Re: Protools11 shortcut problem

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Uh... can you not press the delete key?  I mean...

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Tim Liu timtimliu2...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Protools11 shortcut problem


Hi Chris:

Thank you, your information is very useful.
I want to ask if I want to delete my selection, which key I can press?
If select all, which key I can press?

I know I am very trouble, very sorry! I want to ask what the hot key
for blind people can quick use ProTools? or some hot key will
attention?


Thanks

On 5/21/14, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

Well, if you don't know the bar, you need to go into the edit window with
command+equals, interact with the counter cluster, then figure out what 
bar
the audio is ranging from/to.  Then, you can go back and select it with 
Mr.

Norman's suggestion.

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Tim Liu
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Cc: chris.norm...@googlemail.com
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 4:09 AM
  Subject: Re: Protools11 shortcut problem


  Hi Chris:




  Thank you, but if I don't know the bar, I want to select my listen, 
Which

key I can press?




  On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:33:08 PM UTC+8, Chris Norman wrote:

  If you select the track you want to select audio on, then it’s number 
pad

/, then type the start range (on the number pad), then number pad / again,
then type the end range on the number pad. So, if I wanted to select from
bars 1 to 4, I’d do:

  /1/4




  From bar 1 beat 2, until bar 3, beat 3:

  /1.2/3.3




  HTH,




  On 14 May 2014, at 04:40, Tim Liu timtim...@gmail.com wrote:




  Hi all:




  Thank you for answering my last question, Your answers are very helpful 
to

me.

  I have more questions.

  I would like to ask if I want to select one piece of music in the
ProTools11.1 for edit/quantize, Which I press the shortcut keys?




  Thanks




  --

  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups

Pro Tools Accessibility group.

  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an

email to ptaccess+u...@googlegroups.com.

  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups

Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an

email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/FHZGrF1tiqg/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Protools11 shortcut problem

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Well, first off, are you selecting the tracks from your track list table? 
Just hitting delete, or hitting command+A isn't enough.  All that does is 
selects a portion of the session.  You then have to also tell ProTools which 
tracks you're menipulating.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Tim Liu timtimliu2...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: Protools11 shortcut problem


Hi:

I already try
not work
maybe is the midi track so not work

I have other questions
I want to select all
but I press the command A is not work
which key can press?


thanks

On 5/21/14, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

Uh... can you not press the delete key?  I mean...

Chris.

- Original Message -
From: Tim Liu timtimliu2...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Protools11 shortcut problem


Hi Chris:

Thank you, your information is very useful.
I want to ask if I want to delete my selection, which key I can press?
If select all, which key I can press?

I know I am very trouble, very sorry! I want to ask what the hot key
for blind people can quick use ProTools? or some hot key will
attention?


Thanks

On 5/21/14, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

Well, if you don't know the bar, you need to go into the edit window with
command+equals, interact with the counter cluster, then figure out what
bar
the audio is ranging from/to.  Then, you can go back and select it with
Mr.
Norman's suggestion.

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Tim Liu
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Cc: chris.norm...@googlemail.com
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 4:09 AM
  Subject: Re: Protools11 shortcut problem


  Hi Chris:




  Thank you, but if I don't know the bar, I want to select my listen,
Which
key I can press?




  On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:33:08 PM UTC+8, Chris Norman wrote:

  If you select the track you want to select audio on, then it’s number
pad
/, then type the start range (on the number pad), then number pad /
again,
then type the end range on the number pad. So, if I wanted to select from
bars 1 to 4, I’d do:

  /1/4




  From bar 1 beat 2, until bar 3, beat 3:

  /1.2/3.3




  HTH,




  On 14 May 2014, at 04:40, Tim Liu timtim...@gmail.com wrote:




  Hi all:




  Thank you for answering my last question, Your answers are very helpful

to
me.

  I have more questions.

  I would like to ask if I want to select one piece of music in the
ProTools11.1 for edit/quantize, Which I press the shortcut keys?




  Thanks




  --

  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.

  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to ptaccess+u...@googlegroups.com.

  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/FHZGrF1tiqg/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/FHZGrF1tiqg/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Midimag?

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Can someone tell me how to join the Midimag list?  I have a few questions about 
a keyboard I'm looking to purchase, and wanted to see if someone over there 
could help me out with a few things.  I tried going to

http://www.midimag.org

as I kind of recall that being the U R L, but it's not seeming to load when I 
go there.  (Not sure if that's my computer being an idiot, or if that's me 
being retarded and not rememberring the address.)  LOL!  No offense intended.

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Midimag?

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Thanks.

I'll give it a shot.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: TL 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:02 AM
  Subject: RE: Midimag?


  Hi, try sending a blank message to midimag-subscr...@midimag.org

  TL




--
  From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Christopher-Mark Gilland
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 8:35 AM
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Subject: Midimag?


  Can someone tell me how to join the Midimag list?  I have a few questions 
about a keyboard I'm looking to purchase, and wanted to see if someone over 
there could help me out with a few things.  I tried going to

  http://www.midimag.org

  as I kind of recall that being the U R L, but it's not seeming to load when I 
go there.  (Not sure if that's my computer being an idiot, or if that's me 
being retarded and not rememberring the address.)  LOL!  No offense intended.

  Chris.

  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: PT Express

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Well, what would you be wanting to do with PT?  What type things would you 
be recording?  That'll help us determine if it would be a good fit for you.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: TL t.leiz...@cogeco.ca

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:11 AM
Subject: PT Express


Hi, wondering if the Express version of Pro Tools is accessible? I 
wouldn't
mind trying Pro Tools, but not sure I want to spend $700, only to find out 
I

don't much like it! I suppose I could buy an Ilock and download the Trial
version but ...

TL

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: PT Express

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I'd seriously then look at giving it a try.  Really I would.  PT will 
definitely! do everything you're saying you need to do.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: TL t.leiz...@cogeco.ca

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: PT Express



Mostly my own compositions ...  Guitar, vocals, keyboard / soft synths, so
MIDI editing is important.

TL


-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf

Of Christopher-Mark Gilland
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:17 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PT Express

Well, what would you be wanting to do with PT?  What type things would you
be recording?  That'll help us determine if it would be a good fit for 
you.


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: TL t.leiz...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:11 AM
Subject: PT Express



Hi, wondering if the Express version of Pro Tools is accessible? I
wouldn't
mind trying Pro Tools, but not sure I want to spend $700, only to find 
out



I
don't much like it! I suppose I could buy an Ilock and download the Trial
version but ...

TL

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: PT Express

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

The full version.

I don't think the express version has even been around since version 8, if 
you and I are thinking of the same thing.  I may be confused however.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: TL t.leiz...@cogeco.ca

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 1:42 PM
Subject: RE: PT Express



Hi Chris, thanks ... So are you talking the full version of PT? or the
Express version?

TL


-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf

Of Christopher-Mark Gilland
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:12 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PT Express

I'd seriously then look at giving it a try.  Really I would.  PT will
definitely! do everything you're saying you need to do.

Chris.

- Original Message -
From: TL t.leiz...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: PT Express


Mostly my own compositions ...  Guitar, vocals, keyboard / soft synths, 
so

MIDI editing is important.

TL


-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf
Of Christopher-Mark Gilland
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:17 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PT Express

Well, what would you be wanting to do with PT?  What type things would 
you

be recording?  That'll help us determine if it would be a good fit for
you.

Chris.

- Original Message -
From: TL t.leiz...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:11 AM
Subject: PT Express



Hi, wondering if the Express version of Pro Tools is accessible? I
wouldn't
mind trying Pro Tools, but not sure I want to spend $700, only to find
out



I
don't much like it! I suppose I could buy an Ilock and download the 
Trial

version but ...

TL

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups

Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an

email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: pt tutorials

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I definitely think you would probably get something out of this, yes. I guess 
my number 1 question would be, when you say post production, are you speaking 
more of editting, or what specifically would you be needing to do?

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Juan Pablo 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:39 PM
  Subject: Re: pt tutorials


  is a control surface to do transport and a lot other functions.
  Anyway, I’ll be using pt mainly for post production, not for recording 
anything. Your classes are great for post production as well?
  If yes, I’' would like board the boat to take the course with you!

  Best,
  Juan.
  From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:08 PM
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Subject: Re: pt tutorials

  I'm not even totally sure what the Artist Transport is, so in short, probably 
not.  LOL!

  Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Juan Pablo 
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: pt tutorials

Chris, I have an artist transport as well. Are you planning cover the use 
of the avid artist transport?
Best,
juan.

From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:00 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
Subject: Re: pt tutorials

I'll admit the ones I did on Applevis only go up to lesson 7.  I never 
finnished them due to personal reason.  I'd rather not go into the specifics.  
I'll just say it didn't work out for reasons beyond my control.

This said, I am! now offerring a webinar which we are doing once every 
week.  The classes last for 1 hour.  There is no requirement to attend live.  
In fact, a lot of the students don't.  You will get access to a password 
protected web site area where you may download mp3 archives of the past 
lessons.  This Friday, we will be on lesson 4.  I said that this was going to 
be an 8 week long series, but at the rate things are moving, it probably will 
wind up being more than that.

Anyway, it's not too late to register.  Again, yeah, you'd be coming in 
somewhat late, but remember, you'd have access to all 3 of the previous lessons 
in mp3 format as well, so really technically, you'd not lose anything, and you 
could listen at your own pace.

The main reason I stopped doing things on Applevis was because of bandwidth 
issues along with some other more  minor things as well.  Mainly lifestyle 
changes with at the time prevented me from continuing.  I have no intention 
however of prematurely stopping these lessons that I'm doing now.

The cost to register is $100.  Again, you'll have access to a password 
protected web site area where you can download the sessions that we are working 
on in class to follow along with, you can download all of the mp3 archives of 
the lessons, you will be able with your computer and microphone to participate 
live during the webinars and get your questions answered, you'll be added 
optionally if you wish, to a members only student discussion e-mail list where 
students can share and bounce ideas off one another.  You'll also get access to 
textual documentation notes from each lesson.

Here is just a small example of things that have been, or will be covered.  
Again, this list may be a bit scatter braned.  It's not an official contents, 
but it'll at least give you an idea how thorough I plan to go with this.

What is ProTools
Why it, over Sonar or other DAWS
What even is! a DAW in the first place
Optimising your system for ProTools
Hardware and compatibility
Why use a full sized keyboard
The quick start dialog
Setting session parameters such as sample rate, etc.
Exploring the mix window
The track list table
Selecting and unselecting tracks
Muting, arming, and soloing tracks
What are groups
Difference in mix and edit groups
Sorting, hiding, showing, and deactivating tracks
Scrolling tracks into view
Track termanology: audio, midi, AUX input, Instrument etc.
The new track dialog
Inserting more than one track at a time
Rewinding and fast forwarding
Loop playback
Jumping to a position
Selecting a range of audio
Placemarkers
Setting nudge value
Nudging
Selecting Audio
Regions
Fading
Writing automation
Working with inserts
Working with sends
Reading the meter
Resetting the meter
The Edit window
Counter cluster
Absolute grid vs. shuffle
The selecter tool

Setting time signature
Setting tempo opperations
Click tracks
The metronome
Countdown
Working with midi and instrument tracks
Quantizing
Good mixing practices
Things not to do, that have potential of ruinning an absolutely gorgeous! 
recording

Comping
Working with playlists
Selecting between hours minutes seconds frames, vs. bars beats ticks

That about covers

Re: pt tutorials

2014-05-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Folks,

I apologize.  I didn't realize my messages to Juan Pablo were going to the 
entire list.

I thought after my first reply, he'd written me privately.

Rest assured, I have written  him off list, and future correspondances will be 
kept as such, off list.

My bad.

clgillan...@gmail.com

Thanks.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Juan Pablo 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:12 PM
  Subject: Re: pt tutorials


  Yes, Editting, plugins, fade in/out, etc etc.
  I made my work in the filed, nature recordings. So I have all the files readi 
to be put in protools and begin the job. So I am very confused about the start 
up process, put the track, make selections, copy, paste, mix, etC.
  One of the things, for example, when I’m in the import dialoghe, I can 
preview the files. However, when I add to the track that I previously created, 
I press play button but the file is’nt play. I know that sound a extremely 
neuvie thing but I just have my iMac for the last 3 days.
  But with your course if I  can accelerate the learning process   would be 
fenomenal.

  best,
  Juan.

  From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:56 PM
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Subject: Re: pt tutorials

  I definitely think you would probably get something out of this, yes. I guess 
my number 1 question would be, when you say post production, are you speaking 
more of editting, or what specifically would you be needing to do?

  Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Juan Pablo 
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: pt tutorials

is a control surface to do transport and a lot other functions.
Anyway, I’ll be using pt mainly for post production, not for recording 
anything. Your classes are great for post production as well?
If yes, I’' would like board the boat to take the course with you!

Best,
Juan.
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:08 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
Subject: Re: pt tutorials

I'm not even totally sure what the Artist Transport is, so in short, 
probably not.  LOL!

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Juan Pablo 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:52 PM
  Subject: Re: pt tutorials

  Chris, I have an artist transport as well. Are you planning cover the use 
of the avid artist transport?
  Best,
  juan.

  From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:00 PM
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Subject: Re: pt tutorials

  I'll admit the ones I did on Applevis only go up to lesson 7.  I never 
finnished them due to personal reason.  I'd rather not go into the specifics.  
I'll just say it didn't work out for reasons beyond my control.

  This said, I am! now offerring a webinar which we are doing once every 
week.  The classes last for 1 hour.  There is no requirement to attend live.  
In fact, a lot of the students don't.  You will get access to a password 
protected web site area where you may download mp3 archives of the past 
lessons.  This Friday, we will be on lesson 4.  I said that this was going to 
be an 8 week long series, but at the rate things are moving, it probably will 
wind up being more than that.

  Anyway, it's not too late to register.  Again, yeah, you'd be coming in 
somewhat late, but remember, you'd have access to all 3 of the previous lessons 
in mp3 format as well, so really technically, you'd not lose anything, and you 
could listen at your own pace.

  The main reason I stopped doing things on Applevis was because of 
bandwidth issues along with some other more  minor things as well.  Mainly 
lifestyle changes with at the time prevented me from continuing.  I have no 
intention however of prematurely stopping these lessons that I'm doing now.

  The cost to register is $100.  Again, you'll have access to a password 
protected web site area where you can download the sessions that we are working 
on in class to follow along with, you can download all of the mp3 archives of 
the lessons, you will be able with your computer and microphone to participate 
live during the webinars and get your questions answered, you'll be added 
optionally if you wish, to a members only student discussion e-mail list where 
students can share and bounce ideas off one another.  You'll also get access to 
textual documentation notes from each lesson.

  Here is just a small example of things that have been, or will be 
covered.  Again, this list may be a bit scatter braned.  It's not an official 
contents, but it'll at least give you an idea how thorough I plan to go with 
this.

  What is ProTools
  Why it, over Sonar or other DAWS
  What even is! a DAW in the first place
  Optimising your system for ProTools
  Hardware

Re: pro tools 10 and 11 both crash during recording with the operating system held off interrupts for to long

2014-05-20 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Nick,

What server are you referring to?  O S X server?

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: pro tools 10 and 11 both crash during recording with the 
operating system held off interrupts for to long



Hi, I have tried using the drive and the digi 003 both over firewire with 
no luck what so ever.  Both devices are not seen by the system or if they 
are just the drive and not the digi 003 by pro tools.  I did increase the 
buffer by one more setting and so far things are working ok.  Does the 
fact that I do run the server application mean anything but in the past 
things were working fine can server keep pro tools from working at it's 
best?  Nick Gawronski

On 5/19/2014 11:31 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:

try using a firewire or USB drive instead and see if the issue persist.
On May 19, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com 
wrote:


Hi, I have had this issue for a few days now in both pro tools 10 and 
pro
tools 11.  I have been recording and suddenly with no other programs 
open
and spotlight disabled completely pro tools comes up with the dialog 
that

says the operating system held off interrupts for to long and yes I have
played around with the buffering and other settings in both playback
dialogs with both versions and when recording in pro tools 11 my mac 
book

pro model late 2011 is running very hot.  Also upon every exit of pro
tools 11 it says after saving the session that pro tools has crashed and 
I
keep explaining what is going on with my system.  I have a Digi 003 and 
am
usually just recording one track when this happens.  What could be 
causing

these issues and how do I stop them as I always record to my external
drive connected with the esata express card which before was working 
just
fine and no I have not done anything major with my system.  Nick 
Gawronski


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: pro tools 10 and 11 both crash during recording with the operating system held off interrupts for to long

2014-05-20 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Nick, that wouldn't be every update applied, as there is now a 10.9.3.  It 
just came out a few days ago.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: pro tools 10 and 11 both crash during recording with the 
operating system held off interrupts for to long



Hi, I am running 10.9.2 with every update applied. and latest versions of 
pro tools 10 and 11.  Nick Gawronski

On 5/20/2014 6:35 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote:

What version of OSX are  you guys running?
On May 20, 2014, at 3:52 AM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com 
wrote:


Hi, My Digi 003 is connected to the firewire port and my external drive 
is

connected to an esata express card in my 17 inch mac book pro late model
2011.  Spotlight is totally disabled on the entire system so it does not
even load when I reboot the system.  I don't use it so I did not even 
want

it to load at all.  Nick Gawronski
On Tue, May 20, 2014 1:45 am, Kevin Reeves wrote:

Try switching where the drive and 002 are set up in the chain.


Try plugging the drive into the computer, then run the 002 from the
drive's pass through port.

Folks have seen differing results from that.



Also, regarding spotlight, when you say you disabled spotlight, did you
mean that you added your drive to the list of exclusions for indexing? 
This

makes a huge difference. If this was already covered, I apologize. it's
late and I'm slowly falling off the world.


Kevin



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups

Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an

email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


OT: A really really really quick question regarding a chord.

2014-05-17 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Guys,

My music theory isn't that great, so I'm really hoping here that someone can 
help.

I'm trying to teach a friend of mine the gospel hymn, In the Garden.  We're 
doing it in the key of C mager.  On the line that says, And the joy we share, 
as we terry there... on joy we, I'm on C mager, share, I'm going to e7, as we, 
then on terry, I'm going to F mager.  Now, here's the question.  on terry, that 
F major on keyboared consists of my left pinky on F above middle C, my left 
thumb on the C above that F.  Then in the right hand, I'm just playing a 
straight out F cord, F A and C.  but then, on the word there, I'm moving my 
left pinky to an F sharp, and my right thumb as well to an F sharp.  So 
basically in the left hand is F shartp and C, then the right hand is on F 
sharp, A, and C.  I know this isn't a diminished chord, so what would the name 
a this chord be?  I wouldn't exactly call it a D7 would I?  I know technically, 
it's a D7, but it's really not, being the root isn't in the base.  Being the 
base is based around F sharp, not D.  So would I just say d7/f#?  (in other 
words, D7 over an F sharp base?) Or, is there a better way to define this chord?

Again, I know this isn't really ProTools, but I hope someone out here with some 
music training can tell me what to call this thing.

I won't keep this thread up on list, I swear, just answer my question, and I'll 
be done.

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Avid virtual instruments problems

2014-05-16 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
What is your input and output path set to on the instrument track?  Could that 
be the problem?

Chris.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Liam McCombie 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 8:00 PM
  Subject: Avid virtual instruments problems


  I downloaded protools 11 and it came with the basic virtual instruments 
packages. When i create an instrument track and go to 
insertspluginsinstrument the only thing thats there is a click. None of the 
virtual instruments are there as an option. 
  Im using the akai lpk25 as a controller and if i enable the track to record 
and bash the keys it records what im pressing but no sound because i cant 
assign it an instrument. Ive reinstalled avid virtual instruments multiple 
times but still no luck . I dont want to buy anything from the avid market 
place until ive messed around with the basics so any help on this would be 
great ?

  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Spectrasonics Omnisphere,Trilian en Stylus instrument plugins

2014-05-14 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Hi,

Is this an accessible plugin suite?  Am asking for a friend.

best regards,

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


A thanks to Slau and others

2014-05-08 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Just wanted to thank everyone for their help yesterday with my issue regarding 
clipping and how to better set levels.  Slau, I used the techniques that you 
outlined.  I'll admit, it's a bit out of my comfort zone.  I'm not use to 
recording initially at such a low impedance, but man!  I did a track that way, 
then I raised the volume through a master fader, plus a very very slight bit of 
compression, and man!  god almighty! what! a difference!  I mean literally!  
Night! and day!  I've never! heard myself sound so clean! and so crisp!  I 
think guys that was a huge bit where I wasn't getting that crispness I've been 
looking for all these years when I kept saying even dating back to midi mag, 
about how it was just real muddy.  Well, yeah, duh!  Of corse it's gonna be!  I 
mean, when you set yourself up to master and mix at the same time?  Judice! 
Priest!  No frickin wonder! I sounded all muddy!  I mean, I think I was 
starting my levels on the input gain right at! 0DB.  So yeah...  
W'w'w'w'w'w'w'wayyy! too hot!  Man, I cranked that thing back, and boy! did 
that smoothen things out!  I don't know why! I thought it was so necessary to 
run things so hot!  How could I a been so stupid!  It's a wonder! I didn't fry 
my equipment putting so much juice through it!  Is it normal, guys? that most 
people make this mistake when they first get started?  I hope I'm not alone, 
otherwise, I'm gonna be pretty imbarrassed.  LOL!

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Monitoring levels

2014-05-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I'm 100% perfectly aware that I can monitor the level of an individual track by 
interacting with it, then finding the meter, and then, I can keep hitting vo+F3 
to read what's under the Voiceover cursor.  what however I'm looking for, is 
something slightly more robust.  Is there a way, and if so, how, that I could 
asign a hotspot or something similar then have it where it won't read the meter 
automatically, no, however, if, and only! if, I clip, it'll automatically 
trigger voiceover to say clipped, or to read the meter in such of a way I'll 
know I'm clipping?  Sometimes, with my hearing loss, it's slightly tricky for 
me to know audibly, until it gets where it's so badly clipping, that it's flat 
out disgusting.  The issue is, yeah, I could manually look, but what if I only 
clip on say, one note?  If I sing right over that note for instance then check 
the meter one or two notes early/late, I might miss something very very 
important.  I'm just wonderring the best way to hit that meter dead spot on, so 
I know instantly! that I'm clipping.

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Monitoring levels

2014-05-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Can you outline for me the steps one would take to make a hotspot and then 
have it automatically read it?


I've kind a forgotten how to do this.

Chris.
- Original Message - 
From: Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: Monitoring levels



Beyond using a hotspot, there's not a way that I'm aware of. Assuming
your hardware doesn't have a horribly high noise floor or anything,
then your best bet is probably just to air on the side of caution and
go in at a lower gain level whenever it's a particularly dynamic part
and raise the level after, perhaps with a limiter on the track to
catch any peaks.

Scott

On 5/7/14, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm 100% perfectly aware that I can monitor the level of an individual 
track
by interacting with it, then finding the meter, and then, I can keep 
hitting
vo+F3 to read what's under the Voiceover cursor.  what however I'm 
looking

for, is something slightly more robust.  Is there a way, and if so, how,
that I could asign a hotspot or something similar then have it where it
won't read the meter automatically, no, however, if, and only! if, I 
clip,
it'll automatically trigger voiceover to say clipped, or to read the 
meter
in such of a way I'll know I'm clipping?  Sometimes, with my hearing 
loss,

it's slightly tricky for me to know audibly, until it gets where it's so
badly clipping, that it's flat out disgusting.  The issue is, yeah, I 
could

manually look, but what if I only clip on say, one note?  If I sing right
over that note for instance then check the meter one or two notes
early/late, I might miss something very very important.  I'm just 
wonderring
the best way to hit that meter dead spot on, so I know instantly! that 
I'm

clipping.

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Monitoring levels

2014-05-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK, but I don't want to have to purchase something just for this one task.

If it requires that much work, I'll just keep using vo+F3.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: John André Lium-Netland 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 7:51 AM
  Subject: Re: Monitoring levels


  Hi Chris,


  This might be what you are looking for, it will only alert you by voice when 
you clip or at a given level.


  http://www.katsurashareware.com/pgs/prolevel.html




  Best,
  John André


  On 07 May 2014, at 12:54, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


I'm 100% perfectly aware that I can monitor the level of an individual 
track by interacting with it, then finding the meter, and then, I can keep 
hitting vo+F3 to read what's under the Voiceover cursor.  what however I'm 
looking for, is something slightly more robust.  Is there a way, and if so, 
how, that I could asign a hotspot or something similar then have it where it 
won't read the meter automatically, no, however, if, and only! if, I clip, 
it'll automatically trigger voiceover to say clipped, or to read the meter in 
such of a way I'll know I'm clipping?  Sometimes, with my hearing loss, it's 
slightly tricky for me to know audibly, until it gets where it's so badly 
clipping, that it's flat out disgusting.  The issue is, yeah, I could manually 
look, but what if I only clip on say, one note?  If I sing right over that note 
for instance then check the meter one or two notes early/late, I might miss 
something very very important.  I'm just wonderring the best way to hit that 
meter dead spot on, so I know instantly! that I'm clipping.

Chris.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Monitoring levels

2014-05-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Slau,

I have a question then,

I find that on my monitors, if I leave my volume slider in ProTools on a vocal 
track at 0%, then on my interface, I turn my gain dial way down to the point 
where in PT, on that track, it shows -18DB, that is so profusely quiet, that I 
literally almost cannot even hear it unless I turn my monitors almost 3 fourths 
the way up.  Which of corse is way! way! quieter than Voiceover speech, or say 
my music instrument tracks etc.  In order to get a good level that is audible, 
I'm having to way raise that gain.  Even if I don't raise the gain on my 
interface, but pull the slider on the track in PT all the way to +12DB, which 
is practically all the way up, it only then starts! to become audible.  I know 
you're probably saying, then, ok, Chris, you're music is way way way too hot.  
Crank it way the hell down!  If I do that, then again, the over all level is 
very crisp and clean and doesn't clip, but at the same time, compared to my 
over all volume, PT not with standing, the recording volume is so pathetically 
low in comparison to everything else, that if I crank it up enough to hear it, 
any other sound that gets fed through like Alex from Voiceover etc. literally 
is deafening!  I understand we're talking two different levels here.  the one 
on my interface is the input volume, whilst the one on the track in PT is the 
output volume, I totally get that.  I'm just not sure how to keep that input 
gain on my interface real real low, yet achieve the same level on the output 
volume without having to bring that input gain so hot.  I do have an insert I 
sometimes pop on a vocal track, it's just one of the default pre-installed 
dynamic compression plugins, and yeah, if I set the preset to vocal leveler, it 
helps some, but I don't always want compression.  All I need is an output 
volume only boost.  I thought about using a Pre, if I could find a good 
hardware one that was accessible, but even that is gonna be for the input gain, 
not the output.

So, if you have any suggestions, or think you may know what is going on, let me 
know.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:35 AM
  Subject: Re: Monitoring levels


  Chris,


  If you're in danger of clipping, you're recording way too hot. With something 
like a vocal, your final peak should be -9 to -6 dB full scale. That means your 
average level should be in the range of -18 to -12 dB. That's what headroom is 
for. You're recording with 24 bits which give you a theoretical dynamic range 
of of 140 decibels. The sources you're recording are nowhere near 140 decibels, 
not even close. By pulling back your level, you'll eliminate any concern over 
clipping. Pro Tools is designed to have average levels at -18 dB. 18 decibels 
of headroom is plenty for just about anything you'll ever record.


  Slau


  On May 7, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


I'm 100% perfectly aware that I can monitor the level of an individual 
track by interacting with it, then finding the meter, and then, I can keep 
hitting vo+F3 to read what's under the Voiceover cursor.  what however I'm 
looking for, is something slightly more robust.  Is there a way, and if so, 
how, that I could asign a hotspot or something similar then have it where it 
won't read the meter automatically, no, however, if, and only! if, I clip, 
it'll automatically trigger voiceover to say clipped, or to read the meter in 
such of a way I'll know I'm clipping?  Sometimes, with my hearing loss, it's 
slightly tricky for me to know audibly, until it gets where it's so badly 
clipping, that it's flat out disgusting.  The issue is, yeah, I could manually 
look, but what if I only clip on say, one note?  If I sing right over that note 
for instance then check the meter one or two notes early/late, I might miss 
something very very important.  I'm just wonderring the best way to hit that 
meter dead spot on, so I know instantly! that I'm clipping.

Chris.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Monitoring levels

2014-05-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK, then, yeah, turn all that way way up on the monitor once I have Voiceover 
on another device isolated, but that still doesn't tell me once all recorded 
how to then get that volume back to its original level so it's equal with all 
my other sound.  Is that where a stereo master fader track comes into play?  
I'd create one of them in the session, then bump that volume slider back up to 
compensate, or is there actually a better way?

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:38 AM
  Subject: Re: Monitoring levels


  You have to figure out a way to keep VoiceOver and Pro Tools output separate. 
Your just setting yourself up for a difficult time by trying to run things the 
way you have them set up.


  Also, crank your vocal track up to the max on the fader. As you know, this 
has no effect on recording levels, so boost it. Even a plug-in will have no 
effect on the recorded track except while it's instantiated. The thing to shoot 
for, really, is to keep the screen reader, system sounds, etc. (like Chris 
Smart mentioned) separate from Pro Tools.


  Slau


  On May 7, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


Slau,

I have a question then,

I find that on my monitors, if I leave my volume slider in ProTools on a 
vocal track at 0%, then on my interface, I turn my gain dial way down to the 
point where in PT, on that track, it shows -18DB, that is so profusely quiet, 
that I literally almost cannot even hear it unless I turn my monitors almost 3 
fourths the way up.  Which of corse is way! way! quieter than Voiceover speech, 
or say my music instrument tracks etc.  In order to get a good level that is 
audible, I'm having to way raise that gain.  Even if I don't raise the gain on 
my interface, but pull the slider on the track in PT all the way to +12DB, 
which is practically all the way up, it only then starts! to become audible.  I 
know you're probably saying, then, ok, Chris, you're music is way way way too 
hot.  Crank it way the hell down!  If I do that, then again, the over all level 
is very crisp and clean and doesn't clip, but at the same time, compared to my 
over all volume, PT not with standing, the recording volume is so pathetically 
low in comparison to everything else, that if I crank it up enough to hear it, 
any other sound that gets fed through like Alex from Voiceover etc. literally 
is deafening!  I understand we're talking two different levels here.  the one 
on my interface is the input volume, whilst the one on the track in PT is the 
output volume, I totally get that.  I'm just not sure how to keep that input 
gain on my interface real real low, yet achieve the same level on the output 
volume without having to bring that input gain so hot.  I do have an insert I 
sometimes pop on a vocal track, it's just one of the default pre-installed 
dynamic compression plugins, and yeah, if I set the preset to vocal leveler, it 
helps some, but I don't always want compression.  All I need is an output 
volume only boost.  I thought about using a Pre, if I could find a good 
hardware one that was accessible, but even that is gonna be for the input gain, 
not the output.

So, if you have any suggestions, or think you may know what is going on, 
let me know.

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Slau Halatyn
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:35 AM
  Subject: Re: Monitoring levels


  Chris,


  If you're in danger of clipping, you're recording way too hot. With 
something like a vocal, your final peak should be -9 to -6 dB full scale. That 
means your average level should be in the range of -18 to -12 dB. That's what 
headroom is for. You're recording with 24 bits which give you a theoretical 
dynamic range of of 140 decibels. The sources you're recording are nowhere near 
140 decibels, not even close. By pulling back your level, you'll eliminate any 
concern over clipping. Pro Tools is designed to have average levels at -18 dB. 
18 decibels of headroom is plenty for just about anything you'll ever record.


  Slau


  On May 7, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


I'm 100% perfectly aware that I can monitor the level of an individual 
track by interacting with it, then finding the meter, and then, I can keep 
hitting vo+F3 to read what's under the Voiceover cursor.  what however I'm 
looking for, is something slightly more robust.  Is there a way, and if so, 
how, that I could asign a hotspot or something similar then have it where it 
won't read the meter automatically, no, however, if, and only! if, I clip, 
it'll automatically trigger voiceover to say clipped, or to read the meter in 
such of a way I'll know I'm clipping?  Sometimes, with my hearing loss, it's 
slightly tricky for me to know audibly, until it gets where it's

Re: Monitoring levels

2014-05-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Slau,

I didn't ask for you to gibve me pointers on masterring.  that's quite ok!  
Don't worry about that part of it.  I'm very much willing to do my homework off 
list regarding that.  I was simply just curious if I was even on the right 
track in the first place, thinking that I'll bring those levels back up in the 
final masterring process, and by the sounds of it, it's looking like by what 
you're saying, that yes.  That's exactly right.

Thanks for the help.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 3:14 PM
  Subject: Re: Monitoring levels


  Chris,


  Your final mixes should follow the same principle. Ultimately, you need to 
create a final master where you bump up your levels, add final EQ and 
compression, in other words, mastering. That's beyond the scope of an email 
list. I'm simply telling you what the norm is for recording into a dAW. Keep 
your levels conservative and you'll be fine without worrying about clipping.


  Slau




  On May 7, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


OK, then, yeah, turn all that way way up on the monitor once I have 
Voiceover on another device isolated, but that still doesn't tell me once all 
recorded how to then get that volume back to its original level so it's equal 
with all my other sound.  Is that where a stereo master fader track comes into 
play?  I'd create one of them in the session, then bump that volume slider back 
up to compensate, or is there actually a better way?

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Slau Halatyn
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:38 AM
  Subject: Re: Monitoring levels


  You have to figure out a way to keep VoiceOver and Pro Tools output 
separate. Your just setting yourself up for a difficult time by trying to run 
things the way you have them set up.


  Also, crank your vocal track up to the max on the fader. As you know, 
this has no effect on recording levels, so boost it. Even a plug-in will have 
no effect on the recorded track except while it's instantiated. The thing to 
shoot for, really, is to keep the screen reader, system sounds, etc. (like 
Chris Smart mentioned) separate from Pro Tools.


  Slau


  On May 7, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


Slau,

I have a question then,

I find that on my monitors, if I leave my volume slider in ProTools on 
a vocal track at 0%, then on my interface, I turn my gain dial way down to the 
point where in PT, on that track, it shows -18DB, that is so profusely quiet, 
that I literally almost cannot even hear it unless I turn my monitors almost 3 
fourths the way up.  Which of corse is way! way! quieter than Voiceover speech, 
or say my music instrument tracks etc.  In order to get a good level that is 
audible, I'm having to way raise that gain.  Even if I don't raise the gain on 
my interface, but pull the slider on the track in PT all the way to +12DB, 
which is practically all the way up, it only then starts! to become audible.  I 
know you're probably saying, then, ok, Chris, you're music is way way way too 
hot.  Crank it way the hell down!  If I do that, then again, the over all level 
is very crisp and clean and doesn't clip, but at the same time, compared to my 
over all volume, PT not with standing, the recording volume is so pathetically 
low in comparison to everything else, that if I crank it up enough to hear it, 
any other sound that gets fed through like Alex from Voiceover etc. literally 
is deafening!  I understand we're talking two different levels here.  the one 
on my interface is the input volume, whilst the one on the track in PT is the 
output volume, I totally get that.  I'm just not sure how to keep that input 
gain on my interface real real low, yet achieve the same level on the output 
volume without having to bring that input gain so hot.  I do have an insert I 
sometimes pop on a vocal track, it's just one of the default pre-installed 
dynamic compression plugins, and yeah, if I set the preset to vocal leveler, it 
helps some, but I don't always want compression.  All I need is an output 
volume only boost.  I thought about using a Pre, if I could find a good 
hardware one that was accessible, but even that is gonna be for the input gain, 
not the output.

So, if you have any suggestions, or think you may know what is going 
on, let me know.

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Slau Halatyn
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:35 AM
  Subject: Re: Monitoring levels


  Chris,


  If you're in danger of clipping, you're recording way too hot. With 
something like a vocal, your final peak should be -9 to -6 dB full scale. That 
means your average level should

Re: Monitoring levels

2014-05-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
,

If you're in danger of clipping, you're recording way too hot. With 
something like a vocal, your final peak should be -9 to -6 dB full scale. 
That means your average level should be in the range of -18 to -12 dB. 
That's what headroom is for. You're recording with 24 bits which give you 
a theoretical dynamic range of of 140 decibels. The sources you're 
recording are nowhere near 140 decibels, not even close. By pulling back 
your level, you'll eliminate any concern over clipping. Pro Tools is 
designed to have average levels at -18 dB. 18 decibels of headroom is 
plenty for just about anything you'll ever record.


Slau

On May 7, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
mailto:clgillan...@gmail.comclgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


I'm 100% perfectly aware that I can monitor the level of an individual 
track by interacting with it, then finding the meter, and then, I can 
keep hitting vo+F3 to read what's under the Voiceover cursor.  what 
however I'm looking for, is something slightly more robust.  Is there a 
way, and if so, how, that I could asign a hotspot or something similar 
then have it where it won't read the meter automatically, no, however, 
if, and only! if, I clip, it'll automatically trigger voiceover to say 
clipped, or to read the meter in such of a way I'll know I'm clipping? 
Sometimes, with my hearing loss, it's slightly tricky for me to know 
audibly, until it gets where it's so badly clipping, that it's flat out 
disgusting.  The issue is, yeah, I could manually look, but what if I 
only clip on say, one note?  If I sing right over that note for instance 
then check the meter one or two notes early/late, I might miss something 
very very important.  I'm just wonderring the best way to hit that meter 
dead spot on, so I know instantly! that I'm clipping.


Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to 
mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/optouthttps://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to 
mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/optouthttps://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to 
mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/optouthttps://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-02 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I think what I meant was I didn't realize that you specified both.  I didn't 
realize that when on bars and beats you specified both.  I thought it was an 
absolute bar value.  In other words, I thought that you only could say 3 
bars.  I didn't realize you could say 3 bars, 2 beats.  Same goes with 
hours, minutes, seconds.  I was under the impression you only could specify 
an exact value.  I didn't realize it was flexible enough to say 1 minute 30 
seconds.  I thought you'd have to round the seconds up or down to the 
nearest minute, and only could specify a min value, not a second value as 
well.  I thought it had to either be 1 minute, or 2 minutes, it couldn't be 
1:30.  So I was asking with that assumption, which now I know was incorrect, 
what the different values would represent.  Would it be an absolute minute, 
or would I specify in seconds.  Again, now I see it's both.


Frankly, your terse comments really are not amusing to me!  I was really 
trying to ask for help, and the whole quote: minutes and seconds are... 
well? um... minutes and seconds, was extremely uncalled for!  I was just 
asking for help, you don't have to be such a smart-butt about it.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


You lost me there. minutes represents minutes! Seconds represents, well, 
seconds.



At 01:29 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Shruggs,

That's not what I meant.  I meant what does the numerical values 
represent? In beats/bars it obviously represents bars.  In hour minute 
seconds, what is it representing?... Seconds? Minutes? or what?


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



well, how long do you need to get ready to play?

If you want to convert between bars/beats and minutes/seconds, that 
obviously depends on the tempo of your tune.

At 12:43 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Slau,

So, you said with the pre-roll how many bars?  How do I calculate if I'm 
doing hours minutes seconds frames, instead of bars, beats, ticks?


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

OK, since your keyboard is across the room, you're going to need enough 
pre roll to be able to press record, walk over to your mic, put on 
headphones and get ready to sing. How many bars do you think that'll be? 
8? 10? Whatever you think it should be, type that number into the Pre 
roll field. The Post roll value doesn't matter as much because who cares 
how long the song continues playing after you've finished the record 
pass. If the pre roll value is 0, you'll have no pre roll and you'll be 
recording as soon as you press Command-space bar. The purpose of the pre 
roll is to get a running start, figuratively and, in your case, 
literally.
On May 1, 2014, at 11:49 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
mailto:clgillan...@gmail.comclgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


So, I'm confused.  What do the pre and post roll values do/indicate, if 
not 0, how do I determine what they should be set to, or does it really 
not honest matter.  Just pick a random number so's long as it isn't 0.


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

Chris,

You specifically asked for step-by-step instructions and, when you 
request something like that, it's going to sound complicated. It's not.


1. Select a range within which you wish to record.
2.Enable Pre/Post roll with Command-k and make sure that the pre and 
post roll values in the Transport window are set to something other 
than zero.

3. Record.

It's rather simple. Another alternative is to buy a USB extension cable 
and keep your keyboard close. Punch in by simply pressing Command-Space 
bar where you wish to record. Hit space bar to stop. You don't even 
have to be in Pre/Post roll to do that.


Slau
On May 1, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
mailto:clgillan...@gmail.comclgillan...@gmail.com wrote:



Slau,

This isn't you at all, you did an excellent job explaining, but I must 
admit, you went way over my head!  I know you do audio stuff for a 
living, so it's not gonna be quick, but I'm in no hurry.  Would you be 
willing to make me an audio demonstration of how this works?  I'm 
sorry, but via text, this just isn't making sense at all.  It's not 
your falt, It's just that it seems this is a very hard concept to 
grasp via text.


I thought it would be more easy than this, like select the portion of 
audio you want to record

Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-02 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

If you'd rather not reply, suit yourself.

It doesn't bother me.  There are plenty of others who I know will be happy 
to help.  You not responding doesn't offend me, if you feel it's better.  I 
respect your decision.  Smile.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



I'll save us the bother and not reply in future.
I'm not sure what use a counter that only goes as fine as minute or hour 
increments would be for recording but ok ...


At 11:20 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:
I think what I meant was I didn't realize that you specified both.  I 
didn't realize that when on bars and beats you specified both.  I thought 
it was an absolute bar value.  In other words, I thought that you only 
could say 3 bars.  I didn't realize you could say 3 bars, 2 beats.  Same 
goes with hours, minutes, seconds.  I was under the impression you only 
could specify an exact value.  I didn't realize it was flexible enough to 
say 1 minute 30 seconds.  I thought you'd have to round the seconds up or 
down to the nearest minute, and only could specify a min value, not a 
second value as well.  I thought it had to either be 1 minute, or 2 
minutes, it couldn't be 1:30.  So I was asking with that assumption, which 
now I know was incorrect, what the different values would represent. 
Would it be an absolute minute, or would I specify in seconds.  Again, now 
I see it's both.


Frankly, your terse comments really are not amusing to me!  I was really 
trying to ask for help, and the whole quote: minutes and seconds are... 
well? um... minutes and seconds, was extremely uncalled for!  I was just 
asking for help, you don't have to be such a smart-butt about it.


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


You lost me there. minutes represents minutes! Seconds represents, well, 
seconds.



At 01:29 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Shruggs,

That's not what I meant.  I meant what does the numerical values 
represent? In beats/bars it obviously represents bars.  In hour minute 
seconds, what is it representing?... Seconds? Minutes? or what?


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



well, how long do you need to get ready to play?

If you want to convert between bars/beats and minutes/seconds, that 
obviously depends on the tempo of your tune.

At 12:43 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Slau,

So, you said with the pre-roll how many bars?  How do I calculate if 
I'm doing hours minutes seconds frames, instead of bars, beats, ticks?


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

OK, since your keyboard is across the room, you're going to need 
enough pre roll to be able to press record, walk over to your mic, put 
on headphones and get ready to sing. How many bars do you think 
that'll be? 8? 10? Whatever you think it should be, type that number 
into the Pre roll field. The Post roll value doesn't matter as much 
because who cares how long the song continues playing after you've 
finished the record pass. If the pre roll value is 0, you'll have no 
pre roll and you'll be recording as soon as you press Command-space 
bar. The purpose of the pre roll is to get a running start, 
figuratively and, in your case, literally.
On May 1, 2014, at 11:49 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
mailto:clgillan...@gmail.comclgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


So, I'm confused.  What do the pre and post roll values do/indicate, 
if not 0, how do I determine what they should be set to, or does it 
really not honest matter.  Just pick a random number so's long as it 
isn't 0.


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

Chris,

You specifically asked for step-by-step instructions and, when you 
request something like that, it's going to sound complicated. It's 
not.


1. Select a range within which you wish to record.
2.Enable Pre/Post roll with Command-k and make sure that the pre and 
post roll values in the Transport window are set to something other 
than zero.

3. Record.

It's rather simple. Another alternative is to buy a USB extension 
cable and keep your keyboard close. Punch in by simply pressing 
Command-Space bar where you wish to record. Hit space bar to stop. 
You don't even have to be in Pre/Post roll to do that.


Slau
On May 1, 2014, at 9:48 PM

Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-02 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Allen,

I couldn't have said your post better had I tried!  You literally took the 
words out of my mouth.  Well, ok, out of my fingers.  LOL!  Just kidding 
with ya.


Seriously though, we're all adults here, so let's act like them.  K?

Smile.

Be blessed.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Alan Macdonald alan.macdon...@totalise.co.uk

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


I think we are all in the same boat here and trying to learn pro tools with 
VoiceOver isn't straightforward and can be frustrating at times for all of 
us. I read this forum every day and pick up hints and tips and maybe when 
I'm a bit more clued up I'll be able to help others too but in the meantime 
what I've read here is gold and frankly without it I'd be struggling at 
college but as it is I'm managing nicely. So, if there is something you know 
that someone else doesn't then help them and at some point someone will help 
you in return. In short, we are all on the same team effectively so lets 
keep it that way and we'll all benefit and become pro tools ninjas in the 
end.


Cheers,

Alan,
Oban, Scotland


Sent from my iPhone

On 2 May 2014, at 16:49, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


If you'd rather not reply, suit yourself.

It doesn't bother me.  There are plenty of others who I know will be happy 
to help.  You not responding doesn't offend me, if you feel it's better. 
I respect your decision.  Smile.


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



I'll save us the bother and not reply in future.
I'm not sure what use a counter that only goes as fine as minute or hour 
increments would be for recording but ok ...


At 11:20 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:
I think what I meant was I didn't realize that you specified both.  I 
didn't realize that when on bars and beats you specified both.  I 
thought it was an absolute bar value.  In other words, I thought that 
you only could say 3 bars.  I didn't realize you could say 3 bars, 2 
beats.  Same goes with hours, minutes, seconds.  I was under the 
impression you only could specify an exact value.  I didn't realize it 
was flexible enough to say 1 minute 30 seconds.  I thought you'd have to 
round the seconds up or down to the nearest minute, and only could 
specify a min value, not a second value as well.  I thought it had to 
either be 1 minute, or 2 minutes, it couldn't be 1:30.  So I was asking 
with that assumption, which now I know was incorrect, what the different 
values would represent. Would it be an absolute minute, or would I 
specify in seconds.  Again, now I see it's both.


Frankly, your terse comments really are not amusing to me!  I was really 
trying to ask for help, and the whole quote: minutes and seconds are... 
well? um... minutes and seconds, was extremely uncalled for!  I was just 
asking for help, you don't have to be such a smart-butt about it.


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


You lost me there. minutes represents minutes! Seconds represents, 
well, seconds.



At 01:29 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Shruggs,

That's not what I meant.  I meant what does the numerical values 
represent? In beats/bars it obviously represents bars.  In hour minute 
seconds, what is it representing?... Seconds? Minutes? or what?


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



well, how long do you need to get ready to play?

If you want to convert between bars/beats and minutes/seconds, that 
obviously depends on the tempo of your tune.

At 12:43 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Slau,

So, you said with the pre-roll how many bars?  How do I calculate if 
I'm doing hours minutes seconds frames, instead of bars, beats, 
ticks?


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

OK, since your keyboard is across the room, you're going to need 
enough pre roll to be able to press record, walk over to your mic, 
put on headphones and get ready to sing. How many bars do you think 
that'll be? 8? 10? Whatever you think it should be, type that number 
into the Pre roll field. The Post roll value doesn't matter as much 
because who cares how long the song continues playing after you've 
finished the record pass. If the pre roll value is 0, you'll have no 
pre roll and you'll be recording as soon as you press Command-space 
bar. The purpose of the pre roll

Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-02 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
That's not a half bad idea.  I didn't even think about a wireless keyboard. 
I'm a dork!  LOL!  Just kidding.  Seriously though.


Thanks for the tip.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


Chris, if you get a chance, grab a wireless keyboard with a numb pad IMO. 
I like pressing 3 on the num pad for recording quick punch because it is a 
one button step and in my experience I have got punches in at a fraction 
of a second. It sounds like you will save a whole lot of time considering 
your set up. If you have the key board in your hand you can punch in over 
and over without having to walk over to the keyboard each time to hit 
record. This way you can do 10 takes in about a minute or less depending 
on the length of the punch.

HTH
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



If you'd rather not reply, suit yourself.

It doesn't bother me.  There are plenty of others who I know will be 
happy to help.  You not responding doesn't offend me, if you feel it's 
better. I respect your decision.  Smile.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



I'll save us the bother and not reply in future.
I'm not sure what use a counter that only goes as fine as minute or hour 
increments would be for recording but ok ...


At 11:20 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:
I think what I meant was I didn't realize that you specified both.  I 
didn't realize that when on bars and beats you specified both.  I 
thought it was an absolute bar value.  In other words, I thought that 
you only could say 3 bars.  I didn't realize you could say 3 bars, 2 
beats.  Same goes with hours, minutes, seconds.  I was under the 
impression you only could specify an exact value.  I didn't realize it 
was flexible enough to say 1 minute 30 seconds.  I thought you'd have to 
round the seconds up or down to the nearest minute, and only could 
specify a min value, not a second value as well.  I thought it had to 
either be 1 minute, or 2 minutes, it couldn't be 1:30.  So I was asking 
with that assumption, which now I know was incorrect, what the different 
values would represent. Would it be an absolute minute, or would I 
specify in seconds. Again, now I see it's both.


Frankly, your terse comments really are not amusing to me!  I was really 
trying to ask for help, and the whole quote: minutes and seconds are... 
well? um... minutes and seconds, was extremely uncalled for!  I was just 
asking for help, you don't have to be such a smart-butt about it.


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


You lost me there. minutes represents minutes! Seconds represents, 
well, seconds.



At 01:29 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Shruggs,

That's not what I meant.  I meant what does the numerical values 
represent? In beats/bars it obviously represents bars.  In hour minute 
seconds, what is it representing?... Seconds? Minutes? or what?


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



well, how long do you need to get ready to play?

If you want to convert between bars/beats and minutes/seconds, that 
obviously depends on the tempo of your tune.

At 12:43 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Slau,

So, you said with the pre-roll how many bars?  How do I calculate if 
I'm doing hours minutes seconds frames, instead of bars, beats, 
ticks?


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

OK, since your keyboard is across the room, you're going to need 
enough pre roll to be able to press record, walk over to your mic, 
put on headphones and get ready to sing. How many bars do you think 
that'll be? 8? 10? Whatever you think it should be, type that number 
into the Pre roll field. The Post roll value doesn't matter as much 
because who cares how long the song continues playing after you've 
finished the record pass. If the pre roll value is 0, you'll have no 
pre roll and you'll be recording as soon as you press Command-space 
bar. The purpose of the pre roll is to get a running start, 
figuratively and, in your case, literally.
On May 1, 2014, at 11:49 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
mailto:clgillan...@gmail.comclgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


So, I'm

Native Instruments?

2014-05-02 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I have a blind gentlemen who I'm working with on the use of ProTools.  He's 
curious if any of the Native Instruments stuff is accessible to use as a 
software instrument set with Voiceover.

Any feedback would be appreciated.  I'm going to try getting him to join this 
list, if I can, but in the meantime, if anyone knows, let me know.

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Native Instruments?

2014-05-02 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

OK Scott.

Thanks for the very quick response.  Really appreciate it.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Native Instruments?



The short and unfortunate answer is nope. There are a few hotspot type
solutions that'll unlock a bit of functionality for Kontakt and
perhaps other NI plugs in Windows, but I've not heard of any Mac
equivalents.

Sorry to be the barer of bad news.

Scott

On 5/2/14, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a blind gentlemen who I'm working with on the use of ProTools. 
He's

curious if any of the Native Instruments stuff is accessible to use as a
software instrument set with Voiceover.

Any feedback would be appreciated.  I'm going to try getting him to join
this list, if I can, but in the meantime, if anyone knows, let me know.

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-02 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

No Slau,

I'm using a Fast Track C400 from M-Audio which doesn't have that ability.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



On May 2, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:



I think what I meant was I didn't realize that you specified both.


Chris,

I think I see where the confusion came in. Part of that might have been from 
just reading the text of my reply rather than going to the Transport window 
and finding the pre-roll field. There, you probably would have seen 
something like 1|0|000 or 0:02.000. It would have been self-evident that you 
could enter any value as long as you followed the convention of the session 
time format (eg. bars/beats or minutes:seconds, etc.).


Anyway, I think you're all set. Now, weren't you using something like the 
002 or 003? Those interfaces have a footswitch jack for punching in, BTW. 
Just another option in case you needed one.


Slau


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Editing questions

2014-05-01 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Not yet per sé, aside the PT documentation which is invaluable by the way, but 
there will be a webinar class which I will be holding over the next 8 or so 
weeks on the use of PT with Voiceover.  We will start tomorrow evening at 7PM 
eastern time.  If you and others on the list can't attend live, you will have 
the ability to go back and listen to the webinar at your leisure.  You'll also 
get access to this mailing list as always to ask questions, as well as another 
list I'm setting up specifically for atendees of the class, all the text 
documentation I type up for the class, and even downloads to all the sessions 
that we use over the 8 to 10 week period that we host these classes.  So even 
if you can't attend live, it's not a big deal.  You'll have access to go back 
and listen to the lessons at your own pace, in your own time.

Seats are very limitted, so if you  or anyone else is interested, write me off 
list at:

clgillan...@gmail.com

The cost for registration is $100.00.  Keep in mind, that is a one time 
payment, and at an hour a week over about an 8 week period, that comes to about 
$12.50 per hour.  that's a steel, considerring all you're going to get access 
to.  If interested, send me an e-mail letting me know you've paid, so that I 
can get you in the registration process.  PayPal payments need to be sent to:

clgillan...@gmail.com

Registration closes tonight at 11:59PM E D T.  Sorry for the short notice.  I 
tried sending this to the list, as well as a few others, but apparently my 
e-mail was acting up, and thus it never went through.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Ashley 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 5:01 PM
  Subject: Re: Editing questions


  Is there, anywhere, a Pro Tools getting started guide? Something that 
explains clearly how to do things from a keyboard/accessibility point of view? 
Something that guides you through importing, recording and editing audio; 
working with midi; mastering, mixing, etc?



  On 01/05/2014 21:47, ramy moustafa wrote:

Hi all:



With pro tools, I can, record, record another track, save a file, import 
wave, incert new tracks, solo, mute.



But I still need to now:

How to deselect tracks, how to nuddge via keyboard not with surface because 
I don’t have jug wheel, how to scrubb.

The most important thing for me is editing.

So if you please, I need some answers to my questions.

Thanks





Ramy moustafa saber
Musicc instructor at:
faculty of musical education
music arranger and sound engineer
Sent from my iPhone
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-01 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK, I do understand that there are quite a few questions here, but any help 
would be appreciated with any of these.

First of all, I'd like to talk about punch in/punch outs.  Sometimes, I'll be 
recording a vocal track, be it lead, or backing, and I may hit a line a little 
flat, or a little sharp.  More times than not, flat.  Sometimes, it's in a part 
of the song which makes it very tricky to get kuh boom right on key with no 
lead-in warning.  Yeah, I totally get I could then just back up a ways and 
record a little more than needed just for some wiggle room, but why do that if 
the part right before sounds flawless?  I don't want to chance ruinning a 
perfectly good measure just to get the bar after it sounding good.  That just 
seems a little over kill.  Yeah, I know about the playlist option in the edit 
window on each track, and yes I know about comping.  I confess I don't do it 
much, but I think I'm gonna start getting myself more in the habbit of it.  If 
I want a pollished recording, then face it, sometimes you have to do the more 
dirty tedious work, but in the long run, it's well worth it.  Anyway, so what 
I'd like to do is a punch in/out.  This is just an example.  It doesn't mean 
it's the song I'm working with, but it's one that I know must people know, so 
it'll make my point really well.  Let's take the song Take it Easy by The 
Eagles.  I, natrually am really not a tennor.  I kind of, ish, can do it, but 
not real well.  So let's take the chorus.  Take it easy, take it easy!  Don't 
let the sound of your own words drive you crazy.  Lighten up while you still 
can.  Let's say I'm in the key of G.  This means on lighten up, when I hit that 
C chord, my voice has to hit that G4.  So, basically, the G above middle C.  
For me, that's way stretching it!  I can do it, but it's a major struggle.  
Notice, I said struggle, I did not say strain.  I'm not straining to hit it, 
trust me.  I can hit it, just not very full strength usually, at least not on 
the first try.  I usually have to do it a few times to warm/loosen up.  So, 
what I'm thinking is, if I had a way I could start playing the session right 
where my vocals say Don't let the sound of your own words drive you crazy...  I 
could sing along with that part, not recording, then as soon as I get past 
that, have the record engage automatically, let me then keep singing 
seemlessly, lighten up while you still can, don't even try to understand, just 
find a place to take your stand, and take it easy.  After that, have the record 
disengage all by itself.  My mike isn't near enough to my workstation that I 
can have my hands on the keyboard, nor is it easy for me to hit that line with 
no prior warning to lead up to it.  I just feel I need to easily work my way 
into it.  So yeah, if this can be done, please tell me literally step by step, 
keystroke by keystroke what I'd hit to do it.

My second question is, let's say I'm doing a slow country song, and at the very 
end, the last two or three bars need to be slower tempo, giving me a ending 
retard kind of effect.  If you wonder what I'm talking about, listen, for 
instance to the end of Every Light in the House is on by Trace Adkins.  That's 
a perfect! example!  So, I know in the event, tempo operations window, how to 
go to constant, and set a constant BPM, but then, how do I have it do a retard 
for me?

I'm almost done, just two more things.  If I'm in say, 4/4 time, and all a 
sudden, at the start of a bar, I need to switch time signatures without moving 
the tempo, is there a way I can do that?

Finally, If I've inserted midi tracks into my session, and have their output 
paths going to different xpand2 instrument tracks, is there then a way that I 
could save that arrangement as a .mid midi file?  I know it won't save audio, 
and I know the samples in the xpand2 tracks wouldn't be saved as midi.  I'm 
perfectly aware of that.  I know the whole thing about midi isn't sound.  I 
know it's just 1's and 0's, hince, why I'm routing their outputs to instrument 
tracks.  I just wonder if I could then take those midi tracks, assign the 
correct GM patches to them like piano, guitar, base, drums on channel 10, etc. 
then export them down where any midi player, even something simple as WinAmp on 
Windows could then play the .mid file back with the correct patches in place, 
and would sound decent.

Again, I'm sorry for all the questions, but again, I trust you all will pitch 
in and help me out here a bit.

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-01 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Slau,

This isn't you at all, you did an excellent job explaining, but I must admit, 
you went way over my head!  I know you do audio stuff for a living, so it's not 
gonna be quick, but I'm in no hurry.  Would you be willing to make me an audio 
demonstration of how this works?  I'm sorry, but via text, this just isn't 
making sense at all.  It's not your falt, It's just that it seems this is a 
very hard concept to grasp via text.

I thought it would be more easy than this, like select the portion of audio you 
want to record, then toggle on punch in, arm the track, hit record, and you're 
done.  It seem like there is way more to it than that though.

Wasn't there something like, num pad 4, or was it 6 to turn on punch in, or is 
this about the easiest way to do it.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:36 PM
  Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


  Chris,


  Go to the Transport window.
  Click once on the Pre-roll amount. Assuming you're in bars and beats, type 
the number 1 and press return. The Pre-roll amount will be one bar and Pre-roll 
will automatically be enabled. The button appears to the left of the numeric 
field you just entered.
  Move down to the Post-roll field and follow the same steps.


  Now that Pre and Post roll are enabled, I'd recommend temporarily turning 
them off with Command-k.


  Go to the bar/beat where you wish to punch in. Select the range of bars 
and/or beats you wish to record. Once you've made your selection, press 
Command-k to enable Pre/Post roll. If you press record, you'll hear one bar 
before your selected range as pre-roll and you'll only be in record from the 
selection point. Pro Tools will record through the selection and exit record 
mode for the final bar of post roll.


  If you want two bars of pre-roll, obviously, substitute 2 for 1 when typing 
in the pre-roll value.


  Here's a tip: don't forget to turn off Pre/Post roll when you're done with 
your punch-in. When you try to navigate and get to a particular bar, I 
guarantee it'll confuse you when you hear the music from the previous bar and 
you'll swear that you thought you meant to go to bar 41 and you'll be hearing 
bar 40 and all the while it'll be because you actually are at bar 41 but 
pre-roll is causing you to hear bar 40 first.


  I'll let someone else take the other questions.


  Slau


  On May 1, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


OK, I do understand that there are quite a few questions here, but any help 
would be appreciated with any of these.

First of all, I'd like to talk about punch in/punch outs.  Sometimes, I'll 
be recording a vocal track, be it lead, or backing, and I may hit a line a 
little flat, or a little sharp.  More times than not, flat.  Sometimes, it's in 
a part of the song which makes it very tricky to get kuh boom right on key with 
no lead-in warning.  Yeah, I totally get I could then just back up a ways and 
record a little more than needed just for some wiggle room, but why do that if 
the part right before sounds flawless?  I don't want to chance ruinning a 
perfectly good measure just to get the bar after it sounding good.  That just 
seems a little over kill.  Yeah, I know about the playlist option in the edit 
window on each track, and yes I know about comping.  I confess I don't do it 
much, but I think I'm gonna start getting myself more in the habbit of it.  If 
I want a pollished recording, then face it, sometimes you have to do the more 
dirty tedious work, but in the long run, it's well worth it.  Anyway, so what 
I'd like to do is a punch in/out.  This is just an example.  It doesn't mean 
it's the song I'm working with, but it's one that I know must people know, so 
it'll make my point really well.  Let's take the song Take it Easy by The 
Eagles.  I, natrually am really not a tennor.  I kind of, ish, can do it, but 
not real well.  So let's take the chorus.  Take it easy, take it easy!  Don't 
let the sound of your own words drive you crazy.  Lighten up while you still 
can.  Let's say I'm in the key of G.  This means on lighten up, when I hit that 
C chord, my voice has to hit that G4.  So, basically, the G above middle C.  
For me, that's way stretching it!  I can do it, but it's a major struggle.  
Notice, I said struggle, I did not say strain.  I'm not straining to hit it, 
trust me.  I can hit it, just not very full strength usually, at least not on 
the first try.  I usually have to do it a few times to warm/loosen up.  So, 
what I'm thinking is, if I had a way I could start playing the session right 
where my vocals say Don't let the sound of your own words drive you crazy...  I 
could sing along with that part, not recording, then as soon as I get past 
that, have the record engage automatically, let me then keep singing 
seemlessly, lighten up while you still can, don't even try

Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-01 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
That would be great, except that my mac's keyboard is all the way across the 
room from where the mikes are being placed, and there's no way around that, 
with the way my studio is setup.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Poppa Bear 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:19 PM
  Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


  Chris, for quick punchins like this, I just make sure that under the options 
that quick punch is checked and then play the section you want and when you get 
to the area you want to start recording at, press 3 on the num pad and your on 
live and then stop as soon as your done. That is my way most of the time. 
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 2:48 PM
Subject: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


OK, I do understand that there are quite a few questions here, but any help 
would be appreciated with any of these.

First of all, I'd like to talk about punch in/punch outs.  Sometimes, I'll 
be recording a vocal track, be it lead, or backing, and I may hit a line a 
little flat, or a little sharp.  More times than not, flat.  Sometimes, it's in 
a part of the song which makes it very tricky to get kuh boom right on key with 
no lead-in warning.  Yeah, I totally get I could then just back up a ways and 
record a little more than needed just for some wiggle room, but why do that if 
the part right before sounds flawless?  I don't want to chance ruinning a 
perfectly good measure just to get the bar after it sounding good.  That just 
seems a little over kill.  Yeah, I know about the playlist option in the edit 
window on each track, and yes I know about comping.  I confess I don't do it 
much, but I think I'm gonna start getting myself more in the habbit of it.  If 
I want a pollished recording, then face it, sometimes you have to do the more 
dirty tedious work, but in the long run, it's well worth it.  Anyway, so what 
I'd like to do is a punch in/out.  This is just an example.  It doesn't mean 
it's the song I'm working with, but it's one that I know must people know, so 
it'll make my point really well.  Let's take the song Take it Easy by The 
Eagles.  I, natrually am really not a tennor.  I kind of, ish, can do it, but 
not real well.  So let's take the chorus.  Take it easy, take it easy!  Don't 
let the sound of your own words drive you crazy.  Lighten up while you still 
can.  Let's say I'm in the key of G.  This means on lighten up, when I hit that 
C chord, my voice has to hit that G4.  So, basically, the G above middle C.  
For me, that's way stretching it!  I can do it, but it's a major struggle.  
Notice, I said struggle, I did not say strain.  I'm not straining to hit it, 
trust me.  I can hit it, just not very full strength usually, at least not on 
the first try.  I usually have to do it a few times to warm/loosen up.  So, 
what I'm thinking is, if I had a way I could start playing the session right 
where my vocals say Don't let the sound of your own words drive you crazy...  I 
could sing along with that part, not recording, then as soon as I get past 
that, have the record engage automatically, let me then keep singing 
seemlessly, lighten up while you still can, don't even try to understand, just 
find a place to take your stand, and take it easy.  After that, have the record 
disengage all by itself.  My mike isn't near enough to my workstation that I 
can have my hands on the keyboard, nor is it easy for me to hit that line with 
no prior warning to lead up to it.  I just feel I need to easily work my way 
into it.  So yeah, if this can be done, please tell me literally step by step, 
keystroke by keystroke what I'd hit to do it.

My second question is, let's say I'm doing a slow country song, and at the 
very end, the last two or three bars need to be slower tempo, giving me a 
ending retard kind of effect.  If you wonder what I'm talking about, listen, 
for instance to the end of Every Light in the House is on by Trace Adkins.  
That's a perfect! example!  So, I know in the event, tempo operations window, 
how to go to constant, and set a constant BPM, but then, how do I have it do a 
retard for me?

I'm almost done, just two more things.  If I'm in say, 4/4 time, and all a 
sudden, at the start of a bar, I need to switch time signatures without moving 
the tempo, is there a way I can do that?

Finally, If I've inserted midi tracks into my session, and have their 
output paths going to different xpand2 instrument tracks, is there then a way 
that I could save that arrangement as a .mid midi file?  I know it won't save 
audio, and I know the samples in the xpand2 tracks wouldn't be saved as midi.  
I'm perfectly aware of that.  I know the whole thing about midi isn't sound.  I 
know it's just 1's and 0's, hince, why I'm routing their outputs to instrument 
tracks.  I just wonder if I

Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-01 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
So, I'm confused.  What do the pre and post roll values do/indicate, if not 0, 
how do I determine what they should be set to, or does it really not honest 
matter.  Just pick a random number so's long as it isn't 0.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:42 PM
  Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


  Chris,


  You specifically asked for step-by-step instructions and, when you request 
something like that, it's going to sound complicated. It's not.


  1. Select a range within which you wish to record.
  2.Enable Pre/Post roll with Command-k and make sure that the pre and post 
roll values in the Transport window are set to something other than zero.
  3. Record.


  It's rather simple. Another alternative is to buy a USB extension cable and 
keep your keyboard close. Punch in by simply pressing Command-Space bar where 
you wish to record. Hit space bar to stop. You don't even have to be in 
Pre/Post roll to do that.


  Slau
  On May 1, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


Slau,

This isn't you at all, you did an excellent job explaining, but I must 
admit, you went way over my head!  I know you do audio stuff for a living, so 
it's not gonna be quick, but I'm in no hurry.  Would you be willing to make me 
an audio demonstration of how this works?  I'm sorry, but via text, this just 
isn't making sense at all.  It's not your falt, It's just that it seems this is 
a very hard concept to grasp via text.

I thought it would be more easy than this, like select the portion of audio 
you want to record, then toggle on punch in, arm the track, hit record, and 
you're done.  It seem like there is way more to it than that though.

Wasn't there something like, num pad 4, or was it 6 to turn on punch in, or 
is this about the easiest way to do it.

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Slau Halatyn
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:36 PM
  Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


  Chris,


  Go to the Transport window.
  Click once on the Pre-roll amount. Assuming you're in bars and beats, 
type the number 1 and press return. The Pre-roll amount will be one bar and 
Pre-roll will automatically be enabled. The button appears to the left of the 
numeric field you just entered.
  Move down to the Post-roll field and follow the same steps.


  Now that Pre and Post roll are enabled, I'd recommend temporarily turning 
them off with Command-k.


  Go to the bar/beat where you wish to punch in. Select the range of bars 
and/or beats you wish to record. Once you've made your selection, press 
Command-k to enable Pre/Post roll. If you press record, you'll hear one bar 
before your selected range as pre-roll and you'll only be in record from the 
selection point. Pro Tools will record through the selection and exit record 
mode for the final bar of post roll.


  If you want two bars of pre-roll, obviously, substitute 2 for 1 when 
typing in the pre-roll value.


  Here's a tip: don't forget to turn off Pre/Post roll when you're done 
with your punch-in. When you try to navigate and get to a particular bar, I 
guarantee it'll confuse you when you hear the music from the previous bar and 
you'll swear that you thought you meant to go to bar 41 and you'll be hearing 
bar 40 and all the while it'll be because you actually are at bar 41 but 
pre-roll is causing you to hear bar 40 first.


  I'll let someone else take the other questions.


  Slau


  On May 1, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


OK, I do understand that there are quite a few questions here, but any 
help would be appreciated with any of these.

First of all, I'd like to talk about punch in/punch outs.  Sometimes, 
I'll be recording a vocal track, be it lead, or backing, and I may hit a line a 
little flat, or a little sharp.  More times than not, flat.  Sometimes, it's in 
a part of the song which makes it very tricky to get kuh boom right on key with 
no lead-in warning.  Yeah, I totally get I could then just back up a ways and 
record a little more than needed just for some wiggle room, but why do that if 
the part right before sounds flawless?  I don't want to chance ruinning a 
perfectly good measure just to get the bar after it sounding good.  That just 
seems a little over kill.  Yeah, I know about the playlist option in the edit 
window on each track, and yes I know about comping.  I confess I don't do it 
much, but I think I'm gonna start getting myself more in the habbit of it.  If 
I want a pollished recording, then face it, sometimes you have to do the more 
dirty tedious work, but in the long run, it's well worth it.  Anyway, so what 
I'd like to do is a punch in/out.  This is just an example.  It doesn't mean 
it's

Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-01 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Slau,

So, you said with the pre-roll how many bars?  How do I calculate if I'm doing 
hours minutes seconds frames, instead of bars, beats, ticks?

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:06 AM
  Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


  OK, since your keyboard is across the room, you're going to need enough pre 
roll to be able to press record, walk over to your mic, put on headphones and 
get ready to sing. How many bars do you think that'll be? 8? 10? Whatever you 
think it should be, type that number into the Pre roll field. The Post roll 
value doesn't matter as much because who cares how long the song continues 
playing after you've finished the record pass. If the pre roll value is 0, 
you'll have no pre roll and you'll be recording as soon as you press 
Command-space bar. The purpose of the pre roll is to get a running start, 
figuratively and, in your case, literally.

  On May 1, 2014, at 11:49 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


So, I'm confused.  What do the pre and post roll values do/indicate, if not 
0, how do I determine what they should be set to, or does it really not honest 
matter.  Just pick a random number so's long as it isn't 0.

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Slau Halatyn
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:42 PM
  Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


  Chris,


  You specifically asked for step-by-step instructions and, when you 
request something like that, it's going to sound complicated. It's not.


  1. Select a range within which you wish to record.
  2.Enable Pre/Post roll with Command-k and make sure that the pre and post 
roll values in the Transport window are set to something other than zero.
  3. Record.


  It's rather simple. Another alternative is to buy a USB extension cable 
and keep your keyboard close. Punch in by simply pressing Command-Space bar 
where you wish to record. Hit space bar to stop. You don't even have to be in 
Pre/Post roll to do that.


  Slau
  On May 1, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


Slau,

This isn't you at all, you did an excellent job explaining, but I must 
admit, you went way over my head!  I know you do audio stuff for a living, so 
it's not gonna be quick, but I'm in no hurry.  Would you be willing to make me 
an audio demonstration of how this works?  I'm sorry, but via text, this just 
isn't making sense at all.  It's not your falt, It's just that it seems this is 
a very hard concept to grasp via text.

I thought it would be more easy than this, like select the portion of 
audio you want to record, then toggle on punch in, arm the track, hit record, 
and you're done.  It seem like there is way more to it than that though.

Wasn't there something like, num pad 4, or was it 6 to turn on punch 
in, or is this about the easiest way to do it.

Chris.

  - Original Message -
  From: Slau Halatyn
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:36 PM
  Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions


  Chris,


  Go to the Transport window.
  Click once on the Pre-roll amount. Assuming you're in bars and beats, 
type the number 1 and press return. The Pre-roll amount will be one bar and 
Pre-roll will automatically be enabled. The button appears to the left of the 
numeric field you just entered.
  Move down to the Post-roll field and follow the same steps.


  Now that Pre and Post roll are enabled, I'd recommend temporarily 
turning them off with Command-k.


  Go to the bar/beat where you wish to punch in. Select the range of 
bars and/or beats you wish to record. Once you've made your selection, press 
Command-k to enable Pre/Post roll. If you press record, you'll hear one bar 
before your selected range as pre-roll and you'll only be in record from the 
selection point. Pro Tools will record through the selection and exit record 
mode for the final bar of post roll.


  If you want two bars of pre-roll, obviously, substitute 2 for 1 when 
typing in the pre-roll value.


  Here's a tip: don't forget to turn off Pre/Post roll when you're done 
with your punch-in. When you try to navigate and get to a particular bar, I 
guarantee it'll confuse you when you hear the music from the previous bar and 
you'll swear that you thought you meant to go to bar 41 and you'll be hearing 
bar 40 and all the while it'll be because you actually are at bar 41 but 
pre-roll is causing you to hear bar 40 first.


  I'll let someone else take the other questions.


  Slau


  On May 1, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


OK, I

Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

2014-05-01 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Shruggs,

That's not what I meant.  I meant what does the numerical values represent? 
In beats/bars it obviously represents bars.  In hour minute seconds, what is 
it representing?... Seconds? Minutes? or what?


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions



well, how long do you need to get ready to play?

If you want to convert between bars/beats and minutes/seconds, that 
obviously depends on the tempo of your tune.

At 12:43 AM 5/2/2014, you wrote:

Slau,

So, you said with the pre-roll how many bars?  How do I calculate if I'm 
doing hours minutes seconds frames, instead of bars, beats, ticks?


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

OK, since your keyboard is across the room, you're going to need enough 
pre roll to be able to press record, walk over to your mic, put on 
headphones and get ready to sing. How many bars do you think that'll be? 
8? 10? Whatever you think it should be, type that number into the Pre roll 
field. The Post roll value doesn't matter as much because who cares how 
long the song continues playing after you've finished the record pass. If 
the pre roll value is 0, you'll have no pre roll and you'll be recording 
as soon as you press Command-space bar. The purpose of the pre roll is to 
get a running start, figuratively and, in your case, literally.
On May 1, 2014, at 11:49 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
mailto:clgillan...@gmail.comclgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


So, I'm confused.  What do the pre and post roll values do/indicate, if 
not 0, how do I determine what they should be set to, or does it really 
not honest matter.  Just pick a random number so's long as it isn't 0.


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

Chris,

You specifically asked for step-by-step instructions and, when you 
request something like that, it's going to sound complicated. It's not.


1. Select a range within which you wish to record.
2.Enable Pre/Post roll with Command-k and make sure that the pre and post 
roll values in the Transport window are set to something other than zero.

3. Record.

It's rather simple. Another alternative is to buy a USB extension cable 
and keep your keyboard close. Punch in by simply pressing Command-Space 
bar where you wish to record. Hit space bar to stop. You don't even have 
to be in Pre/Post roll to do that.


Slau
On May 1, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
mailto:clgillan...@gmail.comclgillan...@gmail.com wrote:



Slau,

This isn't you at all, you did an excellent job explaining, but I must 
admit, you went way over my head!  I know you do audio stuff for a 
living, so it's not gonna be quick, but I'm in no hurry.  Would you be 
willing to make me an audio demonstration of how this works?  I'm sorry, 
but via text, this just isn't making sense at all.  It's not your falt, 
It's just that it seems this is a very hard concept to grasp via text.


I thought it would be more easy than this, like select the portion of 
audio you want to record, then toggle on punch in, arm the track, hit 
record, and you're done.  It seem like there is way more to it than that 
though.


Wasn't there something like, num pad 4, or was it 6 to turn on punch in, 
or is this about the easiest way to do it.


Chris.

- Original Message -
From: mailto:slauhala...@gmail.comSlau Halatyn
To: mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.comptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: A few more advanced ProTools Questions

Chris,

Go to the Transport window.
Click once on the Pre-roll amount. Assuming you're in bars and beats, 
type the number 1 and press return. The Pre-roll amount will be one bar 
and Pre-roll will automatically be enabled. The button appears to the 
left of the numeric field you just entered.

Move down to the Post-roll field and follow the same steps.

Now that Pre and Post roll are enabled, I'd recommend temporarily 
turning them off with Command-k.


Go to the bar/beat where you wish to punch in. Select the range of bars 
and/or beats you wish to record. Once you've made your selection, press 
Command-k to enable Pre/Post roll. If you press record, you'll hear one 
bar before your selected range as pre-roll and you'll only be in record 
from the selection point. Pro Tools will record through the selection 
and exit record mode for the final bar of post roll.


If you want two bars of pre-roll, obviously, substitute 2 for 1 when 
typing in the pre-roll value.


Here's a tip: don't forget to turn off Pre

Fading

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK, yesterday, I was training a client on the use of ProTools, and we 
discovered something kind of interesting that I'd like a little bit of 
clarification regarding.

Basically, one of the things he had to do in his ProTools college corse, was to 
take an mp3 file, import it into PT as an audio track, then move 3 minutes, and 
35 seconds into the recording.  That part was easy.  Then he had to trim off 
everything from that point of the recording to the end.  Again, that also was 
very very easy.  Here's however where things got interesting.  The next step, 
was for him to move back 20 seconds before the end of the recording.  That was 
also easily done.  Then however, he had to apply an equal power fade out from 
that point forward... so, basically, the last 20 seconds needed to be faded 
out.  He was instructed by his teacher to use command+F to get into the fade 
dialog.  Well, for him, he's using ProTools 11.  I'm still using 10.0.  I'm not 
even on 10.3, for reasons I'm not gonna bore you all with.  Although, hearing 
Voiceover on his end with 11, has got me really really tempted to purchase 11.  
Anyway, the point is, for him, he got into the fade dialog, set it and it 
worked perfectly!  He went the 20 seconds back, then did shift+option+return to 
select everything to the end of the session, then command+F, and then he set 
the radio button in there to equal, then hit vo+space on OK.  Then when he hit 
the space bar to play, it worked.  I tried this on my end, as I've always 
wonderred without writing automation if there was a way to achieve this.  
Though the dialog looks fairly accessible in PT 10, I'm finding that it's not 
doing the fade like it should be.  Yes, I have made absolutely sure that all 
tracks were selected in the track list table, and I made absolutely sure that I 
was not only lined up in the session where the fade should start, but that I 
had all the audio selected where the fade should occur.  Even still, when 
selecting equal power, it's not working.  Now, there are a few popup/combo 
boxes as well in this dialog.  Maybe 2 or 3 of them.  The options when I open 
them up do not seem to read.  I don't know if they're rellavent or not, but 
yeah...  Is this one thing that in P T 11 became accessible, which in 10.X we 
didn't really have good access to, or am I doing something wrong.

I'm just trying to determine why it worked for him, yet for me, it's not doing 
a thing.

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Fading

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Yes Slau,

That worked.  I have no idea then why the dialog didn't do it.  that's totally 
bizarre!

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:54 PM
  Subject: Re: Fading


  Hi Chris,


  There could be any number of reasons why it's not working for you. I couldn't 
even begin to really troubleshoot it. Suffice it to say, however, that the 
default fade-out, unless you changed it somewhere, is the equal power fade. So, 
you don't even have to open the fades dialog. Simply press Option-g for fade 
to end which will fade from your current insertion point to the end of the 
selected track's region. Give that a try and let's see if things are working 
alright.


  Slau


  On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


OK, yesterday, I was training a client on the use of ProTools, and we 
discovered something kind of interesting that I'd like a little bit of 
clarification regarding.

Basically, one of the things he had to do in his ProTools college corse, 
was to take an mp3 file, import it into PT as an audio track, then move 3 
minutes, and 35 seconds into the recording.  That part was easy.  Then he had 
to trim off everything from that point of the recording to the end.  Again, 
that also was very very easy.  Here's however where things got interesting.  
The next step, was for him to move back 20 seconds before the end of the 
recording.  That was also easily done.  Then however, he had to apply an equal 
power fade out from that point forward... so, basically, the last 20 seconds 
needed to be faded out.  He was instructed by his teacher to use command+F to 
get into the fade dialog.  Well, for him, he's using ProTools 11.  I'm still 
using 10.0.  I'm not even on 10.3, for reasons I'm not gonna bore you all with. 
 Although, hearing Voiceover on his end with 11, has got me really really 
tempted to purchase 11.  Anyway, the point is, for him, he got into the fade 
dialog, set it and it worked perfectly!  He went the 20 seconds back, then did 
shift+option+return to select everything to the end of the session, then 
command+F, and then he set the radio button in there to equal, then hit 
vo+space on OK.  Then when he hit the space bar to play, it worked.  I tried 
this on my end, as I've always wonderred without writing automation if there 
was a way to achieve this.  Though the dialog looks fairly accessible in PT 10, 
I'm finding that it's not doing the fade like it should be.  Yes, I have made 
absolutely sure that all tracks were selected in the track list table, and I 
made absolutely sure that I was not only lined up in the session where the fade 
should start, but that I had all the audio selected where the fade should 
occur.  Even still, when selecting equal power, it's not working.  Now, there 
are a few popup/combo boxes as well in this dialog.  Maybe 2 or 3 of them.  The 
options when I open them up do not seem to read.  I don't know if they're 
rellavent or not, but yeah...  Is this one thing that in P T 11 became 
accessible, which in 10.X we didn't really have good access to, or am I doing 
something wrong.

I'm just trying to determine why it worked for him, yet for me, it's not 
doing a thing.

Chris.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Inserts over multiple tracks, am I understanding this correctly?

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Kevin tought me this back in our training, I confess, but he only briefly 
touched on it.  It's not something we spent much time on, so this would be very 
helpful, if someone could help me out, should I be incorrect on any of these 
steps.

So, I have a few audio tracks which I need to put one or 2 plugins on via 
inserts.  I need the inserts chain to be identical over both those tracks.  
Same plugin presets, same tweeks, yoddie yodda.  For reasons which are hard to 
explain without showing you all the actual session, it wouldn't be practical 
for me to route these tracks through a bus, and then receive them on an 
auxiliary track.  they need to remain outputted as normal on their own tracks.  
Anyway, am I understanding correctly, that if I select all of the tracks that I 
want the inserts carried over to through my track list table, then go to the 
first of those tracks, interact with the inserts, then can't I just press 
vo+command+F5 to route my mouse pointer to say, the insert A popup button, then 
hold down my option key while physically clicking the actual trackpad to 
perform a literal click?  In other words, option+clicking on that insert will 
then carry it across?  Am I understanding this concept correctly?  If not, 
please could someone tell me where I'm going wrong?  I really don't wanna spend 
the time having to configure these inserts on each individual track.

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Fading

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I didn't know about option+G either, but it definitely did do the trick.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Nick Gawronski 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:16 PM
  Subject: Re: Fading


  Hi, I was the student that was talked about in this message and I did a good 
job on the project.  I did not know about the shortcut in the fade dialog and 
my teacher did not know about it either from the looks of the document they 
sent me.  I will make a new pro tools session and try that out with the same 
track the version that was the normal CD audio version and see what happens.  I 
am running 10.3.8 and the latest version of 11.  I will have to test fading out 
in pro tools 10.3.8 and see how things work out.  Nick Gawronski

  On 4/15/2014 2:24 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:

Yes Slau,

That worked.  I have no idea then why the dialog didn't do it.  that's 
totally bizarre!

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:54 PM
  Subject: Re: Fading


  Hi Chris, 


  There could be any number of reasons why it's not working for you. I 
couldn't even begin to really troubleshoot it. Suffice it to say, however, that 
the default fade-out, unless you changed it somewhere, is the equal power fade. 
So, you don't even have to open the fades dialog. Simply press Option-g for 
fade to end which will fade from your current insertion point to the end of 
the selected track's region. Give that a try and let's see if things are 
working alright.


  Slau


  On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


OK, yesterday, I was training a client on the use of ProTools, and we 
discovered something kind of interesting that I'd like a little bit of 
clarification regarding.

Basically, one of the things he had to do in his ProTools college 
corse, was to take an mp3 file, import it into PT as an audio track, then move 
3 minutes, and 35 seconds into the recording.  That part was easy.  Then he had 
to trim off everything from that point of the recording to the end.  Again, 
that also was very very easy.  Here's however where things got interesting.  
The next step, was for him to move back 20 seconds before the end of the 
recording.  That was also easily done.  Then however, he had to apply an equal 
power fade out from that point forward... so, basically, the last 20 seconds 
needed to be faded out.  He was instructed by his teacher to use command+F to 
get into the fade dialog.  Well, for him, he's using ProTools 11.  I'm still 
using 10.0.  I'm not even on 10.3, for reasons I'm not gonna bore you all with. 
 Although, hearing Voiceover on his end with 11, has got me really really 
tempted to purchase 11.  Anyway, the point is, for him, he got into the fade 
dialog, set it and it worked perfectly!  He went the 20 seconds back, then did 
shift+option+return to select everything to the end of the session, then 
command+F, and then he set the radio button in there to equal, then hit 
vo+space on OK.  Then when he hit the space bar to play, it worked.  I tried 
this on my end, as I've always wonderred without writing automation if there 
was a way to achieve this.  Though the dialog looks fairly accessible in PT 10, 
I'm finding that it's not doing the fade like it should be.  Yes, I have made 
absolutely sure that all tracks were selected in the track list table, and I 
made absolutely sure that I was not only lined up in the session where the fade 
should start, but that I had all the audio selected where the fade should 
occur.  Even still, when selecting equal power, it's not working.  Now, there 
are a few popup/combo boxes as well in this dialog.  Maybe 2 or 3 of them.  The 
options when I open them up do not seem to read.  I don't know if they're 
rellavent or not, but yeah...  Is this one thing that in P T 11 became 
accessible, which in 10.X we didn't really have good access to, or am I doing 
something wrong.

I'm just trying to determine why it worked for him, yet for me, it's 
not doing a thing.

Chris.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group

Re: Inserts over multiple tracks, am I understanding this correctly?

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Gotcha.  OK, thanks then for the help.

Chris.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:51 PM
  Subject: Re: Inserts over multiple tracks, am I understanding this correctly?


  Chris,


  This is one of those cases where a modifier click plus a drag is not really 
possible with VoiceOver. Yes, normally, one would Option-click and drag the 
plug-in to create an exact copy on another insert but VoiceOver can't do that, 
at least not now.


  What you'll have to do is instantiate the same plug-ins on the other tracks. 
You can use Shift-Command-c to copy the plug-in settings from the original 
track and then Shift-Command-v to paste those settings into the other tracks. 
You can achieve all of this right from within the plug-in window so it's not 
too bad.


  HTH,


  Slau


  On Apr 15, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


Kevin tought me this back in our training, I confess, but he only briefly 
touched on it.  It's not something we spent much time on, so this would be very 
helpful, if someone could help me out, should I be incorrect on any of these 
steps.

So, I have a few audio tracks which I need to put one or 2 plugins on via 
inserts.  I need the inserts chain to be identical over both those tracks.  
Same plugin presets, same tweeks, yoddie yodda.  For reasons which are hard to 
explain without showing you all the actual session, it wouldn't be practical 
for me to route these tracks through a bus, and then receive them on an 
auxiliary track.  they need to remain outputted as normal on their own tracks.  
Anyway, am I understanding correctly, that if I select all of the tracks that I 
want the inserts carried over to through my track list table, then go to the 
first of those tracks, interact with the inserts, then can't I just press 
vo+command+F5 to route my mouse pointer to say, the insert A popup button, then 
hold down my option key while physically clicking the actual trackpad to 
perform a literal click?  In other words, option+clicking on that insert will 
then carry it across?  Am I understanding this concept correctly?  If not, 
please could someone tell me where I'm going wrong?  I really don't wanna spend 
the time having to configure these inserts on each individual track.

Chris.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


I really need some encouragement.

2013-11-10 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK yall, I feel really stupid right now.  I need a refresher on a couple of  
things.  What does numpad slash do, and what is numpad star?  I know one of 
them is a go to command to jump basically to a particular bar/beat, or 
hour/ninute/second, depending on how you have it set in your edit window, and I 
know the other one is for selecting a range of data.  I just don’t remember 
which is which.  I confess that the way I’ve been editting is just with command 
or option+shift+numpad 1, 2, plus, or minus, and adjusting the nudge value to 
get the selection I need.  Yes, I know about my mark in and out with the down 
arrow, and up arrow, although I’m finding that unless the edit doesn’t have to 
be very tight, which is quite rare, it really doesn’t help me much.  I’m asking 
about the star and slash keys as I’d really like to try starting to use them 
more.  Here’s the situation more specifically.  I’m finding the learning curve 
of editting from Sound Forge on Windows to editting this way in ProTools to be 
very very steep.  Don’t get me wrong.  I totally get the concept of how to do 
this, and without Chuck, Kevin, and Brian Howerton helping along the way, 
especially the last two, thank you all so so so so much by the way, there is no 
way in heck! I could have come this far!  Period!  It just wouldn’t have 
happened!  I can’t tell you all how much you mean to me both professionally, as 
well as friendship speaking.  You all’re very very slowly but surely making my 
recording dreams come true.  The bottom line though is, coming from Sound Forge 
now to this, is just driving me nuts!  Yeah, I know, I need to basically 
probably just forget everything I learned as far as Soundforge goes.  It sounds 
to me like Sound Forge is kind of a poor man’s cheat.  By that I mean, you edit 
pretty much exactly like you’d edit a text based Microsoft Word file.  
Shift+arrow keys, page up and down, home and end, ctrl+C to copy, ctrl+x to 
cut, ctrl+V to paste, left and right arrows to move through or back in the 
file… etc.  It seems like every other daw I have used, be it Sonar, be it 
Goldwave, be it Cakewalk Pro Audio way back in its days, be it Audasity, be it 
Adobe Audition, be it Amadeus Pro, Garageband, whatever… all those seem to rely 
more on set your nudge value, set your zoom aspect ratio if needed, set an in 
and out marker, move your selection around, etc.  I dono, I’m probably 
rambling, so I’ll stop.  The point being, those of you that converted from 
Sound Forge in windows when it comes to editting, and I mean people 
specifically that for editting purpose using SF in Windows… I’d like to hear 
from some of you who’ve come from there and now on PT have gotten very 
proficient at editting in ProTools.  I’d like to get you all maybe, if you 
don’t mind to bounce some ideas to me that may help with my transition.  For 
example, I had a podcast the other day that was sent to me for editting.  I 
brought it up in ProTools.  I thought, you know?  What the heck!  I could do 
this in SoundForge, and get this thing so darn polished and so tight, you’d 
never even know it was editted to start with.  That is literally, not to brag 
purposely, how good I’ve gotten at editting in SF.  I literally have taken 
someone’s voice on a recording phoneme by phoneme, phone by phone, and 
literally got them to say:  Chris is a GD effing idiot!  When I played it for 
the lady who’s voice I used, she busted a gut for about 5 minutes straight 
dying of laughter.  It was a freaking riot!  I just thought this time, I’d at 
least try.  My thought was, OK, look.  If I can’t do it, I can’t do it.  But, 
I’ll never know if I don’t at least try.  No pain, no gain, ey?  So on I went.  
Well, it proved disastrous.  No matter what I did, I could not line up my 
selections accurately enough.  I know it’s possible to do, but I just became so 
damn frustrated, that I gave up.  I finally just went back to old habbits, by 
going into Soundforge on my windows desktop machine, and bangged out the edit 
in just over an hour.  To this day, I hate myself for doing that!  How am I 
ever gonna learn, if I don’t quit doing that!  Exactly!  I won’t!  This 
transition however is just seeming to be too overwhelming.  I wonder aside the 
obvious of Chris, just take some deep breaths.  Relax.  You’re gonna get it 
eventually, I promise, what else maybe I could do that may help me a bit with 
this.  Like I said, I get the concept, but actually then doing it is something 
else apparently, altogether.  I feel like I’m not progressing at the level of 
my expectations, and that really hurts me deeply.  I really am trying, but it’s 
just, not, happening.

Do you all have any thoughts aside, Well Chris, now that I’ve read your novel 
sized sob sogga, looket, I don’t need that right now, OK?  Just help me, don’t 
slander me with such crewel words.  I wrote because I need help, not because I 
need to be ciber slapped in the face.

Chris.

-- 
You received this 

RE: I really need some encouragement.

2013-11-10 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Thank you Slau.  That definitely really helps.  So, here's a question.
Let's say that I'm on bar 2 beat 1, and wanna go to bar 4 beat 3, and select
all that audio.  Do I have to do that with the slash key, or could I
technically line up my cursor on bar 2 beat 1, then with the star key, along
with the shift key dial in to bar 4 beat 3, then have it select.  I'd think
no, I'd actually want to do slash slash, 2, period 3.  Right?

Chris.
 

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 2:18 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: I really need some encouragement.
Importance: High

Num Pad asterisk enables the main counter field. Typing a value and pressing
Enter or return simply puts the insertion/playback cursor in the location
you've entered.

Num pad slash, when tapped the first time, enables the Start field.
Subsequent taps cycle through to the End field and then the Length field.
The procedure for selecting from one minute and 30 seconds to 2 minutes and
forty-five seconds would be:
1. Num pad slash.
2. Type 1, decimal, 30.
3. Num pad slash again to move to the End field.
4. Type 2, decimal, 45 and press Enter.

If you want to get more precise, a second tap of the decimal key gets you to
the milliseconds field.


On Nov 10, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

 OK yall, I feel really stupid right now.  I need a refresher on a couple
of  things.  What does numpad slash do, and what is numpad star?  I know one
of them is a go to command to jump basically to a particular bar/beat, or
hour/ninute/second, depending on how you have it set in your edit window,
and I know the other one is for selecting a range of data.  I just don't
remember which is which.  I confess that the way I've been editting is just
with command or option+shift+numpad 1, 2, plus, or minus, and adjusting the
nudge value to get the selection I need.  Yes, I know about my mark in and
out with the down arrow, and up arrow, although I'm finding that unless the
edit doesn't have to be very tight, which is quite rare, it really doesn't
help me much.  I'm asking about the star and slash keys as I'd really like
to try starting to use them more.  Here's the situation more specifically.
I'm finding the learning curve of editting from Sound Forge on Windows to
editting this way in ProTools to be very very steep.  Don't get me wrong.  I
totally get the concept of how to do this, and without Chuck, Kevin, and
Brian Howerton helping along the way, especially the last two, thank you all
so so so so much by the way, there is no way in heck! I could have come this
far!  Period!  It just wouldn't have happened!  I can't tell you all how
much you mean to me both professionally, as well as friendship speaking.
You all're very very slowly but surely making my recording dreams come true.
The bottom line though is, coming from Sound Forge now to this, is just
driving me nuts!  Yeah, I know, I need to basically probably just forget
everything I learned as far as Soundforge goes.  It sounds to me like Sound
Forge is kind of a poor man's cheat.  By that I mean, you edit pretty much
exactly like you'd edit a text based Microsoft Word file.  Shift+arrow keys,
page up and down, home and end, ctrl+C to copy, ctrl+x to cut, ctrl+V to
paste, left and right arrows to move through or back in the file. etc.  It
seems like every other daw I have used, be it Sonar, be it Goldwave, be it
Cakewalk Pro Audio way back in its days, be it Audasity, be it Adobe
Audition, be it Amadeus Pro, Garageband, whatever. all those seem to rely
more on set your nudge value, set your zoom aspect ratio if needed, set an
in and out marker, move your selection around, etc.  I dono, I'm probably
rambling, so I'll stop.  The point being, those of you that converted from
Sound Forge in windows when it comes to editting, and I mean people
specifically that for editting purpose using SF in Windows. I'd like to hear
from some of you who've come from there and now on PT have gotten very
proficient at editting in ProTools.  I'd like to get you all maybe, if you
don't mind to bounce some ideas to me that may help with my transition.  For
example, I had a podcast the other day that was sent to me for editting.  I
brought it up in ProTools.  I thought, you know?  What the heck!  I could do
this in SoundForge, and get this thing so darn polished and so tight, you'd
never even know it was editted to start with.  That is literally, not to
brag purposely, how good I've gotten at editting in SF.  I literally have
taken someone's voice on a recording phoneme by phoneme, phone by phone, and
literally got them to say:  Chris is a GD effing idiot!  When I played it
for the lady who's voice I used, she busted a gut for about 5 minutes
straight dying of laughter.  It was a freaking riot!  I just thought this
time, I'd at least try.  My thought was, OK, look.  If I can't

RE: I really need some encouragement.

2013-11-10 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Of corse, then don't forget to hit enter afterward.  LOL!  Yeah, I didn't
think that would work, but figured I'd at least ask.

Chris.
 

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 5:33 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: I really need some encouragement.

Hi Chris,

NO, you can't do it the way you suggested. In this instance, if you're on
bar 2, beat 1, you'd press the slash key twice, which will enable the End
field, type 4, decimal, 3, and you will have selected a range from bar 2,
beat 1 to bar 4, beat 3.

Slau

On Nov 10, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thank you Slau.  That definitely really helps.  So, here's a question.
 Let's say that I'm on bar 2 beat 1, and wanna go to bar 4 beat 3, and
select
 all that audio.  Do I have to do that with the slash key, or could I
 technically line up my cursor on bar 2 beat 1, then with the star key,
along
 with the shift key dial in to bar 4 beat 3, then have it select.  I'd
think
 no, I'd actually want to do slash slash, 2, period 3.  Right?
 
 Chris.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf
 Of Slau Halatyn
 Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 2:18 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: I really need some encouragement.
 Importance: High
 
 Num Pad asterisk enables the main counter field. Typing a value and
pressing
 Enter or return simply puts the insertion/playback cursor in the location
 you've entered.
 
 Num pad slash, when tapped the first time, enables the Start field.
 Subsequent taps cycle through to the End field and then the Length field.
 The procedure for selecting from one minute and 30 seconds to 2 minutes
and
 forty-five seconds would be:
 1. Num pad slash.
 2. Type 1, decimal, 30.
 3. Num pad slash again to move to the End field.
 4. Type 2, decimal, 45 and press Enter.
 
 If you want to get more precise, a second tap of the decimal key gets you
to
 the milliseconds field.
 
 
 On Nov 10, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
 clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 OK yall, I feel really stupid right now.  I need a refresher on a couple
 of  things.  What does numpad slash do, and what is numpad star?  I know
one
 of them is a go to command to jump basically to a particular bar/beat, or
 hour/ninute/second, depending on how you have it set in your edit window,
 and I know the other one is for selecting a range of data.  I just don't
 remember which is which.  I confess that the way I've been editting is
just
 with command or option+shift+numpad 1, 2, plus, or minus, and adjusting
the
 nudge value to get the selection I need.  Yes, I know about my mark in and
 out with the down arrow, and up arrow, although I'm finding that unless
the
 edit doesn't have to be very tight, which is quite rare, it really doesn't
 help me much.  I'm asking about the star and slash keys as I'd really like
 to try starting to use them more.  Here's the situation more specifically.
 I'm finding the learning curve of editting from Sound Forge on Windows to
 editting this way in ProTools to be very very steep.  Don't get me wrong.
I
 totally get the concept of how to do this, and without Chuck, Kevin, and
 Brian Howerton helping along the way, especially the last two, thank you
all
 so so so so much by the way, there is no way in heck! I could have come
this
 far!  Period!  It just wouldn't have happened!  I can't tell you all how
 much you mean to me both professionally, as well as friendship speaking.
 You all're very very slowly but surely making my recording dreams come
true.
 The bottom line though is, coming from Sound Forge now to this, is just
 driving me nuts!  Yeah, I know, I need to basically probably just forget
 everything I learned as far as Soundforge goes.  It sounds to me like
Sound
 Forge is kind of a poor man's cheat.  By that I mean, you edit pretty much
 exactly like you'd edit a text based Microsoft Word file.  Shift+arrow
keys,
 page up and down, home and end, ctrl+C to copy, ctrl+x to cut, ctrl+V to
 paste, left and right arrows to move through or back in the file. etc.  It
 seems like every other daw I have used, be it Sonar, be it Goldwave, be it
 Cakewalk Pro Audio way back in its days, be it Audasity, be it Adobe
 Audition, be it Amadeus Pro, Garageband, whatever. all those seem to rely
 more on set your nudge value, set your zoom aspect ratio if needed, set an
 in and out marker, move your selection around, etc.  I dono, I'm probably
 rambling, so I'll stop.  The point being, those of you that converted from
 Sound Forge in windows when it comes to editting, and I mean people
 specifically that for editting purpose using SF in Windows. I'd like to
hear
 from some of you who've come from there and now on PT have gotten very
 proficient at editting in ProTools.  I'd like to get you all maybe, if you
 don't mind

Really could use some clarification

2013-11-07 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Hello gang.
 
I have a client who I'm trying to help with ProTools.  He has Mountain Lion
lamentably, and doesn't seem to have any desire to upgrade or downgrade.  I
explained to him that things would be very difficult with Mountain Lion, but
in the most respectful way I know how to say this, I'm not trying to be
difficult, but he's not understanding when I tell him things don't work as
he thinks.  He is coming from the world of Sonar, and now wants to get into
ProTools.  First of all, a little about his setup:
 
He has a set of studio monitors which are connected to a Mackie onix 1642 16
channel firewire interface.  He also has two midi sampler modules.  I'm not
sure the models.  One is a Barranger, but I don't know what the other one
is.  He told me, but I don't recall.  He's trying to add an instrument
track, more specifically, mini grand, but he can't seem to get the stereo
instrument track to arm so that he can record.
 
What he told me that he's doing is:  he has one of the older model 61 keys
of the Yamaha Motif.  He's running his barranger midi module from the line
out via an 8th inch stereo cable, to one of the 16 channels on his Mackie
onix 1642.  The thing is, he's telling me that module only has a midi out,
and not a midi in.  I find that extremely! hard to believe!  How could you
get midi out of the module, if you're not feeding anything into it to start
with.  He doesn't even have a midi through.  If he did, we could use that,
as you'll see in a minute, as he's got a dazy chain going on here.  The
other module he's not even using right now, period.  He said it's not even
hooked up.  He'd like it to be, but he said it wouldn't be possible with his
setup.  To get midi out of his Motif into the computer, at least with Sonar,
he was not doing this with midi in/midi out.  He actually said he was doing
it via USB from the Motif to his windows computer.  He said he suspected it
would work the same way with his Mac on ProTools.  I asked him if he's
trying to get the sound from the Motif into ProTools, as well as the sounds
from the modules.  He said yes.  He said however, the USB on the motif, at
least on the older model, only carries midi events.  It doesn't carry audio,
thus making a separate audio device.  I know nothing about that.  I dont'
currently have a motif, so am very unfamiliar.  If anyone wants to ship me
their's though... hint hint?  LOL!  Just kidding!  Seriously though...  I
dont' know what else to say.  I told him he could do this, but he'd not be
able to do it like in Sonar.  In Sonar, you can have multiple audio devices
going at the same time both in and out.  You can't with ProTools.  Well, OK,
you can through a send or a bus, ok, fine, but what I'm saying is, you can't
have two audio devices for your playback engine at the same time, can you?
Not at least, unless you use the ProTools agragate device which can be a bit
problematic, at least in my experience.  I told him if he wants to get the
keyboard, and both his modules working, what he should do is:
 
1.  Run an RCA red and white to stereo quarter inch cord out of his motif
and the other end to a channel on the Mackie onix 1642.
 
2.  Run a midi cable from midi out on the motif, to midi in on one of his
modules.
 
3.  Take another midi cord, and run from midi through on the same module
going to the motif.  Run the other end of that cord to midi through on the
second module.
 
4.  Take a 3rd midi cable, and run from midi out of the second module to
midi in on his Mackie onix 1642.
 
Here, we hit a problem.  He said the Mackie onix 1642 doesn't have midi
interface.  I told him, ok, then, does the second module in the chain have a
line out?  He said yes.  I told him ok, then run from that module's line
out, to one of the channel line in's on his Mackie onix 1642 with a stereo
patch cord.
 
5.  I told him finally, then, set your I/O paths up correctly in ProTools to
use the Mackie onix 1642 as his playback engine, and make sure the in and
out paths are set to the defaults.  He seemed very stubborn to not want to
do any of the above steps.  He seems to think that he can run USB out of his
keyboard... Motif... and use it as a USB midi  device on it's own,
stand-alone yet use the other stuff seperetly yet, have PT see them both at
the same time as one device.  I don't know who's confused here, but it
sounds like him.  I dont' think that's possible, is it?  I mean, the only
way I know to do this would be to use audio/midi setup in the utilities
folder of his Finder, and create an agrigate device with those devices all
in it, then set PT to that Agrigate device, right?
 
I  just wanna get some clarification from someone who may use a Motif in
their studio, or maybe have worked with a Mackie onix 1642 specifically, who
could give me some pointers.  I dont' think it's gonna work the way he
clames, but then at times, I never clamed either to not be audio stupid at
times.
 
I promised him I'd reach out to you guys and see if anyone knew 

Clips, Was: Re: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.

2013-10-26 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

I'm changing the subject to better reflect the topic.

So, what would be some cases where you would want to split a track into 
multiple regions/clips?  Can you give me a few productive examples?


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.


Regions or clips as they are known in version ten and later refers to the 
audio that are on the individual tracks. Any recorded piece of audio is one 
clip until you split it with the split command.
On Oct 25, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:



hello guys.

I have two questions which are both completely unrelated. Hopefully, 
somebody can help me out. let's say that I have selected a bit of audio on 
either one audio track, or a series of tracks. back in the days when I was 
using Windows, and was using sound Forge, after selecting audio, I could 
press control K, which would let me hear a little bit of audio before the 
selection, and then a little bit after the selection, skipping the bit of 
audio which I had selected. this was absolutely awesome, as I was able to 
audition the selected audio, and hear what it would sound like if I was to 
delete that bit of audio which I had selected. it really helped me to 
fine-tune my edits. once audio is selected in ProTools, is there a way 
that I can achieve the same process?


The second question is regarding clips. I was under the impression that 
clips were also the same thing is traps, just a different word for the 
same thing. I am now starting to learn, but that is not the case.


I do apologize for the typographical errors in this message, if there be 
any, I am dictating this on my iPhone using Siri. And, you know how that 
can sometimes be.…


hopefully you won't get the idea of what I'm asking however. Please get 
back and let me know. Thank you so much.


Sincerely,

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.

2013-10-25 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
hello guys.

I have two questions which are both completely unrelated. Hopefully, somebody 
can help me out. let's say that I have selected a bit of audio on either one 
audio track, or a series of tracks. back in the days when I was using Windows, 
and was using sound Forge, after selecting audio, I could press control K, 
which would let me hear a little bit of audio before the selection, and then a 
little bit after the selection, skipping the bit of audio which I had selected. 
this was absolutely awesome, as I was able to audition the selected audio, and 
hear what it would sound like if I was to delete that bit of audio which I had 
selected. it really helped me to fine-tune my edits. once audio is selected in 
ProTools, is there a way that I can achieve the same process?

The second question is regarding clips. I was under the impression that clips 
were also the same thing is traps, just a different word for the same thing. I 
am now starting to learn, but that is not the case.

I do apologize for the typographical errors in this message, if there be any, I 
am dictating this on my iPhone using Siri. And, you know how that can sometimes 
be.…

hopefully you won't get the idea of what I'm asking however. Please get back 
and let me know. Thank you so much.

Sincerely,

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Instrument track

2013-10-25 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
First of all, why're you creating 2 or 3 tracks?  You only need one stereo 
instrument track to make this work.


Second of all, are you sure you're creating an instrument track, and not an 
audio track?


Finally, yeah, I don't know what version you have of PT, but if it's version 
9, or version 10, you definitely should have gotten a second DVD with your 
stuff that would be the installer for the Virtual Instruments.  If you 
didn't get a physical DVD set, as you did the digital download, then go 
under my downloads in your Avid online account, and you should see that you 
not only have the DVD downloader for 10.0, or whatever, but you also should 
have one for the virtual instruments and loops.  Both would be on that one 
DVD.  That would give you the DB33 I think it's called, which is basically 
the Hamand B3 modeler, as well as XPand2, Boom, and a few other things as 
well like Mini Grand, etc.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: g...@tznet.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 12:00 PM
Subject: Instrument track



Hello All,

When creating an instrument track I interact with the inserts plugins,
choosing A and I go to the instrument, VO right and the only choice I see
is TC sterio plugin or something like that.

When creating a new track I put 2 so I can use 3 and 4 for the instrument
sterio.

I am sure I am missing something, haven't installed any plugins am I
suppose to I thought some were installed.



Thoughts and suggestions welcome.

John Gunn
ptaccess@googlegroups.com

ptaccess@googlegroups.com


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.

2013-10-25 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

OK, then to set your nudge value, it was what again?

Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.


Hello Christafer, if you use the up and down arrow to select the portion of
audio you are going to edit, you should just be able to make sure your quick
nav is off by pressing the left and right arrow at the same time. You arrow
down at the start of the selection point, then arrow up at the end, when you
hit play back, it should only play that portion of audio you have selected,
If you want to move/nudge the selection over, to move the whole selection
over to the left a little, use shift and - on the num pad and to move the
selection points to the right use shift and +. Remember this moves the
selection points, but if you actually have that audio high lited, it will
nudge that peace left or right. To just move the right marker left or right
at the beginning of the selection point, you hold the command key with the
above keys, if you want to move the end point of the selection left or
right, you use the option key with the above keys. That may be as clear as
mud, but I hope it may help somebody.
HTH
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 7:05 AM
Subject: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.


hello guys.

I have two questions which are both completely unrelated. Hopefully,
somebody can help me out. let's say that I have selected a bit of audio on
either one audio track, or a series of tracks. back in the days when I was
using Windows, and was using sound Forge, after selecting audio, I could
press control K, which would let me hear a little bit of audio before the
selection, and then a little bit after the selection, skipping the bit of
audio which I had selected. this was absolutely awesome, as I was able to
audition the selected audio, and hear what it would sound like if I was to
delete that bit of audio which I had selected. it really helped me to
fine-tune my edits. once audio is selected in ProTools, is there a way that
I can achieve the same process?

The second question is regarding clips. I was under the impression that
clips were also the same thing is traps, just a different word for the same
thing. I am now starting to learn, but that is not the case.

I do apologize for the typographical errors in this message, if there be
any, I am dictating this on my iPhone using Siri. And, you know how that can
sometimes be.…

hopefully you won't get the idea of what I'm asking however. Please get back
and let me know. Thank you so much.

Sincerely,

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.

2013-10-25 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Where's this nudge value button you describe?  Is that in my edit window?

Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.


Nudge value is set either by clicking on the nudge value button and entering 
the desired value or, if you're within one of the default values, by 
pressing Command-Option-plus or minus on the numeric keypad. Default nudge 
values are, for example, 1 millisecond, 10 milliseconds, 100 milliseconds, 
500 milliseconds and 1 second or 60 ticks, 120 ticks, 240 ticks, 480 ticks, 
1 beat, 2 beats or 1 bar. Typing in a custom nudge value like 345 
milliseconds will allow you to nudge by increments of 345 milliseconds but 
then the Command-Option-plus or minus won't change the default values. You 
first have to manually change the nudge value to one of the default preset 
values then the Command-Option shortcut will cycle up and down through the 
preset nudge values.


HTH,

Slau

On Oct 25, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:



OK, then to set your nudge value, it was what again?

Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.


Hello Christafer, if you use the up and down arrow to select the portion 
of
audio you are going to edit, you should just be able to make sure your 
quick
nav is off by pressing the left and right arrow at the same time. You 
arrow
down at the start of the selection point, then arrow up at the end, when 
you
hit play back, it should only play that portion of audio you have 
selected,

If you want to move/nudge the selection over, to move the whole selection
over to the left a little, use shift and - on the num pad and to move the
selection points to the right use shift and +. Remember this moves the
selection points, but if you actually have that audio high lited, it will
nudge that peace left or right. To just move the right marker left or 
right

at the beginning of the selection point, you hold the command key with the
above keys, if you want to move the end point of the selection left or
right, you use the option key with the above keys. That may be as clear as
mud, but I hope it may help somebody.
HTH
- Original Message - From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 7:05 AM
Subject: 2 completely unrelated questions about ProTools.


hello guys.

I have two questions which are both completely unrelated. Hopefully,
somebody can help me out. let's say that I have selected a bit of audio on
either one audio track, or a series of tracks. back in the days when I was
using Windows, and was using sound Forge, after selecting audio, I could
press control K, which would let me hear a little bit of audio before the
selection, and then a little bit after the selection, skipping the bit of
audio which I had selected. this was absolutely awesome, as I was able to
audition the selected audio, and hear what it would sound like if I was to
delete that bit of audio which I had selected. it really helped me to
fine-tune my edits. once audio is selected in ProTools, is there a way 
that

I can achieve the same process?

The second question is regarding clips. I was under the impression that
clips were also the same thing is traps, just a different word for the 
same

thing. I am now starting to learn, but that is not the case.

I do apologize for the typographical errors in this message, if there be
any, I am dictating this on my iPhone using Siri. And, you know how that 
can

sometimes be.…

hopefully you won't get the idea of what I'm asking however. Please get 
back

and let me know. Thank you so much.

Sincerely,

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit

Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Well, for one, I think the ILok manager is a whole different ball game in 
itself.  I don't see why it would mess up your license, being it's on your 
ILok.  Just don't have your ILok plugged in when you actually upgrade, until 
Mavericks is totally installed.  That's the way I'd do it, just to be on the 
safe side.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


Hi, this is really cool news! Mind you , i still do not know how to operate 
this beast entirely, but i think that if i really put my mind to it it might 
just work, at least when Surface reader comes out so i finally can operate 
my Projectmix. Now if i were to move everything i have on my Lion partition 
to one with Mavericks, would that totally screw up my licenses? Would be too 
bad if this was the case, what with the inaccessibility of ILock and all.

/Krister

23 okt 2013 kl. 06:40 skrev Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com:


Well guys?  I couldn't really say anything before today being that 
Mavericks wasn't out, and so, I was strictly on NDA, however, now that 
it's available to all you guys, NDA no longer withstands.  This said, I am 
ex, tremely! happy to announce that at least with ProTools 10.X, all 
accessibility seems to have been restored just like it was in Snow 
Leopard, and in Lion!  All counters read 100% flawlessly, all my edit 
clusters seems to work correctly, all my edit boxes read the values as 
they should, and all my popup buttons even seem to work as they should.  I 
can't speak for PT 11, as I've not yet updated, but I can definitely tell 
you that version 10 is working perfectly over here.  I have no idea! what 
the hell happened in Mountain Lion that made things break so badly, but I 
assure you that in 10.9 Mavericks, though keep in mind, PT is probably not 
yet officially supported there per sé, I assure you that it does indeed 
work!  Oh man! this is a happy day for me and my clients!


I'm jumping for joy!

Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I'd not necessarily say that all the effects are accessible.  That depends 
on your definition of All.  It really depends on what plugin you're using. 
What I meant was more specifically that PT, in itself, from the bigger 
picture, seems to work really well.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: ramy moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


thanks  so much for this great news.
all the fx now are accessible or what.

Ramy moustafa saber
licturer at:
faculty of musical education
music arranger and sound engineer
Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


Well guys?  I couldn't really say anything before today being that 
Mavericks wasn't out, and so, I was strictly on NDA, however, now that 
it's available to all you guys, NDA no longer withstands.  This said, I am 
ex, tremely! happy to announce that at least with ProTools 10.X, all 
accessibility seems to have been restored just like it was in Snow 
Leopard, and in Lion!  All counters read 100% flawlessly, all my edit 
clusters seems to work correctly, all my edit boxes read the values as 
they should, and all my popup buttons even seem to work as they should.  I 
can't speak for PT 11, as I've not yet updated, but I can definitely tell 
you that version 10 is working perfectly over here.  I have no idea! what 
the hell happened in Mountain Lion that made things break so badly, but I 
assure you that in 10.9 Mavericks, though keep in mind, PT is probably not 
yet officially supported there per sé, I assure you that it does indeed 
work!  Oh man! this is a happy day for me and my clients!


I'm jumping for joy!

Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
You know, Mavericks... the new OS that just came out yesterday for OSX.  I'm 
a developer, so I saw the OS way way before nondevelopers did, but I 
couldn't really say anything about it prior to the official release 
yesterday, as I was on a strict nondisclosure agreement: NDA.  As you 
remember I'm sure, in Mountain Lion OSX 10.8, a ton, and I do mean, a ton! 
of things accessibility wise were broken.  Now, most of them have been fixed 
to the point where if you were running something like Snhow Leopard, or Lion 
on your studio machine, you pretty much could now update it to Mavericks and 
have the same equal accessibility without all those stupid accessibility 
flaws that neither myself, Kevin, nor Slau or anyone could quite figure out.


I'm definitely going to be writing Apple Accessibility.  I might get a 
canned response, and most likely, probably will, knowing my experience 
there, so just know that up front, but I'm at least going to write and tell 
them it works, and to keep up the great work!  I think if we do that, it'll 
really encourage them to keep accessibility updates forward coming.  This 
just goes to show, I think Apple really all this time with our complaints 
about Mountain Lion with PT have been listenning.  I confess, you're 
probably wonderring, well Jesus, Chris!  Why didn't you try PT during the 
developer stage.  I did!  Very! Very! thoroughly.  I also have been talking 
a bit with Avid as well as Slau behind the scenes.  Slau didn't know this, 
and I certainly don't feel that I can compare with Slau's work.  I'm not 
even anywhere near! as committed as he is, Note to slau: take that as a 
really huge complement, but I will say that I have talked with a few support 
people there.  Probably no one as high up as Slau has talked with, but, 
trust me, I can tell you now that our voices have been heard, and it just 
goes to show with this Mavericks OSX 10.9 update.  I just simply couldn't 
say anything earlier.  I've known now for some time that PT worked really 
well in Mavericks, I just couldn't tell you so at that time due to the NDA.


Anyway, again, I'd like to congratulate Slau, Kevin, and all others who have 
worked on this list with Avid and with Apple so generously to better improve 
accessibility.  It paid off!


Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I did communicate with both Avid and Apple.  I'm not totally sure on the 
back end how much of it was Apple that fixed the problem, Avid that fixed 
it, or both.  I'm just glad it got done.  LOL!


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


Hahahaha, so picking up and putting money into pimping that old
Macbook running Snow Leopard here was pointless. That'll teach me for
second guessing Apple eh. My cobwebby wallet aside, this is awesome
news! Thanks for letting everyone know Chris.

I'm gonna send a quick note thanking Apple soon. Considering the
amount of back and forth that took place in order to convince them
about this bug, it can only be a good thing for them to hear that the
fix is making a difference to people.

On 10/23/13, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

Actually, you know, I may a jumped the gun here a  bit.  I actually still
use RTas.  This being said, I can try them on a test machine I have over
here and let you all know.  I can't really quite yet say yes or no.  I've
honestly stuck with RTas as that was what I knew and was familiar with, 
and


frankly had totally forgotten about that factor, huge as it is.  So, my
profuse apology.  I can try it out maybe later today after my morning
session coming up here in just a bit, and let you all know my findings.
That's no problem, and I'd be more than happy to check for you later 
today.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me


on Twitter.

http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message -
From: Juan Pablo jpcula...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


The aax plugins are now accessible, chris?
Tks.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:40 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

Well guys?  I couldn't really say anything before today being that
Mavericks
wasn't out, and so, I was strictly on NDA, however, now that it's 
available

to all you guys, NDA no longer withstands.  This said, I am ex, tremely!
happy to announce that at least with ProTools 10.X, all accessibility 
seems

to have been restored just like it was in Snow Leopard, and in Lion!  All
counters read 100% flawlessly, all my edit clusters seems to work
correctly,
all my edit boxes read the values as they should, and all my popup buttons
even seem to work as they should.  I can't speak for PT 11, as I've not 
yet
updated, but I can definitely tell you that version 10 is working 
perfectly

over here.  I have no idea! what the hell happened in Mountain Lion that
made things break so badly, but I assure you that in 10.9 Mavericks, 
though

keep in mind, PT is probably not yet officially supported there per sé, I
assure you that it does indeed work!  Oh man! this is a happy day for me
and
my clients!

I'm jumping for joy!

Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow
me
on Twitter.

http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out

Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Slau,

That's honestly what I suspected, but I wasn't honestly 100% sure.

Anyhow, as always, thanks for the heads up.

Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


This was the result of Apple themselves fixing a problem that existed in 
Mountain Lion and not in Lion. Originally, the low level support at Apple 
pointed everybody to Avid but it wasn't Avid's issue. Some may recall, after 
repeated emails and back  forth with accessibil...@apple.com, that they 
finally acknowledged the problem and now it's apparently fixed, at least for 
version 10.


Regarding version 11, there is definitely progress on that front and we will 
see those results before the end of the year. As always, the improvements 
cannot happen all at once but Avid is clearly committed to improving 
accessibility.


Slau

On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


Well guys?  I couldn't really say anything before today being that 
Mavericks wasn't out, and so, I was strictly on NDA, however, now that 
it's available to all you guys, NDA no longer withstands.  This said, I am 
ex, tremely! happy to announce that at least with ProTools 10.X, all 
accessibility seems to have been restored just like it was in Snow 
Leopard, and in Lion!  All counters read 100% flawlessly, all my edit 
clusters seems to work correctly, all my edit boxes read the values as 
they should, and all my popup buttons even seem to work as they should.  I 
can't speak for PT 11, as I've not yet updated, but I can definitely tell 
you that version 10 is working perfectly over here.  I have no idea! what 
the hell happened in Mountain Lion that made things break so badly, but I 
assure you that in 10.9 Mavericks, though keep in mind, PT is probably not 
yet officially supported there per sé, I assure you that it does indeed 
work!  Oh man! this is a happy day for me and my clients!


I'm jumping for joy!

Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I kind of remember that it did, as there were still some plugins that for 
some reason were not fully PT 11 compatible quite yet, but I'd hate to be 
the breaker of bad news or good news and you wind up finding differently, so 
I'm totally with Slau on this one.  I'd check first before making a 
committed purchase.


Be blessed.

Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


Excellent question but I don't know the answer. If nobody here knows, then 
just contact an avid dealer and they'll surely have the answer.


On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Dónal Fitzpatrick dfitz...@computing.dcu.ie 
wrote:


Forgive a total newbie question here, but if one purchases PT11 10 comes 
with it, am I correct?


With thanks,

Dónal
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:23, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

One more thing about Mavericks, it's not officially approved for Pro 
Tools, although it clearly does seem to work. The next version of Pro 
Tools will be officially compatible with Mavericks and will require a 
minimum of Mountain Lion so it would appear that it would make sense to 
avoid Mountain Lion for Pro Tools and just jump straight to Mavericks.


Slau

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
It's free, don't worry.  I know, that surprised me too!  Get it now before 
Apple changes their mind!  LOL!


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


I am debating on downloading Mavric, it is a free download right now. I
wonder if I can download, but not instal? Does it work like that on the mac
side?
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


Slau,

That's honestly what I suspected, but I wasn't honestly 100% sure.

Anyhow, as always, thanks for the heads up.

Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me
on Twitter.

http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


This was the result of Apple themselves fixing a problem that existed in
Mountain Lion and not in Lion. Originally, the low level support at Apple
pointed everybody to Avid but it wasn't Avid's issue. Some may recall, after
repeated emails and back  forth with accessibil...@apple.com, that they
finally acknowledged the problem and now it's apparently fixed, at least for
version 10.

Regarding version 11, there is definitely progress on that front and we will
see those results before the end of the year. As always, the improvements
cannot happen all at once but Avid is clearly committed to improving
accessibility.

Slau

On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

Well guys?  I couldn't really say anything before today being that 
Mavericks wasn't out, and so, I was strictly on NDA, however, now that 
it's available to all you guys, NDA no longer withstands.  This said, I am 
ex, tremely! happy to announce that at least with ProTools 10.X, all 
accessibility seems to have been restored just like it was in Snow 
Leopard, and in Lion!  All counters read 100% flawlessly, all my edit 
clusters seems to work correctly, all my edit boxes read the values as 
they should, and all my popup buttons even seem to work as they should.  I 
can't speak for PT 11, as I've not yet updated, but I can definitely tell 
you that version 10 is working perfectly over here.  I have no idea! what 
the hell happened in Mountain Lion that made things break so badly, but I 
assure you that in 10.9 Mavericks, though keep in mind, PT is probably not 
yet officially supported there per sé, I assure you that it does indeed 
work!  Oh man! this is a happy day for me and my clients!


I'm jumping for joy!

Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https

Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Ramy,

As I said earlier in my initial post, I don't know.  I haven't updated to 
V11 yet.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: ramy moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Findings with ProTools: Ab, suh, lootly, incredible news!


and what about v11.? is it better now?
Ramy moustafa saber
licturer at:
faculty of musical education
music arranger and sound engineer
Sent from my iPhone


On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

This was the result of Apple themselves fixing a problem that existed in 
Mountain Lion and not in Lion. Originally, the low level support at Apple 
pointed everybody to Avid but it wasn't Avid's issue. Some may recall, 
after repeated emails and back  forth with accessibil...@apple.com, that 
they finally acknowledged the problem and now it's apparently fixed, at 
least for version 10.


Regarding version 11, there is definitely progress on that front and we 
will see those results before the end of the year. As always, the 
improvements cannot happen all at once but Avid is clearly committed to 
improving accessibility.


Slau

On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


Well guys?  I couldn't really say anything before today being that 
Mavericks wasn't out, and so, I was strictly on NDA, however, now that 
it's available to all you guys, NDA no longer withstands.  This said, I 
am ex, tremely! happy to announce that at least with ProTools 10.X, all 
accessibility seems to have been restored just like it was in Snow 
Leopard, and in Lion!  All counters read 100% flawlessly, all my edit 
clusters seems to work correctly, all my edit boxes read the values as 
they should, and all my popup buttons even seem to work as they should. 
I can't speak for PT 11, as I've not yet updated, but I can definitely 
tell you that version 10 is working perfectly over here.  I have no idea! 
what the hell happened in Mountain Lion that made things break so badly, 
but I assure you that in 10.9 Mavericks, though keep in mind, PT is 
probably not yet officially supported there per sé, I assure you that it 
does indeed work!  Oh man! this is a happy day for me and my clients!


I'm jumping for joy!

Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Instrument Track

2013-10-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I never could get boom to work.  Is it like XPand2 in that I can simply 
select a kit, then just arm the track and play?  Apparently, it's not quite 
that easy.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


The bulk of all the sounds are going to be under the Expand instrument 
plugin. For drums, both the expand has drums as well as the boom plugin. 
With each instrument selection you have dozens of settings to change the 
sounds to your own taist.

HTH
- Original Message - 
From: g...@tznet.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 12:39 PM
Subject: Instrument Track



Hello All,

As the subject states, I know how to create an instrment track being 
stereo

ETC but need some suggestions choosing one.

Last week a friend of mine showed me the Hammon B3 and what a sound.

Again any thoughts or suggestions will be appreciated and thanks.

John


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Instrument Track

2013-10-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I'm a little confused on what yu mean by instrument instead of audio or bus. 
What I! do, maybe this is why for me it isn't working, i dono, is, I create 
a track with command shift N.  I then tell it stereo, and I tell it to do an 
instrument track.  Then, I interact with that inst1 instrument track, then 
again, interact within that track with the inserts.  Then on the insert A 
popup, I go to Multi-Channel Plugin, then instrument.  Under there, I chose 
XPand2, once in here, in the librarian menu, I choose my bank/category, then 
finally, my actual instrument.  I then scroll through the menus on my Yamaha 
DGX500 portable grand that I have connected via midi, and set local to 
disable.  This way, I don't get loopback from the keyboard speakers.  Then, 
if I play, it works.  I'm finding however that with Boom, that doesn't seem 
to be working.


Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


Yes Chris, it works the same as Expand. Matt, it is accessible, the plugin 
instrument kit Expand and Boom are fully usable. I do use a USB keyboard, 
I use a simple little oxagyn keyboard that I got for about $50 that works 
fine. To use any of these instruments you creat a new track and instead of 
an audio, or a bus, you choose the instrument option. You then have an 
instrument channel and you go down to incerts on that channel strip and in 
your plugin area you choose instrument and you will then have a list of 
instrument plugins, expand and boom will be in this list. Once you click 
on one, you can go through the kits and sounds like you would go through 
your plugin presets.

HTH
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


I never could get boom to work.  Is it like XPand2 in that I can simply 
select a kit, then just arm the track and play?  Apparently, it's not 
quite that easy.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


The bulk of all the sounds are going to be under the Expand instrument 
plugin. For drums, both the expand has drums as well as the boom plugin. 
With each instrument selection you have dozens of settings to change the 
sounds to your own taist.

HTH
- Original Message - 
From: g...@tznet.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 12:39 PM
Subject: Instrument Track



Hello All,

As the subject states, I know how to create an instrment track being 
stereo

ETC but need some suggestions choosing one.

Last week a friend of mine showed me the Hammon B3 and what a sound.

Again any thoughts or suggestions will be appreciated and thanks.

John


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr

Got Boom to kind of, sort of, ish, work.

2013-10-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I think I got Boom kind a working, but it sounds like it is all drum loops. 
I guess I was under the impression that these were actual drum kits, like 
you get  in XPand2, whereby I could actually play the beat myself.  Frankly, 
this is very controvertial, so I don't wanna get a heated discussion started 
with this as it's liable to become dirty, but, I find loops in some respect 
to be cheating.  OK, yes, they have their purpose, but rarely.


Chris. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Instrument Track

2013-10-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK, I guess I was under the impression that maybe you meant setting the 
input path to instrument instead of your own interface via audio.  I think 
that's where your message was a little confusing to me.  I didn't know if 
you meant creating an instrument track, or if you meant creating one 
instrument track then somehow routing it through a seperet channel strip.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


I think I tried to explain the same steps you are taking, sorry if I didn't 
make it clear, but what you said is how I do it, with the exception that I 
have a USB controler keyboard that is just plug and play.
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


I'm a little confused on what yu mean by instrument instead of audio or 
bus. What I! do, maybe this is why for me it isn't working, i dono, is, I 
create a track with command shift N.  I then tell it stereo, and I tell 
it to do an instrument track.  Then, I interact with that inst1 
instrument track, then again, interact within that track with the 
inserts.  Then on the insert A popup, I go to Multi-Channel Plugin, then 
instrument.  Under there, I chose XPand2, once in here, in the librarian 
menu, I choose my bank/category, then finally, my actual instrument.  I 
then scroll through the menus on my Yamaha DGX500 portable grand that I 
have connected via midi, and set local to disable.  This way, I don't get 
loopback from the keyboard speakers.  Then, if I play, it works.  I'm 
finding however that with Boom, that doesn't seem to be working.


Chris.

Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow 
me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


Yes Chris, it works the same as Expand. Matt, it is accessible, the 
plugin instrument kit Expand and Boom are fully usable. I do use a USB 
keyboard, I use a simple little oxagyn keyboard that I got for about $50 
that works fine. To use any of these instruments you creat a new track 
and instead of an audio, or a bus, you choose the instrument option. You 
then have an instrument channel and you go down to incerts on that 
channel strip and in your plugin area you choose instrument and you will 
then have a list of instrument plugins, expand and boom will be in this 
list. Once you click on one, you can go through the kits and sounds like 
you would go through your plugin presets.

HTH
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


I never could get boom to work.  Is it like XPand2 in that I can simply 
select a kit, then just arm the track and play?  Apparently, it's not 
quite that easy.


Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have 
recorded.


http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to 
follow me on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument Track


The bulk of all the sounds are going to be under the Expand instrument 
plugin. For drums, both the expand has drums as well as the boom 
plugin. With each instrument selection you have dozens of settings to 
change the sounds to your own taist.

HTH
- Original Message - 
From: g...@tznet.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 12:39 PM
Subject: Instrument Track



Hello All,

As the subject states, I know how to create an instrment track being 
stereo

ETC but need some suggestions choosing one.

Last week a friend of mine showed me the Hammon B3 and what a sound.

Again any thoughts or suggestions will be appreciated and thanks.

John


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more

Re: Got Boom to kind of, sort of, ish, work.

2013-10-21 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

OK, let me try playing a little bit more with it, and I'll see what happens.

Chris.


Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded.

http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland

For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me 
on Twitter.


http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic
- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: Got Boom to kind of, sort of, ish, work.


Ok, what happens in my case is that to the left of the keyboard you can 
get single drum hits and the right side is usually asigned  to the built 
in loops. Also on my keyboard I have a drum pad set on the upper right 
corner and that will give me drum hits without the loops in the boom 
plugin.
- Original Message - 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 4:12 PM
Subject: Got Boom to kind of, sort of, ish, work.


I think I got Boom kind a working, but it sounds like it is all drum 
loops. I guess I was under the impression that these were actual drum 
kits, like you get  in XPand2, whereby I could actually play the beat 
myself. Frankly, this is very controvertial, so I don't wanna get a heated 
discussion started with this as it's liable to become dirty, but, I find 
loops in some respect to be cheating.  OK, yes, they have their purpose, 
but rarely.


Chris.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: iLok Manager

2013-10-03 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
The last that I heard, it kind of didn't work at all, frankly.  They used to 
have a web based client which worked fantasticly, but when ProTools 11 came 
out, that changed.  Quite honestly, I don't know why on earth they couldn't 
just leave well as enough alone, but anyway, that's life for ya.  You'll 
probably need to get sighted assistance with that part, but after that, the 
rest is a breeze.

Chris.

On Oct 3, 2013, at 9:56 PM, John Gunn g...@tznet.com wrote:

 Hello All,
 
 How does VO work regarding putting the keys on the iLok device?
 
 John
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Adding a high pass filter

2013-09-24 Thread Mark Gilland
OK, thanks.  I'll have a look.  I just hope there is a 1band that comes with 
PT by default.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: Adding a high pass filter


I'd suggest to keep things simple at first, why not select the 1 band eq 
instead of the 3 or 7 band option. I can't remember the exact name of the 
field but i think its called filter type or something like that. By default 
its set to shelf or something like that. Interact and chang it to high pass. 
The Gain field sets the value for  how much that frequency is cut or 
boosted. Positive values equals a boost and negative values equals a cut. 
Since the purpose of a high pass filter is to remove lows, or *pass the 
highs* you will want a negative value here as it will cut all frequencies at 
the frequency value and lower.

On Sep 24, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Chris Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


Hello guys.

I am running ProTools 10.0 over here with no extra 3rd party EQ plugins. 
I only have the native EQ plugins which come stocked with PT version 10.


I have a vocal track which I have recorded.  I went on an insert, and 
under the plugins sub menu in the insert's popup button, I went to the EQ 
sub menu, then to 3/7 band EQ.  In this particular native plugin, I need 
to know specifically, as maybe I just don't understand EQ very well, but 
the plugin window confuses me a bit.  I know it's totally accessible with 
Voiceover, but most of the controls go way over my head.  Basically, all I 
am trying to do is enable a highpass filter on that track.  No more no 
less.  I just need that HP filter.  Can someone specifically in this 
plugin window direct me on what things I'll hear as I VO+right arrow 
through the window, and what exactly I need to interact with, and 
change/move in order to turn on the filter?  I've asked on another list 
which has a few PT users but all they did was tell me Dude, just look 
through the damn window.  How effing hard can it be!  Excuse me, but I 
wouldn't have asked in the first place if I knew up front I'd get a rude 
snide remark like that.  I trust that won't happen again here as well. 
I'm asking for help, not for a smart ass comment.


Anyway, help is very much appreciated as quickly as possible.

Have a terrific day!

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Probably not the greatest, but tell me what you all think.

2013-09-22 Thread Mark Gilland
OK, I'll admit, this might not be the best, but I am definitely open for 
suggestions on how to get things more pollished.  I'd be curious though not 
only for you to point out the bad parts, but also to tell me the points that 
you do really like, if any.  I'd like to get both sides.


This was put together just this morning in ProTools.  I'll admit I didn't 
really spend much time on this, so I probab ly could have gotten it more 
pollished, but for only 5 takes on the vocal, plus the arrangement I did 
with the instrumentation, I think it actually came out quite well, all 
considered.  You can hear the recording by visiting:


http://boo.fm/b1615015

Plwease let me know what you all think.  Again, I want both the things that 
really could be done to make this shine a bit more, as well as to know the 
things you really did find worked really well for me.


Chris. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Probably not the greatest, but tell me what you all think.

2013-09-22 Thread Mark Gilland
Compression has never ever ever been something that I've understood.  The 
last time I asked on list people chewed the f*** out of me off list 
privately.  I then went over to midimag and was told my question was off 
topic.  I posted to PC Audio and was not only told I was off topic, but was 
banned from the list due to untrue rumors that were spread about me by a 
list member very quickly once he saw I had joined the list.  I dono what the 
hell his issue was, but anyway...  Frankly, I'll be honest to say, vocals 
just might not be my thing.


I have a bit of mental retardation, and that isn't a joke.  I literally have 
been diagnosed clennically with a slight bit, so though not profound in the 
least, one thing that is effected horrifically is my part of the brane which 
neurologically deals a lot with logic and with mathematics.  For this 
reason, I have had compression explained to me on the most simple level you 
could imagine.  I've even had people like Chuck Reichel try sending me video 
tutorials.  I'm sorry but bless his heart, I know he was really trying, but 
it just didn't make sense.  I'm really really pooring my heart felt plee out 
to you all here.  I want to do music ministry, and really want to record. 
It's my dream, so please don't hate me or yell at me for not understanding. 
Guys, I'm not a pro like most of you all are.  I'm hardly even an ammature. 
I'd like to become professional, but I don't see that happening any time 
soon.


I probably could also stand to get some voice lessons, but I live out in the 
boonies, plus, I can't afford audio productions lessons let alone voice 
lessons.


It was hard enough affording Kevin Reeves to work with me the 8 hours he 
did.  If it wasn't for me doing that, I probably never would have gotten the 
hang of ProTools like I have now.


So, I need clarification on a few specific things from you reply.  First of 
all, when you say loosen up, can you be way more specific?  If you mean I 
sound really forced, you're not the first person to say I'm very very very 
tense.  Honestly, I'm not sure how to relax any more.  I feel like to get 
any variation in my vocals I have to have that strong voice and the only way 
to get that is with volume, and the only way to get volume is to project, 
and the only way to project is to push.  Plus, I'm so scared people are not 
going to like the vocal that I wind up probably all tensified and wind up 
trying way too hard.


No, the way you heard it on the mike is actually about how without a mike 
I'd sing it believe it or not.


On the note of compression, I understand I really! need to get the hang of 
this, and quit relying on presets in the librarian menu to do it all for me, 
but please! I'm begging you, can you at least tell me, and I know it's one 
of these things, generally, no, you can't, as I have to play with it, and 
experiment, and just listen to the sound, but can you at least give me a 
plugin that comes with version 10.0 natively, and tell me after popping it 
on an insert, step by step what to vo+right arrow past in the plugin window 
and specifically what control to look for, and how voiceover would read it, 
and tell me what to try setting it to and what preset to start with?  I know 
I may have to play a bit, but can you at least tell me keystroke by 
keystroke something I can try to at least get a good compression ratio set 
to start from that you would almost bet would maybe not be the key, but 
would at least improve things a bit based on my  voice?


I know I'm gonna have to eventually find a way to learn the basics of 
compression, but but I don't know how I'm going to.  I have a severe hearing 
loss, especially on the higher frequencies, so honestly, even if you squash 
the living snot out of it, I still have trouble hearing the effect.  I know 
this is far from the list to be asking for help on mixing as this list is 
more for PT discussion, but if you all can at least help me enough to get me 
started, I promise once we can help me with the basics of good vocal mixing, 
I swear to god, I won't keep bugging you.  Promised!  Please though, help me 
reach my dream.  All I've ever in life wanted is to make a good recording 
that I could go back and listen to and say hey, look, I really can do this 
after all!


On the final note, you said the vocals were a bit too much over the music. 
I agree, but I'm not totally sure how to fix that.  I know the compression, 
but would you say it probably is going to be better to back my gain knob off 
a ways on my Fast Track C400 interface, or do you think it would be better 
to actually turn down the output fader on the vocal track in PT itself, or 
would you simply just maybe start by trying to back off the mike a bit.  I 
know it's all play/listen/try, trial an error, but where should I start? 
Can you give me one thing to try, then rebounce, and I'll let you all hear 
it again, and then we can decide what's next.  I want to do the mixing 
myself 

Re: Probably not the greatest, but tell me what you all think.

2013-09-22 Thread Mark Gilland
Thank you Byron.  That really means a lot to me.  Most people have given me 
very negative criticism, I mean, not now... but in th3e past, so I was real 
real hesitant to share this with you all.  I'm playing a bit with the 
compressor, and think I found a preset that I tweeked.  Basically, we got a 
3/1 ratio, with a 7MS attack, and a 25MS release, and my threshold at -12DB. 
I'm finding that this sounds absolutely in, cr'r'r'r'r'redible!  Oh, my 
heavens! what a difference!  My vocals sound way more well, what's the 
word... full.  They have more bottom to them, but the mud that I described 
way back when is gone!  Keep also in mind though that I used the native EQ 3 
7 band EQ, and under vocals, I set in the librarian menu, add air.  I didn't 
change anything under the add air preset.  I left it completely alone, and 
just let the preset take over the EQ.


Can you give me some steps on what to do to put that distortion on my 
inserts for the base and the drums?  Also, is that just a preference, or is 
there a reason why you're thinking that would work here?  Also, why add 
distortion if you won't hear it?  I don't understand your logic.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: byron harden sticomu...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Probably not the greatest, but tell me what you all think.


hello mark,

this is byron.

somethings sound really  good raw.

i would continue to create a nice balance with all of your sorce tracks.

than 2 , i would add some very light distortion to the bass and drums.

so light infact, that you could not notice it when the music is playing.

i look forward to hearing where this mix will  end up at, because some would 
over process searching for a polished sound, but how you cut it, is how it 
needs to be mixed, good luck  bro. awesome job so far

On Sep 22, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello Mark, good times. So did you play any of the instruments in that 
arangement? The musical arangement is well done, your vocals are ok, it 
just seems like you could loosen up a little. I bet when your singing that 
same song without a mic in front of you you let it rip and roar. So, as 
for any thoughts of how to improve it, I think the vocals are sitting on 
top of the music a little too much, either you could pull the vocals down 
a tad, or compress or both. I myself would definatly compress the vocals 
more, at least a 3 to 1 and go up from there with a fast atack on a faster 
paist song like that and dig into the thresh hold.

Take care
- Original Message - From: Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 5:48 AM
Subject: Probably not the greatest, but tell me what you all think.


OK, I'll admit, this might not be the best, but I am definitely open for 
suggestions on how to get things more pollished.  I'd be curious though 
not only for you to point out the bad parts, but also to tell me the 
points that you do really like, if any.  I'd like to get both sides.


This was put together just this morning in ProTools.  I'll admit I didn't 
really spend much time on this, so I probab ly could have gotten it more 
pollished, but for only 5 takes on the vocal, plus the arrangement I did 
with the instrumentation, I think it actually came out quite well, all 
considered.  You can hear the recording by visiting:


http://boo.fm/b1615015

Plwease let me know what you all think.  Again, I want both the things 
that really could be done to make this shine a bit more, as well as to 
know the things you really did find worked really well for me.


Chris.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: One of my first mixes in PT

2013-09-17 Thread Mark Gilland

I'd be very very interested in listenning.

clgillan...@gmail.com

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT



Thanks all for the comments.
I've mixed before in other daws, namely reaper, and audacity, but back
in march or april a good friend of mine came in to town from Nashville
and spent 3 weeks with me showing me everything he could about PT.
From then onward, I've been on a quest to redo a lot in PT. I find
editing so much nicer in PT.
I was going for a sound here that had a tight bass and kick drums
sound, and I worked to keep the vocal just above the music.
There is a lot going on as there was 5 mics on the amp so obviously
mixing those in to a sub group, and treating them with EQ and
compression ETC.
There is actually about 4 or 5 different guitar tracks going on at a
time, so I'll have to look to see which should go down and which could
stay where they are.
Thanks again.
I've got more things that I'm trying my hand at if anyone would be
intrested in listening.



On 9/16/13, Ricky Prevatte rickypreva...@gmail.com wrote:

I say bring those vocals up what everyone else did. For the first time I
thought it was absolutely great. You had good playing there are things 
that

I would do to the drums but I am a drummer. I would maybe wet the vocal a
little bit with some reverb I would use maybe a little more effects on 
some

of the guitars. Did you use any compression only overall mix? Did you say
you played all of the instruments? If you did that you did better than 
great

on your first time.

Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154

On Sep 16, 2013, at 9:13 PM, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


Now that you mention it, it does kind a have a Gaither kind of feel to 
it.

I never thought about that, but you have a good point.

Chris.

- Original Message - From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT



I like it brother Matt, sounds like some Gathor type influence there.
Would like to hear that voice on a slow Gospel tune. Like Byran said, 
the
vocals could be louder, but I think that you should push the guitars 
down
a few DB a little, it is good playing, but your vocals are nice and 
rich

and I would make sure that you let them shine over the guitar. What is
the DB on your mane BUS/Master sitting at? Over all, very good job for
your first run. Keep it up, I would like to hear more.
- Original Message - From: byron harden 
sticomu...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT



i think its pretty cool.

just a little more vocals,

about 3DB worth.

little less kick and bass.


i know that would take it to the next  level.

this sounds nice ,


there is a lot more that could be done to it.
but if this is your first mix,
it sounds like a great start.
keep
On Sep 16, 2013, at 5:17 PM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:


Just thought I'd throw this out there for some ideas on what could be
better ETC.
If you're offended by hymns you may not want to listen other wise, 
I'd

appreciate any comments.
I played much of this obviously recorded and mixed in PT 10

http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cfm?songid=12499545q=hi



On 9/16/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
Your fine, I'm glad you pointed it out, I wouldn't want to be 
thinking

I'm
giving somebody a good deal and they could get it for almost a 
hundred

or
more less right on Ebay. Thems the breaks.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


Papa, sorry of my tone seemed accusatory, that certainly wasn't my
point! I

was simply pointing out that over the last three months or so, all
the
options that I have been in on ended somewhere between 250 and $325.
Anything above that seems not to really sell.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
wrote:

Hello Matt, at first I was a little put out about what you said, 
but

I
went and checked them out on Ebay and they are much lower than they
were
just a year ago. If somebody on here wanted to pick it up I would 
go

down

to $300. Keep in mind, many of the lower $200 and under are the 002
rack.

I did see a 002 rack with the black lion mod which was only about
$450 or

so, and that is a good deal, but it is not really considered
portable.
Take care
- Original Message - From: Matt Diemert
mcdiem...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Cc: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces



400  is probably a bit high by say eBay standards. Though many are
listed

in this range the ones

Re: One of my first mixes in PT

2013-09-16 Thread Mark Gilland
I definitely agree the lyrics need to be louder.  Aside from that, though, 
this is awesome!  Great job!


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: byron harden sticomu...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT



i think its pretty cool.

just a little more vocals,

about 3DB worth.

little less kick and bass.


i know that would take it to the next  level.

this sounds nice ,


there is a lot more that could be done to it.
but if this is your first mix,
it sounds like a great start.
keep
On Sep 16, 2013, at 5:17 PM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:


Just thought I'd throw this out there for some ideas on what could be
better ETC.
If you're offended by hymns you may not want to listen other wise, I'd
appreciate any comments.
I played much of this obviously recorded and mixed in PT 10

http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cfm?songid=12499545q=hi



On 9/16/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
Your fine, I'm glad you pointed it out, I wouldn't want to be thinking 
I'm
giving somebody a good deal and they could get it for almost a hundred 
or

more less right on Ebay. Thems the breaks.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


Papa, sorry of my tone seemed accusatory, that certainly wasn't my 
point! I


was simply pointing out that over the last three months or so, all the
options that I have been in on ended somewhere between 250 and $325.
Anything above that seems not to really sell.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com 
wrote:



Hello Matt, at first I was a little put out about what you said, but I
went and checked them out on Ebay and they are much lower than they 
were
just a year ago. If somebody on here wanted to pick it up I would go 
down


to $300. Keep in mind, many of the lower $200 and under are the 002 
rack.


I did see a 002 rack with the black lion mod which was only about $450 
or


so, and that is a good deal, but it is not really considered portable.
Take care
- Original Message - From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Cc: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


400  is probably a bit high by say eBay standards. Though many are 
listed


in this range the ones that actually sell are closer to the $250 $325
range. I've been in on several auctions for a 002 over the last month 
and


this is what I've experienced.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Scott Chesworth 
scottcheswo...@gmail.com


wrote:


Only downside to the 002 is no scrub wheel. However, assuming used
gear goes for roughly the same value in the sates as it does here in
the UK, that's a good price for one.

On 9/16/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:

I believe it was discontinued for the 003, but as it was said, a lot
of
people/places still use the 002.
On Sep 15, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
wrote:

Nope, but I know small project studios that are still using them 
with


no
problems. My partner and I both had one in our control room, he is
still
using his.
- Original Message - From: Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: good remote control surfaces



Oh wow,
Do they still make this surface new?

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
On
Behalf
Of Poppa Bear
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:16 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces

I still have a Degidesign 002 that I will let go for $400. It is 
in

very
good condition, still have the packaging.
- Original Message -
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces



if you want one that doubles as a control surface, the 003 is
probably
a good place to start. Otherwise, if you are in the states, you 
may
want to contact a store like www.sweetwater.com and talk to a 
sales

engineer who can help you decide on something.
On Sep 14, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Jed Barton j...@jedbarton.com 
wrote:



Hey guys,
Alright, I am about to make the jump to buy protools, but before 
I


do
I need a suggestion for a remote control surface.  I know there
are
so many out there.
Having one with a scrub wheel would be extremely helpful.
Any ideas?

Thanks,
Jed

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
Google

Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
it,

send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit 

Re: One of my first mixes in PT

2013-09-16 Thread Mark Gilland
Now that you mention it, it does kind a have a Gaither kind of feel to it. 
I never thought about that, but you have a good point.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT


I like it brother Matt, sounds like some Gathor type influence there. Would 
like to hear that voice on a slow Gospel tune. Like Byran said, the vocals 
could be louder, but I think that you should push the guitars down a few DB 
a little, it is good playing, but your vocals are nice and rich and I would 
make sure that you let them shine over the guitar. What is the DB on your 
mane BUS/Master sitting at? Over all, very good job for your first run. 
Keep it up, I would like to hear more.
- Original Message - 
From: byron harden sticomu...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: One of my first mixes in PT



i think its pretty cool.

just a little more vocals,

about 3DB worth.

little less kick and bass.


i know that would take it to the next  level.

this sounds nice ,


there is a lot more that could be done to it.
but if this is your first mix,
it sounds like a great start.
keep
On Sep 16, 2013, at 5:17 PM, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:


Just thought I'd throw this out there for some ideas on what could be
better ETC.
If you're offended by hymns you may not want to listen other wise, I'd
appreciate any comments.
I played much of this obviously recorded and mixed in PT 10

http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cfm?songid=12499545q=hi



On 9/16/13, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
Your fine, I'm glad you pointed it out, I wouldn't want to be thinking 
I'm
giving somebody a good deal and they could get it for almost a hundred 
or

more less right on Ebay. Thems the breaks.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


Papa, sorry of my tone seemed accusatory, that certainly wasn't my 
point! I


was simply pointing out that over the last three months or so, all the
options that I have been in on ended somewhere between 250 and $325.
Anything above that seems not to really sell.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com 
wrote:



Hello Matt, at first I was a little put out about what you said, but I
went and checked them out on Ebay and they are much lower than they 
were
just a year ago. If somebody on here wanted to pick it up I would go 
down


to $300. Keep in mind, many of the lower $200 and under are the 002 
rack.


I did see a 002 rack with the black lion mod which was only about $450 
or


so, and that is a good deal, but it is not really considered portable.
Take care
- Original Message - From: Matt Diemert 
mcdiem...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Cc: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces


400  is probably a bit high by say eBay standards. Though many are 
listed


in this range the ones that actually sell are closer to the $250 $325
range. I've been in on several auctions for a 002 over the last month 
and


this is what I've experienced.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:03 AM, Scott Chesworth 
scottcheswo...@gmail.com


wrote:


Only downside to the 002 is no scrub wheel. However, assuming used
gear goes for roughly the same value in the sates as it does here in
the UK, that's a good price for one.

On 9/16/13, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it was discontinued for the 003, but as it was said, a 
lot

of
people/places still use the 002.
On Sep 15, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
wrote:

Nope, but I know small project studios that are still using them 
with


no
problems. My partner and I both had one in our control room, he is
still
using his.
- Original Message - From: Jed Barton 
j...@jedbarton.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: good remote control surfaces



Oh wow,
Do they still make this surface new?

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]

On
Behalf
Of Poppa Bear
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:16 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces

I still have a Degidesign 002 that I will let go for $400. It is 
in

very
good condition, still have the packaging.
- Original Message -
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: good remote control surfaces



if you want one that doubles as a control surface, the 003 is
probably
a good place to start. Otherwise, if you are in the states, you 
may
want to contact a 

Re: Saving in Version 9 format

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Gilland
So wait a second.  I'm a little confused.  If that is the case, then, what's 
the difference in that from the save as, as I was under the impression that 
if I wanted to save in a new location, that's where save as came into play. 
Where am I getting confused?  What did I miss?


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format


it allows  you to save an entire copy of the session including audio 
files and etc  in a separate location

On Aug 12, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

Awesomeness, I'll give that a shot.  I did kind of wonder what that 
option did differently.


Thanks for the help.

Chris.

- Original Message - From: Monkey Pusher 
monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



try save copy as instead of save as.

On 8/12/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

OK, so I have a studio I'm going to be working in that I need to send a
session to.  They only have ProTools MP9 however.  I know that PT 10 
saves
the session in a .ptx format, which I kind a recall ProTools 9 not 
being

able to open.  When I went to the file menu, and to save as, even after
expanding the disclosure triangle, I don't see any way to set the file 
type


to the older format.  I know this can be done, as I've seen people do 
it. I


just wonder how they're going about resaving the session in a format 
that

MP9 can open.

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups

Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an

email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Saving in Version 9 format

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Gilland

Hey there.

Thank you so much for such a thorough explaination.  That makes perfect 
sense.  So, if I did use Save as, to just make another revision, how would 
that work sinse it's only saving the .ptx file?  Would I then basically copy 
the other files/folders making up the session to the same place where I 
saved the revision with save as?


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



Save as allows you to rename the file/save anew version of the project
file with a new name. For example you have  song.ptx  Then when you
mix it you will do save as  and rename it Song Mix.ptx. You do a
revision and  save it as song mix2.ptx. and so on. While you can use
save as to save a copy in a new location, this only saves the project
file. It doesn't bring the  project audio files, plug in settings,etc
etc along with it. the project file or PTX file is essentially a tiny
file that tells pro tools what do do with the audio  and etc.When
using save copy in,  it will create a new project folder with all the
files associated with the project in it. This is ideal for back up and
archival purposes if you want to save the project to a different hard
drive or etc. It is also ideal when you want to conver the project to
another format for sending off to another  studio/engineer.

On 8/13/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
So wait a second.  I'm a little confused.  If that is the case, then, 
what's


the difference in that from the save as, as I was under the impression 
that


if I wanted to save in a new location, that's where save as came into 
play.


Where am I getting confused?  What did I miss?

Chris.

- Original Message -
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



it allows  you to save an entire copy of the session including audio
files and etc  in a separate location
On Aug 12, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com
wrote:


Awesomeness, I'll give that a shot.  I did kind of wonder what that
option did differently.

Thanks for the help.

Chris.

- Original Message - From: Monkey Pusher
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



try save copy as instead of save as.

On 8/12/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

OK, so I have a studio I'm going to be working in that I need to send
a
session to.  They only have ProTools MP9 however.  I know that PT 10
saves
the session in a .ptx format, which I kind a recall ProTools 9 not
being
able to open.  When I went to the file menu, and to save as, even
after
expanding the disclosure triangle, I don't see any way to set the 
file


type

to the older format.  I know this can be done, as I've seen people do
it. I

just wonder how they're going about resaving the session in a format
that
MP9 can open.

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
send


an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups


Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an


email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups


Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an


email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro

Re: Saving in Version 9 format

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Gilland

OK, gotcha.  That makes sense.  Thanks for the clarification.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format


normally when you do save as to save a revision, its usually being saved in 
the same location as the previous files. So it will automatically point to 
the audio file and plug in settings folder or etc. However if you did want 
to save the revision to another location, it would still point to all those 
files, the problem comes  when you say save the revision to an external HD 
and you then take that HD to a friends house .. since its just the PTX file 
and its not plugged into your computer where the audio and other files re it 
will kick up an error. So if you did save ass, you would manual have to be 
certain to copy all the needed project files to the same external as well 
so when u opened it on your friends computer you could then point it to the 
copy of the files on the external as well. Save Copy in does this lal for 
you and ensures all needed files will be present in the same folder where 
you save that version of the project.


On Aug 13, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


Hey there.

Thank you so much for such a thorough explaination.  That makes perfect 
sense.  So, if I did use Save as, to just make another revision, how would 
that work sinse it's only saving the .ptx file?  Would I then basically 
copy the other files/folders making up the session to the same place where 
I saved the revision with save as?


Chris.

- Original Message - From: Monkey Pusher 
monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



Save as allows you to rename the file/save anew version of the project
file with a new name. For example you have  song.ptx  Then when you
mix it you will do save as  and rename it Song Mix.ptx. You do a
revision and  save it as song mix2.ptx. and so on. While you can use
save as to save a copy in a new location, this only saves the project
file. It doesn't bring the  project audio files, plug in settings,etc
etc along with it. the project file or PTX file is essentially a tiny
file that tells pro tools what do do with the audio  and etc.When
using save copy in,  it will create a new project folder with all the
files associated with the project in it. This is ideal for back up and
archival purposes if you want to save the project to a different hard
drive or etc. It is also ideal when you want to conver the project to
another format for sending off to another  studio/engineer.

On 8/13/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
So wait a second.  I'm a little confused.  If that is the case, then, 
what's


the difference in that from the save as, as I was under the impression 
that


if I wanted to save in a new location, that's where save as came into 
play.


Where am I getting confused?  What did I miss?

Chris.

- Original Message -
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



it allows  you to save an entire copy of the session including audio
files and etc  in a separate location
On Aug 12, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com
wrote:


Awesomeness, I'll give that a shot.  I did kind of wonder what that
option did differently.

Thanks for the help.

Chris.

- Original Message - From: Monkey Pusher
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



try save copy as instead of save as.

On 8/12/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, so I have a studio I'm going to be working in that I need to 
send

a
session to.  They only have ProTools MP9 however.  I know that PT 10
saves
the session in a .ptx format, which I kind a recall ProTools 9 not
being
able to open.  When I went to the file menu, and to save as, even
after
expanding the disclosure triangle, I don't see any way to set the 
file


type

to the older format.  I know this can be done, as I've seen people 
do

it. I

just wonder how they're going about resaving the session in a format
that
MP9 can open.

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
send


an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
send

an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You

Re: protools 10: Lion or Mountain lion?

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland

As I told you on the Mac Access list.  Yes, it will work.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Dónal Fitzpatrick dfitz...@computing.dcu.ie

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:41 PM
Subject: protools 10: Lion or Mountain lion?


Hi folks,

I wonder could someone clarify something.  Will Protools 10 run on Mountain 
lion?  If no, is it possible to, as it were, create a lion partition on 
either the main hard disk or an external HD?


Thanks in advance,

Dónal
Dr. Dónal Fitzpatrick,
School of Computing,
Dublin City University,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9, Ireland
Tel. +353-(0)1-700-8929
fax: +353-(0)1-700-5442
email: dfitzpat (at) computing.dcu.ie

Email Disclaimer
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are 
intended solely for use by the addressee. Any unauthorised dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender and delete the message. Any views or opinions presented in this 
e-mail may solely be the views of the author and cannot be relied upon as 
being those of Dublin City University. E-mail communications such as this 
cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free, timely, secure or error-free and 
Dublin City University does not accept liability for any such matters or 
their consequences. Please consider the environment before printing this 
e-mail.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: protools 10: Lion or Mountain lion?

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland
Which is exactly what I told him in the first place, no offense, but 
probably for the fifth or sixth time, with all due respect.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: protools 10: Lion or Mountain lion?


Will pro tools run on ML. Yes, however ML Voiceover and Protools does
not play nice at the moment. Short answer if you plan to use pro tools
with voice over then you need to run it under lion. Yes it will run in
a lion partition  on your main disc or on an external disc.

On 8/12/13, Dónal Fitzpatrick dfitz...@computing.dcu.ie wrote:

Hi folks,

I wonder could someone clarify something.  Will Protools 10 run on 
Mountain

lion?  If no, is it possible to, as it were, create a lion partition on
either the main hard disk or an external HD?

Thanks in advance,

Dónal
Dr. Dónal Fitzpatrick,
School of Computing,
Dublin City University,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9, Ireland
Tel. +353-(0)1-700-8929
fax: +353-(0)1-700-5442
email: dfitzpat (at) computing.dcu.ie

Email Disclaimer
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for use by the addressee. Any unauthorised dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender and delete the message. Any views or opinions presented in this
e-mail may solely be the views of the author and cannot be relied upon as
being those of Dublin City University. E-mail communications such as this
cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free, timely, secure or error-free and
Dublin City University does not accept liability for any such matters or
their consequences. Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: protools 10: Lion or Mountain lion?

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland
Again, I will explain for the fifth time now.  Some of your counters will 
not read.  By counters I'm speaking of, when you're setting things like the 
tempo, or your key time signature, or in the edit window, looking at how 
many beats/bars, or hours/minutes/seconds you are into the session.  things 
like that.  The counters do not read.  Plus there are probably a few other 
things that I'm forgetting off hand, but those are the biggies.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Dónal Fitzpatrick dfitz...@computing.dcu.ie

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: protools 10: Lion or Mountain lion?


Lovely, that's all I needed to know.  Out of curiosity, what issues are 
there with ML as compared to Lion?  Odd that VO works well on the older OS.


Dónal
On 12 Aug 2013, at 17:57, Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:


Will pro tools run on ML. Yes, however ML Voiceover and Protools does
not play nice at the moment. Short answer if you plan to use pro tools
with voice over then you need to run it under lion. Yes it will run in
a lion partition  on your main disc or on an external disc.

On 8/12/13, Dónal Fitzpatrick dfitz...@computing.dcu.ie wrote:

Hi folks,

I wonder could someone clarify something.  Will Protools 10 run on 
Mountain

lion?  If no, is it possible to, as it were, create a lion partition on
either the main hard disk or an external HD?

Thanks in advance,

Dónal
Dr. Dónal Fitzpatrick,
School of Computing,
Dublin City University,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9, Ireland
Tel. +353-(0)1-700-8929
fax: +353-(0)1-700-5442
email: dfitzpat (at) computing.dcu.ie

Email Disclaimer
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for use by the addressee. Any unauthorised dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender and delete the message. Any views or opinions presented in this
e-mail may solely be the views of the author and cannot be relied upon as
being those of Dublin City University. E-mail communications such as this
cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free, timely, secure or error-free and
Dublin City University does not accept liability for any such matters or
their consequences. Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



Dr. Dónal Fitzpatrick,
School of Computing,
Dublin City University,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9, Ireland
Tel. +353-(0)1-700-8929
fax: +353-(0)1-700-5442
email: dfitzpat (at) computing.dcu.ie

Email Disclaimer
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are 
intended solely for use by the addressee. Any unauthorised dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender and delete the message. Any views or opinions presented in this 
e-mail may solely be the views of the author and cannot be relied upon as 
being those of Dublin City University. E-mail communications such as this 
cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free, timely, secure or error-free and 
Dublin City University does not accept liability for any such matters or 
their consequences. Please consider the environment before printing this 
e-mail.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Counter displays in PT 10?

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland
Again, as we've said, are you on Mountain Lion?  If so, that's why they're 
not reading.  There are issues with pt 10 and ml.  Honestly, I wonder if 
those issues exhibit with pt9 and Mountain Lion.


We shall know very very shortly as I'm about to be playing later today with 
an ml system running pt 9.


Chris.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: Counter displays in PT 10?



Hey, is it me or do the counter displays not read in PT10? Is there
any way of knowing what bar I'm currently on?

So, if they are broken, what's the best way of creating a double
bridge sequence in my song?

So I get into shuffle mode and if I know where the bridge starts and
ends, numeric slash is my friend to create those selections to copy
each track right? But if I don't have those numbers? or is there just
a better way of doing this in tools?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Counter displays in PT 10?

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland
I've tried 10 with Mavericks, yes, but being that Mavericks isn't officially 
released, I'm on NDA thus can't disclose my findings.  Sorry.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Counter displays in PT 10?



OK, that will be it I'm on mountain lion. I didn't know there were
issues with pt and Mountain lion. So I guess I'll have to create a
lion partition then. Is that what you've done or have you just not
upgraded to Lion. Anyone tried any version of tools with Mavericks
yet?

On 8/12/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, as we've said, are you on Mountain Lion?  If so, that's why 
they're

not reading.  There are issues with pt 10 and ml.  Honestly, I wonder if
those issues exhibit with pt9 and Mountain Lion.

We shall know very very shortly as I'm about to be playing later today 
with


an ml system running pt 9.

Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: Counter displays in PT 10?



Hey, is it me or do the counter displays not read in PT10? Is there
any way of knowing what bar I'm currently on?

So, if they are broken, what's the best way of creating a double
bridge sequence in my song?

So I get into shuffle mode and if I know where the bridge starts and
ends, numeric slash is my friend to create those selections to copy
each track right? But if I don't have those numbers? or is there just
a better way of doing this in tools?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups


Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an


email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Counter displays in PT 10?

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland
Because he asked if anyone's used it, I was just assuring him, yes, I had 
but that I couldn't disclose the speicfics.  I, along with other devs though 
are working closely both with Apple and with Avid to improve things.


Sheesh, don't get your pants in a wod.  I simply was answerring that in fact 
yes, I had tried.  Forgive me for being honest.  Next time, I'll lie 
instead.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Juan Pablo jpcula...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: Counter displays in PT 10?


And if you're under a NDA, why did you write this e-mail? Completely 
without sense.


-Original Message- 
From: Mark Gilland

Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:22 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Counter displays in PT 10?

I've tried 10 with Mavericks, yes, but being that Mavericks isn't 
officially

released, I'm on NDA thus can't disclose my findings.  Sorry.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Counter displays in PT 10?



OK, that will be it I'm on mountain lion. I didn't know there were
issues with pt and Mountain lion. So I guess I'll have to create a
lion partition then. Is that what you've done or have you just not
upgraded to Lion. Anyone tried any version of tools with Mavericks
yet?

On 8/12/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, as we've said, are you on Mountain Lion?  If so, that's why 
they're

not reading.  There are issues with pt 10 and ml.  Honestly, I wonder if
those issues exhibit with pt9 and Mountain Lion.

We shall know very very shortly as I'm about to be playing later today 
with


an ml system running pt 9.

Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: Counter displays in PT 10?



Hey, is it me or do the counter displays not read in PT10? Is there
any way of knowing what bar I'm currently on?

So, if they are broken, what's the best way of creating a double
bridge sequence in my song?

So I get into shuffle mode and if I know where the bridge starts and
ends, numeric slash is my friend to create those selections to copy
each track right? But if I don't have those numbers? or is there just
a better way of doing this in tools?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups


Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an


email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups

Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an

email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Counter displays in PT 10?

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland

ok, fine, it doesn't work.  Happy?

Shit, alive, people?  And no, I did not break the NDA.  You need to have a 
look at the NDA specifications, and mayber show me where it states I can't 
tell people I'm a dev or that I'm running Mavericks.  I don't recall ever 
seeing that.  I can't tell you anything ab out it, no, but I can at least 
say yes.  Finally, the issue of question wasn't is anyone running an NDA 
version of PT.  He asked if anyone had tried with Maverick, and it truth, 
yes, I have, and taht is why I said yes, it has been tested.  I would think 
saying issues are being worked on would go without saying and that's why I 
didn't mention it.  The sky's blue.  Must I be that literal?  Sorry to sound 
so much like a jack ass, but honestly, I answered a question, WTF!


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: Counter displays in PT 10?



IF memory serves corretc the issue exist in ML with PT 9 as well. A
lion Partition should work fine. Personally i have a studio machine i
kept on lion and have a laptop i run ML and etc on and test stuff
with.

Regarding NDA, First off you already  broke the NDA by discussing taht
you were running Mavericks.  and seeing as how you aren't disclosing
anything related to features or  OSX centric operations, and you
aren't running a NDA Beta of Pro Tools, you may as well just tell us
your  findings. A simple the same issue persist or it works now is
sufficient.

On 8/12/13, Juan Pablo jpcula...@gmail.com wrote:
And if you're under a NDA, why did you write this e-mail? Completely 
without


sense.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Gilland
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:22 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Counter displays in PT 10?

I've tried 10 with Mavericks, yes, but being that Mavericks isn't
officially
released, I'm on NDA thus can't disclose my findings.  Sorry.

Chris.

- Original Message -
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Counter displays in PT 10?



OK, that will be it I'm on mountain lion. I didn't know there were
issues with pt and Mountain lion. So I guess I'll have to create a
lion partition then. Is that what you've done or have you just not
upgraded to Lion. Anyone tried any version of tools with Mavericks
yet?

On 8/12/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

Again, as we've said, are you on Mountain Lion?  If so, that's why
they're
not reading.  There are issues with pt 10 and ml.  Honestly, I wonder 
if

those issues exhibit with pt9 and Mountain Lion.

We shall know very very shortly as I'm about to be playing later today
with

an ml system running pt 9.

Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: Counter displays in PT 10?



Hey, is it me or do the counter displays not read in PT10? Is there
any way of knowing what bar I'm currently on?

So, if they are broken, what's the best way of creating a double
bridge sequence in my song?

So I get into shuffle mode and if I know where the bridge starts and
ends, numeric slash is my friend to create those selections to copy
each track right? But if I don't have those numbers? or is there just
a better way of doing this in tools?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups

Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an

email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups


Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an


email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received

Re: Saving in Version 9 format

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Gilland
Awesomeness, I'll give that a shot.  I did kind of wonder what that option 
did differently.


Thanks for the help.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Saving in Version 9 format



try save copy as instead of save as.

On 8/12/13, Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:

OK, so I have a studio I'm going to be working in that I need to send a
session to.  They only have ProTools MP9 however.  I know that PT 10 
saves

the session in a .ptx format, which I kind a recall ProTools 9 not being
able to open.  When I went to the file menu, and to save as, even after
expanding the disclosure triangle, I don't see any way to set the file 
type


to the older format.  I know this can be done, as I've seen people do it. 
I


just wonder how they're going about resaving the session in a format that
MP9 can open.

Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Awesome keyboard shortcuts

2013-08-11 Thread Mark Gilland
Wo! baby!  I never knew about the command shift F!  I gotta try that next 
time!


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Readfern-Gray readfern.g...@googlemail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 9:33 AM
Subject: Awesome keyboard shortcuts



OK, so I guess that many of you will know these but I've only just
discovered the last 3 so I thought I'd help other newbies out.

Arm or disarm the selected track for recording shift+r
Mute the selected track Shift+M
Solo the selected track Shift+S

But these are killer

In edit mode.
p select the previous track
semicolon select the next track

In edit or mix mode.
command+shift+f brings up a dialog where you can select a track by its 
number.


For me at least that's much quicker then interacting with the track
list and arrowing to the track I want to mute or solo.

So there you go, enjoy. Anyone know why p and semicolon don't work in mix 
mode?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Assisting with a ProTools Installation

2013-08-08 Thread Mark Gilland

Hey guys.

I need a little help.  The guy who works with me, Ben, has just gone on 
Amazon, and bought him a bundled audio pack which contains a mike, pop 
filter, stand, stereo earphones, the exact same ironically interface that 
I'm using, and a copy of ProTools MP9.  Yes, I know, that's a bit old, but 
he's going to crossgrade it eventually.  Right now though, he's got a 
project coming up on Labor Day weekend, that he has a deadline to finish, 
and being right now, our biggest concern is getting him familiarized with 
the basics of PT.  He's not a musician.  He's going to be mainly using this 
setup for spoken word.


Anyway, I think if I understood correctly that the ILok he's getting should 
already come with the asset for ProTools on it.  If not though, what now 
with this new ILok manager thing are the steps to get his ILok account 
setup, and get his ProTools license over onto the ILok?  Don't worry about 
accessibility.  We have someone sighted who definitely can help us.  We just 
need to know what they will need to do to get things up and working.  I am 
debating just having him call Sweet Water Support and letting them remote 
into his system and do it for him, but I'd rather not bother them and just 
get his mom or dad to help us do it, if possible.  I can help him once we 
get past that, but that's really the biggest concern.  I know how to do it 
with the old web based ILok manager, but I know nothing about this new way 
of doing it which I hear is completely inaccessible.  I really hope we get 
that issue fixed eventually.  Anyway, I'm going to try to get Ben to join 
the list later today.  I think he had intended to do so, and got 
sidetracked, so I'll remind him.  I'm mainly writing on his behalf though as 
first of all, he doesn't know anything about this type stuff, but is 
definitely wanting to learn, and 2, with him not being on the list yet, plus 
the fact I'm gonna be the one helping him one on one to get up and 
running... I just want to make sure all my ducks are in a row to help him, 
cause you know what happens to the levels when you duck something too 
much...  OK, never mind.  That was a smart ass really! bad! joke.  Seriously 
speaking though, yeah, if someone could give me an idea of the process to 
get, or to be sure in the first place, that his asset is on that included 
ILok, I'd really appreciate it.  Again, us getting sighted help isn't an 
issue at all.  That should be fairly easy to do.


Chris. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Assisting with a ProTools Installation

2013-08-08 Thread Mark Gilland
Actually, that's not true on either of the things you mention from what I 
can tell.  I bought an item from somewhere other than Sweet Water and they 
were still more than happy to help me.  Secondly, when I intially back in 
the days got my MP9 bundled copy of ProTools, it had an ILok, and the asset 
was already on it, but, he's still going to want to create an ILok account 
and sync that asset down to his account.  What if down the road he wants to 
buy any ILok licensed plugins.  The bottom line is, he's gonna sooner or 
later enough need an ILok account.


Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: Assisting with a ProTools Installation


Boxed copies of PT 9 came with the licensed on the iLok, However if this is 
PT MP9 I believe the M-Audio interface acts as the copy protection mechnaism 
and the ilok isn't used for those. Also Sweetwater Support as far as I know 
will only be usuable on things bought from Sweetwater, and you mentioned you 
bought this from amazon.


On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:49 AM, Mark Gilland wrote:


Hey guys.

I need a little help.  The guy who works with me, Ben, has just gone on 
Amazon, and bought him a bundled audio pack which contains a mike, pop 
filter, stand, stereo earphones, the exact same ironically interface that 
I'm using, and a copy of ProTools MP9.  Yes, I know, that's a bit old, but 
he's going to crossgrade it eventually.  Right now though, he's got a 
project coming up on Labor Day weekend, that he has a deadline to finish, 
and being right now, our biggest concern is getting him familiarized with 
the basics of PT.  He's not a musician.  He's going to be mainly using 
this setup for spoken word.


Anyway, I think if I understood correctly that the ILok he's getting 
should already come with the asset for ProTools on it.  If not though, 
what now with this new ILok manager thing are the steps to get his ILok 
account setup, and get his ProTools license over onto the ILok?  Don't 
worry about accessibility.  We have someone sighted who definitely can 
help us.  We just need to know what they will need to do to get things up 
and working.  I am debating just having him call Sweet Water Support and 
letting them remote into his system and do it for him, but I'd rather not 
bother them and just get his mom or dad to help us do it, if possible.  I 
can help him once we get past that, but that's really the biggest concern. 
I know how to do it with the old web based ILok manager, but I know 
nothing about this new way of doing it which I hear is completely 
inaccessible.  I really hope we get that issue fixed eventually.  Anyway, 
I'm going to try to get Ben to join the list later today.  I think he had 
intended to do so, and got sidetracked, so I'll remind him.  I'm mainly 
writing on his behalf though as first of all, he doesn't know anything 
about this type stuff, but is definitely wanting to learn, and 2, with him 
not being on the list yet, plus the fact I'm gonna be the one helping him 
one on one to get up and running... I just want to make sure all my ducks 
are in a row to help him, cause you know what happens to the levels when 
you duck something too much...  OK, never mind.  That was a smart ass 
really! bad! joke.  Seriously speaking though, yeah, if someone could give 
me an idea of the process to get, or to be sure in the first place, that 
his asset is on that included ILok, I'd really appreciate it.  Again, us 
getting sighted help isn't an issue at all.  That should be fairly easy to 
do.


Chris.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: I never thought I'd see the day, but I'm taking the plunge into ProTools!

2013-08-08 Thread Mark Gilland

Hello Ben.

Welcome abord!  Great to see a new user getting on board the PT wagon.  If 
I, or anyone else on here can answer any questions for you, don't hesitate 
to let us know.  That's what we're here for, and you'll find none of us 
bite.  We have some very very knowledgeable people on here.  Not to leave 
anyone out, but for example, Kevin Reeves is on here, so is Slau Haliton, or 
as you might or might not know him... jerry Haliton, although he I think 
prefers going by Slau, Dono if Venny is on here or not.  I think he is, but 
not sure.  Chuck Reichel is also on here, you may remember me talking to you 
about him.  Really all of us on here are very friendly, or at least I think, 
so don't ever feel like there is such thing as a dumb question.  When it 
doubt ask.  A lot of the stuff for now might on  here go over your head, but 
don't worry, you gotta start somewhere.


Anyway, ultimately the bottom line is, wlcome to the list.  We're all glad 
to have you~!


Chris.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: An excellent tutorial for pro tools on youtube

2013-02-26 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Can you provide us both the links or at least their watch ID's?  Would love 
to throw them into mactubes.


Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays.
- Original Message - 
From: trevor trevor.sco...@btopenworld.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:01
Subject: An excellent tutorial for pro tools on youtube



I have found a very good two part tutorial for pro tools on youtube.
It is called learning pro tools by Tim Hall.
They are about fifty minutes each and cover a lot of things.
The best thing about them ,is that every thing he does he tells you what 
the key stroke is.

They are definitely worth a listen for anyone learning pro tools.

Cheers,

Trevor

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: An excellent tutorial for pro tools on youtube

2013-02-26 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Wow, you didn't have to do that converting them, I could have watched them 
online.  Thank you though.  I'm very greatful.  That is very appreciated.


Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays.
- Original Message - 
From: trevor trevor.sco...@btopenworld.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 14:15
Subject: Re: An excellent tutorial for pro tools on youtube


For Chris and anyone else who is interested, find the links for the 
tutorials below.



http://www.sendspace.com/file/ge36y8


http://www.sendspace.com/file/4zsvof


Cheers,

Trevor

-Original Message- 
From: Christopher-Mark Gilland

Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:29 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: An excellent tutorial for pro tools on youtube

Can you provide us both the links or at least their watch ID's?  Would 
love

to throw them into mactubes.

Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays.
- Original Message - 
From: trevor trevor.sco...@btopenworld.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:01
Subject: An excellent tutorial for pro tools on youtube



I have found a very good two part tutorial for pro tools on youtube.
It is called learning pro tools by Tim Hall.
They are about fifty minutes each and cover a lot of things.
The best thing about them ,is that every thing he does he tells you what 
the key stroke is.

They are definitely worth a listen for anyone learning pro tools.

Cheers,

Trevor

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools 
Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Fw: News from Avid

2013-02-12 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Dude, no offense.  give the guy some credit.  we dont' really know what all 
is going on behind the scene.  He's apparently a new c e o, so let's 
approach this as maybe this could be a clean slate.  You know... a way to 
see that accessibility is a higher demand priority.


Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays.
- Original Message - 
From: David Ingram dingram...@earthlink.net

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:25
Subject: Re: Fw: News from Avid


How does this change really help our cause?  If someone can please tell me,
i'll be willing to listen.  It just seems that the person was writing to
those who are inside of the company.  There was no mention of any
improvements as it relates to accessibility to any of the products that avid
has or anything like that.  I don't know may be that is coming.
- Original Message - 
From: Monkey Pusher monkeypushe...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: News from Avid


On 2/11/13, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
AvidThis may be a very positive thing.  Slau, you'd know better than any 
of

us.  I assume this is a good sign?

- Original Message -
From: Louis Hernandez, Jr., Avid
To: cgilla...@carolina.rr.com
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:29 PM
Subject: News from Avid



 Trouble viewing email? View as a web page.




  Dear Avid Community,

  You may have seen an announcement earlier today about an
executive leadership change at Avid. As Avid’s new President and CEO, I am
writing to briefly introduce myself, and to provide some early thoughts on
why I am so excited to be leading Avid at such an important time in the
company’s history.

  Having led many previous technology companies in a 
variety

of complex vertical markets, I join the entire Avid team in our commitment
to helping you win in the rapidly changing technology environment we all
face. As a member of Avid’s Board for the past five years, I’ve had the 
good

fortune to become familiar with many of you directly, and I am well aware
that you all are the reason for our success as a company. I am also
confident that the transition of leadership and customer relationships 
will

be smooth, as Gary Greenfield will remain on the Avid Board of Directors
through the end of his current term, to help ensure there will be no
disruption in our current ability to meet our product delivery, service, 
or

account commitments to all of you.

  From my perspective, Avid has never been better 
positioned

to deliver products and solutions that help meet your current and future
business challenges. Over the past 25 years, Avid has built a strong
heritage of industry leadership with the customers who create the most
listened to, most watched, and most loved entertainment in the world. In 
the

last several years, under the leadership of Chris Gahagan, our SVP of
Products and Services, we have continued to innovate around our entire
product suite. The recent addition of other senior executives such as Jeff
Rosica as our SVP Worldwide Field Operations, and W. Sean Ford as our CMO
and VP of Worldwide Marketing has only continued to build energy and
momentum within our broad community of supporters, partners and customers. 
I

am genuinely excited to be leading this management team, and expect even
greater success in the future.

  Going forward, you can expect Avid to work more closely
with you than ever before, whether it’s through our support and services
teams, customer advisory board participation, partner advisory boards, or
direct contact with your key Avid representatives. In addition, I will be
dedicating significant time to meeting with as many of you as possible 
over
the next few weeks and months, hearing your feedback, and understanding 
your

strategic priorities.

  I know from my time with Avid’s Board of Directors, that
there is broad support and excitement in our community about the future
opportunities in our industry generally and for Avid specifically. Thank 
you
again, and I look forward to celebrating many more achievements together 
in
the future. In the meantime, do not hesitate to reach out to me or your 
Avid

contacts directly.

  Best regards,
  Louis Hernandez, Jr.
  President and CEO, Avid





  We're Avid. Learn More

  © 2013 Avid Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 
Product

features, specifications, system requirements and availability are subject
to change without notice. Avid, the Avid logo, and other Avid trademarks 
are

either registered trademarks or trademarks of Avid Technology Inc

Fw: News from Avid

2013-02-11 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
AvidThis may be a very positive thing.  Slau, you'd know better than any of us. 
 I assume this is a good sign?

- Original Message - 
From: Louis Hernandez, Jr., Avid 
To: cgilla...@carolina.rr.com 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:29 PM
Subject: News from Avid


 
 Trouble viewing email? View as a web page. 
 
 


  Dear Avid Community,

  You may have seen an announcement earlier today about an 
executive leadership change at Avid. As Avid’s new President and CEO, I am 
writing to briefly introduce myself, and to provide some early thoughts on why 
I am so excited to be leading Avid at such an important time in the company’s 
history.

  Having led many previous technology companies in a variety of 
complex vertical markets, I join the entire Avid team in our commitment to 
helping you win in the rapidly changing technology environment we all face. As 
a member of Avid’s Board for the past five years, I’ve had the good fortune to 
become familiar with many of you directly, and I am well aware that you all are 
the reason for our success as a company. I am also confident that the 
transition of leadership and customer relationships will be smooth, as Gary 
Greenfield will remain on the Avid Board of Directors through the end of his 
current term, to help ensure there will be no disruption in our current ability 
to meet our product delivery, service, or account commitments to all of you. 

  From my perspective, Avid has never been better positioned to 
deliver products and solutions that help meet your current and future business 
challenges. Over the past 25 years, Avid has built a strong heritage of 
industry leadership with the customers who create the most listened to, most 
watched, and most loved entertainment in the world. In the last several years, 
under the leadership of Chris Gahagan, our SVP of Products and Services, we 
have continued to innovate around our entire product suite. The recent addition 
of other senior executives such as Jeff Rosica as our SVP Worldwide Field 
Operations, and W. Sean Ford as our CMO and VP of Worldwide Marketing has only 
continued to build energy and momentum within our broad community of 
supporters, partners and customers. I am genuinely excited to be leading this 
management team, and expect even greater success in the future.

  Going forward, you can expect Avid to work more closely with 
you than ever before, whether it’s through our support and services teams, 
customer advisory board participation, partner advisory boards, or direct 
contact with your key Avid representatives. In addition, I will be dedicating 
significant time to meeting with as many of you as possible over the next few 
weeks and months, hearing your feedback, and understanding your strategic 
priorities.

  I know from my time with Avid’s Board of Directors, that 
there is broad support and excitement in our community about the future 
opportunities in our industry generally and for Avid specifically. Thank you 
again, and I look forward to celebrating many more achievements together in the 
future. In the meantime, do not hesitate to reach out to me or your Avid 
contacts directly.

  Best regards,
  Louis Hernandez, Jr.
  President and CEO, Avid


 
 
 
  We're Avid. Learn More 
 
  © 2013 Avid Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. Product 
features, specifications, system requirements and availability are subject to 
change without notice. Avid, the Avid logo, and other Avid trademarks are 
either registered trademarks or trademarks of Avid Technology Inc. or its 
subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks 
contained herein are the property of their respective owners. All prices are 
USMSRP for the U.S. and Canada only and are subject to change without notice. 
Contact your local Avid office or reseller for prices outside the U.S. and 
Canada. 

 
  This message you have received is an advertisement or 
solicitation from: Avid Technology, Inc., 75 Network Drive, Burlington, MA, 
01803. This email has been sent to cgilla...@carolina.rr.com. Click here to 
update your email preferences or unsubscribe from Avid emails. 
 
   
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: I know i sound like a broken record, i just want to make sure, PT 9 or 10

2013-01-19 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Oh, that's why.  You need at least 9.0.3 for it to work on Lion.

Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays.
- Original Message - 
From: Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: I know i sound like a broken record, i just want to make sure, 
PT 9 or 10



Hmm, my 9.0 said it didn't want to work with Lion. Maybe it's because the 
license wasn't propperly installed. Hmm, have to hunt for the latest 9 then.

Thanks so much for the help.
/Krister

19 jan 2013 kl. 15:21 skrev Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com:


Hi Krister,

Stick with version 9. There's nothing in 10 that will be of any 
significant gain for you. If you're eligible for the upgrade, go ahead and 
download it. Just simply don't install it. Version 9 works with Lion. 
Learn the Pro Tools environment for now and install the upgrade once some 
of these issues with VoiceOver are resolved.


Cheers,

Slau

On Jan 19, 2013, at 6:02 AM, Krister Ekstrom wrote:


Hi there.
I have bought ProTools and an MBox and it turned out i got v9.0, however 
i have the possibility to upgrade to version 10. Now i heard that 
accessibility in some version of v10 is broken and so my questions now 
are:
Should i stick with a version 9 of Protools and if so which version works 
with Lion or should i upgrade to v10, something i want to do, and if so 
which version is safe to use with Voiceover? As i understand it v10.3.2 
is out of the question so what can/should i use to be certain it works 
with Voiceover?
How can i make sure the plugins will work with VO? and lastly, where do i 
place the loops that came with PT?
Thanks for any and all help and apologies for sounding lake a broken 
record and asking the same questions over and over again, it's just that 
every time i asked i got different answers and i ended up more confused 
than before.

/Krister, PT newbie






Somewhat of an odd request, but need a little help

2013-01-19 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK guys.  I am in the market for getting a new keyboard to use with my 
ProTools setup.  I have a few models in mind, but the one that really stands 
out is the Yamaha Motif.  So, I have a few questions.  First of all, I 
assume that this keyboard would be totally compatible with PT based on what 
I've read and seen.  Second of all, here's the little favor I have to ask. 
I know that a butt load of you don't do this stuff as a hobby, but more as a 
living to put food on your table, clothes on your back, and nappies on your 
kids bum bums, OK, juwst kidding on the last one, LOL! but bottom line is, 
you don't do free work, nor do I expect anyone to, but hear me out on this. 
I also understand this is probably not exactly the list to ask this, so I'm 
gonna keep this very direct, to the point, short and sweet, and very 
sparing.


Basically, I've looked at a Motif, yes.  but the thing is, within PT, I'm 
wanting to use the main samples that come on the keyboard itself, so I'd 
probably run it through it's line out, into my interface.  The only thing 
is, I've heard some of the samples, like the grand pianos a few of the 
guitars, maybe a few of the drum kits, etc. but I never really have heard 
them in context.  I've heard a few sequences which have been done but it 
didn't really give me a good idea, as it's not really exactly the style I'll 
be doing.


With this said, I'm not going to sit here and ask any of you to do 
Beethoven's fifth synthany or something complex, don't worry, that's not 
even my style, but rather let's take this real easy.  I want to hear 
something in context, a song that I actually know and can follow, so that I 
can better not only hear the samples in context but can even know what 
exactly I'm listenning for.  With music I don't know, it's hard as I don't 
exactly know where things should go in the first place.  I don't want 
anything major, but if any of you on here have a motif, and a way to patch 
it through PT, using the internal sequencer just within the Motif itself, 
and all onboard samples, nothing from a soft synth what so ever, let's just 
say something with only 2 chords the whole way through, just basically C, 
and G/G7.  It's not really my choice of music, but it's something very easy 
that I don't think would take much any effort to do.  Could someone maybe 
make me an mp3 of basically piano, drums, base and maybe guitar doing Skip 
to my Lou?  I know again this isn't really the list to ask this per sey.  I 
promise I'm not gonna keep asking.  I'm making this one request, and that'll 
be the end of it, no questions asked.  I cross my heart!  I just want to 
hear in real time what I'm getting.  This way, I can better decide if indeed 
the motif really will have the sound I'm looking for when certain samples 
are combined.  I don't need anything done real fancy.  Just wsomething like 
this simple that will give me an idea.


If willing, my e-mail address is:

clgillan...@gmail.com

I also know this probably will not happen over night.  Take all the time you 
need.  If it takes upward of a week, that's fine.  Just let me know however 
that if I am willing to be patient, you will do it for me.  This way I keep 
in the loop.  OK, enough said.  I'm finnished.  I won't ask anymore on list 
about this being it's a bit off topic.  That's my sincere whole hearted 
promise, so help me god.


Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays. 



Re: Howdy from a new list member

2013-01-16 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Speaking of reading, can someone point me specifically to the file that I 
need to read which lists all of the curent pt shortcut key commands from 
start to finish?


Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays.
- Original Message - 
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: Howdy from a new list member


Welcome, Jed. Hopefully the users on the list can help with questions. 
Prepare to read a lot and re-read :) It starts to make more sense the second 
or third time around. Don't let that discourage you.


Cheers,

Slau

On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Jed Barton wrote:


Hey gang,

Great to be part of this list.  I am just about to get protools and a mac,
and after the hour long discussion I had this afternoon, I'm pumped!
I have been working in broadcasting and audio production for years and 
have

been looking for a true multi-track editer, and now I found it.
Very excited.  Thought I would introduce myself to you guys.

Warmest Regards,

Jed





A Couple of Questions about basic nudging

2013-01-16 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I completely understand that I can select a portion of audio, then can use 
my plus and minus keys on the num pad to nudge forward or backward in my 
session.  I'm curious however if no audio is selected, however my counter is 
set where I want the nudge to start, then! what are the keyboard commands to 
move forward and backward?  I looked in the key shortcuts guide, but I can't 
seem to find it.


My final question is, if I wish to nudge something, does the audio I wish to 
nudge forward or back need to be isolated into its own region, or could I 
actually nudge it forward or back without first splitting into multiple 
regions?


Chris Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
http://www.clgproductions.com
E-mail: ch...@clgproductions.com
Phone: 803-760-7136
Toll-Free: 1-888-405-3185
Mon-Fri 8A.M-5P.M Eastern Standard Time except weekends and holidays. 



Re: A few basic commands forgotten

2013-01-10 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Awesome.  I'll check that out.

Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
- Original Message - 
From: Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: A few basic commands forgotten


Look in the counter cluster for time base.

HTH,

Sent from my iPhone

On 10 Jan 2013, at 00:51, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


OK, this is really really bad.  Kevin would kill me seeing we worked so 
extensively on this in our lessons.  Why this is  slipping my mind, I am 
unsure.


A few questions though:

1.  How do I increase/decrease my zoom ratio?  Like, if I hit the num pad 
plus and minus keys, or while not playing, I hit num pad 1 and num pad 2 
repetedly.  Basically, I wanna adjust the amount of area I cover each time 
I hit those keys.  This way if I need to do something really tight, I can, 
or if I need to zoom in where I can move in bigger chunks, I can.  I 
thought it was command+option+num pad plus and minus, but apparently not. 
That doesn't seem to be working.


2.  I know about using command+num pad plus and minus, or  option+minus or 
plus, but I kind a remember when selecting audio, that I could select in 
bigger chunks with command+num pad 1 or 2, or option+num pad 1 or two, 
depending on which side of the selection I'm moving.  That doesn't seem to 
be working though, and I can't for the life a me figure out why not.


The final question is, where do I go to change the edit counter cluster so 
that instead of it measuring time based off ticks/beats/bars, it bases it 
off hour, minute, seconds?  I gotta track I need to mix but it's spoken 
word, not music, so doing this in musical time signature is gonna be a 
mess!


Thank you.  Again, why these commands are slipping my mind, I don't know. 
I'd be happy to go look at the keyboard shortcut guide, but right now, I 
don't really have anything other than Preview for viewing P D F files, and 
to me, I never have been able to get my head around Preview.  If someone 
else has any other sollutions, I'd be extremely! greatful to know an 
easier way, as I really do wanna start looking more into reading the docs, 
as I'm a very firm believer in that being essential to me learning things 
optymally.


Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions 




Re: Huh! Now this is really strange! Anyone have any idea?

2013-01-10 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK, but with all do respect, that wasn't my problem.

The issue isn't not being able to delete the audio.  The issue is why when I 
only have one track in the entire session, I can't delete anything as for some 
reason if there is only one track, that one track doesn't apparently get 
selected, so even though I'm selecting audio, I'm only putting a selection up 
in my ruler.  It's not literally selecting audio on that track to be deleted.  
I'm only selecting a from/through time, but not the actual data itself.

Thank you kindly,d

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
  - Original Message - 
  From: Chris Norman 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:28 PM
  Subject: Re: Huh! Now this is really strange! Anyone have any idea?


  Unless I'm being stupid (it happens regularly!), you said you were trying to 
delete something?


  I'm not sure how everyone else does it, but the way I do it, is to select the 
audio, then press command b to clear the selection, which seems to delete the 
audio. That's how I've always done it. I have no idea if it's right, but it 
works, and the end result is that the audio is deleted.


  HTH,


  Take care,


  Chris Norman.
  chris.norm...@googlemail.com







  On 10 Jan 2013, at 22:25, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
wrote:


What're you clearing?  I'm totally confused on your reply?

Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
- Original Message - From: Chris Norman 
chris.norm...@googlemail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: Huh! Now this is really strange! Anyone have any idea?


I use command b to clear. It's in the edit menu.

HTH,

Sent from my iPhone

On 10 Jan 2013, at 01:06, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


  OK, this is totally weird, not to mention driving me nuts!  I'm using PT 
10.0.  I'm not on any build of 10.  I'm literally just on straight 10.0. Not 
10.0.1, etc.  This is just straight 10.0.  I'm using OSX 10.6.8 as my O S which 
runs ProTools.  OK, so here's the deal.  Even when I had Lion, I kind a 
remember this being a problem, but never really knew how to work around it 
effectively.

  Basically, I have one track in my entire session.  It's a stereo audio 
track.  I'm trying to select a portion of the track, so that I can trim off 
part of the beginning of the audio.  The issue is, I get the audio I need 
selected, and I make sure under my edit screen that the selecter tool is 
selected, which it is, and I also make sure that the edit mode cluster is on 
shuffle.  Then, I hit my delete key.  Nothing at all happens. Nothing what so 
ever gets deleted.  Yeah, I do have link selection in timeline or whatever 
that's called and the thing where the marker follows selection, I do have all 
that correctly set.  The only way that I have found to get around this problem 
so far, is to create another track, doesn't matter if it's an A U X, 
instrument, audio, or master fader.  The bottom line is, I just have to create 
another track.  I don't necessarily have to put anything on it, nor route 
anything through it with a bus, etc. I just have to have it created.  Then, and 
only! then, I can go up to my track list table, interact with it, go back up to 
the actual audio track I need to edit, hit vo+space to select it, and then! I 
can delete with no issue.  In other words, more simply put, unless I have at 
least two tracks in my session, editting seems to be impossible.  Even though 
with one track only, that track seems to be selected in the track table.  NO, I 
don't! know! it's selected, but I'm assuming! it is, based off the fact, there 
wouldn't be anything else to! select. Plus, Even though with only one track, it 
reads that table as a text box, not a table, I still anyway, have hit vo+space 
on the track, just to be sure it was selected.  Still, no go.  It just won't do 
it, unless there is more than one track in the session.  This is extremely! 
bizarre!  I'm just wonderring if any a you guys have also seen this behavior 
and if so, aside adding a dummy track temporarily, is there a better 
work-around?

  chris. 






Re: help selecting regions

2012-11-26 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
1.  How do I make a region split, and second of all, then how do I move from 
region to region, I know tab is next region, and shift tab selects the 
current region.  I don't remember though what previous region is.  Wasn't 
that option tab?


Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
- Original Message - 
From: Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: help selecting regions


Sure. Look in the options menu. Link track and edit selections I believe is 
the one. Then you can either use the track table to select tracks, or press 
control p and control ; to move up and down through the tracks. Finally, use 
number pad = followed by your range. So = 3 = 4 would select bar 3.


Hth,

Sent from my iPhone

On 25 Nov 2012, at 07:45, chadbaker2 baker3...@gmail.com wrote:



hi i am trying to select regions for quantizing voiceover says there 
selected and there not i had a sighted friend look is there something i 
can turn on where it selects automatically when a track is selected 




Re: response from Gary greenfield

2012-11-16 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Awesome deal Slau!  Please keep us posted.  Glad to hear things are progressing.

Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions

Blog:
http://www.clgproductions.org

Podcast:
http://clgproductions.podhoster.com

E-mail:
ch...@clgproductions.com

IMessage/Facetime:
theblindmusic...@att.net

Windows Live Messenger:
ch...@blindperspectives.net

Twitter:
@gilland_chris

Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/christopher.gilland

Skype:
twinklesfriend2007

Send me a fax from any standard fax machine:
704-697-2069

Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570


  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:47 PM
  Subject: response from Gary greenfield


  Well, folks, I'm happy to inform you that it appears we're looking at Plan A. 
I just got a reply from Gary Greenfield. It's short and sweet and I take that 
to be a good thing for now. Here's his message:


  Slau,

  Thank you for the note. I did hear about the meeting and you are talking 
to the right people. I  know Rich is personally committed to making some 
real progress here so that you and others can take advantage of Pro Tools.   I 
am sure he will keep you updated.

  Enjoy the holiday.

  Gary


  I'll continue to interface with Rich after the holidays to see what needs to 
be done. Just wanted to share the news.


  Cheers,


  Slau



Re: Question about monitoring vocals

2012-11-14 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
OK, have you got a number for M-Audio, which I could call?  The last time that 
I looked on their web site, I didn't seem to find anything.

Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions

Blog:
http://www.clgproductions.org

Podcast:
http://clgproductions.podhoster.com

E-mail:
ch...@clgproductions.com

IMessage/Facetime:
theblindmusic...@att.net

Windows Live Messenger:
ch...@blindperspectives.net

Twitter:
@gilland_chris

Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/christopher.gilland

Skype:
twinklesfriend2007

Send me a fax from any standard fax machine:
704-697-2069

Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570


  - Original Message - 
  From: TheOreoMonster 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:48 PM
  Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals


  Two suggestions. A) have someone sighted next to you while on the phone with 
m-audio support, or  b) call m-audio and see if they will remote into your 
system and set it up for you.  Also they don't need to be a computer wiz  to 
follow the steps laid out in the manual. 

  On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:57 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


The issue is I don't know how to enable direct monitoring on the C400.  I 
think you gotta do it through the M-Audio control panel, which isn't accessible 
in the least, and I lamentably don't have anyone sighted who knows anything at 
all about what they're doing that could help me go in there and turn that on.  
Anyway, again, I'm probably rambling so I'll shut up.

Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions

Blog:
http://www.clgproductions.org

Podcast:
http://clgproductions.podhoster.com

E-mail:
ch...@clgproductions.com

IMessage/Facetime:
theblindmusic...@att.net

Windows Live Messenger:
ch...@blindperspectives.net

Twitter:
@gilland_chris

Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/christopher.gilland

Skype:
twinklesfriend2007

Send me a fax from any standard fax machine:
704-697-2069

Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570


  - Original Message -
  From: TheOreoMonster
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:47 PM
  Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals


  actually since we are recording in digital and at 24 bits there is no 
reason to record as loud as you can with out clipping anymore. That was what 
you had to do in the analog days to make sure the audio was up over the noise 
floor of tape  or you would hear the tape hiss  during what you were recording. 
 You record at lower levels you have more room to bring tracks up in the mix  
before they clip and more flexibility withcompression and other dynamics 
effects. 


  As for the original question. stop trying to monitor what is in the DAW 
and listen to the   direct monitoring from the interface. you should have 
enough level there   without having to crank everything up. Unless you have a 
reverb or something else on the track  that you want to monitor yourself 
through while recording, there is really no benefit to using the input monitor 
in your DAW over the direct monitor of the interface. But if you  insist on 
monitoring through the DAW, then try putting a gain plug in in one of the 
insert slots.


  On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com 
wrote:


OK, no offense, but I got bored of reading half way through the 
message, but here it is:


I'm not a pro, but I always thought you got the original signal as loud 
as possible without clipping. Personally, I head for as close to 0db on that 
gain indicator as possible, usually stopping level testing at about -3db, to 
account for the fact that people usually sing louder with the backing in their 
ears. No clue how you get anything done at -10db, but maybe I'm completely 
wrong.


If that's still not loud enough, turn the fader right up, no one cares 
of that fuzzes, then, if you still don't have enough, once you've got your 
initial level set, compress away, use the fatten or brick wall presets, and you 
should be fine.


Anyways, sorry if I missed your point, but all the extra jabber you put 
in your messages means about 50 paragraphs of whatever whatever, this is 
completely by the point, and I'm bored out of my mind, but I think paragraph 3 
said it all.


HTH,


Take care,


Chris Norman.
chris.norm...@googlemail.com







On 14 Nov 2012, at 02:01, Christopher-Mark Gilland 
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


  OK, this may seem like quite an elementary question, and a lot of you 
probably are gonna look at me and think I'm nuts for asking, but here's my 
situation.

  I have a pare of head phones which I've been using for a while now.  
I'm not gonna sit here and lie to you guies.  They're

Re: Question about monitoring vocals

2012-11-14 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Is there a reason why I get a lotta ladency when I insert auto-Tune?  I'm 
trying to lean more away from that plugin as much as I can, but sometimes, I 
do still use it on rare occasions.


Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions

Blog:
http://www.clgproductions.org

Podcast:
http://clgproductions.podhoster.com

E-mail:
ch...@clgproductions.com

IMessage/Facetime:
theblindmusic...@att.net

Windows Live Messenger:
ch...@blindperspectives.net

Twitter:
@gilland_chris

Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/christopher.gilland

Skype:
twinklesfriend2007

Send me a fax from any standard fax machine:
704-697-2069

Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570


- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals


I just input at around -10, and insert the comp while recording, which will 
crank up the output gain to a desirable level. It's just a matter of 
preference. I prefer recording with some effects on to help the process 
along. 



<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >