RE: Prevent forward/copy/print
Occasionally. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions But you can recall messages with Outlook! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print Bypassing that 'prevention' is trivial. No such attempt has been made in Exchange. It would be the brunt of further jokes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions This feature is available in Lotus Notes (Go to "delivery option", select "Prevent copying"). It prevent forwarding of Email and even copying the content of the email. It works in a Lotus Note environment. We have MS Exchange 5.5 and I was wondering if Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000 include this feature. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus activity
Epiphany is a period in the Christian calendar. I think it's January 6th. > And speaking of viruses and holidays, has anyone else noticed > how Klez changes for some holidays? How else can you explain > messages like "Have a humour Epiphany," which only turn up in > early January? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Prevent forward/copy/print
Take photographs of the screen? If I use my phone to do that, I can even email them to anyone. Les (I like my SPV) Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend & Gilbert Direct Dial: 0191 269 0110 Mobile: 07976 234 165 http://www.sandersons.com -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2003 23:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print Well, without even investing 10 seconds worth of thought I can get around that -- just print screen shots of the document. With 10+ seconds, and any kind of budget, I could probably do better. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:24 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > You have to have the full version of Adobe Acrobat. Not the Reader > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Putley > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print > > > How? > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print > > > You must have meant PDF files. You can set the restriction of > not being able to print/copy/modify pdf files. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Prevent forward/copy/print > > > I would like to disable "forward/copy/print" of an attachment > that I email to somebody. In doing so, the recipient of the > Email will not be able to forward/copy/print the attachment. > This feature is available in Lotus Notes. Does anyone know > if MS Exchange - MS Outlook allow you to do that. Thanks, > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend & Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Prevent forward/copy/print
Yes, I use the Notes folder to record certain things, so that I can recall them later. ;o) William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions But you can recall messages with Outlook! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent forward/copy/print Bypassing that 'prevention' is trivial. No such attempt has been made in Exchange. It would be the brunt of further jokes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions This feature is available in Lotus Notes (Go to "delivery option", select "Prevent copying"). It prevent forwarding of Email and even copying the content of the email. It works in a Lotus Note environment. We have MS Exchange 5.5 and I was wondering if Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000 include this feature. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Mailing List Software
Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks in advance Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but does not > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the message and > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of > the two rules > is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly always > occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > move message > rules? Thanks. > > Damian > -- > -- > --- > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to the > folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > the Inbox. > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > Exchange 2000 > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > it happens. > Am I missing something? Thanks > > Damian > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited
Let's see, in no particular order: -NTBackup will backup remote Exchange servers, if the backup server has Exchange Admin or the ESM tools loaded (depending on the version of Exchange) -Brick level backups are a waste of time and tape. Read the "Ed Crowley Never Restore Method" in the FAQ and you'll see why. Best of all, its free And, for the record. Brightstor IS ARCSERVE. And all you ever need to know about that product line is available here: http://www.clarksupport.com/whynotca.htm -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited > > > Ed, > > Interesting suggestion, but I doubt I can backup the entire > server from a > remote computer using NTBACKUP...or can I? Also, I thought I > had to down > Exchange BEFORE backing up with NTBACKUP? > > I'm looking at Veritas or CAI's new Brightstor product. > Ideally, I want to > backup the entire server plus backup the Exchange single > instance database > as individual mailboxes (for much easier recover). > > BTW, great website - thanks for the link! > > I'd still like to know why IMS had begun to fail after a backup. Any > thoughts on this. > > >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited. > >From: Ed Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Install the Exchange Administrator (free) on the backup > machine and then > >you can correctly back up Exchange from that machine using NTBACKUP. > >Forget kludgy brick backups: > >http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm > > > >Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP > > >>Can someone please (politely) suggest reasons why port 25 > fails after > >>backing up the message stores. To fix this, I must stop > and restart the > >>services again, however, sometimes even that doesn't work > until I delete > >>the contents of the imcdata\OUT folder (always filled with > undeliverable > >>messages as a result of SPAM). Please note, this problem only began > >>about a month ago and the following batch file has worked > successfully > >>for over 1 year. > >> > >>rem *** Stop appropriate services in order... > >>net stop MSExchangeIMC > >>net stop MSExchangeMSMI > >>net stop MSExchangeMTA > >>net stop MSExchangeIS > >>net stop MSExchangeDS > >>net stop MSExchangeSA > >>rem > >>rem *** Backup commands > >> > >>copy c:\exchsrvr\dsadata\dir.edb f:\secure\backup\dir_b.edb > >>copy d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb f:\secure\backup\priv_b.edb copy > >>d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb f:\secure\backup\pub_b.edb rem > pause rem rem > >>*** Start appropriate services in order... rem net start > MSExchangeSA > >>net start MSExchangeDS net start MSExchangeIS net start > MSExchangeMTA > >>net start MSExchangeMSMI net start MSExchangeIMC exit > >> > >>Yes, I know... not an ideal way of backup up 5Gb's worth of message > >>stores but it does the job when your company didn't have > the funds for > >>another tape backup unit and software. > >> > >>Now I have a more appropriate budget and I just purchased a > new Sony AIT > >>backup drive. Now I require software that will backup Exchange 5.5 > >> (brick level preferred) from another computer (i.e. I do > not wish to > >>install tape drive on Exchange Server). > >> > >>Which product(s) are recommended? > - > Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer. Dipix Technologies Inc. > 613-596-4942 x177 or dial extension 0 to page me. > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited
Oh, and your issue with the IMS dying is the fact you're not doing an Exchange aware backup, and something is munging a file in your IMC directory while the service is shut down. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited > > > Ed, > > Interesting suggestion, but I doubt I can backup the entire > server from a > remote computer using NTBACKUP...or can I? Also, I thought I > had to down > Exchange BEFORE backing up with NTBACKUP? > > I'm looking at Veritas or CAI's new Brightstor product. > Ideally, I want to > backup the entire server plus backup the Exchange single > instance database > as individual mailboxes (for much easier recover). > > BTW, great website - thanks for the link! > > I'd still like to know why IMS had begun to fail after a backup. Any > thoughts on this. > > >Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited. > >From: Ed Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Install the Exchange Administrator (free) on the backup > machine and then > >you can correctly back up Exchange from that machine using NTBACKUP. > >Forget kludgy brick backups: > >http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm > > > >Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP > > >>Can someone please (politely) suggest reasons why port 25 > fails after > >>backing up the message stores. To fix this, I must stop > and restart the > >>services again, however, sometimes even that doesn't work > until I delete > >>the contents of the imcdata\OUT folder (always filled with > undeliverable > >>messages as a result of SPAM). Please note, this problem only began > >>about a month ago and the following batch file has worked > successfully > >>for over 1 year. > >> > >>rem *** Stop appropriate services in order... > >>net stop MSExchangeIMC > >>net stop MSExchangeMSMI > >>net stop MSExchangeMTA > >>net stop MSExchangeIS > >>net stop MSExchangeDS > >>net stop MSExchangeSA > >>rem > >>rem *** Backup commands > >> > >>copy c:\exchsrvr\dsadata\dir.edb f:\secure\backup\dir_b.edb > >>copy d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb f:\secure\backup\priv_b.edb copy > >>d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb f:\secure\backup\pub_b.edb rem > pause rem rem > >>*** Start appropriate services in order... rem net start > MSExchangeSA > >>net start MSExchangeDS net start MSExchangeIS net start > MSExchangeMTA > >>net start MSExchangeMSMI net start MSExchangeIMC exit > >> > >>Yes, I know... not an ideal way of backup up 5Gb's worth of message > >>stores but it does the job when your company didn't have > the funds for > >>another tape backup unit and software. > >> > >>Now I have a more appropriate budget and I just purchased a > new Sony AIT > >>backup drive. Now I require software that will backup Exchange 5.5 > >> (brick level preferred) from another computer (i.e. I do > not wish to > >>install tape drive on Exchange Server). > >> > >>Which product(s) are recommended? > - > Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer. Dipix Technologies Inc. > 613-596-4942 x177 or dial extension 0 to page me. > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: (Very) Delayed delivery
Therein lies my problem - this has been happening from this domain to a number of different domains. Since the "from" domain is my customer, I am "them" (coocookuchoo - bastardized from John Lennon) who has to track this. I have Trend involved with this, but did not hear back from my email or phone call yesterday. If anyone has any ideas, it would be appreciated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery Your servers didn't receive the message til today, so where it was hung up before is something for them to track... Are you having problems with delayed messages from other domains? On 1/16/03 21:34, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's the headers - can anyone read what was going on between 12/6/02 and 1/16/03? The Thanks! Received: from amcgate (192.10.10.1 [192.10.10.1]) by MyExchange.amccorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id CFQ2NAR0; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:16:23 -0500 Received: from smtp.customerdomain.com ([65.124.167.195]) by amcgate; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from 192.168.1.11 by CustomersTrendServer (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:09:21 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: E-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:10:20 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] m> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: E-mail Thread-Index: AcKdY4D/RSB6DLfzTSWMDvGfHMg++g== From: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery Look at the headers of the message. On 1/16/03 6:03, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today - 1/16. They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding to a Trend InterScan Virus Wall which is using DNS to send emails. I know both boxes have the correct time on them so I'm stumped how this message could have bounced around so long. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSExchange IS Mailbox Send Queue Size High
Yeah something is going on. I did a compare and the MTA deferred delivery queue is emtpy and the IS send queue is still at 54. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSExchange IS Mailbox Send Queue Size High You might want to check the MSExchangeMTA\Deferred Delivery Queue against the MSExchangeIS Private\Send Queue to see if those match up. Hunter -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSExchange IS Mailbox Send Queue Size High No, email is being delivered fine. I'll follow up on that tool. Thanks Chris. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MSExchange IS Mailbox Send Queue Size High Are users reporting missing or delayed mail? I think PSS might have a tool or two to enumerate these messages. On 1/16/03 6:36, "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, I thought that might have been the issue, but I'm now at 55. I don't think our users use this option much so I am kind of curious to why its still showing a buildup. What other options do I have to find out what is in this queue? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MSExchange IS Mailbox Send Queue Size High I thought that might be it, but I'm a bit sluggish this morning (all that perfmon testing starts to run together after a while as well). On 1/13/03 11:48, "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why yes it does So I guess I am looking at deferred messages then. Thanks Chris. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MSExchange IS Mailbox Send Queue Size High My mind is running 2 cups of coffee short this morning, but if you send a message with a deferred delivery time, does the queue increase to 46? On 1/13/03 10:31, "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Exchange 2k SP3... I was just looking at Perfmon and noticed the queue is steady at 45 and has remained there. I don't have any other high traffic going on right now. All other queues are low. Any idea why it is high? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mover Server Wizard
What is everyone using for automating the recreation of Outlook profiles? I have found Autoprof that appears to the job, but wanted to get any input as to what experience others have had using this tool. Thanks, Mike Lagase -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mover Server Wizard After the Move server wizard has been run to move a server in to another site and Org, all users need to update their Outlook profile to login correctly under the new DN. My question is whether there is a utility of some sort that will automate this procedure to make this seemless for over 1000 users or is this a manual process. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Mike Lagase _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Mailing List Software
Probably not, no. But if you're willing to set up a second box, there are lots of linux ones, or you could use mercury32 for Win32 OS's. http://www.pmail.com/whatsnew/new_m32.htm http://www.slipstick.com/exs/lists.htm -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Free Mailing List Software Subject: Free Mailing List Software Sensitivity: Private Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks in advance Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: (Very) Delayed delivery
Wasn't Coocookuchoo from Simon and Garfunkel? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed delivery > > > Therein lies my problem - this has been happening from this > domain to a > number of different domains. Since the "from" domain is my > customer, I > am "them" (coocookuchoo - bastardized from John Lennon) who > has to track > this. I have Trend involved with this, but did not hear back from my > email or phone call yesterday. If anyone has any ideas, it would be > appreciated. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery > > > Your servers didn't receive the message til today, so where > it was hung > up before is something for them to track... Are you having > problems with > delayed messages from other domains? > > On 1/16/03 21:34, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Here's the headers - can anyone read what was going on > between 12/6/02 > and 1/16/03? The Thanks! > > > Received: from amcgate (192.10.10.1 [192.10.10.1]) by > MyExchange.amccorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail > Service Version 5.5.2653.13) > id CFQ2NAR0; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:16:23 -0500 > Received: from smtp.customerdomain.com ([65.124.167.195]) by amcgate; > Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) > Received: from 192.168.1.11 by CustomersTrendServer (InterScan E-Mail > VirusWall NT); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:09:21 -0500 > content-class: urn:content-classes:message > Subject: E-mail > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:10:20 -0500 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > rdomain.co > > m> > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > Thread-Topic: E-mail > Thread-Index: AcKdY4D/RSB6DLfzTSWMDvGfHMg++g== > From: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:41 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery > > > Look at the headers of the message. > > On 1/16/03 6:03, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about > emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today - > 1/16. > > They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding to a Trend > InterScan Virus > > > Wall which is using DNS to send emails. I know both boxes have the > correct time on them so I'm stumped how this message could > have bounced > around so long. > > Any ideas? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Re: (Very) Delayed delivery
Nope. I am the Walrus. - Original Message - From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:24 AM Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed delivery > Wasn't Coocookuchoo from Simon and Garfunkel? > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:31 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed delivery > > > > > > Therein lies my problem - this has been happening from this > > domain to a > > number of different domains. Since the "from" domain is my > > customer, I > > am "them" (coocookuchoo - bastardized from John Lennon) who > > has to track > > this. I have Trend involved with this, but did not hear back from my > > email or phone call yesterday. If anyone has any ideas, it would be > > appreciated. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:41 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery > > > > > > Your servers didn't receive the message til today, so where > > it was hung > > up before is something for them to track... Are you having > > problems with > > delayed messages from other domains? > > > > On 1/16/03 21:34, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Here's the headers - can anyone read what was going on > > between 12/6/02 > > and 1/16/03? The Thanks! > > > > > > Received: from amcgate (192.10.10.1 [192.10.10.1]) by > > MyExchange.amccorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail > > Service Version 5.5.2653.13) > > id CFQ2NAR0; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:16:23 -0500 > > Received: from smtp.customerdomain.com ([65.124.167.195]) by amcgate; > > Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) > > Received: from 192.168.1.11 by CustomersTrendServer (InterScan E-Mail > > VirusWall NT); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:09:21 -0500 > > content-class: urn:content-classes:message > > Subject: E-mail > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:10:20 -0500 > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 > > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > rdomain.co > > > > m> > > X-MS-Has-Attach: > > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > > Thread-Topic: E-mail > > Thread-Index: AcKdY4D/RSB6DLfzTSWMDvGfHMg++g== > > From: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:41 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery > > > > > > Look at the headers of the message. > > > > On 1/16/03 6:03, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about > > emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today - > > 1/16. > > > > They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding to a Trend > > InterScan Virus > > > > > > Wall which is using DNS to send emails. I know both boxes have the > > correct time on them so I'm stumped how this message could > > have bounced > > around so long. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ___
Contacts
Is there a way to export a distribution list from your Contacts Folder to a CSV or XLS file? ... Using the Import/Export utility of Outlook 2002 only captures single contacts and not distribution lists within the Contacts Folder. _ MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Contacts
You mean a Personal DL? I would check on slipstick.com for utilities or code. - Original Message - From: "Milt Atkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:41 AM Subject: Contacts > Is there a way to export a distribution list from your Contacts Folder to a > CSV or XLS file? ... Using the Import/Export utility of Outlook 2002 only > captures single contacts and not distribution lists within the Contacts > Folder. > > _ > MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger, I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but does not > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the message and > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > move message > rules? Thanks. > > Damian > -- > -- > --- > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is copied to > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > the Inbox. > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > Exchange 2000 > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > it happens. > Am I missing something? Thanks > > Damian > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
That's because your security guy doesn't have to support the desktops or pay for training users in a new OS. Tell him to cut down on the Kool-Aide. If he thinks linux is secure then you need to find another security guy. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: (Very) Delayed delivery
I would recommend capturing your network data at the time the email should have been sent. This will show you: 1. If your mail server sent (or attempted to send) the mail. 2. The response from the other server. 3. If your mail server never sent the mail when it should have. I have used a freeware product called ethereal (www.ethereal.com) to help me solve quite a few problems of this nature. Good luck Doug -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed delivery Therein lies my problem - this has been happening from this domain to a number of different domains. Since the "from" domain is my customer, I am "them" (coocookuchoo - bastardized from John Lennon) who has to track this. I have Trend involved with this, but did not hear back from my email or phone call yesterday. If anyone has any ideas, it would be appreciated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery Your servers didn't receive the message til today, so where it was hung up before is something for them to track... Are you having problems with delayed messages from other domains? On 1/16/03 21:34, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's the headers - can anyone read what was going on between 12/6/02 and 1/16/03? The Thanks! Received: from amcgate (192.10.10.1 [192.10.10.1]) by MyExchange.amccorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id CFQ2NAR0; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:16:23 -0500 Received: from smtp.customerdomain.com ([65.124.167.195]) by amcgate; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from 192.168.1.11 by CustomersTrendServer (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:09:21 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: E-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:10:20 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] m> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: E-mail Thread-Index: AcKdY4D/RSB6DLfzTSWMDvGfHMg++g== From: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery Look at the headers of the message. On 1/16/03 6:03, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today - 1/16. They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding to a Trend InterScan Virus Wall which is using DNS to send emails. I know both boxes have the correct time on them so I'm stumped how this message could have bounced around so long. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
EXACTLY! Unfortunately he is also a Assistant VP -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. That's because your security guy doesn't have to support the desktops or pay for training users in a new OS. Tell him to cut down on the Kool-Aide. If he thinks linux is secure then you need to find another security guy. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The SEC is killing me.
quack - Original Message - From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:19 AM Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. EXACTLY! Unfortunately he is also a Assistant VP -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. That's because your security guy doesn't have to support the desktops or pay for training users in a new OS. Tell him to cut down on the Kool-Aide. If he thinks linux is secure then you need to find another security guy. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
Aflack! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me. quack - Original Message - From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:19 AM Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. EXACTLY! Unfortunately he is also a Assistant VP -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. That's because your security guy doesn't have to support the desktops or pay for training users in a new OS. Tell him to cut down on the Kool-Aide. If he thinks linux is secure then you need to find another security guy. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Damien, I have the same issue with a few of my rules in a Outlook 2000/ Exchange 2000 setup. I've done everything I can think of, scoured the internet for an answer, but so far it is unsolved. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. > Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am > assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone > seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > > the Inbox. > > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > Exchange 2000 > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > it happens. > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > Damian > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Mailing List Software
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free Mailing List Software Sensitivity: Private Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks in advance Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
So am I. Doesn't mean he's not wrong, just that he's got a title. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. EXACTLY! Unfortunately he is also a Assistant VP -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. That's because your security guy doesn't have to support the desktops or pay for training users in a new OS. Tell him to cut down on the Kool-Aide. If he thinks linux is secure then you need to find another security guy. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
So far hes bullet proof, every challenge to his proposals is met with "this is the direction the company is moving" Got any job opening for a 2nd rate net admin with a kick for learning things quickly? :p -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. So am I. Doesn't mean he's not wrong, just that he's got a title. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. EXACTLY! Unfortunately he is also a Assistant VP -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. That's because your security guy doesn't have to support the desktops or pay for training users in a new OS. Tell him to cut down on the Kool-Aide. If he thinks linux is secure then you need to find another security guy. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/sea
Re: Free Mailing List Software
Nope. On 1/17/03 5:10, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (Very) Delayed delivery
Sorry, you'll need to look at the logs of their mail server to see when it transferred to the intermediary box and then troubleshoot the issue from there. On 1/17/03 6:30, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Therein lies my problem - this has been happening from this domain to a number of different domains. Since the "from" domain is my customer, I am "them" (coocookuchoo - bastardized from John Lennon) who has to track this. I have Trend involved with this, but did not hear back from my email or phone call yesterday. If anyone has any ideas, it would be appreciated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery Your servers didn't receive the message til today, so where it was hung up before is something for them to track... Are you having problems with delayed messages from other domains? On 1/16/03 21:34, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's the headers - can anyone read what was going on between 12/6/02 and 1/16/03? The Thanks! Received: from amcgate (192.10.10.1 [192.10.10.1]) by MyExchange.amccorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id CFQ2NAR0; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:16:23 -0500 Received: from smtp.customerdomain.com ([65.124.167.195]) by amcgate; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from 192.168.1.11 by CustomersTrendServer (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:09:21 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: E-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:10:20 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] m> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: E-mail Thread-Index: AcKdY4D/RSB6DLfzTSWMDvGfHMg++g== From: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery Look at the headers of the message. On 1/16/03 6:03, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today - 1/16. They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding to a Trend InterScan Virus Wall which is using DNS to send emails. I know both boxes have the correct time on them so I'm stumped how this message could have bounced around so long. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mover Server Wizard
I use a small Canadian named Pierre. Autoprof works too. On 1/17/03 7:06, "Mike Lagase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is everyone using for automating the recreation of Outlook profiles? I have found Autoprof that appears to the job, but wanted to get any input as to what experience others have had using this tool. Thanks, Mike Lagase -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mover Server Wizard After the Move server wizard has been run to move a server in to another site and Org, all users need to update their Outlook profile to login correctly under the new DN. My question is whether there is a utility of some sort that will automate this procedure to make this seemless for over 1000 users or is this a manual process. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Mike Lagase _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Mailing List Software
What, you wanted to give away software that was free? On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free Mailing List Software Sensitivity: Private Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks in advance Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
He's a moron. Operating systems aren't secure. Secured deployments of operating systems are. Which would be the job of oh, say, a security guy. Tell him to quit waving his magic wand, take off the pointy hat, and do his job. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:06 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: The SEC is killing me. Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 sp3, OWA IIS5 and windows 2000
I already searched at many places. Microsoft comes with one article which seemed to be the solution. That is: deleting an object from the transaction server. Windows 2000 places these objects in the component services, aldo the right object to delete wasn't there. Regards, Bob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Mailing List Software
Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have had enough of yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an automated mailing list on MS Exchange for nowt Nik > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > What, you wanted to give away software that was free? > > On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. > > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Free Mailing List Software > Sensitivity: Private > > > Hello > > Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software > package for MS > Exchange Server 5.5 > > Thanks in advance > > Nik > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
I would fall on the ground laughing if I could just tell him that. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. He's a moron. Operating systems aren't secure. Secured deployments of operating systems are. Which would be the job of oh, say, a security guy. Tell him to quit waving his magic wand, take off the pointy hat, and do his job. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:06 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: The SEC is killing me. Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Everyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did it have any security? And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both Smartware and Smartware II as well. I remember one time I had a requirement to make the database in 3.3 do something that in theory it could not. So I used the macro language to write the code from scratch and generate screens that looked like Smart itself including the menus and commands , thus giving the illusion that Smart had suddenly gotten some new functionality. It was really quick and easy to do, since any command could be linked back to itself, and module linking effectively made the nesting levels unlimited. It was an amazingly powerful environment. Office didn't really begin to come close to it until Office 95, but even the XP version still can't do some of the things that Smartware II could do, which is probably a good thing. A Smartware II program could rewrite the contents of the ROM BIOS, or write directly to things like the disk controller's controls, flip bits on the NIC and so on. In a Netware environment it could do all of this across multiple machines and even retrieve the values of any address using a pair of linked macros. You could write a help center program, complete with take over or merely screen replication tools. It was bad. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange alias naming
Exchange 5.5 I have always made my Exchange mailbox alias the same as the NT user ID this simplifies the authentication process for POP3, IMAP and NNTP and it makes it easy to rollout Outlook through an intellimirror mst file. However, one of my clients has a different naming convention in the form "firstname lastname" which they want to use. My question is what do other people standardise on for the naming convention of the alias and can you add any more weight to my argument. TIA, Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Mailing List Software
There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. On 1/17/03 8:55, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have had enough of yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an automated mailing list on MS Exchange for nowt Nik > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > What, you wanted to give away software that was free? > > On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. > > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Free Mailing List Software > Sensitivity: Private > > > Hello > > Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software > package for MS > Exchange Server 5.5 > > Thanks in advance > > Nik > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Mailing List Software
Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and 'web beacons' > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:58 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, > none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. > > > On 1/17/03 8:55, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have > had enough of > yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an > automated mailing > list on MS Exchange for nowt > > Nik > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > > > > What, you wanted to give away software that was free? > > > > On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Free Mailing List Software > > Sensitivity: Private > > > > > > Hello > > > > Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software > > package for MS > > Exchange Server 5.5 > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Nik > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange alias naming
The proper format for POP3 or IMAP usernames is domain/NT_ID/Mailbox_Alias. That's the format I use all the time, every time[1] so it doesn't matter to in the least what the format is, as long as it minimizes the potential ambiguity associated with logon IDs. I also never use Exchange for NNTP, as I'd rather listen to a technical discussion by Tener than use Exchange for that. However, mailbox alias is about as close to a meaningless attribute as one can find in Exchange, so I'm not sure why it matters or why the customer would even notice or care. How would such a thing even come up in conversation? [1] In fact that's the format specified in my entourage profile even as I type. On 1/17/03 8:57, "Bendall, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Exchange 5.5 I have always made my Exchange mailbox alias the same as the NT user ID this simplifies the authentication process for POP3, IMAP and NNTP and it makes it easy to rollout Outlook through an intellimirror mst file. However, one of my clients has a different naming convention in the form "firstname lastname" which they want to use. My question is what do other people standardise on for the naming convention of the alias and can you add any more weight to my argument. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Mailing List Software
Have I mentioned Mercury32? Oh wait, yes I have. I guess web beacons and adverts are preferable? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:09 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Free Mailing List Software Subject: RE: Free Mailing List Software Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and 'web beacons' > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:58 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, none of > them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Mailing List Software
Putting up with those is what gets you 'free' lists right? On 1/17/03 9:08, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and 'web beacons' > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:58 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, > none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. > > > On 1/17/03 8:55, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have > had enough of > yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an > automated mailing > list on MS Exchange for nowt > > Nik > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > > > > What, you wanted to give away software that was free? > > > > On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Free Mailing List Software > > Sensitivity: Private > > > > > > Hello > > > > Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software > > package for MS > > Exchange Server 5.5 > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Nik > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Mailing List Software
I guess so, wouldn't be too bad if you didn't get replies 3 hours before you get the original :) > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 January 2003 15:24 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > Putting up with those is what gets you 'free' lists right? > > On 1/17/03 9:08, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and > 'web beacons' > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:58 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > > > > There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, > > none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. > > > > > > On 1/17/03 8:55, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have > > had enough of > > yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an > > automated mailing > > list on MS Exchange for nowt > > > > Nik > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > > > > > > > What, you wanted to give away software that was free? > > > > > > On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Free Mailing List Software > > > Sensitivity: Private > > > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software > > > package for MS > > > Exchange Server 5.5 > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > Nik > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTbackup hardware compression ?
I was wondering if hardware compression is generally effective when doing an Exchange-aware NTbackup backup, or if the databases are already compressed? I have a 12GB capacity DDS3 tape drive that I use to do on-line backups of my Exchange server. I have made sure that I am either using the command line switch /hc:on, or checking "hardware compression" in the NTbackup screeen. However, since my Priv.Edb creeped up to >12 Gig, the backup spans two tapes. Could there be something I'm doing incorrectly, or is it time to get a bigger tape drive, or an Exchange backup program that understands tape loaders, or just deal with the additional pain of tape flipping? Thanks for any info Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers ! (next year) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. > Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am > assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone > seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > > the Inbox. > > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > Exchange 2000 > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > it happens. > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > Damian > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
copy of message in outbox (variation on a theme)
exchange 5.5, client outlook 98,2000 (mapi, NOT pop3). User sends "pre-made" message, it looks like the copy that is supposed to go to sent items winds up in the outbox. User clicks send, message is received by recipient, but seems to be stranded in the outbox. I caught one in action and looked - it's not a message waiting to be sent (and it does not prevent other mail from sending - nor does it go away if you send another message). When I opened the stranded message, it doesn't have the "send again" button. There *also* is not a copy of the message in sent items. I have only seen it on one user so far, but have reports of other users. Any ideas? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the > > Inbox. I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine > > what I've done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > Exchange 2000 > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > it happens. > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > Damian > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: NTbackup hardware compression ?
I used to back up a 17GB+ Priv on a DDS3 tape drive without spanning tapes. Something must be wrong with either the tape HW or the driver you are using. Aaron -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTbackup hardware compression ? I was wondering if hardware compression is generally effective when doing an Exchange-aware NTbackup backup, or if the databases are already compressed? I have a 12GB capacity DDS3 tape drive that I use to do on-line backups of my Exchange server. I have made sure that I am either using the command line switch /hc:on, or checking "hardware compression" in the NTbackup screeen. However, since my Priv.Edb creeped up to >12 Gig, the backup spans two tapes. Could there be something I'm doing incorrectly, or is it time to get a bigger tape drive, or an Exchange backup program that understands tape loaders, or just deal with the additional pain of tape flipping? Thanks for any info Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers ! (next year) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NTbackup hardware compression ?
Does the tape drive support it? - Original Message - From: "Jim Helfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:05 AM Subject: NTbackup hardware compression ? > > I was wondering if hardware compression is generally effective when doing > an Exchange-aware NTbackup backup, or if the databases are already > compressed? > > I have a 12GB capacity DDS3 tape drive that I use to do on-line backups of > my Exchange server. I have made sure that I am either using the command line > switch /hc:on, or checking "hardware compression" in the NTbackup screeen. > > However, since my Priv.Edb creeped up to >12 Gig, the backup spans two > tapes. > > Could there be something I'm doing incorrectly, or is it time to get a > bigger tape drive, or an Exchange backup program that understands tape > loaders, or just deal with the additional pain of tape flipping? > > Thanks for any info > > > Jim Helfer > WTW Architects > Pittsburgh PA > Go Stillers ! (next year) > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rules Wizard Issue
You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the > > Inbox. I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine > > what I've done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > Exchange 2000 > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > it happens. > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > Damian > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exporting Public Folders to PSTs
I've got Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 98 and I've exported and imported Public Folders to PSTs many times. However, I'm trying to export some Public Folders now so that we can retire them to tape and remove them from the system and I'm getting the following error: "Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied." I've searched MS and all I find is an article that tell me to stop theh Anti-Virus software on the server I did and it didn't help. Another one about adding the Microsoft Mail service to my client ... didn't try this. Another one about copying a new store.exe to the server I can't do this at this time. And, one about a size limit of 2 GB ... these are only about 60 MB in size each. Would it have anything to do with the fact that when I'm on this particular Exchange server that the Public Folders are stored and I'm in the Exchange Administrator and I click on Public Folders I get a Dr. Watson and the Administrator shuts down. But, I can open the Administrator program on my PC. Could my pub.edb be corrupt? Is there a way to move these particular Public Folders to another server? Any help or suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller Systems Admin BSPMLAW _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Get a copy of cleansweep from the resource kit, install it, blow away your rules and recreate them. If that doesn't work, rebuild your Outlook profile. Otherwise, if you're absolutely sure it's a bug, call PSS and prove it to them, not us. The fact that its not reproduceable by others lends credence to it not being a bug, rather it's something specific to either your machine, your account, or a combination of the two. My use of computers predates Microsoft. I've also worked in tech support for a software company. At this point, neither of those matter. What does matter is that at this point you haven't done anything to prove to us it's a bug. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the > EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the > email. Not > make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever > seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using > Microsoft's > products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said > before And it's > definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these > rules before in > Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more > constructive feedback > I'd like to hear it. Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, > in Outlook > 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Roger, > > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. > Either > > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I > am assuming > > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as > everyone seems to > > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > > > > Damian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > > copy of the > > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules > wizard to > > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is > for another > > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I > noticed that the > > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > > does not > > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > > message and > > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > > move message > > > rules? Thanks. > > > > > > Damian > > > -- > > > -- > > > --- > > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > > it matches > > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > > copied to > > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the > original from the > > > > Inbox. I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine > > > what I've done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > > Exchange 2000 > > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > > it happens. > > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > > > Damian > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To un
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the > > Inbox. I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine > > what I've done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > Exchange 2000 > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > it happens. > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > Damian > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger posted a perfectly valid solution approach - have you tried that, or are you so blinded by your presumption that you've found a bug? -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of > the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the > > Inbox. I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine > > what I've done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > Exchange 2000 > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > it happens. > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > Damian > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
"I can't get rules after it to work." - well, that is kinda the point of that particular rule option. -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 16:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Tried this and it makes things worse, I can't get rules after it to work. Here is something else that is interesting. I tried to create a dummy rule in front of it to filter fake messages, but it does not aleviate the situation. Anyways, I have to assume this is a bug with Outlook 2002. I did not find anything on Microsofts web page yet. Thanks anyways. Damian -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue You might try adding "and stop processing more rules" to the end of your rules. -Peter -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules Wizard Issue I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is copied to the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the Inbox. I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) Exchange 2000 The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when it happens. Am I missing something? Thanks Damian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EXE Outlook Forms
Hi, we are using an Exchange integrated Fax solution and it is using EXE files for the custom forms. We blocked with our AV (Symantec) the transfer of EXE,COM. VBS ... files. The vendor says that's the way there forms are and we basically have to live with it. I would like to know if it is commopn practice to make Outlooks Forms with EXE extensions and what other options would be. I belive they did EXE files because they wanted to protect the source code. The forms themselves are standard and don't contain any weired functionality. Would appreciate your feedback regards uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Here is my issue, the laptop is brand new, the install of Outlook 2002 is brand new, the rules created were brand new on a new profile. This is why I say it is a bug. No I am not so 'blinded' by my presumption that it is a bug to try other peoples ideas. That is why I wrote here. After seeing the behavior of the rules wizard it just seemed so weird on a machine that has never been used before Just my opinion. Roger, I will see what I can do about getting Cleensweep and go form there Damian -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Roger posted a perfectly valid solution approach - have you tried that, or are you so blinded by your presumption that you've found a bug? -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of > the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the > > Inbox. I've done these rules
RE: EXE Outlook Forms
2 cents..Sounds like you are using Faxination. I ran into the same thing... I was running NAI 4.5 on the exch55 box. NAI tech support, came up with a reg hack to exclude said exe files. thus the app then was able to work correctly with OL thru Exch. Id say call Symantec and see if they can do the same for their product Note: It was 2 EXE files that had to be ignored then the app can work as it should bill -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXE Outlook Forms Hi, we are using an Exchange integrated Fax solution and it is using EXE files for the custom forms. We blocked with our AV (Symantec) the transfer of EXE,COM. VBS ... files. The vendor says that's the way there forms are and we basically have to live with it. I would like to know if it is commopn practice to make Outlooks Forms with EXE extensions and what other options would be. I belive they did EXE files because they wanted to protect the source code. The forms themselves are standard and don't contain any weired functionality. Would appreciate your feedback regards uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
2 more cent's I personally I never depend on the mass installed OS's loaded from the hardware vendor..As I have run into more errors with these "factory" installs then if I reload the whole thing fresh... Me Id blow it away load fresh..then see bill -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Here is my issue, the laptop is brand new, the install of Outlook 2002 is brand new, the rules created were brand new on a new profile. This is why I say it is a bug. No I am not so 'blinded' by my presumption that it is a bug to try other peoples ideas. That is why I wrote here. After seeing the behavior of the rules wizard it just seemed so weird on a machine that has never been used before Just my opinion. Roger, I will see what I can do about getting Cleensweep and go form there Damian -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Roger posted a perfectly valid solution approach - have you tried that, or are you so blinded by your presumption that you've found a bug? -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of > the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message r
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
I believe this was done fresh at the company here Of course there's the argument that ghosted installs suck too. ;) Seriously, I don't know where the problem could lie. If I had the option to redo the install on the laptop I would, but as it is my third day here and I'm not an internal support person myself, I'm not sure how they'd take to this quite yet... Still need to feel the waters to see what I can do yet. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue 2 more cent's I personally I never depend on the mass installed OS's loaded from the hardware vendor..As I have run into more errors with these "factory" installs then if I reload the whole thing fresh... Me Id blow it away load fresh..then see bill -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Here is my issue, the laptop is brand new, the install of Outlook 2002 is brand new, the rules created were brand new on a new profile. This is why I say it is a bug. No I am not so 'blinded' by my presumption that it is a bug to try other peoples ideas. That is why I wrote here. After seeing the behavior of the rules wizard it just seemed so weird on a machine that has never been used before Just my opinion. Roger, I will see what I can do about getting Cleensweep and go form there Damian -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Roger posted a perfectly valid solution approach - have you tried that, or are you so blinded by your presumption that you've found a bug? -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of > the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > >
Re: Rules Wizard Issue
You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if > it matches > > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is > copied to > > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the > > Inbox. I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine > > what I've done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > > Exchange 2000 > > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > > it happens. > > Am I missing something? Thanks > > > > Damian > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.ht
EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders
I'm moving a 5.5 server from one machine to another. I've followed the EC Move Server steps from the FAQ and all _seems_ good. I've rehomed the public folders, added the replicas, moved all mailboxes and followed the MSKB on removing the fist server in a site. Now I'm up to the point of REMOVING the replicas of the public folders from the old machine. The two machines have had several days to replicate, but how do I "know" that all the PFs have replicated correctly. Once I remove them from the old machine I'm toast if something went wrong, no? What should I look for? Is there something in Outlook that I can see that says "I'm looking at EX1's copy of this folder" vs "I'm looking at NEPTUNE's copy of this folder." NEPTUNE being the old machine and EX1 the new. Thanks. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something to add to the EC Move server method
Make sure your IS deleted item retention is set correctly on the new server before you do the move. I just lost my delete item restore ability since I hadn't changed the default of 0. I've now changed the default. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Something to add to the EC Move server method
Floss every night. - Original Message - From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 AM Subject: Something to add to the EC Move server method > Make sure your IS deleted item retention is set correctly on the new server > before you do the move. I just lost my delete item restore ability since I > hadn't changed the default of 0. I've now changed the default. > > -Walden > > > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Something to add to the EC Move server method
IIRC items in DIR don't survive a mailbox move even if it is enabled. On 1/17/03 10:37, "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Make sure your IS deleted item retention is set correctly on the new server before you do the move. I just lost my delete item restore ability since I hadn't changed the default of 0. I've now changed the default. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Chris, I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only... This is the process I used to create the rules: Tools --> Rules Wizard --> New Selected 'Start from blank rule' Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a contact in my PAB to meet this critieria. Selected 'Move to specified folder'. Picked a folder for the message. Clicked finished. When I originaly wrote the question I was only getting client side rules After recreating my profile I am getting server side rules only... It's very strange. As I am getting a little muddles over here I am going to start from scratch and wipe all rules with cleansweep. Then I am going to wipe all my profiles. After this I will recreate my profile and then the rules to see if this clears things up. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > -- > > -- > > --- > > I have a rule setup to move a message w
Re: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders
So you see them all under the instances tab on the pub info store properties for the new server? - Original Message - From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM Subject: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders > I'm moving a 5.5 server from one machine to another. I've followed the EC > Move Server steps from the FAQ and all _seems_ good. I've rehomed the public > folders, added the replicas, moved all mailboxes and followed the MSKB on > removing the fist server in a site. > > Now I'm up to the point of REMOVING the replicas of the public folders from > the old machine. The two machines have had several days to replicate, but > how do I "know" that all the PFs have replicated correctly. Once I remove > them from the old machine I'm toast if something went wrong, no? What should > I look for? Is there something in Outlook that I can see that says "I'm > looking at EX1's copy of this folder" vs "I'm looking at NEPTUNE's copy of > this folder." NEPTUNE being the old machine and EX1 the new. > > Thanks. > -Walden > > > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NTbackup hardware compression ?
Thanks, I'll check my drivers & hardware. I'm using either a Sony SDT-9000, or an HP Surestore, so I'm fairly confident that at least the Surestore should be able to do hardware compression. Jim Helfer Aaron Brasslett wrote: > I used to back up a 17GB+ Priv on a DDS3 tape drive without spanning > tapes. Something must be wrong with either the tape HW or the driver > you are using. > > Aaron > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: NTbackup hardware compression ? > > > > I was wondering if hardware compression is generally effective when > doing an Exchange-aware NTbackup backup, or if the databases are > already compressed? > > I have a 12GB capacity DDS3 tape drive that I use to do on-line > backups of my Exchange server. I have made sure that I am either > using the command line switch /hc:on, or checking "hardware > compression" in the NTbackup screeen. > > However, since my Priv.Edb creeped up to >12 Gig, the backup spans > two tapes. > > Could there be something I'm doing incorrectly, or is it time to > get a bigger tape drive, or an Exchange backup program that > understands tape loaders, or just deal with the additional pain of > tape flipping? > > Thanks for any info > > > Jim Helfer > WTW Architects > Pittsburgh PA > Go Stillers ! (next year) > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
> Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > contact in my PAB Makes it a client side rule. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Chris, > I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only... > This is the process I used to create the rules: > > Tools --> Rules Wizard --> New > > Selected 'Start from blank rule' > Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > contact in my PAB > to meet this critieria. > Selected 'Move to specified folder'. Picked a folder for the message. > Clicked finished. > > When I originaly wrote the question I was only getting client side > rules After recreating my profile I am getting server side rules > only... It's very strange. As I am getting a little muddles > over here > I am going to start from scratch and wipe all rules with cleansweep. > Then I am going to wipe all my profiles. After this I will > recreate my > profile and then the rules to see if this clears things up. Thanks. > > > Damian > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', > does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? > > On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Chris, > My apologies for not relaying these results. It > still fails. I > > even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from > scratch and this fails also. > > For my next step I think I will have to try the > various service > packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 > (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of > luck I guess. Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > You've never indicated the results of using contacts to > define the rules > > did you? > > On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Roger, > Look back at the previous emails in the discussion > and see the > EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the > email. Not > > > make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever > seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using > Microsoft's > > > products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said > before And it's > definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these > rules before in > > > Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more > constructive feedback > > > I'd like to hear it. Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, > in Outlook > > > 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Roger, > > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. > Either > > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I > am assuming > > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as > everyone seems to > > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > > > > Damian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > > copy of the > > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > > > > Update to this
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger, Does this make any difference? Other than the client has to be open to process it? I ask only because my rules are no longer client side (the rules don't specifically state this in the rule wizard as they did earlier). Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > contact in my PAB Makes it a client side rule. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Chris, > I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only... This is > the process I used to create the rules: > > Tools --> Rules Wizard --> New > > Selected 'Start from blank rule' > Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > contact in my PAB > to meet this critieria. > Selected 'Move to specified folder'. Picked a folder for the message. > Clicked finished. > > When I originaly wrote the question I was only getting client side > rules After recreating my profile I am getting server side rules > only... It's very strange. As I am getting a little muddles > over here > I am going to start from scratch and wipe all rules with cleansweep. > Then I am going to wipe all my profiles. After this I will recreate > my profile and then the rules to see if this clears things up. > Thanks. > > > Damian > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', > does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? > > On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Chris, > My apologies for not relaying these results. It > still fails. I > > even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from > scratch and this fails also. > > For my next step I think I will have to try the > various service > packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 > (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of > luck I guess. Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > You've never indicated the results of using contacts to > define the rules > > did you? > > On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Roger, > Look back at the previous emails in the discussion > and see the > EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the > email. Not > > > make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever > seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using > Microsoft's > > > products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said > before And it's > definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these > rules before in > > > Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more > constructive feedback > > > I'd like to hear it. Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, > in Outlook > > > 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Roger, > > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. > Either > > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I > am assuming > > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as > everyone seems to > > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > > > > Damian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of > > the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > > >
RE: Virus activity
Er, yes, I know that. What I was remarking on was the fact that Klez seems to know it as well. -Peter -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus activity Epiphany is a period in the Christian calendar. I think it's January 6th. > And speaking of viruses and holidays, has anyone else noticed > how Klez changes for some holidays? How else can you explain > messages like "Have a humour Epiphany," which only turn up in > early January? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders
That wound't be sufficient. As soon as I say "move" they'll show up there, I'm looking for that "warm fuzzy feeling" that the data has actually moved. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders So you see them all under the instances tab on the pub info store properties for the new server? - Original Message - From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM Subject: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders > I'm moving a 5.5 server from one machine to another. I've followed the EC > Move Server steps from the FAQ and all _seems_ good. I've rehomed the public > folders, added the replicas, moved all mailboxes and followed the MSKB on > removing the fist server in a site. > > Now I'm up to the point of REMOVING the replicas of the public folders from > the old machine. The two machines have had several days to replicate, but > how do I "know" that all the PFs have replicated correctly. Once I remove > them from the old machine I'm toast if something went wrong, no? What should > I look for? Is there something in Outlook that I can see that says "I'm > looking at EX1's copy of this folder" vs "I'm looking at NEPTUNE's copy of > this folder." NEPTUNE being the old machine and EX1 the new. > > Thanks. > -Walden > > > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Something to add to the EC Move server method
C'est la vie. -- Thanks. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Something to add to the EC Move server method IIRC items in DIR don't survive a mailbox move even if it is enabled. On 1/17/03 10:37, "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Make sure your IS deleted item retention is set correctly on the new server before you do the move. I just lost my delete item restore ability since I hadn't changed the default of 0. I've now changed the default. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
I'd think it shouldn't, but I've seen the rules wizard choke for a while under a heavy load. Like logging in first thing in the morning and it trying to move all the messages from this forum to another folder. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > Does this make any difference? Other than the client has to be > open to process it? I ask only because my rules are no longer client > side (the rules don't specifically state this in the rule > wizard as they > did earlier). Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > > contact in my PAB > > Makes it a client side rule. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Chris, > > I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only... This > is > > the process I used to create the rules: > > > > Tools --> Rules Wizard --> New > > > > Selected 'Start from blank rule' > > Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > > contact in my PAB > > to meet this critieria. > > Selected 'Move to specified folder'. Picked a folder for > the message. > > Clicked finished. > > > > When I originaly wrote the question I was only getting client side > > rules After recreating my profile I am getting server side rules > > only... It's very strange. As I am getting a little muddles > > over here > > I am going to start from scratch and wipe all rules with > cleansweep. > > Then I am going to wipe all my profiles. After this I will > recreate > > my profile and then the rules to see if this clears things up. > > Thanks. > > > > > > Damian > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the > client only', > > > does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? > > > > On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Chris, > > My apologies for not relaying these results. It > > still fails. I > > > > even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the > rules from > > scratch and this fails also. > > > > For my next step I think I will have to try the > > various service > > packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 > > (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I > am out of > > luck I guess. Thanks. > > > > > > Damian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > You've never indicated the results of using contacts to > > define the rules > > > > did you? > > > > On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Roger, > > Look back at the previous emails in the discussion > > and see the > > EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the > > email. Not > > > > > > make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when > have you ever > > seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using > > Microsoft's > > > > > > products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said > > before And it's > > definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these > > rules before in > > > > > > Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more > > constructive feedback > > > > > > I'd like to hear it. Thanks. > > > > > > Damian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, > > in Outlook > > > > > > 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > >
RE: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders
shut down the original server and then see if everything works -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders That wound't be sufficient. As soon as I say "move" they'll show up there, I'm looking for that "warm fuzzy feeling" that the data has actually moved. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders So you see them all under the instances tab on the pub info store properties for the new server? - Original Message - From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM Subject: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders > I'm moving a 5.5 server from one machine to another. I've followed the EC > Move Server steps from the FAQ and all _seems_ good. I've rehomed the public > folders, added the replicas, moved all mailboxes and followed the MSKB on > removing the fist server in a site. > > Now I'm up to the point of REMOVING the replicas of the public folders from > the old machine. The two machines have had several days to replicate, but > how do I "know" that all the PFs have replicated correctly. Once I remove > them from the old machine I'm toast if something went wrong, no? What should > I look for? Is there something in Outlook that I can see that says "I'm > looking at EX1's copy of this folder" vs "I'm looking at NEPTUNE's copy of > this folder." NEPTUNE being the old machine and EX1 the new. > > Thanks. > -Walden > > > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: (Very) Delayed delivery
Most perceived problems have simple solutions. One of the bad things about a forum with this many participants, is that the frequency that we see complex or unusual problems is sufficiently high that it tends to make us go looking for complexities a little too quickly at times. So, are there any really easy ways to queue a message and have its delivery delayed by several weeks? First let me point out that there was a holiday break in there when lots of people take vacations and turn things off. Ah, let me count the ways . . . generated off line (there are many variations on this theme) server died and was restored server was off-line ISP link went down system upgrade and not everything got turned back on right away I'll bet someone else can add to this list. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed delivery Here's the headers - can anyone read what was going on between 12/6/02 and 1/16/03? The Thanks! Received: from amcgate (192.10.10.1 [192.10.10.1]) by MyExchange.amccorp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id CFQ2NAR0; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:16:23 -0500 Received: from smtp.customerdomain.com ([65.124.167.195]) by amcgate; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from 192.168.1.11 by CustomersTrendServer (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:09:21 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: E-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:10:20 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] m> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: E-mail Thread-Index: AcKdY4D/RSB6DLfzTSWMDvGfHMg++g== From: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: (Very) Delayed delivery Look at the headers of the message. On 1/16/03 6:03, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today - 1/16. They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding to a Trend InterScan Virus Wall which is using DNS to send emails. I know both boxes have the correct time on them so I'm stumped how this message could have bounced around so long. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contacts
You can open the DL and do a save as to a txt file. That's about as close as you'll get without going the third party route. -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Contacts You mean a Personal DL? I would check on slipstick.com for utilities or code. - Original Message - From: "Milt Atkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:41 AM Subject: Contacts > Is there a way to export a distribution list from your Contacts Folder to a > CSV or XLS file? ... Using the Import/Export utility of Outlook 2002 only > captures single contacts and not distribution lists within the Contacts > Folder. > > _ > MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders
When I move from one server to another I find that comparing the public folder resources at the server level gave me that warm fuzzy feeling. Easily done with "save window contents" and Excel. I can spot right away any folder that hasn't fully replicated yet. And I always leave the old machine up but with exchange services shut down for a few days to make sure everything is working. Then I do an offline backup of the old server before I finish removing it. Ronni * A perfect summer day is when the sun is shining, the breeze is blowing, the birds are singing, and the lawn mower is broken. - James Dent - > -Original Message- > From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders > > > That wound't be sufficient. As soon as I say "move" they'll > show up there, > I'm looking for that "warm fuzzy feeling" that the data has > actually moved. > > -Walden > > > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders > > > So you see them all under the instances tab on the pub info > store properties > for the new server? > - Original Message - > From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM > Subject: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders > > > > I'm moving a 5.5 server from one machine to another. I've > followed the EC > > Move Server steps from the FAQ and all _seems_ good. I've > rehomed the > public > > folders, added the replicas, moved all mailboxes and > followed the MSKB on > > removing the fist server in a site. > > > > Now I'm up to the point of REMOVING the replicas of the > public folders > from > > the old machine. The two machines have had several days to > replicate, but > > how do I "know" that all the PFs have replicated correctly. > Once I remove > > them from the old machine I'm toast if something went > wrong, no? What > should > > I look for? Is there something in Outlook that I can see > that says "I'm > > looking at EX1's copy of this folder" vs "I'm looking at > NEPTUNE's copy of > > this folder." NEPTUNE being the old machine and EX1 the new. > > > > Thanks. > > -Walden > > > > > > Walden H Leverich III > > President > > Tech Software > > (516) 627-3800 x11 > > (208) 692-3308 eFax > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000
The file is there, but it seems nobody on the list knows about this error. So i have to figure it out myself. > #2) Well obviously, a 404 error is "Page not found at (this location)" > > What's so hard to figure out about that? Go to the location that it's trying > to access and see if there is a file called logoff.asp. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 > > > Hello Group, > > two errors/questions about a exchange 2000 cluster: > > 1) Owa is only possible to connect to one of the two nodes using the netbios > name. http:\\nodeA\exchange or http:\\nodeB\exchange How to connect owa > using the netbios name of the shared cluster ressource? > http:\\cluster\exchange?? > > 2) Logoff of the mailbox terminates with an error: > Http: 404 page not found for http:\\nodeA\exchange\logoff.asp > > Any advise for this questions? > > Thom > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free Mailing List Software
Or get your account banned for having a non-existent auto-responder[1]. Or have your account suspended for "bouncing emails" at a time when you've got all groups set to no mail. [1] Happens to anyone who types a bit fast for them, as far as I can tell -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free Mailing List Software I guess so, wouldn't be too bad if you didn't get replies 3 hours before you get the original :) > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 January 2003 15:24 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > Putting up with those is what gets you 'free' lists right? > > On 1/17/03 9:08, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and > 'web beacons' > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:58 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > > > > There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, > > none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. > > > > > > On 1/17/03 8:55, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have > > had enough of > > yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an > > automated mailing > > list on MS Exchange for nowt > > > > Nik > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software > > > > > > > > > What, you wanted to give away software that was free? > > > > > > On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Free Mailing List Software > > > Sensitivity: Private > > > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software > > > package for MS > > > Exchange Server 5.5 > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > Nik > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resour
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox Assistant? There is a KB article about that. -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Roger, I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but does not > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the message and > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > move message > rules? Thanks. > > Damian > -- > -- > --- > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is copied to > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > the Inbox. > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > Exchange 2000 > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > it happens. > Am I missing something? Thanks > > Damian > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rules Wizard Issue
I havent seen a need to do that since Outlook 98. - Original Message - From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:32 PM Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox Assistant? There is a KB article about that. -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Roger, I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but does not > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the message and > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > move message > rules? Thanks. > > Damian > -- > -- > --- > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is copied to > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > the Inbox. > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > Exchange 2000 > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > it happens. > Am I missing something? Thanks > > Damian > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Andrey, I had this half completed as I was trying another suggestion. Here is where I am right now: I've run cleansweep to kill all the old rules. Still does not work. I've just activated the Inbox assistant to see if this helps. If the last step fails I will be blowing all rules away, kill my profiles, recreated the profile, recreate mu rules and see what happens. Then I will think about services packs. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox Assistant? There is a KB article about that. -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Roger, I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but does not > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the message and > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > move message > rules? Thanks. > > Damian > -- > -- > --- > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is copied to > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > the Inbox. > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > Exchange 2000 > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > it happens. > Am I missing something? Thanks > > Damian > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Should be 'to people or a distribution list' I think. On 1/17/03 10:36, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris, I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only... This is the process I used to create the rules: Tools --> Rules Wizard --> New Selected 'Start from blank rule' Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a contact in my PAB to meet this critieria. Selected 'Move to specified folder'. Picked a folder for the message. Clicked finished. When I originaly wrote the question I was only getting client side rules After recreating my profile I am getting server side rules only... It's very strange. As I am getting a little muddles over here I am going to start from scratch and wipe all rules with cleansweep. Then I am going to wipe all my profiles. After this I will recreate my profile and then the rules to see if this clears things up. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but > does not > > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the > message and > > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > > move message > > rules? Thanks. > > > > Damian > > --
Re: Rules Wizard Issue
PABs are evil. On 1/17/03 10:44, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Does this make any difference? Other than the client has to be open to process it? I ask only because my rules are no longer client side (the rules don't specifically state this in the rule wizard as they did earlier). Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > contact in my PAB Makes it a client side rule. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Chris, > I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only... This is > the process I used to create the rules: > > Tools --> Rules Wizard --> New > > Selected 'Start from blank rule' > Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a > contact in my PAB > to meet this critieria. > Selected 'Move to specified folder'. Picked a folder for the message. > Clicked finished. > > When I originaly wrote the question I was only getting client side > rules After recreating my profile I am getting server side rules > only... It's very strange. As I am getting a little muddles > over here > I am going to start from scratch and wipe all rules with cleansweep. > Then I am going to wipe all my profiles. After this I will recreate > my profile and then the rules to see if this clears things up. > Thanks. > > > Damian > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', > does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? > > On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Chris, > My apologies for not relaying these results. It > still fails. I > > even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from > scratch and this fails also. > > For my next step I think I will have to try the > various service > packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 > (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of > luck I guess. Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > You've never indicated the results of using contacts to > define the rules > > did you? > > On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Roger, > Look back at the previous emails in the discussion > and see the > EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the > email. Not > > > make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever > seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using > Microsoft's > > > products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said > before And it's > definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these > rules before in > > > Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more > constructive feedback > > > I'd like to hear it. Thanks. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, > in Outlook > > > 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Roger, > > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. > Either > > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I > am assuming > > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as > everyone seems to > > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > > > > Damian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > There are two options
Users on Exchange2000 unable to delete items from Excahnge5.5 OWA
Hi. We are running Exchange 2000 in mixed mode. We are migrating people from 5.5 by moving their mailboxes to an E2K server. For various reasons, our users on Exchange 2000 servers who use OWA do so by going to an Exchange 5.5 OWA. They can do everything they could before they were moved, except delete items. When they try to delete items, they get a pop-up window that says "could not delete item". I tried looking in technet, but the only article I found that matched the situation referred to deleting items fromthe Outbox. Does anyone know of another article that I missed, or has anyone seen this situation before? Thanks. -- Leema _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Chris, You're a genius... I should have seen this from the beginning.I was using 'From' and not 'To' to sort my messages. I guess being out of work for almost 3 months made me forget some basic Outlook stuff. Sorry to harass your guys with such a stupid issue... R Roger, You were right, it was user error. Thanks for all your input. Thanks for all the help! Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue Should be 'to people or a distribution list' I think. On 1/17/03 10:36, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris, I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only... This is the process I used to create the rules: Tools --> Rules Wizard --> New Selected 'Start from blank rule' Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a contact in my PAB to meet this critieria. Selected 'Move to specified folder'. Picked a folder for the message. Clicked finished. When I originaly wrote the question I was only getting client side rules After recreating my profile I am getting server side rules only... It's very strange. As I am getting a little muddles over here I am going to start from scratch and wipe all rules with cleansweep. Then I am going to wipe all my profiles. After this I will recreate my profile and then the rules to see if this clears things up. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why? On 1/17/03 10:06, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris, My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I even tried creating a whole new profile and recreating the rules from scratch and this fails also. For my next step I think I will have to try the various service packs out there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I guess. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules did you? On 1/17/03 9:57, "Scoles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roger, Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's products since DOS 2.0 It's a bug as I've said before And it's definitely not a user issue as I've made dozens of these rules before in Outlook 2000 with NO issues. If you have any more constructive feedback I'd like to hear it. Thanks. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook 2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Roger, > I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either > way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming > that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to > think. Thanks for the 'help'. > > > Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue > > > There are two options for rules - move the message or move a > copy of the > message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > > follow. One is for this mai
Users must login twice to OWA
Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA works fine. Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the solution is to specify the default domain in the authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS article suggests. Any idea's? J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
We had exactly the same problem in our environement and I found the same so we added the default domain on the following virtual directories folders: Exchange Exchweb and the Public Folders Virtual Directory And that seemed to resolve the issue. HTH Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: 17 January 2003 18:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users must login twice to OWA Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA works fine. Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the solution is to specify the default domain in the authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS article suggests. Any idea's? J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
The second prompt is probably for the public store. Did you specify it for the private and the public store? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users must login twice to OWA Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA works fine. Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the solution is to specify the default domain in the authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS article suggests. Any idea's? J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
We have this issue, to wit: Users are in the NT4 domain "storedomain". E2k servers are in AD addomain. Users use their \storedomain account to authenticate to their e-mail accounts on E2k server2. If we point them at a "front end server" i.e. server1 and their account is on server2, it does not pass their credentials, and they have to enter them twice. Don't know if that helps you (and no there hasn't been a solution for this yet) -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:06 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Users must login twice to OWA Subject: Users must login twice to OWA Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA works fine. Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the solution is to specify the default domain in the authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS article suggests. Any idea's? J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Well maybe in this particular case it will solve this dude's problem. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue I havent seen a need to do that since Outlook 98. - Original Message - From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:32 PM Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox Assistant? There is a KB article about that. -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue Roger, I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message. Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'. Damian -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue > > > Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to > follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another > mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the > first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but does not > remove it from the Inbox. While the second rule moves the message and > does not leave behind a copy. It does not matter which of the two > rules is first, the patter of the first failing to work properly > always occurs. Any ideas? Or is this a bug with Outlook 2002 and > move message > rules? Thanks. > > Damian > -- > -- > --- > I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches > certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is copied to > the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from > the Inbox. > I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've > done wrong. Here is what I have on my PC: > Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) > Exchange 2000 > The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when > it happens. > Am I missing something? Thanks > > Damian > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Extract GAL from E2k and import into 5.5
Use CSVDE.exe and export the users from Active Directory to a CSV file (you can export only the fields that are needed) Then massage the CSV file to fit the Exchange 5.5 field names and import it into 5.5 -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Extract GAL from E2k and import into 5.5 I need to extract all of our users from our Exchange 2000 GAL and import them into an Exchange 5.5 server. What is the best method for this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading OWA from 5.5 to 2000
I cannot seem to find specific documentation on how you upgrade a webserver that is only running OWA from 5.5 to 2000. Common sense tells me to pop the Exchange 2000 CD in and run setup (followed by SP3) but I would like to see some documentation. Has anybody done this? Are there any pitfalls to avoid? - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. (602) 631-7486 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users must login twice to OWA
Did you stop and start the service after the change? - Original Message - From: "Ali Wilkes (IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:16 PM Subject: RE: Users must login twice to OWA We have this issue, to wit: Users are in the NT4 domain "storedomain". E2k servers are in AD addomain. Users use their \storedomain account to authenticate to their e-mail accounts on E2k server2. If we point them at a "front end server" i.e. server1 and their account is on server2, it does not pass their credentials, and they have to enter them twice. Don't know if that helps you (and no there hasn't been a solution for this yet) -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:06 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Users must login twice to OWA Subject: Users must login twice to OWA Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA works fine. Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the solution is to specify the default domain in the authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS article suggests. Any idea's? J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrade Q from 5.5 to 2k.
This might be very stupid but I cannot find any conclusive reference to answer my questions. First of all my network: NT 4.0 PDC and BDC then an NT 4.0 server running exchange 5.5. My plan is to upgrade the PDC then the BDC to 2k server leaving it in mixed mode leaving me with one non DC nt 4.0 server running exchange 5.5. I then plan to upgrade the OS on the last server to 2k server. At this point is where I have the questions and am looking for reference. After the last step do I then run ADC prior to upgrading to exchange 2k? Does the server running exchange need to be a DC? Do I need to have a different server with exchange 2k installed before running ADC? There are no hardware issues with the server running exchange so I cannot replace it. I have to use just the hardware I have now. My problem is that I read one thing on MS site and my books from Sybex and such say slightly different things which could be potentially devastating if this upgrade goes awry. So if someone can point to some reference and say "this is absolutely what you need to do" I would really appreciate it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
You bet. > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Users must login twice to OWA > > > Did you stop and start the service after the change? > > - Original Message - > From: "Ali Wilkes (IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:16 PM > Subject: RE: Users must login twice to OWA > > > We have this issue, to wit: > > Users are in the NT4 domain "storedomain". E2k servers are > in AD addomain. Users use their \storedomain account to > authenticate to their e-mail accounts on E2k server2. > > If we point them at a "front end server" i.e. server1 and > their account is on server2, it does not pass their > credentials, and they have to enter them twice. > > Don't know if that helps you (and no there hasn't been a > solution for this yet) > > -Original Message- > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:06 PM > Posted To: List - Exchange Server List > Conversation: Users must login twice to OWA > Subject: Users must login twice to OWA > > > Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. > > This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users > access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon > entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted > again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA > works fine. > > Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the > solution is to specify the default domain in the > authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have > done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. > > I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any > suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS > article suggests. > > Any idea's? > > J a s o n C l i s h e > Senior Network Engineer > Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Direct: (248) 371-3542 > Mobile: (248) 891-8780 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
When you ask if I specified it for the public store, do you mean did I specify the default domain on the public virtual directory? If so, yes. Jason > -Original Message- > From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Users must login twice to OWA > > > The second prompt is probably for the public store. Did you > specify it for the private and the public store? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Users must login twice to OWA > > > Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. > > This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users > access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon > entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted > again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA > works fine. > > Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the > solution is to specify the default domain in the > authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have > done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. > > I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any > suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS > article suggests. > > Any idea's? > > J a s o n C l i s h e > Senior Network Engineer > Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Direct: (248) 371-3542 > Mobile: (248) 891-8780 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
I have set the default domain on the "Exchange" and "Public" virtual directories. My Exchweb virtual directory does not have Basic Authentication selected, so therefore I can't set the default domain on it. Did you have to go in and manually enable Basic Authentication on the Exchweb virtual directory? Did you have to modify any NTFS permissions on any of the associated directories? Jason > -Original Message- > From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Users must login twice to OWA > > > We had exactly the same problem in our environement and I > found the same so we added the default domain on the > following virtual directories > folders: > > Exchange > Exchweb > and the Public Folders Virtual Directory > And that seemed to resolve the issue. > > HTH > > Jason > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Clishe, Jason > Sent: 17 January 2003 18:06 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Users must login twice to OWA > > > Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. > > This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users > access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon > entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted > again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA > works fine. > > Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the > solution is to specify the default domain in the > authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have > done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. > > I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any > suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS > article suggests. > > Any idea's? > > J a s o n C l i s h e > Senior Network Engineer > Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Direct: (248) 371-3542 > Mobile: (248) 891-8780 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
Exactly what I thought. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Users must login twice to OWA The second prompt is probably for the public store. Did you specify it for the private and the public store? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users must login twice to OWA Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA works fine. Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the solution is to specify the default domain in the authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS article suggests. Any idea's? J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading OWA from 5.5 to 2000
There is nothing quite analogous to 'only running OWA' in E2K, you'll want to spend some time researching the requirements for and implications of implementing a FE/BE topology. On 1/17/03 12:50, "Bailey, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I cannot seem to find specific documentation on how you upgrade a webserver that is only running OWA from 5.5 to 2000. Common sense tells me to pop the Exchange 2000 CD in and run setup (followed by SP3) but I would like to see some documentation. Has anybody done this? Are there any pitfalls to avoid? - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. (602) 631-7486 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
