RE: OWA Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yup, 
as long as you all are in the same site.  (Maybe even if you aren't, but 
mine all are).
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Jamie Domingue 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 
  12:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA 
  Question
  
  I am going to add a new Exchange 
  5.5 server to house users' mailboxes.  
  Is it possible for users with mailboxes housed on different Exchange 
  servers to access their mail via OWA from a single server running 
  OWA?
   
  Thanks in 
  advance.
   
  Jamie 
  Domingue
  Systems Integrator 
  II
  Global Data 
  Systems
  337-291-6535
   List Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Replication

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



They 
are also on Weight Watcher's 10 most deadly places to eat list, but who can 
resist when they're fresh out of the fat :)
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 
  4:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Replication
  They just opened near 
  here -  it is taking over as the IT department's preferred form 
  of bribery  :)
   
   
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of 
  Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman 
  Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  

-Original Message-----From: Ropiak Steve - 
    NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Replication
Wow, you MUST be sure if you bet an entire dozen.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 28, 
  2002 4:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Replication
  No. 
  All OWA needs is IIS properly configured and OWA 
  itself.  It does not need a full install of exchange to function - 
  just connectivity to exchange - it uses NetBIOS names so make sure your 
  WINS is good or put a hosts file.  If your current server is running 
  out of room I bet a dozen Krispy Kremes that it is the IIS log files 
  getting unruly.
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
  Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear 
  Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
  500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  > -Original Message- > From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:06 PM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Replication > 
  > > So I don't need 
  the message transfer agent running on the OWA server? > > -Original Message- 
  > From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:22 
  AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  > Subject: RE: Replication > > Owa doesn't replicate...the owa 
  itself only passes through > web requests to 
  the exchange server. >  >  >  > thanks, >  > Fred Valdez > Network 
  Administrator > -Original 
  Message- > From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:59 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Replication > 
  > > Oppps, I guess I 
  should have mentioned that OWA is on it's > own 
  server and that I'm pretty sure it's replicating. >  > -Original 
  Message- > From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:43 
  AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  > Subject: RE: Replication >  > OWA just connects to your 
  server - it does not hold any > information 
  from there. >  > I bet your problem is the IIS log files. >  >  > Jim Zangara, MCSE+I > IT 
  Manager > Special Projects Engineer 
  > Premiere Radio Networks > A Division of Clear Channel Communications > 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 > 
  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 > Direct: (818) 461-8620 
  > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
  > -Original > 
  Message- > From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:20 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: OWA: Replication > Hello 
  Everyone, >  > 
  Hopefully your Monday is going better than mine. >  > I have an issue with my OWA 
  server. It would appear that I > have run out 
  of disk space and thus causes the server crash. > Big surprise huh? Anyway, my question is this, does the OWA 
  > server have to have room for replication 
  between itself and > the main Exchange server? 
  Do I have to have the same amount > of disk 
  space on both servers?  Or can I find a way just to > pull the info from the main server without any 
  replication? >  > TIA >  > Garland Mac Neill > Sys 
  Admin > Solbourne > 
  ] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] >  
  > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-> 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > 
  > List Charter and FAQ > at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > List Charter and FAQ at: > http

RE: Replication

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Replication



Wow, 
you MUST be sure if you bet an entire dozen.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 
  4:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Replication
  No. 
  All OWA needs is IIS properly configured and OWA itself.  
  It does not need a full install of exchange to function - just connectivity to 
  exchange - it uses NetBIOS names so make sure your WINS is good or put a hosts 
  file.  If your current server is running out of room I bet a dozen Krispy 
  Kremes that it is the IIS log files getting unruly.
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT Manager 
  Special Projects Engineer Premiere 
  Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
  Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  > -Original Message- > 
  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:06 PM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Replication > 
  > > So I don't need the 
  message transfer agent running on the OWA server? > 
  > -Original Message- > From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:22 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: 
  RE: Replication > > Owa 
  doesn't replicate...the owa itself only passes through > web requests to the exchange server. >  >  >  > thanks, >  > Fred Valdez > Network Administrator > -Original 
  Message- > From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:59 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Replication > 
  > > Oppps, I guess I 
  should have mentioned that OWA is on it's > own 
  server and that I'm pretty sure it's replicating. >  > -Original 
  Message- > From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:43 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Replication >  
  > OWA just connects to your server - it does not 
  hold any > information from there. >  > I bet your problem is the IIS 
  log files. >  >  > Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
  > IT Manager > Special 
  Projects Engineer > Premiere Radio Networks 
  > A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  > 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 > Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 > Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  >   
  > -Original > 
  Message- > From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:20 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: OWA: Replication > Hello 
  Everyone, >  > 
  Hopefully your Monday is going better than mine. >  > I have an issue with my OWA 
  server. It would appear that I > have run out of 
  disk space and thus causes the server crash. > Big 
  surprise huh? Anyway, my question is this, does the OWA > server have to have room for replication between itself and 
  > the main Exchange server? Do I have to have the 
  same amount > of disk space on both servers?  
  Or can I find a way just to > pull the info from 
  the main server without any replication? >  
  > TIA >  
  > Garland Mac Neill > 
  Sys Admin > Solbourne > 
  ]  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] >  > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-> 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > 
  > List Charter and FAQ > 
  at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-> 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > 
  > > > List Charter and > FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > List Charter and FAQ at: 
  > http://www.sunbelt-> 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 5.5 resource kit

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yeah, 
had to buy the Back Office Resource Kit to get mine.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:24 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 5.5 resource 
  kit
  Isn't the Res Kit a "pay to play" deal 
  ?
  http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/4355.asp
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Karen Palmer 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:13 

Subject: 5.5 resource kit

Does anyone know of any links to the Exchange 5.5 resource kit?  
We can't find it on the MS site and are looking for the mailbox migration 
tool.
 
Thanks,
 
Karen PalmerList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



Thanks, I did forward your post to the folks at CorpSoft for their 
comments.  Their task is to keep us on the correct side of Microsoft 
licensing.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Woodrick, Ed 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:58 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  The 
  real answer is that it depends on your licensing. Not all licenses are written 
  the same. I know that some licenses require a CAL for each machine. Some 
  probably require a CAL per user. I believe that the standard commercial 
  license is per machine.
   
  AND 
  don't forget that this is an authenticated user, so if you are running on a 
  W2K AD, then you will probably also need a W2K CAL also.
   
   
  But 
  most importantly, the answer is to read the license yourself and then consult 
  your lawyer for any interpretations.
   
   
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
    NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:30 AMPosted To: 
Exchange SunbeltConversation: OWA usageSubject: RE: 
OWA usage
Well, that makes sense.  If a user's primary computer at work 
has a CAL and he pops into OWA once in a while from home, the CAL at work 
covers him (or her).
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 
fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 
  6:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Let's begin here by saying that IANAL and that this is not to be 
  taken as legal advice ( ask your Microsoft Licensing rep and get it in 
  writing) but...
  The following is an extract from the Open Licensing Agreement that 
  I dug out yesterday when talking to Microsoft to get hold of a copy of 
  Outlook 2000.
   
  "Client Access.  Licensee must acquire a 
  separate CAL for MS Exch svr in order to use Microsoft Client 
  Software to Access or otherwise utilize Microsoft Exchange 
  Server and/or to access or otherwise utilize the services of any other 
  electronic mail server software.  {the following is the relevant 
  part} Licensee may also use that same CAL for any other digital electronic 
  device that Licensee uses less than 20% of Licensee's total connection 
  time.  
   
  It goes on to define total connection time but that isn't 
  relevant.
   
  The important part here is that you only need CALs for the number 
  of mailboxes that you have configured that are actually accessed by 
  clients logging in and authenticating.  If a user uses OWA to access 
  their mailbox all the time, you would require a CAL for that user, but not 
  necessarily a CAL for every computer that they login from.  
  
   
  As I said "I am not a Lawyer", but I don't think Microsoft really 
  intended that you should have to have a license for every possible 
  workstation that your users could connect from, only for the number of 
  mailboxes that you have configured on the server that are accessed by your 
  users.  However I bet hey wish they could require a license for every 
  machine you login from ;-)
  
  
   
  cheers 
  Wayne Hanks Systems 
  Administrator 
  Paterson Ord Minnett Ph 08 9263 
  1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
  "Don't Panic" 
  -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
   
       
  
    -Original Message-----From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 25 January 2002 
3:16To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage
I believe your Dell guy is wrong.  I've heard from too many 
software vendors who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the 
time that OWA users do need a CAL.  If they didn't, you could get 
away with buying no CAL's by just having everyone use the web 
interface.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve 
RopiakZF Group NAOCERT, Exchange and 
Bar Code Administrator(207) 989-9115 
voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 
  2002 2:07 PMTo: MS-E

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



Well, 
that makes sense.  If a user's primary computer at work has a CAL and he 
pops into OWA once in a while from home, the CAL at work covers him (or 
her).
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:22 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Let's begin here by saying that IANAL and that this is not to be taken 
  as legal advice ( ask your Microsoft Licensing rep and get it in writing) 
  but...
  The 
  following is an extract from the Open Licensing Agreement that I dug out 
  yesterday when talking to Microsoft to get hold of a copy of Outlook 
  2000.
   
  "Client Access.  Licensee must acquire a separate 
  CAL for MS Exch svr in order to use Microsoft Client Software 
  to Access or otherwise utilize Microsoft Exchange Server and/or 
  to access or otherwise utilize the services of any other electronic mail 
  server software.  {the following is the relevant part} Licensee may also 
  use that same CAL for any other digital electronic device that Licensee uses 
  less than 20% of Licensee's total connection time.  
   
  It 
  goes on to define total connection time but that isn't 
  relevant.
   
  The 
  important part here is that you only need CALs for the number of mailboxes 
  that you have configured that are actually accessed by clients logging in and 
  authenticating.  If a user uses OWA to access their mailbox all the time, 
  you would require a CAL for that user, but not necessarily a CAL for every 
  computer that they login from.  
   
  As I 
  said "I am not a Lawyer", but I don't think Microsoft really intended that you 
  should have to have a license for every possible workstation that your users 
  could connect from, only for the number of mailboxes that you have configured 
  on the server that are accessed by your users.  However I bet hey wish 
  they could require a license for every machine you login from 
  ;-)
  
  
   
  cheers 
  
  Wayne Hanks Systems 
  Administrator 
  Paterson Ord Minnett Ph 08 9263 1114 
  fax 08 9325 1086 
  "Don't Panic" 
  -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
   
   
  
    -Original Message-----From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 25 January 2002 
3:16To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage
I 
believe your Dell guy is wrong.  I've heard from too many software 
vendors who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the time that OWA 
users do need a CAL.  If they didn't, you could get away with buying no 
CAL's by just having everyone use the web interface.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 
fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 
  2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me. 
    From Dell: 
  You don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if 
  the user has a machine that they are pulling data 
  down to their Outlook directly off of the server 
  then they would need a CAL. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:20 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage 
  This is my major complaint is that I have people who 
  travel and they like going into a local library of 
  internet café  and getting their emails, fax, and voice mails via the net. When my boss was in Europe last year 
  he must have used 8 different 
  machines.   The way I got around it is that I only 
  give a CAL to a machine while it is in use. Once it is no 
  longer in use and not located on a laptop or on 
  site for 24 hours the CAL is revoked. At least that is what is says in my exchange procedure manual and DR plan. 
  
  Do not quote me and I am not a lawyer but a senior MS 
  local office person told me that what I am doing 
  is within the scope of the CAL. As long as it is a 
  written procedure. 
  ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 
    
  -----Original Message- From: 
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:00 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage 
  Yes, but if each of those 

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



I 
believe your Dell guy is wrong.  I've heard from too many software vendors 
who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the time that OWA users do 
need a CAL.  If they didn't, you could get away with buying no CAL's by 
just having everyone use the web interface.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:07 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me.   From Dell: You 
  don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if the user has 
  a machine that they are pulling data down to their 
  Outlook directly off of the server then they would 
  need a CAL. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:20 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: OWA usage 
  This is my major complaint is that I have people who travel 
  and they like going into a local library of internet 
  café  and getting their emails, fax, and voice 
  mails via the net. When my boss was in Europe last year he must 
  have used 8 different machines.   The way I got 
  around it is that I only give a CAL to a machine while 
  it is in use. Once it is no longer in use and not 
  located on a laptop or on site for 24 hours the CAL is revoked. At 
  least that is what is says in my exchange procedure 
  manual and DR plan. 
  Do not quote me and I am not a lawyer but a senior MS local 
  office person told me that what I am doing is within 
  the scope of the CAL. As long as it is a written 
  procedure. 
  ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 
    
  -Original Message----- From: 
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:00 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: OWA usage 
  Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers they 
  use to OWA into your system you licensing is still out 
  of control.  What I was thinking I'd need is some 
  way to monitor (or perhaps lock out) usage by IP address or MAC 
  address so I'd have some way of demonstrating how many 
  computers are accessing OWA when the guys with the big 
  red "M" on their chest show up at my door. 
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 
  989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA 
  usage 
  We have a global OWAUsers group and only members of that group can access their email via OWA.  Since the number of OWA users is less than the number of Non-OWA users this is not too hard to maintain. 
  -- Jeff Eggleston ====== 
  "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:221397@exchangelist... 
  OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every 
  home user who accesses OWA from their 
  home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 
  OWA.  Problem is, how can I stop those folks that 
  we don't have a CAL for from getting in?  In 
  theory, everyone who has a home computer could 
  use it, but probably few do.  Any one 
  got any ideas on how to monitor / control it? 
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 
  989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers they use to OWA into
your system you licensing is still out of control.  What I was thinking I'd
need is some way to monitor (or perhaps lock out) usage by IP address or MAC
address so I'd have some way of demonstrating how many computers are
accessing OWA when the guys with the big red "M" on their chest show up at
my door.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA usage


We have a global OWAUsers group and only
members of that group can access their email
via OWA.  Since the number of OWA users is
less than the number of Non-OWA users this is
not too hard to maintain.

--
Jeff Eggleston
==========

"Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange
and Bar Code Admn." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:221397@exchangelist...

OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every
home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange
5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for
from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use
it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



I did 
speak with Vendor, it's one CAL for each computer.  If the user is 
going home to OWA into work he needs a CAL.  
And 
the rich get richer . . . .
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 
  4:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  
  There has to be some 
  type of consideration given to OWA users.  As others have mentioned, I 
  always "thought" that you did not need a separate CAL for OWA if you 
  already had one for that users work machine/mailbox.  You may want to 
  speak to your vendor again and bring up that exact scenario that Neils 
  mentions.  It really does sound silly how they are explaining their 
  licensing.
  
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE 
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator 
  Peregrine 
  Systems 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Niels 
  Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:18 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
   
  
  That would only fix 
  half of the problem. 
  
  A single OWA-enabled 
  user can access his OWA account from any Internet-connected PC in the 
  world!
  
   
  
  I'd *hate* to pay MS 
  for that many CALs...   :-)
  
   
  
  /\/iels
  
   
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:48 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage

Create a group 
called NOOWA and deny local login rights to the OWA server to its 
members.  Just a thought.

 

There are many 
other means, like restricting HTTP.

 

 
-Original 
Message-From: Leone, 
Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:48 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage
> If 
they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in. > Its as simple as 
that. 
I think 
his question is "How does I stop the folks who *do* have a mailbox, but for 
whom I don't have an OWA CAL? Other than trusting them not 
to?".
 
> 
    > 
    -----Original Message----- > From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office 
Exchange and Bar Code Admn. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 
Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: OWA 
usage > 
> 
> OK, got 
the bad news from Microsoft.  Every home user who 
> accesses 
OWA from > 
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem 
> is, how 
can I > stop 
those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting 
> in?  
In theory, > 
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably 
> few 
do.  Any one > got any ideas on how to monitor / control 
it? > 
> mit 
freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), > Steve Ropiak > ZF Group NAO 
> CERT, 
Exchange and Bar Code Administrator > (207) 989-9115 voice > (207) 989-8722 fax 
> (513) 
317-0197 cell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > List Charter and FAQ 
at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > List Charter and FAQ 
at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



That 
is my understanding.  I emailed Corpsoft for clarification.  They 
handle our licensing issues.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 
  1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  > I think you have things misunderstood or didn't explain 
  them > correctly. > 
  > You need a CAL for every person that is accessing 
  the > Exchange server. That > CAL encompasses, regular old connections, POP, IMAP, or 
  OWA. 
  Not every person; every computer. If I access at work, and 
  again at home/on the road using OWA, I need 2 licenses. I think.
  > > -Original 
  Message----- > From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:33 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: OWA usage > 
  > > Is that the 
  Microsoft solution?  Just buy two CAL's for every > user, one for > work, one for 
  home? > > mit 
  freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), > Steve Ropiak 
  > ZF Group NAO > CERT, 
  Exchange and Bar Code Administrator > (207) 
  989-9115 voice > (207) 989-8722 fax 
  > (513) 317-0197 cell > 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 
  > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:27 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: 
  RE: OWA usage > > 
  > If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get 
  in. > Its as simple as that. > > -Original Message- 
  > From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and 
  Bar Code Admn. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM 
  > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: OWA usage > > > OK, got the bad news from 
  Microsoft.  Every home user who > accesses OWA 
  from > their home PC  needs a CAL for my 
  Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem > is, how can 
  I > stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for 
  from getting > in?  In theory, 
  > everyone who has a home computer could use it, but 
  probably > few do.  Any one > got any ideas on how to monitor / control it? > > mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best 
  Regards), > Steve Ropiak > ZF Group NAO > CERT, Exchange and Bar 
  Code Administrator > (207) 989-9115 voice 
  > (207) 989-8722 fax > 
  (513) 317-0197 cell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > List Charter and FAQ 
  at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > List Charter and FAQ 
  at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > List Charter and FAQ 
  at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We had this discussion with Corpsoft shortly before a threatened audit by
Microsoft and their position on Exchange licensing is that you don't need a
CAL for every user, but every computer that accesses 5.5 Exchange.  Hence,
if 3 people share one computer, only 1 CAL required.  That being the case,
if this guy accesses Exchange from work, then goes home and does OWA at
night he should need 2 CAL's as there are 2 computers accessing the system.
Am I more confused?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


I think you have things misunderstood or didn't explain them correctly.

You need a CAL for every person that is accessing the Exchange server. That
CAL encompasses, regular old connections, POP, IMAP, or OWA.

-Original Message-----
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


Is that the Microsoft solution?  Just buy two CAL's for every user, one for
work, one for home?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.
Its as simple as that.

-Original Message-----
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA usage


OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Is that the Microsoft solution?  Just buy two CAL's for every user, one for
work, one for home?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.
Its as simple as that.

-Original Message-----
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA usage


OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



See 
Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
  they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
  doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't 
so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to 
  volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
  server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet 
  is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears 
per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



I beg 
to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use file or 
print services (plain old mail users use neither).
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
  they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
  doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't 
so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to 
  volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
  server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet 
  is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears 
per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't so, 
Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  It 
  is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per 
  user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
  licensing.
   
  So - 
  you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server or per seat 
  mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including home 
  machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet is 
  to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft 
  doesn't do a one size fits all for licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears per 
user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to 
the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail 
and delete the original message.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public free/busy time and admin rights

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Was 
the old server the first server in the site?  If so, the system folder 
housing free/busy info is gone.  Check Q152960 about rebuilding the site 
folders.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Jason Cordingley 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 
  3:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Public 
  free/busy time and admin rights
  
  NT Server 4, SP 
  6a
  Exchange 5.5 
  SP4
   
  I have created a new Exchange 5.5 
  box, transferred all our users from the old box to the new box, and everyone 
  can send mail no problems. The old box was then taken away and removed as a 
  server within the exchange admin screen from the new 
  server.
   
  I now have 2 
  problems.
   
  I cannot remotely connect to the 
  exchange server, the error is 
   
  You do not have the permissions 
  required to complete the operation.
  Microsoft Exchange 
  Directory
  ID no: 
  DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS
   
  I am a member of Domain Admins and can remotely use tools like Wins Admin and 
  Server Admin
   
  Also
   
  Sometime when someone gets an 
  email we get the error message
   
  Cannot update public free/busy 
  time.
   
  Has anyone got any ideas for 
  either problem? The remote admin is the least of the 
  problems.
   
  Jason 
  CordingleyList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

No room at the Inn

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

When I try to create a server based rule, Outlook always comes back and says
there's not enough room on the server.  Is this a rights issue or am I
missing something?  

Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT4 SP6.

Thanks

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relaying problem


This is what I'm doing here, except we are on Exchange 5.5.

-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relaying problem

If you open the SMTP server properties, Access tab and click relay
restrictions, then check the "Allow all computers which successfully
authenticate ... bla, bla, bla ... then in Outlook/ Oexpress you can
indicate that the mail client MUST authenticate to send via the server ..
you should be ok... works for me...

B

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 January 2002 08:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relaying problem


Depending on their connection type, specify an IP range under the relay tab
of your Virtual SMTP Server(s).

-Original Message-
From: Greg Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Relaying problem


Hi

I appear to be having a problem with some remote users attaching to my
exchange server using Outlook Express.  The issue is that if I allow
relaying all remote users are able to send and receive email.  However if I
have it this way I am susceptible to spammers. (already happened once, never
again)  When I stop it from allowing relaying no remote users are able to
send email.  Instead they receive an NDR saying that relaying is not
allowed.

I am using exchange 2000 with the latest service pack and Outlook Express
for the clients.  I suspect that I need to alter the way I have it setup.
Is there a step by step guide to seting up Exchange for pop3/smtp clients?

Regards... Greg
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Calendar

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

How about public folder?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Calendar


I have NO idea if what I'm trying to accomplish will work or not, so
I've come to the experts.  What we want to do is share a calendar that
will be used by the entire department for scheduling appointments in
the Conference Room.  This way, users can use the Calendar to see when
the Conference Room is available.  A mailbox has been created called
Conference Room.  Usually, when you schedule an appointment, the Calendar is
not marked until that appointment is accepted.  However, we don't want to
have to have someone manually go in and accept every one of these messages
in the Conference Room mailbox.  Is this making any sense, and if so, is
there anyway to setup an account to automatically accept a meeting when it
is requested?

Thanks.

Robert


*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***

This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail
message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and
may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information.  It is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s).
If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this electronic mail message in
error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system.

*** The Dayton Power & Light Company. ***

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Forwarding mail to an external account

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Can happen if the external account gets full and starts sending nastygrams
back to the Exchange account (We got AOL very mad at us for something
similar) but it's up to the user to properly manage the other account.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forwarding mail to an external account


Is not a way to also start a mail loop ?

- Original Message -
From: "Snook, Kevin S (ITD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 08:41
Subject: RE: Forwarding mail to an external account


> Create an Alternate Recipient (Delivery Options) on the Mailbox in
Exchange
> Admin (you will need to create a custom recipient first) or create a rule
on
> the mailbox. You should look at the security implications of EVERYTHING
from
> his Inbox going to an external address. Most orgs. don't allow this type
of
> thing.
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Couchman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 January 2002 12:54
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Forwarding mail to an external account
>
>
> One of my users has retired and wished to have any mail sent to him here
> forwarded to an external account. It there any way to do this in exchange?
> I'm running MS Exchange 5.5.
>
> Ptl. Bob Couchman
> Unit 57
> Network Administrator
> Madisonville Police Department
> 99 East Center Street
> Madisonville, KY 42431
> (270) 821-1720
> (270) 824-2115 (fax)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
> Visit the Madisonville Police Department on the internet at
> http://www.madisonvillepd.com 
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public Folder Question.

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Nutz.  Didn't see this post before my response.  What rights do the other
users have?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public Folder Question.


Oh yes, & show this as an email address book is ticked

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood 
Sent: 18 December 2001 12:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder Question.


Hi,

I'm trying to use public folders for the 1st time and would appreciate a
little help (sure it's a check box I've missed).

I have created a folder to hold other contacts, I am the owner and a few
other people are reviewers with the rest having no access.

Now, when I compose a new message, click to I see the GAL, my own
contacts and the new folder as seperate address books.

When any of the other users compose a message they only see the GAL &
their own contacts, how do I get outlook to show the new folder as an
address book?

They can see the folder by going though the public folder tree.

Thanks & and sorry about the "lameness" of the question :-)

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public Folder Question.

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Right click on folder, properties, Outlook address book tab, check box for
Show this folder as an Email address book.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder Question.


Hi,

I'm trying to use public folders for the 1st time and would appreciate a
little help (sure it's a check box I've missed).

I have created a folder to hold other contacts, I am the owner and a few
other people are reviewers with the rest having no access.

Now, when I compose a new message, click to I see the GAL, my own
contacts and the new folder as seperate address books.

When any of the other users compose a message they only see the GAL &
their own contacts, how do I get outlook to show the new folder as an
address book?

They can see the folder by going though the public folder tree.

Thanks & and sorry about the "lameness" of the question :-)

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Cannot open pst file

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Outlook needs both read and write access to the PST.  So, you have to copy
the PST from the CD to the hard drive and make sure the read only attribute
is not set on the file.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Dougie Coull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Cannot open pst file


Hi Guys

I've been through the archives because I'm sure this has come up before
but I can't find it.

Basically whats happened is that a new user has arrived onsite with a CD
which contains a .pst file with all his old mail in it. When he tries to
connect the pst file as a personal folder he gets the error message "File
access is denied. You do not have the permission required to access the
file .". Anyone know how to get round this. Like I say I'm sure
I've seen this answered before but its getting near xmas and my brain has
decided to go into holiday mode already

Cheers
Dougie

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: problem with OWA

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Are you using SSL?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: problem with OWA


Hello all,

I have a small problem with OWA and 1 user, he keeps getting access denied
and in the eventlog i see that there is no such user or bad password.
Now when he logs on OWA from his office he has no problems at all, using the
same login/password.
The only difference there is, is that it failed when he tried it from UK and
Belgium, both using MSIE 5.0. The Ex2k server is in the Netherlands and over
here and in Germany he had no problem logging on using OWA, I think the IE
5.0 is the problem but I am not sure.
When i go to OWA, I use the same URL as he does, but I get a domainbox and
he does not (not that it must be used, but still), I am using IE 6.0.

Any ideas?

TIA,

Bob

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: comm. failure... Please help

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: comm. failure... Please help



We get 
that on occasion, typically, it's a user on one server sending mail to another 
server.  Someone here pointed the finger at our AV software.  If I 
recall correctly, if you're running in Combo MAPI/ AVAPI mode, the MTA gets 
Fubar'd by the AV and the message bounces back.  We didn't find a cure and 
it's intermittent and usually goes away by itself if the user resends the 
message so we haven't put a lot of thought into trying to solve 
it.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Sawatzke, Jeff 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
  12:28 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: comm. 
  failure... Please help
  Sorry, can't help.
  
-Original Message-From: Brian Bauer 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:25 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: comm. 
failure... Please help
YesTHis is what the user receives...Nothing is added to the event 
log of the server.

  -Original Message-From: Sawatzke, Jeff 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 
  13, 2001 4:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: comm. failure... Please help
  That is the entire message?
   
  Do you know the intended destination of the 
  message?
  
-Original Message-From: Brian Bauer 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:45 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: comm. 
failure... Please help

 
E2K in mixed mode.  When sending sporadic 
external emails with attachments, we get the following error 
message:

Unable to deliver the message due to a 
communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: 
c=US;a= 
;p=JonesApparelGrou;l=JAG_EXCHANGE-011213211335Z-21807
Any ideas?  The clients that are having the problem are on 
exchange 5.5 servers, and the Internet mail connector is on a exchange 
5.5 server.

 -Original 
Message-From: Brian Bauer 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 
3:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
comm. failure... Please help

  where is this updated
   
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 
2001 12:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: comm. failure... Please 
help
Looks like an ldap port conflict to me 
Make sure your AD is set to 389 and your exchange is 
set to 390 
-Original Message- From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:14 
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: FW: comm. failure... Please help 

any ideas? >  
-Original Message- > From: 
    Brian Bauer  
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 
11:56 AM > To:   
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject:  comm. 
failure...  Please help > 
> 
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure 
>   The MTS-ID of 
the original message is: c=US;a= > 
;p=JonesApparelGrou;l=JAG-EXCH-03-011212161441Z-2 
> > Im getting this 
off and onany ideas 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Hacking tool to .pst files

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

During a security conference, I learned of a brute force tool called
luftware (or loftware), but not sure of it's ability to do PST's.  In the
demo, it was used against the SAM.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Brad Metzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hacking tool to .pst files


One of our ever wise staff members managed to lock herself out of her
personal folders by setting a password on it which she can not recall. This
file of course contains 'mission critical' information for her (blah blah
blah). Anyone have a name or URL for a good pst password hacking tool?
Thanks

Brad

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Looking for ideas

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

No blood, no foul, no time in the penalty box.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for ideas


I Didn't direct that at you, I meant it for humorous
voting buttons.

--- "Cross, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I sent it to a distribution list call
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mistake.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Looking for ideas
> 
> 
> Or why did u send me this email ? :)  Does this look
> like a face that cares ;)
> 
> --- "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and
> Bar Code Admn." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about voting buttons?  (Accept/reject -
> > yes/no/maybe)
> > 
> > mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
> > Steve Ropiak 
> > ZF Group NAO 
> > CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
> > (207) 989-9115 voice 
> > (207) 989-8722 fax 
> > (513) 317-0197 cell 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:29 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Looking for ideas
> > 
> > 
> >   Say that someone want to sends out a message and
> > (1) wants to know it was
> > delivered, and (2) wants users to acknowledge that
> > they have read it.  We're
> > talking about 5000 users.  I thought about having
> > him send it with delivery
> > rcpt with his reply to: address pointing to a
> public
> > folder address.  
> > 
> >   Is there way to put a check box that the user
> has
> > to check before they can
> > reply (or something similiar) to help prove that
> > they read it?
> > 
> >   Any ideas or suggestions are welcomed.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Tom Cross
> > Viasystems
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for
> all of
> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
> or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: mail automatically duplicated

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Corrupt mailbox?  We had a user with a corrupt box, sent 16,000 copies of
his P&L to the CFO.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bao, Gang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mail automatically duplicated


We have a Exchange5.5 user whose mails automatically duplicated since last
Saturday, Any idea of this? He uses outlook2000.

Thanks.

Bao

-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SP


http://www.tntsoftware.com



> -Original Message-
> From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:42 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Exchange 2k SP
> 
> Company URL, please  :)
> And don't tell me its msn.com
> 
> --- Scott Schnoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have a set of tools we've developed internally
> > that we use to stress our
> > product running on systems.  We'll do things like
> > hammer the heck out of the
> > event logs, collect performance data intensely, send
> > email notifications (a
> > lot!), etc.
> >
> > My company's flagship product does real-time
> > monitoring of servers,
> > workstations, etc. and needs to perform well,
> > especially under periods of
> > heavy stress.  So before it goes out to customers,
> > we stress it to the
> > extreme.  It's actually a lot of work, but a lot of
> > fun, too!
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "David N Precht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: Exchange 2k SP
> >
> >
> > > What kind of stress tools ya got  ;) ?
> > >
> > > --- Scott Schnoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ditto here.  Running in production without even
> > a
> > > > hint of any problems.
> > > >
> > > > Also running it on a test/development cluster
> > that
> > > > gets stressed pretty hard
> > > > and all is well there, too.
> > > >
> > > > SP2 gets a big thumbs up from me!
> > > >
> > > > -Scott
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Bob t. Berge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:14 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Same here, installed it overnight and all seems
> > to
> > > > work fine indeed.
> > > > It's a BIG SP, almost 190MB, and the patching
> > takes
> > > > quite some time, but it
> > > > all went good and no strange eventlog entries
> > were
> > > > added after the reboot.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > > > > Van: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Verzonden: maandag 10 december 2001 16:22
> > > > > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Exchange 2k SP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I installed the E2k SP2 this morning, so far,
> > > > everything looks ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mensaje original-
> > > > > De: David N. Precht
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Diciembre de 2001
> > 12:12
> > > > a.m.
> > > > > Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Asunto: Exchange 2k SP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/ESSp1_en.asp
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess MS decided to put it back up !?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> _
> > > > >
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > >
> > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> > > http://greetings.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yah

RE: Looking for ideas

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

How about voting buttons?  (Accept/reject - yes/no/maybe)

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for ideas


  Say that someone want to sends out a message and (1) wants to know it was
delivered, and (2) wants users to acknowledge that they have read it.  We're
talking about 5000 users.  I thought about having him send it with delivery
rcpt with his reply to: address pointing to a public folder address.  

  Is there way to put a check box that the user has to check before they can
reply (or something similiar) to help prove that they read it?

  Any ideas or suggestions are welcomed.

Thanks,

Tom Cross
Viasystems

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Can't delete in OWA

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yes, all 5.5 SP3+, NT4, SP 5.  This is a recently development.  We've had
OWA up for 6 months, this started happening a few weeks ago and we can't pin
down any recent changes that might have triggered this.  I even got
desperate and coughed up the $245 and got no real help.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Can't delete in OWA


Are all servers on the same Exchange SP ? Same OS/SP ?

--- "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and
Bar Code Admn." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Users on one of our servers have an issue where they
> cannot delete mail
> through the OWA interface.  All they get is a pop-up
> saying "Unable to
> delete item".  I did a KB search and the only thing
> that was close is if you
> have set mailbox size restrictions and a user has
> exceeded the limit, but
> that does not apply in this case.  My test account
> has only a single message
> so I'm way under the limit.  Odd part is that only
> users on this one server
> are affected.  Configuration is Exchange 5.5 SP3
> with the post SP3 info
> fixes running on NT4.
> Thanks to all who reply.
> 
> mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
> Steve Ropiak 
> ZF Group NAO 
> CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
> (207) 989-9115 voice 
> (207) 989-8722 fax 
> (513) 317-0197 cell 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bonner, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:11 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: can I delete msgs by subject?
> 
> 
> The situation we're having here is that we actually
> need to delete messages
> themselves out of the store, based on subject line.
> 
> Jon Bonner
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:00 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: can I delete msgs by subject?
> 
> 
> I can not vouch for comparative performance, as I
> have never run the same
> request for each; however, isscan.exe can remove
> attachments based on
> subject, if that is sufficient for you.
> Ref:
>
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q224493
> 
> William
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Can't delete in OWA

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Users on one of our servers have an issue where they cannot delete mail
through the OWA interface.  All they get is a pop-up saying "Unable to
delete item".  I did a KB search and the only thing that was close is if you
have set mailbox size restrictions and a user has exceeded the limit, but
that does not apply in this case.  My test account has only a single message
so I'm way under the limit.  Odd part is that only users on this one server
are affected.  Configuration is Exchange 5.5 SP3 with the post SP3 info
fixes running on NT4.
Thanks to all who reply.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bonner, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: can I delete msgs by subject?


The situation we're having here is that we actually need to delete messages
themselves out of the store, based on subject line.

Jon Bonner


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: can I delete msgs by subject?


I can not vouch for comparative performance, as I have never run the same
request for each; however, isscan.exe can remove attachments based on
subject, if that is sufficient for you.
Ref:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q224493

William

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA Installation

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Rerun setup, add components.  You can also install just OWA to a separate
box if you want to lighten the load on your server.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Paul Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA Installation


We originally installed our Exchange Server 5.5 without Outlook Web
Access. Now my company wants to add it.  Does anyone know if I can add OWA
to our existing installation or do I need to do a whole new Exchange
installation?  (Note: I have to add IIS either on the same server or on a
different one as part of this too.)  If it is possible to add it, do I
just rerun the Exchange installation and add the additional components?

Thanks in advance for any help!

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How could .pif file get through....

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Hit by Goner = yes
Rebuild server(s) = No
Shout many expletives at stupid users = yes

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sawatzke, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How could .pif file get through


Who would read e-mail from a server?

-Original Message-
From: Bruce Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How could .pif file get through


Ouch. Informal survey: Anyone had to rebuild a server due to the Goner?

-Original Message-
From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How could .pif file get through


Yep, we got hit by Goner despite having all .scr extensions blocked.

-Original Message-
From: Craig Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How could .pif file get through



We blocked the usual set of attachments in Groupshield for Exchange 5.5 some
months ago. Including .pif

Yet this morning I received an e-mail with a .pif attachement?

Anyone had this problem?


Craig

 
This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the
information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please
contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is
for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or
used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice
should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters
relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require
diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How could .pif file get through....

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Not familiar with Group shield, but if it's MAPI based, MAPI based AV
products are notorious for letting messages slip by.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Craig Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How could .pif file get through



We blocked the usual set of attachments in Groupshield for Exchange 5.5 some
months ago. Including .pif

Yet this morning I received an e-mail with a .pif attachement?

Anyone had this problem?


Craig

 
This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the
information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please
contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is
for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or
used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice
should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters
relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require
diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Dumb Norton for Exchange

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yeah, I've heard that the AVAPI in 5.5 is so buggy that it doesn't really
help all that much.  Been thinking of switching back to MAPI only mode, but
we just bought Antigen so it's Hasta la Vista, NAV.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb Norton for Exchange


In Auto-Protect mode "MAPI/VAPI" the current version of NAV for EX
cannot resolve that information.  I spoke to Symantec a while back and
they said they were working on a solution.

I changed mine back to just "MAPI Only" for now.  I have not experienced
any problems.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dumb Norton for Exchange

When the AVAPI grabs viruses from attachments it does not report the
sender/recipient, etc. We get the same thing and I called Symantec on
it.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Brad Foss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb Norton for Exchange


I set up the Norton Antivirus for Exchange on both our Exchange servers
(W2k
SP1 and Exchange 5.5 SP4)

It appears to be removing infected attachments just fine, but it is
sending
out email notifications that read;

Sender of the infected attachment:  Unknown Sender Recipient of the
infected
attachment:  Unknown Subject of the message:  Unknown One or more
attachments were deleted.

Do I need to do something else to get it to resolve %1 %2 and %3?

Thanks!

Brad Foss  ISG Core Tech
Neopost
510-489-6800 X2214


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Dumb Norton for Exchange

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

When the AVAPI grabs viruses from attachments it does not report the
sender/recipient, etc. We get the same thing and I called Symantec on it.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Brad Foss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb Norton for Exchange


I set up the Norton Antivirus for Exchange on both our Exchange servers (W2k
SP1 and Exchange 5.5 SP4)

It appears to be removing infected attachments just fine, but it is sending
out email notifications that read;

Sender of the infected attachment:  Unknown Sender Recipient of the infected
attachment:  Unknown Subject of the message:  Unknown One or more
attachments were deleted.

Do I need to do something else to get it to resolve %1 %2 and %3?

Thanks!

Brad Foss  ISG Core Tech
Neopost
510-489-6800 X2214


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MTA & X400

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We 
have an X between our site and our German office.  Sometimes when the 
T-1 goes down, we have to restart the service on both ends a couple times before 
it wakes up again.  Good luck.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Gian Sartor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:02 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: MTA & 
  X400
  Thanks.
   
  That's done, mail still queuing though. Is 
  there anything else I can try?
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
    Ropiak Steve 
    - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:47 
PM
Subject: RE: MTA & X400

Go 
ahead and bounce the service.  It won't trash the 
queue.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 
fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Gian Sartor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:00 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MTA & 
  X400
  Hi, 
   
  I have a small problem which I am hoping 
  someone can shed some light on as my knowledge in this area of Exchange is 
  a bit limited at the mo.
   
  We have 2 Servers transferring mail over 
  X400 connectors, the link between them went down last night, so mail 
  started backing up in the MTA. The connection between the servers is back 
  up now, but the mail is not being transferred. Can I stop and start the 
  MTA service without losing any mail? I also noticed Event ID:9156 in the 
  Application log of one of the servers, I found this article http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q193894&GSSNB=1 which 
  relates to the problem but I don't want to change anything unnecessarily. 
  
   
  Any help with this would be great, thanks 
  in advance.
   
  Gian Sartor MCSEIT Support 
  EngineerList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MTA & X400

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Go 
ahead and bounce the service.  It won't trash the 
queue.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Gian Sartor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:00 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MTA & 
  X400
  Hi, 
   
  I have a small problem which I am hoping 
  someone can shed some light on as my knowledge in this area of Exchange is a 
  bit limited at the mo.
   
  We have 2 Servers transferring mail over X400 
  connectors, the link between them went down last night, so mail started 
  backing up in the MTA. The connection between the servers is back up now, but 
  the mail is not being transferred. Can I stop and start the MTA service 
  without losing any mail? I also noticed Event ID:9156 in the Application log 
  of one of the servers, I found this article http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q193894&GSSNB=1 which 
  relates to the problem but I don't want to change anything unnecessarily. 
  
   
  Any help with this would be great, thanks in 
  advance.
   
  Gian Sartor MCSEIT Support 
  EngineerList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

I though running a file based scanner on an Exchange server was a mortal sin
(like light beer)?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


norton 7.5 corporate
great combination, on my own opinion

-Mensaje original-
De: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Jueves, 06 de Diciembre de 2001 12:59 p.m.
Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Asunto: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


Were thinking or purchasing Antigen.  I didn't realize it didn't protect
your system files also.
Is this pretty typical, for instance does ScanMail do the same thing?
Are
those of you
running Antigen running any other virus protection on Exchange?
 
(different) Robert
 
-Original Message-
From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


No problem, but that very likely was a miracle.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


I fear for your servers life : > 
 
 
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST

-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


Thanks Robert. I assume you've had no conflicting issues running both on
one
box. And the uninstall of InnoculateIT actually went smoothly?

-Original Message-
From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)



Word of warning about removing Inoculate IT: 

1.  Antigen is a groupware messaging solution, it protects the IS and
IMC.  
2.  Antigen does NOT protect your file system, c:\winnt\system32 for
example. 

What I did: 

1.  Remove Inoculate IT for Exchange. 
2.  Install/config/run Antigen. 
3.  Re-install Inoculate IT, the normal server version NOT the Exchange
version. 

Result: 

1.  Antigen (and whatever AV scanners you chose in Antigen) protects
your
Mail infrastructure. 
2.  Inoculate IT protects Your Windows NT Server. 



-Original Message- 
From: Stephen J. Norton [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:05 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Antigen 


I've gotten approval to install Antigen on my Exchange box. I'm
currently 
running InnoculateIT 4.5. Has anyone had any experience removing 
InnoculateIT then installing Antigen? Is there any issues with doing
this? 
Thanks. 

List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***

This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail
message contain confidential information belonging to the originator,
and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information.
It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the
recipient(s).  If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the
taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically
mailed information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the
electronic mail message from your system.

*** The Dayton Power & Light Company. ***

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Client Software

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Jan, 2002.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Client Software


You really don't want to install Outlook on your Exchange server.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Client Software


The old Exchange client is no more, and was superceded by Outlook.
However, if you still have the CDs, it will still work and connect to
your server.  I still use the 4.0 and 5.0 clients in labs, etc.  I guess
they just won't be supported by Microsoft any more.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 06 December 2001 16:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: MS Exchange Client Software
Subject: MS Exchange Client Software


Greetings all,

Yesterday I was desperate and now I am sleeping like a Babe--thanks for
the push to Antigen.  My environment is a small and thought cost would
be prohibitive, but due to educational pricing we can afford it.
Now--my current question.  When I installed Exchg. 4.0 I had a companion
CD to install Exchange Client software on the workstations.  With my 5.5
upgrade, I don't have this software instead Outlook 2000 was shipped.
Is there still Exchange client software available or has this been
replaced with OL 2000?  If the client exists, where might I get a copy?

Thanks in advance,

JRiley

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: quick question on multiple mail box

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: quick question on multiple mail box



This 
is really an Outlook issue, not Exchange.  From my limited experience I 
don't think it can be done.  You could set up a profile for her to open his 
mailbox but she'd have to close Outlook, re-open under the other profile, etc., 
etc.  It gets boring really quick,  Are you using OWA?  She could 
have 2 OWA sessions open, one to his mailbox, one to hers.  Just a 
thought.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Khoi Nguyen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 
  2001 11:14 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: quick 
  question on multiple mail boxSensitivity: 
  Private
  Hi all, 
  I have been asked from my boss this morning that he 
  would like to have his secretary to have the ability to send out message under 
  his name WHILE LOGIN WITH HER ACCOUNT.
  Thing that I did so far. 
  1. Grant permission for his secretary to see his 
  mailbox under hers mailbox (so now she has 2 mailboxes  A and  
  B) 2. Ask her to logon and go into her 
  outlook to verify that she can see and access all of his messages (working 
  fine) 3. Ask her to sent a test message to 
  my mailbox to see if the message come over with her name or his name; it came 
  over with her name.
  4. I am stuck !!! 
  Note: he does 
  not want to send message out with the "Send on Behalf" message.  He wants 
  her to send out with his real identity while under her mail account.  I 
  can set up a profile for them so they can switch when doing this but just want 
  to run by you all to see if there is any other alternative that allow me to do 
  the following:
  1. logon with her account normally 2. switch to his mailbox (while under her mail account) and 
  send out messages that will bare his name instead of hers. 
  3. Can any one help me out with this. 
  Any tips, suggestions are greatly 
  appreciate. 
  TIA 
  Khoi Nguyen NRI 
  System Analysts List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 98 ?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Guess you didn't get the mail.  Gates says the world is coming to an end on
11/24/2001.  Why not just upgrade to Outlook 2000 (or 2002)?  You are
properly licensed for it as long as you have Exchange CAL's.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 11:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 98 ?


Good morning,

Outlook 98 exchange 5.5 sp4.

Please direct me to an Outlook user group if this is an Outlook problem...

When adding holidays to the calendar it only adds holidays from 1997 - 2001.
We do not have holidays for anything from 12/24/2001 - to the end of time.
How do I get updates for future holidays.  

Have a great day.


Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Can't Update "Free/Busy"

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We applied SP2 to Office 2000 and it seemed to help.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 8:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Can't Update "Free/Busy"


We have a couple of user's that get the error that they can't update
free/busy.  It doesn't happen to them all the time.  I found two technet
articles Q184151 & Q247927, neither  of which are the problem.  We only have
one server, and are running Exchange 5.5, SP4, on NT4.0, sp5.  Any other
know issues that can cause this error?  Thanks.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2K -Logon box - Saving User, domain info

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Nachricht



hkey_current_user,Software, Microsoft, Exchange on my NT4 WS 
box.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Jamshed Qureshi 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 
  4:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook 2K 
  -Logon box - Saving User, domain info
  Hi 
  all
  while back when i installed outlook i had to reenter my username domain 
  and password everytime i open outlook. not sure what happened but now the 
  username and domain is already filled in whenever i run 
  outlook.
  are 
  there any registry keys to control this information...?
   
  Chao,
   
  JamshedList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Change Exchange IP

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Just the usual stuff, make sure dns gets updated.  Also, if you have
connectors to other site through that server, make sure those are covered.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bao, Gang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change Exchange IP


We plan to change the IP number of our EXCHANGE server. Is there any thing
that I should be care of? I know changing the name of Exchange will create
problem, but haven't heard any on changing IP.

I would be grateful if you could give any advice and comments.

Thanks.

Bao




 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Files in public folders

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Tina II



Worked.  Thanks.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Gian Sartor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:28 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Files in 
  public folders
  If you open it from the preview pane it will 
  always be read only, try and open it from the window above the preview 
  pane.
   
  Gian Sartor MCSEIT Support 
  Engineer
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Ropiak Steve 
- NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:08 
PM
Subject: Files in public folders

Exchanger server 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6.  When a 
user opens an Excel spreadsheet in a public folder, it always opens as read 
only regardless of the user's rights in that folder.  Is this SOP or is 
there some other permission I need to set?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 
fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: documenting

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: documenting



Visio 
2000 Enterprise Edition.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:00 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  documenting
  Anyone know a good tool to document your AD? I know Visio will do it, but I cant make it go out and auto discover 
  the AD and draw it out. I want something liek 
  ExMAP List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Files in public folders

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Tina II



Exchanger server 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6.  When a user 
opens an Excel spreadsheet in a public folder, it always opens as read only 
regardless of the user's rights in that folder.  Is this SOP or is there 
some other permission I need to set?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Ditto for us.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


Yea we are getting a lot. All FROM different folk, but TO the same
person every time.

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


We are catching it at the gateways using Nemex. So far, 167 hits since
midnight.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Ole Søgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


Hi all
Have anyone experienced the same thing as we have: It's just floating
through NAI's WebShield SMTP - both the attachment blocking and the
virus scan, but is detected by GroupShield in the store

Ole Soegaard
TV 2/Denmark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26. november 2001 18:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


I have seen 4172 catch it today.

-Original Message-
From: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


NAI claims to have this covered:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99069
with any DAT files after 4168  (were now at 4172)
AlV

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Backup EDGE for Exchange2000?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



It's 
that penguin.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 
  28, 2001 9:02 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Backup EDGE for Exchange2000?
  Backup who for what???
  What 
  is this ewnix I am hearing about??
  

-Original Message-From: Mark Tishin 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 
3:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Backup 
EDGE for Exchange2000?

Does anybody know crash recovery software for 
Exchange 2000 that will work the same way Backup EDGE for UNIX works? 

 
Mark 
Tishin
Information Technology 
Services
Maryland Public Television
voice (410) 
581-4373
fax (410) 
581-4357
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen vs. Nortons

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

I use 
NAV and it does a decent job considering it's MAPI / AVAPI based, but it does 
lack attachment filtering and other features that Antigen includes.  Plus, 
I've heard that it's use of the SE API makes it less likely to let messages slip 
through during times of peak traffic.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Karen Palmer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 
  8:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Antigen vs. 
  Nortons
  Has 
  a comparison been done of Nortons vs. Antigen?  We are presently using 
  Nortons on all our servers, but since I have heard from all of you about how 
  great Antigen is, I would like to give it a look and see if it is something we 
  should put on our new Exchange server.  And, of course, data to back up 
  my recommendation is always a good thing...
   
  Thanks,
   
  KarenList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: pop3 and port 25

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients?
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: pop3 and port 25


Ladies and gentlemen,
I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
(btw, this is my first time..so be gentle)
have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system.
I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email.
I get:
"The connection to the sever has failed.
Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061
Error Number: 0x800CCC0E"

after reviewing (Q191687)...
telnet established port 110 as active and listening.
netstat -an confirms port 25 not there.
it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available.
I am not currently running IIS.   
Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server..
Calgon take me away!
any help would be appreciated...thanks,
Jeff


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: looking for hardware

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Mega-dittos on that.  Their smart start CD makes server setup a snap.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up
and administering your servers.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Similar Names In GAL

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Similar Names In GAL



With 
some 5,00+ users globally in our system, we have similar issues, but there 
really are no good technical solutions for PBCAK 
issues.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: Bronson, Craig F. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 
  8:14 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Similar 
  Names In GAL
  My users are pushing the envelope of 
  idiocy by wanting me to come up with a way for them get a prompt - similar to 
  the "Are you Sure" ones - when they send e-Mails. Seems that we have similar 
  names in the GAL as well as in their Contacts (Like Robert L. Jones and Robert 
  M. Jones) and we have compromised some litigations by sending the information 
  to the incorrect Attorneys.
  Please contact me as soon as 
  possible with ever helpful insight, as my CIO is awaiting (as always on 
  something that he needed from me yesterday. Thanks, people. 
  Craig F. Bronson, MCSE 
  Richmond Network Operations 
  e-Mail / Antivirus / RightFAX 
  Administration e-Mail:  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA Problem

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Search the KB, the expired password bug is well documented.  I had the
article kicking around somewhere.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA Problem


I am accessing my Exchange mailbox via OWA using a Win98 PC with IE4.  I
have two issues.

1.  When I sign into the mailbox it gives me a message that says "Your
current password is about to expire in 0 days.  To change your password,
go to the options page after you login".  All I say is "Ok" to it and it
lets me in.  I normally just use my NT password when signing in via OWA. 
Is there a way to turn this off?

2.  I have a user that after he signs in via OWA using Win98 and IE4, he
is able to see the mailbox, but when he tries to send a mail or access
anything in the mailbox he gets a new window that has the sign in window
for OWA.  Any ideas?

Thanks, 
Mike

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Eseutil

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



So, 
let me pose a hypothetical.  I have a 6 GB priv.  I move all the users 
off that server, the priv stays at 6 GB but is basically just white space.  
If I then move a bunch of users back onto the server will the whitespace get 
recycled first or will the priv grow from the newly moved 
mailboxes?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 
  2001 1:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Eseutil
  Sure.  Some people reboot their servers weekly, 
  too.
   
  For 
  the average deployment, offline defragging using eseutil as a regular 
  maintenance tool remains a complete waste of time and 
  resources.(Read: reclamation of whitespace that will be reused 
  anyway)
   
  William 
   
   
  -Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 
  8:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
  Eseutil
  Well, to be more specific
   
  Exchange's online defragmentation is great for defragmenting 
  and reclaiming white space; however, this process does not reduce the size of 
  the database file.  So, if you move a large amount of data from your 
  databases (e.g., you purge a whole lot of messages; you move a whole lot of 
  mailboxes; etc.) then performing an offline defragmentation using ESEUTIL is 
  completely acceptable maintenance that does not need the hand-holding or 
  blessing of PSS to perform.
   
  If you aren't move large amounts of data out of your 
  databases, and you aren't running into any storage limitations (e.g., because 
  you are running Standard or because you're running out of disk space), then 
  running ESEUTIL won't provide much, if any, benefits.
   
  So, whether or not this is a regular maintenance tool really 
  depends on your environment.  For the large majority of Exchange orgs, it 
  probably won't be a regular maintenance tool.
   
  My $.02.
  -- 
  Regards,
   
  Scott Schnoll
   
   
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:21 
AM
Subject: RE: Eseutil

Only use it if you are directed to by PSS, or if you are using the 
standard edition of Exchange 5.5 and are running into the 16GB limit.  
Exchange handles online defrag quite well so there should be no need to run 
and offline defrag unless you are running into the 16GB limit on Standard 
Edition.

  
  -Original Message-From: Dimitri 
  Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil
  So what is 
  the best practice with defragmentation? 
  MS says that 
  "ESEUITL is not considered a tool for regular maintenance and should 
  only be used in case of emergency after contacting Microsoft Technical 
  Support". On the other hand, there're people here that use it on monthly 
  basis!
  So, to use 
  or not to use?
   
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Eseutil

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



Seemed 
obvious and reasonable, but then again, when has this business ever been obvious 
and reasonable 
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:49 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Eseutil
  it will re-use the 
  whitespace.
   
  isn't that what it's 
  there for?
   -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com 
  Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley 
  Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk 
  - You can't 
  tell which way the train went by looking at the tracks. 
  - 
  -Original Message-----From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:37 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Eseutil
  So, 
  let me pose a hypothetical.  I have a 6 GB priv.  I move all the 
  users off that server, the priv stays at 6 GB but is basically just white 
  space.  If I then move a bunch of users back onto the server will the 
  whitespace get recycled first or will the priv grow from the newly moved 
  mailboxes?
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak 
  ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 
2001 1:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Eseutil
Sure.  Some people reboot their servers weekly, 
too.
 
For the average deployment, offline defragging using eseutil as a 
regular maintenance tool remains a complete waste of time and 
resources.(Read: reclamation of whitespace that will be reused 
anyway)
 
William 
 
 
-Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 
8:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
Eseutil
Well, to be more specific
 
Exchange's online defragmentation is great for 
defragmenting and reclaiming white space; however, this process does not 
reduce the size of the database file.  So, if you move a large amount 
of data from your databases (e.g., you purge a whole lot of messages; you 
move a whole lot of mailboxes; etc.) then performing an offline 
defragmentation using ESEUTIL is completely acceptable maintenance that does 
not need the hand-holding or blessing of PSS to perform.
 
If you aren't move large amounts of data out of your 
databases, and you aren't running into any storage limitations (e.g., 
because you are running Standard or because you're running out of disk 
space), then running ESEUTIL won't provide much, if any, 
benefits.
 
So, whether or not this is a regular maintenance tool 
really depends on your environment.  For the large majority of Exchange 
orgs, it probably won't be a regular maintenance tool.
 
My $.02.
-- 
Regards,
 
Scott Schnoll
 
 


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 
  8:21 AM
  Subject: RE: Eseutil
  
  Only use it if you are directed to by PSS, or if you are using the 
  standard edition of Exchange 5.5 and are running into the 16GB 
  limit.  Exchange handles online defrag quite well so there should be 
  no need to run and offline defrag unless you are running into the 16GB 
  limit on Standard Edition.
  

-Original Message-From: Dimitri 
Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil
So what is 
the best practice with defragmentation? 
MS says 
that "ESEUITL is not considered a tool for regular maintenance 
and should only be used in case of emergency after contacting 
Microsoft Technical Support". On the other hand, there're people here 
that use it on monthly basis!
So, to use 
or not to use?
 
 List Charter and 
FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

I can't remember what I did yesterday, let alone 90 days before.  How do
they know they had it so far back?  I'd just smile, point to our corporate
policy that says that we don't keep anything past 30 days and go grab
another cup of coffee.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


Tough s**t for them. What kind of a knob deletes and email and then
needs it 90 days later? 
I wouldn't do it. Period

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


People sometimes want a mail restored that they deleted more than 90
days ago!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 October 2001 14:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


> You may wonder why we bother with BLB when we have such a long deleted
item retention period:
> a)It is occasionally handy to restore an individual email without
using a separate "restore server"
> b)Restoring an single email can be quicker - "hero factor" when
someone's in trouble!
> c)Gives a "belt and braces" approach to backup


But, but, but...!  With such a long DIR period, you don't NEED BLB to do
a), b), & c)!!!  ::confused::  No separate "restore server" is needed;
and DIR is quick, quick, quick (vite, even!).

re: c) -- my dentist said that braces probably wouldn't do me any
good

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
I am in shape. Round is a shape... 
-


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


We use it quite successfully, but only subject to the following:
1)  We also do a full regular backup each night
2)  We have a backup window than allows both BLB and full backup
each
time
3)  We have enough space on the tapes for BLB and full backups
4)  We use Veritas (not ArcServe!)
5)  We have a long deleted item retention period (90 days) so
individual
message recovery is rarely needed.
6)  It has never caused any faults
7)  It is regularly tested

You may wonder why we bother with BLB when we have such a long deleted
item retention period:
a)  It is occasionally handy to restore an individual email without
using a separate "restore server"
b)  Restoring an single email can be quicker - "hero factor" when
someone's in trouble!
c)  Gives a "belt and braces" approach to backup

I would _never_ recommend only doing BLB, but if 1-7 above are all OK
then it can be useful.  I think if you restore from a full backup,
exmerge a couple of emails out of the restore and then into the
production server, you lose SIS for these emails.  For a full restore
I'd always use the full backup not the BLB.

Hope this helps

Cheers,
Andrew.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 October 2001 20:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?





 
from the archives 
**
The Top Ten Reasons why William Doesn't recommend Brick-level backups:

10. The only product he's tried it with is ArcServeIT (*shudder*) 9.
Brick-level backups should be done in conjunction with regular backups
therefore duplicating the process. 8. Brick-level backups don't clear
the transaction logs 7. Brick-level restores (esp of the entire store)
are VERY slow 6. Brick-level restores result in loss of Single Instance
Storage 5. Brick-level backups do not properly maintain all of the data
structures in the store that you might need for a full restore (at least
Computer Associates product doesn't). 4. The alternative is so much
easier and cleaner - deleted item retention. Set deleted item retention
to say 30 days, a little user education and they can do their own
mailbox' restore. 3. Regular use of exmerge (to pst files for backup)
for important mailboxes is another alternative. 2. Section 3.11 at:
 says so (ok, I don't
do everything I'm told either). 1. The archives at the Exchange list at
swynk.com are full of Brick-level horror stories.

-William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+  (and a brand new Exchange MVP!)
**
B

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We were considering Comvault, but never was able to connect with their sales
to get a price.  A real budget breaker, eh?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


There is NO business that needs BLB.   (MAYBE if you can afford Commvault)

-Original Message-
From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


"Horses for Courses" - It really does depend on your type of business
environment.  On this particular customer site, some sales deals in one
department can take a year to complete.  I have been asked to retrieve
mails from 6 -7 months previous (The answer at the time was no as we did
not do Brick Level Backup, and I was not going to restore the whole
Private store for one mail & unfortunately the user had deleted the
archive.pst) After getting it in the neck for that one, we are now doing
BLB's

P.S. What is the maximum retention time with E2K anybody know?


SB

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Why the "!"?

I have been using a DIR period of 35 days ever since going live with
Exchange 5.5 2 years ago.  In all of that time, we have NEVER had to do
a
message or mailbox restore from tape.  

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Motivational Speaker Klingon: EVERY day is a good day to die! Say it
with
me! 
-


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


People sometimes want a mail restored that they deleted more than 90
days
ago!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 October 2001 14:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


> You may wonder why we bother with BLB when we have such a long deleted
item retention period:
> a)It is occasionally handy to restore an individual email without
using a separate "restore server"
> b)Restoring an single email can be quicker - "hero factor" when
someone's in trouble!
> c)Gives a "belt and braces" approach to backup


But, but, but...!  With such a long DIR period, you don't NEED BLB to do
a),
b), & c)!!!  ::confused::  No separate "restore server" is needed; and
DIR
is quick, quick, quick (vite, even!).

re: c) -- my dentist said that braces probably wouldn't do me any
good

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
I am in shape. Round is a shape... 
-


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?


We use it quite successfully, but only subject to the following:
1)  We also do a full regular backup each night
2)  We have a backup window than allows both BLB and full backup
each
time
3)  We have enough space on the tapes for BLB and full backups
4)  We use Veritas (not ArcServe!)
5)  We have a long deleted item retention period (90 days) so
individual
message recovery is rarely needed.
6)  It has never caused any faults
7)  It is regularly tested

You may wonder why we bother with BLB when we have such a long deleted
item
retention period:
a)  It is occasionally handy to restore an individual email without
using a separate "restore server"
b)  Restoring an single email can be quicker - "hero factor" when
someone's in trouble!
c)  Gives a "belt and braces" approach to backup

I would _never_ recommend only doing BLB, but if 1-7 above are all OK
then
it can be useful.  I think if you restore from a full backup, exmerge a
couple of emails out of the restore and then into the production server,
you
lose SIS for these emails.  For a full restore I'd always use the full
backup not the BLB.

Hope this helps

Cheers,
Andrew.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 October 2001 20:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Su

RE: Email Delayed Internally !

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Should 
NEVER switch to decaf mid week.  Just reread the post, it was an internal 
mail.  Are you sure the mail was sent that long ago and not just an 
incorrect date/time on the sender's computer?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: Iain Rhodes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:56 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Email Delayed 
  Internally !
  A user has just 
  received an internal email that was sent 15 days ago !!
   
  Has anyone seen 
  this before or any ideas on how this could happen?
  We are running 
  Groupshield but there was nothing in the email except an legitimate 
  URL
   
  Iain Rhodes
  t: 020 7393 1329 f: 020 7436 4789 
   
  www.pricejam.com
   
  'pricejam to go' Our website in the palm of your hand 
  - PDA users can subscribe at www.pricejam.com
   
  The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and 
  intended solely for the attention and use of the named 
  addressee(s).Internet communications are not secure and therefore 
  pricejamieson does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this 
  message. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do 
  not necessarily represent those of pricejamieson unless otherwise specifically 
  stated.
  
  This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by Network Associates Total Virus Defence http://www.nai.com 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Email Delayed Internally !

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Was it 
mail from outside your system?  If so, are you using IMS or a third party 
POP3 connector?  We've seen some of the 3rd party products bury mail in a 
black hole until something shakes it loose (typically a server 
reboot).
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: Iain Rhodes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:56 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Email Delayed 
  Internally !
  A user has just 
  received an internal email that was sent 15 days ago !!
   
  Has anyone seen 
  this before or any ideas on how this could happen?
  We are running 
  Groupshield but there was nothing in the email except an legitimate 
  URL
   
  Iain Rhodes
  t: 020 7393 1329 f: 020 7436 4789 
   
  www.pricejam.com
   
  'pricejam to go' Our website in the palm of your hand 
  - PDA users can subscribe at www.pricejam.com
   
  The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and 
  intended solely for the attention and use of the named 
  addressee(s).Internet communications are not secure and therefore 
  pricejamieson does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this 
  message. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do 
  not necessarily represent those of pricejamieson unless otherwise specifically 
  stated.
  
  This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by Network Associates Total Virus Defence http://www.nai.com 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Corpsoft, who handles our MS agreements confirmed that any flavor of Outlook
is bought with your Exchange CAL.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?


I don't remember where it was on Microsoft, but last time this came up, I
did find a page, that directly addressed this.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?


As far as I know,  that is correct.  The current flavor of Outlook should
come with Exchange.
Matt

- Original Message -
From: "Scott Erwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:54 AM
Subject: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?


> Hi,
> Our company is moving to Exchange and we will be purchasing Exchange 2000
> cals. I read somewhere (I think on this list) that you get Outlook
licenses
> when you by Exchange. Is this accurate? Can someone elaborate? We have a
> number of clients who need email but don't have Office.
>
> Scott Erwin
> Network Administrator
> Neptune Chemical Pump Co
> http://www.neptune1.com
>
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
>

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Controlling from afar

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

What rights does a user need to be able to admin Exchange from the tool on
his local 'puter.  I had been logging in as the service account, but someone
here said I don't need to do that.  I put myself in all the groups, but it
still says I don't have rights to do what I need to do.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Robin Lawrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Failed to open source store, huh?


What might have happened is that the archive file that Outlook uses has
been deleted, moved or renamed etc, and so Outlook cannot archive to
that file. Have you checked that the archive file exists where Outlook
expects it to be?

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 October 2001 14:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Failed to open source store, huh?




I have a user who ran an Outlook 2K archive and got back a message which
stated:

"Archive skips store due to error. Failed to open source store. The
information store could not be opened."

Everything else works and no exchange bad logfiles are generated.  Any
suggestions.

Outlook2K, Exch 5.5sp4, WindowsNT6a.





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Strange occurrance

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Strange occurrance



TRS-DOS, IBM-DOS, MS-DOS, DR-DOS, MULTI-DOS?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen, 
Best Regards, Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
  2001 1:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Strange occurrance
  That 
  easy.  DOS.
   
  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:48 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Strange 
  occurrance
  Which will be more stable Don or XP is my question? 

  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 11:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
It 
is likely an unusual circumstance.  Now if you get repeats of this 
event, then a closer look would be warranted.
 
Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's 
birthday.  Coincidence?
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
2001 8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Strange occurrance
Was it sent by an inhouse employee?  Maybe someone had 
it in their sent, deleted, or whatever folder and copied it to their outbox 
by mistake.
-Original Message- From: 
Joseph Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 
Strange occurrance 
Anybody gonna try this one? 
I haven't heard anything in about a week. 
> Hello! > > I was just informed that a email dated 6 March 2001 was 
delivered to a > small lists of 
recipients. > > How 
could an email 6 months+ old be re-delivered. > 
> I know the deferred mail option is 
one.  but i don't think anyone > would 
push the delivery date that far into the future. > > Let's play Stump the Exchange 
mavens. > > 
Good luck! > > Joseph 
Ambrose > System and Network Manager 
> The Conference Board > P: 
001-212-339-0443 > F: 001-212-836-3802 
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  
www.conference-board.org List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How to get Exchange administrator Running on a desktop

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

No, but I enjoy the feeling of omnipotence I get from logging in as the
service account.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to get Exchange administrator Running on a desktop


Your machine doesn't have to be in the same domain, just trusted...  You
don't have to install it as the Service account either.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.


 -Original Message-
From:   Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: How to get Exchange administrator Running on a desktop

1. Install your NT4 or Win2K machine into your Exchange domain.
2.  log in with the service account
3. Run setup from the CD.  Do a complete/custom, select only the admin
program.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How to get Exchange administrator Running on a desktop


Running SBS4.5, how do get the Exchange Administration program running on
my desktop so I can administer the Exchange server (5.5) from here?  I
have looked in the installation CDs, on the microsoft knowledge base,
here, slipstick, etc.  GH.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: announcement

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



Does 
this mean that Bill G will share his Cameo on Fraiser with 
Don?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen, 
Best Regards, Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: Scales, Shane G., SPC 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 
  1:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  announcement
  Happy Birthday 
  Don.
  
  Shane Scales, MCSE CCNA SPC, Network Engineer/System Analyst, US Army Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
      
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   
  
  
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 
12:00To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
announcement
I would like to 
announce today the Launch of the Don Ely XP, Birthday 
Celebration.
 
Everyone Wish 
Don a happy birthday.
 
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, 
UCC+WCA, CKWSE
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How to get Exchange administrator Running on a desktop

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

1. Install your NT4 or Win2K machine into your Exchange domain.
2.  log in with the service account
3. Run setup from the CD.  Do a complete/custom, select only the admin
program.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How to get Exchange administrator Running on a desktop


Running SBS4.5, how do get the Exchange Administration program running on
my desktop so I can administer the Exchange server (5.5) from here?  I
have looked in the installation CDs, on the microsoft knowledge base,
here, slipstick, etc.  GH.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Learning material

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Learning material



Me 
too.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen, 
Best Regards, Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 
  2001 1:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Learning material
  I did 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Learning material 
  Do people actually still build their own PC's?  
  
  ellery 
  -Original Message- From: Sean 
  Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Learning material 
  And since all you need is a PC, why don't you start out by 
  building you're own pc. It's a great place to start on 
  your path to knowledge. 
  Regards,   Sean Martin, MCSE Network Administrator 
  Ribelin Lowell & Company Insurance Brokers, Inc. 3111 C Street, Suite 
  300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph: (907) 561-1250 Fax: (907) 561-4315 
  Cell: (907) 229-0885 Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  -Original Message- From: 
  WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Learning material 
  It's the way to learn - why spend thousands on a course, when 
  you can setup 2 pc's, basic networking, learn a new 
  O/S and a New Exchange Product! 
  Worked for me. Enjoy it! 
  Simon Weaver NT Domain 
  Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 
  02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Jolley Lee @Consult [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 25 October 2001 11:56:AM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Learning 
  material 
  I've got some an old hub I can use. The only cost I will have 
  is a PC to be my server. It's a good excuse for me to 
  learn W2K server aswell. I'm looking forward to 
  setting this up now. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 25 October 2001 11:36 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Learning 
  material 
  There you go :) 10MB is fine for what 
  you need - do a swap! 
  Simon Weaver NT Domain 
  Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 
  02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  -----Original Message- From: 
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 25 October 2001 11:35:AM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Learning 
  material 
  Yeah, I've got a whole bunch of 4 and 5 port 10 MB hubs 
  kicking around after we upgraded everything to 100 MB 
  switches.  We could work out a trade. 
  mit freundlichen Grüßen, Best 
  Regards, Steve Ropiak ZF Group 
  NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Learning material 
  Lee Actually, its really easy - you 
  could use a cross-over cable and connect to the 2 
  PC's, or simply get a small 4-port hub, network cables and just attach 
  2 Pc's and install NT / Win2k Server. For test reasons, it's 
  the way to start, especially if you cannot justify the 
  cost of a server (Not everyone can!) 
  If you need any help, please let me know 
  Simon Weaver NT Domain 
  Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 
  02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Jolley Lee @Consult [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 25 October 2001 11:23:AM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Learning 
  material 
  Thanks to you both, 
  I will keep listening to this list and hopefully manage to 
  make myself a small network to learn from. I've never 
  thought of making a network before but I really like 
  the sound of it. 
  Thanks again. 
  Lee 
  -Original Message- From: 
  WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: 25 October 2001 11:20 To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Learning 
  material 
  Lee / Tim, 
  What I have done is setup a test lab, using several servers, 
  and 2 PC's and install / configure the products I wish 
  to learn. 
  I also do this with help from books for the product, TechNet, 
  online help and Microsoft White papers! I am learning 
  new things about exchange all the time (especially 
  2k), and this list is on most occasions helpful and provide good insight. 
  But there is nothing better than getting hands on experience 
  yourself. Even if you cannot afford some servers, just 
  network 2 PC's and play around! 
  Regards 
  Simon Weaver NT Domain 
  Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 
  02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: The sound of toilets flushing

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Tools, Options, Mail Format, Signature , New do it for ya?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: The sound of toilets flushing


They're not supposed to flush - after all isn't the intent is to get a good
"backup" going (heh heh...)

I suppose I better not even try to flush InoculateIT (although we're on the
4th floor & directly over a medical overflow unit, that's not the kind of
overflow they deal with).  But I do have 2 questions (both stupid and
neither have anything to do with a pressing MSExchange issue)...

1) is there anyone on the planet who works with MSExchange and "likes"
ARCSmurf or any of CA's products on or anywhere near their mail servers?
2) how do I make those signatures (I don't know jack about sigmonster) roll
out with my typically inane e-mail messages?  Maybe that way people here
will actually open my stuff.  Anyone doing "sigmonster 101" for the benefit
of us signature-challenged individuals?  I can't pay cash but I can
contribute to the (CA) CD pile...

thanks
randy



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: October 25, 2001 11:31 AM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: The sound of toilets flushing
> 
> >> FYI: ArcServeIT CDs will not flush in most toilets unless broken into
> at
> least four pieces.
> 
> LOFR!!  This is now in my sig file!!
> 
> -Michèle
> Immigration site:  
> Our new 2001 Miata:  
> Tiggercam:  
> -
> Balderdash (n.), a rapidly receding hairline. 
> -
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:21 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: The sound of toilets flushing
> 
> 
> I've been diligently working building an Exchange recovery server with the
> same site and org name as my production server. This server is a member of
> my domain, named differently from my production Exchange box and has NT
> and
> Exchange 5.5 on it at this point. Just found out from AaaarghServeIT that
> their software will only restore the Info store to a server named exactly
> the same as the one it was backed up from. Their solution is to REMOVE my
> production server from the network, build and name my recovery server the
> same as my production box, add it to my network, restore and recover as
> necessary, remove that from my network then add the production box back
> in.
> As Don Ely once stated, I now have sparks shooting out of my eyes.
> 
> Is it possible to use NT backup over the network to back up the info store
> from the production server then restore it over the network to a recovery
> server of a different name?
> 
> FYI: ArcServeIT CDs will not flush in most toilets unless broken into at
> least four pieces.
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: The sound of toilets flushing

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Or Veg-o-matic

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: The sound of toilets flushing


Microwave them. It is fun.. No more then 10 seconds.

Yes it is possible. But you need to install the exchange admin software
on the server you want to have Nt backup on.

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: The sound of toilets flushing


I've been diligently working building an Exchange recovery server with
the same site and org name as my production server. This server is a
member of my domain, named differently from my production Exchange box
and has NT and Exchange 5.5 on it at this point. Just found out from
AaaarghServeIT that their software will only restore the Info store to a
server named exactly the same as the one it was backed up from. Their
solution is to REMOVE my production server from the network, build and
name my recovery server the same as my production box, add it to my
network, restore and recover as necessary, remove that from my network
then add the production box back in. As Don Ely once stated, I now have
sparks shooting out of my eyes.

Is it possible to use NT backup over the network to back up the info
store from the production server then restore it over the network to a
recovery server of a different name?

FYI: ArcServeIT CDs will not flush in most toilets unless broken into at
least four pieces.

Thanks for your help.



 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is there another way of clearing Exch Transaction logs ?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We've been using NT Backup with seemingly good results.  I say seemingly
because we've not had to do a DR on a server yet, but our single test file
restores go well.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Robin Lawrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is there another way of clearing Exch Transaction logs ?


Thanks for expanding and verifying my answer Simon. I'm also wondering
why the backups using BE are not possible. If they're not NTBackup could
always be used.

-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 13:47
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is there another way of clearing Exch Transaction logs ?


Hi Robin,

Committed transactions in the transaction log file are copied to the
database when one of the following occurs:
* The checkpoint falls too far behind in a previous log file. If the
number
of committed transactions in the log files reaches a certain threshold,
ESE
will flush these changes to disk. 
* The number of free pages in memory becomes too low, possibly affecting
system performance. In this case, committed transactions in memory are
flushed to disk to free up pages in memory for system use. 
* Another service is requesting additional memory and ESE needs to free
up
some of the memory it is currently using. ESE flushes pages from memory
to
the database and then updates the checkpoint file. 
* The database service is shutting down. In this case, all updated pages
in
memory are copied to the database file. 
Bear in mind that pages are not copied from memory in any particular
order
and may not all be copied at the same time. The random order in which
the
pages are copied back to disk means that if there is a system crash
while
pages are being written to disk, the database file may have only
portions of
a committed transaction updated in the actual file. In this event, when
the
Store.exe process is started, the transaction will be replayed from the
transaction log files and the database will be updated completely.

My question is - why can you not do an online Backup? What reasons are
there
for not doing one? Are they failing for some reason? If possible, its
nice
to get the Backup Software to commit the logs to the DB :)

Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Robin Lawrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 01:34:PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is there another way of clearing Exch Transaction logs ?

I believe when you stop and restart the Information Store service, the
logs files will be committed to the database and then deleted.

Can someone else on this list verify/correct that?

Robin.

-Original Message-
From: Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 13:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is there another way of clearing Exch Transaction logs ?


Hi all

We use Backup Exec from Verita to flush all our Exchange transaction
logs.
What I want to know, is that when backups are not possible due to
certain
reasons, what other ways are there to flush these LOGS, in order to save
on disk space ?
Any ideas ?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
...
This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.  Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.
Astrium Limited
Gunnels Wood Road
Stevenage
Hertfordshire
SG1 2AS

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

There is no escape from Windows 95 .

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Robin Lawrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.


I thought you could only press Escape in Windows 95. I stand corrected.

Robin.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 13:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.


also Win98

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
Plan to be spontaneous tomorrow. 
-


-Original Message-
From: Robin Lawrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.


Aah, this is Windows 95 isn't it. I'm assuming the users home PC's were
Windows NT/2000.wrong assumption!

Robin.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 13:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.


Here it is!  

Q182158
"NOTE: When you start Windows, do not press ESCAPE when prompted for the
Windows password, or you will not be able to access the .ost file
because
the proper credential information has not been supplied."

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain, but
where
are we going to find a duck and a hose at this hour?" 
-


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.


It was my understanding that that was not enough.  They must also log
into
the machine itself with the network credentials -- even if they let it
"time
out" as start up. 

There's a Q article about this somewhere

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
I can bend minds with my spoon. 
-


-Original Message-
From: Robin Lawrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.


Are the users home machines that they're logging in from on the domain
or are they standalone machines? If they are on the domain, are the
usernames and passwords that they log onto the machine with the same as
their network username and password? If not, or if the machines are not
on the domain, then it could be that when Outlook starts and tries to
connect to the Exchange server, it is passing the credentials of the
locally logged on user to Exchange. Exchange doesn't recognise these
users and so doesn't allow a connection. What you need to do in Outlook
is define what network logon credentials to use.

In Outlook on the users home PC's, select Tools, Services. Select
Microsoft Exchange Server, then click Properties and select the Advanced
Tab. Where you get the drop down box for Network Logon Credentials,
select None and ok everything.

Now, when you start up Outlook, you will be prompted for your username,
password and domain. Enter your network details and you should get in.

Robin.

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 October 2001 19:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Remote connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.


William, this leads me to believe he is not using VPN, but allowing
people
to logon remotely from the Public Internet.  Very bad!!

Note: Our firewall is not blocking port 135 and there is not a problem
> connecting to our 5.5 server using the Outlook client remotely.


> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> --_=_NextPart_001_01C15CA9.61402952
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> I am in the process of migrating our dept from NT 4 To W2k and from Ex
> 5.5 to E2k.
> =20
> We are having a problem connecting to our E2K server using the Outlook
> client remotely from outside our organizat

RE: Learning material

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yeah, I've got a whole bunch of 4 and 5 port 10 MB hubs kicking around after
we upgraded everything to 100 MB switches.  We could work out a trade.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Learning material


Lee
Actually, its really easy - you could use a cross-over cable and connect to
the 2 PC's, or simply get a small 4-port hub, network cables and just attach
2 Pc's and install NT / Win2k Server. For test reasons, it's the way to
start, especially if you cannot justify the cost of a server (Not everyone
can!)

If you need any help, please let me know

Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Jolley Lee @Consult [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 11:23:AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Learning material

Thanks to you both,

I will keep listening to this list and hopefully manage to make myself a
small network to learn from. I've never thought of making a network before
but I really like the sound of it.

Thanks again.

Lee

-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 11:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Learning material


Lee / Tim,

What I have done is setup a test lab, using several servers, and 2 PC's and
install / configure the products I wish to learn.

I also do this with help from books for the product, TechNet, online help
and Microsoft White papers! I am learning new things about exchange all the
time (especially 2k), and this list is on most occasions helpful and provide
good insight.

But there is nothing better than getting hands on experience yourself. Even
if you cannot afford some servers, just network 2 PC's and play around!

Regards

Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 11:10:AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Learning material

monitoring this list is pretty good learning material...but it's all pretty
useless and boring unless you can set yourself a network up with an exchange
server. When I was learning (well, when I started...If you've finished
learning, why are you here?) I set one up at home...all the users were
either me, my girlfriend, or my cat, so if I crashed it in the name of
education it wasn't a big deal.

Can't really help much more than that! I never used booksI let
experience teach me!

HTH

-Original Message-
From: Jolley Lee @Consult [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 10:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Learning material


I am new to this list and don't get to work with Exchange except for the
clients. Does anybody know of a good source to learn about Exchange server
and admin on the web.

Thanks

Lee


**
This email transmission is confidential and intended for the
addressee only. It may contain privileged and confidential
information. If you are not the person or organisation to
whom it is addressed, you must not copy, distribute, or take
any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and return it.

Carillion PLC Registered in England No. 3782379
Registered Office:
Birch Street Wolverhampton WV1 4HY
**

_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
...
This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.  Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium
Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.
Astrium Limited
Gunnels Wood Road
Stevenage
Hertfordshire
SG1 2AS

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternati

RE: Antivirus API

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We're using NAV in MAPI AVAPI  mode and haven't seen that one but do
occasionally get a rash of NDRs for messages going between the servers.  I
think someone here had an open call with Trend who pointed the finger at the
AVAPI.  From what I've read, the one in 55 is so buggy that I'm thinking of
re-installing NAV in MAPI  mode only.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator


-Original Message-
From: Montgomery, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Antivirus API


Of those of you that are using an antivirus program that utilizes the
Antivirus API, have you seen and or addresses the MAPI issues discussed in
Q264731?  Basically we are seeing issues with MAPI clients accessing
unscanned attachments getting errors.  After the first attempt everything
seems to work fine.  We were told to look at Q264731.  I was curious if
anyone else has done these changes and if so did it fix the issue for you or
did it cause other problems?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
GroupShield 4.5

Thank you for your time,

John Montgomery
Information Technology
LAN Administrator
HoneyBaked Ham

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sending HTML to list (DON'T!!!!)

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



What 
about IBM?  DR? 
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen, 
Best Regards, Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator 

  -Original Message-From: Don Ely 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 
  11:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Sending 
  HTML to list (DON'T)
  Which version, I got 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, and 6.x...  
  ;o)
  

-Original Message-From: Stephen J. 
Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 
2001 8:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Sending HTML to list (DON'T)
We're all a bunch of idiots.
Anybody see my DOS disks?

  -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:25 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Sending 
  HTML to list (DON'T)Shut up!> 
  -Original Message-> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:20 AM> To: MS-Exchange 
  Admin Issues> Subject: RE: Sending HTML to list (DON'T)> 
  > > Exchange lists are notoriously rude. It's the best 
  part.> > I'd go nuts trying to read this list in digest 
  mode.> > William> > -Original 
  Message-> From: Kevin D. Alons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:21 AM> To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues> Subject: Sending HTML to list (DON'T)> > 
  > I recently signed up for this list (in digest mode) and while 
  > the content> can be helpful, the users here are incredibly 
  rude. I don't > know if there> are any recommended 
  guidelines, but here are mine:> 1) NO HTML posts, it is obnoxious 
  to wade through it in > digest mode> (and I doubt that email 
  mode is much better!).> 2) Snip (and include) only relevant info 
  from original > (replied to)> posts.> > Thank 
  you,> > Kevin Alons> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  > List Charter and FAQ at:> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> 
  > List Charter and FAQ at:> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm> 
  List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: recommended SMTP server?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We're using a Linux send mail box to grab out stuff from the 'net but
haven't found a decent affordable antivirus solution for it.  We expect our
Exchange AV software to catch any nasties it gets.  I'd be interested to see
if anyone has anything affordable and protected.

> mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZFNAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
Office (207) 989-9115
Cell (513) 314-0197
Pager (800) 621-3740
Fax (207) 989-8722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: recommended SMTP server?


Anyone have a recommendation for SMTP server to run as gateway between our
Exchange server and the outside world?  I'd like to set up a gateway/filter
server using some product like Mail essentials (those silly Brits can't
capitalize their Proper Nouns the way us Americans do) but am wary of using
another MS product, ha ha...

Thanks, Sean

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA authentication [points]

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

How many (points) for the free toaster?

> mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZFNAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
Office (207) 989-9115
Cell (513) 314-0197
Pager (800) 621-3740
Fax (207) 989-8722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA authentication [points]


Joe Heaton wins 10 points for today's most answered Question  : >
YO Joe!

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: Loaiza, Ing. Robert (COL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA authentication



To solve this problem do the following:

1. Go to c:\Exchsrvr\Webdata\USA folder
2. Copy the file Root.asp to Root.aspxx where xx is the date 2.
Open the Root.asp file, then edit it:

   a. Look for the line that reads:

if cint(days) < 0 then days = 1

  b. Change the line to:

  in cint(days) <  1 then days = 1

3. Save, and close the file.

-Mensaje original-
De: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Jueves, 04 de Octubre de 2001 12:43 p.m.
Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Asunto: OWA authentication


I have an NT4 SP5 machine, Exchange 5.5 SP4.  OWA installed.  I have a
user who logs in and gets a message " Your password is set to expire in
0 days. Change it or else" .  I have gone in under HTTPS, and changed
the password, and changed the password in User manager for Domains, but
she is still getting this message.  Help!

Thanks in advance,

Joseph L. Heaton, MCSE
NT Administrator
FDI Consulting, Inc.
1610 Arden Way,  Suite 145
Sacramento, CA  95815
(916)921-4390 x.228


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange upgrade question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Sure, it's in the public domain.

> mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZFNAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
Office (207) 989-9115
Cell (513) 314-0197
Pager (800) 621-3740
Fax (207) 989-8722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question


That's funny.  Can I use it?

Pat Smith
Systems Administrator
FishNet Security
816.421.6611

http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/

 -Original Message-
From:   Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question

Bald?  My hair has a permanent wave.  i.e., each morning I wave goodbye to
more of it .

> mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZFNAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
Office (207) 989-9115
Cell (513) 314-0197
Pager (800) 621-3740
Fax (207) 989-8722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question


I already had the Exchange tabs in the user properties in AD, but I went
ahead and installed the Exchange admin tools on my AD controller, and still
no luck.  Here's a strange one in this same sequence of events:  The
Exchange-related services do not show up on the Exchange server that I just
installed.  I installed Exchange 2k, then installed the latest SP for
Exchange, but still nothing.  I have reloaded Exchange on this Win2k box
twice now.  What am I missing?!

Signed, going bald quickly!

Pat Smith
Systems Administrator
FishNet Security
816.421.6611

http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/

 -Original Message-
From:   Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question

Actually the LDAP situation only applies to Exchange 5.5 Running on an
AD DC.

But yes you need to install the exchange Admin tools on any machine you
want to manage mailboxes from.

Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County High School of the Arts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(714) 560-0900 ex5910


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question


You need to install the Exchange Admin tools to what ever computer you
are going to manage from.  If that is your DC, yes, you need to install
it on it.

The LDAP issue only applies to the situation where the Exchange is on a
DC.

Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question


Yes, I used the ADC from the Exch CD.  I have 2-way setup.  I set up a
brand new Win2k box that is the AD PDC, if you will.  I did NOT install
the Exch Admin tools on that box, but rather the new Exch server.
Should I set up the Exch Admin tools on my AD Controller?

Thanks for the info.  I'm also seeing some articles regarding LDAP and
port 389.  Some say that the connector should run on something other
than 389. Did you change your LDAP port before doing the connector?

Thanks,


Pat Smith
Systems Administrator
FishNet Security
816.421.6611

http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/


 -Original Message-
From:   Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question

Pat,

1.) Are you using the ADC from the Exchange CD?

2.) Do you have one-way or two-way replication setup?
I believe you need to have two-way. I had two-way replication
setup during my migration and everything worked fine. I did the move
mailbox method.

3.) What machine are you using AD Users and Computers from? Do you have
the Exchange Admin tools on the machine you are using?

Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County School of the Arts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange upgrade question

Hello all.  I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I
think I do!).

I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k
server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new
Exch server.  I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from
Ex 5.5 to AD, and it seemed to work.  Several hours later, I ran the
/ForestPrep utility before installing Ex2k.  I have now fully installed
Exch2k, and patched it with the latest sp.

My problem is, when I ri

RE: Exchange upgrade question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Bald?  My hair has a permanent wave.  i.e., each morning I wave goodbye to
more of it .

> mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best Regards,
Steve Ropiak
ZFNAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
Office (207) 989-9115
Cell (513) 314-0197
Pager (800) 621-3740
Fax (207) 989-8722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question


I already had the Exchange tabs in the user properties in AD, but I went
ahead and installed the Exchange admin tools on my AD controller, and still
no luck.  Here's a strange one in this same sequence of events:  The
Exchange-related services do not show up on the Exchange server that I just
installed.  I installed Exchange 2k, then installed the latest SP for
Exchange, but still nothing.  I have reloaded Exchange on this Win2k box
twice now.  What am I missing?!

Signed, going bald quickly!

Pat Smith
Systems Administrator
FishNet Security
816.421.6611

http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/

 -Original Message-
From:   Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question

Actually the LDAP situation only applies to Exchange 5.5 Running on an
AD DC.

But yes you need to install the exchange Admin tools on any machine you
want to manage mailboxes from.

Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County High School of the Arts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(714) 560-0900 ex5910


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question


You need to install the Exchange Admin tools to what ever computer you
are going to manage from.  If that is your DC, yes, you need to install
it on it.

The LDAP issue only applies to the situation where the Exchange is on a
DC.

Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question


Yes, I used the ADC from the Exch CD.  I have 2-way setup.  I set up a
brand new Win2k box that is the AD PDC, if you will.  I did NOT install
the Exch Admin tools on that box, but rather the new Exch server.
Should I set up the Exch Admin tools on my AD Controller?

Thanks for the info.  I'm also seeing some articles regarding LDAP and
port 389.  Some say that the connector should run on something other
than 389. Did you change your LDAP port before doing the connector?

Thanks,


Pat Smith
Systems Administrator
FishNet Security
816.421.6611

http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/


 -Original Message-
From:   Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question

Pat,

1.) Are you using the ADC from the Exchange CD?

2.) Do you have one-way or two-way replication setup?
I believe you need to have two-way. I had two-way replication
setup during my migration and everything worked fine. I did the move
mailbox method.

3.) What machine are you using AD Users and Computers from? Do you have
the Exchange Admin tools on the machine you are using?

Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County School of the Arts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange upgrade question

Hello all.  I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I
think I do!).

I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k
server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new
Exch server.  I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from
Ex 5.5 to AD, and it seemed to work.  Several hours later, I ran the
/ForestPrep utility before installing Ex2k.  I have now fully installed
Exch2k, and patched it with the latest sp.

My problem is, when I right-click on a user in AD, and select the
"Exchange Tasks" option, the only available Exchange option is "Enable
Instant Messaging".  There is no "Move Mailbox" option which, according
to everything I've read, there should be.

Anyone seen this?  Anyone have any ideas what's going on?  It's as if
the Exchange services didn't get installed on the new box.  Help!



Pat Smith
Systems Administrator
FishNet Security
816.421.6611

http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/  



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_char

RE: Exchange Enterprise

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We're still a 5.5 shop here.

> mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
> 
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Enterprise


Which version?  5.5 (and 2000 AFAIK) is fine, but anything less and you
need the annoying "Microsoft Exchange Connector" disk.
 
Neil
-Original Message-
    From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code
Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 03 October 2001 14:37
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange Enterprise
Subject: Exchange Enterprise


Can you mix and match Enterprise and Standard within a site?  We
have one server that continually bumps up against the ceiling and they
want to do Enterprise, but the other servers are in fine shape.
 
Thx.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
office (207) 989-9115 
cell (513) 314-0197 
 

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange Enterprise

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Can 
you mix and match Enterprise and Standard within a site?  We have one 
server that continually bumps up against the ceiling and they want to do 
Enterprise, but the other servers are in fine shape.
 
Thx.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak ZF 
Group NAO Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: John Matteson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 
  9:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT 
  SBS
  If 
  you, or someone on the list has the posting Steve is referring to, would you 
  mind reposting it to the list, or sending it to me directly? I seem to have 
  missed it.
   
  John Matteson; Exchange 
  ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
  Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to 
  *ME*! 
  
-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 
9:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT 
SBS

Yes 
- it was posted on this list and the NT list. Sorry, don't have the 
link.
 
Steve 
Clark
Clark 
Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN 
Charter Member
"Who's 
watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
  
301-610-9584 voice
  
240-465-0323 Efax
 
-Original 
Message-From: John 
Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:30 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: NT 
SBS
 
Did 
they put up a press release or something?
 
John 
Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate 
Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 
- 2981 
You're 
just jealous because the little voices only talk to 
*ME*! 

-Original 
Message-From: Clark, 
Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:56 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: NT 
SBS
NT4 
is going out to pasture.
 
Steve 
Clark
Clark 
Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN 
Charter Member
"Who's 
watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
  
301-610-9584 voice
  
240-465-0323 Efax
 
-Original 
Message-From: Stephen 
J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:53 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: NT 
SBS
 
Sorry about this. I 
missed something. What news from MS yesterday?
-Original 
Message-From: Clark, 
Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: NT 
SBS
Yes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ 
E2K. Especially after the news form MSyesterday - can't afford to answer 
the question of why in a year.Thanks for your concern.Steve 
ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's 
watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 
voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSSo, have you made a decision?(I 
would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying withExchange5.5, 
put it on Win2000)William-Original 
Message-From: Clark, SteveTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: 
10/2/01 7:24 PMSubject: RE: NT SBSHOLD THE PHONE - this was sent 
days agoSteve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN 
Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 
voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Clark, 
Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSHaving a terrible time making the 
decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. Thiswill be going into a single server 
shop running OLD applications. Ex 2Klooks great but I have very little 
experience with the product and theydon't need the extra 
frills...Thanks for the feedback.Steve ClarkClark 
Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your 
network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 
voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Gordon 
Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Re: NT SBSThe only problem I had with SBS is with 
Citrix .. otherwise its OK... though I do prefer 2k SBS which allows 
you to loadbalance acrossthree servers List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/

RE: Happy Birthday to email

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Cleanup



It'd 
work if MS's next release is DOS-XP.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak ZF 
Group NAO Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:27 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  a 
  486/20 and a p150 with no drives hmmm, just doesnt stack 
  up
  
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
    Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 15:16 
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
Birthday to email
What ya got to offer?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
  2001 3:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  Excellent.   Trade ya?
   
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
  Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  Nothing yet, the AIAG has a program where they embed them in tires 
  so when a car rolls off the line it passes in front of the reader which 
  captures the VIN and the serial numbers of the tires.  Then, when 
  there's a recall, they can easily figure out where the bad tires 
  went.  We're considering doing the same thing in our transmissions 
  and other key components we produce.  No concrete plan yet, just a 
  lot of ideas.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 
02, 2001 3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Happy Birthday to 
email
Cool.  What are you doing with the RFID? 

 
-Original Message-----From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
    Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Happy Birthday to email
I implement auto-ID technologies (bar code, RFID) in the 
facilities.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office 
(207) 989-9115 cell (513) 
314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 
  02, 2001 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Happy Birthday to 
  email
  What is a bar code admin?
   
   
  -Original Message-----From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
  Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  Some of us were graduating high school.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office 
  (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 
  314-0197 
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 
02, 2001 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Happy Birthday to 
email
Some of the people here weren't even born 
yet. [1]
 
[1] Hi Bill!
 
-Original Message-From: Bill Higgins 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 
02, 2001 11:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Happy Birthday to 
email
The great great great grandpappy of 
Exchange... 
 
 http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011001/tc/tech_email_anniversary_dc_1.htmlList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exch

RE: Happy Birthday to email

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Cleanup



The 
technology behind it is very basic, the antenna energizes the tag which 
broadcasts out it's data back to the antenna.  The data is formatted 
similarly to a PDF 417 bar code if your familiar with 2-D symbologies.  The 
tags will carry up to 1 or 2 K of data and are read-write.  The Maine 
Turnpike uses similar technology to manage toll accounts.  You can buy toll 
access at a discounted rate ($50 worth of travel for $40) and the RFID device 
decrements whenever you enter the highway.  An LCD warns you when you're 
low on cash.  Commercial accounts carry no cash, the transactions build up 
on the host and you get a monthly bill for travel.  Like my snow blower, 
when it's working, it's the best thing since sliced bread.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  3:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  very 
  cool.  We were toying with membership ID's to simplify checkin at events. 
  Eventually membership discounts could be implemented between members.  
  
   
  I've 
  heard of pilot programs started in some cities where the Mobil 
  Speedpasses can be used to buy food at McDonalds.  
   
  -----Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:12 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  Nothing yet, the AIAG has a program where they embed them in tires so 
  when a car rolls off the line it passes in front of the reader which captures 
  the VIN and the serial numbers of the tires.  Then, when there's a 
  recall, they can easily figure out where the bad tires went.  We're 
  considering doing the same thing in our transmissions and other key components 
  we produce.  No concrete plan yet, just a lot of 
  ideas.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Happy Birthday to email
Cool.  What are you doing with the RFID? 
     
    -Original Message-----From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
    Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:53 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
Birthday to email
I 
implement auto-ID technologies (bar code, RFID) in the 
facilities.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
  2001 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  What is a bar code admin?
   
   
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
      Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  Some of us were graduating high school.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Happy Birthday to email
Some of the people here weren't even born yet. 
[1]
 
[1] Hi Bill!
 
-Original Message-From: Bill Higgins 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 11:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Happy Birthday to email
The great great great grandpappy of 
Exchange... 
 
 http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011001/tc/tech_email_anniversary_dc_1.htmlList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_l

RE: Happy Birthday to email

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Cleanup



What 
ya got to offer?
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  3:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  Excellent.   Trade ya?
   
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:12 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  Nothing yet, the AIAG has a program where they embed them in tires so 
  when a car rolls off the line it passes in front of the reader which captures 
  the VIN and the serial numbers of the tires.  Then, when there's a 
  recall, they can easily figure out where the bad tires went.  We're 
  considering doing the same thing in our transmissions and other key components 
  we produce.  No concrete plan yet, just a lot of 
  ideas.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Happy Birthday to email
Cool.  What are you doing with the RFID? 
 
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
    Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:53 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
Birthday to email
I 
implement auto-ID technologies (bar code, RFID) in the 
facilities.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
  2001 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  What is a bar code admin?
   
   
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
  Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  Some of us were graduating high school.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Happy Birthday to email
Some of the people here weren't even born yet. 
[1]
 
[1] Hi Bill!
 
-Original Message-From: Bill Higgins 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 11:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Happy Birthday to email
The great great great grandpappy of 
Exchange... 
 
 http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011001/tc/tech_email_anniversary_dc_1.htmlList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Happy Birthday to email

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Cleanup



Nothing yet, the AIAG has a program where they embed them in tires so 
when a car rolls off the line it passes in front of the reader which captures 
the VIN and the serial numbers of the tires.  Then, when there's a recall, 
they can easily figure out where the bad tires went.  We're considering 
doing the same thing in our transmissions and other key components we 
produce.  No concrete plan yet, just a lot of ideas.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  Cool.  What are you doing with the RFID? 
   
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:53 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  I 
  implement auto-ID technologies (bar code, RFID) in the 
  facilities.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Happy Birthday to email
What is a bar code admin?
 
 
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
    Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:46 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
Birthday to email
Some of us were graduating high school.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
  2001 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  Some of the people here weren't even born yet. 
  [1]
   
  [1] Hi Bill!
   
  -Original Message-From: Bill Higgins 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
  2001 11:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Happy Birthday to email
  The great great great grandpappy of 
  Exchange... 
   
   http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011001/tc/tech_email_anniversary_dc_1.htmlList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Happy Birthday to email

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Cleanup



I 
implement auto-ID technologies (bar code, RFID) in the 
facilities.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  2:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  What 
  is a bar code admin?
   
   
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:46 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  Some 
  of us were graduating high school.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 
2001 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Happy Birthday to email
Some of the people here weren't even born yet. 
[1]
 
[1] Hi Bill!
 
-Original Message-From: Bill Higgins 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
11:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Happy 
Birthday to email
The great great great grandpappy of 
Exchange... 
 
 http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011001/tc/tech_email_anniversary_dc_1.htmlList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Happy Birthday to email

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Cleanup



Some 
of us were graduating high school.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  Some 
  of the people here weren't even born yet. [1]
   
  [1] 
  Hi Bill!
   
  -Original Message-From: Bill Higgins 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  11:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Happy 
  Birthday to email
  The great great great grandpappy of 
  Exchange... 
   
   http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011001/tc/tech_email_anniversary_dc_1.htmlList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule)

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

And pray daily that someone doesn't send you an attachment that exceeds the
storage limit on your Hotmail account that causes NDR's to be sent back to
your Exchange account that are forwarded to Hotmail that cause more NDR's,
etc., etc.  Been there, done that with AOL.

 mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
 
Steve Ropiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Ben Cabie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule)


set up a custom mailbox in exchange that forwards to the hotmail account,
then open up his mailbox properties and use the custom mailbox as an
alternate recipient

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Using native NTBACKUP utility to backup Exchange 5.5 server

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



No BL, 
can't span tapes either from what I've been told.  Ours hasn't gotten that 
large yet.  We scripted ours so it kicks off 
automatically.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Rybski Dajo 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 
  10:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Using 
  native NTBACKUP utility to backup Exchange 5.5 server
  We 
  use NTBACKUP for online backup of the DS and IS. Didn't experience 
  any problems with that yet (knock on wood).
  Brick-level backups are not possible with 
  NTBACKUP.
   
  If 
  you have a relatively small sized Exchange server and no excessive 
  backup needs, then NTBACKUP will do just fine.
  -Dajo 
  
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-Van: Ratini Heidi - IL 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Verzonden: dinsdag 2 oktober 2001 
16:13Aan: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesOnderwerp: Using 
native NTBACKUP utility to backup Exchange 5.5 server

OK I'm doing 
this correctly this time.
Does anyone use the native "NTBACKUP" utility 
on their EX 5.5 installations to backup their Exchange IS's online? Recently 
Microsoft recommended we use the native NTBACKUP utility to do the page 
layer online backups. Just looking for input from anyone on this list 
currently doing this, rather than going to a 3rd party application for 
backups.
Also, do any of you know if individual 
mailboxes can be restored when using NTBACKUP as the backup solution? I'm 
not sure on this aspect, but I would suspect not, I don't think NTBACKUP 
does brick layer backups.
Thanks for any input you have,
Heidi
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: queue.bad

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Glad to see no one made any reference between this last post and recent
events.

mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
 
Steve Ropiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Ratini Heidi - IL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: queue.bad


Sorry, I'm a thread hijacker.  I didn't mean to disturb the thread of this
message, I f'd up.  I will not do this again.

Heidi

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: queue.bad


Thread hijacker!

-Original Message-
From: Ratini Heidi - IL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 02 October 2001 14:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: queue.bad
Subject: RE: queue.bad


Does anyone use the native "NTBACKUP" utility on their EX 5.5 installations
to backup their Exchange IS's online?  Recently Microsoft recommended we use
the native NTBACKUP utility to do the page layer online backups.  Just
looking for input from anyone on this list currently doing this, rather than
going to a 3rd party application for backups.

Also, do any of you know if individual mailboxes can be restored when using
NTBACKUP as the backup solution?  I'm not sure on this aspect, but I would
suspect not, I don't think NTBACKUP does brick layer backups.

Thanks for any input you have,

Heidi

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: queue.bad


I must admit, I've not heard of queue.bad

It will be ok to delete it as far as I know.  You can even delete queue.dat,
as the IMS creates a new one when it starts (although you don't need to in
this case).

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Chris Meirick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 02 October 2001 13:08
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: queue.bad
Subject: Re: queue.bad


I think that some other muppet may have renamed the queue.dat file to
queue.bad and just left it there for me to discover. Does this sound about
right?

Chris

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you
have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you
have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Email footer software

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Probably a few % points to your bandwidth utilization.

> mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
> 
Steve Ropiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email footer software


Internally, I would consider signatures from the email client side.

We send thousands and thousands of internal messages.  I wonder what a
disclaimer would add...

Otherwise, I'm sure you are familiar with section 4.1:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec4.htm

William

-Original Message-
From: Don Goldstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email footer software


I am looking for software that will work with our
Exchange 5.5 server to add an email footer (legal
disclaimer) to each message.  This software must work
directly with the Exchange server, not just the SMTP
component,  because the footer must be added to
messages that stay within the company AND messages
that go out the Internet.  Does anyone know of a
product that will do this?  Some of the products out
there only work with SMTP.

 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Email Viruses

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



Also, 
because it uses the SE API's instead of MAPI or AVAPI it is less likely to get 
overwhelmed during a mail storm and let messages slip through 
unscanned.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:42 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Email 
  Viruses
  They 
  block virus and/or attachments at the IMS level before they hit any 
  mailbox/machine/server.  They also can be set up to send the offending 
  party a email message stating that they are sending out a virus. This last 
  feature will cut down the number of virus you get significantly. Many 
  organizations upgraded their AV after the sales/marketing/CEO type get a 
  message back stating that they are spreading "X" virus
   
  
  ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area 
  Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax   - 651-225-7695  
  
  -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  12:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Email 
  Viruses
  

Antigen 
over Trend? Why?
 
Steve 
Clark
Clark 
Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN 
Charter Member
“Who's 
watching your network?”
www.clarksupport.com
  
301-610-9584 voice
  
240-465-0323 Efax
 
-Original 
Message-From: Ellery 
July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
12:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Email Viruses
 
Antigen is the 
product. 
-Original 
Message-From: Rudy 
Lovato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
9:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Email Viruses
I'm using Symantec 
Exchange AntiVirus 2.1.  It allows you to block attachments with a 
registry hack, it doesn't seem to let me blcok more than 10.  I guess 
that should suffice, I was just wondering if there was something out there 
with more advanced features.  It will probably cost $$$ 
though
-Original 
Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
7:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Email Viruses
It 
doesn't.
What are you using 
for an Exchange Antivirus?
-Original 
Message-From: Rudy 
Lovato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
6:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Email Viruses
Alright, help me 
out here...  So the admin pack does not block them on the 
server
-Original 
Message-From: Randal, 
Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
7:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Email Viruses
That's not blocking 
them on the server!
 
Phil
-Phil 
RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK 


-Original 
Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 
14:16To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Email 
Viruses
If you have the lastest security 
patches installed, you can use the FREE admin pack to specify what file 
attachments to block.
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm 
-Original 
Message- 
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
8:11 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Subject: RE: Email 
Viruses 

 
You could try unplugging the network 
cable... 

- Phil 
Randal 
Network Engineer Herefordshire 
Council 
Hereford, UK 
> -Original 
Message- 
> From: Rudy Lovato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 September 
2001 14:01 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
> Subject: RE: Email 
Viruses 
> > > Is there a free 
program that will block attachments on the > Exchange 
server? 
> > -Original 
Message- 
> From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 
September 25, 2001 1:52 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
> Subject: RE: Email 
Viruses 
> > > I block these: vbs, 
exe, bat, js, vbe, wsf, wsh, hta, shs, > com, pif, cmd, > reg, scr, chm, asx, 
wmd, wmz, lnk, eml and nws > > -Original 
Message- 
> From: Rudy Lovato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 
September 25, 2001 1:44 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
> Subject: Email 
Viruses 
> > > > Anybody have any 
  

RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Ed Crowley Server Move Method



Sure, 
unless of course you don't like them.  In which case, the recycle bin 
.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Ed 
  Crowley Server Move Method
  Hey Folks 
  The errors on my current exchange server and the fact that the 
  previous guy set it up as a bdc and other things running on it has prompted me 
  to move it to a new better stronger faster box only running exchange.  I 
  am going to utilize the Ed Crowley method but I had a question I was hoping 
  someone could answer.
  Is it possible to move users to the new server and place them 
  in recipient containers? 
  TIA 
  Jim 
  There was a power outage at a department store yesterday. 
  Twenty people were trapped on the escalators. -- Steven Wright List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA Password expires in 0 days

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yeah, been there, done that.  Found an easy patch that worked.

> mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
> 
Steve Ropiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Password expires in 0 days


There are three (maybe four now) KB articles that address this issue.

A quick search of Microsoft's site with the exact phrase will reveal them.

William


-Original Message-
From: Eric Larsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA Password expires in 0 days


When any of my users (including myself) log on to the owa page, the
following error is displayed:  Your current password is about to expire in 0
days.  To change your password, go to the Options page after you login.  You
can then click OK and it launches the owa page.  This has been going on for
a week or so.  so much for 0 days. When you click on the options page, then
click on change password button, I get a page cannot be displayed error...
what fun. any ideas?

-Eric Larsen
-Key Knife, Inc.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox Rights

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Or . . .log in as the service account and you can open anything

> mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
> 
Steve Ropiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox Rights


Pedro,

This is the way it is supposed to behave. MS changed Exchange's default
permission to Deny Admins to users Mailboxes (I guess Sys Admins have to
much power they wanted to make us work to get into Mailboxes.) Anyway
you need to add the account you want to view the mailboxes from to the
permissions on each user (Pain in the A** if you have a lot you need
set).

The mailboxes are getting the inherited rights from the exchange
configuration container in the configuration portion of AD.

Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County School of the Arts

-Original Message-
From: Pedro Sosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox Rights


I have a strange problem. We recently went from 5.5 to 2000. It seems
the
mailbox rights on many mailboxes are inheriting a deny for Domain Admins
and Enterprise Admins. I am a member of both groups. I need to open
several maiboxes and cannot. Where are these mailboxes getting these
inherited rights, and why is this happening? and not all mailboxes??

Pedro

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Antivirus

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Exchange Antivirus



Using 
NAV in combo mode and it's works OK.  It'll squeak a lot if you're not up 
to date on service packs and info store fixes.  Also, like all MAPI, AVAPI 
products, it'll drop stuff now and then, but it'll grab most of 
it.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:39 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 
  Antivirus
  I am getting ready to install Norton AV for 
  Exchange and wanted to ask one question first.  What is the best method 
  to use for the scanning MAPI, VAPI, or the combination MAPI/VAPI.  I 
  think that I fully understand the differences and I am leaning toward the 
  MAPI/VAPI mode.  Is anyone out there using Norton in this config and is 
  there anything that I should watch out for?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Info store warnings

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Arcserve and Exchange 5.5



Looks 
like Microsoft's KB is still down. My searches are not returning any hits.  
Does anyone know where in the Addmin program that I can set the tripwire for 
warnings on approaching the ceiling for the size of the IS?  We may go to 
the Enterprise edition to make it a non-issue.  Does anyone also know if 
media is still available for Exchange 5.5 EE?  I guess we need to purchase 
Ex 2 K for proper licensing, but need the disk to do the install on our new 
server.
 
Thanks
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Ambrose, Joseph 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 
  24, 2001 10:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Arcserve and Exchange 5.5
  
  Have 
  you checked the CA support site?
   
  http://support.cai.com/
   
  Joseph Ambrose
  System and Network 
  Manager
  The Conference Board
  Phone : 
  001-212-339-0443
  Fax : 001-212-836-3802
  Email : 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  
  www.conference-board.org
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Markus 
  Kost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:56 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Arcserve and 
  Exchange 5.5
   
  Hi,
  I have a little 
  Problem with my Backup.
  Arcserve IT 6.61 on 
  WinNT4.0 
  Errors:
      
  
  E4102  Unable 
  to open Database ErrorCode -2008
  E3511  Unable 
  to begin Database Backup
  and he wants to 
  Backup the Winnt\~d34234..tmp ( why that? )
  Some 
  Ideas?
  Thanks
  -markus
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Does NIMDA Corrupt Exchange???

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We had a severe infestation of our German systems and all they needed to
clean was the mailboxes.  'd be wary of is anything stuck in a queue when I
crank up the services again.

> mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
> 
Steve Ropiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Does NIMDA Corrupt Exchange???


Hello,
I am trying to figure out if NIMDA will infect the Exchange Database?  My
Exchange Services are shutdown and the server is up. I've cleaned the
server of the NIMDA virus, but I am now worried about restarting the
Exchange services in fear of unleashing the virus if it resides in the
database.  Any ideas of whether it does or notor if there is a cleaner
for the Exchange database?

Thanks, 
Mike

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Database limits

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

A la NCC 1701 USS Enterprise?

> mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards 
> 
Steve Ropiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office (207) 989-9115
cell (513) 314-0197


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database limits


The Enterprise version supports saucer separation.

-Original Message-
From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database limits


Does anyone know how can you tell if you are running Exchange 5.5
Enterprise Edition?(aside from letting your IS grow to 16GB)

Regards,
Shawn


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database limits


16GB, shutdown. That's the rule.
If you need more than 16GB, you need to be using the Enterprise version
of Exch which has no limits.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Database limits


Anyone have a relevant Q doc on size limits on databases in Exchange?
One of our servers hit the 16 GB roof last night and we just want to
know what the rules are.

Thx.,
Steve

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Database limits

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Anyone have a relevant Q doc on size limits on databases in Exchange?  One
of our servers hit the 16 GB roof last night and we just want to know what
the rules are.

Thx.,
Steve

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm