Re: Studying Switching [7:75030]
All the info relating to this book is good and I'm going to buy on the back of these reviews but... what makes people write switching related poems? ""Nakul Malik"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > I started off studying routing and found it to be a topic that interested me > a lot. I just couldn't get enough of halabi Doyle and the rest. I studied a > lot, practiced a lot and was thrilled when I passed the exam in beta. > > Next I started studying for switching. That didn't turn out as well as I > thought it would. I couldn't just work up the same level of interest. I have > been analyzing the reasons and have come up with the following: > 1. I've never worked with switches much, so I don't know too much about > them, as opposed to routers. > 2. Study materials. > > I've been wondering, has anyone else faced similar problems in their quest > for CCNP. > > Also, could someone recommend some good materials/resources for switching > other than the official Cisco book? > > Any/all answers would be appreciated. > Thanks. > -N > > -- > Nakul Malik > > H-342 > New Rajendra Nagar > New Delhi - 110060 > > Mobile: +91-9811424477 > Ph: +91-11- 2582 3488 > +91-11- 2585 0155 > Fax:: +91-11- 2575 2904 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75165&t=75030 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Route Maps [7:74258]
Given the following configuration, will traffic be load balannced between Serial 0 and Serial 1, or will Serial 0 be preferred, then Serial 1 Router(conf)#route-map test permit 10 Router(conf-route-map)#set default interface serial 0 serial 1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74258&t=74258 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Can 802.1q & isl co-exist on same network?? [7:73511]
They can run on the same network but a pair of directly connected switches must be using the same trunking protocol. Tim ""dj"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Have a production campus LAN network primarily running with 3508Gs and > 3524XL data switches with gigabit fiber uplinks. All switches are > currently running ISL Vlan trunking between the uplink ports. There's > also a 2620 router running ISL fastethernet subinterfaces configured > with encapsulation ISL. > > I have some non-cisco network devices that only support 802.1q vlan > trunking. I already know the 802.1q trunking on non-cisco equipment > works ok with cisco devices running 802.1q trunking. > > However, when I deploy the non-cisco equipment in the production campus > LAN, can I have some trunk ports running 802.1q trunking and other trunk > ports running ISL. Bottom line: Can ISL and 802.1q co-exist or do I > have to migrate entire LAN to 802.1q vlan trunking?? > > regards, > dj > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73513&t=73511 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]
Bit of a strange one this. We have 2 7206 routers running HSRP that are support by our telecoms provider. The fast ethernet interface of each is connected into our 2950 along with a firewall. >From the switch, or firewall, I can ping either of the 'real' ip addresses but not the virtual address. I have used debug arp and seen the arp request go out for the virtual address (the telco has done the same and see's the request come in) but there is no reply. If we configure a static arp entry it all works fine. Anyone ever experienced anything like this??? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73098&t=73098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Per-destination load balancing [7:72944]
Thank you for your replies, think I've got it now. ""Tim Champion"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken from CCO): > > "Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute packets > based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to achieve load > sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to > take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. For example, given > two paths to the same network, all packets for destination1 on that network > go over the first path, all packets for destination2 on that network go over > the second path, and so on. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by > default when you start the router, and is the preferred load balancing for > most situations." > > It was my understanding that per-destination load balancing was based on the > destination address only and not on the source/destination pair. > > > > If someone could clarify it would be much appreciated. > > > > Cheers > > > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73009&t=72944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Per-destination load balancing [7:72944]
Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken from CCO): "Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute packets based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. For example, given two paths to the same network, all packets for destination1 on that network go over the first path, all packets for destination2 on that network go over the second path, and so on. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you start the router, and is the preferred load balancing for most situations." It was my understanding that per-destination load balancing was based on the destination address only and not on the source/destination pair. If someone could clarify it would be much appreciated. Cheers Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72944&t=72944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CEF & Per-packet load sharing [7:72232]
Does anyone know of any performance limitations relating to the use of per-packet load sharing in conjunction with CEF & EIGRP? I only want to use it on 2 VLAN interfaces so is it possible to configure on a per-interface basis or just globally? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72232&t=72232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GRE Tunnel & EIGRP [7:72093]
I am planning on using a GRE tunnel across a MPLS VPN in order to create an EIGRP neighbour relationship across the cloud. The VPN link will be running at 8Mbps. The routers terminating the tunnel will be a 3640 and RSM. Does anyone know if this will adversely impact the processors and/or throughput of the link. Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72093&t=72093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merge ISDN 2000AF Software? [7:71731]
I have a used Merge ISDN 2000AF simulator I purchased for my lab and I am in desperate need of the software for it. Merge Tech support says that I need to re download the software to the simulator, because it is corrupt. Does anyone have the software they can share with me? Thanks, Tim Medley, CCDP, CCNP+Voice, CWNA medley at mac dot com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71731&t=71731 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSS Switches... [7:71292]
Hi, Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all. We are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL sticky works on them first Thanks in advance! - Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71292&t=71292 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Route Metrics [7:70958]
I have a situation whereby I want to perform load balancing across 2 links. The problem is that the router which will have to perform the load balancing learns one route via EIGRP and the other from a static route. I know how to alter the administrative distance of the static route but I'm not sure on how to tweak the metric. I guess I need to either increase the metric of the static route of reduce the metric of the EIGRP route. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70958&t=70958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Technology, Certification, Skill Sets, and Looking [7:70868]
OMG that is the funniest thing I have heard. I myself am training to one day become a cruise director. The hard part is watching all the Love Boat reruns and I am falling in love with Julie. Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Technical Operations New York 2 Thomson Financial -Original Message- From: Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Technology, Certification, Skill Sets, and Looking [7:70860] Wow, Chuck, way to suck the life out of the economy and our futures...oh, wait, that was due to the bubble popping lo all those years ago. For an assessment of networking futures, let's turn to Lovecraft...(thanks to www.Cthulhu.org) "It seemed to be a sort of monster, or symbol representing a monster, of a form which only a diseased fancy could conceive. If I say that my somewhat extravagant imagination yielded simultaneous pictures of an octopus, a dragon, and a human caricature, I shall not be unfaithful to the spirit of the thing. A pulpy, tentacled head surmounted a grotesque and scaly body with rudimentary wings; but it was the general outline of the whole which made it most shockingly frightful. " We know the pulpy head has been popped... Sadly, though, I believe that you are right on the money...networking and its advanced features are becoming more point-button simple. I figure that we got about 10 years at the most before the bottom truly drops out and networking becomes as simple and mindless as programming your VCR or TiVo...you don't need assistance anymore. As far as for myself, I am currently working on developing my people skills as I do want to attain senior greeter status...the handing out balloons and talking is really tripping me up...does anyone want to form a study group with me to study that? Charles ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The Road Goes Ever On wrote: > > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in > > message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Someone also just sent me a URL to this newspaper article > > that points out > > > the importance of learning business practices, not just > > particular > > > technologies. It's a good read: > > > > > > http://www.startribune.com/stories/789/3936460.html > > > > > > > An interesting artivcle, and one with some nuggets of good > > advice, > > particularly for those new to the business cycle. For those who > > have been > > seeing articles like this over the past twenty years or so, > > this article > > reinforces good advice, much along the lines that NRF has > > offered in other > > threads that appear regularly on Groupstudy. Good advice is > > timeless, and > > the advice in this article, which reiterates similar outlooks > > as have > > appeared in the business press over the past couple of decades > > remains true. > > > > Way back when I was learning things and formulating my own > > technology > > philosophy, I was blown away by three things I read - Peter > > Keens book > > Competing in Time, Paul Strassman's book The Business Value of > > Computers, > > and an obscure article written by an economist working for the > > Chicago > > Federal Reserve Bank. Each of these sources in its own way says > > similar > > things from a higher level. The Fed study was a short and > > simple one, but of > > all the business sources I have read, still seems the most > > relevant. The > > gist of the study was that investment in infrastructure yielded > > high returns > > in productivity. The author was reporting on government > > investment in > > physical infrastructure such as roads, water treatement, and > > the like, but a > > clever studentworking towards his master degree while going to > > night school > > ran with that theme and wrote a master's thesis which earned him > > departmental honors. > > Was that you? :-) Sounds interesting. > > Thanks for commenting on the article. I thought it made some good points. > > Priscilla > > > > > > Anyone in the technology field, whether it be IT Management, > > Consulting, or > > even something as seemingly mundane as sales, should ALWAYS be > > aware of the > > business value of technology. Over the past 15 years or so it > > has been > > technology which has driven productivity. > > > > The dark side is that technology changes, and has a way of > > becoming more > > appliance like, meaning that what as skilled labor yesterday is > > out of the > > box tomorrow. Thin about it. All you folks who are AVVID > > experts and > > therefore in high demand. How long before AVVID is nothing more > > than another > > PBX, and routers self configure for QoS? Think the telco > > employee who drives > > the truck and installs your DSL is making 100K? not likely. > > > > So yes - keep your skills up to date, so you don't end up like > > the guy in > > the article. My own opinion is that one must always consider > > the value to > > business for any skill set one pursues. > > > > JMHO
RE: Email access over the Internet [7:70755]
There is an option in the Cisco VPN client called "NAT Transparency" which when enabled, allows me to VPN into work (like right now) from behind a NAT firewall. Just gotta find out what that option is in securemote software. Tim -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:51 PM To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Com (E-mail); Comserv (E-mail); '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Email access over the Internet Folks, I have a problem in my work where for some strange reason I cant access my email over the internet from a hotel. The reason for me not being able to access email is because, oddly enough, the hotel uses NAT. We use checkpoint firewalls and I use securemote software. Now I believe its something to do with the secure ID token that I use and when I type this in there is some form of checksum which is checked at the server end. This of course has changed due to the Nat going on. has anybody out there experience this as well and know what the simple solution is. I'm sure there is a simple solution and its just my company politics which is causing me the problems. Any help will be much appreciated. Robert McCallum CCIE #8757 01415663448 07818002241 ___ You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group. Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70755&t=70755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 3550 [7:70449]
Does anyone know of a command which will show the flavour of GBIC in a particular slot of a 3550? Many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70449&t=70449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Many-to-one NAT on 2611XM [7:70193]
We are going to be NATing up to 12 Internet Proxies behind a single registered IP address on a Cisco 2611XM. Has anyone tried anything similar or is anyone aware of any performance implications of this configuration? Many thanks in advance Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70193&t=70193 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851]
Larry, There are a couple of new 10/100/1000 blades coming out for the 6500. The "module for value" version runs directly off of the 32gig backplane. There is also a higher speed version that requires the 256gig backplane. "48-port 10/100/1000 Ethernet module for value--oriented wiring closets-This module utilizes the Catalyst 6500 32 Gbps backplane. A single Cisco Catalyst 6500 chassis can cost-effectively support 48 to 576 10/100/1000 ports using any generation of Cisco Catalyst 6500 supervisor engine. It also features TDR and will offer a field-upgradeable IEEE 802.3af standards based in-line power daughter card" All of the pricing and additional information can be found here: http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/prod_033103.html Tim CCIE 9015, CSS1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Letterman Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] The new 48 port 10/100/1000 module will require a new SUP720 or sup-3 as some are calling it.. It may also require a SFM module. The sup 3 will require a new fan tray and I believe power supplies... The info is a little sketchy at this time, but that is what we have heard..thats a lot of upgrading for 48 gig ports..and most servers cant really fill a 100FD pipe anyway... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Jeffrey Reed > Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 8:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] > > > Larry, what's the "costly upgrade" all about? I saw two 48-port > 10/100/1000 blades introduced. One is for "performance" and the other > for "value". Do both need the upgrade to the chassis? > > Thanks!! > > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Larry Letterman > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 7:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] > > we have had the 16 port 10/100/1000 blade for a while in the cat 6000 > line. As DRE says, the 48 port version will be out soon..however it > will require a costly upgrade to the chassis... > > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of dre > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] > > > > > > ""Greg Rend"" wrote in message ... > > > Does anyone know if/when Cisco is going to announce a standalone > > > (2950, 3550), triple speed switch? If there is already one out > > > there from Cisco (standalone) please excuse my ignorance. I > > > haven't been about to track one down. I know Cisco has a 3550-12T > > > Switch but ony 12 10/100/1000 ports. Word on the street is that > > > Cisco is going to announce a higher density, anyone have any news? > > > > Well considering Cisco just came out with the Sup720 and have > > 10/100/1000 modules for the 6500 platform finally on the official > > roadmap (announcement in May) -- I don't forsee them having it on > > smaller switches in bulk until much later. 10/100/1000 has been > > available on the Catalyst 4000 series for quite some time now, > > however, so that would likely be the platform of choice for > > 10/100/1000 applications. Or maybe another vendor. > > > > -dre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66962&t=66851 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UK based CCIE training [7:66825]
Can anyone recommend a UK based CCIE training company, i.e. one which provide mentoring, training material etc? Has anyone got any general views on this approach to CCIE studies? Thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66825&t=66825 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: so how does IGRP unequal load-balancing work anyway? [7:66667]
I can't remember the exact terminology but an IGRP router is aware of a neighbors metric to a destination as well as its own metric to the same destination. The router will only consider routes to be valid if the upstream router's metric to the destination is lower than its own metric to the same destination. This prevents the problems you mentioned below. You may want to get a second opinion on this! Tim ""nwo"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > It occurs to me that I do not understand how IGRP unequal load balancing > works. > > Yes, I understand what the commands are, and I am well aware of the > intricacies involved in fast-switching and CEF. So please don't respond by > telling me to configure 'variance' or stuff like that. I already know all > that. > > What I don't understand is this. A fundamental part of EIGRP unequal load > balancing is the concept of the feasible successor, where routes of unequal > metric to a particular destination will be considered only if the > corresponding neighbor is a feasible successor for the destination in > question. This is in order to prevent the problem of packets being sent to > to a router that is actually further away from the destination than the > sending router is to that destination. > > Yet, I am aware of no such safeguards in IGRP. IGRP has no such concept of > a topology table with neighbor's advertised distances and whatnot. > Therefore it seems that packets could easily be forwarded away from the > destination. Furthermore, it would seem to me that packets could actually > bounce back and forth between 2 routers for awhile. > > Please say it ain't so. Yet I am unaware of any construct within IGRP that > would prevent it from being so. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7&t=7 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2511 Hardware Issue [7:66662]
Has anyone experienced, or heard of, the following problem: I recently bought a 2nd hand 2511 but only async interfaces 9-16 work. 1-8 receive data but do not transmit. Could it possibly be due to one of the numerous jumper settings? many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2&t=2 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R&S CCIE Written Question [7:66619]
Does the R&S written exam include any questions on EIGRP being used for IPX or Appletalk? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66619&t=66619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]
When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values) which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest, lowest or average value for the entire route? Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be appreciated. Many thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66181&t=66062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]
When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values) which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest, lowest or average value for the entire route? Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be appreciated. Many thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66062&t=66062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token Ring and CCNP Switching Exam 640-604 [7:65885]
Is token ring a part of the CCNP Switching Exam 640-604? It is not listed in the exam objectives. Thanks, Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65885&t=65885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2511 Reverse Telnet [7:65819]
Help please! I have just bought a 2511 and am attempting to use it for reverse telnet. I have connected each of the octal cable RJ-45 cables into a console port. I initiate a reverse telnet session and can recieve data, i.e. when I power on the target router I recieve boot loader etc messages up until "press return to start". The problem is I can't send anything, pressing return doesn't work. I am reseanably confident that I have entered all the right commands. Can anyone shed any light on this? Many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65819&t=65819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE [7:65426]
This is absolutely the funniest thing I have ever read. Juan, its good to know that there are still people in this line of work with a sense of humor. Oh, and my routers talk to me, actually they swear. Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Technical Operations New York 2 Thomson Financial -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE [7:65426] This is way too funny! :-) Especially the part about Microsoft and corduroy... >>> Juan Blanco 3/14/03 7:27:12 AM >>> Team, I got this from a friend but I not sure if you have seen this or not but only someone pursuing the CCIE would laugh at it!! In the course of my day-to-day work, people ask me what is a CCIE? I thought about this for some time. I wrote some notes. And this is what I came up with: I am a dynamic figure, often seen scaling 8 foot computer racks and charming magnetic security cardswipes. I have been known to remodel SME networks on my lunch breaks, making them more efficient in the area of capital deployment, reliability and performance. I translate technobabble for Management, I write award-winning technical presentations and deliver them better than an American president announcing tax cuts. I can recite complete chapters of the Cisco Documentation CD, backwards and, with little effort and at the same time, perform decimal to binary conversion for very large numbers. I woo women with my sensuous and godlike MIDI playing on a notebook. I can pilot computer trolleys up severe inclines with unflagging speed, and I can rack Cisco gear faster than Arnold Schwarznegger can bench press. I am an expert in network diagramming tools, a veteran in web surfing, and know the Cisco Web Site better than I know my own family. Just to keep it interesting, I occasionally tread water for three days while programming Cisco practice labs. I manage time efficiently and can complete a timesheet every week. In addition, I know the part number for every Cisco router cable. Using only a Chinese AC power cord and a large glass of water, I once single-handedly rebuilt the network core of major co-location facility after the roof fell in. I used to play games, but now it's serious. I am the subject of numerous urban myths and I am the creator of a few as well. When I'm bored, I test fiber optic cable, calculate power loss sums on UTP and the minimum refraction index for 50 micron multimode fiber. I mean, what IS the point of it ? I understand that DLSW and Source Route Translational Bridging actually has a reason for existence. It's not just IBM playing a practical joke. Really. I enjoy urban guerilla activities. I can build a 802.11b parabolic dish antennae using surplus antennae from defunct satellite companies and a juice can. It has better performance than off the shelf products. I think that having a wind generator and solar array as power backup for my practice lab is not only responsible preparation, it's environmentally friendly too. On Wednesdays, after work, I repair old monitors free of charge for my local charity. I know that canonical to non-canonical conversion is not about religion, it's about "ART." Microsoft geeks worldwide swoon over my original line of corduroy evening wear, which I don't understand -- it was supposed to be funny. I don't perspire. I am a private citizen, yet I receive fan mail. I have been caller number ten and have won the cash jackpot. I can speak IPX NLSP, AppleTalk, ATM PVC, QoS, and BGP to name a few, and redistribute routes at will, with filtering, using non contiguous masks. I install IPV6 on customer sites whenever I can, just so I can play with it. Same for OSPF NSSA. Children trust me. I can hurl squishy giveaway tradeshow toys at sales personnel with stunning accuracy, and ensure that the dweeb from administration gets the blame. I have charisma beyond normal mortals; if I didn't the boss would have sent the other guy to this exam. I once read Cisco Quality of Service, Caslow Bridges and Routers 2nd Ed, and Jeff Doyles' Routing TCP/IP Vol2 in one day, and still had time to do practice on a Frame Relay multipoint network, using OSPF and IGRP, split horizon, route maps and ISDN. I know the exact location of every food item in the supermarket and I use a link state protocol to calculate the shortest path to get there. I have performed several covert operations with the CIA. It was kind of fun having them follow me around. I know that security and privacy is a phantasm-like myth created by "security companies" to extract money from IT Managers who can't implement a decent security policy. But it's great fun to play with. I sleep once a week; when I do sleep, I sleep in a chair. I know exactly how much coffee my body will take to sustain me at peak function. While on vacation, I successfully negotiated with the hotel to fix their network in return for free accommodation. The laws of society do not apply to me. I bal
Catalyst Port Counters [7:64355]
Does anyone know why the Giant counter below shows "-" as opposed to a numerical counter? Cisco Works is showing the trunk as suffering from a high number of oversize errors but the port counters don't back this up. I've tried a clear counters but this has made no difference. Sessions_A (enable) sh po 1/1 Port Name Status Vlan Level Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- -- - - --- 1/1 to_cab_AA connected trunk normal full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Trap IfIndex - --- 1/1 disabled 3 Port Broadcast-Limit Broadcast-Drop --- -- 1/1 65.00 % 0 Port Send FlowControlReceive FlowControl RxPause TxPause Unsupported adminoper adminoper opcodes - --- --- --- 1/1 on on on on 0 0 0 Port Align-Err FCS-ErrXmit-Err Rcv-ErrUnderSize - -- -- -- -- - 1/1 0 0 0 0 0 Port Single-Col Multi-Coll Late-Coll Excess-Col Carri-Sen Runts Giants - -- -- -- -- - - -- --- 1/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64355&t=64355 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN Client-RAS-VPN-PIX Route Mapping? [7:63919]
This is a classic "VPN Gateway behind the PIX" question... Can NAT/PAT/Static Routes be used on a Trusted PIX Port to provide Web Access to RAS/VPN Client to VPN3000 Gateway to PIX Trusted Port The VPN Gateway is positioned on a subnet behind the PIX. URL references are appreciated. Thanks. Tim Weil - CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63919&t=63919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Latest News and Developments from Cisco [7:63775]
Which cisco exams have a prefix of 642? Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Technical Operations New York 2 Thomson Financial -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: Latest News and Developments from Cisco [7:63775] FYI -Original Message- From: Cisco Systems Inc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:53 PM Cisco Systems would like to inform you on the latest news and developments from the Cisco Internet Learning Solutions Group. Please read below about revisions to certification and recertification, Cisco Qualified Specialist retirements and new courses. = Revision to Cisco Certified Design Professional (CCDP) program The new CCDP program structure will reflect the latest developments in network design and technologies incorporating converged networking solutions. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_new/ccdp/ Retiring Four Focused Certifications In response to changes in market needs, Cisco will retire four focused certifications - Cisco Internet Solutions Specialist, Cisco SNA/IP Design Specialist, Cisco SNA/IP Support Specialist, and Cisco Security Specialist 1. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_new/cqsretire/ Adjusted Recertification Policy for CCNA & CCDA To recognize those candidates who demonstrate skills beyond their current certification status, Cisco will adjust its recertification policy at the Associate level, CCNA & CCDA. If a recertification candidate passes any new exam at the professional or Cisco Qualified Specialist level, the candidate will be considered recertified at the CCNA or CCDA level. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_new/recertification/ Revised Security Courses Cisco is proud to announce the release of three revised security courses covering the newest PIX, VPN & IOS security technologies. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_new/revisedsecurity/ _ Cisco Learning Partners are the only source of authorized Cisco training. Carefully selected by Cisco Systems, these companies are the only organizations to employ Certified Cisco Systems Instructors and deliver Cisco authorized and approved content. http://www.cisco.com/go/training All contents copyright (C) 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63798&t=63775 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco works 2000 cd one 5th Edition [7:63023]
I am trying to upgrade to CW2000 5th edition but am having some problems. When attempting to suspend all jobs using: cwjava -cw install_directory com.cisco.nm.cmf.jrm.DisableJobs I recieve the following message: "unable to launch JVM" Has anyone else run into this problem? Many thanks in advance Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63023&t=63023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Study group in Chicago? [7:62777]
That sounds like an excellent idea. Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Technical Operations New York 2 Thomson Financial -Original Message- From: David Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Study group in Chicago? [7:62777] Well here is a question for the group in general: Would you think that a combination of a CCNP study group and a CCIE Written group (mainly people that have just started studying for the CCIE) be beneficial to everyone involved? Or would the focus be completely different? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Study group in Chicago? [7:62777] I hear ya on that one... I'm just trying to find the time to hook up my lab; so I can study for the CCNP. -Original Message- From: Fernandez, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Study group in Chicago? [7:62777] Hey, what about a CCNP Study Group in Chicago? Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Technical Operations New York 2 Thomson Financial -Original Message- From: Chris Theiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Study group in Chicago? [7:62777] I'd be interested in joining one, or forming a new one. Nguyen, David wrote: > Any CCIE study groups here in the Chicago area? > > Regards, > > David -- Chris Theiss IPG WAN Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 425-6624 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62879&t=62777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Study group in Chicago? [7:62777]
Hey, what about a CCNP Study Group in Chicago? Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Technical Operations New York 2 Thomson Financial -Original Message- From: Chris Theiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Study group in Chicago? [7:62777] I'd be interested in joining one, or forming a new one. Nguyen, David wrote: > Any CCIE study groups here in the Chicago area? > > Regards, > > David -- Chris Theiss IPG WAN Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 425-6624 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62785&t=62777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Call Manager backup question [7:62617]
Does any one know where I can find information about the Cisco Call Manager 3.2 backup utility? I am trying to find out what my backup tapes have on them. Thanks Tim Lipscombe Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62617&t=62617 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Access Through Cisco VPN Concentrator? [7:61999]
Just curious Does anybody know how well the "default gateway" setting in the Cisco 3005 concentrator works? I want to make sure my VPN clients can access the internet while on VPN by having the concentrator route all the internet traffic through the default gateway. Thanks! - Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61999&t=61999 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: username autocommand [7:61583]
Albert, Under your line config add: authorization exec VTY -Tim Fletcher At 11:12 AM 1/23/2003 +1100, Albert Lu wrote: >I've got these statements in there, but it still wouldn't work > >aaa authentication login VTY local-case enable >aaa authorization exec VTY local > >login authentication VTY > > >Albert > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Tim Fletcher >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:36 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: username autocommand [7:61583] > > >Albert, > >Make sure you have the following configured: > >aaa new-model >aaa authentication login default local-case >aaa authorization exec default local > >It won't work without the authorization. > >-Tim Fletcher > >At 12:28 AM 1/23/2003 +1100, Albert Lu wrote: > >hello group, > > > >Has anyone got the 'username autocommand' command working? I can't get the > >autocommand to work, and only works when I put it in the line configs. > > > >This is what I'm trying to do from the Cisco DocCD, take a look at the >'who' > >username example. > > > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fse >c > >ur_r/fothercr/srfpass.htm#1017939 > > > >Thanks > > > >Albert > >. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61669&t=61583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: username autocommand [7:61583]
Albert, Make sure you have the following configured: aaa new-model aaa authentication login default local-case aaa authorization exec default local It won't work without the authorization. -Tim Fletcher At 12:28 AM 1/23/2003 +1100, Albert Lu wrote: >hello group, > >Has anyone got the 'username autocommand' command working? I can't get the >autocommand to work, and only works when I put it in the line configs. > >This is what I'm trying to do from the Cisco DocCD, take a look at the 'who' >username example. > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fsec >ur_r/fothercr/srfpass.htm#1017939 > >Thanks > >Albert >. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61583&t=61583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Automatic copying of the configuration scheduling [7:61538]
There's a perl script called cisco-conf which logs into Cisco gear and issues a "copy run tftp" or maybe "copy start" don't remember... anyway, excellent tool. http://search.cpan.org/author/JWIED/Cisco-Conf-0.10/ Tim ""Mr piyush shah"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear all > I have been assigned the task of copying a series of > configurations in a router on a daily basis .I am > tired of giving copy startup-config tftp command in > each router . I was wondering if is there any way > wherein we can automate this i.e copy startup-config > tftp will run in each riuter automaticall at 9:00 am > daily morning ? > I am in search of that kind of solution .Request you > to help me. > Thanks in advance. > > Piyush > > > Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. >visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61561&t=61538 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco VPN Question [7:61148]
Just wondering... Does anybody know how reliable the Cisco VPN client is with "split-tunneling" when paired with a Cisco 3005 concentrator. Is it able to perform as advertised is almost every situation or does it have problems with private networks and/or different service providers or cable modems/hubs/routers? - Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61148&t=61148 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alittle off topic [7:58917]
Hi everybody. Anyone have an opinion on a good beginning book on Unix? Thanks, Tim. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58917&t=58917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confused from London [7:57780]
We beat the Ozzies at rugby and we'll do the same at soccer in Febuary. As for the cricket, well its not over yet.. ""Peter Kingston"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 5 games of cricket Between Australia and England have just commenced... > Australia won the first game very convincingly > > Australia should go a clean sweep > > -- > Regards, > > Peter Kingston > Telstra BigPond Direct > Freecall 1800 066 594 > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well you better explain this to us Yankees. Our baseball season is over > > unfortunatley, and now all we have is football (ugh). Well we have hockey > > and basketball too, I guess, and they're a litte better! :-) > > > > Priscilla > > > > Peter Kingston wrote: > > > > > > I just as a little bit of friendly rivalry, > > > > > > I believe there is more than yourself confused in London, > > > naming your > > > cricketers 5 zips looks like a fair chance > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > Peter Kingston > > > Telstra BigPond Direct > > > Freecall 1800 066 594 > > > wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Someone asked me a question which confused me:- > > > > If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different > > > network, which > > > > passes through a cisco router why do i get replies from > > > certain devices. > > > > > > > > The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. > > > > I thought the router would therefore drop the packet > > > > > > > > Any thoughts > > > > Thanks > > > > -P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57876&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multicast [7:57773]
Yes, yes and yes but, only certain cats support igmp snooping. Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Sales, Trading and Wealth Management Thomson Financial [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 630-353-7013 Fax: 630-435-4960 901 Warrenville Rd Suite 15 Lisle, IL 60532 -Original Message- From: Hotmail Cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multicast [7:57773] Hi, I have some users who want to use a multicast application between different vlans. Is multicast forwarding turned on by default on 12.1 IOS? Would'nt I need to config something like PIM, IGMP and CGMP on my cat's and routers to do this efficiently or will the IOS just flood multicast packets out all interfaces by default? Thanks for any clues! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57788&t=57773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Has Anyone used Global Knowledge? [7:57297]
just in case you need another reply, The Global Knowledge in Atlanta is also recommended Tim ""David Vital"" wrote in message news:200211121616.QAA10750@;groupstudy.com... > Wondering if anyone here has experience with Global Knowledge and the > classes they offer. > > Thanks, > > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57339&t=57297 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CID exam 640-025 [7:57268]
No SNA on the blueprint means no SNA on the test. I took it a few months ago and didn't have any either. Tim ""David"" wrote in message news:200211120415.EAA12014@;groupstudy.com... > Hi folks, > > The CID exam. The Cisco has a lot of SNA content in it, > however I can't find any SNA stuff at (excuse wrapping) > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam s/640-025.html > > > I can't find anything about changes on Cisco's website, > so...does the CID have any SNA? > > Cheers, > > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57272&t=57268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clearing access lists counters [7:57241]
although that should have worked, try clear ip access-list counter as well I just tested this on a 3662 and both commands worked (IOS 12.1) Tim ""John Tafasi"" wrote in message news:20022125.VAA01591@;groupstudy.com... > Can some one tell me how to clear access-list counters? I tried to use the > command "clear access-list counters" but it did not work. Please see the > output of the show command below. > > R5-2503#show access-lis abc > Extended IP access list abc > Dynamic test permit ip any any > permit ip any any (158 matches) > permit tcp any host 10.10.110.3 eq telnet > R5-2503# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57271&t=57241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Lab Kit [7:57099]
Can anyone point me in the direction of a definitive kit list for a CCIE study lab? many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57099&t=57099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hyperterminal [7:56796]
Does anyone know which setting needs changing to get HyperTerminal to paste configs into a Cisco device without stuttering? Thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56796&t=56796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: 6509 w/2 SUP2/MSFC2 and FlexWAN [7:56774]
Hello, I am working on a high availability solution for a single 6509. The customer currently has a 6509 with dual SUP 2's and dual MSFC2/PFC2's. This box also has a FlexWAN module and I am having some difficulty locating any useful information on Cisco's new site about setting this up with some high availability or redundancy. When I configure the MSFC's like normal with HSRP on all of the VLAN interfaces only the MSFC in the active SUP can see the FlexWAN module and serial ports. They do not even show up on the second MSFC. Is there a "Ciscoized" way to set this up? Thanks for any help! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56774&t=56774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Works 2000 problem [7:56601]
I have a problem with Cisco Works 2000 whereby the ANI server has the busy flag set. This is effecting many of the services. I have tried all of the suggestions on CCO but it has made no difference. Has anyone else seen this before? Cheers Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56601&t=56601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: odd & even # IPs on an ACL [7:56551]
that joke deserves it's own thread ;-) Tim ""Jennifer Mellone"" wrote in message news:200210310718.HAA06644@;groupstudy.com... > Cute! > > So I'm thinking that tomorrow (Halloween) I'll put on a subnet mask. > It will be 255.255.0.0, and the two 0's will have little holes in the middle > for my eyes ;-) > > - Jennifer Mellone Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56578&t=56551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ACS for Windows 2000 [7:56534]
I had the same problem so I just made the acs server a domain controller and all is well Tim ""Marakalas"" wrote in message news:200210301727.RAA17390@;groupstudy.com... > Hi guys > > I have problems in configuring ACS for RAS to > authenticate users using Active Directory on the > Windows domain? I'm having problems in getting this to work. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56567&t=56534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does the number means? [7:56511]
ha... CCIE practice question (at least that's where I think I saw it) I call it revision but I think the test answer is "maintenance version" - the higher the number in brackets the more fixes that version of IOS contains. Tim ""champion boliao"" wrote in message news:200210300815.IAA20427@;groupstudy.com... > hi, > > i have list of IOS that supports MPLS. > > 12.0[3], 12.1[4.6], 12.1[7.3], 12.1[8.4],@12.1(20011103:114302) > > Please tell me what does the numbers in bracket mean. > > thank you very much > > > > Yahoo! Travel > - Great flight deals, travel info and prizes! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56512&t=56511 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - of general interest [7:56500]
Chuck, didn't this strike you as corporate welfare? Tim ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:200210300050.AAA32516@;groupstudy.com... > saw this one come through today. Personally, I agree with the premise. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3953254;5700831;g?http://207.27.3.33/2/ > watch the wrap > > -- > > www.chuckslongroad.info Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56510&t=56500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Works 2000 and Windows XP [7:56485]
Hey all, has anyone been able to install Cisco Works 2000 on an WindowsXP Pro Box? Thanks, Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Sales, Trading and Wealth Management Thomson Financial Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56485&t=56485 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GBIC Types [7:56468]
Does anyone know of a show command on a Catalyst 5k which will show the type of GBIC installed, SH, LX/LH etc? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56468&t=56468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hate cisco's new site? [7:56236]
Oh did they mean to redesign the website? I thought some script kiddies defaced it and Cisco hadn't had time to fix it. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: sam sneed [mailto:vristevski@;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hate cisco's new site? [7:56236] Am I the only one that hates Cisco's new site? I can't find anything that I'm looking for on the there. Its driving me up the wall. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56254&t=56236 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: caller name ID/call manager [7:56218]
Yep this is a known issue with CCM. Why cisco chose to do this is anyones guess. All the telco's that we work with send Caller ID Name in the ISDN Facility IE. Per Cisco, this can be modified on a per trunk group basis on a DMS-100 switch. None of the Telcos' we use have a DMS-100 so we haven't been able to verify this. Cisco says they will modify CCM to send/receive caller id name in the ISDN Facilty IE, but they haven't committed to a timeframe or version. One of the telco's we use, came up with an alternate method to send a name for Calling Party Name on a per DID Block basis, but in order to do this our H323 Gateways need to use ISDN NI3, which the current Cisco IOS revisions do not support yet. Cisco gave no indication as to if/when they will support NI3. We lose more IP Telephony deals because of stupid features that everyone else's IP Telephony system or traditional key/pbx system has. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld ph: 704.943.3615 -Original Message- From: Paul Beckman [mailto:pbeckman@;DeltaHealthGroup.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: caller name ID/call manager [7:56218] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We have been "working" with Cisco on a problem for about a year now and have determined that we can not get caller name id on our phone because Bellsouth is sending it in the facility ID field. Cisco call manager will only look at the display IE field. We have also checked with two other carriers and they also deliver it in the facility ID field. My question is... does anyone get caller name ID on their phones from external callers? And if so what carrier do you use and what kind of switch is it being brought in on? Paul Beckman MCSE MCT CCNA CCA Delta Health Group CIS Department (850) 470-0155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBPbgT9hWcSOytpgTKEQIHTQCgtpSERcRtzv8sHpM2R5Sp9jUkp10AoOj/ yFcoI+Iz9oLFBq3nQWdOS8sz =p+gW -END PGP SIGNATURE- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56233&t=56218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hate cisco's new site? [7:56236]
I used to bitch about the old one and am now totally screwed... I guess I'll learn to like it ;-( Tim ""sam sneed"" wrote in message news:200210241956.TAA01985@;groupstudy.com... > Am I the only one that hates Cisco's new site? I can't find anything that > I'm looking for on the there. Its driving me up the wall. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56260&t=56236 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing sims [7:56132]
I always thought that routersim was pretty good. I haven't used the CCNP version but I've heard good things about it. Tim ""James Gosnold"" wrote in message news:200210230850.IAA30967@;groupstudy.com... > Hi all, > > Fresh from the CCNA I have just started study for CCNP routing exam, this is > probably not an unusual question but I would appreciate any advice. > > Although I have a small lab at home I found routing sims invaluable in > studying for the CCNA, do any of you know of any good ones for the CCNP? > Specifically sims with support for OSPF, EIGRP and BGP. > > Thanks, James. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56133&t=56132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HDLC STAC Compression [7:56073]
Is anyone out there using STAC compression on HDLC links in a live network? If so what is the maximum speed link you would apply it to and has it brought significant benefits. Many thanks in advance Tim Champion Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56073&t=56073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Book Recommendation [7:55805]
Can anyone recommend a good book covering Ethernet. Would such a book be useful for CCIE studies? Thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55805&t=55805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rate limit clarification [7:55778]
Can someone clarify if the burst-normal and burst-max options of the
rate-limit command are inclusive or exclusive of the CIR? To rate-limit to
400kbps would I want 40 0 0 or 40 5 5
Additionally, is there a reason the CIR (bps) is in bits and the burst in
bytes???
rate-limit {input | output} bps burst-normal burst-max conform-action action
exceed-action action
router(config-if)#rate-limit output ?
Bits per second
access-group Match access list
dscp Match dscp value
qos-group Match qos-group ID
NAPA7513-B(config-if)#rate-limit output 40 ?
Normal burst bytes
Thanks,
Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55778&t=55778
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Enable Secret of AS5300 [7:55086]
there are tools for this all over the web. your enable password is cisco1 Tim ""Danial Morison"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi group > > I lost the enable secret password of my Cisco AS5300.I have the > configuration showing. > > enable secret 5 $1$6YRM$nzNXQuv4h24C3AlB8N3rp. > enable password 7 110A1016141D5A > > Any idea to decrypt this password. > > Thanks in advance > > > > _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55088&t=55086 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: FS IBM SX GBIC's work fine with Cisco 3500 series switches [7:54929]
I have a bunch of IBM SX GBIC's for sale i anyone is interested for use in your labs. I have tested these in several 3500 XL series switches as well as in a 6500 and they work fine. Selling them for $25 each plus shipping. Simple inexpensive way to use Gig E in your home lab. I do not believe that these are on the approved Cisco third party GBIC list, so I wouldn't use them on a production network. Tim Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54929&t=54929 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Practical exam question [7:54783]
Does anyone know if the CCIE practical exam is 'regional specific', i.e. will I need in-depth knowledge of T-1 & T-3 services despite living and working in the UK? Many thanks in advance Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54783&t=54783 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPPP Question [7:54691]
Any one running MPPP out there? Specifically on mulitple point-to-point T-1 interfaces? I am doing some research on using MPPP to bundle mulitple T-1s together to look like 1 fat pipe. I have some documentation that states there is 12.5% overhead. I was wondering if anyone else has played around with it. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54691&t=54691 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wireless LAN Exam [7:54608]
A great source for information is the e-learning stuff on PEC. Also lots of info on CCO, and there is always the training class from Giga Wave. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Anil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Wireless LAN Exam [7:54608] Hi, Can any one suggest good books/ URL for the Wireless LAN exam, as the part of Partner Specialization program. Thanks in Advance. Regards... Anil __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54684&t=54608 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why my input error and CRC always same [7:54516]
I would suggest that "input errors" is a general counter for all input errors and that these are then split down in to more sepcific error types, in this case CRC. Can anyone confirm this? ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Packet Errors > If you have a large amount of alignment errors, FCS errors, or late > collisions, this may indicate: > > > Duplex mismatch > > Bad NICs > > Cable problems (causing mangled packets, flapping ports, and so on) > > For more information on duplex mismatch errors, see Configuring and > Troubleshooting Ethernet 10/100Mb Half/Full Duplex Auto-Negotiation. The > most common issue with speed/duplex is that customers manually set the > speed/duplex on the switch, but not on the workstation/server. Auto > speed/duplex on one side and 100/Full-duplex on the other side is a > misconfiguration and will result in a duplex mismtach. > > Larry Letterman > Cisco Systems > > > Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote: > > >Hi.. Some users complaint to me that their application getting > >disconnection. I have fixed the speed and duplex of their switch port at > >both sides and changed the cable but still the same. And the strange thing > >is that all the problem ports are all having the same error pattern-same > >number of input errors and CRC. The rest of errors are all zero-as shown > >below.Those other ports that have different number input errors and CRC > >are not having disconnection problem. Any idea what can I do on those > >ports that having disconnection problem? > > > > > > > > > > > >SW4>sh int fas0/21 > > > >FastEthernet0/21 is up, line protocol is up > > > > Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 00d0.790c.d315 (bia 00d0.790c.d315) > > > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, > > > > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > > > > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set > > > > Keepalive not set > > > > Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX > > > > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > > > > Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 5d21h > > > > Queueing strategy: fifo > > > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > > > > 5 minute input rate 2000 bits/sec, 5 packets/sec > > > > 5 minute output rate 52000 bits/sec, 23 packets/sec > > > > 2859951 packets input, 283856132 bytes > > > > Received 213447 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > > > 152 input errors, 152 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored > > > > 0 watchdog, 0 multicast > > > > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > > > > 8585472 packets output, 2364752071 bytes, 0 underruns > > > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > > > > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred > > > > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > > > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > >Cat29-L7-4> > > > > > >== > >De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > >is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > >onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > >de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > >== > >The information contained in this message may be confidential > >and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > >receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > >herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > > > >== > -- > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54539&t=54516 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Show running-config all at once [7:54367]
so that's what that does, and that explains why cisco works is always using
it.
Tim
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Use "terminal length 0" from priveleged mode to turn off the more
> prompt.
>
> HTH,
> John
>
> >>> "Don Claybrook" 9/27/02 2:29:31 PM
> >>>
> Hello.
>
> A customer asked me if I knew of a way to show the running
> configuration all
> at once, not page-at-a-time ("-more-"). I have no idea, but any
> hints,
> clues, or outright answers would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54372&t=54367
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAN Monthy Report [7:54362]
We use an Excel spreadsheet that counts up the minutes and displays your uptime as a percentage. Is that the kind of thing you are looking for? It's very management friendly ;-) ""Azhar Teza"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > My boss has asked me to provide a monthly WAN reports regarding the > UpTime/Downtime, Data Throughput etc. Does someone has a template in > regards of what other fields can be included in the report? He would like > to have a professional report. Thanks, Teza > > > Changed your e-mail? Keep your contacts! Use this free e-mail change of > address service from Return Path. Register now! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54373&t=54362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IRB, Subinterfaces and BVIs on an 8510 [7:54269]
I don't think this will work or better phrased... I couldn't get it to work, I'm not sure it should work either. HTH (doubtful), Tim ""Chris Watson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If I create a VLAN on a subinterfaceand give that subinterface an IP addy, > assign the sub to a bridge group, and then assign the bridge group to a BVI, > can I use IP unnumbered on the BVI or do I need an additional IP addy? > > Chris Watson, CCNP > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54298&t=54269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token Ring fundamentals [7:53871]
CCIE R&S why else ;-) Tim ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Tim Metz wrote: > > > > so to rephrase the original question, although there is never > > more than one > > token on the ring, there can be more than one data/command > > frame... > > Yes. There can be more than one frame if you use Early Token Release. It's > not likely, but it's allowed by the specifications. There's just one token > though. The token is a 3-byte "symbol of authority." That's what IEEE 802.5 > calls it, probably to avoid using the term frame. ;-) A sender grabs the > token and converts it do a frame, changing one bit, adding more bytes and > addressing, etc. > > Why are you studying Token Ring?? Ugh. ;-) > > ___ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com > www.priscilla.com > > > > > > or am I totally missing the point ;-) > > > > Tim > > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in > > message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Mike Mandulak wrote: > > > > > > > > Oops I forgot to cc my reply to the list again. but you're > > > > right. > > > > > > > > Here's what I sent him... > > > > Only one. However (there's always a however) the adapters > > can > > > > be configured > > > > to use ETR (early token release) which means that as soon > > as an > > > > adapter > > > > starts receiving a frame it can start transmitting its own > > data > > > > out the TX > > > > path while receiving the incoming frame. While that's not 2 > > > > tokens, it is 2 > > > > different frames on the wire at the same time. > > > > > > That's not really what it means, not that it matters much > > these days. ;-) > > > > > > With no early token release, a sending station must see its > > own frame come > > > back before it releases a free token that someone else can > > grab. > > > > > > With early token release (ETR), a sending station can release > > a token at > > the > > > end of its transmission, regarless of whether it's starting > > to receive its > > > own transmission yet. Someone else can grab the free token > > and turn it > > into > > > a frame. Hence, there can be more than one frame, as you say, > > but still > > only > > > one free token. > > > > > > It was all a bunch of marketing FUD really though. It would > > have to be a > > > physically very large network for the ETR feature to make any > > difference. > > On > > > typical networks, the sender was already getting back its own > > transmission > > > as it finished its transmission anyway. So it released a free > > token at > > about > > > the same time regardless if ETR was in use or not. But nobody > > cares any > > more > > > about the actual behavior. You just have to learn the theory. > > ;-) > > > > > > _ > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com > > > www.priscilla.com > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Ken Chipps" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 9:37 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Token Ring fundamentals [7:53871] > > > > > > > > > > > > > One, unless early token release is in effect. Assuming I > > am > > > > remembering > > > > > my old Token Ring stuff right. > > > > > ""Tim Metz"" wrote in message > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > While doing some token ring reading I realized that I > > have > > > > no idea how > > > > > many > > > > > > tokens can be on the ring at one time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone??? stupid question?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54291&t=53871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call Manager Domain. [7:54221]
All, I'm currently running subscribe/publisher call managers happily on a 10.138 network. To access the Active Directory for web logons etc to IP phones we need to add the two call managers to our local domain...Seems simple enough, but are there any issues or possible problems I'm not aware of by doing this ??? please advise. thx Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54221&t=54221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
Well actually she took me. She's a travel agent and went on a business trip. Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:44 AM To: Tim Medley Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] Tim, you made the mistake of taking her...:) Larry Tim Medley wrote: I can't remeber the last time I got to play golf. With carpal tunnel and work and sleep and studying theres not much time for golf. I though I was going to play golf on vacation a few months ago. Beutiful course in the caribbean, even saved my lunch money for a whole week so I could play a round, but my wife wanted me to spend time with her instead. I did offer to let her caddy for me... oh well that's another story. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Chuck's Long Road [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Shawn has a great deal then..I thought they took our money and we got nothing back except complaints about what we spend on cars, golf and cert test!!! CL: your wife leaves you enough to spend on cars, golf, and cert tests? wanna trade? ;-> Kaminski, Shawn G wrote: God, the crap us guys have to go through to get laid! :-) Sorry if this is offending to anyone. I just couldn't help it! -Original Message- From: Tim Medley [ SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] She's obsessed with money. My wife is also psychic. I was out to lunch a few weeks back at a sandwich shop with a bunch of guys from the office. I had just sat down to eat and my wife calls on the cell phone and started yelling at me for spending money at lunch. I hadn't even begun to eat my sandwich. My wife also doesn't like to front money for my employer, they should prepay for an exam (or other expenses) on the company credit card. I really don't mind. I've been in worse situations. At a previous job I traveled A LOT, and it took forever to get my employ er to cut an expense check. Fortunately my current employer pays expenses on time. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] if the employer re-imburses you, whats the issue with your wife? Tim Medley wrote: So is that how people without experience do it? Just keep failing the ccie written exam until you've memorized all the questions or get lucky? You must be single, or rich, or both. My wife has a fit when I spent $125 on a exam I am well prepared for, let alone spend $300 on the written. And my employer reimburses for the exam. I guess now I know why my employer will only pay for an exam twice. Try picking up a book and learning something, then you could pass the exam on the first try. Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Julio Godinez [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] Passing score 105: First attempt 77, Second attemp (yesterday) 95 =( . Next time you will be mine baby... -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Inc. -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Inc. &i=54150&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54226&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: network design [7:54142]
so poetic Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Chuck's Long Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: network design [7:54142] ""Dwayne Saunders"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > Let me start with I am about to start my design track. Every one > comments on Priscilla's Book Top Down Network Design I was just looking at > it and was wondering since this was written dec 1998 is it still current to > today's network topology's (Not trying to flame you Priscilla). you must remember this - a kiss is still a kiss a sigh is still a sigh the fundamental things apply as time goes by ;-> > > Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards > > D'Wayne Saunders > Data Network Administrator > CCNP, CSS1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54158&t=54142 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routine Powercycles or reloads [7:54098]
One of our border gateway routers has been up for almost 4 years. clt1-7206-twtc-bgr uptime is 192 weeks, 4 days, 18 hours, 43 minutes Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routine Powercycles or reloads [7:54098] Can anyone tell me if they have come accross documentation or guidance from Cisco on how often a 7200 router or any router should be reloaded if ever for a maintanance purposes ? Thx Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54155&t=54098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LAN Design [7:54023]
Hey Priscilla, Do you have any new books planned? tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023] Thank-you very much for the recommendations for Top-Down Network Design. I probably don't express my gratitude often enough to the many people who bought the book. I suspect that we may be helping a Cisco Networking Academy student with homework. ;-) This sounds a lot like the exercises they do. That program has a tendency to teach a bottom-up design methodology that focuses on physcial size and technology/media selection, before gaining an understanding for: business and "political" concerns budget user expectations for reliability, response time, etc. application requirements for bandwidth, delay, etc. appliation behavior in terms of broadcasts, traffic patterns, etc. You all did a good job of pointing out the importantance of these concepts, so I will say no more. Priscilla Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > ""Tim Medley"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > If you are serious about designing this netwoek and designing > ir correctly > > for scalability and functionality, pick up a good network > design book. > > > > My reccomendation is Top Down Network Design, by Priscilla > Openheimer. U > > have two copies one at home and one at the office, I refer to > this tome > > quite often. Great book, excellent methodology. > > CL: a good book indeed. the irony here is that oftentimes, > particularly in > smaller environments, the person who has to make these > decisions is under a > severe time constraint, and does not have time to attain the > background that > all of us study. back in the days when I was a network manager, > I never had > time to learn this stuff. my own road to correct network > thinking began > after I was downsized. :-> > > > > > > > > > Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA > > Sr. Network Architect > > VoIP Group > > iReadyWorld > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: LAN Design [7:54023] > > > > > > If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There > are around > > 200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to use > Ethernet to > > link them up. As for the other storey it is for admin > purpose. The > distance > > is around 150m between the further storey. However it is > possible to put a > > switch/router at the middle for interconnect. > > > > Cheers, > > Jimmy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54152&t=54023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
I can't remeber the last time I got to play golf. With carpal tunnel and work and sleep and studying theres not much time for golf. I though I was going to play golf on vacation a few months ago. Beutiful course in the caribbean, even saved my lunch money for a whole week so I could play a round, but my wife wanted me to spend time with her instead. I did offer to let her caddy for me... oh well that's another story. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Chuck's Long Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Shawn has a great deal then..I thought they took our money and we got > nothing back except complaints about > what we spend on cars, golf and cert test!!! CL: your wife leaves you enough to spend on cars, golf, and cert tests? wanna trade? ;-> > > Kaminski, Shawn G wrote: > > >God, the crap us guys have to go through to get laid! :-) > > > >Sorry if this is offending to anyone. I just couldn't help it! > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Tim Medley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:23 AM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] > >> > >>She's obsessed with money. My wife is also psychic. I was out to lunch a > >>few weeks back at a sandwich shop with a bunch of guys from the office. > >>I had just sat down to eat and my wife calls on the cell phone and > >>started yelling at me for spending money at lunch. I hadn't even begun > >>to eat my sandwich. > >> > >>My wife also doesn't like to front money for my employer, they should > >>prepay for an exam (or other expenses) on the company credit card. I > >>really don't mind. I've been in worse situations. At a previous job I > >>traveled A LOT, and it took forever to get my employer to cut an expense > >>check. Fortunately my current employer pays expenses on time. > >> > >>tm > >> > >>Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA > >>Sr. Network Architect > >>VoIP Group > >>iReadyWorld > >> > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:47 AM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] > >> > >>if the employer re-imburses you, whats the issue with your wife? > >> > >> > >> > >>Tim Medley wrote: > >> > >>>So is that how people without experience do it? Just keep failing the > >>> > >>ccie > >> > >>>written exam until you've memorized all the questions or get lucky? > >>> > >>>You must be single, or rich, or both. My wife has a fit when I spent > >>> > >>$125 on > >> > >>>a exam I am well prepared for, let alone spend $300 on the written. And > >>> > >>my > >> > >>>employer reimburses for the exam. > >>> > >>>I guess now I know why my employer will only pay for an exam twice. > >>> > >>>Try picking up a book and learning something, then you could pass the > >>> > >>exam > >> > >>>on the first try. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA > >>>Sr. Network Architect > >>>VoIP Group > >>>iReadyWorld > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: Julio Godinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:04 PM > >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Subject: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] > >>> > >>> > >>>Passing score 105: First attempt 77, Second attemp (yesterday) 95 > >>> > >>=( . > >> > >>>Next time you will be mine baby... > >>> > >>-- > >> > >>Larry Letterman > >>Network Engineer > >>Cisco Systems Inc. > -- > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54150&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
You must be single too I lost that privledge right after I said I do... Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] God, the crap us guys have to go through to get laid! :-) Sorry if this is offending to anyone. I just couldn't help it! > -Original Message- > From: Tim Medley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] > > She's obsessed with money. My wife is also psychic. I was out to lunch a > few weeks back at a sandwich shop with a bunch of guys from the office. > I had just sat down to eat and my wife calls on the cell phone and > started yelling at me for spending money at lunch. I hadn't even begun > to eat my sandwich. > > My wife also doesn't like to front money for my employer, they should > prepay for an exam (or other expenses) on the company credit card. I > really don't mind. I've been in worse situations. At a previous job I > traveled A LOT, and it took forever to get my employer to cut an expense > check. Fortunatelymy current employer pays expenses on time. > > tm > > Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA > Sr. Network Architect > VoIP Group > iReadyWorld > > -Original Message- > From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] > > if the employer re-imburses you, whats the issue with your wife? > > > > Tim Medley wrote: > > >So is that how people without experience do it? Just keep failing the > ccie > >written exam until you've memorized all the questions or get lucky? > > > >You must be single, or rich, or both. My wife has a fit when I spent > $125 on > >a exam I am well prepared for, let alone spend $300 on the written. And > my > >employer reimburses for the exam. > > > >I guess now I know why my employer will only pay for an exam twice. > > > >Try picking up a book and learning something, then you could pass the > exam > >on the first try. > > > > > > > >Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA > >Sr. Network Architect > >VoIP Group > >iReadyWorld > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Julio Godinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:04 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] > > > > > >Passing score 105: First attempt 77, Second attemp (yesterday) 95 > =( . > >Next time you will be mine baby... > -- > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54149&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
psychotic? yes she's all that too...
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Tim Medley
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
Are you sure you meant "psychic" and not something spelled similarly? :)
just kidding
"Tim
Medley"
cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: CCIE written
"revised" [7:53972]
nobody@groupstudy.
com
09/25/2002
11:23
AM
Please respond
to
"Tim
Medley"
She's obsessed with money. My wife is also psychic. I was out to lunch a
few weeks back at a sandwich shop with a bunch of guys from the office.
I had just sat down to eat and my wife calls on the cell phone and
started yelling at me for spending money at lunch. I hadn't even begun
to eat my sandwich.
My wife also doesn't like to front money for my employer, they should
prepay for an exam (or other expenses) on the company credit card. I
really don't mind. I've been in worse situations. At a previous job I
traveled A LOT, and it took forever to get my employer to cut an expense
check. Fortunatelymy current employer pays expenses on time.
tm
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
if the employer re-imburses you, whats the issue with your wife?
Tim Medley wrote:
>So is that how people without experience do it? Just keep failing the
ccie
>written exam until you've memorized all the questions or get lucky?
>
>You must be single, or rich, or both. My wife has a fit when I spent
$125 on
>a exam I am well prepared for, let alone spend $300 on the written. And
my
>employer reimburses for the exam.
>
>I guess now I know why my employer will only pay for an exam twice.
>
>Try picking up a book and learning something, then you could pass the
exam
>on the first try.
>
>
>
>Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
>Sr. Network Architect
>VoIP Group
>iReadyWorld
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Julio Godinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:04 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
>
>
>Passing score 105: First attempt 77, Second attemp (yesterday) 95
=( .
>Next time you will be mine baby...
--
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems Inc.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54146&t=53972
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LAN Design [7:54023]
LOL Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023] Chuck's Long Road wrote: >CL:my employer has lots of idle sales engineers who would just love to talk >to you, not to mention sell you something :-> > So does Mine :) :Larry Letterman Cisco... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54148&t=54023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
Fortuneatley, we don't have a policy yet that requires us to stay after we get a certification. I imagine we will eventually have such a policy, but we're a startup and don't have that problem yet. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Jeroen Timmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] Dating and married ? :) I have been dating for 11 years now, yes .. with the same girl :) Would seem like a marriage dont you think ? BUt i guess it's the same everywhere, that you have to sign a paper that you don't leave after getting a certificate. They mostly wanna kaap you a year or more, depends on the contract. Leave within that period off time ? Bring out the cash and start paying for the cost they had for putting you through certification. JT -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: John Hutchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 25 september 2002 16:38 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] heheh...you now know the difference between dating and marriage! Where I work, we have a trade agreement with a testing facility, so I get cisco boots and tests for free. Not only do I not have to pay first then get reimbursed. But even though I'm missing work, I still get my 40 hours paycheck when I'm at the boot. Sounds like a win/win situation, right? Wrong, my wife complains because I have to sign an agreement that says I won't get the cert and then quit. She think they should shell out 10k for it all and that I should just be able to leave the next day. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54145&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
She's obsessed with money. My wife is also psychic. I was out to lunch a few weeks back at a sandwich shop with a bunch of guys from the office. I had just sat down to eat and my wife calls on the cell phone and started yelling at me for spending money at lunch. I hadn't even begun to eat my sandwich. My wife also doesn't like to front money for my employer, they should prepay for an exam (or other expenses) on the company credit card. I really don't mind. I've been in worse situations. At a previous job I traveled A LOT, and it took forever to get my employer to cut an expense check. Fortunately my current employer pays expenses on time. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] if the employer re-imburses you, whats the issue with your wife? Tim Medley wrote: >So is that how people without experience do it? Just keep failing the ccie >written exam until you've memorized all the questions or get lucky? > >You must be single, or rich, or both. My wife has a fit when I spent $125 on >a exam I am well prepared for, let alone spend $300 on the written. And my >employer reimburses for the exam. > >I guess now I know why my employer will only pay for an exam twice. > >Try picking up a book and learning something, then you could pass the exam >on the first try. > > > >Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA >Sr. Network Architect >VoIP Group >iReadyWorld > > > >-Original Message- >From: Julio Godinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:04 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] > > >Passing score 105: First attempt 77, Second attemp (yesterday) 95 =( . >Next time you will be mine baby... -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54066&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LAN Design [7:54023]
If you are serious about designing this netwoek and designing ir correctly for scalability and functionality, pick up a good network design book. My reccomendation is Top Down Network Design, by Priscilla Openheimer. U have two copies one at home and one at the office, I refer to this tome quite often. Great book, excellent methodology. Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LAN Design [7:54023] If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There are around 200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to use Ethernet to link them up. As for the other storey it is for admin purpose. The distance is around 150m between the further storey. However it is possible to put a switch/router at the middle for interconnect. Cheers, Jimmy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54029&t=54023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
So is that how people without experience do it? Just keep failing the ccie written exam until you've memorized all the questions or get lucky? You must be single, or rich, or both. My wife has a fit when I spent $125 on a exam I am well prepared for, let alone spend $300 on the written. And my employer reimburses for the exam. I guess now I know why my employer will only pay for an exam twice. Try picking up a book and learning something, then you could pass the exam on the first try. Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Julio Godinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972] Passing score 105: First attempt 77, Second attemp (yesterday) 95 =( . Next time you will be mine baby... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54025&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4000 router console cable [7:53981]
You need a standard cisco console cable and a cisco db25 adaptor (rj45 to db25). Standard cisco terminal settings apply. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Black Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4000 router console cable [7:53981] I just acquired a 4000 router and can't get it to respond through the console port. As usual in this case, I suspect I have a cable problem. I thought I needed a straight through DB9-DB25 modem cable, but it doesn't seem to work. I want to make sure I have the right cable before I start chasing other possibilities. Is this in fact the right cable? I have searched the archives and looked at several CCO links without a clear answer (maybe I'm just not smart enough to understand what I'm reading :-)). What I'd really like is something ultra-simple, like "db-25 pin2 to db-9 pin3" and so on. Can anyone point that out to me? TIA. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54024&t=53981 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token Ring fundamentals [7:53871]
so to rephrase the original question, although there is never more than one token on the ring, there can be more than one data/command frame... or am I totally missing the point ;-) Tim ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Mike Mandulak wrote: > > > > Oops I forgot to cc my reply to the list again. but you're > > right. > > > > Here's what I sent him... > > Only one. However (there's always a however) the adapters can > > be configured > > to use ETR (early token release) which means that as soon as an > > adapter > > starts receiving a frame it can start transmitting its own data > > out the TX > > path while receiving the incoming frame. While that's not 2 > > tokens, it is 2 > > different frames on the wire at the same time. > > That's not really what it means, not that it matters much these days. ;-) > > With no early token release, a sending station must see its own frame come > back before it releases a free token that someone else can grab. > > With early token release (ETR), a sending station can release a token at the > end of its transmission, regarless of whether it's starting to receive its > own transmission yet. Someone else can grab the free token and turn it into > a frame. Hence, there can be more than one frame, as you say, but still only > one free token. > > It was all a bunch of marketing FUD really though. It would have to be a > physically very large network for the ETR feature to make any difference. On > typical networks, the sender was already getting back its own transmission > as it finished its transmission anyway. So it released a free token at about > the same time regardless if ETR was in use or not. But nobody cares any more > about the actual behavior. You just have to learn the theory. ;-) > > _ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com > www.priscilla.com > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ken Chipps" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 9:37 PM > > Subject: Re: Token Ring fundamentals [7:53871] > > > > > > > One, unless early token release is in effect. Assuming I am > > remembering > > > my old Token Ring stuff right. > > > ""Tim Metz"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > While doing some token ring reading I realized that I have > > no idea how > > > many > > > > tokens can be on the ring at one time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone??? stupid question?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53998&t=53871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanted MC3810 [7:53877]
I'm looking for a MC3810 forsale or preferably trade. I'm looking for a basic unit, I don't need the MFT card or voice cards. I have some extra gear I would prefer to trade for the MC3810, but I can buy one if the price is reasonable. If you are interested, please contact me off line. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53877&t=53877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring fundamentals [7:53871]
While doing some token ring reading I realized that I have no idea how many tokens can be on the ring at one time. anyone??? stupid question?? Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53871&t=53871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to make real player from outside to contact real [7:53617]
I am assuming that you only have this one service behind the PIX or do you have multiple servers behind the PIX? I would like to see a config of multiple servers behind a PIX - utilizing only "1" external IP address. Tim -Original Message- From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to make real player from outside to contact real [7:53586] Ok, the solution is very simple one. I know this will work because I running my RealPlayer Helix Universal Streaming Server version 9.0.1 on my Linux box behind a Pix firewall. The linux box has an RFC 1918 address (192.168.1.100) sitting on the DMZ network (192.168.1.254 is IP address of the DMZ interface on the PIX). The 192.168.1.100 is NATed to the public with 199.0.56.293 On the pix firewall: static (inside,dmz) 199.0.56.293 192.168.1.100 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 199.0.56.293 eq 8080 (if http is running on here) access-list 100 permit tcp any host 199.0.56.293 eq 7070 access-list 100 permit udp any host 199.0.56.293 eq 554 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 199.0.56.293 eq 9090 (monitor only) access-group 100 in interface outside Now, since the actual streaming server is behind the Pix firewall, you will have to modify the streaming server configuration file to make it work. Add the following line to the rmserver.cfg file: Restart the streaming server. Now from one of the workstation on the outside Pix firewall, fireup RealPlayer and put the following in the URL: rtsp://199.0.56.293:554/sex.mpg It will work You can make it work from clicking the link in the web browser; however, I don't have to go over it here. Enjoy Now, this is something a CCIE doesn't know how to fix. Mike "Magdy H. Ibrahim" wrote:Hi All, I have a client wants to create Real server behind Pix firewall and I am trying to make the outside real player to contact the inside server but I failed.. Is there any extra commands more than the following commands on the PIX to allow the ourside clients to communicate with the inside server?? Please advise help me the PIX configuration. fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 fixup protocol sip 5060 no fixup protocol skinny 2000 fixup protocol rtsp 554 fixup protocol rtsp 8554 names FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53617&t=53617 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS for 2500 [7:53353]
So has anyone actually found an IOS image for a 2500 that supports MPLS? I'd like to learn about MPLS in my home lab. I couldn't find anything in thr feature navigator. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Tom Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MPLS for 2500 [7:53353] If I understand this correctly, cisco routers support this RFC 3032 feature. Then the next question is, Do any Cisco routers support VoMPLS, where lines would bring analog or digital voice into voice ports and the router would translate (transcode?) the stream into bits that are encapsulated as the payload of MPLS frames in accord with MPLS Forum Implementation Agreement dated July 27, 2001? I'm not sure about the addressing and other details, but I'd just like to know if cisco routers can do this wihtout the intervention of IP packets. (And approximately what classifying, marking and queueing would the routers use on the PPP links if other traffic such as IP or IPX non-voice data were also present. But that is asking too much at this point. Maybe later.) -- TT Larkin, Richard wrote: > Definitely yes with PPP - a new NCP (MPLSCP) provides indication that the > frame is an MPLS frame instead of an IP or IPX frame. MPLS is treated as > just another network layer protocol. > > Not sure about HDLC though. > > Richard Larkin > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2002 4:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MPLS for 2500 [7:53353] > > > MPLS'ers, > > Assuming you find the IOS that supports MPLS on the 2500 > or 2600, is it possible then to set up a little MPLS cloud > with HDLC or PPP links connecting the routers? > > Alternatively, we have used the MPLS routers as access > devices to connect to a FR cloud (ATM too but we don't have > the ATM switches yet). But we'd like to just use three or > four inexpensive 2500/2600 routers with HDLC/PPP serial > links as the cloud. Can it be done? > > -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53525&t=53353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sales Expert Exam [7:52972]
All the information for the Cisco Sales exams are on the Partner E-Learning Site (PEC). There are web based learning courses there covering the sales exams. If you don't have access to PEC, then you probabally do not need to take the sales exams as they are for reseller certification. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Chernooki Sergei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sales Expert Exam [7:52972] Dear coleagues, Please recommend a study guide to prepare for the Sales Expert Exam. Some topics of it confuse me because I am a technician myself. So I need a reading to get prepared to pass the exam. Thank you. Best regards, Sergei A. Chernooki Telecommunications Engineer, CCNA NPP Belsoft, Inc 18 Moskovskaja str. office 548, 220007 Minsk Republic of Belarus phone: (375 (0)17) 222, ext.435, 2281321 fax: (375 (0)17) 2228058, mob. +375-(0)29-653-55-03. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 50242822 WWW: http://www.belsoft.by Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52983&t=52972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Callmanager installation [7:52946]
Stephane, CCM 2.4 was designed for Windows NT 4, and so you may be getting a bogus error. I believe it is asking for Win2k sp4, but I don't think there is a Win2k sp4 yet, they just released sp3 a few weeks ago. If you are attempting to learn Call Manager, I wouldn't waste my time with CCM 2.4 it is entirely different that CCM 3.x tim Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Stephane LITKOWSKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Callmanager installation [7:52946] I tried to install Callmanager 2.4.5 on a Windows 2000 Server with SQL Server 7 (upgraded to SP4). And when I launch setup, it says that I need Service Pack 4 at least for Y2k updates. What does it mean ? Service Pack for what ? thanks for help. -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom & Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52952&t=52946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice suggestion needed [7:52936]
1) CIPT is very product specific, relates almost entirely to Cisco Call Manager 2) CVOICE is Cisco VoX; dial-peers, VoIP, VoATM, VoFR, some QoS, some minor VoIP hardware product knowledge. 3) IPTT is all about troubleshooting CIsco IPT products (CCM, Unity, VoIP) 4) DQoS is all QoS, inside and out 5) CuSE and CuSA exams are similar to CIPT, but relate to Unity, also covers MS Exchange, and AD I would start with the exam that covers information you are most familiar with. Most of the Cisco Voice relate exams assume hands on product knowledge, without that hands on knowledge, the exams are 3 or 4 times harder. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: . . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice suggestion needed [7:52936] hi group To a person that does not have much voice background, which is a better course to take, the CIPT or CVoice? I need to write the several Voice Specialization test eventually. And how about the unity course? is that any good? _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52951&t=52936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE and voice. [7:52860]
At Networkers San Diego this year, during the CCIE power session, they said gave us maybe 2 pages in the hand outs covering voice on the lab. Know everything listed on the blue print for voice and you'll be fine. tim Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: Casey, Paul (6822) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE and voice. [7:52860] Does anyone know the level to at which voice is tested to on the routing and swithing lab exam I have purchased some fxs cards and can do so much.. But what about call manager, fxo connections, gatekeeper,.etc Or is this detailed level reseved for the voice specialisation exam The web site still only seems to state that voice technology will account for a small apart.. Just wondering of the level of detail that one needs to go into.. not asking anyone to break NDA, nor would I expect you, (I wanna do this on my own). but how much is expected of you for this aspect.. Any help appreciated Kind regards. Paul. -- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52864&t=52860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
static route [7:52789]
Hi, We are trying to add a static route on a Cat3550 switch so everything sent to address 192.168.1.7 ip address is re-routed to 192.168.41.254. What's the best method ? thx Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52789&t=52789 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hardware issues w/ 4000-M [7:52764]
Anyone run into this before? I pulled a couple 4000's (I believe they are 4000-M's, definately not regular 4000's, and they don't appear to be 4500 or 4700's), out of a storage closet. When I boot up the first one I get the following, System Bootstrap, Version 4.6(1), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1992 by cisco Systems bus error not generated on main memory parity error location 0xfc, phase 0, subtest 0, test: write written 0x0, read 0x0 ... aborting failed main memory parity test ... aborting I've replaced the dram simm with a known good one and I still get the error. I have swapped out the flash, the shared memory chip, and the roms with no luck. I even tried without shared mem and flash. When I boot the second one I get the following, System Bootstrap, Version 4.6(1), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1992 by cisco Systems Bad memory at location 0x0010: wrote 0x0010, read 0x0FF0 Same thing, I've swapped all the memory, roms, etc, with no change. Are both of these boards toast? I've looked at all the jumper locations and compared them to whats on CCO and everything looks kosher. Anyone run into this beofre or have any other ideas? Or should I just use these as paperweights. thanks, tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52764&t=52764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pc communication problem [7:52763]
Hi folks, I was wondering if you could help me out on a small project I am working on. I have two PCs with IP addresses connected to an actual campus LAN, however, only in a lab do I want to have a router with one PC communicate to another router with the other PC via a serial connection.(want to simulate a network using routers) I would like the PCs to be able to send text messages to each other. What can I do? Thanks for any help. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52763&t=52763 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AGS for sale and some freebies (cleaning out the garage) [7:52746]
I have an AGS+ for sale works good and a couple of old CGS's that I'd rather give away than throw in the dumpster. AGS+ 9 Slot router - csc/4 processor card with 11.0 roms - environmental card - 5 serial ports - 1 ethernet port - Lots of extras, a few Ethernet cards, misc Ethernet and serial appliquis - Asking $250 Free to a good home (pay for shipping or pickup in person): - (2) Cisco CGS Router Carcass...Case, and power supply, I might have a CSC/2 processor card around somewhere Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52746&t=52746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security Policy [7:52061]
I'd be interested in something like this too, to use as a template. Perhaps someone has a generic dummy security policy from a class or something they can share. tm Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Security Policy [7:52061] Hi All, does any one have a copy of a security policy (like a corporate security outline for the company) that they are willing to share, so I can create one using that as a template/guide ? Thanks all John Sydney, Australia ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52252&t=52061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124]
I would probably look at 12.1.16. It is GD and should be stable. IP Plus IPSec 3DES only requires 8 and 40 so you should be fine. If you are feeling brave you could load up 12.2.10b.. :) Tim CCIE 9015, CSS1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Firesox Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124] Folks, I am in need of a quick help. I have 2610 doing 3DES for site-to-site VPN. It creates a tunnel successfully, but it crashes and gives me an error messgage below. *** System received a SIGTRAP exception *** signal= 0x5, code= 0xd00, context= 0x81640a98 PC = 0x80db4414, Vector = 0xd00, SP = 0x81cfb1f0 *** Unexpected Console FIFO timeout interrupt *** PC = 0xfff03fc4, Vector = 0x500, SP = 0x81641ca4 The IOS is C2600 Software (C2600-IK2S-M), Version 12.0(7)XK1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE I have 16MB flash and 48mb Dram. I am suspecting this is a bug within the IOS. If so, can someone tell me what the most bug-free IOS(3DES) is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52129&t=52124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help, Switching Solution with 4006 [7:51799]
Rik is correct. The SupIII only supports IP routing protocols. To get layer3 IPX in the 4000 you will need to install the 4232 L3 blade and the enhanced IOS image for it. This would not be very clean. Do they really need the IPX? Maybe you can pitch a conversion from IPX to IP while installing the switch. I also notice that you have the 5483 TX GBIC's specked out. Are your cable runs within the distance limitations? When you are talking about running between floors you better have them tested to be sure. Tim CCIE 9015, CSS1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larkin, Richard Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help, Switching Solution with 4006 [7:51799] I was told by Cisco that Sup III didn't support IPX routing! Rik -Original Message- From: Wayne Jang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2002 8:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help, Switching Solution with 4006 [7:51799] Hi, I am proposing the following LAN solution to a customer. Does it make sense? -WS-C4006-S3(sup III engine) Do I need special licenses for this? The customer will be using IP and IPX. I saw some licensing software for the Sup III that was around $1700 for both IP and IPX. I don't know that that is all about. -One 48 port RJ45 blade for servers and workstations on same floor -One 6 port GBIC blade (WS-X4306-GB) that will be used to connect to five WS-2950s on different floors -I will use the WS-5483 GBICs to connect the 2950s to the six port WS-X4306-GB Can anyone think of things I haven't considered? Thanks Wayne Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51827&t=51799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
