Re: WD Hard Drives

[Harry Putnam]

"Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've been selling WD (only the BB and JB models mind you - 7200RPM) with my
> systems since their WD400BB came out and was voted fastest 40Gb HDD at the
> time. That was a while ago, so you can see how long I've been dealing with
> them.

I'm guessing maybe 2 yrs since 40gig was a common size.  Maybe a
little less.  So in reference to your statement of `never' having
returned one.  How long does `never' span in this case?

> I've actually never had to return one yet. So I was assuming they were above
> good, in fact excellent. Can the original poster let me know where this
> 'timebomb' information is please? I'd like to read it.

If one of your buyers had a failure would it be retured to you?  Or
would you have a reason to know it had happened?

What I'm getting is trying to see if your experience is just your own
usage or your customer base too. 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: WD Hard Drives

[Edward Dekkers]

> IIRC, one was maybe a year old. The other was bad out of the box I
> think. It never died completely, it just collected errors out the
> wazoo. It took me a while to realize it was the drive, and not some
> other component. By then, I was glad to see it go.

Wow, do we get different drives to you here in Australia?

I've been selling WD (only the BB and JB models mind you - 7200RPM) with my
systems since their WD400BB came out and was voted fastest 40Gb HDD at the
time. That was a while ago, so you can see how long I've been dealing with
them.

They carry a three year warranty which is better than most.

BUT

I've actually never had to return one yet. So I was assuming they were above
good, in fact excellent. Can the original poster let me know where this
'timebomb' information is please? I'd like to read it.

P.S. Currently using a WD1200JB (the 120Gb with the 8Mb Cache).

LIGHTENING! (for an IDE drive I mean)

Regards,
Ed.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: (no subject)

[loophole]

it should be 2.4.9-34 :)

sorry.


--- loophole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> that is the latest kernel version for 7.2 - 2.4.9-31
> 
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2002-104.html
> 
> What kernel version to you expect to be the latest?
> Unless you have an S390 which has version 2.4.9-37.
> :)
> 
> cheers,
> lh
> 
> --- Josepablo Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gretings,
> > 
> > Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date
> --configure
> > and made sure that 
> > the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed
> > up2date -u and the 
> > updates were made, however the kernel was updated
> > but up tp version: 
> > 2.4.9-34 which is not the latest kernel. The
> > question is why does 
> > up2date refuse to update the kernel to the newest
> > version?
> > 
> > Thank You.
> > Josepablo Pérez
> > 
> 
> > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/octet-stream
> name=after up2date -u my kernel did not get updated
> to
> the latest version.
> 
> 
> 
> =
> -
> lh  
> -
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


=
-
lh  
-

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: (no subject)

[loophole]

that is the latest kernel version for 7.2 - 2.4.9-31

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2002-104.html

What kernel version to you expect to be the latest?
Unless you have an S390 which has version 2.4.9-37. :)

cheers,
lh

--- Josepablo Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gretings,
> 
> Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure
> and made sure that 
> the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed
> up2date -u and the 
> updates were made, however the kernel was updated
> but up tp version: 
> 2.4.9-34 which is not the latest kernel. The
> question is why does 
> up2date refuse to update the kernel to the newest
> version?
> 
> Thank You.
> Josepablo Pérez
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/octet-stream
name=after up2date -u my kernel did not get updated to
the latest version.



=
-
lh  
-

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Samba Printer Setup Problem

[Rupesh]

I am using Redhat 7.2 and I have configured Samba 2.2.5-1.

I my Network Places, I am able to view my Linux Server and access my
shared directories, here I get the option of Printers and Faxes, when
I try to Add Printer I get the following error message.

" You dont have sufficient privileges a add a printer on
"\\SambaServer". Do you want to run this command as a different user?
"

What could be the reason for this error message, though I am able to
access the shared directories on SambaServer from my Network Places.

TIA.

-Rupesh



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Mutt and text/html (SOLVED)

[Kevin - KD Micro Software]

Hi 
Tony,
 
Thanks! That was definitely the answer I was 
looking for.Originally I wanted to use sendmail for this but I couldn't seem 
to get the encoding right on the PDF file. It would send through ok but when it 
came to opening it, Acrobat would throw it out as a corrupted file, so I gave up 
on that and used Mutt.This way makes things so much easier for 
me.
 
Thanks again.
Kevin 
GreenKD Micro Software[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MP 107, Market City, 280 Bannister Road, Canning Vale WA 
6155.Phone: 9256 1566 (2778 internal)     Mobile: 
0419 949 254.
 
- Original Message - 
From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Mutt and text/html
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-> Hash: SHA1> 
> On 11-Jul-2002/10:52 +0800, Kevin - KD Micro Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:> >This is probably a dumb question but I've looked everywhere 
and can't> >find the answer to this.  I'm using Mutt to send out 
an email with a PDF> >attachment using the command:> 
>> >echo "" >/dev/null | mutt -a $pdf -H $elog> 
>> >with $pdf being set by my script as the PDF file and $elog is 
the actual> >message body file.  File $elog contains 
this:> >> >From: $fromname <$fromemail>> 
>To: $sendlogto> >Subject: $fromname: E-Mail Log> 
>> >The mail log is attached.> >> >This itself 
works perfectly. But what I would like to do is have HTML> >code 
inside the message body. Adding the Content-Type: text/html line to> 
>the $elog file doesn't seem to let this work because the 
Content-Type> >gets overwritten by Mutt putting in the Content-Type: 
multipart/mixed;> >boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" because of the 
attachment.> >> >Does anyone know of any way I can get Mutt 
to set the Content-Type for> >the message body?> > Send 
both the PDF and the HTML as attachments. Otherwise there is no way> to 
set the MIME boundary correctly.> > Another way is to use mmencode 
to do the Base64 encoding, have the script> create all the message 
headers and MIME boundaries and pipe the result to> sendmail. You can use 
my sendfile.sh script as a starting point.> >   http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/downloads/> > Just add a text/html part with "Content-Disposition: 
inline". That whould> work fine.> > > Tony> - 
-- > Anthony E. Greene > 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 
239D> AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05    HomePage: 
> Linux. The choice of a GNU generation > 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 
(GNU/Linux)> Comment: Anthony E. Greene  
0x6C94239D> > 
iD8DBQE9LPimpCpg3WyUI50RAlonAKDA+274be3X82GtkWKz/K8v76kh2QCgrjbP> 
a+bsHA4z+WfRI9AzeQct76k=> =NPLo> -END PGP 
SIGNATURE-> > > > 
___> Redhat-list mailing 
list> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: WD Hard Drives

[Hal Burgiss]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:07:30PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I had 2 WD drives die very prematurely not long ago. Then, I had to
> > ask myself why would I want replacements? I don't trust them, at least
> > the low end ones. I have another that seems fine though. I also try to
> > keep this in mind:
> 
> Hal, what are you using to determine premature?  My experiences with

IIRC, one was maybe a year old. The other was bad out of the box I
think. It never died completely, it just collected errors out the
wazoo. It took me a while to realize it was the drive, and not some
other component. By then, I was glad to see it go.

> computer equip of any kind, spans only a time frame since 1996 so I
> wonder what long term users have seen in terms of longevity for drives.

I typically replace mine every few years or so. But I still have a
386/SX16 with original drive (IIRC) and power supply, circa 1989 that
runs IBM DOS7 fine :/ What surprises me more than the drive, is the
power supply. The fan works and everything despite having a heavy dose
of crud on the blades.

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: WD Hard Drives

[Harry Putnam]

Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I had 2 WD drives die very prematurely not long ago. Then, I had to
> ask myself why would I want replacements? I don't trust them, at least
> the low end ones. I have another that seems fine though. I also try to
> keep this in mind:

Hal, what are you using to determine premature?  My experiences with
computer equip of any kind, spans only a time frame since 1996 so I
wonder what long term users have seen in terms of longevity for drives.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: WD Hard Drives

[Hal Burgiss]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:36:16PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> 
> It would be interesting to hear of other experiences.

I had 2 WD drives die very prematurely not long ago. Then, I had to
ask myself why would I want replacements? I don't trust them, at least
the low end ones. I have another that seems fine though. I also try to
keep this in mind:

http://linux-ide.org/endorsements.html

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: WD Hard Drives

[Harry Putnam]

Julian Opificius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've been following a thread on the Mandrake newbie list about hard
> drives, and "learned" that my Western Digital HDs are about as welcome
> in the Linux world as a hole in the head.
>
> I haven't had any problems with my RH7.2 installations to date, even
> after I added a WD 80Gig drive on one of them. Am I living on borrowed
> time?
> Can anyone speak from experience on the issue?

I've run linux on wd drives since 1996.  A total of 6 drives have
been used  2 failed.  One after about 3 yrs, the other after about 1
yr.  The survivors are about 2-3yr old now.

Both were replaced with no questions and in short order. (about
1 wk ).  But I happen to live near a wd distribution point which may
have sped it up on the return leg, but would have had no bearing on
them getting it back to me.

None of them have been treated gently.  And have been pulled and
installed a few times.. and .. not by experts, but yours truly.
That is to say, they've been dropped, had coffee spilled on them etc. 

Not sure how that failure rate holds up against other brands since
I've mostly used wd.  I've moved slowly away from them, but more from
retiring some drives due to there being small (3gig) and buying stuff
that came with other brands installed, than on purpose.

I have had 1 maxtor (of three I've used) , about 9mnts old, fail.  It
took 3 wks for a replacement to arrive, but was also free.

I can make no comment on performance of a technical nature. But I
kind of doubt it would be much of a factor between brands, unless you
go scsi.

It would be interesting to hear of other experiences.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: (no subject) a.k.a What kernel for 7.2

[Patrick Beart]

At 8:39 AM +0800 7/11/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Josepablo Pérez wrote:
>
>>  Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that
>>  the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the
>>  updates were made, however the kernel was updated but up tp version:
>>  2.4.9-34 which is not the latest kernel. The question is why does
>>  up2date refuse to update the kernel to the newest version?
>
>Actually, 2.4.9-34 is the latest kernel for the 7.2 version of Red Hat.
>
>Check out the packages section on https://rhn.redhat.com.
>
>You could upgrade to 7.3 for a later kernel.


Why can't a kernel version BEYOND 2.4.9-34 be used with RH 7.2??

There is a stable version to at least 2.4.18-3. Has anybody 
run this kernel version with RH 7.2??



Patrick Beart

-- 

Web Architecture  &  "iWeb4Biz" 503-774-8280   Portland, OR
Internet Consulting, Intelligent Web site Development & Secure site Hosting.
http://www.WebArchitecture.com/

"This is an era when nonsense has become acceptable and sanity is 
controversial."
  - Thomas Sowell




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

WD Hard Drives

[Julian Opificius]

I've been following a thread on the Mandrake newbie list about hard drives, 
and "learned" that my Western Digital HDs are about as welcome in the Linux 
world as a hole in the head.

I haven't had any problems with my RH7.2 installations to date, even after 
I added a WD 80Gig drive on one of them. Am I living on borrowed time?
Can anyone speak from experience on the issue?


There was a composer name Liszt
Whose music no one could resiszt
   When he swept the keyboard
   No one could be bored
And now that he's gone, he is miszt.

or ...

A tutor who tooted the flute
Tried to tutor two tooters to toot.
   Said the two to the tutor,
   "Is it harder to toot, or
To tutor two tooters to toot?"

Julian & Deb Opificius
802 Fawn Road, Elk River, MN 55330
763.441.1291.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Message Queues Maximum Message Size

[Raymond Fung]

Check the "/proc/sys/kernel/msgmax" file. Put a new value into this
file (e.g. by "echo 16384 > /proc/sys/kernel/msgmax") can change the
maximum allowable size immediately (NO NEED to recompile kernel and NOT
even reboot the system). If you want to keep the setting even after
reboot, try editing "/etc/sysctl.conf" and put in a line like :
"sys.kernel.msgmax = 16384" and that's it.

Regards,
Raymond Fung.

Dave Ihnat wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:10:03PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 08-Jul-2002/12:16 -0600, Alan Kirton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >What is the maximum allowable size for messages put onto System V message
> > >queues and how is the maximum size controlled?
> >
> > If you're talking about sendmail, see "MaxMessageSize" in sendmail.cf or
> > SMTP_MAILER_MAX in your .mc file.
> 
> No, he's talking about the System V ipc stuff--look at ipcs, f'rinstance.
> 
> Last I looked, you still need to change #defines in msg.h and recompile the
> kernel, but that was a long time ago--they were talking about creating a
> proc interface, but I don't know if it's bubbled to the top of the stack.
> That's at least the place to start looking.
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Dave Ihnat
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Mutt and text/html

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11-Jul-2002/10:52 +0800, Kevin - KD Micro Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is probably a dumb question but I've looked everywhere and can't
>find the answer to this.  I'm using Mutt to send out an email with a PDF
>attachment using the command:
>
>echo "" >/dev/null | mutt -a $pdf -H $elog
>
>with $pdf being set by my script as the PDF file and $elog is the actual
>message body file.  File $elog contains this:
>
>From: $fromname <$fromemail>
>To: $sendlogto
>Subject: $fromname: E-Mail Log
>
>The mail log is attached.
>
>This itself works perfectly. But what I would like to do is have HTML
>code inside the message body. Adding the Content-Type: text/html line to
>the $elog file doesn't seem to let this work because the Content-Type
>gets overwritten by Mutt putting in the Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" because of the attachment.
>
>Does anyone know of any way I can get Mutt to set the Content-Type for
>the message body?

Send both the PDF and the HTML as attachments. Otherwise there is no way
to set the MIME boundary correctly.

Another way is to use mmencode to do the Base64 encoding, have the script
create all the message headers and MIME boundaries and pipe the result to
sendmail. You can use my sendfile.sh script as a starting point.

  http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/downloads/

Just add a text/html part with "Content-Disposition: inline". That whould
work fine.


Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LPimpCpg3WyUI50RAlonAKDA+274be3X82GtkWKz/K8v76kh2QCgrjbP
a+bsHA4z+WfRI9AzeQct76k=
=NPLo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[R P Herrold]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote:

> I don't think so. He can receive mail from other servers in his domain.

The transport mechanism is not described -- fetchmail could be
pulling local copies, for all we know.  A trace of
/var/log/messages would demonstrate external connectivity, and
reject reasons.  The cited tips item is a general local net 
solution.

-- Russ herrold



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Getting Hi-Res time in Linux (Redhat)

[Harry Putnam]

"Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 08-Jul-2002/20:39 -0500, "Parhami, Faraz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there
>>a method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross
>>'timeofday'. Is this the right method to use? 'gethrtime' guarantees 1
>>microsecond precision.
>
> You might try asking this on the Linux Kernel Mailing List (lkml) or on a
> developer's list.

Take a look on your system for the perl module `Time::HiRes'.  If it
is installed `perldoc Time::HiRes' will pull up its man (pod)  page.

Its only a perl interface to existing functions... From Time::HiRes:
[...]
   gettimeofday ()
   In array context returns a 2 element array with the
   seconds and microseconds since the epoch.  In scalar
   context returns floating seconds like
   Time::HiRes::time() (see below).

   usleep ( $useconds )
   Sleeps for the number of microseconds specified.
   Returns the number of microseconds actually slept.
   Can sleep for more than one second unlike the usleep
   system call. See also Time::HiRes::sleep() below.
[...]

I don't think it came with perl-6.1 but it does with perl-6.8 and you
can get it from CPAN anyway.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/22:52 -0400, Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wednesday 10 July 2002 10:30 pm, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>> There is no point to adding sendmail to hosts.allow because it is not
>> called by inetd/xinetd. It is a standalone daemon that has its own
>> network access controls, just like Apache.
>>
>> SSHd is standalone too, but the Red Hat build is compiled with
>> tcpwrappers support, so it reads hosts.allow and hosts.deny without
>> having to depend on inetd/xinetd.
>
>Just like ssh Red Hat's sendmail is also built with tcp wrappers support.
[snip]

I stand corrected.


Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LPWFpCpg3WyUI50RAkQRAKCKe2AANa7pYNi47iLUlIIS7shXcQCgnVCg
HFiMvzhviNeBkyvHjzsDbTY=
=u3sX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: single login on multiple computers?

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/21:28 -0500, Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a HOWTO somewhere on a relatively easy way to get user information
>(username, password, expiration, etc.) into an ldap database?  The docs for
>ldap seem fairly indepth - massive overkill for what should be a relatively
>easy problem.  For example, what's the equivalent to useradd?

I've never used LDAP like this, but the Red Hat docs are actually pretty
thorough these days. I looked around the Support section of their web
site, found the RH7x docs, and a few minutes later, success.

There's an LDAP section of the Reference Guide that covers setting up the
system to authenticate using LDAP.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LPU6pCpg3WyUI50RAjabAKCM3mSiFaAcJigmfxSx6OP2r+mk+wCghGXA
wxcWgTGMsLc+df6m3yXXovk=
=Y7X0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[Michael Fratoni]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 10:32 pm, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 10-Jul-2002/20:31 -0400, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> >> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
> >> from servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers
> >> on my domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing
> >> Windows 2000
> >>
> >> Do you have any suggestions?
> >
> >Gee -- Has it been a full week since we have had this
> >question?  Naw -- it was just since last Saturday.
> >
> >See item 5. http://www.owlriver.com/tips/sendmail-tip.html
>
> I don't think so. He can receive mail from other servers in his domain.

Also, unless I am mistaken, by default /etc/sysconfig/sendmail
contains:
DAEMON=yes

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj0s81gACgkQn/07WoAb/St2bgCfWkOOcfHVZd9qdkWxa0ZKqddM
HiYAn2kL1ioChFp8o5yY4x20hzclVtDJ
=Wyv3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[Michael Fratoni]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 10:30 pm, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:24 pm, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> > I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
> > from servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers
> > on my domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing
> > Windows 2000 server. So far, from reading manuals I have
> > 1) commented out the DAEMON_OPTIONS line in the sendmail.mc file and
> > rebuilt sendmail.cf
> > 2) added sendmail:ALL to the hosts.allow file.
>
> There is no point to adding sendmail to hosts.allow because it is not
> called by inetd/xinetd. It is a standalone daemon that has its own
> network access controls, just like Apache.
>
> SSHd is standalone too, but the Red Hat build is compiled with
> tcpwrappers support, so it reads hosts.allow and hosts.deny without
> having to depend on inetd/xinetd.

Just like ssh Red Hat's sendmail is also built with tcp wrappers support.

[mfratoni@paradox sendmail-8.11.6]$ pwd
/home/mfratoni/rpmbuild/SOURCES/sendmail-8.11.6
[mfratoni@paradox sendmail-8.11.6]$ grep -i tcpwrap sendmail*
sendmail-8.11.0-redhat.patch:+define(`confENVDEF', `$(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) -Wall 
- -DXDEBUG=0 -DTCPWRAPPERS -DSASL -DNETINET6 -DUSE_VENDOR_CF_PATH=1 
- -D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS')

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj0s8tAACgkQn/07WoAb/SsEqwCfbAw2LwMyBbj41PvrQjwynzl+
y0AAnR27xEt89qdbt15dbiVhM50jiU8D
=a5Ol
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Mutt and text/html

[Kevin - KD Micro Software]

Hello,
 
This is probably a dumb question but I've looked 
everywhere and can't find the answer to this.I'm using Mutt to send out an 
email with a PDF attachment using the command:echo "" >/dev/null | mutt -a $pdf -H 
$elog
 
with $pdf being set by my script as the PDF file 
and $elog is the actual message body file.
File $elog contains this:
 
From: $fromname <$fromemail>To: 
$sendlogtoSubject: $fromname: E-Mail Log
 
The mail log is 
attached.
This itself works perfectly. But what I would like to do is have HTML 
code inside the message body. Adding the Content-Type: 
text/html line to the $elog file doesn't seem to let this work because 
the Content-Type gets overwritten by Mutt putting in the
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" because of the attachment.Does 
anyone know of any way I can get Mutt to set the Content-Type for the message 
body?

Kevin 
GreenKD Micro Software[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MP 107, Market City, 280 Bannister Road, Canning Vale WA 
6155.Phone: 9256 1566 (2778 internal)     Mobile: 
0419 949 254.    

Re: Please Help - Frustrated Newbie!

[Tom Wilson]

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 04:46 pm, Dale Scott's voice rose above the 
ones in my head and declared:

[snip]
>
> I guess I've now got two choices:  How can I undo the errata that
> seems to have messed me up, or back to my original question as to
> where I can find a more current apache package.

I would recommend removing the default apache install of Redhat and 
download and install the latest version from httpd.apache.org and put 
it in /usr/local/apache.  Read the documentation with it for all the 
juicy details.  You can download a binary version that is as simple and 
quick as typing ./install.sh in a shell.

>
> Last question - what the heck is SIGHUP and why does it keep
> occuring?

A signal sent to a process that causes it to restart itself.  

man 7 signal

Will give you details on what all the signals do and there number code. 
 i.e SIGHUP = kill -1

> Thanks for your help! - - Dale

-- 
Tom Wilson
Reg. Linux User #199331




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/20:31 -0400, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Donnie Grimes wrote:
>
>> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
>> servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on my
>> domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing Windows 2000
>
>> Do you have any suggestions?
>
>Gee -- Has it been a full week since we have had this 
>question?  Naw -- it was just since last Saturday.
>
>See item 5. http://www.owlriver.com/tips/sendmail-tip.html

I don't think so. He can receive mail from other servers in his domain.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LO5WpCpg3WyUI50RAprlAKDWnZt1WzU3D469uYw1I1lAug2h8gCfe9oU
A2l4kgxwmzIprPoEDtde7L0=
=r6wd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:24 pm, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
> from servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on
> my domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing
> Windows 2000 server. So far, from reading manuals I have
> 1) commented out the DAEMON_OPTIONS line in the sendmail.mc file and
> rebuilt sendmail.cf
> 2) added sendmail:ALL to the hosts.allow file.

There is no point to adding sendmail to hosts.allow because it is not
called by inetd/xinetd. It is a standalone daemon that has its own network
access controls, just like Apache.

SSHd is standalone too, but the Red Hat build is compiled with tcpwrappers
support, so it reads hosts.allow and hosts.deny without having to depend
on inetd/xinetd.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LO2tpCpg3WyUI50RAn4TAKDt6u/ItN74wn5Ir8UxJLC9fjVxXgCg9slc
MaxCqfAYp6KZ+ujGF5MEZFI=
=z4Yo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: single login on multiple computers?

[Ed Wilts]

Is there a HOWTO somewhere on a relatively easy way to get user information
(username, password, expiration, etc.) into an ldap database?  The docs for
ldap seem fairly indepth - massive overkill for what should be a relatively
easy problem.  For example, what's the equivalent to useradd?

Thanks,
.../Ed

Ed Wilts
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On 10-Jul-2002/14:16 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am in need of some guidance.  I am trying to set-up a few workstations
> >in a proof of concept for management.
> >
> >How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
> >may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
> >computers?
>
> Use NIS or LDAP on a single server and configure the others to use that
> server for authentication. Or if the server is large enough, put all the
> accounts on it and use the other boxes as XTerminals.
>
> Tony
> - --
> Anthony E. Greene 





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: single login on multiple computers?

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/19:53 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[about managing user accts for multiple machines in one place]
>Is it possible to have the users use NT authentication?

Yes, using pam_smb_auth. See the docs in
 on a RH7x machine.


Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LOtkpCpg3WyUI50RAkKWAJ4jkwnD2+wK9fDID8prscC0agNDewCg2Wh1
LIOan4hWLVCQQ2rV5xyEeXI=
=Nlqz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Red Hat 8

[George Abdo]

It is not out yet.

There is a beta out.



> Sergio Pantoja H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Where can i doenload redhat 8 
> 
> In the ftp site i can't found it
> 
> Sergio Pantoja H.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Engineer
> System, Network and Security Administrator
> #user 245264 counter.li.org



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Getting Hi-Res time in Linux (Redhat)

[Dave Ihnat]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:12:30PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> >I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there
> >a method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross
> >'timeofday'. Is this the right method to use? 'gethrtime' guarantees 1
> >microsecond precision.
> 
> You might try asking this on the Linux Kernel Mailing List (lkml) or on a
> developer's list.

True.  Look also for info on 'setitimer/getitimer'.  (Hmm...did they ever
recreate the BSD 'nap' kernel call?)

Cheers,
-- 
Dave Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: How to ban BOOTP traffic? How to ban 255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0 on eth0?

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/15:00 -0700, Apolinaras Sinkevicius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What do I have to enter in via command line to ban all
>the traffic on ethernet adapter eth0 coming or leaving
>255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0. I am tired of bootp
>traffic my server gets hit cause provider does not
>force other users to check their configurations, so I
>would like to ban all bootp traffic to my external
>adapter and all 255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0 traffic.

Block incoming traffic that is destined for your port 68, unless it's
coming from your ISP's DHCP server. The BOOTP ports are listed in
/etc/services.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LN7KpCpg3WyUI50RAmS/AKDPPBvGymi+a5effn1vjwZH4cMjqACgreUh
/z6zaxabz9pAWvzTnQmMugM=
=0NPz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Red Hat 8

[Ed . Greshko]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Sergio Pantoja H. wrote:

> Where can i doenload redhat 8 
> 
> In the ftp site i can't found it

You can't download SW that doesn't exist.  There is a new beta called 
limbo if that interests you.  That beta *may* be a indication of what "Red 
Hat 8" will look likeif indeed the next official release is "8".  For 
all we knowthe next version will be "RedHat XP" with XP being "eXtra 
Penguins".

Ed




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Message Queues Maximum Message Size

[Dave Ihnat]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:10:03PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 08-Jul-2002/12:16 -0600, Alan Kirton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What is the maximum allowable size for messages put onto System V message
> >queues and how is the maximum size controlled?
> 
> If you're talking about sendmail, see "MaxMessageSize" in sendmail.cf or
> SMTP_MAILER_MAX in your .mc file.

No, he's talking about the System V ipc stuff--look at ipcs, f'rinstance.

Last I looked, you still need to change #defines in msg.h and recompile the
kernel, but that was a long time ago--they were talking about creating a
proc interface, but I don't know if it's bubbled to the top of the stack.
That's at least the place to start looking.

Cheers,
-- 
Dave Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/14:24 -0400, Donnie Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
>servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on my
>domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing Windows 2000
>server. So far, from reading manuals I have
>1) commented out the DAEMON_OPTIONS line in the sendmail.mc file and rebuilt
>sendmail.cf
>2) added sendmail:ALL to the hosts.allow file.

I think sendmail is expecting mail to be addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when most mail is actually addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You have to tell
sendmail that "domain.tld" is another name for the machine it's running
on.

Try putting domain.tld in /etc/mail/local-host-names. I think that's
a kludge, and there may be a better way of doing it, but I think it will
work.


Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LN37pCpg3WyUI50RAvY/AKCgt2H0C+yp6+yGz8cPz4p5yanYsACfcHLP
YJ5AMidD9al3RY1EgKTd7Gg=
=EDN1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Red Hat 8

[Sergio Pantoja H.]

Where can i doenload redhat 8 

In the ftp site i can't found it

Sergio Pantoja H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Engineer
System, Network and Security Administrator
#user 245264 counter.li.org



msg83138/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Getting Hi-Res time in Linux (Redhat)

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08-Jul-2002/20:39 -0500, "Parhami, Faraz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there
>a method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross
>'timeofday'. Is this the right method to use? 'gethrtime' guarantees 1
>microsecond precision.

You might try asking this on the Linux Kernel Mailing List (lkml) or on a
developer's list.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LNt5pCpg3WyUI50RAoBHAKCDDbKcPl0iFUd3vJ1+DAsy3I1ZkgCfZgSz
1zD4rjlQAXsrv6zp1aDAou4=
=eUnO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Message Queues Maximum Message Size

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08-Jul-2002/12:16 -0600, Alan Kirton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What is the maximum allowable size for messages put onto System V message
>queues and how is the maximum size controlled?

If you're talking about sendmail, see "MaxMessageSize" in sendmail.cf or
SMTP_MAILER_MAX in your .mc file.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LNrqpCpg3WyUI50RArjEAKDnd2tOAGIcl6WQew6Zh/sslhmTJgCgmthV
CJW1l7vV9z0kEVdjYo2pdgE=
=Zew5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Installing FreeS/Wan RPM's 2.4.18-3

[Brian]

  It's working THANKS THANKS.Installing FreeS/Wan Redhat 7.3

  1.) Download the RPM's  

  ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/pub/crypto/freeswan/RedHat-RPMs

  2.) Intstall the RPM's
  a.)FreeS/Wan Module 
b.)FreeS/Wan

  3.)  

echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0  -j MASQUERADE
iptables -A FORWARD  -j ACCEPT


iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p udp  --sport 67  --dport 68 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp  --sport 1024: --dport 1723 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p udp  --sport 500   --dport 500 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p udp--dport 5050 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p ah   -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p esp   -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p 47-j ACCEPT
iptables -P INPUT DROP



config setup

interfaces="%defaultroute" or "ipsec0=eth0" or "ipsec0=ppp0" 
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none
plutoload=%search
plutostart=%search
uniqueids=yes


conn %default

keyingtries=1
authby=secret


conn tunnel-one

type=tunnel
left=192.168.0.45 or "%defaultroute" ---> ( my eth0 interface)
leftnexthop=
leftsubnet=10.1.1.0/255.255.255.0 --> (this is my eth1 segment)
right= %any ---> (this is my windows 2000 pro box, with SSH Sentinel)
keyexchange =ike
ikelifetime= 240m
pfs = yes
keylife = 1h
#rightsubnet = /255.255.255.0
rightnexthop =
compress = no
auto = add

--


Here is my ipsec.secrets config


192.168.0.45 %any: PSK "junk"


It's work great with SSH Sentinel
 
   



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

APACHE update problem [WAS:Re: Please Help - Frustrated Newbie!]

[Michael Fratoni]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 04:46 pm, Dale Scott wrote:

I'm sure someone answered this question several days ago, but here goes: 

> First off, understand I'm a total newbie.  I saw a posting the other
> day where someone mentioned that they were running Apache 1.3.23.  One
> of the responders commented on how insecure that was and that the
> original poster should upgrade to a newer release.  This bothered me as
> I'm running Apache 1.3.22.  I fired up GnoRPM, clicked on WebFind, and
> looked for something newer.  I could not find an RPM for RH7.2 that was
> newer then the one I've got.   Then I went to RH's download section and
> was dismayed to find that when one does a search on 'Apache' you get
> nothing back.So, my first question is:
>
> Where can I find a newer version of Apache in RPM format for RH 7.2?

apache-1.3.22-6 is the most current rpm version for Red Hat 7.2. It 
contains backported fixes, and should not be a problem. The official 
updates from the Apache group were merged into Red Hat's current Apache 
version. While the version number is behind the official Apache release, 
the fixes have been Incorporated.

> A couple of days later I received an errata notice from RH indicating
> that they had a security patch for Apache (RHSA-2002:103-18).  I loaded
> it Monday afternoon and everything seemed fine but during the early
> morning hours on Tuesday my httpd server tried to restart and it barfed
> when it came to any entry in the config file that referenced
> modules/mod_log_config.so. That file appears to be corrupted.  As a
> temporary workaround, I commented out all references to that file in
> the httpd config and restarted the server. Now I'm trying to find where
> I can download a fresh copy of mod_log_config. I'm assuming it is part
> of a higher level package but don't have a clue which one.
>
> Can someone tell me where I might find a fresh copy of this file?

Restore your httpd config file to it's old state, and restart the httpd 
process. The update didn't force a restart, and this is the cause of the 
error messages.
Just run "/sbin/service httpd restart" and the errors should go away.

> Later yesterday I discovered that my php parser had quite working
> properly.   I suspect this is also related to my having installed the
> errata upgrade.
>
>  Any idea how I might resolve this?

This may be related to the httpd restart.

> Last question - what the heck is SIGHUP and why does it keep occuring?

see "man 7 signal" for what it means, and it is probably happening when 
log rotate tries to rotate the http server logs.

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj0s2RQACgkQn/07WoAb/Sv/kACfT/0OL7kzZqqJ/zYmFDOEn1hk
gdMAnRW+MfatRGEGD4iQxli1P9SczciP
=RKyY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[Michael Fratoni]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:24 pm, Donnie Grimes wrote:
> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email
> from servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on
> my domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing
> Windows 2000 server. So far, from reading manuals I have
> 1) commented out the DAEMON_OPTIONS line in the sendmail.mc file and
> rebuilt sendmail.cf
> 2) added sendmail:ALL to the hosts.allow file.

Did you restart sendmail after regenerating the sendmail.cf file?
Did you allow the installer to configure a firewall, and if so, did you 
allow smtp traffic on your external interface?
Is there any useful info in /var/log/maillog or /var/log/messages?

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj0s1R0ACgkQn/07WoAb/Su9tgCgnb5FdfFURZRkcP34QDe/UnT2
cakAoLXFKfkmYX8SSZlBPY9Tzm9mIo6Z
=lE6d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: (no subject) a.k.a What kernel for 7.2

[Ed . Greshko]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Josepablo Pérez wrote:

> Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that 
> the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the 
> updates were made, however the kernel was updated but up tp version: 
> 2.4.9-34 which is not the latest kernel. The question is why does 
> up2date refuse to update the kernel to the newest version?

Actually, 2.4.9-34 is the latest kernel for the 7.2 version of Red Hat.

Check out the packages section on https://rhn.redhat.com.

You could upgrade to 7.3 for a later kernel. 

Ed




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Kernel version [WAS: (no subject)]

[Michael Fratoni]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 08:28 pm, Josepablo Pérez wrote:
> Gretings,
>
> Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that
> the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the
> updates were made, however the kernel was updated but up tp version:
> 2.4.9-34 which is not the latest kernel. The question is why does
> up2date refuse to update the kernel to the newest version?

kernel-2.4.9-34 IS the latest kernel released for Red Hat 7.2
 See ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj0s0+YACgkQn/07WoAb/SuV4wCgmPA/pshc3RpkMj8kACYUDhOu
j2IAoKY3dVuBbFXYDE3t9s0eEpCRp2F9
=Q2qV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: problem receiving email

[R P Herrold]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Donnie Grimes wrote:

> I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
> servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on my
> domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing Windows 2000

> Do you have any suggestions?

Gee -- Has it been a full week since we have had this 
question?  Naw -- it was just since last Saturday.

See item 5. http://www.owlriver.com/tips/sendmail-tip.html

-- Russ Herrold



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

(no subject)

[Josepablo Pérez]

Gretings,

Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that 
the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the 
updates were made, however the kernel was updated but up tp version: 
2.4.9-34 which is not the latest kernel. The question is why does 
up2date refuse to update the kernel to the newest version?

Thank You.
Josepablo Pérez



after up2date -u my kernel did not get updated to the latest version.
Description: Binary data

Re: [Users] FreeS/Wan on Redhat 7.3

[Bret Hughes]

On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 02:00, Sam Sgro wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> 
> 
> We have produced FreeS/WAN 1.98b RPMs for RedHat kernel versions 2.4.7-10, 
> 2.4.9-34, 2.4.18-3, 18-4 and 18-5. They don't require any kernel recompilation, 
> as this results in a module-based install. 
> 
> These RPMs greatly speed up the installation process: you can get a stock or 
> fully updated RedHat 7.2 or 7.3 system up and running with FreeS/WAN in 
> minutes. That way, you can spend more time tweaking your configuration. :)
> 
> They are available at:
> 
> ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/pub/crypto/freeswan/RedHat-RPMs
> 
> Sam Sgro
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
Very cool. thanks Sam.  
Bret



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: single login on multiple computers?

[dbrett]

Is it possible to have the users use NT authentication?

david

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 10-Jul-2002/14:16 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am in need of some guidance.  I am trying to set-up a few workstations
> >in a proof of concept for management.
> >
> >How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
> >may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
> >computers?
> 
> Use NIS or LDAP on a single server and configure the others to use that
> server for authentication. Or if the server is large enough, put all the
> accounts on it and use the other boxes as XTerminals.
> 
> Tony
> - -- 
> Anthony E. Greene 
> OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
> AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
> Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D
> 
> iD8DBQE9LLfspCpg3WyUI50RAqx/AJ4qIOGDzVlE8LXHzRny4kdrBxgQ0wCfa2DK
> OTuqz80y4CCvEJQdizOWmCc=
> =hJOT
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: single login on multiple computers?

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hi David,

> How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
> may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
> computers?

 NIS(+). See the NIS-HOWTO. (Why the faq has the howto rpm dissappeared from 
the distro? The docs cd is almost empty. Should be some space for at least the 
english howto's...)

Bye,
Leonard.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Semi-simple Routing Question!

[Harry Putnam]

Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I could be terribly wrong here, but my thinking is that the GW
> statement in eth1 on m6 is being ignored (maybe check dmesg). I have
> never assigned a static route in linux that did not show up in netstat

It turns out your suggested experiment showed absolutely no difference
with 192.168.1.1 knocked down as gateway from 192.168.1.5.  Pinging ssh'
ing etc, no problem.  In fact route didn't know anything about it being
up so it wasn't, just as you said.

a simpler diagram:

Not bothering with addresses for 1-4, illustrates what I tried out.
Apparently I've been seized with temporary insanity (I hope its
temporary anyway), because I don't see the odd behavior I reported now
with a more structured experiment.

XX=192.168
 
  INTERNET
 |
   DSL MODEM 
 |
 NETGEAR router/firewall XX.0.1
 ||
eth0 | XX.0.7   eth0  | XX.0.5
   mach6   mach5
eth1 | XX.1.5   eth1  | XX.1.1  
  -- XX.1.1/24hub ---
  |  |   |  |
mach1   mach2  mach3  mach4 

Mach5 has gateway set to XX.0.1 (the netgear router)

If, on mach 6 I knock down any gateway, netstat -nr  shows:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway   Genmask  Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0   255.255.255.0   U40 0  0  eth1
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0   255.255.255.0   U40 0  0  eth0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0   255.0.0.0   U40 0  0  lo

In that config I can ping ssh etc to all 1-6 machines and the router
XX.0.1 from mach 6 but can't get to the internet of course.



Now setting XX.0.1(router)  as default gateway, netstat now shows

Kernel IP routing table
Destination   Gateway  Genmask   Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.1.0   0.0.0.0  255.255.255.0   U  40 00 eth1
192.168.0.0   0.0.0.0  255.255.255.0   U  40 00 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0  255.0.0.0   U  40 00 lo
0.0.0.0   192.168.0.1  0.0.0.0 UG 40 00 eth0

In this config I can ping ssh etc to all machine,router and internet 
>From mach 6

===
Knocking down XX.0.1 as gateway and putting up XX.1.1

netstat -nr now shows:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination  Gateway Genmask   Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
192.168.1.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 00 eth1
192.168.0.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 00 eth0
127.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U40 00 lo
0.0.0.0  192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG   40 00 eth1


I can still ping, ssh and get the internet.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: [Users] FreeS/Wan on Redhat 7.3

[Brian]

I not blamming Redhat

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Lee
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Users] FreeS/Wan on Redhat 7.3


it is not free redhat that is the problem, but you not being
able to compile the kernel correctly.  don't bash redhat
for that.   i have been able to get it working without a problem.
plus i found a rpm package somewhere on the net for the kernel
with ipsec for redhat.

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Brian wrote:

>
>   I have been trying to install FreeS/Wan 1.98b for about one week now and
> have gotten NO Where.
> My advice to anyone that wants to run FreeS/Wan buy SuSE 8.0 Pro with
> FreeS/Wan already included , it will save you from pulling all your hair
> out, unless you have no hair to begin with. It seems like redhat does not
> like FreeS/Wan for some reason, everytime I get FreeS/Wan to work I need
add
> another fuction to the kernel then after I think I have it, when I
re-start
> and get to the part starting IPSEc, IT BOMBS out, telling KLIPS is now
> not part of the kernel...LOL I have tryed to re-compile the kernel and
> de-slect the options that I think caused the problem but with no luck...
> when I slect the netfilter option, which I need to setup routing , It
bombs
> out when I restart redhat...
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Using RHN - Dep problem

[ABrady]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:15:29 -0400
"Norm Yates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have 3 packages that are reported by RHN to be out of date.
> 
> They won't update because they need - libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so - the trouble
> is I can't find that package anywhere.  What am I doing wrong?  The
> packages that won't update are below.
> 
> Ethereal-base
> Ethereal-gtk+
> Snort-snmp

http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=libsnmp.so.0.4.2.1

Found via  a search at rpmfind.net

-- 
0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that?



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: single login on multiple computers?

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/14:16 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am in need of some guidance.  I am trying to set-up a few workstations
>in a proof of concept for management.
>
>How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
>may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
>computers?

Use NIS or LDAP on a single server and configure the others to use that
server for authentication. Or if the server is large enough, put all the
accounts on it and use the other boxes as XTerminals.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LLfspCpg3WyUI50RAqx/AJ4qIOGDzVlE8LXHzRny4kdrBxgQ0wCfa2DK
OTuqz80y4CCvEJQdizOWmCc=
=hJOT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Fetchmail

[Anthony E. Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10-Jul-2002/17:31 -0300, Marcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 18:31, Marcelo wrote:
>> > Hi, I'm getting a problem using fetchmail with linuxconf in Red Hat 7.2.
>The system hangs while configuring fetchmail in linuxconf and, when I try to
>reboot, the system hangs in "Configuring Linuxconf hooks". So, if I disable
>the module fetchmail in linuxconf, the system returns to its normal
>operation. Did anyone had a problem like this ? Is this a problem of
>fetchmail ?

No, this is a problem with Linuxconf.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene 
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: 
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene  0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9LLispCpg3WyUI50RArF0AJ97SipMWKjNEQlHR9d5kNcTo6BkmgCg/K40
dlRg7/Rka04L7LRpErTVhfI=
=p8Ha
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Please Help - Frustrated Newbie!

[Thomas Carlson 650.723.1357]

Dale,

I use red hat's up2date. It was free for the first system and works 
quite well from a gui  or cl interface. You can sign up to use it at 
the red hat network.

sighup is used to kill and restart a service.

Cheers,

Thomas






>First off, understand I'm a total newbie.  I saw a posting the other day
>where someone mentioned that they were running Apache 1.3.23.  One of the
>responders commented on how insecure that was and that the original poster
>should upgrade to a newer release.  This bothered me as I'm running Apache
>1.3.22.  I fired up GnoRPM, clicked on WebFind, and looked for something
>newer.  I could not find an RPM for RH7.2 that was newer then the one I've
>got.   Then I went to RH's download section and was dismayed to find that
>when one does a search on 'Apache' you get nothing back.So, my first question
>is:
>
>Where can I find a newer version of Apache in RPM format for RH 7.2?
>
>A couple of days later I received an errata notice from RH indicating that
>they had a security patch for Apache (RHSA-2002:103-18).  I loaded it
>Monday afternoon and everything seemed fine but during the early morning
>hours on Tuesday my httpd server tried to restart and it barfed when it came
>to any entry in the config file that referenced modules/mod_log_config.so. 
>That file appears to be corrupted.  As a temporary workaround, I commented
>out all references to that file in the httpd config and restarted the server.
>  Now I'm trying to find where I can download a fresh copy of mod_log_config. 
>  I'm assuming it is part of a higher level package but don't have a clue
>which one. 
>
>Can someone tell me where I might find a fresh copy of this file?
>
>Later yesterday I discovered that my php parser had quite working properly. 
>I suspect this is also related to my having installed the errata upgrade. 
>
>  Any idea how I might resolve this?
>
>I guess I've now got two choices:  How can I undo the errata that seems to
>have messed me up, or back to my original question as to where I can find a
>more current apache package.
>
>Last question - what the heck is SIGHUP and why does it keep occuring?
>
>Thanks for your help! - - Dale
>
>
>
>___
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
Thomas Carlson
650.723.1357 Phone
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://haas.stanford.edu



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Permission denied !!!!

[Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)]

I tryed to use kmymoney2 to manage my finances,

It works very well using it as root but with simple user  it issued this message :
kmymoney2: error while loading shared libraries: libkfile.so.3: cannot open shared 
object file: Permission denied

Is anyone bring me a solution !!!



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

SENDMAIL+IMAP

[und3rgr0und]

Hello

I have static IP and domain.
Sousing RH7.2
I need to set up a server with sendmail using imap
the clients must be able to send mails between them and to any e-mail in the  
internet.

What's the best way to do it?
Anyone knows where to find a HOW-TO/documentation/tutorial for this?

I have it almost configured. I can send mails, but nobody receive a sht
any config file you need me to post, just let me know.


/etc/rc.d/init.d/help_plz start  

;-)

TIA



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Tcpdchk for RedHat 7.2?

[Hal Burgiss]

On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:00:45PM -0300, Shaw, Marco wrote:
> Anyone know where I can find tcpdchk for RedHat 7.2 (from
> tcp_wrappers)?  The RedHat RPM files don't seem to contain it.
> 
> I'll at least ask here before I try to compile one.

It is not included because it does not work with xinetd (or didn't). 

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

tape drive

[Tyler Durdin]

I have just connected my Dell powervolt 110T tape backup to my server which 
is running RH 7.3. How do I make this thing work? This is the first time i 
have ever tried to install a new piece of hardware on a linux system. Can 
someone point me in the right direction? Also, what kind of software do i 
need for this tape backup thingy?Thanks.


_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: HOWTO : change my IP address

[Ashwin Kutty]

Try..

man ifconfig

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] cana rich wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is some one know what is the command line to
> change the IP address, the netmask ?
>
> THanks for your help.
>
> Canarich
>
> ___
> Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
> Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>

---
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits."  - Albert Einstein

Ashwin
kutty..
Systems Administrator
Dalhousie University Libraries
(902) 494-2694



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: [Users] FreeS/Wan on Redhat 7.3

[Sam Sgro]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-



We have produced FreeS/WAN 1.98b RPMs for RedHat kernel versions 2.4.7-10, 
2.4.9-34, 2.4.18-3, 18-4 and 18-5. They don't require any kernel recompilation, 
as this results in a module-based install. 

These RPMs greatly speed up the installation process: you can get a stock or 
fully updated RedHat 7.2 or 7.3 system up and running with FreeS/WAN in 
minutes. That way, you can spend more time tweaking your configuration. :)

They are available at:

ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/pub/crypto/freeswan/RedHat-RPMs

Sam Sgro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Steve Lee wrote:

> it is not free redhat that is the problem, but you not being 
> able to compile the kernel correctly.  don't bash redhat
> for that.   i have been able to get it working without a problem.
> plus i found a rpm package somewhere on the net for the kernel
> with ipsec for redhat.
> 
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Brian wrote:
> 
> > 
> >   I have been trying to install FreeS/Wan 1.98b for about one week now and
> > have gotten NO Where.
> > My advice to anyone that wants to run FreeS/Wan buy SuSE 8.0 Pro with
> > FreeS/Wan already included , it will save you from pulling all your hair
> > out, unless you have no hair to begin with. It seems like redhat does not
> > like FreeS/Wan for some reason, everytime I get FreeS/Wan to work I need add
> > another fuction to the kernel then after I think I have it, when I re-start
> > and get to the part starting IPSEc, IT BOMBS out, telling KLIPS is now
> > not part of the kernel...LOL I have tryed to re-compile the kernel and
> > de-slect the options that I think caused the problem but with no luck...
> > when I slect the netfilter option, which I need to setup routing , It bombs
> > out when I restart redhat...
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.

iQCVAwUBPSvbh0OSC4btEQUtAQGPrgP/elPyMoO0tKIra8l5T//e6MkaIY8JtY5m
mNvCUQ7lv8FK9akU0Ci5hRucVeyUbfcs6X+gqtKQl5B+FfpOIU7wJVNWKAa2DX87
99so6+hRLNPOc3Axvttbc2Afs+g9adkB2oNQ9c06+cylctzC+KX1ZKSJd+YCTKS4
puuw6zIDIE8=
=0/Q9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

ARP Problem on RH 7.2 through iptables

[Queberto Maera]

Has anybody the iptables solution to ARP Problem as suggested in 'LVS HOWTO 
- ARP Problem'. I am asking becasue I tried the other approaches and they are 
not working when I put the qmail server live on to the LVS.
 
Any comments/suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Qesad Ednor

problem receiving email

[Donnie Grimes]

I've installed Red Hat 7.3 and cannot get my server to receive email from
servers outside of my domain (I can get mail from other servers on my
domain). I am building the linux server to replace an existing Windows 2000
server. So far, from reading manuals I have
1) commented out the DAEMON_OPTIONS line in the sendmail.mc file and rebuilt
sendmail.cf
2) added sendmail:ALL to the hosts.allow file.

Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Donnie



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: numlock key !!!

[Mohd Irfan R Khan]

You Can Lock Numlock
key from the setup of the BIOS of Your Machine.

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: numlock key !!!

 

Hello

 

I
use RH7.3 and i'd like to lock the numlock key at the boot of the system

 

Anyone
can help me ?

 

reverse DNS

[Devon Harding - GTHLA]

For some reason, I cannot to a reverse lookup on my IP address on my RH7.2
system.  When I do a 'dig -x 12.x.x.x', I get the following error: ';;
connection timed out; no servers could be reached'

Here are my DNS files:

named.conf

options {
directory "/var/named";
};
key "rndckey"{
algorithm "hmac-md5";
secret "ko3EjjIw+4Tf8BKHZqjq+g==";
};
controls{
inet 127.0.0.1 allow{
localhost;
}   keys{
"rndckey";
};
};
zone "." {
type hint;
file "named.ca";
};
zone "domain.com" {
type master;
file "domain.com";
notify yes;
};
zone "x.x.12.IN-ADDR.ARPA" {
type master;
file "12.x.x";
notify yes;
};
zone "0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA" {
type master;
file "127.0.0";
};

12.x.x:

$TTL43200
@   IN  SOA ns1.domain.com.  hostmaster.domain.com. (
2002070102 ; serial
1H ; refresh
15 ; retry
14D ; expire
12H ; default_ttl
)
110 IN  PTR systems1.domain.com.
65  IN  PTR netop.domain.com.

-Devon



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: booting a CDROM from a boot floppy

[Giulio Orsero]

On 9 Jul 2002 12:55:21 -, "O.U ramu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>hyderabad.i have one problem to load Redhat linux on that machine 
>because in that cdrom drive support is not there.only boot 
>sequence is from floppy or from Hard Disk only.on this issue 
>please kindely help me how to load with bootable floppy or from 
>harddisk  with out from cdrom drive bios support is not there 
>also.i will be very thankfull to all.

You can try following these directions to boot off the floppy drive:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/install-guide/s1-steps-install-cdrom.html

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Postgresql upgrade?

[Petr Kubecka]

I went successfuly through upgrade. Unless you use triggers etc. the only
thing you need is to restore the data in PSQL 7.2 after you init your
dataspace and create the database. See user manual for details.


Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2002 02:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Postgresql upgrade?




After a RH7.1-7.3 upgrade, postgres won't start, complaining that I need to
update my data format.
The instructions in the postgres readme.rpm.dist file refer to a nonexistant
program and make no sense.

I did a pg_dumpall before the upgrade, per the 7.3 release notes,
but I can find no instructions for what to do after the upgrade.
Does anyone know how to do this?

--
---
Carl Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Assembles easily in minutes with common household tools!
-







___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Getting Hi-Res time in Linux (Redhat)

[Parhami, Faraz]

I am looking for an equivalent of solaris 'gethrtime()' method. Is there a
method with high resolution in Red Hat? I have come accross 'timeofday'. Is
this the right method to use? 'gethrtime' guarantees 1 microsecond
precision.

Thanks



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Tcpdchk for RedHat 7.2?

[Shaw, Marco]

Anyone know where I can find tcpdchk for RedHat 7.2 (from tcp_wrappers)?  The RedHat 
RPM files don't seem to contain it.

I'll at least ask here before I try to compile one.

Marco



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Message Queues Maximum Message Size

[Alan Kirton]

What is the maximum allowable size for messages put onto System V message
queues and how is the maximum size controlled?

Thanks,

Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Need help installing DAT tape backup unit on RH 7.3

[Apolinaras Sinkevicius]

I have APS HyperDAT tape drive which is not that
young, it does take though DDS2 tapes, also it is on
SCSI II interface. I think it has Python 28388 drive
in it.
How do I install this tape drive on my system?

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

How to ban BOOTP traffic? How to ban 255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0 on eth0?

[Apolinaras Sinkevicius]

What do I have to enter in via command line to ban all
the traffic on ethernet adapter eth0 coming or leaving
255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0. I am tired of bootp
traffic my server gets hit cause provider does not
force other users to check their configurations, so I
would like to ban all bootp traffic to my external
adapter and all 255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0 traffic.
Thank you in advance!

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RH7.3 boot loader location on dual boot

[Robert Hartung*]

Hi all,
  I have set up a new dual boot system for my son with RH7.3 and W2k.  W2K has 
the 1st 15 MB of a 30 MB drive hd0 [hda] with 20 MB of a 2nd HD for win data 
and the remaining 40 MB for linux.

  Grub was installed on hda6 which is the "/" directory on the 
extended "partition" and "system commander" can see the partition but will not 
show it for to use it as a "bootable" partition.  My question is whether there 
is still the HD location limit on installation of the linux boot loader that 
was formerly the case.

Thanks,

Bob 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: which NIC is which

[John Telford]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:18:18PM -, Binyon Steve Contr Det 4 AFC2TIG/ASRCC wrote:
> John,
>   You will have problems with identical cards, where upon reboot there
> is a chance that the assignment between eth1 and eth2 (or in your case eth1,
> eth2, eth3, eth4...) will switch on you.  It appears that eth(n) is a
> logical assignment to the first card that is detected at boot time, and is
> therefore independent on the MAC address of the card or what PCI slot that
> the card is inserted into.  I dont have a good answer for you, a few months
> ago a similar question arose and really wasn't answered at that time either.
> The question on what algrothim used is a good one. 

On most routers I am using NICs with the same vendor part/model number. 

Interesting possibility.  Fortunately I haven't experienced eth(n)
assignments changing between reboot.  My experience is adding another
*may* change eth(n) assignments.

>   I'm looking at the source myself to figure it out.  Read up on the
> PnP stuff and see if this may lead to something else.  Sorry no help, but
> I'm currently looking into it.
> Steve Binyon
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Telford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:52 PM
> To: redhat-list
> Subject: which NIC is which
> 
> 
> I'm building routers.  It's difficult to tell in advance which NIC will
> be assigned eth0 and which will assigned eth1 when using two NICs.  Ping
> testing usually clears up this simple problem.
> 
> The identification problem gets worse when adding a third NIC, after
> sorting out the first two NICs.  Frequently the eth0 or eth1 assignments
> for the first two NICs change.
> 
> Of course adding a fourth and fifth NIC multiplies the identification
> problem.  Yes, some of my routers are supporting five network segments.
> 
> My question is, what's the algorithm for assigning Ethernet
> designations?  I know it not placement order in the PCI bus, and I know
> its not the NIC data-link address.
> 
> So what is it?
> 
> Thanks ...John
> -- 
> John Telford - Owner
> JohnTelford.com LLC
> 503-292-6865 - fax:503-292-3094
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.johntelford.com
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-- 
John Telford - Owner
JohnTelford.com LLC
503-292-6865 - fax:503-292-3094
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.johntelford.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Semi-simple Routing Question!

[Harry Putnam]

Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> There was no particular good reason for the setup below but this is
>> where I am running into what I described:
>> 
>
> I'm dying to ask anyway! What are you achieving/trying to do with M6
> that it cohabitates both networks?

I knew you wouldn't be able to resist ...hehe.  First let me say I
appreciate you taking time out with this since it is clearly not a
mainstream problem.  Also I'll add that I am a fairly long time
linux/uxix user but an awfull dope about networking.

Also your perception about 192.168.1.6 is well founded, but wrong.
Rather it was again added confusion on my part.  should have read 
192.168.1.5  the eth1 address shown in the files from /etc/sysconfig.
So 192.168.1.5 is mach6.  The one with the screwball connection.

Looks like the diagrem may have gotten a bit distorted by mail
formatting so I'll let the first one stand.

Now, the short answer is that it started as a way to access the
internet uninterupted by shennanigans on mach5.  So it was gatewayed
to both the internet outlet and mach5.  

Mach5 itself is my pretend firewall machine where I desperately try to
outwit script kiddies without suffering any compromise...because of
the store bought firewall/router I'm hiding behind.  I can still
experiment with iptables and do dreadfully stupid things without too
much fear of being hacked.

But back to mach6.  I got used to the two nics and got interested in
why it does what it does, so left it like that.

I'm going to try your experiment shortly and will be posting back
about it, but my experience before setting the second gateway up was
that mach6 with the ethernet wires indicated in the diagram, could not
ping the router gateway 192.168.0.1 although it could reach the
internet thru mach5 I guess.  It only guess work on this end and
certainly not terribly credible.

ssh connections from it did indeed seem to `find' there way in a long
pause, verbose (-v) output wasn't particularly helpfull. I thought
maybe there really was some sort of finding going on.

The router (192.168.0.1) is also a switch .. just for your info.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Semi-simple Routing Question!

[Matthew Boeckman]

> I'm confusing things here, but not on purpose.  I mean that I have
> assigned a gateway to both eth0 and eth1 in this way:

easy to get confused in all this :)

> 
> These files are on machine6 in diagram below:
> cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:
>   USERCTL='no'
>   NETMASK='255.255.255.0'
>   BOOTPROTO='none'
>   HWADDR='00:03:47:fa:4b:13'
>   DEVICE='eth0'
>   IPADDR='192.168.0.7'
>   GATEWAY='192.168.0.1'
>   TYPE='Ethernet'
>   ONBOOT='yes'
>   NETWORK='192.168.0.0'
>   BROADCAST='192.168.0.255'
> 
> cat /etc/sysconfig-networkscripts/ifcfg-eth1:
>   USERCTL='no'
>   NETMASK='255.255.255.0'
>   BOOTPROTO='none'
>   HWADDR='00:04:75:9b:e5:0d'
>   DEVICE='eth1'
>   IPADDR='192.168.1.5'
>   GATEWAY='192.168.1.1'
>   TYPE='Ethernet'
>   ONBOOT='yes'
>   NETWORK='192.168.1.0'
>   BROADCAST='192.168.1.255'
> 
> Without that second one (192.168.1.1) a machine 192.168.1.6 was
> unable to ping 192.168.0.1 (the firewall) and ssh connections between
> 192.168.0 and 192.168.1 took several minutes find a route
> 

I think that is probably the rub. From your diagram, I assume that 
192.168.1.6 is one of m1, m3, or m4. If this is the case, then _nothing_ 
that you change on m6 should affect the connectivity of m1-m5 (again if 
m1-m4 are gw to eth1 on m5). I think that means that you changed those 
route statements in network-scripts, but your problem was actually 
solved by something else.

Also, ssh connections don't "find routes". They either make the 
connection or they don't. The main reason for ssh connections to take a 
long time is reverse dns lookups failing or timing out. For arguments 
sake, try removing that GATEWAY statment from m6's eth1, reboot (or 
reinitialize inet) and see if your ping still works fine. If not, make 
sure that the machine not pinging is correctly configured for ip, 
netmask, and gw. Also check the ssh connections, if they take a long 
time, try ssh -v -v -v for verbose output.

I could be terribly wrong here, but my thinking is that the GW statement 
in eth1 on m6 is being ignored (maybe check dmesg). I have never 
assigned a static route in linux that did not show up in netstat -rn.


> There was no particular good reason for the setup below but this is
> where I am running into what I described:
> 

I'm dying to ask anyway! What are you achieving/trying to do with M6 
that it cohabitates both networks?

HTH


> Calling GW1 192.168.0.1
> GW2 192.168.1.1
> 
> 
>   INTERNET
>  |
>   dsl modem 
>  | 
>ROUTER (GW1 192.168.0.1) NETGEAR FR314
>  |
>  
>   |  |eth0 192.168.0.5
>eth0=> | rh7.1 Mach5
>   |  |eth1 GW2 192.168.1.1
>  mach6   | 
>eth1=> |  |   
>
>|  |  ||
>   m1 m2  m3   m4
> 192.168.0.7
>rh 7.3
> 
> Where machine 5 is gatewayed to the router 192.168.0.1
> And m1 m2 m3 m4 are gatewayed to Mach5 (eth1)
> 
> Machine 6 is a sort of hybrid that has a connection to both 192.168.0
> and 192.168.1.  That is the machine with two designated gateways
> Yet a netstat -nr on mach 6 shows only:
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth1
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U40 0  0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG   40 0  0 eth0
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 


-- 
Matthew Boeckman(816) 777-2160
Manager - Systems Integration   Saepio Technologies



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Stress Test tool for web server of proxy

[Chapman, Matt]

Hi,

I am trying to stress test a proxy filter for concurrent connections.  I
am looking for GPL software that can do this...

Can wget be run to do this somehow?

-- 
Matthew Chapman .~.
Network Engineer/V\  
Orange County Public Schools   // \\ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /(   )\
"Don't fear the penguin!"  ^^-^^



---
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended solely
for the recipient(s) and may contain privileged information. Tampering
with or altering the contents of this message is prohibited. This information
is the same as any written document and may be subject to all rules
governing public information according to Florida Statutes. Any message
that falls under Chapter 119 shall not be altered in a manner that misrepresents
the activities of Orange County Public Schools. [References: Florida State
Constitution I.24, Florida State Statutes Chapter 119, and OCPS Management
Directive A-9.]  If you have received this message in error, or are not the named
recipient notify the sender and delete this message
from your computer.

Please Help - Frustrated Newbie!

[Dale Scott]

First off, understand I'm a total newbie.  I saw a posting the other day 
where someone mentioned that they were running Apache 1.3.23.  One of the 
responders commented on how insecure that was and that the original poster 
should upgrade to a newer release.  This bothered me as I'm running Apache 
1.3.22.  I fired up GnoRPM, clicked on WebFind, and looked for something 
newer.  I could not find an RPM for RH7.2 that was newer then the one I've 
got.   Then I went to RH's download section and was dismayed to find that 
when one does a search on 'Apache' you get nothing back.So, my first question 
is: 

Where can I find a newer version of Apache in RPM format for RH 7.2?

A couple of days later I received an errata notice from RH indicating that 
they had a security patch for Apache (RHSA-2002:103-18).  I loaded it 
Monday afternoon and everything seemed fine but during the early morning 
hours on Tuesday my httpd server tried to restart and it barfed when it came 
to any entry in the config file that referenced modules/mod_log_config.so.  
That file appears to be corrupted.  As a temporary workaround, I commented 
out all references to that file in the httpd config and restarted the server. 
 Now I'm trying to find where I can download a fresh copy of mod_log_config.  
 I'm assuming it is part of a higher level package but don't have a clue 
which one.  

Can someone tell me where I might find a fresh copy of this file?

Later yesterday I discovered that my php parser had quite working properly.  
I suspect this is also related to my having installed the errata upgrade.  

 Any idea how I might resolve this?

I guess I've now got two choices:  How can I undo the errata that seems to 
have messed me up, or back to my original question as to where I can find a 
more current apache package.

Last question - what the heck is SIGHUP and why does it keep occuring?

Thanks for your help! - - Dale



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Semi-simple Routing Question

[Harry Putnam]

Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm not entirely sure what you are asking.
>
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window
>> irtt Iface
>> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth1
>> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth0
>> 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U40 0  0 lo
>> 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG   40 0  0 eth0
>> In the above output eth1 also has a gateway (192.168.1.1) but it
>> doesn't show.
>
> why do you say that it does? Are you sure that you don't mean that
> eth1 has an address of 192.168.1.1 _bound_ to it? If you specify an
> explicit gateway for a given interface, it will report in netstat -rn
> (route -v). If what you mean is that eth1 is 192.168.1.1, there is no
> need for a route statment. An IP address and a subnet are all that is
> needed to define a network segment. Gateways are only necessary when
> traversing subnets. If your address was 192.168.1.1 /23
> (255.255.252.0), you would be able to ping 192.168.2.1 without a
> gateway.

I'm confusing things here, but not on purpose.  I mean that I have
assigned a gateway to both eth0 and eth1 in this way:

These files are on machine6 in diagram below:
cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:
  USERCTL='no'
  NETMASK='255.255.255.0'
  BOOTPROTO='none'
  HWADDR='00:03:47:fa:4b:13'
  DEVICE='eth0'
  IPADDR='192.168.0.7'
  GATEWAY='192.168.0.1'
  TYPE='Ethernet'
  ONBOOT='yes'
  NETWORK='192.168.0.0'
  BROADCAST='192.168.0.255'

cat /etc/sysconfig-networkscripts/ifcfg-eth1:
  USERCTL='no'
  NETMASK='255.255.255.0'
  BOOTPROTO='none'
  HWADDR='00:04:75:9b:e5:0d'
  DEVICE='eth1'
  IPADDR='192.168.1.5'
  GATEWAY='192.168.1.1'
  TYPE='Ethernet'
  ONBOOT='yes'
  NETWORK='192.168.1.0'
  BROADCAST='192.168.1.255'

Without that second one (192.168.1.1) a machine 192.168.1.6 was
unable to ping 192.168.0.1 (the firewall) and ssh connections between
192.168.0 and 192.168.1 took several minutes find a route

There was no particular good reason for the setup below but this is
where I am running into what I described:

Calling GW1 192.168.0.1
GW2 192.168.1.1


  INTERNET
 |
  dsl modem 
 | 
   ROUTER (GW1 192.168.0.1) NETGEAR FR314
 |
 
  |  |eth0 192.168.0.5
   eth0=> | rh7.1 Mach5
  |  |eth1 GW2 192.168.1.1
 mach6   | 
   eth1=> |  |   
   
   |  |  ||
  m1 m2  m3   m4
192.168.0.7
   rh 7.3

Where machine 5 is gatewayed to the router 192.168.0.1
And m1 m2 m3 m4 are gatewayed to Mach5 (eth1)

Machine 6 is a sort of hybrid that has a connection to both 192.168.0
and 192.168.1.  That is the machine with two designated gateways
Yet a netstat -nr on mach 6 shows only:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth1
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U40 0  0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG   40 0  0 eth0



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: which NIC is which

[Binyon Steve Contr Det 4 AFC2TIG/ASRCC]

John,
You will have problems with identical cards, where upon reboot there
is a chance that the assignment between eth1 and eth2 (or in your case eth1,
eth2, eth3, eth4...) will switch on you.  It appears that eth(n) is a
logical assignment to the first card that is detected at boot time, and is
therefore independent on the MAC address of the card or what PCI slot that
the card is inserted into.  I dont have a good answer for you, a few months
ago a similar question arose and really wasn't answered at that time either.
The question on what algrothim used is a good one. 
I'm looking at the source myself to figure it out.  Read up on the
PnP stuff and see if this may lead to something else.  Sorry no help, but
I'm currently looking into it.
Steve Binyon

-Original Message-
From: John Telford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:52 PM
To: redhat-list
Subject: which NIC is which


I'm building routers.  It's difficult to tell in advance which NIC will
be assigned eth0 and which will assigned eth1 when using two NICs.  Ping
testing usually clears up this simple problem.

The identification problem gets worse when adding a third NIC, after
sorting out the first two NICs.  Frequently the eth0 or eth1 assignments
for the first two NICs change.

Of course adding a fourth and fifth NIC multiplies the identification
problem.  Yes, some of my routers are supporting five network segments.

My question is, what's the algorithm for assigning Ethernet
designations?  I know it not placement order in the PCI bus, and I know
its not the NIC data-link address.

So what is it?

Thanks ...John
-- 
John Telford - Owner
JohnTelford.com LLC
503-292-6865 - fax:503-292-3094
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.johntelford.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Fetchmail

[Marcelo]

Hi,

This is my fetchmail file.

set logfile "/var/log/fetchmail.log"
set syslog
set postmaster "informatica"
set daemon 120
poll pop.visywork.com.br with protocol POP3, with options
 localdomains domain.br
 user "marcelo_informatica" there with password "ofni" is marcelo here
  with options rewrite mimedecode flush pass8bits

Can you tell me if there is any problem ?

Thanks,
Marcelo.

- Original Message -
From: "Jay Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: Fetchmail


> On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 18:31, Marcelo wrote:
> > Hi, I'm getting a problem using fetchmail with linuxconf in Red Hat 7.2.
The system hangs while configuring fetchmail in linuxconf and, when I try to
reboot, the system hangs in "Configuring Linuxconf hooks". So, if I disable
the module fetchmail in linuxconf, the system returns to its normal
operation. Did anyone had a problem like this ? Is this a problem of
fetchmail ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marcelo.
> >
>
> Like redhat said, linuxconfig is obsolete.  Just edit the .fetchmailrc
> file as root with vi and setup "poll" for all users.
>
>
> $ sudo cat /root/.fetchmailrc.old
> # Configured by jay using vi!
> #
> set logfile "/var/log/fetchmail"
> set postmaster "postmaster"
> set nobouncemail
> set no spambounce
> set properties ""
> poll mail.yourdomain.net via mail.yourdomain.net
>  with proto IMAP port 143
>user 'marcelo' there with password '' is 'marcelo' here
> options fetchall forcecr
> folder JUNK INBOX
> smtpname [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> # change proto to pop3 if you need to and comment out the folder and
> smtpname lines if you want.
>
> I know I sound like a smart ass but there are circumstances beyond my
> control, and I am pretty pissed right now.  Check out the unrelated link
> below if you want...  I am a long time linux user and father of two
> wonderful kids, but I have come under attack by local officials!
>
>
> jay
>
> http://www.geocities.com/auftopic
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: wheel mouse works in everything but netscape

[dogface]

i was using ns4.79 on my old system then went to
ns7.0. and i did like the 7.0. does anyone know 
if the 7.0 has something like the 6.22 for the wheel mouse?

thank you.

eric
- Original Message - 
From: "loophole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:31 AM
Subject: [RHL] Re: wheel mouse works in everything but netscape


ups?  :) sorry 'bout that,  i was using netscape 6.2.2
and i don't have any copy of 4.79. :(

cheers,
lh
--- clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thank you for the quick reply.
> 
> with the netscape 4.79 that im using i did not find
> anything under advanced about the wheel mouse. just 
> stuff about java cache and proxies. 
> 
> do people still use imwheel?? that's what i used to
> use
> and i would not have a problem using it again.
> 
> TIA 
> eric
> 
> loophole wrote:
> > 
> > hi,
> > 
> > in netscape go to Edit > Preferences > Advanced >
> > Mouse Wheel.
> > 
> > There are options there that affects your wheel
> mouse.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > lh
> > 
> > --- clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > my wheel mouse works in everything but netscape.
> > > it is a mouseman plus. i have the axis mapping
> > > in the xf86conf and with the other things it
> works.
> > >
> > > what am i missing??
> > >
> > > thank you
> > >
> > > eric
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > 
> > =
> > ---
> > ||   ||
> > ||   ||
> > ||   ||>>>
> > ||   ||  ||
> > 
> > 
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> > 
> > ___
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


=
-
lh  
-

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: wrong ident being sent out on irc on 7.3

[dogface]

thank you. duh on my part.
that was a nice simple fix.

thanks again. i guess with a little
rtfm'ing i would have found that.

thank you again.

eric
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "clover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:00 AM
Subject: [RHL] Re: wrong ident being sent out on irc on 7.3


On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 at 7:44pm (-0500), clover wrote:

> when i try to get on irc with my new 7.3 system
> the ident is wrong. it shows up as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and not what it needs to be. when i turn off identd
> it shows up right but it is not sending an ident reply.
> this worked right on my old 6.2 system.
>
> is there something i need to configure?
>

Looks like what your seeing is the des encrypted version of identd's
output... or at least as much of it as it as IRC is interested in.. normally
it's much longer

Escape character is '^]'.
22 , 4257
22, 4257 : USERID : OTHER :[u0+gzT21e/ZYOwfYck5Z5l83Ty8IYnLR]
Connection closed by foreign host.

... you prolly wanna go into /etc/identd.conf and change...

result:encrypt = yes

... to be "no" and then restart the daemon...

Escape character is '^]'.
22 , 4257
22, 4257 : USERID : OTHER :root
Connection closed by foreign host.

... or something like that.  Beware.. now your system will leak
information... the specific example I gave here let me see that the remote
server's sshd daemon is running as root.  Not a very interesting example but
for things like named or apache it might by useful to me to know what user
you've got those processes running as.

M.

--
WebCentral Pty Ltd   Australia's #1 Internet Web Hosting Company
Level 5, 100 Wickham St.   Network Operations - Systems Engineer
PO Box 930, Fortitude Valley. phone: +61 7 3249 2557
Queensland, Australia 4006.   pgp key id: 0x900E515F



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RV: Routing

[Jim Cunning]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ximo Llacer wrote:

> Jim.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> All this is to try another thing.
>
> I'm beginning with this and I don´t know how get help.
>
> My true problem is the next :
>
> I've got 3 lans:
>
> Lan A: 192.168.200.0 = all my clients computers are coneccted.
> Lan B: 192.168.2.0   = there are 3 hosts where the clients A must be
> access.
> Lan C: 192.168.3.0   = where is connected the router
>
> Linux:
> Eth0: 192.168.200.100
> Eth1: 192.168.2.100
> Eth2: 192.168.3.100
>
> Router : 192.168.3.17
>
> LINUX has 3 ethernets so I can separate traffic and after set filters.
>
> ---Lan A -- LINUX  -- Lan C ==Internet
> | |
> | Lan B
> All  | |
> Hosts hostCA  hostCB
>
>
> I want to use the linux red hat 7.3 to access internet lan C and access
> another lanB from LAN A.
>
> How Could mount this strategy ?
>
> Is It must be very complicated ?
>

Ximo,

This looks even simpler to deal with.

1.  All client hosts (192.168.200.x) should have their default route to
192.168.200.100.

2.  Your Linux host (it is a router, too) should have its default route to
192.168.3.17.

3.  Your hosts on LAN B should have their default routes set to
192.168.2.100.

That's it. To summarize, however, the configuration is simple on all
internal hosts--just a default route to the appropriate LAN interface on
your Linux router, 192.168.200.100 on LAN A, and 192.168.2.100 on LAN B.

The route table on the Linux router is only slightly more complicated:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
192.168.100.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U   0  0   0 eth0
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U   0  0   0 eth1
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U   0  0   0 eth2
0.0.0.0 192.168.3.170.0.0.0 UG  0  0   0 eth2

You are using IP addresses for your LANs in the private address space.
(See RFC1918 for more in private addresses) This means that your client
hosts, LAN B hosts, and your linux router cannot communicate to the global
internet _unless_ your internet router, 192.168.3.17, does NAT (network
address translation) for all the private addresses you have assigned.

Good luck,
Jim



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Semi-simple Routing Question

[Matthew Boeckman]

I'm not entirely sure what you are asking.

> 
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth1
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U40 0  0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG   40 0  0 eth0
> 
> 
> In the above output eth1 also has a gateway (192.168.1.1) but it
> doesn't show.

why do you say that it does? Are you sure that you don't mean that eth1 
has an address of 192.168.1.1 _bound_ to it? If you specify an explicit 
gateway for a given interface, it will report in netstat -rn (route -v). 
If what you mean is that eth1 is 192.168.1.1, there is no need for a 
route statment. An IP address and a subnet are all that is needed to 
define a network segment. Gateways are only necessary when traversing 
subnets. If your address was 192.168.1.1 /23 (255.255.252.0), you would 
be able to ping 192.168.2.1 without a gateway.

Again tho, I'm not sure I'm answering the question you are asking :-), 
if not just repost.


> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 


-- 
Matthew Boeckman(816) 777-2160
Manager - Systems Integration   Saepio Technologies



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Error??: on Redhat 6.2: rpm --rebuild bind-9.2.1-0.7x.src.rpm

[Wolfgang Pfeiffer]

Hi all,

On a Redhat 6.2 I "--rebuilt" a bind-9.2.1-0.7x.src.rpm: so far
everything went well:
rpm --rebuild bind-9.2.1-0.7x.src.rpm
I have now this:
ls /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bind*
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bind-9.2.1-0.7x.i386.rpm
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bind-utils-9.2.1-0.7x.i386.rpm
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bind-devel-9.2.1-0.7x.i386.rpm

but during the build processes I got error messages like
these (I ran at least 2 builds, the following  excerpt is taken from
one of them, not necessarily for the bind*.rpm's from above):

###

[ ... ]

mkdir /var/tmp/bind-root/usr/include/isccfg
libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish /usr/lib'
mkdir /var/tmp/bind-root/usr/include/lwres
mkdir /var/tmp/bind-root/usr/man/man3
libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish /usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/lwres/liblwres.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isccfg/libisccfg.la' has not
been installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isccc/libisccc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isccfg/libisccfg.la' has not
been installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isccc/libisccc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/lwres/liblwres.la' has not been
installed
in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `
/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `
/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isccfg/libisccfg.la' has not
been installe
d in `/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `
/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `
/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/dns/libdns.la' has not been
installed in `
/usr/lib'
libtool: install: warning: `../../lib/isc/libisc.la' has not been
installed in `
/usr/lib'
+ install -c -m 640 bin/rndc/rndc.conf /var/tmp/bind-root/etc
+ install -c -m 755 contrib/named-bootconf/named-bootconf.sh
/var/tmp/bind-root/
usr/sbin/named-bootconf
+ install -c -m 755 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/named.init
/var/tmp/bind-root/etc/rc
.d/init.d/named
+ install -c -m 644 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/named.logrotate
/var/tmp/bind-root/e
tc/logrotate.d/named
+ touch /var/tmp/bind-root/etc/rndc.key
+ gcc -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -o
/var/tmp/bind-root/usr/sbin/dns-keygen /usr/
src/redhat/SOURCES/keygen.c
+ cd /var/tmp/bind-root/usr/man
+ tar xjf /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/bind-manpages.tar.bz2
+ mkdir -p /var/tmp/bind-root/etc/sysconfig
+ cp /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/named.sysconfig
/var/tmp/bind-root/etc/sysconfig/na
med
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ cd bind-9.2.1
+ DOCDIR=/var/tmp/bind-root/usr/doc/bind-9.2.1
+ export DOCDIR
+ rm -rf /var/tmp/bind-root/usr/doc/bind-9.2.1
+ /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/bind-root/usr/doc/bind-9.2.1
+ cp -pr CHANGES README /var/tmp/bind-root/usr/doc/bind-9.2.1
+ cp -pr doc/a

single login on multiple computers?

[dbrett]

I am in need of some guidance.  I am trying to set-up a few workstations
in a proof of concept for management.

How do I set-up 3 or 4 computers with multiple users, so that one person
may login into any computer without having to set-up all users on all
computers?

david




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

IPTables question

[Apolinaras Sinkevicius]

What do I have to enter in via command line to ban all
the traffic on ethernet adapter eth0 coming or leaving
255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0. I am tired of bootp
traffic my server gets hit cause provider does not
force other users to check their configurations, so I
would like to ban all bootp traffic to my external
adapter and all 255.255.255.255 and 0.0.0.0 traffic.
Thank you in advance!

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: [Users] FreeS/Wan on Redhat 7.3

[Steve Lee]

it is not free redhat that is the problem, but you not being 
able to compile the kernel correctly.  don't bash redhat
for that.   i have been able to get it working without a problem.
plus i found a rpm package somewhere on the net for the kernel
with ipsec for redhat.

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Brian wrote:

> 
>   I have been trying to install FreeS/Wan 1.98b for about one week now and
> have gotten NO Where.
> My advice to anyone that wants to run FreeS/Wan buy SuSE 8.0 Pro with
> FreeS/Wan already included , it will save you from pulling all your hair
> out, unless you have no hair to begin with. It seems like redhat does not
> like FreeS/Wan for some reason, everytime I get FreeS/Wan to work I need add
> another fuction to the kernel then after I think I have it, when I re-start
> and get to the part starting IPSEc, IT BOMBS out, telling KLIPS is now
> not part of the kernel...LOL I have tryed to re-compile the kernel and
> de-slect the options that I think caused the problem but with no luck...
> when I slect the netfilter option, which I need to setup routing , It bombs
> out when I restart redhat...
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: RV: Routing

[Ximo Llacer]

Jim.

Thanks for your help.

All this is to try another thing.

I'm beginning with this and I don´t know how get help.

My true problem is the next :

I've got 3 lans:

Lan A: 192.168.200.0 = all my clients computers are coneccted.
Lan B: 192.168.2.0   = there are 3 hosts where the clients A must be
access.
Lan C: 192.168.3.0   = where is connected the router

Linux:
Eth0: 192.168.200.100
Eth1: 192.168.2.100
Eth2: 192.168.3.100

Router : 192.168.3.17

LINUX has 3 ethernets so I can separate traffic and after set filters.

---Lan A -- LINUX  -- Lan C ==Internet
|   |
|   Lan B
All| |
Hosts   hostCA  hostCB


I want to use the linux red hat 7.3 to access internet lan C and access
another lanB from LAN A.

How Could mount this strategy ?

Is It must be very complicated ?

-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
En nombre de Jim Cunning
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de julio de 2002 19:03
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: RV: Routing

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ximo Llacer wrote:

> I have 2 if :
>
>  eth0=192.168.200.11
>  eth1=192.168.2.189
>
> I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.
>
> My route table is:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use Iface
> Lan A
> 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.189   255.255.255.0   UG0  0
0 eth1
> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
0 eth1
> Lan B
> 192.168.200.0   192.168.200.11  255.255.255.0   UG0  0
0 eth0
> 192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  0
0 eth0
>
> 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  0
0 lo
> Router
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.200.17  0.0.0.0 UG0  0
0 eth0
>
>
> Host A = 192.168.2.100GW=192.168.2.189
> Host B = 192.168.200.100  GW=192.168.200.11
>
> I can't to access to internet from Host A but Host B yes.
>
> Is correct this route table ?
>
> Can be that the linux 7.3 is protected anyway ?
>
> When I filter with iptraf it shows unreachable port.

When you say "I have 2 if" and list the addresses eth0=192.168.200.11
and
eth1=192.168.2.189, this must be another host (C?) that you are
intending
to use as an internal router to the internet router at 192.168.200.17.
Right?

I see two problems with the information you supplied.  1) Delete the
following lines from your route table--they are unnecessary, and might
actually be your main problem:

192.168.2.0 192.168.2.189   255.255.255.0   UG0  00
eth1
192.168.200.0   192.168.200.11  255.255.255.0   UG0  00
eth0

2) The (apparently default) gateway of 192.168.200.11 for host B means
that B must send to router C, which then must resend _on the same LAN_
to
192.168.200.17.  This makes C a one-armed router, unnecessarily routing
packets that could go directly to the correct router. The default
gateway
for host B should be 192.168.200.17.

A more consistent configuration for hosts A and B, would be something
like
this:

Host A (192.168.2.100):
192.168.200.0 gw 192.168.2.189 (network route through host C)
0.0.0.0   gw 192.168.200.17 (default route to internet router)

Host B (192.168.200.100):
192.168.2.0   gw 192.168.200.11 (network route through host C)
0.0.0.0   gw 192.168.200.17 (default route to internet router)

For the return path, the internet router must have a network route:
192.168.2.0   gw 192.168.200.11 (through host C)


Jim Cunning



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Routing

[Mike Davison]

I assume you are showing data for a router. It looks ok. Packets destined for 
192.168.2.0/24 will go out eth1, packets for 192.168.200.0/24 will go out 
eth0 and everything else will be sent to 192.168.200.17, which is out eth0. 
Fine. 

The problem is on host A. Look at the route table on host A ('netstat -nr' 
will do this). Compare it to the route table on host B since it does work 
correctly. Host A probably doesn't have a default route to 192.168.2.189. 
Host B must have a default route to 192.168.200.11. Clear? 

cheers,
Mike


On Wednesday 10 July 2002 08:59 am, Ximo Llacer wrote:
> HI.
> 
> Please Could anyone help about this matter ¿
> 
> I have 2 if :
> 
>  eth0=192.168.200.11
>  eth1=192.168.2.189
> 
> I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.
> 
> My route table is:
> 
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse 
Iface
> Lan A
> 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.189   255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth1
> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
> Lan B
> 192.168.200.0   192.168.200.11  255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth0
> 192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
> 
> 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
> Router
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.200.17  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0 
> 
> 
> Host A = 192.168.2.100GW=192.168.2.189
> Host B = 192.168.200.100  GW=192.168.200.11
> 
> I can't to access to internet from Host A but Host B yes.
> 
> Is correct this route table ?
> 
> Un Cordial Saludo / Best regards
> Ximo Llácer
> Dpto Sistemas  (GrupoInterpack )
> G 0034 61767050 • 0034 61767158
> 0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Semi-simple Routing Question

[Harry Putnam]

Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I think the best answer is 'man route'
>
> route add -net 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
> route add -net 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
>
Matthew,  I posted a similar answer in this thread.  Although I think
yours is clearer.  But a question I've had about this.  That is, a
machine with two nics and therefor two gate ways.  However the output
of netstat -nr only shows one.

Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window  irtt Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth1
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U40 0  0 eth0
127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U40 0  0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG   40 0  0 eth0

In fact one never really sees the actual ip address reflected in
netstat -nr or `route' output.  Only the network addresses are
visisble.  except the default route which is spelled out.

Hard to see how a route can exist without an address on both ends.

In the above output eth1 also has a gateway (192.168.1.1) but it
doesn't show.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: RV: Routing

[Jim Cunning]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ximo Llacer wrote:

> I have 2 if :
>
>  eth0=192.168.200.11
>  eth1=192.168.2.189
>
> I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.
>
> My route table is:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
> Lan A
> 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.189   255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth1
> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
> Lan B
> 192.168.200.0   192.168.200.11  255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth0
> 192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
>
> 127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
> Router
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.200.17  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
>
>
> Host A = 192.168.2.100GW=192.168.2.189
> Host B = 192.168.200.100  GW=192.168.200.11
>
> I can't to access to internet from Host A but Host B yes.
>
> Is correct this route table ?
>
> Can be that the linux 7.3 is protected anyway ?
>
> When I filter with iptraf it shows unreachable port.

When you say "I have 2 if" and list the addresses eth0=192.168.200.11 and
eth1=192.168.2.189, this must be another host (C?) that you are intending
to use as an internal router to the internet router at 192.168.200.17.
Right?

I see two problems with the information you supplied.  1) Delete the
following lines from your route table--they are unnecessary, and might
actually be your main problem:

192.168.2.0 192.168.2.189   255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth1
192.168.200.0   192.168.200.11  255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth0

2) The (apparently default) gateway of 192.168.200.11 for host B means
that B must send to router C, which then must resend _on the same LAN_ to
192.168.200.17.  This makes C a one-armed router, unnecessarily routing
packets that could go directly to the correct router. The default gateway
for host B should be 192.168.200.17.

A more consistent configuration for hosts A and B, would be something like
this:

Host A (192.168.2.100):
192.168.200.0 gw 192.168.2.189 (network route through host C)
0.0.0.0   gw 192.168.200.17 (default route to internet router)

Host B (192.168.200.100):
192.168.2.0   gw 192.168.200.11 (network route through host C)
0.0.0.0   gw 192.168.200.17 (default route to internet router)

For the return path, the internet router must have a network route:
192.168.2.0   gw 192.168.200.11 (through host C)


Jim Cunning



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RV: Routing

[Ximo Llacer]

HI.

Please Could anyone help about this matter ¿

I have 2 if :

 eth0=192.168.200.11
 eth1=192.168.2.189

I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.

My route table is:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
Lan A
192.168.2.0 192.168.2.189   255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth1
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
Lan B
192.168.200.0   192.168.200.11  255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth0
192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0

127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
Router
0.0.0.0 192.168.200.17  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0 


Host A = 192.168.2.100GW=192.168.2.189
Host B = 192.168.200.100  GW=192.168.200.11

I can't to access to internet from Host A but Host B yes.

Is correct this route table ?

Can be that the linux 7.3 is protected anyway ?

When I filter with iptraf it shows unreachable port.

Un Cordial Saludo / Best regards
Ximo Llácer
Dpto Sistemas  (GrupoInterpack )
G 0034 61767050 • 0034 61767158
0




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Routing

[Ximo Llacer]

HI.

Please Could anyone help about this matter ¿

I have 2 if :

 eth0=192.168.200.11
 eth1=192.168.2.189

I have ip_forward = yes in /etc/networks.

My route table is:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
Lan A
192.168.2.0 192.168.2.189   255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth1
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
Lan B
192.168.200.0   192.168.200.11  255.255.255.0   UG0  00 eth0
192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0

127.0.0.0   0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0   U 0  00 lo
Router
0.0.0.0 192.168.200.17  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0 


Host A = 192.168.2.100GW=192.168.2.189
Host B = 192.168.200.100  GW=192.168.200.11

I can't to access to internet from Host A but Host B yes.

Is correct this route table ?

Un Cordial Saludo / Best regards
Ximo Llácer
Dpto Sistemas  (GrupoInterpack )
G 0034 61767050 • 0034 61767158
0




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

TACACS+ Servers on Linux

[Jeffery Myers]

Could some folks make some suggestions?  Experiences?
Greatly appreciated!
j



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: partition error

[Josep M.]

Hello.

The first partition that You must create is /boot ,these must be allocated in the 
first 1024 cilynders,after You can 
create in order as You wish .

Josep

Begin of Quote shyam :
>hi friends
>
>I am trying to install RH7.2 on my home pc ,i have 18GB hard disk(scsi).i have one 
>win95 partition of 9GB and in rest of 9GB i need to install RH7.2 . while installing 
>iam able create only /,swap,/var each of around 250MB and iam not able to proceed 
>further it is giving error saying:"could not allocate requested partitions" but i can 
>find still 7993MB free space
>
>where i went wrong ?
>
>any help is precious
>
>with regards
>shyam
>
>
>_
>There is always a better job for you at Monsterindia.com.
>Go now http://monsterindia.rediff.com/jobs
>
>
>
>___
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

partition error

[shyam]

hi friends

I am trying to install RH7.2 on my home pc ,i have 18GB hard 
disk(scsi).i have one win95 partition of 9GB and in rest of 9GB i 
need to install RH7.2 . while installing iam able create only 
/,swap,/var each of around 250MB and iam not able to proceed 
further it is giving error saying:"could not allocate requested 
partitions" but i can find still 7993MB free space

where i went wrong ?

any help is precious

with regards
shyam


_
There is always a better job for you at Monsterindia.com.
Go now http://monsterindia.rediff.com/jobs



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Using RHN - Dep problem

[Norm Yates]

I have 3 packages that are reported by RHN to be out of date.

They won't update because they need - libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so - the trouble is I
can't find that package anywhere.  What am I doing wrong?  The packages that
won't update are below.

Ethereal-base
Ethereal-gtk+
Snort-snmp


Thank you,
Norm




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: How do you set default user characteristics?

[Stephen_Reilly]

Try setting the "Password & account policies" in userconf

steve

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 July 2002 13:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: How do you set default user characteristics?
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
>  I'm using Redhat 7.3.  I am required by my security 
> regulations to set
> things like Max Password Age, Min Password Age, and Password 
> Warn Age for
> my users.   I would like to do this globally as default 
> settings for new
> users.  If I set these characteristics in /etc/login.defs, 
> they do take
> effect for new users added with the adduser command, but do 
> not take effect
> for users added with Redhat's user management gui 
> (redhat-config-users).
> I'm wondering if there's a reason this file is ignored by
> redhat-config-users, or if there is any other file that that 
> command looks
> to to set it's defaults.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Caroline
> 
> Caroline Fields
> Open Systems Branch
> DISA DECC Mechanicsburg
> 717-605-2824
> DSN 430-2824
> 2b||!2b?
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Lost all account privileges

[Nicolas Bock]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Mark Gillingham wrote:

> Suddenly I lost all privileges while in a user account through ssh.
> After loggin out, I could not log back in. I was using sudo at the time
> to edit a config file. Is this a know bug, or something else?

Depending on which config file you were editing, this could be completely 
"normal". What were you editing?

nick



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: tn3270

[R P Herrold]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Stamper, Steve wrote:

> Does anyone know of a source for character based tn3270?  
> We have this function on our AIX boxes and am trying to
> eliminate

ummm ...  c3270 in the x3270 package comes to mind ...

c3270: Curses-Based 3270 Emulation 

c3270 is the curses-based version of x3270.  It runs on any
dumb terminal, and supports (almost) all of the features of
x3270 -- 3279 color, TN3270E, IND$FILE file transfer, keymaps,
alternate character sets, tracing, scripting, the ibm_hosts
file, profile files ($HOME/.c3270pro), pr3287 printer
sessions, etc.  c3270 scripts are compatible with x3270
scripts, and the subset of command-line options and resource
definitions are compatible as well.

did you google first?

-- Russ herrold



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: What is this ?????????????

[achana]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I think or I am going crazy or I am too stupid too understand this one. Check
> it out: After my computer is restarted I connect to the Internet, but I don't
> establish any connection yet to any site. Now, I do a netstat -pan and see 4
> external ip-addresses.!! How is this possible?? When I do a arp -a I get 6

tcpdump
look at the traffic


begin:vcard 
n:Chan;Arthur
tel;work:1.718.633.5892
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.saysit.com
org:SAYS I.T.
adr:;;234 E 2nd Street;Brooklyn;New York;11218-2314;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Partner
note;quoted-printable:This message and all attachments are confidential.=0D=0AThey are meant solely for the addressee.=0D=0AAny authorised use or dessemination is prohibited.=0D=0AEmails are liable to unauthorised alterations.=0D=0ANeither SAYS I.T. nor any of its partners or subsidiaries or affiliates=0D=0Ashall be responsible for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
x-mozilla-cpt:;25408
fn:Arthur Chan
end:vcard

Re: Semi-simple Routing Question

[Matthew Boeckman]

I think the best answer is 'man route'

route add -net 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
route add -net 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0

A good friend once described the best way to understand routing: "be the 
packet". If your .1.x clients are trying to get to .2.1, and their gw is 
.1.1, .1.1 needs to know _where_ .2.x is. You tell it that in the first 
route statement above. The inverse is true, .2.x clients (and responses 
from the .1.x pings, etc) need to know where .1.x is, hence the second 
statment. I imagine that you also will have a 'default' setup for all 
other traffic going to the net? I assumed your netmasks above to be /24, 
replace with whatever it really is, likewise for the eth naming. Make 
sure that whatever eth device each network is on is listed correctly. 
(in other words if 192.168.1.1 is bound to eth0 and 192.168.2.1 is bound 
to eth1 the above is correct).

HTH

Adrian Hunt wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've read a few TFM's ;-) but can't seem to figure it
> out on my own.  I have a very simple routing need, for
> the time being, and yet I can't seem to figure it out.
> 
> Without even addressing the firewall aspect at this
> point, I'm simply trying to take one machine with 2
> network interfaces (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.2.1) and
> convince it to route IP traffice such that 192.168.2.X
> can ping, telnet to, print to, etc. 192.168.1.X.
> 
> I've echo'd 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward, and
> hoping for a miracle I installed 'routed' and started
> it to no avail.  All the firewall tables are
> completely flushed.  All machines have 192.168.x.1 set
> as their default route, x being whichever subnet
> they're attached to and configured properly on.  The
> routing box can see/ping all the desktops on both
> networks, and vice-versa.  I simply can't get traffic
> from one desktop to another.
> 
> Any help is appreciated!
> 
> TIA!
> 
> Adrian.
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 


-- 
Matthew Boeckman(816) 777-2160
Manager - Systems Integration   Saepio Technologies



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list