Problems with SBS and external mail

2002-06-11 Thread Hakan Bulin

Hi, 
I've a strange problem with SBS Server 4.5. My client can't recieve
external mail. If you look att site adressing for exchange it looks like
this www.company.com
If you change it to company.com they don't recieve any external mail, you
will get unknown recepient if mailing them.
But if you use www.. as site adressing mail gets through, and recieve a
internal inbound mail failure.
They use the pop3 connector in exchange for this. 
Tried updating exchange to sp4, no luck. 

Anyone could help me? Thanks in advance. 

//Hakan

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Problems with SBS and external mail

2002-06-11 Thread Salvador Manzo

They're running Reverse DNS lookups and you don't have a record for
company.com, only www.company.com?

-Original Message-
From: Hakan Bulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 23:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Problems with SBS and external mail


Hi, 
I've a strange problem with SBS Server 4.5. My client can't recieve
external mail. If you look att site adressing for exchange it looks like
this @www.company.com
If you change it to @company.com they don't recieve any external mail, you
will get unknown recepient if mailing them.
But if you use @www.. as site adressing mail gets through, and recieve a
internal inbound mail failure.
They use the pop3 connector in exchange for this. 
Tried updating exchange to sp4, no luck. 

Anyone could help me? Thanks in advance. 

//Hakan

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Problems with SBS and external mail

2002-06-11 Thread Richard McMahon
Title: RE: Problems with SBS and external mail





Are the POP mailboses setup to use this name or are they all using www.company.com. If so then you need to change to POP accounts as it is the POP server that does not know the recipient and not the exchange server.

-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 07:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problems with SBS and external mail



They're running Reverse DNS lookups and you don't have a record for
company.com, only www.company.com?


-Original Message-
From: Hakan Bulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 23:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Problems with SBS and external mail



Hi, 
I've a strange problem with SBS Server 4.5. My client can't recieve
external mail. If you look att site adressing for exchange it looks like
this @www.company.com
If you change it to @company.com they don't recieve any external mail, you
will get unknown recepient if mailing them.
But if you use @www.. as site adressing mail gets through, and recieve a
internal inbound mail failure.
They use the pop3 connector in exchange for this. 
Tried updating exchange to sp4, no luck. 


Anyone could help me? Thanks in advance. 


//Hakan


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Mark Kelsay

Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Send as on a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Clark, Steve

Maybe I'm missing something here but how do you give send as permissions on
a public folder?

 

Ultimate goal is to set up a PF for receipt of mailing lists. Have already
created the folder, verified the email address - trying to set up the perms
to send/ as in case I have a brain storm and am able to answer .

 

Exchange 5.5 SP 4+

NT 4 SP 6a+

Size 11 ½ shoe

Blood type B+

 

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Chris Norris

Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :)
Also web server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Sabo, Eric

Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :)
Also web server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Schutte, Keith [EPT/FLO]

Exchange 5.5
71,000 GAL objects in 269 sites
14 sites under my control with 1600 users
Proliant 3000 Dual PII 300  6000 Dual Ppro 200 servers with 512MB, 2-12GB
stores, 25-400 users per site

 -Original Message-
From:   Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Poll time

Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :)
Also web server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Filtering based on extra header info

2002-06-11 Thread Bob Christian

You could always create a rule to check messages when they arrive with specific words 
in the header and filter for X-Spam-Flag: YES, moving it to a SPAM folder or sending 
it to Deleted Items.

Spam Assassin is pretty good.  I use Trend's eManager to filter SPAM along with some 
rules I have created.  It results in blocking around 90% of the SPAM and gives me 
around 0.10% of filtered messages that are legit.  They all forward to a mailbox and I 
review the to/from addresses to make sure they are not to/from clients.

Trend's product is good (8 out of 10 *s), but it does have a few bugs that they have 
hotfixed and it has some shortcomings in that it can't import/export wordlists.  
Though it is hard to beat Spam Assassin (free) (10 out of 10 *s)!  It is a great 
product.

Any chance you can forward your ISP information?  I have a friend with a hosted site 
that would like to get on with an ISP that has something in place, such as Spam 
Assassin.

Regards,

Bob

Bobby J. Christian II
VeriSign, Inc.
Savannah, GA
912.527.4396
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Send as on a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Jim Holmgren

Hey Steve,
I believe you can set these permissions from Exch Admin by going to
Folders...Public Folders...and getting the Properties of the specific Public
Folder you want.  Look at the Permissions tab.

Hope this helps!

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send as on a public folder


Maybe I'm missing something here but how do you give send as permissions on
a public folder?

 

Ultimate goal is to set up a PF for receipt of mailing lists. Have already
created the folder, verified the email address - trying to set up the perms
to send/ as in case I have a brain storm and am able to answer .

 

Exchange 5.5 SP 4+

NT 4 SP 6a+

Size 11 ½ shoe

Blood type B+

 

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT

Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Micciche, Robert
Title: RE: Death to the evil PST





The first gotcha is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit. It is 16G not 16T.


-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST



Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's (and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox. We are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a. There are about 2,000 users in our site. I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases. I am trying to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc. But, in case we don't get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT
Title: Message



Been 
there, done that once. Hence my reference to the Enterprise 
upgrade.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 
  2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Death to the evil PST
  The first gotcha is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit. It is 16G 
  not 16T. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Death to 
  the evil PST 
  Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the 
  use of PST's (and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the 
  mailbox. We are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a. There 
  are about 2,000 users in our site. I'm curious how large some of your 
  databases are and any difficulties associated with handling large Exchange 
  databases. I am trying to "retrain" our management here to think in 
  terms of limiting mailbox sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., 
  etc. But, in case we don't get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are 
  there any other "gotchas" out there waiting for me?
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
  CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax 
  (513) 314-0197 cell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Stuart Tonge

Place a max mailbox size on every user is my tip.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not 
intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of 
its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no 
liability (including  in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or 
refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of 
subsequent written confirmation.
If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by 
telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its 
employees 
and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as 
United Coop 
deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems from being 
used to view, 
store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or otherwise 
offensive or 
discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please report it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Neil Hobson


As well as the other tips, why not consider www.kvsplc.com as a solution to keeping 
messages, but not necessarily in the store.  It's got a wonderful PST import wizard 
(that also can delete them after the import!)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 11 June 2002 14:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Death to the evil PST
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's (and light 
beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We are running Exch 5.5 
Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users in our site.  I'm curious how 
large some of your databases are and any difficulties associated with handling large 
Exchange databases.  I am trying to retrain our management here to think in terms of 
limiting mailbox sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we 
don't get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out there 
waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT

That was my first thought, too.  But management is still in the give the
users enough rope to hang themselves frame of mind.  As I said, we are
attempting to retrain our management.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


Place a max mailbox size on every user is my tip.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
written confirmation of its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims
all responsibility and accept no liability (including  in negligence) for
the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
confirmation.
If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from
your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is
strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages
between its employees 
and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful
supervision as United Coop 
deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its
reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems
from being used to view, 
store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or
otherwise offensive or 
discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please
report it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT

Thanks, we looked at Mail Keeper as well.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST



As well as the other tips, why not consider www.kvsplc.com as a solution to
keeping messages, but not necessarily in the store.  It's got a wonderful
PST import wizard (that also can delete them after the import!)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 11 June 2002 14:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Death to the evil PST
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Send as on a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Clark, Steve

Very interesting - running the admin program on a W2K PC, I don't have the
permissions tab as if I was running on the server. Thanks for the pointer


resume banging head on desk ...

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

Hey Steve,
I believe you can set these permissions from Exch Admin by going to
Folders...Public Folders...and getting the Properties of the specific Public
Folder you want.  Look at the Permissions tab.

Hope this helps!

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send as on a public folder


Maybe I'm missing something here but how do you give send as permissions on
a public folder?

 

Ultimate goal is to set up a PF for receipt of mailing lists. Have already
created the folder, verified the email address - trying to set up the perms
to send/ as in case I have a brain storm and am able to answer .

 

Exchange 5.5 SP 4+

NT 4 SP 6a+

Size 11 ½ shoe

Blood type B+

 

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Majetic, John RAME

I think I have beat you all.

Exchange 5.5 Standard, on NT4.0 SP6A
198 MB Memory
2 GB mirrored system Partition
6GB raid for IS
2GB drive for the Logs
1 Pentium Pro 100Mhz CPU

184 users all using PSTs
When I got here the box was PDC, DHCP, Primary Wins, a RAS server with 8 VPN
Ports on it, ran Mail Essentials, and had several print queues on it!

CPU was about 30% to 60%, but memory got to be a real issue. After several
weeks of constant use it would be using 220MB, and things would really slow
down.

I am replacing this box one service at a time as we speak. It is now only
the RAS server, and will go away entirely with the installation of Windows
2000.

John Majetic

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :)
Also web server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Send as on a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Jim Holmgren

Really???  
Did you got to Tools...Options...and use the Permissions Tab to make them
viewable on your local copy of Ex Admin?

c'mon Steve...I need to get back to watching my VCD of the Tyson-Lewis fight
;-)

Jim


-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder


Very interesting - running the admin program on a W2K PC, I don't have the
permissions tab as if I was running on the server. Thanks for the pointer


resume banging head on desk ...

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

Hey Steve,
I believe you can set these permissions from Exch Admin by going to
Folders...Public Folders...and getting the Properties of the specific Public
Folder you want.  Look at the Permissions tab.

Hope this helps!

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send as on a public folder


Maybe I'm missing something here but how do you give send as permissions on
a public folder?

 

Ultimate goal is to set up a PF for receipt of mailing lists. Have already
created the folder, verified the email address - trying to set up the perms
to send/ as in case I have a brain storm and am able to answer .

 

Exchange 5.5 SP 4+

NT 4 SP 6a+

Size 11 ½ shoe

Blood type B+

 

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Send as on a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Andy David

Tools/Options/Permissions Tab

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder


Very interesting - running the admin program on a W2K PC, I don't have the
permissions tab as if I was running on the server. Thanks for the pointer


resume banging head on desk ...

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

Hey Steve,
I believe you can set these permissions from Exch Admin by going to
Folders...Public Folders...and getting the Properties of the specific Public
Folder you want.  Look at the Permissions tab.

Hope this helps!

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send as on a public folder


Maybe I'm missing something here but how do you give send as permissions on
a public folder?

 

Ultimate goal is to set up a PF for receipt of mailing lists. Have already
created the folder, verified the email address - trying to set up the perms
to send/ as in case I have a brain storm and am able to answer .

 

Exchange 5.5 SP 4+

NT 4 SP 6a+

Size 11 ½ shoe

Blood type B+

 

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Andy David

In the event of a mail loop  (however unlikely if you implement proper
procedures i.e blocking replies to the Internet etc...) - w/o limits you
risk hanging *yourself* with that rope.


-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


That was my first thought, too.  But management is still in the give the
users enough rope to hang themselves frame of mind.  As I said, we are
attempting to retrain our management.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


Place a max mailbox size on every user is my tip.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
written confirmation of its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims
all responsibility and accept no liability (including  in negligence) for
the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
confirmation.
If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from
your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is
strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages
between its employees 
and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful
supervision as United Coop 
deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its
reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems
from being used to view, 
store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or
otherwise offensive or 
discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please
report it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received 

RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Stuart Tonge

you'll be sorry if you dont get them to listed, my store is 15.7gb, which is
bad enough, and there's 100mb left on the drive.. lol.. 
not much I can do about it though..

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


That was my first thought, too.  But management is still in the give the
users enough rope to hang themselves frame of mind.  As I said, we are
attempting to retrain our management.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


Place a max mailbox size on every user is my tip.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
written confirmation of its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims
all responsibility and accept no liability (including  in negligence) for
the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
confirmation.
If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from
your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is
strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages
between its employees 
and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful
supervision as United Coop 
deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its
reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems
from being used to view, 
store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or
otherwise offensive or 
discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please
report it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



This email has been scanned 

RE: Send as on a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Clark, Steve

... stops banging head on desk, checks the options, decides to go back under
desk 

is it Monday?

Thanks.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

Really???  
Did you got to Tools...Options...and use the Permissions Tab to make them
viewable on your local copy of Ex Admin?

c'mon Steve...I need to get back to watching my VCD of the Tyson-Lewis fight
;-)

Jim


-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder


Very interesting - running the admin program on a W2K PC, I don't have the
permissions tab as if I was running on the server. Thanks for the pointer


resume banging head on desk ...

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

Hey Steve,
I believe you can set these permissions from Exch Admin by going to
Folders...Public Folders...and getting the Properties of the specific Public
Folder you want.  Look at the Permissions tab.

Hope this helps!

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send as on a public folder


Maybe I'm missing something here but how do you give send as permissions on
a public folder?

 

Ultimate goal is to set up a PF for receipt of mailing lists. Have already
created the folder, verified the email address - trying to set up the perms
to send/ as in case I have a brain storm and am able to answer .

 

Exchange 5.5 SP 4+

NT 4 SP 6a+

Size 11 ½ shoe

Blood type B+

 

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Death to the evil PST

2002-06-11 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT

I was thinking that if we do go with Enterprise, we'd keep the db's on the
SANS where we have about a TB and a half free.  One of our servers that blew
the 16 GB limit was a JV and they had a 16 GB database on a 20 GB partition.
We had to plug in a couple more drives before we could even massage any free
space into the database.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


you'll be sorry if you dont get them to listed, my store is 15.7gb, which is
bad enough, and there's 100mb left on the drive.. lol.. 
not much I can do about it though..

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


That was my first thought, too.  But management is still in the give the
users enough rope to hang themselves frame of mind.  As I said, we are
attempting to retrain our management.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


Place a max mailbox size on every user is my tip.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
written confirmation of its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims
all responsibility and accept no liability (including  in negligence) for
the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please
notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the
message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination,
copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this
E-mail message is strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages
between its employees 
and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful
supervision as United Coop 
deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its
reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems
from being used to view, 
store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or
otherwise offensive or 
discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please
report it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com

RE: Send as on a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Corgiat, Rick

All week...

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

... stops banging head on desk, checks the options, decides to go back under
desk 

is it Monday?

Thanks.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

Really???  
Did you got to Tools...Options...and use the Permissions Tab to make them
viewable on your local copy of Ex Admin?

c'mon Steve...I need to get back to watching my VCD of the Tyson-Lewis fight
;-)

Jim


-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder


Very interesting - running the admin program on a W2K PC, I don't have the
permissions tab as if I was running on the server. Thanks for the pointer


resume banging head on desk ...

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send as on a public folder

Hey Steve,
I believe you can set these permissions from Exch Admin by going to
Folders...Public Folders...and getting the Properties of the specific Public
Folder you want.  Look at the Permissions tab.

Hope this helps!

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send as on a public folder


Maybe I'm missing something here but how do you give send as permissions on
a public folder?

 

Ultimate goal is to set up a PF for receipt of mailing lists. Have already
created the folder, verified the email address - trying to set up the perms
to send/ as in case I have a brain storm and am able to answer .

 

Exchange 5.5 SP 4+

NT 4 SP 6a+

Size 11 ½ shoe

Blood type B+

 

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List 

Delivering NDRs into a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Stuart Pittwood

Hi,

I need to have all NDRs delivered into a public folder, I have set up the folder, the 
SMTP virtual server settings and the email address for the folder.

However, I'm getting the following event in the application log

EventID : 2028
Source : MS ExchangeIS Public

The delivery of a message sent by public folder DROPPED 
MAIL9783A0F44E87AB885F7E578FAC3596AA00E334 has failed.
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 

 The non-delivery report has been deleted. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

What have I missed??

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Outlook password

2002-06-11 Thread saurin m shah

Hi, 

After moving user to different domain, user is getting prompt  for id
password and domain name.
We are using exchange 5.5 outlook 2000 window 95/nt/2000 .NT
authentication
  How ever user are able to access email.



Thanks in advance.

Saurin


GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Outlook password

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

Do you have trusts in the domain?
Also did you change the Primary Windows Account on the exchange account to
match his new one?

-Original Message-
From: saurin m shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook password


Hi, 

After moving user to different domain, user is getting prompt  for id
password and domain name. We are using exchange 5.5 outlook 2000 window
95/nt/2000 .NT authentication
  How ever user are able to access email.



Thanks in advance.

Saurin


GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Delivering NDRs into a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Dahl, Peter

I am guessing you are using Exchange 2000.  We are working with
Microsoft on this same issue.  We were told this was by design.  After
much discussion with them over this we are close to getting a change
made that would give the administrator an option to keep or delete the
NDR's.

Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delivering NDRs into a public folder


Hi,

I need to have all NDRs delivered into a public folder, I have set up
the folder, the SMTP virtual server settings and the email address for
the folder.

However, I'm getting the following event in the application log

EventID : 2028
Source : MS ExchangeIS Public

The delivery of a message sent by public folder DROPPED
MAIL9783A0F44E87AB885F7E578FAC3596AA00E334 has failed.
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 

 The non-delivery report has been deleted. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

What have I missed??

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify 
the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. 
 Failure to follow this process may be unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Outlook password

2002-06-11 Thread Dahl, Peter

I have seen this most frequently with Win 9x machines that were
configured to login to the incorrect domain.  Verify that the
workstation is logging into the domain that you want them to.

Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: saurin m shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook password


Hi, 

After moving user to different domain, user is getting prompt  for id
password and domain name. We are using exchange 5.5 outlook 2000 window
95/nt/2000 .NT authentication
  How ever user are able to access email.



Thanks in advance.

Saurin


GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify 
the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. 
 Failure to follow this process may be unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Delivering NDRs into a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Stuart Pittwood

Yes it's Exchange 2000

Thanks for the info

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delivering NDRs into a public folder


I am guessing you are using Exchange 2000.  We are working with
Microsoft on this same issue.  We were told this was by design.  After
much discussion with them over this we are close to getting a change
made that would give the administrator an option to keep or delete the
NDR's.

Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delivering NDRs into a public folder


Hi,

I need to have all NDRs delivered into a public folder, I have set up
the folder, the SMTP virtual server settings and the email address for
the folder.

However, I'm getting the following event in the application log

EventID : 2028
Source : MS ExchangeIS Public

The delivery of a message sent by public folder DROPPED
MAIL9783A0F44E87AB885F7E578FAC3596AA00E334 has failed.
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 

 The non-delivery report has been deleted. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

What have I missed??

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify 
the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. 
 Failure to follow this process may be unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Preston Jeffares

Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the big 
systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Preston Jeffares

I think we have a winner folks...

May God Bless you dear sir...

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I think I have beat you all.

Exchange 5.5 Standard, on NT4.0 SP6A
198 MB Memory
2 GB mirrored system Partition
6GB raid for IS
2GB drive for the Logs
1 Pentium Pro 100Mhz CPU

184 users all using PSTs
When I got here the box was PDC, DHCP, Primary Wins, a RAS server with 8 VPN
Ports on it, ran Mail Essentials, and had several print queues on it!

CPU was about 30% to 60%, but memory got to be a real issue. After several
weeks of constant use it would be using 220MB, and things would really slow
down.

I am replacing this box one service at a time as we speak. It is now only
the RAS server, and will go away entirely with the installation of Windows
2000.

John Majetic

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :)
Also web server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Erik Sojka

Only his wife can tell you about that...

 -Original Message-
 From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:23 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the 
 reigns of one of the big systems.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 E55 on W2K server
 70 Users
 Compaq ML530
 Dual Xeon
 1GB
 2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
 4x36 Ultra 3 for IS
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
 2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
 8000+ users
 Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache 
 each processor
   3 GB Physical Memory
   60 GB RAID on each server
   Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN
 
   One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB
 
 
 Eric Sabo
 NT Administrator
 Computing Services Center
 California University of Pennsylvania
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Exchange 2000
 25 users
 Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
 2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) 
 Also web server
 and  MS Project Central server
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Exchange 5.5 ent.
 90 users
 Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
 1 gig of RAM
 24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Poll time
 
 
 Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just 
 curious and
 thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
 environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most 
 people on the
 smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take 
 pride on my
 little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as 
 the PDC, File
 Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 
 people.  So what ya
 got out there?
 
 Exchange 2000
 2 sites 700 users
 Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
 12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
 Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... 
 anyone else?)
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

OH, That system. 

I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I like hot butter on my
breakfast toast.

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Only his wife can tell you about that...

 -Original Message-
 From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:23 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the
 reigns of one of the big systems.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 E55 on W2K server
 70 Users
 Compaq ML530
 Dual Xeon
 1GB
 2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
 4x36 Ultra 3 for IS
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
 2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
 8000+ users
 Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache
 each processor
   3 GB Physical Memory
   60 GB RAID on each server
   Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN
 
   One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB
 
 
 Eric Sabo
 NT Administrator
 Computing Services Center
 California University of Pennsylvania
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Exchange 2000
 25 users
 Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
 2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :)
 Also web server
 and  MS Project Central server
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Poll time
 
 
 Exchange 5.5 ent.
 90 users
 Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
 1 gig of RAM
 24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Poll time
 
 
 Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just
 curious and
 thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
 environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most 
 people on the
 smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take 
 pride on my
 little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as 
 the PDC, File
 Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 
 people.  So what ya
 got out there?
 
 Exchange 2000
 2 sites 700 users
 Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
 12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
 Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures...
 anyone else?)
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim

Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+departme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




e-mails slow to delete

2002-06-11 Thread Chris Pohlschneider

Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4SP6.


We have several users that encounter a little bit of latency when trying to
open or delete e-mails. Seems like most of the issues come from e-mails that
have attachments. I looked at the attachment size and can see where a 2MB or
above might take a little to delete. We are experincing issues with files in
size of like 768K. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Chris

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Preston Jeffares

At MEC 99, I went to the panel discussion... I think the guy from Lucent was sitting 
on well over 100k seats as well.  Hehehehe I really would hate to have to run that 
thing.

That was a rather humorous conference... they had a few hundred computers set up 
downstairs for people to check their e-mail, access the internet, and most importantly 
to show of Exchange 2k and all it's new toys.  It also had this communist block 
display of server hardware running the back-end... the biggest pieces Dell, Compaq, 
EMC, and IBM had.  

On the last day I'm going down to check my mail and play around... only to find out... 
that their Exchange server went down.  No clustering... no backups... HAHAHAHAHAAHHA.  
The admin for Chevron was standing next to me shaking his head and laughing.  It took 
them a few hours to get things running again.

With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went down at the 
Microsoft Exchange Conference.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+departme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim

It went down on the first release of a brand new product on a relatively new
directory, built for a one time special occasion where 4000 users who know
Exchange were trying to poke holes in it. Not a bad effort I'd say.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


At MEC 99, I went to the panel discussion... I think the guy from Lucent was
sitting on well over 100k seats as well.  Hehehehe I really would hate to
have to run that thing.

That was a rather humorous conference... they had a few hundred computers
set up downstairs for people to check their e-mail, access the internet, and
most importantly to show of Exchange 2k and all it's new toys.  It also had
this communist block display of server hardware running the back-end... the
biggest pieces Dell, Compaq, EMC, and IBM had.  

On the last day I'm going down to check my mail and play around... only to
find out... that their Exchange server went down.  No clustering... no
backups... HAHAHAHAHAAHHA.  The admin for Chevron was standing next to me
shaking his head and laughing.  It took them a few hours to get things
running again.

With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went
down at the Microsoft Exchange Conference.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+departme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

So what are you trying to say?

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


It went down on the first release of a brand new product on a relatively new
directory, built for a one time special occasion where 4000 users who know
Exchange were trying to poke holes in it. Not a bad effort I'd say.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


At MEC 99, I went to the panel discussion... I think the guy from Lucent was
sitting on well over 100k seats as well.  Hehehehe I really would hate to
have to run that thing.

That was a rather humorous conference... they had a few hundred computers
set up downstairs for people to check their e-mail, access the internet, and
most importantly to show of Exchange 2k and all it's new toys.  It also had
this communist block display of server hardware running the back-end... the
biggest pieces Dell, Compaq, EMC, and IBM had.  

On the last day I'm going down to check my mail and play around... only to
find out... that their Exchange server went down.  No clustering... no
backups... HAHAHAHAHAAHHA.  The admin for Chevron was standing next to me
shaking his head and laughing.  It took them a few hours to get things
running again.

With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went
down at the Microsoft Exchange Conference.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+depa
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+rtme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Markus Lindemann

On that last note, yes we're having 'issues' with those PERC things too.
Greatest headache is the remote machines not coming back up after a
reboot. They sit in the 'bios not installed' state. Give them another
hard reboot and it's fine. Doesn't inspire a lot of confidence though.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 13:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Chris Norris

Do you have the correct drivers and BIOS version for your operating system.  I had the 
same issue until I applied the BIOS flash and have had no further problems.

-Original Message-
From: Markus Lindemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


On that last note, yes we're having 'issues' with those PERC things too.
Greatest headache is the remote machines not coming back up after a
reboot. They sit in the 'bios not installed' state. Give them another
hard reboot and it's fine. Doesn't inspire a lot of confidence though.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 13:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim

Cut 'em some slack!

I did like that they left it so anyone could create root level public
folders one year. There were some very creative individuals who used that
opening.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what are you trying to say?

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


It went down on the first release of a brand new product on a relatively new
directory, built for a one time special occasion where 4000 users who know
Exchange were trying to poke holes in it. Not a bad effort I'd say.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


At MEC 99, I went to the panel discussion... I think the guy from Lucent was
sitting on well over 100k seats as well.  Hehehehe I really would hate to
have to run that thing.

That was a rather humorous conference... they had a few hundred computers
set up downstairs for people to check their e-mail, access the internet, and
most importantly to show of Exchange 2k and all it's new toys.  It also had
this communist block display of server hardware running the back-end... the
biggest pieces Dell, Compaq, EMC, and IBM had.  

On the last day I'm going down to check my mail and play around... only to
find out... that their Exchange server went down.  No clustering... no
backups... HAHAHAHAHAAHHA.  The admin for Chevron was standing next to me
shaking his head and laughing.  It took them a few hours to get things
running again.

With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went
down at the Microsoft Exchange Conference.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+depa
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+rtme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just 

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Markus Lindemann

This happened on a machine straight out of the factory. The OS hasn't
started to load at that stage, but I will double check the versions on
them.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 11 June 2002 17:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Do you have the correct drivers and BIOS version for your operating
system.  I had the same issue until I applied the BIOS flash and have
had no further problems.

-Original Message-
From: Markus Lindemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


On that last note, yes we're having 'issues' with those PERC things too.
Greatest headache is the remote machines not coming back up after a
reboot. They sit in the 'bios not installed' state. Give them another
hard reboot and it's fine. Doesn't inspire a lot of confidence though.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 13:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

But what do you mean?

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Cut 'em some slack!

I did like that they left it so anyone could create root level public
folders one year. There were some very creative individuals who used that
opening.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what are you trying to say?

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


It went down on the first release of a brand new product on a relatively new
directory, built for a one time special occasion where 4000 users who know
Exchange were trying to poke holes in it. Not a bad effort I'd say.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


At MEC 99, I went to the panel discussion... I think the guy from Lucent was
sitting on well over 100k seats as well.  Hehehehe I really would hate to
have to run that thing.

That was a rather humorous conference... they had a few hundred computers
set up downstairs for people to check their e-mail, access the internet, and
most importantly to show of Exchange 2k and all it's new toys.  It also had
this communist block display of server hardware running the back-end... the
biggest pieces Dell, Compaq, EMC, and IBM had.  

On the last day I'm going down to check my mail and play around... only to
find out... that their Exchange server went down.  No clustering... no
backups... HAHAHAHAHAAHHA.  The admin for Chevron was standing next to me
shaking his head and laughing.  It took them a few hours to get things
running again.

With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went
down at the Microsoft Exchange Conference.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+depa
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+rtme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: 

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Preston Jeffares

I think he means that Beer drinkers are really just wimps that can't handle whiskey.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


But what do you mean?

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Cut 'em some slack!

I did like that they left it so anyone could create root level public
folders one year. There were some very creative individuals who used that
opening.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what are you trying to say?

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


It went down on the first release of a brand new product on a relatively new
directory, built for a one time special occasion where 4000 users who know
Exchange were trying to poke holes in it. Not a bad effort I'd say.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


At MEC 99, I went to the panel discussion... I think the guy from Lucent was
sitting on well over 100k seats as well.  Hehehehe I really would hate to
have to run that thing.

That was a rather humorous conference... they had a few hundred computers
set up downstairs for people to check their e-mail, access the internet, and
most importantly to show of Exchange 2k and all it's new toys.  It also had
this communist block display of server hardware running the back-end... the
biggest pieces Dell, Compaq, EMC, and IBM had.  

On the last day I'm going down to check my mail and play around... only to
find out... that their Exchange server went down.  No clustering... no
backups... HAHAHAHAHAAHHA.  The admin for Chevron was standing next to me
shaking his head and laughing.  It took them a few hours to get things
running again.

With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went
down at the Microsoft Exchange Conference.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+depa
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+rtme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
X-Sybari-Space:    
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
X-Sybari-Trust: d23c14fb 050014dd  003d
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web 

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread John Matteson

Well does anyone remember when Gates introduced some new OS at the Chicago
Microsoft conference? The silly OS has the gall to crash and burn while he
was using it.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


At MEC 99, I went to the panel discussion... I think the guy from Lucent was
sitting on well over 100k seats as well.  Hehehehe I really would hate to
have to run that thing.

That was a rather humorous conference... they had a few hundred computers
set up downstairs for people to check their e-mail, access the internet, and
most importantly to show of Exchange 2k and all it's new toys.  It also had
this communist block display of server hardware running the back-end... the
biggest pieces Dell, Compaq, EMC, and IBM had.  

On the last day I'm going down to check my mail and play around... only to
find out... that their Exchange server went down.  No clustering... no
backups... HAHAHAHAHAAHHA.  The admin for Chevron was standing next to me
shaking his head and laughing.  It took them a few hours to get things
running again.

With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went
down at the Microsoft Exchange Conference.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment
in the US. Well over 100K seats.

Soon to blow all of those away is this one:
http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de
livers+largest+exchange+2000+implementation+in+australia+to+the+nsw+departme
nt+of+educat.asp

Makes me feel lucky only to have 20K users.

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


So what is the biggest system out there?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


I'm not a big admin, I just play one on TV.

Frankly, I don't like working for big companies. I like small companies. 100
or less.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the
big systems.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server
and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File
Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So what ya
got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 

Move Mailbox is hosed (Part Duex)

2002-06-11 Thread Garland Mac Neill
Title: Message









What am I missing here? The information
store starts ok and the mailbox storage mounts fine, which is what Technet suggests. I also get Event ID 9167 and 1008 with
the same error. Replication seems to be fine. Ive removed the AV s/w. IS
this installation hosed? 



Thanks in advance,

Garland



Event Type: Error

Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin

Event Category: MAPI
Session 

Event ID: 9175

Date: 6/11/2002

Time: 10:04:11 AM

User: N/A

Computer: SAKIC

Description:

The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore'
failed with the following error: 

The attempt to log on to the Microsoft
Exchange Server computer has failed.

The MAPI provider failed.

Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store

ID no: 8004011d-0512-





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







RE: Outlook password

2002-06-11 Thread John Matteson

If it's a Win 9x machine, please find and chisel out of the hard drive all
the .PWL files then reboot.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook password


I have seen this most frequently with Win 9x machines that were
configured to login to the incorrect domain.  Verify that the
workstation is logging into the domain that you want them to.

Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: saurin m shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook password


Hi, 

After moving user to different domain, user is getting prompt  for id
password and domain name. We are using exchange 5.5 outlook 2000 window
95/nt/2000 .NT authentication
  How ever user are able to access email.



Thanks in advance.

Saurin


GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you
are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete
this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Delivering NDRs into a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread John Matteson

Exchange 5.5 will also drop NDR's that go into a Public Folder.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delivering NDRs into a public folder


Yes it's Exchange 2000

Thanks for the info

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 15:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delivering NDRs into a public folder


I am guessing you are using Exchange 2000.  We are working with
Microsoft on this same issue.  We were told this was by design.  After
much discussion with them over this we are close to getting a change
made that would give the administrator an option to keep or delete the
NDR's.

Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delivering NDRs into a public folder


Hi,

I need to have all NDRs delivered into a public folder, I have set up
the folder, the SMTP virtual server settings and the email address for
the folder.

However, I'm getting the following event in the application log

EventID : 2028
Source : MS ExchangeIS Public

The delivery of a message sent by public folder DROPPED
MAIL9783A0F44E87AB885F7E578FAC3596AA00E334 has failed.
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 

 The non-delivery report has been deleted. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

What have I missed??

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you
are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete
this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Cosner, Jeff

Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Crouthamel, Jonathan

http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for the 
listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message 
that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given 
nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Q320436

2002-06-11 Thread Dryden, Karen
Title: Message



After applying this patch, our SA would not start. 
MS PSS says there's a known issue with this patch in that it changes the share 
permissions on the servername.log share. The fix is to remove the share, 
start the SA, and the share gets recreated with the correct share 
permissions.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Robert D. Young

Hi all.

I'm trying to get OWA working for the first time on my W2K/E2K system (worked fine for 
years on my NT4/Ex5.5 boxes) and have run into a bug someone may be familiar with. 

Environment:

Clients are W2K/IE6 with current patches (lat time I looked). Server is W2K AS, E2K 
SP1, ISA (yes, on the same box) and IIS 5 (basically, BO2K). I've followed all the 
ISA/Shinder/Technet stuff I can find to config so local IIS listens on a free port and 
all requests are redirected to that port. Can get to in-house written 
publicly-available web pages on the system from across the Internet fine.

I can access OWA in-house but across the net I am requested to sign in (OK), then I 
get the two frames and a long pause. Eventually, both frames get a page cannot be 
displayed message in them.

Any ideas?

- Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Baker, Jennifer

Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Preston Jeffares

BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Public Folder Resources

2002-06-11 Thread Rodney Li

Hi All,
I need to obtain some information on the public folder resources we are
using. I know we can get to that via Public Information Store/Public
Folder resources on the public folder server. However, I want the data
arranged by subfolder. Is there a tool that will allow me to do that?
Rodney

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Carey, Greg

We ran into that after checkpoint required that we put in an anti-nimda
rule into the firewall (even though the requests were blocked by other
rules).  We were having an issue with a cvp server and they wouldn't
even look at it without us having that rule.

Basically OWA uses calls that trigger their nimda rule.

-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA


Hi all.

I'm trying to get OWA working for the first time on my W2K/E2K system
(worked fine for years on my NT4/Ex5.5 boxes) and have run into a bug
someone may be familiar with. 

Environment:

Clients are W2K/IE6 with current patches (lat time I looked). Server is
W2K AS, E2K SP1, ISA (yes, on the same box) and IIS 5 (basically, BO2K).
I've followed all the ISA/Shinder/Technet stuff I can find to config so
local IIS listens on a free port and all requests are redirected to that
port. Can get to in-house written publicly-available web pages on the
system from across the Internet fine.

I can access OWA in-house but across the net I am requested to sign in
(OK), then I get the two frames and a long pause. Eventually, both
frames get a page cannot be displayed message in them.

Any ideas?

- Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim

That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Garland Mac Neill

Does it pop up with the internal service error as well? Twice?

-Original Message-
From: Carey, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA

We ran into that after checkpoint required that we put in an anti-nimda
rule into the firewall (even though the requests were blocked by other
rules).  We were having an issue with a cvp server and they wouldn't
even look at it without us having that rule.

Basically OWA uses calls that trigger their nimda rule.

-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA


Hi all.

I'm trying to get OWA working for the first time on my W2K/E2K system
(worked fine for years on my NT4/Ex5.5 boxes) and have run into a bug
someone may be familiar with. 

Environment:

Clients are W2K/IE6 with current patches (lat time I looked). Server is
W2K AS, E2K SP1, ISA (yes, on the same box) and IIS 5 (basically, BO2K).
I've followed all the ISA/Shinder/Technet stuff I can find to config so
local IIS listens on a free port and all requests are redirected to that
port. Can get to in-house written publicly-available web pages on the
system from across the Internet fine.

I can access OWA in-house but across the net I am requested to sign in
(OK), then I get the two frames and a long pause. Eventually, both
frames get a page cannot be displayed message in them.

Any ideas?

- Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Public Folder Resources

2002-06-11 Thread Dahl, Peter

In Exchange 2000 system manager this is located in the Admin group that
owns the Public Folder tree.  Open the Administrative Groups folder
select the appropriate admin group.  Under that you will see Folders,
open that and your Public Folder Tree will be available.

Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder Resources


Hi All,
I need to obtain some information on the public folder resources we are
using. I know we can get to that via Public Information Store/Public
Folder resources on the public folder server. However, I want the data
arranged by subfolder. Is there a tool that will allow me to do that?
Rodney

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify 
the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. 
 Failure to follow this process may be unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Bill Beckett

I'm scared

-Original Message-
From:   Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I
subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and
subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review
the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is
not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in
error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and
other
information in this message that do not relate to official company
business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread William Lefkovics

Exchange2000.
2 Users.
PII 300.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each
processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web
server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC,
File Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So
what ya got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Garland Mac Neill

Exchange 5.5 
130 users
Dual Xeon 1MB
1 GB
raid 5 80 GB

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time

Exchange2000.
2 Users.
PII 300.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each
processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web
server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC,
File Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So
what ya got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Cosner, Jeff

Actually it isn't really a big brother thing.  They want to proof
automated emails for a period of time.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
From:   Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Carey, Greg

It would stay at the loading... message unless you hit refresh.  Then you would get 
the two frames with the cannot display in both.

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA


Does it pop up with the internal service error as well? Twice?

-Original Message-
From: Carey, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA

We ran into that after checkpoint required that we put in an anti-nimda
rule into the firewall (even though the requests were blocked by other
rules).  We were having an issue with a cvp server and they wouldn't
even look at it without us having that rule.

Basically OWA uses calls that trigger their nimda rule.

-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA


Hi all.

I'm trying to get OWA working for the first time on my W2K/E2K system
(worked fine for years on my NT4/Ex5.5 boxes) and have run into a bug
someone may be familiar with. 

Environment:

Clients are W2K/IE6 with current patches (lat time I looked). Server is
W2K AS, E2K SP1, ISA (yes, on the same box) and IIS 5 (basically, BO2K).
I've followed all the ISA/Shinder/Technet stuff I can find to config so
local IIS listens on a free port and all requests are redirected to that
port. Can get to in-house written publicly-available web pages on the
system from across the Internet fine.

I can access OWA in-house but across the net I am requested to sign in
(OK), then I get the two frames and a long pause. Eventually, both
frames get a page cannot be displayed message in them.

Any ideas?

- Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: Q320436

2002-06-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Title: Message



Share permissions or NTFS file perms within the 
share ?




  "Dryden, Karen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in 
  message news:264470@exchangelist...
  After applying this patch, our SA would not 
  start. MS PSS says there's a known issue with this patch in that it 
  changes the share permissions on the servername.log share. The fix is to 
  remove the share, start the SA, and the share gets recreated with the correct 
  share permissions.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread William Smith

I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now allow me
to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but haven't been
able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that should be filtered.
Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Baker, Jennifer

I would never do that.  My point was that the number of technological
solutions for behavioral problems is quite small.

The 12 steps work for more that just alcohol addiction.

We are here if you need to talk.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Preston Jeffares

I wouldnt worry about the subjects... just add a nice list of file filters.  I'll dig 
through my mail and see if I can find a few extension lists for ya.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now allow me
to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but haven't been
able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that should be filtered.
Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread William Lefkovics

There are no dangerous subjects.  But Mr Blackstone has a pretty good,
as yet unpublished list.


-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now
allow me to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but
haven't been able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that
should be filtered. Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Preston Jeffares

Jen... unfortunately you'd have to add a few more steps to even begin to help me!!

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


I would never do that.  My point was that the number of technological
solutions for behavioral problems is quite small.

The 12 steps work for more that just alcohol addiction.

We are here if you need to talk.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Delivering NDRs into a public folder

2002-06-11 Thread Precht, David

A.G.: From a newsgroup post: When you install Exchange 5.5, by default,
automatic replies to the Internet are disabled. Have a look on the Internet
Mail tab of the IMS property pages. In particular, click on the advanced
options tab and see if any of those settings are affecting your system.
V.P.: I fixed this problem by granting permission of anonymous on that
folder to more than a contributor  

http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=2028source=


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delivering NDRs into a public folder


Hi,

I need to have all NDRs delivered into a public folder, I have set up the
folder, the SMTP virtual server settings and the email address for the
folder.

However, I'm getting the following event in the application log

EventID : 2028
Source : MS ExchangeIS Public

The delivery of a message sent by public folder DROPPED
MAIL9783A0F44E87AB885F7E578FAC3596AA00E334 has failed.
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 

 The non-delivery report has been deleted. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

What have I missed??

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim

I'm not the one with the Velcro gloves...

-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


I'll take your word on it's existence.
That you checked that it exists concerns me.  ;)

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Bill Beckett

What's wrong with Velcro gloves?


-Original Message-
From:   Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

I'm not the one with the Velcro gloves...

-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


I'll take your word on it's existence.
That you checked that it exists concerns me.  ;)

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I
subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and
subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review
the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is
not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in
error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and
other
information in this message that do not relate to official company
business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Ray Zorz

HP P/166 w/96meg, no raid, 50 users, Exchange 5.5, BDC, Ras, File
server. 

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 
130 users
Dual Xeon 1MB
1 GB
raid 5 80 GB

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time

Exchange2000.
2 Users.
PII 300.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each
processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web
server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC,
File Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So
what ya got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Robert D. Young

So did you have a work-around? ISA may have a pre-defined rule, but which one? I 
haven't added any filters apart from one for a NetWare server that wanted NTP...

NAV (CE 7.6) hasn't reported a trigger of Nimda, so I don't think it's involved...

- Robert

-Original Message-
From: Carey, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA


We ran into that after checkpoint required that we put in an anti-nimda
rule into the firewall (even though the requests were blocked by other
rules).  We were having an issue with a cvp server and they wouldn't
even look at it without us having that rule.

Basically OWA uses calls that trigger their nimda rule.

-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA


Hi all.

I'm trying to get OWA working for the first time on my W2K/E2K system
(worked fine for years on my NT4/Ex5.5 boxes) and have run into a bug
someone may be familiar with. 

Environment:

Clients are W2K/IE6 with current patches (lat time I looked). Server is
W2K AS, E2K SP1, ISA (yes, on the same box) and IIS 5 (basically, BO2K).
I've followed all the ISA/Shinder/Technet stuff I can find to config so
local IIS listens on a free port and all requests are redirected to that
port. Can get to in-house written publicly-available web pages on the
system from across the Internet fine.

I can access OWA in-house but across the net I am requested to sign in
(OK), then I get the two frames and a long pause. Eventually, both
frames get a page cannot be displayed message in them.

Any ideas?

- Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Joe Friess

Are you using SSL and do you have the appropriate ports open on the firewall? (http:80 
 SSL:443). If your using NAT, are the above ports redirected to your OWA server?

Joe Friess

 -Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OWA


Hi all.

I'm trying to get OWA working for the first time on my W2K/E2K system (worked fine for 
years on my NT4/Ex5.5 boxes) and have run into a bug someone may be familiar with.

Environment:

Clients are W2K/IE6 with current patches (lat time I looked). Server is W2K AS, E2K 
SP1, ISA (yes, on the same box) and IIS 5 (basically, BO2K). I've followed all the 
ISA/Shinder/Technet stuff I can find to config so local IIS listens on a free port and 
all requests are redirected to that port. Can get to in-house written 
publicly-available web pages on the system from across the Internet fine.

I can access OWA in-house but across the net I am requested to sign in (OK), then I 
get the two frames and a long pause. Eventually, both frames get a page cannot be 
displayed message in them.

Any ideas?

 - Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Chris Peden

Compaq Proliant ML370 G2
Dual P3 1.4ghz
1gb RAM
Smart Array 5302/64 Raid 1+0 array (4x18.2gb 15k u3 scsi)
Compaq AIT LVD 35/70 AIT tape drive
Dual 10/100 NICS teamed for bandwidth
MS SBS 2000
1.6gb IS
15 users


Thanks,
-Chris-
IT Director
Sundowner Interiors


-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 
130 users
Dual Xeon 1MB
1 GB
raid 5 80 GB

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time

Exchange2000.
2 Users.
PII 300.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


E55 on W2K server
70 Users
Compaq ML530
Dual Xeon
1GB
2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs
4x36 Ultra 3 for IS

-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode
2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active)
8000+ users
Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each
processor
3 GB Physical Memory
60 GB RAID on each server
Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN

One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB


Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 2000
25 users
Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM
2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web
server and  MS Project Central server

-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time


Exchange 5.5 ent.
90 users
Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache)
1 gig of RAM
24 gig IS (Major Packrats here)

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time


Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of
environments everyone is running in.  See who has the most people on the
smallest boxes and who has the largest org.  I used to take pride on my
little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC,
File Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people.  So
what ya got out there?

Exchange 2000
2 sites 700 users
Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site
12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other
Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?)

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

Ill email you off list.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now allow me
to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but haven't been
able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that should be filtered.
Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Kurt

Nothing really - I suspect they'd give you a really good grip on the
sheep.

| -Original Message-
| From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:02
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
| What's wrong with Velcro gloves?
|
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From:   Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent:   Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:54 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject:RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|   I'm not the one with the Velcro gloves...
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   I'll take your word on it's existence.
|   That you checked that it exists concerns me.  ;)
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list
| as well?  I
| subbed
|   mine to...
|
|   alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and
| subscribe him to
|   a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   http://www.intellireach.com/
|
|   Used to be microdata
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.
|
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000
|
|   Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the
| internet from a
|   specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes
| to review
| the emails
|   before they are sent.
|
|   TIA.
|
|   Jeff Coz Cosner
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|
|
| --
| --
|   --
|   The information contained in this email message is
| privileged and
|   confidential information intended only for the use of
| the individual
| or
|   entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this
| message is
| not the
|   intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
| dissemination,
|   distribution or copy of this message is strictly
| prohibited.  If you
| have
|   received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
| Suhler
|   Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax
| (212)381-8168, or email
|   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
|
|
| ==
| ==
|   ==
|
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|   *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
|   This email and any files transmitted with it are
| confidential and
| intended
|   for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in
| error
|   please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions,
| conclusions and
| other
|   information in this message that do not relate to
| official company
| business
|   shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
| Datavision-Prologix.
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   

RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Dillon, Jeff

not to fear...the sheep like it.  B

at least this still involves rerouting outgoing males.

-Original Message-
From: Kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Nothing really - I suspect they'd give you a really good grip on the
sheep.

| -Original Message-
| From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:02
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
| What's wrong with Velcro gloves?
|
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From:   Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent:   Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:54 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject:RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|   I'm not the one with the Velcro gloves...
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   I'll take your word on it's existence.
|   That you checked that it exists concerns me.  ;)
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list
| as well?  I
| subbed
|   mine to...
|
|   alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and
| subscribe him to
|   a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   http://www.intellireach.com/
|
|   Used to be microdata
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.
|
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000
|
|   Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the
| internet from a
|   specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes
| to review
| the emails
|   before they are sent.
|
|   TIA.
|
|   Jeff Coz Cosner
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|
|
| --
| --
|   --
|   The information contained in this email message is
| privileged and
|   confidential information intended only for the use of
| the individual
| or
|   entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this
| message is
| not the
|   intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
| dissemination,
|   distribution or copy of this message is strictly
| prohibited.  If you
| have
|   received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
| Suhler
|   Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax
| (212)381-8168, or email
|   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
|
|
| ==
| ==
|   ==
|
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|   *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
|   This email and any files transmitted with it are
| confidential and
| intended
|   for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in
| error
|   please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions,
| conclusions and
| other
|   information in this message that do not relate to
| official company
| business
|   shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
| Datavision-Prologix.
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|   List Charter and FAQ 

RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread William Smith

ThanksI see why it was off list!

What a potty mouth email :)

W



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Ill email you off list.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now allow me
to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but haven't been
able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that should be filtered.
Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Nickolaos Fotopoulos

i've done something similar, but with:

alt.erotica.hampster.ductape

wonder who makes theselol

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Martin Blackstone

Heh. I had to come up with that by myself!

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


ThanksI see why it was off list!

What a potty mouth email :)

W



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Ill email you off list.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now allow me
to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but haven't been
able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that should be filtered.
Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Garland Mac Neill

Oh lord, people from WY.

-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

not to fear...the sheep like it.  B

at least this still involves rerouting outgoing males.

-Original Message-
From: Kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Nothing really - I suspect they'd give you a really good grip on the
sheep.

| -Original Message-
| From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:02
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
| What's wrong with Velcro gloves?
|
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From:   Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent:   Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:54 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject:RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|   I'm not the one with the Velcro gloves...
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   I'll take your word on it's existence.
|   That you checked that it exists concerns me.  ;)
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list
| as well?  I
| subbed
|   mine to...
|
|   alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and
| subscribe him to
|   a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   http://www.intellireach.com/
|
|   Used to be microdata
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.
|
|
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail
|
|
|   Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000
|
|   Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the
| internet from a
|   specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes
| to review
| the emails
|   before they are sent.
|
|   TIA.
|
|   Jeff Coz Cosner
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|
|
| --
| --
|   --
|   The information contained in this email message is
| privileged and
|   confidential information intended only for the use of
| the individual
| or
|   entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this
| message is
| not the
|   intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
| dissemination,
|   distribution or copy of this message is strictly
| prohibited.  If you
| have
|   received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
| Suhler
|   Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax
| (212)381-8168, or email
|   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
|
|
| ==
| ==
|   ==
|
|
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|   *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
|   This email and any files transmitted with it are
| confidential and
| intended
|   for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in
| error
|   please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions,
| conclusions and
| other
|   information in this message that do not relate to
| official company
| business
|  

RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Garland Mac Neill

Hey Martin,

Can you send me the list. I'll need it if I can ever get this piece of crap
Exchange server running. 

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering

Heh. I had to come up with that by myself!

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


ThanksI see why it was off list!

What a potty mouth email :)

W



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Ill email you off list.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now allow me
to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but haven't been
able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that should be filtered.
Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread William Lefkovics

You must be referring to the hardware.

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Hey Martin,

Can you send me the list. I'll need it if I can ever get this piece of
crap Exchange server running. 

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering

Heh. I had to come up with that by myself!

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


ThanksI see why it was off list!

What a potty mouth email :)

W



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Ill email you off list.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now
allow me to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but
haven't been able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that
should be filtered. Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim

It can't be that bad or you'd already be using the words that Martin has in
his list. 1018 errors tend to make me profane and I can swear like a
merchant seaman when I get worked up.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


You must be referring to the hardware.

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Hey Martin,

Can you send me the list. I'll need it if I can ever get this piece of
crap Exchange server running. 

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering

Heh. I had to come up with that by myself!

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


ThanksI see why it was off list!

What a potty mouth email :)

W



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Ill email you off list.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now
allow me to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but
haven't been able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that
should be filtered. Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread student2003

Under IIs have you turned off parent paths on the site? If so try 
turning them back on. That worked for us. (Pleased don't ask why! %)


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Garland Mac Neill

No I'm referring to the Software. I haven't seen the list yet, but I'm sure
after messing with this I'll have a few to add to it. 

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering

It can't be that bad or you'd already be using the words that Martin has in
his list. 1018 errors tend to make me profane and I can swear like a
merchant seaman when I get worked up.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


You must be referring to the hardware.

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Hey Martin,

Can you send me the list. I'll need it if I can ever get this piece of
crap Exchange server running. 

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering

Heh. I had to come up with that by myself!

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


ThanksI see why it was off list!

What a potty mouth email :)

W



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Content Filtering


Ill email you off list.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering


I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now
allow me to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but
haven't been able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that
should be filtered. Has anyone complied a list like this?

Thank you,
W

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Garland Mac Neill

Why?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: OWA

Under IIs have you turned off parent paths on the site? If so try 
turning them back on. That worked for us. (Pleased don't ask why! %)


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Siegfried Weber

Here's mine: http://www.cdolive.net/download/junkcontent.txt. Mind
sending me yours, Martin?

Cheers:Siegfried runat=server /

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:29 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Content Filtering
 
 Ill email you off list.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:47 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Content Filtering
 
 
 I've recently upgraded to a version Sybari's Antigen which will now
allow
 me
 to do content filtering. I've looked through a few KB's but haven't
been
 able to find a list of know 'dangerous' subjects that should be
filtered.
 Has anyone complied a list like this?
 
 Thank you,
 W
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA

2002-06-11 Thread Precht, David

Any errors / event ids ?


-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 14:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA


Hi all.

I'm trying to get OWA working for the first time on my W2K/E2K system
(worked fine for years on my NT4/Ex5.5 boxes) and have run into a bug
someone may be familiar with. 

Environment:

Clients are W2K/IE6 with current patches (lat time I looked). Server is W2K
AS, E2K SP1, ISA (yes, on the same box) and IIS 5 (basically, BO2K). I've
followed all the ISA/Shinder/Technet stuff I can find to config so local IIS
listens on a free port and all requests are redirected to that port. Can get
to in-house written publicly-available web pages on the system from across
the Internet fine.

I can access OWA in-house but across the net I am requested to sign in (OK),
then I get the two frames and a long pause. Eventually, both frames get a
page cannot be displayed message in them.

Any ideas?

- Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Move Mailbox is hosed (Part Duex)

2002-06-11 Thread Precht, David
Title: Message



9167 : 
Q264413
1008 : 
http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1008source=
9175 : 
Q264413 , Q288598




  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 
  12:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Move Mailbox 
  is hosed (Part Duex)
  
  What am I missing here? The information 
  store starts ok and the mailbox storage mounts fine, which is what Technet suggests. I also get Event ID 9167 and 1008 with 
  the same error. Replication seems to be fine. I've removed the AV s/w. IS this 
  installation hosed? 
  
  Thanks in 
  advance,
  Garland
  
  Event Type: 
  Error
  Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin
  Event Category: 
  MAPI Session 
  Event ID: 
  9175
  Date: 
  6/11/2002
  Time: 
  10:04:11 AM
  User: 
  N/A
  Computer: 
  SAKIC
  Description:
  The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore' failed with the following error: 
  
  The attempt to log on to the Microsoft 
  Exchange Server computer has failed.
  The MAPI provider 
  failed.
  Microsoft Exchange Server Information 
  Store
  ID no: 8004011d-0512- 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Public Folder Resources

2002-06-11 Thread Precht, David

Right click on the top Public folder in Outlook and go to properties .. That
should break it down... However manual


-Original Message-
From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 14:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder Resources


Hi All,
I need to obtain some information on the public folder resources we are
using. I know we can get to that via Public Information Store/Public Folder
resources on the public folder server. However, I want the data arranged by
subfolder. Is there a tool that will allow me to do that? Rodney

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




  1   2   >