Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit
On 7/15/2013 10:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: [...] And my translation: I have deleted two OO-Config Folder in AppData\Roaming which I missed in my first attempt. - AppData\Roaming\3 of the previously deinstalled AOO341 - AppData\Roaming\4 of the parallel installed AOO400-Snapshots. - And the installation folders in \Program File(x86) I had deinstalled/deleted AOO341 and AOO400-Snapshot already before RC-Installation. I assume, that an Average Joe user has not installed a snapshot previously and therefore no config folder \4 exists. Up to now I have always installed the full versions over my old versions, and never got problems (or never notice some.) I'll do some testing tonight. I have two clean VM images, for Windows 8 32-bit and Windows 7 64-bit, that I can install the AOO 4.0 RC on. Since these are fresh images they don't have any residual files from previous AOO installs. I was not able to get a crash with AOO 4.0 RC on Windows 7 64-bit or Windows 8 32-bit. I tested Writer in a document with a mix of objects and formats, doing a lot of editing, formatting, copy/paste and delete operations, including formatting via the Sidepanel. This was the en-US version. So this doesn't look like a shallow crash that everyone will see. But it would be good to narrow it down.For example, has anyone seen it on a non-German version? Is that a clue? Is a particular object involved? I tried also with images, drawings, lists, tables, etc. Was anything more exotic involved? While I was a QA engineer for OpenOffice at Sun, we had: ++ Crashes that were limited to a particular language ++ Crashes that happened only (exactly) once with every installation. ++ Crashes that happened only after the first start of an installation ++ Of course, crashes that were limited to a particular language ++ ... Now imagine even a combination of two or more of those preconditions and you may prefer looking for a needle in a haystack. Virtualbox for example has the great feature of taking snapshots. That should be extremely useful to be able to rollback preconditions. Peter Mine was a clean new install, not an update. But it is hard to imagine a scenario where copy or delete operations behave differently depending on whether the install was an update or not. -Rob -Rob Kind regards Regina Kind regards Regina - Dennis -Original Message- From: Max Merbald [mailto:max.merb...@gmx.de] Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 11:01 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Regina Henschel Subject: Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit Hi Regina, I reported the same thing on June 22, but I couldn't reproduce it the next day. That was not the RC of course but build 9701. I have no idea what caused it. It doesn't happen right now either, I just tried again. Max Am 14.07.2013 19:36, schrieb Regina Henschel: Hi all, there is a mail on the German list, which describes a crash when mark something in Writer and then copy it. (Which would be a show-stopper.) The poster has deinstalled OOo3.4.1 and all previous snapshots and then installed the RC. OS is Windows 8, 64 bit. Can someone test it with this conditions? Unfortunately I haven't got Windows 8. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
On 7/14/13 10:05 AM, Michal Hriň wrote: Dňa Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:42:03 +0200 Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com napísal: Am Sonntag, 14. Juli 2013 um 06:35 schrieb imacat: On 2013/07/13 20:52, Ariel Constenla-Haile said: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacatima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote: Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed something on the Traditional Chinese version? UI translation is not complete: https://translate.apache.org/zh_TW/aoo40/ I can see that 97% is translated. Not that bad. Do we have an agreement that we need 100% for a release? http://markmail.org/message/pxgvjuw2j3ukqsom Concerns should have been risen at that time, it was discussed on the mailing list, and properly tagged (if it does not happen on the mailing list...). I'm asking because I really don't know it and in former OOo times we have done releases for languages with at least 80% translated UI [1]. So, maybe a change that I haven't seen in the last weeks. For this particular case, the translation of the main 4.0.0 feature is incomplete https://translate.apache.org/zh_TW/aoo40/svx/source/sidebar/ How serious would it be to release this translation in such a state? The same applies to other languages released in 3.4.* but not in this 4.0.0 RC. Hmm... I see the problem with side bar translation. And I'm very sorry that I was in my research paper and did not notice the previous discussion. However, there are several issues of concern: 1. I am going to give a talk in our largest local open source conference (COSCUP 2013, http://coscup.org/) on 8/3, and plan to announce OpenOffice 4.0. It is the first talk after the key notes. It would be very embarrassing to announce it without a local version released. 2. There would be a large-scale deployment around August or September (6000-7000) in a government department, and they are planning to join our development force in order to fix some Chinese problems in governmental use. If OpenOffice 4.0 Traditional Chinese version is not available at that time, we could only give them 3.4.1, which their development could not be based on. I've asked our local community to help the translation in urgent. If we can finish the Traditional Chinese sidebar translation with certain amount, could it be OK to release it? let translate the UI First and then we can figure out what's possible. Hopefully some other languages can continue the translation as well and we can think about a language only release where I am a big fan of to support local communities. But in general we have discussed it and I would have not released German (my mother language) if the UI translation would have been not complete. Just to make sure that we need active local communities who participate in the project or at least in the translation part. Hi Juergen, Yust today German translation is done. I know this, it was an example only. If not complete I would not have released it I and French community made some changes in translations. Did you think about rebuilding some (sk, fr, de maybe cn) binaries ? no, the whole process takes time and these of course useful improvements will go in the next version. I recommend to create a new issue for translation updates. Otherwise it is hard to track that something has changed. Juergen - Michal Hriň It would be even better if the help would be translated as well but that is a much higher burden and we are more flexible here. Juergen Regards -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[DISCUSS] [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
On 7/14/13 11:31 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: -1 We can't release a version with a potential crash in selection copy/paste on windows 64 bit versions. it is your right to vote as you want and what your personal opinion is. But as I mentioned earlier it would help us if concerns are more detailed and more qualified that we can take it serious. I can only guess that you mean the problem regarding Windows 8 64 bit and here several people tried to reproduce the issue but nobody was able to reproduce. For me there is no copy/paste problem at the moment with the RC. Juergen Am 12.07.13 11:11, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] New localization requirements policy needed for releases
On 14/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote: In this specific case, for AOO 4.0, I'm suggesting we release any additional languages that are 100% on September 16th. This is similar to what we did for AOO 3.4.1. After that date I think we then wait for AOO 4.1. Releasing a new language should be rather easy and repeatable, so it is something that we can do once a month (but I can understand that August may be problematic due to holidays). Ideally, we should have a monthly update, say around mid-month, where we: 1) Release new languages (of course, based on the same code revision as 4.0, exactly as done for 3.4.1) that have reached 100% UI translation. 2) Formally unrelated to #1, we make (unreleased) dev snapshots available of languages that have UI at 75-99%. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] New localization requirements policy needed for releases
On 7/15/13 9:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 14/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote: In this specific case, for AOO 4.0, I'm suggesting we release any additional languages that are 100% on September 16th. This is similar to what we did for AOO 3.4.1. After that date I think we then wait for AOO 4.1. Releasing a new language should be rather easy and repeatable, so it is something that we can do once a month (but I can understand that August may be problematic due to holidays). Ideally, we should have a monthly update, say around mid-month, where we: 1) Release new languages (of course, based on the same code revision as 4.0, exactly as done for 3.4.1) that have reached 100% UI translation. 2) Formally unrelated to #1, we make (unreleased) dev snapshots available of languages that have UI at 75-99%. People should work on a reliable build bot infra structure that can provide builds for all major platforms (Linux, Windows, MacOS). And then we can configure more languages on demand. I will be not the manual build bot ;-) Proposing is fine but please think also about the realization. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] New localization requirements policy needed for releases
On 15.07.2013 09:19, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 7/15/13 9:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 14/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote: In this specific case, for AOO 4.0, I'm suggesting we release any additional languages that are 100% on September 16th. This is similar to what we did for AOO 3.4.1. After that date I think we then wait for AOO 4.1. Releasing a new language should be rather easy and repeatable, so it is something that we can do once a month (but I can understand that August may be problematic due to holidays). Ideally, we should have a monthly update, say around mid-month, where we: 1) Release new languages (of course, based on the same code revision as 4.0, exactly as done for 3.4.1) that have reached 100% UI translation. 2) Formally unrelated to #1, we make (unreleased) dev snapshots available of languages that have UI at 75-99%. People should work on a reliable build bot infra structure that can provide builds for all major platforms (Linux, Windows, MacOS). And then we can configure more languages on demand. Currently the Windows buildbot of the SNAPSHOT tag does a weekly full build of all languages: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#winsnap Is any fully translated language missing from that list? Should semi-translated languages be built too? Yes, we should build all languages on all other platforms too. But we don't have a Mac buildbot yet and until the build baseline is increased to XCode4 that will probably have to stay so. On the Linux64 things look much better but disk space on that buildbot used to be a problem. The Linux32 buildbot needs to be set up, but from a localization perspective its build result it is indistinguishable from the Linux64 build. Also FreeBSD buildbot would be possible, but AFAIK Maho is working on a tinderbox build there, so setting up a buildbot would probably be wasted work. Also getting buildbots for OS/2 or Solaris X86 or Sparc just for the localized snapshot builds is probably wasted work unless there is a number of translators that only test on these platforms. Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit
On 14.07.2013 22:34, Max Merbald wrote: Hello Dennis, it's as you said, you select a part in the text and then you right-click it and click copy, i. e. in my case it happened when I was trying to copy by mouse. But as I said it happened several weeks ago and it hasn't happened again since. My OS is Win8 64 bit too. This may very well have been caused by a regression bug I have introduced (and later fixed). It was usually triggered by copying or removing selected text in Writer. The issues are 121479 (the fix for this bug introduced the regression) and 122682 (fix for it, checked in on July 8th): https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121479 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122682 And just to be clear, this has been fixed and is not in the release. -Andre Max Am 14.07.2013 22:14, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: I don't quite understand what this means: mark something in Writer and then copy it. Is this about selecting something in Writer and copying it to the clip-board? Or is there some other action that reproduces this situation. I can test this in Windows 8 x64. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Max Merbald [mailto:max.merb...@gmx.de] Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 11:01 AM To:dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Regina Henschel Subject: Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit Hi Regina, I reported the same thing on June 22, but I couldn't reproduce it the next day. That was not the RC of course but build 9701. I have no idea what caused it. It doesn't happen right now either, I just tried again. Max Am 14.07.2013 19:36, schrieb Regina Henschel: Hi all, there is a mail on the German list, which describes a crash when mark something in Writer and then copy it. (Which would be a show-stopper.) The poster has deinstalled OOo3.4.1 and all previous snapshots and then installed the RC. OS is Windows 8, 64 bit. Can someone test it with this conditions? Unfortunately I haven't got Windows 8. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Mac release
Hi, Issue 122732 [1]reminded me of the problem on Mac where the system complains that the AOO installation packaged does not come from the Apple app store. As Ariel pointed out, this is covered in the release notes for AOO 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. I am not sure that that many users would find the note in the release notes, follow the link to the solution and fix it. I wonder if it would be a good idea to explain this at a more visible place, like the download button for the Mac version. Does anybody know if that is possible? -Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122732 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit
On 15.07.2013 10:09, Andre Fischer wrote: On 14.07.2013 22:34, Max Merbald wrote: Hello Dennis, it's as you said, you select a part in the text and then you right-click it and click copy, i. e. in my case it happened when I was trying to copy by mouse. But as I said it happened several weeks ago and it hasn't happened again since. My OS is Win8 64 bit too. This may very well have been caused by a regression bug I have introduced (and later fixed). It was usually triggered by copying or removing selected text in Writer. The issues are 121479 (the fix for this bug introduced the regression) and 122682 (fix for it, checked in on July 8th): https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121479 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122682 And just to be clear, this has been fixed and is not in the release. OK, that was not very clear :-) The bug *fix* is in the release and therefore the bug is not. -Andre Max Am 14.07.2013 22:14, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: I don't quite understand what this means: mark something in Writer and then copy it. Is this about selecting something in Writer and copying it to the clip-board? Or is there some other action that reproduces this situation. I can test this in Windows 8 x64. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Max Merbald [mailto:max.merb...@gmx.de] Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 11:01 AM To:dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Regina Henschel Subject: Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit Hi Regina, I reported the same thing on June 22, but I couldn't reproduce it the next day. That was not the RC of course but build 9701. I have no idea what caused it. It doesn't happen right now either, I just tried again. Max Am 14.07.2013 19:36, schrieb Regina Henschel: Hi all, there is a mail on the German list, which describes a crash when mark something in Writer and then copy it. (Which would be a show-stopper.) The poster has deinstalled OOo3.4.1 and all previous snapshots and then installed the RC. OS is Windows 8, 64 bit. Can someone test it with this conditions? Unfortunately I haven't got Windows 8. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
On 12/07/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. ... [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 Andrea - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Hi, Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. [..] Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... There a some errors in the German translations (already fixed on Pootle), but not so severe to not release German version. Nobody could reproduce the crash. So all together my vote: +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.0.0_release_blocker denied: [Bug 122733] Opening Hybrid PDF document fails, brings up ASCII filter options dialog
j...@apache.org has denied Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de's request for 4.0.0_release_blocker: Bug 122733: Opening Hybrid PDF document fails, brings up ASCII filter options dialog https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122733 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org no showstopper, but a feature request to make the hybrid PDF reading independent of the PDF import extensions - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
No release blocking issues found according to my testing in Windows 7. Feel a little pity that 2 of my opened defects not fixed in 4.0. But I believe it is more important to deliver 4.0 with so many valuable features ASAP. And we can keep continuous delivery to have more enhancement step by step after 4.0. So: +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 - Shenfeng (Simon) 2013/7/12 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Hi, I downloaded the source release candidate, verified the MD5 and SHA256 checksums, and built it on Windows 7. All without problems. Therefore: +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 Regards, Andre - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.0.0_release_blocker denied: [Bug 121754] Build HSQLDB with JDK 7
j...@apache.org has denied 4.0.0_release_blocker: Bug 121754: Build HSQLDB with JDK 7 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121754 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org remove showstopper request because we currently build our release not with Java 7 For 4.1 I propose to switch completely to Java 7 and change our build dependencies accordingly. But for now this is no stopper issue for me. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 for releasing this RC as AOO 4.0 I have made many tests on my own, including a complete build of the src release under MacOS and verifying the signature etc. We can always do better and can fix more bugs but the overall situation will not change. It will be always the same. Please continue to verify translations and improve it, it's not wasted time. These improvements will go in the next release. The same for the new file type and application icons. We should continue the good work and should integrate it asap on trunk. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Is this something special for AOO that we need to get permission from Infra to upload? Is this because of the size of the release? -Rob Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
As Juergen pointed out, the AOO 4.0 release vote has successfully completed. The release is approved. However, please *do not* go out and start announcing the release yet. We need to coordinate a few final steps before this is done, including: 1. Provisioning the files to the Apache and SourceForge distribution directories 2. Waiting for the files to replicate within the mirror network (as much as 24 hours) 3. Verify download scripts against actual AOO 4.0 files. 4. Complete the release notes. Convert them to HTML. Give some time for translations. 5. Prepare announcement emails and blog post and webpage. The above should all be done before we announce. After we announce, we have a few other items to do: 5. Update logos on social media sites 6. Enable update notification server 7. Follow up blog post +1 week. I'd like to recommend that we aim for a noon UTC announcement on Wednesday, if possible. That would mean that items 1-5 are complete then. Release notes translations can roll in over time if needed. But we should have the English Release Notes and the other items ready to go. Does this make sense? Am I missing anything? Anyone think that Wed. is not possible? It is better not to make an important announcement at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) since that tends to mute the press coverage. We should use the Release Dashboard to coordinate the status of these items: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/4.0+Release+Dashboard Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
On 7/15/13 4:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Is this something special for AOO that we need to get permission from Infra to upload? Is this because of the size of the release? They wanted to be informed that is at least what I learned from earlier releases. And yes I believe it is the amount of 22 GB. I informed infra on Friday that we are planning a release and that the vote will be finished today. We will see. Juergen -Rob Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Sidebar meta issue is closed
Hi, the development of the sidebar is finished and the vote for our release is over. Therefore I have closed the sidebar meta issue: bug 121420 now has status resolved/fixed. I would like to thank everybody who has helped to make this happen. A lot of people have contributed including, but not limited to, UX design, programming, testing, translation, documentation and discussion (providing new ideas). I think that we did a great job. Andre - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Possible show stopper on Windows 8, please verify
I just got my testlink set up, and received a couple test cases 7 hours ago. The first test I went to do I couldn't complete because it caused what I think is a show stopper for windows 8 (if its reproducible) Can anyone copy or cut contents to their system clipboard in windows 8 using the 4.0.0 RC snapshot? It causes an immediate crash every time for me. Here is the bug I opened, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122752 Samer
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
2013/7/14 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 good job!! +1 well said - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi
Re: autocorrect macro?
From: The weird writer [mailto:weirdwriter9...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:41 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: autocorrect macro? that Macro does not work with windows. :( I do not know why, because the macro is for all operating systems under which OO runs suitable (e.g. Windows, Linux, MacOS). *What error message occurs?* Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Possible show stopper on Windows 8, please verify
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Samer Mansour samer...@gmail.com wrote: I just got my testlink set up, and received a couple test cases 7 hours ago. The first test I went to do I couldn't complete because it caused what I think is a show stopper for windows 8 (if its reproducible) Can anyone copy or cut contents to their system clipboard in windows 8 using the 4.0.0 RC snapshot? It causes an immediate crash every time for me. There was some discussion of this on another thread. Someone reported a clipboard crash on Windows 8 with an earlier snapshot (not the RC) but was not able to reproduce it. I tried yesterday on a clean Windows 8 install and could not get a crash, copying, pasting, etc., content. But you are saying it is cut not copy. I can try that. Also, are you running 32-bit or 64-bit Windows 8? -Rob Here is the bug I opened, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122752 Samer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac release
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Issue 122732 [1]reminded me of the problem on Mac where the system complains that the AOO installation packaged does not come from the Apple app store. As Ariel pointed out, this is covered in the release notes for AOO 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. We should add this again to Release Notes for 4.0.0 and Install Guide. I am not sure that that many users would find the note in the release notes, follow the link to the solution and fix it. I wonder if it would be a good idea to explain this at a more visible place, like the download button for the Mac version. Does anybody know if that is possible? I'm not sure about this one. This happens as soon as correct download is identified by the Download page? -Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122732https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122732 --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi
Re: Possible show stopper on Windows 8, please verify
I logged my comments in the bug, I searched the db before I opened a new bug sorry if its a duplicate. It is windows 8 64-bit. Crashes on copy and cut. Paste seems to not be affected. The four steps Rob gave in the bug are the minimum required steps to reproduce. On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Samer Mansour samer...@gmail.com wrote: I just got my testlink set up, and received a couple test cases 7 hours ago. The first test I went to do I couldn't complete because it caused what I think is a show stopper for windows 8 (if its reproducible) Can anyone copy or cut contents to their system clipboard in windows 8 using the 4.0.0 RC snapshot? It causes an immediate crash every time for me. There was some discussion of this on another thread. Someone reported a clipboard crash on Windows 8 with an earlier snapshot (not the RC) but was not able to reproduce it. I tried yesterday on a clean Windows 8 install and could not get a crash, copying, pasting, etc., content. But you are saying it is cut not copy. I can try that. Also, are you running 32-bit or 64-bit Windows 8? -Rob Here is the bug I opened, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122752 Samer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[Bug 122753]Pictures gets corrupted after rotation on AOO 4.0
A forum user found a problem, not present on 3.4.1, with the release candidate on Impress. Investigating a bit I reproduced it on Draw too: pictures get corrupted when rotating them. I did not find any report describing the problem, so I filled this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122753 It seems quite serious. What do you think? Regards Ricardo
Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit
I have opened a new bug, with the version from about in the comments, please let me know if this is still the same bug. I did a upgrade from 3.4.1 to 4.0.0. Hiding the side panel did not affect outcome. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122752 On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote: On 15.07.2013 10:09, Andre Fischer wrote: On 14.07.2013 22:34, Max Merbald wrote: Hello Dennis, it's as you said, you select a part in the text and then you right-click it and click copy, i. e. in my case it happened when I was trying to copy by mouse. But as I said it happened several weeks ago and it hasn't happened again since. My OS is Win8 64 bit too. This may very well have been caused by a regression bug I have introduced (and later fixed). It was usually triggered by copying or removing selected text in Writer. The issues are 121479 (the fix for this bug introduced the regression) and 122682 (fix for it, checked in on July 8th): https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=121479https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121479 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122682https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122682 And just to be clear, this has been fixed and is not in the release. OK, that was not very clear :-) The bug *fix* is in the release and therefore the bug is not. -Andre Max Am 14.07.2013 22:14, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: I don't quite understand what this means: mark something in Writer and then copy it. Is this about selecting something in Writer and copying it to the clip-board? Or is there some other action that reproduces this situation. I can test this in Windows 8 x64. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Max Merbald [mailto:max.merb...@gmx.de] Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 11:01 AM To:dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Regina Henschel Subject: Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit Hi Regina, I reported the same thing on June 22, but I couldn't reproduce it the next day. That was not the RC of course but build 9701. I have no idea what caused it. It doesn't happen right now either, I just tried again. Max Am 14.07.2013 19:36, schrieb Regina Henschel: Hi all, there is a mail on the German list, which describes a crash when mark something in Writer and then copy it. (Which would be a show-stopper.) The poster has deinstalled OOo3.4.1 and all previous snapshots and then installed the RC. OS is Windows 8, 64 bit. Can someone test it with this conditions? Unfortunately I haven't got Windows 8. Kind regards Regina --**--** - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscribe@**openoffice.apache.orge-mail%3adev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-help@openoffice.**apache.orge-mail%3adev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --**--** - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscribe@**openoffice.apache.orge-mail%3adev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-help@openoffice.**apache.orge-mail%3adev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --**--** - To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscribe@**openoffice.apache.orge-mail%3adev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:dev-help@openoffice.**apache.orge-mail%3adev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --**--** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Bug 122753]Pictures gets corrupted after rotation on AOO 4.0
2013.07.15. 16:55 keltezéssel, Ricardo Berlasso írta: A forum user found a problem, not present on 3.4.1, with the release candidate on Impress. Investigating a bit I reproduced it on Draw too: pictures get corrupted when rotating them. I did not find any report describing the problem, so I filled this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122753 Not attached the example file, which caused the problem. Zoltan It seems quite serious. What do you think? Regards Ricardo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Bug 122753]Pictures gets corrupted after rotation on AOO 4.0
2013/7/15 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu 2013.07.15. 16:55 keltezéssel, Ricardo Berlasso írta: A forum user found a problem, not present on 3.4.1, with the release candidate on Impress. Investigating a bit I reproduced it on Draw too: pictures get corrupted when rotating them. I did not find any report describing the problem, so I filled this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122753https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122753 Not attached the example file, which caused the problem. Zoltan Sorry, bugzilla stripped the file without warning when I sent the report... I tried again and it seems too large so I uploaded it here: http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/rotation.odg I added the link on the report. Regards Ricardo It seems quite serious. What do you think? Regards Ricardo --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac release
Am 07/15/2013 10:18 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer: Issue 122732 [1]reminded me of the problem on Mac where the system complains that the AOO installation packaged does not come from the Apple app store. As Ariel pointed out, this is covered in the release notes for AOO 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. I am not sure that that many users would find the note in the release notes, follow the link to the solution and fix it. I wonder if it would be a good idea to explain this at a more visible place, like the download button for the Mac version. Does anybody know if that is possible? -Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122732 It is possible. However I don't like to have an exception for users of platform X. This would make the index.html more unreadable than it is already. Therefore I've created a general text and link to the release notes (of course, it's still intermediate): http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html 1) Directly in the main green box. 2) In a second sub-green box. Please have a look and tell what you think. IMHO 1) is better. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Bug 122753]Pictures gets corrupted after rotation on AOO 4.0
Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Berlasso schrieb: A forum user found a problem, not present on 3.4.1, with the release candidate on Impress. Investigating a bit I reproduced it on Draw too: pictures get corrupted when rotating them. I did not find any report describing the problem, so I filled this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122753 It seems quite serious. What do you think? That the Bitmap is not inserted is likely a problem with the cache. Set the value in Tools Options Memory to for example 12MB Memory per object. The bad display of the rotated jpg-picture might be a moire effect. Please zoom in and see, whether it remains. You might test to switch on/off anti-aliasing in addition. I do not see such effect on my screen. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Bug 122753]Pictures gets corrupted after rotation on AOO 4.0
2013/7/15 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Berlasso schrieb: A forum user found a problem, not present on 3.4.1, with the release candidate on Impress. Investigating a bit I reproduced it on Draw too: pictures get corrupted when rotating them. I did not find any report describing the problem, so I filled this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122753https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122753 It seems quite serious. What do you think? That the Bitmap is not inserted is likely a problem with the cache. Set the value in Tools Options Memory to for example 12MB Memory per object. The bad display of the rotated jpg-picture might be a moire effect. Please zoom in and see, whether it remains. You might test to switch on/off anti-aliasing in addition. I do not see such effect on my screen. It's not just a bad display: it is exported to pdf http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/rotation.pdf But I just see a weird behaviour: Reopening the document, rotation works without problems on the fox picture, but if I copy the fox picture → paste special as bitmap → get the empty box → rotation fails again on the original picture. Increasing the memory per object does not change this behaviour. Regards Ricardo Kind regards Regina --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: autocorrect macro?
when I try i get a weird error. extract faied 42 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac release
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/15/2013 10:18 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer: Issue 122732 [1]reminded me of the problem on Mac where the system complains that the AOO installation packaged does not come from the Apple app store. As Ariel pointed out, this is covered in the release notes for AOO 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. I am not sure that that many users would find the note in the release notes, follow the link to the solution and fix it. I wonder if it would be a good idea to explain this at a more visible place, like the download button for the Mac version. Does anybody know if that is possible? -Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122732https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122732 It is possible. However I don't like to have an exception for users of platform X. This would make the index.html more unreadable than it is already. Therefore I've created a general text and link to the release notes (of course, it's still intermediate): http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html 1) Directly in the main green box. 2) In a second sub-green box. Please have a look and tell what you think. IMHO 1) is better. Marcus 1) is better. maybe change wording to Click here for known installation issues I know this is going to the Release Notes page...but maybe we should focus on highlighting installation. I just edited Release Notes to duplicate the Mac OS X info in the Upgrading/Installing section. Left it in Known Issues as well. --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi
Re: Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
On 7/15/13 4:54 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/15/2013 04:11 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: As Juergen pointed out, the AOO 4.0 release vote has successfully completed. The release is approved. However, please *do not* go out and start announcing the release yet. We need to coordinate a few final steps before this is done, including: 1. Provisioning the files to the Apache and SourceForge distribution directories 2. Waiting for the files to replicate within the mirror network (as much as 24 hours) 3. Verify download scripts against actual AOO 4.0 files. 4. Complete the release notes. Convert them to HTML. Give some time for translations. 5. Prepare announcement emails and blog post and webpage. The above should all be done before we announce. After we announce, we have a few other items to do: 5. Update logos on social media sites 6. Enable update notification server 7. Follow up blog post +1 week. I'd like to recommend that we aim for a noon UTC announcement on Wednesday, if possible. That would mean that items 1-5 are complete then. Release notes translations can roll in over time if needed. But we should have the English Release Notes and the other items ready to go. When Juergen is allowed to upload the release until ~20:00 UTC today, then the files can be distributed around the mirrors and I should be able to update the DL websites tomorrow evening to be ready until Wednesday noon UTC. files are uploaded, see my reply in the RESULT thread... I put Roberto in cc Juergen For the moment it looks like as it could be possible. Marcus Does this make sense? Am I missing anything? Anyone think that Wed. is not possible? It is better not to make an important announcement at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) since that tends to mute the press coverage. We should use the Release Dashboard to coordinate the status of these items: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/4.0+Release+Dashboard Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: As Juergen pointed out, the AOO 4.0 release vote has successfully completed. The release is approved. However, please *do not* go out and start announcing the release yet. We need to coordinate a few final steps before this is done, including: 1. Provisioning the files to the Apache and SourceForge distribution directories 2. Waiting for the files to replicate within the mirror network (as much as 24 hours) 3. Verify download scripts against actual AOO 4.0 files. 4. Complete the release notes. Convert them to HTML. Give some time for translations. Does this mean we'll move English Release Notes to web as always? 5. Prepare announcement emails and blog post and webpage. The above should all be done before we announce. After we announce, we have a few other items to do: 5. Update logos on social media sites 6. Enable update notification server 7. Follow up blog post +1 week. I'd like to recommend that we aim for a noon UTC announcement on Wednesday, if possible. That would mean that items 1-5 are complete then. OK - a lot depends on uploads and mirror situation Release notes translations can roll in over time if needed. But we should have the English Release Notes and the other items ready to go. Does this make sense? Am I missing anything? Anyone think that Wed. is not possible? It is better not to make an important announcement at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) since that tends to mute the press coverage. We should use the Release Dashboard to coordinate the status of these items: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/4.0+Release+Dashboard Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi
Re: Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
Will the new distributor page be opened up in conjunction with the new release? Don
Re: Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: As Juergen pointed out, the AOO 4.0 release vote has successfully completed. The release is approved. However, please *do not* go out and start announcing the release yet. We need to coordinate a few final steps before this is done, including: 1. Provisioning the files to the Apache and SourceForge distribution directories 2. Waiting for the files to replicate within the mirror network (as much as 24 hours) 3. Verify download scripts against actual AOO 4.0 files. 4. Complete the release notes. Convert them to HTML. Give some time for translations. Does this mean we'll move English Release Notes to web as always? Personally, I think that is a pain in the ass to convert the wiki Release Notes to HTML. Remember, our goal has been to make the Release Notes nicer, with more graphics, etc. So this is going to make conversion more difficult. But if someone really wants to do that, then I have no objections. -Rob 5. Prepare announcement emails and blog post and webpage. The above should all be done before we announce. After we announce, we have a few other items to do: 5. Update logos on social media sites 6. Enable update notification server 7. Follow up blog post +1 week. I'd like to recommend that we aim for a noon UTC announcement on Wednesday, if possible. That would mean that items 1-5 are complete then. OK - a lot depends on uploads and mirror situation Release notes translations can roll in over time if needed. But we should have the English Release Notes and the other items ready to go. Does this make sense? Am I missing anything? Anyone think that Wed. is not possible? It is better not to make an important announcement at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) since that tends to mute the press coverage. We should use the Release Dashboard to coordinate the status of these items: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/4.0+Release+Dashboard Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: Will the new distributor page be opened up in conjunction with the new release? We're not ready on the CD distributor thing, if that is what you are referring to. But good reminder that this is still an open task. -Rob Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Am 07/15/2013 06:08 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. is this due to the size of the release? dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes I think this will lead to a different URL than I've used for testing. Let's see what this will mean for the DL websites. Seems it's the best to wait and see what will happen on SourceForge to continue any testing. A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt The binaries are in www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/... and also in www.apache.org/dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/ Any reason for this duplication? Marcus rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes. But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Ciao Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,
Re: [Bug 122753]Pictures gets corrupted after rotation on AOO 4.0
2013/7/15 Ricardo Berlasso rgb.m...@gmail.com 2013/7/15 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Berlasso schrieb: A forum user found a problem, not present on 3.4.1, with the release candidate on Impress. Investigating a bit I reproduced it on Draw too: pictures get corrupted when rotating them. I did not find any report describing the problem, so I filled this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122753https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122753 It seems quite serious. What do you think? That the Bitmap is not inserted is likely a problem with the cache. Set the value in Tools Options Memory to for example 12MB Memory per object. The bad display of the rotated jpg-picture might be a moire effect. Please zoom in and see, whether it remains. You might test to switch on/off anti-aliasing in addition. I do not see such effect on my screen. It's not just a bad display: it is exported to pdf http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/rotation.pdf But I just see a weird behaviour: Reopening the document, rotation works without problems on the fox picture, but if I copy the fox picture → paste special as bitmap → get the empty box → rotation fails again on the original picture. Increasing the memory per object does not change this behaviour. I added two new attachments to the issue, one an odg file with the corrupted image and its source, the other the pdf export. Regards Ricardo Regards Ricardo Kind regards Regina --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? Roberto dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: As Juergen pointed out, the AOO 4.0 release vote has successfully completed. The release is approved. However, please *do not* go out and start announcing the release yet. We need to coordinate a few final steps before this is done, including: 1. Provisioning the files to the Apache and SourceForge distribution directories 2. Waiting for the files to replicate within the mirror network (as much as 24 hours) 3. Verify download scripts against actual AOO 4.0 files. 4. Complete the release notes. Convert them to HTML. Give some time for translations. Does this mean we'll move English Release Notes to web as always? Personally, I think that is a pain in the ass to convert the wiki Release Notes to HTML. Remember, our goal has been to make the Release Notes nicer, with more graphics, etc. So this is going to make conversion more difficult. But if someone really wants to do that, then I have no objections. -Rob Given our past thread on this, I didn't know what the decision was. For now, we will link to the Community wiki area I guess, and deal with other issues on this matter later. 5. Prepare announcement emails and blog post and webpage. The above should all be done before we announce. After we announce, we have a few other items to do: 5. Update logos on social media sites 6. Enable update notification server 7. Follow up blog post +1 week. I'd like to recommend that we aim for a noon UTC announcement on Wednesday, if possible. That would mean that items 1-5 are complete then. OK - a lot depends on uploads and mirror situation Release notes translations can roll in over time if needed. But we should have the English Release Notes and the other items ready to go. Does this make sense? Am I missing anything? Anyone think that Wed. is not possible? It is better not to make an important announcement at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) since that tends to mute the press coverage. We should use the Release Dashboard to coordinate the status of these items: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/4.0+Release+Dashboard Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi
Re: Mac release
On 15.07.2013 18:08, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/15/2013 10:18 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer: Issue 122732 [1]reminded me of the problem on Mac where the system complains that the AOO installation packaged does not come from the Apple app store. As Ariel pointed out, this is covered in the release notes for AOO 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. I am not sure that that many users would find the note in the release notes, follow the link to the solution and fix it. I wonder if it would be a good idea to explain this at a more visible place, like the download button for the Mac version. Does anybody know if that is possible? -Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122732https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122732 It is possible. However I don't like to have an exception for users of platform X. This would make the index.html more unreadable than it is already. Therefore I've created a general text and link to the release notes (of course, it's still intermediate): http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html 1) Directly in the main green box. 2) In a second sub-green box. Please have a look and tell what you think. IMHO 1) is better. Marcus 1) is better. I like 1 better, too. But it still looks too prominent. We don't want to scare our users (when only a minority will run into this problem). Maybe an explanation in the release notes is enough. maybe change wording to Click here for known installation issues I know this is going to the Release Notes page...but maybe we should focus on highlighting installation. I just edited Release Notes to duplicate the Mac OS X info in the Upgrading/Installing section. Left it in Known Issues as well. Great thanks. --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC at noon on Monday, 15 July: 2013-07-15 12:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: Mac release
Am 07/15/2013 06:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/15/2013 10:18 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer: Issue 122732 [1]reminded me of the problem on Mac where the system complains that the AOO installation packaged does not come from the Apple app store. As Ariel pointed out, this is covered in the release notes for AOO 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. I am not sure that that many users would find the note in the release notes, follow the link to the solution and fix it. I wonder if it would be a good idea to explain this at a more visible place, like the download button for the Mac version. Does anybody know if that is possible? -Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122732https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122732 It is possible. However I don't like to have an exception for users of platform X. This would make the index.html more unreadable than it is already. Therefore I've created a general text and link to the release notes (of course, it's still intermediate): http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html 1) Directly in the main green box. 2) In a second sub-green box. Please have a look and tell what you think. IMHO 1) is better. Marcus 1) is better. maybe change wording to Click here for known installation issues Sure, the wording is always changeable. I know this is going to the Release Notes page...but maybe we should focus on highlighting installation. Actually I wanted to create a TOC for the release notes. However, it's still locked by Herbert or Andre. Then we will have the headlines as links and I can use the Kniwn Issues as jump label in the URL. I just edited Release Notes to duplicate the Mac OS X info in the Upgrading/Installing section. Left it in Known Issues as well. That's good. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Coordination on AOO 4.0 Release Announcement
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: As Juergen pointed out, the AOO 4.0 release vote has successfully completed. The release is approved. However, please *do not* go out and start announcing the release yet. We need to coordinate a few final steps before this is done, including: 1. Provisioning the files to the Apache and SourceForge distribution directories 2. Waiting for the files to replicate within the mirror network (as much as 24 hours) 3. Verify download scripts against actual AOO 4.0 files. 4. Complete the release notes. Convert them to HTML. Give some time for translations. Does this mean we'll move English Release Notes to web as always? Personally, I think that is a pain in the ass to convert the wiki Release Notes to HTML. Remember, our goal has been to make the Release Notes nicer, with more graphics, etc. So this is going to make conversion more difficult. But if someone really wants to do that, then I have no objections. -Rob Given our past thread on this, I didn't know what the decision was. My takeaway was there were concerns with having uncontrolled changes to the Release Notes. But if we like the wiki as a technology there are ways of handling this. For example, we could link to a specific revision of the wiki page from the download page. That allows us to be constant by default, but preserves flexibility to update it later if needed. -Rob For now, we will link to the Community wiki area I guess, and deal with other issues on this matter later. 5. Prepare announcement emails and blog post and webpage. The above should all be done before we announce. After we announce, we have a few other items to do: 5. Update logos on social media sites 6. Enable update notification server 7. Follow up blog post +1 week. I'd like to recommend that we aim for a noon UTC announcement on Wednesday, if possible. That would mean that items 1-5 are complete then. OK - a lot depends on uploads and mirror situation Release notes translations can roll in over time if needed. But we should have the English Release Notes and the other items ready to go. Does this make sense? Am I missing anything? Anyone think that Wed. is not possible? It is better not to make an important announcement at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) since that tends to mute the press coverage. We should use the Release Dashboard to coordinate the status of these items: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/4.0+Release+Dashboard Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten. -- Jon Bon Jovi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**files/4.0.0/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** files/4.0.0/binaries/de/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Ok, if we need to do that I need to know where can we rsync copy files from. Please communicate is ASAP because updating mirrors takes a lot. Thanks Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/**4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_external_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-**external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** AOO+4.0+Release+Noteshttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** Development+Snapshot+Builds#**DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-**AOOSnapshothttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related RAT scan for this RC can be
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
2013/7/15 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**files/4.0.0/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** files/4.0.0/binaries/de/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Ok, if we need to do that I need to know where can we rsync copy files from. Please communicate is ASAP because updating mirrors takes a lot. I ask that because the old location doesn't have 4.x (rsync.apache.org::apache-dist/incubator/ooo/files/) and we can't rsync files from there. Roberto Thanks Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/**4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_external_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-**external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** AOO+4.0+Release+Noteshttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Am 07/15/2013 07:44 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Roberto Galoppiniroberto.galopp...@gmail.com 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**files/4.0.0/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** files/4.0.0/binaries/de/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Ok, if we need to do that I need to know where can we rsync copy files from. Please communicate is ASAP because updating mirrors takes a lot. I ask that because the old location doesn't have 4.x (rsync.apache.org::apache-dist/incubator/ooo/files/) and we can't rsync files from there. a bit lower in this mail thread Juergen stated this: rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-**external I can imagine that this is the way to go. However, Juergen as Release Manager should have the last word. Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/**4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_external_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-**external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** AOO+4.0+Release+Noteshttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages)
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 07:44 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Roberto Galoppiniroberto.galoppini@**gmail.comroberto.galopp...@gmail.com 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** **files/4.0.0/https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**files/4.0.0/ https://**sourceforge.net/projects/**openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.** 0.0/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/ ) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** files/4.0.0/binaries/de/https**://sourceforge.net/projects/** openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.**0.0/binaries/de/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Ok, if we need to do that I need to know where can we rsync copy files from. Please communicate is ASAP because updating mirrors takes a lot. I ask that because the old location doesn't have 4.x (rsync.apache.org::apache-**dist/incubator/ooo/files/) and we can't rsync files from there. a bit lower in this mail thread Juergen stated this: rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external We get this error: $ rsync rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external . @ERROR: chroot failed rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at /SourceCache/rsync/rsync-42/rsync/main.c(1398) [receiver=2.6.9] Roberto I can imagine that this is the way to go. However, Juergen as Release Manager should have the last word. Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source- contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_dist_files.txt http://**people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_**dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.**txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_external_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~**jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.**txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) 0 Michal Hriň -1 Raphael Bircher (binding) Thanks Juergen On 7/12/13 11:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared
Contact message (from Gary Firestone)
I have Open Office 3.4 and I am wondering why I cannot do a mail merge? It lets me go through up to step 3 but it will not let me continue. How can I get this function to work to complete the task at hand? It would be tremendous if I can get this feature to work. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[Discuss}{Release Notes 4.0.0]
Given the negative press we have received in some quarters about having dropped language translations, would it make sense to add a notice in the Release Notes for 4.0.0 about languages that were available for 3.4.x but not available for 4.0.0. My personal feeling is that it would be good since it would give us a place to direct user with support questions to for a definitive statement, but I also recognize how controversial this topic can be. Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Contact message (from Terje Ådland)
Hei! Jeg bruker mitt open office org. writer skriveprogram mye, og ang. innstillinger av div. funksjoner har jeg litt problemer. Hvor skal jeg lete!? Et eksempel: skriver f.eks. ordet ødemarking. Skriver jeg noe etter ordet øde dukker ødemarking opp, med marking markert i blått. Dette er høyst irriterende! Hva kan jeg gjøre for å bli kvitt dette problemet!!?? Jeg liker absolutt ikke å bli overvåket når jeg skriver!! Ville satt stor pris på en tilbakemelding og hjelpe meg ut av dette! Vennlig hilsen Terje Ådland Bergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Am 07/15/2013 08:02 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 07:44 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Roberto Galoppiniroberto.galoppini@**gmail.comroberto.galopp...@gmail.com 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** **files/4.0.0/https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**files/4.0.0/ https://**sourceforge.net/projects/**openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.** 0.0/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/ ) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** files/4.0.0/binaries/de/https**://sourceforge.net/projects/** openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.**0.0/binaries/de/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Ok, if we need to do that I need to know where can we rsync copy files from. Please communicate is ASAP because updating mirrors takes a lot. I ask that because the old location doesn't have 4.x (rsync.apache.org::apache-**dist/incubator/ooo/files/) and we can't rsync files from there. a bit lower in this mail thread Juergen stated this: rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external We get this error: $ rsync rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external . @ERROR: chroot failed rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at /SourceCache/rsync/rsync-42/rsync/main.c(1398) [receiver=2.6.9] If it's not a temporary problem, you can try to assemble the right URL from the content of this, maybe it's working: http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt PS: I don't know how much you are doing with rsync, so maybe this will help also: http://www.2rosenthals.net/wordpress/rsync-error-5-may-be-exactly-what-it-says-165/ Otherwise Juergen should help out. Sorry for the delay. Marcus I can imagine that this is the way to go. However, Juergen as Release Manager should have the last word. Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source-contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries -contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries -contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_dist_files.txt http://**people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_**dist_files.txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.**txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_external_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~**jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.**txthttp://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external If you have further questions please let me know. Juergen On 7/15/13 3:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I can't start the upload on dist because I have to wait on confirmation of infra... I will keep you informed Juergen On 7/15/13 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The vote period to release the RC (based on release branch AOO40, revison 1502185) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. The ballot result in 20 votes, 18 +1 votes including 12 binding PMC member votes. One abstain vote and one -1 vote based on an issue that were not clear. Nobody was able to reproduce the problem. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.0 Vote tally +1 Sylvain Dennis +1 Marco A.G. Pinto +1 Fr web forum +1 V Stuart Foote +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) +1 Kay Schenk (binding) +1 Jan Iversen (binding) +1 Rob Weir (binding) +1 Marcus Lange (binding) +1 Joost Andrae +1 Donald Harbison (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +1 Regina Henschel (binding) +1 Shengfeng Liu +1 Andre Fischer (binding) +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) +1 Herbert Duerr
Re: [Discuss}{Release Notes 4.0.0]
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote: Given the negative press we have received in some quarters about having dropped language translations, would it make sense to add a notice in the Release Notes for 4.0.0 about languages that were available for 3.4.x but not available for 4.0.0. Negative press? Do you have a link? Remember, we didn't drop anything. For example, we had released no translation of French 4.0 last week, because 4.0 was not done. Now that 4.0 is done and the translation is done, we can release both. Does that mean we dropped French last week? No it just means it was not ready to release yet. When the same conditions are met for other languages, we release them as well. So we're not dropping anything. We're merely releasing the translations that are done now rather than waiting longer for the ones that are still in progress. We did the exact same thing before with AOO 3.4.1. My personal feeling is that it would be good since it would give us a place to direct user with support questions to for a definitive statement, but I also recognize how controversial this topic can be. I added a statement to the release notes explaining that more translations are coming and telling how interested parties can volunteer to help. Is that good enough? -Rob Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Contact message (from Gary Firestone)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Gary Firestone garyfirest...@yahoo.com wrote: I have Open Office 3.4 and I am wondering why I cannot do a mail merge? It lets me go through up to step 3 but it will not let me continue. How can I get this function to work to complete the task at hand? It would be tremendous if I can get this feature to work. The help form on the wiki is for reporting issues with the wiki. For support questions please review your options here: http://www.openoffice.org/support/ Regards, -Rob Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Contact message (from Terje Ådland)
The help form on the wiki is for reporting issues with the wiki, e.g., login problems. For support questions please review your options here: http://www.openoffice.org/support/ Regards, -Rob 2013/7/15 Terje Ådland jonjek...@yahoo.no: Hei! Jeg bruker mitt open office org. writer skriveprogram mye, og ang. innstillinger av div. funksjoner har jeg litt problemer. Hvor skal jeg lete!? Et eksempel: skriver f.eks. ordet ødemarking. Skriver jeg noe etter ordet øde dukker ødemarking opp, med marking markert i blått. Dette er høyst irriterende! Hva kan jeg gjøre for å bli kvitt dette problemet!!?? Jeg liker absolutt ikke å bli overvåket når jeg skriver!! Ville satt stor pris på en tilbakemelding og hjelpe meg ut av dette! Vennlig hilsen Terje Ådland Bergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Openoffice Base copy function
In my club membership data base, I can use Filter by Selection to isolate a group of members that I want to send an E-mail to and, if I click on the E-mail Address field label, the entire column is highlighted but when I click on Copy and then try to Paste the block of E-mail Addresses in the Bcc field of on E-mail, I only get one E-mail address! I need to be able to copy the entire block of E-mail Addresses. John
Re: Contact message (from Terje Ådland)
2013/7/15 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org The help form on the wiki is for reporting issues with the wiki, e.g., login problems. For support questions please review your options here: http://www.openoffice.org/support/ Regards, -Rob Just as information, the contact page was moved away from the top of wiki sometime ago, and now has the following text at the top: Please use the form below for technical help with wiki (questions about openOffice is answered at http://forum.openoffice.org) So unless we remove contact completly, I dont see we can do much. rgds jan I. 2013/7/15 Terje Ådland jonjek...@yahoo.no: Hei! Jeg bruker mitt open office org. writer skriveprogram mye, og ang. innstillinger av div. funksjoner har jeg litt problemer. Hvor skal jeg lete!? Et eksempel: skriver f.eks. ordet ødemarking. Skriver jeg noe etter ordet øde dukker ødemarking opp, med marking markert i blått. Dette er høyst irriterende! Hva kan jeg gjøre for å bli kvitt dette problemet!!?? Jeg liker absolutt ikke å bli overvåket når jeg skriver!! Ville satt stor pris på en tilbakemelding og hjelpe meg ut av dette! Vennlig hilsen Terje Ådland Bergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Contact message (from Terje Ådland)
Am 07/15/2013 10:22 PM, schrieb janI: 2013/7/15 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org The help form on the wiki is for reporting issues with the wiki, e.g., login problems. For support questions please review your options here: http://www.openoffice.org/support/ Regards, -Rob Just as information, the contact page was moved away from the top of wiki sometime ago, and now has the following text at the top: Please use the form below for technical help with wiki (questions about openOffice is answered at http://forum.openoffice.org) So unless we remove contact completly, I dont see we can do much. I'm optimistic, thanks for your help. Marcus 2013/7/15 Terje Ådlandjonjek...@yahoo.no: Hei! Jeg bruker mitt open office org. writer skriveprogram mye, og ang. innstillinger av div. funksjoner har jeg litt problemer. Hvor skal jeg lete!? Et eksempel: skriver f.eks. ordet ødemarking. Skriver jeg noe etter ordet øde dukker ødemarking opp, med marking markert i blått. Dette er høyst irriterende! Hva kan jeg gjøre for å bli kvitt dette problemet!!?? Jeg liker absolutt ikke å bli overvåket når jeg skriver!! Ville satt stor pris på en tilbakemelding og hjelpe meg ut av dette! Vennlig hilsen Terje Ådland Bergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
Am Montag, 15. Juli 2013 um 22:11 schrieb Juergen Schmidt: Am Montag, 15. Juli 2013 um 21:53 schrieb Juergen Schmidt: Am Montag, 15. Juli 2013 um 21:40 schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/15/2013 08:02 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 07:44 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Roberto Galoppiniroberto.galoppini@**gmail.comroberto.galopp...@gmail.com 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** **files/4.0.0/https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**files/4.0.0/ https://**sourceforge.net/projects/**openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.** 0.0/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/ ) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** files/4.0.0/binaries/de/https**://sourceforge.net/projects/** openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.**0.0/binaries/de/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Ok, if we need to do that I need to know where can we rsync copy files from. Please communicate is ASAP because updating mirrors takes a lot. I ask that because the old location doesn't have 4.x (rsync.apache.org::apache-**dist/incubator/ooo/files/) and we can't rsync files from there. a bit lower in this mail thread Juergen stated this: rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external We get this error: $ rsync rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external . @ERROR: chroot failed rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at /SourceCache/rsync/rsync-42/rsync/main.c(1398) [receiver=2.6.9] If it's not a temporary problem, you can try to assemble the right URL from the content of this, maybe it's working: http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt PS: I don't know how much you are doing with rsync, so maybe this will help also: http://www.2rosenthals.net/wordpress/rsync-error-5-may-be-exactly-what-it-says-165/ Otherwise Juergen should help out. Sorry for the delay. Roberto, I got the rsync URL from the infra team, if there is a problem we have to figure it out with infra. I haven't used rsync and don't know what the problem is. We just created a new directory that is not synchronized with the Apache mirrors and is today mainly for you or other externals. just to make it even more clear, you have to rsync dist/externaldist/openoffice only. There are the binaries and only the signatures files, the checksum and hashes are duplicated. We want them on the apache mirrors and I duplicate them for simplification only Marcus told me that I send the reply to him only. Sometimes the mail client on my phone is driving me crazy... Juergen Juergen Marcus I can imagine that this is the way to go. However, Juergen as Release Manager should have the last word. Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source - contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries - contains all the
Re: Contact message (from Terje Ådland)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/15/2013 10:22 PM, schrieb janI: 2013/7/15 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org The help form on the wiki is for reporting issues with the wiki, e.g., login problems. For support questions please review your options here: http://www.openoffice.org/support/ Regards, -Rob Just as information, the contact page was moved away from the top of wiki sometime ago, and now has the following text at the top: Please use the form below for technical help with wiki (questions about openOffice is answered at http://forum.openoffice.org) So unless we remove contact completly, I dont see we can do much. I'm optimistic, thanks for your help. We see similar things with emails to the private and press mailing lists. We get a support question sent to these lists every few days. It is reasonable to believe that we have a similar fraction of wiki users who just don't read the instructions. However, in this case, I'm still waiting for the first real case of someone using the form for its intended purpose. Until that happens I can't really calculate its success rate ;-) It is essential a problem of scale. It is hard to give individual attention to 50 million users. So we need to concentrate on self-help via FAQ's, etc., and then direct users towards the best tools for interactive help, e.g., the forums. Anything that is confusing to users, even at the 1% level, will lead to a flood of emails. -Rob Marcus 2013/7/15 Terje Ådlandjonjek...@yahoo.no: Hei! Jeg bruker mitt open office org. writer skriveprogram mye, og ang. innstillinger av div. funksjoner har jeg litt problemer. Hvor skal jeg lete!? Et eksempel: skriver f.eks. ordet ødemarking. Skriver jeg noe etter ordet øde dukker ødemarking opp, med marking markert i blått. Dette er høyst irriterende! Hva kan jeg gjøre for å bli kvitt dette problemet!!?? Jeg liker absolutt ikke å bli overvåket når jeg skriver!! Ville satt stor pris på en tilbakemelding og hjelpe meg ut av dette! Vennlig hilsen Terje Ådland Bergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Possible show stopper on Windows 8, please verify
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Samer Mansour samer...@gmail.com wrote: I logged my comments in the bug, I searched the db before I opened a new bug sorry if its a duplicate. It is windows 8 64-bit. Crashes on copy and cut. Paste seems to not be affected. The four steps Rob gave in the bug are the minimum required steps to reproduce. An update on this crash. I was eventually able to reproduce it on Windows 8, 64-bit. This was an initial install, not an upgrade. Samer saw it on an upgrade install. I worked on the stack trace with Herbert (fortunately my Windows 8 machine had a debugger installed). Herbert gave me a patch to test. It appears to work on my machine. We're waiting to hear back from Samer on whether it worked for him. I realize this would be a Royal Pain of the First Order, but I wonder if this defect is worth respinning the RC? Regards, -Rob On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Samer Mansour samer...@gmail.com wrote: I just got my testlink set up, and received a couple test cases 7 hours ago. The first test I went to do I couldn't complete because it caused what I think is a show stopper for windows 8 (if its reproducible) Can anyone copy or cut contents to their system clipboard in windows 8 using the 4.0.0 RC snapshot? It causes an immediate crash every time for me. There was some discussion of this on another thread. Someone reported a clipboard crash on Windows 8 with an earlier snapshot (not the RC) but was not able to reproduce it. I tried yesterday on a clean Windows 8 install and could not get a crash, copying, pasting, etc., content. But you are saying it is cut not copy. I can try that. Also, are you running 32-bit or 64-bit Windows 8? -Rob Here is the bug I opened, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122752 Samer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: autocorrect macro?
I trust you tested the latest copy available here: http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21t=7368 On 07/15/2013 12:08 PM, The weird writer wrote: when I try i get a weird error. extract faied 42 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: autocorrect macro?
yes, I have, on the latest version of open office using windows 7 and that is how I got the error code 42 extraction failed. I am running the latest version of java to interact with the java access bridge so JAWS can work with open office, as well, if that helps. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discuss}{Release Notes 4.0.0]
Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote: Given the negative press we have received in some quarters about having dropped language translations, would it make sense to add a notice in the Release Notes for 4.0.0 about languages that were available for 3.4.x but not available for 4.0.0. Negative press? Do you have a link? Was remembering a conversation from this list awhile back, mostly rumblings from the blogs. Unfortunately a quick search of the archive wasn't able to uncover anything. May be just my memory is getting faulty with age. Remember, we didn't drop anything. For example, we had released no translation of French 4.0 last week, because 4.0 was not done. Now that 4.0 is done and the translation is done, we can release both. Does that mean we dropped French last week? No it just means it was not ready to release yet. Rob I know we didn't drop anything and most of our users will know it also; however when we due a major release that does not include languages that where there before it will be noticed and commented on. The purpose of this post was not to rehash the minutia, but to solicit informed opinion as to whether an preemptive entry in the languages section of the release notes could help ward off some support requests and to give the people doing the support a place to point concerned people to. When the same conditions are met for other languages, we release them as well. So we're not dropping anything. We're merely releasing the translations that are done now rather than waiting longer for the ones that are still in progress. We did the exact same thing before with AOO 3.4.1. My personal feeling is that it would be good since it would give us a place to direct user with support questions to for a definitive statement, but I also recognize how controversial this topic can be. I added a statement to the release notes explaining that more translations are coming and telling how interested parties can volunteer to help. Is that good enough? Whether it is good enough is not for me to decide but it does accomplish the intent of the initial question. Keith -Rob Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC)
2013/7/15 Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Am Montag, 15. Juli 2013 um 22:11 schrieb Juergen Schmidt: Am Montag, 15. Juli 2013 um 21:53 schrieb Juergen Schmidt: Am Montag, 15. Juli 2013 um 21:40 schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/15/2013 08:02 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 07:44 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Roberto Galoppiniroberto.galoppini@**gmail.com roberto.galopp...@gmail.com 2013/7/15 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de Am 07/15/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: 2013/7/15 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com Hi, the upload is finished already. We agreed on a structure to separate the binaries from the src release and make the binaries available in a special directory for Sourceforge. There is a 4.0.0 staged folder set up which is good ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** **files/4.0.0/ https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**files/4.0.0/ https://**sourceforge.net/projects/**openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.** 0.0/https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/ ) But the only files uploaded are some de binaries have been uploaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ https://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/** files/4.0.0/binaries/de/https**://sourceforge.net/projects/** openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.**0.0/binaries/de/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.0/binaries/de/ Those are ok, but there are no other files uploaded to SF yet for 4.0. I've created them for testing purpose only. Is anyone working on uploading all the reaming files? I would expect that there is an automatism to grep the files from the Apache Dist folder(s). Was this not the way how it was done for 3.4.x? Ok, if we need to do that I need to know where can we rsync copy files from. Please communicate is ASAP because updating mirrors takes a lot. I ask that because the old location doesn't have 4.x (rsync.apache.org::apache-**dist/incubator/ooo/files/) and we can't rsync files from there. a bit lower in this mail thread Juergen stated this: rsync Url: rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external We get this error: $ rsync rsync.apache.org::apache-dist-external . @ERROR: chroot failed rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at /SourceCache/rsync/rsync-42/rsync/main.c(1398) [receiver=2.6.9] If it's not a temporary problem, you can try to assemble the right URL from the content of this, maybe it's working: http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.txt PS: I don't know how much you are doing with rsync, so maybe this will help also: http://www.2rosenthals.net/wordpress/rsync-error-5-may-be-exactly-what-it-says-165/ Otherwise Juergen should help out. Sorry for the delay. Roberto, I got the rsync URL from the infra team, if there is a problem we have to figure it out with infra. I haven't used rsync and don't know what the problem is. We just created a new directory that is not synchronized with the Apache mirrors and is today mainly for you or other externals. just to make it even more clear, you have to rsync dist/externaldist/openoffice only. There are the binaries and only the signatures files, the checksum and hashes are duplicated. We want them on the apache mirrors and I duplicate them for simplification only Juergen, You still need to fix the chroot error in the apache-dist-external rsync module. Either the path configured is wrong or there is a permission problem (by default rsync accesses data using user nobody). Can you please help this? Second best if you know where are those files and you want to upload them this would work too. Let me know asap. Thanks Marcus told me that I send the reply to him only. Sometimes the mail client on my phone is driving me crazy... Juergen Juergen Marcus I can imagine that this is the way to go. However, Juergen as Release Manager should have the last word. Marcus dist/openoffice/4.0.0/source - contains the src release + signatures/checksum/hashes dist/openoffoce/4.0.0/binaries - contains the signatures/checksum/hashes only. For security reasons we keep them on the Apache dist folder and provide them from there as in the past. dist/externaldist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries - contains all the binaries (SDK, full install, lang packs) + signatures/checkssum/hashes A complete file list can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_dist_files.txt http://**people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_**dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_dist_files.txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo40_external_dist_files.**txt http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**aoo40_external_dist_files.txt
Re: [DISCUSS] New localization requirements policy needed for releases
On 7/15/2013 12:19 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 7/15/13 9:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 14/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote: In this specific case, for AOO 4.0, I'm suggesting we release any additional languages that are 100% on September 16th. This is similar to what we did for AOO 3.4.1. After that date I think we then wait for AOO 4.1. Releasing a new language should be rather easy and repeatable, so it is something that we can do once a month (but I can understand that August may be problematic due to holidays). Ideally, we should have a monthly update, say around mid-month, where we: 1) Release new languages (of course, based on the same code revision as 4.0, exactly as done for 3.4.1) that have reached 100% UI translation. 2) Formally unrelated to #1, we make (unreleased) dev snapshots available of languages that have UI at 75-99%. People should work on a reliable build bot infra structure that can provide builds for all major platforms (Linux, Windows, MacOS). And then we can configure more languages on demand. While there are periodic complaints about the build bots (e.g. when there are breaking changes made to the source tree), the main bots are pretty stable. They mainly break when broken. If you look at Windows Snapshot build http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-w7snap/ , the Windows nightly build http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/ , and the Linux 64bit build http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux64-nightly/ , you will notice that they are quite stable (esp. with the fix to the hanging process issue) We can ask again at infra for our CentOS linux 32 bot and Mac hardware, and we have waited long enough on that front. But, are there any issues we can identify with the current Windows snapshot build that make it unusable? We can configure more languages on these bots on demand right now. Is there a technical reason you don't like them? A. I will be not the manual build bot ;-) Proposing is fine but please think also about the realization. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: autocorrect macro?
sorry the error is BASIC runtime error object variable not set - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discuss}{Release Notes 4.0.0]
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote: Given the negative press we have received in some quarters about having dropped language translations, would it make sense to add a notice in the Release Notes for 4.0.0 about languages that were available for 3.4.x but not available for 4.0.0. Negative press? Do you have a link? Was remembering a conversation from this list awhile back, mostly rumblings from the blogs. Unfortunately a quick search of the archive wasn't able to uncover anything. May be just my memory is getting faulty with age. Remember, we didn't drop anything. For example, we had released no translation of French 4.0 last week, because 4.0 was not done. Now that 4.0 is done and the translation is done, we can release both. Does that mean we dropped French last week? No it just means it was not ready to release yet. Rob I know we didn't drop anything and most of our users will know it also; however when we due a major release that does not include languages that where there before it will be noticed and commented on. The purpose of this post was not to rehash the minutia, but to solicit informed opinion as to whether an preemptive entry in the languages section of the release notes could help ward off some support requests and to give the people doing the support a place to point concerned people to. I think the important message for users is that languages can be added incrementally, as the translations complete. They are not tied to the main release schedule in the same way other product features are. It will probably be annoying to some users to see a language appear in one release, then not be on the next release date, but then appear a month later, etc. But this is a self-correcting issue. The more users who are annoyed by this timing the more potential volunteers we have to correct it. The trick is to advertise that we need volunteers on the NL page. For example, we did this for Turkish and we now see a new volunteer introducing themselves on the L10N list every few days: http://www.openoffice.org/tr/ Regards, -Rob When the same conditions are met for other languages, we release them as well. So we're not dropping anything. We're merely releasing the translations that are done now rather than waiting longer for the ones that are still in progress. We did the exact same thing before with AOO 3.4.1. My personal feeling is that it would be good since it would give us a place to direct user with support questions to for a definitive statement, but I also recognize how controversial this topic can be. I added a statement to the release notes explaining that more translations are coming and telling how interested parties can volunteer to help. Is that good enough? Whether it is good enough is not for me to decide but it does accomplish the intent of the initial question. Keith -Rob Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Contact message (from Deborah Skelton)
I opened an accout a couple of years ago butdon't remember my username or password. Can you retrieve it? Deborah Skelton - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org