Re: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies
Stephen Russell wrote: http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=21070 Hi Stephen! I hope you enjoyed the Kool-aid. Regards, Pete Stephen Russell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] The Credible Shrinking Deficit
http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=20artnum=1issue=20060711 The budget gap is now close to its historical average for the last four decades remarkable so soon after 9-11, not to mention last year's devastating natural disasters. It's all part of a prosperity that has generated more than 5.4 million new jobs in the last three years. Zinedine Zidane is a butt-head http://www.cafepress.com/zinedinezidane Press 1 for English http://www.cafepress.com/press1forenglis Hate Jon Corzine? http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Hate Soccer? http://www.cafepress.com/ihatesoccer Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies
ROTFLMAO! I think Bob was at the movies too, but he was outside picketing against the evil islamofascists! :-) Regards Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer Pegasus Software Limited Orion House, Orion Way, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6PE * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 * Fax: +44 (0) 1536 495001 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.pegasus.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: 11 July 2006 15:15 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=21070 Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ Pegasus Software Limited is a member of the Systems Union Group plc Registered Office: Systems Union House, 1 Lakeside Road, Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6XP Registered No: 1601542 This e-mail is from Pegasus Software Limited. The e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone. Pegasus Software Limited utilises an anti-virus system and therefore any files sent via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. You are however advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Pegasus Software Limited will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies
I guess you didn't learn anything from the subway bombings. --- Dominic Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ROTFLMAO! I think Bob was at the movies too, but he was outside picketing against the evil islamofascists! :-) Regards Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer Pegasus Software Limited Orion House, Orion Way, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6PE * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 * Fax: +44 (0) 1536 495001 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.pegasus.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: 11 July 2006 15:15 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=21070 Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ Pegasus Software Limited is a member of the Systems Union Group plc Registered Office: Systems Union House, 1 Lakeside Road, Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6XP Registered No: 1601542 This e-mail is from Pegasus Software Limited. The e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone. Pegasus Software Limited utilises an anti-virus system and therefore any files sent via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. You are however advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Pegasus Software Limited will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Zinedine Zidane is a butt-head http://www.cafepress.com/zinedinezidane Press 1 for English http://www.cafepress.com/press1forenglis Hate Jon Corzine? http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Hate Soccer? http://www.cafepress.com/ihatesoccer Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies
! ! ROTFLMAO! I think Bob was at the movies too, but he was outside ! picketing against the evil islamofascists! ! ! :-) Meanwhile, Dominic was here, picketing against Mike, Pete and Bob: http://tinyurl.com/kjd5x ;-) - Bob ! ! Regards ! ! Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP ! Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer ! ! Pegasus Software Limited ! Orion House, Orion Way, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6PE ! ! * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 ! * Fax: +44 (0) 1536 495001 ! * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! * http://www.pegasus.co.uk ! ! ! -Original Message- ! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On ! Behalf Of Stephen Russell ! Sent: 11 July 2006 15:15 ! To: profox@leafe.com ! Subject: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies ! ! http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=21070 ! ! ! Stephen Russell ! DBA / Developer ! ! Electracash, Inc. ! 5100 Poplar Ave. ! Suite 2518 ! Memphis, Tennessee 38137 ! 1-901-684-0348 ! Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! www.electracash.com ! ! The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the ! right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting ! moment. ! ! ! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies
You sure it's not this link? http://www.blazesequinerescue.com/images/buford2.jpg --- Bob Calco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ! ! ROTFLMAO! I think Bob was at the movies too, but he was outside ! picketing against the evil islamofascists! ! ! :-) Meanwhile, Dominic was here, picketing against Mike, Pete and Bob: http://tinyurl.com/kjd5x ;-) - Bob ! ! Regards ! ! Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP ! Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer ! ! Pegasus Software Limited ! Orion House, Orion Way, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6PE ! ! * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 ! * Fax: +44 (0) 1536 495001 ! * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! * http://www.pegasus.co.uk ! ! ! -Original Message- ! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On ! Behalf Of Stephen Russell ! Sent: 11 July 2006 15:15 ! To: profox@leafe.com ! Subject: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies ! ! http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=21070 ! ! ! Stephen Russell ! DBA / Developer ! ! Electracash, Inc. ! 5100 Poplar Ave. ! Suite 2518 ! Memphis, Tennessee 38137 ! 1-901-684-0348 ! Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! www.electracash.com ! ! The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the ! right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting ! moment. ! ! ! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
Loads of questions spring to mind! Send them my email address and get them to tell me exactly what they want. -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies
I think I look rather fetching! LOL! ;-) Regards Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: 12 July 2006 08:07 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies ! ! ROTFLMAO! I think Bob was at the movies too, but he was outside ! picketing against the evil islamofascists! ! ! :-) Meanwhile, Dominic was here, picketing against Mike, Pete and Bob: http://tinyurl.com/kjd5x ;-) - Bob ! ! Regards ! ! Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP ! Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer ! ! Pegasus Software Limited ! Orion House, Orion Way, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6PE ! ! * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 ! * Fax: +44 (0) 1536 495001 ! * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! * http://www.pegasus.co.uk ! ! ! -Original Message- ! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On ! Behalf Of Stephen Russell ! Sent: 11 July 2006 15:15 ! To: profox@leafe.com ! Subject: [OT] Pete and Michael take us to the movies ! ! http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=21070 ! ! ! Stephen Russell ! DBA / Developer ! ! Electracash, Inc. ! 5100 Poplar Ave. ! Suite 2518 ! Memphis, Tennessee 38137 ! 1-901-684-0348 ! Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! www.electracash.com ! ! The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the ! right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting ! moment. ! ! ! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ Pegasus Software Limited is a member of the Systems Union Group plc Registered Office: Systems Union House, 1 Lakeside Road, Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6XP Registered No: 1601542 This e-mail is from Pegasus Software Limited. The e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone. Pegasus Software Limited utilises an anti-virus system and therefore any files sent via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. You are however advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Pegasus Software Limited will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Have a Calendar object?
Bummer, ... so what's *wrong* with mscommctl.MonthView ? Andrew Davies MBCS CITP - AndyD 8-)# ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any queries. ** ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Have a Calendar object?
The MS bit! BG Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Davies Sent: 12 July 2006 08:37 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: Have a Calendar object? Bummer, ... so what's *wrong* with mscommctl.MonthView ? Andrew Davies MBCS CITP - AndyD 8-)# ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any queries. ** [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Al Gore's Penguin Army
Madigan, What do you know about style? That leather mask and gag ball is so out-of-style. That's the same thing your boyfriend was saying about your pink lace panties. -- Kris www.shamrocktrails.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Al Gore's Penguin Army
That's the same thing your boyfriend was saying about your pink lace panties. ROTFLMAO! My keyboard is now covered in coffee!! Regards Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel Sent: 12 July 2006 09:07 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Al Gore's Penguin Army Madigan, What do you know about style? That leather mask and gag ball is so out-of-style. That's the same thing your boyfriend was saying about your pink lace panties. -- Kris www.shamrocktrails.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ Pegasus Software Limited is a member of the Systems Union Group plc Registered Office: Systems Union House, 1 Lakeside Road, Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6XP Registered No: 1601542 This e-mail is from Pegasus Software Limited. The e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone. Pegasus Software Limited utilises an anti-virus system and therefore any files sent via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. You are however advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Pegasus Software Limited will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Get the open method
Is there anyway of getting a pointer to an open method (i.e. you are editing a forms init method) so you can read the code in it? I was wondering at a way to replace the standard vfp print routine for one that labels up the pages, adds lines numbers etc. Regards -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Control Container Objects
Hi All, I have created an object (use a container class to place all my gubbins in) that mimics a list control but also gives a dynamic functionality to it. One thing I have noticed though is that all of the controls that make up the object are visible in the property tree when used on a form. Now I would like to stop this, and think by using a control object instead of a container object should do this. Am I correct? If I just modify the class (edit the table file) and change the baseclass of the container to control, will this work? What are the main differences between the container class and the control class? (VFP7) Cheers all Tristan Leask Software Developer Marine Software Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marinesoftware.co.uk -- Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: ODBC Setup Error - VFP8 2003 Server
It's buried on the MS site. I don't have a URL. Is your mail server blocking MSI packages? Let me know and I'll zip it up and send it again. Or you could try searching their site for VFPODBC.MSI. Steve Ellenoff wrote: Thanks Richard, but never received it.. Also, where did you get this installer from? I've got every VFP CD there is, so surely you'd think it'd be on one of those.. -Steve -- Richard Kaye Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message has been checked for viruses before sending. - ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Project lifecycle cartoon
The first time I saw that it had fewer drawings! On 7/11/06, Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damn, the old ones are the best eh? It's got to be twenty years since I last saw that, wow! Mark --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: ODBC Setup Error - VFP8 2003 Server
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro/downloads/updates/odbc/default.aspx On 7/12/06, Steve Ellenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Richard, but never received it.. Also, where did you get this installer from? I've got every VFP CD there is, so surely you'd think it'd be on one of those.. -Steve --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Proverb for the day
Give a man a fish and he will eat today. Teach him to fish and he'll get some beers and disappear with his mates. Regards Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 * dominic.burford BLOCKED::mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @pegasus.co.uk I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980 __ Pegasus Software Limited is a member of the Systems Union Group plc Registered Office: Systems Union House, 1 Lakeside Road, Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6XP Registered No: 1601542 This e-mail is from Pegasus Software Limited. The e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone. Pegasus Software Limited utilises an anti-virus system and therefore any files sent via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. You are however advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Pegasus Software Limited will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Have a Calendar object?
They'll just have to type their dates like the rest of the world... :-) Chet, I changed all my 'type in date' boxes to mscommctl *years* ago, and have never had any problems. Andrew Davies MBCS CITP - AndyD 8-)# ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any queries. ** ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory
Last italians news : Materazzi admits he uttered insults against Zidane, but that it was in response to its arrogant attitude. Last french news : Zidane will commit a press conference this evening. Gérard. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory
And German news : it seems that two italian players are doping positive controlled for the match. Gérard. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [WC] Another Zidane theory
I say let it lie. The World Cup is over, now it is just a war of words. Regards Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer * Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gérard Lochon Sent: 12 July 2006 12:59 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory Last italians news : Materazzi admits he uttered insults against Zidane, but that it was in response to its arrogant attitude. Last french news : Zidane will commit a press conference this evening. Gérard. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ Pegasus Software Limited is a member of the Systems Union Group plc Registered Office: Systems Union House, 1 Lakeside Road, Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6XP Registered No: 1601542 This e-mail is from Pegasus Software Limited. The e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone. Pegasus Software Limited utilises an anti-virus system and therefore any files sent via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. You are however advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Pegasus Software Limited will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
I have another question : My wife uses GroupWise at work. When i try to send her messages a little bit larger for OE and my provider bandwidth, they are splitted in several sub-messages. How can she combine/decode the received messages with GroupWise ? I didn't find anything about that in the groupwise documentation. Thanks. Gérard. PS : and don't say i just have to not send messages to my wife when she's working ... ;o) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Cesar Chalom : GRADIENT COMMAND BUTTONS WITH GDI+
After showing how to create forms with gradient backgrounds, Cesar shows in his blog how to create command buttons with the same effect. http://weblogs.foxite.com/cesarchalom/archive/2006/07/11/1969.aspx -- Aílsom F. Heringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: ailsom.osklen Analista de Sistemas -- Osklen Departamento de Informática Rio de Janeiro - RJ BRASIL http://www.osklen.com.br 55 21 22198971 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
There are some system wide settings that can force a break but hardly anyone uses them. Depending on the version of GW you may often see the text component of an email separated as an attachment along with the route-trace info but the document should appear as normal. Which version of GW is she using? -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
Which version of GW is she using? Heu ... ... she says it's the release n° 6 (haha, number six ... hell, i'm not a number, i'm a free man !) Gérard. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory
On 7/12/06, Dominic Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I say let it lie. The World Cup is over, now it is just a war of words. You can re-live the moment whenever you wish: http://www.czeta.it/play.php?idm=3394canale=13 -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
Try setting Tools-Options-Environment-Views- Use default views for reading to yes and the two view docs in html options to true and see what you get. The administrator can lock/override these options (but they hardly ever do). If that doesn't do it email me directly and I will give you a GW account to send an email to to see what I get. -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Sad but true
NEW LAW COMING FROM CONGRESS -- AMERICANS WITH NO ABILITIES ACT WASHINGTON, DC Congress is considering sweeping legislation, which provides new benefits for many Americans. The Americans With No Abilities Act (AWNAA) is being hailed as a major legislation by advocates of the millions of Americans who lack any real skills or ambition. Roughly 50 percent of Americans do not possess the competence and drive necessary to carve out a meaningful role for themselves in society, said Barbara Boxer. We can no longer stand by and allow People of Inability to be ridiculed and passed over. With this legislation, employers will no longer be able to grant special favors to a small group of workers, simply because they do a better job, or have some idea of what they are doing. The President pointed to the success of the US Postal Service, which has a long-standing policy of providing opportunity without regard to performance. Approximately 74 percent of postal employees lack job skills, making this agency the single largest US employer of Persons of Inability. Private sector industries with good records of nondiscrimination against the Inept include retail sales (72%), the airline industry (68%),and home improvement warehouse stores (65%) The DMV also has a great record of hiring Persons of Inability. (63%) Under the Americans With No Abilities Act, more than 25 million middle man positions will be created, with important-sounding titles but little real responsibility, thus providing an illusory sense of purpose and performance. Mandatory non-performance-based raises and promotions will be given, to guarantee upward mobility for even the most unremarkable employees. The legislation provides substantial tax breaks to corporations which maintain a significant level of Persons of Inability in middle positions, and gives a tax credit to small and medium businesses that agree to hire one clueless worker for every two talented hires. Finally, the AWNA ACT contains tough new measures to make it more difficult to discriminate against the Nonabled, banning discriminatory interview questions such as Do you have any goals for the future? or Do you have any skills or experience which relate to this job? As a Non-abled person, I can't be expected to keep up with people who have something going for them, said Mary Lou Gertz, who lost her position as a lug-nut twister at the GM plant in Flint, MI due to her lack of notable job skills. This new law should really help people like me. With the passage of this bill, Gertz and millions of other untalented citizens can finally see a light at the end of the tunnel. Said Senator Ted Kennedy, It is our duty as lawmakers to provide each and every American citizen, regardless of his or her adequacy, with some sort of space to take up in this great nation. Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Alternatives
Do I remember correctly that you guys where going to record some of the sessions so that you could put them up on the web? Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully Posted At: 12 July 2006 14:19 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Alternatives Subject: Re: Alternatives That sounds like a good session somewhere! http://foxforward.net/session.php?topic=17 (See how I was sneaky and worked that into the message! Bad Kevin) Kevin Cully CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of Fox Forward 2006! http://foxforward.net -- Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
You are thinking correctly. The Control class will hide all contained objects from direct access. This is a Pro with the properties list and could be a Con at runtime when you want to modify something inside and do not have access to it through the control property. Tracy -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:08 AM Subject: Control Container Objects Hi All, I have created an object (use a container class to place all my gubbins in) that mimics a list control but also gives a dynamic functionality to it. One thing I have noticed though is that all of the controls that make up the object are visible in the property tree when used on a form. Now I would like to stop this, and think by using a control object instead of a container object should do this. Am I correct? If I just modify the class (edit the table file) and change the baseclass of the container to control, will this work? What are the main differences between the container class and the control class? (VFP7) Cheers all Tristan Leask Software Developer Marine Software Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marinesoftware.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory
Well, what do you expect? The French press is still going after Lance Armstrong for imagined doping charges from '98! In fact, everyone knows that the '98 french tour was wholly and generally doped. So it just seems curious to french media that Lance is not guilty just because he was the champ'. Very paranoïd, i know ... but it's our cultural way of exception :o))) Gérard. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Something doesn't seem right about the Baseball MVP gettinga brand new car....
Your wonderment is understandable but the MVP is only one of several hundred peers and should get something special. Perhaps instead of a car, he should get a membership in Rush Limbaugh's drug plan. HALinNY -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 23:27 To: Profox Subject: [OT] Something doesn't seem right about the Baseball MVP gettinga brand new car ...especially when he's getting bazillions to play baseball anyway. Is this just a sour-grapes emotion? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
Okay, I have now tried it, but it seems to screw the code up so it doesn't work. No matter. Can objects reference other objects within side the control? I think this maybe what is mucking up the code. Regards Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Posted At: 12 July 2006 14:25 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects You are thinking correctly. The Control class will hide all contained objects from direct access. This is a Pro with the properties list and could be a Con at runtime when you want to modify something inside and do not have access to it through the control property. Tracy -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:08 AM Subject: Control Container Objects Hi All, I have created an object (use a container class to place all my gubbins in) that mimics a list control but also gives a dynamic functionality to it. One thing I have noticed though is that all of the controls that make up the object are visible in the property tree when used on a form. Now I would like to stop this, and think by using a control object instead of a container object should do this. Am I correct? If I just modify the class (edit the table file) and change the baseclass of the container to control, will this work? What are the main differences between the container class and the control class? (VFP7) Cheers all Tristan Leask Software Developer Marine Software Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marinesoftware.co.uk [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Macros format/style in old code
Hi Lew Message: 8 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:27:27 -0400 From: Lew Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Macros format/style in old code To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii I'm cleaning up some old code and I keep coming across macros which are uniformly coded with quotation marks and dots. Eg if a macro is stored in a memvar, instead of seeing: memvar The code consistently reads: memvar. All I can find out about this is that the programmer decided that using the quotation marks and dot all the time avoided problems. Anyone have any idea what problems are being addressed here, if any? I regularly add the . to the end of a macro, just like I add a ) after a (. It helps me see two dots are needed with commands like this... lcObject = test store something to lcObject..SomeProperty I've seen the memvar. format used when the memvar wasn't even an expression. That's better done as lcVar = memvar With memvar containing an expression... lcVar = memvar. but it's almost always better to lcVar = eval(memvar) Note that both parentheses are mandatory ;) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Seeking Assistance - Upgrading to High-Speed
On 7/11/06, Joel N. Fischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm pretty sure I have the prefix right -- NF stands for something that is computer-related, but not FoxPro-related, right? I hope so, anyway. But, on to the question... Exactly right. So. I've been on dial-up Internet since I started, pretty much, some 15+ years ago. I'm now considering going to high-speed access. Nearly any of the commodity high-speed routers available from Linksys, D-Link or Netgear will provide the basic functionality: NAT (Network Address Translation) provides a basic software firewall between you and the internet. Most of the routers block most of the badness coming from the internet. Each Windows, Mac or Linux workstation should also run a software firewall program, such as ZoneAlarmPro. The WinXP firewall is crippled and more trouble than it is worth. The router should also provide switched service for (typically) four ethernet connections. These should configure automatically and be recognized by your machines once you've cabled the machines together and turned everything on. If not, come back with follow-up questions and we'll try to help! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: table buffering
Judith Barer wrote: I realize that I do have to update more than one table. So I can use table buffering but can I still use the SQL update, insert and delete commands. It says the following in the help file on cursorsetprop Note Buffering is not applied to tables that are opened implicitly, for example, using SQL INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE commands. This sounds like those commands ignore table buffering. So then I would have to use append , replace and delete for table buffering to work? Hi Judith, When it talks about opening a table implicitly it means that the command will open the table for you, and therefore will not do CURSORSETPROP() E.g. Close tables all use file1 scatter memvar insert into file2 from memvar note file2 not open but opened by the insert. When you open explicitly you can then use table buffering. E.g. Close tables all use file1 scatter memvar use file2 in 0 CURSORSETPROP(1,.t.,'FILE2') enable buffering insert into file2 from memvar Then you can use tableupdate to save the changes. The reason I suggest using buffering for more than one table is that you would have to update one table, then try and update the next table. This could cause problems if you could not update the second table (no rollback without transactions). You could go through both files with SET MULTILOCKS ON and get all the locks before doing the updates but it is much easier to do the changes with buffering. Peter This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed.Its contents are confidential and may be protected in law. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email. While Rajan Imports has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the risk of virus transmission through email, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate virus protection. www.rajan-group.co.uk Rajan Imports Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR. Tel:0161 831 3700 Fax:0161 831 3715 London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Macros format/style in old code
Lew, memvar is NOT the same as memvar. The former simply replaces the memvar with the characters you specify in memvar and this will NOT end up being a string as far as VFP is concerned in the code A couple of examples: Example 1 - Hello=Newval cStr1=Hello cStr2=cStr1. Gives cStr2 as Newval cStr2=cStr1. Gives cStr2 as Hello Example 2 - Memvar=Select * memvar. From Customer into cursor curTest This simply builds theSQL expression but you could use exec() which is quicker =Exec(Memvar+ From Customer into cursor curTest) Example 3 - Memvar=Fred Replace Name with Memvar. in Customer This is of course the equivalent of: Replace Name with Memvar As a matter of course I always terminate a macro with a . because it makes the macro expression stand out expecially if you are accessing an object as the Macro value: Memvar=oObject vValue=Memvar..Property1 However It is preferable and quicker to use the Eval() in these circumstances i.e vValue=Eval(Memvar+.Property1) Hope this helps Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz Sent: 12 July 2006 14:27 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Macros format/style in old code I'm cleaning up some old code and I keep coming across macros which are uniformly coded with quotation marks and dots. Eg if a macro is stored in a memvar, instead of seeing: memvar The code consistently reads: memvar. All I can find out about this is that the programmer decided that using the quotation marks and dot all the time avoided problems. Anyone have any idea what problems are being addressed here, if any? -Lew [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
The form you put the control object onto can not get into the control to see objects. Objects within the control object should be able to see other objects in the control object without a problem. Tracy -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Okay, I have now tried it, but it seems to screw the code up so it doesn't work. No matter. Can objects reference other objects within side the control? I think this maybe what is mucking up the code. Regards Tristan ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Alternatives
On 7/11/06, Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know it's a heinous thought, probably particularly in this group, but what's a good non-Windoze alternative to VFP? Mark: I'm a fan of LAMP for web solutions. I've been delivering PHP apps running against MySQL for the past two years, and have had some good successes there. I'd like to also work with PostgreSQL as it is a free-er database and had competitive features. I also work with Python and Perl, but mostly for lightweight scripting at this point; I hope to expand my knowledge of them, but there's only a few tricks this old dog can learn at one time. For rich-client solutions, I think dabo is the place to be. The Python language is approachable, fairly easy to use, there are lots of supporting materials online and a lot of pre-built libraries of functions to tap. There are also some great packaged solutions out there that can bring a lot of value to your clients. I've been really impressed with some of the content management systems out there. A few years ago, a CMS was a proprietary way to tie your web site up to one solution. Now, the CMSes have matured to being much more similar to application frameworks with tremendous built in features like member management, forums, wikis, and so forth. Xaraya is a current favorite. Other packaged software making waves includes SugarCRM (customer relationship management in LAMP), Asterisk for free PBX/VOIP functionality, and many many more. My recommendation is to shop around. Attend local LUG meetings, FOSS meetings or PHP UG meetings, whatever you can find locally, join mailing lists like Pro* and figure out what particular applications you'd like to be developing and supporting. There are thousands of apps, frameworks and toolkits out there (www.sourceforge.net and www.freshmeat.net), so do your homework, refine your requirements and diversify your toolbox with some familiarity with several solutions. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Get the open method
On 7/12/06, Michael Hawksworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering at a way to replace the standard vfp print routine for one that labels up the pages, adds lines numbers etc. File, Print, Options... lets you add line numbers. For headings and other layout, you might want to review what's available in the FoxPro documenting wizard. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Get the open method
Cheers Tracy, I'll have a look. -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
On 7/11/06, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They have several thousand e-mail messages in GroupWise, and want to back them up from the work computer, and be able to view them at home. I'm pretty sure they just want a CYA backup, but whatever. Does anyone know how to do this? I've never even seen the program. They don't have groupwise at home, so can the messages be backed up all at once to some sort of large text file? Or is it proprietary only? Or what? A quick Google [1] indicates that Thunderbird could import the messages into a standard mbox format: http://www.google.com/search?q=thunderbird+import+groupwise -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Get the open method
I just want a better quick print when you have a method open. Handle line wrapping etc. Figured I would have to write my own. Using the documentation tools is fine for more permanent records. -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory
On Jul 12, 2006, at 9:46 AM, Dominic Burford wrote: Lance was never accused at the time of taking drugs. Only since his retiring has the French media swung into a full on attack on him. What the French media have never liked, is that a cocky American has completely dominated their most famous race for seven years. What's even more odd is that they claimed at one point that the cancer treatments he received gave him an unfair edge!! Talk about chutzpah! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
Okay, I have put a copy of my dynamic list control up on my site so you can see what is happening. http://www.tleask.plus.com/dynlist.zip Basically, at the moment it is a container baseclass, if I then edit the vcx file (table) and change it to a control baseclass it then stops working. Any ideas? Oh, if you have any comments about the control itself, let me know! I like to hear how bad my coding is! G Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Posted At: 12 July 2006 15:04 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects The form you put the control object onto can not get into the control to see objects. Objects within the control object should be able to see other objects in the control object without a problem. Tracy -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Okay, I have now tried it, but it seems to screw the code up so it doesn't work. No matter. Can objects reference other objects within side the control? I think this maybe what is mucking up the code. Regards Tristan [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP Gig in Warsaw Indiana USA
http://www.prgjobs.com/showjob.cfm?JobNum=230519
regards [Bill]
--
William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply}
VFP Webhosting? You BET! - http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting
Failing dotNet Project? - http://www.dotnetconversions.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
FDP Gig in Philly
http://www.jobcircle.com/classifieds/539599.html
regards [Bill]
--
William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply}
Mondo Cool DSL - http://www.efgroup.net/shopfordsl.html
VFP Webhosting? You BET! - http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting
Failing dotNet Project? - http://www.dotnetconversions.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Macros format/style in old code
Lew, I have no idea on that one - there is certainly no point in it at all. Perhaps the original developer wanted to slow down the Fox because it all ran t fast! As to exec(), my tests have found it to be slightly faster. It would be interesting to do a small test on various macro substitutions and compare speed. Andy Kramek has a few tests on his site and they certainly show Exec() to be faster. Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz Sent: 12 July 2006 15:50 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Macros format/style in old code Hmm... My original post wasn't quite right, sorry. It's not a question of alternative macros; it's a question of unnecessary ones. I'm seeing this in stuff that looks like: cMemvar = bob Select ... From Where person = cMemvar. Is there any point to this at all? I'll post others as I find them. Also, for what it's worth, I don't find exec() faster for one line macros at all. A simple wins hands down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Macros format/style in old code Lew, memvar is NOT the same as memvar. The former simply replaces the memvar with the characters you specify in memvar and this will NOT end up being a string as far as VFP is concerned in the code A couple of examples: Example 1 - Hello=Newval cStr1=Hello cStr2=cStr1. Gives cStr2 as Newval cStr2=cStr1. Gives cStr2 as Hello Example 2 - Memvar=Select * memvar. From Customer into cursor curTest This simply builds theSQL expression but you could use exec() which is quicker =Exec(Memvar+ From Customer into cursor curTest) Example 3 - Memvar=Fred Replace Name with Memvar. in Customer This is of course the equivalent of: Replace Name with Memvar As a matter of course I always terminate a macro with a . because it makes the macro expression stand out expecially if you are accessing an object as the Macro value: Memvar=oObject vValue=Memvar..Property1 However It is preferable and quicker to use the Eval() in these circumstances i.e vValue=Eval(Memvar+.Property1) Hope this helps Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lew Schwartz Sent: 12 July 2006 14:27 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Macros format/style in old code I'm cleaning up some old code and I keep coming across macros which are uniformly coded with quotation marks and dots. Eg if a macro is stored in a memvar, instead of seeing: memvar The code consistently reads: memvar. All I can find out about this is that the programmer decided that using the quotation marks and dot all the time avoided problems. Anyone have any idea what problems are being addressed here, if any? -Lew [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
Tristan, What exactly is the problem you want to solve? I've loaded it up but don't know really what I'm looking at or for. Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: 12 July 2006 15:43 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Okay, I have put a copy of my dynamic list control up on my site so you can see what is happening. http://www.tleask.plus.com/dynlist.zip Basically, at the moment it is a container baseclass, if I then edit the vcx file (table) and change it to a control baseclass it then stops working. Any ideas? Oh, if you have any comments about the control itself, let me know! I like to hear how bad my coding is! G Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Posted At: 12 July 2006 15:04 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects The form you put the control object onto can not get into the control to see objects. Objects within the control object should be able to see other objects in the control object without a problem. Tracy -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Okay, I have now tried it, but it seems to screw the code up so it doesn't work. No matter. Can objects reference other objects within side the control? I think this maybe what is mucking up the code. Regards Tristan [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
Did you change BaseClass and Class to Control? I'm not seeing any change in behavior with my changes to the classlib. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software 828-665-1818 -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Okay, I have put a copy of my dynamic list control up on my site so you can see what is happening. http://www.tleask.plus.com/dynlist.zip Basically, at the moment it is a container baseclass, if I then edit the vcx file (table) and change it to a control baseclass it then stops working. Any ideas? Oh, if you have any comments about the control itself, let me know! I like to hear how bad my coding is! G Tristan ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Alternatives
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:07:17 -0400, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hey, stick to Python then. There's no 'then' after 'if', and no 'endif' at all to worry about! ;-) No, just making sure everything is indented properly! -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
Yes, I change the class and the baseclass to 'control'. I then run the form and when you select an item in the list the highlighting no longer works. What version of VFP are you using? Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Posted At: 12 July 2006 16:05 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Did you change BaseClass and Class to Control? I'm not seeing any change in behavior with my changes to the classlib. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software 828-665-1818 -- Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Thumbnails
On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:58 AM, aj wrote: I would like to create thumbnails of the pages If you happen to own WebConnect, it has an image control that works well and has been fast enough for me. Ken ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Al Gore's Penguin Army
You got me confused with someone else, I don't live in California. --- Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Madigan, What do you know about style? That leather mask and gag ball is so out-of-style. That's the same thing your boyfriend was saying about your pink lace panties. -- Kris www.shamrocktrails.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Zinedine Zidane is a butt-head http://www.cafepress.com/zinedinezidane Press 1 for English http://www.cafepress.com/press1forenglis Hate Jon Corzine? http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Hate Soccer? http://www.cafepress.com/ihatesoccer Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
VFP 9 SP 1 works Visual FoxPro 07.00..9465 for Windows behaves as you said. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software 828-665-1818 -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:32 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Yes, I change the class and the baseclass to 'control'. I then run the form and when you select an item in the list the highlighting no longer works. What version of VFP are you using? Tristan ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Hummorists ride the presidents butt
When he travels, Dick Cheney has certain things that he needs. He needs what he calls a 'downtime suite.' Coincidentally, George W. Bush also has a 'downtime suite.' It's called the Oval Office. --David Letterman http://politicalhumor.about.com/b/a/256830.htm Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
Tristan, Sorry I see what you say is happening but my two controls on the same page one based on a container and one on a control just function identically Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: 12 July 2006 16:35 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Hi Dave, Cheers for having a look. It's a bit of a silly one, but I wanted try and use the control baseclass (instead of the container). It's hard to explain... If you run the form, you can see it is just like a list control apart from a few things that aren't quite right. You should be able to slect an item and then it will highlight. If you then browse control.vcx and search and change container to control. Rerun the form and now the highlighting doesn't work. This is the part that I do not understand. Aren't containers and controls exactly the same except with a control you cannot access the child objects from outside the control. This is starting to make no sense to me! lol Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Posted At: 12 July 2006 16:17 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Tristan, What exactly is the problem you want to solve? I've loaded it up but don't know really what I'm looking at or for. Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: 12 July 2006 15:43 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Okay, I have put a copy of my dynamic list control up on my site so you can see what is happening. http://www.tleask.plus.com/dynlist.zip Basically, at the moment it is a container baseclass, if I then edit the vcx file (table) and change it to a control baseclass it then stops working. Any ideas? Oh, if you have any comments about the control itself, let me know! I like to hear how bad my coding is! G Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Posted At: 12 July 2006 15:04 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects The form you put the control object onto can not get into the control to see objects. Objects within the control object should be able to see other objects in the control object without a problem. Tracy -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Okay, I have now tried it, but it seems to screw the code up so it doesn't work. No matter. Can objects reference other objects within side the control? I think this maybe what is mucking up the code. Regards Tristan [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Tricorder makes a comeback
A new sensor being developed can detect bioweapons in sealed packages from a short distance away-calling to mind Star Trek's handheld scanning devices known as tricorders. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/07/060711-biosensor.html?s ource=rss Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Al Gore's Penguin Army
From: Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] You got me confused with someone else, I don't live in California. I think she was referring to your track attire. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
I am using VFP9 SP1 so I can confirm there is NO difference. Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson Tristan Leask wrote: Opps, I forgot to say 'Thanks' Cheers Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Posted At: 12 July 2006 16:45 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects VFP 9 SP 1 works Visual FoxPro 07.00..9465 for Windows behaves as you said. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software 828-665-1818 -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:32 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Yes, I change the class and the baseclass to 'control'. I then run the form and when you select an item in the list the highlighting no longer works. What version of VFP are you using? Tristan [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Control Container Objects
Blasted VFP7! How did I know it was going to be that! lol Container it is then! Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Posted At: 12 July 2006 16:45 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Control Container Objects Subject: RE: Control Container Objects VFP 9 SP 1 works Visual FoxPro 07.00..9465 for Windows behaves as you said. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software 828-665-1818 -Original Message- From: Tristan Leask Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:32 AM Subject: RE: Control Container Objects Yes, I change the class and the baseclass to 'control'. I then run the form and when you select an item in the list the highlighting no longer works. What version of VFP are you using? Tristan [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Thumbnails
Dave Crozier wrote: AJ, With VFP9 you can simply set the Picture Property of an image control to point to a .tif file and then set isometric sizing. Dave Crozier A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aj Sent: 12 July 2006 14:59 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Thumbnails Hello everyone. I have large multipage tiff images. I would like to create thumbnails of the pages in the file and display them to the user. Ceasar Chalom enhanced the gdiplus classes to allow for multipage tiff images but they run too slow in my opinion. Does anyone have a better solution to the problem? A.J. TIA [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: ODBC Setup Error - VFP8 2003 Server
Thanks Helio W Richard K for the info.. I passed it on this morning, and he just reported back that it solved his problem. Much appreciated! Steve At 12:27 AM 7/12/2006, you wrote: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro/downloads/updates/odbc/default.aspx On 7/12/06, Steve Ellenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Richard, but never received it.. Also, where did you get this installer from? I've got every VFP CD there is, so surely you'd think it'd be on one of those.. -Steve --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Alternatives
Do you mean VMware Player? - Original Message - From: Tracy Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:14 PM Subject: RE: Alternatives There has been recent discussions on the IRC about this. A few have gone to Ubuntu, installed VMPlayer, then moved the image of the XP/W2K drive into a VMPlayer session. Ubuntu (free), VMPlayer (free), still using the same license of XP/W2K on the same hardware (now in a virtual hardware session on that physical hardware). No dual boot, just start up a window and VFP is at your finger tips. Tracy -Original Message- From: Mark Stanton Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:17 PM Subject: Alternatives [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Government gets into your wallet
http://www.prisonplanet.com/022904rfidtagsexplode.html Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Alternatives
On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Alan Bourke wrote: No, just making sure everything is indented properly! You mean you don't indent your code? -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] how to screw with the FAA
http://cyburdine.com/content/view/62/31/ Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] the Fourth Reich
http://www.oilempire.us/bushnazi.html Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] joke
Employment Standards determined a small woodworking shop owner was not paying proper wages to his help and sent an agent out to interview him. I need a list of your employees and how much you pay them, demanded the agent. Well, there's Jake my finisher who's been with me for 3 years, I pay him $900 a week. The apprentice Tom has been here for 6 months, and I pay him $500 a week. Then there's the half-wit that works here about 18 hours a day. He makes $10 a week and I buy him a case of beer every Friday, replied the owner. That's the guy I want to talk to; the half-wit, says the agent. The owner says, That would be me. Stephen Russell DBA / Developer Electracash, Inc. 5100 Poplar Ave. Suite 2518 Memphis, Tennessee 38137 1-901-684-0348 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.electracash.com The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time, but also to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Alternatives
From: Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] No, just making sure everything is indented properly! You mean you don't indent your code? White space is your friend. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] coming to theatres soon ...
Where do you think those billions of dollars are going? Burned in a furnace? - Original Message - From: Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 12:54 PM Subject: [OT] coming to theatres soon ... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13763982/ China and North Korea, with North Korea as proxy, have been gearing up their arms programs because they've been threatened. Since there is zero possibility of American troops being sent to Asia again, what this threat will actually cause is another wmd arms race. This will keep the military and it's arms-merchant contractors fat and happy, on top of already having reamed our economy of hundreds of billions, some say a trillion (to date, it's not over!), for their war in ME. And this is not to mention the Big Oil reaming and all those lives and all that destruction. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] coming to theatres soon ...
Bill doesn't understand that these companies have employees and shareholders. It's obvious now that Reagan's SDI is needed now with crazies like Iran and North Korea having nuclear technology. Once again the Left was wrong. They fought tooth and nail against SDI. These are the same nutbags who believe in Global Warming. Same lunatics. Remember the NO NUKES movement? Good thing we didn't listen to them, because the Soviet Union collapsed in part because of new nukes in Europe. This gets tiresome because the Left has never been correct on anything. Why does anyone listen to them anymore? Perhaps we need more American History in the schools instead of diversity training and the I have two mommies bullshit. If it were up to the Lefties, we'd all be a pile of cinders right now. --- Nicholas Geti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where do you think those billions of dollars are going? Burned in a furnace? - Original Message - From: Bill Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 12:54 PM Subject: [OT] coming to theatres soon ... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13763982/ China and North Korea, with North Korea as proxy, have been gearing up their arms programs because they've been threatened. Since there is zero possibility of American troops being sent to Asia again, what this threat will actually cause is another wmd arms race. This will keep the military and it's arms-merchant contractors fat and happy, on top of already having reamed our economy of hundreds of billions, some say a trillion (to date, it's not over!), for their war in ME. And this is not to mention the Big Oil reaming and all those lives and all that destruction. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Zinedine Zidane is a butt-head http://www.cafepress.com/zinedinezidane Press 1 for English http://www.cafepress.com/press1forenglis Hate Jon Corzine? http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Hate Soccer? http://www.cafepress.com/ihatesoccer Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory
What the French media have never liked, is that a cocky American has completely dominated their most famous race for seven years. Ridiculous. Lance wasn't the first american to win this race several times, think of Greg Lemond. Gérard. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Matrix printers using built-in fonts.
If you are printing via windows the OS will make use of built in fonts by sending a character stream, if you are using a truetype font or one that isn't integrated into the printer (and the driver supports it) you will get an image at 18x9/8 ish bytes. You also get better resilience in factory environments as stopping a character flow just looses a bunch of characters but the system carries on, if you interupt a bit stream you get garbage (ala turning a deskjet off and on mid long print). So to sum up you will reduce the send file size and if you have the normal buffer on you OKI you will speed up the whole job. It depends on how big the prints are and how fast the printer is as to the benefits. -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Fox Forward Videos and Screencasts (was Re: Alternatives)
We have come to an agreement on principal with a company that will video tape and record screencasts of the presentations. Nothing has actually been signed however. The agreement must also be reviewed and agreed upon with each of the presenters individually. The speakers/presenters are under no obligation to sign the agreement. The videos and screencasts will be made available for purchase. I don't yet know what the price would be and I don't know when they would become available. -Kevin Kevin Cully CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of Fox Forward 2006! http://foxforward.net Tristan Leask wrote: Do I remember correctly that you guys where going to record some of the sessions so that you could put them up on the web? Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully Posted At: 12 July 2006 14:19 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: Alternatives Subject: Re: Alternatives That sounds like a good session somewhere! http://foxforward.net/session.php?topic=17 (See how I was sneaky and worked that into the message! Bad Kevin) Kevin Cully CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of Fox Forward 2006! http://foxforward.net -- Unless otherwise agreed expressly in writing by Marine Software Limited, this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was sent. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication you should destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents. Please notify the sender immediately of the error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory
On Jul 12, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Gérard Lochon wrote: What the French media have never liked, is that a cocky American has completely dominated their most famous race for seven years. Ridiculous. Lance wasn't the first american to win this race several times, think of Greg Lemond. Exactly. In fact, LeMond is one of the people leading the attacks on Armstrong. More like sour grapes than nationalistic envy. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] coming to theatres soon ...
Where do you think those billions of dollars are going? Burned in a furnace? The money is going into the war machine, which is a dead-end industry. In the best of times their products aren't used, and in the worst of times they are used to destroy. Compare that to spending on productive industries of any nature, whose products are actually used to make peoples' lives better. I think I understand your point, that we pay soldiers who in turn feed their 7-11's and gas stations, etc., so the money stays in the economy, but the counter-point is there are no fruits of that soldier's labor. He didn't build a chair that someone is still using, and he didn't plant trees or feed people. If his job was infantry, he'll have to unlearn everything he was taught, and that's not a plus for society. You may wind up saying that it all boils down to we're paying for security. The problem with that thinking is that science has placed Big Gun Security into the garbage pile of illusions. This truth hasn't come sharply into focus yet, and let's hope it doesn't, but we cannot ignore it. Security, to the extent that it can be achieved, is far more likely to come from noble aspirations and achievement then guns of any size. We're barking up the wrong tree. Bill http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13763982/ China and North Korea, with North Korea as proxy, have been gearing up their arms programs because they've been threatened. Since there is zero possibility of American troops being sent to Asia again, what this threat will actually cause is another wmd arms race. This will keep the military and it's arms-merchant contractors fat and happy, on top of already having reamed our economy of hundreds of billions, some say a trillion (to date, it's not over!), for their war in ME. And this is not to mention the Big Oil reaming and all those lives and all that destruction. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Matrix printers using built-in fonts.
From: Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] I seem to remember that if you use fonts on a VFP report that match inbuilt printer fonts, then printing will be much quicker. Can anyone confirm this, or elaborate in the context of an Oki Microline 395, whcih emulates Epson LQ. Yes and No. It's a tricky situation. I have hundreds of clients with the OKI 395 and getting them to rip was always fun. Keep all the text as text, no lines, no shadows, no artwork and you will get it right. I liked the FastFont on the IBM Proprinter drivers as my font and it rocked! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
Thanks, Michael and Ted! I'll pass those messages along, and see if we get anywhere this weekend! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] How to save GroupWise messages?
Gérard Lochon wrote: I have another question : My wife uses GroupWise at work. When i try to send her messages a little bit larger for OE and my provider bandwidth, they are splitted in several sub-messages. How can she combine/decode the received messages with GroupWise ? I didn't find anything about that in the groupwise documentation. Hi Gérard, it's an OE feature, someone enabled it because it's not active by default. In OE go to Tools - Accounts - Properties - Advanced, look for Break apart messages larger than, uncheck it, accept changes. HTH Saludos, Jaime Vasquez Guatemala C.A. Comodo AntiVirus http://www.comodo.com : Outbound message clean. Scan Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 7:54:27 AM Virus Definition Update: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 Copyright © 2006 COMODO ®. All rights reserved. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/mixed text/plain (text body -- kept) text/plain (text body -- kept) --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
How to count Pageframes in a form
I'm playing around with FOR EACH, but not getting anywhere, and I'm not sure I'm on the right track. In VFP9, how can I programatically tell how may pageframes are in the current form? I have a class of forms that may have zero, 1 or theoretically more page frames, each page frame will have a unique name, and I need to return number of page frames so I can iterate through their pages. The page iteration isn't the problem, getting the pageframe and it's name is. Thanks! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: How to count Pageframes in a form
Iterate for each control on the form. Use the baseclass property of the control to see if it's a pageframe. Example code (untested): *Iterate through each control on the form FOR EACH loControl IN THISFORM.Controls IF UPPER(loControl.BaseClass) == PAGEFRAME *Iterate through each page on the pageframe FOR EACH loPage IN loControl.Pages *Do whatever with each page WAIT WINDOW loPage.Name ENDFOR ENDIF ENDFOR At 04:41 PM 7/12/2006, you wrote: I'm playing around with FOR EACH, but not getting anywhere, and I'm not sure I'm on the right track. In VFP9, how can I programatically tell how may pageframes are in the current form? I have a class of forms that may have zero, 1 or theoretically more page frames, each page frame will have a unique name, and I need to return number of page frames so I can iterate through their pages. The page iteration isn't the problem, getting the pageframe and it's name is. Thanks! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] coming to theatres soon ...
Clearly you don't know what you're talking about. There are many people on this board with .mil mail addresses who make their living working for the Nation's defense. And what part of what I said does this refute? Additionally, there are huge breakthoughs in microchip, robotic, optic, radar, sonar, satellite, and other technologies that wouldn't be developed if not for the military. It would all happen anyway. All the people who work on the base or around a base make a living too including restaurants, grocery stores, dry cleaners, office buildings, etc. And what part of what I said does this refute? Finally, not having a superior, well-funded military is not an option, so why argue about it. We're decades past achieving MAD. No country on Earth is going to attack us. That leaves borderless terrorism, which we can't send a giant army or navy to defeat. Before you say we did beat them, I'll say we created more than we defeated. The ME is now an open, festering sore, thanks to your heroes. And you're still listening to them? Unless you've got a few more stupid, senseless pre-emptive wars planned, what exactly are you going to do with this giant military machine? Admire it? Keep feeding it? For what? I'm saying transform it. Part to join with UN forces for when force absolutely, positively must be used, and the rest assigned to building and humanitarian missions. There are more than a billion people in the world today who are suffering and in need of help. It doesn't take a genius to connect those dots. Bill ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: How to count Pageframes in a form
Vince Teachout wrote: In VFP9, how can I programatically tell how may pageframes are in the current form? I have a class of forms that may have zero, 1 or theoretically more page frames, each page frame will have a unique name, and I need to return number of page frames so I can iterate through their pages. The page iteration isn't the problem, getting the pageframe and it's name is. Thanks! Well, Vince, first I'd like to chide you for not perservering a bit longer before yelling for help - you wanker! Having said that, there are at least two ways that I came up with: nCount = 0 FOR nI = 1 TO thisform.ControlCount nCount = nCount + IIF(UPPER(thisform.controls[nI].baseclass) = PAGEFRAME, 1, 0) endfor ? nCount nCount = 0 FOR EACH oFoo IN thisform.Controls nCount = nCount + IIF(UPPER(ofoo.baseclass)=PAGEFRAME,1,0) endfor ? ncount Next time, RTFM, ok? (any better suggestions welcome, btw) Thanks. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: How to count Pageframes in a form
Steve Ellenoff wrote: Iterate for each control on the form. Use the baseclass property of the control to see if it's a pageframe. Example code (untested): *Iterate through each control on the form FOR EACH loControl IN THISFORM.Controls IF UPPER(loControl.BaseClass) == PAGEFRAME *Iterate through each page on the pageframe FOR EACH loPage IN loControl.Pages *Do whatever with each page WAIT WINDOW loPage.Name ENDFOR ENDIF ENDFOR Thanks, Steve. I came up with a similar answer about 5 minutes after I posted that, after spending some time with my good buddy, the debugger tool. Thank you, though! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Matrix printers using built-in fonts.
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:05:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Yes and No. It's a tricky situation. I have hundreds of clients with the OKI 395 and getting them to rip was always fun. Hmmm ... would it ever get up to near raw DOS-type speed though? I also have a problem with tearoff. Basically they want a print to finish, and the paper to feed forward to tearoff position. Then the next job reels it back before starting to print. It used to do this when they printed DOS-style. The 395 is emulating an Epson LQ and uses a custom paper size of 11 inches long. Using the Windows Epson LQ 1050 driver (or indeed the LQ 1000) it prints fine but refuses to do the form tearoff bit. If I use the OKI 395 driver it's as slow as hell, the output is incorrect but it does the form tearoff. Printing from an XP machine, through a shared printer on a 2K server, the custom paper is defined on the server. The tearoff is set to 300ms internally int the printer. I set it to 2 seconds as well, but no dice. Arrg! Any ideas? -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Matrix printers using built-in fonts.
Yes and No. It's a tricky situation. I have hundreds of clients with the OKI 395 and getting them to rip was always fun. Hmmm ... would it ever get up to near raw DOS-type speed though? I also have a problem with tearoff. Basically they want a print to finish, and the paper to feed forward to tearoff position. Then the next job reels it back before starting to print. It used to do this when they printed DOS-style. The 395 is emulating an Epson LQ and uses a custom paper size of 11 inches long. Using the Windows Epson LQ 1050 driver (or indeed the LQ 1000) it prints fine but refuses to do the form tearoff bit. If I use the OKI 395 driver it's as slow as hell, the output is incorrect but it does the form tearoff. Printing from an XP machine, through a shared printer on a 2K server, the custom paper is defined on the server. The tearoff is set to 300ms internally int the printer. I set it to 2 seconds as well, but no dice. Arrg! Any ideas? Just wondering if there might be a way to use the COPYFILE API to send printer commands directly to the printer, and if that might help? Bill -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Matrix printers using built-in fonts.
Alan Bourke wrote: On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:05:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Yes and No. It's a tricky situation. I have hundreds of clients with the OKI 395 and getting them to rip was always fun. Hmmm ... would it ever get up to near raw DOS-type speed though? I also have a problem with tearoff. Basically they want a print to finish, and the paper to feed forward to tearoff position. Then the next job reels it back before starting to print. It used to do this when they printed DOS-style. The 395 is emulating an Epson LQ and uses a custom paper size of 11 inches long. Using the Windows Epson LQ 1050 driver (or indeed the LQ 1000) it prints fine but refuses to do the form tearoff bit. If I use the OKI 395 driver it's as slow as hell, the output is incorrect but it does the form tearoff. My stuff is sent to pre printed forms Contracts/Odometer statements, etc... So I don't have that fit on the page. I can tell you that you can pass to the printer the commands to do what ever you need. Reverse a line or x Lines, set to compressed font, kick it out to double. They are non printing fields on the report and I have used them since FP1.0 came out. Printing from an XP machine, through a shared printer on a 2K server, the custom paper is defined on the server. The tearoff is set to 300ms internally int the printer. I set it to 2 seconds as well, but no dice. Stephen Russell DBA / Operations Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/387 - Release Date: 7/12/2006 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Deficit Levels
http://images.ucomics.com/comics/tmmda/2006/tmmda060712.gif -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] It's the Conservatism, stupid!
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/07/12/ its_the_conservatism_stupid.php ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/qkzqv ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ask a conservative what the biggest problem in America is today, and you’ll get answers like overtaxation, a sexualized culture, lack of respect for authority, insufficient church-going or big government running amok. But if you then asked the conservative what the real source of the problem was—the beating heart pumping blood to each and all of these socio-politico-cultural wounds—you’d get the same answer: liberalism. On the other hand, you could ask a liberal a hundred questions about the problems facing our country before you’d get to an answer that placed conservatism at the heart of the nation’s ills. And conservatives learn these messages when still young. What does a “campus liberal” do? Well, it depends what his or her issue is: fighting sweatshop labor, or environmental degradation, or the Iraq war, or any of a dozen other problems about which liberals are concerned. What, on the other hand, does a “campus conservative” do? Fight liberals and liberalism. You can hear it in the media as well. As any fan of Limbaugh, Hannity or O’Reilly hears every day, whatever the issue is, the problem is liberals. Conservatives write books saying liberals are The Party of Death , who are Trashing Democracy, Waging War Against Christianity , ,Screwing Up America, Corrupting Our Future—and on top of it all, our whole ideology is A Mental Disorder. Liberals, on the other hand, write books about why George W. Bush is a terrible president. (I plead guilty.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT]Satellite PC
I've seen that advertised too and wondered if it were legit --- Eurico_EZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Has anybody heard of Satellite PC ? It claims that u can turn your computer into a TV and access 700+ channels using some software. Eurico. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Zinedine Zidane is a butt-head http://www.cafepress.com/zinedinezidane Press 1 for English http://www.cafepress.com/press1forenglis Hate Jon Corzine? http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Hate Soccer? http://www.cafepress.com/ihatesoccer Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Yet another consultant story.
So a few months ago I suggested that a client of mine put up a simple website. Nothing fancy, about 5-10 hours of work, which would have included getting a domain name, hosting site, writing the HTML, and showing them how to update it if they want to. So yesterday I walk in to take care of this disk-corruption problem and my contact there says I have good news and bad news for you. The good news is that management decided to get a website, the bad news is that the elected president's daughter is now on the payroll doing it. LOL I said, how can that be a full-time job? Now this is a non-profit organization that is paid for by a cooperative of about 1000 members, so this is just criminal what they're doing. This woman is working 40 hours a week at home on a site that is absolutely horrible. Literally, the site could have been put up me in 10 hours, and a expert website designer probably in 5. It looks like a 10yo designed it. Maybe her kid did it. LOL So far she's logged months of hours. LOL So now I'm wondering, now that I know, if I'm liable for not notifying the other trustees or could I be charged later with complicity? This has got to be breaking some laws. Additionally, this knucklehead installed this Spector Pro key logging software, which I don't know if it was authorized by the president or whether this is a fishing expedition. But since it is the president's daughter, I obviously can't say a word. The accountant, which I work with directly, showed me the software and asked me what I thought of their new anti-virus software. I told her it wasn't anti-virus, it was key logging software. So obviously the bill was paid through the accountant as anti-virus software. Now she's worked for the company for like 15 years and now she's steamed. What snakes. I'm thinking of bailing completely on this client as it looks like things are going to get real bad real soon. I'd rather not get involved anymore since the prospects of new work is zero. It ain't what you know, it's who's your daddy. LOL ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [WC] Another Zidane theory
I suppose they think that if he hadn't had the treatment he wouldn't have been so great! Logical, but chutzpah. ::a -Original Message- From: Ed Leafe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 July 2006 15:28 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [WC] Another Zidane theory On Jul 12, 2006, at 9:46 AM, Dominic Burford wrote: Lance was never accused at the time of taking drugs. Only since his retiring has the French media swung into a full on attack on him. What the French media have never liked, is that a cocky American has completely dominated their most famous race for seven years. What's even more odd is that they claimed at one point that the cancer treatments he received gave him an unfair edge!! Talk about chutzpah! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
