Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Chris C.
On Sunday 15 April 2007 22:30, Stuart Henderson wrote:
 On 2007/04/15 20:27, Chris C. wrote:
  I'm in the need to replace my two 100mbit fxp nic's in my firewall with a
  1000mbit one. The hardware is kinda old. (PIII)
  I'm looking for an inexpensive but not bad (so I think no realtek chips)
  nic. Have looked at sk and bge, but couldn't find any bge nics at my
  local vendors. So... which driver to go? sk? em?

 Modern Realtek re(4) are not really a problem, they do IPv4 TCP
 checksum offload, HW vlan tagging, and are a better design than the
 rl(4). They only handle jumbo frames up to 7.5k, but if jumbo
 support was a big issue you'd probably have mentioned it already
 (and even 2k would cover many of the reasons you'd want jumbos).

 I'd still go for the sk(4) if they were the same price - this is
 fairly possible, unlike em(4) which will almost certainly cost more
 than re(4) - but don't worry about it, pretty much anything you
 pick up is likely to work fine.

Thanks, will go and get some sk's.

Greetings
Chris



ne3 interface funny behaviour

2007-04-16 Thread Manuel Ravasio
Hello list.
I'm setting up an old Toshiba laptop as a firewall, DNS forwarder, DHCP
server and wireless access point using OpenBSd 4.0 i386.

I have 3 network interfaces:
- unknown-brand USB 10/100 interface, available as axe0, working perfectly
- Netgear PCMCIA wireless interface, available as ath0, working perfectly
- unknown-brand PCMCIA 10/100, available as ne3, *almost* working

My idea is to use axe0 as external interface (the laptop has no USB2 support,
so it will never make high transfer speed anyway), ne3 as internal cabled
interface, and ath0 as internal wireless access point.

Everything is working perfectly so far except by ne3: the card is recognized,
it gets its IP address correctly during boot, but apparently there is no link
to the switch. The connection leds on card's dongle light up, but the
switch's port corresponding led doesn't, and I can't ping any other box on
the network.
Cable and switch port are OK, I have tested with another card; ping is
successfull ,too.
I also tried to fix card's speed and duplex (to 100full) adding corresponding
entries to hostname.ne3, alas to no avail.
Unfortunately, I cannot use the ok card used for tests because it is a
thick one, with no dongle, and it make the laptop's second PCMCIA slot
unavailable for wireless card.

Has someone had similar experiences?
Can someone give me a hint about what's happening?

Thank you in advance,
bye,
Manuel
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Recommend Technical Networking Book?

2007-04-16 Thread Clint Pachl

Hi all,

Can anyone recommend a technical networking book (or links) regarding 
design, architecture, implementation, monitoring, and best practices? I 
just purchased a Dell 3248 managed switch, 10 IBM 1U servers, and 10 
towers. I would like to practice setting things up on this hardware. I 
have just discovered VLANs (tagged/untagged) and configured a few on the 
switch. Some other topics of interest are Spanning Tree, OSPF, BGP, 
Multicasting, and redundancy (link aggregation, trunking, CARP, etc.).


I own The Practice of System and Network Administration, which is an 
excellent book, but does not get technical. Perhaps something to 
compliment this title?


Can anyone comment on these titles that I'm thinking about getting 
(good/bad)?


The Switch Book: The Complete Guide to LAN Switching Technology 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471345865/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=IRD9JNS6W69MPcolid=1B2FORVUWNNME, 
by Rich Seifert 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471345865/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=IRD9JNS6W69MPcolid=1B2FORVUWNNME


Network Analysis, Architecture, and Design, 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0123704804/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=I1VQRIWRA7ZKKCcolid=1B2FORVUWNNME 
by James D. McCabe 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0123704804/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=I1VQRIWRA7ZKKCcolid=1B2FORVUWNNME


The Tao of Network Security Monitoring: Beyond Intrusion Detection, 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0321246772/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=IHNHJ98G36HX1colid=1B2FORVUWNNME 
by Richard Bejtlich 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0321246772/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=IHNHJ98G36HX1colid=1B2FORVUWNNME


Designing Large Scale LANs, 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596001509/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=I2606QCO9PP08Lcolid=1B2FORVUWNNME 
by Kevin Dooley 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596001509/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=I2606QCO9PP08Lcolid=1B2FORVUWNNME


_Top-Down Network Design (2nd Edition) (Networking Technology) 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1587051524/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=I2DTYHO3KFFU71colid=1B2FORVUWNNME, 
by Priscilla _Oppenheimer


Principles of Network and System Administration 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470868074/ref=wl_it_dp/103-5124063-8263036?ie=UTF8coliid=I3ISYDRDLITCOGcolid=1B2FORVUWNNME, 
by Mark Burgess



-pachl*
*



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Ronnie Garcia

Chris C. a icrit :
I'm in the need to replace my two 100mbit fxp nic's in my firewall with a 
1000mbit one. The hardware is kinda old. (PIII)

I'm looking for an inexpensive but not bad (so I think no realtek chips) nic.
Have looked at sk and bge, but couldn't find any bge nics at my local vendors. 
So... which driver to go? sk? em?


Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF anabled) ?
I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300 lines pf.conf

--
Ronnie Garcia r.garcia at ovea dot com



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Clint Pachl

Ronnie Garcia wrote:

Chris C. a icrit :
I'm in the need to replace my two 100mbit fxp nic's in my firewall 
with a 1000mbit one. The hardware is kinda old. (PIII)
I'm looking for an inexpensive but not bad (so I think no realtek 
chips) nic.
Have looked at sk and bge, but couldn't find any bge nics at my local 
vendors. So... which driver to go? sk? em?


Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF 
anabled) ?
I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300 lines 
pf.conf
What is your packets/sec when your pushing 40Mbs? Does the traffic flow 
in one em and out the other or is the dual em in a trunk (i.e. 2Gbs)?


-pachl



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Chris C.
On Monday 16 April 2007 10:27, Ronnie Garcia wrote:
 Chris C. a icrit :
  I'm in the need to replace my two 100mbit fxp nic's in my firewall with a
  1000mbit one. The hardware is kinda old. (PIII)
  I'm looking for an inexpensive but not bad (so I think no realtek chips)
  nic. Have looked at sk and bge, but couldn't find any bge nics at my
  local vendors. So... which driver to go? sk? em?

 Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF anabled)
 ? I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300 lines
 pf.conf

I am doing ~190mbit throughput with my current nics (PIII 1000MHz, CPU is at 
20% idle) with pf disabled, but I usually only have large nfs or ftp packets 
and some http and ssh traffic.

Greetings
Chris



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Ronnie Garcia

Clint Pachl a icrit :

Ronnie Garcia wrote:

Chris C. a icrit :
I'm in the need to replace my two 100mbit fxp nic's in my firewall 
with a 1000mbit one. The hardware is kinda old. (PIII)
I'm looking for an inexpensive but not bad (so I think no realtek 
chips) nic.
Have looked at sk and bge, but couldn't find any bge nics at my local 
vendors. So... which driver to go? sk? em?


Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF 
anabled) ?
I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300 lines 
pf.conf
What is your packets/sec when your pushing 40Mbs? Does the traffic flow 
in one em and out the other or is the dual em in a trunk (i.e. 2Gbs)?


Traffic gets in one em, is filtered by pf, and gets out from the other 
em (and the other way around).
Its doing 11kpps in and 6kpps out of each em, plus 7kpps on the pfsync 
interface, which is a sis


--
Ronnie Garcia r.garcia at ovea dot com



Re: Binary kernel and base update

2007-04-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/04/15 03:41, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 (As an aside, how often do you update your -current systems

varies; main desktop/laptop and any boxes I use when I'm working
on anything to do with ports, fairly often.

other machines - generally when there's a fix that I want or when
there's something particular to test.

 and do you run -current on production servers?)

sometimes. I've probably got more production routers than
servers running OpenBSD, almost all of the routers run varying
degrees of -current.



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Craig Skinner
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 12:03:10PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
  
  That was the primary reason for using postfix with dovecot. Years  
  back, I tried to get both sendmail and postfix working with SMTP AUTH  
  and Cyrus as I recall. It was a mess. The super-easy integration of  
  postfix and dovecot for SMTP AUTH is a welcome change.
 
 I think the main trick is in writing scripts that generate all databases
 from a single main file. This is fairly easy using perl, awk, 
 
 Of course, this becomes a hundred times more difficult the moment user
 administration is not done centrally.
 


At an ISP that I worked for, all user config data was held in postgres.
When fields were changed, new flat files were generated (passwd,
shell.allow, ftpusers, apache, quota, etc, etc). The files were then
scp'd to the various server farms from the postgres box.

Having the mail daemons use SQL for auth was too slow.

Customers and support staff had web interfaces to postgres for config of
services.



Re: ne3 interface funny behaviour

2007-04-16 Thread Manuel Ravasio
Problem solved.

The card is faulty: it doesn't work on other systems either.
It *apparently* works, it gets recognized, it can be assigned an IP address,
connection led lights up, but no actual connection is available.

A close look to the card-dongle connector shows a little damage to the
plastics, less than 1mm wide, actually, but maybe large enough to create
extra-currents or so.

So, I'm looking for a new card.
Any suggestions for makes/models known to work with OpenBSD?

Thank you all,
Manuel


--- Kamil Monticolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 snip
 
 Does ne3 works good on other system? Maybe card is bad? Did you try to swap
 pcmia cards over the slots?
 birkoff
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Re: host to host ipsec link

2007-04-16 Thread Markus Wernig
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:

 Currently the order in which isakmpd, ipsecctl and sasyncd need to be
 invoked in order for everything to work is pretty rigid. 
 
 # isakmpd -KS   
 # ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf
 # sasyncd 
 
 First start isakmpd with -KS, this brings up isakmpd in passive mode, 
 isakmpd won't initiate any IKE traffic until an sasyncd process sets
 isakmpd to active mode through the fifo, you can do this by hand by
 issuing M active into the fifo with echo. Don't forget to load your rules 
 before you issue this command. 
 
 If you are not going to use sasyncd, don't use -S.
 

Hi  thx for the insight. I now realize that the problem is caused by
sasyncd not starting. It terminates immediately with the message
config: syntax error. Unfortunately it's not a syntax error in the
sasyncd.conf file, but the error really seems to stem from the program
config that seems to get called in the process of invoking sasyncd ...
between stat-ing the config file and parsing it, as I would suppose,
because sasyncd will not complain about real, intentional syntax errors
in the file or an empty file, but will bail out on wrong file permissions.

I have copied over sasyncd.conf from a working installation and changed
the sharedkey and peer parameters. But config: syntax error hits me even
if I empty the file (which should produce errors about missing
sharedkeys and the like)

Just to go sure, here's the file:

# cat /etc/sasyncd.conf
interface carp1
flushmode sync
listen on xl0 port 5000
sharedkey [32byte RSA key]
peer 10.111.1.2

Plus, syntax error does not appear in the sasyncd binary with strings
or source code.

Sorry again if I'm missing something obvious.
/markus



Re: Recommendation for a UPS

2007-04-16 Thread bofh
On 4/15/07, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Or, find an old ups with a serial port, make sure it's on the nut
 list, then buy replacement batteries at batteriesplus for ~$25 each.


Oops, sent to Chris when I mean to send to misc :)



Re: host to host ipsec link

2007-04-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/04/16 15:06, Markus Wernig wrote:
...

the error message does come from sasyncd.

 sharedkey [32byte RSA key]

the other config lines are ok, the error must be here.

 Plus, syntax error does not appear in the sasyncd binary with strings
 or source code.

it's in the file produced by yacc(1)



Re: CARP access outside a subnet

2007-04-16 Thread Markus Wernig
Hi

I'm not sure about carp supporting addresses in other subnets than the
physical one. But to debug this further:
- what does tcpdump -e -n -i xennet1 show on the routers when you ping
the virtual interface from outside the lan?
- is the route for the egress path the same as for the ingress path
(i.e. does the route back to the accessing device point out over the
same interface (xennet1) that the packets come in on)?
- maybe your next hop router does not receive the virtual mac address.
check the arp table on the next hop router.
- what is the error message when pinging from the outside and who
generates it?

krgds /markus

david l goodrich wrote:
 I'm sorry to bring this up again, since it didn't get any responses the
 first time.
 
 But I haven't had any luck on my own, and was hoping someone might have an
 idea.
 
 
 On 4/9/07, david l goodrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have two hosts in a CARP group.

 on router-meus-cd1, i have the following network configuration:

 router-meus-cd1# ifconfig xennet1
 xennet1:
 flags=8963UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu
 1500
 capabilities=2800TCP4CSUM_Tx,UDP4CSUM_Tx
 enabled=0
 address: 00:16:3e:71:ef:6f
 inet 10.10.10.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.10.10.255
 inet6 fe80::216:3eff:fe71:ef6f%xennet1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
 router-meus-cd1# ifconfig carp216
 carp216: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 carp: MASTER carpdev xennet1 vhid 216 advbase 1 advskew 0
 address: 00:00:5e:00:01:d8
 inet 216.51.247.30 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast 216.51.247.31
 router-meus-cd1#

 on router-meus-cn1, i have a similar configuration:

 router-meus-cn1# ifconfig xennet1
 xennet1:
 flags=8963UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu
 1500
 capabilities=2800TCP4CSUM_Tx,UDP4CSUM_Tx
 enabled=0
 address: 00:16:3e:04:d3:e0
 inet 10.10.10.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.10.10.255
 inet6 fe80::216:3eff:fe04:d3e0%xennet1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
 router-meus-cn1# ifconfig carp216
 carp216: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 carp: BACKUP carpdev xennet1 vhid 216 advbase 1 advskew 
 0216.51.247.30

 address: 00:00:5e:00:01:d8
 inet 216.51.247.30 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast 216.51.247.31
 router-meus-cn1#


 The default route, nameservers, etc are all set correctly.

 CARP works great on the 216.51.247.24/29 subnet, from any machine on that
 subnet I can ping 216.51.247.30.

 When I get outside the subnet, I can't ping the address or ssh to it.

 Does anyone have some insight into why this is happening?

 Thanks
   --david



Re: Recommendation for a UPS

2007-04-16 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 03:45:35PM -0400, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
 What are your power requirements? Just a single server? How big of a
 system are we talking about? ...mainframe, onyx, or a single opteron?
 
 
 Regards,
 ~Jason
 
 
 My power requirements are very small.  The server is running an Athlon
 xp 2000+ with 2 HDDs in raid 1 (no screen).  And that's the only thing
 that will be attached to the UPS.

  i got an APC 'Smart-UPS 2200 RM' offa ebay for like $500 after shipping,
  new battery.

  got ahold of a serial cable for it, and am using nut to watch
  the status just fine.

  on-battery-oh-crap powerdowns work dandy for it and the machines and
  random things that're hooked to it.

  last i remember i'm sucking about 350-400 W [1] at any given time off the
  UPS, and it lasts about 25-35 minutes after a power off situation, with
  everything staying powered on.

  if i drop everything except for the VIA and its dsl modem, it lasts a
  hell of a lot longer ( i think i saw it last just about 2h or so the
  one time i did that )

[1] {
hp netserver ld pro (old ppro, 3 SCSI HD)
2x soekris 4801
soekris 4501
via 310-dp board+case
apc masterswitch 9210
xyplex console server
16 port ethernet switch
16 port kvm
2x dsl modems
}

-- 

  jared



Re: host to host ipsec link

2007-04-16 Thread Markus Wernig
Stuart Henderson wrote:
 On 2007/04/16 15:06, Markus Wernig wrote:
 ...
 
 the error message does come from sasyncd.
 
 sharedkey [32byte RSA key]
 
 the other config lines are ok, the error must be here.
 

aarrgg ... and indeed it was. I had produced that
string with # openssl rand 32 | perl -pe 's/./unpack(H1,$)/ges' - as
I always do - but must have botched something on the way ... thx
/m



Re: ne3 interface funny behaviour

2007-04-16 Thread Daniel Melameth
Manuel Ravasio wrote:
 Problem solved.
 
 The card is faulty: it doesn't work on other systems either.
 It *apparently* works, it gets recognized, it can be assigned an IP
 address, connection led lights up, but no actual connection is 
 available.
 
 A close look to the card-dongle connector shows a little damage to
 the plastics, less than 1mm wide, actually, but maybe large enough
 to create extra-currents or so.
 
 So, I'm looking for a new card.
 Any suggestions for makes/models known to work with OpenBSD?

I'm doing something similar and have had much success with fxp --
specifically an Intel PRO/100 Cardbus card.  Prior to using fxp I was using
xl, but I can push far more traffic through the system using fxp.



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:17 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:


* Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-16 07:44]:

The CS20 does seem to be a pretty nice machine. I noticed that there
is one obvious CS20 in the newrack.jpg picture. Is power consumption
pretty high on these?


haven't measured... shouldn't be worse than a dual xeon or the like


Good to know. Thanks.

Bryan



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:58 AM, Ronnie Garcia wrote:


Clint Pachl a icrit :

Ronnie Garcia wrote:
Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF  
anabled) ?
I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300  
lines pf.conf
What is your packets/sec when your pushing 40Mbs? Does the traffic  
flow in one em and out the other or is the dual em in a trunk  
(i.e. 2Gbs)?


Traffic gets in one em, is filtered by pf, and gets out from the  
other em (and the other way around).
Its doing 11kpps in and 6kpps out of each em, plus 7kpps on the  
pfsync interface, which is a sis


This brings up a question I have had for a while. Does pfsync  
generate enough traffic that running gigabit cards for your $ext_if  
and $int_if and a 100base-TX card for your pfsync interface cause a  
major bottleneck?


Bryan



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:


On 2007/04/15 14:06, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:

My staff needs to be able to add accounts easily and unfortunately,
the command line is not that easy for them.


BSD auth, ldap, sql, text files - take your pick... There's also
dovecot-sieve if you need server-side filtering.

One thing to note if you use milters, Postfix milter support is not
based on libmilter; building milter apps on a box with Sendmail 8.14
installed will result in breakage when run against Postfix until
Postfix milter support is updated unless you take extra care.


Thanks for the heads up on that. I was not aware of that potential  
issue.


Bryan



Re: Binary kernel and base update

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:


On 2007/04/15 03:41, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:

(As an aside, how often do you update your -current systems


varies; main desktop/laptop and any boxes I use when I'm working
on anything to do with ports, fairly often.

other machines - generally when there's a fix that I want or when
there's something particular to test.


OK. Thanks for the info.


and do you run -current on production servers?)


sometimes. I've probably got more production routers than
servers running OpenBSD, almost all of the routers run varying
degrees of -current.


My DNS servers are running older versions of current that I need to  
update. I am always a little concerned that I am going to run into a  
show-stopping bug that would cause downtime for an important server  
such as a mail server. That's why there is -release and -stable I  
suppose. The biggest reason I see personally for running -current is  
to get access to newer ports.


Bryan



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Ronnie Garcia

Bryan Vyhmeister a icrit :

On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:58 AM, Ronnie Garcia wrote:


Clint Pachl a icrit :

Ronnie Garcia wrote:
Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF 
anabled) ?
I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300 lines 
pf.conf
What is your packets/sec when your pushing 40Mbs? Does the traffic 
flow in one em and out the other or is the dual em in a trunk (i.e. 
2Gbs)?


Traffic gets in one em, is filtered by pf, and gets out from the other 
em (and the other way around).
Its doing 11kpps in and 6kpps out of each em, plus 7kpps on the pfsync 
interface, which is a sis


This brings up a question I have had for a while. Does pfsync generate 
enough traffic that running gigabit cards for your $ext_if and $int_if 
and a 100base-TX card for your pfsync interface cause a major bottleneck?


It depends on the rate of the states changes.
Here, we have ~30mbits on pfsync, for ~40mbits of traffic (!)

--
Ronnie Garcia r.garcia at ovea dot com



openbgp not exporing ipv6 to routing tables

2007-04-16 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi,

I have configured openbgpd on openbsd 4.0 (upgraded from 3.8) and there
seems to be problem with IPv6.  I have tried google and irc, but without
success.

I am receiving IPv6 prefixes just fine (791 from upstream transit, 140
from local IX), but they are not exported to kernel routing tables.

Neighbor ASMsgRcvdMsgSentOutQ  Up/Down  State/PrefixRcvd
[...]
DE-CIX-IPv6-R26695   4609   4356 0 3d00h33m140
DE-CIX-IPv6-R16695   4749   4355 0 2d19h24m140
DE-CIX-IPv6-UP2   6695  12041   4356 0 3d00h33m791
DE-CIX-IPv6-UP1   6695  12035   4356 0 3d00h33m791

# route -n show -inet6
Routing tables

Internet6:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs 
 UseMtu  Interface
::/104 ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
::/96  ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
::1::1UH 12 
   0  33192   lo0
::127.0.0.0/104::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
::224.0.0.0/100::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
::255.0.0.0/104::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
:::0.0.0.0/96  ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
2001:678:1::/642001:678:1::1  U   0 
   0  -   lo1
2001:678:1::1  link#7 UHL 0 
   0  -   lo0
2001:7f8::/64  link#1 UC  6 
   0  -   bge0
2001:7f8::1a27:0:2 00:30:48:42:02:5f  UHLc0 
2535  -   bge0
2001:7f8::1a27:0:102   00:30:48:74:67:c4  UHLc0 
   36624  -   bge0
2001:7f8::1a27:0:103   00:30:48:74:9c:1d  UHLc0 
   17030  -   bge0
2001:7f8::1a27:5051:c09d   00:30:48:42:03:bc  UHLc1 
2775  -   bge0
2001:7f8::1a27:5051:c19d   00:30:48:41:d2:70  UHLc1 
   13163  -   bge0
2001:7f8::20ad:0:1 00:12:1e:1b:c8:00  UHLc0 
 424  -   bge0
2001:7f8::6268:0:1 00:15:60:55:89:1d  UHL 0 
   0  -   lo0
2001:7f8:0:5::/64  link#2 UC  3 
   0  -   bge1
2001:7f8:0:5::28   00:30:48:42:02:5e  UHLc0 
2897  -   bge1
2001:7f8:0:5:0:1a27:0:100:0a:b8:6b:dd:78  UHLc1 
2225  -   bge1
2001:7f8:0:5:0:1a27:1:100:19:06:23:b1:d8  UHLc1 
   18503  -   bge1
2001:7f8:0:5:0:6268:0:100:15:60:55:89:1c  UHL 0 
   0  -   lo0
2002::/24  ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
2002:7f00::/24 ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
2002:e000::/20 ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
2002:ff00::/24 ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
fe80::/10  ::1UGRS0 
   0  -   lo0
fe80::%bge0/64 link#1 UC  6 
   0  -   bge0
fe80::214:f6ff:fe7e:43f0%bge0  00:14:f6:7e:43:f0  UHLc0 
 393  -   bge0
fe80::215:60ff:fe55:891d%bge0  00:15:60:55:89:1d  UHL 1 
   0  -   lo0
fe80::230:48ff:fe41:d270%bge0  00:30:48:41:d2:70  UHLc0 
1254  -   bge0
fe80::230:48ff:fe42:25f%bge0   00:30:48:42:02:5f  UHLc0 
 757  -   bge0
fe80::230:48ff:fe42:3bc%bge0   00:30:48:42:03:bc  UHLc0 
1888  -   bge0
fe80::230:48ff:fe74:67c4%bge0  00:30:48:74:67:c4  UHLc0 
 501  -   bge0
fe80::230:48ff:fe74:9c1d%bge0  00:30:48:74:9c:1d  UHLc0 
  29  -   bge0
fe80::%bge1/64 link#2 UC  2 
   0  -   bge1
fe80::20a:b8ff:fe6b:dd78%bge1  00:0a:b8:6b:dd:78  UHLc0 
2878  -   bge1
fe80::215:60ff:fe55:891c%bge1  00:15:60:55:89:1c  UHL 0 
   0  -   lo0
fe80::230:48ff:fe42:25e%bge1   00:30:48:42:02:5e  UHLc0 
 860  -   bge1
fe80::%lo0/64  fe80::1%lo0U   0 
   0  -   lo0
fe80::1%lo0 

encap routes

2007-04-16 Thread Markus Wernig
Hi all

Does anybody know what the status of the problem described here is?

http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-12/0327.html

The problem is that OBSD IPSec gateways will reject packets they have an
SA for if they don't have an IP route to the destination (any route,
default gw will suffice).
Is it planned to be change the default behaviour?

thx /markus



Architecture of console/terminal drivers

2007-04-16 Thread Markus Ritzer

Hello!


I would like to write a console driver for the Xbox port of OpenBSD. I 
have a framebuffer driver that can draw pixels, characters and strings 
on the screen, but I don't know how to implement a real console driver.


I'm not even sure about the terms console, terminal, wscons, vcons.

Is a wsdisplay driver enough?
What functions do I have to implement?


A part from the kernel configuration of NetBSD:


xboxfb0 at pci? dev ? function ?   # the framebuffer
wsdisplay*  at xboxfb? console ?


and from NetBSD files.i386:

device xboxfb: wsemuldisplaydev, rasops32, vcons
attach xboxfb at pci
file  arch/i386/xbox/xboxfb.c xboxfb needs-flag


I'm not sure what functions and structs I need.

I have read the manpages wsdisplay and wscons.



Thank you in advance,

Markus



Re: pciide: ATI IXP 600 SATA

2007-04-16 Thread alemao
Hi Jonathan,

With the patch, it finds the device, but no hard disks at all. I could send
you a dmesg but it passes ahci and i can't see the messages it gives me.
Then it enters on ddb and i cannot type (usb keyboard is not ready yet at
this level).

There's something i can do to it stops just after ahci loads, so i can write
the messages somewhere?

Thanks.



Multipath Routing and Routing Software

2007-04-16 Thread Christoph Schneeberger
Good day,

I am sorry if this has been answered in the past, I have googled the
topic without getting real answers and thought it might be appropriate
to post this question here:

I have happily read about the multipath abilities introduced in 4.0,
however the FAQ only cites an example with static routing which does no
failover at all and requires manual intervention in case of a link failure.

I would like to use OSPF on the job which has been working fine on
OpenBSD 3.3 in the form of quagga for me for years now, but notabene
only with failover on 2 highspeed links (16/18Mbit/s). Now i was
wondering if either OpenOSPF or the quagga port would support ospf ecmp
in OpenBSD 4.0 and I couldn't find any clear answer yet. This would give
me the redundancy i already have, combined with doubled capacity if both
links are operating.

Thanks for any pointers in advance,

Christoph

-- 

  Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?



Supermicro PDSMi-LN4+

2007-04-16 Thread Johan Linner

Hi,

Just installed 4.0 on a Supermicro PDSMi-LN4+, see dmesg below.
Seems to work fine, just concerned about these messages:

cpu0: unknown Core FSB_FREQ value 0 (0x4208)
cpu1: unknown Core FSB_FREQ value 0 (0x4208)

ioapic0: pin 16 shares different IPL interrupts (40..50), degraded 
performance
ioapic0: pin 18 shares different IPL interrupts (40..50), degraded 
performance
ioapic0: pin 19 shares different IPL interrupts (40..50), degraded 
performance


unknown at iic0 addr 0x2f not configured (hw sensors?)

Anyone out there who can explain what is going on?
(I'll try 4.1 as soon as I revecive the disks)

/Johan

--- dmesg: ---
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC.MP) #936: Sat Sep 16 19:27:28 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 
2.13 GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16

real mem  = 1072128000 (1047000K)
avail mem = 969924608 (947192K)
using 4256 buffers containing 53710848 bytes (52452K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(3c) BIOS, date 02/05/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 
0xfd490, SMBIOS rev. 2.51 @ 0x3feea000 (30 entries)

bios0: Supermicro PDSMi-LN4
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd490/0xb70
pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 18 Interrupt Routing table entries
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #15 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x1000
ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
mainbus0: Intel MP Specification (Version 1.4) (INTELMUKILTEO)
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: unknown Core FSB_FREQ value 0 (0x4208)
cpu0: apic clock running at 266 MHz
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 
2.13 GHz
cpu1: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16

mainbus0: bus 0 is type PCI
mainbus0: bus 1 is type PCI
mainbus0: bus 9 is type PCI
mainbus0: bus 10 is type PCI
mainbus0: bus 11 is type PCI
mainbus0: bus 12 is type PCI
mainbus0: bus 15 is type PCI
mainbus0: bus 16 is type ISA
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic1 at mainbus0: apid 3 pa 0xfecc, version 20, 24 pins
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7230 MCH rev 0xc0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel E7230 PCIE rev 0xc0
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
Intel IOxAPIC rev 0x09 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 not configured
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01
pci3 at ppb2 bus 9
em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E) rev 0x03: apic 
2 int 16 (irq 11), address 00:30:48:89:32:da

ppb3 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01
pci4 at ppb3 bus 10
em1 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573L) rev 0x00: apic 
2 int 17 (irq 12), address 00:30:48:89:32:db

ppb4 at pci0 dev 28 function 2 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01
pci5 at ppb4 bus 11
em2 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573L) rev 0x00: apic 
2 int 18 (irq 5), address 00:30:48:89:32:dc

ppb5 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01
pci6 at ppb5 bus 12
em3 at pci6 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573L) rev 0x00: apic 
2 int 19 (irq 11), address 00:30:48:89:32:dd
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2 int 
23 (irq 10)

usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2 int 
19 (irq 11)

usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1
uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2 int 
18 (irq 5)

usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2
uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2 int 
16 (irq 11)

usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3
uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2 int 
23 (irq 10)

usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub4 at usb4
uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered
ppb6 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA AGP rev 0xe1
pci7 at ppb6 bus 15
vga1 at pci7 dev 0 function 0 XGI Technology Volari Z7 rev 0x00
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x01: 

Re: Multipath Routing and Routing Software

2007-04-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/04/16 18:32, Christoph Schneeberger wrote:
 Now i was wondering if either OpenOSPF or the quagga port would support
 ospf ecmp in OpenBSD 4.0 and I couldn't find any clear answer yet.

Nothing in 4.0 or 4.1. -current has some code towards this, but
iirc it's not complete yet. Apart from that ospfd works pretty nicely.



Re: isakmpd multiple tunnels

2007-04-16 Thread Tim Pushor

Thanks for the response.

I should have been more clear. I am using isakmpd.conf and want to 
support multiple tunnels. Am I able to just add additional tunnels/lines 
under the [Phase 1] block that points to another relevant ISPEC 
configuration?


Anyone?

Thanks,
Tim

Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:

On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:25:49AM -0600, Tim Pushor wrote:
  

Hi friends,

I'm looking to add another IPSEC connection to my openbsd 3.9 firewall. 
All examples I've seen are a single connection (phase 1). To support 
multiple vpn's tunnels, is it as simple as adding additional lines under 
[Phase 1] pointing to the new phase1 configuration block?



yes.  However, please take a look at ipsecctl(8) and ipsec.conf(5).

HJ.




Re: openbgp not exporing ipv6 to routing tables

2007-04-16 Thread Henning Brauer
* Ond??ej Sur?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-16 17:40]:
 I have configured openbgpd on openbsd 4.0 (upgraded from 3.8) and there
 seems to be problem with IPv6.  I have tried google and irc, but without
 success.
 
 I am receiving IPv6 prefixes just fine (791 from upstream transit, 140
 from local IX), but they are not exported to kernel routing tables.

do the v6 nexthops show up in bgpctl sh nex ?

-- 
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sunday 15 April 2007 15:23, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Siegbert Marschall wrote:
  Hi,
 
  On the other hand, there seems to be a 'the alpha bug' around. I
  don't
  think it's solved yet, and it's been around for a long time.
  Apparently,
  it causes random crashes.
 
  only on some machines.

 Any idea if it surfaces on dual processor CS20 machines? I have the
 opportunity to pick up three dual 833 Mhz CS20 machines.

 Bryan

I've been told the alpha bug has been with us since (at least) OpenBSD 
3.0 and many people have tried to solve it. As one of the people who 
tried, and (miserably) failed, to find the alpha bug, I can say it is 
really an esoteric problem. A lot of information points to a rare race 
condition (i.e. software fault) on particular system under particular 
loads but no one has managed to prove it either way. Heck, for all I 
know it could even be an unknown hardware glitch that never received an 
errata because no one at DEC/Compaq/HP ever noticed it with supported 
operating systems.

I've never seen the alpha bug on my DS20L (equivalent to the CS20) or 
my 500/500 but I have seen it on my PC* boxes. Other people have had 
the exact opposite experience. The only time I've hit the bug was 
during system builds and in contrast, others have reported hitting the 
bug at other times during normal operation.  -- The trouble is, when 
you have a strange mystery bug floating out there, it may or may not 
be correctly blamed for any and all problems.

-jcr



SMP: Software Interrupts/ipending

2007-04-16 Thread Robert Gogolok
Hi,

I'm studying the interrupt handling of the OpenBSD 4.0 GENERIC.MP kernel.

1.)
There is the softintr() method that registers a software interrupt in the 
ipending variable, which is handled in Xdoreti on return from an interrupt.

machdep.c:
4463 void
4464 softintr(int sir, int vec)
4465 {
4466 __asm __volatile(orl %1, %0 : =m (ipending) : ir (sir));
4467 #ifdef MULTIPROCESSOR
4468 i82489_writereg(LAPIC_ICRLO,
4469 vec | LAPIC_DLMODE_FIXED | LAPIC_LVL_ASSERT | 
APIC_DEST_SELF);
4470 #endif
4471 }

In the MP case softintr() will also generate in line 4468 an interrupt through 
the IPI mechanism.

Why doesn't softintr() just use the IPI mechanism in the MP case?


2.)
Software interrupts registered through ipending get handled in Xdoreti (and on 
splx()).
For an pending interrupt in ipending at position i the execution goes on at 
Xresume[i].

In the MP case only the soft interrupts Xsoftty, Xsoftnet, Xsoftclock got a 
chance to be called from Xresume since the other once are leftovers from the 
old PIC? Therefore Xresume_legacy1, ...


Greetings,
Robert



carp compatibility 4.0 - current

2007-04-16 Thread Csillag Tamas
Hi guys,

I have a two redundant OpenBSD firewalls with carp. Both is version 4.0.

I am planning to upgrade the one in the BACKUP state to -current and a
few days/weeks later the other one. But I am wondering if is there any
change in pfsync or carp protocol which will force me to upgrade both at
the same time to retain a proper failover capability.

IIRC simmilar change happend at 3.8, that's why I am asking.

Thanks in advance,
   cstamas
-- 
Life is complex - It has real and imaginary parts.
   -- Andrea Leistra

CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas



xenocara in /usr/src can cause problems ?

2007-04-16 Thread Cedric Brisseau

Hi all,

I follow current and it seems to me strange that xenocara is under
/usr/src. I have my src tree in /usr/src and xenocara in
/usr/src/xenocara. So when I update my src tree with cvs it seems that
I have problems : on one computer (src tree originally from CD) cvs
never finish and on an other (src tree from a cvs mirror) the command
:

# cd /usr/src
# cvs -d $CVSROOT -q up -Pd

Cvs update xenocara tree :
P share/man/man4/Makefile
U share/man/man4/nx.4
P share/man/man4/tht.4
P sys/dev/pci/files.pci
U sys/dev/pci/if_nx.c
U sys/dev/pci/if_nxreg.h
P sys/dev/pci/if_tht.c
P xenocara/app/fvwm/extras/FvwmScript/FvwmScript.1
P xenocara/app/fvwm/modules/FvwmSaveDesk/FvwmSaveDesk.1

I wonder if it's intended.

Kind regards,
Cedric



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Henning Brauer
* Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-16 20:45]:
 On Apr 16, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Ronnie Garcia wrote:
 
 Bryan Vyhmeister a icrit :
 This brings up a question I have had for a while. Does pfsync  
 generate enough traffic that running gigabit cards for your  
 $ext_if and $int_if and a 100base-TX card for your pfsync  
 interface cause a major bottleneck?
 
 It depends on the rate of the states changes.
 Here, we have ~30mbits on pfsync, for ~40mbits of traffic (!)
 
 Based on this, I would say that it is important to have gigabit cards  
 throughout if you plan on getting much more than 100 Mbps throughput  
 in your firewall.

err. no. the ratio gets better on more thruput. and of course it 
depends on traffic patterm

 Has anyone ever experimented with using a separate  
 VLAN for pfsync traffic on a gigabit card? Is that even possible?

should work

-- 
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Monday 16 April 2007 12:06, Maurice Janssen wrote:
 On Monday, April 16, 2007 at 11:30:29 -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 On Apr 16, 2007, at 10:39 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
 I've never seen the alpha bug on my DS20L (equivalent to the
 CS20) or
 my 500/500 but I have seen it on my PC* boxes. Other people have
  had the exact opposite experience. The only time I've hit the bug
  was during system builds and in contrast, others have reported
  hitting the bug at other times during normal operation.  -- The
  trouble is, when you have a strange mystery bug floating out
  there, it may or may not be correctly blamed for any and all
  problems.
 
 Thank you for the followup. I guess I will just try and see what
 happens. I should dig out my PC164 whatever box and see if it
 exhibits the issue.

 FWIW: the bug seems to occur at my 3000/300X, but only during heavy
 load like 'make build'.  I never finished such a build, but I only
 tried a few times.

 Maurice

I just thought of something which might be worth a try on systems that 
show the bug during system builds; use nice(1) to lower the build 
priority. It's a long shot, and I haven't tried it, but it *might* be a 
useful work around. Then again, it might be a waste of time.

-jcr



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Kian Mohageri
On 4/16/07, Ronnie Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bryan Vyhmeister a icrit :
  On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:58 AM, Ronnie Garcia wrote:
 
  Clint Pachl a icrit :
  Ronnie Garcia wrote:
  Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF
  anabled) ?
  I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300 lines
  pf.conf
  What is your packets/sec when your pushing 40Mbs? Does the traffic
  flow in one em and out the other or is the dual em in a trunk (i.e.
  2Gbs)?
 
  Traffic gets in one em, is filtered by pf, and gets out from the other
  em (and the other way around).
  Its doing 11kpps in and 6kpps out of each em, plus 7kpps on the pfsync
  interface, which is a sis
 
  This brings up a question I have had for a while. Does pfsync generate
  enough traffic that running gigabit cards for your $ext_if and $int_if
  and a 100base-TX card for your pfsync interface cause a major
 bottleneck?

 It depends on the rate of the states changes.
 Here, we have ~30mbits on pfsync, for ~40mbits of traffic (!)



On our college campus with 50Mbps, we see ~8Mbps pfsync traffic.

Your ratio amazes me...  What type of environment is that in?

-- 
Kian Mohageri



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Jason Dixon

On Apr 16, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:


On Apr 16, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Ronnie Garcia wrote:


Bryan Vyhmeister a icrit :
This brings up a question I have had for a while. Does pfsync  
generate enough traffic that running gigabit cards for your  
$ext_if and $int_if and a 100base-TX card for your pfsync  
interface cause a major bottleneck?


It depends on the rate of the states changes.
Here, we have ~30mbits on pfsync, for ~40mbits of traffic (!)


Based on this, I would say that it is important to have gigabit  
cards throughout if you plan on getting much more than 100 Mbps  
throughput in your firewall. Has anyone ever experimented with  
using a separate VLAN for pfsync traffic on a gigabit card? Is that  
even possible?


Of course.  You could do a 3-homed firewall using a single physical  
interface with VLANs.  Not that you *should*, but you *could*.


--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net



Re: xenocara in /usr/src can cause problems ?

2007-04-16 Thread Marco S Hyman
  I follow current and it seems to me strange that xenocara is under
  /usr/src. I have my src tree in /usr/src and xenocara in
  /usr/src/xenocara. So when I update my src tree with cvs it seems that

Strangeness is a matter of personal choice.  You do not have to
put xenocara under /usr/src, it is just that /usr/src/xenocara is
the default location.

  I have problems : on one computer (src tree originally from CD) cvs
  never finish and on an other (src tree from a cvs mirror) the command

This is a local configuration issue on your machine.   If you look
in /usr/src/CVS/Entries you'll see a line that looks something like

D/xenocara

which is an instruction to the cvs process on your machine to access
the xenocara directory when doing updates and other cvs operations.  If
you don't want xenocara automatically updated when doing a cvs up in
/usr/src simply remove that line from the file.Instead of entering
the xenocara directory and doing an update the cvs process will simply
print ? xenocara and otherwise skip the directory.  You can then
cd /usr/src/xenocara; cvs up when you wish to update the xenocara code.

There may be a proper way to do what I've suggested using cvs, but
I've always found it easier to edit the Entries file.

// marc



Re: xenocara in /usr/src can cause problems ?

2007-04-16 Thread Shane Harbour
Something went wrong when you pulled the tree down.  Last I checked 
xenocara should be under /usr like XF4 is and not under your src 
directory.  /usr/src should only contain the kernel and userland for the 
base system.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong.


Shane

Cedric Brisseau wrote:

Hi all,

I follow current and it seems to me strange that xenocara is under
/usr/src. I have my src tree in /usr/src and xenocara in
/usr/src/xenocara. So when I update my src tree with cvs it seems that
I have problems : on one computer (src tree originally from CD) cvs
never finish and on an other (src tree from a cvs mirror) the command
:

# cd /usr/src
# cvs -d $CVSROOT -q up -Pd

Cvs update xenocara tree :
P share/man/man4/Makefile
U share/man/man4/nx.4
P share/man/man4/tht.4
P sys/dev/pci/files.pci
U sys/dev/pci/if_nx.c
U sys/dev/pci/if_nxreg.h
P sys/dev/pci/if_tht.c
P xenocara/app/fvwm/extras/FvwmScript/FvwmScript.1
P xenocara/app/fvwm/modules/FvwmSaveDesk/FvwmSaveDesk.1

I wonder if it's intended.

Kind regards,
Cedric




Hostated not clearing pf states?

2007-04-16 Thread Tautvydas Bružas
On weekend I decided to give a try for hoststated on OpenBSD 4.1 compiled
from source, and I noticed a problem when using sticky-address in hoststated
service. Let's say you have 2 hosts defined in webhosts table:

webhost1=10.10.10.11
webhost2=10.10.10.12

table webhosts {
real port http
check http / code 200
host $webhost1
host $webhost2
}

And service www looks like this:

service www {
virtual host $ext_addr port http

# tag every packet that goes thru the rdr rule with HOSTSTATED
tag HOSTSTATED

table webhosts
}

Now if webhost1 dies, all requests goes to webhost2 and it failover is
successful. If we add sticky-address to www service, and webhost2 dies looks
like sticky-address still sends all request from same client to webhost2
even if it's dead as long as you have state in pf:

pfctl -vvvss |grep x.x.x.x
all tcp 10.10.10.12:443 - 72.26.99.52:443 - x.x.x.x:20763
TIME_WAIT:TIME_WAIT
all tcp x.x.x.x:20763 - 10.10.10.12:443   TIME_WAIT:TIME_WAIT

After state times out, it will actually fail over to webhost1, but if you
are trying to load balance really active hosts, each time client tries to
connect to webhost2 it starts new state and effectively resets timeout
counter.


Tautvydas



Re: isakmpd multiple tunnels

2007-04-16 Thread Hans-Joerg Hoexer
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:59:41AM -0600, Tim Pushor wrote:
 Thanks for the response.
 
 I should have been more clear. I am using isakmpd.conf and want to 
 support multiple tunnels. Am I able to just add additional tunnels/lines 
 under the [Phase 1] block that points to another relevant ISPEC 
 configuration?

yes.

 
 Anyone?
 
 Thanks,
 Tim
 
 Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:25:49AM -0600, Tim Pushor wrote:
   
 Hi friends,
 
 I'm looking to add another IPSEC connection to my openbsd 3.9 firewall. 
 All examples I've seen are a single connection (phase 1). To support 
 multiple vpn's tunnels, is it as simple as adding additional lines under 
 [Phase 1] pointing to the new phase1 configuration block?
 
 
 yes.  However, please take a look at ipsecctl(8) and ipsec.conf(5).
 
 HJ.



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Ronnie Garcia

Kian Mohageri a icrit :

On 4/16/07, Ronnie Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Bryan Vyhmeister a icrit :

On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:58 AM, Ronnie Garcia wrote:


Clint Pachl a icrit :

Ronnie Garcia wrote:

Do you expect doing more than 100mbits with this hadware (with PF
anabled) ?
I'm maxing a P4 2.4Ghz at 40mbits, with a dual em, and a ~300 lines
pf.conf

What is your packets/sec when your pushing 40Mbs? Does the traffic
flow in one em and out the other or is the dual em in a trunk (i.e.
2Gbs)?

Traffic gets in one em, is filtered by pf, and gets out from the other
em (and the other way around).
Its doing 11kpps in and 6kpps out of each em, plus 7kpps on the pfsync
interface, which is a sis

This brings up a question I have had for a while. Does pfsync generate
enough traffic that running gigabit cards for your $ext_if and $int_if
and a 100base-TX card for your pfsync interface cause a major

bottleneck?

It depends on the rate of the states changes.
Here, we have ~30mbits on pfsync, for ~40mbits of traffic (!)



On our college campus with 50Mbps, we see ~8Mbps pfsync traffic.
Your ratio amazes me...  What type of environment is that in?


Content delivery (web servers, streaming).
Approx 100 servers.

--
Ronnie Garcia r.garcia at ovea dot com



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 12:33:09PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
 On Monday 16 April 2007 12:06, Maurice Janssen wrote:
  On Monday, April 16, 2007 at 11:30:29 -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
  On Apr 16, 2007, at 10:39 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
  I've never seen the alpha bug on my DS20L (equivalent to the
  CS20) or
  my 500/500 but I have seen it on my PC* boxes. Other people have
   had the exact opposite experience. The only time I've hit the bug
   was during system builds and in contrast, others have reported
   hitting the bug at other times during normal operation.  -- The
   trouble is, when you have a strange mystery bug floating out
   there, it may or may not be correctly blamed for any and all
   problems.
  
  Thank you for the followup. I guess I will just try and see what
  happens. I should dig out my PC164 whatever box and see if it
  exhibits the issue.
 
  FWIW: the bug seems to occur at my 3000/300X, but only during heavy
  load like 'make build'.  I never finished such a build, but I only
  tried a few times.
 
  Maurice
 
 I just thought of something which might be worth a try on systems that 
 show the bug during system builds; use nice(1) to lower the build 
 priority. It's a long shot, and I haven't tried it, but it *might* be a 
 useful work around. Then again, it might be a waste of time.

Just curious: why do you think this helps? It's not like nice'ing the
only process on the box that uses any real resources helps, does it?

Joachim

-- 
TFMotD: tl (4) - Texas Instruments ThunderLAN 10/100 Ethernet device



Re: xenocara in /usr/src can cause problems ?

2007-04-16 Thread Matthew R. Dempsky
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:51:19PM -0600, Shane Harbour wrote:
 Something went wrong when you pulled the tree down.  Last I checked 
 xenocara should be under /usr like XF4 is and not under your src 
 directory.  /usr/src should only contain the kernel and userland for the 
 base system.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

release(8) says ``Xenocara sources are supposed to be in XSRCDIR which
defaults to /usr/src/xenocara.''



Re: carp compatibility 4.0 - current

2007-04-16 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:15:11PM +0200, Csillag Tamas wrote:
 Hi guys,
 
 I have a two redundant OpenBSD firewalls with carp. Both is version 4.0.
 
 I am planning to upgrade the one in the BACKUP state to -current and a
 few days/weeks later the other one. But I am wondering if is there any
 change in pfsync or carp protocol which will force me to upgrade both at
 the same time to retain a proper failover capability.
 
 IIRC simmilar change happend at 3.8, that's why I am asking.

You'll have to ask someone with more knowledge, but I don't recall
seeing any big changes. Although I seem to recall someone proposing to
change advskew or something like that, I don't know what became of that.

Joachim

-- 
TFMotD: vhold (9) - acquire a hold on a vnode



Re: encap routes

2007-04-16 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:52:05PM +0200, Markus Wernig wrote:
 Hi all
 
 Does anybody know what the status of the problem described here is?
 
 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-12/0327.html
 
 The problem is that OBSD IPSec gateways will reject packets they have an
 SA for if they don't have an IP route to the destination (any route,
 default gw will suffice).
 Is it planned to be change the default behaviour?

Quite possibly not. Why? What is the problem?

Joachim

-- 
TFMotD: arp (4) - Address Resolution Protocol



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread Siegbert Marschall
Hi,

 On Monday 16 April 2007 12:06, Maurice Janssen wrote:
 On Monday, April 16, 2007 at 11:30:29 -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 On Apr 16, 2007, at 10:39 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
 I've never seen the alpha bug on my DS20L (equivalent to the
 CS20) or
 my 500/500 but I have seen it on my PC* boxes. Other people have
  had the exact opposite experience. The only time I've hit the bug
  was during system builds and in contrast, others have reported
  hitting the bug at other times during normal operation.  -- The
  trouble is, when you have a strange mystery bug floating out
  there, it may or may not be correctly blamed for any and all
  problems.
 
 Thank you for the followup. I guess I will just try and see what
 happens. I should dig out my PC164 whatever box and see if it
 exhibits the issue.

 FWIW: the bug seems to occur at my 3000/300X, but only during heavy
 load like 'make build'.  I never finished such a build, but I only
 tried a few times.

 Maurice

 I just thought of something which might be worth a try on systems that
 show the bug during system builds; use nice(1) to lower the build
 priority. It's a long shot, and I haven't tried it, but it *might* be a
 useful work around. Then again, it might be a waste of time.


oh mann, crap it. I have 2 3000-300LX and one 3000-300X. I had the LXs
crashing on me, the X never crashed. swapped the CPU-Boards and I had
the other machine crashing. okay, so the 300X modules crash, just mine
doesn't or takes a _long_ time to do so. let's see what the upcoming
patch does. do you also get funny LLSC memory error messages when you
run the builtin tests ? I had the impression the stuff was related but
couldn't find one with intimate enough knowledge of the hardware to
dig it and the cpu-manuals one can download are rather useless in this
context. apart from the fact that those errors should not show up in
a single cpu-system. you have to run the test a few times to get them,
they only show up sometimes.

kind of explains why it's rare in DS20s, with multiple CPUs LLSC error
make the machine useless on single CPUs they shouldn't be there but
don't kill it since there is only one cache.

however, right now they are all off. as soon as something to test comes
up I will power them up again and test.

-sm



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.

On 4/16/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:43 AM, Craig Skinner wrote:
 At an ISP that I worked for, all user config data was held in
 postgres.
 When fields were changed, new flat files were generated (passwd,
 shell.allow, ftpusers, apache, quota, etc, etc). The files were then
 scp'd to the various server farms from the postgres box.

That is an idea I had not thought of. Thank you for the suggestion.
That might be a much better way of working with a database.

 Having the mail daemons use SQL for auth was too slow.


would using postgreSQL for auth with postfix / Dovecot be slow even if
you used top of the line hardware say a dual core CPU and 4GB memory
w/ RAID 0?I am thinking very strongly about moving our Exchange Server
to postfix / PostgresSQL.

 Customers and support staff had web interfaces to postgres for
 config of
 services.

I am going to have to look into that. Also, thanks to others for the
exim info as well as the vote for courier-imapd. I have used courier-
imapd and I found it to be a pretty good platform but I like dovecot
better personally.

Bryan




Re: openbgp not exporing ipv6 to routing tables

2007-04-16 Thread Ondřej Surý
Henning Brauer pm9e v Po 16. 04. 2007 v 19:06 +0200:
 * Ond??ej Sur?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-16 17:40]:
  I have configured openbgpd on openbsd 4.0 (upgraded from 3.8) and there
  seems to be problem with IPv6.  I have tried google and irc, but without
  success.
  
  I am receiving IPv6 prefixes just fine (791 from upstream transit, 140
  from local IX), but they are not exported to kernel routing tables.
 
 do the v6 nexthops show up in bgpctl sh nex ?

They do:

# bgpctl sh next

Nexthop  State 
2001:7f8::   valid bge0UP, Ethernet, active, 100 MBit/s
[...]

# bgpctl sh next | grep 2001 | wc -l
  32 

Sorry for not revealing IP addresses, I am not sure if I can.  Full list
can be sent directly to you upon request.

Ondrej
-- 
Ondxej Sur} [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ***  http://blog.rfc1925.org/
Kulturnm obhasnmk  ***  http://www.obcasnik.cz/



Re: Dell Latitude D820

2007-04-16 Thread Antoine Jacoutot

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Siju George wrote:

X -configure produced a configuration file which just worked :-)



Mailing from that Laptop usinf Firefox2 :-)

One problem still persists.
X works only 800x600 resolution.


I have the exact same problem here under a Dell Latitude D820 too.
I'm running the latest snap.
Obviously, something's wrong with the nv driver and the NVidia 7300 Go.

I won't post a dmesg/Xorg.log are they're exactly the same that Siju 
posted.
For now, one can use the vesa driver to get a better resolution, but 
it's not easy on the eyes ;)


--
Antoine



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread Miod Vallat
  I just thought of something which might be worth a try on systems that 
  show the bug during system builds; use nice(1) to lower the build 
  priority. It's a long shot, and I haven't tried it, but it *might* be a 
  useful work around. Then again, it might be a waste of time.
 
 Just curious: why do you think this helps? It's not like nice'ing the
 only process on the box that uses any real resources helps, does it?

It does not change anything wrt this problem.

Miod



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread Maurice Janssen
On Monday, April 16, 2007 at 12:33:09 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2007 12:06, Maurice Janssen wrote:
 FWIW: the bug seems to occur at my 3000/300X, but only during heavy
 load like 'make build'.  I never finished such a build, but I only
 tried a few times.

I just thought of something which might be worth a try on systems that 
show the bug during system builds; use nice(1) to lower the build 
priority. It's a long shot, and I haven't tried it, but it *might* be a 
useful work around. Then again, it might be a waste of time.

Could be bad luck, but it seems to have the opposite effect.  It panic'd
after a few minutes (details below), while up to now it used to run many
hours before it panic'd.

Maurice


panic: trap
Stopped at  Debugger+0x4:   ret zero,(ra)
RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT WHEN REPORTING THIS PANIC!
DO NOT EVEN BOTHER REPORTING THIS WITHOUT INCLUDING THAT INFORMATION!
ddb ps
   PID   PPID   PGRPUID  S   FLAGS  WAIT   COMMAND
*15298  27518  17937  0  3  0x4006  netio  cat
 27518  22909  17937  0  3  0x4086  pause  sh
 22909  12217  17937  0  3  0x4086  pause  sh
 12217   9940  17937  0  3  0x4086  wait   make
  9940  13807  17937  0  3  0x4086  pause  sh
 13807  20226  17937  0  3  0x4086  wait   make
 20226   1148  17937  0  3  0x4086  pause  sh
  1148  17567  17937  0  3  0x4086  wait   make
 17567  17937  17937  0  3  0x4086  pause  sh
 17937   6783  17937  0  3  0x4086  wait   make
  6783  15405   6783  0  3  0x4086  pause  ksh
 15405  23322  15405   1000  3  0x4086  pause  ksh
 23322   9574   9574   1000  3   0x184  select sshd
  9574918   9574  0  3  0x4184  netio  sshd
 19985  1  19985   1000  3  0x4086  ttyin  ksh
  8836  1   8836  0  30x84  select cron
 24506  1  24506  0  3 0x40184  select sendmail
   918  1918  0  30x84  select sshd
   430  1430  0  3   0x184  select inetd
 20290  0  0  0  30x100284  nfsidl nfsio
 12060  0  0  0  30x100284  nfsidl nfsio
 21537  0  0  0  30x100284  nfsidl nfsio
  3000  0  0  0  30x100284  nfsidl nfsio
  8612  1   8612  0  30x84  poll   ntpd
 24754  1  24754 83  3   0x184  poll   ntpd
 12430  13175  13175 73  3   0x184  poll   syslogd
 13175  1  13175  0  30x8c  netio  syslogd
 8  0  0  0  30x100204  crypto_wa  crypto
 7  0  0  0  30x100204  aiodoned   aiodoned
 6  0  0  0  20x100204 update
 5  0  0  0  30x100204  cleanercleaner
 4  0  0  0  30x100204  reaper reaper
 3  0  0  0  30x100204  pgdaemon   pagedaemon
 2  0  0  0  30x100204  pftm   pfpurge
 1  0  1  0  3  0x4084  wait   init
 0 -1  0  0  3 0x80204  scheduler  swapper
ddb trace
Debugger(6, fc85ba38, 0, 0, fe00056df610, 8) at Debugger+0x4
panic(fc837e04, 1, 0, 2, fe00056df760, fe00056dfa2c) at panic+0 
x130
trap(?, ?, 0, 2, fe00056df760, fe00056dfa2c) at trap+0x55c
XentMM(?, ?, 0, 2, ?, fe00056dfa2c) at XentMM+0x20
pmap_activate(fc8e23a0, fe00056dc000, fc7cb3e9, 1400, 0, ff 
fffe00056dfa2c) at pmap_activate+0x24
cpu_switch(?, ?, fc7cb3e9, 1400, 0, fe00056dfa2c) at cpu_switch+0xfc
cpu_switch(?, ?, fc7cb3e9, 1400, 0, fe00056dfa2c) at cpu_switch+0xfc
cpu_switch(?, ?, fc7cb3e9, 1400, 0, fe00056dfa2c) at cpu_switch+0xfc
cpu_switch(?, ?, fc7cb3e9, 1400, 0, fe00056dfa2c) at cpu_switch+0xfc
cpu_switch(?, ?, fc7cb3e9, 1400, 0, fe00056dfa2c) at cpu_switch+0xfc
cpu_switch(?, ?, fc7cb3e9, 1400, 0, fe00056dfa2c) at cpu_switch+0xfc
this last line keeps repeating



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:48:00PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
 On 4/16/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:43 AM, Craig Skinner wrote:
  At an ISP that I worked for, all user config data was held in
  postgres.
  When fields were changed, new flat files were generated (passwd,
  shell.allow, ftpusers, apache, quota, etc, etc). The files were then
  scp'd to the various server farms from the postgres box.
 
 That is an idea I had not thought of. Thank you for the suggestion.
 That might be a much better way of working with a database.
 
  Having the mail daemons use SQL for auth was too slow.
 
 would using postgreSQL for auth with postfix / Dovecot be slow even if
 you used top of the line hardware say a dual core CPU and 4GB memory
 w/ RAID 0?I am thinking very strongly about moving our Exchange Server
 to postfix / PostgresSQL.

That depends on the load, but it's certainly faster to use something
less heavy than a RDBMS - which is very good and very fast at what it
does, but what it does isn't 'simple key-value lookups'.

On that topic, MySQL might perform better here.

Joachim

-- 
PotD: x11/xpostit - PostIt (R) messages onto your X11 screen



Re: pciide: ATI IXP 600 SATA

2007-04-16 Thread alemao
Jonathan,

I get the dmesg of ahci identifying my card. If you want to send me more
patchs to test it's ok.
I need to set tty com0 at boot.conf and unplug my usb devices from it to
boot (kbd and mouse, this machine don't have PS/2). It's strange, after the
bootloader timeouts and start to load kernel, it stops at entry point
xxx and then i need to type something to load the kernel.. w/o usb
devices, it boot fine.

below is dmesg
[ using 598688 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ]  


Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993  


The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.  


Copyright (c) 1995-2007 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.  http://www.OpenBSD.org   
  



OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #3: Mon Apr 16 18:35:20 BRT 2007   
  

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
 

real mem = 1038069760 (1013740K)

avail mem = 877133824 (856576K)   

using 22937 buffers containing 104013824 bytes (101576K) of memory  


mainbus0 (root)   

bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0450 (68 entries)   
  

bios0: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 320 

acpi0 at mainbus0: rev 2

acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT APIC BOOT MCFG HPET SLIC   
  

acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits

acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat


cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)   
  

cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz, 3000.48 MHz


cpu0: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF  
  

LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,C
   

xTPR,NXE,LONG 

cpu0: 2MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache 

cpu0: apic clock running at 200MHz  

cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)


cpu1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz, 3000.11 MHz


cpu1: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF  
  

LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,CNXT-ID,CX16,


xTPR,NXE,LONG 

cpu1: 2MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache 

ioapic0 at mainbus0 apid 8 pa 0xfec0, version 21, 24 pins   
  

ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 8


acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 1 (PCI1)   

acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI2)   

acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI3)   

acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI4)   

acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI5)   

acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI6)   

acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI8)   

acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 2 (PCI7)   

acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)   

acpicpu0 at acpi0: CPU0: acpicpu1: C2 not supported 
  

acpicpu1: C3 not supported  

no performance/throttling supported   

acpicpu1 at acpi0: CPU1: acpicpu2: C2 not supported 
  

acpicpu2: C3 not supported  

no performance/throttling supported   

acpicpu2 at acpi0: CPU2: acpicpu3: C2 not supported 
  

acpicpu3: C3 not supported  

no performance/throttling supported   

acpicpu3 at acpi0: CPU3: acpicpu4: C2 not supported 
  

acpicpu4: C3 not supported  

no performance/throttling 

Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Monday 16 April 2007 14:14, Maurice Janssen wrote:
 I just thought of something which might be worth a try on systems
  that show the bug during system builds; use nice(1) to lower the
  build priority. It's a long shot, and I haven't tried it, but it
  *might* be a useful work around. Then again, it might be a waste of
  time.

 Could be bad luck, but it seems to have the opposite effect.  It
 panic'd after a few minutes (details below), while up to now it used
 to run many hours before it panic'd.

Damn. It didn't work but it was a long shot to begin with. At least we
know timing/priority does affect when/how quickly the bug surfaces.

Just out of curiosity, what exact command did you run to get the results
you posted. Was it something like this:

# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/alpha/conf
# config GENERIC
# cd ../compile/GENERIC
# make clean  make depend
# nice make

?

I think I'll dust off one the alphas and give this another shot. At the
moment, I've got far too much hair which is in dire need of being
pulled out in frustration... ;-)

-jcr



4.0-stable lockup

2007-04-16 Thread Mitja
Hello,

I am experiencing lockups every 24-48 hours. I think the problem is
somewhere in my high network usage, but I can't find out the source of
the problem.

# netstat -m
1300 mbufs in use:
1289 mbufs allocated to data
7 mbufs allocated to packet headers
4 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses
772/808/6144 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
1972 Kbytes allocated to network (94% in use)
0 requests for memory denied
0 requests for memory delayed
0 calls to protocol drain routines


Any idea how to diagnose the problem?

=DMESG=
OpenBSD 4.0-stable (fbs) #0: Wed Mar 28 20:22:57 CEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/kernel
cpu0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 146 (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 1024KB L2
cache) 2 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SSE3
real mem  = 1073246208 (1048092K)
avail mem = 970592256 (947844K)
using 4256 buffers containing 53764096 bytes (52504K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 07/15/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @
0xf0010, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf8e00 (50 entries)
bios0: Supermicro H8SSL
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf4f50/160 (8 entries)
pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found: ICU vendor 0x1166 product 0x0205
pcibios0: PCI bus #2 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x2000! 0xca000/0x1600
0xcb800/0x1600 0xcd000/0x1000
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 ServerWorks HT-1000 PCI rev 0x00
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci1 dev 13 function 0 ServerWorks HT-1000 PCIX rev 0xb2
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
em0 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq
9, address 00:04:23:d0:93:60
em1 at pci2 dev 1 function 1 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq
5, address 00:04:23:d0:93:61
bge0 at pci2 dev 3 function 0 Broadcom BCM5704C rev 0x10, BCM5704 B0
(0x2100): irq 7, address 00:30:48:5b:0a:88
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
bge1 at pci2 dev 3 function 1 Broadcom BCM5704C rev 0x10, BCM5704 B0
(0x2100): irq 9, address 00:30:48:5b:0a:89
brgphy1 at bge1 phy 1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
pciide0 at pci1 dev 14 function 0 ServerWorks SATA rev 0x00: DMA
pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt
pciide0: port 0: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD2500KS-00MJB0
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 238475MB, 488397168 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
pciide0: port 1: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s
wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0: WDC WD2500KS-00MJB0
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 238475MB, 488397168 sectors
wd1(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
pciide0: port 2: PHY offline
pciide0: port 3: PHY offline
pciide1 at pci1 dev 14 function 1 ServerWorks SATA rev 0x00
piixpm0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 ServerWorks HT-1000 rev 0x00: polling
iic0 at piixpm0
admcts0 at iic0 addr 0x2c
pciide2 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 ServerWorks HT-1000 IDE rev 0x00: DMA
atapiscsi0 at pciide2 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: TEAC, CD-224E-N, 1.AA SCSI0 5/cdrom
removable
cd0(pciide2:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 0
pcib0 at pci0 dev 2 function 2 ServerWorks HT-1000 LPC rev 0x00
ohci0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 ServerWorks HT-1000 USB rev 0x01: irq
10, version 1.0, legacy support
usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: ServerWorks OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ohci1 at pci0 dev 3 function 1 ServerWorks HT-1000 USB rev 0x01: irq
10, version 1.0, legacy support
usb1 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1
uhub1: ServerWorks OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ehci0 at pci0 dev 3 function 2 ServerWorks HT-1000 USB rev 0x01: irq 10
usb2 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub2 at usb2
uhub2: ServerWorks EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
vga1 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 ATI Rage XL rev 0x27
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 24 function 0 AMD AMD64 HyperTransport rev 0x00
pchb1 at pci0 dev 24 function 1 AMD AMD64 Address Map rev 0x00
pchb2 at pci0 dev 24 function 2 AMD AMD64 DRAM Cfg rev 0x00
pchb3 at pci0 dev 24 function 3 AMD AMD64 Misc Cfg rev 0x00
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker
spkr0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom1 at 

If you get this

2007-04-16 Thread Sporcich, William R
Drop me a note.


Bill Sporcich

Lockheed Martin Information Services

  509-372-3941 Desk

  509-438-0718 Cell



driver question

2007-04-16 Thread James Mackinnon
This was likely answered before. I went hunting and seemed to not find a solid
answer, thus, after the time of looking, I figured I need to take the moment
to ask

I have a quad Xeon 700 Dell 6450 with 4 146gig scsi drives connected to a perc
2/dc controller.

The drives are setup properly, I can run FreeBSD 6.2 on it without issue.

The thing is, I like OpenBSD and want to run it. can I get any suggestions on
it. It's controller firmware is older.  When I try to boot to install it, it
basically tells me there is no disks.


I'm trying with my purchased OpenBSD 4.0 CD

Again, sorry if the question was asked before, after spending some time
looking and seeing Freebsd work without issue, it was time to come and ask to
see what I can, if possible, do to get Open running on this box.

Thanks

James



Re: Dell Latitude D820

2007-04-16 Thread Siju George

On 4/17/07, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

For now, one can use the vesa driver to get a better resolution, but
it's not easy on the eyes ;)



Could you please send me the xorg.conf file that gives a resolution
over 800x600?

Thankyou so much

kind Regards

Siju



Re: 4.0-stable lockup

2007-04-16 Thread Adam Hawes
 Any idea how to diagnose the problem?

Turn on as much verbose logging as you can and see what you get.  Do you
get any kernel crash messages on the console when the machine hangs or
does it just hang up and die?

Your first port of call is to get the system logs out of the machine.
Sending
them to the console is a start.  Sending them to another machine via serial
will let you go back through them after it's crashed and look for symptoms.

I don't know enough about the guts of OpenBSD to help diagnose the crash,
but is there a way to turn on verbose kernel logging?  If there is that would
help narrow things down a little.

It's difficult to diagnose a problem like this, but clear your mind of
assumptions.  It could be anything - bad memory, bad CPU, bad network
card, bad software, bad disks, etc.  You need to start ruling out all of
those
things.  In my experience hard lockup are almost always due to failing
hardware rather than the OS (unless you're running unstable development
drivers for bleeding edge hardware).

Memory can be stressed by hefty compiles.  Building the kernel is a good
test.
Does a kernel compile succeed?  How about if you use make -j 4 to run 4
tasks in parallel and use up more RAM?  That also stresses the CPU.  You
could boot one of those *cough* Linux live CDs with a memory tester on it and
run a memory test overnight to look for failures but that's not reliable in
many
border cases.

Are the disks OK?  Smart can be used to check for some kinds of errors.
Look in the logs for disk access failures.

Finally, if you think it's network related unplug the network and stress test
the machine.  Try a different NIC if you have one lying about.

Regards,
A



Re: 4.0-stable lockup

2007-04-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/04/16 23:44, Mitja wrote:
 I am experiencing lockups every 24-48 hours. I think the problem is
 somewhere in my high network usage, but I can't find out the source of
 the problem.
 bios0: Supermicro H8SSL

It's mostly the PAE pmap-related bug (reverted before 4.1-release), but
I think there is also some problem with the non-ACPI irq tables with the
BIOS shipped with the motherboards, I think this is also fixed on the
newer BIOS.

Run them on 4.1 or -current with either ACPI enabled or latest BIOS and
they should be happy. Mine (single-core) are much better with bsd.mp for
the APICs.

I have a bunch of these, mostly as routers (bgpd/ospfd which are great).
I prefer them to Sun X2100 after I got those problems fixed (PCI slot which
accepts ebay'd fibre cards, two half-decent NICs onboard rather than one
and an nfe, and I found them easier to buy).

 em0 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq
 9, address 00:04:23:d0:93:60
 em1 at pci2 dev 1 function 1 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq
 5, address 00:04:23:d0:93:61

If you have any problems with the em(4), try jumpering the pci-x for
66MHz rather than auto, there's definitely some problem with the newer quad
cards and 133 on these boards, which might apply to the other cards.

There is also a jumper you can do to force power-on after power
failure, which is very useful if they're remote.



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Kian Mohageri
On 4/13/07, Steven Presser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,
 I'm working for a small company which has settled on OpenBSD as its
 server software (because the security is excellent).  We have settled on
 what software to use for everything but the mail server.  I'd like to
 request recommendations from the knowledgeable people of this
 list.  The priorities for the mail server are:
 1. Security
 2. Usability (for the end user - not everyone is technically skilled,
 although the setup can be done for anyone who needs help)
 3. Ease of setup
 4. Scaleability
 Obviously the first is by far the most important.  The other three
 are more perks than anything else.



Throwing in another vote for Dovecot for IMAP.  I'm stuck with Qmail at the
moment (works fine), but Postfix is nice.

As for webmail, I haven't heard Roundcube mentioned yet.  We use it, and
it's at least pretty enough.  Requires a database, unfortunately, but it
works with LDAP and our staff like it.

http://roundcube.net/

--
Kian Mohageri



Re: driver question

2007-04-16 Thread Ted Unangst

On 4/16/07, James Mackinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

This was likely answered before. I went hunting and seemed to not find a solid
answer, thus, after the time of looking, I figured I need to take the moment
to ask

I have a quad Xeon 700 Dell 6450 with 4 146gig scsi drives connected to a perc
2/dc controller.


pretty sure that's the aac driver.  it doesn't really work.



Re: GRAPE cluster supercomputer + OpenBSD

2007-04-16 Thread David Gwynne
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:20:07AM +0200, Vim Visual wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm not concerned about the library, I'm almost sure it'll work in
 OpenBSD -it was written to be very portable-; it's the raid controller
 what will finally be the key to the OS... I forgot to give details,
 sorry. It's an Areca Raid Controller arc-1220

that card works fine in openbsd. it even has bio support out of the
box.

 Yes, the OS is not that important, the cluster will not have a public
 IP and is already sitting behind a firewall (don't ask me which one,
 please, it's a RHL one, it was not my personal choice) and I've got
 obsd installed on my laptop to do the data analysis of the results but
 I was looking forward to having obsd on the cluster...

i suspect the library that talks to the GRAPE card requires access to
the hardware registers. if it uses the same mechanisms as X, then it
might just work, but i don't like your chances.

 Today I'll boot the cd and see whether the controller is configured...

it'll be fine :)

dlg



Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread chefren

J.C. Roberts wrote:

On Monday 16 April 2007 14:14, Maurice Janssen wrote:

I just thought of something which might be worth a try on systems
that show the bug during system builds; use nice(1) to lower the
build priority. It's a long shot, and I haven't tried it, but it
*might* be a useful work around. Then again, it might be a waste of
time.

Could be bad luck, but it seems to have the opposite effect.  It
panic'd after a few minutes (details below), while up to now it used
to run many hours before it panic'd.


Hm, this could point to violated hardware specifications, memory cells 
that aren't used fast enough and thus not auto-refreshed in time.


I presume the Alpha-bug is OpenBSD-only so it's definitely not a 
hardware problem? Could be that OpenBSD uses certain parts not often enough.


Slow down the clocks to see if it's in that direction? And if so, start 
reading the datasheets...


If someone in The Netherlands is really interested I can provide 433 and 
500MHz Miata's, we also have an original DEC Alpha AXP development board 
available, I presume with a 166MHz 21064, boots via Ethernet with bootp. 
Ethernet, yes the original version, we have a DEC Ethernet-BNC adapter 
for it too.


+++chefren



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
Of course.  You could do a 3-homed firewall using a single  
physical interface with VLANs.  Not that you *should*, but you  
*could*.


Didn't you post about a router on a stick not too long ago. That's  
immediately what I thought of when I posted about this.


Bryan



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 7:14 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:

On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:49 PM, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
Didn't you post about a router on a stick not too long ago. That's  
immediately what I thought of when I posted about this.

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117482540111222w=2


I did a search for router on a stick and that thread didn't come up.  
Strange. Anyway, that was the thread I was thinking of.


Bryan



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Jason Dixon

On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:49 PM, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:


On Apr 16, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
Of course.  You could do a 3-homed firewall using a single  
physical interface with VLANs.  Not that you *should*, but you  
*could*.


Didn't you post about a router on a stick not too long ago. That's  
immediately what I thought of when I posted about this.


http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117482540111222w=2

--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net



Re: sk or em

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Ronnie Garcia wrote:


Kian Mohageri a icrit :

On 4/16/07, Ronnie Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It depends on the rate of the states changes.
Here, we have ~30mbits on pfsync, for ~40mbits of traffic (!)

On our college campus with 50Mbps, we see ~8Mbps pfsync traffic.
Your ratio amazes me...  What type of environment is that in?

Content delivery (web servers, streaming).
Approx 100 servers.


That makes more sense. Streaming is a very different world than  
standard internet access for customers. I would anticipate that my  
pfsync traffic would probably end up being pretty low. On my main  
link now, I am seeing around a 1000 packets per second and usage  
going from between 3 to 6 Mbps both in and out depending on time of  
day. I am peaking at 6 Mbps more and more often and so I am moving up  
to a DS3. That was the next logical leap. I am running in the  
neighborhood of 10,000 to 13,000 states. Obviously I have no need for  
gigabit but it was an interesting idea. Do you guys think a pair of  
Soekris net4801's in a carp(4) setup would do all right with up to 10  
Mbps with a 100 to 150 rule pf.conf given what I mentioned above? I  
have some P3 boxes that I plan on eventually using as carp boxes but  
the project isn't completed yet.


Bryan



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Adam
Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 would using postgreSQL for auth with postfix / Dovecot be slow even if
 you used top of the line hardware say a dual core CPU and 4GB memory
 w/ RAID 0?I am thinking very strongly about moving our Exchange Server
 to postfix / PostgresSQL.

When the job is repeatedly looking up values in a hierarchical schema,
a relational database isn't a great choice.  This is exactly the kind of
task ldap is meant for, and it does it very well.  Courier, dovecot,
sendmail, postfix, sasl, etc will all happily use ldap.

Adam



AFS Server on OpenBSD

2007-04-16 Thread Rico Secada
Hi,

I have been trying to find some information on setting up a AFS server on 
OpenBSD, is it even possible?

Rico.



Re: AFS Server on OpenBSD

2007-04-16 Thread Marcus Watts
 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:30:46 +0200
 From: Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: misc@openbsd.org
 Subject: AFS Server on OpenBSD
 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hi,
 
 I have been trying to find some information on setting up a AFS server on 
 OpenBSD, is it even possible?
 
 Rico.
 
 

Yes, this should be possible.

Visit:
www.openafs.org
to get openafs source.

Either use heimdal (built-in to openbsd) or build and install
MIT kerberos, or decide if kaserver is sufficient and
acceptable to you.

You don't need to bother with the openafs afs cache manager if
you're just running an afs server, so you will most likely want to
build openafs with '--disable-kernel-module'.

If you have more questions regarding openafs, ask
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
what you're asking about is really AFS-centric, not openBSD-centric.

-Marcus Watts



Distributed File System

2007-04-16 Thread Rico Secada
Hi all.

At work I am experiencing with setting up some distributed file system, at the 
current moment working with NFS. The problem is that it is being setup at work 
and people, from their homes, need to be able to mount the system.

I have no prior experience in this, except for setting up and using NFS across 
a LAN. 

I would greatly appreciate any recommendations regarding security, 
effectiveness and other advices!

I have been thinking about tunneling NFS over SSH2, and possibly using some 
kind of cache, but I do not know if this is actually the best approach. I have 
also been thinking about using AFS as posted before.

Also perhaps, but not necessary, support for Windows could be needed in the 
long run.

What are you guys using and how is it setup?

Best and kind regards!

Rico.



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
Throwing in another vote for Dovecot for IMAP.  I'm stuck with  
Qmail at the

moment (works fine), but Postfix is nice.

As for webmail, I haven't heard Roundcube mentioned yet.  We use  
it, and
it's at least pretty enough.  Requires a database, unfortunately,  
but it

works with LDAP and our staff like it.

http://roundcube.net/


I have looked at Roundcube in the past but just never installed it. I  
am sick and tired of CommuniGate Pro and its ridiculous upgrade  
prices which is why I have been testing different servers. A big part  
of the equation is webmail. One choice is Squirrelmail which works  
well enough but I am really not happy with it. Its performance is not  
so great with large IMAP mailboxes either. I just looked at the  
Roundcube site again and the it looks promising. I'll have to try it  
out.


Bryan



Re: Mail Server (seeking recommendations)

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On Apr 16, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Adam wrote:


Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

would using postgreSQL for auth with postfix / Dovecot be slow  
even if

you used top of the line hardware say a dual core CPU and 4GB memory
w/ RAID 0?I am thinking very strongly about moving our Exchange  
Server

to postfix / PostgresSQL.


When the job is repeatedly looking up values in a hierarchical schema,
a relational database isn't a great choice.  This is exactly the  
kind of

task ldap is meant for, and it does it very well.  Courier, dovecot,
sendmail, postfix, sasl, etc will all happily use ldap.


LDAP does seem to have some major advantages. Even with a PostgreSQL  
backend to LDAP, it runs much better than PostgreSQL by itself?


Bryan



Really stuck and help needed of resources depletions on web servers.

2007-04-16 Thread Daniel Ouellet

Hi,

I need some help to find out what I can do to address this problem.

I did research, but so far can't get where I need to go and I am more 
stuck then usual and time is the essence this time around. I am adding 
more server resources tonight, but still need help as it can't keep up 
with the demand so far. Any help would be more then welcome as I am 
running like a chicken with his head cutoff now. I am not sure that I am 
looking at the right thing and run out of ideas, so I am setting more 
capacity with additional servers, however, that really will take lots of 
time and I am in a bind.


Any clue stick would be very much appreciated right now!

I am running 3.9 for now on a web server and today four times it crash 
and nothing could be done on the keyboard or anything else then reboot 
the server. Traffic was lots heavier then usual.


First look like PF run out of resources, or something, I disable PF to 
see if that help and I thought it was it, but then it happen again. Crash.


I am running 3.9 and the dmesg is below. The only thing I had on the 
screen was this: 95% sure, as I couldn't do much and no pen, etc.


started with a bunch of error message on the screen with:

extend_alloc_supregion: can't allocated region
extend_alloc_supregion: can't allocated region
extend_alloc_supregion: can't allocated region
extend_alloc_supregion: can't allocated region
extend_alloc_supregion: can't allocated region
extend_alloc_supregion: can't allocated region

end then I had this one:
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL
pf_test: pf_get_frag returned NULL


Anything I can do to help this situation?

I am kind of stuck, so any ideas woud;l be more then welcome.

===

OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #462: Thu Mar  2 03:52:16 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 1073278976 (1048124K)
avail mem = 908550144 (887256K)
using 22937 buffers containing 107536384 bytes (105016K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 242, 1593.82 MHz
cpu0: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,NXE,MMXX,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW
cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 1MB 
64b/line 16-way L2 cache

cpu0: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative
cpu0: DTLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 AMD 8131 PCIX rev 0x12
pci1 at ppb0 bus 3
AMD 8131 PCIX IOAPIC rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 not configured
ppb1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 AMD 8131 PCIX rev 0x12
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
bge0 at pci2 dev 3 function 0 Broadcom BCM5704C rev 0x02, BCM5704 A2 
(0x2002): irq 10, address 00:00:1a:19:55:df

brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
bge1 at pci2 dev 3 function 1 Broadcom BCM5704C rev 0x02, BCM5704 A2 
(0x2002): irq 11, address 00:00:1a:19:55:de

brgphy1 at bge1 phy 1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
AMD 8131 PCIX IOAPIC rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
ppb2 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 AMD 8111 PCI-PCI rev 0x07
pci3 at ppb2 bus 1
ohci0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 AMD 8111 USB rev 0x0b: irq 10, version 
1.0, legacy support

usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
ohci1 at pci3 dev 0 function 1 AMD 8111 USB rev 0x0b: irq 10, version 
1.0, legacy support

usb1 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1
uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
vga1 at pci3 dev 4 function 0 ATI Rage XL rev 0x27
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 AMD AMD8111 LPC rev 0x05
pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 AMD 8111 IDE rev 0x03: DMA, channel 0 
configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility

wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: Maxtor 6E040L0
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 38166MB, 78165360 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 6
pciide0: channel 1 disabled (no drives)
amdpm0 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 AMD 8111 Power rev 0x05: rng active
iic0 at amdpm0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 24 function 0 AMD AMD64 HyperTransport rev 0x00
pchb1 at pci0 dev 24 function 1 AMD AMD64 Address Map rev 0x00
pchb2 at pci0 dev 24 function 2 AMD AMD64 DRAM Cfg rev 0x00
pchb3 at pci0 dev 24 function 3 AMD AMD64 Misc Cfg rev 0x00
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 

Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status

2007-04-16 Thread Maurice Janssen
On Monday, April 16, 2007 at 15:17:32 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2007 14:14, Maurice Janssen wrote:
 Could be bad luck, but it seems to have the opposite effect.  It
 panic'd after a few minutes (details below), while up to now it used
 to run many hours before it panic'd.

Damn. It didn't work but it was a long shot to begin with. At least we 
know timing/priority does affect when/how quickly the bug surfaces.

Just out of curiosity, what exact command did you run to get the results 
you posted. Was it something like this:

# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/alpha/conf
# config GENERIC
# cd ../compile/GENERIC
# make clean  make depend 
# nice make

?

The kernel was built a few days ago.  What I did before this panic was:
boot
# rm -rf /usr/obj/*
# cd /usr/src
# make obj
# cd /usr/src/etc  env DESTDIR=/ make distrib-dirs
# cd /usr/src
# nice -n 20 make build

After about 10 minutes, it paniced.  /usr/src and /usr/obj are nfs
mounts.  BTW: the memory tests (as suggested by Siegbert) didn't show
any LLSC errors.

# dmesg
[ using 536000 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ]
consinit: using prom console
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California.  All rights
reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2006 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.
http://www.OpenBSD.org

OpenBSD 4.0-stable (GENERIC) #0: Fri Apr 13 05:15:48 CEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/alpha/compile/GENERIC
DEC 3000 - M300X, 175MHz
8192 byte page size, 1 processor.
total memory = 67108864 (65536K)
(2097152 reserved for PROM, 65011712 used by OpenBSD)
avail memory = 49037312 (47888K)
using 793 buffers containing 6496256 bytes (6344K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
cpu0 at mainbus0: ID 0 (primary), 21064-1 (pass 3)
tcasic0 at mainbus0
tc0 at tcasic0: 12.5 MHz clock
PMAGB-BA (Smart Frame Buffer (HX8)) at tc0 slot 6 offset 0x200 not configd
ioasic0 at tc0 slot 5 offset 0x0: slow mode
le0 at ioasic0 offset 0xc: address 08:00:2b:97:43:37
le0: 32 receive buffers, 8 transmit buffers
scc0 at ioasic0 offset 0x10: console
scc1 at ioasic0 offset 0x18
mcclock0 at ioasic0 offset 0x20: mc146818 or compatible
AMD79c30 at ioasic0 offset 0x24 not configured
tcds0 at tc0 slot 4 offset 0x0: TurboChannel Dual SCSI (baseboard)
tcds0: fast mode set for chip 0
asc0 at tcds0 chip 0: NCR53C94, 25MHz, SCSI ID 7
scsibus0 at asc0: 8 targets
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: DEC, RZ26L (C) DEC, 442D SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd0: 1001MB, 3117 cyl, 8 head, 82 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 2050860 sec total
sd1 at scsibus0 targ 3 lun 0: DEC, RZ26L (C) DEC, 442D SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd1: 1001MB, 3117 cyl, 8 head, 82 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 2050860 sec total
MAGMA8+2 at tc0 slot 1 offset 0x0 not configured
fta0 at tc0 slot 0 offset 0x0fta0: DEC DEFTA TC FDDI DAS Controller
fta0: FDDI address 08:00:2b:b0:8b:47, FW=3.00, HW=0, SMT V7.2
fta0: FDDI Port[A] = A (PMD = ANSI Multi-Mode), FDDI Port[B] = B (PMD = ANSI Mu)
root on sd0a swap on sd0b
rootdev=0x800 rrootdev=0x800 rawdev=0x802