Outlook question
I know this probably isn't the correct place to ask this question, so if anyone can direct me to either a resource for this issue or the correct place to ask I would appreciate it. The owner of our company is having an issue with the nickname file for Outlook. About every 2-3 months the file appears to go missing and he has to start over. Last time this happened I double checked the file. It was still there. There was still data in it and the file didn't appear to be corrupt. I looked at the timing but couldn't see anything that happens on his machine every 2-3 months only. He is the only one that has this issue. We're running SBS2k3 with Exchange included, fully patched. The workstations are running XP and Outlook 2k3, fully patched. Any guidance would be appreciated. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever
Re: Outlook question
The nickname cache has a capacity of 1,000 entries. http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2005/up050609.htm#nk2 - Original Message - From: King's Kid To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:16 AM Subject: Outlook question I know this probably isn't the correct place to ask this question, so if anyone can direct me to either a resource for this issue or the correct place to ask I would appreciate it. The owner of our company is having an issue with the nickname file for Outlook. About every 2-3 months the file appears to go missing and he has to start over. Last time this happened I double checked the file. It was still there. There was still data in it and the file didn't appear to be corrupt. I looked at the timing but couldn't see anything that happens on his machine every 2-3 months only. He is the only one that has this issue. We're running SBS2k3 with Exchange included, fully patched. The workstations are running XP and Outlook 2k3, fully patched. Any guidance would be appreciated. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever
Re: Outlook question
Thank you Kathleen!! BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever From: Orland, Kathleen korl...@rogers.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed, February 17, 2010 9:20:56 AM Subject: Re: Outlook question The nickname cache has a capacity of 1,000 entries. http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2005/up050609.htm#nk2 - Original Message - From: King's Kid To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:16 AM Subject: Outlook question I know this probably isn't the correct place to ask this question, so if anyone can direct me to either a resource for this issue or the correct place to ask I would appreciate it. The owner of our company is having an issue with the nickname file for Outlook. About every 2-3 months the file appears to go missing and he has to start over. Last time this happened I double checked the file. It was still there. There was still data in it and the file didn't appear to be corrupt. I looked at the timing but couldn't see anything that happens on his machine every 2-3 months only. He is the only one that has this issue. We're running SBS2k3 with Exchange included, fully patched. The workstations are running XP and Outlook 2k3, fully patched. Any guidance would be appreciated. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever
Quick Outlook Question
I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
Your outgoing mail server more than likely, otherwise he could be considered to be relaying. IIRC, if you configure a secure smtp session with the server with his credentials he won't be relaying, but using your outgoing server is probably the simplest option. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote: I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Quick Outlook Question
Normally (I would think) the SMTP server where the POP3 account is. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
OK after reading some of the other replies and considering my cold is making my head feel fuzzy consider my post recalled. I think it's time to go home. Can't believe I can't remember this stuff right now. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote: Your outgoing mail server more than likely, otherwise he could be considered to be relaying. IIRC, if you configure a secure smtp session with the server with his credentials he won't be relaying, but using your outgoing server is probably the simplest option. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote: I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Quick Outlook Question
Does Outlook let you use a different From: address on replies to emails from that POP account? The outgoing mail server needs to be the one for the domain that's going to be in his From: address. From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick Outlook Question Normally (I would think) the SMTP server where the POP3 account is. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
Re: Quick Outlook Question
Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Quick Outlook Question
Unless the domain at the POP location has SPF records that don't allow your Exchange server to spoof them. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Quick Outlook Question Your outgoing mail server more than likely, otherwise he could be considered to be relaying. IIRC, if you configure a secure smtp session with the server with his credentials he won't be relaying, but using your outgoing server is probably the simplest option. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Quick Outlook Question
Does the remote site support the message submission port (SMTP Auth to port 587)? This is really the recommended way, though ISP support is still up and coming. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 15:12 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Quick Outlook Question Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Quick Outlook Question
Going to be sending 'from' the pop3 account? Then the smtp server where the account is. You could send it through yours if you wanted to, and allowed that domain on your server but if the domain for the pop3 account has SPF records set up that would not work well for you. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
The SMTP server of the ISP of the additional account, including authentication to that server. - Original Message - From: Sherry Abercrombie To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:53 PM Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: [Bulk] Re: Quick Outlook Question
Use port 587 for the SMTP server and port 110 for the POP3 server. - Original Message - From: Sherry Abercrombie To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:12 PM Subject: [Bulk] Re: Quick Outlook Question Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
Yeah, I thought about that. Then I thought about Nyquill. About the time I saw MBS. Then I posted to the list. Think some more about Nyquill. Wonder if this is swine flu. Reflect that I'm actually feeling better than this weekend. Where am I? On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.comwrote: Unless the domain at the POP location has SPF records that don’t allow your Exchange server to spoof them. -- *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:02 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Quick Outlook Question Your outgoing mail server more than likely, otherwise he could be considered to be relaying. IIRC, if you configure a secure smtp session with the server with his credentials he won't be relaying, but using your outgoing server is probably the simplest option. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Quick Outlook Question
The exec's brain is going to explode once you have it working, imho. He/She is going to get real confused what mailbox he/she is working in. Webmail for the other account would have been so much better for him/her. Not your call, I know. Just giving you 'I told you so' ammo. :) From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Quick Outlook Question Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.commailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
I know, believe me I knowand this exec is not exactly what we would call a computer literate person.. I've got several questions now that need to be answered they are all in a meeting at the moment. Thanks everyone for the quick responses suggestions. We haven't allowed POP3 access in years because of the risks (had a major virus infestation because of a person's pop3 email account they turned off McAfee on their computer.lots of things changed after that incident ;) ) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote: The exec’s brain is going to explode once you have it working, imho. He/She is going to get real confused what mailbox he/she is working in. Webmail for the other account would have been so much better for him/her. Not your call, I know. Just giving you ‘I told you so’ ammo. J *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:12 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Quick Outlook Question Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
Blocking port 25 outbound is not 'arbitrary' - it's 'egress filtering'. And, it's highly recommended. I'd think serious about doing what you're doing, and would likely require they gave me a written and signed request, which had been passed by the org's lawyer. Nasty things happen when kludges like this are put together, and my basic rule is that personal and corporate email don't mix - assuming that this is for a personal account. Even if it's not personal, mixing two [probably-]unrelated business' email is problematic. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
I don't have a choice, this is basically a family organization this exec is family. It's a web-site that was setup and maintained by a 3rd party. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Blocking port 25 outbound is not 'arbitrary' - it's 'egress filtering'. And, it's highly recommended. I'd think serious about doing what you're doing, and would likely require they gave me a written and signed request, which had been passed by the org's lawyer. Nasty things happen when kludges like this are put together, and my basic rule is that personal and corporate email don't mix - assuming that this is for a personal account. Even if it's not personal, mixing two [probably-]unrelated business' email is problematic. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
Are you in the mob? :-) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote: I don't have a choice, this is basically a family organization this exec is family. It's a web-site that was setup and maintained by a 3rd party. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Blocking port 25 outbound is not 'arbitrary' - it's 'egress filtering'. And, it's highly recommended. I'd think serious about doing what you're doing, and would likely require they gave me a written and signed request, which had been passed by the org's lawyer. Nasty things happen when kludges like this are put together, and my basic rule is that personal and corporate email don't mix - assuming that this is for a personal account. Even if it's not personal, mixing two [probably-]unrelated business' email is problematic. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
I suppose we all have our crosses to bear... At least you have a job. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:45, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: I don't have a choice, this is basically a family organization this exec is family. It's a web-site that was setup and maintained by a 3rd party. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Blocking port 25 outbound is not 'arbitrary' - it's 'egress filtering'. And, it's highly recommended. I'd think serious about doing what you're doing, and would likely require they gave me a written and signed request, which had been passed by the org's lawyer. Nasty things happen when kludges like this are put together, and my basic rule is that personal and corporate email don't mix - assuming that this is for a personal account. Even if it's not personal, mixing two [probably-]unrelated business' email is problematic. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
Ha Jonathan, go take some NyQuil ;) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote: Are you in the mob? :-) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote: I don't have a choice, this is basically a family organization this exec is family. It's a web-site that was setup and maintained by a 3rd party. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Blocking port 25 outbound is not 'arbitrary' - it's 'egress filtering'. And, it's highly recommended. I'd think serious about doing what you're doing, and would likely require they gave me a written and signed request, which had been passed by the org's lawyer. Nasty things happen when kludges like this are put together, and my basic rule is that personal and corporate email don't mix - assuming that this is for a personal account. Even if it's not personal, mixing two [probably-]unrelated business' email is problematic. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: Quick Outlook Question
I've made up my mind, don't bother me with the facts From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Quick Outlook Question I don't have a choice, this is basically a family organization this exec is family. It's a web-site that was setup and maintained by a 3rd party. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Blocking port 25 outbound is not 'arbitrary' - it's 'egress filtering'. And, it's highly recommended. I'd think serious about doing what you're doing, and would likely require they gave me a written and signed request, which had been passed by the org's lawyer. Nasty things happen when kludges like this are put together, and my basic rule is that personal and corporate email don't mix - assuming that this is for a personal account. Even if it's not personal, mixing two [probably-]unrelated business' email is problematic. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Quick Outlook Question
Don't use quotes around family. :-) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote: Ha Jonathan, go take some NyQuil ;) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote: Are you in the mob? :-) On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote: I don't have a choice, this is basically a family organization this exec is family. It's a web-site that was setup and maintained by a 3rd party. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Blocking port 25 outbound is not 'arbitrary' - it's 'egress filtering'. And, it's highly recommended. I'd think serious about doing what you're doing, and would likely require they gave me a written and signed request, which had been passed by the org's lawyer. Nasty things happen when kludges like this are put together, and my basic rule is that personal and corporate email don't mix - assuming that this is for a personal account. Even if it's not personal, mixing two [probably-]unrelated business' email is problematic. Kurt On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: Good questionthis just got dropped in our laps this morning and we're scrambling to get it done because they needed it like yesterday of course. I 'think' we've gotten the appropriate firewall changes made because yes, we do arbitrarily block port 25 at the firewall unless it's in the approved list. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Which-ever SMTP server is going to send the email for that account. Probably the remote SMTP server, unless you block arbitrary port 25 at your firewall. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Outlook Question I've got a co-worker trying to setup and executive's Outlook to connect to an additional POP3 account. My dumb question is the outgoing SMTP field, what should that be? My outgoing mail server, or the smtp server where the POP3 mail is at? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
outlook question
I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Check out the add-ins page from Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Q263297 OL2000: Administrator Information About the Outlook E-mail Security Update http://www.microsoft.com/Office/ORK/2000/journ/outsecupdate.htm -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question Check out the add-ins page from Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Prchoz zprva neobsahuje viry. (Kontrolovano na serveru) Zkontrolovno antivirovm systmem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.375 / Virov bze: 210 - datum vydn: 10.7.2002 --- Odchoz zprva neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolovno antivirovm systmem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.375 / Virov bze: 210 - datum vydn: 10.7.2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Nope - there are addins to control access and override the security. You can open or run any attachment you want provided it's added to the list. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
There are also reg hacks. Cuz I love hacking registries! :P -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question Nope - there are addins to control access and override the security. You can open or run any attachment you want provided it's added to the list. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
You are such a geek. LOL Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question There are also reg hacks. Cuz I love hacking registries! :P -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question Nope - there are addins to control access and override the security. You can open or run any attachment you want provided it's added to the list. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
HEY!!! I R n0t a g33k! :( -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question You are such a geek. LOL Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question There are also reg hacks. Cuz I love hacking registries! :P -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question Nope - there are addins to control access and override the security. You can open or run any attachment you want provided it's added to the list. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
No, it is SP-1. I needed it for other reasons, I definitely did not want the outlook security updates on any of my systems. Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: outlook question Importance: Low If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Lookie here http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q259514 -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question No, it is SP-1. I needed it for other reasons, I definitely did not want the outlook security updates on any of my systems. Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: outlook question Importance: Low If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Don't forget to Completely Remove Remaining Office CD1 Files and Registry entries http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938 -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Title: RE: outlook question If youre setup with the outlook security model, install sp2, and use the public folder called outlook security settings to allow yourself to open the attachments fully. -Original Message- From: Tom Gerstner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question The Reg hack works for SP-1 -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question Don't forget to Completely Remove Remaining Office CD1 Files and Registry entries http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938 -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question If you mean SP2 for Office 2000, there is no fix. You need to do an uninstall and then reinstall Office. Then omit the SP2 upgrade. -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
SUMMARY Microsoft Outlook 2000 Service Release 1 (SR-1) provides an attachment security feature that is designed to increase the security protection for certain types of e-mail attachments. This feature provides explicit warning language when attachments are opened, and you are required to save the attachment to the file system before opening it. This can help you avoid accidentally releasing viruses that hide in certain file types. Note : In previous versions of Outlook, this functionality was provided in three separate patches: one for each version of Outlook. MORE INFORMATION When you open attachments with file name extensions such as .exe, .bat, .com, or .cmd, you receive the following warning message: Attachment Security Warning WARNING! The file may contain a virus that can be harmful to your computer. It is important to be VERY certain that this file is safe before you open it. You must save this file to disk before it can be opened. Filename: file name Type: file type To save the attachment, click Save to Disk. Caution : The attachment warning runs for all attachments with executable file name extensions. It does not detect, or clean a virus from an infected attachment. If you save a file that has a virus, and then run it from the hard disk, your computer is still infected. Saving the file is simply an extra precaution to take when considering the safety of the attached file. You must still use an updated virus-scanning program to check the file for a possible virus. Microsoft Office files, such as .doc, .xls, or .ppt, are not affected by this patch, and behave just as they did before installing the patch. To control macro behavior for Office documents, set the security level in the individual Office program itself. To Modify the Behavior of the Attachment Security Warning WARNING : If you use Registry Editor incorrectly, you may cause serious problems that may require you to reinstall your operating system. Microsoft cannot guarantee that you can solve problems that result from using Registry Editor incorrectly. Use Registry Editor at your own risk. To either add, or remove file types for the Attachment Security Warning, follow these steps: Click Start , click Run , type regedit , and then click OK . Locate the following key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Security If the Security key is not present, right-click the Outlook key, point to New on the shortcut menu, and then click Key . Type Security as the name, and then press ENTER. Click to select the Security key, and on the Edit menu, point to New . Click String Value , type AddWarningFileTypes , and then press ENTER. Right click AddWarningFileTypes , and then click Modify . Enter the extensions of those file types for which you want to receive a warning in the Value data box. Note that the file extensions should be entered as semicolon- (;) delimited strings without using any periods (.). Click the Security key, on the Edit menu, point to New , and then click String Value . Type RemoveWarningFileTypes , and then press ENTER. Right-click the RemoveWarningFileTypes value, and then click Modify on the shortcut menu. Enter the extensions of those file types for which you do not want to receive a warning. Note that the file extensions should be entered as semicolon-delimited strings without using any periods. Quit Registry Editor. NOTE : You must have some string value added to the AddWarningFileTypes key in order for RemoveWarningFileTypes to work. If necessary create a fake extension for AddWarningFileTypes, such as qqq -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Title: RE: outlook question SR-1: Tools|Options|Security|Attachment Security; Set it to none. SP2: Bad news unless you have an exchange server and implement the public folder fix. -Original Message- From: Tom Gerstner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question SUMMARY Microsoft Outlook 2000 Service Release 1 (SR-1) provides an attachment security feature that is designed to increase the security protection for certain types of e-mail attachments. This feature provides explicit warning language when attachments are opened, and you are required to save the attachment to the file system before opening it. This can help you avoid accidentally releasing viruses that hide in certain file types. Note : In previous versions of Outlook, this functionality was provided in three separate patches: one for each version of Outlook. MORE INFORMATION When you open attachments with file name extensions such as .exe, .bat, .com, or .cmd, you receive the following warning message: Attachment Security Warning WARNING! The file may contain a virus that can be harmful to your computer. It is important to be VERY certain that this file is safe before you open it. You must save this file to disk before it can be opened. Filename: file name Type: file type To save the attachment, click Save to Disk. Caution : The attachment warning runs for all attachments with executable file name extensions. It does not detect, or clean a virus from an infected attachment. If you save a file that has a virus, and then run it from the hard disk, your computer is still infected. Saving the file is simply an extra precaution to take when considering the safety of the attached file. You must still use an updated virus-scanning program to check the file for a possible virus. Microsoft Office files, such as .doc, .xls, or .ppt, are not affected by this patch, and behave just as they did before installing the patch. To control macro behavior for Office documents, set the security level in the individual Office program itself. To Modify the Behavior of the Attachment Security Warning WARNING : If you use Registry Editor incorrectly, you may cause serious problems that may require you to reinstall your operating system. Microsoft cannot guarantee that you can solve problems that result from using Registry Editor incorrectly. Use Registry Editor at your own risk. To either add, or remove file types for the Attachment Security Warning, follow these steps: Click Start , click Run , type regedit , and then click OK . Locate the following key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Security If the Security key is not present, right-click the Outlook key, point to New on the shortcut menu, and then click Key . Type Security as the name, and then press ENTER. Click to select the Security key, and on the Edit menu, point to New . Click String Value , type AddWarningFileTypes , and then press ENTER. Right click AddWarningFileTypes , and then click Modify . Enter the extensions of those file types for which you want to receive a warning in the Value data box. Note that the file extensions should be entered as semicolon- (;) delimited strings without using any periods (.). Click the Security key, on the Edit menu, point to New , and then click String Value . Type RemoveWarningFileTypes , and then press ENTER. Right-click the RemoveWarningFileTypes value, and then click Modify on the shortcut menu. Enter the extensions of those file types for which you do not want to receive a warning. Note that the file extensions should be entered as semicolon-delimited strings without using any periods. Quit Registry Editor. NOTE : You must have some string value added to the AddWarningFileTypes key in order for RemoveWarningFileTypes to work. If necessary create a fake extension for AddWarningFileTypes, such as qqq -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outlook question
Title: RE: outlook question THANK YOU Why cant they have that in the documentation! Geez! Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question Importance: Low SR-1: Tools|Options|Security|Attachment Security; Set it to none. SP2: Bad news unless you have an exchange server and implement the public folder fix. -Original Message- From: Tom Gerstner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outlook question SUMMARY Microsoft Outlook 2000 Service Release 1 (SR-1) provides an attachment security feature that is designed to increase the security protection for certain types of e-mail attachments. This feature provides explicit warning language when attachments are opened, and you are required to save the attachment to the file system before opening it. This can help you avoid accidentally releasing viruses that hide in certain file types. Note : In previous versions of Outlook, this functionality was provided in three separate patches: one for each version of Outlook. MORE INFORMATION When you open attachments with file name extensions such as .exe, .bat, .com, or .cmd, you receive the following warning message: Attachment Security Warning WARNING! The file may contain a virus that can be harmful to your computer. It is important to be VERY certain that this file is safe before you open it. You must save this file to disk before it can be opened. Filename: file name Type: file type To save the attachment, click Save to Disk. Caution : The attachment warning runs for all attachments with executable file name extensions. It does not detect, or clean a virus from an infected attachment. If you save a file that has a virus, and then run it from the hard disk, your computer is still infected. Saving the file is simply an extra precaution to take when considering the safety of the attached file. You must still use an updated virus-scanning program to check the file for a possible virus. Microsoft Office files, such as .doc, .xls, or .ppt, are not affected by this patch, and behave just as they did before installing the patch. To control macro behavior for Office documents, set the security level in the individual Office program itself. To Modify the Behavior of the Attachment Security Warning WARNING : If you use Registry Editor incorrectly, you may cause serious problems that may require you to reinstall your operating system. Microsoft cannot guarantee that you can solve problems that result from using Registry Editor incorrectly. Use Registry Editor at your own risk. To either add, or remove file types for the Attachment Security Warning, follow these steps: Click Start , click Run , type regedit , and then click OK . Locate the following key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Security If the Security key is not present, right-click the Outlook key, point to New on the shortcut menu, and then click Key . Type Security as the name, and then press ENTER. Click to select the Security key, and on the Edit menu, point to New . Click String Value , type AddWarningFileTypes , and then press ENTER. Right click AddWarningFileTypes , and then click Modify . Enter the extensions of those file types for which you want to receive a warning in the Value data box. Note that the file extensions should be entered as semicolon- (;) delimited strings without using any periods (.). Click the Security key, on the Edit menu, point to New , and then click String Value . Type RemoveWarningFileTypes , and then press ENTER. Right-click the RemoveWarningFileTypes value, and then click Modify on the shortcut menu. Enter the extensions of those file types for which you do not want to receive a warning. Note that the file extensions should be entered as semicolon-delimited strings without using any periods. Quit Registry Editor. NOTE : You must have some string value added to the AddWarningFileTypes key in order for RemoveWarningFileTypes to work. If necessary create a fake extension for AddWarningFileTypes, such as qqq -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook question I installed Office SP-1 because I had no choice. Now I can't open many attachments without saving them first. I know this can be changed in the registry, does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt
Outlook Question
Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they "appear" to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
Run the user's mailbox from a different client to see if that's the problem. When you find out that it is, look closer at their profile, and email editor. -Original Message- From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they appear to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
look in the outlook tools-options-prferences-email options-when forwarding a message and when reply toa messge- - - - - - -settings. Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4501 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-4914 1120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 -Original Message-From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Question Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they "appear" to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
I have this when I send HTML email from my W2K PC running OutLook XP sending to an internal Win98 PC running O2K. If I change from HTML to text, works fine. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they appear to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
Title: RE: Outlook Question through Exchange ? or otherwise ? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I have this when I send HTML email from my W2K PC running OutLook XP sending to an internal Win98 PC running O2K. If I change from HTML to text, works fine. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they appear to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
Internal to my site - Exchange 5.5 sp4+, NT 4 sp6+ Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question through Exchange ? or otherwise ? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I have this when I send HTML email from my W2K PC running OutLook XP sending to an internal Win98 PC running O2K. If I change from HTML to text, works fine. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they appear to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
Yes the problem is internal only as far as I can tell. I am trying the changes you recommended Steve. Thanks, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question Internal to my site - Exchange 5.5 sp4+, NT 4 sp6+ Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question through Exchange ? or otherwise ? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I have this when I send HTML email from my W2K PC running OutLook XP sending to an internal Win98 PC running O2K. If I change from HTML to text, works fine. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question Hello, I am having a problem with a user receiving messages that are cut off half way through the message. When the user forwards the message to someone else the whole message is viewable. If the message is resent to the user the text is missing again. Have any of you seen or heard of this problem before. I have checked the Outlook settings on the client and they appear to be correct. Server is Win2K SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Client is on a Win98 machine running Outlook 2000. TIA, Jamie Domingue Systems Integrator II Global Data Systems 337-291-6535 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Outlook Question
I know this is a Exchange list but thought you guys/gals might be able to help me out. In outlook 2000 if I go to tools options / email options/ tracking/ I am unable to check replay to read receipts. Does anyone know how to change this so I can set it never replay with a read receipt. Thanks in advance for you help James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
I believe it only works for IMS mail. Do you have an IMS entry in your profile? J -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question I know this is a Exchange list but thought you guys/gals might be able to help me out. In outlook 2000 if I go to tools options / email options/ tracking/ I am unable to check replay to read receipts. Does anyone know how to change this so I can set it never replay with a read receipt. Thanks in advance for you help James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
I do not know where would I go to look at this. The reason for the questions is I have a co worker that does a read request on everything she sends me. so if I read her message while doing something else and don't replay back to her she gets on my case so want to turn it off. -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I believe it only works for IMS mail. Do you have an IMS entry in your profile? J -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question I know this is a Exchange list but thought you guys/gals might be able to help me out. In outlook 2000 if I go to tools options / email options/ tracking/ I am unable to check replay to read receipts. Does anyone know how to change this so I can set it never replay with a read receipt. Thanks in advance for you help James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
In C/W mode: http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm http://www.grinningshark.com/ Outlook.com: $1.5M!?!? http://page.auctions.shopping.yahoo.com/auction/60019145 William -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question I know this is a Exchange list but thought you guys/gals might be able to help me out. In outlook 2000 if I go to tools options / email options/ tracking/ I am unable to check replay to read receipts. Does anyone know how to change this so I can set it never replay with a read receipt. Thanks in advance for you help James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
Try www.slipstick.com I recall an add on read receipt blocker. You can also add a column to you Inbox view for read receipt requested so at least you know when someone requests one. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I do not know where would I go to look at this. The reason for the questions is I have a co worker that does a read request on everything she sends me. so if I read her message while doing something else and don't replay back to her she gets on my case so want to turn it off. -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I believe it only works for IMS mail. Do you have an IMS entry in your profile? J -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question I know this is a Exchange list but thought you guys/gals might be able to help me out. In outlook 2000 if I go to tools options / email options/ tracking/ I am unable to check replay to read receipts. Does anyone know how to change this so I can set it never replay with a read receipt. Thanks in advance for you help James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question
Microgarden --- Hotchkiss, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try www.slipstick.com I recall an add on read receipt blocker. You can also add a column to you Inbox view for read receipt requested so at least you know when someone requests one. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I do not know where would I go to look at this. The reason for the questions is I have a co worker that does a read request on everything she sends me. so if I read her message while doing something else and don't replay back to her she gets on my case so want to turn it off. -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question I believe it only works for IMS mail. Do you have an IMS entry in your profile? J -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question I know this is a Exchange list but thought you guys/gals might be able to help me out. In outlook 2000 if I go to tools options / email options/ tracking/ I am unable to check replay to read receipts. Does anyone know how to change this so I can set it never replay with a read receipt. Thanks in advance for you help James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
How about simple English then. No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
He will now make a dogged effort to know the correct answer :) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook Question BCC How about simple English then. No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
I don't understand what your saying can you elaborate on the simple English answer? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC How about simple English then. No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
BCC means blind copy, meaning you're not supposed to know who else got the e-mail. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
I know this. But thought maybe someone would know a way around it, that's all. Did not mean to offend anyone or ask a stupid questions. Just thought it would be something interesting to look into on a Friday afternoon. I had checked out some sites and did not find anything thought I would ask the list. Sorry -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC BCC means blind copy, meaning you're not supposed to know who else got the e-mail. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
I do believe that somehow some of the bulk emailer sites (read Spammers!) have software that might be able to do this. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC I know this. But thought maybe someone would know a way around it, that's all. Did not mean to offend anyone or ask a stupid questions. Just thought it would be something interesting to look into on a Friday afternoon. I had checked out some sites and did not find anything thought I would ask the list. Sorry -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC BCC means blind copy, meaning you're not supposed to know who else got the e-mail. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
If you were on an exchange server and had all the rights, you could log in to the users mail box, and look at the sent items. That is your only option. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC I know this. But thought maybe someone would know a way around it, that's all. Did not mean to offend anyone or ask a stupid questions. Just thought it would be something interesting to look into on a Friday afternoon. I had checked out some sites and did not find anything thought I would ask the list. Sorry -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC BCC means blind copy, meaning you're not supposed to know who else got the e-mail. -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
You can not go backwards to see if there was a BCC on a message. That information is no longer with the message. I am terribly sorry for not being clear. As email is received inbound, there are ways to check, but not retroactively, to my knowledge. William -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Question BCC
Thanks for everyone's help. I thought maybe it would be saved in the email makes since that after it leaves the exchange box it does not keep a record on the email would make it to easy to know. I know this was not an important question just wanted to know. Thanks again for the great responses. James -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC You can not go backwards to see if there was a BCC on a message. That information is no longer with the message. I am terribly sorry for not being clear. As email is received inbound, there are ways to check, but not retroactively, to my knowledge. William -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had someone bcc'ed on it. Just wondering checked out the sites that people sent but did not find anything. James List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Outlook question
Hi everybody I hope some body can help me. I have a client who are using Olook 2000 some of the users share their calendar with others after a while they lose the their share and they have to go through the process of sharing again. Their mail server is off site I have no idea what mail server they are using. Any hint or help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook question
If their mail server is 'off site' then they likely are not using MAPI profiles and are using POP or IMAP to access email. This does not allow for 'shared calendars' as .pst files can only be accessed one at a time. However, teamfolders *might* be a solution. http://www.slipstick.com/dev/teamfolders.htm William -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook question Hi everybody I hope some body can help me. I have a client who are using Olook 2000 some of the users share their calendar with others after a while they lose the their share and they have to go through the process of sharing again. Their mail server is off site I have no idea what mail server they are using. Any hint or help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook question
Find out the mail system for starters -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook question Hi everybody I hope some body can help me. I have a client who are using Olook 2000 some of the users share their calendar with others after a while they lose the their share and they have to go through the process of sharing again. Their mail server is off site I have no idea what mail server they are using. Any hint or help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook question
Thanks William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook question If their mail server is 'off site' then they likely are not using MAPI profiles and are using POP or IMAP to access email. This does not allow for 'shared calendars' as .pst files can only be accessed one at a time. However, teamfolders *might* be a solution. http://www.slipstick.com/dev/teamfolders.htm William -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook question Hi everybody I hope some body can help me. I have a client who are using Olook 2000 some of the users share their calendar with others after a while they lose the their share and they have to go through the process of sharing again. Their mail server is off site I have no idea what mail server they are using. Any hint or help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook question
No worries. Not much help though. :o/ William -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook question Thanks William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook question If their mail server is 'off site' then they likely are not using MAPI profiles and are using POP or IMAP to access email. This does not allow for 'shared calendars' as .pst files can only be accessed one at a time. However, teamfolders *might* be a solution. http://www.slipstick.com/dev/teamfolders.htm William -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook question Hi everybody I hope some body can help me. I have a client who are using Olook 2000 some of the users share their calendar with others after a while they lose the their share and they have to go through the process of sharing again. Their mail server is off site I have no idea what mail server they are using. Any hint or help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Simple Outlook Question
Title: RE: Simple Outlook Question
You
obviously aren't smart enough to know about it or to smart to need it..
-Original Message-From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001
10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Simple
Outlook Question
I
have never heard of the GetSmart software ? What does it do
?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 18,
2001 11:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Simple Outlook Question
Unfortunately at the moment I believe it's part of MS
GetSmart software - "missed it by that much".
I think the alternative is put the fax info in another
field.
-Original Message- From:
Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
Simple Outlook Question
I ran across the same issue with one of my users. Yes you
can remove the contents of the Fax field and email
will no longer bring up the Fax contact but this
also means that you can not store fax numbers in your contacts. It
seems that there should be a way to disable the feature so
you can maintain fax numbers for your contacts and
not be forced to choose the email contact or fax
contact every time you want to send an email to that contact.
-Original Message- From:
Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:30 PM To:
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook
Question
You can delete/remove the fax field from the contact list
and that would eliminate the issue.
ellery
-Original Message- From:
Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple
Outlook Question
I have a client who just recently converted there email from
using POP to MAPI. This user is remotely located and
was using her personal email and now is using both
in the same profile. She just called to say that when she types a persons name in the To: field of an email and
that recipients also has a fax number allocated,
that she gets to choices to send the email to. It
would be a good function except for she is not using
any type of fax programs from her PC. So she would like to only
send email messages to email recipients not fax recipients.
Is there a way to turn that feature off so that the
fax recipients don't show up when recipient names
are being resolved. I think that it is stupid that it would want to list a fax number for an email message when no
faxing is going to occur. Any ideas? TIA!
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList
Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Simple Outlook Question
This may or may not work for you, but this is what I have found...and unfortunately I don't know the detailed mechanics of it to explain what must or must not be enabled to get the same results... When composing a new message I enter the fist few letters of a recipients (already in global address book/contacts/or personal address book) last name and move to the next appropriate field (CC, BCC, Body...) and the email address is automagically inserted. When more than one name is needed I separate them with commas. I do know that this feature is an option (OL2K: Tools Menu, Options, Email Options, Advanced Email Options, Check both allow comma as address separator AND automatic name checking). If you have a lot of contacts this can be a tad slow, but I have over 150 and about the same in the global address book and I don't find it terrible. Now for the first few times I send email to a contact that has multiple stored items I have to right-click on that name (red zig-zag line under name warns me there are multiple possibilities for this contact) and select between say Bob Smith (E-mail) or Bob Smith (Fax) or Bob Smith (Pager), etc. When I have done this, usually just once, the next time I use that name (without opening an address book) it automagically populates the email address for that contact. I am not sure if clearing your personal history lists would affect this as I have not seemed to notice anything, but I could be wrong. There may also be more settings that are helping this happen that I am not aware of. It works for me and I HATE opening an address book anyway. Example for me would be a message to bob smith, caren jaques, jamie hernandez, michael stone I only enter smit, jaq, hern, ston and move to begin typing my message, and the names complete themselves properly. The more of the last name you enter the faster the search with an EXACT hit - especially when there are similarly spelled last names (smith and smithen are a good example). Also this search appears to be keyed off of the DISPLAY NAME not the actual email address. I change all contacts email addresses to use the persons first and then last name as the display name. Hope you have the same luck because THIS SAVES ME A TON OF TIME - I would not use my email as much otherwise. Daniel -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question You obviously aren't smart enough to know about it or to smart to need it.. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question I have never heard of the GetSmart software ? What does it do ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question Unfortunately at the moment I believe it's part of MS GetSmart software - missed it by that much. I think the alternative is put the fax info in another field. -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question I ran across the same issue with one of my users. Yes you can remove the contents of the Fax field and email will no longer bring up the Fax contact but this also means that you can not store fax numbers in your contacts. It seems that there should be a way to disable the feature so you can maintain fax numbers for your contacts and not be forced to choose the email contact or fax contact every time you want to send an email to that contact. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question You can delete/remove the fax field from the contact list and that would eliminate the issue. ellery -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple Outlook Question I have a client who just recently converted there email from using POP to MAPI. This user is remotely located and was using her personal email and now is using both in the same profile. She just called to say that when she types a persons name in the To: field of an email and that recipients also has a fax number allocated, that she gets to choices to send the email to. It would be a good function except for she is not using any type of fax programs from her PC. So she would like to only send email messages to email recipients not fax recipients. Is there a way to turn that feature off so that the fax recipients don't
RE: Simple Outlook Question
I ran across the same issue with one of my users. Yes you can remove the contents of the Fax field and email will no longer bring up the Fax contact but this also means that you can not store fax numbers in your contacts. It seems that there should be a way to disable the feature so you can maintain fax numbers for your contacts and not be forced to choose the email contact or fax contact every time you want to send an email to that contact. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question You can delete/remove the fax field from the contact list and that would eliminate the issue. ellery -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple Outlook Question I have a client who just recently converted there email from using POP to MAPI. This user is remotely located and was using her personal email and now is using both in the same profile. She just called to say that when she types a persons name in the To: field of an email and that recipients also has a fax number allocated, that she gets to choices to send the email to. It would be a good function except for she is not using any type of fax programs from her PC. So she would like to only send email messages to email recipients not fax recipients. Is there a way to turn that feature off so that the fax recipients don't show up when recipient names are being resolved. I think that it is stupid that it would want to list a fax number for an email message when no faxing is going to occur. Any ideas? TIA! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Simple Outlook Question
Title: RE: Simple Outlook Question I have never heard of the GetSmart software ? What does it do ? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Simple Outlook Question Unfortunately at the moment I believe it's part of MS GetSmart software - "missed it by that much". I think the alternative is put the fax info in another field. -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question I ran across the same issue with one of my users. Yes you can remove the contents of the Fax field and email will no longer bring up the Fax contact but this also means that you can not store fax numbers in your contacts. It seems that there should be a way to disable the feature so you can maintain fax numbers for your contacts and not be forced to choose the email contact or fax contact every time you want to send an email to that contact. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question You can delete/remove the fax field from the contact list and that would eliminate the issue. ellery -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple Outlook Question I have a client who just recently converted there email from using POP to MAPI. This user is remotely located and was using her personal email and now is using both in the same profile. She just called to say that when she types a persons name in the To: field of an email and that recipients also has a fax number allocated, that she gets to choices to send the email to. It would be a good function except for she is not using any type of fax programs from her PC. So she would like to only send email messages to email recipients not fax recipients. Is there a way to turn that feature off so that the fax recipients don't show up when recipient names are being resolved. I think that it is stupid that it would want to list a fax number for an email message when no faxing is going to occur. Any ideas? TIA! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Simple Outlook Question
Title: RE: Simple Outlook Question It's a joke.Get Smart, Don Adamsdang I'm old. -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Simple Outlook Question I have never heard of the GetSmart software ? What does it do ? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Simple Outlook Question Unfortunately at the moment I believe it's part of MS GetSmart software - "missed it by that much". I think the alternative is put the fax info in another field. -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question I ran across the same issue with one of my users. Yes you can remove the contents of the Fax field and email will no longer bring up the Fax contact but this also means that you can not store fax numbers in your contacts. It seems that there should be a way to disable the feature so you can maintain fax numbers for your contacts and not be forced to choose the email contact or fax contact every time you want to send an email to that contact. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question You can delete/remove the fax field from the contact list and that would eliminate the issue. ellery -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple Outlook Question I have a client who just recently converted there email from using POP to MAPI. This user is remotely located and was using her personal email and now is using both in the same profile. She just called to say that when she types a persons name in the To: field of an email and that recipients also has a fax number allocated, that she gets to choices to send the email to. It would be a good function except for she is not using any type of fax programs from her PC. So she would like to only send email messages to email recipients not fax recipients. Is there a way to turn that feature off so that the fax recipients don't show up when recipient names are being resolved. I think that it is stupid that it would want to list a fax number for an email message when no faxing is going to occur. Any ideas? TIA! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Simple Outlook Question
Ellery has it right, here is the same recommendation straight from Microsoft. If your computer does not have fax capabilities, you may want to store the fax number in a different field in the contact, such as the notes section. Here is the link if you are interested: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q242/3/76.ASP Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Outlook Question You can delete/remove the fax field from the contact list and that would eliminate the issue. ellery -Original Message- From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple Outlook Question I have a client who just recently converted there email from using POP to MAPI. This user is remotely located and was using her personal email and now is using both in the same profile. She just called to say that when she types a persons name in the To: field of an email and that recipients also has a fax number allocated, that she gets to choices to send the email to. It would be a good function except for she is not using any type of fax programs from her PC. So she would like to only send email messages to email recipients not fax recipients. Is there a way to turn that feature off so that the fax recipients don't show up when recipient names are being resolved. I think that it is stupid that it would want to list a fax number for an email message when no faxing is going to occur. Any ideas? TIA! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
