their partner site and you get
discounts from Tech Data and Ingram, but discounts to what level?  5, 10, 20
points?

Also, I heard a rumor (not from anyone on this list) that if you get Wireless
Specialization status, that only wireless products will get discounts from
distributors.  Is this true?

I ask this list only because the sales dept at my company is lacking in these
areas and I would like to get them up to speed.  I called our local Cisco
rep,
but he won't be coming out for a couple of weeks and I would like to have
some
information before meeting with him.

Thanks.

-Joe




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51334t=51334
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



IDS [7:51147]

2002-08-10 Thread Joe Rubino

I am on the trail of the last test for CSS1 Cert  - The IDS test.
From what I gather on their website; Cisco is phasing out CSIDS and
replacing it with IDSPM.  There are no books titled IDSPM.
So I have 2 questions:
A)  is the CSIDS book a valid study guide for IDSPM?
B)  If they are phasing it out how long do I have to take the  
CSIDS?

Thanks in advance JDR



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51147t=51147
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Dell switches [7:50934]

2002-08-10 Thread Joe Rubino

I have to concur with my colleague Mr. Brunner#8217;s 8/8 post and add this:
If Cisco would lower their Cost they wouldn#8217;t be shooting themselves
in the foot.  Yeah, Yeah I know Cisco quality and support#8230;  Ok they
are still the king of the hill and FOR THE MOST PART you get what you pay
for; however, ponder this #8211; we recently deployed 2 VPN 3002 hardware
clients and they had MADE IN MEXICO stamped on them#8230; WTF???




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51149t=50934
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352]

2002-07-23 Thread Joe Tutokey

Edward,

I had the same exact issue from the same exact book, I am working with a
LS1010 ASP in a 5500 switch (pretty much the same as your setup). The
previous post was correct in saying that you only have to enter the PVC on
one of the interfaces, do a show atm vc (I think that's right) and you
will see a list of all VPI/VCI pairs, the ports they are on and the VPI/VCI
pair they connect to and the associated port. Even though you have only one
PVC statement you will see that the ports are cross-connected properly
(there will be two entires in the table). Also, when you look at the table
it should show that the VC status is UP, if not there is another issue
going on.

Hope this helps!

Joe


Edward Sohn  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Heya,

 I'm kinda new at the ATM bit, and I'm having trouble configuring an
 L1010...

 I'm simply trying to perform the configuration as documented in Lab18 in
 the CCIE Practical Studies book.  I have two active ATM interfaces,
 12/0/0 and 12/0/2.

 As I go to enter in the first PVC command on 12/0/0, atm pvc 0 112
 interface ATM12/0/2 0 121, I don't seem to have any problems.  It's on
 the corresponding PVC command that I get an error.  When I enter in the
 atm pvc 0 121 interface ATM 12/0/0 0 112 command on the 12/0/2
 interface, i get an error stating, %connection creation fails: vpi/vci
 has been used by other connections.

 I tried this many times, without luck.  I was simply configuring the
 interfaces with the exact same commands as the book says.  I looked on
 CCO, but couldn't find anything regarding this...

 Anyone run into this before?

 Thanks in advance,

 Eddie

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name
of
 Notebook.jpg]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49400t=49352
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SSL Acceleration [7:47596]

2002-06-27 Thread Joe Tutokey

John,

My company is doing something similar. Our problem started with making
sure a clients web requestes stayed on the same server even while moving
from HTTP to HTTPS requests. We did not want to use redirects, so our Local
Director 416 could not cut it. I have installed a Cisco SCA-11000 SSL
accelerator in front of a Cisco CSS-11000 switch. Here are my thoughts so
far.

- the SCA-11000 passes any non-ssl traffic to the CSS-11000 to be load
balanced. The CSS-11000 does sticky load balancing on all HTTP packets
making sure the user maintains the same server.

- getting the key and cert into the SCA-11000, coming from a Win2K
server was a little interesting and I had to end up consulting some Cisco
TAC documents to find the exact steps to do this (only with a MS solution
though).

- when a customer transitions from a non-secure page to a secure page
(and maintain the same server), the URL will look something like this
https:whatever.asp. The SCA will
decrypt the inbound stream and hand it off to the CSS to be load balanced.
With the CSS's layer 5 ability to balance by info in the url, I can use the
server name in the URL to make sure the secure connection makes it back to
the same server (and maintains the session the client started). This
requires that our web servers have a directory that is labeled with their
server name and that the code used for the sure site is in that directory on
all the servers (unique for each server, of course). This was the least code
rewrite intensive solution we could find. It's been a real learning
experience too!! :))

If anyone else has been doing some similar things I would love to hear about
it!

Joe

John Neiberger  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 We're evaluating SSL acceleration for our web servers and the product
 currently up to bat is the Array 500TX.  With this device we can offload
 the SSL processing from the origin servers.  However, while testing the
 evaluation unit we're discovering that there's a lot more to this than
 simply loading the certs and keys onto the box and turning it on.

 For example, it may be that we have to rewrite portions of the code on
 our site to make it compatible with this solution.  There are also
 changes required on the web servers themselves to make them play nicely
 with the Array box.

 I'm wondering if any of you have implemented SSL accleration (with
 anyone's product) and what gotchas you might have run into.  I'm almost
 to the point of dropping the idea of SSL acceleration and simply
 suggesting that we add more servers!  :-)  That's by far the simplest
 solution and doesn't require any changes to our existing code or
 configurations.  We simply plug the server into our existing load
 balancing switch and, with a small tweak of that config, we're off and
 running.

 Any thoughts?

 John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47608t=47596
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help with RSP4+ and normal boot sequence in a 7 [7:47408]

2002-06-25 Thread Joe Tutokey

Hello (my first post!),

I have had a similar problem with my lab ls1010 ASP. It would always
load the image from the bootflash instead of the PCMCIA card camping in
slot0:. With the config register set to 0x2102 I tried the following:

-removing the flash simm from the ASP forced a boot to slot0: (there is
no image in the bootflash in this case)

-putting a boot system flash slot0: (pretty sure that is
the syntax) also worked, but the system takes a while to boot. It looks like
it loads the bootflash, then it interprets the config file and says to
itself he wants a different image and goes about loading it.


Hope this can help!

Joe Tutokey

David j  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi boys!
 I'm having problems with a 7500 I have upgraded a few weeks ago, when I
type
 sh ver in others 7500 that I have, I can see these lines:
 ---xx---
 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
 IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-IK8SV-M), Version 12.2(7a), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc2)
 Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
 Compiled Thu 21-Feb-02 04:23 by pwade
 Image text-base: 0x600109C8, data-base: 0x6179A000
 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(10r)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
 BOOTLDR: RSP Software (RSP-BOOT-M), Version 12.2(7a), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc2)
 ---xx---
 However when I do the same on the problematic router I can see the
 following:

 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
 IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-JK8SV-M), Version 12.2(7c), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
 Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
 Compiled Sat 11-May-02 11:02 by pwade
 Image text-base: 0x600109C8, data-base: 0x61B28000
 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(10r)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

 So as you can see, I can't see any reference to the BOOTLDR. I've talked
 with the boys at TAC and they haven't got any solution (I've rebooted the
 router 4 or 5 times, upgraded and downgraded the software)
 Anybody knows what is the correct process for booting a 7500 with a RSP4+?
 Cisco says that RSP4+ boots the main image directly without loading the
 bootflash, but I have 7 routers loading the bootflash before loading the
 main image.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47424t=47408
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Passed CCIE Written! [7:45881]

2002-06-10 Thread Joe Tutokey

Good Job! Congratulations!

Joe Tutokey
Juli Hato  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Congratulation Scott Chapin

 HATO


 From: Amir Azhar Jamaluddin
 Reply-To: Amir Azhar Jamaluddin
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Passed CCIE Written! [7:45881]
 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:58:25 -0400
 
 Congratulation on your success. May you do well in the lab too.
 
 Bravo
 
 -nict-
 
 -Original Message-
 From: scott chapin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:21 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Passed CCIE Written! [7:45881]
 
 
 Hello All - I passed the routing and switching exam today.  I wanted to
 pass
 on a big thanks to the group.  You all have been very helpful.
 
 I used:
 Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert by Sybex
 Boson practice exams
 Token Ring paper by Lou Rossi
 www.cisco.com, www.cisco.com, and www.cisco.com   :)
 
 Now on to the lab!
 
 Scott Chapin CCNP
 _
 Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
 http://www.hotmail.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46227t=45881
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MCNS [7:44968]

2002-05-24 Thread Joe Rubino

I am set to take the MCNS soon; can anyone offer any words of wisdom?


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44968t=44968
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Layer2 Layer3 or Hardware problem? [7:42391]

2002-04-23 Thread Joe Morabito

Hi all.  I have a real world problem and would like some thoughts, here it
goes.

Client has a central site with 7 remote locations.  Central site has a 6513
with MSFC2, all sites have T1 in.  Eigrp is used between sites and is fine.
At the central site lies an AS/400 that all remote sites connect into (users
use IBM client access).  All is IP no SNA anywhere.  What happens is at one
and only one location users get bounced out of there session about 4 or 5
times a day.  They have full connectivity to the central site, just no
AS/400.

So I was at the remote site where the problem exists, could ping the as400
fine.  So I waited for a blackout, it came.  When the users were bounced I
tried to ping the as400 and was unsuccessful.  I tried to ping the central
router and was good, I tried to ping the vlan ip address that the as400 was
in, that was good.  I even tried to ping other computers in the same subnet
as
the as400 and that was good.  Tried to ping the as400 again and that was NO
good.  These outages only last a couple of minutes and then it comes back up.

There is NO route flapping.  All eigrp neighbors stay put and all routes stay
put.

What is really strange is that this happens only from one remote location,
all
other locations are fine.  The as400 has only one NIC (ehternet) and all
other
sites connect to the same IP address.

So where is the problem?  I checked the port the as400 was plugged into and
found some errors, I found out that the port was set to 100/full and the
as400
nic was set to 100/half, so I adjusted the port on the switch to 100/half.
But if this was the problem, wouldn't all sites have trouble?  Could the
switch possibly be aging out its cam table to the remote site that is having
problems?

I don't remember if they blacked out again after changing the duplex (I had
been staring at debugs for about 8 hours).

I called TAC and bumped up the outbound queue size to the site that is having
problems, but haven't had a chance to call them back.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.

-Joe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42391t=42391
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Puzzles - WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]

2002-04-06 Thread Joe Morabito

solution for part A:

Lock the box, send it to your friend.  Send the key as a separate delivery.

In essence there are two deliveries made.


- Original Message -
From: Craig Columbus 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: Puzzles - WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]


 Part A:  I heard this one where the friend also has a key that will open
 his lock, but not yours.  Also, the condition is that no destructive
 techniques are allowed, so breaking or cutting wasn't a possible solution.

 Part B:
 He never states that the rope is attached to the top of the pole, just
that
 it's attached to the pole.  So, the answer is that the poles are somewhere
 between 0 and 32 feet apart.

 Craig

 At 11:33 PM 4/5/2002 -0500, you wrote:
 I'll bite.
 a) Boxes and diamond. Gordian Knot technique. Lock the diamond in your
box
 and send it to your friend. He breaks the lock or cuts open the box.
 b) Poles and rope. The poles are touching.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:55 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: My interview story [7:40553]
 
   The goal is to determine how you think.  Most real world solutions to
   problems can be applied to technological hurdles, or problems.
  
   As an example:
  
   Prep:
 You have an empty box, a lock, a key for your lock, and a
   diamond.
 Your friend has an empty box, and a lock for his box.
  
   Goal:
 You want to get the diamond to your friend via courier.  However
   the   courier will steal anything that is not locked.  How do you do
   this?
  
  
   Another example:
  
 If you have 2 20' poles, a 32' rope strung between them, and the
   lowest point of the rope is 4' off of the ground, how far apart are
   the poles?
  
   It gauges how one thinks and handles situations.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40678t=40553
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Creating Serial cross over cable [7:38280]

2002-03-14 Thread Joe Lin

Hi,

I am trying to figure out my options for creating 60pin serial cross
over cables.

If I had 2 cables that are 60pin to 25pin, can I just buy a 25pin null-modem
cable, connect them and create a serial crossover?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38280t=38280
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Creating Serial cross over cable [7:38280]

2002-03-14 Thread Joe Ferguson

No, I don't think that is possible.

I looked into the same thing a few months back and someone in one of these
groups posted a link on Cisco.com that showed all the pin outs for these
cables ( I can't find the link, sorry)  if I remember right there are
certain pins crossed together in the DCE side and different ones crossed
together in the DTE side... looked like it was going to be a real pain in
the neck.

someone else then told me about http://www.anthonypanda.com , he has these
60pin (DCE/DTE) crossover cables for $14.00 each. I think the website says
they are $18.00 each but he is also selling them on ebay for $14.00 and
should honor that price if you buy direct... at least he did for me. I
bought 6 of them. I set up a paypal account and fired off a few emails to
him to work out the details and I had the cables in a week...

... they work great and his responses to my emails were fast and complete..
I had NEVER bought ANYTHING online like this and was VERY nervous about
doing so but I gotta say that this went very smooth .

Unless someone knows a better price, that is the best price I was able to
find ANYWHERE.

there is a shipping cost involved (I think he is in Hong Kong) and I am not
sure what it was but my total bill was $110.00 for all 6 cables.

I would recommend using him if you are thinking about buying them.

Disclaimer: I do not work for him nor am I involved with him in any way
other then as a one time customer. I only offer this info because these are
useful cables and he has a good price for them. If I would have used ebay I
would have given him a good feedback comment and since I didn't, I can at
least do this   :^)

-Joe-






Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38344t=38280
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Static NAT entries timeout value?? [7:37910]

2002-03-11 Thread Joe Morabito

For deleting sub interfaces, you need to reload, but for nat translations
use:


clear ip nat trans *

-Joe


- Original Message -
From: s vermill 
To: 
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: RE: Static NAT entries timeout value?? [7:37910]


 If you can reload the router I would do that.  Very strange but not
 uncommon.  Someone here recently had a problem where a router was load
 balancing accross deleted subinterfaces.

 Cisco Nuts wrote:
 
  Hello,
  Is there a timelimit on how long a router keeps the static nat
  entries in
  its buffer EVEN though you take out the entries from the router?
  I can still ping the ip's from other routers even though I took
  out the
  entries on the nat router. I would think that this would only
  be possible if
  the router keeps the entries in its buffer but am not sure??
  Thank you.
  Regards.
 
  Output:
  NAT Router:
  RTB#sh ip nat trans
  RTB#
  RTB#sh ip nat statis
  Total active translations: 0 (0 static, 0 dynamic; 0 extended)
  Outside interfaces:
Ethernet0, Serial0
  Inside interfaces:
Serial1
  Hits: 0  Misses: 0
  Expired translations: 0
  Dynamic mappings:
  RTB#
 
  Notice the 0 static !!
 
  Now from a client router:
  RTC#ping 172.16.11.10
 
  Type escape sequence to abort.
  Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.11.10, timeout is 2
  seconds:
  !
  Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max =
  4/5/8 ms
  RTC#ping 172.16.6.15
 
  Type escape sequence to abort.
  Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.6.15, timeout is 2
  seconds:
  !
  Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max =
  4/5/8 ms
  RTC#
 
  These are the static entries that I had just taken OFF the NAT
  router:
 
  ip nat inside source static 10.10.50.4 172.16.11.70
  ip nat inside source static 10.10.60.4 172.16.11.10
  ip nat inside source static 10.10.70.4 172.16.6.15
 
  Any ideas??
 
 
  _
  Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
  http://www.hotmail.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37917t=37910
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]

2002-03-09 Thread Joe McCormack

I took the beta BCRAN last Thursday and plan to take the beta Support on
Monday the 18th.  I do not think I would have any problem with the
regular BCRAN test because I am having no trouble with Transcender and
Boson tests.  The 3 hour beta is a royal pain.  I will probably take the
regular test rather than wait three months to see the results.  

If I do not feel 100% ready for the Support test by Next Friday I may
take the regular test instead.

Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Tarek Sabry
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]

OK I just took it. Yes 3 hours. But the number of questions is
horrendous!
It definitely took me by surprise. I thought as I have been studying for
my
CCIE lab for the past year or so (on and off) then this will be a walk
in
the park. Was NOT!

First of all I did not know that you cannot go back to questions.
Definitely
I would have had a different strategy. I wasn't simply prepared for that
so
I ended up spending too long on some questions, which I regretted later
because I had a lot of very difficult questions in the beginning and a
lot
of easy ones in the end that I wish I could spend like 20 seconds on
each
instead of 3! I had 10 minutes to answer 45 questions in the end!!!

I never took CCNP v2 but rumor has it that its routing exam isn't that
hard.
Well, maybe I'm not that competent, but today I had real tricky
questions in
this Beta. Well, but again the way the questions were asked was also
really
bad in some instances. For the first time in an exam I just had to leave
some comments for some of the questions.

I don't know if I'll pass or not. I think I still did OK. The lesson I
learned from taking this test without preparing for it is that CCNP and
CCIE
are just very different ball games, and not just 2 levels of competence.
You
can get get away with some uncertainties as to how things really work,
but
in the CCNP (or at least this new version) this is much less the case.

Tarek



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Byron
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]


any confirmation on the time? i plan to take it next week.

byron
- Original Message -
From: EMW_Tech
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]


 I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of
1
hour

And was it three hours?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37767t=37500
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: strange problem [7:37359]

2002-03-05 Thread Joe Morabito

6)  the crossing guard got a virus and is out sick today, now the packets
don't know where to go

5) someone accidentally unplugged the internet

4)  bill g$tes tried to upgrade the internet and it blue screened on him

o.k. I am out of ideas...


- Original Message -
From: Chuck 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: strange problem [7:37359]


 David Letterman's top 10 reasons this customer can't browse the internet:

 10) aliens are abducting the packets

 9) someone experimenting in Tessla physics has created a time warp nearby.
 the packets will reach the internet tomorrow, or they may have been thrown
 back in time and have arrived before the internet was created

 8) Art Bell is talking about this phenomenon at this very moment on his
 radio show

 7)  the server is temperamental and would rather talk to other people than
 your customer

 6) through 2)   make up your own. I have to stop because I have finally
 realized I will never have a successful career in comedy

 1) there is an access list on the edge router that is wreaking havoc

 my best guess, never having seen configs or traceroutes, etc

 Chuck








 kaushalender  wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Hi group
 
  I am facing strange problem one of customer whom we have given 128Kbps
  linkand connected on ppp ecapsulation. They r not able to browse the
  website.When i did traceroute and ping it was working fine and customer
  is able to reach the internet .But when i typed www.yahoo.com in the
  browser the browser was respoding website found waiting for reply  and
  it keeps on waiting .Can somebody can help me in identifing that why
  http request is dieng or geting killed




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37366t=37359
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35648]

2002-02-16 Thread Joe Morabito

Chuck,

I was just going over the steps laid out in caslow's book, do you think the
step 1, step 2, step 3 approach is better than the layered approach - layer
2, layer 3, access-list, etc.

Thanks.


- Original Message -
From: Joe Morabito 
To: Chuck Church ; ;

Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776!


 Congrats!

 What did you do the last couple of months?  Practice speed?  Or maybe
 practice the many little things in IOS?

 Thanks!

 I too long for a good night sleep


 - Original Message -
 From: Chuck Church 
 To: ; 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM
 Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776!


  All,
 
  I think the title says it all.  Took the lab today at RTP.  4th time
  was the charm.  I don't know where to begin.  Might as well start with
the
  thank you's.  Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass.  Thanks
 also
  to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out
 in
  the past with problems.  Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list
  together.  As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole
story.
  Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the
 Novell
  and MS Certs.  After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE
written
  in October 2000.  Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare
  for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP.  Didn't know much
more
  than your average CCNP would.  Tried again in April, but BGP killed me,
 and
  again I didn't make it to day 2.  After that, I found a study partner
  (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer.  Did all the
 bootcamp
  labs, thought I knew everything I needed to.
  November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab.  I don't
  know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1
 day
  format had a very low pass rate.  I know I could have used a couple more
  hours to finish.  If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and
  failed, don't be discouraged.  I think they've scaled it back a little
  nowadays.
  Fast forwarding to today.  After spending a week with Val, Bruce,
  and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed,
I
  felt pretty prepared.  Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's
 book
  made sense.  Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this
 morning.
  Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch.  At that point I was done
  with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's.  In other words about 2/3
 of
  the way done, by my estimate.  At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back
 and
  work on 3 things I couldn't figure out.  A little discussing with the
  proctor, and 2 of them were fixed.  But then I think I read too much.  I
 had
  solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might
  change what they were looking for.  Checking with the proctor, I got the
  impression that he really didn't like my solution.  So there I am, 1.5
 hours
  to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :(  Looked OK, but with
1/2
 an
  hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o  10
minutes
  to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double
  check all my other work as time expired.  I know I left 1 thing
 unconfigured
  (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes.  They
 said
  to expect the results tomorrow afternoon.  A plane flight back to New
 York,
  and there's the email waiting.  8776!
  If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list:
 
  Groupstudy!  Paul's done a great job.  There are certain people on this
 list
  that should be flagged as must-reads.  I won't mention any last names,
but
  there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a
 huge
  asset to this list.  Thanks guys.
 
  Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP,
but
  were afraid to ask.
 
  Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val
 Pavlichenko
  - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon.  This book
covers
  most everything.  I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and
  QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet.  But still the most useful book I've
  found.
 
  Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is
in
  that book.
 
  Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company
 was
  cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't!  Great
preparation
  and simulation for the test.
 
  Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source!
 
  Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/  Bruce and
Val
  explain the most difficult subjects very well.  A couple of things are a
  little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class.
 Be
  prepared to work your a** off that week though.  8:30AM to 11PM is the
 norm
  that week.  But I highly recommend it, especially if you've

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35281]

2002-02-13 Thread Joe Morabito

Congrats!

What did you do the last couple of months?  Practice speed?  Or maybe
practice the many little things in IOS?

Thanks!

I too long for a good night sleep


- Original Message -
From: Chuck Church 
To: ; 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM
Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776!


 All,

 I think the title says it all.  Took the lab today at RTP.  4th time
 was the charm.  I don't know where to begin.  Might as well start with the
 thank you's.  Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass.  Thanks
also
 to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out
in
 the past with problems.  Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list
 together.  As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story.
 Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the
Novell
 and MS Certs.  After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written
 in October 2000.  Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare
 for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP.  Didn't know much more
 than your average CCNP would.  Tried again in April, but BGP killed me,
and
 again I didn't make it to day 2.  After that, I found a study partner
 (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer.  Did all the
bootcamp
 labs, thought I knew everything I needed to.
 November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab.  I don't
 know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1
day
 format had a very low pass rate.  I know I could have used a couple more
 hours to finish.  If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and
 failed, don't be discouraged.  I think they've scaled it back a little
 nowadays.
 Fast forwarding to today.  After spending a week with Val, Bruce,
 and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I
 felt pretty prepared.  Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's
book
 made sense.  Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this
morning.
 Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch.  At that point I was done
 with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's.  In other words about 2/3
of
 the way done, by my estimate.  At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back
and
 work on 3 things I couldn't figure out.  A little discussing with the
 proctor, and 2 of them were fixed.  But then I think I read too much.  I
had
 solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might
 change what they were looking for.  Checking with the proctor, I got the
 impression that he really didn't like my solution.  So there I am, 1.5
hours
 to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :(  Looked OK, but with 1/2
an
 hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o  10 minutes
 to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double
 check all my other work as time expired.  I know I left 1 thing
unconfigured
 (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes.  They
said
 to expect the results tomorrow afternoon.  A plane flight back to New
York,
 and there's the email waiting.  8776!
 If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list:

 Groupstudy!  Paul's done a great job.  There are certain people on this
list
 that should be flagged as must-reads.  I won't mention any last names, but
 there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a
huge
 asset to this list.  Thanks guys.

 Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but
 were afraid to ask.

 Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val
Pavlichenko
 - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon.  This book covers
 most everything.  I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and
 QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet.  But still the most useful book I've
 found.

 Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in
 that book.

 Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company
was
 cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't!  Great preparation
 and simulation for the test.

 Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source!

 Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/  Bruce and Val
 explain the most difficult subjects very well.  A couple of things are a
 little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class.
Be
 prepared to work your a** off that week though.  8:30AM to 11PM is the
norm
 that week.  But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to
 passing before.

 Well, sorry to ramble on so much.  I'm off to bed for a L O N G
 sleep.

 Thanks again,

 Chuck Church
 CCIE 8776
 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE
 Sr. Network Engineer
 Magnacom Technologies
 140 N. Rt. 303
 Valley Cottage, NY 10989
 845-267-4000 x218
 _
 Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
 Please discuss commercial lab 

RE: VIP2 microcode [7:34511]

2002-02-06 Thread Joe Carr

Daniel

I just found out that the VIP2 is a VIP2-40 so I don't think
that memory is the issue.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Daniel Cotts
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VIP2 microcode [7:34511]

Long reply coming back: The following is a cut from a show diag. Note
the
Controller Memory Size line. In this case it most likely is a VIP2-10.
Do a
search on CCO for Mandatory Memory Upgrade - here is one of the finds:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn4489_05141999.html 
TGN_7507sh diagbus
Slot 0:
Physical slot 0, ~physical slot 0xF, logical slot 0, CBus 0
Microcode Status 0x4
Master Enable, LED, WCS Loaded
Board is analyzed 
Pending I/O Status: None
EEPROM format version 1
VIP2 controller, HW rev 2.04, board revision D0
Serial number: 04378695  Part number: 73-1684-03
Test history: 0x00RMA number: 00-00-00
Flags: cisco 7000 board; 7500 compatible

EEPROM contents (hex):
  0x20: 01 15 02 04 00 42 D0 47 49 06 94 03 00 00 00 00
  0x30: 68 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

Slot database information:
Flags: 0x4  Insertion time: 0xFF4 (7w3d ago)

Controller Memory Size: 8 MBytes DRAM, 512 KBytes SRAM

PA Bay 0 Information:
Ethernet PA, 8 ports
EEPROM format version 1
HW rev 1.14, Board revision A0
Serial number: 15355261  Part number: 73-1391-08 

PA Bay 1 Information:
Ethernet PA, 8 ports
EEPROM format version 1
HW rev 1.12, Board revision A0
Serial number: 06632776  Part number: 73-1391-07 

--Boot log begin--

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software 
IOS (tm) VIP Software (SVIP-DW-M), Version 11.3(11a), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 20-Sep-99 07:31 by jjgreen
Image text-base: 0x60010910, data-base: 0x6016E000
  
  
--Boot log end--
  

 -Original Message-
 From: Joseph Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:56 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: VIP2 microcode [7:34511]
 

 ***END CUT FROM CONSOLE***
 
We also did a sh diag and saw that the board is disabled 
 wedged and the
 memory amount is unknown (like before), and this time, it 
 doesn't say the sw
 version (under sh cont cbus) and the microcode status is 0x5.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34666t=34511
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VIP2 Issue [7:34330]

2002-02-04 Thread Joe

Georg,

   Unfortunately I already had the c5rsm-jsv-mz.121-10.bin image loaded.
I'm going to try the c5rsm-jsv-mz.122-3.bin image and see if I still have
the problem.

Joe

 Any system that has a VIP installed must have a v image (currently av
or
 jv). For example:

rsp-ajv-mz.111-472*

rsp-jv-mz.111-472*

 Can you check what your IOS version is exactly ?
 Regards,
 Georg




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34426t=34330
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



aux port redial [7:34066]

2002-02-01 Thread Joe carr

I have a 2511 with a modem attached to the AUX port and I use a chat script
to
get the modem to dial. I have no trouble getting connected but I have to send
traffic over the interface to get it to come up. So if the interface gets
disconnected how can I get it come back up with issuing a ping or manually
sending traffic over the line.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34066t=34066
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: aux port redial [7:34073]

2002-02-01 Thread Joe carr

- Original Message -
From: Joe carr
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: aux port redial


I have a 2511 with a modem attached to the AUX port and I use a chat script
to
get the modem to dial. I have no trouble getting connected but I have to send
traffic over the interface to get it to come up. So if the interface gets
disconnected how can I get it come back up with issuing a ping or manually
sending traffic over the line.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34073t=34073
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: aux port redial [7:34082]

2002-02-01 Thread Joe carr

- Original Message -
From: Joe carr
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:37 AM
Subject: Fw: aux port redial



- Original Message -
From: Joe carr
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: aux port redial


I have a 2511 with a modem attached to the AUX port and I use a chat script
to
get the modem to dial. I have no trouble getting connected but I have to send
traffic over the interface to get it to come up. So if the interface gets
disconnected how can I get it come back up with issuing a ping or manually
sending traffic over the line.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34082t=34082
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE benefits [7:33871]

2002-01-31 Thread Joe Carr

Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does
a CCIE receive




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33871t=33871
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: CCIE benefits [7:33872]

2002-01-31 Thread Joe Carr

- Original Message -
From: Joe Carr
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:26 AM
Subject: CCIE benefits


Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does
a CCIE receive




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33872t=33872
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE benefits [7:33874]

2002-01-31 Thread Joe Carr

Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does
a CCIE receive?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33874t=33874
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VIP2 ATM issue [7:33898]

2002-01-31 Thread Joe Carr

I have a cat5000 with sup III and RSM w/VIP2 card. in the VIP card I have a
songle port OC3 multimode fiber card installed.
When I session into the RSM I cannot access the atm interface and it does not
show up  in a show int or a show run. I can see the VIP2 on the sup III as an
expansion module. Can you help me?

Thanks,
Joe




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33898t=33898
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE starting pay [7:33899]

2002-01-31 Thread Joe Carr

what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33899t=33899
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE starting pay [7:33912]

2002-01-31 Thread Joe Carr

haha very funny




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33912t=33912
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Telnet to PIX from outside interface [7:30413]

2001-12-29 Thread Joe

PIX cannot be telnet from outside. Use SSH instead.
ietobe  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,Guy
 Can anybody tell me how to allow telnet from outside network on PIX?

 Tks

 Gabriel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30426t=30413
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Off Topic - Good 3920 simulator [7:28802]

2001-12-10 Thread gz joe

where to download it?thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28812t=28802
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is Pix failover can be Load balancer ? [7:26673]

2001-11-19 Thread Joe

Check out Alteon load balancer, they have a white paper how to do firewall
load balancing. And they are very complicated  expensive. And why not just
buy a high end model with gigabit throughput then no need for load
balancing?
Sivarajan Thiruvadi  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi Pals

 I wish to know wheather 2 cisco pix firewalls can be configured for
 redundancy
 as well as Load balancing.

 In general failover means in case of active PIX fails the stand by one
will
 come into line.
 But my customer wants FWLB (Fire wall load balancing).
 If any one has idea on this please help me.

 Thanks and regards
 Siva




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26687t=26673
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DLSW issue [7:25179]

2001-11-03 Thread Joe

Just wondering how to do point number 5 without using the keyword
promiscuous? Do I use dlsw prom-peer-defaults?
news  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hey guys

 I need help on understanding DLSW.
 I can not use the keyword promiscuous any where in my config.

 R3 and R2 is connected to Ring 100.  R5 is connected to R3 and R2 via
serial
 link.

 Task:
 1. establish DLSW peer from R5 and R3 and R2
 2. R5 should choose R2 as a better path to reach Ring 100
 3. If R2 is unavailable then  R3 should be backup for R5
 4. R3 and R2 should establish peer only when there is a DLSW data to sent
 5. Configure R3 such a way so that if any router is added to the network
 will establish a peer with R3 to reach Ring 100

 Any tips or suggestion on how to configure these?

 Faisal




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25181t=25179
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Token Ring defined [7:24643]

2001-10-30 Thread Joe

Both are wrong.
Physically, it is a star all connected to a token ring MAU. Logically, it a
ring with token passing.
Dave Luancing  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I have conflicting reports. I see in one of my books
 that token ring is a physical ring - logical star.

 The next book claims a physical ring - logical bus.

 Which is correct?

 -D.L.

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
 http://personals.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24644t=24643
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: What do you cats do for motivation? [7:24549]

2001-10-29 Thread Joe

I am sick of networking after doing it for a few years and I quit my job and
take a long break for 2 years and do something that is totally irrelevant to
computer. During that period, I go flying and learn my private pilot
license, travel, then come back and everything change and learn all the way
to my CCIE.

Take a break if don't feel good.
Ouellette, Tim  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Man O Man. I'm finding it super-tough to stay motivated with all of this
 super-duper-heavy-geeky CCIE studying that I have to do. How do you guys
 keep your mind focused and your eyes straight ahead?  I find it really
easy
 to answer my phone on a friday night and talk to my buddies, next thing
you
 know i'm at the local pub forgetting my name.  I've got soo many books to
 ready, and soo man labs that I want to do.  The light at the end of the
 tunnel isn't even close to being visable and it's tough. Can anyone help?

 btw, anyone used any audio tapes/cd's to listen to cisco type stuff during
 the commute to work? I was thinking about doing something like that but I
 think hearing my own voice speak would be enough to drive me insane. Any
 thoughtS?

 Tim




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24602t=24549
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Feedback on SNMPc 5.1 NMS [7:23976]

2001-10-23 Thread Joe

SNMPc is not cheap either. Although it is a good product if you can't afford
the HP openview. In my experience, those customer with that amount of
routers will probably perfer something even cheaper like Whatsupgold
althought there functions are limited.
Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hai,

 I need some feedback on a product from www.castelrock.com called SNMPc 5.1
 We are testing the product here in Malaysia to be sell to other small
medium
 co that can't pay for HP or Sun NMS.  From our brief testing with the
 evaluation product, it is a good NMS for small scale network node.
 Any good or bad feedback on the product is most welcome.  Currently the
 customer that we are about too perpouse the product is running on NT
 Enviroment with 8 cisco router, 6 of em are 1700S and the rest are 2600s.

 Thanks

 Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23980t=23976
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pix firewall training docs [7:23794]

2001-10-22 Thread Joe Black

just wanted to see if anyone is interested in selling their Cisco Pix
Firewall Advanced training guides email me... thanks
Joe




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23794t=23794
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BSCI [7:23323]

2001-10-17 Thread Joe

Yes, there are the famous book Routing TCP/IP Volume 1 should do the jobs
and you will pass with flying color if you understand all of it.
fahim  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi Group
 Can anyone suggest me book for BSCI (Building Scalable Cisco
Internetworks)
 exam 640-900, It seems there is no Cisco press book, if you happen to give
 this exam, pls let me know which books you used.

 Thanks
 Fahim
 CCNA, CCDA




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23326t=23323
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



vlans [7:17919]

2001-08-30 Thread Joe Morabito

If you have a switch that has 2 vlans (vlan1 and vlan2) using the same
physical connection to the rest of the network, what happens to vlan1 if
vlan2 is suffering from a broadcast storm, since both vlans traverse the
same physical wire?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17919t=17919
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CCIE Equipment Discounts [7:17980]

2001-08-30 Thread Shojayi Joe

Cisco SE's get 60%. That's a good discount. I know of one company that gets
44%.

Joe


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18023t=17980
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



using the upgrade command on a GSR [7:17767]

2001-08-29 Thread Shojayi Joe

I recently upgraded  the software on one of our GSR's. All of my interfaces
are going nuts. I did a show version and noticed that it was saying upgrade
rom-monitor upgrade switch fabric. I tried the upgrade rom-monitor
command and the router seems to be hosed. No resonse at the console. I
logged into the back up GSP card and it was in rom-mon mode. So I'm a little
confused as to what's going on. Anyone ever seen this before? Please let me
know if you have any suggestions. Thank you.

Joe


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17767t=17767
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: I HAVE QUESTION How can i know who conn to my rout [7:17575]

2001-08-28 Thread Shojayi Joe

Try a 
router show sessions

show sessions is the command


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17577t=17575
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE:QoS on CAT6k [7:17576]

2001-08-28 Thread Shojayi Joe

You can use CAR on a router to rate-limit by aggregate. It will rate-limit
by IP, sub-net, or just blanket converage. If you want to rate-limit with a
CAT6k, then you must have a MSFC card. You can use CAR on the MSFC. But that
is creating (one token bucket) or one rate for all the traffice within the
designation. If your CAT6k has a PFC also, then you can implement microflow
switching, another form of rate-limiting for QoS. Microflow switching can
scale to a maximum of 32,000 flows on the PFC. After that, it will start
taxing your processor. I do not know the age-out time for the flows, using
microflow switching, if anyone know, please let me know. You can set
microflow switching to use the ingress or egress. You create a QoS ACL, then
you map the QoS ACL to either a port or a VLAN. QoS rate-limiting can also
be done the same way as microflow switching, except as an aggregate; you
simply choose aggregate instead of microflow. Microflow switching will
rate-limit by flow. You could create a rate-limit for the flows within a
VLAN, and then an aggregate rate-limit for all of the traffic. There are
several ways of doing rate-limiting this way. Hope his helps.

Joe


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17576t=17576
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CAR, is it a decent solution? [7:16737]

2001-08-21 Thread Shojayi Joe

The way I understand it and when I used it in our lab environment CAR works
good. You can rate-limit per IP, IP block, or all traffic as an aggregate.
DCAR is where the processing is distributed to the VIP. So I don't see how a
2600 could use that. Of course on an interface that use a VIP card, if you
go into the interface itself, you can tell it to use only cef and not dcef
by typing ip cef only. Car can rate-limit using access-list which the
rate-limit can references. You can also create a access-list rate-limit.
CAR uses the token bucket scheme. There is one bucket for each list, unless
you use the continue option, then your flow may match several limits. You
can set the TOS bit or IP precendence with CAR as well. You can make it so
that the flow compared to one rate-limit then continues on to as many other
rate-limits as you would like. The key I think to CAR is to remember that
the rate-limit looks at the flows, but acts as an aggregate.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16737t=16737
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Need help with Microflow Switching! [7:16549]

2001-08-20 Thread Shojayi Joe

I need help setting up Microflow switching. I have a 6506 with a sup1a-ge,
it has the MSFC and PFC in it. I can't get it to use Microflow switching.
I'm trying to set our customers to a certain bandwidth limit, but it won't
engage at all. If anyone can be of help, please let me knoow. If you have
some questions for me, please ask! Thank you.

Joe


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16549t=16549
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Cache Engine [7:16291]

2001-08-16 Thread Shojayi Joe

We use ce-590's a in several places. We're using WCCP v2, so our routers
must run at least 12.0(11). The 2.1 code is has had a lot of problems. We've
upgraded all of ours to 2.51. We're waiting for the release of the Ruby code
(4.1). There will be a lot more features available in it, as well as a lot
of bugs fixes. At this time we only cache http, but we average around 40%
hits. This equates to about saving 10% of our back haul. The cache servers
ahave worked great for us. A service such as Cidera can give you a 22mb.
satellite feed, where your cache server can easily get hot content with
out traversing the internet, further saving you bandwidth and delay, for a
very small fee of course.

Joe


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16305t=16291
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Microflow Switching Question [7:16216]

2001-08-15 Thread Shojayi Joe

I'm trying to learn more about microflow switching. I understand that
microflow switching can rate-limit by aggregate or by flow. I would like to
rate-limit ip flows going through our network that use our switch. I was
looking at CAR, but CAR only uses one token bucket. I need a solution that
will create a (dynamic) token bucket for every flow, instead of the flows
using one token bucket for ALL bits. I've been trying to get Microflow
switching to work, but have been unsuccessful. If anyone has any
suggestions, please let me know.
Thank you.

Joe


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16216t=16216
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Pix and WIN2K IPSec tunnel [7:16108]

2001-08-14 Thread Joe Morabito

Wondering if anyone can help...

Here is the scenario:

(untrusted - DMZ) WIN2K -  PIX   -- (trusted - internal WIN2K)

I plan on setting up a Win2K IPSec tunnel between the two servers.  Is there
anything special that needs to be configured on the Pix if it will only be
passing the traffic?

Also, both of these servers are on the inside of a 1700 that goes out to the
Internet, but that should not make a difference.

Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16108t=16108
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



access lists [7:13928]

2001-07-27 Thread Joe Morabito

How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all internet
traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out?

I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any  and the ethernet uses an
inside
addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside.

But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial
interface, people can no longer get outside.  Any ideas?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13928t=13928
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Urgent... [7:13351]

2001-07-23 Thread Joe

Change the following line at BOBKBOM

dialer map ip 10.4.0.50 name BOBKHYD broadcast 0403391011
to
dialer map ip 10.4.10.50 name BOBKHYD broadcast 0403391011


sakella locuz  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi everybody,

 I am in a big problem..request ur assistance immediately...
 This is the configuration now working on 2 routers connected over a leased
 line also has a ISDN backup. While the leased line is working we tried the
 backup by switching of the leased line modem. The ISDN connection came up
but
 there was nothing traversing over the connection.

 We checked the status, connection is absolutely OK, also we found that the
 leased circuit configuration when removed totally and connected over ISDN
 data
 flows smoothly.

 Kindly reply with exact problem...enclosed is the running config..

 -- show running-config --

  Building configuration...

 Current configuration:

 !

 version 12.0

 service timestamps debug uptime

 service timestamps log uptime

 no service password-encryption

 !

 hostname BOBKHYD

 !

 enable secret 5

 !

 username bobk password 0

 username BOBKBOM password 0

 ip subnet-zero

 !

 isdn switch-type basic-net3

 !

 !

 !

 interface Ethernet0/0

  ip address 10.4.10.50 255.255.255.0

  no ip directed-broadcast

  no keepalive

 !

 interface Serial0/0

  ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252

  no ip directed-broadcast

  no ip mroute-cache

  backup delay 0 600

  backup interface Dialer1

  backup load 60 40

  no fair-queue

 !

 interface BRI0/0

  description connected to BOBKBOM

  no ip address

  no ip directed-broadcast

  encapsulation ppp

  dialer rotary-group 1

  isdn switch-type basic-net3

  no cdp enable

 !

 interface Serial0/1

  no ip address

  no ip directed-broadcast

  shutdown

 !

 interface Dialer1

  description connected to BOBKBOM

  bandwidth 64

  ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0

  no ip directed-broadcast

  encapsulation ppp

  no ip split-horizon

  dialer in-band

  dialer idle-timeout 600

  dialer map ip 10.4.0.30 name BOBKBOM broadcast 0222805890

  dialer hold-queue 10

  dialer-group 1

  no cdp enable

  ppp authentication chap

 !

 ip classless

 ip route 10.4.0.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/0

 ip route 10.4.0.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer1 100

 ip http server

 !

 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit

 !

 line con 0

  exec-timeout 0 0

  transport input none

 line aux 0

 line vty 0 4

  password

  login

 !

 end

 -- show running-config --

 Building configuration...

 Current configuration:

 !

 version 12.1

 service timestamps debug uptime

 service timestamps log uptime

 no service password-encryption

 !

 hostname BOBKBOM

 !

 enable secret 5

 !

 username bobk password 0

 username BOBKHYD password 0

 !

 !

 !

 !

 memory-size iomem 25

 ip subnet-zero

 !

 isdn switch-type basic-net3

 !

 !

 !

 !

 !

 !

 !

 !

 !

 interface Serial0

  description connected to bobkhyd

  bandwidth 64000

  ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252

  no fair-queue

 !

 interface BRI0

  description connected to BOBKHYD

  no ip address

  encapsulation ppp

  dialer rotary-group 1

  isdn switch-type basic-net3

  no cdp enable

 !

 interface FastEthernet0

  description connected to fastethernetLAN

  ip address 10.4.0.30 255.255.255.0

  no keepalive

  speed auto

 !

 interface Dialer1

  description connected to BOBKHYD

  ip unnumbered FastEthernet0

  encapsulation ppp

  no ip split-horizon

  dialer in-band

  dialer idle-timeout 600

  dialer map ip 10.4.0.50 name BOBKHYD broadcast 0403391011

 dialer hold-queue 10

  dialer-group 1

 no cdp enable

  ppp authentication chap

 !

 ip classless

 ip route 10.4.10.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0

 ip route 10.4.10.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer1 100

 ip http server

 !

 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit

 !

 voice-port 2/0

 !

 voice-port 2/1

 !

 !

 line con 0

  transport input none

 line aux 0

 line vty 0 4

  password

  login

 !

 no scheduler allocate

 end



 -Surya-




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13360t=13351
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: QUERY ON DLSW [7:13188]

2001-07-21 Thread Joe

At router B, Put the token ring into ring-list and the ethernet to port-list
dlsw ring-list 1 rings 10
dlsw port-list 2 ethernet 0
Peer with router A using port-list 2 and Router C using ring-list 1
dlsw remote 2 tcp 
dlsw remote 1 tcp 

Cheers


Grad Alfons Kanon  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Thanks,

 I'm using dlsw.
 The tricky part that I am not too expert is on router B since it has both
TR
 and Eth, so how can I guarranty that Router A to B only ethernet to
 ethernet, and Router B to C only TR...not between them (TR to Eth),

 Grad




 From: Nigel Taylor
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: QUERY ON DLSW [7:13188]
 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:41:51
 
 
 I guess the first question would be what technologies do you have
 implemented?  Bridging, DLSW... I guess on the most basic level you could
 apply ACLs to limit what media talks to what.
 
 HTH
 
 Nigel
 
 From: Grad Alfons Kanon
 Reply-To: Grad Alfons Kanon
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: QUERY ON DLSW [7:13188]
 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 07:32:43 -0400
 
 Hello need Help,
 
 I have three routers:
 Router A with ethernet
 Router B with Token RIng and Ethernet
 Router C with TOken RIng.
 
 How can i configure my routers to guarranty that only TR talk to TR and
 Etehernet to Ethernet , not between them,
 
 
 Tx
 
 Grad
 
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13193t=13188
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Networkers presentation links [7:13121]

2001-07-20 Thread Joe

 Does anyone have the URL's of the 2001 Networkers' CCIE Power Sessions?

 Thank You!

 - Sean





 Padhu
 (LFG)
 , Cisco Mail List
 oe.com  , CCIE_Lab Groupstudy List
 Sent by:
 cc:
 nobody@groupsSubject: RE: Networkers
 presentation links

 tudy.com



 07/19/2001
 01:17
 PM

 Please
 respond
 to
 Padhu
 (LFG)





 Thanks Chuck,

 Great resource here.

http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw01/pres/preso/RoutingandSwitchingTechnolog

 ies/RST-204.pdf
 Was just going thro this ...Look at te one on privilege levels. I am
 pasting
 whats out there.
 show running-config looks like it needs more than the defined privilege
 levels to get this
 to work. I have tried enabling router level, Ip under interface etc...only
 to still see part of the config.. I wonder if you have to enable a long
 list
 of things to see the entire running-config... Might as well give 'em a
 print
 out of the config for the level 5 users. -)


 any ideas ?

 Cheers,Padhu
 --
--

 -
 username gltest privilege 5 password 0 gltest
 privilege configure level 5 interface
 privilege interface level 5 shutdown
 privilege exec level 5 show ip route
 privilege exec level 5 configure terminal
 privilege exec level 5 show running-config


 Now i do disable 5
 R5#show running-config
 Building configuration...

 Current configuration:
 !
 !
 !
 interface Loopback0
 !
 interface Ethernet0
 !
 interface Serial0
 !
 interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
 !
 interface Serial0.2 multipoint
 !
 interface Serial1
 !
 interface BRI0
  shutdown
 !
 !
 end

 R5#


 -Original Message-
 From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:39 PM
 To: Cisco Mail List; CCIE_Lab Groupstudy List
 Subject: Networkers presentation links


 I know these have been posted before, but in case you missed it:

 http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw01/pres/index.html

 lots of big PDF files. you may want to download or view over higher speed
 connections.

 enjoy

 Chuck
 **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
 **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13137t=13121
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco links for IS-IS study required, please [7:11305]

2001-07-07 Thread Joe

I too can't find any detail explanation of ISIS on the web. The most detail
coverage I find is in Jeff Doyle book TCP/IP Routing Volume 1. Or you may
try http://www.nanog.org/ they have a few presentation about ISIS.
Peter Topp  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hope you people can help,
 I'm due to sit the BSCI beta in 2 weeks time. I don't seem to be able to
 find any meaty links on cisco's site using their search engine. Hope
someone
 can provide a couple of URLs to help.
 Thanks in advance,
 Pete




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11306t=11305
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: No Arrow Keys Hyper Term ??? [7:11221]

2001-07-06 Thread Joe Morabito

Yup, I had the same problem, you must install service pack 2 for win 2k.  I
 found the bug on Microsofts web site.
 
 
 Joe Morabito
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Circusnuts 
 To: 
 Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:44 PM
 Subject: No Arrow Keys  Hyper Term ??? [7:11221]
 
 
  Anyone else had this issue ???  I upgraded my PC from 98 to 2000  the
 arrow
  keys no longer work in Hyper Term only ???
 
  Thanks
  Phil




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11227t=11221
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Any used router to be sold in Hong Kong ? [7:10966]

2001-07-04 Thread Joe Wong

There are few for auction at www.go2hk.com now.
Charles Peter  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10980t=10966
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



supervisor engine [7:9902]

2001-06-25 Thread Joe Morabito

Does anyone know if you can use the ports of a supervisor engine (which ever
model) for trunking?

Or do you always need to use a port from the chasis...Assuming you have no
rsm.

Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9902t=9902
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs [7:8807]

2001-06-18 Thread Bubba Joe

I thought Cisco is more of a software (IOS)company than a hardware company?

-Bubba

Omer Ehsan Dar  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Dear paul,
 Hi, being an electrical engineer myself I have to say that I agree with
 all the points you made except one. That is the one comparing SAP to
 CCIE. If you look into it deeply SAP was a software Cisco is basically a
 hardware company. So if some has been a CCIE for a couple of years and
 had worked with the myrid of equipment available chances are that he
 wont disappear so easily. he will get work maybe not for 120K to 150K
 but maybe 100K he will be needed because Computer Networks are going to
 stay. so even if Cisco is replaced with another company the laws of
 networking are not going to change they are the same. As in Electrical
 engineering Ohm's law is still the same that is for those who dont know
 Voltage = Current x Reisitance (V=IR) (sic! couldnt resist it).
 Another analogy is for software programmers, if you made a program in
 the original Fortran or Algol you can still run it in the latest version
 of C++ or Visual Basic.
 That is my opinion of course.
 Omer Ehsan Dar




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8950t=8807
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: need a hand with a IPSEC tunnel [7:8703]

2001-06-15 Thread Joe Wong

Seem like you crypo isakmp policy doesn't match and it try the default and
still don't work.

Make sure your crypto isakmp policy match. By typing and check
R3#show crypto isakmp policy
Default protection suite
encryption algorithm:   DES - Data Encryption Standard (56 bit
keys).
hash algorithm: Secure Hash Standard
authentication method:  Rivest-Shamir-Adleman Signature
Diffie-Hellman group:   #1 (768 bit)
lifetime:   86400 seconds, no volume limit


Winchester, Derek  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Any of you that have used ipsec with the Cisco box, could you shed some
 light on this matter. For some reason I cant get pass phase one. All of
the
 perameters seem to match up. Here is the log.


 2d18h: ISAKMP:  encryption DES-CBC
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  hash MD5
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  default group 1
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  auth pre-share
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  life type in seconds
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  life duration (basic) of 720
 2d18h: ISAKMP (0:1): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 0
 2d18h: ISAKMP (0:1): Checking ISAKMP transform 1 against priority 65535
 policy
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  encryption DES-CBC
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  hash MD5
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  default group 1
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  auth pre-share
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  life type in seconds
 2d18h: ISAKMP:  life duration (basic) of 720
 2d18h: ISAKMP (0:1): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 0
 2d18h: ISAKMP (0:1): no offers accepted!
 2d18h: ISAKMP (0:1): SA not acceptable!
 2d18h: ISAKMP (0:1): incrementing error counter on sa: PROPOSAL_NOT_CHOSEN
 2d18h: %CRYPTO-6-IKMP_MODE_FAILURE: Processing of Main mode failed with
peer
 at 1
 92.128.101.16
 2d18h: ISAKMP (1): sending packet to 192.128.101.16 (R) MM_NO_STATE
 2d18h: ISAKMP (0): received packet from 192.128.101.16 (N) NEW SA

 Derek S. Winchester
 IPSS Network Engineer
 IP Services Business Unit
 Lucent Technologies
 Phone: 978-298-2143
 Cell: 978-973-4561
 Fax: 978-298-2006
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8739t=8703
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lab questions [7:8506]

2001-06-14 Thread Morabito Joe

I have seen the equipment list etc. for the ccie r/s lab.  I have a couple
of questions:

How will ISDN be simulated?  If a simulator (ie Teltone) is used, will we be
required to know how to configure it?

How will frame relay be simulated?  Is that provided by the lab or will we
have to configure a router as a frame relay switch?

Please answer within NDA.  Thanks.

Joe Morabito

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8506t=8506
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lab no more 12 months.. [7:8509]

2001-06-14 Thread Morabito Joe

Did anyone catch that the lab must now be taken no longer than 18 months.  I
was looking at the web site and was surprised to see this change.

Has anyone else seen any other changes?  I heard a rumor about 2900 series
switches in the lab.

Joe Morabito

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8509t=8509
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: lab no more 12 months.. [7:8509]

2001-06-14 Thread Morabito Joe

Here is the url:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/policies.html


Here is the quote from the site:

Written Exam Expiry 
Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within 18 months of passing the
CCIE Qualification exam. As long as a candidate attempts the CCIE Lab at
least once every 12 months after the first lab attempt, the candidate may
take up to three years to pass the Lab Exam. However, if a candidate has not
passed the CCIE Lab exam within three years of passing the written exam, he
or she must retake the CCIE Qualification exam before the candidate will be
allowed to schedule the Lab exam again. 


-Original Message-
From: Robert Nelson-Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Morabito Joe
Subject: Re: lab no more 12 months.. [7:8509]


From: Morabito Joe 
Reply-To: Morabito Joe 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lab no more 12 months.. [7:8509]
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:45:35 -0400

Did anyone catch that the lab must now be taken no longer than 18 months.  
I
was looking at the web site and was surprised to see this change.

Nope, can't find it.  The one change I can find is that if you score less 
than 20 points on your first day, you have to wait six months before trying 
again, but you only have to wait 30 days if you score over this.

Has anyone else seen any other changes?  I heard a rumor about 2900 series
switches in the lab.

Can't see the point, their is little difference between these and the 5000s.

  The G's are a little different being classical IOS based.

Rob./

Joe Morabito

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8525t=8509
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



IPexpert.net [7:6698]

2001-05-31 Thread Joe Morabito

Has anyone purchased their workbook?  Is it any good?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6698t=6698
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Back to back Serial for Cisco 2621 [7:6497]

2001-05-30 Thread Joe Cremer

Does any one know a cable supplier for a dce/dte cable to connect two cisco
2621 routers with dual serial modules (wic-2t, with smart jack). I looked
through the archives and found alot od 2500 cables but nothing for the new
connector.

Thanks

Joe




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6497t=6497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Back to back Serial for Cisco 2621 [7:6497]

2001-05-30 Thread Joe Cremer

Thanks to all.  I didn't see the smartjack cables when I went out earlier.
I'm on the right track now.  Joe

Joe Cremer  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does any one know a cable supplier for a dce/dte cable to connect two
cisco
 2621 routers with dual serial modules (wic-2t, with smart jack). I looked
 through the archives and found alot od 2500 cables but nothing for the new
 connector.

 Thanks

 Joe
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6517t=6497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is it really worth it? CCIE [7:5725]

2001-05-25 Thread Morabito Joe
 of redundancy
  or
  complex scenario questions) and an overall
  difficulty
  not related to technological issues but grammar,
  construct and marketing. As such, passing proves
  that
  you can do one thing - pass the test. It doesn't
  mean
  that you can troubleshoot, design, deploy or manage
  anything. Is Erlang-B important in routing and
  switching? Is knowing the port density on the Z
  series
  router valuable when the product was replaced two
  years ago?
  
  It's not sour grapes - I'm certified. But, its on
  the
  last page of my resume, and its not who I am. I'm
  me,
  and I happen to be certified. Its not I'm certified
  (along with X others) and I'm one of many.
  
  Also, I know a lot of people who will not disclose
  their certs, including CCIE, unless asked. It's
  being
  humble.
  
  I don't think that anyone is incapable of passing
  the
  X test/exam. Its a matter of time, money, pain and
  desire. A lot of great people in this industry are
  great because they are good - not because a test
  told
  the world that they were.
  
  
  
  --- Donald B Johnson jr
  wrote:
   I don't agree, people who write technically, their
   reputation is centered
   around how accurate their writing is, and where
   mistakes are made how
   quickly they fix those errors. I don't see where
   failing a test, would
   invalidate anyone's writing or lessen their
   reputation. The quoted
   explanation may be true I am not disputing that,
  it
   probably is a factor, I
   just think it is unfounded.
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Kevin Schwantz
   To:
   Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:07 AM
   Subject: Re: Is it really worth it? CCIE
  [7:5725]
  
  
Did you know that many of the top Cisco
  engineers
   are not CCIE qualified?
   I
have always wondered why people like Sam Halabi
   and the likes do not get
certified.A Cisco employee told me that these
   people have everything to
   lose
and nothing to gain if they take the CCIE exam.
  If
   they refrain from
   taking
the tests, their reputation stays intact. If
  they
   take the test and fail,
people will start to question their credibility.
   
Kevin
   
Morabito Joe wrote in message
...
 Hi,
  
 === message truncated ===
 
 
 =
 Robert Padjen
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
 
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5895t=5725
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Is it really worth it? CCIE [7:5725]

2001-05-24 Thread Morabito Joe

Hi,

I want to ask a question to those already CCIEs.  Is it really worth it?
Don't get me wrong, I love the work and the learning.  I actually plan to
take the lab by july of next year, but how has your life changed since
obtaining your ccie?  Was it what you expected?  Better or worse?

Please share your life experience after reaching the big goal.  Personally I
can't wait to achieve CCIE status.

Thanks.

Joe Morabito




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5725t=5725
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lab-troubleshooting [7:5033]

2001-05-18 Thread Morabito Joe

Without disclosing much as per NDA, is the troubleshooting portion similar
to the setup.  The lab setup requires you to perform certain configs in
certain times.  Is troubleshooting similar, or do you just walk in and they
say o.k. now find out what is wrong and fix it...

Thanks.

Joe Morabito




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5033t=5033
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



any atm left? [7:4551]

2001-05-15 Thread Morabito Joe

With cisco taking atm lane out of the lab, will we be required to connect to
any atm devices?

I am wondering because I am almost done with my lab and would like to know
if I need an atm equipment.

Thanks

Joe Morabito

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4551t=4551
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ccbootcamp [7:4570]

2001-05-15 Thread Morabito Joe

Are the labs from ccbootcamp really that good?

Their testimonial have many people saying they passed on their first
attempt.

Thanks.

Joe Morabito

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel.(860) 408-3463
Fax.(860) 408-6263




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4570t=4570
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ccie study in hartford [7:4393]

2001-05-14 Thread Morabito Joe

Anyone interested in studying with a partner in the Hartford, CT area?

I have a halfway sized lab and am looking to expand.

Thanks.

Joe Morabito

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4393t=4393
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE Lab Practice [7:4395]

2001-05-14 Thread Joe Wong

CCIE lab practice kit.

Lupi, Guy  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does anyone know of a book that has some realistic CCIE lab scenarios?  I
 have a lab with most of the equipment necessary but I don't want to waste
my
 time with lab scenarios that I won't see in the real lab exam.  Any help
is
 appreciated.
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4407t=4395
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: On-line registration for the CCIE RS lab [7:4149]

2001-05-11 Thread Joe Wong

I try to login it too and the id is case sensitive. i.e it doesn't accept
SPxxx but accept spxx?!
ElephantChild  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 On Fri, 11 May 2001, Brian Dennis wrote:

  Dang I feel kind of left out ;)

 You shouldn't. I tried to register online and it won't accept my testing
 ID.

 --
 Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was
 about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made
 me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving
 people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4189t=4149
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NEED CCIE in WEST VIRGINA AREA [7:2986]

2001-05-02 Thread Joe Harris

Claudette,

Please never again send a job posting to a technical news server. There is a
news server set up at groupstudy  specifically for job
postings. The mail sever you sent your job post to is for technical knowledge
sharing and not for head hunting. Thank you for your cooperation with this
matter.

-Joe Harris
CCIE# 6200, Security, Voice
AIM Management
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100
Houston, TX.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2986t=2986
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CID Beta Exam Score Report [7:896]

2001-04-19 Thread Joe Bluggs

Yep finally got mine,

840 - shocker, because i spent a good half hour at the end of the
exam in the comments asking for clarity, and voicing my opinion
on
the seeming ambiguity of this "Cisco Secure VPN" exam.

In retrospect it was a good exam - the type to keep you guessing
(for
4 months) whether you passed - in that if i didn't actually know
what
i was talking about, had a variety of on-the-job experience, was
creative about knowing what could and might work(around) in a
given
situation, and willing to have my expectations and exam-time
personal
security turned upside down i would truly have no hope of
passing.

gotta love them beta exams...

Get your Free E-mail at http://sitamoht.zzn.com

Get your own FREE Web and POP E-mail Service in 14 languages at
http://www.zzn.com.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1217t=896
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



$$$ for labtime [7:179]

2001-04-10 Thread Joe Dewberry

I am looking to take the CCNA exam soon, but would like some solid lab time.
What is a benchmark for say five four hour sessions with a set/rack of
routers?

Thanks,

Joe Dewberry




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=179t=179
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Critical] GBIC over MMF...

2001-03-23 Thread Joe Pollere

Gary,

Check out http://www.canoga.com/fast_lan.htm model 9120.

HTH's

Joe



At 07:04 PM 3/22/01, ±è±ÔÇü wrote:
Hi~ Everyone...

I have some questions for GBIC. I'm gonna install the Cat 4003 connected to
remote distribution switch over MMF.

But distance is the problem. Distance between Cat 4003 and Cat 2948G-L3 is
about over 600m using MMF.

I know that distance limitation of MMF is 500m and so I need the solution to
overcome this.

Do you know about "extender" or "repeater" which I can apply?

Thanks,.

Gary KIM in Korea...


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: What's the benefits of using cluster between CAT3500 switches?

2001-03-23 Thread Joe Johonness

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/multimedia/download.html

Check out this link.
JJ

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Phone line simulator

2001-03-14 Thread Joe Wong

I am looking for a phone line simulator to do some dial-up practice using
modems. I would appreciate any recommendation of model, price and setup. And
I wonder a low cost PABX can do the job?

I ask this because the ISDN simulator is too expensive for me and if I use
the modem dial-up for practice, will I lose anything that I can't do?

Thanks in advance


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 0s and 1s??

2001-03-08 Thread Joe Eagan

http://www.optimized.com/COMPENDI/

-Original Message-
From:   Howard C. Berkowitz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, March 08, 2001 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: 0s and 1s??

In ethernet, are the bits, 0s and 1s,
0 volts and +5 volts?

I saw that on my CCNA test but did
not see it in the books I used.

Is that true?

Without SIGNIFICANT clarification, as to which specifications the 
question refers, it's insanely false.

To begin with, a bit being sent to the medium doesn't exactly 
correspond to medium signals. The actual medium (at least the 
electrical ones with which I am familiar) use Manchester encoding.

Second, if we include optical ethernet, what do voltages have to do with it?

If the question refers to AUI, RJ45/10BaseT, etc., it needs to be 
clear that's what it means.

It feels like yet another test writer taking the easy way out, 
testing for a factoid that he or she doesn't really understand.

Since I am getting crotchety about this, I conclude I need lunch.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Study Group in Central Valley, CA

2001-03-06 Thread Joe Dewberry

Hello Group,

Check this url:

http://www.cisco-users.org/index.htm

I'd like to try to get something like this together in the Central Valley
area of Cal, primarily the Tracy/Manteca area.  Anyone interesed?


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Free Cisco Router

2001-02-28 Thread Joe Freeman

I can have it picked up tomorrow night!

I'm in Monroe, but will have someone over there to do a turn up Thursday afternoon,
evening, and I could have them pick this up from you.

Thanks-
Joe Freeman, CCNA/CCDA

Brian wrote:

 thats right a free router.  Its a Cisco IGS (Dual Ethernet Router).  It
 has a dead fan in it. But you can get the Fans new from electronic houses
 like Newark and Digikey, etc.

 It still works, even with a dead fanjust gets a little hot.  Not
 sure of the mem config, I think the ios is 9.x or 10.x something like
 that.

 Anyways, all you have to do is pay shipping.  Its 14x13x4 and weighs
 10-12lbs I would say.  No catches, a free router.

 If you aren't willing to pay shipping, please don't respond.  When you
 goto ups.com and plug in the above dimensions and weight, and zip codes (I
 am in 71101 shreveport, LA), I will charge you that exact amount plus $5
 (to cover my time to prep this and the cost of the box, penuts etc).

 Brian

 ---
 I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!!
 email me for a quote

 Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 318-222-2638 x 109318-222-2638 x 101

 Netjam, LLC   http://www.netjam.net
 1401 Oden St.
 Suite 18
 Shreveport, LA 71104
 Fax 318-221-6612

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T-1 Cross-over

2001-02-23 Thread Joe Dewberry

A T-1 has four wires on an rj-45 connector.  1-2/4-5 .  I use the orange and
blue pair.  wo-1/ow-2  wb-4/bw-5 on one end.  wb-1/bw-2 and wo-4/ow5 on the
other end.
""Roan, Wayne"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Group,

 I have a 4000 and a 2501.  I am building a test lab and was going to
 use a couple of CSU/DSUs connected together via a T-1 cross-over cable.
Has
 anyone ever done this and is this the best way to construct a lab?

 Thanks,

 Wayne

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IP Protocol 89?

2001-02-23 Thread Joe Dewberry

Heydoes anybody have a net xray .cap file they could post to the group?
All of the networks I have seen have NO OSPF!  I'd like a chance to run it
thru a sniffer and see the traffic patterns, decodes etc


""Kane, Christopher A."" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 In trying to understand OSPF in much more detail, I am reading RFC 2328.
 Several times Mr. Moy refers to OSPF as " IP Protocol 89". I checked the
 "RFC/Port Number" page that I reference often
 (http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/default0301.htm) and found that indeed
 OSPF is IP Protocol 89. I have not seen this before. Sure, I've worked
with
 TCP/UDP port numbers, but this is the first time I've paid attention to
the
 fact that the protocols themselves have numbers too. This is interesting.

 Should I look at 89 as a number that can be manipulated as I would 23
 (telnet) or 69 (tftp)? Can someone explain where these numbers are used?
Are
 they found in headers? As networkers, are we concerned with these numbers?
 Does anyone commonly filter based on a protocol's number? Or is getting
this
 granular an exercise in futility for a network engineer?

 Thanks,
  Chris

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Micronet Solution Cisco Virtual lab

2001-02-21 Thread joe jackson

I have been using this lab for the past 2 days and it
has been terrific.  These guys are preparing for their
CCIE lab too so they can customize the lab to fit your
need.

Joe

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Denial of Service question [1:2057]

2001-02-19 Thread Joe Johonness

You can use ip inspect statements if you are running the firewall IOS.=20
ip inspect max-incomplete high 100
ip inspect max-incomplete low 50
ip inspect tcp synwait-time 5

There are lots more commands you can use to help cut down DOS effects.=20
Joe Johonness

I have a question on Denial of Service attacks.  i was
told that you could prevent a denial of service
attacks by just a few lines of code on your router. =20

Does anybody know what those lines of code are if they
exist???

Geoffery Raney



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   >