Re: HSRP design [7:28982]
Do both RSMs need to be on the same subnet? Thanks richard beddow wrote: Mike, DMA channels are indeed the I/O's ports I refered to, but I couldn't remember what they were called (each time I learn something new , something old falls out the other end). I came across this about three years ago while setting up a multicast network and experiencing throughput problems, IOS was 112-13_P(1). It looks like Cisco have changed the allocation method, what IOS are you running? RB. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29089t=28982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HSRP design [7:28982]
Hello I have a design question. I have two 5505 with RSM in each that are connected to each other with 200Mb trunk. Right now RSM of the first switch is in VLAN 1; RSM of the second switch is in the VLAN 2. Altogether I have about 20 VLANs. I am planning to run HSRP between both RSMs. What would be the best way of doing it? Here is what I think needs to happen: 1. Change the IP address of the second RSM and make it a part of VLAN 1 2. Reconfigure all VLAN 3. For even-numbered VLANs make the primary gateway RSM1 4. For odd-numbered VLANs make the primary gateway RSM 2 5. Copy the configuration for VLANs from RSM 1 to RSM 2 I do not have much experience in design so any input is more than welcome. Thanks, [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28982t=28982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ospf config [7:26034]
I am sorry for a stupid question. I am trying to set up an OSPF network. So far I am doing from a router to a router . Here is what I have: Router A: int e0/0 ip address 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network poin-to-point network ospf 10 network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255.0.0 area 0 Router B: int e0/0 ip address 192.168.31.0 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-point network ospf 10 network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 When I do sh dcp neigh I can see the router but I can not ping it. Would you please tell me what I am doing wrong. Thanks in advance, [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26034t=26034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5505 and XP [7:24845]
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24845t=24845 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN [7:24231]
Does anyone have any recomendations on VPN producs? Links to articles and personal experience woudl be great. As far as know Cisco VPN concentrators, Check Point, and Nokia rules the market. What is your opinion on that. Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24231t=24231 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Server config [7:21877]
First of all I am using it to console in to the phone switch not a modem. Second how would I set the speed to 2400. Access server has its own line speed different from baud rate. Like for expample 9600 would be equal to 38400 on access server? I found that on Cisco's web site. Thanks, Alex Andy Hoang wrote: If it says open then it works. Can you issue some modem commands? Try ATZ. The modem should respond with an OK. You can set the access server run at speed 2400. Is your cable correct? The modem is DCE and your access server async line is DTE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of khramov Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Access Server config [7:21877] Nope there are no passwords, I've got it to the point where I telnet into async 1 port and it opens it up, but nothing comes on the screesn, It just says open. I think there might be a speed mismatch issue, device that is attached to it runs at 2400 and I do no think that you can set access server to run at the speed lower then 9600. So if anyone has any ideas please help. Here is the config: interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.190.25 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface Async1 no ip address async mode dedicated no peer default ip address ! ip default-gateway 192.168.190.2 no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.190.2 ip route 192.168.78.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.190.2 ! line con 0 line 1 8 no exec modem InOut transport preferred telnet transport input all stopbits 1 speed 38400 line 9 16 line aux 0 Tarak Robbana wrote: Is there a password set on the device your telneting into? Sorry, have to start with the small stuff. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22032t=21877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Server config [7:21877]
here is the config : ip host modem1 2001 192.168.190.25 ip name-server 192.78.4.156 ip name-server 192.78.4.158 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.190.25 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! interface Async1 no ip address async mode dedicated no peer default ip address ! no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.190.2 ip route 192.168.78.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.190.2 ! line con 0 line 1 8 modem InOut transport input all stopbits 1 speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware line 9 16 line aux 0 khramov wrote: We are trying to configure access server to console in to the device that is attached to it through async port. When we try to telnet into the device that attached to the router we get connection refused message. What should we check? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21878t=21877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access Server config [7:21877]
We are trying to configure access server to console in to the device that is attached to it through async port. When we try to telnet into the device that attached to the router we get connection refused message. What should we check? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21877t=21877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Server config [7:21877]
Nope there are no passwords, I've got it to the point where I telnet into async 1 port and it opens it up, but nothing comes on the screesn, It just says open. I think there might be a speed mismatch issue, device that is attached to it runs at 2400 and I do no think that you can set access server to run at the speed lower then 9600. So if anyone has any ideas please help. Here is the config: interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.190.25 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface Async1 no ip address async mode dedicated no peer default ip address ! ip default-gateway 192.168.190.2 no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.190.2 ip route 192.168.78.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.190.2 ! line con 0 line 1 8 no exec modem InOut transport preferred telnet transport input all stopbits 1 speed 38400 line 9 16 line aux 0 Tarak Robbana wrote: Is there a password set on the device your telneting into? Sorry, have to start with the small stuff. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21939t=21877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:21051]
Hello, ip dhcp-server works, I didn't specify it with a hyphen. So would you agree that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed broadcast, ip helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config? If I enable ip dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp (ports 66 and 67)? Thanks a lot, Alex MADMAN wrote: Hmm.. I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's and an MSFC2, they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config. So I figured they must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and wallah, there it is!!! C7507MIX#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. C7507MIX(config)#no ip for C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67 C7507MIX(config)#^Z C7507MIX#wr t Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless no ip forward-protocol udp bootps Dave khramov wrote: I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file. I mean (ip forward-protocol udp 67). Is that the way it is suppose to be? MADMAN wrote: Check ip foward protocol Dave khramov wrote: Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21133t=21051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:21051]
Priscilla, I think that you are right about the ip dhcp-server command. I looked it up on Cisco's web site. It seems that it can be used only with dial up to tell the client where dhcp server is. Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Yes, I finally found that also, but only in reference to dial-up networks where the router is acting as an access sever for SLIP/PPP clients. Does it work elsewhere? It would be good if it did. Priscilla At 02:24 PM 9/26/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Their must be more than one way to foreword DHCP requests. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial_r/drdreip.htm#xtocid1564817 Tom got me looking into this earlier. -Eric -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051] At 01:06 PM 9/26/01, khramov wrote: From my understanding ip dhcp-server command will enable upd broadcast on ports 66 and 67. Is that true? It causes your router to BE a DHCP server and to accept and process broadcasts to UDP port 67 and to send responses from port 66. It does not cause the router to forward UDP broadcasts to port 67. If you turn your router into a DHCP server, you would also have to identify an external File Transport Protocol (FTP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), or remote copy protocol (rcp) server that you will use to store the DHCP bindings database. The router will access that database. Here's more info on turning your router into a DHCP server, which is often not a good idea, in my opinion (because it detracts from the router's real jobs): http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr_c/ipcprt1/1cfdhcp.htm Priscilla Alex Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and ip forward-protocol udp 67 no ip forward-protocol 137 no ip forward-protocol 138 The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a helper address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to configure it to be more discerning. Priscilla At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote: Hello, ip dhcp-server works, I didn't specify it with a hyphen. So would you agree that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed broadcast, ip helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config? If I enable ip dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp (ports 66 and 67)? Thanks a lot, Alex MADMAN wrote: Hmm.. I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's and an MSFC2, they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config. So I figured they must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and wallah, there it is!!! C7507MIX#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. C7507MIX(config)#no ip for C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67 C7507MIX(config)#^Z C7507MIX#wr t Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless no ip forward-protocol udp bootps Dave khramov wrote: I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file. I mean (ip forward-protocol udp 67). Is that the way it is suppose to be? MADMAN wrote: Check ip foward protocol Dave khramov wrote: Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612
Re: Catalyst 4000 Configuration [7:20996]
RSM config can be a little different. It depends on what version of software you are running. If you are running Version 12.0(14)W5(20). To configure vlans you need to type in interface port-channel1.x , where x is vlan ID. You might want to research it a little more on Cisco's web site. Hope it helps Juan Blanco wrote: Ray, They use the same software and command-line interface CLI as the 500 series...One of the main difference between these switches and 5000 is the high density of Gigabyte Ethernet ports supported. JB -Original Message- From: Ray Smith To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/25/2001 9:21 AM Subject: Catalyst 4000 Configuration [7:20996] Guys, Is there a difference with configuring the Catalyst 4000 as oppose to a Catalyst 5000? Is the operating system the same or even similar? Ray _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21013t=20996 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco vs 3com [7:21028]
Does any one have a white paper that compares Cisco 2900 XL switches to 3COM 4300 series switches? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21028t=21028 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP [7:21051]
Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21051t=21051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access Server [7:21056]
Hello, Does any one have experience configuring Access Server on 2511? I've got a several devices with serial ports that I need to access remotely, preferably telnet into them. So I found an old 2511 with async ports. But I can not get it working. Here is the config on that 2511: interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.190.25 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 192.78.4.47 no lat enabled ! interface Async1 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 ip tcp header-compression passive async mode interactive peer default ip address 192.168.190.26 ! interface Async2 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 peer default ip address 192.168.190.27 ! interface Async3 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 peer default ip address 192.168.190.28 ! interface Async4 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 ip tcp header-compression passive encapsulation ppp shutdown async mode interactive peer default ip address 192.173.50.14 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap line 1 16 login local transport input telnet stopbits 1 flowcontrol hardware Would you please tell me what I am missing. I am only going to be using first three async ports. Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21056t=21056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP network design [7:21019]
Patric, Jeff is right, I do not think that you can pass EIGRP packets though firewall. My suggestion is create a vpn tunnel and put in some static routes. Alex Jeff Smith wrote: Patrick, I don't think you will have a choice of passing EIGRP through a firewall because I don't think you can do it. An eigrp packet uses multicast addressing and has no layer 3 address. I would think that a firewall would not pass this traffic. From: Patrick Donlon Reply-To: Patrick Donlon To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: EIGRP network design [7:21019] Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:52:28 -0400 Hi everyone I've got a project where I have to design and implement EIGRP in a small to medium sized network of about 50 to 70 routers. One of my main problems is what to do with routing updates at the firewalls at each site, should they be allowed to pass through the firewall or should statics be used either side of the firewalls. Another problem I can see is the routes on the firewalls, is there a way to avoid having to type all those route entries in them, the network has many discontiguous networks. And one last point is the redistribution to the BGP routers at the edge of the network I'm after some tips, experiences and URLs so I can read around the subject myself Regards Pat _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21071t=21019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:21051]
I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file. I mean (ip forward-protocol udp 67). Is that the way it is suppose to be? MADMAN wrote: Check ip foward protocol Dave khramov wrote: Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21075t=21051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP [7:21051]
I am running 12.1 and I do not have a ip dhcp server (address). Are you suggesting to configure my router as a DHCP server? No, we have a win nt dhcp server running. Our win nt servers are reciving a lot of broadcasts because of some kind of election for a master browser (NT thing). That means that our routers are passing unnessary broadcast. I tried to specify broadcasts only for port 66 and 67 (dhcp ports ) but it is not showing up in my config, it could be enable by default. Here is a copy of config on my router: ! Last configuration change at 16:27:46 cdt Tue Sep 25 2001 ! NVRAM config last updated at 16:27:48 cdt Tue Sep 25 2001 ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption clock timezone cst -6 clock summer-time cdt recurring ip subnet-zero ip cef ip domain-name nsuok.edu ip name-server 192.78.4.156 ip name-server 192.78.4.158 ! ! ! ! interface Vlan1 description (vlan 1) Management Vlan ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 192.173.45.15 ip directed-broadcast ! interface Vlan2 description A ip address 172.17.1.1 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 192.173.45.15 ip directed-broadcast ! interface Vlan3 description B ip address 172.18.1.1 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 192.173.45.15 ip directed-broadcast ! interface Vlan4 description C ip address 172.19.1.1 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 192.78.4.47 ip directed-broadcast ! Tim Booth wrote: Alex, Ip dhcp server [address | name] will solve your problems (IOS 11.0 and later). As far as the problems you're having with the NETBEUI traffic and ip helper, you need to make sure you have protocol forwarding enabled, and transparent or source-route bridging properly configured aka UDP flooding. This solution is much more lengthy and cumbersome than the ip dhcp server command for dhcp broadcast forwarding. As I found on the cisco site, with ip directed-broadcast the only protocols that are forwarded are those that are specified with the ip forward-protocol command. By default (IOS 12.0 and later), ip directed-broadcast is disabled, and all directed ip broadcasts are dropped. This command translates from directed broadcasts to physical broadcasts. I think what is meant by a directed broadcast is a subnet (or possibly multicast?) and a physical broadcast is meant as 255.255.255.255, and would be forwarded out all interfaces (?). Hope this helps, Tim Booth - Original Message - From: khramov To: Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: DHCP [7:21051] Hello How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server? I know that ip helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios services causes some problems for win nt server. So I guess to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on ports 67 and 68 only? And another question that I have what exactly ip directed-broadcast command does? I've searched Cisco's web site but I never came across a clear defenition? Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21082t=21051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2916 config [7:20689]
I've got a 2916 XL switch with 11.2(8) SA3 software. I want to create a vlan 2 and make that a management vlan. But it is not letting me assign an IP address to it. When I do : conf t int vlan 2 It comes back with % Unrecognized command . I've tried shutting down vlan 1 first, it did not work. Any ideas? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20689t=20689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: catalyst 6000 [7:20244]
set port host disables negotiation for ether channnel, trunking, and stp. I would also recommend to set speed and duplex manually. Alex MADMAN wrote: You could try disabling PAGP and all that good stuff with the set port host command. Dave ndabarasa michel wrote: hello, i need a help from the list. i have a switch (catalyst6000) as a central node in a physical star topology. the other nodes are three catalyst2948. they are connected to the central catalyst6000 with optic fiber. i have spanning tree disabled cause we don't have redundancy links yet,thus no loops. now one server connected with optic fiber is periodically unreachable(every 2 minutes). i log into the console and i found this error message PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP : port 2/4 left bridge port 2/4 PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP : port 2/4 joined bridge port 2/4 does it have anything to do with STP ? who can help ? /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) |oOOO--(_)--OOOo--|-|- | Ndabarasa Michel... | | CCNA,CCAI.. | | cell (+250)08510951..| | .oooO | | ( )Oooo. | |---\ (--- ( )---|-| \_) ) /|-| (_/ -- FREE! The Best in Rwanda Email Address @mail.rw Reserve your name right now at http://mail.rw -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20293t=20244 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H.323 [7:20295]
Does any one have experience with H.323 Polycom units? If so any hints on why they can be drooping the connection to the remote site while they are in session. All of the units are sitting behind the Cisco Pix firewall. Thanks, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20295t=20295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing issue [7:20306]
I've got two 5505 at the core with RSM modules, both of the 5505s have connection to the firewall. Plus I've got a trunk between the 5505s. When I do a trace route from one of the routers that is attached to one of the 5505 to a server outside of the firewall it first hits 5505 that the router is attached to then it goes over the trunk to the second 5505 and only then it hits the firewall and a server. Both of the 5505 RSMs have static routes to the firewall. What can I do to prevent packets from going over the trunk to the second 5505 and go directly to the firewall? Thanks in advance, AK [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20306t=20306 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
traceroute [7:19963]
sometimes when I do a traceroute it skeeps some routers. Is there any way to adjusst time out or something to get traceroute to show all the routers that packet is going through? Regards, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19963t=19963 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Design question [7:19993]
I've got 2 5505 at the core of the network. Then I've got anywhere from twenty to twenty five routers and about the same number of switches at the distribution and access layers of the network. One of the 5505 has blade with 8 gigabit ports, all the other port are 100 MbBaseFx. Original design was very messy. It had VLANs implemented but half of the network was in the management vlan. Shortly I am planning on redesigning some staff. I want to put all the routers and switches in the management VLAN. Dedicate a gigabit link for a server farm. I also want ot put all the bandwidth intensive networks on gigabit backbone. One thing that I am not sure about is how to configure my 5505. Would I want to implement HSRP on 5505, that would offer redundancy, however, it does not offer load balancing. Another idea that I was thinking about is implementing Spanning tree per vlan and configure access layer switches to run two vlans. Would you please give me some ideas on what I should do? Thanks in advance. Regards, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19993t=19993 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5505 [7:19754]
I've got a 5505 and I can not telnet into the switch portion of it from my work station. To get into it I have ot telnet into RSM module first and from there I telnet into the switch intself. I check 5505 it does not have an ip permit list configured on it. So why I can not telnet into the switch. Regards, Alex Khramov [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19754t=19754 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ip default route [7:19755]
What is the difference between ip default route and stating 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X ? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19755t=19755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5505 [7:19754]
Yes it does have a SC interface. And that is the one that I am trying to telnet into. Default gateway is RSM. Wilson, Bradley wrote: This is just a guess, but doesn't the switch have an sc0 interface, even if it does have an RSM installed? If so, does the sc0 have an IP address and default gateway (probably the RSM) set? BJ -Original Message- From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5505 [7:19754] I've got a 5505 and I can not telnet into the switch portion of it from my work station. To get into it I have ot telnet into RSM module first and from there I telnet into the switch intself. I check 5505 it does not have an ip permit list configured on it. So why I can not telnet into the switch. Regards, Alex Khramov [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19763t=19754 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5505 [7:19754]
Thanks a lot, guys I got it working. It was the ip default gateway. Thanks again, Alex EA Louie wrote: because you need to configure an ip route to the outside world on the switch to tell it where its default gateway is (similar to a workstation) - Original Message - From: khramov To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:21 AM Subject: Re: 5505 [7:19754] Yes it does have a SC interface. And that is the one that I am trying to telnet into. Default gateway is RSM. Wilson, Bradley wrote: This is just a guess, but doesn't the switch have an sc0 interface, even if it does have an RSM installed? If so, does the sc0 have an IP address and default gateway (probably the RSM) set? BJ -Original Message- From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5505 [7:19754] I've got a 5505 and I can not telnet into the switch portion of it from my work station. To get into it I have ot telnet into RSM module first and from there I telnet into the switch intself. I check 5505 it does not have an ip permit list configured on it. So why I can not telnet into the switch. Regards, Alex Khramov [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19782t=19754 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eigrp routing [7:19603]
I have a static route on my core router to the firewall. However, when I do sh ip eigrp topology it shows that there are two routes to the firewall through other routers in a topology table. Since firewall does not respond to traceroute how can I test the network. I am sure that it is using staic route, but why does it have two other entries in the topology table. Trying to learn eigrp. Thanks for your input, Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19603t=19603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN Security [7:18203]
I would like to add that I also had bad experience with 3548 switches. I had three go bad out of four that I installed. However, I did have a good experience with 2948G. But they are a little bit more expensive. here is my .02c Trevor J Corness, CCNA wrote: Well, it depends.. I definately still would not VLAN off ports from a big switch.. do you plan on putting a NetManager box on the inside, and wanting to monitor the DMZ Hub/Switch? If not, a Cat3524XL could be best (though I've had bad track record personally with those boxes, I'm sure over-all they're fine.. I've just been unlucky to come across 14 bad ones out of 17 I've installed). Anyways.. hope you can straighten it out.. those are just my .02c worth. Regards, Trevor J Corness Radian Corporation http://www.radiancorp.com -Original Message- From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:20 AM To: Trevor J Corness, CCNA Subject: Re: VLAN Security [7:18203] Cisco's pushing the Fast 10/100 hub now, but I don't know that state of those older HP/Cisco 10 base T models. The Internet connection I am looking to start with is @ least 10 Megs, maybe as high as 30 Megs. Does that change your advice any ??? Thanks Phil - Original Message - From: Trevor J Corness, CCNA To: 'Circusnuts' Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 2:26 AM Subject: RE: VLAN Security [7:18203] If you are talking about a single 3500 as the DMZ, with no links to the internal network... or just VLAN'ing off ports of a 6509 or something larger.. I would definately suggest a standalone 3500.. simply because of the problems of Leaky Buckets. A well planned attack, will overload the buffers of the switch, and leak traffic onto the Private network. This is why I normally used managed hubs for DMZ (normally a customer won't have more than a T1 in this case).. so that I can split off a single port for monitoring.. and no leaky buckets. This is a personal preference though. Your situation may be much different than my normal encounters at my job. You have not supplied the information needed to make the hub/switch decision.. Out of curiosity, do you know if Cisco still sells managed Hubs? Or are they all EOL? I normally use HP 10base-T hubs (again, decided by the 1.544Mbps T1). Regards, Trevor J Corness Radian Corporation http://www.radiancorp.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Circusnuts Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 5:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLAN Security [7:18203] I'm finishing a project @ work have an opportunity to recommend multiple 3500 series switches or VLAN configuration. The placement of these boxes will be before a firewall, coming off of a BGP router (for IDS's, SwitchProbes, DMZ, etc.,). Can anyone think of an argument either way ??? Thanks Everyone Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18694t=18203 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring Frame size [7:18466]
I need to change frame size on of my Token Ring subnets. If I change the Token Ring frame size on the router and it will be different (larger) than the frame size that is configured on a work station how is it going to affect the work station? And if I change the frame size on the workstation first would that crash the router? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18466t=18466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token Ring Frame size [7:18466]
Here is what I've got: We have a remote site where we run token ring and ethernet. Core router (Cisco 4500) has 1 tr interface and 2 ethernet interfaces. One ethernet interface goes out to the firewall and the other interface is just an ethernet subnet with workstations. Some time in the past, I am not sure but for whatever reason frame size on token ring interface was changed to 1500 from I believe the default 4500. Ever since users have been complaining about poor network performance. I think that if change MTU it might speed them up a little bit. However, all the PC are also set to 1500 frame size. So I am debating whether changing the frame size will help users and if I change it how long the network will be down or is it just a matter of rebooting PCs. So I guess my router does both routing and translation. What do you think I should do? Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 02:40 PM 9/4/01, khramov wrote: I need to change frame size on of my Token Ring subnets. If I change the Token Ring frame size on the router and it will be different (larger) than the frame size that is configured on a work station how is it going to affect the work station? And if I change the frame size on the workstation first would that crash the router? Thanks It shouldn't be a serious problem either way you do it. Users may have to re-establish connections, however. Are the routers truly routers or are they source-routing bridges? With source-route bridging, each bridge checks the largest frame field and decrements it if the bridge is configured for something smaller than is in the frame. This happens during route discovery and session establishment. Changing one of the bridges after sessions are established could cause problems. If the routers are truly routers and are routing IP, there's a similar situation. IP hosts can use IP maximum transmission unit (MTU) discovery to determine the largest possible frame size to use. This happens during session establishment. Changing the MTU on one of the routers after sessions are established could cause problems. But routers shouldn't crash and there shouldn't be any other dire consequences. Also, it sounds like you are increasing MTU which is less worrisome than decreasing MTU. Do you do any translational bridging between Ethernet and Token Ring segments? Translational bridging can be difficult to get working, especially if you use Token Ring frame sizes that are larger than Ethernet allows (1500 bytes). If you use routing instead of bridging, there will be fewer problems. If your routers are now going to need to fragment and reassemble IP packets, in order to go between Token Ring which supports larger frames and Ethernet which supports 1500 byte frames, keep in mind that the routers will be slower. This is additional work that they don't normally have to do. I think it forces them to use process switching instead of the faster switching methods. Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18478t=18466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token Ring Frame size [7:18466]
Thanks a lot for your input. Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Where are the servers or mainframes that the Token Ring PCs are using? Do they support a large frame size? What is the traffic flow? Does the traffic from the PCs travel across an Ethernet segment or some other segment that does not support a large frame size? Are you using bridging or routing? The steps you should take include: Analyze the physical topology. Analyze the logical topology and traffic flow. Define the problem with as much detail as possible. How else can you characterize the poor network performance? Gather facts, such as why was the frame size changed? Does it affect all users? Is it reproducible across applications? What is the actual response time? What are the error rates at the data-link layer, upper layers? Analyze router configurations, determine if bridging or routing is happening. What do show interface commands show? Consider possibilities. Try to do this without bias and assumptions (such as the assumption that performance problems are caused by frame size) Create an action plan Implement the action plan Observe the results If you have really done the initial steps and are ready to implement the action plan of changing frame size, you are doing the right think to think about the implications of making this change. With very little data to go on, I think you can make the change without much risk. Both routing and bridging supposedly handle various frame sizes. Priscilla At 04:38 PM 9/4/01, khramov wrote: Here is what I've got: We have a remote site where we run token ring and ethernet. Core router (Cisco 4500) has 1 tr interface and 2 ethernet interfaces. One ethernet interface goes out to the firewall and the other interface is just an ethernet subnet with workstations. Some time in the past, I am not sure but for whatever reason frame size on token ring interface was changed to 1500 from I believe the default 4500. Ever since users have been complaining about poor network performance. I think that if change MTU it might speed them up a little bit. However, all the PC are also set to 1500 frame size. So I am debating whether changing the frame size will help users and if I change it how long the network will be down or is it just a matter of rebooting PCs. So I guess my router does both routing and translation. What do you think I should do? Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 02:40 PM 9/4/01, khramov wrote: I need to change frame size on of my Token Ring subnets. If I change the Token Ring frame size on the router and it will be different (larger) than the frame size that is configured on a work station how is it going to affect the work station? And if I change the frame size on the workstation first would that crash the router? Thanks It shouldn't be a serious problem either way you do it. Users may have to re-establish connections, however. Are the routers truly routers or are they source-routing bridges? With source-route bridging, each bridge checks the largest frame field and decrements it if the bridge is configured for something smaller than is in the frame. This happens during route discovery and session establishment. Changing one of the bridges after sessions are established could cause problems. If the routers are truly routers and are routing IP, there's a similar situation. IP hosts can use IP maximum transmission unit (MTU) discovery to determine the largest possible frame size to use. This happens during session establishment. Changing the MTU on one of the routers after sessions are established could cause problems. But routers shouldn't crash and there shouldn't be any other dire consequences. Also, it sounds like you are increasing MTU which is less worrisome than decreasing MTU. Do you do any translational bridging between Ethernet and Token Ring segments? Translational bridging can be difficult to get working, especially if you use Token Ring frame sizes that are larger than Ethernet allows (1500 bytes). If you use routing instead of bridging, there will be fewer problems. If your routers are now going to need to fragment and reassemble IP packets, in order to go between Token Ring which supports larger frames and Ethernet which supports 1500 byte frames, keep in mind that the routers will be slower. This is additional work that they don't normally have to do. I think it forces them to use process switching instead of the faster switching methods. Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18487t=18466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Tacacs [7:17110]
Hi, Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying to do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network to authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what should I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on this. Thanks a lot, alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17110t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should be used for technical discussions not for personal insults. If you think that you are smarter than me or have better work habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with that. Otherwise I would be asking questions. Donald B Johnson jr wrote: After someone gives you an answer, are you going to have time to research if it is a good solution for you or are you going to just implement it. It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors heart if he could see you now. actually the only two things that would make me to busy that I couldn't research an access solution would be; A raging blaze A Seinfeld rerun don - Original Message - From: khramov To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] Hi, Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying to do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network to authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what should I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on this. Thanks a lot, alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17126t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tacacs [7:17073]
Hi, Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying to do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network to authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what should I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on this. Thanks a lot, alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17073t=17073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loopback Interface [7:16174]
Would you please explain me in simple terms what is loopback interface? One of the techs from our ISP told me to config my router for loopback interface instead of multilink interface so that he would push the config to my router. He also told me that multilink requires high CPU usage. Would you please give me your opinion on this. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16174t=16174 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Usage of Spanning-tree GUARD and UDLD features. [7:15602]
This this: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/77.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/74.html Urooj's Hi-speed Internet wrote: Hi Folks, Can someone please guide me on the usage of Spanning-tree GUARD and UDLD (Uni-directional Link Detection) features in the Catalyst switches? My specific question is would there be a need to use both in a situation, as they seem to serve the same basic purpose ? Or is Spanning-tree GUARD feature superior as it checks certain software features such as Ether-channel and trunks also ? Aziz S. Islam Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15602t=15602 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTP [7:15512]
Hi, Anyone knows of a good NTP server software that I can install on Win NT server PC to sync. time on routers and switches? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15512t=15512 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCM with 6509 [7:13549]
Is anyone using CCM software? If yes did you have to config anything special on 6509 and 2980G sw in order for CCM to work. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13549t=13549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch Config [7:11761]
I've posted a question about this problem that I am having yesterday, but I still have not been able to resolve this problem. Here is what I've got: 2900 connected to 5505A which connected to another 5505B. From 2900 I can ping 5505A's RSM and I can ping sc0 and RSM on 5505B. Default gateway on 2900 is a port on 5505 that I am connected to. Default gateway for sc int on 5505A is its RSM. Both of the 5505s are VLAN 1, 2900 is config for VLAN 76. When I do sh vlan on 5505A, it is showing VLAN 76 active, connected to 4/8. 4/8 is up. When I do traceroute from 2900 to sc on 5505A it goes to its gateway adn then times out, but I can ping RSM just fine. And subnet network that I got config for VLAN 76 is added to the RSM on 5505A routing table. Any ideas? Any input is appreciated. Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11761t=11761 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
switch config [7:11583]
I've got a switch hooked up to 5505. I can ping RSM module. I can ping all the other sw on the network that hooked up to the 5505, but I can not ping 5505. any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11583t=11583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: switch config [7:11583]
I've got a sc interface config on 5505. New switch is on a diffrent subnet but I can ping RSM that is on the same subnet as sc on 5505. I do have a default route config on 2900 John Neiberger wrote: Okay, I'll ask the painful questions: Do you have the sc0 interface configured? If so, are you pinging from a device in the same subnet/vlan? If not, do you have a default route set in the switch? Those are the first things I would check. Regards, John khramov 7/9/01 3:14:48 PM I've got a switch hooked up to 5505. I can ping RSM module. I can ping all the other sw on the network that hooked up to the 5505, but I can not ping 5505. any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11591t=11583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: switch config [7:11583]
I mean an IP address that is assigned to the VLAN. Port on 5505 and new switch is configured on the same vlan. Patrick Ramsey wrote: when you say the 5505, do you mean the management port? Or do you mean an ip address assigned to given vlan? Is the ip you are pinging on your same subnet? If not does the 5505 have a default gateway? -Patrick khramov 07/09/01 05:14PM I've got a switch hooked up to 5505. I can ping RSM module. I can ping all the other sw on the network that hooked up to the 5505, but I can not ping 5505. any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11590t=11583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6509 [7:10299]
hi, I am trying to config 6509 switch. I am adding vlan interfaces to the RSM. I've got some Class B addresses and class C addresses. When I add a class C address and for s.m. I put 255.255.255.0 it comes back with message that /24 is a bad mask for this address. When I put 255.255.0.0 it accepts it. Will it cause any problems? Is there a problem with running class B and class C ip addreses at the same time? Switch itself has a class B address. Thanks in advance, Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10299t=10299 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Management Software [7:9980]
Any opinions on Network Instruments' Observer management software. I am debating between this one and Agilent Advisor SW Edition. If you had any experience with any of these software or other network management software please let me know your opinion on what is the best buy. Thanks a lot, Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9980t=9980 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wake on LAN [7:8755]
Is there a special config on a router for wake on lan to work? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8755t=8755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wake on LAN [7:8755]
I think that wake on lan sends out a broadcast with F... in the destination field. May be because it a layer 2 broadcast it is not passing the packets. Can I configure a router to pass layer 2 broadcasts? And if I can is there a way to control the broadcast so that only wake on lan packets would pass? Thanks Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Could you capture with a protocol analyzer the actual Wake on LAN packet? It's always been a mystery to me. But my guess is that it's not a routable packet. On the other hand, is it even a packet or it is just an electrical surge or something? I suggest you find out more about what the Wake on LAN sender actually sends. Maybe somebody else knows. We did discuss it once before. Check the archives. We did not discusss it from the point of view of it crossing a router, though. Priscilla At 03:29 PM 6/15/01, khramov wrote: Is there a special config on a router for wake on lan to work? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8775t=8755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wake on LAN [7:8755]
Well it seems that WOL is a widely used technology. So there is got to be a way how pass those packets through the router. Any ideas? Patrick Ramsey wrote: It is indeed a packet. And all of the utils I have seen to perform a WOL to a device use MAC addresses, so routing would not be possible. Now that I think about it, this would be the only way this would work unless you could build a tcp/ip stack into the rom of a nic. (otherwise the OS would already have to be awake to make use of it's tcp/ip stack) -Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer 06/15/01 03:48PM Could you capture with a protocol analyzer the actual Wake on LAN packet? It's always been a mystery to me. But my guess is that it's not a routable packet. On the other hand, is it even a packet or it is just an electrical surge or something? I suggest you find out more about what the Wake on LAN sender actually sends. Maybe somebody else knows. We did discuss it once before. Check the archives. We did not discusss it from the point of view of it crossing a router, though. Priscilla At 03:29 PM 6/15/01, khramov wrote: Is there a special config on a router for wake on lan to work? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8778t=8755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wake on LAN [7:8755]
Thanks for the idea, but policy routing might be just a little bit difficult for me right now. I can enable the MAC broadcast on a router, but the would defeat the whole purpose of having a router. Peter Slow wrote: i beleive it is one of those evil broadcast packets. you'd have to brigde it, or write something to send out your own. you might wanna look at the type feild if there is one in the packet, and try and do some sort of policy routing thing to automatically trow it onto a tunnel interface...and then do whatever this brings me to another question. if i make it so that a policy map matches a broadcast packet, and explicity route that packet out of an interface using the policy routing thingy, can i route a broadcast? if so, i will pat myself on the back for finally coming up with a good idea =P Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th. Street New York, New York 10001 Cell: +1(516) 782.1535 Desk: +1(646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Wake on LAN [7:8755] Well it seems that WOL is a widely used technology. So there is got to be a way how pass those packets through the router. Any ideas? Patrick Ramsey wrote: It is indeed a packet. And all of the utils I have seen to perform a WOL to a device use MAC addresses, so routing would not be possible. Now that I think about it, this would be the only way this would work unless you could build a tcp/ip stack into the rom of a nic. (otherwise the OS would already have to be awake to make use of it's tcp/ip stack) -Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer 06/15/01 03:48PM Could you capture with a protocol analyzer the actual Wake on LAN packet? It's always been a mystery to me. But my guess is that it's not a routable packet. On the other hand, is it even a packet or it is just an electrical surge or something? I suggest you find out more about what the Wake on LAN sender actually sends. Maybe somebody else knows. We did discuss it once before. Check the archives. We did not discusss it from the point of view of it crossing a router, though. Priscilla At 03:29 PM 6/15/01, khramov wrote: Is there a special config on a router for wake on lan to work? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8790t=8755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wake on lan [7:8792]
As far as I know WOL layer 2 broadcast, it does not have an IP field. That is the main problem. What is the command to look up if direct-broadcast is already enabled on the router? Thanks, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: One other thought: The article that Patrick referenced implies that you could enable directed broadcasts. The default on modern routers is no directed broadcasts but you could disable that. It's not recommended for security reasons, but if you want to do it the command is no ip directed-broadcast. http://esupport.ca.com/public/sdo_shipit/infodocs/7065.asp But you have to find out what the server or whatever is sending to wake up the stations. You are troubleshooting in the blind until you find out what it is sending. Is it an IP packet? Is it a UDP packet? Is it just a MAC packet? Is it a broadcast? At the MAC and IP layers? Priscilla At 05:58 PM 6/15/01, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: The ip helper command might help. Also use the ip forward-protocol command to forward the Wake on LAN broadcast and the no ip forward-protocol command to not forward other broadcasts. You would have to check the documentation to see if this would work for sure. Let us know how it goes! Thanks. Priscilla At 03:31 PM 6/15/01, khramov wrote: I think that wake on lan sends out a broadcast with F... in the destination field. May be because it a layer 2 broadcast it is not passing the packets. Can I configure a router to pass layer 2 broadcasts? And if I can is there a way to control the broadcast so that only wake on lan packets would pass? Thanks Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8795t=8792 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch 2924 [7:8613]
I am configuring 2924 and I am trying to set a password for http. I did: line vty 5 15 password **, However, instead of the password that I typed in, it uses my enable password to log into the switch through http. What am I doing wrong? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8613t=8613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch 2924 [7:8613]
I looked on Cisco's web site and I couldn't find any information. Would you please explain me what is vty anyway, is it only for telnet sessions? How would you then configure access to the switch from browser. khramov wrote: I am configuring 2924 and I am trying to set a password for http. I did: line vty 5 15 password **, However, instead of the password that I typed in, it uses my enable password to log into the switch through http. What am I doing wrong? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8619t=8613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TAC [7:8416]
I've got a problem with one of my sw. Status light stays orange. I can not find TAC's phone number on cisco's web site. Would you please send their support number. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8416t=8416 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TAC [7:8416]
Disregard that, I found the phone number, However, if someone knows why the status light stays orange please let me know. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8418t=8416 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wake on LAN [7:8221]
Hi, I've got a TR network and I am trying to to get wake on lan to work. It works when I connect workstation through a hub to the server that initializes wake on lan, however, when I connect workstation to the actual network it does not work. I've got a 4000 Cisco router and 8272 IBM TR Switch, is there any special configurations I need set up on the router or switch for the wake on lan to work. Alexander Khramov Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8221t=8221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wake on LAN [7:8079]
Hi, I've got a TR network and I am trying to to get wake on lan to work. It works when I connect workstation through a hub to the server that initializes wake on lan, however, when I connect workstation to the actual network it does not work. I've got a 4000 Cisco router and 8272 IBM TR Switch, is there any special configurations I need set up on the router or switch for the wake on lan to work. Alexander Khramov Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8079t=8079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN 1 [7:7367]
Thanks a lot everyone I got. Config on RSM was not correct. khramov wrote: What is the command to shut down VLAN 1 on a switch? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7507t=7367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN on 5505 [7:7341]
I am configuring VLAN on 5505. When I run status shows that it is not connected. I checked my cable run it seems fine and I checked the config few times. Any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7341t=7341 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN 1 [7:7367]
What is the command to shut down VLAN 1 on a switch? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7367t=7367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN 1 [7:7367]
I've configure 2 VLAN on 5505 and it is connected to 2900. In order for my VLANs to work I need to disable VLAN. my commands: config t int vlan 1 shutdown I thought that this would bring down administratively shut down vlan 1 but it does not. What am I doing wrong? Alex Collins wrote: You need VLAN 1 as a minimum for the switch to operate from my understanding (I'm sure to be corrected if wrong). If you only have just one VLAN (which will be VLAN1) the switch is a single broadcast domain anyway so you can kinda ignore VLAN's entirely at that point. What are you trying to achieve? Alex. -Original Message- From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2001 17:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:VLAN 1 [7:7367] What is the command to shut down VLAN 1 on a switch? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7374t=7367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN 1 [7:7367]
Thanks for all of you replies: Here is more details on what I am doing. I am new to VLAN so please patient with me. I have 5505 with RSM module. I config. VLAN xx on 5505, enabled the port on 5500 and added route to the RSM database. Then I have a fiber run to 2900. On 2900 I enabled f1/1 and created VLAN. Added IP address to the VLAN xx, gateway and s.m. Since I want to manage the switch through my vlan I disabled vlan 1. I get a green light on a 2900 but I still can not ping 5505. I am suspecting that on 5505 or 2900 port fast was turned on by another network tech., and I do not know how to check for it. And I do not know if that could cause a problem. Thanks for you help. Alex Khramov Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7403t=7367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN 1 [7:7367]
Thanks for all of you replies: Here is more details on what I am doing. I am new to VLAN so please patient with me. I have 5505 with RSM module. I config. VLAN xx on 5505, enabled the port on 5500 and added route to the RSM database. Then I have a fiber run to 2900. On 2900 I enabled f1/1 and created VLAN. Added IP address to the VLAN xx, gateway and s.m. Since I want to manage the switch through my vlan I disabled vlan 1. I get a green light on a 2900 but I still can not ping 5505. I am suspecting that on 5505 or 2900 port fast was turned on by another network tech., and I do not know how to check for it. And I do not know if that could cause a problem. Thanks for you help. Alex Khramov Karen E Young wrote: The requirements for connecting a router to a switch running multiple VLANs have been posted to the list before do I won't go into great detail. If VLAN 1 has an IP address on the switch then you need to set up an IP address for whichever VLAN you want to act as the management VLAN and THEN shut down the VLAN 1 interface. However, I've only seen that particular setup on IOS switches, not Catalyst OS switches. On Cat OS switches (set-based) the management VLAN is determined by the sc0 interface and if that happens to be something besides VLAN 1 then VLAN 1 can be ignored. The control traffic for the switch protocols will use VLAN 1 unless you specifically re-route them to another VLAN. I wrote another post a month ago about this (Groupstudy archives - http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/cisco/200105/msg00795.html), you might want to check it out since it has bearing on your issue. Config Summary-- On the switch: - Make sure that the switch has a management interface set up - Set the trunking options for the port to the router (set trunking to on so that trunking doesn't have to be negotiated) - Set port connecting to router as 100Mb full-duplex (To prevent problems with auto-negotiation) - Set the remaining ports to be used on the switch to their respective VLANs. - Make sure that all of the the VLANs you want to connect to the router are enabled on the trunk link On the router: - Make sure the port connecting to the switch is 100Mb full-duplex (To prevent problems with auto-negotiation) - Create a subinterface for each VLAN thats configured on the switch (doesn't have to include default VLANs such as VLAN 1 unless you're using if for your management interfaces) - set up appropriate ip addresses on all subinterfaces - Set up trunking options on the subinterfaces. - Do a no shutdown on the interface to activate it. If I can be of any further help, please feel free to contact me. Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 6/6/2001 at 1:35 PM khramov wrote: I've configure 2 VLAN on 5505 and it is connected to 2900. In order for my VLANs to work I need to disable VLAN. my commands: config t int vlan 1 shutdown I thought that this would bring down administratively shut down vlan 1 but it does not. What am I doing wrong? Alex Collins wrote: You need VLAN 1 as a minimum for the switch to operate from my understanding (I'm sure to be corrected if wrong). If you only have just one VLAN (which will be VLAN1) the switch is a single broadcast domain anyway so you can kinda ignore VLAN's entirely at that point. What are you trying to achieve? Alex. -Original Message- From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2001 17:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:VLAN 1 [7:7367] What is the command to shut down VLAN 1 on a switch? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7402t=7367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN problems [7:6475]
Thanks a lot. It worked. I can now ping and telnet into 5505. Appreciate your help. Alex Mike Bernhardt wrote: Are you trying to manage the 2924 from the new VLAN? If so, you have to shut down VLAN 1. then you can no-shut the new VLAN. .. Mike Bernhardt CCIE #6079 To reply directly, yo know what to do... khramov wrote: Trying to set up a VLAN between 5505 with the RSM module and 2924 Cisco Catalyst Switch over 100baseFX. Everything seems to be working correctly except the VLAN on the 2924 shows shut down and can not be brought up. On 5505 we created VLAN, assign an IP address to the VLAN on 5505 and on the VLAN 2924. We left the VLAN 1 on the 2924 with no IP address. We also enabled EIGRP routing on RSM module on 5505. Any suggestions on what we need to do to make them talk over the VLAN. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6602t=6475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN problems [7:6475]
Trying to set up a VLAN between 5505 with the RSM module and 2924 Cisco Catalyst Switch over 100baseFX. Everything seems to be working correctly except the VLAN on the 2924 shows shut down and can not be brought up. On 5505 we created VLAN, assign an IP address to the VLAN on 5505 and on the VLAN 2924. We left the VLAN 1 on the 2924 with no IP address. We also enabled EIGRP routing on RSM module on 5505. Any suggestions on what we need to do to make them talk over the VLAN. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6475t=6475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking Napster and Aol on Pix config/Setting up Tacus or [7:1650]
Check out this article http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20010319S0002 Instead of creating extended ACLs they set up a server running CheckPoint software. It filters files by their type and sets priorities on them, so you can set up the lowest priority for mp3 files. Anyway check out the article, you might find it useful. -- Kind regards, Alexander N. Khramov, CCNA Student Technical Consultant NSU, Computing and Telecommunications [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keyur Lavingia wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This has actually come up again in the discussion. If u want to block AIM outgoing from ur network, u should try to block the IP Addresses of the login server of AIM which is login.oscar.aol.com The AIM App is designed to scan for ports other than 5190 to login to the server, so port blocking will not work always. Sincerely, KEYUR LAVINGIA Network Engineer Peak XV Networks San Ramon, CA 94583. W - 925.242.7492 C - 925.699.8855 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peakxv.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Blocking Napster and Aol on Pix config/Setting up Tacus or [7:1629] Just a note, that people can shoose other ports to get to the AIM services. Kevin O'Gilvie wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Before I ask this question I would like to give something back, below is the config to block aim and napster: access-list acl_out deny tcp any any eq 5190 access-list acl_out deny tcp any any eq 8875 access-list acl_out deny tcp any any eq access-list acl_out deny tcp any any eq 6699 access-list acl_out deny tcp any any eq access-group acl_out in interface inside access-list acl_out permit tcp any any access-list acl_out permit ip any any Now I would like to setup a Tacus+ or Radius Server on My network I have a widows 2000 domain and I am unsure of how to do this. Please advise. TIA, Kevin _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1650t=1650 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need some HELP.
Try this: http://www.tcpmag.com/salarysurvey/2001/default.asp -- Kind regards, Alexander N. Khramov, CCNA Student Technical Consultant NSU, Computing and Telecommunications [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2503 Problem
You might want to try a different Hyperterminal Program. -- Kind regards, Alexander N. Khramov, CCNA Student Technical Consultant NSU, Computing and Telecommunications [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Omer Ehsan Dar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I have a 2503 router with 12.0 IOS. it does not obey the password recovery command the break command does not work if you hit it during bootup. Any suggestions. Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP-Routing Study Guide
Greetings everyone, I am getting ready to start studying for my CCNP Routing Exam.What books would you recommend? I've heard good things about "CCNP Routing Exam Certification Guide" by Clare Gough (Cisco Press) and "CCNP: Routing Study Guide" by Todd Lammle. -- Kind regards, Alexander N. Khramov, CCNA Student Technical Consultant NSU, Computing and Telecommunications [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
