Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
Mario Ivankovits a écrit : robert burrell donkin wrote: There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far. Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-( 3 the release has been compiled using 1.4.2: if commons-configuration is supposed to support 1.3 jdks then this could be a problem unless you've taken very careful steps. I've seen this too. I checked the build and tests and found te build fails with jdk.1.3 as there are references to javax.sql.DataSource and so I thought this is a jdk1.4 project. Unhappily a wrong decision by me. But this might explain why a jdk1.4 were used. --- Mario Can't this dependency be solved using jdbc2.0-stdext.jar ? I'm using Jdk 1.3 and cannot upgrade. Not supporting 1.3 anymore will stop my migration to commons-configuration. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
Nicolas De Loof schrieb: Mario Ivankovits a écrit : robert burrell donkin wrote: There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far. Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-( 3 the release has been compiled using 1.4.2: if commons-configuration is supposed to support 1.3 jdks then this could be a problem unless you've taken very careful steps. I've seen this too. I checked the build and tests and found te build fails with jdk.1.3 as there are references to javax.sql.DataSource and so I thought this is a jdk1.4 project. Unhappily a wrong decision by me. But this might explain why a jdk1.4 were used. --- Mario Can't this dependency be solved using jdbc2.0-stdext.jar ? I'm using Jdk 1.3 and cannot upgrade. Not supporting 1.3 anymore will stop my migration to commons-configuration. Nico. Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and run under a JDK 1.3. Unfortunately this jar cannot be distributed via ibiblio because of licence issues, which makes the build a bit unconvenient. But I guess I will have to update the pom to declare this dependency because DatabaseConfiguration needs the DataSource interface. Would be a good idea to update documentation in this respect, too. Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
On 12/1/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/30/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/30/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/1/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Release managers are also facing tougher release checkers now IMHO. For instance, I haven't ignored configuration, but haven't had the time to check it out properly (way too much to do). I try to only give a +1 if I genuinely am happy. Perhaps I'm now applying too high a standard? Its a tough balance. Adding to what Stephen said, voting +1 to me means at a minimum you're indicating knowledge of the code and/or an intention to support it in some way. For me I can do that on only 3 to 5 of the Commons components. A good example is FileUpload - as a user I would like to see a release, but I only recently looked at a bit of the code and made a minor contribution. When it comes to a vote I'm not sure whether I'll vote for it or not as I don't think I have the time to actually provide any support. Is this the generally accepted criteria or do others follow more or less lenient criteria? I think most people voting +1 are _not_ saying they're prepared to support it. Rather, they're saying something more like I've checked out the proposed distribution, and didn't see any issues, so I'm happy for the Commons Foo team to release it as is. How much work is behind each +1 I'm sure varies from person to person. Some, like Stephen, are putting more effort into checking out the builds than they used to, while I'm sure others are more lenient. I hope I'm not wrong on this. If I am, and you're right, Niall, then I might as well give up on ever getting another FileUpload release out the door, based on how few people other than myself have ever touched the code base over the last several years. -- For me +1 means pretty much what Martin describes above. I check the release contents, make sure required elements are there and in jars, make sure there is nothing funny included. I test the builds, validate sigs, etc and inspect the web site and, if present, clirr/jdiff and look carefully at the release notes. I also review the javadoc, maven reports and POM. I do try to learn a little more with each release that I review; but at this point I can only provide support for a handful of commons components personally, so my +1 really just means I have validated the release and based on what I see and have seen on the list the release is good to go. I have been derelict over the past couple of weeks though, due to this being a very busy time of year and my trying to get [math] released. I will review the outstanding candidates ASAP. OK this is good to know - checking a release is doable. I think I'd come to the view I had based on the type of thing people put in a vote: [ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help [ ] +0 I support this release and am unable to help The difference between +1 and +0 here implies some further commitment after the vote. Niall Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
Can't this dependency be solved using jdbc2.0-stdext.jar ? I'm using Jdk 1.3 and cannot upgrade. Not supporting 1.3 anymore will stop my migration to commons-configuration. Nico. Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and run under a JDK 1.3. Unfortunately this jar cannot be distributed via ibiblio because of licence issues, which makes the build a bit unconvenient. But I guess I will have to update the pom to declare this dependency because DatabaseConfiguration needs the DataSource interface. Would be a good idea to update documentation in this respect, too. Oliver AFAIK, other apache projects require sun jars to compile. You may ask commons-dbcp commiters that seem to have the same requirement : !-- Note JDBC 2.0 is a pain, because it must be manually downloaded to your Maven repository, and it's not even required on JDK 1.4. Maybe we should remove it from this dependency list so Maven doesn't choke? -- dependency idjdbc/id version2.0/version /dependency This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37727] - [resources] Fix serializability contracts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37727. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-01 10:15 --- (In reply to comment #2) So the reasoning is (I hope you're right, it'll be good to be wrong here) - * BasicMessage has this field - Object[] values * Therefore, one may not guarantee serializability of BasicMessage The rest is just a cascading effect since BasicMessage's go everywhere. Am I being too convoluted about some corner cases? ;-) The more I think about the above, there is little that can be done either way. OK, I understand where you're coming from now. My view is as long as we (the libarary developers) haven't put anything that would prevent serializabilty then thats good enough. If a user adds a non-serializable object as a replacement parameter then thats their issue. And I agree with you when you say that there is little that we can do with the other classes we *surely* know are not serializable. Maybe its best to leave a known issue in the release notes about these and move on? Personally I would rather the webapp implementations were removed from Commons Resources - it would be one less off putting dependency (even if it is realistically optional) and theres so little to the implementations. I also think we could probably refactor XMLResources and PropertyResources so that its straightforward to customize how the InputStreanm is acquired - which means Webapp implementations of these would be simpler to do. I also think we should remove the ResourcesBundle implementation - the main point of Commons Resources is to provide an alternative to that class - so I don't see much merit in wrapping it. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
On 12/1/05, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't this dependency be solved using jdbc2.0-stdext.jar ? I'm using Jdk 1.3 and cannot upgrade. Not supporting 1.3 anymore will stop my migration to commons-configuration. Nico. Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and run under a JDK 1.3. Unfortunately this jar cannot be distributed via ibiblio because of licence issues, which makes the build a bit unconvenient. But I guess I will have to update the pom to declare this dependency because DatabaseConfiguration needs the DataSource interface. Would be a good idea to update documentation in this respect, too. Oliver AFAIK, other apache projects require sun jars to compile. You may ask commons-dbcp commiters that seem to have the same requirement : !-- Note JDBC 2.0 is a pain, because it must be manually downloaded to your Maven repository, and it's not even required on JDK 1.4. Maybe we should remove it from this dependency list so Maven doesn't choke? -- dependency idjdbc/id version2.0/version /dependency It would be neater if something could be done in the maven.xml to detect JDK 1.3 and add it into the class path from a property specified in the build.properties. I'm going to face the same issue in Commons Resources - we have 1 class that relies on JDBC 2. Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
Can the project.xml be customized using jelly ? something like this : j:if test=${java.version == '1.3'} dependency idjdbc/id /dependency /j:if It would be neater if something could be done in the maven.xml to detect JDK 1.3 and add it into the class path from a property specified in the build.properties. I'm going to face the same issue in Commons Resources - we have 1 class that relies on JDBC 2. Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r350235 - /jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml
Author: dion Date: Thu Dec 1 04:10:18 2005 New Revision: 350235 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350235view=rev Log: Use groupId/artifactId consistently instead of simply id Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml?rev=350235r1=350234r2=350235view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:10:18 2005 @@ -238,47 +238,56 @@ dependency - idxml-apis/id + groupIdxml-apis/groupId + artifactIdxml-apis/artifactId version1.0.b2/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-beanutils/id + groupIdcommons-beanutils/groupId + artifactIdcommons-beanutils/artifactId version1.6/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-collections/id + groupIdcommons-collections/groupId + artifactIdcommons-collections/artifactId version2.1/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-jexl/id + groupIdcommons-jexl/groupId + artifactIdcommons-jexl/artifactId version1.0/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-jelly/id + groupIdcommons-jelly/groupId + artifactIdcommons-jelly/artifactId version1.0/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-logging/id + groupIdcommons-logging/groupId + artifactIdcommons-logging/artifactId version1.0.3/version /dependency dependency - iddom4j/id + groupIddom4j/groupId + artifactIddom4j/artifactId version1.5/version /dependency dependency - idjaxen/id + groupIdjaxen/groupId + artifactIdjaxen/artifactId version1.1-beta-2/version /dependency dependency - idxerces/id + groupIdxerces/groupId + artifactIdxerces/artifactId version2.2.1/version properties gump.projectxml-xerces/gump.project - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r350237 - /jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/threads/project.xml
Author: dion Date: Thu Dec 1 04:15:22 2005 New Revision: 350237 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350237view=rev Log: Use groupId/artifactId consistently instead of simply id Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/threads/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/threads/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/threads/project.xml?rev=350237r1=350236r2=350237view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/threads/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/threads/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:15:22 2005 @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ -- project extend${basedir}/../tag-project.xml/extend - idcommons-jelly-tags-threads/id + artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-threads/artifactId namecommons-jelly-tags-threads/name currentVersion1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/currentVersion packageorg.apache.commons.jelly.tags.threads/package @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-junit/artifactId version1.0/version urlhttp://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/junit//url + properties +scopetest/scope + /properties /dependency !-- END for test -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r350238 - /jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/util/project.xml
Author: dion Date: Thu Dec 1 04:17:44 2005 New Revision: 350238 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350238view=rev Log: Use groupId/artifactId consistently instead of simply id Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/util/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/util/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/util/project.xml?rev=350238r1=350237r2=350238view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/util/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/util/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:17:44 2005 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ project extend${basedir}/../tag-project.xml/extend - idcommons-jelly-tags-util/id + artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-util/artifactId namecommons-jelly-tags-util/name currentVersion1.1.2-SNAPSHOT/currentVersion packageorg.apache.commons.jelly.tags.util/package @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ dependencies !-- START for compilation -- dependency - idcommons-lang/id + groupIdcommons-lang/groupId + artifactIdcommons-lang/artifactId version2.0/version /dependency dependency @@ -61,6 +62,9 @@ artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-junit/artifactId version1.0/version urlhttp://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/tags/junit//url + properties +scopetest/scope + /properties /dependency !-- END for test -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [all] Together, and bricks apart
+1 (can't really say non-binding ;-) Would also like to help revive sandbox functor if I have time. Whats needs to be done to get it this project into commons proper and build a community? Someone else made the point that it would be good to know what needs to be done to make a release. I agree that would useful (wiki?) (I'll take another look). I still think it would be good to have a set of standard functors interfaces. Functor based programming in java is verbose enough without having to wrap implementations. I know people have said these are different but there are in fact quite a few similarities (e.g. composition functions). Tim. -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2005 08:40 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart On 12/1/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/30/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/30/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/1/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Release managers are also facing tougher release checkers now IMHO. For instance, I haven't ignored configuration, but haven't had the time to check it out properly (way too much to do). I try to only give a +1 if I genuinely am happy. Perhaps I'm now applying too high a standard? Its a tough balance. Adding to what Stephen said, voting +1 to me means at a minimum you're indicating knowledge of the code and/or an intention to support it in some way. For me I can do that on only 3 to 5 of the Commons components. A good example is FileUpload - as a user I would like to see a release, but I only recently looked at a bit of the code and made a minor contribution. When it comes to a vote I'm not sure whether I'll vote for it or not as I don't think I have the time to actually provide any support. Is this the generally accepted criteria or do others follow more or less lenient criteria? I think most people voting +1 are _not_ saying they're prepared to support it. Rather, they're saying something more like I've checked out the proposed distribution, and didn't see any issues, so I'm happy for the Commons Foo team to release it as is. How much work is behind each +1 I'm sure varies from person to person. Some, like Stephen, are putting more effort into checking out the builds than they used to, while I'm sure others are more lenient. I hope I'm not wrong on this. If I am, and you're right, Niall, then I might as well give up on ever getting another FileUpload release out the door, based on how few people other than myself have ever touched the code base over the last several years. -- For me +1 means pretty much what Martin describes above. I check the release contents, make sure required elements are there and in jars, make sure there is nothing funny included. I test the builds, validate sigs, etc and inspect the web site and, if present, clirr/jdiff and look carefully at the release notes. I also review the javadoc, maven reports and POM. I do try to learn a little more with each release that I review; but at this point I can only provide support for a handful of commons components personally, so my +1 really just means I have validated the release and based on what I see and have seen on the list the release is good to go. I have been derelict over the past couple of weeks though, due to this being a very busy time of year and my trying to get [math] released. I will review the outstanding candidates ASAP. OK this is good to know - checking a release is doable. I think I'd come to the view I had based on the type of thing people put in a vote: [ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help [ ] +0 I support this release and am unable to help The difference between +1 and +0 here implies some further commitment after the vote. Niall Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r350240 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk: jelly-tags/validate/project.xml jelly-tags/velocity/project.xml jelly-tags/xml/project.xml jelly-tags/xmlunit/project.xml parent-project.x
Author: dion Date: Thu Dec 1 04:36:47 2005 New Revision: 350240 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350240view=rev Log: Use groupId/artifactId consistently instead of simply id Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/validate/project.xml jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/velocity/project.xml jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xmlunit/project.xml jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/parent-project.xml jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/validate/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/validate/project.xml?rev=350240r1=350239r2=350240view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/validate/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/validate/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:36:47 2005 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ project extend${basedir}/../tag-project.xml/extend - idcommons-jelly-tags-validate/id + artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-validate/artifactId namecommons-jelly-tags-validate/name currentVersion1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/currentVersion packageorg.apache.commons.jelly.tags.validate/package @@ -43,11 +43,13 @@ /properties /dependency dependency - idjunit/id + groupIdjunit/groupId + artifactIdjunit/artifactId version3.8.1/version /dependency dependency - idmsv/id + groupIdmsv/groupId + artifactIdmsv/artifactId version20030807/version /dependency !-- END for compilation -- @@ -74,12 +76,16 @@ artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-junit/artifactId version1.0/version urlhttp://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/junit//url + properties +scopetest/scope + /properties /dependency !-- END for test -- !-- START for running demos -- dependency - idcommons-cli/id + groupIdcommons-cli/groupId + artifactIdcommons-cli/artifactId version1.0/version /dependency !-- END for running demos -- Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/velocity/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/velocity/project.xml?rev=350240r1=350239r2=350240view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/velocity/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/velocity/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:36:47 2005 @@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ -- project extend${basedir}/../tag-project.xml/extend - idcommons-jelly-tags-velocity/id + artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-velocity/artifactId namecommons-jelly-tags-velocity/name - currentVersion1.0/currentVersion + currentVersion1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/currentVersion packageorg.apache.commons.jelly.tags.velocity/package @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ !-- START for compilation -- dependency - idvelocity/id + groupIdvelocity/groupId + artifactIdvelocity/artifactId version1.3/version urlhttp://jakarta.apache.org/velocity//url properties Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml?rev=350240r1=350239r2=350240view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:36:47 2005 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ project extend${basedir}/../tag-project.xml/extend - idcommons-jelly-tags-xml/id + artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-xml/artifactId namecommons-jelly-tags-xml/name currentVersion1.2-SNAPSHOT/currentVersion packageorg.apache.commons.jelly.tags.xml/package @@ -38,14 +38,16 @@ /versions dependencies dependency - idcommons-jelly/id + groupIdcommons-jelly/groupId + artifactIdcommons-jelly/artifactId versionSNAPSHOT/version /dependency !-- run time / in testing-- dependency - idxalan/id + groupIdxalan/groupId + artifactIdxalan/artifactId version2.3.1/version /dependency dependency @@ -53,6 +55,9 @@ artifactIdcommons-jelly-tags-junit/artifactId version1.0/version urlhttp://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/junit//url + properties +scopetest/scope + /properties /dependency /dependencies /project Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xmlunit/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xmlunit/project.xml?rev=350240r1=350239r2=350240view=diff
svn commit: r350241 - in /jakarta/commons/proper: jexl/trunk/project.xml jxpath/trunk/project.xml
Author: dion Date: Thu Dec 1 04:46:43 2005 New Revision: 350241 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350241view=rev Log: Use groupId/artifactId consistently instead of simply id Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.xml jakarta/commons/proper/jxpath/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.xml?rev=350241r1=350240r2=350241view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:46:43 2005 @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ project pomVersion3/pomVersion - idcommons-jexl/id + groupIdcommons-jexl/groupId + artifactIdcommons-jexl/artifactId inceptionYear2003/inceptionYear currentVersion1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/currentVersion nameCommons JEXL/name @@ -116,11 +117,13 @@ /developers dependencies dependency - idjunit/id + groupIdjunit/groupId + artifactIdjunit/artifactId version3.8.1/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-logging/id + groupIdcommons-logging/groupId + artifactIdcommons-logging/artifactId version1.0.3/version /dependency /dependencies Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jxpath/trunk/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/jxpath/trunk/project.xml?rev=350241r1=350240r2=350241view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/jxpath/trunk/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jxpath/trunk/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:46:43 2005 @@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ project pomVersion3/pomVersion nameJXPath/name - idcommons-jxpath/id - currentVersion1.2/currentVersion + groupIdcommons-jxpath/groupId + artifactIdcommons-jxpath/artifactId + currentVersion1.3-SNAPSHOT/currentVersion inceptionYear2001/inceptionYear shortDescriptionXPath for Java Objects/shortDescription descriptionA package of Java utility methods for accessing and modifying object properties/description @@ -92,41 +93,50 @@ dependencies dependency - idxerces/id + groupIdxerces/groupId + artifactIdxerces/artifactId version1.2.3/version /dependency dependency - idservletapi/id + groupIdservletapi/groupId + artifactIdservletapi/artifactId version2.2/version /dependency dependency - idjunit/id + groupIdjunit/groupId + artifactIdjunit/artifactId !-- typerequired/type-- version3.8/version /dependency dependency - idant+optional/id + groupIdant/groupId + artifactIdant-optional/artifactId version1.5.1/version /dependency dependency - idxml-apis/id + groupIdxml-apis/groupId + artifactIdxml-apis/artifactId version2.0.2/version /dependency dependency - idjdom/id + groupIdjdom/groupId + artifactIdjdom/artifactId version1.0/version urlhttp://www.jdom.org/url /dependency dependency - idcommons-beanutils/id + groupIdcommons-beanutils/groupId + artifactIdcommons-beanutils/artifactId version1.4/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-logging/id + groupIdcommons-logging/groupId + artifactIdcommons-logging/artifactId version1.0/version /dependency dependency - idcommons-collections/id + groupIdcommons-collections/groupId + artifactIdcommons-collections/artifactId version2.0/version /dependency - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r350242 - /jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml
Author: dion Date: Thu Dec 1 04:51:41 2005 New Revision: 350242 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350242view=rev Log: Use groupId/artifactId consistently instead of simply id Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml?rev=350242r1=350241r2=350242view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml Thu Dec 1 04:51:41 2005 @@ -363,12 +363,13 @@ !-- Lang should depend on very little -- dependencies dependency -idjunit/id +groupIdjunit/groupId +artifactIdjunit/artifactId version3.8.1/version /dependency !-- dependency - groupIdmaven-pluginss/groupId + groupIdmaven-plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-findbugs-plugin/artifactId version0.7.1/version urlhttp://maven-plugins.sourceforge.net/maven-findbugs-plugin//url - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37363] - [email] Address char-set can not be individuallyset
James, We should keep this discussion on the commons-dev email list, I'll cc it there. I would love to take a patch file for you, and if you haven't worked with Open Source before and Apache specifically I can help you. In terms of getting the changes in, well we are ALL apache developers! In order to submit a patch, all you have to do is check out the source, make the change, write a unit test, and then create a patch file. I find Eclipse and Maven make this very very easy. I suggest you read http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html for more about Apache Foundation and how you can become involved. Eric On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:44 PM, James Huang wrote: Well, my use case is simpler but I know for sure it is happening in real word: the encoding of email addresses is different from that of the whole message. This happens to some Japanese mail systems, as I was told. To cope with my use case, the fix is extremely easy: in the org.apache.commons.mail.Email class, just add a few more methods to take javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress as parameter. Afterall, I believe InternetAddress is used internally anyway. I don't want to go through the hassle of creating accounts, etc., in order to submit patches, and just hoping some apache mail developer will make this easy fix. Your scenario is interesting but different; I'd imaging you'll have to change the encoding for the message body itself in order to send to different recipients (expecting specific encoding)? Cheers, -James From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37363] -[email] Address char-set can not be individually set Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:36:57 +0100 (CET) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37363. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37363 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-29 15:36 --- Would you like to submit a patch and a unit test? Basically, what this allows you to do is send a single email to multiple recipients, and each recipient gets their own charset for their email? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi? tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25527] - [fileupload] process lynx linemode browser's multipart form post too!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-01 16:26 --- again having some problems with the latest lynx --version Lynx Version 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) libwww-FM 2.14, SSL-MM 1.4.1, GNUTLS 1.0.16 Built on linux-gnu Sep 26 2004 12:53:36 as per apt-get on debian sarge: Dec 1, 2005 4:18:38 PM org.apache.struts.upload.CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handleRequest SEVERE: Failed to parse multipart request org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Read timed out at org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:376) at org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:266) at org.apache.struts.upload.CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.handleRequest(CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.java:193) at org.apache.struts.util.RequestUtils.populate(RequestUtils.java:443) at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processPopulate(RequestProcessor.java:804) at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:203) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1196) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:432) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:709) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:237) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:157) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:214) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:407) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:526) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:827) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:731) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:526) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) Dec 1, 2005 4:18:38 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve invoke SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet action threw exception org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Read timed out at org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:376) at org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:266) at org.apache.struts.upload.CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.handleRequest(CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.java:193) at org.apache.struts.util.RequestUtils.populate(RequestUtils.java:443) at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processPopulate(RequestProcessor.java:804) at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:203) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1196) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:432) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:709) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:237) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:157) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:214) at
RE: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
Hi Oliver, Oliver Heger wrote on Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:26 AM: Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and run under a JDK 1.3. Unfortunately this jar cannot be distributed via ibiblio because of licence issues, which makes the build a bit unconvenient. But I guess I will have to update the pom to declare this dependency because DatabaseConfiguration needs the DataSource interface. Would be a good idea to update documentation in this respect, too. So, where's the problem (yeah, I know Stephen's blog about Compiling with older JDK)? Use 1.4 to compile it and have source/target as 1.3. For M2 you can have dependencies depending on the JDK version. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25527] - [fileupload] process lynx linemode browser's multipart form post too!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-01 16:33 --- admitted, the attachment had 20 MB, but I allow 70 MB -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of Net by MattTaylor
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by MattTaylor: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Net The comment on the change is: added javadoc URL -- * /FrequentlyAskedQuestions + * [http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/net/apidocs/index.html Javadoc] + - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
Jörg Schaible wrote: Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and run under a JDK 1.3. Unfortunately this jar cannot be distributed via ibiblio because of licence issues, which makes the build a bit unconvenient. But I guess I will have to update the pom to declare this dependency because DatabaseConfiguration needs the DataSource interface. Would be a good idea to update documentation in this respect, too. So, where's the problem (yeah, I know Stephen's blog about Compiling with older JDK)? Use 1.4 to compile it and have source/target as 1.3. For M2 you can have dependencies depending on the JDK version. But as stated in his blog you have to set the bootclasspath too. Currently (temporary) I have a similar problem in commons-vfs. And if it is somehow possible I would like to avoid to release such a construct. If you would like to compile such a beast you have to have two JDKs installed. :-( IMHO Not that nice. --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [all] Together, and bricks apart
Tim, I would be willing to help with commons functor, as I have found it useful in the past and I have familiarity with it. James -Original Message- From: Tim Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:31 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [all] Together, and bricks apart +1 (can't really say non-binding ;-) Would also like to help revive sandbox functor if I have time. Whats needs to be done to get it this project into commons proper and build a community? Someone else made the point that it would be good to know what needs to be done to make a release. I agree that would useful (wiki?) (I'll take another look). I still think it would be good to have a set of standard functors interfaces. Functor based programming in java is verbose enough without having to wrap implementations. I know people have said these are different but there are in fact quite a few similarities (e.g. composition functions). Tim. -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2005 08:40 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart On 12/1/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/30/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/30/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/1/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Release managers are also facing tougher release checkers now IMHO. For instance, I haven't ignored configuration, but haven't had the time to check it out properly (way too much to do). I try to only give a +1 if I genuinely am happy. Perhaps I'm now applying too high a standard? Its a tough balance. Adding to what Stephen said, voting +1 to me means at a minimum you're indicating knowledge of the code and/or an intention to support it in some way. For me I can do that on only 3 to 5 of the Commons components. A good example is FileUpload - as a user I would like to see a release, but I only recently looked at a bit of the code and made a minor contribution. When it comes to a vote I'm not sure whether I'll vote for it or not as I don't think I have the time to actually provide any support. Is this the generally accepted criteria or do others follow more or less lenient criteria? I think most people voting +1 are _not_ saying they're prepared to support it. Rather, they're saying something more like I've checked out the proposed distribution, and didn't see any issues, so I'm happy for the Commons Foo team to release it as is. How much work is behind each +1 I'm sure varies from person to person. Some, like Stephen, are putting more effort into checking out the builds than they used to, while I'm sure others are more lenient. I hope I'm not wrong on this. If I am, and you're right, Niall, then I might as well give up on ever getting another FileUpload release out the door, based on how few people other than myself have ever touched the code base over the last several years. -- For me +1 means pretty much what Martin describes above. I check the release contents, make sure required elements are there and in jars, make sure there is nothing funny included. I test the builds, validate sigs, etc and inspect the web site and, if present, clirr/jdiff and look carefully at the release notes. I also review the javadoc, maven reports and POM. I do try to learn a little more with each release that I review; but at this point I can only provide support for a handful of commons components personally, so my +1 really just means I have validated the release and based on what I see and have seen on the list the release is good to go. I have been derelict over the past couple of weeks though, due to this being a very busy time of year and my trying to get [math] released. I will review the outstanding candidates ASAP. OK this is good to know - checking a release is doable. I think I'd come to the view I had based on the type of thing people put in a vote: [ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help [ ] +0 I support this release and am unable to help The difference between +1 and +0 here implies some further commitment after the vote. Niall Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
At least one of you release checkers ;-) should setup a wiki to describe every step to do, this helps the release manager and those checking it. Especially if you are a newbie in the release cycle it might be a great start AND it defines standards. I like Marios idea. Very new to commons-dev i would like to get more involved. I guess i will start with bugfixing, submitting patches all this stuff. Checking out a potentiel release is work everyone can do- if there is a concrete description what to do. I really have a problem with:hey do you support this release?- ok, i have no idea if this is all ok cause i don't know what i should check. In this case it's better to shut up :-) If somebody could provide a wiki page it would be a good start for a noob like i am to help out with some things. Namely: gimme a checklist. Cheers, Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
Mario Ivankovits wrote: Phil Steitz wrote: Thats true, I'll learn with every release review too, but can do this only if another one complains about this and that. If I read the stuff you do to check a release I am shocked, damn much work to do. At least one of you release checkers ;-) should setup a wiki to describe every step to do, this helps the release manager and those checking it. Especially if you are a newbie in the release cycle it might be a great start AND it defines standards. Everyone does this in its own way. You can look at outstanding issues, run tests check for test coverage, look at the preperation that has gone into it (dev traffic, commits for a component) and the human factor is also important for me. What I also normally do during development of the applications I make during the day, is make source dependencies on those components, which will give some kind of feeling about those components. Most of the time I will not vote for components I have used myself. VFS, Validator and Configuration fall into that category atm. And e.g. we started to discuss if we have to convert line-endings - after years (!) of commons releases - and we were not able to have a vital discussion about this little topic. It actually took me 12 days to send a reaction to that one, so not really a quick response, but I also never received a response to my question / conclusion. You can only detail read so much, so most of the time I am just skimming and stop at interesting threads and now and then I actually miss someting I would like to read. I tend to focus more on (for me) productive things, since (almost) all of my open source efforts happens/has to happen in my spare time, which is limited.. Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
I hope I'm not wrong on this. If I am, and you're right, Niall, then I might as well give up on ever getting another FileUpload release out the door, based on how few people other than myself have ever touched the code base over the last several years. Just about FileUpload : in the coming weeks I am going to use it and as far as i've seen it is pretty much in need of a release, since the last was 2003 if I am not mistaking and quite a few issues (esp memory leaks) have been fixed after that. So at this stage I would already support a release. I'll ping the dev list when I started using it.. Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
On 11/30/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm also seeing a trend that is a tad disappointing. The last three successive release votes each needed to make pleas for a better response from the developer community. We've witnessed this for, in chronological order: * VFS [1] * Validator [2] * Configuration [3] Viewing it slightly more abstractedly: 1) We have areas of inactivity. 2) We don't notice those areas. 3) We are thusly unable to encourage increased activity. I'm afraid it might be easy to misunderstand or ridicule this email, point to the some Apache voting FAQ, and move on. This is not a statement about individuals -- rather the community -- indeed, personally, I've done nothing to help in the above cases, including even choosing not to cast non-binding opinions when the votes came up. I'll be glad if I'm told I've misunderstood the current state of affairs, maybe RMs are just anxious by nature (comes with the territory), this is all *expected* to happen, and I'm the only one who sees things in a different light. I'll be happier still if this were an abberation rather than the norm. You're spot on. Even going inactive and trying to get active again, it's hard for me to pick up what's different in the release management etc. Documentation is one thing, so that if someone is able to find it they can follow it along, but we also need to work together on automation. It shouldn't be this hard etc :) Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
On 11/30/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are certainly correct in spotting these cases, however other votes will also go through. One of the big issues I have with Apache is the amount of procedure and boring stuff necessary to go through to get a release released. The vote is really the tip of the iceberg, the real effort is in the uploading, copying, signing, linking... Releasing at sourceforge is a dream by comparison (although its an unfair comparison of course). Yeah, SF has the step wait for Lag repeated many times over :) I've been playing with release things on osjava.org. It's still a 22 step process: http://wiki.osjava.org/confluence/display/IDEAS/OSJava+release+process Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
Martin van den Bemt wrote: I tend to focus more on (for me) productive things, since (almost) all of my open source efforts happens/has to happen in my spare time, which is limited.. Me too, especially the [vfs] thing is a free time job for me. But even more it is demotivating if you are blocked due to a more restrictive check when it comes to the release vote then you had during your release candidates. I search a little bit, and guess what, we have such a documentation http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html We have to rework it, tough. *) In the area of class file format we should state that we not allow to use only the target attribute but also require to use the correct jdk version: the version the project was designed for. *) And we need a new point of what files we need to crlf fix. *) And I dont know why we should fix all bugs, its not very productive to mark all bugs as later and after the release revert the status again. --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25527] - [fileupload] process lynx linemode browser's multipart form post too!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-01 20:40 --- Do you have any evidence to support this being a bug in Struts / FileUpload, rather than a bug in the latest version of Lynx? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25527] - [fileupload] process lynx linemode browser's multipart form post too!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25527 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-01 21:53 --- Martin, you may be right, I guess the next diagnostic steps would be to post to http instead of https and then do an ethereal or tcpflow dump. I'll post the results once I get to them (apologies, may take some time...) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
Mario Ivankovits wrote: I search a little bit, and guess what, we have such a documentation http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html We have to rework it, tough. *) In the area of class file format we should state that we not allow to use only the target attribute but also require to use the correct jdk version: the version the project was designed for. +1 I believe that the ideal is to compile with JDK 1.4/1.5 but using bootclasspath to pickup the JDK1.2 libraries. That said, I tend to just use JDK1.3 to compile (no bootclasspath). In theory this can affect JDK1.2 users, but a) there are very few of those b) there were no bytecode change 1.2-1.3 AFAIN c) non one has ever reported an overloaded method issue either *) And we need a new point of what files we need to crlf fix. I don't intend to -1 a release on this. The key files are the top level release notes. *) And I dont know why we should fix all bugs, its not very productive to mark all bugs as later and after the release revert the status again. Personally, I've never done that. Stephen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:12 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: snip --- [X] +1 I support creating [collection-functors] [ ] +0 It's OK [ ] +1 If you must [ ] -1 I don't support this because --- - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2
snip/ AFAIK, other apache projects require sun jars to compile. You may ask commons-dbcp commiters that seem to have the same requirement : !-- Note JDBC 2.0 is a pain, because it must be manually downloaded to your Maven repository, and it's not even required on JDK 1.4. Maybe we should remove it from this dependency list so Maven doesn't choke? -- dependency idjdbc/id version2.0/version /dependency It would be neater if something could be done in the maven.xml to detect JDK 1.3 and add it into the class path from a property specified in the build.properties. I'm going to face the same issue in Commons Resources - we have 1 class that relies on JDBC 2. Niall I think simply checking for a JDK 1.3 may not be enough because you can use the maven.compile.executable property to select a compiler from a different JDK. Then compilation may take place on a JDK 1.3, but maven is actually running on a JDK 1.4 or whatever. I just tested the following approach: In maven.xml I added the following goal: !-- Adds the jdbc-stdext to the dependency classpath if the dependency.jdbc property is defined. -- preGoal name=java:compile j:if test=${dependency.jdbc != ''} path id=extended.dependency.path pathelement path=${dependency.jdbc}/ /path maven:addPath id=maven.dependency.classpath refid=extended.dependency.path/ /j:if /preGoal Now in your build.properties you can define the dependency.jdbc variable to point to the jdbc jar. If it is set, the dependency will be added to the classpath; otherwise not. Given that this setup is clearly documented, do you think this solution is practical? Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feedparser
Is the sandbox project feed parser abandoned? I have updated the source to work with the new jdom and would like to commit my updates as I presume they are wanted. Sent an e-mail to Kevin a few days ago, but there is no reply. The whole repository is somewhat a mess too. Maven dependencies are bad will not build, et.c. It's a shame on such a nice project. I would be happy to fix it up. -- karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
-1 to any commons-net new release. see pmc thread for details (if any committers aren't on the pmc please shout and i'll nominate you) - robert On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 07:47 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: As I have little time now, I propose the following. 1.4.1 will be just 1.4.0 with whatever changes are needed to reverse the dependency on jdk 1.4.x. No other bug fixes will be included. Re-vote +1 [yes] -1 [no] +1 --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Feedparser
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:44 +0100, karl wettin wrote: Is the sandbox project feed parser abandoned? I have updated the source to work with the new jdom and would like to commit my updates as I presume they are wanted. Sent an e-mail to Kevin a few days ago, but there is no reply. The whole repository is somewhat a mess too. Maven dependencies are bad will not build, et.c. It's a shame on such a nice project. I would be happy to fix it up. good question: i'm not sure. hopefully some folks who know more will jump in now... IIRC feedparser had been elected to the commons proper and was being moved there. would you mind checking out proper, taking a look around and reporting back what you find? - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Created: (JELLY-224) The parser always try to load the DTD even if validate = false
The parser always try to load the DTD even if validate = false -- Key: JELLY-224 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-224 Project: jelly Type: Bug Components: taglib.xml Environment: Working of line or behind a proxy Reporter: Philippe Kernevez The tag ixml:parse/i always try to load the DTD even if the attribut ivalidate=false/i is used. This cause an error when we use this tag without connection. See: the linked issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPDASHBOARD-34 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sandbox] December dormancy proposal
As per the Sandbox pruning proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/ProposalSandboxPruning), I propose to archive the following 'inactive' components (ie nothing changed in over 6 months): benchmark contract servlet Unless I hear a -1 by the 7th, I'll move them to dormancy. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
Mario Ivankovits wrote: Martin van den Bemt wrote: I tend to focus more on (for me) productive things, since (almost) all of my open source efforts happens/has to happen in my spare time, which is limited.. Me too, especially the [vfs] thing is a free time job for me. But even more it is demotivating if you are blocked due to a more restrictive check when it comes to the release vote then you had during your release candidates. More involvment in the RC's is what I can think of for myself here, also for projects I don't use. I search a little bit, and guess what, we have such a documentation http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html We have to rework it, tough. *) In the area of class file format we should state that we not allow to use only the target attribute but also require to use the correct jdk version: the version the project was designed for. *) And we need a new point of what files we need to crlf fix. To reask the question in this thread : what is broken with crlf ? I use both windows and linux (and mix zips and tgz on both platforms) and never had a single issue with this. It could be the way I work though :) *) And I dont know why we should fix all bugs, its not very productive to mark all bugs as later and after the release revert the status again. You don't have to fix all bugs, but the number and kind of bugs solved / still open can be a good indicator of how the project is doing. Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
robert burrell donkin wrote: -1 to any commons-net new release. see pmc thread for details (if any committers aren't on the pmc please shout and i'll nominate you) I am on the PMC but haven't got mails for a long time :-/ Stephen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart
Stephen Colebourne wrote: Mario Ivankovits wrote: I search a little bit, and guess what, we have such a documentation http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html We have to rework it, tough. *) In the area of class file format we should state that we not allow to use only the target attribute but also require to use the correct jdk version: the version the project was designed for. +1 I believe that the ideal is to compile with JDK 1.4/1.5 but using bootclasspath to pickup the JDK1.2 libraries. That said, I tend to just use JDK1.3 to compile (no bootclasspath). In theory this can affect JDK1.2 users, but a) there are very few of those b) there were no bytecode change 1.2-1.3 AFAIN c) non one has ever reported an overloaded method issue either What about using maven's maven.compile.executable property to point to the target JDK? This is what I have done with the RCs for configuration. This seems to be convenient, but has the disadvantage that the manifest in the generated jar contains the version of the JDK on which maven is running (not the target JDK). Or does anybody know a trick how to handle this? *) And we need a new point of what files we need to crlf fix. I don't intend to -1 a release on this. The key files are the top level release notes. There has been a longer discussion about this subject. I wonder if a user has already complained about that. I mean, if I open a file with Windows notepad and find out that the line endings are incorrect, I open it again with Wordpad. So what? I assume that our target group (i.e. programmers) use editors that can handle such things. *) And I dont know why we should fix all bugs, its not very productive to mark all bugs as later and after the release revert the status again. Personally, I've never done that. +1 That really doesn't make much sense. Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r351532 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/SCXMLSemanticsImpl.java
Author: rahul Date: Thu Dec 1 16:12:22 2005 New Revision: 351532 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351532view=rev Log: Treat a NFE as an immediate send. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/SCXMLSemanticsImpl.java Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/SCXMLSemanticsImpl.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/SCXMLSemanticsImpl.java?rev=351532r1=351531r2=351532view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/SCXMLSemanticsImpl.java (original) +++ jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/SCXMLSemanticsImpl.java Thu Dec 1 16:12:22 2005 @@ -249,9 +249,19 @@ params.put(varName, varObj); } } +String delay = snd.getDelay(); +long wait = 0L; +if (delay != null delay.length() 0) { +try { +wait = Long.parseLong(delay.trim()); +} catch (NumberFormatException nfe) { +APP_LOG.warn(Could not parse delay for send, ++ it will be treated as immediate, nfe); +} +} evtDispatcher.send(snd.getSendid(), snd.getTarget(), snd.getTargettype(), snd.getEvent(), -params, hints, Long.parseLong(snd.getDelay())); +params, hints, wait); } else if (a instanceof Var) { Var vr = (Var) a; String varName = vr.getName(); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r351534 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/SCXMLDigester.java
Author: rahul Date: Thu Dec 1 16:17:41 2005 New Revision: 351534 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351534view=rev Log: ** Support for corner cases where the SCXML document resides in: * A java or web archive * A compound document where it has already been parsed (In such cases, there shouldn't be any external src references) ** Some Javadoc and whitespace changes Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/SCXMLDigester.java Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/SCXMLDigester.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/SCXMLDigester.java?rev=351534r1=351533r2=351534view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/SCXMLDigester.java (original) +++ jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/SCXMLDigester.java Thu Dec 1 16:17:41 2005 @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ import org.xml.sax.Attributes; import org.xml.sax.ErrorHandler; +import org.xml.sax.InputSource; /** * pThe SCXMLDigester provides the ability to digest a SCXML document into @@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ //-- PUBLIC METHODS --// /** - * API for standalone usage where the SCXML document is a URL. + * pAPI for standalone usage where the SCXML document is a URL./p * * @param scxmlURL *a canonical absolute URL to parse (relative URLs within the @@ -120,14 +121,14 @@ } /** - * API for standalone usage where the SCXML document is a URI. - * A PathResolver must be provided. + * pAPI for standalone usage where the SCXML document is a URI. + * A PathResolver must be provided./p * * @param pathResolver *The PathResolver for this context * @param documentRealPath *The String pointing to the absolute (real) path of the - * SCXML config + *SCXML document * @param errHandler *The SAX ErrorHandler * @param evalCtx @@ -161,6 +162,57 @@ documentRealPath, e.getMessage() }); log.error(errMsg, e); +} + +if (scxml != null) { +updateSCXML(scxml, evalCtx, evalEngine); +} + +return scxml; + +} + +/** + * pAPI for standalone usage where the SCXML document is an + * InputSource. This method may be used when the SCXML document is + * packaged in a Java archive, or part of a compound document + * where the SCXML root is available as a + * codeorg.w3c.dom.Element/code or via a codejava.io.Reader/code. + * /p + * + * pemNote:/em Since there is no path resolution, the SCXML document + * must not have external state sources./p + * + * @param documentInputSource + *The InputSource for the SCXML document + * @param errHandler + *The SAX ErrorHandler + * @param evalCtx + *the document-level variable context for guard condition + *evaluation + * @param evalEngine + *the scripting/expression language engine for creating local + *state-level variable contexts (if supported by a given + *scripting engine) + * + * @return SCXML The SCXML object corresponding to the file argument + * + * @see Context + * @see ErrorHandler + * @see Evaluator + */ +public static SCXML digest(final InputSource documentInputSource, +final ErrorHandler errHandler, final Context evalCtx, +final Evaluator evalEngine) { + +Digester scxmlDigester = SCXMLDigester.newInstance(null, null); +scxmlDigester.setErrorHandler(errHandler); + +SCXML scxml = null; +try { +scxml = (SCXML) scxmlDigester.parse(documentInputSource); +} catch (Exception e) { +log.error(Could not parse SCXML, e); } if (scxml != null) { - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
Can you just summarize what your objections are instead of referencing some location that most people don't have access to? robert burrell donkin wrote: -1 to any commons-net new release. see pmc thread for details (if any committers aren't on the pmc please shout and i'll nominate you) - robert On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 07:47 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: As I have little time now, I propose the following. 1.4.1 will be just 1.4.0 with whatever changes are needed to reverse the dependency on jdk 1.4.x. No other bug fixes will be included. Re-vote +1 [yes] -1 [no] +1 --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: commons-concoct - new project proposal
I might be wrong, but I think I've seen an URI implementation in Axis (don't know if it's a strict RFC-2396 implementation, a java.net.URI backport, just something they needed or something that does its best to interpret any messy string passed in) For me, I buy the simply use the : as a delimiter part :-) To be honest, the very first scratch of the library relied on URIs, but on a second thought I think URIs do not fit well in a library like this... java.net.URIs: - They are only available from jdk1.4 - of course ;-) - They don't require the scheme to be specified, and I don't think there's a way to properly implement relative URI semantic in concoct - They don't parse string:a string ( must be escaped with %20) - They don't parse string:## - They don't really provide any useful functionality for the lib, aside for syntax checking - which is not really useful IMHO RFC-2396 URIs: - defaulting to string: when no scheme is specified - a welcome feature IMHO, and one that would ease adoption of the lib in with .properties files - does not fit well with relative URI semantics - the grammar is more strict than needed (see deviations in java.net.URI code) - all the path stuff is irrelevant for the lib - they require escaping beyond that of the scheme used and (possibly) the file format they are stored in (such as entity escape for xml). Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi Giorgio! Its purpose is to parse URI-like strings (anything in the form somescheme:somestring) into java objects according to a scheme-specific syntax (which is straightforward in most cases) Do you plan to support the full URI specification of do you simply use the : as delimiter ;-) But then the URI stuff of your project should be splitted out into its own project e.g. commons-uri In [vfs] we have needs for a jdk independend URI library. --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
robert burrell donkin wrote: -1 to any commons-net new release. see pmc thread for details (if any committers aren't on the pmc please shout and i'll nominate you) - robert On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 07:47 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: As I have little time now, I propose the following. 1.4.1 will be just 1.4.0 with whatever changes are needed to reverse the dependency on jdk 1.4.x. No other bug fixes will be included. Re-vote +1 [yes] -1 [no] +1 --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK. Robert is referring to a serious issue here. It's prudent to wait. There are questions about copyright on one of our classes. The thread Robert refers to has the subject Re: Does Apache have agreement to use other open source code outside of Apache? and it's all in the last couple of days. So we have to wait. Which is just as well. Because I have another issue. I don't understand the maven.compile.target property. Working from the net 1.4.0 tag, I change only project.properties to set maven.compile.target back to 1.2. Since there are a few places in 1.4.0 that depend on jdk 1.4, my expectation was that changing the project properties would cause the compile to break on those places. But it did not. It compiled successfully. Why wouldn't it break? Can someone explain how this works? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
For the thread's info; Robert's cc'd Rory on the pmc email. This is legal shit and irritatingly it seems there are increased liability issues when you talk publically. Any active committer should be on the PMC, unless they've only recently joined, so if you're active kick away and one of us will gladly nominate you. -- Stephen: I'm guessing you didn't get my reply when you asked about not getting mail from the list a while back. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed, which forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is that still active? Hen On 12/1/05, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you just summarize what your objections are instead of referencing some location that most people don't have access to? robert burrell donkin wrote: -1 to any commons-net new release. see pmc thread for details (if any committers aren't on the pmc please shout and i'll nominate you) - robert On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 07:47 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: As I have little time now, I propose the following. 1.4.1 will be just 1.4.0 with whatever changes are needed to reverse the dependency on jdk 1.4.x. No other bug fixes will be included. Re-vote +1 [yes] -1 [no] +1 --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: commons-concoct - new project proposal
I've read trough the charter and will post a formal proposal as soon as I get the time to write it down ;) In the meantime, is there anyway I could upload the code (its around 60k, zipped), in a quest for initial committers to include on the proposal? As regards incubation: - The code have never been released, whether on its own or inside a larger application/library - I'm the sole copyright owner of the code - I am (of course) willing to donate it to ASF Does this imply it needs to be incubated? Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 11/30/05, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oddly enough, I have spent the last week point five working on a similar setup at $work. My syntax is slightly different (extended I would say). If this proposal is accepted in principle, I could query my boss whether we could make any contributions. As an Apache committer, I believe I have the right to work in the Jakarta commons sandbox on such a project. Commons people? snip/ Indeed, the Commons charter says you're welcome :-) Procedurally, its nice to start with a [proposal] thread, in the format specified by the Example Package Proposal section of the charter [1], and obtain feedback from existing Commons committers. If the code was *not* developed in the ASF repository, you will have to incubate [2] it first. Someone with more incubator-related experience will probably clarify once the details are posted in the proposal. -Rahul [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/charter.html [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ -Matt --- Giorgio Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been working on a library I aim to contribute to the commons bazaar (as a standalone lib or maybe as part of commons-transform), but: - I'm not sure mine is a good idea for a commons library - I'm not a commons committer - The lib still needs work (it is a prototype right now) The library, which is named Concoct for now, should come handy in configuration files (that is, I think so :). Its purpose is to parse URI-like strings (anything in the form somescheme:somestring) into java objects according to a scheme-specific syntax (which is straightforward in most cases): for now it can only handle strings like int:189 - new Integer(189) string:foo - new String(foo) null:whatever - null class:oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver - oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.class and convert expressions like bean:org.example.MyClass(foo=string:foo,bar=null:null) into an instance of MyClass, with attributes set as specified. Plans are to add many other schemes, eg: - jdbc: to produce Connections - jdbc-datasource: to produce DataSources (via commons-dbcp) - singleton: to return the same Object if the expression is evaluated more than once - proxy: to build a dynamic proxy - file:,http:,ftp: to read the specified url into a java.net.URL - deserialize: to read an object from an URL - ... The idea is to enable the combination of different schemes in expressions (such as in the bean: scheme example - above). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Committer cleanup
I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6 months. We have 105 commons committers, and 36 additional sandbox committers. We've had 43 committers committing to proper, and 7 extra committing to sandbox in the last 6 months. Then we'd add back anyone else on request if need be. Anyone against the idea? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: commons-concoct - new project proposal
On 12/1/05, Giorgio Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've read trough the charter and will post a formal proposal as soon as I get the time to write it down ;) In the meantime, is there anyway I could upload the code (its around 60k, zipped), in a quest for initial committers to include on the proposal? Either attach it to a bugzilla entry, or mail it to me and I'll put it in my ~ space As regards incubation: - The code have never been released, whether on its own or inside a larger application/library - I'm the sole copyright owner of the code - I am (of course) willing to donate it to ASF Does this imply it needs to be incubated? Depends on the people interested. If there are no/few existing committers interested, then yes you'd need to be incubated. If however the majority of interested committers are existing committers, then we'll go with a code grant and goto the sandbox. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[all] short critique of site
Some thoughts on the site. A] Looking at the front page. 1) Jakarta link on the bar is redundant. We already have a huge logo in the top left. 2) No need to include the direct svn link, just use viewcvs. Simpler for the user. 3) Korea translation link is dead. 4) Japanese translation link is out of date. 5) While the wiki is unofficial documentation, it is an official resource. 6) DB Commons is empty. 7) Contributor page. Is this worth the effort of the maintenance? B] Clicking on sandbox. 1) There are many projects which have become dormant. How should we be changing the site? 2) Corresponding Wiki page needs changing [my fault :) ] Okay, onto something else next. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of AutomatedIdeas by HenriYandell
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by HenriYandell: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/AutomatedIdeas The comment on the change is: Fixing urls to latest versions -- Steps? - Obviously I'm (HenriYandell) tied to my own tools and need kicking to use something else. I'd use an improved variant of [http://builds.osjava.org Integration] for the automated developer site and [http://multidoc.osjava.org Multidoc] as the wrapping-interface. + Obviously I'm (HenriYandell) tied to my own tools and need kicking to use something else. I'd use an improved variant of [http://builds.osjava.org/osjava Integration] for the automated developer site and [http://dist.osjava.org/releases/multidoc-jnr/ Multidoc] as the wrapping-interface. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of TheSandbox by HenriYandell
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by HenriYandell: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TheSandbox The comment on the change is: An attempt at an update. -- ||'''Component'''||'''State'''||'''Plan'''|| + ||VFS||Promoted||under active development again.|| - ||Cache||Published - ||Clazz||Published||Dormant, no clear use case, no community, stable code. Was too complex for many (who could use DynaBean), and not complex enough for others (who needed a Java syntax tree as found in Eclipse/Netbeans)|| ||Compress||Published||Dormant, no current community, code extracted from Ant.|| - ||CommonsConvert||Published||Development intended, strong use case. Various conversion ideas extracted from BeanUtils.|| - ||Events||Published||Dormant, no current community.|| - ||Functor||Published||Dormant, no current community, stable code.|| ||Id||Published||In development, promotion target, strong use case, stable code. Parts from Lang, parts new.|| - ||JJar||Published||ready to die as superseded by Apache Depot.|| - ||Mapper||Published - ||Messenger||Published - ||Scaffold||Published|| is a toolkit for building web applications, to complement web application frameworks (such as Struts).|| ||[:SCXML]||Published||Reference Implementation of State Chart XML (SCXML), currently a W3C Working Draft.|| + ||SQL||Published||Moved to db.apache.org as DdlUtils|| - ||SQL||Published - ||ThreadPool||Published - ||VFS||Published||under active development again.|| - ||Workflow||Published ||FeedParser||Published - ||Filters||Unpublished||meant to contain servlet filters, but not yet come alive|| - ||HTTP||Unpublished||handful of classes for use with http connections|| ||Jex||Unpublished ||Launcher||Unpublished - ||Periodicity||Unpublished - ||Reflect||Unpublished||Extracted from BeanUtils, but unfinished and in a coma. Proved to difficult to test across JVMs and for little benefit.|| ||Servlet||Unpublished||not enough here to justify a component|| - ||Threading||Unpublished||migrated over from Avalon Excalibur. Currently inactive.|| - ||xo||Unpublished||XML to Bean mapper.|| ||Benchmark||Unpublished ||Altrmi||Dead||Moved from the Incubator to Codehaus now [http://jremoting.codehaus.org JRemoting].|| ||Graph||Dead||rewritten as graph2|| - ||JJar||Dead||superseded by [http://incubator.apache.org/depot/ Apache Depot] (currently in the incubator)|| ||JRCS||Dead||no longer really hosted by Jakarta. It has moved to Codehaus [http://cvs.codehaus.org/viewcvs.cgi/jrcs/?root=codehaus Codehaus CVS]|| ||Pattern||Dead||code moved to lang and id projects.|| - ||cache||?? - ||grant||?? - ||graph2||?? - ||joran||?? - ||jux||?? - ||rupert||?? - ||services||?? + ||Filters||-dormant||meant to contain servlet filters, but not yet come alive|| + ||HTTP||-dormant||handful of classes for use with http connections|| + ||Periodicity||-dormant + ||Reflect||-dormant||Extracted from BeanUtils, but unfinished and in a coma. Proved to difficult to test across JVMs and for little benefit.|| + ||Threading||-dormant||migrated over from Avalon Excalibur. Currently inactive.|| + ||xo||-dormant||XML to Bean mapper.|| + ||cache||-dormant + ||grant||-dormant + ||graph2||-dormant + ||jux||-dormant + ||rupert||-dormant + ||services||-dormant - ||simplestore||?? + ||simplestore||-dormant - ||workflow||?? - ||xmlunit||?? + ||xmlunit||-dormant + ||Cache||-dormant + ||Clazz||-dormant||Dormant, no clear use case, no community, stable code. Was too complex for many (who could use DynaBean), and not complex enough for others (who needed a Java syntax tree as found in Eclipse/Netbeans)|| + ||CommonsConvert||-dormant||Development intended, strong use case. Various conversion ideas extracted from BeanUtils.|| + ||Events||-dormant||Dormant, no current community.|| + ||Functor||-dormant||Dormant, no current community, stable code.|| + ||JJar||-dormant||superseded by [http://incubator.apache.org/depot/ Apache Depot] (currently in the incubator)|| + ||Mapper||-dormant + ||Messenger||-dormant||In fact dead, real version is at Codehaus nowadays|| + ||Scaffold||-dormant|| is a toolkit for building web applications, to complement web application frameworks (such as Struts).|| + ||ThreadPool||-dormant + ||Workflow||-dormant ||periodicity_1||-dormant ||joran||-dormant ||launcher||-dormant @@ -75, +72 @@ ||Util||Deleted||this component split into many others and eventually the original component was left with nothing.|| ||Armi||Deleted||prior name of 'altrmi'.|| ||uid||Deleted||prior name of 'id'.|| + ||joran||Deleted
[jelly] Gump failures
These seem to have been going on for months. Any chance they can be fixed and stop spamming us? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jelly] Gump failures
It's a break in how Jaxen works. Unless we upgrade all of Jelly to work with the code changes in Jaxen, the failures will continue. Personally, I'd rather stick where we are with jaxen in Jelly and stop Gump from nagging us. On 12/2/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These seem to have been going on for months. Any chance they can be fixed and stop spamming us? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George Bernard Shaw - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on jakarta-servletapi-5-servlet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.servletapi. -DEBUG- Dependency on jakarta-taglibs-standard exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.jstl. -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 54 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/discovery/dist/commons-discovery.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/lang/dist/commons-lang-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/forehead/forehead-1.0-beta-5.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr154/dist/lib/servlet-api.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-taglibs/dist/standard/lib/jstl.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dist/junit/junit.jar - [junit] Expected expression: ${singleSize*2} [junit] Actual expression: ${doubleSize} File: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly At tag test:assertEquals: line: 359 column: 75 [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.JellyTagException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly:359:75: test:assertEquals expected:[22] but was:[22] [junit] Expected expression: ${singleSize*2} [junit] Actual expression: ${doubleSize} File: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly At tag test:assertEquals: line: 359 column: 75 [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.handleException(TagScript.java:712) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:282) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] Caused by: org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.JellyAssertionFailedError: expected:[22] but was:[22] [junit] Expected expression: ${singleSize*2} [junit] Actual expression: ${doubleSize} File: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly At tag test:assertEquals: line: 359 column: 75 [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertTagSupport.fail(AssertTagSupport.java:39) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertTagSupport.failNotEquals(AssertTagSupport.java:62) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertEqualsTag.doTag(AssertEqualsTag.java:55) [junit] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on jakarta-servletapi-5-servlet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.servletapi. -DEBUG- Dependency on jakarta-taglibs-standard exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.jstl. -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 54 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/discovery/dist/commons-discovery.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/lang/dist/commons-lang-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/forehead/forehead-1.0-beta-5.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr154/dist/lib/servlet-api.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-taglibs/dist/standard/lib/jstl.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dist/junit/junit.jar - [junit] Expected expression: ${singleSize*2} [junit] Actual expression: ${doubleSize} File: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly At tag test:assertEquals: line: 359 column: 75 [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.JellyTagException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly:359:75: test:assertEquals expected:[22] but was:[22] [junit] Expected expression: ${singleSize*2} [junit] Actual expression: ${doubleSize} File: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly At tag test:assertEquals: line: 359 column: 75 [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.handleException(TagScript.java:712) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:282) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] Caused by: org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.JellyAssertionFailedError: expected:[22] but was:[22] [junit] Expected expression: ${singleSize*2} [junit] Actual expression: ${doubleSize} File: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/suite.jelly At tag test:assertEquals: line: 359 column: 75 [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertTagSupport.fail(AssertTagSupport.java:39) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertTagSupport.failNotEquals(AssertTagSupport.java:62) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertEqualsTag.doTag(AssertEqualsTag.java:55) [junit] at
Re: [jelly] Gump failures
Irritating. :) The classic one, where if we turn it off we'll never turn it on again, but fixing the problem is not in the forseeable future. I'm +1 on turning it off. Maybe stick a note in the root dir of the Jelly svn. Hen On 12/1/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's a break in how Jaxen works. Unless we upgrade all of Jelly to work with the code changes in Jaxen, the failures will continue. Personally, I'd rather stick where we are with jaxen in Jelly and stop Gump from nagging us. On 12/2/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These seem to have been going on for months. Any chance they can be fixed and stop spamming us? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George Bernard Shaw - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[all] Commons Manual
Let's imagine a manual existed for Commons committers. It would assume that a committer understands the ASF, ie) they've read the Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too). What would the chapters be? Initial list: * Short description of Commons/Introduction. * Communication. How to use the mailing lists. Voting. * Subversion information. How to check code out. * Maven information. How to build. * Site information. How to generate the site. How to upload your changes. * Releasing. How to release. * PMC. What they're there for (Commons point of view). * Legal. How to not screw-up. Am I missing anything? Idea, if it's not obvious, is to bring together the various bits of information on wiki's, site and more importantly in people's heads. Stick it in a more concrete form and tell people to go read it. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Committer cleanup
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6 months. We have 105 commons committers, and 36 additional sandbox committers. We've had 43 committers committing to proper, and 7 extra committing to sandbox in the last 6 months. Then we'd add back anyone else on request if need be. Anyone against the idea? 6 months seems quite short if you're only counting commits. Would the numbers be significantly different if we use 1 year instead? Where do you plan on keeping the list of people removed? It will need to be somewhere that we can get at, so that we know who can be added back without question. -- Martin Cooper Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [all] short critique of site
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some thoughts on the site. A] Looking at the front page. 1) Jakarta link on the bar is redundant. We already have a huge logo in the top left. 2) No need to include the direct svn link, just use viewcvs. Simpler for the user. Perhaps, but AIUI viewcvs puts a significantly higher load on our infrastructure, and the infra@ folks have specifically stated that they would prefer people to use direct links to the SVN repo. -- Martin Cooper 3) Korea translation link is dead. 4) Japanese translation link is out of date. 5) While the wiki is unofficial documentation, it is an official resource. 6) DB Commons is empty. 7) Contributor page. Is this worth the effort of the maintenance? B] Clicking on sandbox. 1) There are many projects which have become dormant. How should we be changing the site? 2) Corresponding Wiki page needs changing [my fault :) ] Okay, onto something else next. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-xml-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-xml-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-xml-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-xml-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 41 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testSetSingleNodeAndAsString(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:294:81: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:294:81: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.xml.SetTag.doTag(SetTag.java:86) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testSetStringLists(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:339:82: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:339:82: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.xml.SetTag.doTag(SetTag.java:86) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testEntities(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-xml-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-xml-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-xml-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-xml-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 41 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testSetSingleNodeAndAsString(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:294:81: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:294:81: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.xml.SetTag.doTag(SetTag.java:86) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testSetStringLists(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:339:82: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/xml/suite.jelly:339:82: x:set You must define an attribute called 'select' for this tag. [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.xml.SetTag.doTag(SetTag.java:86) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testEntities(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit]
Re: [all] Commons Manual
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's imagine a manual existed for Commons committers. It would assume that a committer understands the ASF, ie) they've read the Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too). What would the chapters be? Initial list: * Short description of Commons/Introduction. * Communication. How to use the mailing lists. Voting. * Subversion information. How to check code out. * Maven information. How to build. * Site information. How to generate the site. How to upload your changes. * Releasing. How to release. * PMC. What they're there for (Commons point of view). * Legal. How to not screw-up. Am I missing anything? Not sure if these would be in the committers manual or elsewhere, as I'm similarly not sure that all of the above should be part of the manual rather than for everyone to read. * How the sandbox works / how components get promoted. * The whole active / dormant / dead process. -- Martin Cooper Idea, if it's not obvious, is to bring together the various bits of information on wiki's, site and more importantly in people's heads. Stick it in a more concrete form and tell people to go read it. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-swing : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-swing/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Sole output [commons-jelly-tags-swing-01122005.jar] identifier set to project name -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/target/test-reports -WARNING- No directory [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/target/test-reports] -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-swing/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-swing.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-swing (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 4 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/target/commons-jelly-tags-define-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/interaction/target/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/lang/dist/commons-lang-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:274) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:308) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:261) at org.apache.commons.jelly.JellyContext.getTagLibrary(JellyContext.java:432) at org.apache.maven.jelly.MavenJellyContext.getTagLibrary(MavenJellyContext.java:171) at org.apache.commons.jelly.parser.XMLParser.createTag(XMLParser.java:1033) at org.apache.commons.jelly.parser.XMLParser.startElement(XMLParser.java:647) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.startElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractXMLDocumentParser.emptyElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DTDConfiguration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source) at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-swing : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-swing/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Sole output [commons-jelly-tags-swing-01122005.jar] identifier set to project name -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/target/test-reports -WARNING- No directory [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing/target/test-reports] -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-swing/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-swing.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-swing (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 4 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/swing] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/target/commons-jelly-tags-define-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/interaction/target/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/lang/dist/commons-lang-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:274) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:308) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:261) at org.apache.commons.jelly.JellyContext.getTagLibrary(JellyContext.java:432) at org.apache.maven.jelly.MavenJellyContext.getTagLibrary(MavenJellyContext.java:171) at org.apache.commons.jelly.parser.XMLParser.createTag(XMLParser.java:1033) at org.apache.commons.jelly.parser.XMLParser.startElement(XMLParser.java:647) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.startElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractXMLDocumentParser.emptyElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DTDConfiguration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source) at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-define-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-define-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-define-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-define-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-define-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 14 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/dynabean/target/commons-jelly-tags-dynabean-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/commons-jelly-tags-xml-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.unionExpr(XPathReader.java:1129) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.unaryExpr(XPathReader.java:1117) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.multiplicativeExpr(XPathReader.java:1039) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.additiveExpr(XPathReader.java:982) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.relationalExpr(XPathReader.java:902) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.equalityExpr(XPathReader.java:850) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.andExpr(XPathReader.java:826) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.orExpr(XPathReader.java:804) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.expr(XPathReader.java:797) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.parse(XPathReader.java:105) [junit] at org.jaxen.BaseXPath.init(BaseXPath.java:126) [junit] at org.jaxen.BaseXPath.init(BaseXPath.java:152) [junit] at org.jaxen.dom4j.Dom4jXPath.init(Dom4jXPath.java:101) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.expression.xpath.XPathExpression.evaluate(XPathExpression.java:78) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.expression.ExpressionSupport.evaluateRecurse(ExpressionSupport.java:61) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:256) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127) [junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) [junit] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-define-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-define-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-define-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-define-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-define-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 14 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/define] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/dynabean/target/commons-jelly-tags-dynabean-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/commons-jelly-tags-xml-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.unionExpr(XPathReader.java:1129) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.unaryExpr(XPathReader.java:1117) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.multiplicativeExpr(XPathReader.java:1039) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.additiveExpr(XPathReader.java:982) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.relationalExpr(XPathReader.java:902) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.equalityExpr(XPathReader.java:850) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.andExpr(XPathReader.java:826) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.orExpr(XPathReader.java:804) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.expr(XPathReader.java:797) [junit] at org.jaxen.saxpath.base.XPathReader.parse(XPathReader.java:105) [junit] at org.jaxen.BaseXPath.init(BaseXPath.java:126) [junit] at org.jaxen.BaseXPath.init(BaseXPath.java:152) [junit] at org.jaxen.dom4j.Dom4jXPath.init(Dom4jXPath.java:101) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.expression.xpath.XPathExpression.evaluate(XPathExpression.java:78) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.expression.ExpressionSupport.evaluateRecurse(ExpressionSupport.java:61) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:256) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127) [junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) [junit] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on ant exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.ant-optional. -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 17 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/ant/target/commons-jelly-tags-ant-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/commons-jelly-tags-xml-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.xml.ExprTag.doTag(ExprTag.java:46) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:186) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.getBodyText(TagSupport.java:234) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.SetTag.doTag(SetTag.java:90) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:186) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.jsl.TemplateTag$1.run(TemplateTag.java:160) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Mode.fireRule(Mode.java:58) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Mode.applyTemplates(Mode.java:79) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.RuleManager$1.run(RuleManager.java:171) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Mode.fireRule(Mode.java:58) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Stylesheet.run(Stylesheet.java:102) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Stylesheet.run(Stylesheet.java:91) [junit] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Dependency on ant exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.ant-optional. -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -WARNING- Overriding Maven properties: [/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/build.properties] -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/target/test-reports The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 17 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/ant/target/commons-jelly-tags-ant-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/commons-jelly-tags-xml-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar - [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.xml.ExprTag.doTag(ExprTag.java:46) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:186) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.getBodyText(TagSupport.java:234) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.SetTag.doTag(SetTag.java:90) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:186) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.jsl.TemplateTag$1.run(TemplateTag.java:160) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Mode.fireRule(Mode.java:58) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Mode.applyTemplates(Mode.java:79) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.RuleManager$1.run(RuleManager.java:171) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Mode.fireRule(Mode.java:58) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Stylesheet.run(Stylesheet.java:102) [junit] at org.dom4j.rule.Stylesheet.run(Stylesheet.java:91) [junit] at
Re: [all] Commons Manual
On 12/1/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's imagine a manual existed for Commons committers. It would assume that a committer understands the ASF, ie) they've read the Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too). What would the chapters be? Initial list: * Short description of Commons/Introduction. * Communication. How to use the mailing lists. Voting. * Subversion information. How to check code out. * Maven information. How to build. * Site information. How to generate the site. How to upload your changes. * Releasing. How to release. * PMC. What they're there for (Commons point of view). * Legal. How to not screw-up. Am I missing anything? Not sure if these would be in the committers manual or elsewhere, as I'm similarly not sure that all of the above should be part of the manual rather than for everyone to read. * How the sandbox works / how components get promoted. * The whole active / dormant / dead process. Definitely good chapters. They are concepts that currently only apply to Commons, not to all of the ASF. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-html : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-html/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Sole output [commons-jelly-tags-html-01122005.jar] identifier set to project name -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-reports -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-html/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-html.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-html (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 14 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/target/commons-jelly-tags-jsl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/commons-jelly-tags-xml-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/nekohtml-0.9.5/nekohtml.jar - [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testLowerCase(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:40:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:40:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertTag.doTag(AssertTag.java:54) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testMixedCase(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:47:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:47:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - commons-jelly-tags-html : Commons Jelly Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-html/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Sole output [commons-jelly-tags-html-01122005.jar] identifier set to project name -DEBUG- Dependency on xml-xerces exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xerces. -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/project.properties -INFO- Project Reports in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-reports -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-jelly/commons-jelly-tags-html/gump_work/build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-html.html Work Name: build_commons-jelly_commons-jelly-tags-html (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 14 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html] CLASSPATH: /opt/jdk1.4/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils-core.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/cli/target/commons-cli-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/target/commons-jelly-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/target/commons-jelly-tags-jsl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/junit/target/commons-jelly-tags-junit-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/log/target/commons-jelly-tags-log-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/xml/target/commons-jelly-tags-xml-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/jexl/dist/commons-jexl-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api-01122005.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dom4j/build/dom4j.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/jaxen-1.1-beta-6/jaxen-1.1-beta-6.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/nekohtml-0.9.5/nekohtml.jar - [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testLowerCase(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:40:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:40:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.AssertTag.doTag(AssertTag.java:54) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:262) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95) [junit] at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1.runTest(CaseTag.java:59) [junit] [junit] [junit] Testcase: testMixedCase(org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.junit.CaseTag$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:47:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] org.apache.commons.jelly.MissingAttributeException: file:/x1/gump/public/workspace/commons-jelly/jelly-tags/html/target/test-classes/org/apache/commons/jelly/html/suite.jelly:47:48: test:assert You must define an attribute called 'test' for this tag. [junit] at
svn commit: r351602 - /jakarta/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/native/dso-dyld.c
Author: billbarker Date: Thu Dec 1 21:28:57 2005 New Revision: 351602 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351602view=rev Log: Hide the defs in stdbool.h under Mac. What brain-dead system includes junk like stdbool.h in the system header files? Fix for Bug #37447 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/native/dso-dyld.c Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/native/dso-dyld.c URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/native/dso-dyld.c?rev=351602r1=351601r2=351602view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/native/dso-dyld.c (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/native/dso-dyld.c Thu Dec 1 21:28:57 2005 @@ -20,6 +20,14 @@ #include mach-o/dyld.h +#ifdef __bool_true_false_are_defined +/* We define these differently than stdbool.h, so ignore the defs there */ +#undef bool +#undef true +#undef false +#endif + + /* Print an error message and abort all if a specified symbol wasn't found */ static void nosymbol(const char *s) { log_error(Cannot find symbol '%s' in library,s); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37447] - [daemon] jsvc does not build under 10.4.3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-02 06:32 --- I choose the opposite of your suggestion (e.g. ignore the settings from stdbool.h), but the result should be the same. If you get commons-daemon from trunk, you should be able to compile it on Mac without problems. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
Steve Cohen wrote: The thread Robert refers to has the subject Re: Does Apache have agreement to use other open source code outside of Apache? Has this something to do with an email from IBM in the last few days asking me if I am really was the creator of my contributions? Not that I made any mistake (I guess this was a mail to all commons-net developers), but I was a little bit irritated. Which is just as well. Because I have another issue. I don't understand the maven.compile.target property. Working from the net 1.4.0 tag, I change only project.properties to set maven.compile.target back to 1.2. Since there are a few places in 1.4.0 that depend on jdk 1.4, my expectation was that changing the project properties would cause the compile to break on those places. But it did not. It compiled successfully. The jdk1.4 compiler creates a class file suitable to run under an earlier JVM, this works as long as you do not use any new api. Then you'll get the NoSuchMethod Exception. This is the reason why we should use the least possible compiler and not only the target attribute. You didnt notice if you use any new api call at compile time. --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Committer cleanup
Henri Yandell wrote: I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6 months. 1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this project into account. A commiter active in the mailinglist is also a valuable part of a project and for the community. --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
On 12/2/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: The thread Robert refers to has the subject Re: Does Apache have agreement to use other open source code outside of Apache? Has this something to do with an email from IBM in the last few days asking me if I am really was the creator of my contributions? Not that I made any mistake (I guess this was a mail to all commons-net developers), but I was a little bit irritated. Probably. The commons-net copyright question was raised by an IBM email. If you do get those questions, please make sure they get copied to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The PMC should be the one responsible for answering questions about our code. Which is just as well. Because I have another issue. I don't understand the maven.compile.target property. Working from the net 1.4.0 tag, I change only project.properties to set maven.compile.target back to 1.2. Since there are a few places in 1.4.0 that depend on jdk 1.4, my expectation was that changing the project properties would cause the compile to break on those places. But it did not. It compiled successfully. The jdk1.4 compiler creates a class file suitable to run under an earlier JVM, this works as long as you do not use any new api. Then you'll get the NoSuchMethod Exception. This is the reason why we should use the least possible compiler and not only the target attribute. You didnt notice if you use any new api call at compile time. --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George Bernard Shaw - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
Hi! Any active committer should be on the PMC, unless they've only recently joined, so if you're active kick away and one of us will gladly nominate you. I wasnt aware that we (the committers) are allowed to be on the PMC list. I thought it need some time until a committer can become a PMC. Though, if possible I would like to join the mailinglist! --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[email] Using Templates for Mail Message
Hi, A very common method which I use for setting messages is by loading from an external file and replace some tokens with desired values. For e.g. -- AUTO-GENERATED MESSAGE FOLLOWS. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. --- Hello, You have been successfully registered. Login Detail login :@LOGIN@ pwd :@PWD@ - After reading this file, I replace @LOGIN@ and @PWD@ with the appropriate values and then send the contents. I was wondering whether such feature could be incorporated in API. There could be a class something like the following public class Template{ private String template; public Template(InputStream in){ template=loadTemplate(in); } public String replaceTokens(Map map){ //Replace all string within @@ return template; } } May be have a more sophisticated implementation for various data sources. Please share your views. Thanks Herak - Yahoo! Personals Let fate take it's course directly to your email. See who's waiting for you Yahoo! Personals
Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?
Me too, if possible. I havent received the CC: yet, so if someone who is on the PMC can forward a copy of the email to me, I would appreciate it. Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! Any active committer should be on the PMC, unless they've only recently joined, so if you're active kick away and one of us will gladly nominate you. I wasnt aware that we (the committers) are allowed to be on the PMC list. I thought it need some time until a committer can become a PMC. Though, if possible I would like to join the mailinglist! --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]