[no subject]

2006-12-05 Thread Ed Zell
Carlos,

The segments did grow somewhat since 3.4.   They can be even bigger if you
have DRDA linked in.  We do in ours to allow access from DB/2 Connect on
the Windows side. Our database machines are 32 meg in the directory.  Here
are the values that we are using for DB/2 7.4 shared segments.

ORIGIN SYSNAME  BEGPAG ENDPAG



280740RMGR  02800  02A3F  

D0 740ISQL  00D00  00D5F

C0 740SQLDS 00C00  00D7F

300740XRDS  03000  033DF




Ed Zell
(309) 674-8255 x-107
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Carlos Bodra
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 5:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: 

 

Hi!

 

We are installing DB2 V7.4 and have a -934 error during start up of server 
machine unde a z/VM 4.4 Level 0501.

What sounds strange is that if we start server without saved segment support, 
no problems occurs.

Our old data base is a SQL version 3.4, so saved segments grows a lot and we 
don´t know if this problem is because wrong definition of saved segments (using 
vmfsgmap exec)

 

Since SQL is running in production and these saved segments have original IBM 
names, we did need to rename new ones. Bellow is where we put them:

 

DB2RMGR 01400-02300

DB2ISQL   00B00-00B60

DB2SQLDS 008B0-00A2F

DB2XRDS 01400-0237F

DB2SP03 008B0-0237F  -- This is DB Space

 

Server machine has 128MB memory defined in directory.

 

Since we guess that DB2 program directory is not complete about how to 
generated saved segments, we are trying to get some help and hints from VM-L 
gurus.

 

Thanks a lot for help.

 

Carlos 

São Paulo - Brazil

 


.


CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE:  This communication, including any attachments, is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed 
and contains information which may be confidential.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, any distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, notify 
the sender immediately, delete the communication and destroy all copies. Thank 
you for your compliance.


z/VM 5.2 sl 0602, OSA/IP problem

2006-12-05 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I'm hoping that there is a fix for this, because a known fix, is easier
to fix then changing our network G.

I have two LPARs,

LPAR0, is the 390 side.
z/VM 5.1 IP address 205.235.227.74
Runs mostly VSE guests, IP address 192.168.99.xxx
OSA ports 2000 - 2005

LPAR1, is the IFL side.
z/VM 5.1 IP address is 192.168.193.3 (this is a supernet
192.168.192/22)
Runs mostly zLinux guests, IP address 192.168.193.xxx
OSA ports 2010-2015

Both LPARs are using vswitch.  

Instead of installing z/VM 5.2 in another LPAR, I installed it, second
level, under LPAR0.
VMTEST on the 390 side
z/VM 5.2 IP address 192.168.194.4  (note that this address is covered
by the supernet, but LPAR1 isn't using this Class C network).
OSA ports 2016-2018.

Note all addresses are on the same OSA card, and the same port on the
card.  If the network types are doing any routing for me, everything
should be getting to the same, physical cable.  So I'm hoping that any
routing problems can be solved on my side.

I can ping myself 192.168.194.4.
I cannot ping 192.168.194.1, 205.235.227.41, 205.235.227.74,
192.168.3.21 (my PC).
And it doesn't seem that anyone can ping me (192.168.194.4).

netstat home   
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520
   
IPv4 Home address entries: 
   
Address Subnet Mask  Link  
--- ---  --
192.168.194.4   255.255.255.0QDIO1 
   
IPv6 Home address entries: None
   
Ready; T=0.02/0.04 11:14:00
netstat gate   

VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520

   

Known IPv4 gateways:   

   

Subnet Address  Subnet Mask  FirstHopFlgs PktSz Metric Link

--  ---   - --
--   
Default none   205.235.227.41  UGS  1500  none
QDIO1
192.168.194.0   255.255.255.0directUT   1500  none
QDIO1
205.235.227.0   255.255.255.0directUS   1500  none
QDIO1
   

Known IPv6 gateways: None  

   

Ready; T=0.02/0.04 11:14:16

   

netstat dev

VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520

   

Device [EMAIL PROTECTED]Type: OSDStatus: Ready  

  Queue size: 0 CPU: 0 Address: 2016Port name:
UNASSIGNED   
  IPv4 Router Type: NonRouter  Arp Query Support: Yes  

Link QDIO1 Type: QDIOETHERNET   Net number: 0  

  BytesIn: 0   BytesOut: 308   

  Forwarding: Enabled  MTU: 1500IPv6: Disabled 

  Broadcast Capability: Yes

  Multicast Capability: Yes

  Group   Members  

  -   ---  

  224.0.0.1  1 

Ready; T=0.02/0.03 11:14:31


The config file:

;
--  
 
DEVICE [EMAIL PROTECTED]  OSD 2016  
 
LINK QDIO1 QDIOETHERNET [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MTU 1500 
 
; (End DEVICE and LINK statements) 
 
;
--  
  
;
--  
  
HOME   
 
192.168.194.4   255.255.255.000 QDIO1  
 
; (End HOME Address information)   
 
;
--  
  
GATEWAY
 
; Network   Subnet  First   Link MTU   
 

Re: z/VM 5.2 sl 0602, OSA/IP problem

2006-12-05 Thread Rich Smrcina

You say /22, but your netmask is set for /24.

Tom Duerbusch wrote:

I'm hoping that there is a fix for this, because a known fix, is easier
to fix then changing our network G.

I have two LPARs,

LPAR0, is the 390 side.
z/VM 5.1 IP address 205.235.227.74
Runs mostly VSE guests, IP address 192.168.99.xxx
OSA ports 2000 - 2005

LPAR1, is the IFL side.
z/VM 5.1 IP address is 192.168.193.3 (this is a supernet
192.168.192/22)
Runs mostly zLinux guests, IP address 192.168.193.xxx
OSA ports 2010-2015

Both LPARs are using vswitch.  


Instead of installing z/VM 5.2 in another LPAR, I installed it, second
level, under LPAR0.
VMTEST on the 390 side
z/VM 5.2 IP address 192.168.194.4  (note that this address is covered
by the supernet, but LPAR1 isn't using this Class C network).
OSA ports 2016-2018.

Note all addresses are on the same OSA card, and the same port on the
card.  If the network types are doing any routing for me, everything
should be getting to the same, physical cable.  So I'm hoping that any
routing problems can be solved on my side.

I can ping myself 192.168.194.4.
I cannot ping 192.168.194.1, 205.235.227.41, 205.235.227.74,
192.168.3.21 (my PC).
And it doesn't seem that anyone can ping me (192.168.194.4).

netstat home   
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520
   
IPv4 Home address entries: 
   
Address Subnet Mask  Link  
--- ---  --
192.168.194.4   255.255.255.0QDIO1 
   
IPv6 Home address entries: None
   
Ready; T=0.02/0.04 11:14:00
netstat gate   

VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520

   

Known IPv4 gateways:   

   

Subnet Address  Subnet Mask  FirstHopFlgs PktSz Metric Link

--  ---   - --
--   
Default none   205.235.227.41  UGS  1500  none
QDIO1
192.168.194.0   255.255.255.0directUT   1500  none
QDIO1
205.235.227.0   255.255.255.0directUS   1500  none
QDIO1
   

Known IPv6 gateways: None  

   

Ready; T=0.02/0.04 11:14:16

   

netstat dev

VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520

   

Device [EMAIL PROTECTED]Type: OSDStatus: Ready  

  Queue size: 0 CPU: 0 Address: 2016Port name:
UNASSIGNED   
  IPv4 Router Type: NonRouter  Arp Query Support: Yes  

Link QDIO1 Type: QDIOETHERNET   Net number: 0  

  BytesIn: 0   BytesOut: 308   

  Forwarding: Enabled  MTU: 1500IPv6: Disabled 

  Broadcast Capability: Yes

  Multicast Capability: Yes

  Group   Members  

  -   ---  

  224.0.0.1  1 

Ready; T=0.02/0.03 11:14:31



The config file:

;
--  
 
DEVICE [EMAIL PROTECTED]  OSD 2016  
 
LINK QDIO1 QDIOETHERNET [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MTU 1500 
 
; (End DEVICE and LINK statements) 
 
;
--  
  
;
--  
  
HOME   
 
192.168.194.4   255.255.255.000 QDIO1  
 
; (End HOME Address information)   
 
;
--  
  
GATEWAY
 

Re: z/VM 5.2 sl 0602, OSA/IP problem

2006-12-05 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Two different systems...

LPAR1 is /22.  The netmask which I didn't show is:  000.000.003.0
The netmask I did show, which is /24, is for the second level system on
LPAR0.

I took down LPAR1 last night, and brought up the second level system,
now first level.  Just to see if the supernet was getting involved and
preventing me doing what I wanted.  But I had the same problems.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/5/2006 10:53 AM 
You say /22, but your netmask is set for /24.

Tom Duerbusch wrote:
 I'm hoping that there is a fix for this, because a known fix, is
easier
 to fix then changing our network G.
 
 I have two LPARs,
 
 LPAR0, is the 390 side.
 z/VM 5.1 IP address 205.235.227.74
 Runs mostly VSE guests, IP address 192.168.99.xxx
 OSA ports 2000 - 2005
 
 LPAR1, is the IFL side.
 z/VM 5.1 IP address is 192.168.193.3 (this is a supernet
 192.168.192/22)
 Runs mostly zLinux guests, IP address 192.168.193.xxx
 OSA ports 2010-2015
 
 Both LPARs are using vswitch.  
 
 Instead of installing z/VM 5.2 in another LPAR, I installed it,
second
 level, under LPAR0.
 VMTEST on the 390 side
 z/VM 5.2 IP address 192.168.194.4  (note that this address is
covered
 by the supernet, but LPAR1 isn't using this Class C network).
 OSA ports 2016-2018.
 
 Note all addresses are on the same OSA card, and the same port on
the
 card.  If the network types are doing any routing for me, everything
 should be getting to the same, physical cable.  So I'm hoping that
any
 routing problems can be solved on my side.
 
 I can ping myself 192.168.194.4.
 I cannot ping 192.168.194.1, 205.235.227.41, 205.235.227.74,
 192.168.3.21 (my PC).
 And it doesn't seem that anyone can ping me (192.168.194.4).
 
 netstat home   
 VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520

 IPv4 Home address entries: 

 Address Subnet Mask  Link  
 --- ---  --
 192.168.194.4   255.255.255.0QDIO1 

 IPv6 Home address entries: None

 Ready; T=0.02/0.04 11:14:00
 netstat gate 
 
 
 VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520  
 
 
  
 
 
 Known IPv4 gateways: 
 
 
  
 
 
 Subnet Address  Subnet Mask  FirstHopFlgs PktSz Metric
Link
 
 --  ---   - --
 --   
 Default none   205.235.227.41  UGS  1500  none
 QDIO1
 192.168.194.0   255.255.255.0directUT   1500  none
 QDIO1
 205.235.227.0   255.255.255.0directUS   1500  none
 QDIO1
  
 
 
 Known IPv6 gateways: None
 
 
  
 
 
 Ready; T=0.02/0.04 11:14:16  
 
 
  
 
 
 netstat dev  
 
 
 VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520  
 
 
  
 
 
 Device [EMAIL PROTECTED]Type: OSDStatus: Ready
 
 
   Queue size: 0 CPU: 0 Address: 2016Port name:
 UNASSIGNED   
   IPv4 Router Type: NonRouter  Arp Query Support: Yes
 
 
 Link QDIO1 Type: QDIOETHERNET   Net number: 0
 
 
   BytesIn: 0   BytesOut: 308 
 
 
   Forwarding: Enabled  MTU: 1500IPv6: Disabled   
 
 
   Broadcast Capability: Yes  
 
 
   Multicast Capability: Yes  
 
 
   Group   Members
 
 
   -   ---
 
 
   224.0.0.1  1   
 
 
 Ready; T=0.02/0.03 11:14:31  
 
 
 
 The config file:
 
 ;

-- 

  
 DEVICE [EMAIL PROTECTED]  OSD 2016
 
  
 LINK QDIO1 QDIOETHERNET [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MTU 1500   
 
  
 ; (End DEVICE and LINK statements) 

Re: z/VM 5.2 sl 0602, OSA/IP problem

2006-12-05 Thread Miguel Delapaz
Tom,

You have one network device on your system (QDIO1 - 192.168.193.3).

Your routing table states that you have a direct connection throught that 
device to 205.235.227.0/24 which is not on your network.  So, you're not 
on the same network as the default gateway you have configured, which 
would explain why you cannot PING 205.235.227.41, 205.235.227.74 and 
192.168.3.21.  As to why you can't PING 192.168.194.1, I'm not sure, is 
that host up?  Is that host actually attached to the same network as 
QDIO1?

Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development 

Displaying PDFs

2006-12-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
I have some PDFs that have been residing on a Windows machine. These
display quite nicely from a VM web server. The PC is going to be sent to
the junk heap and not replaced. What hoops do I need to jump through to
move the PDFs to a CMS Mdisk or SFS directory? I have tried to FTP using
several different specifications and each time I am greeted with a
message telling me that the file does not begin with %PDF when I try to
display a file. 

TIA,
Richard Schuh




Re: CMSCALL return code

2006-12-05 Thread George Haddad
Looking at my  yellow card , there MAY be a reason to use LA  or L for 
certain cases.
It looks like both SR and XR set the condition code, while L and LA do 
not . So if one wanted to
preserve the CC for some reason, one could be justified in coding the L 
or LA. So take a good look

at the subsequent stmts before replacing those Load opcodes !

Schuh, Richard wrote:

IIRC, the times for SR and XR were the same on the Amdahl machines, at
least on the ones that came after the 470. They may have been the same
on the 470, as well.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:02 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CMSCALL return code

Sheesh, this goes way back to my good old Assembler diaper days when
programmers really cared about performance instead of drag and drop
solutions.
Slightly off-topic: if I remember correctly, we argued intensely about
zeroing a GPR and the performance differences between: 


- SR R15,R15
- XR R15,R15
- LA R15,0(not seriously considered by performance geeks)
- L R15,=F'0' (considered for use only by amateur programmers coming
from a BASIC or COBOL background and otherwise held in low esteem by
real programmers).  ;-)

IIRC, the actual performance difference between SR and XR was different
based more on specific processor models that anything else.

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.



  


Re: Displaying PDFs

2006-12-05 Thread McKown, John
Did you do a BINARY file transfer? I serve PDF files from z/OS with no
problems using BIN to transfer to a UNIX filesystem. Is that SFS or BFS
on CMS? I forget, sorry.
 
 

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
  

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:30 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Displaying PDFs



I have some PDFs that have been residing on a Windows machine.
These display quite nicely from a VM web server. The PC is going to be
sent to the junk heap and not replaced. What hoops do I need to jump
through to move the PDFs to a CMS Mdisk or SFS directory? I have tried
to FTP using several different specifications and each time I am greeted
with a message telling me that the file does not begin with %PDF when I
try to display a file. 

TIA, 
Richard Schuh 




Re: Displaying PDFs

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Jones

Hi, Richard.

I'm not following what the problem is hereyou state that the PDF 
files display nicely from a VM web serverdoesn't that imply that the 
PDF files are already stored on VM some place? Or is the VM web server 
getting the PDF files from the PC somehow?



DJ

Schuh, Richard wrote:

I have some PDFs that have been residing on a Windows machine. These
display quite nicely from a VM web server. The PC is going to be sent to
the junk heap and not replaced. What hoops do I need to jump through to
move the PDFs to a CMS Mdisk or SFS directory? I have tried to FTP using
several different specifications and each time I am greeted with a
message telling me that the file does not begin with %PDF when I try to
display a file. 


TIA,
Richard Schuh





Re: Displaying PDFs

2006-12-05 Thread Tom Largent
No Hoops... We do this all the time on our VM system.  FTP upload the 
PDF file in binary format to either a minidisk or SFS available to the 
webserver.  You might also have to define a file attribute on the VM Web 
Server to supply the   application/pdf   mime type.


Tom



*From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Schuh, Richard
*Sent:* Tue 12/5/2006 12:29 PM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Displaying PDFs

I have some PDFs that have been residing on a Windows machine. These 
display quite nicely from a VM web server. The PC is going to be sent to 
the junk heap and not replaced. What hoops do I need to jump through to 
move the PDFs to a CMS Mdisk or SFS directory? I have tried to FTP using 
several different specifications and each time I am greeted with a 
message telling me that the file does not begin with %PDF when I try to 
display a file.


TIA,
Richard Schuh




Re: Displaying PDFs

2006-12-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
No, they are stored elsewhere at the moment. There are links to them in
an HTML page. The point is that the files are complete and do display
from their current location. FTP to VM corrupts them in some way. If I
open the files on the PC with word, the first 4 bytes are %PDF. I have
tried using both ASCII and Binary file transfers to VM and get the same
message.  

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:02 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Displaying PDFs

Hi, Richard.

I'm not following what the problem is hereyou state that the PDF
files display nicely from a VM web serverdoesn't that imply that the
PDF files are already stored on VM some place? Or is the VM web server
getting the PDF files from the PC somehow?


DJ

Schuh, Richard wrote:
 I have some PDFs that have been residing on a Windows machine. These 
 display quite nicely from a VM web server. The PC is going to be sent 
 to the junk heap and not replaced. What hoops do I need to jump 
 through to move the PDFs to a CMS Mdisk or SFS directory? I have tried

 to FTP using several different specifications and each time I am 
 greeted with a message telling me that the file does not begin with 
 %PDF when I try to display a file.
 
 TIA,
 Richard Schuh
 
 
 


Re: z/VM 5.2 sl 0602, OSA/IP problem

2006-12-05 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Pictures and emailarrg!


|   |   |
|lpar0  |   lpar1   |
| z/VM 5.1 (390)| z/VM 5.1 (IFL)|
| cua 2000-2002 OSA | cua 2010-2012 OSA |
| 205.235.227.74 home   | 192.168.193.3 home|
| netmask 255.255.255.0 | netmask 255.255.252.0 |
| gateway 205.235.227.41| gateway 192.168.192.1 |
_
| Guest Machines (VSE)  | Guest machines zLinux |
| 192.168.99.xxx| 192.168.193.xxx   |
| using vswitch | using vswitch |
_
| VMTEST z/VM 5.2   |
| cua 2016-2018 |
| 192.168.194.4 home|
| netmask 255.255.255.0 |
| gateway 192.168.194.1 |
_
  

On the VMTEST system, I don't care what IP address it is.  Nor do I
care about the netmask or gateway.  I was attempting to use some of the
unused addresses in my supernet.

A little history.  When the z/890 was being installed, I asked the
network guys for 4 ranges of addresses.  
1 set for the IFL side
1 set for the internal lan on the z/890 (between the laptops and Win/XP
remote service console)
1 set for our new DS6800 (between the laptops and the Win/XP remote
service console)
1 set for the 390 side (for use while we had our 205.235.227.74 network
on the MP3000, I needed another set on the z/890 390 side for parallel
testing)

Instead of 4 separate networks that didn't interfer with each other,
they gave me 4 class C networks bundled together as a supernet.  I sure
didn't need 1000+ IP addresses, but they gave them to me and they
worked.So far.  I didn't use any of them for the z/890 or for the
DS6800.  By time they configured the supernet, I had some other
addresses for these boxes.

Now, for the first time, I'm trying to use some of these extra ip
addresses.  I thought that the IFL side, that has the supernet, might be
intefering with my other use of some addresses in the VMTEST machine. 


But I took down LPAR1 with the supernet and brought up VMTEST as a
first level system in LPAR1.  I still couldn't connect.  So this implies
to me that I don't have a problem, yet, with the supernet stuff.

OK I see what you mean about the defaultnet.  I changed my statements
to:

HOME   
 
192.168.194.4   255.255.255.000 QDIO1  
 
; (End HOME Address information)   
 
;
--  
  
|...+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+..
GATEWAY
 
; Network   Subnet  First   Link MTU   
 
; Address   MaskHop Name Size  
 
; - --- ---  - 
 
205.235.227 255.255.255.0   =   QDIO11500  
 
DEFAULTNET  192.168.194.1   QDIO11500  
 
; DEFAULTNET  205.235.227.41  QDIO11500
 
; (End GATEWAY Static Routing information) 
 
;
--  
  

It didn't seem to make any change
netstat gate   
 
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520
 
   
 
Known IPv4 gateways:   
 
   
 
Subnet Address  Subnet Mask  FirstHopFlgs PktSz Metric Link
 
--  ---   - --
--
Default none   192.168.194.1   UGS  1500  none
QDIO1 
192.168.194.0   255.255.255.0directUT   1500  none
QDIO1 
205.235.227.0   255.255.255.0directUS   1500  none
QDIO1 
   
 
Known IPv6 gateways: None  
 
   
 
Ready; T=0.02/0.03 13:40:21
 
ping 192.168.194.1 
 
Ping Level 520: Pinging host 

Re: Displaying PDFs

2006-12-05 Thread Peter . Webb
With CA VM:Webserve, you have to not only transfer the file in binary,
but specify no translate on display.

vmwebsrv query attributes pdf

Attribute Name  Characteristics

--

PDF STATIC SSI NO TRANSLATE NONE CONTENT-TYPE
application/pdf   
... BFSLINEND NONE SYSTEM NO ICONURL

... /VM:Webgateway/Images/ICONDOC.GIF

Ready;


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: December 5, 2006 13:20
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Displaying PDFs

No, they are stored elsewhere at the moment. There are links to them in
an HTML page. The point is that the files are complete and do display
from their current location. FTP to VM corrupts them in some way. If I
open the files on the PC with word, the first 4 bytes are %PDF. I have
tried using both ASCII and Binary file transfers to VM and get the same
message.  

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:02 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Displaying PDFs

Hi, Richard.

I'm not following what the problem is hereyou state that the PDF
files display nicely from a VM web serverdoesn't that imply that the
PDF files are already stored on VM some place? Or is the VM web server
getting the PDF files from the PC somehow?


DJ

Schuh, Richard wrote:
 I have some PDFs that have been residing on a Windows machine. These 
 display quite nicely from a VM web server. The PC is going to be sent 
 to the junk heap and not replaced. What hoops do I need to jump 
 through to move the PDFs to a CMS Mdisk or SFS directory? I have tried

 to FTP using several different specifications and each time I am 
 greeted with a message telling me that the file does not begin with 
 %PDF when I try to display a file.
 
 TIA,
 Richard Schuh
 
 
 


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any 
review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited.  If you received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  The 
integrity and security of this message cannot by guaranteed on the Internet.  
The Sender accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on basis of the information provided.  The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses.  The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this e-mail.  This disclaimer is the property of the TTC and 
must not be altered or circumvented in any manner.


IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Jones
IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015
50


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
Dave, 

The URL is Non-working, even if resolve the issue of it being split
into 2 pieces.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:34 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: IBM sues PSI

IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
50


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Ray Mansell

Schuh, Richard wrote:
Dave, 


The URL is Non-working, even if resolve the issue of it being split
into 2 pieces. 	  

  

Hmmm... it worked for me, and it wasn't split, either

Ray Mansell


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Wakser, David
Funny, it worked for me!

David Wakser 

-Original Message-
From: Schuh, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:40 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Dave, 

The URL is Non-working, even if resolve the issue of it being split
into 2 pieces.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may
contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or
Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the regulations under
the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act of 1996. If it is not
clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank
you. 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Marty Zimelis
Hi Dave,
   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.  (One
assumes you meant patent infringement.)

   Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either.  And
yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together doesn't
yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work could send
the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

Marty 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:34 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 
 http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
 50
 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Daniel P. Martin

Dear colleagues:

Please try this alternate URL:

  *http://tinyurl.com/ynfpxo*

-dan.

Marty Zimelis wrote:

Hi Dave,
   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.  (One
assumes you meant patent infringement.)

   Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either.  And
yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together doesn't
yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work could send
the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

	Marty 

  

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones

Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: IBM sues PSI

IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
50




Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Peter . Webb
As requested: ?articleID=196601550

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marty Zimelis
Sent: December 5, 2006 14:48
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Hi Dave,
   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.
(One
assumes you meant patent infringement.)

   Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either.
And
yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together
doesn't
yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work could
send
the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

Marty 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:34 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
 50
 


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any 
review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited.  If you received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  The 
integrity and security of this message cannot by guaranteed on the Internet.  
The Sender accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on basis of the information provided.  The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses.  The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this e-mail.  This disclaimer is the property of the TTC and 
must not be altered or circumvented in any manner.


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Wakser, David
Last part is: articleID=196601 

-Original Message-
From: Marty Zimelis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:48 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Hi Dave,
   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.  (One
assumes you meant patent infringement.)

   Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either.  And
yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together doesn't
yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work could send
the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

Marty 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:34 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 
 http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196601
 5=
 50
 
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may
contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or
Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the regulations under
the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act of 1996. If it is not
clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank
you. 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Miguel Delapaz
 
Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either. 
And
 yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together 
doesn't
 yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work could 
send
 the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

articleID=196601550

Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development 

Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
 

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marty Zimelis
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Hi Dave,
   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.
(One assumes you meant patent infringement.)

   Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either.
And yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together
doesn't yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work
could send the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

Marty 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:34 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 
 http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196601
 5=
 50
 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
You need to remove the final = on the first line before pasting. 

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=19660155
0 

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marty Zimelis
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Hi Dave,
   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.
(One assumes you meant patent infringement.)

   Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either.
And yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together
doesn't yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work
could send the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

Marty 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:34 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 
 http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196601
 5=
 50
 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread william JANULIN
Worked for me, also
--- Wakser, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Funny, it worked for me!
 
 David Wakser 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Schuh, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:40 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI
 
 Dave, 
 
 The URL is Non-working, even if resolve the issue
 of it being split
 into 2 pieces.  
 Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any
 attachment to it, may
 contain material that is confidential, proprietary,
 privileged and/or
 Protected Health Information, within the meaning
 of the regulations under
 the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability
 Act of 1996. If it is not
 clear that you are the intended recipient, you are
 hereby notified that you
 have received this transmittal in error, and any
 review, dissemination,
 distribution or copying of this e-mail, including
 any attachment to it, is
 strictly prohibited. If you have received this
 e-mail in error, please
 immediately return it to the sender and delete it
 from your system. Thank
 you. 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Edward M. Martin
Very Interesting article.   Sounds like the Hercules War is still
going on.

Ed Martin 
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ext. 40441

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:34 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
 50


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward M. Martin
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:04 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI
 
 
 Very Interesting article.   Sounds like the Hercules War is still
 going on.
 
 Ed Martin 

But Hercules is definitely targeted to hobbyists. PSI is attempting to
target businesses. That is likely (IMO) why IBM does not sue any of the
Hercules developers. Although I guess that they could. I hope not
because I use Hercules to learn Linux on zSeries. 

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Jones

I guess it time for me to go get my eyes checked:-)

Of course, I meant to type patent instead of patient, I just missed 
that pesky i in the middle.



Sorry about the split url, too.

I don't think that this will have much of an impact on the z/VM 
community as, to the best of my knowledge, PSI never offered to support 
z/VM on it's Intel platform.


A couple of months ago, IBM let the patent agreement with FSI (the 
Flex-ES folks) expireand now IBM is suing PSI. Perhaps this is all 
laying the groundwork by IBM to introduce a small development/business 
type zSeries system in the near future..and this is pure 
speculation on my part.


DJ
Marty Zimelis wrote:

Hi Dave,
   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.  (One
assumes you meant patent infringement.)

   Second, I'm with Richard Schuh.  I can't get the URL to work either.  And
yes, I noticed that it wrapped.  Even pasting the two bits together doesn't
yield a working URL for me.  Perhaps someone who got it to work could send
the last part (starting with ArticleID=).

	Marty 




-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones

Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: IBM sues PSI

IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
50



Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Dodds, Jim
I cannot get it to work either. Here is the link I used:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward M. Martin
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Very Interesting article.   Sounds like the Hercules War is still
going on.

Ed Martin 
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ext. 40441

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:34 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
 50


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Loren Charnley, Jr.
All you need to do is to go www.informationweek.com and the article is
listed on the first page.

Loren Charnley
IT Systems Engineer
Family Dollar Stores, Inc
(704) 847-6961 Ext. 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Dodds, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

I cannot get it to work either. Here is the link I used:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward M. Martin
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Very Interesting article.   Sounds like the Hercules War is still
going on.

Ed Martin 
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ext. 40441

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:34 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
 50

-
 NOTE:
This e-mail message contains PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
information and is intended only for the use of the specific
individual or individuals to which it is addressed. If you are not
an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that
any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this e-mail or
the information contained herein or attached hereto is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, notify the person
named above by reply e-mail and please delete it. Thank you.


Re: REXX Primer

2006-12-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
The second of the links looks promising as one of the choices is to
download HTML second choice); however, when that is selected, the
resulting file is of filetype BOO - boo hoo, sob



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zoltan Balogh
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Primer




On 12/5/06, Zoltan Balogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

i know this is not in pdf format, but maybe this is what you
need:

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/DMSG8A01/CCONTENTS?
DT=19921218093737


or maybe this page has a bit more possibility:
http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?CTY=USFNC
=SRXPBL=SC24-5598-01 




On 12/4/06, Schuh, Richard  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

Does anyone have the subject book in PDF format? 

Thanks, 
Richard Schuh 






Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread David Boyes
First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.

Obligatory historical footnote: IBM *did* build lab blood chemistry and
other biomedical equipment starting in 1972 (cf. the 2991 Blood Cell
Processor). Equipment manufacturing and repair ended in 1984 with the
sale of the biomedical business to COBE Laboratories, Inc. 

 (One assumes you meant patent infringement.)

Indeed. 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Julian Wall

They also made copying machines too,1971 time frame. .

Julian Wall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
601-479-7460



David Boyes wrote:

   First, I don't think IBM is branching out into the healthcare area.



Obligatory historical footnote: IBM *did* build lab blood chemistry and
other biomedical equipment starting in 1972 (cf. the 2991 Blood Cell
Processor). Equipment manufacturing and repair ended in 1984 with the
sale of the biomedical business to COBE Laboratories, Inc. 

  

(One assumes you meant patent infringement.)



Indeed. 



  


Re: REXX Primer

2006-12-05 Thread Zoltan Balogh

you need a reader for filetype boo, or you have to get html pages manually.
I prefer to use wget (if you are under windows then wget for windows):

wget -k -rmnp --user-agent=Mozilla
http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/dmsg8a01/

but i started it for you now, so maybe it will be done until tomorrow
morning. Then ill post you the url where you can find it for a time you
download it.

On 12/5/06, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 The second of the links looks promising as one of the choices is to
download HTML second choice); however, when that is selected, the resulting
file is of filetype BOO - boo hoo, sob

 --
*From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Zoltan Balogh
*Sent:* Monday, December 04, 2006 9:12 PM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: REXX Primer



On 12/5/06, Zoltan Balogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 i know this is not in pdf format, but maybe this is what you need:

 
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/DMSG8A01/CCONTENTS?DT=19921218093737


or maybe this page has a bit more possibility:

http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?CTY=USFNC=SRXPBL=SC24-5598-01

 On 12/4/06, Schuh, Richard  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Does anyone have the subject book in PDF format?
 
  Thanks,
  Richard Schuh
 
 




Re: REXX Primer

2006-12-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
Thanks for all of the effort. It really is appreciated.
 
And yes, windows is the official platform for desktops and laptops at
the office..



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zoltan Balogh
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:30 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Primer


you need a reader for filetype boo, or you have to get html pages
manually. 
I prefer to use wget (if you are under windows then wget for windows):

wget -k -rmnp --user-agent=Mozilla
http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/dmsg8a01/

but i started it for you now, so maybe it will be done until tomorrow
morning. Then ill post you the url where you can find it for a time you
download it.


On 12/5/06, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

The second of the links looks promising as one of the choices is
to download HTML second choice); however, when that is selected, the
resulting file is of filetype BOO - boo hoo, sob



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Balogh
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Primer





On 12/5/06, Zoltan Balogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

i know this is not in pdf format, but maybe this is what
you need:

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/DMSG8A01/CCONTENTS?
DT=19921218093737


or maybe this page has a bit more possibility:

http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?CTY=USFNC
=SRXPBL=SC24-5598-01 




On 12/4/06, Schuh, Richard  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

Does anyone have the subject book in PDF format?


Thanks, 
Richard Schuh 







IBM SUES PSI LINK

2006-12-05 Thread Jeff Kennedy
 
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=19660155
0
Jeffry A. Kennedy
Certco,Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread P. Raulerson
I don't think they will ever target Hercules, even if someone puts out a
commercial product with it. Does anyone know what PSI is using under the
covers? A horrid thought just occurred to me that it might BE Hercules. 

-Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of McKown, John
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:08 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI
 
  -Original Message-
  From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward M. Martin
  Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:04 PM
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
  Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI
 
 
  Very Interesting article.   Sounds like the Hercules War is still
  going on.
 
  Ed Martin
 
 But Hercules is definitely targeted to hobbyists. PSI is attempting to
 target businesses. That is likely (IMO) why IBM does not sue any of the
 Hercules developers. Although I guess that they could. I hope not
 because I use Hercules to learn Linux on zSeries.
 
 --
 John McKown
 Senior Systems Programmer
 HealthMarkets
 Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
 Administrative Services Group
 Information Technology
 
 This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
 information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
 content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
 should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
 copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
 based on it, is strictly prohibited.
 


Re: REXX Primer

2006-12-05 Thread Zoltan Balogh

you find the book here:
http://hok.duf.hu/~zolo/down/publibfp.boulder.ibm.com.tar.gz

You can unpack it with winrar, winzip or simply with TotalCommander.
Just unpack it, and start for example:
publibfp.boulder.ibm.com\cgi-bin\bookmgr\BOOKS\dmsg8a01\CCONTENTS.html

All link is working without internet except search or 1-2 special button on
the top.

plz send a short reply to me or to the list if i can delete it.



PS1: Finally the best way was: wget  -E -k -rmnp --user-agent=Mozilla
   (if you want to try things later by yourself)

PS2: wget for windows is a simple program without install, but it usually
knows more then complete programs in this topics