Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Don't forget to SHOUT LOUDLY when that day of work is complete ;) Luke Klaus Hartl wrote: > > Joel Birch schrieb: >> Anything we can do to lighten the load? I'm sure many of us will >> agree that this is one of the most exciting and important plugin >> projects at the moment. >> >> Good luck with everything Klaus. >> >> Joel. > > Thanks for your kind offer, Joel! I think I'll be needing just another > day of work to be able to announce beta. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9573616 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Joel Birch schrieb: > Anything we can do to lighten the load? I'm sure many of us will > agree that this is one of the most exciting and important plugin > projects at the moment. > > Good luck with everything Klaus. > > Joel. Thanks for your kind offer, Joel! I think I'll be needing just another day of work to be able to announce beta. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 14/03/2007, at 3:03 AM, Klaus Hartl wrote: > Mark schrieb: >> hows the development going? > > I'm sorry, I'm pretty busy at the moment and I'm stuck, but I gathered > all the feedback and hope to get things further on the weekend... I > have > already started to fix a few bugs in IE. > > > -- Klaus Anything we can do to lighten the load? I'm sure many of us will agree that this is one of the most exciting and important plugin projects at the moment. Good luck with everything Klaus. Joel. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Mark schrieb: > hows the development going? I'm sorry, I'm pretty busy at the moment and I'm stuck, but I gathered all the feedback and hope to get things further on the weekend... I have already started to fix a few bugs in IE. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
hows the development going? 2007/3/2, [-Stash-] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Just tried this in IE7 (WinXPSP2) and the overlay is solid black. Some of the CSS positioning is also a little out of kilter, but everything works! Looking forward to this one Klaus :) Luke Klaus Hartl wrote: > > Sean O schrieb: >> Klaus, >> >> Nice job, everything looks great in Firefox 2 & IE 7 PC. > > Sean, as I said, I haven't done any testing in IE at all so far. I'm > truly amazed, that it looks great in IE 7 already. :-) > > -- Klaus -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9277570 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Just tried this in IE7 (WinXPSP2) and the overlay is solid black. Some of the CSS positioning is also a little out of kilter, but everything works! Looking forward to this one Klaus :) Luke Klaus Hartl wrote: > > Sean O schrieb: >> Klaus, >> >> Nice job, everything looks great in Firefox 2 & IE 7 PC. > > Sean, as I said, I haven't done any testing in IE at all so far. I'm > truly amazed, that it looks great in IE 7 already. :-) > > -- Klaus -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9277570 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Can you not just overlay the loading animation over the top of the currently shown image/content? Just not clear the content? Would that really add that much code? Luke Klaus Hartl wrote: > > agent2026 schrieb: >> I agree, but what bothers me about the loading more is that the entire >> Thickbox (other than the overlay) disappears while this is happening. It >> would be less disturbing if the 'ui' stayed - the border, >> margin/background, >> links/txt, etc. - and just the image changed. >> >> I like your idea for the loader too. IE7 can handle transparent PNGs, >> though I haven't tested how well. Maybe IE6 gets a loadbar instead? >> >> Adam >> >> deadguy wrote: >>> When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very >>> intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the loading spinner >>> on top of the current image until the next image is loaded (rather >>> than making the current image disappear completely). The downside is >>> IE's poor handling of transparent PNG. > > I agree that its not ideal that the box gets hidden when loading the > next image. I'll see what I can do here. Fore sure, this will add more > code. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9247701 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
agent2026 schrieb: > I agree, but what bothers me about the loading more is that the entire > Thickbox (other than the overlay) disappears while this is happening. It > would be less disturbing if the 'ui' stayed - the border, margin/background, > links/txt, etc. - and just the image changed. > > I like your idea for the loader too. IE7 can handle transparent PNGs, > though I haven't tested how well. Maybe IE6 gets a loadbar instead? > > Adam > > > deadguy wrote: >> When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very >> intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the loading spinner >> on top of the current image until the next image is loaded (rather >> than making the current image disappear completely). The downside is >> IE's poor handling of transparent PNG. I agree that its not ideal that the box gets hidden when loading the next image. I'll see what I can do here. Fore sure, this will add more code. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
[-Stash-] schrieb: > > Klaus Hartl wrote: >> [-Stash-] schrieb: >>> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential >>> addition! >> clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not >> working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient? > > OK, I just tested with own hacked about version of ThickBox 2.1 and clicking > on the overlay while the "loading" animation is showing does indeed kill the > TB. However, clicking on the actual lading animation itself does NOT kill > the TB. Would it be possible for TB3 to close when you click on the loading > animation? That way the loading animation can be simply modified to say > "loading... click to cancel" which is nice and explanatory. Ah, I know why. Because the loading animation is a layer on top of the dim, thus the click event of the dim isn't fired of course. I will fix this! -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus Hartl wrote: > [-Stash-] schrieb: >> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential >> addition! > > clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not > working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient? OK, I just tested with own hacked about version of ThickBox 2.1 and clicking on the overlay while the "loading" animation is showing does indeed kill the TB. However, clicking on the actual lading animation itself does NOT kill the TB. Would it be possible for TB3 to close when you click on the loading animation? That way the loading animation can be simply modified to say "loading... click to cancel" which is nice and explanatory. Klaus Hartl wrote: > [-Stash-] schrieb: >> I like this idea a lot. Added to this, it would be nice if progressive >> images (JPEG and PNG) could start to display as soon as you have the >> image >> size. > > The display of the Box is bound to the load event of the image. I don't > think that there is another way to do it except for maybe setting up an > interval to check size, but that would mean a lot overhead, so this will > not go in, I'm sorry. People already started to complain about file > size... I didn't realise this, so I'm quite happy to not have this feature included as I want TB to remain nice and light as well :) Thanks for all the hard work Klaus :) Luke -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9246757 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I agree, but what bothers me about the loading more is that the entire Thickbox (other than the overlay) disappears while this is happening. It would be less disturbing if the 'ui' stayed - the border, margin/background, links/txt, etc. - and just the image changed. I like your idea for the loader too. IE7 can handle transparent PNGs, though I haven't tested how well. Maybe IE6 gets a loadbar instead? Adam deadguy wrote: > > When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very > intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the loading spinner > on top of the current image until the next image is loaded (rather > than making the current image disappear completely). The downside is > IE's poor handling of transparent PNG. > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9208801 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus Hartl wrote: > [-Stash-] schrieb: >> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential >> addition! > > clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not > working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient? > > > -- Klaus Parhaps, Thickbox handles this better, but with Imagebox, since I can't stop it properly I need to reload the page to reach the initial state. As an example, see: http://noneg.tornkvist.org:8080/search.yaws?adonly=false&action=keyword&key=barcelona Its in Swedish but just click on the link: Bildspel at the top. Since I'm initiating Imagebox when clicking on the link I want to 'stop' it when it closes down. Now I have to reload the page to do it. And if I quit using the Escape button, havoc results when trying to repeat the procedure. (clicking on the thumbnails should not ignite Imagebox in this case) Cheers, Tobbe ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 28/02/07, Alexandre Plennevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no > >> sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen > sizes... > > >What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for > the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that >from the current > Thickbox without any changes. > > > I mean with TB, you specify its width and height by giving pixel values > (width=600&height=400 for example). > This is wrong: if the users has a 2 pixel wide monitor (or a very small > screen), TB should use whatever screen assets the user has. That is why > width=90% is better. Perhaps there should be min-width/height (and max while you are at it) if you are going to use percentages. Also how would you indicate it (perhaps width=90&height=90&unit=percent)? Is it to be % of screen or window (I assume window)? I can't imagine someone having a monitor that big. If they did, they probably would not have the browser maximised (as most sites would look bad at very high resolution). Those with small screens probably have a portable device, which thickbox won't work in anyway. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Klaus Hartl > Sent: mercredi 28 février 2007 14:49 > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha > > Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > > If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely > > need to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the > > same page, or even Application. > > > > I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how > > my app will use TB (ajax/iframe) to display interfaces. I would > > therefore love to have 3 different thickbox plugins, so 3 different > > files. If i need to mix, just adding the script source link to the > > related TB version would enable me to. > > > > > type="text/javascript"> > type="text/javascript"> > src="plugin.thickbox.iframe.js" type="text/javascript"> > > > > this would also enable to build more functionalities for specific uses > > (gallery, zoom, prev/next only apply to images). > > I just wrote in reply to Sam, that I'm thinking about making TR modular > exactly like that. The basis is already there. On the other hand, for the > Ajax example it just saves us 5 lines of code... > > > > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no > > sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen > sizes... > > What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for the > viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that from the current Thickbox > without any changes. > > > > thank you! > > Thank you for feedback. And all the others! I hope we can build a Thickbox > everybody (ok, hopefully most of us) is satisfied with! > > And while I'm at it, thanks to cody for letting us do this! > > > -- klaus > > > > -- klaus > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- > Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. > Analyse effectuée par AVG. > Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/705 - Date: 27/02/2007 > 15:24 > > > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
[-Stash-] schrieb: > A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential > addition! clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient? -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
[-Stash-] schrieb: > I like this idea a lot. Added to this, it would be nice if progressive > images (JPEG and PNG) could start to display as soon as you have the image > size. The display of the Box is bound to the load event of the image. I don't think that there is another way to do it except for maybe setting up an interval to check size, but that would mean a lot overhead, so this will not go in, I'm sorry. People already started to complain about file size... -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Currently the "Close" link doesn't appear until the content is loaded - if the content takes a long time to load, you can't get rid of the TB. I'd like a nice juicy "Cancel" button just beneath (or wherever) the loading animation s I can change my mind and not wait for the content to be loaded. Shouldn't this just be tied to the close link? [-Stash-] wrote: > A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential > addition! > > Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote: >> I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it. >> Also, a hook when Imagebox closes down would have been very handy. >> >> Perhaps Thickbox3 can remedy this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9208798 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
> One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my > modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first > image, and vice versa +1 ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Shouldn't this just be tied to the close link? [-Stash-] wrote: > > A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential > addition! > > > Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote: >> I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it. >> Also, a hook when Imagebox closes down would have been very handy. >> >> Perhaps Thickbox3 can remedy this? > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9208696 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential addition! Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote: > I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it. > Also, a hook when Imagebox closes down would have been very handy. > > Perhaps Thickbox3 can remedy this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9208518 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I like this idea a lot. Added to this, it would be nice if progressive images (JPEG and PNG) could start to display as soon as you have the image size. deadguy wrote: > When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very > intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the loading spinner > on top of the current image until the next image is loaded (rather > than making the current image disappear completely). The downside is > IE's poor handling of transparent PNG. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9208497 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I'm sure we will ;) And thank you Klaus for taking this over. Adam Klaus Hartl wrote: > > > Thank you for feedback. And all the others! I hope we can build a > Thickbox everybody (ok, hopefully most of us) is satisfied with! > > And while I'm at it, thanks to cody for letting us do this! > > > -- klaus > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9204540 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
>> as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no >> sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes... >What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that >from the current Thickbox without any changes. I mean with TB, you specify its width and height by giving pixel values (width=600&height=400 for example). This is wrong: if the users has a 2 pixel wide monitor (or a very small screen), TB should use whatever screen assets the user has. That is why width=90% is better. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaus Hartl Sent: mercredi 28 février 2007 14:49 To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely > need to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the > same page, or even Application. > > I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how > my app will use TB (ajax/iframe) to display interfaces. I would > therefore love to have 3 different thickbox plugins, so 3 different > files. If i need to mix, just adding the script source link to the > related TB version would enable me to. > > type="text/javascript"> type="text/javascript"> src="plugin.thickbox.iframe.js" type="text/javascript"> > > this would also enable to build more functionalities for specific uses > (gallery, zoom, prev/next only apply to images). I just wrote in reply to Sam, that I'm thinking about making TR modular exactly like that. The basis is already there. On the other hand, for the Ajax example it just saves us 5 lines of code... > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no > sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes... What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that from the current Thickbox without any changes. > thank you! Thank you for feedback. And all the others! I hope we can build a Thickbox everybody (ok, hopefully most of us) is satisfied with! And while I'm at it, thanks to cody for letting us do this! -- klaus -- klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/705 - Date: 27/02/2007 15:24 ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 2/28/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no sense > > fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes... > > What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for > the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that from the current > Thickbox without any changes. He means you can't dpeend on any default viewport size minimum, and TB requires integer sizes in pixels for its size. So what happens when your user is on a 400x400 viewport, and you set thickbox to 600x400? A size specification method that uses percentages instead of pixels would solve this, probably depending on horizontal (yuck) and vertical scrolling inside TB. Dylan ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely need > to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the same page, or > even Application. > > I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how my app > will use TB (ajax/iframe) to display interfaces. I would therefore love to > have 3 different thickbox plugins, so 3 different files. If i need to mix, > just adding the script source link to the related TB version would enable me > to. > > > > > > this would also enable to build more functionalities for specific uses > (gallery, zoom, prev/next only apply to images). I just wrote in reply to Sam, that I'm thinking about making TR modular exactly like that. The basis is already there. On the other hand, for the Ajax example it just saves us 5 lines of code... > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no sense > fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes... What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that from the current Thickbox without any changes. > thank you! Thank you for feedback. And all the others! I hope we can build a Thickbox everybody (ok, hopefully most of us) is satisfied with! And while I'm at it, thanks to cody for letting us do this! -- klaus -- klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
>> One thing is sure: I'll not be able to implement all the different
requirements here, and so why not allowing extendibility made easy (I like
making things as easy to use as possible).
Right on. The TB website forum can be used to build a knowledge base of
various common extended uses (like refresh page on TB_close, using
callbacks, etc...)
I'm salivating and looking forward to the next TB release !!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: mercredi 28 février 2007 14:34
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Sam Collett schrieb:
> On 28/02/07, agent2026 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified
>> Thickbox is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top
>> reasons Cody made Thickbox in the first place, and it's definately a
>> very important factor for me.
>>
>> Adam
>
> It is only in alpha stage at the moment, so perhaps it may shrink in
> size by beta or final release.
Sam, that's right. I'll try hard to get the file size smaller again.
I'll have to trade off readability for that though, currently variable names
and so on are very explicit.
> The file size has probably increased because it has been made more
> flexible as a plugin (I would call ThickBox a pseudo-plugin as you
> couldn't do $("a.foo").thickbox()).
Yes, there are a few additions and improvements that caused the file size to
increase, for example the form to Thickbox functionality, I18n, setting
default values and some other things. I also thought about making all other
types than Image optional modules. That would mean extra files on the one
hand, but that would also mean an Interface to easily extend thickbox with
your own builder functions.
This modularity was mentioned on this list once. The basis for this is
already there and I think it is doable. So if you want it your way, just
plugin your own builder function and Skin and you're done... What do you
think of that?
One thing is sure: I'll not be able to implement all the different
requirements here, and so why not allowing extendibility made easy (I like
making things as easy to use as possible).
> The original Thickbox, while good, was not very flexible - the page
> had to modified to get it to work (via querystring to add with and
> height etc, which I think was invalid as well), elements added after
> the page was load required extra work (e.g. $(a.thickbox).unbind();
> TB_init()), not smooth when you scrolled (would be better if scrolling
> was disabled instead), CSS issues etc.
Yes, I think, the URLs you had to use were malformed. I wanted that to be
fixed in ayn case.
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu.
Analyse effectuée par AVG.
Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/705 - Date: 27/02/2007
15:24
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Sam Collett schrieb:
> On 28/02/07, agent2026 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified Thickbox
>> is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top reasons Cody made
>> Thickbox in the first place, and it's definately a very important factor for
>> me.
>>
>> Adam
>
> It is only in alpha stage at the moment, so perhaps it may shrink in
> size by beta or final release.
Sam, that's right. I'll try hard to get the file size smaller again.
I'll have to trade off readability for that though, currently variable
names and so on are very explicit.
> The file size has probably increased because it has been made more
> flexible as a plugin (I would call ThickBox a pseudo-plugin as you
> couldn't do $("a.foo").thickbox()).
Yes, there are a few additions and improvements that caused the file
size to increase, for example the form to Thickbox functionality, I18n,
setting default values and some other things. I also thought about
making all other types than Image optional modules. That would mean
extra files on the one hand, but that would also mean an Interface to
easily extend thickbox with your own builder functions.
This modularity was mentioned on this list once. The basis for this is
already there and I think it is doable. So if you want it your way, just
plugin your own builder function and Skin and you're done... What do you
think of that?
One thing is sure: I'll not be able to implement all the different
requirements here, and so why not allowing extendibility made easy (I
like making things as easy to use as possible).
> The original Thickbox, while good, was not very flexible - the page
> had to modified to get it to work (via querystring to add with and
> height etc, which I think was invalid as well), elements added after
> the page was load required extra work (e.g. $(a.thickbox).unbind();
> TB_init()), not smooth when you scrolled (would be better if scrolling
> was disabled instead), CSS issues etc.
Yes, I think, the URLs you had to use were malformed. I wanted that to
be fixed in ayn case.
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely need to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the same page, or even Application. I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how my app will use TB (ajax/iframe) to display interfaces. I would therefore love to have 3 different thickbox plugins, so 3 different files. If i need to mix, just adding the script source link to the related TB version would enable me to. this would also enable to build more functionalities for specific uses (gallery, zoom, prev/next only apply to images). as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes... thank you! alex [-Stash-] wrote: > > I agree with this. Keep it tight and let it do the core things extremely > well. Is there any reason you can't have an extension for a plugin? > Perhaps all you need is a section in the core file where you can add as > many lines as yuo like that say "enable this extension -> path"? > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9203349 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 28/02/07, agent2026 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified Thickbox
> is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top reasons Cody made
> Thickbox in the first place, and it's definately a very important factor for
> me.
>
> Adam
It is only in alpha stage at the moment, so perhaps it may shrink in
size by beta or final release.
The file size has probably increased because it has been made more
flexible as a plugin (I would call ThickBox a pseudo-plugin as you
couldn't do $("a.foo").thickbox()).
The original Thickbox, while good, was not very flexible - the page
had to modified to get it to work (via querystring to add with and
height etc, which I think was invalid as well), elements added after
the page was load required extra work (e.g. $(a.thickbox).unbind();
TB_init()), not smooth when you scrolled (would be better if scrolling
was disabled instead), CSS issues etc.
Also, you had to heavily modify thickbox to get it to work for you
(infact I use a version you posted a while back) - you should never
need to do that for a plugin.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified Thickbox is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top reasons Cody made Thickbox in the first place, and it's definately a very important factor for me. Adam Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote: > > > Some other things: > > I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it. > Also, a hook when Imagebox closes down would have been very handy. > > Perhaps Thickbox3 can remedy this? > > Btw: what is the plan here, Thickbox looks very much alike as Imagebox. > It could/is a bit confusing with two so powerful and similar libs. > Why not enhance Imagebox instead of making Thickbox3 ? > > Cheers, Tobbe > > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9203114 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I like the idea of the zoom feature a lot for larger images. You have some window resize issues with the overlay though (common issue), as well as if an image has been zoomed. The slideshow link is and excellent feature - user configurable. I agree with the feedback. I started in the middle, and when I got to the end clicking the image closed the thickbox when it used to mean next, which was disturbing. Adam BoOz wrote: > > My hacks : > - Thickbox is setup when finding type="jpeg" (or gif or png) in , or > on class=thickbox > - When an image is shown, the next one is pre-loading > - Click show next image > - "next" and "previous" as logos (rather than text string) > - Slideshow option > - Zoom option for big images > - css "a la lightbox" > - keyboard focus on "slideshow" and "zoom" > - keyboard broasing (tab, enter etc) > > I had some feed back with that version : I was asked that it went in > circles (the last image is followed by the first) > > BoOz > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9202377 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Some other things: I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it. Also, a hook when Imagebox closes down would have been very handy. Perhaps Thickbox3 can remedy this? Btw: what is the plan here, Thickbox looks very much alike as Imagebox. It could/is a bit confusing with two so powerful and similar libs. Why not enhance Imagebox instead of making Thickbox3 ? Cheers, Tobbe ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Hi, Klaus Hartl a écrit : >agent2026 schrieb: > > >>Very nice Klaus. >> >>One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my >>modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first >>image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a >>Thickbox. >> >> > >Is clicking on the image will take you to the next image expected >behavior? I don't think so, but it's not my Thickbox, it's ours. So what >do the others think? > >Same for that circular thing? Feedback please! > >Besides, I also planned to implement a slideshow option. Another idea: >Instead of next/previous links one could (optionally) show mini >thumbnails... hm, just thinking out loud. After all, the script won't >get smaller. > I'd like to feed back by showing my own thickbox hacks (most of them are already in Klaus version) : http://spip-zone.info/spip.php?article31 (see the portefolio at the bottom of the page) My hacks : - Thickbox is setup when finding type="jpeg" (or gif or png) in , or on class=thickbox - When an image is shown, the next one is pre-loading - Click show next image - "next" and "previous" as logos (rather than text string) - Slideshow option - Zoom option for big images - css "a la lightbox" - keyboard focus on "slideshow" and "zoom" - keyboard broasing (tab, enter etc) I had some feed back with that version : I was asked that it went in circles (the last image is followed by the first) BoOz ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
The mockup looks very similar to the Lightbox functionality, and I think their implementation would do what you want. Nothing is visible to start, but when you roll over the left or right half of the image the previous or next text respectively fades in over the image. Clicking anywhere on the left or right half of the image (not just on the faded in links) will load the previous or next image respectively. Before I found Thickbox I was considering Lightbox in part for this feature, but Lightbox is unfortunately not very light. Effectively, this is the same as click=next on the right half of the image, and if you're going to put the buttons on the image anyway, why not make the whole image hot. My only comment is they should not be visible without being triggered in some way. Many like myself can't have anything over the image area all time. I'll also add that I think the 'image 1 of xx' should remain as Klaus suggests, as well as the ability to add captions. Adam Rick Faircloth wrote: > > A good compromise would be to put the mouseover points on the TB frame > with very low opacity, but visible nonetheless... then when someone > approaches > the text/graphics with the mouse pointer, the mouseover points can become > more > distinct in direct proportion to the proximity of the mouse pointer. > > Rick > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9201446 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I think the difference between selected text in MS Word
and a Thickbox instance is that people would expect (for the most part)
to be able to mouseover selected text and have some options appear.
(Usually from right-clicking, but enabled by mouseover anyway)
The new effect with the menu fading in for selected text in MS Word is
very cool, but for Thickbox, without some visual cue for clickable options,
people wouldn't know where to mouseover at all.
A good compromise would be to put the mouseover points on the TB frame
with very low opacity, but visible nonetheless... then when someone
approaches
the text/graphics with the mouse pointer, the mouseover points can become
more
distinct in direct proportion to the proximity of the mouse pointer.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:46 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Ah, I see! Cool!
What do the others think? I'm no designer, so I didn't (want to) change
much compared to the initial Thickbox anyway. I'd like having a little
bit more text ("Image 2 of 5") in the control, but I like the idea of
having a control thats only there if needed. The control could slide up
or fade in if you hover of the hotspot. In addition that would make
calculating the box height much easier as well!
The different opacities in one box though will not be doable, because
one box inherits the opacity of its parent. Or maybe with using a
transparent png but that won't work in IE 6 easily and adds another
asset I'd rather avoid.
But as I wrote, in the end thats just a matter of the included skin and
I made it so that one can just plugin his or her own skin style sheet.
There will be a default skin, but I encourage everyone to make new skins
once Thickbox Reloaded is out.
You just had to replace jquery.thickbox.skin.css with another one.
-- Klaus
Mark schrieb:
> hmm.. i guess the attatchment didn`t get through and therefore the
> entire message didn`t get on the list (i can see it here in my gmail)
> here is the suggestion again with the image posted on imageshack.
>
> full message was:
> ---
> i like this alot :)
> don`t get me wrong but i`ve made a mockup how i would like to see it..
> this doesn1`t mean that htere is something wrong with the version you
> posted.. just these changes in my mockup make it complete for me :)
>
> the mockup is in the attatchment.
> explenation:
> let the "Close this window" (not vissable in the mockup) appear when the
> mouse gets close to it. for the NEXT and PREV part with hte transparent
> background.. also let that appear or fade depending on the location on
> the mouse.. lets say if the mouse gets with in a 20pixel radius of the
> next or prev the part will appear. otherwise it will fade away or stay
> away (same with the close this window)
>
> i hope you can do something with this.
> Mark.
> ---
>
> Image:
> (kinda big images.. 700+ KB in PNG.. perhaps that`s why it didn`t got
> through)
> http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/3640/mockupthickboxcopyps4.png
>
> extra information:
> the thick white border arround the image is transparent (0.8 or 0.9) the
> px width border that`s directly arround the image isn`t transparent and
> the 1px border that is arround the thick white border also isn`t
> transparent (or just a little)
>
> let me know what you think of it.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> 2007/2/27, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>
> Mark schrieb:
> > @Klaus Hartl
> >
> > don`t you like my mockup suggestion?
>
>
> ???
>
> Mark, I'm all ear, but I haven't got a mail of yours. Did you write me
> an email or to the list?
>
>
> -- Klaus
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com <mailto:discuss@jquery.com>
> http://jquery.com/discuss/ <http://jquery.com/discuss/>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the loading spinner on top of the current image until the next image is loaded (rather than making the current image disappear completely). The downside is IE's poor handling of transparent PNG. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
perhaps you could do it with positioned divs? without any images.. than you
could use the round corners trick in javascript (which also works on IE) or
you could just leave them with the default edges.. and perhaps you could use
it in combination of this: http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/fisheye.html not
for the zooming but that stuff had the radius stuff.. or something that
works like it. the only thing left to do than is adjusting the opacity when
the mouse moves closer or further away.. o btw.. do you have Office 2007? if
you have it open up a document and select a text.. then you also get the
same effect that i would like to see in thickbox :)
Mark.
2007/2/27, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ah, I see! Cool!
What do the others think? I'm no designer, so I didn't (want to) change
much compared to the initial Thickbox anyway. I'd like having a little
bit more text ("Image 2 of 5") in the control, but I like the idea of
having a control thats only there if needed. The control could slide up
or fade in if you hover of the hotspot. In addition that would make
calculating the box height much easier as well!
The different opacities in one box though will not be doable, because
one box inherits the opacity of its parent. Or maybe with using a
transparent png but that won't work in IE 6 easily and adds another
asset I'd rather avoid.
But as I wrote, in the end thats just a matter of the included skin and
I made it so that one can just plugin his or her own skin style sheet.
There will be a default skin, but I encourage everyone to make new skins
once Thickbox Reloaded is out.
You just had to replace jquery.thickbox.skin.css with another one.
-- Klaus
Mark schrieb:
> hmm.. i guess the attatchment didn`t get through and therefore the
> entire message didn`t get on the list (i can see it here in my gmail)
> here is the suggestion again with the image posted on imageshack.
>
> full message was:
> ---
> i like this alot :)
> don`t get me wrong but i`ve made a mockup how i would like to see it..
> this doesn1`t mean that htere is something wrong with the version you
> posted.. just these changes in my mockup make it complete for me :)
>
> the mockup is in the attatchment.
> explenation:
> let the "Close this window" (not vissable in the mockup) appear when the
> mouse gets close to it. for the NEXT and PREV part with hte transparent
> background.. also let that appear or fade depending on the location on
> the mouse.. lets say if the mouse gets with in a 20pixel radius of the
> next or prev the part will appear. otherwise it will fade away or stay
> away (same with the close this window)
>
> i hope you can do something with this.
> Mark.
> ---
>
> Image:
> (kinda big images.. 700+ KB in PNG.. perhaps that`s why it didn`t got
> through)
> http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/3640/mockupthickboxcopyps4.png
>
> extra information:
> the thick white border arround the image is transparent (0.8 or 0.9) the
> px width border that`s directly arround the image isn`t transparent and
> the 1px border that is arround the thick white border also isn`t
> transparent (or just a little)
>
> let me know what you think of it.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> 2007/2/27, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >:
>
> Mark schrieb:
> > @Klaus Hartl
> >
> > don`t you like my mockup suggestion?
>
>
> ???
>
> Mark, I'm all ear, but I haven't got a mail of yours. Did you write
me
> an email or to the list?
>
>
> -- Klaus
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Ah, I see! Cool!
What do the others think? I'm no designer, so I didn't (want to) change
much compared to the initial Thickbox anyway. I'd like having a little
bit more text ("Image 2 of 5") in the control, but I like the idea of
having a control thats only there if needed. The control could slide up
or fade in if you hover of the hotspot. In addition that would make
calculating the box height much easier as well!
The different opacities in one box though will not be doable, because
one box inherits the opacity of its parent. Or maybe with using a
transparent png but that won't work in IE 6 easily and adds another
asset I'd rather avoid.
But as I wrote, in the end thats just a matter of the included skin and
I made it so that one can just plugin his or her own skin style sheet.
There will be a default skin, but I encourage everyone to make new skins
once Thickbox Reloaded is out.
You just had to replace jquery.thickbox.skin.css with another one.
-- Klaus
Mark schrieb:
> hmm.. i guess the attatchment didn`t get through and therefore the
> entire message didn`t get on the list (i can see it here in my gmail)
> here is the suggestion again with the image posted on imageshack.
>
> full message was:
> ---
> i like this alot :)
> don`t get me wrong but i`ve made a mockup how i would like to see it..
> this doesn1`t mean that htere is something wrong with the version you
> posted.. just these changes in my mockup make it complete for me :)
>
> the mockup is in the attatchment.
> explenation:
> let the "Close this window" (not vissable in the mockup) appear when the
> mouse gets close to it. for the NEXT and PREV part with hte transparent
> background.. also let that appear or fade depending on the location on
> the mouse.. lets say if the mouse gets with in a 20pixel radius of the
> next or prev the part will appear. otherwise it will fade away or stay
> away (same with the close this window)
>
> i hope you can do something with this.
> Mark.
> ---
>
> Image:
> (kinda big images.. 700+ KB in PNG.. perhaps that`s why it didn`t got
> through)
> http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/3640/mockupthickboxcopyps4.png
>
> extra information:
> the thick white border arround the image is transparent (0.8 or 0.9) the
> px width border that`s directly arround the image isn`t transparent and
> the 1px border that is arround the thick white border also isn`t
> transparent (or just a little)
>
> let me know what you think of it.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> 2007/2/27, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >:
>
> Mark schrieb:
> > @Klaus Hartl
> >
> > don`t you like my mockup suggestion?
>
>
> ???
>
> Mark, I'm all ear, but I haven't got a mail of yours. Did you write me
> an email or to the list?
>
>
> -- Klaus
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
hmm.. i guess the attatchment didn`t get through and therefore the entire message didn`t get on the list (i can see it here in my gmail) here is the suggestion again with the image posted on imageshack. full message was: --- i like this alot :) don`t get me wrong but i`ve made a mockup how i would like to see it.. this doesn1`t mean that htere is something wrong with the version you posted.. just these changes in my mockup make it complete for me :) the mockup is in the attatchment. explenation: let the "Close this window" (not vissable in the mockup) appear when the mouse gets close to it. for the NEXT and PREV part with hte transparent background.. also let that appear or fade depending on the location on the mouse.. lets say if the mouse gets with in a 20pixel radius of the next or prev the part will appear. otherwise it will fade away or stay away (same with the close this window) i hope you can do something with this. Mark. --- Image: (kinda big images.. 700+ KB in PNG.. perhaps that`s why it didn`t got through) http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/3640/mockupthickboxcopyps4.png extra information: the thick white border arround the image is transparent (0.8 or 0.9) the px width border that`s directly arround the image isn`t transparent and the 1px border that is arround the thick white border also isn`t transparent (or just a little) let me know what you think of it. Mark. 2007/2/27, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mark schrieb: > @Klaus Hartl > > don`t you like my mockup suggestion? ??? Mark, I'm all ear, but I haven't got a mail of yours. Did you write me an email or to the list? -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Mark schrieb: > @Klaus Hartl > > don`t you like my mockup suggestion? ??? Mark, I'm all ear, but I haven't got a mail of yours. Did you write me an email or to the list? -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
@Klaus Hartl don`t you like my mockup suggestion? ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Whoa! :)
What I would really like to see is thickbox gracefully changing its size
to accommodate the loaded content.
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Hi jQuerians,
>
> I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
> may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
>
> Here's what's new:
>
> * Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
> for content that gets loaded/created later on).
> * Totally unobtrusive: no classes needed for links, no params in URL.
> * Confirm type Thickbox, triggered automatically by binding Thickbox to
> a form. If "yes" the form gets submitted unless a custom callback is
> defined (for example for Ajax submitting)
> * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
> type of link:
> image: href is an image
> content: href is a hash
> ajax: href is internal and not image
> iframe: href is external and not image
> confirm: element is form
> * Improved UI blocking (Thanks to Mike "Malsup" and the BlockUI plugin)
> * Options for width/height are now passed in as settings object literal
> or are stored as default values via $.thickbox.defaults({ width: 300,
> height: 400 })
> * Options top/left positioning (instead of centering), unit defaults to 'px'
> * Easier skinning: The look is completely separated into an extra style
> sheet
> * Scrolling via mousewheel/touchpad is blocked
> * Lets you define custom animations for showing the modal window via
> settings
> * Requires jQuery 1.1.1
>
> Maybe I have forgotten something.
>
> I thought of including the required style sheets dynamically, but you
> would still have to include the path somehow.
>
> You can also have a look here (besides repository):
> http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
>
> Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. I
> just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first!
>
>
> -- Klaus
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
totally agree with all of the below. agent2026 wrote: > I feel similarly about the slideshow - I wouldn't expect it, and would like > to view the image I clicked for as long or short a time as I want to. But, > it's a sensible option. > > And I agree, click=next is not something you'd necessarily expect. And if > you don't, you probably wouldn't click on the image at all and would never > be aware that the function exists (sounds like I'm starting to argue against > myself here, but bear with me). But, the behavior is being taken up here an > there, and once a user realizes they have this option they see how much > nicer/easier it is just to click though the images themselves rather than > have to click tiny 'next' links each time (which, in the case of this > Thickbox, are not always in the same place depending on the size of the > image). > Basically I think if you don't know it's there, you won't use it. But if > you do try it, or learn it's there, it a very easy and efficient way to > browse through images. When I first came across a gallery that used > click=next I thought 'wow, what a great idea. I don't need to repeatedly > hunt down little thumbnails and next/prev buttons, I can just flip though > all the images by clicking the huge image button right in the middle of the > page'. > > As for the circular browsing, again I think it's a nice beneficial feature, > and a sensible option. The main reasons are these: often when I look at a > gallery of thumbs, I click the one that looks the most interesting to me > first. Chances are it's not the first one, but somewhere in the middle. > After checking this image out, I'm happy to continue with 'next' to see what > else there is. Once I hit the end, I now need to click several, if not > many, images back to see the ones I haven't seen, whereas if I could just > wrap around to the beginning it would be much easier. Another reason is > once I've gone through a gallery, sometimes I'd like to go through it again > from the beginning. In both cases obviously I could close the Thickbox and > start again from the beginning, but that's a workaround behavior which > should be avoided. > > So, that's my case ;). Sorry so long-winded, but I see these as very useful > features. I have these added to my Thickbox, and it doesn't take much code. > Everything's still tight, and rather then separating them why not make them > configurable options, much like jCarousel. > > > > Adam > > > > Klaus Hartl wrote: > >> agent2026 schrieb: >> >>> Very nice Klaus. >>> >>> One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my >>> modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first >>> image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a >>> Thickbox. >>> >> Is clicking on the image will take you to the next image expected >> behavior? I don't think so, but it's not my Thickbox, it's ours. So what >> do the others think? >> >> Same for that circular thing? Feedback please! >> >> Besides, I also planned to implement a slideshow option. Another idea: >> Instead of next/previous links one could (optionally) show mini >> thumbnails... hm, just thinking out loud. After all, the script won't >> get smaller. >> >> >> -- Klaus >> >> >> ___ >> jQuery mailing list >> discuss@jquery.com >> http://jquery.com/discuss/ >> >> >> > > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I agree with you that fits more in customization than mainstream use. So, please make TB so that it does not create unique ids, but classes so that making multiple instances of it does not involve modifying the plugin code itself :!) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Collett Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 15:28 To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha On 27/02/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > > Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes > > (one on top of the other) ? > > Ugh. No, at least not yet. To make it most efficient, the window gets > created once and is then reused. That said, currently Thickbox 3 is > not designed to do that. Was it possible before? Is this a wildly > requested requirement? > > > -- Klaus Perhaps that may be more appropriate for a plugin to Thickbox as I guess this may significantly increase the file size (which hopefully will be similar in size to what ThickBox 2.1 is now)? While it may be useful, I think in most cases thickboxes won't be used to open other thickboxes. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/703 - Date: 26/02/2007 14:56 ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
This wasn't possible before, although it would be kinda nice. HighSlide (http://vikjavev.no/highslide/) does this pretty well, from an end user point of view. I have no idea if it's well coded etc. I would put this outside the scope for TB3 and move it into 4, or as an optional addon. Most of the time you only need one thing up at a time and I'd image this added complexity would really enlarge the code. Luke Klaus Hartl wrote: > > Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: >> Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes (one on >> top of the other) ? > > Ugh. No, at least not yet. To make it most efficient, the window gets > created once and is then reused. That said, currently Thickbox 3 is not > designed to do that. Was it possible before? Is this a wildly requested > requirement? > > -- Klaus -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9183320 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 27/02/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > > Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes (one on > > top of the other) ? > > Ugh. No, at least not yet. To make it most efficient, the window gets > created once and is then reused. That said, currently Thickbox 3 is not > designed to do that. Was it possible before? Is this a wildly requested > requirement? > > > -- Klaus Perhaps that may be more appropriate for a plugin to Thickbox as I guess this may significantly increase the file size (which hopefully will be similar in size to what ThickBox 2.1 is now)? While it may be useful, I think in most cases thickboxes won't be used to open other thickboxes. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes (one on > top of the other) ? Ugh. No, at least not yet. To make it most efficient, the window gets created once and is then reused. That said, currently Thickbox 3 is not designed to do that. Was it possible before? Is this a wildly requested requirement? -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes (one on
top of the other) ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 13:39
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Torbjorn Tornkvist schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if it also supported Internationalization of the
> Previous/Next strings etc.
>
> Perhaps, it already does? I'll have to check the source.
>
> Cheers, Tobbe
I've stripped out all the strings, i18n is done via settings defaults or
even in override settings in particular Thickboxes (useful for different
forms to Thickboxes on one page):
These are the defaults:
i18n: {
close: { text: 'Close', title: 'Close this window' },
count: { text: 'Image #{image} of #{count}'},
next: { text: 'Next', title: 'Show next image' },
prev: { text: 'Previous', title: 'Show previous image' },
confirm: { what: 'Are you sure?', confirm: 'Yes', cancel: 'No' } }
I'm all open for better suggestions, I'm not even a native english speaker.
The string "Image #{image} of #{count}" becomes "Image 3 of 4" of course.
You can construct your own with the replaced variables, like 'Showing
#{image} of #{count} total.' or '#{image}/#{count}'...
Set defaults like:
$.thickbox.defaults({
i18n: {
confirm: { what: 'Please confirm', confirm: 'Okay', cancel:
'Back' }
}
});
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu.
Analyse effectuée par AVG.
Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/703 - Date: 26/02/2007
14:56
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Torbjorn Tornkvist schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if it also supported Internationalization
> of the Previous/Next strings etc.
>
> Perhaps, it already does? I'll have to check the source.
>
> Cheers, Tobbe
I've stripped out all the strings, i18n is done via settings defaults or
even in override settings in particular Thickboxes (useful for different
forms to Thickboxes on one page):
These are the defaults:
i18n: {
close: { text: 'Close', title: 'Close this window' },
count: { text: 'Image #{image} of #{count}'},
next: { text: 'Next', title: 'Show next image' },
prev: { text: 'Previous', title: 'Show previous image' },
confirm: { what: 'Are you sure?', confirm: 'Yes', cancel: 'No' }
}
I'm all open for better suggestions, I'm not even a native english speaker.
The string "Image #{image} of #{count}" becomes "Image 3 of 4" of
course. You can construct your own with the replaced variables, like
'Showing #{image} of #{count} total.' or '#{image}/#{count}'...
Set defaults like:
$.thickbox.defaults({
i18n: {
confirm: { what: 'Please confirm', confirm: 'Okay', cancel:
'Back' }
}
});
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 26/02/07, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/02/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi jQuerians,
> >
> > I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
> > may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
> >
> > Here's what's new:
> >
> > * Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
> > for content that gets loaded/created later on).
> > * Totally unobtrusive: no classes needed for links, no params in URL.
> > * Confirm type Thickbox, triggered automatically by binding Thickbox to
> > a form. If "yes" the form gets submitted unless a custom callback is
> > defined (for example for Ajax submitting)
> > * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
> > type of link:
> > image: href is an image
> > content: href is a hash
> > ajax: href is internal and not image
> > iframe: href is external and not image
> > confirm: element is form
> > * Improved UI blocking (Thanks to Mike "Malsup" and the BlockUI plugin)
> > * Options for width/height are now passed in as settings object literal
> > or are stored as default values via $.thickbox.defaults({ width: 300,
> > height: 400 })
> > * Options top/left positioning (instead of centering), unit defaults to 'px'
> > * Easier skinning: The look is completely separated into an extra style
> > sheet
> > * Scrolling via mousewheel/touchpad is blocked
> > * Lets you define custom animations for showing the modal window via
> > settings
> > * Requires jQuery 1.1.1
> >
> > Maybe I have forgotten something.
> >
> > I thought of including the required style sheets dynamically, but you
> > would still have to include the path somehow.
> >
> > You can also have a look here (besides repository):
> > http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
> >
> > Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. I
> > just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first!
> >
> >
> > -- Klaus
>
> Looking good so far. A couple of suggestions:
>
> A way to specify a link is to an image (perhaps by className). At the
> moment, it just checks if the image has one of the common extensions.
> It will fail if the image being linked to is dynamically generated
> (and thus does not contain the extension) - i.e.
> /showphoto.ashx?ContactID=23. The content type may not be known
> beforehand, but it is certain to be an image.
>
> Long titles. Sometimes titles can be very long (especially if someone
> else is supplying it), and when they are, you can't see all the text.
> Perhaps the height of the title bar should by dynamic rather than
> fixed. More a CSS issue than anything, but is would be good if the CSS
> supplied with the plugin took this into account. This is what worked
> for me:
>
> #tb-title-bar {
>padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 6px;
> }
>
> #tb-title-bar h2 {
> margin:4px 14px 3px 0; /* 14px is to take into account the close image */
> }
>
> #tb-content {
> /* removed all css */
> }
>
Another suggestion:
You can't use the tab key in the thickbox (except for external
content, which is in an iframe anyway). You may want to add an example
of a form within a thickbox (I've had to do some workarounds to get
forms to work in ThickBox 2.1)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I feel similarly about the slideshow - I wouldn't expect it, and would like to view the image I clicked for as long or short a time as I want to. But, it's a sensible option. And I agree, click=next is not something you'd necessarily expect. And if you don't, you probably wouldn't click on the image at all and would never be aware that the function exists (sounds like I'm starting to argue against myself here, but bear with me). But, the behavior is being taken up here an there, and once a user realizes they have this option they see how much nicer/easier it is just to click though the images themselves rather than have to click tiny 'next' links each time (which, in the case of this Thickbox, are not always in the same place depending on the size of the image). Basically I think if you don't know it's there, you won't use it. But if you do try it, or learn it's there, it a very easy and efficient way to browse through images. When I first came across a gallery that used click=next I thought 'wow, what a great idea. I don't need to repeatedly hunt down little thumbnails and next/prev buttons, I can just flip though all the images by clicking the huge image button right in the middle of the page'. As for the circular browsing, again I think it's a nice beneficial feature, and a sensible option. The main reasons are these: often when I look at a gallery of thumbs, I click the one that looks the most interesting to me first. Chances are it's not the first one, but somewhere in the middle. After checking this image out, I'm happy to continue with 'next' to see what else there is. Once I hit the end, I now need to click several, if not many, images back to see the ones I haven't seen, whereas if I could just wrap around to the beginning it would be much easier. Another reason is once I've gone through a gallery, sometimes I'd like to go through it again from the beginning. In both cases obviously I could close the Thickbox and start again from the beginning, but that's a workaround behavior which should be avoided. So, that's my case ;). Sorry so long-winded, but I see these as very useful features. I have these added to my Thickbox, and it doesn't take much code. Everything's still tight, and rather then separating them why not make them configurable options, much like jCarousel. Adam Klaus Hartl wrote: > > agent2026 schrieb: >> Very nice Klaus. >> >> One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my >> modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first >> image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a >> Thickbox. > > Is clicking on the image will take you to the next image expected > behavior? I don't think so, but it's not my Thickbox, it's ours. So what > do the others think? > > Same for that circular thing? Feedback please! > > Besides, I also planned to implement a slideshow option. Another idea: > Instead of next/previous links one could (optionally) show mini > thumbnails... hm, just thinking out loud. After all, the script won't > get smaller. > > > -- Klaus > > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9179758 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
David Duymelinck schrieb:
> [-Stash-] schreef:
>> I like the sound of this idea if it can be made to work :)
>>
>> Do you have an example of what you're talking about David?
>>
>> Luke
>>
> I will set up an example this evening.
>
David, I have thought about it a little more. Maybe you can achieve what
you need with what is already there. There is an onConfirm option that
will replace the default form submit...
$('form').thickbox({
onConfirm: function() {
}
});
We'd need a way to inject the proper values to the settings object to
get different thickboxes, but that should be doable, at least by setting
$.thickbox.defaults each time depending on which submit button got clicked.
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
[-Stash-] schreef: > I like the sound of this idea if it can be made to work :) > > Do you have an example of what you're talking about David? > > Luke > I will set up an example this evening. -- David Duymelinck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I like the sound of this idea if it can be made to work :)
Do you have an example of what you're talking about David?
Luke
DavidIcreate wrote:
>
> Klaus Hartl schreef:
>> David Duymelinck schrieb:
>>
>>> Klaus Hartl schreef:
>>>
* Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively
on
type of link:
image: href is an image
content: href is a hash
ajax: href is internal and not image
iframe: href is external and not image
confirm: element is form
>>> Is it possible to bind the confirm to the button and not to the form,
>>> that way there can be different confirms for a form. I'm thinking about
>>> a datagrid with two delete buttons, one to delete a row and one to
>>> delete all the data.
>>>
>>
>> Thats not really possible, because you can always submit a form by
>> hitting enter. Besides that it won't degrade graceful, e.g. I'd consider
>> that obtrusive - a button (type button) without JS is useless.
>>
>> Can't you just use two forms?
>>
> The way i use the buttons in php is by coding different behavior
> according with the button names so they are not useless without JS but
> because of the greater loss of data deleting the datagrid i style the
> confirm box more in your face then the delete row confirm. so i was
> thinking something in the line of
>
> $('#form').thickbox({confirms: ['#deletedate': '#confirmdeletedata',
> 'button.deleterow': '#confrimdeleterow']});
>
> it is just something i was wondering about when i saw the demo i don't
> know if it's a useful extension of the code for others. Another use may
> be a submit and a reset button.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9179110
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
I agree with this. Keep it tight and let it do the core things extremely well. Is there any reason you can't have an extension for a plugin? Perhaps all you need is a section in the core file where you can add as many lines as yuo like that say "enable this extension -> path"? Luke Alexandre Plennevaux wrote: > > IMO: > > These are all nice add-ons, but i'd rather have them out of the main TB > library, using optional callbacks. > > If these are popular requests, to address this request and yet not > overblow > the library, I think it's best that you maybe publish a FAQ: how to make > circular clicking / how to make a slideshow out of thickbox / etc... > > I suppose having the possibility to indicate a callback function after TB > is > opened and after TB is closed would enable this, and open up TB for the > widest range of use. > > My 2 centz > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Klaus Hartl > Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 10:29 > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha > > agent2026 schrieb: >> Very nice Klaus. >> >> One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help >> my modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads >> first image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an >> image in a Thickbox. > > Is clicking on the image will take you to the next image expected > behavior? > I don't think so, but it's not my Thickbox, it's ours. So what do the > others > think? > > Same for that circular thing? Feedback please! > > Besides, I also planned to implement a slideshow option. Another idea: > Instead of next/previous links one could (optionally) show mini > thumbnails... hm, just thinking out loud. After all, the script won't get > smaller. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9179087 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus Hartl schreef:
> David Duymelinck schrieb:
>
>> Klaus Hartl schreef:
>>
>>> * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
>>> type of link:
>>> image: href is an image
>>> content: href is a hash
>>> ajax: href is internal and not image
>>> iframe: href is external and not image
>>> confirm: element is form
>>>
>>>
>> Is it possible to bind the confirm to the button and not to the form,
>> that way there can be different confirms for a form. I'm thinking about
>> a datagrid with two delete buttons, one to delete a row and one to
>> delete all the data.
>>
>
> Thats not really possible, because you can always submit a form by
> hitting enter. Besides that it won't degrade graceful, e.g. I'd consider
> that obtrusive - a button (type button) without JS is useless.
>
> Can't you just use two forms?
>
The way i use the buttons in php is by coding different behavior
according with the button names so they are not useless without JS but
because of the greater loss of data deleting the datagrid i style the
confirm box more in your face then the delete row confirm. so i was
thinking something in the line of
$('#form').thickbox({confirms: ['#deletedate': '#confirmdeletedata',
'button.deleterow': '#confrimdeleterow']});
it is just something i was wondering about when i saw the demo i don't
know if it's a useful extension of the code for others. Another use may
be a submit and a reset button.
--
David Duymelinck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
IMO: These are all nice add-ons, but i'd rather have them out of the main TB library, using optional callbacks. If these are popular requests, to address this request and yet not overblow the library, I think it's best that you maybe publish a FAQ: how to make circular clicking / how to make a slideshow out of thickbox / etc... I suppose having the possibility to indicate a callback function after TB is opened and after TB is closed would enable this, and open up TB for the widest range of use. My 2 centz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaus Hartl Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 10:29 To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha agent2026 schrieb: > Very nice Klaus. > > One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help > my modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads > first image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an > image in a Thickbox. Is clicking on the image will take you to the next image expected behavior? I don't think so, but it's not my Thickbox, it's ours. So what do the others think? Same for that circular thing? Feedback please! Besides, I also planned to implement a slideshow option. Another idea: Instead of next/previous links one could (optionally) show mini thumbnails... hm, just thinking out loud. After all, the script won't get smaller. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/703 - Date: 26/02/2007 14:56 ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
David Duymelinck schrieb: > Klaus Hartl schreef: >> * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on >> type of link: >> image: href is an image >> content: href is a hash >> ajax: href is internal and not image >> iframe: href is external and not image >> confirm: element is form >> > Is it possible to bind the confirm to the button and not to the form, > that way there can be different confirms for a form. I'm thinking about > a datagrid with two delete buttons, one to delete a row and one to > delete all the data. Thats not really possible, because you can always submit a form by hitting enter. Besides that it won't degrade graceful, e.g. I'd consider that obtrusive - a button (type button) without JS is useless. Can't you just use two forms? -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
agent2026 schrieb: > Very nice Klaus. > > One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my > modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first > image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a > Thickbox. Is clicking on the image will take you to the next image expected behavior? I don't think so, but it's not my Thickbox, it's ours. So what do the others think? Same for that circular thing? Feedback please! Besides, I also planned to implement a slideshow option. Another idea: Instead of next/previous links one could (optionally) show mini thumbnails... hm, just thinking out loud. After all, the script won't get smaller. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus Hartl schreef: > * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on > type of link: > image: href is an image > content: href is a hash > ajax: href is internal and not image > iframe: href is external and not image > confirm: element is form > Is it possible to bind the confirm to the button and not to the form, that way there can be different confirms for a form. I'm thinking about a datagrid with two delete buttons, one to delete a row and one to delete all the data. Nice work so far, looking forward to the final release. -- David Duymelinck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Very nice Klaus. One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a Thickbox. Great work, and thanks. Adam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9178063 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 27/02/2007, at 1:05 AM, Klaus Hartl wrote: > Hi jQuerians, > > I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It > may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite. > > Here's what's new: I'm dumbstruck. Thanks Klaus and Jorn - you have made my day/week/ month. I find Thickbox so useful and it looks like Thickbox 3 takes it a huge step forward with unobtrusiveness, quality code, and best of all - all the best enhancements put together in one almighty 'box. It's truly One Box to Rule Them All again! I'll be tinkering with this! Joel Birch. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Looks great in FF!
Not there yet in IE6 though. Totally fails actually. But like you said,
it's alpha.
Good luck!
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 9:06 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Hi jQuerians,
I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
Here's what's new:
* Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
for content that gets loaded/created later on).
* Totally unobtrusive: no classes needed for links, no params in URL.
* Confirm type Thickbox, triggered automatically by binding Thickbox to
a form. If "yes" the form gets submitted unless a custom callback is
defined (for example for Ajax submitting)
* Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
type of link:
image: href is an image
content: href is a hash
ajax: href is internal and not image
iframe: href is external and not image
confirm: element is form
* Improved UI blocking (Thanks to Mike "Malsup" and the BlockUI plugin)
* Options for width/height are now passed in as settings object literal
or are stored as default values via $.thickbox.defaults({ width: 300,
height: 400 })
* Options top/left positioning (instead of centering), unit defaults to
'px'
* Easier skinning: The look is completely separated into an extra style
sheet
* Scrolling via mousewheel/touchpad is blocked
* Lets you define custom animations for showing the modal window via
settings
* Requires jQuery 1.1.1
Maybe I have forgotten something.
I thought of including the required style sheets dynamically, but you
would still have to include the path somehow.
You can also have a look here (besides repository):
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. I
just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first!
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus Hartl schrieb: > Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. > I just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first! My Feedback: -Hardcoded Titles: title="Close this window" going to "var defaultValues" -Inline Content: you have in CSS display none, give a way to let Thickbox this setting over Option or so. For unobtrusive and JS is OFF. Thank you -- Viele Grüße, Olaf --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://olaf-bosch.de www.akitafreund.de --- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Hi,
It would be nice if it also supported Internationalization
of the Previous/Next strings etc.
Perhaps, it already does? I'll have to check the source.
Cheers, Tobbe
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Hi jQuerians,
>
> I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
> may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
>
> Here's what's new:
>
> * Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
> for content that gets loaded/created later on).
> * Totally unobtrusive: no classes needed for links, no params in URL.
> * Confirm type Thickbox, triggered automatically by binding Thickbox to
> a form. If "yes" the form gets submitted unless a custom callback is
> defined (for example for Ajax submitting)
> * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
> type of link:
> image: href is an image
> content: href is a hash
> ajax: href is internal and not image
> iframe: href is external and not image
> confirm: element is form
> * Improved UI blocking (Thanks to Mike "Malsup" and the BlockUI plugin)
> * Options for width/height are now passed in as settings object literal
> or are stored as default values via $.thickbox.defaults({ width: 300,
> height: 400 })
> * Options top/left positioning (instead of centering), unit defaults to 'px'
> * Easier skinning: The look is completely separated into an extra style
> sheet
> * Scrolling via mousewheel/touchpad is blocked
> * Lets you define custom animations for showing the modal window via
> settings
> * Requires jQuery 1.1.1
>
> Maybe I have forgotten something.
>
> I thought of including the required style sheets dynamically, but you
> would still have to include the path somehow.
>
> You can also have a look here (besides repository):
> http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
>
> Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. I
> just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first!
>
>
> -- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus Hartl wrote: > > Sean, as I said, I haven't done any testing in IE at all so far. I'm > truly amazed, that it looks great in IE 7 already. :-) > Karl, JFYI inline examples also work in Safari.. ajax example does not. Dmitry -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9167180 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Janet Weber schrieb: > Sounds good > How about building in thumbails so you only have to refer to the main image. > > Janet Not sure if that's reasonable. Imagine you were using the Thickbox for an image gallery with lots of huge images. All original images would have to be loaded, but you'd want to view only one or two maybe. So the loading would take a while and also the browser build-in scaling is not that nice. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
The demo page doesn't seem to work for me. Running IE6. After clicking
on one of the Show Thickbox links, the page is so jumbled looking that
it can't possibly be what you intended Klaus. Also, clicking on any
image on the page causes the image to appear *waaay* down the screen
such that I have to scroll down to see it. If I then click on another
image, it appears just below the first image way down the page. Hmm...
I'm sure this isn't what's supposed to happen.
Chris
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Hi jQuerians,
I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
Here's what's new:
* Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
for content that gets loaded/created later on).
* Totally unobtrusive: no classes needed for links, no params in URL.
* Confirm type Thickbox, triggered automatically by binding Thickbox to
a form. If "yes" the form gets submitted unless a custom callback is
defined (for example for Ajax submitting)
* Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
type of link:
image: href is an image
content: href is a hash
ajax: href is internal and not image
iframe: href is external and not image
confirm: element is form
* Improved UI blocking (Thanks to Mike "Malsup" and the BlockUI plugin)
* Options for width/height are now passed in as settings object literal
or are stored as default values via $.thickbox.defaults({ width: 300,
height: 400 })
* Options top/left positioning (instead of centering), unit defaults to 'px'
* Easier skinning: The look is completely separated into an extra style
sheet
* Scrolling via mousewheel/touchpad is blocked
* Lets you define custom animations for showing the modal window via
settings
* Requires jQuery 1.1.1
Maybe I have forgotten something.
I thought of including the required style sheets dynamically, but you
would still have to include the path somehow.
You can also have a look here (besides repository):
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. I
just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first!
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
http://www.cjordan.us
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Sean O schrieb: > Klaus, > > > Nice job, everything looks great in Firefox 2 & IE 7 PC. > > However, nothing seems to work (for me, anyway) in IE 6 PC. > Image content gets appended below the body and mangled. > Inline/External/Ajax content appears, but on top of existing copy with no > windows, styling, or overlays. > > Note: this is just one PC I've noticed this on... Sean, as I said, I haven't done any testing in IE at all so far. I'm truly amazed, that it looks great in IE 7 already. :-) I think the (untested) fixed positioning emulation causes these weird things in IE 6. Don't worry,I'm going to fix this of course! -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus, Nice job, everything looks great in Firefox 2 & IE 7 PC. However, nothing seems to work (for me, anyway) in IE 6 PC. Image content gets appended below the body and mangled. Inline/External/Ajax content appears, but on top of existing copy with no windows, styling, or overlays. Note: this is just one PC I've noticed this on... ___ SEAN O Klaus Hartl wrote: > > Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. I > just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first! > > > -- Klaus > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9164542 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
> You can also have a look here (besides repository):
> http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
Fantastic, Klaus! This is very "jQuery" now with the simple usage of
$('a').thickbox().
Great, great stuff!
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Sounds good
How about building in thumbails so you only have to refer to the main image.
Janet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 9:06 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Hi jQuerians,
I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
Here's what's new:
* Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
for content that gets loaded/created later on).
* Totally unobtrusive: no classes needed for links, no params in URL.
* Confirm type Thickbox, triggered automatically by binding Thickbox to
a form. If "yes" the form gets submitted unless a custom callback is
defined (for example for Ajax submitting)
* Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
type of link:
image: href is an image
content: href is a hash
ajax: href is internal and not image
iframe: href is external and not image
confirm: element is form
* Improved UI blocking (Thanks to Mike "Malsup" and the BlockUI plugin)
* Options for width/height are now passed in as settings object literal
or are stored as default values via $.thickbox.defaults({ width: 300,
height: 400 })
* Options top/left positioning (instead of centering), unit defaults to 'px'
* Easier skinning: The look is completely separated into an extra style
sheet
* Scrolling via mousewheel/touchpad is blocked
* Lets you define custom animations for showing the modal window via
settings
* Requires jQuery 1.1.1
Maybe I have forgotten something.
I thought of including the required style sheets dynamically, but you
would still have to include the path somehow.
You can also have a look here (besides repository):
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet. I
just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first!
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
