Mint 6x7 on ebay, act quick (BIN)
Just listed: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1352664412 Mint 6x7 + prism BIN $650. US shipping only. Antti-Pekka --- * Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358 500 789 753 * * Computec Oy Turku* FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 10 264 0777 * - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
Brian, The bottom line is what works best for the individual and the photography they do. For me, I had used primes only from 1968 until 89 (with the exception of a Vivitar zoom I bought in 71 and returned the following day). In 1989, I bought my first AF camera and zooms - feeling that the optical quality had improved. That lasted until 1999 when, by chance, I drug our my old Spotmatic and a few lenses for a comparison shoot to see how far optics had advanced in 30 years. The AF gear was sold to fund a LX and I have been happier ever since. What the primes did was to remind me of how to see again. Again, this is personal and many may have only learned photography with the latest AF cameras and Lenses. The trend can always be noted every time one pops into a camera store. Bob - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:07 PM Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student In 003001c1fa36$8a17ad30$1502a8c0@rappr, on 05/13/02 at 02:26 PM, Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: |Your legs are painted on and don't want to walk closer. I really have an hard time understanding how this canard got started much less gets repeated. Walking is not the same as zooming. Perspective changes, subjects escape, proximity offends, bridges and sheer drops do not permit getting closer even if they were equivalent. |As a stop-gap until you can afford primes. sure lets shoot that scene off the end of the dock with an 85mm prime then switch to a 150 for a detail and then switch to that 300 for another more distant detail. Primes have advantages but stacking them up as a replacement for a zoom is not among them just as zooms have their very real place in the tool kit but an f3.5 zoom at 50mm is no replacement for an f1.4 50mm. differing philosophies but more agree with you than with me. Bran -- --- Any Discordian is expressedly forbidden to believe what she reads. -Discordian Catma [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re[2]: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
For me, I find that zooms tend to help me to take good snapshots. Primes tend to make me think more about what I am trying to do. Along the same lines as an earlier discussion about how Medium Format forces one to think a bit more about the shot due to 10 frames per roll. Primes tend to make me think more about the focal length I really want to work with because changing lenses is much slower than zooming. Another way to put it is that with a prime, I tend to try to create the picture and with a zoom I tend to record what I am seeing. Each has their place and I use zooms when I am taking snapshots. When I am try to create a serious picture, I use a prime. Bruce Dayton Sunday, May 12, 2002, 11:16:49 PM, you wrote: BR Brian, BR The bottom line is what works best for the individual and the BR photography they do. BR For me, I had used primes only from 1968 until 89 (with the exception of BR a Vivitar zoom I bought in 71 and returned the following day). In 1989, I BR bought my first AF camera and zooms - feeling that the optical quality had BR improved. That lasted until 1999 when, by chance, I drug our my old BR Spotmatic and a few lenses for a comparison shoot to see how far optics had BR advanced in 30 years. The AF gear was sold to fund a LX and I have been BR happier ever since. What the primes did was to remind me of how to see BR again. BR Again, this is personal and many may have only learned photography with BR the latest AF cameras and Lenses. The trend can always be noted every time BR one pops into a camera store. BR Bob BR - Original Message - BR From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:07 PM BR Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For BR Student In 003001c1fa36$8a17ad30$1502a8c0@rappr, on 05/13/02 at 02:26 PM, Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: |Your legs are painted on and don't want to walk closer. I really have an hard time understanding how this canard got started much less gets repeated. Walking is not the same as zooming. Perspective changes, subjects escape, proximity offends, bridges and sheer drops do not permit getting closer even if they were equivalent. |As a stop-gap until you can afford primes. sure lets shoot that scene off the end of the dock with an 85mm prime then switch to a 150 for a detail and then switch to that 300 for another more distant detail. Primes have advantages but stacking them up as a replacement for a zoom is not among them just as zooms have their very real place in the tool kit but an f3.5 zoom at 50mm is no replacement for an f1.4 50mm. differing philosophies but more agree with you than with me. Bran -- --- Any Discordian is expressedly forbidden to believe what she reads. -Discordian Catma [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . BR - BR This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, BR go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to BR visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Need advice for flash for Pentax PZ-1P
Hi All, I'm looking for advice on buying a flash for my Pentax PZ-1P. I'm looking to use the flash for mostly for indoor and outdoor portraits. I was considering 1 of the 3 following units: Metz54MZ-3, Pentax AF-360 FGZ or the Pentax AF-500 FTZ. I would appreciate input that would help me in making the right choice on which unit to purchase. Thanks, Ed - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Need advice for flash for Pentax PZ-1P
Ed, As I used to have PZ-1p's and used them extensively and had an AF500FTZ and now have MZ-S's with AF360FGZ's, I'll give you my best take. For the PZ-1p, there are not really any great features that the new 360 has over the 500. The one exception is the 360 flash has a sensor so can be used with old, non-TTL bodies. But with the PZ-1p, the 500FTZ is a great flash. It has more power than the 360, but costs a bit more. It also feels a bit more rugged in build. If you are anticipating getting an MZ-S in the future, then the 360 might be worth considering - you only lose on GN compared to the 500, but if you are sticking with the PZ-1p, then get the 500FTZ. Sorry I can't comment on the Metz. Bruce Dayton Sunday, May 12, 2002, 11:59:18 PM, you wrote: m Hi All, m I'm looking for advice on buying a flash for my Pentax PZ-1P. I'm looking to m use the flash for mostly for indoor and outdoor portraits. I was considering m 1 of the 3 following units: Metz54MZ-3, Pentax AF-360 FGZ or the Pentax m AF-500 FTZ. I would appreciate input that would help me in making the right m choice on which unit to purchase. m Thanks, m Ed m - m This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, m go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to m visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: 45 - 125mm zoom question
AFAIK, the close-up lens was an accessory item. For the filtersize: Gerjan van Oosten explains it in his ultimate AP screwmount guide. The size on the lens is 58mm but you need a 67mm step-up ring to prevent vignetting when using filters. Thats why the original hood is a two piece item, a step-up ring and a 67 mm hood. Thanks to all who provided the explanation. Sure enough, mine is a two part hood as described, and once I really went looking I found it mentioned in the the little orange K lenses book. Seems a strange system, but I suppose it was cheaper than trying to accomodate a step in the lens barrel just for the filters. I wonder what sort of hood could be used for the long end of the range. The A85 1.4 is an obvious candidate, but some of the 67 and 645 lenses use a 67mm size too, so maybe one of those could be used. Paul Ewins Melbourne, Australia - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: lenshoods for A*85 f/1.4 (was: Re: A certain eBay item...)
The PH-SA is indeed longer at 2 3/8 tall. Ah, but not as much as it looks in the pics. There's half an inch in it - and after all, forget the length, feel the quality ;-D Spits AND Mustangs and quite a bit else I imagine... Ah, the dreaded W-word. Yeah, me too. Being an employee I get 25 days paid leave per year. Where do they all go I shouldn't post this here, but I just sent Brendan this list of the ten cars that would sit in my garage if I won the lotto: 72 Charger AC Cobra (with some Shelby treatment!!) Top of the line Range Rover (just fer cruisin) CJ-5 Jeep with some -off monster mudders Land Rover Defender (my daily driver right now) Aston Martin Vantage Ginetta G4 Citroen 2CV (for those times when my head is over in France...) a big Mercedes-Benz van converted to a motor home and finally, a modern, run-of-the-mill family Ford - to use as target practice! (now that's enough cars -Ed.) Cheers, Cotty ___ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out the UK Macintosh ads http://www.macads.co.uk - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
In a message dated 12/05/02 21:46:53 GMT Daylight Time, Bojidar writes: It is difficult and expensive to receive playment from outside the EU, and there is no way to insure packages that go to the USA. Are you sure? Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Photographica report
In a message dated 13/05/02 02:26:17 GMT Daylight Time, Paul writes: Hi Peter, Do they come with the free Harry Potter gift ? :) Another obtuse reference? Do you really get AP over there? All bar the Tamron come with the free giftie. Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Photographica Report
Hi Peter, The four footer, is that a 1000/8 M42? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Peter wrote: New toys; Let's see, the first is about four foot long, weighs I guess 6kg, and comes with it's own tripod. Actually I am sure it is more like 10kg. It's not the lens you mentioned. Have another guess. Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Okay folks, fess up, WAY OT
Hi, On 10 May 2002 at 13:52, Bill Owens wrote: I'll go first (hanging my head in shame) No shame at all. We have to use some non-Pentax equipment regularly just to see the diffrence.. ;-) My question is; How many of you will confess to owning and/or using either the K60 or the K88? I have a nice Kiev88 with 3.5/45, 2.8/80, 2.8/150, a removable lens 2X TC, TTL prism and waist level finder + 2 magazines. A very capable set, but I use it only a few times a year, for special purposes. For regular shooting, I like my little Pentaxes (LX, MX) so much more... The K88 is far too big for a second body, most of the time I carry around my CertoSix (6x6 RF folder) instead. Gabor - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Elicar Ring light
Has any one had any experiences with the Elicar ring light flash? It is supposed to have a modelling light and a flash sensor mounted on the ring light. Any help would be appreciated. Bob Rapp - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Medium Format - I can see clearly now...
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 06:57 PM, Jeff wrote: I don't care much about the green color cast in the RSX. Eek! That's not your RSX, that's a warning sign at your lab: either the colour developer time was too short or the temperature too low, or the colour developer is close to exhaustion, or if it was dip dunk, either the bubblers aren't firing right and the chemistry isn't being agitated enough. Have a chat with them. They may not know that a problem is there -- RSX is pretty sensitive to those kinds of things. Bring the film along to show them, especially anything with an open patch of neutral colour where you can see the shift. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Re: Advice Needed For Student
Regarding the K1000, William Robb wrote: Think simple, elegant and reliable. I don't think the K1000 gets the respect it deserves. It has all the features one needs for photography, in a simple, clean, well laid out body. It would be nice if it had direct DOF preview, rather than having to goof the camera to get it. Ah, ~that~ would be the KM. Simple, elegant, reliable... plus self-timer and DOF preview button. Bill Peifer Rochester, NY - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: OT: Re: Photographica report
In a message dated 13/05/02 14:26:28 GMT Daylight Time, Bob writes: Peter, You have to get out more. Harry Potter is a fictional character in a series of best selling books and a recent movie. I believe he is written as an English School Boy aged 11 or 13. We had overnight lines at the bookstores when the last book came out. eh??? I thought Paul was referring to our stocktaking sale offer (October 2001) - all purchases over £100 get free Harry Potter photo albums. As AP obviously takes some time to make it's way to him. KR Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bojidar Dimitrov Of course, FedEx and UPS will ship insured, but shipment to the USA of a 4 lb. package with a $500 value costs $240!!! If you have any other ideas, I will gladly listen... DHL? tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Photographica Report: Pentax 6x7 TTL prism
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes I think I had a pretty productive day. snip Pentax 6x7 TTL prism for £50, I think its broken as I can't see the needle. Can someone who owns one of these prisms confirm that the needle should indeed still be visible with the prism removed from the camera? Yes. When the prism is removed, the meter needle should be visible, pointing at the minus indication. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: IR and MZ-S (was RE: (2): Last Call, Torontonians)
Tom.I think it was the data imprinting but Aaron can tell us for sure. Dave Begin Original Message From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, 13 May 2002 09:43:37 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IR and MZ-S (was RE: (2): Last Call, Torontonians) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Brooks It was good beer.Actually that parkette by the FlatIron building would have been good for IR shots but the sun went away in the PM.Aaron showed me IR negatives from an MZ-S(I think)that bleed through past the sproket holes.If you have an older body that might be advisable. Was it the frame counter or the data imprinting? BTW, the ZX-5n is fine for IR. I'm not sure I ever tried it in the 1p. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . End Original Message Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Photographica Report
Pentax telescope? Steve Larson snip Subject: Re: Photographica Report Hi Peter, The four footer, is that a 1000/8 M42? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Peter wrote: New toys; Let's see, the first is about four foot long, weighs I guess 6kg, and comes with it's own tripod. Actually I am sure it is more like 10kg. It's not the lens you mentioned. Have another guess. Keep going...you didn't ask me what color it was, yet :) Dave Mann - keep schtumm Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
On Monday 13 May 2002 09:24, Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote: IMO zooms are only useful when there's no time to change lenses, or move around, and while shooting transparencies. Lukasz Please explain. How are zooms more useful for shooting transparencies? What has film type got to do with lenses or focal lengths?? For the record I shoot 99% transparencies and use primes exclusively because I like them better not because I am less lazy than someone who uses zooms. Zoom lenses have their place as do primes. For the record, I use my zooms when I use print film (BW). This whole argument about discipline and creative processes based on lens type used is crap especially when punctuated with comments such as the one quoted above. Christian - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Re: Advice Needed For Student
- Original Message - From: Peifer, William [OCDUS Subject: RE: Re: Advice Needed For Student Regarding the K1000, William Robb wrote: Think simple, elegant and reliable. I don't think the K1000 gets the respect it deserves. It has all the features one needs for photography, in a simple, clean, well laid out body. It would be nice if it had direct DOF preview, rather than having to goof the camera to get it. Ah, ~that~ would be the KM. Simple, elegant, reliable... plus self-timer and DOF preview button. It would have been nice if they had kept the KM in the lineup, rather than stripping it into the K1000. Unfortunately, they didn't, and KMs are a bit rare compared to K1000s William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
- Original Message - From: tom Subject: RE: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student When I sold the MZ-30 and bought a MX with a 50mm, I got back to the times of the Roleiflex, when one had to actually move to change perspective, which resulted in better pictures - IMO zooms make people lazy. Hmm. A zoom lens made *you* lazy, therefore zooms make people lazy. Whatever. I've seen it happen more often than not. Some people are better disciplined than others. Most will take the easy way, which is not necessarily the right way. Some turn pro, figure they know it all, and get dismissive about the learning curve that they went through themselves. Whatever. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
- Original Message - From: Christian Skofteland Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student This whole argument about discipline and creative processes based on lens type used is crap.. Whatever. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
Hi Boz and all, it's not completely true that there is no insurance available at all. I sent a parcel with a lens to an Australian PDML member. There was an insurance available, but not for the complete way. IIRC it was insured up to Australia. Inside Australia it was not insured. But I selected a delivery which has to be signed by the receiver. That gives a certain amount of security. But to express the big amount of fees in Germany. I had to pay at the post office around 30 US$ for transport and insurance ! If I would transfer money to America, it would cost me about 15..20 US$ !! That's crazy. Only escape is via VISA, PAYPAL and similiar possibilities. Even if we want to transfer money to other European countries ( most of them use now the EURO, so there are no currency eychanges ), the fees are still about 10..15 US$. We wait hopefully that these fees get cancelled, but up to now I have no date for that. As long as the banks don't get forced by the government, I suppose they will take a lot of money for such transfers. Hey American guys, do you still claim about the nationalistic Germans ? I suppose and hope not. Ciao Bernd H. Boz wrote My statement applies only to Germany. The German Postal Office will NOT ship insured to any country outside of the EU. I found this incredible, so I asked at three different post offices, and then made an official inquiry. The result was always the same --- no insurance to countries outside the EU. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
Tom, I can only speak for myself, and that's exactly what i din in my post. I guess the choice of words obscured what I *really* meant. That's why I started with the words my experience. Lukasz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lukasz Kacperczyk When I sold the MZ-30 and bought a MX with a 50mm, I got back to the times of the Roleiflex, when one had to actually move to change perspective, which resulted in better pictures - IMO zooms make people lazy. Hmm. A zoom lens made *you* lazy, therefore zooms make people lazy. Whatever. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Any info on 80-205mm f4.5 Takumar, with Macro?
Hi Stan, I have this lens and also the Takumar Zoom 70-150/4.5 that preceded it. They are both great lenses and perform much better than one would expect from lenses that old. The 70-150 is a Super Takumar lens, while the 80-205 is a Super Multi Coated Takumar one. However, the later doesn't have the open aperture lever that was introduced for that series of lenses. They are both extremely well built lenses and you can see no expenses were avoided or corners cut by Takumar on their production. The older lens uses a much needed tripod collar that is, unfortunately, not present at the 80-205. They both need an attachment close focus lens to focus at objects closer than 3.5 meters. On the 70-150 the filter ring is a 67 mms one, while the 80-205 uses a 58 mms one. With such attachments they will both focus from 1.9 to 3.5 meters, indicated by a third focusing distance scale on their respective barrels. I suspect the not so short minimum focusing distance helps prevent distortion at the short end of their zoom ranges. The hood for the 80-205/4.5 is exactly the same used by the 135/2.5 and the 200/4, except for the markings. The 80-205 is a VERY long lens an, IMHO, needs a tripod more than other zoom lenses of similar range. This is only a subjective view and,for what it's worth, I consider it's optical performance to be similar to the Vivitar S1's 70-210/3.5 that I also use. I haven't used the Takumar in a situation where flare would be a problem but I suspect it's as good as the other SMC lenses of this vintage, perhaps a little worse due the number of elements. It's definitively not mushy at the long end...;-) I hope this helps. Best regards, Eduardo. - Original Message - From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 11:23 PM Subject: Any info on 80-205mm f4.5 Takumar, with Macro? Does anyone have any practical experience with the subject lens? Has anyone ever seen one? I received a note from someone who has one and is wondering about it. I can tell him that older zooms tended to be weak and mushy at the long end, distorted at the short end. And would show flare if not SMC coated. But all of this would be extrapolation from what has been said about other lenses, not based on direct reports. Can anybody help me out? Stan - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
Bernd- I wouldn't complain about bank fees of $10US for currency transfers- it is $40US here in the US. Taka - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
I make prints all the time of my photos. When I print my transparencies I crop them to fit frame formats or to further enhance the composition just as I do with print film (I don't always crop them though). I don't use transparency film to do slide shows. I use it because I prefer its properties to that of color print film. I still don't understand what lens type has to do with film choice. Christian On Monday 13 May 2002 10:27, you wrote: Cause you don't exactly crop transparencies, and zooms allow one to leave out unwanted objects in situations when otherwise it would be impossible. Regards, Lukasz - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
I cannot believe I am writing another prime vs zoom... Still, I am just back from vacation and have my 2c ready. I think one important aspect of primes is underrated: convenience. For this week I had in my bag a 24, a 50 and a 135 lenses. The final result was that I took a half dozen pics with 24mm, a half dozen with 135mm, and the rest of 5 rolls with 50mm. I had to swap the lenses only 3-4 times, and those were moments when I *had to* -- there's no way to take any sensible pic with the normal lens. And the 1 smal lens + 1 small body setup is godsent when you have to carry it on your shoulder from 8 am to 1 am day after day and shoot in busy places in a moderately friendly city! I think the single strongest attraction to zooms is that people feel that otherwise, having only 1 normal lens, they would miss a lot of shots. This can be true or false, depending how you look at it. Speaking for myself, I have realized one day that I cannot take *every* shot, no matter what lenses I have. It is physically impossible. The trick is to get the best out of what you have. And this is where the fun is, since you have to turn your brain on. In the end it turns out that the percentage of trully missed opportunities is tiny and most of shots can be taken with almost any sensible lens if you give it a little thought (of course, street photography with 500mm tele is probably as inconvenient as shooting birds with 20mm wide angle, but I am not talking about extremes here). In the end, I think zooms are great for people who are trying to figure out whether photography is worth doing at all. But once you are after that stage, it's just another annoyance -- extra weight to carry, extra compromises to cope with and not much use if you think about it. LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
Cause you don't exactly crop transparencies, and zooms allow one to leave out unwanted objects in situations when otherwise it would be impossible. I have nothing against zoom lenses, and don't think they're limiting in any way unless they are used to learn the basics of composition (and I guess the original post was about exactly this). Still, it's my opinion I'm entitled to have, and I don't deny you the right to think it's crap ;) Regards, Lukasz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Skofteland Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student On Monday 13 May 2002 09:24, Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote: IMO zooms are only useful when there's no time to change lenses, or move around, and while shooting transparencies. Lukasz Please explain. How are zooms more useful for shooting transparencies? What has film type got to do with lenses or focal lengths?? For the record I shoot 99% transparencies and use primes exclusively because I like them better not because I am less lazy than someone who uses zooms. Zoom lenses have their place as do primes. For the record, I use my zooms when I use print film (BW). This whole argument about discipline and creative processes based on lens type used is crap especially when punctuated with comments such as the one quoted above. Christian - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
Hi Bernd, it's not completely true that there is no insurance available at all. I sent a parcel with a lens to an Australian PDML member. There was an insurance available, but not for the complete way. IIRC it was insured up to Australia. Inside Australia it was not insured. As I understand it, the German Post Office changed their insurance conditions recently (2001). I too sent a package to Australia in March 2001, and it was not insured. If I would transfer money to America, it would cost me about 15..20 US$ !! That's crazy. Only escape is via VISA, PAYPAL and similiar possibilities. Note that PayPal charges extra for currency conversion. Even if we want to transfer money to other European countries ( most of them use now the EURO, so there are no currency eychanges ), the fees are still about 10..15 US$. We wait hopefully that these fees get cancelled, but up to now I have no date for that. As long as the banks don't get forced by the government, I suppose they will take a lot of money for such transfers. in an insured envelope works extremely well, even if it is against the rules. $ works too, only you have to pay the exchange fees. Hey American guys, do you still claim about the nationalistic Germans? I am sure that this was a joke... Cheers, Boz - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
- Original Message - From: HUDERER Subject: RE: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438 Hey American guys, do you still claim about the nationalistic Germans ? I suppose and hope not. HAR!! That comment was not made by an American WW - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
In a message dated 5/13/2002 10:03:27 AM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In the end, I think zooms are great for people who are trying to figure out whether photography is worth doing at all. But once you are after that stage, it's just another annoyance -- extra weight to carry, extra compromises to cope with and not much use if you think about it. No. They are simply not much use when you think about it. There are times/places when I get as far as I can with my feet - then I use the zoom for the final precise framing. Primes are fine - I use them as often as I can. Your regard for zooms as an 'annoyance' is your prerogative, but your regard does not make them an annoyance for everyone. Oh, damn! I can't get the framing I want with my prime lens, so the shot isn't worth having. Nonsense. Ed Matthew - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Contax N Digital - spec changes
One problem with full sized imaging chips, that does sound plausable, is related to the geometry of the sensor cells. They are somewhat like photon buckets with a certain depth. If light doesn't come straight in it is blocked by the walls of the bucket. This becomes a significant factor towards the edge of the chip since the light rays coming from the lens are at an angle. This was the reason given for significant light falloff for an early Kodak DSLR with a full sized chip. The only way to avoid the problem would be to use a larger diameter lens, or apply some sort of transform function to the chip output. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Vs: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
Framing - it is not as easy to crop a slide as a print - can be done, of course. If you only make prints from slides, it´s no difference but for slide shows and preparation for the printed page it is. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Päivä: 13. toukokuuta 2002 16:07 Aihe: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student On Monday 13 May 2002 09:24, Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote: IMO zooms are only useful when there's no time to change lenses, or move around, and while shooting transparencies. Lukasz Please explain. How are zooms more useful for shooting transparencies? What has film type got to do with lenses or focal lengths?? snip Christian - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Vs: Contax N Digital - spec changes
There are digital backs for Hasselblad and Rollei MF cameras (at least) that use existing lenses. The thing about filters in front of the sensor is basically correct but Contax must use them, too. The lenses designed specifically for digital images have lower resolution - but it is not a good reason for bragging. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Pål Audun Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Päivä: 13. toukokuuta 2002 13:39 Aihe: RE: Contax N Digital - spec changes I don't believe anything of the below for a moment. To all of you guys waiting for Nikon or Canon coming out with a 1-1 because you have lenses, don't, It will never happen. In order to get 1-1 they will have to design all new lenses, and you will have to buy them. The reason being the distance that is needed for infinity focus and that of coverage of the 1-1 chip + the distance needed for the filters that goes between the lens and chip ( which Contax / Kerocera makes for all camera companies Nikon, Canon, bla bla bla. Not only that, but the specs on your old lenses don't stack up to what is needed for digital, not by a long shot. On top of all of that your Hasselblad and Mamiya medium format lenses that you wanted to use with that Digital back you where going to buy don't cut the mustard either. But guess what, The Contax N1 645 Lenses do as they were designed for it before the N1 or those Leaf and Kodak backs where made. They are the only lenses, right now that give you the optimum digital results. I could give you more on that but I'm way beyond my typing or writing skills already and want to get this done. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: nikon sponsored tv shows
I watch the show every Sunday morning. It's just one big add for Nikon but it's still a good show In a message dated 5/12/02 12:20:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was just watching the OLN series wildlife adventures and they had a bit on whale watching and needed equipment. Obviously being sponsored by Nikon you'd expect to see only Nikon cameras but what baffled me were some of the claims made. The worst was about Aperture Priority and shutter priotiy modes on the F90x, the gentleman displaying the cameras said ONLY NIKON can do it! Followed by 3 min of Nikon adds. So much for truth in media. __ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Vs: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
I agree for slide shows but not the printed page. After all that's just a scan that is then cropped to fit the page just as a negative would be. Christian On Monday 13 May 2002 12:28, you wrote: Framing - it is not as easy to crop a slide as a print - can be done, of course. If you only make prints from slides, it´s no difference but for slide shows and preparation for the printed page it is. All the best! Raimo - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Photographica Report: Pentax 6x7 TTL prism
David Mann wrote: Pentax 6x7 TTL prism for £50, I think its broken as I can't see the needle and William Robb replied: Yes. When the prism is removed, the meter needle should be visible, pointing at the minus indication. Hi Dave, I may have some good news for you. I bought a TTL prism finder with an ~allegedly~ inoperative meter. Mine had the same symptom as yours -- that is, I couldn't see the needle in the viewfinder. Turned out my metering circuit actually ~did~ work, and the reason I couldn't see the needle was because a reflecting optic inside the housing had come unglued. It was ~very~ simple to fix. I suspect this might be a common problem. This reflecting optic is actually a little rectangular prism that sits just in front of, and just slightly below, the eyepiece. You'll need to remove the cover from your TTL prism finder to get access to this piece. Removing the cover is fairly simple. Once the cover is off, the rest is pretty straightforward. Here's how (1) Remove the shutter speed dial assembly. You may want to first set the ASA at something like 100, and the shutter speed position to something like 1/60. To remove this dial, you'll need to loosen and remove the screw in the center of the dial (you can bend a paperclip to fit into the holes on this screw, then twist anticlockwise, using a pair of tweezers to securely grasp both sections of the paperclip). Lift off the dial, then the ASA indicator wheel and spring underneath. (2) Remove the Asahi Pentax (or Honeywell Pentax) plastic nameplate from the front of the prism finder cover. This nameplate is held in place with a little glue. You'll see a couple of screw heads once you remove the cover. (3) Finally, remove the seven or eight screws holding the prism finder cover in place. There are two in the front, two in the rear, two on one side, and one or two on the other side. (4) Now it's time to find out if the metering circuit works or not. With the cover off, you can now see two important things -- one of these important things is the meter itself, along with the + and - exposure indicators. It will be over toward the left as viewed from the rear of the prism finder. Take your 6x7 body, and remove the lens if one is attached. Mount the meter onto your 6x7 body, making sure the detents click into place. Mount a lens on the body, making sure the lens is set to the AUTO position. You now want to turn the TTL finder circuit ON. You'll have to manually switch the TTL finder circuit on by momentarily touching the two ON connectors together. Now point the lens to a bright light, and watch the meter needle for a response. If the needle responds as it should to more or less light, increased or decreased aperture (set at the lens), and increased or decreased shutter speed (set by moving the little potentiometer under the shutter speed/ASA dial), then your metering circuit is just fine. (5) Now to fix the reflecting optics. It may be best to remove the prism finder from the body at this point. I mentioned in Step #4 that there are two important things you can see with the prism finder cover removed -- one of these things is the meter itself, and the other thing is a pair of screws holding the eyepiece housing to the rear of the prism finder body. You'll need to remove this eyepiece housing to see the little rectangular reflecting optic I mentioned at the beginning of my note. Remove the two securing screws, then CAREFULLY tip the eyepiece housing away from the prism finder housing. (I say carefully, because there are a couple of delicate wires inside this eyepiece housing which connect the power contacts to the metering circuit board. They're prone to break at the contacts, and they ~can~ be resoldered, but it's kind of a nuisance to have to do that, so be a bit careful.) (6) With the eyepiece housing tipped away from the prism finder body, you should see a little blackened rectangular glass prism located just in front of and below where the eyepiece was located. IIRC, prism dimensions are about 5mm x 5mm x 20mm. Chances are this little rectangular prism has come unglued. You can probably push this little prism back and forth in its milled recess with your fingers, or a stiff piece of card, or a dental pick, etc. Slide it so the angled, unblackened end is roughly centered under the eyepiece area, then temporarily hold the eyepiece housing back in place and see if the meter is now visible in the bottom center of the prism finder field of view. (It helps to allow light from a desk lamp to illuminate the top area of the finder, above the meter.) You may have to repeat this a few times, but you should eventually find a position for this little reflecting prism where the view in the eyepiece looks the best. Without allowing the little reflecting prism to move, inspect its optimal position, then glue in place with a little contact cement or Super Glue. Now reattach the eyepiece housing and
Re: Photographica Report
Peter wrote: Keep going...you didn't ask me what color it was, yet :) Dave Mann - keep schtumm No fair. I was hoping to get a free Harry Potter photo album for guessing (its a pancake lens!). Thanks to William Robb for the prism info. I wonder how it got damaged... someone must have dropped the camera it was attached to or something. Another question: the plastic thumbwheel that sits under its shutter speed dial, is that meant to be a completely separate part, or is it supposed to stay attached to the prism assembly? Mine is not attached and it seems like it would be very easy to lose when I put the waist-level finder on. Going by the picture on both BH and KEH it looks like it is a separate part. Also the power switch doesn't actually lock into the on or off positions, it just springs back to the middle. A different prism I played with does the same. Is that normal? I am thinking that I got what I paid for ;) No big deal though, its what I expected for only 50 portraits of the Queen. BTW I would have responded to William privately but the archive website doesn't give out email addresses... - Dave - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
Everyone is different. There is no right and wrong. The quality of a fixed focal length lens is, in 95 per cent of the times, better than the quality of a zoom. Does it matter? Not if you are making prints 8X10 or less or if you are printing out on a inkjet or using a cheap photo lab. There are good reasons for using both zooms and fixed focal length. Why carry around a big, heavy 28-100 zoom if you can carry an elegant 28mm and a 100mm f2.8. Your end result will be better, your load lighter and ... Saying this, I have many zooms that I use often and enjoy very much. They include: 28-105, 75-150 70-210 100-300 Sometimes I take one or two zooms to photograph a particular subject. If buying zooms, however, get the best you can to maximize quality. P.S. that does not mean the most expoensive... - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Repairing a broken aperture coupling chain on the 6x7
Hi folks, The aperture coupling chain on the 6x7 body is a bit fragile, and it's not uncommon that the chain eventually breaks. The repair is somewhat expensive if you take it to a repair shop, but I found from personal experience that it's not too difficult to fix it yourself. Recently, I passed what I learned on to another 6x7 owner -- an astrophotography buff from Austria who had posted a request for assistance on Photo.net. He was able to complete the repair, and he's now posted my repair instructions, along with a few of his pictures, on his web site. If any of you find yourself with a broken aperture coupling chain and you wish to attempt the repair yourself, you may find the following web site useful: http://www.salzgeber.at/articles/6x7chainRepair.html Two of the pictures posted along with the written instructions are the relevant line drawings from the service manual, showing the correct adjustments referenced in the text. Hope this helps! Bill Peifer Rochester, NY - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
Ed, I should have made clear that I was talking about recreational photography only. Of course, if you are shooting for money, if you have to take *this* shot, you have to take it, period. OTOH, if your goal is to take *a* good picture, pretty much any object can be shot from a dozen different angles, with a dozen of different focal lengths, and so on, and with equally great end result. With zoom you can get the first one that pops in your head, immediately, without realization that there are other choices/compositions. With a single prime you have to figure which one would work the best. And often, as a result of thinking, at least speaking strictly for myself, it is possible to find a better, or, more interesting aspect. And as I said, again, from my experience, the number of truly missed shots is usually negligeable, if you do some thinking before pushing the button. From: LEDMRVM Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 08:19:30 -0700 -- Oh, damn! I can't get the framing I want with my prime lens, so the shot isn't worth having. Nonsense. Ed Matthew LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Re: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
No insurance outside the USA on postal shipments either! I checked and the US Postal Service only can provide insurance within the USA borders. This is especially a problem when sending payment outside the USA. In some cases like Germany, the US Post Office no longer offers international money orders. I can send a registered letter, but only insured to $40.00. Regards, Bob S. Boz wrote: My statement applies only to Germany. The German Postal Office will NOT ship insured to any country outside of the EU. I found this incredible, so I asked at three different post offices, and then made an official inquiry. The result was always the same --- no insurance to countries outside the EU. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Photographica Report
Concerning the 6x7 TTL prism finder, David Mann wrote: The plastic thumbwheel that sits under its shutter speed dial, is that meant to be a completely separate part, or is it supposed to stay attached to the prism assembly? [Snip] Also the power switch doesn't actually lock into the on or off positions, it just springs back to the middle. A different prism I played with does the same. Is that normal? Hi Dave, Yes, it's a completely separate part, and it can be purchased new for a ridiculous price ($30 US or thereabouts, IIRC). You're right -- it's easy to lose. Bill Robb told me a while back that this TTL ring was included with the original TTL prism finder when purchased new, but that sellers of used TTL prism finders often do not include this helpful little thumbwheel. I believe I read on the Greenspun archive that a cut-up piece of plastic 35mm film canister works just as well. That ON/OFF switch is meant to be a momentary contact switch. The fact that it rests in the middle position between ON and OFF is perfectly normal. By the way, Dave, I was hoping you might consider gathering and reporting a little bit of useful information. If you happen to remove your TTL prism finder cover to reveal the circuit board underneath, I wonder if you might possibly be able to measure the resistances that the three potentiometers on the circuit board are set to. I'd be especially interested in what readings you get with the prism finder removed from the camera body. I've measured the values for mine, and I believe these are appropriate when one is using a brighter-than-normal screen. I'm wondering what the values are, typically, for a prism finder calibrated for a normal screen. Well, must get some lunch now. Cheers! Bill Peifer Rochester, NY - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Photographica Report
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Photographica Report Thanks to William Robb for the prism info. I wonder how it got damaged... someone must have dropped the camera it was attached to or something. Another question: the plastic thumbwheel that sits under its shutter speed dial, is that meant to be a completely separate part, or is it supposed to stay attached to the prism assembly? Mine is not attached and it seems like it would be very easy to lose when I put the waist-level finder on. Going by the picture on both BH and KEH it looks like it is a separate part. Also the power switch doesn't actually lock into the on or off positions, it just springs back to the middle. A different prism I played with does the same. Is that normal? The thumbwheel is a separate component, but is supplied with the meter prism (note to those who buy them on eBay). The switch that you describe is working normally. The meter is activated by flicking the momentary switch to on, and releasing it. The meter will deactivate on it's own in about a half minute. I found Bill Pfeifer's description of the prism problem both lucid, and likely. The meter prism, like all things 6x7 is pretty robust. I would actually be quite surprised if the meter movement is broken. If the needle is not visible, the internal mirror, which I was not aware of, is a very likely culprit. Bill, I would be very interested in aquiring your repair instructions for the meter linkage chain. If there is a weak spot in the 6x7, this is it. Thanks William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Contax N Digital - spec changes
Well, I think it's pretty clear that making current N***n 35mm lenses work with 35mm-size CCDs is indeed quite possible. And they work well. The Horseman Digiflex proves that beyond any doubt. It really is the end of the argument. The feat is already being done. (And while I know of no camera that is doing this with C***n lenses -- or with other 35mm brands -- I can't see any reason to think that if it's possible with N***n lenses it wouldn't be possible with C***n's.) -Original Message- From: Raimo Korhonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 May 2002 17:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vs: Contax N Digital - spec changes There are digital backs for Hasselblad and Rollei MF cameras (at least) that use existing lenses. The thing about filters in front of the sensor is basically correct but Contax must use them, too. The lenses designed specifically for digital images have lower resolution - but it is not a good reason for bragging. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Pål Audun Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Päivä: 13. toukokuuta 2002 13:39 Aihe: RE: Contax N Digital - spec changes I don't believe anything of the below for a moment. To all of you guys waiting for Nikon or Canon coming out with a 1-1 because you have lenses, don't, It will never happen. In order to get 1-1 they will have to design all new lenses, and you will have to buy them. The reason being the distance that is needed for infinity focus and that of coverage of the 1-1 chip + the distance needed for the filters that goes between the lens and chip ( which Contax / Kerocera makes for all camera companies Nikon, Canon, bla bla bla. Not only that, but the specs on your old lenses don't stack up to what is needed for digital, not by a long shot. On top of all of that your Hasselblad and Mamiya medium format lenses that you wanted to use with that Digital back you where going to buy don't cut the mustard either. But guess what, The Contax N1 645 Lenses do as they were designed for it before the N1 or those Leaf and Kodak backs where made. They are the only lenses, right now that give you the optimum digital results. I could give you more on that but I'm way beyond my typing or writing skills already and want to get this done. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: RE: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
Bernd H. wrote: Hey American guys, do you still claim about the nationalistic Germans ? I suppose and hope not. Bernd, That was the Canadian 'Wheatfield Willy' making that claim about US nationals and Germans. I think he was joking, but those Canadians get crazy this time of year with the Hockey playoffs and the tundra thawing. g It sounds like your banks are also extracting heavy fees for international transactions. There has to be a business opportunity here somewhere. Regards, Bob S. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: A*85/1.4 - one for $1,100+, one for $438
Hi Paul, you wrote: Bullshit! See Bojidar's explanation for the facts. Nice sprachgefuehl,* Heiko! From the usenet's netiquette (see http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/ primer/part1/): --Start ... Be Careful with Humor and Sarcasm. Without the voice inflections and body language of personal communications, it is easy for a remark meant to be funny to be misinterpreted. Subtle humor tends to get lost, so take steps to make sure that people realize you are trying to be funny. The net has developed a symbol called the smiley face. It looks like :-) and points out sections of articles with humorous intent. No matter how broad the humor or satire, it is safer to remind people that you are being funny. ... End Regards, Heiko BTW - Sprachgefuehl is correct. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Advice Needed For Student
Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote: Regarding the K1000, William Robb wrote: Think simple, elegant and reliable. I don't think the K1000 gets the respect it deserves. It has all the features one needs for photography, in a simple, clean, well laid out body. It would be nice if it had direct DOF preview, rather than having to goof the camera to get it. Ah, ~that~ would be the KM. Simple, elegant, reliable... plus self-timer and DOF preview button. Ahhh that would be the KX too :) annsan Bill Peifer Rochester, NY - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: LX repair
Any aversion to Pentax doing the work? Repair time is 4-6 weeks, and expedited service is available for an added charge. Essentially, they will give the body a complete overhaul and bring everything back into spec. You get a 1 year warranty on the work (and the entire body) once they return it. They have yet to let me down, including my most recent LX, which is 20+ years old, had impact damage, and had been in a box for the past eight years. The address is: Pentax Corporation Attn: Service Dept. 35 Inverness Drive East Engelwood, Colorado 80112 -jim -Original Message- From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LX repair Ok, I know someone gave me some good info on this earlier and I thought I had saved it but... alas... I have one possible source, but would like another. I really do need to get the blasted body fixed light meter screwed up, sticky mirror too. Best scenario - good recomendation in NYC or close. forget PHOTO-TECH - they seem unable or unwilling to do CLA or real repairs on camera bodies of this vintage (20 years old). sigh. annsan - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Vs: Contax N Digital - spec changes
Mark Roberts wrote: Horseman has pretty well debunked the standard 35mm lenses won't work with full-frame CCDs nonsense by making a camera that uses Nikon lenses with Megavision T32 and H2O digital backs (it is, of course, hideously expensive). Here are some shots taken with an 18mm. http://www.ashleymorrison.com/H20%20image/Test004.html I started eating crow when I saw those images a few weeks ago. It doesn't taste half bad. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
What the papers say...
From the techie section in today's Independent 'Review', by Charles Arthur: The digital camera revolution is very much upon us. Digital cameras overtook standard film cameras some time last year in terms of volumes sold. Where once you were proud to show off your new Pentax SLR with its removable lenses, to look swish now you need a great-looking digital camera. So there you have it. It's Pentax SLR or fixed lens digital rangefinder. Bob Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from eugate01.e-mail.com (unverified [194.196.143.93]) by me02.web2000.activeisp.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.6) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 May 2002 18:02:29 +0200 X-igwMailID: g4DG14Y43202. Received: Received: by eugate.e-mail.com with ESMTP id g4DG14Y43202 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 May 2002 16:01:05 GMT Received: from mclnm02 (unverified) by mclne02.johnlewis.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 May 2002 17:01:30 +0100 Subject: What the papers say... To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4a July 24, 2000 Message-ID: OF1215822D.CD6FC129-ON80256BB8.0057BFF2@LocalDomain From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 17:02:29 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on MCLNM02/JLP(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 13/05/2002 17:02:26 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From the techie section in today's Independent 'Review', by Charles Arthur: The digital camera revolution is very much upon us. Digital cameras overtook standard film cameras some time last year in terms of volumes sold. Where once you were proud to show off your new Pentax SLR with its removable lenses, to look swish now you need a great-looking digital camera. The Canon IXUS 330, whose sleek steel and aluminium lines are reminiscent of Leicas of old. * Notice: This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of the John Lewis Partnership. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. (Please note that it is your responsibility to scan this message for viruses). * John Lewis plc Registered in England 233462 Registered office 171 Victoria Street London SW1E 5NN Websites: http://www.johnlewis.com and http://www.waitrose.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Need advice for flash for Pentax PZ-1P
Unfortunately, this has happened to me also. Forgot to mention it. I wonder if the 360 is prone to this? Robert One point about the AF500FTZ and batteries -- I noticed on a trip that when I pulled out the flash, my brand-new lithium AAs were DEAD! In fact, this has happened with that flash twice. I'm guessing that it's easy for the unit to be accidentally turned on while travelling in a camera bag, so -- based on that theory -- I no longer leave the batteries in it while transporting the flash. When I'm setting up to shoot, that's when I put them in, and remove them when done. ERNR My photographs hang on the virtual walls at http://members.aol.com/ernreed - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Winder Motor Cover for SuperProgram
I need a winder motor cover for a SuperProgram. Anyone know of a source? I haven't tried Pentax USA. Is it the best bet for one? Thanks, Robert _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Advice Needed For Student
In a message dated 5/13/2002 2:31:17 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Regarding the K1000, William Robb wrote: Think simple, elegant and reliable. I don't think the K1000 gets the respect it deserves. It has all the features one needs for photography, in a simple, clean, well laid out body. It would be nice if it had direct DOF preview, rather than having to goof the camera to get it. Ah, ~that~ would be the KM. Simple, elegant, reliable... plus self-timer and DOF preview button. Ahhh that would be the KX too :) And the K2. Ed - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Contax N Digital - spec changes
That might make some sense if the buckets were the same size, but they are not.. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:11 AM Subject: Re: Contax N Digital - spec changes One problem with full sized imaging chips, that does sound plausable, is related to the geometry of the sensor cells. They are somewhat like photon buckets with a certain depth. If light doesn't come straight in it is blocked by the walls of the bucket. This becomes a significant factor towards the edge of the chip since the light rays coming from the lens are at an angle. This was the reason given for significant light falloff for an early Kodak DSLR with a full sized chip. The only way to avoid the problem would be to use a larger diameter lens, or apply some sort of transform function to the chip output. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Advice Needed For Student
Regarding the KM, I wrote: Simple, elegant, reliable... plus self-timer and DOF preview button. and Annsan duly noted: Ahhh that would be the KX too :) Right you are, Annsan! And of course the KX comes with mirror lock-up, too -- something lacking from both my K1000 and my KM. (Of course, there's that flick-of-the-shutter-button-trick) I think I recall reading a comment from George DeFockert quite a long time ago about the fact that the KX viewfinder is considerably brighter than that of the other K-series bodies. If only I could have found a bargain KX for the price I got my bargain KM for! ;-) By the way, how's the weather today in the Big Apple? It's really miserable up here. Unless one ~likes~ rain, wind, and temperatures in the mid-40s. Uggh! Maybe the sun will come out later this week? Bill Peifer Rochester, NY - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Battey Life
I just bought many AA batteries, and a friend told me to store it in the refrigerator to save battery life. But when I was in videography school, the professor told us to keep battery in a warm place. I am really confused, does anyone know? Regards, Andy - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: What the papers say...
Wow! They are selling more $850 digitals than $6 disposables. Who would have figured? Or, is that liar's do figure? Now, if they said the digital is more of a yuppy status symbol than an SLR, I would have no problem with that. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:21 PM Subject: What the papers say... From the techie section in today's Independent 'Review', by Charles Arthur: The digital camera revolution is very much upon us. Digital cameras overtook standard film cameras some time last year in terms of volumes sold. Where once you were proud to show off your new Pentax SLR with its removable lenses, to look swish now you need a great-looking digital camera. So there you have it. It's Pentax SLR or fixed lens digital rangefinder. Bob Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from eugate01.e-mail.com (unverified [194.196.143.93]) by me02.web2000.activeisp.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.6) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 May 2002 18:02:29 +0200 X-igwMailID: g4DG14Y43202. Received: Received: by eugate.e-mail.com with ESMTP id g4DG14Y43202 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 May 2002 16:01:05 GMT Received: from mclnm02 (unverified) by mclne02.johnlewis.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 May 2002 17:01:30 +0100 Subject: What the papers say... To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4a July 24, 2000 Message-ID: OF1215822D.CD6FC129-ON80256BB8.0057BFF2@LocalDomain From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 17:02:29 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on MCLNM02/JLP(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 13/05/2002 17:02:26 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From the techie section in today's Independent 'Review', by Charles Arthur: The digital camera revolution is very much upon us. Digital cameras overtook standard film cameras some time last year in terms of volumes sold. Where once you were proud to show off your new Pentax SLR with its removable lenses, to look swish now you need a great-looking digital camera. The Canon IXUS 330, whose sleek steel and aluminium lines are reminiscent of Leicas of old. * Notice: This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of the John Lewis Partnership. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. (Please note that it is your responsibility to scan this message for viruses). * John Lewis plc Registered in England 233462 Registered office 171 Victoria Street London SW1E 5NN Websites: http://www.johnlewis.com and http://www.waitrose.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: LX repair
- Original Message - From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:27 PM Subject: LX repair Ok, I know someone gave me some good info on this earlier and I thought I had saved it but... alas... I have one possible source, but would like another. I really do need to get the blasted body fixed light meter screwed up, sticky mirror too. If you don't mind shipping internationally, Pentax Canada is doing all three of mine at the moment, so they should be well practiced. The charges start at about Can$300.00 (around US$200.00), and go up from there depending on parts required. One of mine needs a new circuit, which has put the price at Can$500.00. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Batts and the PZ1P (WAS: Need advice for flash for Pentax PZ-1P)
I second this. I purchased two sets of Rayovac NiMH rechargables along with the one hour charger by the same manufacturer. NiMHs are just about a total necessity if you do much shooting with this flash at all. They are quicker to recharge than alkaline and they last longer. With this flash I used to take 2 sets of aklalines to shoot one football game, switching at the half. With the NiMH I only need to take one set, this is highschool football by the way. I choose the Rayovac batts over the other brands because they had a longer life 1600mha vs the other's 1300mha. Also the one hour charger has a car kit available so if the need ever arose I'd have that option for charging. Speaking of the TR Power Pack II, has it ever been determined if you can use NiMH batts in that? I know you cannot use nicads, but never saw if you cannot use the NiMH... -- Nick Wright http://www.wrightfoto.com/ -- From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Need advice for flash for Pentax PZ-1P Date: Mon, May 13, 2002, 2:19 PM Nimh rechargables and 1 hr quick charger has been a life saver. The Flash does turn it self on when loose in bag, it also can't auto off if bumping into it's own buttons. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/13/2002 12:15:36 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a PZ1p with an AF500FTZ flash. Great combo, powerful, swivels up/down and sideways, has AF assist IR lamp. I don't think the flash can be beat when used with a PZ1p. Some say it is a battery hog. I agree with this perception as far as using alkaline batts. Use lithium and it goes a lot further. One point about the AF500FTZ and batteries -- I noticed on a trip that when I pulled out the flash, my brand-new lithium AAs were DEAD! In fact, this has happened with that flash twice. I'm guessing that it's easy for the unit to be accidentally turned on while travelling in a camera bag, so -- based on that theory -- I no longer leave the batteries in it while transporting the flash. When I'm setting up to shoot, that's when I put them in, and remove them when done. ERNR My photographs hang on the virtual walls at http://members.aol.com/ernreed - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . __ Games, Movies, Music Sports! http://entertainment.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Battey Life
Batteries in the case of AA are electrolytic cells- you would refrigerate them to slow ion movement, which would improve battery life. Taka -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Vu Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Battey Life I just bought many AA batteries, and a friend told me to store it in the refrigerator to save battery life. But when I was in videography school, the professor told us to keep battery in a warm place. I am really confused, does anyone know? Regards, Andy - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For
Cool, you both just don't get it do you? I think I am going to crawl under a rock now. William Robb - Original Message - From: Mishka Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Jonathan, I have to admit, I am too lazy to change lenses most of times. And I still think that prime(s) help me take better pictures. In fact, I found that swapping the lenses usually have negative effect, since it distracts me from what I am trying to photograph: I am spending time thinking where the hell is that red dot?, rather than which angle of view works better?. My main problem with zooms is that they encourage my natural tendency to slip into Point-And-Shoot mode. With primes, it's not just changing the camera position that matters -- it's slowing me down and making me think about the picture, since the first thing that pops in the viewfinder is usually composed bad enough that it prevents me from pushing the button exactly that instance. For very similar reason I have a better percentage of pics I am not ashamed to show to people other than my mother if I shoot with a fully-manual MF camera, be it a 6x7 or 'cord -- I cannot PS with them. By the way, I seriously doubt that there's the right perspective and the right focal length as well as the best shot, otherwise I would open a business selling sticky tags with printed right solutions tomorrow! G Mishka From: Jonathan Donald Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 22:55:07 -0700 ... Too many choices may overwhelm a beginner. This is my analysis as to why a novice photographer may make blah photographs with a zoom, not because it was a quick and dirty way out of spending time on the composition. With so many choices to make with the zoom, the novice simply makes a few more wrong choices (i.e. zooms instead of changing camera position). It is debatable whether ~forcing~ a photographer to ONLY change position is of value. It does teach a lesson I suppose, but places all the emphasis on perspective and virtually none on the effect of focal length. If a photographer is always lazy by zooming, he/she may just as likely be lazy by using only one focal length all of the time. A balance of the right perspective and the right focal length is required to obtain the best shot. Whether this is done with zooms or primes is irrelevant, and a matter of taste. Just my .02 - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: IR and MZ-S (was RE: (2): Last Call, Torontonians)
On Monday, May 13, 2002, at 09:43 AM, tom wrote: Was it the frame counter or the data imprinting? It was both...the frame counter from the bottom, the data imprinting (set to the lowest setting, I was told) from the top. Pretty gruesome. Not advisable unless you intend to crop panoramas out of the middle. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Winder Motor Cover for SuperProgram
No, You don't need! It is totaly useless! A. Wirtz Robert Woerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need a winder motor cover for a SuperProgram. Anyone know of a source? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb - Original Message - From: tom Subject: RE: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student Hmm. A zoom lens made *you* lazy, therefore zooms make people lazy. Whatever. I've seen it happen more often than not. Some people are better disciplined than others. Most will take the easy way, which is not necessarily the right way. Some turn pro, figure they know it all, and get dismissive about the learning curve that they went through themselves. Whatever. I never said I knew anything, much less everything. I just have issues with anyone in any field saying there's one true way to learn. Not only are there several ways to learn, people have different motivations and ends. I got dismissive because it's bad logic. BTW, I had no compositional learning curve. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Winder Motor Cover for SuperProgram
- Original Message - From: Andreas Wirtz Subject: Re: Winder Motor Cover for SuperProgram No, You don't need! It is totaly useless! A. Wirtz Besides, there is no such thing. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
- Original Message - From: tom Subject: RE: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student I never said I knew anything, much less everything. I just have issues with anyone in any field saying there's one true way to learn. Not only are there several ways to learn, people have different motivations and ends. I got dismissive because it's bad logic. BTW, I had no compositional learning curve. You don't get it either Tom. It's not about composition. It's about learning how to see, William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Send Mz-S to Repair
I think nothing for a Malasian Company, you know how well they pay their people??¿¿. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Lukasz Kacperczyk Enviado el: lunes, 13 de mayo de 2002 0:51 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: Send Mz-S to Repair What's wrong with Malaysia? ;) Lukasz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Emilio Puga Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Send Mz-S to Repair Oh, god apologise me, don´t buy a MZ-S, BUY TWO OF EM. Well, I have to say you that mine was of the earlier series, new cameras don´t have this problems, and believe me it´s a GREAT CAMERA, yesterday I held a Dinax 7 and yes It looks like if it were designed by George Lucas, but doesn´t have the finish of my beloved pentax, and one detail, one of the first things I look when someone try to sell me a camera is to look at the bottom, and guess what I found on Dinax/Maxxum 7??¿¿ MADE IN MALASYA Now I understand those cheap plastics. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de David S. Enviado el: domingo, 12 de mayo de 2002 18:35 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Send Mz-S to Repair Emilio Puga wrote: Hi group, few weeks ago I were asking you if someone had problems with Mz-S´s rewind when using Slide film, cracks and unrewound rolls, and a you told me that it is normal, cause mz-s´s film receptacle is a bit critical with film positioning, well, after two weeks of tests, and after following all your instrutions, I send my camera for repair to Reflecta Spain (pentax distributor). The thing its that after two weeks they call me saing that they don´t see anithing wrong on the camera, then I asked the repair man if they tried it with Slide film, and guess the answer??? -Oh, not tried with slide because don´t have a roll here- Ok, they will test it on monday and say something to me. Oh god everithing is happening to me, my 645n makes wrong aperture readouts, my Mx´s meter is locked on the on position, my tokina 28-70 2,6 crashed , uaaa what can I do?? place a candle to someone?? or maybe pay a gipsy?? I am beginning to know what you feel like. I have to put $2000 of repairs into my vehicle. I WAS thinking of buying an MZ-S, that will be delayed now. -- David S. Nature and wildlife photography http://www.sheppardphotos.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Odp: Re: Odp: Polacy na PDML (was Re: )
- Great idea! What about next week (saturday evening)??? Best regards Sylwek Unfortunately next weekend I'm going fishing... Greetz Artur - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
Some thoughts on zooms... I think zooms are great tools for teaching cropping, but not that great for teaching someone how to see in terms of a particular focal length. If you stand in one place and take a series of photos with a zoom lens set to, say, 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm and 105mm, you're not taking five different photos. All you're doing is taking one photo at 28mm and then cropping differently. Perspective, proportion... everything stays the same as you zoom in. Zooming a lens does not give you a different photo, only a different crop. OTOH, if you took a 28mm lens and took five photos while walking towards an object to make it larger, *then* you'd have five different pictures. The size of the object would still be increasing in your viewfinder, but its relation to the background and the apparent perspective of the photo would be changing. Can you set a zoom lens to a particular focal length and use it like a prime? Of course. Do zooms encourage this kind of shooting? Not at all, IMO. I think zooms can be a great tool if used correctly. They can give you an idea of how a shot will look like from different crops, and they can take the place of several primes if you are willing or able to use your feet. As for whether or not zooms are good for beginners... I'm staying out of that one. :) I agree with Bill in theory, but I also think that there are a lot of beginners out there who would have the discipline to use a zoom properly if their instructor explained the issue to them. chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Shipping from Germany to USA via UK
I'm probably tempting fate here, but... If any listmember would like to buy from eBay Deutschland and would like a middleman - I will volunteer - as long as it's not a flood. Confirm with seller that he/she will ship to UK (we're still in the EU as far as I know, even though we've yet to ditch the pound). Bid. Win. Pay the seller - that bit's up to you. Have them ship to me in England (I dunno - say it's a present :-) and I will forward on the package, with insurance via Royal Mail air mail to you in the USA. UK - USA about 4 or 5 days. Reimburse me the cost of the postage, plus a bottle of plonk (cheap wine) and I'll play. (Told you I wuz cheap) Of course, I can offer further services - testing, for instance, you want to make sure that 135 1.8 works like they said in the auction, right??? ;-) Off list if you're serious. Cotty ___ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out the UK Macintosh ads http://www.macads.co.uk - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Winder Motor Cover for SuperProgram
Robert, There is no winder motor cover and never has been one for the Super Program/Super A. This camera came without one out of the box, OEM! I've had one for 19 years and it has never been a problem for me. Regards, Bob S. I need a winder motor cover for a SuperProgram. Anyone know of a source? I haven't tried Pentax USA. Is it the best bet for one? Thanks, Robert - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Photographica report
Hi Peter, Yep we do, some one at work had a copy with the black and white special. I was actualy surprised that it had some interesting articles in the b/w special. Regards, Paul - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:18 PM Subject: Re: Photographica report In a message dated 13/05/02 02:26:17 GMT Daylight Time, Paul writes: Hi Peter, Do they come with the free Harry Potter gift ? :) Another obtuse reference? Do you really get AP over there? All bar the Tamron come with the free giftie. Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Beautiful Oddities For Sale
I have some mostly uncommon or unusual lenses now up for pre-eBay sale. Many are Pentax lenses, while many other are third-party cult classics. They are all K-mount items (except for the 400/5.6 Novoflex lens head, which has to mate with a Novoflex focusing mount). I have the list of lenses for sale posted at http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/lenslist.htm . I am offering these items to the list, in case any of you guys has been looking for any of these. I have not put a price on each - I am looking for reasonable bids on these - one of the nice things about eBay is that I don't have to come up with prices in advance - the market will determine the selling prices - g. If you are interested in any of these critters, please reply DIRECTLY to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - please do NOT reply to the list - for questions and/or to offer a reasonable bid. Please note that I have no intention of simply giving any of these away, so please make any bid a reasonable bid. I don't mind settling for a little less than what an item might get on eBay - no seller's fees to pay - but I'm offering these for sale to get back at least most of my investment in each of them, and not to be charitable. The buyer will pay all shipping costs. Payment must be in USD by PayPal OR by USPS Postal Money Order ONLY (and, obviously, PayPal would have to be used by non-US buyers.) The unsold lenses will go onto eBay shortly (where they will be offered only to US bidders). Thanks for your interest. Fred - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Old Aircraft Photography
Fredo! I have to confess that I do have a fondness for some of the older military aircraft (especially the B-17 and the P-51, my favorite bomber and fighter, respectively). I also would like to sometime see a P-38 (I assume that there must be a few still surviving) and I also would love to see an Me-109 someday. snip I do hope to eventually see some of the other remaining B-17's that are still around, and my ultimate dream trip (with photo gear, of course) would be a journey to the locations of some of the old B-17 airfields in the UK (East Anglia area). Come on over fella! Duxford is just such an East Anglian aerodrome. I don't know if a Flying Fortress will be present but I can sure as heck find out. P-51s, definately. Me-109, I'll have to check. Apparently the climax of the three hour show is ALL the flying display planes trouping past in formation - we're talking a couple a dozen at least - all going ten to the dozen. They say it's pretty unbelievable. http://www.macads.co.uk/pdml/ carrot --- stick, Cotty ___ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out the UK Macintosh ads http://www.macads.co.uk - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: LX repair
No aversion at all -- I was just hoping not to have to _send_ it anywhere if I could help it :) Actually, this was the one place someone once recommended to me before... The one in Colorado. annsan Rupprecht, James R wrote: Any aversion to Pentax doing the work? Repair time is 4-6 weeks, and expedited service is available for an added charge. Essentially, they will give the body a complete overhaul and bring everything back into spec. You get a 1 year warranty on the work (and the entire body) once they return it. They have yet to let me down, including my most recent LX, which is 20+ years old, had impact damage, and had been in a box for the past eight years. The address is: Pentax Corporation Attn: Service Dept. 35 Inverness Drive East Engelwood, Colorado 80112 -jim -Original Message- From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LX repair Ok, I know someone gave me some good info on this earlier and I thought I had saved it but... alas... I have one possible source, but would like another. I really do need to get the blasted body fixed light meter screwed up, sticky mirror too. Best scenario - good recomendation in NYC or close. forget PHOTO-TECH - they seem unable or unwilling to do CLA or real repairs on camera bodies of this vintage (20 years old). sigh. annsan - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Winder Motor Cover for SuperProgram
I need a winder motor cover for a SuperProgram. Anyone know of a source? I haven't tried Pentax USA. Is it the best bet for one? All Pentax 135 SLR bodies after the M series do not have this cover, AFAIK. regards, Alan Chan _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Battey Life
I just bought many AA batteries, and a friend told me to store it in the refrigerator to save battery life. But when I was in videography school, the professor told us to keep battery in a warm place. I am really confused, does anyone know? WARM! But not hot. Temperate. Room temperature. (why is it wherever you go it's always room temperature?? --steve wright) Cold does no good for batteries at all... Cotty ___ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out the UK Macintosh ads http://www.macads.co.uk - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
re: pawn shops and skylight filters
Hi all I realized that I didn't get back to the list and mention that I got the filter off my lens with a wrench. Thanks for the suggestions. Martin - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: LX repair
Hi Ann, I know it's less convenient, but I'd send it to Pentax Colorado. They've been doing good work lately, and if they do screw up they'll fix it. Paul Ann Sanfedele wrote: Ok, I know someone gave me some good info on this earlier and I thought I had saved it but... alas... I have one possible source, but would like another. I really do need to get the blasted body fixed light meter screwed up, sticky mirror too. Best scenario - good recomendation in NYC or close. forget PHOTO-TECH - they seem unable or unwilling to do CLA or real repairs on camera bodies of this vintage (20 years old). sigh. annsan - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Vs: Contax N Digital - spec changes
Raimo Korhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe this could be avoided by the use of some kind of optics in front of the chip? The legendary Bill Peifer addressed this many moons ago: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All this talk about analog vs. digital lenses has got me wondering a bit. I'm curious where this whole idea of CCD sensors requiring (or preferring) perpendicular rays originated. I'm pretty convinced that it must have originated because somewhere along the line, something got taken out of context, and a fundamentally incorrect idea grew from there. From the standpoint of the underlying physics, Tom is absolutely right -- the purpose of a lens is to bring an image to critical focus at the focal plane, and the nature of the sensor (film, CCD, CMOS, or other) isn't particularly relevant. After all, if all the light rays strike the sensor perpendicularly, then they are necessarily parallel and thus cannot form an image at the focal plane! I suspect that this perpendicular-ray story -- dare I say legend? -- may have originated from a misinterpretation of the characteristic behavior of CCD sensors. We all know that in single-chip color CCD sensors, some of the pixels are sensitive to red, others to green, and still others to blue. For the case of color cameras with single CCD sensors, color sensitivity is imparted to a particular pixel by incorporating a microscopic optic -- a lenslet and filter -- in front of that pixel, which I believe is accomplished as part of the manufacturing process for the sensor chip. I can imagine that the numerical aperture of this microscopic optic may not be terribly large, and it might very well constrain the field of view of its corresponding pixel. Maybe someone that knows more about chip fab can comment on this. Anyway, although each individual pixel may very well be looking through an optic with small numerical aperture, it's only looking a very short distance (microns? tenths of microns?) to the illuminated spot on the focal plane directly in front of it. In fact, this is precisely what you want. If each pixel had a more wide-angle view, it would not only register the intensity of light directly in front of it, but it would also register the intensity of light from a immediately adjacent pixels (perhaps pixels intended to sense a different color), resulting in a spatially and chromatically degraded image. The characteristics of the macroscopic, analog lens mounted onto the front of the camera -- focal length, f-number, etc. -- isn't particularly relevant, except that a faster analog lens will make each pixel-size spot of light at the focal plane correspondingly brighter. Jaume's original question about spectral characteristics of particular lenses and lens coatings is interesting as well. The general strategy in designing the ~lens~ is, among other things, to reduce chromatic aberration; that is, to get red, green, and blue rays from a single object point to focus at a single point on the same focal plane. I think lens ~coatings~ are generally optimized to match the response of the human eye, rather than the film emulsion. (Likewise, most film emulsions -- excluding infrared, of course -- are designed to match the human eye.) I believe that the general strategy in designing antireflection coatings (like SMC) is to minimize the reflective loss of green light, since green is the color our eyes are most sensitive to. This doesn't mean that the coated lens passes primarily green light; rather, it means that for the 1% or 2% of light that would otherwise be lost at each air-glass interface of an uncoated lens element, the lens designers try to rescue the green component by applying a green-optimized antireflection coating. CCDs are more sensitive to the red end of the spectrum than the human eye. You might imagine that in order to maximize the signal level at the focal plane of the CCD, a lens designer might consider using antireflection coatings optimized for passing red light. However, this would yield an image with what we would perceive as a highly perturbed color balance. In fact, for consumer imaging applications, designers use filters that ~decrease~ the intensity of far red and near infrared light impinging on the sensor. Thus, I can't imagine that consumer digital camera designers would go to the expense of new lens designs, or bodies specific for old vs. new lenses. (Although that would certainly be an interesting marketing gimmick) Just as a final aside, I'll mention a pet peeve of mine. It seems that in many discussions, we refer to film-based and CCD-based imaging as analog and digital. This is really an artificial distinction. CCDs, after all, ~are~ analog sensors, and the readout electronics for CCDs are analog circuits. The only thing that makes digital cameras digital is the way the analog signal array is stored after being read off the CCD sensor. A minor point, but a pet peeve nonetheless. Bill
Re: Battey Life
Andy, If you want the batteries to work, then they need to be warm when using them . . . If you want to store them over time, they will benifit from being kept chilled, until you need to use them, at which point you need to warm them again. IL Bill Andy Vu wrote: I just bought many AA batteries, and a friend told me to store it in the refrigerator to save battery life. But when I was in videography school, the professor told us to keep battery in a warm place. I am really confused, does anyone know? Regards, Andy - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Old Aircraft Photography
Fred, I did my trade training in the RAF at RAF Kirton-in-Lindsey, which I believe was the base for the US-manned Eagle squadron during the war. Our accommodation, as a result, was far superior to the standard of the day! At that time (1960), many of the buildings which had been used for operations were still in use, although I have no idea whether the base still exists even. I once had the vaguely surreal experience, whilst driving in East Anglia in the 1970's, of seeing a B17 in full war-paint on it's final approach to an airfield: sorry I can't tell you which one. It was like being in a time warp... John Coyle Brisbane, Australia On Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:21 AM, Fred [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: SNIP I do hope to eventually see some of the other remaining B-17's that are still around, and my ultimate dream trip (with photo gear, of course) would be a journey to the locations of some of the old B-17 airfields in the UK (East Anglia area). Most of the fields are gone, of course, but some vestiges apparently do remain, and I do have a modern book that has details on all of the fields to use as a reference for the research that would be necessary before the actual planning of such a trip. Fred - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Winder Motor Cover for SuperProgram
I bought the camera used and assumed it was missing. Thanks for the information. Robert - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
OT: AA battery types
The recent Batter Life Question prompted me to ask the following: I have a related question... What batteries do you use in your battery packs? It used to be such an easy choice for me... Energizer or Duracell... but now there's regular energizer, energizer max, energizer titanium, energizer e^2 Photo batteries,... etc. sigh The whole thing has left me befuddled. I guess ultimately my question is, has anyone found that the price difference across the different levels of AA bateries within a brand name (and these price differences are VERY dramatic) are worth the extra bucks? I'm very tempted to stay with just the cheapest version of each, but not sure if I'm doing myself a disservice or if it really is just marketing. Moreover, my battery life has seemingly varied so much that I cant get a handle on which is best. If this was any other list, I'd doubt that anyone would have a definitive answer. but this is the PDML... home of the anal retentive (I mean that in an endearing way) so I'm sure SOMEONE has done a definitive test on this already... or at least has made a general assessment. Thanks in advance for your opinions. jerome - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Battey Life
From the Energizer Homepage: Keep batteries at room temperature. Heat can shorten their life and a damp location like the refrigerator is not recommended. Also, never carry loose batteries in your pocket or purse - contact with metal items like keys or coins can short-circuit the battery. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Send Mz-S to Repair
Didn't think of that. Lukasz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Emilio Puga Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Send Mz-S to Repair I think nothing for a Malasian Company, you know how well they pay their people??¿¿. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Lukasz Kacperczyk Enviado el: lunes, 13 de mayo de 2002 0:51 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: Send Mz-S to Repair What's wrong with Malaysia? ;) Lukasz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Emilio Puga Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Send Mz-S to Repair Oh, god apologise me, don´t buy a MZ-S, BUY TWO OF EM. Well, I have to say you that mine was of the earlier series, new cameras don´t have this problems, and believe me it´s a GREAT CAMERA, yesterday I held a Dinax 7 and yes It looks like if it were designed by George Lucas, but doesn´t have the finish of my beloved pentax, and one detail, one of the first things I look when someone try to sell me a camera is to look at the bottom, and guess what I found on Dinax/Maxxum 7??¿¿ MADE IN MALASYA Now I understand those cheap plastics. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de David S. Enviado el: domingo, 12 de mayo de 2002 18:35 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Send Mz-S to Repair Emilio Puga wrote: Hi group, few weeks ago I were asking you if someone had problems with Mz-S´s rewind when using Slide film, cracks and unrewound rolls, and a you told me that it is normal, cause mz-s´s film receptacle is a bit critical with film positioning, well, after two weeks of tests, and after following all your instrutions, I send my camera for repair to Reflecta Spain (pentax distributor). The thing its that after two weeks they call me saing that they don´t see anithing wrong on the camera, then I asked the repair man if they tried it with Slide film, and guess the answer??? -Oh, not tried with slide because don´t have a roll here- Ok, they will test it on monday and say something to me. Oh god everithing is happening to me, my 645n makes wrong aperture readouts, my Mx´s meter is locked on the on position, my tokina 28-70 2,6 crashed , uaaa what can I do?? place a candle to someone?? or maybe pay a gipsy?? I am beginning to know what you feel like. I have to put $2000 of repairs into my vehicle. I WAS thinking of buying an MZ-S, that will be delayed now. -- David S. Nature and wildlife photography http://www.sheppardphotos.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: AA battery types
I'm using pretty much only the Energizer high output 1700mAH and Ray-O-Vac 1600 mAH NiMH rechargeables. My digicam eats through batteries so quickly that it's not cost-effective to use anything else and I figure I may as well use the same for my motor drive, flash and other stuff that need AAs and need juice- remote controls for the TV don't count. Otherwise, if I were using disposable batteries, I'd use Energizer Lithium cells for the flash and digicam, probably as well for the motor drive. Taka - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: AA battery types
On Mon, 13 May 2002, TM wrote: I'm using pretty much only the Energizer high output 1700mAH and Ray-O-Vac 1600 mAH NiMH rechargeables... Smacking self in head I use rechargeables for my cd player and havent a clue why I never thought to do the same for my camera equipment!!! One problem is that after a while, it seems that the life (or rather, turn-around time) on my rechargeables has diminished significantly; and was already significantly shorter than nonrechargeables to begin with... However! My rechargeables are cheap ones. Now that I think about it, i suppose that such an investment would make plenty of sense. Even if I bought plenty of rechargers + batteries, its still probably MUCh more economically efficient over time. Thanks for this (most obvious!) idea. Smacking self in head again Much appreciated. jerome - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: AA battery types (carrying case)
Speaking of AAs, what do you all use to carry spare AAs, esp. if they're rechargeables and thus out of the box? If you buy one of the higher end versions of some batteries [energizer in particular], they tend to come in a plastic shell thats much more sturdy than the plastic on other battery packages. Once the cardboard is stripped down and discarded, this makes for a good recycleable battery case. - jerome - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Battey Life
On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:34:58 -0400 (EDT), Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes wrote: [...] never carry loose batteries in your pocket or purse - contact with metal items like keys or coins can short-circuit the battery. When I was about 13, Dad needed batteries and flash bulbs for his camera for christmas or a vacation or something, so we all went down to the K-mart to get them. Coming out of the store, I was walking beside my dad, and noticed a brief flash of light from his pants pocket. About a half a second later he was dancing quite a jig on the sidewalk. He'd put batteries, flash bulbs, and coins all in the same pocket. :-) TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: LX repair
Paul Stenquist wrote: Hi Ann, I know it's less convenient, but I'd send it to Pentax Colorado. They've been doing good work lately, and if they do screw up they'll fix it. Paul That is 3 for them. Butch mentioned a place closer to home I might at least call. I'm such a terrible procrastinator about these things, pretty soon I'll be down to one body. thanks for the input, ann Ann Sanfedele wrote: Ok, I know someone gave me some good info on this earlier and I thought I had saved it but... alas... I have one possible source, but would like another. I really do need to get the blasted body fixed light meter screwed up, sticky mirror too. Best scenario - good recomendation in NYC or close. forget PHOTO-TECH - they seem unable or unwilling to do CLA or real repairs on camera bodies of this vintage (20 years old). sigh. annsan - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student
- Original Message - From: Jonathan Donald Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For Student The whole friggin point isn't about whether the zoom is a better compositional tool or not. It's not about composition at all. It's about learning how to see what light does when it hits an object, how that gets translated into an image. This is best learned with a 50mm lens (if we are using the 35mm format as an example). It matches (more or less) the field of view of the human eye, and consequently, produces a picture with a perspective we can immediately relate to. The idea is to learn one thing at a time, and learn it well. First, learn what light does, that controls everything else. Composition is secondary to this, as compositional needs will change depending on the angle of light hitting the object. Not my fault a bunch of idiots think this is bullshit. People that have this figured out are better photographers. Look back at the subject line. The word Student should say something about where I am coming from. You can learn what I am talking about with any lens, it doesn't matter if you use a zoom, or a friggin fisheye. You will learn it faster, and better with a standard focal length prime lens, one that doesn't allow you to cheat, just because you want the instant gratification of easy composition. Some of this stuff is work. Now, back to my rock. Thanks Bill - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .