[MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
Yeah, it would be possible if I could use a Doouble sided drive, but I only have single sided drives :-( - Original Message - From: Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1 By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive? (360k) Yes, it is, but a 360kb image was not released. The easyest way is creating a 360kb image from a 720kb floppy just copying the necessary files (and, of course, installing the kernel into it). With 360kb, at least, you'll be able to full access the Internet. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage/ * As opinioes expressas neste e-mail sao de minha inteira responsabilidade e nao refletem a posicao da AL Software * ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
voyager wrote: Yeah, it would be possible if I could use a Doouble sided drive, but I only have single sided drives :-( Use a PC to copy files from the 720K disk to the 360K disks! ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
Yeah, it would be possible if I could use a Doouble sided drive, but I only have single sided drives :-( - Original Message - From: Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1 By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive? (360k) Yes, it is, but a 360kb image was not released. The easyest way is creating a 360kb image from a 720kb floppy just copying the necessary files (and, of course, installing the kernel into it). With 360kb, at least, you'll be able to full access the Internet. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage/ * As opinioes expressas neste e-mail sao de minha inteira responsabilidade e nao refletem a posicao da AL Software * ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive? (360k) - Original Message - From: Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:00 AM Subject: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1 Hi, guys. I hope this list isn`t dead... :P I released again UZIX 0.2.1. The new release fix the corrupted FudeBrowZer program of the previous release. It also contains better network modules (their power will be demonstrated next weekend, at MSXRio2003 - stay tuned). The address, as usual, is: http://uzix.sf.net. P.S.: Manuel, I checked the files to be sure they fit on a 720KB floppy before releasing them. :) Adriano ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive? (360k) Yes, it is, but a 360kb image was not released. The easyest way is creating a 360kb image from a 720kb floppy just copying the necessary files (and, of course, installing the kernel into it). With 360kb, at least, you'll be able to full access the Internet. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage/ * As opinioes expressas neste e-mail sao de minha inteira responsabilidade e nao refletem a posicao da AL Software * ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
[MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
Hi, guys. I hope this list isn`t dead... :P I released again UZIX 0.2.1. The new release fix the corrupted FudeBrowZer program of the previous release. It also contains better network modules (their power will be demonstrated next weekend, at MSXRio2003 - stay tuned). The address, as usual, is: http://uzix.sf.net. P.S.: Manuel, I checked the files to be sure they fit on a 720KB floppy before releasing them. :) Adriano ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
I'm not dead ^^ Keep your project until I complete my H/W project ^^ Greeting, - Jun. - Original Message - From: Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:00 AM Subject: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1 Hi, guys. I hope this list isn`t dead... :P I released again UZIX 0.2.1. The new release fix the corrupted FudeBrowZer program of the previous release. It also contains better network modules (their power will be demonstrated next weekend, at MSXRio2003 - stay tuned). The address, as usual, is: http://uzix.sf.net. P.S.: Manuel, I checked the files to be sure they fit on a 720KB floppy before releasing them. :) Adriano ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
[MSX] UZIX 'setup.dat' file size fixed
For those who are interested: Now the setup.dat file for UZIX 0.2.1 fits on a single floppy. Sorry for the inconvenience and the delay to fix this. Regards, Adriano http://uzix.sf.net ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
[MSX] New UZIX 0.2.1 alpha / Novo alfa do UZIX 0.2.1
http://uzix.sf.net Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage ___ MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:40:37AM +0200, Tristan wrote: Warning. This is *beta* software. There are still plenty bugs so things might go wrong. Also please be kind and use logout to finish your session so another person can login. Do not just disconnect because that will hang the telnet daemon. Hi, Very nice to have just been logging in on a MSX computer. I was trying to write a README file to tell everyone to edit addr.txt and make it an addressbook, but unfortunately ed seemed to hang, so I had to disconnect :-( Does telnetd really hang, or does it just wait for a timeout? Anyway, I had some problems. I usually use ``cat file'' to create simple files. But that didn't work with a ``file: file not found'' error. After touching it, it was still not found. So I tried ed, but that didn't quite work as I hoped (I didn't really expect anything, I just read the manpage on how it worked) These are just some points which I think should be fixed. But I want to say again this is very great, it feels like a real (be it a bit slow) unix machine (even more because it's MSX and unices have something with names ending on X ;-) ) One remark about this reply concerning LF/CRLF: The telnet standard specifies LF should be used as newline. If your client cannot handle that, then you have a buggy client ;-) bye, shevek -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
Anyway, I had some problems. I usually use ``cat file'' to create simple files. But that didn't work with a ``file: file not found'' error. cat displays a file, thus uses a file as input, i think you were confused with 'echo this file' Vincent -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Vincent van Dam wrote: Anyway, I had some problems. I usually use ``cat file'' to create simple files. But that didn't work with a ``file: file not found'' error. cat displays a file, thus uses a file as input, i think you were confused with 'echo this file' wrong! cat puts its inputchannel simply trough to its outputchannel. If you specify a file(s) it will use the file(s) as its input, otherwise it will simply use (just as every other 'good' unix program) the std-in. In an interactive shell this means that cat will read the keyboard and out it to it's std-out. If std-out is redirected to a file using the '' rederection command, you can use cat filename to directly type letters into a file David -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
Hi, folks. Since now I have a power beta tester for UZIX, Tristan, and now that all of you know that UZIX rulez a lot, I feel compelled to make things better on UZIX. I'll check carefully the bugs reported about telnet daemon and try to fix them. Most of them are caused because I didn't test telnetd under Windows, but only under Linux, and it worked fine (no, Shevek, I didn't test ed or cat). These are just some points which I think should be fixed. But I want to say again this is very great, it feels like a real (be it a bit slow) unix machine (even more because it's MSX and unices have something with names ending on X ;-) ) If Tristan had a TR and 56kbps serial connection, things would be faster. But I don't complain. It's great to log into Omega's MSX, far away thousands of miles from my home. :) Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: Hi, folks. Since now I have a power beta tester for UZIX, Tristan, and now that all of you know that UZIX rulez a lot, I feel compelled to make things better on UZIX. I'll check carefully the bugs reported about telnet daemon and try to fix them. Most of them are caused because I didn't test telnetd under Windows, but only under Linux, and it worked fine (no, Shevek, I didn't test ed or cat). Hi, ed seems to give problems, indeed (I would prefer vi anyway...), but cat worked fine. I catted a text file (how was that made anyway?) from ~guest. The problem seemed to be the to redirect the output, so that should be in the shell. Bye, shevek -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz wrote: PS: a convertion of CR (or LF) to CR+LF would be better, but it's not important, the important is that it WORKS!!! That's something you should configure in your telnet client, not in the telnet daemon... Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
ed seems to give problems, indeed (I would prefer vi anyway...), but cat worked fine. I catted a text file (how was that made anyway?) from ~guest. The problem seemed to be the to redirect the output, so that should be in the shell. On the console, ed, tee or echo work fine to create a textfile. using cat file to create a textfile should in theory work but SASH doesnt support it yet.. On the telnet connection, ed, tee and echo have problems. Echo doesnt work because the redirection to a file isnt handled correctly somehow. Tee doesnt work because it doesnt receive the ctrl-d to close the file. Maybe Adriano can have a look at that.. Greetings P.S. Bas: UZIX telnetd can't handle termination of processes upon disconnect very well yet, it seems. So if you disconnect, your ed session will just wait forever, and keep the telnetd busy. Its not your fault ;) Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Yes! It worked last night :) :) After some fiddling around with my firewall, which wasn't too fond of port 81 at first :) Nice to see an MSX as part of the Internet :) Jan - Original Message - From: Tristan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:27 AM Subject: MSX running UZIX webserver Hi all, Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 :) I hope it stays up for a few days. Bye, Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Tomorrow I'll send you a special version of tupiniquim, with port definition in command-line, ok? Thank you but the port definition is really not that important to me. Its allright as it is! :) Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
RE: MSX running UZIX webserver
ah ok last night it didn't work on 81 , but now it does :) kalter -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens J. Lukens Verzonden: dinsdag 23 april 2002 9:35 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: MSX running UZIX webserver Yes! It worked last night :) :) After some fiddling around with my firewall, which wasn't too fond of port 81 at first :) Nice to see an MSX as part of the Internet :) Jan - Original Message - From: Tristan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:27 AM Subject: MSX running UZIX webserver Hi all, Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 :) I hope it stays up for a few days. Bye, Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
Two remarks for Windows users: set local echo on and use VT-52 terminal. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX telnet experiment
Yes, it works! I will copy here what I got. Nice job! For me, it couldn't be better. For small applications, the speed is acceptable, so we can move on! Greetings from Brazil! PS: a convertion of CR (or LF) to CR+LF would be better, but it's not important, the important is that it WORKS!!! --- Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz http://www.lsi.usp.br/~mdalpoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] old Fords never die, just get better UZIX operating system at (localhost) Kernel 0.2.1 on a MSX uzix login: Password: S ASH (ver. 1.0f) guest@uzix$ -al: No such file or directory guest@uzix$ ./ ../ testje dit_is_een_tes file guest@uzix$ /hom e/guest guest@uzix$ test ls exit guest@uzix$ guest@uzix$ -a: No such file or direc tory guest@uzix$ 512 drwxr-xr-x 2 @25./ 512 drwxr-xr-x 4 @30 ../ 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 @364 testje 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 @375 dit_is_ee n_tes 17-rw-r--r-- 1 @352 file guest@uzix$ guest@uzix$ guest@uzix$ gues t@uzix$ 512 drwxr-xr-x 2 @25./ 512 drwxr-xr-x 4 @30 ../ 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 @364 testje 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 @375 dit_is_een_tes 17 -rw-r--r-- 1 @352 file guest@uzix$ /home/guest guest@uzix$ guest@uzix$ . / ../ user/ guest/ guest@uzix$ PI D TTY STATTIME COMMAND 1 0 Waitfor 00:00:00 init 10 0 Sleep 00:00:00 login 18 0 Ready 00:02:40 telnetd 7 0 Ready 00:17:38 pppd 6 0 Ready 00:00:30 tcpipmo d 21 0 Ready 00:00:00 telnetd 22 0 Sleep 00:00:00 telnetd 23 30 Waitfor 00:00:00 -sh 24 30 Running 00:00:00 ps guest @uzix$ On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Tristan wrote: Hi people, The webserver is down atm... It didnt keep up with all hits very well, but at least some managed to get the html :) For now, I've loaded telnetd instead of httpd, so you guys can telnet into the MSX and have a look at UZIX. Just use any telnet application and connect to msx.rulez.nl. Use username 'guest' with password 'guest'. There can be only one connection at a time, so try again later if you get a connection refused. When you get in, have a look at the various commands you can try by entering 'ls /bin'. You can see which processes are running with 'ps -a'. Some unix experience is welcome, but there is documentation available via 'man command'. Please do not use 'tee', it will hang because telnetd doesnt pass ctrl-d correctly or something. Warning. This is *beta* software. There are still plenty bugs so things might go wrong. Also please be kind and use logout to finish your session so another person can login. Do not just disconnect because that will hang the telnet daemon. Have fun, Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Hi, I regret to inform that I cannot reach it here(I'm at work now, 9:15 am) ( I hope it will be available again, I'd really like seeing an MSX webserver. I'll keep trying, though. Bye, Jan Lukens - Original Message - From: Tristan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:27 AM Subject: MSX running UZIX webserver Hi all, Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 :) I hope it stays up for a few days. Bye, Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 Can't reach the page. :( Monday, 1:33pm, TZ=GMT-3 I hope it stays up for a few days. Me too! :P Alas, it went down within a few hours. httpd only printing '+' repeatedly on console.. Reboot fixed this for now. Other folks: please be patient, its a single threaded webserver so only one request at the same time.. Page takes at least 5 minutes to load. Adriano: Also due to reasons beyond my comprehension, sometimes it fails to send either one of the pictures included in the page. It seems httpd misses either one of the get requests the browser sends.. Maybe the browser sends multiple requests at the same time? Can the http protocol distinguish between single and multithreaded webservers? But for now it works again :) Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Alas, it went down within a few hours. httpd only printing '+' repeatedly on console.. Reboot fixed this for now. '+' signs are the secret signal for 'fudeba, i am out of memory!'. :P Too much broken connections in a short period of time causes this. I must get a better way of dealing with this problem... Adriano: Also due to reasons beyond my comprehension, sometimes it fails to send either one of the pictures included in the page. It seems httpd misses either one of the get requests the browser sends.. Maybe the browser sends multiple requests at the same time? Can the http protocol distinguish between single and multithreaded webservers? I also noted this behaviour. I think that this is a client fault. I read the entire HTTP RFC (don't remember the number now) and the version HTTP/1.0 and option Connection: close should be enough for client making just ONE connection at a time. At home, Netscape 4.75 worked fine, but Mozilla 0.99 not. Seems that most browsers assume a multithreaded webservers. Maybe I understood the RFC wrongly? Anybody knows more about this subject? But for now it works again :) I'll try again... Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
'Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha' wrote about 'Re: MSX running UZIX webserver' - Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 04:59:11PM CEST Alas, it went down within a few hours. httpd only printing '+' repeatedly on console.. Reboot fixed this for now. '+' signs are the secret signal for 'fudeba, i am out of memory!'. :P Too much broken connections in a short period of time causes this. I must get a better way of dealing with this problem... Adriano: Also due to reasons beyond my comprehension, sometimes it fails to send either one of the pictures included in the page. It seems httpd misses either one of the get requests the browser sends.. Maybe the browser sends multiple requests at the same time? Can the http protocol distinguish between single and multithreaded webservers? I also noted this behaviour. I think that this is a client fault. I read the entire HTTP RFC (don't remember the number now) and the version HTTP/1.0 and option Connection: close should be enough for client making just ONE connection at a time. At home, Netscape 4.75 worked fine, but Mozilla 0.99 not. Seems that most browsers assume a multithreaded webservers. Maybe I understood the RFC wrongly? Anybody knows more about this subject? I read the HTTP RFC's also, and indeed, I remember the same thing about Connection: close, soo I asume you are correct, this tells the client to close the connection, and then use a new connection for the next request. Yet still, if to many people start trying to connect/reconnect, I think your UZIX webserver or perhaps the IP stack will very easially run out of memory? Of course I don't know enough about UZIX :) Joost -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Yet still, if to many people start trying to connect/reconnect, I think your UZIX webserver or perhaps the IP stack will very easially run out of memory? This is a big problem, because MSX connection is slow. So, people enter the URL and wait for 30s. If they don't see anything on screen, they click the reload button. Connection is closed and a new one is opened. But the old connection don't simply die. It must wait until the TIME_WAIT timeout expires. Well, click the reload button two times and you'll get four sockets open. This is the current limit of UZIX TCP/IP (due to memory restrictions). Next version of UZIX (0.2.2) will have a much better memory handling routines, so TCP/IP can allocate even 4Mb of RAM to it :P. This will solve any problem related to miss of free memory (of course, if the MSX has enough phisical memory). Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 Congratulations, Tristan. Here at home I could see the page. :) Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
RE: MSX running UZIX webserver
it should be :80 :) Kalter -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha Verzonden: maandag 22 april 2002 23:36 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: MSX running UZIX webserver Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 Congratulations, Tristan. Here at home I could see the page. :) Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
it should be :80 :) It should. But it isn't, since now Tristan has two webservers running on his IP. :) Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
It should. But it isn't, since now Tristan has two webservers running on his IP. :) Indeed. I can also turn off the other webserver and make the MSX the primary server ;) BTW, Adriano, you are fudeba. When accessing url http://msx.rulez.nl:81/blaat.html : 404 Not Found. The requested URL /blaat.html was not found on this server. Tupiniquim Web Server for UZIX vr. 1.0 at msx.alsoft.com Port 80 ^^ You hardcode the server hostname in a 404 error message?! rofl! ;) Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
When accessing url http://msx.rulez.nl:81/blaat.html : 404 Not Found. The requested URL /blaat.html was not found on this server. Tupiniquim Web Server for UZIX vr. 1.0 at msx.alsoft.com Port 80 ^^ You hardcode the server hostname in a 404 error message?! rofl! ;) It's not my entire fault. :))) Ok, I confess, port 80 is hardcoded in tupiniquim, but hostname isn't. It's defined on /etc/HOSTNAME. :) Future versions of tupiniquim will have a configurable port in command line. :P Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
It's not my entire fault. :))) Ok, I confess, port 80 is hardcoded in tupiniquim, but hostname isn't. It's defined on /etc/HOSTNAME. :) Oh my god. I never changed the hostname. Now who is the bigger fudeba? :) 404 Not Found. The requested URL /blaatje.html was not found on this server. Tupiniquim Web Server for UZIX vr. 1.0 at msx.rulez.nl Port 80 Btw, when can we expect the next kernel release?? :)) Bye, Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Oh my god. I never changed the hostname. Now who is the bigger fudeba? :) You, of course... :P Btw, when can we expect the next kernel release?? :)) Tomorrow I'll send you a special version of tupiniquim, with port definition in command-line, ok? Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
MSX running UZIX webserver
Hi all, Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 :) I hope it stays up for a few days. Bye, Tristan -- a.k.a. OmegaMSX Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org) FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx) MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365.com/stations/266034) WWW: http://httpd.chello.nl/~t.zondag01 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Yes, It works! Nice job for you and Adriano Cunha! But where is the imagnes? It seems to be that 2 images should appear. Greetings from Brazil! --- Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz http://www.lsi.usp.br/~mdalpoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] old Fords never die, just get better On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Tristan wrote: Hi all, Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver: http://msx.rulez.nl:81 :) I hope it stays up for a few days. Bye, Tristan -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Hey guyz, Because of the time difference, bad English and a not-so-well known April Fools Day some people in Japan actually believed this pun. So errr. Uzix is not dead yet ;) But considering the huge coding efforts of Chaos, I suggest we carry on with our development of Windows msXP. I think we really are getting somewhere! :) Greetz, Sander http://www.msx.org http://www.benjaminb.nl -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Sander Zuidema wrote: Hey guyz, Because of the time difference, bad English and a not-so-well known April Fools Day some people in Japan actually believed this pun. So errr. Uzix is not dead yet ;) I live in Brazil but when I read the message it was some days after, so I didn't get it immediately. However, the sarcasm of the original message is what got my attention :) I hope to fix my MSX so I can run UZIX on a real machine... Stephen Pedrosa Eilert -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st: Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
d-fader wrote: here we go: 10 cls 20 color 15,4,4 23 width 80 Nah, make that a width 132:height 55 More text on the screen is cool Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
At 10:16 2-4-02 +0200, you wrote: Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st: Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Of which year? :) GreeTz, BiFi Visit my Home Page at www.bifi.msxnet.org mail me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FTP: ftp.bifi.msxnet.org ICQ #36126979 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric looks like the spainish are ahead 93 days :-) and aprils fools day is started in brielle the netherlands. Vincent -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
At 10:16 02/04/2002 +0200, you wrote: Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st: Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric Or 272, depends -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
RE: UZIX is dead
Jep, the dutch invented april fools day :) On the day they beat the spanish in brielle there was a little rime too, but I can't remember it anymore Stephan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of eMeSiX Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 17:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: UZIX is dead Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric looks like the spainish are ahead 93 days :-) and aprils fools day is started in brielle the netherlands. Vincent -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
UZIX is dead
Hi, After thinking a lot about it, I decided to kill UZIX. After many crashes of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC, I realized that I don't want it happening on my MSX. So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for our beloved MSX. I'll put my efforts on a beautiful GUI, nice animation effects and strong user interference avoidance. In other words, I'll start a new operating system called Windows msXP. And to ensure its easy development and performance, I'll write it in pure MSX BASIC. After all, why we would need a multitask/multiuser/multianything OS for our MSX? Just nice icons, pretty windows and beauty animations are enough! I think every MSX user who read this e-mail will agree and support my decision, since it's rational and intelligent. Regards, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diretor Executivo - AL Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Hmmm, After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does, but what about the other countries? PS: I joined the Windows MSXP team in order to work with Adriano in his new OS. []s Mauricio Braga. _ Você podia estar baixando sua musica predileta, enquanto lia esse e-mail. Não perca tempo, tenha acesso rápido a internet com o Super iG. http://registro.ig.com.br/superig -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
At 14:08 01/04/2002 -0300, you wrote: Hmmm, After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does, but what about the other countries? PS: I joined the Windows MSXP team in order to work with Adriano in his new OS. []s Mauricio Braga. Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
At 13:53 1-4-02 +, you wrote: After thinking a lot about it, I decided to kill UZIX. After many crashes of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC, I realized that I don't want it happening on my MSX. So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for our beloved MSX. I'll put my efforts on a beautiful GUI, nice animation effects and strong user interference avoidance. In other words, I'll start a new operating system called Windows msXP. And to ensure its easy development and performance, I'll write it in pure MSX BASIC. After all, why we would need a multitask/multiuser/multianything OS for our MSX? Just nice icons, pretty windows and beauty animations are enough! I think every MSX user who read this e-mail will agree and support my decision, since it's rational and intelligent. I like it too, and I can help as well... I have a virtual memory system in basic lying around somewhere and I can provide a basic multitask system as well... GreeTz, BiFi Visit my Home Page at www.bifi.msxnet.org mail me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FTP: ftp.bifi.msxnet.org ICQ #36126979 -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does, but what about the other countries? Actually it was invented in 1948 by the United States of America, in response to under-achievement and lack of innovation in the rest of the known world. America invented everything, didn't you know that? :) Richard (firmly entrenched in the United Kingdom, and very nice it is too) -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Em 01 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: I definately support your idea. I can even offer some assistance! About a year ago I wrote some MMU routines, with complete support for virtual memory, memory protection and memory swapping. Those routines are already written in MSX BASIC so can be easily integrated into your new OS. That's great! With your help, things will get faster. I was thinking about writing those routines, but since you already have them, I will put my efforts in another direction. I'm contacting Ricardo Bittencourt in order to get the specs of vip and must format, so the new MSX Windows Media Player I'll write will be able to play them. I'll work on the MSX JVM too, with just in time compiler (it will translate java bytecode to msx basic code, it will increase many times the performance). If Ricardo Wants it, I will send the code to him, so he can add java support to fudebrowser. The only problem is that in order to play mpeg2 files in full screen with the new MSX Windows Media Player, and Java Apps with the new MSX JVM, I believe you will need a 10 mhz z80 processor. I would like to know more about your z80 microcode. Contact me, maybe with your assistance, it won't be necessary the 10mhz Z80. []s Mauricio Braga. _ Você podia estar baixando sua musica predileta, enquanto lia esse e-mail. Não perca tempo, tenha acesso rápido a internet com o Super iG. http://registro.ig.com.br/superig -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:53:25PM +, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: Hi, After many crashes of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC,... I told you that micorsoft is always right :-) operating system called Windows msXP. Yep, it's all in the name. Free (386)BSD made the mistakes of to many weird letters and numbers in their name and it freightens people away. The cool name that's it * David * Wasn't it one of those MS lovers that once said that ? ;-) -- Never assume malice when results can be explained through incompetence? -- Napoleon Bonaparte -- In the case of M$, the distinction can be a difficult one to make -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Em 01 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: I definately support your idea. I can even offer some assistance! About a year ago I wrote some MMU routines, with complete support for virtual memory, memory protection and memory swapping. Those routines are already written in MSX BASIC so can be easily integrated into your new OS. That's great! With your help, things will get faster. I was thinking about writing those routines, but since you already have them, I will put my efforts in another direction. I'm contacting Ricardo Bittencourt in order to get the specs of vip and must format, so the new MSX Windows Media Player I'll write will be able to play them. I'll work on the MSX JVM too, with just in time compiler (it will translate java bytecode to msx basic code, it will increase many times the performance). If Ricardo Wants it, I will send the code to him, so he can add java support to fudebrowser. The only problem is that in order to play mpeg2 files in full screen with the new MSX Windows Media Player, and Java Apps with the new MSX JVM, I believe you will need a 10 mhz z80 processor. I would like to know more about your z80 microcode. Contact me, maybe with your assistance, it won't be necessary the 10mhz Z80. []s Mauricio Braga. _ Você podia estar baixando sua musica predileta, enquanto lia esse e-mail. Não perca tempo, tenha acesso rápido a internet com o Super iG. http://registro.ig.com.br/superig -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Hey, I wanna help too, that's why I've been working since I received the message. Ofcourse, new operating systems need to crash a lot, that's why I already made that part! (it's taken from the Teddy's In Action windows emulator...), problem is that routine was in asm, so that's a bit too fast (you can't see the screen building up), that's why I tried to make it in MSX-Basic! Let me hear if you can use it, else just steel it, cause that's what the developers of the world's most used operating systems also do... And be sure to kill all people with open source routines, after you steel them, ofcourse... here we go: 10 cls 20 color 15,4,4 23 width 80 26 a = hFA4978D:s$ = windows msXP kernel 30 print A fatal exception has occurred on address + a*rnd(65535) + in module + s$ + ! 40 print You gotta reboot! Please press the [any] key to reboot the system, unsaved changes will be lost... 50 input a$ : defusr=0:a=usr(0) It's not completely perfect, but I guess it's a good basis! Good luck and hope to hear from you! d-fader -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
I prefer this one in WIDTH 40 ;) Sander http://www.msx.org http://www.benjaminb.nl - Original Message - From: d-fader [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 23:13 Subject: Re: UZIX is dead Hey, I wanna help too, that's why I've been working since I received the message. Ofcourse, new operating systems need to crash a lot, that's why I already made that part! (it's taken from the Teddy's In Action windows emulator...), problem is that routine was in asm, so that's a bit too fast (you can't see the screen building up), that's why I tried to make it in MSX-Basic! Let me hear if you can use it, else just steel it, cause that's what the developers of the world's most used operating systems also do... And be sure to kill all people with open source routines, after you steel them, ofcourse... here we go: 10 cls 20 color 15,4,4 23 width 80 26 a = hFA4978D:s$ = windows msXP kernel 30 print A fatal exception has occurred on address + a*rnd(65535) + in module + s$ + ! 40 print You gotta reboot! Please press the [any] key to reboot the system, unsaved changes will be lost... 50 input a$ : defusr=0:a=usr(0) It's not completely perfect, but I guess it's a good basis! Good luck and hope to hear from you! d-fader -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: New UZIX-targeted HTC compiler script for Linux
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: Eric Boon and Manuel Bilderbeek made a new script to compile UZIX programs under Linux This script has the advantage of using subdirectories; and you don't need to put everything in a single directory to compile anymore It's very useful Some notes: - the version Adriano got from us is not the latest version We found some bugs last weekend Eric is fixing them - the script is *not* UZIX targeted, but MSX-DOS targeted You can easily adapt it for UZIX though Maybe we should make an option so that the user can choose the OS - you can *not* use original CP/M files, since most of them have CTRL-Z and other garbage at the end of the file We made also a script to convert CP/M files to normal text files, removing the garbage I think Eric has the latest version of that script at hands, so he could send it to Adriano - Please read the restrictions in the script itself: you cannot have captial letters in the Hi-Tech C path, you need gcc (no problem there, I guess), and the other requirements, like: you need the cpmemu - most of it is made by Eric, please send fan-mail to him! ;-) -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://wwwfaqmsxnetorg/) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeekcjbnet/ -- For info, see http://wwwstacknl/~wynke/MSX/listinfohtml
Re: New UZIX-targeted HTC compiler script for Linux
Manuel Bilderbeek wrote: Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: Eric Boon and Manuel Bilderbeek made a new script to compile UZIX programs under Linux. This script has the advantage of using subdirectories; and you don't need to put everything in a single directory to compile anymore. It's very useful. Some notes: - the version Adriano got from us is not the latest version. We found some bugs last weekend. Eric is fixing them. Correction: Eric will fix them this weekend :-) - the script is *not* UZIX targeted, but MSX-DOS targeted. You can easily adapt it for UZIX though. Maybe we should make an option so that the user can choose the OS. Actually, the script is not targeted at all :-) I would like to know what the exact differences are between the UZIX version of the HiTech C package and the original... Adriano? - you can *not* use original CP/M files, since most of them have CTRL-Z and other garbage at the end of the file. We made also a script to convert CP/M files to normal text files, removing the garbage. I think Eric has the latest version of that script at hands, so he could send it to Adriano... - Please read the restrictions in the script itself: you cannot have captial letters in the Hi-Tech C path, you need gcc (no problem there, I guess), and the other requirements, like: you need the cpmemu. - most of it is made by Eric, please send fan-mail to him! ;-) Since I have no real obligations to fullfill this weekned I'll see if I can make a effort to make a nice package out of the scripts and the dir-ified HiTech stuff, with installation instructions and all that stuff... Patience is silver, HiTech is gold ;-) -- Eric Boon ---.---.. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 0 = 0+0+0+... = (1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+... || | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | = 1-(1-1)-(1-1)-... = 1-0-0-... = 1 || `'---'' -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: New UZIX-targeted HTC compiler script for Linux
Eric Boon wrote: Manuel Bilderbeek wrote: Actually, the script is not targeted at all :-) I would like to know what the exact differences are between the UZIX version of the HiTech C package and the original Adriano? Good point Also: are there any other libraries (except those from Pierre Gielen on FUNet) for Hi-Tech C available? Preferably with sources I heard that Konamiman (Hi Nestor!) also did some work on Hi-Tech C Are there known bugs (and fixes available?) in Pierre's libglib? Anyone? Let's make a nice library collection -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://wwwfaqmsxnetorg/) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeekcjbnet/ -- For info, see http://wwwstacknl/~wynke/MSX/listinfohtml
Re: New UZIX-targeted HTC compiler script for Linux
- the version Adriano got from us is not the latest version. We found some bugs last weekend. Eric is fixing them. Don't forget to send me a copy. :) - the script is *not* UZIX targeted, but MSX-DOS targeted. The script Eric sent me (and that is available at UZIX site) *IS* UZIX targeted. = Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz ___ Yahoo! Empregos O trabalho dos seus sonhos pode estar aqui. Cadastre-se hoje mesmo no Yahoo! Empregos e tenha acesso a milhares de vagas abertas! http://br.empregos.yahoo.com/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: New UZIX-targeted HTC compiler script for Linux
Actually, the script is not targeted at all :-) I would like to know what the exact differences are between the UZIX version of the HiTech C package and the original... Adriano? Just library, header files and CRT0.OBJ (which is C0U.OBJ in UZIX). = Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz ___ Yahoo! Empregos O trabalho dos seus sonhos pode estar aqui. Cadastre-se hoje mesmo no Yahoo! Empregos e tenha acesso a milhares de vagas abertas! http://br.empregos.yahoo.com/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
New UZIX-targeted HTC compiler script for Linux
Hi, Eric Boon and Manuel Bilderbeek made a new script to compile UZIX programs under Linux. This script has the advantage of using subdirectories; and you don't need to put everything in a single directory to compile anymore. It's very useful. The new script is, as allways, at http://uzix.sf.net; Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz Who? Me, worry? - Bill Gates, about problems with Windows -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Maico Arts wrote: That guy I was talking about is Jurgen Kramer. He send me the image files of the 1.59 novaxis bios. No other documentation or information that can explain why Uzix works on Novaxis 1.51 but not on 1.59? -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://www.faq.msxnet.org/) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Maico Arts wrote: I need the help of the guy who made the ROM vr. 1.59 (or anyone who knows this ROM in deep). And that guy did not react to my email for asking for info... Maybe Gert de Boom can shine any light on this... Gert told me he doesn't know about this version. He thought it was the one that is adapted by NWO... But afaik that is another different version (with rolled out ldirs). HELP! I want to be able to run Uzix on my MSX! -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://www.faq.msxnet.org/) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Hello And that guy did not react to my email for asking for info... Maybe Gert de Boom can shine any light on this... Gert told me he doesn't know about this version. He thought it was the one that is adapted by NWO... But afaik that is another different version (with rolled out ldirs). That guy I was talking about is Jurgen Kramer. He send me the image files of the 1.59 novaxis bios. greetings Maico Arts -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: Hi, MSXers. Since the MSX scene is too calm and people prefer fighting about useless topics, I decided to release UZIX 0.2.1. I'm calling it 'alpha' because I didn't update the docs and I wanna add some more improvements in this version (hi, Alex!). System is funcional, running fine on my TR+IDE CIEL. Further information and the complete description of improvements can be found on UZIX page. So, download and run it! What's new in this version? I can't find it on the web site. -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://www.faq.msxnet.org/) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Manuel, What's new in this version? I can't find it on the web site. Go to download section of UZIX 2.0. Check UZIX alphas section. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz Who? Me, worry? - Bill Gates, about problems with Windows _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: What's new in this version? I can't find it on the web site. Go to download section of UZIX 2.0. Check UZIX alphas section. Found it. Thanks! Any support yet for Novaxis ROM 1.59.64? If not (general call): who has information about this specific BIOS release? -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://www.faq.msxnet.org/) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Hello I need the help of the guy who made the ROM vr. 1.59 (or anyone who knows this ROM in deep). And that guy did not react to my email for asking for info... Maybe Gert de Boom can shine any light on this... greetings Maico Arts MSX-NBNO -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
UZIX 0.2.1 alpha released
Hi, MSXers. Since the MSX scene is too calm and people prefer fighting about useless topics, I decided to release UZIX 0.2.1. I'm calling it 'alpha' because I didn't update the docs and I wanna add some more improvements in this version (hi, Alex!). System is funcional, running fine on my TR+IDE CIEL. Further information and the complete description of improvements can be found on UZIX page. So, download and run it! http://uzix.sf.net Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz Who? Me, worry? - Bill Gates, about problems with Windows _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
RE: Results of ethernet card prototype on UZIX
No, you didn't read it wrong. Checkout the results of ethernet card prototype on UZIX. Far out, man! ;) Keep up the good work! -Dan -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Results of ethernet card prototype on UZIX
Hi, MSXers. No, you didn't read it wrong. Checkout the results of ethernet card prototype on UZIX. http://uzix.sourceforge.net/uzix2.0/ethernet/ Regards, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz Who? Me, worry? - Bill Gates, about problems with Windows _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX test
Hi, Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI? You mean, the beta test, with the uzix version in http://uzix.sourceforge.net/test/uzix021.pma? I'll see if I can spare a few minutes one of these days to run the test on my Novaxis. Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX test
Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI? To do both test that is possible no one can do it... Sorry, I mean: Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with (UZIX kernel) AND (Novaxis OR MegaSCSI)? = Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz ___ Yahoo! GeoCities Tenha seu lugar na Web. Construa hoje mesmo sua home page no Yahoo! GeoCities. É fácil e grátis! http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX test
Hello Adriano Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with (UZIX kernel) AND (Novaxis OR MegaSCSI)? Well, I can, but as I said I haven't had mauch time lately... greetings Maico Arts -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
UZIX test
Hi, Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI? Regards, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz If Windows is user-friendly, why does its manual has at least 600 pages? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX test
Hello Adriano Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI? To do both test that is possible no one can do it... I want to do the test, but I haven't had much time lately... Greetings Maico Arts -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Greetings from Uzix 0.2.0
Hi, This message is sent from my turbo R, connected to the net using a Sunrise IDE+RS232C interface and a null modem cable to my Linux box. Uzix 0.2.0 is really cool! Bye, Maarten -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Mega update in UZIX page and version 0.2.0 released
Hi, MSXers. If you thought that UZIX project was dead, you're wrong. UZIX page got a major update. Here are the news: - New site layout To handle the news of the project. - Site update Including project status, introduction and how-to texts and installation and Internet connection guides. - Updated UZIX 1.0 installation programs Small changes to make it easier installing UZIX on a MSX that doesn't use partitioning scheme. - C compiler targeted for UZIX Tired of programming for a monotask and monouser system? Now the Hitech-C compiler is available with UZIX libraries (standard, math and TCP/IP), so you can compile applications for UZIX 1.0 and 2.0. Besides a guide about creating UZIX application , is also available MSXDOS, MS-DOS and Linux versions of the compiler. - UZIX 0.2.0 Finally the new version of the unique UNIX operating system for MSX is available, with all features and applications of UZIX 1.0 and, yet, new features: * direct access to floppy drive on MSX Turbo-R; Faster access (and no more problems) with floppy disks in MSX Turbo-R . * kernel support to RS232 interfaces; Allowing RS232 access even using the shell. * Sunrise RS232 and ACCNET support; Throw away your Gradiente TM-2 modem and buy NOW your Sunrise RS232 interface or ACCNET and access Internet at 56Kbps! (no, I'm not being paid by Sunrise or HNostar for the marketing) * intelligent memory utilization; Dynamic memory allocation for processes, allowing applications to use from only 16kb to 48kb of linear memory. More powerful applications and more efficient memory utilization, allowing UZIX to run on a MSX2 with 128kb RAM or on a MSX Turbo-R with 4096kb RAM (no, UZIX 2.0 does not work - and will not - on a MSX1). * virtual terminals; Would you like to make two things at the same time on your MSX? Three? Would you like to have two, three MSX running at the same time and sharing the same HD/floppy/RS232/etc? Duplicate, triplicate, multiply your work on MSX! Now UZIX has virtual terminals: you have virtual monitors on your MSX, easily accessible by GRAPH+Fn keys! - FudeBrowZer 1.2 UZIX 2.0 version of FudeBrowZer. It has the same functionality of version 1.1 (for UZIX 1.0), but also has dynamic WILD server selection. - Extra applications for UZIX 2.0 Using DOS emulation, some applications, not available on UZIX, as an example, were ported, expanding (more) the usage of the system: PMARC, PMEXT, XARJ, UNPMA, MED (ASCII's text editor), MBASIC and Microsoft Multiplan. Check the screenshots of UZIX at the site. The installation package and the diskimage are also available. The address, as always, is: http://uzix.msx.org Regards, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz Aibohphobia n. - The fear of palindromes _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Eric, I can send you the Novaxis info that Maico Arts sent me. Please, I'd like to have all info anyway - even if I don't get to write the Novaxis driver for Uzix32 :-) Ok. Erh, can't I use/rewrite the MegaSCSI routines and keep floppy support? Or is the floppy also disabled when MegaSCSI (or IDE for that matter) is selected? No. Because MegaSCSI/Sunrise IDE/floppy drivers are the same routines. There is no specific drivers. Novaxis support on UZIX48k is something for a (not near) future... I C, but having a working version on Uzix32 would help, wouldn't it? :-) Of course. :) Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less C -- It isn't just for breakfast anymore. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Adriano de Cunha wrote: Get UZIX sources from UZIX page. Will do, will do :-) I can send you the Novaxis info that Maico Arts sent me. Please, I'd like to have all info anyway - even if I don't get to write the Novaxis driver for Uzix32 :-) You will need to rewrite all the DEVFLOP.MSX routines and substitute them by the Novaxis IO routines. Ok... But you will loose floppy-disk support. Erh, can't I use/rewrite the MegaSCSI routines and keep floppy support? Or is the floppy also disabled when MegaSCSI (or IDE for that matter) is selected? Novaxis support on UZIX48k is something for a (not near) future... There is much more to do first... I C, but having a working version on Uzix32 would help, wouldn't it? :-) Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Eric, Hm, I still would like to see Novaxis stuff in the Uzix I have now. If the sources of Uzix32 are released, will there be enough info to hack in the novaxis support (and e.g. cut out the IDE or MegaSCSI stuff...) ?? Or would it be possible to take the Novaxis driver for Uzix48 and use it in Uzix32? (I have no problem with trying to patch Uzix 0.1.8 upto 0.1.81 or 0.1.9 ;-)) Get UZIX sources from UZIX page. I can send you the Novaxis info that Maico Arts sent me. You will need to rewrite all the DEVFLOP.MSX routines and substitute them by the Novaxis IO routines. But you will loose floppy-disk support. Novaxis support on UZIX48k is something for a (not near) future... There is much more to do first... = Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz ___ Yahoo! GeoCities Tenha seu lugar na Web. Construa hoje mesmo sua home page no Yahoo! GeoCities. É fácil e grátis! http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
UZIX 1.0 final
Hi, MSXers. UZIX page was updated. This was the last planned update. The news are: - UZIX 1.0 Final version, stable, of UZIX. - Updated sources Including some bugfixes necessary for making UZIX work with brazilian MSX with MegaRAM. - UZIX 1.0 for MSX1 Functional version, tested with a Expert 1.1 and DDX MegaRAM. Includes TCP/IP Stack and FudeBrowZer. YES! You can access the Internet just with a MSX1! - TCP/IP guides updated; - MSXDOS utilities updated; - WILD source updated (little bugfixes); The UZIX page address is, as usual: http://uzix.msx.org Bye, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
If no one wants to send me a Novaxis for Christmas ;) [I send it back, I promess], I will need beta testers when the Novaxis driver be ready. Volunteers, anyone? :) Of course Eric and I will be happy to test it (again)! The parallel-live-chat helped a lot. We'll have to arrange that again next time! :-) Any ideas yet about how to get it working on or (according to you WEIRD) Novaxis interfaces? Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4 ever! (Questions? FAQ: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/ ) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Manuel, Of course Eric and I will be happy to test it (again)! The parallel-live-chat helped a lot. We'll have to arrange that again next time! Of course! Any ideas yet about how to get it working on or (according to you WEIRD) Yes! Weird! Weird! Weird! :P :) Novaxis interfaces? Yes. Maico Arts send me interestings docs and sources of Novaxis. Next UZIX HD drivers will use direct access to MegaSCSI/IDE/Novaxis/ floppy/etc BIOS (for floppies I'll use Alex Wulms's FastCopy drivers, so no more slowdown problems with your MSXs). I think the problem with Novaxis will be solved. Regards, = Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz ___ Yahoo! GeoCities Tenha seu lugar na Web. Construa hoje mesmo sua home page no Yahoo! GeoCities. É fácil e grátis! http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Yes. Maico Arts send me interestings docs and sources of Novaxis. Next UZIX HD drivers will use direct access to MegaSCSI/IDE/Novaxis/ floppy/etc BIOS (for floppies I'll use Alex Wulms's FastCopy drivers, so no more slowdown problems with your MSXs). I think the problem with Novaxis will be solved. That sounds terrific! But, will it be solved in Uzix 48k (which means we'll have to wait relatively long... :-)? Or already in 32k (which would be cooler! ;-)? Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4 ever! (Questions? FAQ: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/ ) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
RE: UZIX is dead
UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :) Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else on UZIX32k kernel. So, you'll have to wait relatively long... Hi! I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? -Dan Derpaux / www.algorythms.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
RE: UZIX is dead
Hi, I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? UZIX48k kernel will have 64kb. :) Regards, = Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz ___ Yahoo! GeoCities Tenha seu lugar na Web. Construa hoje mesmo sua home page no Yahoo! GeoCities. É fácil e grátis! http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :) Okay, that's right... Forgot that... :-) Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else on UZIX32k kernel. So, you'll have to wait relatively long... Okay, we'll do that. I'm looking forward to Uzix48k! Keep us updated! :-) Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4 ever! (Questions? FAQ: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/ ) PPS: Visit my homepage: http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
RE: UZIX is dead
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:33:26 +0200, adisak wrote: Hi! I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? the 48k of Uzix48k name is not about kernel size. As Adriano already said, Uzix48k will have a 64Kb kernel. 48k means that all apps will have 48kb of linear address available, instead of the actual 32Kb of Uzix32k. 48Kb is almost what is given by MSXDOS, but the difference is Uzix provide lots and lots of services DOS will never imagine to provide, and of course, the multitask... ((^= Daniel Caetano [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...A necessidade de criatividade e' o que contribui para a mudanca. A criatividade mantem o criador vivo. (Frank Herbert) -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Daniel Caetano wrote: On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:33:26 +0200, adisak wrote: Hi! I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? the 48k of Uzix48k name is not about kernel size. As Adriano already said, Uzix48k will have a 64Kb kernel. 48k means that all apps will have 48kb of linear address available, instead of the actual 32Kb of Uzix32k. But, is the new Uzix going to be called Uzix48k? I don't like this name. I prefer simply Uzix. The first thought that shaked my head when I saw the 48Kb was the ZX Spectrum 48Kb with rubber keys... Greets -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Ivan, But, is the new Uzix going to be called Uzix48k? I don't like this name. I prefer simply Uzix. I like UZIX also. I like it so much that UZIX will not be named UZIX48k, but only UZIX. The difference will be the version number. The first thought that shaked my head when I saw the 48Kb was the ZX Spectrum 48Kb with rubber keys... Hahaha! :) Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
- Original Message - From: Manuel Bilderbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:52 PM Subject: Re: UZIX is dead UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :) Okay, that's right... Forgot that... :-) Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else on UZIX32k kernel. So, you'll have to wait relatively long... Okay, we'll do that. I'm looking forward to Uzix48k! Keep us updated! :-) Hm, I still would like to see Novaxis stuff in the Uzix I have now. If the sources of Uzix32 are released, will there be enough info to hack in the novaxis support (and e.g. cut out the IDE or MegaSCSI stuff...) ?? Or would it be possible to take the Novaxis driver for Uzix48 and use it in Uzix32? (I have no problem with trying to patch Uzix 0.1.8 upto 0.1.81 or 0.1.9 ;-)) Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
What I would appreciate is Sunrise IDE support for UZIX, or is it implemented already ? Read the Docs Stt :)) It's allready implemented. What we need is support for the Sunrise RS232 so a lot of european people can connect their msx to a PC and browse the internet with their MSX... Checked general info from uzix-page, but didn't found out anything about IDE support. Maybe I didn't read enough carefully... Greetings: Saku Taipale, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX with external mapper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 13 July 2001 08:21, you wrote: Yeah, i have the same problem with my 512kb external Memmorymapper, but you allready know that :)) (also have a problem with my Internal Memmory mapper, but that's a diffrent story). External mapper on a Turbo-R ? I have the same problem in R800 mode. I use a checkmark mapper and apparently they are to slow to be used in a not 3.5 MHz machine. Since the R800 stand of the Turbo-R is faster... Make sure the mapper is fast enough for anything faster than the lowest 3.5 MHz. Otherwise the RAM's don't have enough time to set their data on the bus so the CPU reads in rubbish values, therefore executing a program made of random opcodes which in 99.% of the cases will crash the computer. In the other 0.0001% change your MSX will turn into a super intelligent system trying to take over the world by dailing the USA racket launchs systems, so always discconnect your modem :-) David Heremans - -- If it weren't for Emulation, we'd have no reason to lack a life -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7TpxyY1Ruj4IFD1oRAqubAJ9fa6ufYU9rIub+18bI7keRWrhHeACdF8ns +lJTYw7IABdigA3SfKpupVI= =rcGm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Adriano: [UZIX = dead] Hmmm, what about the Novaxis SCSI support? :-) That's a limitation of UZIX32k that I want to break. :) Ah Ok :-) How much people here would like to help such project? I would, definitely. In two years that the UZIX site is up, two or three guys really asked me for infos about making applications for UZIX, etc. Well, the main reasons why I didn't try to contact you about application development included: (1) Lack of time (2) You showed no intention of releasing *anything* of UZIX, except the one-big-binary-package. That made it rather hard for me to decide whether it would be useful for me to put time and effort in UZIX related development. (3) UZIX doesn't run comfortably on my machine - running from flop is **s**l**o**w** and my HD interface was not supported (heheh ;-)) At the moment a (4) kicks in: I've got RSI, which largely limits my possiblilities to type - and try doing any development without typing :-/ Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
I would be interested in helping the development as well, but since I only own 2 MSX1s, I'll have to make do with an MSX2(+) emulator. Also it's been some time since I did any programming on the MSX. I've only been able to run the disk image on fMSX and it works fine and looks good. A question for you: exactly what filesystem does UZIX run on? Is it a MINIX (like) filesystem, or an entirely own variant? Martin. -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Read the Docs Stt :)) It's allready implemented. What we need is support for the Sunrise RS232 so a lot of european people can connect their msx to a PC To a PC, Sandy??? It's like killing a fly with a cannon... About Sunrise RS232: I'll work on it. If anyone has something ready, it would be nice if I receive it. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less The difference between Windows and a virus? Virus is free. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Martin, A question for you: exactly what filesystem does UZIX run on? Is it a MINIX (like) filesystem, or an entirely own variant? It's a variant of the classic inode structure of the UNIX FS. Inodes, direct blocks, indirect blocks, double indirect blocks. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less The difference between Windows and a virus? Virus is free. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
(2) You showed no intention of releasing *anything* of UZIX, except the one-big-binary-package. If you read the Introduction section on UZIX page, you would notice that I wrote: When finished, the entire UZIX project will be released to the public for free. Ok, point taken, but when the project is finished doesn't encourage me to go an jump on in :-) If I had a Novaxis, you can bet UZIX would run on it. I know :-) (Anyone here got a spare Novaxis for Adriano?) At the moment a (4) kicks in: I've got RSI, which largely limits my possiblilities to type - and try doing any development without typing :-/ That's a really serious problem... :/ Yep :-/ I just started work on building a C (cross)compiler, which would have perfectly fitted in an UZIX environment, since it was at first supposed to be a cross-compiler for Linux. I didn't have much yet, though - only the start of a lex/yacc parser... Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
(2) You showed no intention of releasing *anything* of UZIX, except the one-big-binary-package. If you read the Introduction section on UZIX page, you would notice that I wrote: When finished, the entire UZIX project will be released to the public for free. Ok, point taken, but when the project is finished doesn't encourage me to go an jump on in :-) If I had a Novaxis, you can bet UZIX would run on it. I know :-) (Anyone here got a spare Novaxis for Adriano?) At the moment a (4) kicks in: I've got RSI, which largely limits my possiblilities to type - and try doing any development without typing :-/ That's a really serious problem... :/ Yep :-/ I just started work on building a C (cross)compiler, which would have perfectly fitted in an UZIX environment, since it was at first supposed to be a cross-compiler for Linux. I didn't have much yet, though - only the start of a lex/yacc parser... Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
Eric, If you read the Introduction section on UZIX page, you would notice that I wrote: When finished, the entire UZIX project will be released to the public for free. Ok, point taken, but when the project is finished doesn't encourage me to go an jump on in :-) It's just because I like to make thing well done. And that's why I released the source of UZIX only after it's as stable as possible, and not right after version 0.1.1. If I had a Novaxis, you can bet UZIX would run on it. I know :-) (Anyone here got a spare Novaxis for Adriano?) If no one wants to send me a Novaxis for Christmas ;) [I send it back, I promess], I will need beta testers when the Novaxis driver be ready. Volunteers, anyone? :) Yep :-/ I just started work on building a C (cross)compiler, which would have perfectly fitted in an UZIX environment, since it was at first supposed to be a cross-compiler for Linux. I didn't have much yet, though - only the start of a lex/yacc parser... Oh... You have a long road yet... Compilers are really a hard thing to to. Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less The difference between Windows and a virus? Virus is free. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: UZIX is dead
I mumbled: [something again] Sorry for the double - outlook espresso hickupped... Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
